web analytics
The Standard
Advertising

Bait and switch

Written By: - Date published: 3:47 pm, June 28th, 2008 - 78 comments
Categories: election 2008, national, slippery - Tags:

It strikes me there is a disconnect between what prospective National voters expect it to do in government and what it has actually promised it would do. Some examples:

Tax Cuts
How much larger do you expect the tax cut National will offer you will be compared to the ones Labour has announced? $5 a week? $10? Hardly any difference. National supporters weren’t satisfied with Labour’s cuts, they’ll want a significant amount more and such puny offerings would make a mockery of National’s endless fixation on cutting tax. Seems to me they’ve got to offer at least $20 a week more or the expectations of potential voters will be disappointed. How are they going to find the $3 billion needed to satisfy this minimal expectation? Not through cutting ‘waste‘.

Reverse the Child Discipline law
The Bradford amendments to Section 59 pf the Crime Act is one of National supporters’ main bugbears. Despite the fact that National voted for the law, Labour is blamed. Surely, then there is a strong expectation that National will reverse the amendments. But it’s not going to happen. John Key says they would change the law if there was evidence good parents were being criminalised and he says that is not happening.

Lower petrol tax
A common refrain from National supporters is that petrol prices are the fault of taxes (in fact, higher fuel prices reduces government tax revenue and raises its costs). Labour is blamed for this over-taxation and they believe electing National will change this. It won’t. National has repeatedly stated it won’t remove or reduce taxation on fuel.

Power prices
Think power prices are too high? Expect National to lower them? Think again. National has no energy affordability policy. It does, however, have a policy of extracting more profits from SOEs, and the biggest SOEs are Meridian, Genesis, Mercury, and Transpower; National wants power companies to make more profit, from higher prices. It opposes the Electricity Commission, whose reserve generator at Whirinaki gave us a buffer during the recent ‘power crisis’.

It is no coincidence that the expectations of National’s supporters and its actual policies are different. National’s strategy relies on hit and run attacks on the government. This encourages a belief that National has some plan to tackle the problem at isuue when it doesn’t. Securing the votes of people who have expectations that don’t gel with reality, what the Americans call ‘bait and swtich’, underpins National strategy.

So, if you’re thinking of voting National, ask yourself: what do you expect from them and do these expectations match with National’s actual statements?  Or are you falling for the bait?

78 comments on “Bait and switch”

  1. higherstandard 1

    According to the latest polls Tax cuts are not top of mind anymore.

    ” ..The economy continued to rate as the top issue likely to affect respondents’ vote (23.8 per cent).

    But public concern about crime saw law and order selected as the next issue most likely to affect voting, rising to nearly a quarter of respondents (23.4 per cent) – up from just 11 per cent in May. It overtook tax cuts (19 per cent) as the second biggest issue.”

    Not surprising that law and order is of rising concern with the spate of shocking incidents in Sth Auckland recently.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10518834

  2. Yeah, and National has no solutions for those issue either, yet I bet a lot of potential National voters think they do.

  3. higherstandard 3

    But both you and I know that governments are blamed when things turn sour not oppositions – tis the way of the world.

  4. But is that why you would vote National?

  5. Perhaps National can increase the fines for those losers that park in Handicap spots to raise money for tax breaks.

  6. erikter 6

    [lprent: banned remember]

  7. bill brown 7

    Not surprising that law and order is of rising concern with the spate of shocking incidents in Sth Auckland recently

    I would say:

    Not surprising that the msm is concentrating on law and order after the gap between National’s and Labour’s tax cut package was minimised.

  8. Monty 8

    you leftards just do not get it. It is not just those points above which is why Labour are so far behind. It is because they are arrogant (see Clark parking over disabled park for latest proof) Cullen has refused to give tax custs for nine years despite massive surpluses, and the list just goes on and on. Chris Trotter summed it up during the week when he said in his column “The trouble with this government, is that it’s always telling us what to do.” The Labour government as the current economic recession tells us have not actually managed the economy well.

    At present households in Auckland are struggling as evidenced by the increase in mortgagee sales, defaults on loans, drop in house sales (no confidence) and retail sales falling through the floor. The perception (and quite corect as well) is that Labour has robbed the woring classes to fund their social programmes. The middle classes who have funded the Labour ego have had enough.

    Labour as a result will suffer their worst defeat in a generation. In 12 months time while Labour are still licking their festering wounds and wondering how to cope with life with Helen controling every aspect of their lives, some on the left will undertake an objective analysis. The cause will be several things, but top of the list will be
    Cullen and his arrogance
    Electoral Finance Act
    Clark and her vindictiveness (and lust for power)
    The Anti-smacking law
    The Health system (and the sheriff in charge -)
    High interest rates
    Falling house prices (and no consumer confidence)
    destruction of the independant Public Service (it is not the government’s plaything)
    The theft of $800,000 of taxpayers money
    Increases in violent crime (and lack of real action on P and gangs)
    the drift to Australia of friends and family (everyone seems to have lost a son / daughter/ brother / sister to the West Island)
    And most importantly the arrogance of every single labour Party member of parliament.

    What does amaze me is that your support has not yet slumped to 20% – but given current polling trends I am certain that will be acheivable

  9. RedLogix 9

    Monty does the perfect demo of the sucker who has swallowed the exact “bait and switch” routine SP writes about. Classic.

    Monty gets the “Unselfconcious Irony Award” for the week.

  10. gobsmacked 10

    This will be the very shiny silver lining if National do win – getting out the popcorn and watching the show, as the penny slowly drops among the fingers-in-the-ears John Key fan club. Like when you start dating “HotChickHot4U” off the internet, and she turns out to be a scam artist who ends up with half your house. How did that happen? Coz you stopped thinking and followed your dick.

    Self-delusion is not compulsory, it’s a choice. And if people can’t be bothered to try and find out what they’re getting, they get what they deserve.

    PS Have just yawned my way through Monty’s long post … couldn’t find a single National policy there either. Says it all.

  11. Matthew Pilott 11

    Redlogix says it all really. Someone who considers ‘leftards’ a clever call it top of the list of people to get suckered by national. I wonder what muzza thinks Key will do for him – or maybe he just likes his smile.

  12. Lew 12

    Monty: On this thread I offered you a bet of a case of beer if National win 75 seats. Since you’re predicting Labour falling to 20%, I should think you’d be all the more keen now to put your money where your typing fingers are.

    Do we have a deal?

    L

  13. Key and National would be a disaster in government and there would be a bit of schadenfreude in seeing that go down. Problem is that it would be the people who really suffer, not National’s wealthy base.

    Monty, Brett – I hope you see that you’re ust showing that you’ve been suckered in by misdirection and the bait and switch. Honestly, I can’t image supporting a government in circumstances where I can’t name what they will do… it seems all you see National as is ‘not-Labour’. Incredible. Do you really want a government like that, with no policy and no solutions?

  14. coge 14

    Well Steve, it’s a case of knowing what Govt we don’t want, & knowing how best to get that result. This Clark led Govt is considered by most to be an abject failure. I anticipate both they & their coalition partners will be roundly rejected by the electorate.

  15. gobsmacked 15

    Ha ha ha … that’s brilliant!

    (You are a parody, I take it?)

  16. higherstandard 16

    Key and National would be a disaster in government .. how so ?

    Problem is that it would be the people who suffer not Nationals wealthy base …. really how so ?

    So those people who voted National in the last election and in this are the wealthy ? and they voted or are thinking of voting National because they’re wealthy and greedy … really … do you really believe that ? After your rant some time ago regarding the young Nats I’m starting to think you actually do.

  17. coge. If the Labour-led governments are such a failure, how come National wouldn’t reverse any of their changes?

    HS. You’ve seen all the stats, I can’t remember how many times we’ve showed the minimum wage and median income graphs, the distribution of income vs tax cut graphs…. National doesn’t believe in raising the minimum wage or improving work rights, plus a cornerstone of neoliberal economics is unemployment to suppress wage demands. Who suffers then? The people, not the wealthy. Are Natioanl supporters for those things because they are ‘bad’, no of course not. They believe that those policies are best for society in the long-run (‘with the right incentives, everyone will work hard and be rich doctors and IT contractors’), problem is (and again, we’ve shown this in a dozen different ways) they aren’t, they are best for those at the top, and the poor get shafted.

  18. RedLogix 18

    Coge,

    You are posting on a political blog site. It is openly left-wing partisian and there are a number of people here who are highly politically literate. As with all blogs the level of debate is can be variable, but allow me to assure you that if you continue posting here in this miserable vein you will be challenged to raise your game.

    1. You assert that this Labour led govt has been a failure. What is your definition of failure and how are you going to measure success? Specifically at what points do you think this govt has failed?

    2. You are welcome to your opinion that you do not want a Labour govt. Fine. But what DO you want, and what evidence do you have that National (the only plausible alternative at this point) will deliver anything like what you are hoping for?

    Surprise me with a coherent, reasoned and evidence based argument if you will.

  19. polaris 19

    yes, with Lake Hawea about to go the lowest it is allowed to go, the “power crisis” is really over isn’t it Clinton?

  20. coge 20

    RedLogix. Yes, it’s abundantly clear what sort of blog The Standard
    is. I think it is positive that many folk of opposing political stripe post are able to post here. I’m sure you understand this makes for lively debate, & thanks for your invitation. In my world political literacy is purely a subjective concept, as with the ideas of failure & success. But now we need to look at some facts, so I can answer your questions.

    1/Polling. In my opinion Labour are not polling at the levels that make them electable. How do I come to this conclusion? Since 2002 when Labour trounced National, Labours polling has fallen into a longterm downtrend, a slow decline if you will. Conversely National has experienced a longterm uptrend. Six years of this has made a huge difference. Now please answer this. For Labour, how can this be any measure of success? If it is not success, surely it is failure? I admit it is all based on statistics, but speculate that Labour has alienated many of their former supporters.

  21. KK 21

    cOge? So you ‘re everything thing on polls. 1/Polling – is that it?

    “In my world political literacy is purely a subjective concept, as with the ideas of failure & success. But now we need to look at some facts” – your sentence makes about no sense and you named just one fact.

  22. coge 22

    RedLogix,

    2/ As to the alienation of some former labour supporters, well three terms is a long time for any Govt. The scandals, the advent of “Nanny state”, the economy, the P epidemic & attendant crimes etc, night after night on the media. National are seen as the new broom, when you’re in opposition you can’t make any real mistakes.
    From my own personal point of view, National traditionally are better custodians of the economy & have a better handle on crime. They also understand business, which time & time again Labour demonstrate ample ignorance in.

    One final comment. Intellectual bullying which raises it’s head on this blog once in a while. It’s not a good look for Labour & I fail to see how it helps your cause. Perhaps you would care to comment?

  23. lprent 23

    coge: I think that RL was quietly warning you about me and/or Irish. We like having people of different opinions around here when they discuss things. We don’t tolerate trolls for too long because they don’t contribute to debate.

    The comment he was referring to caused me to give you a troll scan – it was a classic troll comment. But you seem to occasionally contribute – hopefully you’ll get better :D

  24. Short of Labour digging up some real dirt on Key/National, the Right is going to be making up the next coalition government. Not that it will make any difference to the economy, National seems unlikely to reverse Labour’s biggest mistake: Working For Families.

  25. KK 25

    cOge “From my own personal point of view” – that’s tautology

    Nanny state, the economy, the P epidemic & attendant crimes etc, night after night on the media.

    have you ever given thought that the mainstream media is not the only source of information? Your arguments are seriously baseless mate.. perhaps if you backed them up and presented a coherent argument they’d be less of this “intellectual bullying”

    Do you really think that Labour “demonstrate ample ignorance”, I’ve heard the contrary I think that you’ve been mislead by the media and the key-loving machine.

  26. coge 26

    Iprent, thanks. A troll scan? Didn’t hurt a bit.

    Generally shorter communication is the most efficient. In this case it was noticed.

    Cheers

    [lprent: Shorter is efficient around here as well, at least for banning. You have to explain the why as well as the conclusions. That allows people to pick apart the arguments. Short usually leads to flamewars and I stomp on those because they're too annoyingly mechanical to scan. Consequently short usually leads to bans or moderation on the general basis that I like killing rogue code and the trash is the fastest and most efficient solution]

  27. Billy 27

    SP: If the Labour-led governments are such a failure, how come National wouldn’t reverse any of their changes?

    So, Steve, given that Labour have never reversed the benefit cuts of Ruth Richardson’s first budget, I take it we are all agreed that they were a great success.

  28. Dean 28

    SP:

    “coge. If the Labour-led governments are such a failure, how come National wouldn’t reverse any of their changes?”

    If the mother of all budgets and the 90s welfare reforms caused such division and poverty, why isn’t Labour prepared to reverse them?

    You really are a sycophant if you continue along this line of hypocrisy.

  29. Dean 29

    “So, Steve, given that Labour have never reversed the benefit cuts of Ruth Richardson’s first budget, I take it we are all agreed that they were a great success.”

    Snap! And about 1 minute apart. I wonder if SP will find the time to explain this one away?

  30. Lew 30

    He’s already done so several times.

    L

  31. coge 31

    KK, it seems you & I are not voting in the same election.

    Where does the general public get information from? How does the economy effect their opinion of the encumbants? What are the polling trends indicating to you? This all represents aspects of public opinion.

    Splitting hairs on this blog will not make one iota of difference to public opinion.

    I was a Labour supporter for many years, what I see now is a different party that has tired of listening, as it seems you have.

  32. RedLogix 32

    Coge.

    You made the effort therefore I’ll attempt an honest response.

    Yes we know the polls have the Left as underdogs going into this election. As you correctly identify, there is a natural electoral cycle. The longer ANY govt stays in power, the more inclined the electorate is to simply hanker change for change’s sake. Moreover as you correctly identify, being in power makes you an easy target.

    It’s made harder when large and influential sectors of the media are nakedly committed to changing the govt as well.

    It’s made harder when the general standard of political debate in this country is so low, that outright lies and smears are routinely substituted for facts. For instance I personally became politicised in 2004 when I witnessed National and Federated Farmers derail a long overdue reform of Public Access to Crown lands and backcountry recreation assets with a deliberate, malicious and hysterical campaign of lies and disinformation. The Minister, Jim Sutton who had shepherded a long and careful process of consultation and policy development through to the point of introducing legislation was crucified. The very cautious reforms his working party had proposed towards mapping and negotiating legal, LINEAR access to public land, along pre-defined corridors over private land… was hysterically twisted into a fearmongering vision of hordes of townies, criminals and vandals “WANDERING AT WILL” over farmlands and forests raping burning and pillaging. It was a deeply retrograde and cycnical exercise in sustained lies that has eroded my rights as a New Zealander to do what I love most… getting out in the backcountry to tramp, hunt or fish.

    The scandals, the advent of “Nanny state’, the economy, the P epidemic & attendant crimes etc, night after night on the media.

    The scandals were mostly beat-ups. In fact compared to the non-stop debacles of the 90′s Labour have run a pretty well disciplined and competent ship. Of course things do inevitably go wrong. In fact life on the 9th Floor is a constant succession of mini to major crisis… but almost without exception, the issues have been dealt with that within reason have balanced the need for accountability and the need for natural justice and fair process.

    The term “Nanny State” is meaningless rhetoric.

    The economy is doing quite well internally, but is like every other nation going to be challenged by the catastrophic fiscal debacle caused by the US Bush Administrations disasterous policies.

    Actual crime rates are either falling or static, despite John Keys claims that they are “rocketing out of control”. (Another absurd statement that the media gave him a free pass on.) What is happening is that it is election year and the media will run as always the usual “who can be toughest on crime” soundbite auction that they always do. Nothing new here.

    What has changed is the advent of P. Note carefully this substance was NOT introduced as the result of Labour policy, but getting tough on it would require the banning of the precursor chemical pseudoephidrine worldwide. This would cost the big drug companies billions of dollars. Can you see a Key led National govt committing to such a policy?

    As for your notions that “National traditionally are better custodians of the economy & have a better handle on crime.” the truth betrays the fantasy. In fact world-wide, middle of the road, social democratic govts have generally done quite well in both respects

  33. RedLogix 33

    Splitting hairs on this blog will not make one iota of difference to public opinion.

    So why are you here then?

    (This being the shorter and more efficient version.)

  34. Ari 34

    Billy/Dean- Choosing not to fight on one front is slightly different from adopting your competitor’s policy wholesale on about six different major fronts after bitterly opposing them. Really, it’s only because of the It’s Okay If You Smile Hard Enough principle that Key got away with it. ;)

    I agree with you though that Labour’s refusal to commit to even moderate benefit increases is sad, but it still leaves plenty of their principles intact.

  35. RedLogix 35

    On further reflection I can take that a step further. From Chris Trotter:

    Take away the direct, popular participation in the processes of decision-making, he told his audience of academics and diplomats (and by participation he wasn’t simply referring to the voting, but to all the talking, arguing, organising and footslogging required to mobilise public opinion) and democracy is emptied of all its meaning and power.

    In his own, memorable, formulation: “The discussion is the democracy.” Or, as he confided to me later, over dinner: “The great failure of social democratic parties came when they decided it was easier to assemble a symbolic majority of parliamentarians than build a genuine majority of citizens.”

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/4599177a1861.html

    The media does not do conversations. It largely shuts us OUT of the debate, or filters what little we are allowed to say. But here on the blogs we ARE having conversations… we ARE doing democracy… we ARE the authentic public opinion… not that fake opinion that the polling companies thrust down our throats for their own profit.

    The Standard has been around less than one year, it’s early days. It’s far too soon to dismiss the blogs as irelevant to public opinion… far less to the future of democratic government.

  36. Draco TB 36

    National traditionally are better custodians of the economy & have a better handle on crime.

    For the last 70 years Labour has always handled the economy better than National. The one time they didn’t was the Fourth Labour government where they carried out massive structural changes that benefited the few at the expense of the many.

    They also understand business, which time & time again Labour demonstrate ample ignorance in.

    Define ‘business’?
    This may seem like a silly question but National always tends to ignore the biggest business sector in society. This, of course, is what the Fourth Labour government did as well.

    Where does the general public get information from?

    Unfortunately they get most of their information from the MSM which is massively biased in Nationals favour. This results in a misinformed populace.

  37. Bill 37

    “It strikes me there is a disconnect between what prospective National voters expect it to do in government and what it has actually promised it would do.”

    I’m not so sure that prospective National voters have any expectations per se.

    The problem could simply be that Labour voters didn’t get their expectations realised through the Labour led government. Admittedly I’m stating this on purely anecdotal evidence, but there is a lot of it.

    One example. There was a CTU/ Labour ‘meet’ about a year ago. The Labour cabinet members were there and a plethora of Union Officials. So far, a lot of (mostly) like minded people. There were also delegates, and that is where paths diverged.

    The fact that Labour and the Officials more or less engaged in mutual back slapping over Labour’s achievements overlooked the fact that a hell of a lot of the delegates present were not impressed, nay, pissed off.

    The overwhelming feeling amongst delegates I spoke with (a fair number)was that labour was ‘crap’ but that there was no other choice available. There seemed to be a sense of resignation that the interests of workers had not been and wouldn’t be addressed. If people were going to vote Labour, then it would only be because there was no other choice and in spite of the resentment felt.

    Nobody likes being told “We’ll give you (x, y or z) but you’ll have to wait 18 months, 2 years or whatever.” It pisses people off. When the x, y or z finally materialises, it is received, not with any sense of gratitude, but with resentment. (Try it with a kid. Buy them a bar of chocolate, tell them they can’t have it until next Tuesday and feel the resentment. And possibly be on the receiving end of some ‘get even’ behaviour?)

    National with their hit and run tactics and so on are merely (cynically) echoing or feeding off a sense of discontent felt by large numbers of workers. Throw in the line that things will be ‘different’ under National and you have a potential Obama scenario; empty platitudes that get filled by false wishful thinking. Maybe with National it’s more a suspension of disbelief and convincing yourself that things won’t be as bad as you know deep down they will be, married to the fact that you want to get a bit of your own back on a government that you feel has let you down.

  38. lprent 38

    RL: I originally got involved in this blog because I was interested in the effect in the 2011 election. I usually start political projects a long time prior to the effective date to figure out the bugs (as we’ve been doing). Besides the political systems are a bit sluggish and resistant to change. The msm were (to put it mildly) crap because of their sound bite problems.

    We needed a medium that was less chokeable and leads to better debate. Otherwise the political process would start having some severe difficulties in the longer term.

    As you say this is early days. But I have been surprised at the effectiveness of this medium. It shows in the sluggish responses just before I have to upgrade capabilities yet again.

  39. coge 39

    RL, Thanks for your considered reply. You have expanded my understanding of your position. Yes, politics is a brutal game, still a two edged sword even after years of MMP. Generally my politics are in line with ACT, but that remains to be seen.
    I agree with you about the quality of political debate, particularly in the use of the internet. Perhaps that’s why I’m posting here tonight. For better or worse that is the future which
    all concerned will need to embrace. Much like crickets descent into 20/20. Public opinion wins elections & I believe Labour are losing on that front.

  40. Lew 40

    RedLogix: “we ARE the authentic public opinion not that fake opinion that the polling companies thrust down our throats for their own profit.”

    Self-selected partisans defending a line or ideology anonymously on the interwebs aren’t anything approaching public opinion. This is one of the major delusions possessed by the blogosphere.

    The thing to realise is that once blogs become genuinely relevant, they will be institutionalised – either by the media or by those whose positions they espouse. The current ad-hoc model under which we participate lacks credibility, isn’t sustainable and doesn’t scale well. For a better model, look to something like OhMyNews – this got a good profile on Mediawatch last Sunday.

    DracoTB: “the MSM which is massively biased in Nationals favour.”

    The MSM seems currently to favour National for two structural reasons:

    1. Commercial media outlets use news as a means of enticing people to watch, read or listen to their advertisements. They compete for the same eyeballs and earholes. This means that, given tight resources resulting from the need to generate profit, they go with what will more easily attract eyeballs and earholes. National have three advantages here – firstly, they’re in opposition, and so don’t actually have to do anything; they just have to appear to want to do something. Secondly, anything bad which happens (and bad things will inevitably happen) is the fault of government, and bad things sell news – if it bleeds, it leads also applies to public funds. Thirdly, and most critically, National package their messages in order to make them useful to the media, relying upon the media business’s love for efficiency. Journalists are expensive; research and investigation are hard. Victory goes to those who make it easiest to simply print their press release, play their soundbite, or accept their glib assumption. This effect is redoubled in conjunction with the first caveat: because National aren’t in government, they don’t have to deliver on their statements. This may well be their downfall, but by then they’ll be in office.

    2. Commercial media outlets are owned by transnational capital and, where it doesn’t harm revenue (per 1 above), will take the line which advantages those interests.

    The hierarchy here is 1 over 2, because ultimately transnational capital doesn’t care how it gets its profits. The classical propaganda model is that the media drive consumption, because consumption drives advertising, and advertising drives revenue; not because they ideologically want a particular party to rule. The media want governments who will keep the economy strongest and demand highest. If (and both of you seem to agree with me on this one) that government in NZ would in fact be Labour-led, why would they oppose it? The answer is: National makes their work easy.

    L

  41. RedLogix 41

    Self-selected partisans defending a line or ideology anonymously on the interwebs aren’t anything approaching public opinion. This is one of the major delusions possessed by the blogosphere.

    Only because at present the vast bulk of public opinion is actively disengaged from political debate. Hell according to one media article last week there is a whole GenerationY out there that makes a point of ignoring politics.

    If I allow that you are correct, then the democratic experiment is doomed. Eventually it will all come down to who has the biggest marketing budget and slickest branding exercise. Nothing else will matter.

    If you will permit me my delusions for a moment. Four years ago I didn’t give a rat’s patui about politics. The internet was my portal to an issue I cared about, and one I wanted to participate in. Now I am a very ordinary citizen and to some extent I resent the label “self-selected partisian”. It’s a dismissive and minimising label, much the same as the term “party activist” is often used to minimise the sheer hard work and dedication of thousands of people committed to political causes. Without their efforts we wouldn’t have a democracy to be arguing about.

    Same for me. Yes I am a self selected partisian. I choose my social democrat outlook on life for all the same reasons Michael Cullen outlined in his speech in Wgtn to us just a few weeks ago.

    I’m not ashamed of believing in the innate moral equality of all people, I reject the unspoken assumptions of social hierachy I hear from the right.

    I instinctively select for long-term considerations, not short-term ones. The ability to defer gratification and work toward long-term goals is the most powerful predictor of genuine success. I reject the short-term live for today, maximise this quarter’s bottom line philosophy that is the main driver of unrestrained capitalism.

    In a complex world of competing demands, I am willing to seek a balance between the individual’s needs and rights to pursue opportunity and success on their own terms, against the wider needs of society to provide security for those vulnerable ones least able to protect themselves. I reject the delusion that ‘self-interest’ governs all, that the mythical ‘free market’ somehow solves all problems. Examples of market failures abound, and a critical role of govt is to provide moderating regulation and intervention in order to protect the interests of society as a whole.

    And yes I accept that the current blog model is immature and clumsy. With time they will evolve into something else… perhaps more institutionalised…. but the nature of the internet means that all attempts by institutions to capture the debate will fail. To quote an old line… the net interprets censorship as damage, and routes around it.

  42. lprent 42

    Lew: I don’t think that they can colonize this media all that easily.

    Currently the key issue for most media is the entry and maintenance costs.

    There is bugger all entry cost because the software is currently free and maintained by a vast base of geeks. There are few setup costs. The only real ‘code’ I had to do was to put plugin’s together and tested, plus a bit of css to get the exact effect required. Most sites spend way to much effort in getting good looking graphics – but that is to get the advertisers interested. That leads on to my second point.

    The direct cost of running this blog is now about $150/month on a standard commercial provider with considerable room for expansion. I don’t forsee needing more upgrades at the current growth for a few years.

    This gives me complete control on the system and I’ve used that to tweak performance. For instance I’ve dropped the data transmitted by a third in the last couple of months by tweaking the ModWrite caching rules.

    Technically, msm would have to figure out how to offer something significantly more effective to the end users that could be used as a choke point. Problem is those geeks know how do that stuff as well and will duplicate the algorithms and publish the code.

    //—-

    Now the non-technical. Writing and moderation are the keys. But it has to be a cooperative effort. A blog site requires a reasonable number of people to run effectively.

    The writing has to be pretty good and frequent. I’d anticipate slowly increasing the number of posters here over time as we get past beta hassles. Most of them would be recruited from the commentators doing it as a hobby. Some will come from other sites with moderation problems. That gets the main face of the site.

    Comments are a form of dialogue that is probably as important as the posts long term. A lot of lurkers look at them and often get involved eventually. Problem is that it is debilitating for writers to look at some of the crap that shows up as comments. This is what eventually killed Usenet. But it doesn’t take that much effort to kill the trolls and shills. You just have to have a ‘flexible’ general policy that can get very preemptive and quite arbitrary.

    Eventually the comments will self-regulate to a high degree because if you comment it is a total bastard to be cut off when you get banned, moderated, or have ugly sarcastic notes added.

    That is the toolkit I’m going to play with after this election. I think a lot of that can be automated without going the whole “you have to login” style. That is why I’m looking at what I call the rogue program look of trolls.

    Anyway, I think that the msm will have problems with people doing this as a hobby. They have few competitive advantages

  43. Lew 43

    RL: “the vast bulk of public opinion is actively disengaged from political debate … the democratic experiment is doomed.”

    I don’t think this follows. Democracy is rule of/by/for the people, and if The People don’t care about it then that’s their prerogative – it’s still democracy. It will stop being democracy in a meaningful sense if tests as to political knowledge, or similar, are implemented as a requisite to suffrage. I agree, though, that democracy is better with an aware and engaged populace, and I encourage all means to inform and engage people in the system, and to dispel cynicism about it.

    “Eventually it will all come down to who has the biggest marketing budget and slickest branding exercise. Nothing else will matter.”

    This is reductio ad absurdum, but even so: it’d still be democracy. People might be deluded or mistaken or just plain wrong in who they want to vote for, but that’s their right. There will always exist a bloc of the electorate who is politically aware, astute and somewhat more resistant to spin and marketing, and even if your reductio ad absurdum line comes to pass, it will be those voters who are kingmakers.

    “Now I am a very ordinary citizen”

    This is a nice delusion, and many people hold it, but by your own definition of ordinary citizens as disconnected from politics, it can’t logically be true.

    “to some extent I resent the label “self-selected partisian’. It’s a dismissive and minimising label,”

    I am possessed of strong political and ideological beliefs, but I am not a partisan. I use the term in its strict sense: supporter and defender of a particular party. That’s what most of the people commenting on blogs are, and fair enough too. I am an ideologue – I support and defend ideological positions, not their implementation by a particular group of people. So yes, to an extent, I am dismissive of partisans – not for their ideological positions necessarily, but for their common insistence that one party’s particular implementation is flawless or perfect.

    “much the same as the term “party activist’ is often used to minimise the sheer hard work and dedication of thousands of people committed to political causes.”

    I value the work of activists, and even partisans, very highly, but I see it for what it is: a means to an end.

    “Without their efforts we wouldn’t have a democracy to be arguing about.”

    This is only true for a certain, fairly narrow, ideal type of democracy, as I try to explain above.

    “the nature of the internet will I hope mean that all attempts by institutions to capture the debate will fail. To quote an old line the net interprets censorship as damage, and routes around it.”

    The major problem here is information overload. It’s not that there won’t ever be good, non-institutionalised content and analysis on the interwebs – I’m certain there always will be, just as there are self-published and self-distributed handbills, newsletters, films, songs, photos and essays – but how many of them have you seen? And how many of them has the notional average voter seen? To win the battle for the blogosphere, the media industry doesn’t have to censor or shut things down – it just has to make its own offerings the default and the most accessible. They will do it; mark my words. The reason they will do it is because they have all the same skills and technology as the current volunteer community has – plus they have money.

    I don’t consider this a bad thing – just the nature of the beast. Something, as you say, to route around. Keep making the better mouse trap.

    L

    Edit: Lynn, I hadn’t read your comment when I wrote this, but I think I’ve mostly given my views to it :)

  44. lprent 44

    Lew: I agree about what the msm will do.

    I don’t think that the posts are as likely to be as interesting. But their problem is going to be the moderation. If you don’t have it then the comments deteriorate to the lowest denominator. Too much and it becomes flat and weak.

    The msm posters will need content. They get it from good informed and opinionated comments. I don’t think that msm blogs can achieve that. They simply can’t pay the people capable of it enough to do it.

  45. RedLogix 45

    Clarification:

    “Now I am a very ordinary citizen’

    By this I mean that I am not employed by nor hold any office in any political Party, or semi-political body such as a Union. I have never worked directly for Central Govt nor by the Civil Service. I’ve never stood for public office (although I am compelled to respect those who have the guts to do so).

    All of us are unique in some way, but I make no special claims in regards to politics.

  46. Lew 46

    Lynn: Why won’t they be able to use the same moderate methods you use? What will prevent them from harnessing the same communities you do?

    Content will come from the same people who generate content now – journalists and opinion drivers.

    As far as comments go, I agree that they are at least as important as content – the bidirectional aspect is the major paradigmatic difference between this and traditional media formats. I see potential for all sorts of reputation-based commentary systems – escalation of privileges for good posters (like commenters in good standing here have the chance to make guest posts); micropayment systems rewarding insight; citizen-moderation, etc. I agree it’s a tricky problem as readership increases and becomes more general, but I don’t see how the volunteer community has any advantage.

    L

  47. Lew 47

    RL: I see what you mean, thanks.

    L

  48. RedLogix 48

    Lew,

    You make some strong points. But the difference is this… if the media attempt to capture or censor their content, then the barrier to entry for a more attractive competitor is so low that they could loose their dominance very quickly.

    Consider what has happened on the net already, look at how quickly huge outfits like AOL, or Yahoo have lost participation. Look how quickly whole new models like Facebook or Second Life have arisen. I’ve often thought that Fairfax made a big error of judgement in paying so much for Trademe, when a new alternative model could so easily take it’s place.

  49. ak 49

    Lew: The MSM seems currently to favour National for two structural reasons:
    Very good Lew (and Red)- nice analysis, but the biggie is the age-old fact that the tories own the MSM

    5% gap in November last year, now 20% thanks solely to the reportage from the Herald and her sisters.

    Just look at today’s headline: PM FORCES DISABLED MAN TO WALK.

    That such an utterly disgusting anti-Clark distortion of the facts can be laid before the public with such apparent impunity confirms my fears that we are rapidly adopting the “South American disease.” And all it entails.

    Key would have led us into Iraq and made us and our grandchildren targets of terrorism forever: are kiwis such naive ingenues that we cannot learn the lessons of history?

  50. ak 50

    (err – sorry to interrupt your geeky conversation, as you were)

  51. outofbed 51

    Don’t worry AK
    I have a healthy regard for the intelligence of Kiwi’s and in spite of the polls not looking good. I am absolutely convinced that the Tories won’t get in.
    I can’t see the 2005 Labour vote of 41% dropping by more then a few percent. Sure the Tories will be the biggest party but I am not convinced that they will get above 45%.
    I’m picking a LGM win and that is what I will be working my arse off to achieve

    night

  52. The sad part about the economy is that the world’s economy is suffering due to the consistent incompetence of the conservative US President, George W Bush. He turned surpluses into US$250B annual deficits thanks to his tax cuts to the top 1% of earners. His invasion and occupation of Iraq bring total to US$550+ billion annually. Those deficits and that war are the reasons for global economic heartburn, high oil prices and the credit crunch.

    It is bizarre to blame the economy on a centre-left government who refused to have any part in invading Iraq and who wisely did NOT cut taxes through 8 years despite intense pressure from National’s media allies.

    Voters appear to be making up their minds on emotive issues that actually have no real significance in their daily lives. Most are the consequence of a series of media beat-ups intended to make people think the present government is the “nanny-state”…and mainly over issues that in the big scheme of things are trivial.

    The people I talk to who don’t like Labour have that “We’ll show HER!” air about them. Never mind she doesn’t actually deserve it. They have been convinced somehow that she does….and the facts have nothing to do with it.

    They most often have no detailed understanding of ANY policy. They are voting their (apparently ignorant) gut.

    Not good….but too late now to change, I think. People learn slowly at the best of times.

  53. RedLogix 53

    As suspected. The Persuaders have been at work:

    http://www.stuff.co.nz/4601215a10.html

  54. lprent 54

    Why won’t they be able to use the same moderate methods you use? What will prevent them from harnessing the same communities you do?

    They’re corporates, average residence time of anyone in a single position is less than 2 years. Frequently a lot less.

    They haven’t managed a dynamic moderated community yet that has lasted more then 5 years. Almost every long lasting one has been done either by individuals or small companies. It is always a labor of love. Most of the advantages of capital don’t apply.

    What makes you think that corporate wage slaves can achieve it in this media?

  55. lprent 55

    RL: I liked that. I’m sure that the writer are going to have fun.

  56. Lew 56

    ak: “nice analysis, but the biggie is the age-old fact that the tories own the MSM”

    This is a particular point of disagreement between us, and probably worth discussing at some length (perhaps at another time). I see the business model as master to the ideology, not the other way around. One thing is sure – the media aren’t going to starve whether National or Labour (or the Democrats or the Republicans, or the Conservatives or Labour, or the Liberal Coalition or Labor) are in office, because ultimately these parties all represent the same basic ideology of globalised liberal-democratic capitalism – it’s a few details of implementation which separate them.

    “5% gap in November last year, now 20% thanks solely to the reportage from the Herald and her sisters.”

    But you haven’t actually addressed why the media are reporting this way. Saying `it’s because they’re all Tories at heart’ is a cop-out which if taken to its logical conclusion will result in anyone who’s not a Tory shunning the media. This path leads to electoral ruin. You have to learn to live with them, because politically, you can’t live without them.

    Steve Withers: “Voters appear to be making up their minds on emotive issues that actually have no real significance in their daily lives.”

    As they ever will. Feelings and suspicions trump rational consideration any day. People will engage in all manner of logical gymnastics to justify their gut instincts, but it’s rare to see someone change their deeply-held opinions in the face of actual evidence. I’ve quoted Murray Edelman’s argument on this blog a couple of times in support of this principle: it’s foundational to the art and science of political persuasion.

    RL: “As suspected. The Persuaders have been at work”

    I’d be shocked if Key and co. hadn’t contracted them again, or someone very much like them. They’d have been fools not to do so. Hager’s article there is, like The Hollow Men, not so much an indictment of National as a window into their world. Anyone who thinks it’s substantially different in other major parties might want to think again. I suspect it might be a little bit different within NZ Labour – but not within any of the other parties I listed above. The reason I think it’s different within NZ Labour is that I don’t see the sorts of advantages which derive from a well-constructed and well-implemented media/PR strategy accruing to Labour at present.

    Incidentally, the presence of articles like Hager’s in the Tory-owned media puts the lie to the somewhat conspiratorial idea that they’re dead-set against the left.

    L

  57. Lew 57

    Lynn: “What makes you think that corporate wage slaves can achieve it in this media?”

    `Corporate wage slaves’ as you somewhat uncharitably term them achieve plenty in all sorts of fields. I do take your point about continuity, however, that just suggests to me that a greater emphasis be placed on retention.

    You are absolutely right that all previously-successful models like this have been done on a small-scale, decentralised basis, or (like Slashdot, for instance) as a mostly-independent subsidiary owned but not managed by the larger corporate. Also, you inferred earlier that an edge could lie in distributed Free Software-like models of co-operation, code and method-sharing. There are indeed huge advantages to be gained here, and as yet corporates have been very reluctant to relinquish the necessary control over their systems to allow these to work.

    Interesting times.

    L

  58. IrishBill 58

    “Anyone who thinks it’s substantially different in other major parties might want to think again.”

    I think you would be surprised to find out how amateur most parties are when it comes to their political PR, Lew. Most of them do their spin in-house and develop their messages through groups of politicians and internal advisors with a bit of help from sister parties from other countries (particularly Australia and the UK). The hired gun approach is relatively new in NZ politics and not widely practiced simply because most parties don’t have the funds for this level of advice (a single round of focus groups costs tens of thousands of dollars and to be effective you have to run them continually) and are not willing to cede that much control of their campaigns to “outsiders”. I would hate to see the bill the Nats have run up with CT over the last two and a half years. I suspect is would be heading toward seven figures or more.

  59. Tax Cuts
    I’m not concerned with tax cuts; anything that National’s weak leadership offers will simply be a bribe to get them into power.

    However, the tax that is being collected is simply not being well managed. We are fast approaching Australia’s 1/3 of the work force being civil servants, who unfortunately are not “productive”; they don’t increase GDP ratios – the only reason Australia are so high on the GDP per hour list is the mining industry boom.

    NFP organizations which include most government departments have a fundamental core culture of adding layers of bureaucracy. What the private sector called middle-management-bloat.

    Cull off some of this and put the money back into the following:
    front line education/health/law
    grants for developing business; including subsidised employment for long term unemployed with REAL support structures
    increase innovation through dollar for dollar matching of R & D (not the insignificant 15% they currently put forward)

    A manager can manage 30 people comfortably. Why then is the ratio in government closer to 1:7. Cut the wasters. Put the tax where it will improve NZ’s shocking GDP per hour productivity statistics.

    Section 59
    I don’t personally use physical discipline on my child. However; I don’t think Section 59 was well considered. Assault is assault; and the judiciary already had powers to convict, but the police kept messing up due process and evidence chains.

    Petrol
    Lost opportunity with Tui Oil Fields and the likes. Also, put 20% of the current revenue generating by fuel taxation into R & D for alternative fuels. Balance of tax to subsidise improving our fleet by dumping all vehicles over 10 years old and improving public transport alternatives. Will pay for itself in relatively short time frame. Roading initiatives can be put on hold – they are such a short term view it is a waste of capital.

    Power Prices
    As it is an essential service; all profits should be retained for infrastructure and improved technologies.

    Summary
    Nothing National will do will improve those four things; and if Labour were actually serious about fixing problems, they would take a more pragmatic approach and provide real support for innovation in internal processes and infrastructure.

    They are being too timid; we could lead the world in energy infrastructure innovation. Bugger the agricultural industry; R & D and innovation in new technologies is where NZ should position itself to make it a wealthy country once again.

    And that all falls back to having a secure infrastructure and education.

    So National have no leadership or experience, and can never achieve what New Zealand needs. I pity the National supporter. They probably know in the back of their mind that National will make a complete hash of it.

    [Apologies Karl, for some reason you got caught in the spam filter]

  60. Anthony 60

    “and if Labour were actually serious about fixing problems, they would take a more pragmatic approach and provide real support for innovation in internal processes and infrastructure.”

    The problem with Labour (or any other party) encouraging innovation, is that it will breed success, and that will mean there are less people dependent on the state – i.e. Labour’s support base will not need them in government to guarantee their benefits if they aren’t on them anymore.

    And Labours subsequent response to this success would once again be their short-sighted income re-distribution policies, which actually ends up stunting growth and innovation, instead of rewarding it.

  61. Draco TB 61

    Lew:

    But you haven’t actually addressed why the media are reporting this way

    It’s because they’re being told to.
    The Independent

    The minute stated: “For The Sun and News of the World he explained that he is a ‘traditional proprietor’. He exercises editorial control on major issues like which party to back in a general election or policy on Europe.”

    He may not maintain control over other editors but you can be fairly certain that he maintains influence. Such influence was recently seen here in NZ when APN forced an editor of a local rag to print a correction.

    Capitalism = Ownership and Ownership = Control

    Incidentally, the presence of articles like Hager’s in the Tory-owned media puts the lie to the somewhat conspiratorial idea that they’re dead-set against the left.

    Or it adds to the illusion that their reporting is unbiased. I’ve read some of the studies and done my own research and the conclusion is inescapable – the msm are right-biased.

  62. Lew 62

    DTB: I’m aware of the Murdoch and APN cases, and I’ve seen Outfoxed too. They show that there is some causative link between ownership and editorial content, but not that there is a throughgoing line of editorial argument in all media determined from the top.

    The argument that `Capitalism = Ownership and Ownership = Control’ does have some currency, but broadly speaking it’s limited to a few publications in a stable; the reason for this is that as soon as you take a partisan line, you turn off a large chunk of your target audience. This goes doubly in NZ, where the market is so crowded that a paper has to appeal to as broad a cross-section of the populace as possible just to stay viable. News of the World, The Sun and Fox have already segmented themselves away in that market niche on the reactionary right – they have nothing to lose from holding that line, and in fact they stand to gain from holding it by giving their audience what they want to hear. In NZ nobody has that luxury.

    I’ve never argued the ideological imperative is not there; just that it’s subservient in most cases to the profit imperative.

    Your argument that the presence of contrary voices in the media is to give the `illusion’ of a lack of bias is cynical. The whole idea that there’s an `unbiased’ media is a utopian fallacy. If you talk to any political editor long enough they’ll acknowledge their own and their outlet’s biases; that they exist and broadly what they are. Contrary to what you might think, most people do take these into account – in fact, it’s the main reason why people choose that medium over others.

    I hire a lot of people to work in the media industry. Question 1 in the interview is about what media literacy: what are your media consumption habits? I get a variety of responses, and I don’t judge on the basis of what but on the basis of why they choose particular media. I’m particularly hard on people who choose the echo-chamber approach of only listening to Newstalk ZB, or National Radio, or reading the Dominion Post. An argument like yours which would if taken to its logical conclusion mean something like `I don’t trust the media because it’s all owned by international capitalists’ shows a sorry degree of media literacy indeed.

    From your comments it’s clear to me that you don’t live in an echo chamber – so you clearly see some value in the capitalist-owned media. Why for you, but not for others? Or are you not actually arguing that people ignore the Capitalist Media in favour of the Peoples’ Media (if it even exists)?

    L

  63. bill brown 63

    “…where the market is so crowded that a paper has to appeal to as broad a cross-section of the populace as possible just to stay viable”

    Or it creates a large cross-section of the populace that agrees with it and therefore are more likely to read it to hear what they want to hear.

  64. Lew 64

    BB: Doesn’t follow. There is a feedback component to media consumption (that is – media outlets both create and respond to markets) but it’s not as clear as you claim. In NZ, there aren’t enough eyeballs and earholes for an outlet to simply be able to create a market for itself.

    L

  65. bill brown 65

    Not sure about that. What’s the Herald’s competition in Auckland? If you wake up in the morning and decide to buy a paper, which one do you buy?

    I think this gives the Herald the ability to create a market, I agree attenuated, but not by as much as if there were a competitor.

    If you hit the right note – and anecdotal evidence is that Ak is bluer than the rest of the country – you may be onto a positive feedback winner.

  66. Lew 66

    BB: That’s the thing which explicitly prevents the Herald from creating its own strongly partisan editorial line: the threat that a competitor paper might move in. If the Herald went strongly pro-National, to the point where Labour voters weren’t satisfied with it, there would be an opportunity for Fairfax to launch a competitor paper, or an Auckland Edition of the DomPost, or something else.

    You are right in a sense, though – the Herald can move its editorial line to the right or left as public opinion shifts, as long as it does so without alienating a large enough market share to allow a meaningful competitor in. This is also subject to the feedback effect, so it could stimulate a further shift in political views – it’s a tricky business.

    Internationally speaking, it takes about 1m-1.5m people to support a broadsheet daily newspaper. NZ has four full-scale metros, plus the Waikato Times and various regionals. That’s about saturation; all those papers are working to very tight margins and under very firm competition, even though they’re all-but-one run out of two main offices. And you can still get the DomPost or the ODT in Auckland, or the ODT or the Herald in Wellington. I tried to get a Dom post or a Herald in Christchurch once – no dice there.

    L

  67. bill brown 67

    It is true you can get the Dom Post in Ak. However, even as a DP subscriber, when I’m in Ak I read the Herald.

    On a nationwide level, we may be at saturation, however I do not agree that there is competition for the Herald in AK (or for the dom post in Wellington) They are very city centric papers – even if the Herald has illusions of grandeur with its name!

  68. Lew 68

    BB: Yes, they explicitly aren’t national papers, though the Herald does aspire to be, as you say. But if one gives up ground on either side of the great divide, it’s a small step for the other to become a national daily, and then it’s on. A bit like mutually-assured destruction :)

    L

  69. Draco TB 69

    Lew:
    I see value in all media and have no difficulties with media bias. I can recognize it even as I recognise my own bias. I would prefer it if the media acknowledged their bias as not everyone will recognise it. The hidden aspect of MSM bias leads to times when articles like the Hager article are published and people will point to that article and say ‘see, they’re not biased’ – exactly as you did (Yes, I know that’s not exactly what you said but that’s how it came across). So, the MSM occasionally publish left wing articles which leads to the continuing illusion that the MSM aren’t biased even though 90%+ of the articles they publish have a definite right-wing slant.

  70. Lew 70

    DTB: “90%+ of the articles they publish have a definite right-wing slant.”

    I know this was an off-the-cuff figure and I’ll not hold you to it, but I’d love to see some methodologically sound research into that question; quantitative and qualitative content analysis of the Big 4 over a fair length of time, controlled against how it was at, say, this time in the last National government’s term. I suspect there’d be a correlation, but not as strong as you might think.

    The hard bit, of course, would be getting a good definition of what constitutes a `right-wing slant’.

    This is the root of my problem with people bagging the media as biased, incidentally: nobody does it on the basis of hard data or methodologically rigorous research. I don’t trust peoples’ gut feelings on these matters, especially when there’s such a strong correlation between someone’s own political views and their perceptions of bias against them: the fact that The Standard thinks the media is all biased against the left while KiwiBlog thinks it’s all biased against the right seems to me a good indication that it’s less biased than either group thinks.

    L

  71. Quoth the Raven 71

    coge – I have said this before but I’ll say it again; You can’t blame the P epidemic (if indeed there is one) on Labour. This has been a worldwide problem. It hasn’t mattered whether governments have been more or less left or right. P has been around for a very long time. There wasn’t much of a problem with recreational use until the rise of ephedrine and pseudoehpedrine based cold medicines. The vast majority of these chemicals are made in half a dozen factories around the world and the product sold to big pharmaceuticals or to illicit drug makers. If you want to blame someone for the P epidemic blame those companies. Coming down hard on users is certainly not going to solve the problem and neither is wasting time and effort chasing after each and every pusher (an approach which hasn’t worked for any drug). P is unique in that the source of drug (unlike something that can be grown in your backyard) could be easily targeted and controlled but governements around the world haven’t bothered with going after the source they’ve instead chosen to go after every little pusher or restrict in some way the sale of cold medicines. A much harder and in the end ineffective approach to the problem.

  72. Draco TB 72

    the fact that The Standard thinks the media is all biased against the left while KiwiBlog thinks it’s all biased against the right seems to me a good indication that it’s less biased than either group thinks.

    The problem with this methodology is that real studies have shown that the MSM really are right leaning and the Kiwiblog Right are just spouting what they’ve been told by their leaders – facts be damned. ie, basing a judgement by averaging what two opposing groups think of the same item doesn’t get you close to what the actual truth is.

    I’d point you you in the direction of Political Communications in New Zealand by Janine Hayward and Chris Rudd (eds). It’s not exactly what you’re looking for and probably doesn’t answer the specific question that you’re asking. Bill Rosenberg has an interesting take on it in News media ownership in New Zealand.

  73. Draco TB 73

    the fact that The Standard thinks the media is all biased against the left while KiwiBlog thinks it’s all biased against the right seems to me a good indication that it’s less biased than either group thinks.

    The problem with this methodology is that real studies have shown that the MSM really are right leaning and the Kiwiblog Right are just spouting what they’ve been told by their leaders – facts be damned. ie, basing a judgement by averaging what two opposing groups think of the same item doesn’t get you close to what the actual truth is.

    I’d point you you in the direction of Political Communications in New Zealand by Janine Hayward and Chris Rudd (eds). It’s not exactly what you’re looking for and probably doesn’t answer the specific question that you’re asking. Bill Rosenberg has an interesting take on it in News media ownership in New Zealand.

    EDIT: I may have submitted this twice – the first time it didn’t seem to go through.

  74. Glenn 74

    1. National will usher in a new Dark Age, slashing workers rights and sacrificing babies on the altar of neoliberalism.

    2. National are really no different than Labour.

    Which is it, boys and girls?

  75. Lew 75

    DTB: For one thing, an `I reckon’ based on the fact that blogs on both sides claim the media is against them isn’t a methodology, and I’d never claim it was one.

    I’m not aware of any close content analyses of NZ media which have found a strong rightward bias, which is why I called for some. Rosenberg’s work is good and useful, but it is not such a piece of research, and in my view overemphasises ownership. It doesn’t actually demonstrate a link between ownership and editorial policy; it hypothesises one and asks us to take it as fact. It’s fair enough – actually proving the link would be a great deal of work and he or others may well be in the process of proving it.

    This is ultimately my point – it’s arguable, not set in concrete. And arguing about it is valuable.

    L

  76. Lew 76

    Glenn: False dichotomies are easy.

    L

  77. RedLogix 77

    Glenn,

    Almost right, only as Lew points out you’ve created a false choice. What you should have written is:

    1. National will usher in a new Dark Age, slashing workers rights and sacrificing babies on the altar of neoliberalism.

    2. National will pretend to be no different than Labour, before the election.

  78. There is an old saying “when the world gets a cold NZ gets pneumonia”
    My wife and I are pensioners so are on the Old Age Pension.
    She handles the money expertly. I have tried to get her to give me say an hour a day and I would write the book for her. No way “hose”! Let them find out for themselves.

Links to post

Important links

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • There’s a name for this…
    The latest atrocity in the Australian government's war on refugees: covering up the rate of self-harm and attempted suicide:Harrowing eyewitness accounts from the president of the Australian Human Rights Commission and a team of medical experts say there is a...
    No Right Turn | 24-07
  • Deep State Power Crimes: An Anglo-American News Blindspot in MH-17 Coverage
    MH-17 vs Ukrainian SU-25? Russian Defense Ministry claims a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet was within 5-10 km of MH-17. By Snoopman, 24 July 2014 No Brainer vs No Brainer It’s fascinating to see TVNZ’s One News ask its viewers on...
    Snoopman News | 24-07
  • UK police spied on their critics
    First, it was the family of Stephen Lawrence. Now we learn that the UK police spied on other people seeking justice from them as well:Undercover police gathered intelligence on grieving families who were battling the Metropolitan police for justice, including...
    No Right Turn | 24-07
  • Gerry
    So Gerry's a complete screw up. (Again.) That sounds like something for Gerry to explain all by himself. Have fun, Gerry. Filed under: nationalGerry Brownlee...
    Polity | 24-07
  • An answer to the anti-fluoride critics – in one image
    Click image to enlarge.  The chemical website Compound Interest, is producing a series of infograms to communicate some chemistry.  Here is an excellent one they produced on fluoride. I think it would make a great poster. It is accompanied by...
    Open Parachute | 24-07
  • Everything in moderation
    I’m not sure it really warranted being front-page news (Gaza? MH17? Anyone?) but the announcement of Mike Hosking as the anointed moderator for TVNZ’s political leaders’ debates was always going to lead to a bit of head-scratching. Hosking’s political leanings...
    Boots Theory | 24-07
  • Key and Hauiti – don’t ask, don’t tell
    How much money did National’s soon-to-be-former List MP Claudette Hauiti misspend on parliamentary credit card? We don’t know. As a mere backbencher, her credit card information can’t be OIAd, meaning that they only way we’ll ever find out is if...
    Occasionally erudite | 24-07
  • Exports continue to simplify under National
    Export data released today from Statistics New Zealand today shows a continuing and disturbing trend in the New Zealand economy — we are exporting less high-valued manufactured goods (down 12.5 percent) and less high-valued manufactured goods as a proportion of...
    frogblog | 24-07
  • Mike Hosking is not a Thing That Matters
    TVNZ plans to have Mike Hosking as its moderator for the network’s televised leaders’ debates. To my mind, it’s a stupid choice, but then I’m someone who can’t stand Mr Hosking’s brand of ageing hipster, Paul Henry-esque, elitist minority bashing “broadcasting”....
    Occasionally erudite | 24-07
  • Another botched execution in the US
    Another US execution has gone horribly wrong:The controversy engulfing the death penalty in the United States escalated on Wednesday when the state of Arizona took almost two hours to kill a prisoner using an experimental concoction of drugs whose provenance...
    No Right Turn | 24-07
  • A serial offender
    So it wasn't just a holiday in Oz Claudette Hauiti tried to stick us with:Outgoing National MP Claudette Hauiti admits using her parliamentary charge card to buy petrol for her personal car in a further breach of the rules on...
    No Right Turn | 24-07
  • Should we charge tourists extra for driving on NZ roads?
    There have been a few suggestions recently that international tourists should be paying more to drive in New Zealand, or have to pass a driving test, or things along those lines. Winston Aldworth, the Travel Editor at the Herald, wrote...
    Transport Blog | 24-07
  • Govt gives $107m for Lincoln buildings, $0 for staff
    Hau Taki Haere Vol 17 No 24 The government has agreed to give up to $107.5 million in capital funding toward the rebuilding of Lincoln University’s science facilities destroyed in the Canterbury earthquakes. While welcoming...
    Tertiary Education Union | 24-07
  • Can you really trust your gut? And should you?
    Have you ever been in an interview and thought to yourself “this person just feels […] The post Can you really trust your gut? And should you? appeared first on Connected....
    Potentia | 24-07
  • Non-teaching staff claim to join AIS agreement
    TEU members at Auckland Institute of Studies (AIS) started bargaining with their employer this week and they have want non-teaching members want the chance to bargain too this time. AIS, a large institution with a...
    Tertiary Education Union | 24-07
  • Nurses petition for entry programme for new nurses
    The New Zealand Nurses Organisation has launched a petition to get a nurse entry to practice (NEtP) position for every new graduate nurse. NZNO spokesperson Liz Robinson says New Zealand is facing a significant nursing shortage...
    Tertiary Education Union | 24-07
  • Cleaners, kitchen and services staff want professional development
    Tertiary education cleaners, service staff and kitchen workers need more professional development opportunities says TEU national president Lesley Francey. Her call follows a mini-conference of TEU members working in cleaning, kitchens and services held...
    Tertiary Education Union | 24-07
  • TEU develops strategy to support Māori students
    TEU’s national council wants more action to address the needs of Māori students following information earlier this year that Māori students take significantly longer to pay back student loans. TEU’s Te Tumu Awhina, Margaret Taurere...
    Tertiary Education Union | 24-07
  • From Here To There: How Did Labour Become So Hopelessly Lost?
    No Direction Home: Has Labour ever been so lost? Has the path to electoral victory ever been so obscured? Starting from where they are now, how can they possibly get to where they need to be on 20 September?WRITING ABOUT...
    Bowalley Road | 23-07
  • Internet Mana party highlights
    The Internet Mana party road-trip has been putting to shame National's badly attended meetings by packing halls around the country. Not only is the party party getting people who don't usually engage in politics to participate, the ground swell of...
    The Jackal | 23-07
  • Claudette Hauiti is a thief
    When Claudette Hauiti was appointed an MP just over a year ago, on the back of Aaron Gilmore having to quit because he abused his position, many people were happy to see a person who has a lot of attributes...
    The Jackal | 23-07
  • A da Vinci Code
    I am reminded today of the dreams of Leonardo da Vinci, one of history’s greatest theoretical aviators. “For once you have tasted flight you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards, for there you have been and there...
    Polity | 23-07
  • Fight for 26 weeks paid parental leave to go on
    A bill to extend paid parental leave to 26 weeks has run out of time for parliament to pass it before the election. However, the coalition to support 26 weeks paid parental leave, of...
    Tertiary Education Union | 23-07
  • Gordon Campbell on Gaza and burning the Israeli flag
    One of the selling points in New Zealand’s campaign for a temporary seat on the Security Council is that we have a pluckily independent voice to offer on international conflicts. This image is not entirely self-delusional. When we did occupy...
    Gordon Campbell | 23-07
  • Mike Hosking
    Andrea Vance at Stuff reports: The Labour Party is in a standoff with TVNZ over plans to use presenter Mike Hosking to moderate the live televised leaders' debates. The state broadcaster is refusing to budge, declaring: "Mike is our man."...
    Polity | 23-07
  • An interesting poll from TVNZ. Note some of the VERY left-wing questions!?
    .   . July 19 – Yesterday, I received this poll, sent by TVNZ to my email. What I found very interesting were some of the question relating to issues that have not been discussed – literally – for decades....
    Frankly Speaking | 23-07
  • An interesting poll from TVNZ. Note some of the VERY left-wing questions!?
    .   . July 19 – Yesterday, I received this poll, sent by TVNZ to my email. What I found very interesting were some of the question relating to issues that have not been discussed – literally – for decades....
    Frankly Speaking | 23-07
  • Evidence Mounts For Major Investigation Into Media Links to National Party
    TVNZ just put itself forward as possibly the first Media Company to be investigated for links to the National Party, insisting to use Mike Hoskings in upcoming Leaders debates, a second rate National Party fanatic ‘Journalist’. It wasn’t long ago...
    An average kiwi | 23-07
  • Location affordability in New Zealand cities – is greenfield growth reall...
    Several weeks ago I attended the annual New Zealand Association of Economists conference in Auckland. Geoff Cooper, Auckland Council’s Chief Economist, had organised several sessions on urban issues, and as a result there was a lot of excellent discussion of...
    Transport Blog | 23-07
  • Koretake Paki
    What reason is there for the Crown Law to be appealing a discharge without conviction for a drink driving offence and a theft from a car? --NZ Herald:Korotangi Paki, 19, was let off charges of burglary, theft and drink driving...
    Tumeke | 23-07
  • 2014 – Ongoing jobless tally
    . . Continued from: 2013 – Ongoing jobless tally So by the numbers, for this year, January OceanaGold/Macraes Mine: 146 redundancies Fitzroy Yachts: 100 redundancies OceanaGold: 76 redundancies Tenix: 15 redundancies February Goodman Fielder: 125 redundancies Pacific Steel Group: 70-90 redundancies...
    Frankly Speaking | 23-07
  • 2014 – Ongoing jobless tally
    . . Continued from: 2013 – Ongoing jobless tally So by the numbers, for this year, January OceanaGold/Macraes Mine: 146 redundancies Fitzroy Yachts: 100 redundancies OceanaGold: 76 redundancies Tenix: 15 redundancies February Goodman Fielder: 125 redundancies Pacific Steel Group: 70-90 redundancies...
    Frankly Speaking | 23-07
  • Why red-zoning provincial New Zealand will never be an option
    If you follow the logic of some economists this week who tell us to ‘red-zone’ small towns in New Zealand, then presumably the same logic should apply globally. New Zealand is too small, too far away, with too many old...
    Pundit | 23-07
  • Hot Air: the sorry tale of climate policy in New Zealand
    This guest post is by Alister Barry, producer and co-director of the new documentary Hot Air, which will be premiered in Wellington next week. Hot Air is screening in the New Zealand International Film Festival around the country over the...
    Hot Topic | 23-07
  • Laid-back Tennis Court – Lorde (Diplo’s Andre Agassi Remix)
    ...
    The Paepae | 23-07
  • Paula Bennett highlights some “loopy rules”
    Hello everyone. I’m Local Government Minister and chief National Party sass-machine Paula Bennett. I’ve been asked by MyThinks to write more about our plans to review and reject all of those stupid and loopy rules that many of our tiny...
    My Thinks | 23-07
  • Election news. Where is it
    So where’s the election news? Main stream media seems more obsessed about David Cunliffe’s holiday than the policies that his party is promoting. If I want to read about where he is vacationing and why, then let’s read it in...
    Closing the Gap | 23-07
  • Sorry – it’s a complicated word
    The art of saying sorry – it’s a tough one. Apologise like Lou Vincent, and win plaudits left, right and centre. Apologise like Aaron Gilmore, and everything just gets worse. It’s been an odd time lately for apologies. David Cunliffe of...
    Occasionally erudite | 23-07
  • Robert Ellis’s apocalyptic vision of Auckland
    This blog has often written about Auckland’s 1950s-era motorway development plan, which transformed the city in fundamental ways. New Zealand painter Robert Ellis was one of the first to grasp the significance and character of that transformation. His Motorway/City series,...
    Transport Blog | 23-07
  • Dear LEGO employees…
    Hi. My name is Ian and I'm a campaigner with Greenpeace. I'm also a new dad and a big fan of LEGO. She's a little young now, but I know that in a few years my baby girl will be...
    Greenpeace NZ blog | 23-07
  • Feed: Fulminating and fermenting
    Longtime readers of this site may be aware of my occasional bursts of fulmination about overhopped stunt beers -- and my calls for New Zealand craft brewers to produce more sessionable brews in the classic best bitter style I think...
    Public Address | 23-07
  • More stat-juking
    There were more allegations in Parliament today that the government is juking the stats, with Andrew Little pointing at a report from the Taranaki Daily News that a Crown prosecutor had claimed:"There was one occasion in 2012 when it was...
    No Right Turn | 23-07
  • A cleaner, fairer, smarter New Zealand
    Russel Norman- General debate speech, 23 July 2014   Together, it is possible to build a cleaner, fairer, smarter New Zealand. A New Zealand in which our rivers are clean enough to swim in and our precious beaches are safe...
    frogblog | 23-07
  • Using Ministerial Inquiries to Close Down Debate
    As a young MP in the British House of Commons in the late 1970s, I rapidly became aware that half the political stories in Fleet Street originated with the Press Association’s indefatigable political correspondent, Chris Moncrieff. I was regularly button-holed...
    Bryan Gould | 23-07
  • Prison hulks
    In the 18th and 19th centuries, Britain pioneered a new type of atrocity: the prison hulk. Faced with a shortage of jail space, they turned to imprisoning convicts on former warships. The prisoners were subjected to appalling conditions in an...
    No Right Turn | 23-07
  • Challenging Britain’s panopticon
    Last week, the British establishment rammed through new "emergency" surveillance and data retention laws, with the collusion of all three major parties. Now those laws are being challenged in the courts:Two leading Westminster civil liberties campaigners, David Davis and Tom...
    No Right Turn | 23-07
  • Systemic Realignment.
    The chaotic state of contemporary international affairs demonstrates the serious limitations of constructivism and idealism as theoretical frameworks for the analysis of global macro-dynamics. The former claims that the construction of international institutions helps universalise common values and mores, thereby...
    Kiwipolitico | 23-07
  • Member’s Day
    Today is a Member's Day, the last of the Parliamentary term. But thanks to government filibustering over the past few months, instead of seeing the third reading of Sue Moroney's Parental Leave and Employment Protection (Six Months' Paid Leave) Amendment...
    No Right Turn | 23-07
  • Socially helpful photoshopping
    This one is close to my heart. It involves a man who lost his infant daughter Sophia to severe disease. She was only 6 weeks old. Sophia’s father Nathan had never seen her face free of wires and tubes. So...
    Polity | 23-07
  • Why are the electric trains so slow?
    In the first week or two of the Onehunga Line’s switch to electric trains there were major issues with the trains keeping to timetable, apparently due to overly conservative speed restrictions being put in the trains as part of their...
    Transport Blog | 23-07
  • “They put Maori centre stage” – Harawira
    “I’m sorry I can’t be at parliament for the valedictory speeches of Tariana Turia and Pita Sharples” said Hone Harawira, MANA Leader and MP for Tai Tokerau, ”but I’d like to add my own best wishes as they reach the end...
    Mana | 24-07
  • ACT trying to have it both ways on zoning
    ACT Party candidate David Seymour’s campaign against changes to school zones in the Epsom electorate looks hollow given his party’s commitment to the abolition of school zoning altogether, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins says. “It’s disingenuous for David Seymour to...
    Labour | 24-07
  • Interest rate rise will hit the regions
    The latest interest rate rise will hit the fragile regional economies of  New Zealand and hurt exporters by putting more upward pressure on the exchange rate, says Labour’s Finance spokesperson David Parker.  “The regions are already hit by dropping  export...
    Labour | 24-07
  • Burning the flag or accepting the evil
    Burning the Israeli flag in Auckland in protest over the murder of innocent civilians in Gaza is nothing to be ashamed of” said MANA Leader and Tai Tokerau MP, Hone Harawira. “Calling for both sides to stand down when one side...
    Mana | 23-07
  • Photo op disguises abysmal failure
    John Key’s opening of four Housing NZ units in Bexley today is nothing more than an insincere photo op designed to hide the Government’s failure to rebuild the housing stock destroyed by the earthquakes, says Labour’s Associate Housing spokesperson Poto...
    Labour | 23-07
  • TAXPAYER UNION “outrageously stupid”
    Jordan Williams, Executive Director of the Taxpayers’ Union says a MANA billboard “appears to have been funded by taxpayers”, and calls it “an outrageous use of taxpayer money”. “But the only thing that is outrageous, is how outrageously stupid Jordan Williams was...
    Mana | 23-07
  • Green Party launches Solar in Schools policy
    The Green Party will help schools install solar and save money on their power bills by investing $20 million into solar PV systems in schools. The $20 million is expected to:Help around 500 schools install solar over three yearsResult in...
    Greens | 23-07
  • Extent of job losses at Invermay remain hidden
    Despite growing concern in the agriculture and science sectors, both AgResearch management and the Minister responsible are continuing to hide the true extent of job losses at AgResearch’s Invermay campus, Labour’s MP for Dunedin North David Clark says. “Science and...
    Labour | 23-07
  • Tōku reo, tōku oho oho, tōku reo, tōku mapihi maurea – MANA launches ...
    “MANA is launching its te reo Māori policy this morning ahead of the first reading of the government’s Māori Language Strategy Bill this afternoon”, saidMANA deputy leader and candidate for Waiariki, Annette Sykes. “MANA’s policy is based on a love...
    Mana | 23-07
  • Connectivity Upgrade to close digital divide
    Labour will close the digital divide with its Connectivity Upgrade to ensure all New Zealanders can be part of a growing, more connected economy and have the right to access quality broadband, Labour Leader David Cunliffe says.  “The digital revolution...
    Labour | 23-07
  • New parents deserve support – Labour will deliver
    ...
    Labour | 23-07
  • National refuses meeting with Maui’s advocates
    National has refused a briefing from a group of Maui's dolphins experts, whose research shows 80 per cent of New Zealanders want greater protection for the critically endangered dolphin, the Green Party said today.Dolphin campaigner Gemma McGrath and marine scientist...
    Greens | 23-07
  • MANA Tamaki send a challenge to Labour
    “Labour should set the agenda and purposely do something positively controversial once a week”, said MANA candidate for Mt Albert, Joe Carolan. “A good start would be for all Labour Auckland MPs and members to join the Justice for Palestine...
    Mana | 23-07
  • We must act to save our dolphins
    A new report makes it clear for the urgent need to protect Maui’s and Hector’s dolphins while arguing  it is clear that there is no need for further research, says Labour’s Conservation spokesperson Ruth Dyson.  “Labour backs the public call...
    Labour | 23-07
  • School told to manipulate national standards data
    Parents can have little confidence in the Government’s National Standards after an Auckland school was told to manipulate its data so it added up, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. “Valley School in Pukekohe was advised in an email from the...
    Labour | 23-07
  • Regional economies must have tailored plans
    News that up to 114 jobs could be lost from Fonterra’s Canpac plant in Hamilton reinforces the need for a government plan to build resilient regional economies, Labour’s MP for Hauraki-Waikato Nanaia Mahuta says. “The Canpac site has effectively responded...
    Labour | 23-07
  • Auditor General slams Shared Services project
    The Auditor-General’s Office could not have been more damning about the 18 months spent on the Central Agency Shared Services (CASS) project at the Finance and Expenditure Committee this morning, says Maryan Street, Labour’s State Services spokesperson.  ...
    Labour | 23-07
  • Fonterra job losses a massive blow to Waikato
    The potential loss of up to 114 jobs from Fonterra’s Canpac plant in Hamilton is a massive blow to the Waikato region which has already lost hundreds of jobs, Labour says. Labour’s Social Development spokesperson and Hamilton-based list MP Sue...
    Labour | 23-07
  • Basin flyover decision an opportunity for capital
    The decision to reject the proposed flyover at the Basin Reserve must be taken as an opportunity to properly fund Wellington’s transport future and must not be used as an excuse to take resources away from the capital, Wellington Labour MPs...
    Labour | 22-07
  • National out of touch with the regions
    John Key is out of touch with regional New Zealand if he believes tinkering with council regulations will restore opportunities to small towns, Labour Leader David Cunliffe says. “While the regions are crying out for sustainable growth and job opportunities,...
    Labour | 22-07
  • Flyover rejection a victory for sustainable transport
    The rejection of the proposed Basin Reserve flyover by a Board of Inquiry is a victory for sustainable transport in Wellington and paves the way for other alternatives to be given a fair hearing, Wellington Labour MPs Grant Robertson and...
    Labour | 22-07
  • Reo Māori Policy Launch
    MANA will be launching its Reo Māori policy at 10am Thursday 24 July, at Matangireia (the old Māori Affairs Select Committee room at Parliament). We will also be addressing our concerns regarding the Minister of Māori Affairs Māori Language Strategy...
    Mana | 22-07
  • Basin Flyover decision victory for common sense
    The Green Party welcomed the Environmental Protection Authority's draft decision announced today not to allow the $90 million Basin Reserve flyover in Wellington to proceed."Both popular and expert opinion opposed the flyover. The proposal was expensive, unnecessary and would have...
    Greens | 22-07
  • Loss Leading could destroy Kiwi lamb’s reputation
    Meat companies that supply supermarkets and sell New Zealand lamb as a loss leader in the United Kingdom should lose their access to this valuable quota market, said Labour’s Primary Industries spokesperson Damien O’Connor. “Our reputation as a Lamb producer...
    Labour | 22-07
  • Ae Marika! 22 July 2014
    The big storm has gone, but the damage that it did and the saturation levels that it reached meant that smaller storms quickly overwhelmed roading, and water-flow systems again in the north. And although certain individuals are talking up the...
    Mana | 21-07
  • 2014 Roger Award nominations now open
    The Roger Award is for The Worst Transnational Corporation Operating in Aotearoa/New Zealand in 2014 Nominations are now open please visit the website to nominate the worst TNC in Aotearoa. You will need to include reasons why you think your...
    Mana | 21-07
  • Labour will revive the regions with new fund
    The next Labour Government will co-develop Regional Growth Plans for every region of New Zealand and will invest at least $200 million in a fund to create breakthrough opportunities for jobs and sustainable growth, Labour Leader David Cunliffe says....
    Labour | 21-07
  • Speech to Local Government New Zealand
    Speech to the Local Government New Zealand Conference 2014 Read our full regional development policy Download Introduction Early in my time as an MP I went for a long walk on a windswept Kare Kare beach with Waitakere mayor Bob Harvey. We talked...
    Labour | 21-07
  • Stop Israeli State Terror – Rally and March this Saturday 26th July, Aote...
     The humanitarian crisis in Gaza is getting much worse and the world is marching in unprecedented numbers. New Zealanders spoke out strongly last Saturday with a march of 5,000 people in Auckland (see picture below) – the biggest march ever...
    Mana | 21-07
  • NZ needs to assist UN with aid for Gaza
    The New Zealand Government should support the United Nation's efforts to raise money to assist humanitarian aid for the people of Gaza, the Green Party said today.The United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) has made a...
    Greens | 21-07
  • INTERNET MANA ROAD TRIP- LEG 2
      WAIKATO / TARANAKI / MANAWATU-WANGANUI  Tuesday July 29th, 6pm | RotoruaDistinction Hotel, Fenton Ballroom, 390 Fenton Street, Rotorua  Wednesday July 30th 6pm | HamiltonWaikato University, Price Waterhouse Coopers Lecture Theatre, Gate 7, Hillcrest Rd Hamilton  Thursday July 31st, 6pm |...
    Mana | 21-07
  • Road fix needed now, not later
    Northland’s roading system is in chaos and needs fixing fast, Labour List MP Kelvin Davis says.  “According to NZTA’s 10 year funding data every area of Northland has had a decrease in NZTA funding since 2008...
    Labour | 20-07
  • KiwiSaver innovations needed to build wealth
    The innovative changes to KiwiSaver suggested by the Financial Services Council today will be seriously considered by Labour as part of plans to make KiwiSaver universal, Labour’s Finance spokesperson David Parker says. “Universal KiwiSaver is an essential part of Labour’s...
    Labour | 20-07
  • Greens announce 20 hours free ECE for two year olds
    The Green Party today announced that its key social platform for this election will be to tackle child poverty and inequality by ensuring every child in New Zealand has enough to thrive.The Green Party will make a series of policy...
    Greens | 20-07
  • MANA Pasifika Says NO To Discrimination
    Vice Chairperson of MANA Pasifika James Papali’i  feels for Ms Tupou and her children after they were served with trespass orders from their  local swimming pool in new market. With no warning or explanation from the pool staff Police ordered...
    Mana | 20-07
  • MANA Movement policy release – Economic Justice – John Minto
    Address notes from Mana Economic Justice Spokesperson and co-vice President John Minto to Economic policy launch in Kelston – 2pm, Sunday 20 July 2014. Reducing inequality and giving everyone a fair go MANA Movement’s policy prescription for a rich man’s...
    Mana | 20-07
  • One-sided reporting on the Middle East Conflict
    The following was sent to New Zealand Herald, Fairfax Media, Radio New Zealand, Television New Zealand, TV3, Radio Live and ZB Network. We are writing to all of you because there are well established patterns of reporting which seem to have been adopted by New Zealand...
    Mana | 20-07
  • New President for MANA Movement
    Lisa McNab, MANA President, and Annette Sykes, outgoing MANA President and candidate for Waiariki Lisa McNab was officially passed the mantle of MANA President in a special ceremony at Potahi Marae in Te Kao this week, following her unanimous election into the...
    Mana | 20-07
  • Te Reo Māori a doorway to opportunity
    A Labour Government will ensure more of our children have the opportunity to learn te reo Māori by encouraging the learning and use of it in schools, Labour’s Māori Affairs spokesperson Nanaia Mahuta says....
    Labour | 19-07
  • Work numbers not all they’re cracked up to be
    The Government's figures on the numbers of beneficiaries don't add up, Labour's Social Development spokesperson Sue Moroney says."Paula Bennett keeps saying 1500 people are going off the benefit into work every week, yet today she announced just 16,000 fewer people...
    Labour | 18-07
  • Flood relief for National voters first
    “The flooding in Tai Tokerau has hammered the north and impacted hundreds of families right across the region,” said MANA Leader and Tai Tokerau MP, Hone Harawira. “It’s bitterly disappointing to see that the first response from this National government...
    Mana | 18-07
  • Don’t contract out your loyal cleaners SkyCity3
    SkyCity should put aside its proposal to contract out its cleaning staff and not be lured by the prospect of washing their hands of these essential jobs and leaving them to the world of third party contracting, Labour’s Associate Labour...
    Labour | 18-07