<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Standard &#187; workers&#8217; rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thestandard.org.nz/category/economy-and-work/workers-rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thestandard.org.nz</link>
	<description>The New Zealand labour movement used to have its own newspaper. A group of us thought that now might be a good time for it to be digitally reborn: The Standard v2.0 - now in a new format The Standard v3.0</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:00:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Save our Port</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/save-our-port/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/save-our-port/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bunji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=74741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>It's slipped down the news agenda but is about to come back up it: The Ports of Auckland Dispute. Tony Gibson is wasting our money on his union-busting campaign that will result in reduced profits  for ratepayers. <a href="http://www.saveourport.com/">Sign up</a> to make him see sense.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/save-our-port/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>186</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congrats on raising the minimum wage John</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/congrats-on-raising-the-minimum-wage-john/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/congrats-on-raising-the-minimum-wage-john/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 00:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bunji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minimum wage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=74727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Shame you couldn't raise it to a living one though. The working poor will appreciate the extra $1000 per year coming this April, but it still won't cover their bills...</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/congrats-on-raising-the-minimum-wage-john/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>66</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>POAL sleaze</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/poal-sleaze/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/poal-sleaze/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>IrishBill</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=74492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I've heard that POAL has private detectives following union officials around and taking photos.</p>
<p>I'd imagine that's where "scoops" like <a href="http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2012/01/not-involved/">this</a> are coming from.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/poal-sleaze/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marryatt must go</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/marryatt-must-go/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/marryatt-must-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 17:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob parker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[christchurch council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tony marryatt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=74323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most Kiwis have had no payrise, if they're lucky enough to have kept their jobs, in the past few years. Yet Christchurch City Council CEO Tony Marryatt has kept on getting pay rises on his obscene salary, <a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/6332887/Marryatts-ratings-fell-but-salary-kept-rising">even as his job performance has declined</a>. Now the arrogant bastard is saying he'll keep $34,000 he doesn't deserve unless the elected council 'behaves'. There is no justification for this madness. Sack him.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/marryatt-must-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ports of Auckland and casualisation</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-and-casualisation/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-and-casualisation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 23:57:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FairnessAtWork</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casualisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=74132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CTU President Helen Kelly talks about the Ports of Auckland and the effects of casualisation on workers and workplace health and safety.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-and-casualisation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ports of Auckland vs 400,000 wharfies</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-vs-400000-wharfies/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-vs-400000-wharfies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Tony Gibson with his $750,000 salary and his senior managers on half a million each may have thought they had it easy beating up on some $27 an hour workers so that they could increase profits by cutting wages but they failed to calculate that those 330 workers are backed by 400,000 brothers and sisters around the world.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-vs-400000-wharfies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>116</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Local board members support wharfies</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/local-board-members-support-wharfies/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/local-board-members-support-wharfies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 18:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[auckland supercity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The travesty of the Port of Auckland dispute is that we have a publicly-owned company trying to slash its workers' pay so that it can try to undercut another majority publicly owned company that has already slashed wages, the only winners being the foreign shipping lines. Well, here's some of our representatives standing up for Auckland workers.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/local-board-members-support-wharfies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>There is no alternative</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/there-is-no-alternative/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/there-is-no-alternative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 18:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zetetic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Work conditions in the Right's ideal world:</p>
<ul>
<li>Stevedores only paid while actually unloading containers</li>
<li>Firemen only paid when fighting fires</li>
<li>Emergency doctors only paid while saving lives</li>
<li>Soldiers only paid if under fire</li>
<li>All Blacks only paid while handling the ball/tackling</li>
<li><del>MPs only paid while in the House</del></li>
<li><del>CEOs not paid while at their Papamoa beach-house</del></li>
</ul>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/there-is-no-alternative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>182</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1951 it ain&#8217;t, for now</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/1951-it-aint-for-now/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/1951-it-aint-for-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 19:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[greens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some have compared the Port of Auckland dispute to the 1890 waterfront dispute, 1913 general strike, and 1951 lockout. They want Labour and the Greens to get involved. Actually, this is no 1951 redux. The POA fight is just about one company trying to undercut another. The net effect on New Zealand is zero. The last thing the workers need is Labour creating an excuse for National to attack them.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/1951-it-aint-for-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>120</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Meet the wharfies and their families</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/meet-the-wharfies-and-their-families/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/meet-the-wharfies-and-their-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Standard</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[class war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Port of Auckland and its National Party allies would have you believe that the stevedores are monsters for not be willing to accept a 20% pay cut so that POA can try to undercut Port of Tauranga (where's the 'national interest' in that, again?). But, let's hear from these workers, and their families, as they struggle to protect their livelihood.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/meet-the-wharfies-and-their-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>157</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report shows ports not to blame for freight costs</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/report-shows-ports-not-to-blame-for-freight-costs/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/report-shows-ports-not-to-blame-for-freight-costs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 21:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Eddie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privatisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73717</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The Productivity Commission reports that freight costs are 25% higher here than in Australia and freight costs as a % of cargo value has risen in recent years. Their solution? Make the public and port workers poorer by privatisation and casualisation. Of course, those are ideological goals, not solutions to the freight cost issue, which has nothing to do with ports.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/report-shows-ports-not-to-blame-for-freight-costs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stick a fork in Port management, they&#8217;re done</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/stick-a-fork-in-port-management-theyre-done/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/stick-a-fork-in-port-management-theyre-done/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 18:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maritime union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A leaked Ports of Auckland strategy document shows their goal is to reduce the stevedores' wages by 20%. They were planning to manufacture a crisis even before the stevedores' collective expired. They've been rumbled breaking the law by not bargaining in good faith. Their political support will now evaporate. They should cut their losses, and a deal with the workers, now.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/stick-a-fork-in-port-management-theyre-done/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>264</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why does the Right think port workers&#8217; pay should be cut?</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/why-does-the-right-think-port-workers-pay-should-be-cut/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/why-does-the-right-think-port-workers-pay-should-be-cut/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Henderson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ports of auckland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>National high flyer Jami-Lee Ross, Ports of Auckland's chief shill, and Fran O'Sullivan all joined the fray over the port dispute yesterday. How does their line that the workers are overpaid marry with the Port's claim that they're offering pay rises? Does the Port project its wage bill would rise or fall if its offer were to be accepted? And what to make of this 'national interest' line?</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/why-does-the-right-think-port-workers-pay-should-be-cut/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ports of Auckland wage numbers</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-wage-numbers/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-wage-numbers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 08:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lprent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There has been some interesting material floating around in comments and on facebook about the Ports of Auckland waterside disputing workers wages. Looks like we are starting to get some more information outside of the right wing nut job sites. Ultimately the information has to be provided by the Ports of Auckland because they are the only organisation that holds the wages data across employees. But the figures provided by the P0A (the 91k)  include overtime payments, shift payments, superannuation subsidies, medical insurance subsidies and hardly constitute a normal wage that the employee would see..</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/ports-of-auckland-wage-numbers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>136</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1000 member challenge</title>
		<link>http://thestandard.org.nz/1000-member-challenge/</link>
		<comments>http://thestandard.org.nz/1000-member-challenge/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 22:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jenny Michie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[workers' rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[council of trade unions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Together]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thestandard.org.nz/?p=73643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>My challenge (as part of my new life as expert communications / campaign / recruitment consultant to the stars) over the next 6 weeks is to encourage 1000 union members to bring their family into the union family for just $1 a week. That’s 1000 people who are already members of a union affiliated to the CTU to sign up their own family and whanau members to Together</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thestandard.org.nz/1000-member-challenge/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

