<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A lecture on the WAIS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/</link>
	<description>The New Zealand labour movement used to have its own newspaper. A group of us thought that now might be a good time for it to be digitally reborn: The Standard v2.0 - now in a new format The Standard v3.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:24:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprent</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144916</link>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 10:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144916</guid>
		<description>:) 

I think you&#039;ve missed the &quot;70,000 scientists signed this petition&quot; 

&lt;em&gt;that they didn&#039;t know that they&#039;d &#039;signed&#039;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://thestandard.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think you&#8217;ve missed the &#8220;70,000 scientists signed this petition&#8221; </p>
<p><em>that they didn&#8217;t know that they&#8217;d &#8216;signed&#8217;</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedLogix</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144913</link>
		<dc:creator>RedLogix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144913</guid>
		<description>PB,

Cripes mate that is, is... so accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PB,</p>
<p>Cripes mate that is, is&#8230; so accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pascal's bookie</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144912</link>
		<dc:creator>Pascal's bookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144912</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;This could undermine the anthropogenic argument&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I love this shit. 

&lt;i&gt;Hey, look at this! If you pump out these gases into the atmosphere everything we know about climatology says the temp should rise&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; Oh yeah? So? &lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;So those are the gases we&#039;ve been pumping out.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt;Well the temperature isn&#039;t rising so your *theory* is for shit.&lt;/b&gt; 

&lt;i&gt;Yeah well there&#039;s feedback loops and buffers and stuff. It&#039;s a complicated business, but in any case, those buffers can&#039;t handle what we are throwing at them and eventually things&#039;ll have to pop somewhere. It&#039;s fucking physics.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; Pffft. Nah you&#039;re full of it. Come back to me when the temp starts rising.&lt;/b&gt;

dum-de-doo, dum-de-doo

&lt;i&gt;Hi. the temps are totally rising. Look at this graph. It&#039;s a zigzag heading up. &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; Yeah but we&#039;re going down at the moment. You&#039;re such a liar, that&#039;s the total opposite of what you said!&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Look smarter. Like I said, it zigzags, but if you smooth out those zigzags it&#039;s heading up. Just like we expected. And it&#039;s physics. There&#039;s a problem here. We should really start pumping less of this shit into the atmosphere.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; Why? Even if we are getting hotter, hotter&#039;s good, and you can&#039;t prove it&#039;s these gases you&#039;re so concerned about.&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; A little bit hotter overall can make life really unpleasant in the places humans actually fucking live, and every time these gases have been more prevalent, the temp has risen. We&#039;ve been checking it out.&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; So it&#039;s happened before then? &lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Yep. Here&#039;s the graphs and data. It&#039;s definitely happened before, lots of times. These gases that we are pumping out cause the temp to rise. &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; Ha ha. That data says it happened before humans had even evolved, therefore it can&#039;t be us. Or did we send back our gases in a time machine? What a loon. ha ha. &lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Er, it&#039;s the gases, not the people. The gases can be released in any number of ways, none of them good, some of them though, preventable. Which would be &#039;the point&#039;. &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; So how can you say that it&#039;s us that&#039;s releasing the gases?&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Had a suck on your tailpipe lately? &lt;/i&gt;

&lt;b&gt; You&#039;re really uncivil, you know that? &lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt; Don&#039;t get me fucking started. &lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This could undermine the anthropogenic argument</p></blockquote>
<p>I love this shit. </p>
<p><i>Hey, look at this! If you pump out these gases into the atmosphere everything we know about climatology says the temp should rise</i></p>
<p><b> Oh yeah? So? </b></p>
<p><i>So those are the gases we&#8217;ve been pumping out.</i></p>
<p><b>Well the temperature isn&#8217;t rising so your *theory* is for shit.</b> </p>
<p><i>Yeah well there&#8217;s feedback loops and buffers and stuff. It&#8217;s a complicated business, but in any case, those buffers can&#8217;t handle what we are throwing at them and eventually things&#8217;ll have to pop somewhere. It&#8217;s fucking physics.</i></p>
<p><b> Pffft. Nah you&#8217;re full of it. Come back to me when the temp starts rising.</b></p>
<p>dum-de-doo, dum-de-doo</p>
<p><i>Hi. the temps are totally rising. Look at this graph. It&#8217;s a zigzag heading up. </i></p>
<p><b> Yeah but we&#8217;re going down at the moment. You&#8217;re such a liar, that&#8217;s the total opposite of what you said!</b></p>
<p><i> Look smarter. Like I said, it zigzags, but if you smooth out those zigzags it&#8217;s heading up. Just like we expected. And it&#8217;s physics. There&#8217;s a problem here. We should really start pumping less of this shit into the atmosphere.</i></p>
<p><b> Why? Even if we are getting hotter, hotter&#8217;s good, and you can&#8217;t prove it&#8217;s these gases you&#8217;re so concerned about.</b></p>
<p><i> A little bit hotter overall can make life really unpleasant in the places humans actually fucking live, and every time these gases have been more prevalent, the temp has risen. We&#8217;ve been checking it out.</i></p>
<p><b> So it&#8217;s happened before then? </b></p>
<p><i> Yep. Here&#8217;s the graphs and data. It&#8217;s definitely happened before, lots of times. These gases that we are pumping out cause the temp to rise. </i></p>
<p><b> Ha ha. That data says it happened before humans had even evolved, therefore it can&#8217;t be us. Or did we send back our gases in a time machine? What a loon. ha ha. </b></p>
<p><i> Er, it&#8217;s the gases, not the people. The gases can be released in any number of ways, none of them good, some of them though, preventable. Which would be &#8216;the point&#8217;. </i></p>
<p><b> So how can you say that it&#8217;s us that&#8217;s releasing the gases?</b></p>
<p><i> Had a suck on your tailpipe lately? </i></p>
<p><b> You&#8217;re really uncivil, you know that? </b></p>
<p><i> Don&#8217;t get me fucking started. </i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprent</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144897</link>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144897</guid>
		<description>Except that this particular rise in C02 levels has the isotropic signature of released coal and oil rather than the volcanic gas emissions that appear to have triggered previous changes. It is also a *lot* faster than previous changes according to the ice cores. etc etc... Read http://realclimate.org or http://www.hottopic.com (or sites linked from there) if you want a readable version of the research.

However the geology of previous eras tells us roughly what happens when greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere. Ice melts, sea levels rise, the climate changes over wide areas with changing rain and wind patterns, sea currents turn on and off, deserts shift, even possible northern glaciations, etc. The exact effects are unpredictable when you&#039;re looking back over 10&#039;s of thousands or millions of years.

The only thing that you can be sure about is that human civilization will suffer intensely. It evolved for and during relatively stable climatic conditions (geologically speaking). Climate changes that can be withstood by hunter-gathers are likely to be lethal for complex civilizations. Do you want to take the risks to have an RV?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that this particular rise in C02 levels has the isotropic signature of released coal and oil rather than the volcanic gas emissions that appear to have triggered previous changes. It is also a *lot* faster than previous changes according to the ice cores. etc etc&#8230; Read <a href="http://realclimate.org" rel="nofollow">http://realclimate.org</a> or <a href="http://www.hottopic.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.hottopic.com</a> (or sites linked from there) if you want a readable version of the research.</p>
<p>However the geology of previous eras tells us roughly what happens when greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere. Ice melts, sea levels rise, the climate changes over wide areas with changing rain and wind patterns, sea currents turn on and off, deserts shift, even possible northern glaciations, etc. The exact effects are unpredictable when you&#8217;re looking back over 10&#8242;s of thousands or millions of years.</p>
<p>The only thing that you can be sure about is that human civilization will suffer intensely. It evolved for and during relatively stable climatic conditions (geologically speaking). Climate changes that can be withstood by hunter-gathers are likely to be lethal for complex civilizations. Do you want to take the risks to have an RV?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: djp</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144895</link>
		<dc:creator>djp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 07:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144895</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;
Polar ice sheets have grown and collapsed at least 40 times over the past five million years, causing major sea-level fluctuations.
&lt;/i&gt;

This could undermine the anthropogenic argument

ps. New capcha is easier to read thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i><br />
Polar ice sheets have grown and collapsed at least 40 times over the past five million years, causing major sea-level fluctuations.<br />
</i></p>
<p>This could undermine the anthropogenic argument</p>
<p>ps. New capcha is easier to read thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprent</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144881</link>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 04:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144881</guid>
		<description>Yeah. This is a nice (if somewhat ugly) system. I haven&#039;t seen a noticeable increase in the spambots getting through to akismet. Looks like it is doing its job.

I turned off the speaking version mainly to get rid of the extra comment. Will turn back on if anyone desperately needs it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah. This is a nice (if somewhat ugly) system. I haven&#8217;t seen a noticeable increase in the spambots getting through to akismet. Looks like it is doing its job.</p>
<p>I turned off the speaking version mainly to get rid of the extra comment. Will turn back on if anyone desperately needs it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144878</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144878</guid>
		<description>Your comment from 2:48pm is blank in the RSS feed. I read off RSS most of the time and it&#039;s the only blank I&#039;ve seen.

P.S. The fact that edit works on my own comments in the RSS feed is pretty cool :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your comment from 2:48pm is blank in the RSS feed. I read off RSS most of the time and it&#8217;s the only blank I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>P.S. The fact that edit works on my own comments in the RSS feed is pretty cool <img src='http://thestandard.org.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprent</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144875</link>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 03:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144875</guid>
		<description>RL&#039;s comment? Umm that&#039;s odd. Adds to bug list.

The other nice thing about Peters anti-spam though is that not only does it allow me to respond from my iPhone, I&#039;ve also just found that it also allows me to respond from my severely locked down work system.......

And I just got a quote string - that is definitely the problem. Will fix now. Time for a break anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RL&#8217;s comment? Umm that&#8217;s odd. Adds to bug list.</p>
<p>The other nice thing about Peters anti-spam though is that not only does it allow me to respond from my iPhone, I&#8217;ve also just found that it also allows me to respond from my severely locked down work system&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>And I just got a quote string &#8211; that is definitely the problem. Will fix now. Time for a break anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144874</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144874</guid>
		<description>The comment to which this is a reply appears blank in the RSS feed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The comment to which this is a reply appears blank in the RSS feed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lprent</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144873</link>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 02:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144873</guid>
		<description>Thanks.. &lt;sigh&gt;. 

Sounds like Nevil Gibson, the editor at the NBR should go as well. He wrote a particularly stupid editorial last week. Not understanding the science is no excuse for being a credulous fool. &lt;a href=&#039;http://hot-topic.co.nz/time-to-worry-nbr-editor-lacks-insight-on-climate-change/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Time to worry: NBR editor lacks insight on climate change&lt;/a&gt;. 

Looks like he believes number of non-scientific paper lines rather asking scientists themselves.&lt;/sigh&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.. <sigh>. </p>
<p>Sounds like Nevil Gibson, the editor at the NBR should go as well. He wrote a particularly stupid editorial last week. Not understanding the science is no excuse for being a credulous fool. <a href='http://hot-topic.co.nz/time-to-worry-nbr-editor-lacks-insight-on-climate-change/' rel="nofollow">Time to worry: NBR editor lacks insight on climate change</a>. </p>
<p>Looks like he believes number of non-scientific paper lines rather asking scientists themselves.</sigh></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedLogix</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144854</link>
		<dc:creator>RedLogix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144854</guid>
		<description>Will be there. I&#039;ll try and knock up a post if not all of the Prof&#039;s material goes whistling overhead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will be there. I&#8217;ll try and knock up a post if not all of the Prof&#8217;s material goes whistling overhead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roger nome</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/a-lecture-on-the-wais/comment-page-1/#comment-144852</link>
		<dc:creator>roger nome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 01:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=16582#comment-144852</guid>
		<description>This is just alarmism. Everybody knows that the American Association of oil barons are right and everyone else is wrong? My understanding is that so called &quot;global warming&quot; is just a global conspiracy that&#039;s been whipped up by the comunust liberal media (this guy for example)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD39QY8ew3c

and the global comunust peer-reviewed science journals?  

I&#039;m sure redbaiter and MacDoc can give us a more sophisticated look at the conspiracy than i can though ... guys, a bit of help here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just alarmism. Everybody knows that the American Association of oil barons are right and everyone else is wrong? My understanding is that so called &#8220;global warming&#8221; is just a global conspiracy that&#8217;s been whipped up by the comunust liberal media (this guy for example)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD39QY8ew3c" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZD39QY8ew3c</a></p>
<p>and the global comunust peer-reviewed science journals?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure redbaiter and MacDoc can give us a more sophisticated look at the conspiracy than i can though &#8230; guys, a bit of help here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

