Oh dear. Hamas has posted two videos that completely contradict each other. Video one - "Human shields have proven effective in Gaza" - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQ6S0-o3uFI Video two - Hamas denies using human shields in Gaza - https://www.youtube....
Desperate..... moi..... ? Why would we be "desperate" when three recent polls have shown us to be pushing 50%? Desperation is for the 30 percenters....... :)
Abuse aside, do you not admit that the reason for the flow of votes outlined by several of us makes sense? It is fricking obvious, surely! You have gained some votes from fruitcakes but lost some of the middle-ground people. Swings and roundabouts. I'll ...
Yep ..... correct!
Ahhhhh... the sweet sound of denial........ :) Keep it up! (Shhhhh.... don't tell anyone that you are really a Nats "plant"....... :) )
Correct, BB.
Oh, cue the violins and the pics of people starving in the streets. If things are so dire in NZ then why is it that orchardists and farmers have to get people in from Fiji and the Philippines to do work? Why is it, too, that people deliberately fail job ...
"...mainstream media on their side..." Pfft..... If by "mainstream media" you mean the leftwing bootlickers at TV1 and TV3, you're a little bit off the mark. The Herald and Dom Post too - hardly "on the side of the Right". "...revitalize their image..." ...
"...something Labour could emulate." It certainly could. Look at a lineup that includes the likes of Goff, King, Mallard, Moroney and Fenton. Gee - what an absolute picture of dynamism and youth *they* present! This blog calls it "shedding the deadwood". ...
"...the widespread delusion that profit is good..." Uh.... even "communist" China has a capitalist profit-based economy now. Nasty nasty "profit"...... :) As for so-called "rich pricks" that Cunners likes to poke abuse at - many of those "rich pricks" are ...
I have a post from a blog elsewhere (the post is by an employer) - consider THIS, David Cunliffe - "I will be starting the person on $15 p.h., and if they are any good they will be on $17 p.h. after 90 days. It will only be 20 hrs per week to start with, ...
One of Cunliffe's "bright ideas" is to raise pay-rates for the low-paid. Result? Some companies will lay off some of the said low-paid (or not employ them in the first place). Other companies are very likely to raise their prices, and others may go under ...
I want the chocolate fish for spotting Cunliffe's first lie. Here we have the article in which he "vows to spare his detractors" - http://www.3news.co.nz/Cunliffe-vows-to-spare-detractors/tabid/1607/articleID/313349/Default.aspx Yet what do we see mere ...
It's interesting that a "fear of democracy" article should appear on a pro-Labour website when Labour themselves ignored the *87%* of "no" votes in the smacking referendum" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Zealand_citizens-initiated_referendum,_2009 So -...
It says that "John Key had made the election a referendum.....", does it not? So - does that not suggest that Goff was regarding the election as a referendum? If not, why not?
As you can see - Goff said that Key had made it a referendum, so (taking the former Labour leader at his word), I guess it *was* a referendum.
In the document at that link - "Mr Goff said Prime Minister John Key had made this year's election a referendum on whether New Zealanders wanted to see their most important strategic assets sold".
So - the fact that Labour and the Greens are still kicking up a fuss about *partial* asset sales shows one thing - they do not believe the former leader of the Labour party when he said that the election was a "referendum on asset sales".
Posted the link above, but here it is again.... http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2013/03/why-do-we-need-another-referendum-we-already-had-one/
Dear P.B. - you really should enlighten yourself on what is happening in Europe. The Swedish parliament, for example. The parties in power in Sweden refuse to work with the Swedish Democrats party because they are anti-immigration (and they see that, in ...
A link to the assertion by Phil Goff - Here you go - http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2013/03/why-do-we-need-another-referendum-we-already-had-one/
Can't even reply to my posts with facts. Laughs more.
They are buying them for PROFIT, my dear "Pascal's bookie". Ooooooh... "profit". Dirty word - must wash my mouth out..... Oh, and btw - my dislike of Islam is exactly the same as the dislike that the *apostates* from Islam have of it. Are they lying, dear ...
Uh - the "convention" hasn't been finalised yet, in case you hadn't heard. By the way - do you have anything else to offer other than abuse? Uh.... "reasoned argument", perhaps?
*Laugh* - here comes Pascal's bookie - friend of Lenin. So - your mate Phil Goff was LYING then when he said that the election would be "a referendum on asset sales"? Yes or no? Put up or shut up.
Will Labour buy back the 49% of the assets sold? Yes or no? If yes - why? The government will *still have control* of all assets by keeping *51%* of them. What would be gained by buying back the other 49%? Not "control" - they already have it!
The right's "fear of democracy"? What nonsense. There has already been a referendum on asset sales - it was called the 2011 election. Gee - even *Phil Goff* the Labour leader at that time - said that the election "would be a referendum on asset sales". How...
My research points to single-digit IQs being the cause of Labour Party support.
Who was the "bright spark" that decided to leave Parliamentary Services out of the OIA in the first place? What the *heck* were they thinking?
Recent Comments