web analytics
The Standard
Advertising

GM lobby can butt out

Written By: - Date published: 10:22 am, September 5th, 2012 - 53 comments
Categories: farming, food, leadership, science - Tags:

Genetically modified (GM) food is a contentious issue worldwide. Personally I’m not as opposed to GM as many on the left, but I think that there are perfectly good reasons that NZ as a country should remain GM free. And we should certainly stand up and say so in the face of inept and blatant lobbying like this:

GM panel warns NZ it could miss bus

New Zealand has been issued an ultimatum by GM heavyweights – change our tune on genetically modified food or watch our exporting lifeblood lag behind the rest of the world.

Or watch our exporting lifeblood soar as we provide to big anti-GM market segments.

The warning was delivered yesterday by a high-powered panel including the US Government’s bio-tech trade envoy and the vice-president of US giant DuPont Agricultural Biotechnology.

The panel pitched crop-enhancing bio-technology as the world’s best hope of feeding a population expected to double by 2050 – and said that if New Zealand failed to buy in, our crops could become quickly out-dated.

Yes, American agri-business would love to get us dependent on their products for our food production. And that makes sense how? Piss off.

But Jack Bobo, a senior adviser for biotechnology to the US State Department, claimed not doing so could hurt us. “New Zealand has a choice – will it continue to meet its own needs and the needs of others, or will it slowly become a net importer of foods?

And at that point I had a good laugh and stopped paying attention. NZ a “net importer of foods”? You need to make your threats just a tiny bit believable guys.

Organic NZ spokeswoman Debbie Stanwick dismissed the panel’s warning as “scaremongering, especially when most of the world’s leading trading partners, such as China, have already legislated to protect their own crops from GE”.

End of story.

53 comments on “GM lobby can butt out”

  1. tc 1

    ‘Or watch our exporting lifeblood soar as we provide to big anti-GM market segments ‘ you’ve nailed it, we got the isolation and environment to be very successful in this segment.

    Premium niche product getting the margins, like our top end wine does, with plenty of markets. Once people wake up to the poor nutritional and other factors (chemicals etc) this segment will boom.

    Boss (S1, E5 I think) had a swipe at it in an episode with a farmer standing in his destitute fields as the seeds don’t propogate forcing them back each season to purchase from the only provider, Monsanto I believe. The politicians response was honest and sad.

  2. Jared 2

    You are under the assumption that GE is only beneficial for business and is detrimental to society and the environment. This is wrong. Unfortunately Agribusiness like Monsanto have used GE appallingly and created a stigma against it. There is nothing wrong with the technology only how it is employed.

    Would you be surprised to learn that diabetics are still alive today because of GE? 30 years ago the increasing numbers of diabetics almost depleted the world supply of insulin. Insulin used to be derived from pigs, but this was problematic since some people were allergic to it and it also carried viruses from pigs to humans. Then scientists engineered a E. coli bacterium which secretes human insulin and viola! Mass produced insulin with no side-effects. This has been going on for 30 years.

    Also, GE technology is being used to make “Golden rice”, which contains Beta-carotene. Beta-carotene is the precursor to vitamin A. In the third world child blindness is a major problem because of the lack of vitamin A which is required for sight. By making golden rice, and easily grown staple with beta-carotene in it, scientists hope to help prevent blindness from developing from a lack of vitamin A.

    These are two examples of how GE has been used properly. I think we can use GE to our advantage, and anyone who thinks it is unhealthy or unnatural obviously has no knowledge of the science behind it.

    In the future GE may become necessary to develop crops which can withstand climate change… I wouldn’t be so ready to dismiss it.

    • r0b 2.1

      Would you be surprised to learn that diabetics are still alive today because of GE?

      I wouldn’t be surprised at all. As per the original post, I am not universally opposed to GM. I’m quite happy to take it on a case by case basis. But in the case of NZ agriculture I think that any large scale move to GM crops should be resisted.

    • Lanthanide 2.2

      Bacteria producing a specific medicine is quite different from crops with increased resistance to herbicides that allows farmers to spray more herbicides on the crops to kill off the weeds.

      • Jim Nald 2.2.1

        Indeed. GE/GM medicine or laboratory-produced and controlled pharmaceutical is one thing and GE/GM food, crop or agriculture is quite another thing.

        Tell the globally corporatised GM food lobby to keep their greedy fingers off our food production and distribution.

        They ran the line more than a decade ago that GM food would feed the poor and hungry around the world. But then they got shown up for, putting it politely, being quite contradictory. They have been driving for world domination and super-profiteering by wanting to push technologies like terminator or suicide seeds down our throats and GM merchants such as Monsanto have been trying to make people stomach their so-called “non-toxic” Roundup weed spray.

        Post-script: Having said that, the practices of the Big Pharma industry have been questionable enough, revealing damning track record in the court of law, and pharmas do not need any more help to be further tainted by associating with the GM food lobby.

      • insider 2.2.2

        We have been getting that resistance through selective breeding for thousands of years. GE is not a requirement, so it’s not helpful to connect the two as if it were.

        I’m not sure I see an inherent difference in creating a GM product that people inject into their bloodstream and creating a GM product that people chew and swallow. Can you point it out for me?

      • blue leopard 2.2.3

        Yes, the distinction between the development of medicine and food need to be made very clear.

        “Insertion of genes into the genome can also result in unintended effects, which need to be reduced/eliminated by selection, SINCE SOME OF THE WAYS THE INSERTED GENES EXPRESS THEMSELVES IN THE HOST OR THE WAY THEY AFFECT THE FUNCTIONING OF THE CROP’S OWN GENES ARE UNPREDICTABLE. This may lead to the development of unknown toxic/allergenic components, WHICH WE CANNOT ANALYZE for and seriously limiting the selection criteria. Current testing methods need radical improvements.”

        http://www.actionbioscience.org/biotech/pusztai.html

        It is a cowboy mentality to proceed with the introduction GM modified crops into our food chain without the ability to test for the toxicity of this technology.

    • weka 2.3

      Golden rice isn’t an example of appropriate technology. It’s an example of hiding the stupid, as well as justifying western greed by using non-western poverty. 

      Have a look at this picture.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Vitamin_A_deficiency.PNG

      Notice how India features? That’s the country that’s fighting agribusiness for the rights to grow its own multiple varieties of rice and other grains. That’s right, agribusiness is undermining the ability of local people to grow their own food. 

      Vandana Shiva, an Indian anti-GMO activist, argued the problem was not that the crop had any particular deficiencies, but that there were potential problems with poverty and loss of biodiversity in food crops. These problems are aggravated by the corporate control of agriculture based on genetically modified foods. By focusing on a narrow problem (vitamin A deficiency), Shiva argued, the golden rice proponents were obscuring the larger issue of a lack of broad availability of diverse and nutritionally adequate sources of food. Other groups have argued a varied diet containing foods rich in beta carotene such as sweet potatoleafy green vegetables and fruit would provide children with sufficient vitamin A. However Professor West (Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health) has argued that foodstuffs containing Vitamin A are either unavailable, or only available at certain seasons, or that they are too expensive for most poor families in underdeveloped countries.
       

      Because of lacking real-world studies and uncertainty about how many people will use golden rice, WHO malnutrition expert Francesco Branca concludes “giving out supplements, fortifying existing foods with vitamin A, and teaching people to grow carrots or certain leafy vegetables are, for now, more promising ways to fight the problem”.
       
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_rice 

    • Clashman 2.4

      GM crops have largely been, at best a dissapointment, at worst a disaster. There are a myriad of reasons NOT to go down this path, economic, enviromental and social.

      “Farmers in South Africa have suffered millions of dollars in lost income due to the failure of their genetically modified (GMO) corn to produce kernels. The three varieties of plants look lush and healthy from the outside, but when the husks were pulled back there are no kernels. Monsanto’s GMO corn was planted on 82,000 hectares of farmland, an amount that equals over 202,000 acres.”

      Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/025992_Monsanto_food_GMO.html#ixzz25YMFAPWg

      “soya growers in Argentina and Brazil have been found to use twice as much herbicide on their GM as they do on conventional crops, and a survey by Navdanya International, in India, showed that pesticide use increased 13-fold since Bt cotton was introduced.”

      “Ten common weeds have now developed resistance in at least 22 US states, with about 6m hectares (15m acres) of soya, cotton and corn now affected.”
      http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/oct/19/gm-crops-insecurity-superweeds-pesticides

      “Industry figures confirm GM food is a commercial flop in Europe”
      “Widespread public opposition and environmental concerns expressed by several European governments, scientists and farmers have made GM food a commercial flop in Europe,”
      http://www.greenpeace.org/eu-unit/en/News/2012/GM-figures/

      Ill stop here but lets face it, I could list page after page after page of these sort of reports.
      Maybe in the future when (if) all the problems have been overcome we can look at it, but not now.
      Its a genie that is very difficult, if not impossible, to put back in it’s bottle once released.

      • Draco T Bastard 2.4.1

        …and a survey by Navdanya International, in India, showed that pesticide use increased 13-fold since Bt cotton was introduced.”

        Interesting considering this article in the Guardian:

        Bt cotton is one type and now makes up 95% of China’s vast plantations. Since its introduction in 1997, pesticide use has halved and the study showed this led to a doubling of natural insect predators such as ladybirds, lacewings and spiders. These killed pests not targeted by the Bt cotton, in cotton fields, but also in conventional corn, soybean and peanut fields.

        Of course, it’s entirely possible that not killing all insects with pesticides would have resulted in the same benefits without the GE. As I say, Nature been doing this a lot longer than we have and is a hell of a lot better at it.

        • Clashman 2.4.1.1

          Yep initially pesticide use will drop but…
          “Over time, scientists have learned, initially rare genetic mutations that confer resistance to Bt toxins are becoming more common as a growing number of pest populations adapt to Bt crops.”
          http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/06/120620133359.htm

          “Rootworms from several fields were collected, and their larvae, reared in the laboratory, were introduced to Bt maize. Turns out that the larvae whose parents came from fields with a longer history of growing Cry3Bb1 maize exhibited a higher survival. In fact, the survival correlated nicely with the number of consecutive growing seasons of this type of maize”
          http://www.science20.com/curious_cub/resistance_gm_crops-81313

    • mike 2.5

      Comparing the safety and effectiveness of insulin made in a lab for diabetics, with the safety and effectiveness of allowing biotech corporations to genetically modify crops, the food supply of a population, makes no sense.

      Do biologists have perfect knowledge? No. Can anyone foresee all of the unintended consequences which might result from GE foods at all stages from production to long term health? No. Can anyone fully understand and predict the unintended consequences of interactions between these crops and other species in the eco-system? No. Do profit-driven multi-national corporations have a documented history of lying about the safety of their products? And of using fear and scare tactics to sell products that people don’t need? Yes and yes.

      Is the above a good enough reason to err on the side of caution and extend a big fat f*ck off middle finger to the US Government’s bio-tech trade envoy and the vice-president of US giant DuPont Agricultural Biotechnology when they fly over to our country to give us a buy in to our irreversible product, which is making your food obsolete, or die scaremongering ultimatum talk?

      Yes Jared, it really is.

      • mike 2.5.1

        “…give us a ‘buy in to our irreversible product, which is making your food obsolete, or die’ scaremongering ultimatum talk?”

        That sentence was not very clear, maybe the above will clarify.

  3. Dv 3

    >>These are two examples of how GE has been used properly. I think we can use GE to our advantage, and anyone who thinks it is unhealthy or unnatural obviously has no knowledge of the science behind it.

    BUT the problem is you cant trust them!!!

    • Jared 3.1

      How exactly? Where do you get your information to come to a conclusion that you can’t trust GE?

      If you base it entirely on Monsanto then you have a point, they are corrupt and have ruined GE tech.

      However, you rely on technology derived from science so at what point do you draw the line to say “I don’t trust this”? My experience is that people will only say that when they do not directly benefit from it. Example: Cars are a huge source of pollution, and are wholly unnatural things. Yet we quite happily use them and accept them because they benefit us, but they are more damaging that any GE tech.

      • Dv 3.1.1

        Jared It is not GE i don’t trust, it is the spin and manipulation by the big companies such as Monsanto as you elaborated.

        I was not clear I agree.

    • kiwi_prometheus 3.2

      “anyone who thinks it is unhealthy or unnatural obviously has no knowledge of the science behind it.”

      Remember when nuclear energy was the promise of infinite clean cheap energy forever and ever?

      Or when thalidomide was a wonderful new drug that cured mum’s morning sickness?

      Genetic engineering of food production is in the interest of the likes of Monsato. What are all the consequences going to be of smashing down the genetic evolutionary barriers between species genera, kingdoms and domains? Can the scientists really be so sure its all so fantastic.

      There’s too many human beings, 10 billion coming up. We need to depopulate fast. But all the scientists want to do is find ways of producing more food, thereby encouraging further overcrowding on this rock.

      • Jared 3.2.1

        And yet Nuclear technology continues to evolve, have you read about Liquid thorium reactors? Or nuclear fusion.

        Your examples are valid but you neglect to mention the successes of technology, like vaccination. Without it we would still have Polio and Smallpox. If you focus on mistakes you forget all the good.

        “Genetic evolutionary barriers”. You do realize there is no such thing. DNA is a promiscuous mistress. DNA is the same in all organisms, be it plant, fungi, bacteria or human. DNA is shared between different bacterial species all the time, as well as between plants and fungi, fungi and bacteria…this list goes on. The human genome is FULL of viral DNA, over 10% of the whole human genome is viral in origin. o\One of the genes controlling placenta formation “ERVWE1″ is actually viral in origin, but was incorporated into the human genome eons ago.

        • kiwi_prometheus 3.2.1.1

          “DNA is shared between different bacterial species all the time, as well as between plants and fungi, fungi and bacteria…this list goes on.”

          What, like taking a “glow in the dark” bit of jelly fish DNA and sticking it in other critters and plants to make them glow?

          I don’t think so. What scientists are doing is way way beyond what happens through nature.

          “incorporated into the human genome eons ago.”

          Yeah, exactly, over gazillions of years of evolution. Not a scientist chucking it altogether like a tossed salad, on a boring Sunday afternoon.

          “If you focus on mistakes you forget all the good.”

          The problem is the exact opposite, the mistakes are erased from memory in our technocratic civilization, to be repeated again and again.

          Can you remember, Jared, a grinning Ronald Reagan proclaiming that “Progress is our best product!”.

      • mike e 3.2.2

        Don’t worry some sort of disease will wipe us out and only the genetially modified will survive

        • kiwi_prometheus 3.2.2.1

          Yeah like that SARS in the lab – they made it an air born variation as research “to see how it might mutate”.

    • Clashman 4.1

      We produce enough food for the planet now, its politics that causes famines not a lack of food.
      The claim in the Herald article that we need GM crops because the global population will double by 2050 is actually laughable, food is going to be the least of our problems if we get to 12billion people.

      • weka 4.1.1

        Or if we get to 2050.

      • blue leopard 4.1.2

        @ Clashman

        “We produce enough food for the planet now”

        Absolutely, and it makes my blood boil that the pitch that promote-GM-food-industry STILL
        includes the fallacious argument: “the world’s best hope of feeding a population expected to double by 2050″ What bollocks!

        I had thought that this argument regarding GM and “providing food for the starving” was well discredited 20-30years ago when the last round of promotion was evident in our country.

        The first 2 sentences of WFP “Causes of Hunger” page:

        1. “Food has never before existed in such abundance, so why are 925 million people in the world going hungry?”
        2. “In purely quantitative terms, there is enough food available to feed the entire global population of 7 billion people. ”

        http://www.wfp.org/hunger/causes

        One would hope that the population were well aware of the simple fact that Clashman relays by now.

  4. blue leopard 5

    Interesting to note the incredible DOUBLE STANDARDS when comparing the topic that Penny Bright introduced to Open Mike yesterday regarding a hospital refusing high-dose intravenous treatment of Vitamin C on patients’ requests and this issue regarding GM FOOD.

    One standard disallows a treatment that is highly likely do no harm at the very worst, yet could improve health for the patient. Information available indicates that some people have benefitted from the treatment in the very hospital that is refusing it. I take it this is based on the understanding that this treatment has not gone through rigorous scientific tests that prove that it has more than a placebo effect.

    The other standard allows the introduction of food that has an entirely new constitution prior to rigorous scientific tests being developed that can test for whether this food is introducing new toxins into our food chain. The issue regarding testing for this toxicity is very very complex-not only involving direct toxicity, also involving the potential toxicity of the combined effect of the added constituent with every other constituent of the food product.

    This move to allow such into our food chain is nothing more than a cowboy approach that I thoroughly disapprove of. It is highly immoral.

  5. Murray Olsen 6

    The way genetic engineering of food plants happens, I can’t see it as anything but an attempt to control the world food supply. Imposing terminator seeds on a population which lives by subsistence agriculture, such as in large parts of the 3rd world, is an absolute obscenity. The corporates have largely achieved control of energy, they’re trying with water and education, they control the financial system and communications networks already. We’d have to be idiots to give them control over our food supply, which is exactly why NAct will fight tooth and nail to do it.

    • blue leopard 6.1

      I view it as the inevitable unthought-out consequences of the ad hoc system we have developed which encourages monetary profit and the pursuit of narrow self interest to be the guiding forces of our system and society.

      It is yet another symptom of money-which is meant to be the servant-becoming the master.

    • Draco T Bastard 6.2

      We’d have to be idiots to give them control over our food supply, which is exactly why NAct will fight tooth and nail to do it.

      QFT.

    • Clashman 6.3

      That’s the ultimate goal Murray.

  6. feijoa 7

    Absolutely. This is not about feeding the world. It is about money, and Agribusiness OWNS the genome of these things.
    We shouldn’t touch the stuff

  7. yeshe 8

    I’ve said it here before, and repeat it again — best we beware the hidden terms of the TPP. We may need to call again upon the perfection of Te Tiriti to save us.

    Weeds in USA are now so resistant to the oceans of Roundup used on food crops, the use of — get this Kiwis — the widespread use of 2 4 D has now been approved for use on food crops in USA due to failures with Roundup !! Yes, 2 4 D. And the D stands for Dioxin. Simply unbelievable what these agri-chemical companies will foist upon our fragile planet. And millions and millions of acres of once-productive farmland has been abandoned due to superweeds.

    Watch for the report to appear about how much it is costing us not to have GM crops — remember this is the study that Nick Smith denied exioted when he didn’t even know it was being done within his own department !!

    This is truly the worst, most dangerous and deleterious guvmint New Zealanders have ever elected.

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      No water, so no corn or wheat grown in US therefore no need for 2 4 D. Perfect.

    • blue leopard 8.2

      Further to Yeshe’s comment re TPPA:

      “When New Zealand’s chief negotiator was asked what were “the top local impediments” to concluding a TPP agreement, the first item he listed was the nation’s GMO regulations – and cited Monsanto’s unhappiness with these.”

      http://www.sustainabilitynz.org/news_item.asp?sID=236 (pdf)

      **Nice to know that Monsanto is privy to the TPPA negotiations where the NZ public are not**

      • yeshe 8.2.1

        Thx Blue Leopard — your ** nice-to-know statement — what a superb question to be asked in the House.

        And anyone wanting to be truly spooked — search Morgellon’s Disease .. more than 40,000 confirmed cases in USA, and NIH and CDC admit they have no idea what it is. Alternative practitioners understand .. most are certain the painful and multiple hair-like strands growing out of peoples’ skin are protein strands directly related to proteins inserted into GM food crops. Watch for proof to appear.

        “Citovsky’s team took scanning electron microscope pictures of the fibres in or extruding from the skin of patients suffering from Morgellons disease, confirming that they are UNLIKE ANY ORDINARY NATURAL OR SYNTHETIC FIBRES “.(see Fig. 1, assembled from Citovsky’s website [8]).

        http://www.i-sis.org.uk/agrobacteriumAndMorgellons.php

        Search Google for Morgellons images but maybe wait until after breakfast.

        and
        …..Sufferers include folk singer Joni Mitchell, who has complained of ‘”This weird incurable disease that seems like it’s from outer space… Fibres in a variety of colours protrude out of my skin: they cannot be forensically identified as animal, vegetable or mineral. Morgellons is a slow, unpredictable killer – a terrorist disease. It will blow up one of your organs, leaving you in bed for a year.”

        So it’s new, frightening and profoundly odd. But if you were to seek the view of the medical establishment, you’d find the strangest fact about this disease: morgellons doesn’t exist.

        http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2011/may/07/morgellons-mysterious-illness

  8. Glg 9

    If GM growers cannot contain the pollen from their plants, there we have a problem. And thats just what the US has. NZ had to change regulations to allow GM contaminated corn into NZ, ie less than x% contamination doesn’t count as contamination.
    Also there is evidence that GM pollen is implicated in bee hive collapse, although this could be the dodgy insecticides that use on GM crops.
    Continued high use of Roundup eventually kills the soil bacteria, then plants do less well, then weeds gain resistence, more weedkiller, farmers in India now have very high levels of suicide, GM led them straight into poverty.
    GM is not safe for the environment, and Manufacturers hate it that Europe wants nothing to do with their crap, NZ has to be smart enough to do the same.

    • yeshe 9.1

      Sad that the longest straight line in the known universe is the one running between our NAct guvmint and the word “smart”. Terrifying.

  9. BLiP 10

    .

    Call this latest kerfuffle “inept and blatant lobbying” if you must but, really, its just a distraction from the fact that its “game-over”. Know the history, observe what’s happening overseas, and read between the lines and its apparent that, rather than “lobbying”, we are seeing an announcement of the inevitable. Genetically engineered food and its concomitant frankenstein farming was introduced by deceit ten years ago. thanks Labour. National Ltd™ has further assisted the process by trashing any public regulatory enforcement and monitoring. Our kiwifruit producers know all about that aspect. Today, all National Ltd™ has to do is stand silent while the multinationals finish the job. Now its just a matter of selling the idea to the public without letting on that its fait accompli. Hey presto, dire TINA threats and PR pipedreams about health/economic benefits based on voodoo science and make-believe economics.

    Protest, piss and moan all you like but it might be a better idea to dig in your own veggie garden, and sooner rather than later. Hopefully, “already existing domestic production” will not be made illegal, although the distribution, even gratis, of any produce probably will be.

  10. Tamati 11

    It seems to me that the left is at risk as being seen as anti-science, as is the Republicans in the US. How can you be so skeptical of science, on one hand, then adamant about it when talking about global warming? – You can have it both ways!

    Why does New Zealand have to choose between GE and non-GE anyway? Surely individual farmers can make their own decisions, as they are ones who are taking   the risks, and will reap the rewards.

    • blue leopard 11.1

      @ Tamati

      Because if your neighbour chooses to have a GM crop on their land then your plants may become contaminated; meaning that we are not entitled to simply choose as we see fit-one person’s choice is going to effect another’s freedom to choose.

      • Carol 11.1.1

        Not to mention , the corporatisation of farming that’s been going on….

      • Tamati 11.1.2

        Sure, but we could easily employ mechanisms to prevent or reduce this. And it’s not likely to be a problem for livestock, only crops. So a blanket ban would seem premature.

        • blue leopard 11.1.2.1

          @Tamati,

          Whom gets to choose whether it is the GM food producers who are enclosed in a giant plastic bubble (to ensure no contamination) or the people wishing to keep their food uncontaminated?

          (I wouldn’t worry about spending too much time on thinking about the answer to this question, we won’t get the opportunity to choose now that it is clear that Monsanto has more influence on our successive governments than ordinary NZers.)

          • Tamati 11.1.2.1.1

            Producers choose what they wish to grow. Consumer buy and consume what they wish. (And there are plenty of organic options out their already) 

            • Carol 11.1.2.1.1.1

              Tamati, that just sounds naive and out of touch with the reality of the dictatorship of the corporates in the “market”.

            • blue leopard 11.1.2.1.1.2

              +1 Carol

              Tamati, Both types of producers do not get to choose what they wish to grow in this scenario when contamination is a reality. This leads one person’s choice to be mutually exclusive to the others.

              I suggested a giant plastic bubble in order to avoid the contamination and I’m asking you:

              Who gets to choose whether they live inside the bubble or in the open air-the GM Food growers-to-be, or the Real Food growers?

              • Tamati

                GM producers would obviously pay for and provide the mechanism to prevent spread of genetic material from one farm to the next. It terms of live stock, a common farm fence would be fine. 

                Most GM seed is hybrid anyway, so incapable of reproducing. 

                • Colonial Viper

                  Wait until those seed killing genes spread.

                • blue leopard

                  @Tamati

                  How would GM producers prevent negative effects of genetic material when it is not yet known what the negative effects of GM Food is (therefore how does one protect oneself from it)?

                  “The SSC highlights the rapidly increasing complexity of the changes in plants arising from the insertion of a variety of genes and a variety of combinations of genes. Current evaluation methods regarding human and animal health and the environment, suffer from different limitations when dealing with the variety of issues which might emerge from the development and introduction of new GMPs..”

                  p13 ~European Commission report on Risk Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants (2000)

                  Are you aware that those wishing for this business to be expanded are also against food being labelled to indicate that it contains GM?

    • Colonial Viper 11.2

      Tamati said

      Surely individual farmers can make their own decisions, as they are ones who are taking the risks, and will reap the rewards.

      BS

      We’re all taking the risk because we are all living in the same biosphere. Get with the programme.

Important links

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

1 2 3 7

  • Time for NZ to prohibit the killing of great apes
    That ban was widely hailed, and spurred efforts in other countries to get similar bans. However, apes are still being exploited, abused and killed, both in captivity and in the wild. Examples of cruelty, neglect and abuse abound. Apes are… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    11 hours ago
  • Auckland building consents: Tragic
    The only word to describe the latest building consent figures for Auckland is ‘tragic’, Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says. “Whatever the Government is doing to address the Auckland housing crisis, it is clearly not working. ...
    12 hours ago
  • A whiff of a new biosecurity scandal?
    A pest which could create havoc for New Zealand’s horticulture and agriculture sector must be as much a focus for the Government as hunting out fruit flies, Labour’s Biosecurity spokesperson Damien O’Connor says. “While the Ministry for Primary Industries is… ...
    14 hours ago
  • Government shrugs off health sector crisis
    Despite new evidence showing that cuts to health spending are costing lives the Government continues to deny the sector is struggling, Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King says. “Health services in New Zealand are in crisis. ...
    1 day ago
  • Parata lowered the bar for failing charter school
    When Hekia Parata became aware that the Whangaruru charter school was experiencing major problems her first action was to drop standards by reducing the number of qualified teachers they had to employ, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins has revealed. “Hekia… ...
    1 day ago
  • National not being straight about the economy
    John Key and Bill English need to be straight with New Zealanders about the damage their failure to diversify the economy is doing, after new figures show export growth plunged due to a collapse in dairy exports, says Grant Robertson.… ...
    2 days ago
  • Mind the Gap
    This week the International Monetary Fund released a report on the wider economic value in closing the gender pay gap. When even the bastions of free-market economics start to raise concerns about gender pay gaps, we have to realise how… ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie MP
    2 days ago
  • Labour will hold National to parental leave promise
    Labour will hold National to its promise to increase the support given to new parents of premature, multiple birth and babies born with disabilities, Labour’s paid parental leave campaigner Sue Moroney says. "I am naturally disappointed that after battling for… ...
    2 days ago
  • It was all just pillar talk
    Steven Joyce’s confession that he can no longer guarantee a pillar-free design for the New Zealand International Convention Centre shows the Government has abandoned its dream of creating an ‘iconic’ ‘world-class’ structure, says Labour Economic Development spokesperson David Clark. “Steven… ...
    2 days ago
  • Australians move on offshore speculators
    John Key might want to have a quiet word with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott about Canberra's just-announced crack down on offshore speculators when he visits New Zealand this week, Labour's Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says."Tony Abbott's centre right government… ...
    2 days ago
  • Government at odds on overseas driver crashes
    National backbencher Jacqui Dean has spoken out about overseas driver crashes, putting herself at odds with Prime Minister John Key who is on record as saying it’s not a big issue, Labour’s Transport spokesperson Phil Twyford says. “I’m not surprised… ...
    2 days ago
  • Human Rights and the Palestine Crisis
    Last week I heard two Palestinians speak at Wellington events about the ongoing crisis in their country. Samar Sabawi spoke to a full house about the history of Palestine and gave us a lucid and disturbing account of the situation… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 days ago
  • Time to take real care of our kids
    An Amnesty International report has once again criticised New Zealand’s track record on looking after our kids, Labour’s Children’s spokesperson Jacinda Ardern says. The annual report, which looks at global human rights abuses highlights not only the fact that high… ...
    2 days ago
  • John Key wrong about Labour’s war vote
    John Key’s desperate claims that the former Labour Government didn’t put combat troop deployment to a Parliamentary vote are simply wrong, Labour’s Defence spokesperson Phil Goff says. “It was disgraceful that the Prime Minister ran rough shod over democracy and… ...
    3 days ago
  • Māori language bill needs work
     It is clear that the first draft of the Māori Language Bill was about structures and funding rather than the survival of te reo Māori, Labour’s Māori Development Spokesperson Nanaia Mahuta says.  “Labour is pleased that the Minister of Māori… ...
    3 days ago
  • Report proves troubled school shouldn’t have opened
    The long-awaited release of an Education Review Office report into Northland’s troubled Whangaruru charter school proves it should never have been approved in the first place, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins says. “This report identifies problems with absenteeism and disengaged… ...
    3 days ago
  • Reply to PM’s statement on deploying troops to Iraq
    “The decision of any Government to send troops to a conflict zone is a very serious one, and it is right that this House takes time to consider it, to debate it, and, ideally, to vote on it, but we… ...
    3 days ago
  • Minister must take action on death trap slides
    Workplace Relations Safety Minister Michael Woodhouse must take urgent action to ensure inflatable amusement rides don’t become death traps for children, Labour’s spokesperson on Labour Relations Iain Lees-Galloway says. “No one wants to stop kids having fun, but horror stories… ...
    4 days ago
  • Manus Island and the New Zealand Government
    This week the Greens have participated in awareness activity about Manus Island, the refugee camp on an island in Papua New Guinea where Australia dumps asylum seekers. John Key says that he has every confidence in the Australian Government’s claim… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    1 week ago
  • Election Inquiry – Getting accessible voting on the agenda
    James Shaw has been doing a series of blogs on the Election Inquiry into last year’s general election.  I thought this was a great opportunity to raise an issue very dear to me – accessible voting. Last year’s general election… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    1 week ago
  • RMA changes no solution to Christchurch housing
    Housing will continue to be a big issue in 2015. The latest Consumer Price Index, released last month, shows both good news and bad news on the housing front. After years of being the most expensive place to build a… ...
    GreensBy Eugenie Sage MP
    1 week ago
  • Saving kokako in South Auckland’s Hunua Ranges
    It is amazing that you can hear the song of the endangered North Island kokako in South Auckland’s Hunua Ranges, less than 50 kms from the central city. A heavy schedule of policy workshops at the Green Party’s Policy… ...
    GreensBy Eugenie Sage MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Let’s not turn a blind eye to human rights
    The Cricket World Cup has just opened in New Zealand, and it’s an opportunity for us to shine on the world stage. International sport can be a chance for us to build relationships with other countries, and examine what it… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Its Just Not Cricket
    This week it was my privilege to work with Sri Lankan Tamil communities in this country and host Australian journalist and human rights advocate Trevor Grant. I knew a bit about Trevor from his biography but I didn’t know just… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Time for NZ to #BeCrueltyFree
    The Government is about to progress the final stages of the Animal Welfare Amendment bill. This will be our last opportunity to get changes made to improve the bill to ensure a better outcome for animals. I have put forwards… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    2 weeks ago
  • We want access!
    Access to buildings is a big issue for many New Zealanders. It looks like that, due to the hard work and persistence of people in the disability community, the Government may finally be starting to take access to buildings seriously.… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens call on Super Fund to divest from fossil fuels
    The Green Party today called on the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (the Fund) to divest from fossil fuels, starting immediately with coal. The call was accompanied with a new report, Making money from a climate catastrophe: The case for divesting… ...
    GreensBy Russel Norman MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Young Kiwis’ housing crisis
    Shelter is a fundamental human need along with food, water and clean air. All humans need adequate shelter; it’s a human right. Warm, safe, stable accommodation is critical for young people to be able learn and grow and just be.… ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie MP
    2 weeks ago
  • On the River Patrol in Te Tai Tokerau
    Last Wednesday, I went on a tour of some of Northland’s rivers with  Millan Ruka from Environmental River Patrol as he monitored water quality throughout Te Tai Tokerau. The dry conditions meant we couldn’t use the boat but we visited… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Opening of Parliament 2015
    Russel NormanOpening of Parliament Speech February 2015 Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou katoa. A brief history of climate change What a summer! It's been hot, even here in Wellington, hotter than any summer I can remember. All… ...
    GreensBy Russel Norman MP
    2 weeks ago

  • Politicians’ pay increases
    “An increase of 3.5% in the minimum wage compared with 5.5% increase for politicians is appalling. It is another example of the wealthy looking after themselves and showing no regard for the poor” says Peter Malcolm, National Secretary of Income… ...
    8 hours ago
  • Invade Mexico for Guacamole Reserves Instead
    #WagePeaceNZ, founded yesterday, along with all 7 of its Twitter followers, demands that New Zealand invade Mexico for its Guacamole reserves in lieu of sending 143 troops to Iraq. ...
    8 hours ago
  • Australian Prime Minister to thank New Zealand fire crews
    The contribution of more than 400 New Zealand firefighters in helping battle bushfires across the Tasman over the past 14 years will be acknowledged tomorrow during a visit by Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to an Auckland fire station. ...
    8 hours ago
  • A simple question for Winston Peters: Where do you live?
    "Winston Peters has set a new record, being economical with the truth only hours into his campaign," claims Northland ACT candidate Robin Grieve. ...
    8 hours ago
  • Northland doesn’t need yesterday’s man
    "It's great that Winston Peters is finally taking an interest in Northland. But frankly we don’t need yesterday’s ideas from yesterday’s men in our region," ACT Northland candidate Robin Grieve said today. ...
    9 hours ago
  • Children’s Day – 365 days a year
    Barnardos wants New Zealanders to celebrate Children’s Day on 1 March, and to recognise the effort it takes to raise great kids over all 365 days of the year. ...
    10 hours ago
  • Will MPs Put Taxpayers’ Money Where Their Mouth is?
    The Taxpayers’ Union is calling the bluff of MPs and has written to each one asking whether they will be accepting the backdated pay increases announced yesterday. Taxpayers’ Union Executive Director, Jordan Williams, says: ...
    12 hours ago
  • Fonterra Sneaks Round The Corner
    Fonterra’s subsidiary Glencoal has put its plans for an open cast mine on SH2 at Mangatangi on hold indefinitely. The local community is celebrating. They worked very hard with submissions on all the impacts of coal mining that you are… ...
    12 hours ago
  • How Free Is Free Speech?
    How Free Is Free Speech: Do we recommend unconstrained freedom of expression? The Chief Human Rights Commissioner, David Rutherford, will be In Conversation with Noel Cheer at St Andrew’s on The Terrace, Wellington on Tuesday 3 March 2015 from 12:15pm… ...
    12 hours ago
  • No military deployment in Iraq: Nationwide peace vigils
    Peace vigils calling for increased humanitarian assistance and diplomatic support for Middle East peace processes, and opposing the military deployment to Iraq, will be held around the country at 5pm on Thursday, 5 March, coordinated by Peace Movement ...
    13 hours ago
  • Message of Nationwide Day of Action :‘TPPA? No Deal!’
    “An amazing 22 towns and cities across New Zealand have rallied to the call for a nationwide day of action against the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) on 7 March”, according to Chantelle Campbell who is coordinating the national events ...
    14 hours ago
  • New Group Against Amalgamation
    A group of Wellingtonians have launched a campaign to resist the Greater Wellington Regional Council’s scheme to amalgamate Wellington’s existing councils. The group, Best Little Capital, has been formed by Wellingtonians Michael Moughan and Digby ...
    15 hours ago
  • Stark contrast between benefit increase & MPs’ pay rise
    Stark contrast between benefit increase & MPs’ pay rise Media release Friday 27 February 2015 Earlier this week Social Development Minister Anne Tolley announced that benefits will increase by 0.51% on 1 April. Yesterday MPs were granted a 5.5% ...
    15 hours ago
  • Sensible Sentencing challenges MPs to refuse pay rise
    “I realise this will take courage and we extend an open challenge to all MPs – or any MP from any party – to have the courage to be the first to stand up and publicly denounce this nonsense and… ...
    15 hours ago
  • Labour Party President Elected
    Labour Party President Elected Nigel Haworth has been elected as Labour Party President following a vote conducted among the constituent organisations and elected representatives of the Party. This follows the resignation of Moira Coatsworth in December 2014. ...
    15 hours ago

Removed at the request of The Daily Blog.
Public service advertisements by The Standard

Current CO2 level in the atmosphere