Except most of them aren't really questions, instead rhetorical indignation about Cunliffe's martyrdom.
You mean he wouldn't answer pointless rhetorical questions?
If this is 'widely regarded', what would a narrow range of views look like?
Jenny, as a real neo-liberal famously once said, there you go again… Disgreeing with you or criticising Cunliffe does not automatically make someone a neo-liberal. Doubtless, NZ's politics are operating within a neo-liberal framework and there are a only ...
So that would suggest that Blip hasn't read the speech…
How do you sustain an analysis that the reasons for defeat in 2011 & 2014 were the same as 2008? In 2008 there was a stale but fairly well disciplined Caucus with at least a veneer of competence and unity. Result, a narrow loss. Since then Labour has ...
Very selective on Cunliffe/Parker. Difficult for anyone in the Caucus to take responsibility for the election result when the Leader was refusing to and seeking to manipulate the process. Reading Parker's launch statement, he seems to be taking ...
But he doesn't insist on the need to raise the age of eligibility. In his announcement speech he clearly backed away from that as a policy plank (as did Little).
Doesn't the resolution above allow for the consideration of all options?
+1 Muzza
Deny, delay, defer. On the money pigman.
I could say quite safely that the 'Supercity' concept was probably inspired by an American concept?
When the rights of the taxpayer are being balanced against the needs of the beneficiary, then I am all for it. It's our taxes, and our money that is going to support these people, and I would expect that ANY government would take every step to ensure that ...
Oh that's right, keep pushing the made up rubbish while ignoring the opinion polls! Have you not forgotten it was your indifference to the expressed will of the public that got your lot in to opposition!
Recent Comments