Greens call for new tools, QE to save jobs

Written By: - Date published: 9:51 am, October 7th, 2012 - 328 comments
Categories: exports, greens, jobs, monetary policy, russel norman, tourism, trade - Tags:

40,000 manufacturing jobs gone in four years. Manufactured exports in free-fall. Tourism revenue collapsing. If that’s not a crisis, what is? Why is the government going to do? Nothing. Nothing. On Q+A, Russel Norman put forward a solid proposal: lower the OCR, new tools to stop housing booms, and quantitative easing to pay for Christchurch and rebuilding our disaster fund.

Finally, some action. Something to grab on to.

The Right will howl but what right do they have to howl? They are complete economic failures. They have prayed to their failed god while jobs are lost every day.

What the Greens are proposing is essentially what all our trading partners are doing. They’re driving their currencies down – and it’s working for them: QE stopped a depression in the US, it has held the euro together, it has made the Japanese economy surprisingly strong. And it’s worked by holding their currencies down and pushing ours up.

So, what are we going to do about it? Fight fire with fire. It’s the only way. The alternative is what National is doing – kissing goodbye to 200 manufacturing jobs and 1,000 Kiwis every week.

And putting the money into the Christchurch rebuild and the Natural Disaster Fund is smart. It lessens the inflationary impact and it means we are covered for both the current rebuild and the next disaster. (National’s ‘plan’ is to have the Natural Disaster Fund, which pays for your EQC claims back to $6 billion in 2041! $6 billion wasn’t enough in 2011, and what happens if Wellington goes in five years?)

I look forward to John Key, when he gets back from fellating Mickey Mouse, explaining why the best path for New Zealand is losing 200 manufacturing jobs a week and leaving our disaster fund empty so that money traders can make a profit off us.

[Update: On Q+A, James Cameron is saying that John Key, having promised us that he wasn’t going to offer more money to Hollywood did just that. Instead of lowering the dollar, like the Greens would do, Key’s plan is to give Hollywood more taxpayer money to compensate them for the high dollar.]

[Update: This piece from Bernard Hickey is relevant. r0b]

328 comments on “Greens call for new tools, QE to save jobs ”

  1. Colonial Viper 1

    go for it. Using QE to rebuild communities and infrastructure is absolutely the way to go. Especially if it is done through a government run and operated public works programme, cutting out the dead loss of private sector profits.

    • Brent Kingi 1.1

      Yeah sure Pal, and we can skip and prance in the meadows with the unicorns too.

      QE, the way to go? What nonsense is that? If printing money is a way to go, to build up communities and infrastructure (jobs, etc), then why hasn’t it worked in America? They tried QE1, it failed, tried QE2 and Operation Twist, that failed, and now the FED has unleashed QE3, aka QE-infinity, and that with absolutely no doubt in my mind, will fail too.

      The Keynesian idea of simply printing ourselves into prosperity is one of such foolishness, I cannot honestly believe that there is serious discussion about it. If printing money to stimulate economic growth is a solution, then why don’t the poorest countries in the world simply do it too.

      No, an economy will never genuinely grow without real production and savings taking place, and this requires government to get the hell out of the way, with all the stifling regulations and taxes, and allow the economy grow by itself. But, if we continue to follow the Keynesian ideas of government intervention, and economic stimulation through central bank easing, then things will only get worse.

      Printing money for expansion in money supply, inflation by definition, will only lead to higher prices in food and energy, making it even harder for those on low and fixed incomes. I wish it were as simple as printing money, but it’s not.

      • AmaKiwi 1.1.1

        Quantitative Easing (QE) has failed everywhere.

        Re-build Christchurch; Yes.

        Print money; No.

        Human civilization is drowning in debts multiplying like cancer since WW II. The total debts can NEVER be repaid. Read the news. Europe, USA, China, Japan. Everyone is dying from excess debt.

        My mistake. The people in the streets of Greece, Italy, Spain, Portugal, are celebrating, not rioting.

      • Colonial Viper 1.1.2

        Yeah sure Pal, and we can skip and prance in the meadows with the unicorns too.

        Banks print money into circulation all the time. QE is simply the Government reasserting its own rights over the sovereign currency of a nation.

        QE, the way to go? What nonsense is that? If printing money is a way to go, to build up communities and infrastructure (jobs, etc), then why hasn’t it worked in America?

        They didn’t follow Steve Keen’s suggestion: QE needs to be directed at ordinary people, not at investment banks who simply end up hoarding the capital.

        The Keynesian idea of simply printing ourselves into prosperity is one of such foolishness

        It’s not an idea of Keynes; this is simply right wing PR bullshit.

        No, an economy will never genuinely grow without real production and savings taking place, and this requires government to get the hell out of the way, with all the stifling regulations and taxes

        More right wing bullshit; out of control private sector ticket clipping banks have driven the GFC.

        I wish it were as simple as printing money, but it’s not.

        Of course its not. The money has to go into paying down debt and creating productive infrastructure and economic capabilities. This requires a government with vision and a mission – something National sorely lacks.

        BTW stop reading Ayn Rand and Greenspan mate. It rots your brain.

        • halfcrown 1.1.2.1

          “BTW stop reading Ayn Rand and Greenspan mate. It rots your brain.”

          Well said, I could not say it better

        • Richard McGrath 1.1.2.2

          You still haven’t answered Brent’s question – if printing money was the answer, why aren’t all the poor countries doing it? Hang on, Zimbabwe did, didn’t they, there’s a picture of a hundred trillion dollar note on Whale Oil’s blog. They really paid debt off and rebuilt infrastructure there, didn’t they?

          • McFlock 1.1.2.2.1

            If surgery is the answer, why isn’t everyone stabbing themselves with knives? Oh, that’s right, some guy slit his wrists, that really worked well for him, didn’t it?
                      
            No one answer can solve every problem in the world, especially if you examine it in exceptionally low resolution.

      • Poission 1.1.3

        The FED has unleashed QE3, aka QE-infinity, and that with absolutely no doubt in my mind, will fail too.

        What the QE program allowed for was the high interest fixed mortgages to be undone.This allowed the borrowers to reduce the amount of interest being paid and apply it to debt reduction.At present the enhanced repayment program will reduce the total managed debt by 25% in one year.

        Similarly on shoring,and structural change in the US infrastructure and manufacturing will reduce (by import substitution) US dependence in a wide number of areas,as they are now fully coming onstream 2013-2014 there will be a decrease in the US trade deficit by around 250 billion pa.

        • Colonial Viper 1.1.3.1

          What the QE program allowed for was the high interest fixed mortgages to be undone.This allowed the borrowers to reduce the amount of interest being paid and apply it to debt reduction.At present the enhanced repayment program will reduce the total managed debt by 25% in one year.

          I’m a bit iffy on this. IMO it might work if:

          1) Banks are willing (or required) to forgive or alter instruments like ARMs.
          2) It is assumed that the debt was ever close to repayable in the first place: for many “NINJA”, “low doc”, “subprime” loans that was not the case, and a 25% reduction in debt is not going to make any difference.
          3) Housing values have not fallen so far that homeowners are still underwater even after a 25% reduction in “total managed debt”.
          4) The homeowner has a job and a regular income left.

          Of course QE has become a tool to just swap private debt for public debt; overall no deleveraging has occurred. Also, because consumers (understandably) appear reluctant to take on new net debt, the US economy remains stuck in the doldrums.

          The other problem is that of the securitization of the debts in question as well as ownership uncertainty affecting the status of millions of mortgages for which the paperwork was never properly completed or tracked.

          Similarly on shoring,and structural change in the US infrastructure and manufacturing will reduce (by import substitution) US dependence in a wide number of areas

          I’ve read some reports of onshoring moves. Even if some of these jobs are coming back in the front door, they are still leaking out the back door at a similar or greater rate.

          Record numbers on food stamps this year.

          • Poission 1.1.3.1.1

            “Housing values have not fallen so far that homeowners are still underwater even after a 25% reduction in “total managed debt”

            One of the mortgage lending data companies suggested that prepayments for underwater owners (owing at least 20% more then equity) have been the highest of prepayment repayers.

            There was a recent article recently were Australians were around 18 months ahead in their mortgages ( They have been repaying at same rates as cuts have come) around 125 billion shock absorber .

            http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/borrowers-in-a-hurry-to-pay-off-mortgages-20120925-26ilm.html

            this is not to say QE has a place in NZ,it may not.The asymmetry in the tax system needs addressing first.As does non resident property investment (what useful purpose this serves I am yet to be convinced on)

            The on-shoring of industry in the US,has a number of factors not least structural changes on both US infrastructure,and advanced new technology process(especially in steel manufacturing)

            Here the Chinese advantage of low labour cost 1.75 ph China.vs 34.50 ph US disappears on freight alone for the low value Chinese product.The new US plants (a lot smaller and less energy intensive, producing more advanced products that are required in new technological products.

            The main growth US seems to be in the small/medium companies unconstrained by the overweight bureaucracy of the large corporate manufacturers.The production curve is
            ahead of growth at present.

            One of the benefits of the low interest regime in the US is that the Federal gvt interest bill is also down around 100 billion,the lowest since 2005.

            http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-10-04/u-s-interest-cost-falls-to-lowest-since-2005-as-debt-soars-1-.html

            • Colonial Viper 1.1.3.1.1.1

              One of the benefits of the low interest regime in the US is that the Federal gvt interest bill is also down around 100 billion,the lowest since 2005.

              That’s great, but it also comes with two major downsides:

              1) Savers and pension funds are getting smashed. They were expecting regular, safe 4% and 5% returns on funds invested and now they are lucky to get 1%. The real life effect of this is that people have to postpone retirement and save far more than they ever thought they needed to.

              2) Asset and commodity price speculation by those who control capital is rampant. Cheap money, easy to leverage, is pouring into commodities and derivatives pushing prices higher and higher (not withstanding the correction which is underway in the markets presently as the gravity of the situation the real economy is facing becomes clearer).

              The on-shoring of industry in the US,has a number of factors not least structural changes on both US infrastructure,and advanced new technology process(especially in steel manufacturing)

              This is all well and good but is it going to be enough to offset losses in other areas of the non-farm payroll numbers? We have to wait and see, but shadowstats has true US unemployment closer to 20% than to 10% and this has been the case for a long time now.

              There was a recent article recently were Australians were around 18 months ahead in their mortgages ( They have been repaying at same rates as cuts have come) around 125 billion shock absorber .

              This is the positive spin, of course. The other way of looking at this is that Australians are much less confident of ongoing income growth than they used to be and are paying off debt and saving ASAP.

              This can be seen in the dismal retail numbers at Christmas and throughout the year which has become commonplace.

              Next time you have friends visit Brisbane, the Gold Coast or the Sunshine Coast. Ask them to give you their impressions of how the economy is going over there compared to 4-5 years ago.

              From what I have heard its pretty grim.

      • Draco T Bastard 1.1.4

        No, an economy will never genuinely grow without real production and savings taking place, and this requires government to get the hell out of the way, with all the stifling regulations and taxes, and allow the economy grow by itself.

        And that conclusively proves that you have NFI WTF you’re talking about.

        The banks print money, the money goes to building up productivity (well, some of it, most of it goes into housing) thus growing the economy (in theory). Unfortunately, the banks charge interest on the money that they printed making it impossible to pay back and causing a massive drag on the economy (otherwise known as a dead weight loss). “Savings” in this situation actually causes the economy to decline as the bank “loans” the money into existence and paying it back is destroying that money thus decreasing the amount of money in circulation.

        Now, if the government printed the money instead and charged no interest on it then a) it can actually be paid back and b) it actually builds up society rather than grinding it to a halt as is happening now.

        • Georgecom 1.1.4.1

          Growth due to real production (in the real economy) and savings would be something novel. Not something promoted by Neo-liberalism however (the economic genre favoured by National and Act). Neo-liberalism gave us growth in the financial economy and ‘savings’ mechanisms called strange and mysterious names. All came apart in 2008.

          Seems like its neo-liberalism that needs to get out of the way and allow for some solutions to be developed rather than continuing the cycle of failure.

          • Draco T Bastard 1.1.4.1.1

            Seems like its neo-liberalism that needs to get out of the way and allow for some solutions to be developed rather than continuing the cycle of failure.

            Yep. Neo-liberalism is, from what I can see, nothing more than justification for the continued exploitation of society by the rich.

      • Mikesh 1.1.5

        If printing money is not the way to go, then perhaps someone should inform the trading banks.

      • prism 1.1.6

        Brent Kingi 1.1

        No, an economy will never genuinely grow without real production and savings taking place, and this requires government to get the hell out of the way, with all the stifling regulations and taxes, and allow the economy grow by itself. But, if we continue to follow the Keynesian ideas of government intervention, and economic stimulation through central bank easing, then things will only get worse.

        So you would keep going as we are now. Bat down any suggestion about a better economic system, reply to what you see as economic Keynesian cliches with your own old cliches. The solution might suit you but you aren’t the whole country.

        Very amusing – “allow the economy [to] grow by itself”. In what direction pray? And what happens if it grows into a boom and bust cycle? Housing has already been untouched by human hands, that’s excluding property speculators of course and much lauded young things who have leveraged themselves into “owning” six houses by the age of 22. Is that what you mean by getting the government get out of the way?

      • Fortran 1.1.7

        B K

        Agreed
        I can hear Muldoon cackling – he never thought that Social Credit (sorry) Greenpeace New Zealand would ever agree with his policies.

      • Rusty Shackleford 1.1.8

        “I cannot honestly believe that there is serious discussion about it.”
        The only place it is being discussed is on thestandard.org.nz, and I would hardly call that serious.

        • McFlock 1.1.8.1

          Don’t put yourself down, Rusty – a bit of effort plus some reconditioned logic circuits and you might be able to learn about this thing that we humans call “empathy”. 

          • Rusty Shackleford 1.1.8.1.1

            You have zero credibility so you attack the messenger, classic.

            • McFlock 1.1.8.1.1.1

              Dissonance, much? Or maybe just plain hypocrisy, given the subject sophistication, philosophical depth, and intellectual rigour of your comment 1.1.8: a trite comment that deserved the flippant answer. 
                 
              Oh, that’s right – you freely admit to being a hypocrite. Option 2 it is, then. 
                 
              And apparently I’m the one with zero credibility, you hypocrite. 

              • Rusty Shackleford

                I rarely attack people personally, and never do so unless they attack me first.

                I love how you use my honesty as a stick to beat me with. I could have claimed to have been a titan of industry or some kind of lefty hero with water tight morals and convictions. The fact stands that a person can be one thing and say another. The truth of what they say is not negated by their actions. No matter how much effort you want to put into twisting it as such.

                I assume that by accusing me of lacking “empathy” that you view yourself to be imbued with only the highest and best quality example of said attribute? If that is the case, why would you advocate a policy that, at best, has never worked and on average causes untold misery?

                • McFlock

                  you could have resisted being a hypocrite, too. 
                     
                  Should that be “an hypocrite”? Meh.
                       
                  dude, you made a personal comment about everyone here, and now you’re pissed that I made an equally trite comment in response.
                     
                  Get a life.
                     
                  ps: a comment about you is a comment about you, not a comment about myself. The clue is in the subject. 
                      
                  pps: given that you should by now know that we neither share one another’s opinions about each other’s political position (and economics is politics), nor is it likely we ever will, the obvious response is “I advocate policies that help people because I have a problem with babies dying, and you don’t”. 
                        
                  ppps: given that this thread is already lively enough, I’m not going to get into a derail. Part of my self-improvement policy. So this will be my last word on what looks to be a rather banal tit-for-tat…
                    
                    
                  … wait for it …
                    
                    
                    
                  … waaaait for itttt…
                    
                     
                    
                  this 

                  • Rusty Shackleford

                    “I advocate policies that help people because I have a problem with babies dying, and you don’t”.

                    This is why you are fucking stupid. The policies you advocate are not the inverse of this comment ie. printing money does not save babies from dying. Moron.

                • So how do we feed the starving poor Rusty?
                  How bout jobs for all those Miners / State service workers?

                  • Rusty Shackleford

                    What do you mean? What do these questions have to do with printing money?

                    • Printing money is a short term answer for the bungling of the elected MPs’.

                      Regulation is what will keep food on tables and people in work.

                      For a reference of this see “Wage and Price Freeze” by Robert Muldoon

                      I dare you too google it buddy, we are in the same place, the Gnat’s just won’t admit it this time

                    • Rusty Shackleford

                      hehe, you had me going there for a second. Thanks for the larf.

                    • You’re Welcome M8!
                      Glad I could expand your Mind 🙂

                    • And the Gnats’ have been effectively “printing” money for 2 years+- now
                      They just use high interest loans from foreign partners instead of a ghost account.
                      Stupid for our small economy really, completely at the mercy of foreign markets.

  2. KJT 2

    This can solve several problems in one go.

    The high NZ dollar, money for State supplied infrastructure, especially housing, (Dropping our excessive housing prices driven by banks) and avoiding the interest costs of allowing overseas banks to add the zeros to the money supply.

    To those who say it will cause inflation.
    Well inflation only occurs when the market is saturated. Like the one for houses to speculate on. (The RWNJ’s do not seem too concerned about the housing inflation caused by loan money attracted by our excessive interest rates and rising dollar).

    Inflation caused by private banks lending always has interest added. An extra cost no country is managing to keep up with.

    And it does work. Got us out of the 30’s depression before most other countries. Germany has never looked back since they did the same with the new Mark after the war.

    We also need to address the, long past its use by date, blunt instrument that is the reserve bank act.
    Presently the raising of the OCR to fight inflation is like trying to lift a bucket by standing more people in it.

    The raised interest rates attracts speculative lending into NZ causing housing and dairy bubbles.
    The rates affect existing loans. Businesses and home owners are unable to change their loan amounts each time the rate is lifted.
    All that is doing is making them pay windfall profits to the bank as extra interest. Businesses are hit with a double whammy of higher loan costs than overseas competitors and a higher dollar. The interest owed, then drops our current account balance even more.

    A surcharge for the first year of new mortgages is better. The money raised is not adding to interest owed and it only effects new borrowing. State banking would be even better. http://publicbanking.wordpress.com/

  3. Lanthanide 3

    “It lessens the inflationary impact”

    I’m not sure how printing free money lessens the inflationary impact of anything.

    • KJT 3.1

      You think raising interest charges is not inflation.

      How is it any more free money than the banks printing it? Which is what happens now.
      Except the money is free to them but one bank alone charges 3 billion last year to do it!

      However. Printing money to supply housing at reasonable cost will cut housing inflation.
      Simple supply and demand.
      Slowing speculation driven bubbles.

      Inflation has been allowed to become such a bogey that the benefits of a low level of inflation are ignored.

      Better that we borrow from ourselves to rebuild Christchurch than pay an exorbitant price to offshore financiers to do it.
      Why is one more inflationary than the other?

      • Lanthanide 3.1.1

        “How is it any more free money than the banks printing it? Which is what happens now.
        Except the money is free to them but one bank alone charges 3 billion last year to do it!”

        Because there is a practical limit on the amount of money a bank can create. They have to have a mortgage, with someone to borrow and a reasonable commitment to repaying it (based on expected future earnings). There is no such limitation on money created through QE, the government can easily create as much or as little as they want, based on whim.

        Also, once it becomes known that the government is printing money to cover the CHCH rebuild, what do you think the various suppliers of goods and services in CHCH are going to do? “Hmm, normally I would charge $20k to demolish this building, but because the government is paying and they’re printing money, I’ll quote $30k instead”.

        “Inflation has been allowed to become such a bogey that the benefits of a low level of inflation are ignored.”

        We presently have a low level of inflation. I think you mean to say “benefits of a moderate level of inflation”.

        • Colonial Viper 3.1.1.1

          Also, once it becomes known that the government is printing money to cover the CHCH rebuild, what do you think the various suppliers of goods and services in CHCH are going to do? “Hmm, normally I would charge $20k to demolish this building, but because the government is paying and they’re printing money, I’ll quote $30k instead”.

          Nope.

          You create a government owned operation to do this job. No private profiteering.

          You can also use the QE to create 5,000 new trade apprenticeships with full scholarships. Within 12 months semi-skilled labour will greatly increase in supply, further preventing contractor profiteering.

          Lanth, it’s not that your concerns have no foundation. Its just that countering the negative scenarios are bloody easy.

          Investing QE in the creation of additional capability and infrastructure maintains and improves economic productivity. Relative price stability is maintained in that scenario.

          We presently have a low level of inflation. I think you mean to say “benefits of a moderate level of inflation”.

          relative price stability is not a big deal when debt is high and real incomes are declining, especially for Maori, Pasifika and youth who have born the brunt of this Great Recession.

          • Poission 3.1.1.1.1

            There is little inflation,in the Japanese reconstruction.

          • Lanthanide 3.1.1.1.2

            “You create a government owned operation to do this job. No private profiteering.”

            Ok, and how long is that going to take to set up? When can they begin work on this benighted recovery that still hasn’t really started? Who is this department going to employ? People working for the current private companies? How are they going to entice them to work for the government instead of the private companies, by paying higher wages?

            There’s your inflation.

            • Dem Young Sconies 3.1.1.1.2.1

              The government could simply nationalise the building industry. This would protect the jobs of current private sector workers, and would negate the need to duplicate investment in capital. It would also remove the problem of a lead time in setting up a new public works orgainisation from scratch.

              • KJT

                I thought they had. Just called it Fletchers and allowed them to charge what they liked.

                • Dem Young Sconies

                  Makes the solution even simpler then. Nationalise Fletchers. Then it can become a state owned monopoly, rather than a private sector monopoly. The difference is there wont be price gouging, and any benefit will flow to the nation rather than fat-cat shareholders.

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Plus the Christchurch rebuild is going to take a decade. Plenty of time to think longer term.

              • prism

                Dem Young Sconies
                Don’t know what that means but it made me think of the book The Incredible Lightness of Scones. Certainly the idea you are floating is pretty insubstantial.

                Nationalising isn’t needed or wanted. Emergency response only from government, so we don’t get overpriced leaky homes. And a register of all involved in erecting buildings to try and prevent false names and fast dissolution of shell companies.

            • Draco T Bastard 3.1.1.1.2.2

              How are they going to entice them to work for the government instead of the private companies, by paying higher wages?

              Oh noes, the government might actually pay living wages.

              Back in 2k8 my nephew was paid around $35/hr +GST. These days he’s lucky to get $25/hr +GST and that’s barely enough to keep him solvent.

              I doubt that there would be enough inflation to really cause any issues.

            • Colonial Viper 3.1.1.1.2.3

              There’s your inflation.

              Lanth, why are you equating higher wages and more employment with higher inflation? You need to take into account current high private debt levels, excess labour supply, and significant productive overcapacity.

              Besides, moderately higher inflation is useful for combatting high debt situations.

              You need to take these factors into account.

            • prism 3.1.1.1.2.4

              Lanthanide
              Make a list of all the things that could go wrong with the idea of government funding and rebuilding and then put it on the wall to ensure that when it is planned and agreed, all the factors have been covered. Don’t talk the suggestion down before it can be considered fully .

          • halfcrown 3.1.1.1.3

            “You create a government owned operation to do this job. No private profiteering.”

            Go and wash your mouth out. How dare you “suggest” that a government department owned by the people for the benefit of the people could do a better job. Are not aware of what the neo liberals have preached for the last three decades, and that is THE market and only THE market will deliver.

            The right wing fuckwits will accuse you next of preaching communism

        • Draco T Bastard 3.1.1.2

          Also, once it becomes known that the government is printing money to cover the CHCH rebuild, what do you think the various suppliers of goods and services in CHCH are going to do? “Hmm, normally I would charge $20k to demolish this building, but because the government is paying and they’re printing money, I’ll quote $30k instead”.

          And this is why the government uses a Ministry of Works instead of private contractors.

          • KJT 3.1.1.2.1

            Still possible to have competitive pricing from all the smaller builders. Run by a competent State employee.

            Instead of giving one large building company all the contract, so they can charge what they like while screwing tradespeople.

            • Colonial Viper 3.1.1.2.1.1

              For starters, give smaller firms access to very low interest capital allowing them to hire staff, purchase equipment, organise and compete against the big boys more effectively.

              Make it easy for contractors and staff to walk away from the big corporates and strike out alone in co-ops and worker owned contracting firms.

              • Draco T Bastard

                The government is printing money at 0% thus can afford to loan it to SMEs at 0%. Hell, they don’t even need to make it a loan – make it a gift. The government will get it’s money back through the taxes that the SME will pay over it’s lifetime.

    • Dv 3.2

      Well in Japan the interest rate for housing is 0.97% and there is a tax deduction for interest payments.
      And housing prices are fairly stable.

    • mike e 3.3

      Lanth its not free the govts charge interest on the printed money that has to be paid back with the loan. which would be inflationary if spent in the wrong area of your economy.
      Building more houses would bring down the price of housing! if done right!
      When the money is repaid to the govt its deflationary!

  4. BM 4

    So the Greens answer is to make our dollar worthless so everyone has to pay through the nose for any imports.
    How well do you think that’s going to go down with your average man,woman in the street, when you have to pay $300 for a pair of shoes, that use to cost $30.00.
    Or you can’t drive any where because petrol is $10.00 per litre.
    Within weeks prices would sky rocket, what are the greens going to do about that?

    • KJT 4.1

      When they again have a job making shoes so they can afford to actually buy quality shoes.

      Instead of $30 ones that last a month.

      No point being able to import cheap shoes when we are all on minimum wage or the benefit waiting beside the phone, for Mcd’s or AWF to graciously grant us 6 hours work a week

    • KJT 4.2

      So they have a job making quality shoes and can actually afford to buy them.

      Instead of $30 junk which lasts a month.

      We are really paying a high price for imported junk. Including interest and replacement costs.

      Petrol should be $10 a litre, so we look for sustainable alternatives.

    • RedLogix 4.3

      Alternately we could allow our dollar to increase in value so that all our manufacturing and export businesses collapse and die. Then lots of people would be unemployed and wouldn’t be able to afford even those $30 shoes … or petrol at any price.

      Besides the Chinese still fix their currency at a fraction of its real value, and the US and Europe, plus much of the rest of the world are printing money flat-out, there really isn’t much risk of the Kiwi dollar becoming worthless faster than anyone else’s.

      • BM 4.3.1

        We can’t compare ourselves to China or the US, they’re massive and integral to the world economy, we aren’t.
        Are there any countries that are the same size and with similar economy as us printing money?, what effects has it had on their economies.

        • RedLogix 4.3.1.1

          So printing money is only inflationary in small countries? Who wrote that rule?

          Are there any countries that are the same size and with similar economy as us printing money?

          Well Argentina and Iceland are both on record as defaulting on large amounts of sovereign debt (which is largely equivalent to printing money when you are in debt) … and both economies have been doing quite alright since thank you very much.

        • Jackal 4.3.1.2

          Japan, which has many similarities with New Zealand, implemented quantitative easing from 2001 to 2006. Despite what Matthew Hooton believes, they had good results with a less vigorous policy than the US and UK. What adversely impacted Japan during this time was weak export performance, which would have been a lot worse without quantitative easing.

          The greatest benefits there appears to have stemmed from the commitment to an extended period of low interest rates. In conjunction with the quantitative easing program in the US, Japan’s program appears to have had only a limited upward impact on inflation.

          If the policy is undertaken correctly, with the right signals given, New Zealand would likely see an overall reduction in long-term interest rates, no significant increase in inflation and a boost to our export driven economy, which would create jobs.

          If National actually wants to create jobs, then they should listen to what Russel Norman has to say. Otherwise they’re just following the same old status quo, which is obviously not working for the average Kiwi.

          • Draco T Bastard 4.3.1.2.1

            National don’t want to create jobs – they just want to give our wealth away to themselves and their rich mates foreign and domestic.

            • Colonial Viper 4.3.1.2.1.1

              National need to ensure a continuing and massive over-supply of labour in order to keep wages low.

              • tinfoilhat

                When the time comes they’ll all be tried as the treasonous traitors they are and we all know what the penalty for treason is.

        • mike e 4.3.1.3

          BM read some economics literature before you start with your simplistic scare tactics!
          Small countries such as ours haven’t got the balls to make such decisions,
          But if the US UK EU China Japan Hadn’t done Quantitative easing ( printing Money sa you naively put it)
          We would be in the shit up to our eye balls because all that money that Double Dipping Dipshit is borrowing $ 52 billion would not be available!
          We need some one ie the greens to put us back on an even playing field while we are borrowing billions they are printing it.So we are building mountains of debt forcing our dollar up as risk increases leaving our productive sector high and dry!

        • Frank Macskasy 4.3.1.4

          And yet, BM, supporters of current free market economics offer no alternatives?

          What an irony if the mantra of “TINA” (There Is No Alternative) is to be used against the very architects of deregulation, who coined that phrase in the first place…

          We’re losing jobs and exporters are hurting. Never mnind about higher fuel prices and other imports if the dollar goes down. If exporters go down, we won’t be able to PAY for fuel and imports.

          Something that free marketeers forget.

          In the meantime, while opponants of QE (and other solutions) quibble, let’s not forget,

          ANZ; 1,000 redundancies
          Wire by Design, 55 redundancies
          Hakes Marine; 15 redundancies
          Telecom; 400 redundancies
          Brightwater Engineering; 40 redundancies
          Pernod Ricard New Zealand; 13 redundancies
          Depart of Corrections; 130 redundancies
          Summit Wool Spinners; 80 redundancies
          Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade; 80 redundancies
          Cavalier/Norman Ellison Carpets; 70 redundancies
          IRD; 51 redundancies
          Flotech; 70 redundancies
          NZ Police; 125 redundancies
          CRI Plant and Food; 25 redundancies
          Te Papa; 16 redundancies (?)
          PrimePort Timaru; 30 redundancies
          Kiwirail; 158 redundancies
          Fisher & Paykel; 29 redundancies
          Goulds Fine Foods; 60 redundancies
          Canterbury University; 150 redundancies (over three years)
          Solid Energy; 363 redundancies
          Tiwai Pt aluminium smelter; 100 redundancies
          Axiam Metals; 44 redundancies
          Norske Skog; 120 redundancies
          Goodman Fielder; redundancy numbers t.b.a.
          Dunedin City Council/Delta: 30 redundancies
          Blue Sky Meats; 100 redundancies
          Kaipara Ltd/Stockton Alliance; 63 redundancies
          Wainuiomata New World; 44 redundancies
          Nuplex; 64 redundancies
          Newmont Waihi Gold; 20 redundancies
          Ministry of Justice; 70-200 redundancies

          And these are just the few that I’ve noticed reported in the media.

          • BloodyOrphan 4.3.1.4.1

            Bloody well said Frank!

            The facts are, they’d rather make people redundant and strave them too death.
            Rather than accept failure of their outdated Bullshit that was stolen from GrandPappy and moronoically repeated ad infinitum.
            It must make them feel “Valid” in the “Confusing” world they live in.

      • Matthew Hooton 4.3.2

        Of course there is no risk of the NZD becoming worthless if the RBNZ printed money and used it to try to push up the USD against the NZD. That’s not the issue. The issue is that the effort would definitely fail (just as even the Bank of Japan failed when it had a go, and the RBNZ failed when it tried in 2007).

        • Lanthanide 4.3.2.1

          Page 28, “Crisis, One Central Bank Governor & The Global Financial Collapse” – Alan Bollard with Sarah Gaitanos.

          Our new policy was to intervene selectively – to sell the New Zealand dollar at a peak and buy it back in a trough in order to moderate the most extreme currency fluctuations, influence the markets and knock the top off the currency at its height. The tactic aroused huge media interest, financial market comment and some controversy. Our own expectations were far more limited than those of so-called experts. We used a mixture of overt and covert operations to buy US dollars in the market and to ensure buyers of New Zealand currency remained uncertain about just how many New Zealand dollars we were selling through this period.

          The interventions went more or less as we had hoped, and gradually the pressure on the New Zealand dollar lifted, making exporters more competitive. The disadvantage of our interventions was that the Reserve Bank would now hold an ‘open’ FX position

          So if you want to believe what Alan said about the policy, he considers it a success.

          Over the course of the rest of the book, these dealings are referred back to a few times. The reserve bank ended up making quite a profit from the situation, as the NZ $ naturally dropped back afterwards, which increased the worth of the FX position.

        • mike e 4.3.2.2

          Mad hatters you have changed the subject selling currency is effective short term and the sell off took the top off the peak and forced speculators to have a rethink and also the RBNZ made a small profit!

        • KJT 4.3.2.3

          And the internal economy in Japan is doing so badly??

        • Colonial Viper 4.3.2.4

          Of course there is no risk of the NZD becoming worthless if the RBNZ printed money

          Uh, Matthew, you do know that undermining the high value of the NZD is actually a goal of the exercise, right?

          A 20% drop in value to US70c value brings the rate much closer to the working historical norm, in case you didn’t know.

    • James Henderson 4.4

      If you think a an over-inflated dollar driven up because our competitors are lowering their exchange rates is good for New Zealand, you’re in a very small minority. There are 40,000 manufacturing workers and their families, for starters, who would disagree.

    • mike e 4.5

      Backwards Monetarist Jeez no wonder our economy is in such strife with your sort of maths !
      $30 dollars + 20% =$36 Not $300
      $2.20+ 20%=$2.60 Not $ 10
      That would improve our balance of payments overnight!
      we would have more people in jobs not buying so many cars fuel etc!
      Wages would start to rise again interest rates would stay down so long as we had a CGT!
      The cost of 20% increase on the import cost would not feed through to that much increase in retail probably only between 5and 10 percent of the retail value BM!

    • Draco T Bastard 4.6

      Oh, you mean our local manufacturing would get a boost as it would then be cheaper to make stuff here?

    • prism 4.7

      BM
      Yes it’s a problem. Have you ever had to take some nasty tasting medicine? When there is chronic pain it becomes the lesser of two evils.

      The idea would be to manage the climb down – abseil really from the peaks of our overhigh currency – not just hold our noses and jump off. We know there is no such thing as a soft landing, but we could lessen the impact if we can get our smarts together.

  5. James Henderson 5

    lanthe, there’s obviously some impact (overseas it has been basically too small to measure) but it depends what you do with the money once you’ve printed it. If you threw in to the crowd beneath your office window, that would be inflationary. If you use it to offset foreign borrowing and buy offshore assets – what the Greens are proposing – then it’s far less inflationary in NZ.

    How many instances of hyper-inflation as a result of quantitative easing during this Great Recession can you point to?

    • Lanthanide 5.1

      Where am I talking about hyper-inflation?

      • Colonial Viper 5.1.1

        Hey Lanth, the RB has previously been willing to sacrifice tens of thousands of jobs as the main way to ensure price stability.

        What we need is a way to maintain relative price stability but ensure employment and incomes more than keep up.

        Its very difficult to deliver an increased standard of living without this.

        • Lanthanide 5.1.1.1

          “Its very difficult to deliver an increased standard of living without this.”

          Increased standard of living for whom? We have enough money in this country, it’s just concentrated in too few hands.

    • Jokerman 5.2

      De flation

  6. Matthew Hooton 6

    You do understand that unemployment in New Zealand is much lower than in the US and Eurozone, whose policies you cite with approval? NZ 6.8%, US 7.8%, Eurozone 11.4%. Whatever printing money might be good for, it doesn’t have a good record of lowering unemployment.

    And presumably you also know that, in 2010, the Bank of Japan spent over NZ$41 billion trying to lower the yen against the USD, losing its taxpayers around NZ$7.4 billion. Last year, it spent nearly NZ$210 billion, for losses of “only” NZ$931 million. And surely you also know that, despite this vast expenditure, far greater than anything the NZ could contemplate, the yen appreciated over 18% against the USD over that time.

    And KJT above is hilarious over the deutschmark. It was always one of the strongest currencies in the world, a fact the West Germans were fixated on after their experience in the 1920s and 1930s, and – despite how strong it was – West Germany became the manufacturing powerhouse of the world.

    When people say they want a new approach to monetary policy, they really have to offer something more that “failed neo-liberal consensus,” “new tools,” “broader focus” and so forth. Just what is that, in practice, they want the RBNZ to do?

    • James Henderson 6.1

      And what’s the cost of doing nothing, Matthew?

      Our unemployment rate is rising, the US’s is falling.

      It comes down to this:
      are our competitors acting to lower their currencies and raise ours? Yes
      is that hurting NZ? Yes, ask manufacturing and tourism
      Can we fight fire with fire? Yes
      Ought we act? Yes. The alternative is watching record job losses and record emigration.

      • Matthew Hooton 6.1.1

        But what do you want to do?
        Printing money to buy USDs will not work (assuming that’s what you mean by fighting fire with fire) – they would just print more and we would keep printing more to buy it.
        You (and the Greens) have to say what you want the RBNZ or the govt (through fiscal policy) to do.
        You still haven’t said what you think they should do.
        (PS. I think the best thing would be to tighten fiscal policy, to reduce govt borrowing, but I doubt you would agree with that.)

        • RedLogix 6.1.1.1

          Alternately you simply use the ‘printed money’ to cancel debt.

          • Colonial Viper 6.1.1.1.1

            Alternately you simply use the ‘printed money’ to cancel debt.

            Yep. Steve Keen’s “quantitative easing for the public”.

            Hooten’s refrain is simply a tired repeat and variations of “There Is No Alternative” (TINA).

          • Draco T Bastard 6.1.1.1.2

            That’s what I was getting at here in having the government buy up peoples homes with government created money. When you’ve got the option of struggling to pay the mortgage or to keep the same house, same friends, same schools for the kids while only having 10% of income going out? Yeah, I’m pretty sure that quite a lot of people will take up the option and thus cancelling a lot of the interest bearing debt.

        • Pascal's bookie 6.1.1.2

          What would reducing demand in the economy achieve?

          • Matthew Hooton 6.1.1.2.1

            Like I said, I don’t expect anyone here would agree with tightening fiscal policy (I think it would allow a further non-inflationary OCR cut and therefore reduce the NZD a little bit without cutting real wages), but my point here is not to advocate what I think might be a good idea – it is what the author and other commentators actually want to see happen. No one (including David Parker and the Greens) are really saying what they want, beyond slogans like “failed neo-liberal consensus,” “fighting fire with fire” etc

            • Pascal's bookie 6.1.1.2.1.1

              You didn’t answer the question Matthew.

              What do you think reducing demand in the economy would achieve?

              Come on, outline the effects of reducing demand in the current conditions.

              The economy could hardly be described as ‘overheating’.

            • James Henderson 6.1.1.2.1.2

              interesting. Matthew’s answer to the high dollar is to reduce economic activity – ie shrink the economy. So, that’s the clever plan that English has been running these four years?

              “no-one’s saying what they want” um, the Greens just released a detailed plan.

              Your plan is to keep losing 200 manufacturing jobs a week and, on top of that, slash public services/governemnt transfers, and with them consumer demand. Because that’s working out so well…

            • mike e 6.1.1.2.1.3

              Stick to your message Matthew do nothing nothink!

            • KJT 6.1.1.2.1.4

              What crap as usual. We have written pages and pages of possible solutions.

              The Greens have all their policy on their site and you still claim we are not providing solutions.

              And you still support Neo-liberal policy which is increasing debt, killing our manufacturing sector, destroying our current account and cutting real wages.
              Where are YOUR solutions?

              The neo-liberal ones have been tried. Newsflash. They DID NOT WORK.

            • xtasy 6.1.1.2.1.5

              Mathew Hooton

              “Tightening fiscal policy”, yeah right!

              Tthat is what drove Germany into recession and depression in the first place. Inflation had a totally different reason. It was “printing money” for the wrong reason, but quite understandable reason for the Germans, namely to pay off the exorbitant, unfair reparations charged on them by the winning powers after WW1. they printed money to get rid of the debt, not to expand the economy, which would have been a totally different story.

              By the way, it did not only cause a lot economic trouble, it created the fertile ground for Hitler and his party to gain power. So maybe the “western” imperialist powers were not all that “innocent” after all, complaining about the war that followed.

              Hoot on and blow your horn for Bennett now, she needs the “hoots”, as more are starting to see through her and hate her.

              Quantitative easing in measure may work, at least it cannot harm, as all others do it. So why be the pure nun amongst a world of prostitutes, when it does not even warrant the effort, NZ being a miniscule economic power, but easy game for speculators.

        • mike e 6.1.1.3

          MH printing money to buy USD what utter BS as if the US would print money to offset a small economy like ours, China for sure but NZ way to small!
          Next the right wing neo classics only print money to sure up investment banks who are borrowing at 1/2 % interest rate of the major trading block RB’s printing and lending it to debt ridden countries like ours at between 6&;7% gouging our economy you F/wit!
          Austerity was supposed to drive down our debt but all it is doing is given us a YOYO recession like when the same policy was followed during the 1920’s to 1935 and again during the 1990’s!
          Its an outdated economic Ideology simplistic when the Sarah Palins and Brashes English’s and Hootens try compare and economy to a home budget is how you spin doctors sell this Bullshit to the masses!
          Look to economic hisTory Matthew something you right wing bean brained bean counters fail to do!
          Having less money circulating in your economy Fucks it Argentina 97 to 98!
          Now all European countries that are being forced into Austerity now are declining !
          Goldman Sachs (Greeks couldn’t afford loans GS told lies about Greek economy and defrauded both the Greeks and European banks )And Merrill Lynch (Ireland John Key ML sold them down the drain)sold them down the drain!along with the Libor eurobor nipponbor etc gouged these economies sold them loans they could not repay insider trading corruption while all your fat cat mates paid no taxes ie Greek tycoons!

        • Jokerman 6.1.1.4

          *deflation*

    • mike e 6.2

      Masterbater of spin hoot on!
      Your figures here are just conjecture not the truth!
      If QE hadn’t taken place the US and Europe as well as us would be in a far worse state than now!
      Stick to spin Matthew your an expert no question on that Account!
      When it comes to economics throwing a few half truths around has no credibility!
      The truth is that China has been stealing all the jobs Matthew by keeping their currency value low allowing unprofitable companies to gouge the world manufacturing until they are broke then monopolise that industry with more corporate welfare from the Central Chinese communist party (Now a Ring wing Fascist state)!
      Killing and jailing activists including trade unionists(some what akin to what the right wing would prefer and get handed to them on a plate by the command and control economy of China)
      While the developed countries have no option in the end!
      QE is not what you portray it as.
      QE is a valid tool to get banks lending again in the neo liberal version and thats been not as successful as you have pointed out because the low interest money ends up in the speculators hands and grossly inflated investment wankers bonuses ( Shonkey at ML US $45 billion to bail out BofA so they could buy ML corporate welfare ie SCF)
      QE as used by the first labour social credit government went to building cheap housing(RE Don Brashes productivity commissions findings that the biggest hurdle is poor housing in NZ)
      manufacturing and farm development which all had long term benefits for our economy!
      QE works 10 times better if you put it in the right place in your economy.
      Its effectively a cheap loan as the Government does make a profit as well from the small interest rate
      The money is paid back something the rwnj’s such as yourself Matt fail to point out!

    • Poission 6.3

      West Germany became the manufacturing powerhouse of the world

      West Germany had less accountants then NZ at that time,the manufacturing companies were run by highly skilled engineers and physicists (and mostly still are)

      The usual suspects that inhabit the boards of NZ entities suggest there is a systemic problem.

      http://www.meridianenergy.co.nz/company/about-us/people/board-of-directors/

      Japan for all its so called problems,such as high gross debt,has 4.1% unemployment and overseas investments of 7.5 trillion dollars.

      • Colonial Viper 6.3.1

        German manufacturers also tended to be German owned and specifically, family owned. This meant that owners of those German companies were much less likely to shut down and shift offshore.

        The fact that German unions and laws make offshoring factories a real bitch should also be considered.

    • KJT 6.4

      It became a strong currency after the German government re-introduced the new Mark, “backed by all of us” quantitative easing after hyper-inflation.

      Hooten is on another RWNJ planet as usual.

    • xtasy 6.5

      Matthew Hoot-on and off: I like your comparison with Germany, if only you could compare NZ with the third largest industrial nation on earth. Are you for bloody real, or are you so over-confident to get away with this BS? Germany has been through the thick and thin also, especially mid to late 1990s, and the 2004 to 2005 year, where they brought in harsh welfare reforms, that cut social spending, which though hiked up again two years later, as it was all base on silly calculations.

      Germany is of course successful, as they have always believed in high skills and education, training – or workers and in value added production. A bit like the Scandinavian smart countries also.

      Now where does this compare with NZ then, dear smart talker of NatACT? NZ is reaching rather 2nd to 3rd world standards in training and value added production. We still train and educate a lot of people here, rather to become nurses, teachers, doctors, lawyers, accountants, technicians and so on, but we do NOT KEEP them here, as there is NO production, and no industry.

      Lawyers and teachers may always be needed, but they hardly put the butter on the bread!

      So your favoured government goes on about a lot of ideological plans, but I see no advance in getting more made out of the raw materials this country grows. We export fish, logs, milk powder, meat, oil, coal, whatever, so the Chinese and others make “real” products out of the stuff, or use it to fire their industries.

      That is hardly “German”, mate, it is “Zimbabwe” or “Congo” style, not wanting to put those countries down for their misfortunes.

      You are part of the problem, mate, blaming Kiwis for failure, when the government does nothing to get things moving and developing. Get your baggage, take a bloody hike and advise a dictator in the 3rd world about your political and economic ideas. You may do NZ a great favour! Maybe start in Somalia, great potential to get some development out of very little then! Xtasy

    • prism 6.6

      Matthew
      It’s so funny to read NZ being compared to Germany France et al. They are in the midst of a landmass while we are stretched out on two skinny islands at the bottom of the world with a national population of one medium sized city such as Sydney or Melbourne. We are very self important and do punch above our weight sometimes but we have to find our own way through the mess, watching the others and trying not to get stood on.

  7. Matthew Hooton 7

    KJT also talks about raised interest rates. Which raised rates are these?
    Since the NZ recession began in early 2008 and the GFC began later that year, the RBNZ has slashed interest rates (see http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/monpol/statements/0090630.html ) and the banks have followed.

    • James Henderson 7.1

      our rates are high by international standards, triggering the carry trade, which pushes up the dollar and gives banks the funds to fuel housing bubbles.

      • Matthew Hooton 7.1.1

        Are you really arguing that higher interest rates fuel housing bubbles???
        And that, correspondingly, if the OCR was reduced from its current 2.5%, and mortgage rates fell by the same amount (which they always do) then there wouldn’t be a renewed housing bubble?
        If so, that’s an, um, innovative view. And I think you would be on your own there.

        • James Henderson 7.1.1.1

          well, as in my previous piece, if the reason that we have interest rates that are out of whack with the world (and so we endure a carry trade and high exchange rate) is because we’re afraid of a housing boom, then we need policies that directly address the possibility of such a boom. The Greens address that in their plan. http://www.greens.org.nz/sites/default/files/q__a_on_qe_proposal_draft.pdf

          • Tim 7.1.1.1.1

            Don’t get him too worked up JH – he’ll throw a hissy fit and Kathryn will have issyoos trying to deal with him tomorrow.

        • mike e 7.1.1.2

          As per usual master of spin you are just pointing out housing bubbles ” bubble brain “a variable CGT would be far more effective but would piss off to many property speculators who 99% support the Nact Govt.
          So the speculative sector keeps flourishing while the manufacturing gets handed to the developing economies (who all subsidize ie China india thailand)while our balance of payments goes to hell in a hand basket!
          A YOYO economy just like in the 1990’s Matthew while we play the pure ideological game every body else isn’t and we are getting screwed over and you and your ilk keep pushing the same ideological purist clap trap!
          Matthew the purist propaganda expert!
          Cost Accountants are beaned brained bean counters with no vision!
          Our economy has been run by these idiots for to long the only thing they can come up with is pure Bullshit (Brighter Future)

        • RedLogix 7.1.1.3

          Are you really arguing that higher interest rates fuel housing bubbles???

          Well during a period of interest rates in the range of 8-12% New Zealand still managed the most ginormous housing price bubble in all history.

          What actually triggers a bubble is when banks loosen LVR ratios and lending policies.

          • Colonial Viper 7.1.1.3.1

            Well during a period of interest rates in the range of 8-12% New Zealand still managed the most ginormous housing price bubble in all history.

            Yep. If asset speculators believe that the price of a house is going to increase by 1/3 over the next year, a 10% p.a. mortgage rate is still a great deal.

          • BM 7.1.1.3.2

            I would probably say the media triggers housing bubbles more than anything else.
            Tales of people making big dollars on property usually kicks things along pretty rapidly, especially ones with the rags to riches theme.

            • Colonial Viper 7.1.1.3.2.1

              Media is simply PR. It’s the banks which are the dealers of the cheap debt which fuels the price bubble.

            • lefty 7.1.1.3.2.2

              Supply and demand play a big part in creating housing bubbles too.

              If the Government created money for spending on housing and established an institution charged with building enough affordable, quality housing available for sale or rent to all who needed it, there is no conceivable reason why people would pay over the top prices to either rent or buy a home.

              Rents would drop and the Government could stop its handout subsidies to landlords which would lead to a further drop ( it would be interesting to know how much taxpayer money would be saved by removing these handouts to bludging and unaccountable landlords).

              There would be a lot of people employed.

              There would also be a few bankrupt speculators and bank profits might take a bit of a hit.

              There would be no housing bubble.

              • Colonial Viper

                Its stupid having 1/3 of NZ’s population on 3% of its land. Absolutely unsustainably stupid, from a housing perspective, and from many other perspectives.

            • mike e 7.1.1.3.2.3

              Naive thinking Brainless Monetarist!

        • Dv 7.1.1.4

          Carry trade Mathew.
          AND
          >>And that, correspondingly, if the OCR was reduced from its current 2.5%, and mortgage rates fell by the same amount (which they always do)

          NO THEY DONT
          The banks passed on to the customer 116% of rate rise and 84% of rate cut.

          HT
          Interest.co

          On planet Australian banks

          http://www.theage.com.au/business/the-big-banks-take-with-one-hand–and-the-other-20121003-26ztm.html

          The size of the difference is shocking. Using (Aussie) monthly Reserve Bank statistics on its cash rate and mortgage rates over the two decades to 2011 the paper finds Australian banks have on average passed on 116 per cent of each rate rise and only 84 per cent of each cut.

          Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/business/the-big-banks-take-with-one-hand–and-the-other-20121003-26ztm.html#ixzz28NeiUwHk

          NOTE Passed on to the customer 116% of rate rise and 84% of rate cut.

          • Colonial Viper 7.1.1.4.1

            Matthew, you aren’t doing yourself proud pretending to be gormless. You know how the foreign banks rip off our local economy why do you act as if you are protecting them?

  8. Pascal's bookie 8

    Just to head off any nonsense about ooger booger hyperinflation oh noes:

    http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2012/09/03/why-you-wont-find-hyperinflation-in-democracies/

    A study from a couple of guys at the hard leftist CATO organisation indicates that hyperinflation is actually the least of a country’s problems when the are suffering from it. It appears that hyperinflation is actually really hard to bring about; it’s rare, extremely rare in democracies, and is more a symptom of complete political catastrophe than economic policy settings.

    basically, anyone who brings it up as a threat of some policy change is being a scaremongering halfwit.

  9. prism 9

    Depending on the way that any quantitative easing is spent it could be the answer for most of our problems economically in Godzone. Maybe God has spoken to Rusel – it doesn’t appear that anyone in NACT is in conversation with him.

  10. r0b 10

    Added a quick update – today’s Bernard Hickey piece is relevant:

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=10838829

  11. Draco T Bastard 11

    And putting the money into the Christchurch rebuild and the Natural Disaster Fund is smart. It lessens the inflationary impact and it means we are covered for both the current rebuild and the next disaster. (National’s ‘plan’ is to have the Natural Disaster Fund, which pays for your EQC claims back to $6 billion in 2041! $6 billion wasn’t enough in 2011, and what happens if Wellington goes in five years?)

    And it never will be enough, not when the economy is being run flat with no capacity to spare. Having money in the bank is useless if there isn’t anything that can be bought with the money which is what you get when the economy is run flat out all the time.

  12. captain hook 12

    new zealanders are quintesentially external referencers.
    i.e. they need goods to promote their self esteem and distinguish themselves from others.
    till this sociopathic tendency is reversed or negated then kiwis must keep spending to ward off depression and guilt.

    • Colonial Viper 12.1

      till this sociopathic tendency is reversed or negated then kiwis must keep spending to ward off depression and guilt.

      Of course, it’s already obvious in our society that spending is really successfully doing neither.

  13. Go Russel Norman !

    I still think a wage and price freeze is the best answer, if we wait another year it’s going to be much harder on the local economy.

    We should be petitioning the UN to stop the emargo on Iran.
    Iran/China managed to move oil this year and dropped the price by over $25 a barrel.

    State housing is a must, we have 10’s of thousands of young people moving into parental life and they need support.

    Trade agreements are meant to encourage our local and foreign economy, not impoverish it.

    The only other answer is to work much more closely with Chinese and Iranian banks.
    (I doubt John Key has the gonads for that though)

    • Pete 13.1

      A price freeze is untenable. Given the fluctuation of oil prices, the cost of delivering our goods to market is always going to be uncertain. The global increase in wheat prices, which we don’t produce much of ourselves, would also be hard to resist. As for wages – they have been stagnant for a year. We haven’t reached a no growth economic model quite yet.

      Having read through the Greens’ Q+A document I can see they have done their homework. On balance I think it’s a good policy. The harm is in increasing the costs of imports like oil, wheat, consumer durables, vehicles, tractors and other machinery. We can’t make all the stuff we need ourselves. That said, we seemed to get by ok when the NZD was at 70 cents.

      • Colonial Viper 13.1.1

        As for wages – they have been stagnant for a year. We haven’t reached a no growth economic model quite yet.

        Those figures are not inflation adjusted and do not represent real spending power.

        The harm is in increasing the costs of imports like oil, wheat, consumer durables, vehicles, tractors and other machinery. We can’t make all the stuff we need ourselves.

        We can become a lot more self sufficient (we used to be and we need to in future has cheap oil supplies continue to deplete), we have plenty of farmland capable of growing wheat, also we can lose our love affair with getting a new smart phone every year and a new car every three.

      • BloodyOrphan 13.1.2

        Agreed, but how do we stop any “Civilian Benefits” being absorbed by banks and other big money orgs over the next year?.

        We’re forever chasing our tails at the moment, the end result is less services for all.

        • Colonial Viper 13.1.2.1

          Super profit tax. Any profits over $100M pa are taxed at 49%.

          • BloodyOrphan 13.1.2.1.1

            Personal or corporate?, I was looking, couldn’t find anything over 28% for company TAX

            • Colonial Viper 13.1.2.1.1.1

              I was referring to a Super profit corporate tax = 49%. The idea is to swing the game against the big corporates and for home grown SMEs.

              We probably should also have a top Income Tax tier set at 10x the median income (=$290,000 pa currently) at 49%

              Get rid of secondary tax, set a 0% income tax for the first $10K earned, drop GST back 10%.

              Plus FTT, CGT, asset tax, estate tax, etc.

              • Now your talkin bud …..
                Need regulation on lending
                (not that their current rates are bad, but you have too allow for “Bad civilised people”) ….
                Civilians start to get ahead again.

          • Lanthanide 13.1.2.1.2

            One thing that’s never made any sense to me at all, and I’d really like an answer to, is why right-wing types always claim that lower company tax rates mean more jobs and the companies staying in the country.

            Now, I can understand why a company might be more inclined to stay in the country with lower tax rates, but the jobs argument doesn’t make any sense to me. Salaries (and therefore jobs) are expenses, so no tax is paid on them any way. It would thus seem that higher tax rates encourage more jobs, because you get an effective discount against what the profit would have been anyway. Eg, with a 50% tax rate, you earn $100k you get to keep $50k of it. But if you spend all of that $100k on someone’s salary, then you’re effectively only out of pocket by $50k while the employee gets $100k (before taxes of course).

            Maybe it’s some sort of argument that breaks down at the small percentages we’re talking about? Like “if the tax rate is 28% instead of 33%, I’ll get more money in my hand for the work I do so I’ll make more effort to grow my business, therefore more jobs”, except like the piddly income tax cuts of 33% to 30%, I don’t think anyone is actually encouraged to ‘work more’ because they receive more in the pocket; if anything they’re more likely to keep working the same amount, or work less.

            • Colonial Viper 13.1.2.1.2.1

              why right-wing types always claim that lower company tax rates mean more jobs and the companies staying in the country.

              Its just a cover story giving corporates an excuse to retain more profits for shareholder distribution.

              In a way its a none-too-subtle threat. “Tax us in a way we don’t like and we will walk from your country, shutting down our operations”.

              After all, hiring staff and paying extra salaries are operational expenses which detract from profits. Lower company tax rates actually incentivise the elimination of jobs, as doing so greatly increases returns to shareholders.

              Another key understanding here: corporates really don’t like to vacate markets for their competitors big or small to take over. And having some profit is better than not having those profits or having your competitors take it for themselves.

              But politicians tend to be chickenshit/ignorant so fall for it every time.

              • KJT

                Argentina and Iceland proved that they are too greedy to stay away despite tax rates.

                And. If they do, the demand still exists so someone else will eventually start up in their place.

                • Colonial Viper

                  If they do, the demand still exists so someone else will eventually start up in their place.

                  Yep, so on this end of the equation you have the Government support new SMEs starting up to fill any gaps left. Ideally in the form of worker-owned co-ops.

              • Draco T Bastard

                In a way its a none-too-subtle threat. “Tax us in a way we don’t like and we will walk from your country, shutting down our operations”.

                Which, if the government was printing the money and not the private banks, would be a hollow threat.

            • KJT 13.1.2.1.2.2

              Tax rates have never stopped anyone from trying to make money.

              In fact cutting taxes and wages has killed much of NZ business.

              The employees on wages and those who are paid out of taxes, such as police, Teachers, welfare recipients and state servants are also customers!

              Money taken as profits and interest by overseas corporates is permanently lost to New Zealand. The worst of it is that it is circular. We end up having a bigger deficit to pay these, which leads to more borrowing and more profits lost.

            • Jackal 13.1.2.1.2.3

              Lanthanide

              Why right-wing types always claim that lower company tax rates mean more jobs and the companies staying in the country.

              You know, there is some truth to their argument… If you overtax people/companies who are in a position to create jobs, they won’t create jobs. The opposite of this argument is that giving the rich tax cuts creates jobs… As we have recently unfortunately learnt, it doesn’t. You need to find a balance between the two, which I think the previous tax regime had.

              Unfortunately New Zealand is now in a financial mess that needs urgent and perhaps drastic measures in order to remedy the problem. Without any urgent changes, the next government will need to ensure those who have benefited the most from the financial dysfunction are made to pay the most, mainly because nobody else will be able to.

              We will likely again see claims that tax policy is making rich people leave New Zealand… But in my opinion good riddance to them. If they’re not contributing positively to a sound economy and the welfare of all New Zealanders, what is the point in having them here?

              The kind of capitalist running dog, that National’s policy is generally designed to placate, is the epitome of parasites that a country like New Zealand definitely doesn’t need… They are in fact the pariah’s of civilisation and highly detrimental to the development of society.

              • Colonial Viper

                You know, there is some truth to their argument… If you overtax people/companies who are in a position to create jobs, they won’t create jobs.

                But they don’t create jobs anyway. So why don’t you tax them and have the Government use that money to create the jobs.

                • KJT

                  “”You know, there is some truth to their argument… If you overtax people/companies who are in a position to create jobs, they won’t create jobs.””

                  Not really correct. It is demand that creates jobs. Not the owners of money capital.

                  http://kjt-kt.blogspot.co.nz/2012/08/the-wealth-creator-myth-stealing.html

                  The whole idea of capitalism as an allocation mechanism is that the money follows the demand.

                  The dilemma of socialism is that even though it is proven that a more equal society will eventually result in increased prosperity for everyone, you still have to persuade the mega-rich not to steal all the monetary wealth, and sabotage it, before the effects become apparent.

                  • Jackal

                    Generally speaking investors and business owners create jobs KJT, because they take advantage of perceived demand for products or services. They are by definition owners of money/capital.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Nope. Entrepreneurs are responsible for the bulk of jobs created. Those who own money and capital (eg banks) usually stand in the way more than they help things along.

                      investors and business owners

                      These are two quite different groups of people, with only a narrow common intersection.

                    • Jackal

                      And if an entrepreneur cannot get investment to undertake his/her business, no jobs are created. Jobs are created when capital is available, whether from private or government sources. Taxing the rich into oblivion is not a solution CV, just as National’s hands off approach isn’t a solution either.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      I think its funny you think that a 49% tax on super-profits, or a 49% income tax on those earning over 10x the median wage, equals taxing the rich “into oblivion”.

                      Of course, its no such thing. I am simply suggesting that those who benefit the most by far from our capitalist economic system pay the most, by far.

                    • Jackal

                      I totally agree… It’s where the top tax rate kicks in that will define our societies success or failure, and ensuring that the rich pay their taxes at all is just as important.

                      Unfortunately the higher the tax rate, the more likely the rich will find ways to avoid paying their taxes. 49% would undoubtedly mean a huge increase to tax evasion… So what’s your solution there?

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Taxing the rich into oblivion is not a solution

                      As they’re the cause of societal dysfunction – yes it is.

                      Unfortunately the higher the tax rate, the more likely the rich will find ways to avoid paying their taxes.

                      And when they do that we take everything off them and throw them in jail for 20 years.

                    • Jackal

                      If you take the corrections budgets and divide it by the average amount of inmates in New Zealand jails, you’ll find it costs around $300,000 per year to incarcerate each inmate.

                      Then you have court costs and police investigation costs not to mention the cost of building more jails and lost productivity from having somebody wasting away in jail… So let’s conservatively say it will cost $7.5 million per tax cheat to enforce your regime. How many additional tax cheats are created by increasing the top tax rate is anyones guess.

                      Just like the Proceeds of Crime (Recovery) Act, this money will not be recouped from seizing assets, because tax evaders, just like drug dealers, will find better ways to hide their wealth.

                      So how exactly do you propose to pay to lock more people up, because they’re undertaking a crime to evade a policy that you have implemented… By borrowing more money? It appears you haven’t properly thought your plan through DTB.

                • Jackal

                  Rich people I know create jobs when they have a need, there are profits to be made and the resources are available. Even with a higher tax regime, a lower interest rate could offset this and would help in some respects to ensure job creation. However a raft of other initiatives need to be in place to ensure its success.

                  As I’m sure you agree CV, rich people are taxed and some of that money is already used by the government to create jobs… National’s contention that the government doesn’t create jobs is a complete nonsense!

                  Whether the private sector or the government is better placed to create jobs is a matter of opinion, but it’s my observation that both can get it horribly wrong!

                  The private sector needs the ability to create jobs when it’s required, with the government needing to be ready to ensure economic stability within the free market to ensure job creation is in the right places. This is achieved by properly reading indicators to help create jobs in specific sectors where longterm growth is achievable. Without that, New Zealand will continue to limp along and not achieve its true potential.

                  The government should increase the amont of jobs it directly creates, especially in R+D. This would increase our knowledge based economy, which is perhaps our most profitable resource available. In many ways, quantitative easing is only a stop measure, and relying on our export driven economy is ultimately unsustainable long term.

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Rich people I know create jobs when they have a need, there are profits to be made and the resources are available.

                    its more profitable to eliminate jobs mate.

                    Let’s say you own a business with 5 staff. Cut out one job and make an extra $40K profit a year. Goal.

                    • Jackal

                      That’s a very simplistic view… You forget that in most industries, reducing staff reduces productivity, which ultimately means less products or services are available to sell. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to know that means less profits, which is not the goal of most companies.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      You forget that in most industries, reducing staff reduces productivity, which ultimately means less products or services are available to sell.

                      In general, I completely disagree with your reasoning.

                    • Jackal

                      In general, unless the jobs in question are unproductive, then reducing the amount of employees reduces productivity, which generally reduces profits.

                      The only way for your argument to work is if working hours are dramatically increased without reimbursement… Which makes me think you’re confusing my contention with the effects of globalisation, and perhaps mechanization?

                    • Colonial Viper

                      In general, unless the jobs in question are unproductive

                      Its this statement which is loaded with neoliberal assumptions.

                      You need to talk to more people who have been on the receiving end of redundancies, downsizing, right sizing etc.

                      I don’t believe you can separate out the effects of globalisation and technology in this debate.

                    • Jackal

                      CV

                      Its this statement which is loaded with neoliberal assumptions.

                      I presume you think this because the rightwing have used the excuse that laying off public servants will increase the governments productivity? You’re effectively buying into their bullshit CV. The flip side of this argument is that a job is worthwhile even if it’s unproductive… If that’s what you’re saying CV, I would have to disagree.

                      You need to talk to more people who have been on the receiving end of redundancies, downsizing, right sizing etc.

                      Saying I’m ignorant of people who’ve been laid off is a lame obfuscation.

                      I don’t believe you can separate out the effects of globalisation and technology in this debate.

                      We’re talking about jobs that people do here in New Zealand CV. Protecting our jobs from international businesses that undercut and undertake corporate takeovers to ensure market dominance is a completely different debate to the one we’re having.

                      Although they’re intertwined, protecting our industries from offshore competition has a different set of levers than invigorating our internal economy and creating jobs here.

                      Just so we’re clear, my contention is that reducing the amount of employees generally reduces the amount of productivity able to be achieved, which in most cases reduces profits. This is true on a business and a governmental level, hence all the public services that are no longer available (or severely degraded) since National sacked thousands of public servants.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      In general, unless the jobs in question are unproductive, then reducing the amount of employees reduces productivity, which generally reduces profits.

                      Wrong. In general the market hasn’t grown while productivity has and so getting rid of a worker will result in higher profits. That’s where all the downsizing over the last few decades has come from.

                    • Jackal

                      You’re talking about growth in Labour productivity for New Zealand of approximately 0.4% since 1978… Hardly a game changer DTB.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      You’re talking about growth in Labour productivity for New Zealand of approximately 0.4% since 1978… Hardly a game changer DTB.

                      Nah your number is ridiculously out I think. NZ GDP has gone up 9x since 1980. But population has only gone up 1.4x.

                      1980 GDP = $23B
                      2011 GDP = $202B

                      That’s an 880% increase in GDP

                      Population
                      1980 = 3.16M
                      2011 = 4.41M

                      That’s a much smaller 40% increase in population.

                    • Jackal

                      I’m no expert, but according to Treasury, output growth from 1978 to 2007 was 2.6% from all contributions. Labour contributed 0.3% of this, with capital 1.4% and multifactor productivity 0.9%. However their figures only go to 2007. I’ve been generous in approximating 0.4% Labour output growth from 1978 to 2012.

                      BTW CV Labour productivity is not the only factor in the growth of GDP.

                      You are correct DTB that in some cases the free market has caused redundancies? This is very different to the amount of productivity being dependent on the amount of workforce a business has available. Basically two people can produce more than one… Why is that so hard to understand?

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Basically two people can produce more than one… Why is that so hard to understand?

                      It’s not a question of being able to produce more or not but if there’s demand for the produce which there isn’t. So if you have two people who can do a job but only enough work for one person to do it then one person is out of work.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Basically two people can produce more than one… Why is that so hard to understand?

                      because it’s not true.

                    • Jackal

                      So you think one worker can make more stuff than two workers? Don’t be a dickhead CV.

      • Draco T Bastard 13.1.3

        We can’t make all the stuff we need ourselves.

        Actually, we could. We do have the resources available. We just couldn’t do it immediately.

        • Colonial Viper 13.1.3.1

          Driving down consumerism of high value imported items would help enormously. Listen people, you do not need to change your iPhone 4 for an iPhone 5. You do not need to change your three year old 42″ LCD tv for a 50″ 3D model.

    • Draco T Bastard 13.2

      Trade agreements are meant to encourage our local and foreign economy

      No they’re not. They’re there to protect investors and that protection comes at the expense of the populace who’s government just signed the FTA. The inevitable result is an impoverishment of the populace.

      • BloodyOrphan 13.2.1

        Hence the words “meant to” bud

        • Colonial Viper 13.2.1.1

          Hence the words “meant to” bud

          They’re not accidentally designed and written you know; they do tend to achieve what they are genuinely intended by their sponsors to achieve.

          The “meant to” you are referring to (and I think this is what you are referring to) simply the PR cover story sold to the public.

          • BloodyOrphan 13.2.1.1.1

            Absolutely, that’s why we need a leader of the people.
            Those agreements should be used for protection of our economy, not exposure.

  14. captain hook 14

    why buy a rake when you can get a leaf blower, spend time at the mower shop, go to the service station for petrol, make enough noise to shatter the peace on a Sunday , and generally delude yourself that every time you pull the trigger it equates to the power of your own personal ejaculation.
    talk about Marxian false consciousness.
    the world had gone crazy.

  15. Fortran 15

    QE is a return to Muldoonism (and Douglas).
    Get real – when to dollar drops the price of imports goes up – why are televisions etc so cheap (and shoes).
    Watch the price of fuel when it happens. Then you will see inflation.

    • Colonial Viper 15.1

      you’re saying that the Federal Reserve in the USA has returned to Muldoonism?

      What exactly are you on about?

      • BloodyOrphan 15.1.1

        Yes they have, they are subsidising the price of oil at the bowser.

        • Colonial Viper 15.1.1.1

          Well they are subsidising the price of gasoline at every stage of exploration, extraction, refining and distribution, but they certainly didn’t learn that from Muldoon.

          • BloodyOrphan 15.1.1.1.1

            Muldoon got it from somewhere.
            Problem is our Net account is zero or negative at the moment.

            What people call “Printing” money is just another Ghost account with 100 billion in it, they do own the transaction engine, but not so cosher on the international scene

            The one real driver is the cost of transport, we have too bring that down and build some reserves back up.

            • Colonial Viper 15.1.1.1.1.1

              Problem is our Net account is zero or negative at the moment.

              Balance of payments?

              Same as the last 20 years.

              • I can’t believe that, some off the record conversations from the reserve bank would imply otherwise.

                Why are ther Gnats’ going on about welfare bludgers and asset sales, there is something driving them.

                • Colonial Viper

                  I can’t believe that, some off the record conversations from the reserve bank would imply otherwise.

                  NZ current account has been consistently negative and sittng around 4%-6% of GDP forever. Reserve Bank chart of 1990 to current.

                  http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/keygraphs/fig6.html

                  • Fair enough we’re on the same page then.

                    • KJT

                      NZ tradeables in real products is actually positive. It is interest and profits going offshore that makes the difference.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      It is interest and profits going offshore that makes the difference.

                      The interest can be seen to by having the government print money and ban the banks from creating it. The profits going offshore can only be remedied by banning foreign ownership.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      The profits going offshore can only be remedied by banning foreign ownership.

                      Quick and dirty (part) solution is a 49%, 59% or 69% super tax on corporate profits over $100M pa.

                    • KJT

                      Don’t mind profits going offshore if they have built up a sustainable and productive industry that benefits New Zealand. When it is just speculation raising the costs of existing assets then it becomes a problem.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      IMO if its something vital we should and can do ourselves – like phones and banking – we should, whether privately or publicly.

                      And yes some profits can go offshore, but not as big a share as now.

                    • A fixed monetary value cap on offshore transactions, revised annually perhaps.
                      Not a percentage, that just keeps us chasing our tails.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Don’t mind profits going offshore if they have built up a sustainable and productive industry that benefits New Zealand.

                      I’d prefer it if we’d just bought the technology ourselves and then built it up from there. We get what we need, the foreign entity makes a one off profit and everyone’s happy. With foreign ownership though we just keep paying and paying and paying through off-shored profits.

            • Draco T Bastard 15.1.1.1.1.2

              The one real driver is the cost of transport, we have too bring that down and build some reserves back up.

              Transport is easy. More rail and all of it electrified which means more renewable electricity generation such as wind.

              More reserves of what?

            • Robin Westenra 15.1.1.1.1.3

              Yes, you are right. When Muldoon was PM the economy, although in a period of stagflation was still growing. We had cheap oil. We don’t and growth has gone forever – hence the mad grab for resources everywhere, including off our coast.

    • mike e 15.3

      Fratrain Inflation will reduce demand on imported goods why our balance of payments has been in the Negative since 1976 except for may be 3 finacial quarters in 36 years !

  16. AmaKiwi 16

    Deflation. Do any of you know what deflation is?

    Hint: Deflation was the crash of 2008-09.

    Deflation is when prices go down, not up. All prices go down. The price of labour, goods, services, real estate, shares, commodities. Why do prices go down? Because there is no credit to buy with.

    We crashed in 2008-09 because people and institutions would neither lend nor spend. It’s happening again for the same reason. In case you forgot, in 2008-09 the NZD lost 40% of its value against the USD. Why did the USD go up? Because globally more than half of all debt is denominated in USD. In 2008-09, when Kiwis (and everyone else) could not pay their loans they sold assets to buy USD (or their banks did).

    Borrowing more money is like forcing whiskey down a drunk’s throat to get him to sober up.

    We’re in trouble because collectively we can never repay everything we owe. So let’s borrow more for our children to repay.

    • Colonial Viper 16.1

      You’ve totally screwed up a whole lot of economic concepts here. You’ve also mixed up what has happened in the USA with what has happened in NZ.

      Note that NZ inflation and cpi have NOT been negative. We have NOT had a deflationary experience in the NZ economy. Every ordinary householder knows that daily costs of living have been going UP not DOWN.

      In case you forgot, in 2008-09 the NZD lost 40% of its value against the USD. Why did the USD go up?

      Yes, but the US did not allow that situation to persist. Their money printing means that entire loss has since been erased.

      We’re in trouble because collectively we can never repay everything we owe. So let’s borrow more for our children to repay.

      So write off the debt, like Iceland did. Or let it inflate away. Or print money to pay it off.

      • AmaKiwi 16.1.1

        CV, we’ll have to agree to disagree.

        Writing off debt is called “defaulting.” It is about as painless as open heart surgery.

        • Colonial Viper 16.1.1.1

          Writing off debt is called “defaulting.” It is about as painless as open heart surgery.

          Maybe we could try a generation of austerity like the Greeks and the Irish? That’s going to be as painless and quick as amputating your leg with a razor blade.

    • KJT 16.2

      When did prices go down in NZ?? In what planet. Key’s?

      • AmaKiwi 16.2.1

        Which prices are you asking about.

        During the 2008-2009 NZD crash, prices for imported goods went UP because our dollar was worth less.

        Did you try selling real estate or shares during that time? They went DOWN while imported goods went UP.

        • Colonial Viper 16.2.1.1

          Did you try selling real estate or shares during that time? They went DOWN while imported goods went UP.

          Yeah but only compared to the very peak of the boom 2006/2007. If you looked back another 5 years to 2001 property was still well in the black during the “crash”.

          • AmaKiwi 16.2.1.1.1

            CV, good luck if you think property is a good investment when:

            1. the world is drowning in debt
            2. two-thirds of the money we borrow we borrow from overseas
            3. business is slowing everywhere on the planet (except repo agents).

            My time line goes back a bit farther than 2001 to 1987 and 1929 and 1720.

            I think the next stage of the crash has barely begun and no government policies can avert it. Both the Right and Left are in denial that the crash is inevitable. My view is we must share the pain more evenly and focus on what is essential for everyone’s healthy survival.

            “The earth has enough for everyone’s need, but not for everyone’s greed.” Ghandi

            • xtasy 16.2.1.1.1.1

              ALL property in private ownership, that goes beyond the own home, should be taxed highly, unless invested for the social good of offering affordable tenancy to renters. ALL property that is of a speculative nature should be taxed above anything else, as that is NOT productive investment and thus harmful for the economy. Do not forget macro economics, and stop over excusing micro economists, always looking after number one and nobody else.

              I am in agreement, at least in part, with Gareth Morgan and Hickey. They may not be what some here like, but I think that some of their recent analysis, conclusions and recommendations make a lot of sense, for instance a universal minimum income to do away with the present benefit system.

              But that is a bit too far fetching for narrow minded envy driven haters.

              You may need to “earn” your “yellow star” with the label “bludger” or “poor sucker” written on it, that appears to be on the mind of some in the middle class and up the ladder. I hate to disappoint you, the Third Reich failed, not just because of the war, but also for about half of Germans never believing in the shit the Nazis preached to them.

              So let us move on and get the economy rebuilt on a totally new, but positive and intelligent foundation for god’s sake!

            • Colonial Viper 16.2.1.1.1.2

              CV, good luck if you think property is a good investment when:

              Are you speaking in terms of a financial investment? Well I agree. But if you’re talking about a real investment, farm land rocks.

        • KJT 16.2.1.2

          What has real estate prices or shares got to do with ordinary people.

          We buy and sell in the same market. The gap generally stays the same.

          As for shares, we are too busy trying to keep up with constantly rising grocery and power prices, to worry about a few rich gits who are silly, or rich enough to take that sort of gamble.

    • Draco T Bastard 16.3

      In case you forgot, in 2008-09 the NZD lost 40% of its value against the USD.

      I get a ~20% drop from 2008 to 2009. Not a 40% drop.

      We’re in trouble because collectively we can never repay everything we owe. So let’s borrow more for our children to repay.

      That’s what we’re doing under this government. The Greens (and me) are suggesting we do something else.

      • AmaKiwi 16.3.1

        Draco, check the exchange rates from the 2007 highs to the 2008-09 lows

        NZD/USD from high of .8219 to 2009 low of .4897 = 40.4% loss

        NZD/JPY from high of 97.81 to 2009 low of 44.25 = 54.7% loss

        NZD/EUR from high of .5870 to 2009 low of .3879 = 33.9% loss

        Both National AND the Greens are proposing more debt.

        The difference between me and most of today’s bloggers is I think we cannot avert disaster. The best we can do is not make it any worse by going deeper into debt for non-essentials, as National is doing.

        • Poission 16.3.1.1

          In that last 5 years NZ debt increase in the sectors are

          Agriculture 15.008 billion ( 47%)

          Business 6.573 billion ( 9%)

          Household mortgages 28.947 billion (20%)

          debt inflation in households and agriculture ( which is mostly land capture eg Crafer) suggest that constraint is needed in investment expectations.

        • Draco T Bastard 16.3.1.2

          Draco, check the exchange rates from the 2007 highs to the 2008-09 lows

          I did, I even linked to them.

        • Colonial Viper 16.3.1.3

          Why are you so concerned with those historical exchange rates? Once the US QE programmes kicked in, the USD weakened right back down again.

          • AmaKiwi 16.3.1.3.1

            “Why are you so concerned with those historical exchange rates?”

            Because the NZD at USD $0.40 is also a disaster for us. The factors which caused the drop in 2008-09 are all still in place to cause it to happen again.

  17. Wow, Russell Norman channels his inner Mugabe or wait is that the Weimar republic I hear crumbling in the back ground? And oh oops, isn’t it Fletcher with all its shares owned by the big banks who would hog all this money out of thin air just like they do in the US and Europe?

    What a fucking Nincompoop!

    And to the writer of this post. What planet do you get your information on the US economy from? Let me guess the NZ mainstream media?

    Incredible, and for those of you who want to know more about what QE really means: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=share&hl=en&v=_WrMWK-FJzU&gl=US

    • James Henderson 17.1

      back to the bong, ev

      • travellerev 17.1.1

        I see you really have your arguments down pat. For your information. I have never smoked a bong or a joint in my life. In fact I have never even tried one puff of a cigarette. You on the other hand must have taken a handful of happy and other pills to be able to ignore history.
        you are an ignoramus who has no idea about what is happening financially and economy wise around the globe and who will have a rude awakening when inflation will tax whatever economy is left into the pockets of the 1% while the rest of us will be tenants in our own land.
        And for those of you who want to know what is really happening with the economies in Europe here is the link to <a href=’http://zerohedge.com/’>Zero hedge</a>. They are guys who work in the financial world and keep a running commentary and James please don’t give up your day job. Economical commentary is not your forte.

        CV, My bad, Here is a better <a href=’http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/how-qe3-will-make-the-wealthy-even-wealthier-while-causing-living-standards-to-fall-for-all-the-rest-of-us’>link</a>

        QE is just a Government/Banking Cartel trick to give the bankers more money at the cost of the rest of us. In other words you want to make the neo-liberal right winger 1%ers happy? Start a round of QE!

        Social credit which is the exclusion of the privately owned global banking cartel and the re-nationalisation of the right to manage our own wealth and issuing of our own money ( a right which we abdicated in 1987 with the Reserve bank act) is a somewhat different beast but it is my every educated guess that the banksters won’t let that happen any time soon.

        • Draco T Bastard 17.1.1.1

          Social credit which is the exclusion of the privately owned global banking cartel and the re-nationalisation of the right to manage our own wealth and issuing of our own money ( a right which we abdicated in 1987 with the Reserve bank act) is a somewhat different beast but it is my every educated guess that the banksters won’t let that happen any time soon.

          I figure the same but I also figure that if we get people to understand how the present system works then democracy will force the needed change (which is why this government is doing it’s best to destroy our democracy).

    • Colonial Viper 17.2

      That link has very little information on QE, just some general stuff on the banking cartel.

      NZ should move to a debt free Government provided money supply, to take it out of the hands of the banks.

      Your Zimbabwe and Weimar Republic examples are not relevant as we still have a productive, resource rich economy. We simply need a money supply to get that economy moving and transactions going.

      • Dv 17.2.1

        There seem to be some merit in govt issued credit interest free to carry out public works and then withdrawing that money as the investment brings returns.

      • travellerev 17.2.2

        CV,
        Here is Michael Snider of the Economic collapse blog’s take on QE and Weimar and here is a graph of the time scale of the Weimar republic.
        You’re not stupid so don’t act like it. The global financial system if imploding as a result of a lack of confidence in the fiat system not because banks need more money to lend to small businesses etc.

        In fact according to Michael Hudson they lend great sums of money just not to us.
         
        I agree with the fact that we the people have to take back the management of our own wealth and that means Social credit. Big difference to QE.

    • xtasy 17.3

      travellerev: I wonder who the nincompoot or whatever you like to describe it is?

      Russel may not have the 100 per cent solution, but he, same as Winston by the way, have more damned brain and common sense than the idiot lot running the show at present. So get off, wake up, actually read the Wall Street Journal, Economist, Financial Times and more, and you will find that your thinking is surely that 100 percent moronic!

    • QoT 17.4

      is that the Weimar republic I hear crumbling in the back ground

      Ahahahahahahahahaha.

      Seriously, ev, you’ve posted some batshit stuff in the past, but comparing NZ to the Weimar Republic is so over the top it’s fucking brilliant.

      • travellerev 17.4.1

        xtacy,

        I do, every day, AAAND…. I read/watch Zero hedge, Max Keiser , Michael Hudson, Bill Black, Gains pains capital, Cris Martensens’s Peak prosperity, Reggie Middleton’s Boom bust blog, The market Ticker, Testosterone pit, naked capitalism and last but not least the reformed trader to name a few. All of these guys are still active in the financial world and every single one of them has forgotten more about global finance than I have been able to absorb over the last six years, six hours every day.

        QoT,

        Sweetie, just because you have the brain capacity of a twerp doesn’t mean there isn’t more outside your limited vision.

        I suggest you start reading some of the publications mentioned above and get back to me in oh, five or six years when you may begin to see the light. In the mean time give it a rest ok? Go back to writing about “Feminism” or something. That seems to be your forté!

        NZ will be the Weimar republic if idjits like Russel are let loose on the financial mechanisms of this country and that can happen real quick.

  18. captain hook 18

    It would do some people,beside heka paratai, well to remember that the only time nz has had any stability was when there were controls in place.
    way back in the 1950’s.
    the system ended up with gross distortions but they were going in the right direction.
    it is obvious to anyone with a modicum of knowledge about the nz economy that nz is too small for qe to have any effect without another set of gross distortions arising in another altogether new direction.
    so if nz is to maintain stability then it is time for a new system of controls.
    so?
    to proceed against the prevailing winds of financial orthodoxy may seem like political suicide but nz is coming to that place in history where decisions have to be made besides just providing a play country for the already rich.
    it may be that physical uniformity and the unending variety of unnecessary disabling choices is necessary but the maintenance of the other democratic freedoms plus the openness of the web will ensure a healthy environment.

  19. millsy 19

    QE is the PC term for currency devaluation isnt it?

    • James Henderson 19.1

      no, it’s a tool for currency devaluation.

      • millsy 19.1.1

        So the same outcome is achieved?

        • Colonial Viper 19.1.1.1

          millsy, its not a deterministic process like the “currency devaluation” you have in mind which is probably to do with a fixed/pegged value currency and is not applicable to the “clean float” the NZD exists in now.

          Basically, the market will still have a strong say in what the value of the NZD is, unless we take further steps eg. to peg its value to a “basket” of other currencies.

  20. Having a green MP promoting QE (and in the name of growth/employment) is a bit like Captain Paul Watson promoting Whale Sushi.
    Maybe Norman wants to be the leader of Labor ?

    • Colonial Viper 20.1

      But QE done right will get economic growth and consumption going again…ok I’ll stop baiting now.

      • Draco T Bastard 20.1.1

        Actually, if done right it move us to a sustainable economy.

        • Colonial Viper 20.1.1.1

          Yes indeed it will. We have to use the last of the good times to set this country up for the next 200 years.

  21. xtasy 21

    As much as I am a very cautious economist, I think Russel has a point in showing some real courage here, while we have a gutless, no answer, idiotic government relying solely on “Joyce juice” that is rather the poisonous “snake oil” juice NZ has been fed for two to three decades now!

    This “snake oil” medicine so often thrown at Labour and the Greens is really a “snakey oil” BS recipe by a government that lost all solutions, and seeks to blame the opposition now, for its own failings.

    There is sense in doing just a bit of what all other countries are doing. Why be the goody, goody purist, when all are out there to ruin the economic fair play and harm NZ industry and exports. You would have to be an idiot to stick to this. But grant them that “privilege”, they are just as much of idiots as that Mormon boy Romney is in the US.

    I do not believe the money printing recipe will be the end solution, but it must be applied in measure and with sense, and NOTHING will be lost. I know enough about economics, have studied a fair bit of it, to understand also, that 50 per cent of it is “psychology”.

    So get moving on with it. The Greens are leading the way, while Shearer is uncertain, at least Parker supports some of this, and while the paint brush is still in the hand of the “sickness beneficiary entrepreneur roof-painter”.

    Things can only improve. I will vote Green again, maybe Mana, but Labour, wake up to f-ing reality, thanks!

  22. Poission 22

    If ever there was clear evidence that we need to get rid of that buffoon Dunne it was on 60 minutes tonight.There is a release on Voxy from Norman,

    http://www.voxy.co.nz/politics/foreign-trusts-must-be-broken-open-greens/5/137001

    Has he still got 500 paid up members ?

    • xtasy 22.1

      yes, absolutely: NZ is now a “tax haven” for drug cartels, Russian and Chinese mafia and other operators, dodgey people dodging taxes all over the planet. By the way: I read and heard about this about 2 years ago, presented it to local media, but NONE wanted anything to do with it!?

      Same as other stuff I presented recently, and it is clear, NZ media is amongst the worst in the world. But once some journo suddenly “discovers” a convenient” story, they are swift to report it, without disclosing sources and suggestions.

      Bastards!!!

      • thatguynz 22.1.1

        It’s even worse than that.  I can recall a trading course I did about 8-9 years ago where the instructor was quite unequivocal that NZ was viewed as a tax haven for overseas entities – and in particular Australian residents..
         
        I’m astonished the media are trotting this out as a recent advent now…
         

  23. xtasy 23

    Maybe try You tube on this one. No regrets for positive power from Michel Telo. Not a revolutionary as such, but at least inspirational:

    *** É Nóis Faze Parapapá ! http://youtu.be/TDbBkvVYN3s – (NEW SINGLE)

    http://youtu.be/TDbBkvVYN3s

    Perhaps give it a try and listen, a bit trendy, but a good taste alternative musica to what we get all day. Salute

  24. redfred 25

    The Greens policy is well thought out, careful and conservative.

    It is funny watching Key, Joyce frothing at the mouth, “You can’t create money!

    Then what is our fractional banking system then;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fractional_reserve_banking

    Why is John Key so against this? I think it would mean a requirement to put tighter controls and monitoring on the Banks.

    Captain Bank Of America Key will never jeopardise his chairmanship of on Myrell Lynch, by curtailing the Banks monopoly on money printing.

    This QE would be about buying and building assets not playing the money market. The difference is huge, and the Greens policy is very smart.

    • AsleepWhileWalking 25.1

      Russell Norman is very smart. I’m liking the Greens more and more

      • tinfoilhat 25.1.1

        I’m hoping Russell is PM or at least very high up in the next NZ parliament, hopefully he’ll be able to get Key and his cronies tried for their crimes against NZ and they can be punished or even better thrown out of the country along with their families and other hangers on.

    • Draco T Bastard 25.2

      Why is John Key so against this?

      If governments go round creating money, reducing poverty and generally making society more successful it takes the power away from the capitalists, shows that they’re absolutely worthless and that they’ve been stealing from us for the last few centuries.

      • TheContrarian 25.2.1

        Saying ‘the capitalists’ is so broad as to be almost useless as a descriptor. You might as well just say ‘them’ because it carries nearly as much descriptive power.

        • Draco T Bastard 25.2.1.1

          Considering that it’s only about 1% of the population – not really.

          • TheContrarian 25.2.1.1.1

            “Considering that it’s only about 1% of the population – not really.”

            Only 1% of the population are capitalists? How do you figure?

            • felix 25.2.1.1.1.1

              How does he figure? My guess would be by knowing the meaning of the words he uses rather than just trolling the standard with inane questions looking for pointless arguments that are bound to end in his own embarrassment.

              • It would help if Draco clarified what he meant by ‘capitalists’ because like I already said “Saying ‘the capitalists’ is so broad as to be almost useless as a descriptor.”.

              • higherstandard

                ‘…..rather than just trolling the standard with inane questions looking for pointless arguments that are bound to end in his own embarrassment.”

                Isn’t that the raison d’etre for the site Messr Felix Lebadaud ?

              • Add to that with why on earth would I ever be embarrassed by what the knob-ends and nobodies at The Standard thought?

                • Te Reo Putake

                  Well, as you are currently the leading knobhead and nobody at the Standard I would have thought embarrassment would be a regular thing for you, along with confusion, shame, bewilderment,  and the nagging feeling that you really should try to think of something contrarian to say at least one time in order to justify your handle.
                   
                  And ‘capitalist’ is not a broad term and it’s getting less broad every day as power is concentrated in fewer hands. Do you own the means of production, TC? Yes? Then you are a capitalist. No? Then, like the rest of us, no matter what your job title, you are not a capitalist.

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Perhaps we can specify a bit further by using the term “crony capitalist”. One who parasitically extracts capital from society to benefit himself and his mates.

      • tinfoilhat 25.2.2

        They and their failed ideology should be thrown on the scrap heap.

  25. tsmithfield 26

    If anyone does a bit of research they will find that the effect of QE in the US has been to rescue the banks which were fucked, and to drive up stock prices. So, QE is great if you are a banker or a stock speculator.

    The big problem is that QE is funding huge asset bubbles to the extent that the price of the assets doesn’t reflect the underlying value of the assets. The reason for the bubble is that the return on money in the bank is zero, so people have little option but to put their money into assets such as stocks, even though the dividend return on these is also fairly tragic, but still better than zero.

    Sooner or later the bubble will burst and the price of the assets will drop to reflect their fundamental value. This will result in the crash cycle repeating.

    The difference in NZ is that the RB still room to move with dropping interest rates. This means there is still scope for conventional money policy. The reason the US had to engage in QE is that they had exhausted their options under conventional policy.

    • Draco T Bastard 26.1

      That would be because the US QE was done to benefit the banks and not their society.

    • mike e 26.2

      Tsm about a 1/3 of what you are describing is truth ‘they are buying NZ dollars and NZ govt stock which is returning 6 to 7 percent forcing our dollar up you idiot much safer returns on govt stock!
      Ask your financial advisor not some rwnj propagandist!

  26. infused 27

    Why pay to see Chopper when I can read this blog. God this is hilarious.

  27. Would someone like to tell me WTF we would want to do the same as our trading partners – that would be like a race to the bottom.

    It is strange to see people of the Left espousing a policy that has led to inflation and the massive redistribution of wealth from the poor and middle classes to the extremely rich.

    QE3 to infinity is the one thing that will destroy the world economy.

    Quit treating this problem as if is soluble – as Richard Heinberg says ‘growth is dead” ( http://podcast.radionz.co.nz/sat/sat-20120929-1105-richard_heinberg_end_of_growth-048.mp3)

    If the Greens want to look at something that it should be the ideas of Steve Keen who is advocating a debt jubilee involving a kind of ‘QE for the people’ – giving the money to the people instead of the banks to pay off debt.

  28. chris73 29

    Printing money? Cunliffe wouldn’t be so dumb as to entertain this sort of thinking…would he?

    • Colonial Viper 29.1

      If its good enough for China, Japan, USA, EU, Chile, Switzerland…maybe it’s good enough for us too?

      • chris73 29.1.1

        No it is not. I’ll see your examples and raise you a Germany and Zimbabwe.

        • Colonial Viper 29.1.1.1

          Bullshit. I lay down a full house and you can’t even put together a matching pair. Your examples are a post WW I Germany and the kleptocratic dictatorship of Mugabe. Irrelevant.

          This versus China, Japan, USA, EU, Chile who are all significant and current trading partners.

          We’re in a full scale international currency war and all you want to do is bury your head in the sand. Wake up.

        • RedLogix 29.1.1.2

          Banks and governments print money all the time. (Where the hell do you think it all comes from?) The amount of cash (M0) in this country is about $3b … yet the GDP is around $200b and the M3 is in the order of $400b. All that money is pure credit. All ‘printed’ by banks buddy.

          The hyperinflation booga you keep bringing up has very specific context where there is either a failure of the normal democratic political process, an asset price speculative mania, or a destruction of the productive capacity of an economy. Or some combination of all three.

          It is not the ‘printing’ of money that is the problem, that occurs routinely. It is the misuse of this function that leads to hyperinflation.

          • Colonial Viper 29.1.1.2.1

            Exactly. Destruction of productive capacity, loss of adequate marketplace competition, failure to invest in core productive infrastructure and capability, control of the money supply by speculators are all needed for a genuine loss in price stability to occur.

            • Poission 29.1.1.2.1.1

              Destruction of productive capacity, loss of adequate marketplace competition,

              There is a nice speech from Andrew Haldane head of stability at the Bank of England,

              Back in 2000, financial markets valued global banks at two or three times the book value of their equity saying, in effect, that an investor who had placed $1 with a bank had doubled, perhaps trebled his stake. It should have been no surprise that investors flooded in, resulting in a threefold rise in global banks’ balance sheets in less than a decade, in what was perhaps the largest bank bubble in financial history.

              When that bubble popped in 2007, so too did market valuations. Today, most global banks are valued at a discount – many at a small fraction – of their equity book value. Today, an investor who had placed $1 with a bank would on average have seen that return as little as 50 cents. Once a value-creation machine, banks have become a value-destruction machine; in response, bank investors are seeking shelter and bank balance sheets have begun a crash diet.

              He argues that as banks are too big to fail,then they are too big too price,regulate and manage, eg Ma Bell,

    • mike e 29.2

      C73 But if the double dipstick mentions it you will be the first to defend him won’t you!
      Well at the height of the GFC Borrowing Bills Blinglish said if things got worse it would be an option!

      • chris73 29.2.1

        No I wouldn’t because it simply does not work unless your economy is large enough to handle it or you have virtually nil inflation.

        Prediction time: this will slow the US economic recovery and will in fact make it worse.

        • Colonial Viper 29.2.1.1

          Nah you’re taking shit mate.

          Whether you put $20 into your economy by borrowing it from the Saudis or you put $20 into your economy by Government issue makes no difference whatsoever.

          Get a grip. The shop keeper doesn’t care (and doesn’t know) where the $20 came from.

        • mike e 29.2.1.2

          So when our population was one million it was to small to print money 1935 till the 1070’s we printed money!
          You don’t have a clue do you C73 you are just repeating the Mantra!
          Go read some economics history books before blindly repeating some one else’s Spin!
          Want to place a bet now!
          It worked so well a lot of other countries followed our example!
          Just putting money into the banking system doesn’t work as well as spending on housing for instance!
          But when banks are not lending what do you do Chris just leave the economy floundering!
          Sure giving $45 billion to BofA to rescue the bankrupt corrupt Merrill Lynch was dumb because now the Bank of America is having to find billions more for a second rescue of Merrill Lynch because the firm that shonkey worked for is the most corrupt investment bank in history!

    • Draco T Bastard 29.3

      There’s essentially only two ways to deal with excess debt:
      1.) Inflate it away (Quantitative Easing) or
      2.) Default

      I’d prefer the second option but I don’t think many people would go for it. That leaves us with the first.

      There’s a couple of ways to do that though:
      1.) Government issues bonds which the RBNZ buys increasing the amount of money available to the government. The bonds will be paid off over time and probably have interest on them making them part of the problem
      2.) The government just prints the bloody money with no interest, buys stuff, has stuff built and raises taxes

      The second option is the better option as it would get rid of the unpayable debt that we have but the political parties are trying very hard not to raise taxes.

      • Colonial Viper 29.3.1

        QE is not really the equivalent of “inflating debt away” however, because overall inflation does not need to be impacted if that money doesn’t enter the real economy in an uncontrolled way.

        Financial commentators regard QE more along the lines of a “technical default” as you are paying the debt back, but in a way which was not agreed to and which dilutes the asset value of the debt.

  29. tsmithfield 30

    The problem the Federal Reserve is going to face at some stage is having to unwind the huge positions they have taken.

    One of the positions they have taken is in US Treasuries at very low yields. There is an inverse relationship between yield and value on Treasury securities. So, if the yield goes up (the value of Treasuries go down) then the Fed is going to take an absolute bath on its positions.

    Yields may well rise if other countries (e.g. China) get sick of funding US debt. Even if that doesn’t happen, yields will rise as the Fed tries to unload its positions. This will be incredibly bad for the US economy and will push up interest rates.

    There really isn’t a free lunch, and QE should be the last option, not the first.

    • Colonial Viper 30.1

      So, if the yield goes up (the value of Treasuries go down) then the Fed is going to take an absolute bath on its positions.

      That’s why ZIRP and NIRP will be used to keep kicking the can down the road. Until, as you imply, we run out of road.

    • redfred 30.2

      The Greens aren’t proposing anything like the US; the QE will be exclusively for Chistchurch rebuild and the Natural disaster fund to purchase foreign assets…….that is all, there is no USD target, no bottomless pit of money to be spent. This is why it is so smart, it is for building/purchasing productive assets.

      A side effect of this QE or in this case the Government lending itself money will be a likely reduction in the exchange rate. This will flow through, more tourist spending more manufacturing jobs. Yes consumption of imported goods will fall, this isn’t a bad thing…remember National arguments for increasing GST….to curb consumption and improve saving, much the same argument applies.

      Inflationary risk will be minimal. It is a very targeted use of QE that may do some good, the risk is minimal, we need to fund these projects anyway.

      Key and Joyce are full of shit! 40,000 manufacturing jobs have been lost under their watch. It is a disgrace!

    • mike e 30.3

      What beautiful lies you tell the simple monetarist!
      The US government made $700 million out of the first round of QE most of it all paid back!
      It didn’t cost the tax payers a cent you idiot!
      Before you try arguing it may pay to do some research!
      Then i can go back to calling you the stupid moetarist!

      • OneTrack 30.3.1

        Why are they up to QE3 and counting then? Doesnt Obama have any other options?

        • mike e 30.3.1.1

          OT the republicans are sabotaging any democratic initiative Obama puts forward!
          To make him look bad in the voters eyes.

          • Colonial Viper 30.3.1.1.1

            Mate, voters have a “choice” between the Bankers Party and the Other Bankers Party in the USA.

        • Draco T Bastard 30.3.1.2

          Well, the best option for the US would be to stop protecting the rich from their own actions but that’s not likely to happen due to all the US politicians being either rich themselves and/or fully owned by corporations.

  30. If you want to see which way things are going in tHe USA see this –

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6AsUz_1qIXE

    We won’t be that far behind.

  31. tsmithfield 32

    Anyway, it is a mugs game trying to devalue our currency against the US.

    We are much better to try and keep our currency at a range of 75-77 against the AU. Australia is our biggest trading partner, so having a healthy differential there is a good idea. This doesn’t mean printing money. It just means dropping our interest rate in concert with them. They have just gone down 25 points. We should do the same.

    • mike e 32.1

      The Stupid monetarist!
      You don’t know Jack!
      What value is the Aussie dollar against ours!
      Dropping our interest rates would barely move our dollar any where!
      The banks will still charge what they like!
      Our dollar is welded to the Aussie we need a big Idea not a failed idea!

  32. redfred 33

    What scares Captain Bank of America Key and is it Phil O’Riley or Steven Joyce Steven Joyce about the Greens targeted QE program is it might work.

    Then they have some explaining to do.

  33. tsmithfield 35

    The problem is once we start heading down this direction, and the left catches on to the idea that there is a source of “money” that doesn’t even require tax, then we will be equivalent to Zimbabwe within a decade. 🙂

    • Colonial Viper 35.1

      With the destruction of the NZ manufacturing and industrial base, that’s exactly where Key and English are taking us.

    • mike e 35.2

      The Simple Monetarist the Labour social democrats alliance in 1935 practised that very policy and New Zealand was the first country to recover from the depression.
      right up until the late 60’s the state advances corporation used printed money for housing manufacturing and farm development!
      Inflation wasn’t a problem because productivity kept ahead !

      • OneTrack 35.2.1

        How is productivity going to keep ahead this time?

        • mike e 35.2.1.1

          OT By investing in the right areas of the economy ie Auckland and Christchurch’s housing shortages
          That would bring down the housing bubble and inflation at the same time.
          It would however piss off the big four Aussie banks though because they would not have the easy price gouging ride they have now.
          The National Party are in their back pocket.
          Just look at Westpac’s economic strategy for New Zealand on their website then have a look at Nationals strategy they are identical in every word down to the dots !
          The only difference is the colour ones red and the other blue!
          I’ll let you figure that one out!
          Banking would be another area funding Kiwibank to become a business bank!
          Infrastructure
          Research and development!

    • Draco T Bastard 35.3

      Strange, the “left” seem to think this idea of printing money comes with some limitations. The RWNJs, on the other hand, think that the private banks printing money has none whatsoever.

  34. captain hook 36

    I dont care as long as I can buy some houses, rack rent them and call myself a capitulist.

  35. KJT 37

    All the howls about Zimbabwe and the Weimer republic forget that their productive sectors were first destroyed, before they started printing money when there was nothing to buy with it.

    Not a lot different from Nationals present efforts!

    A lot different from lending to ourselves to invest in paying our under-utilised and capable construction industry to rebuild Christchurch. Vital infrastructure which will return the investment many times in future.

    • Exactly if all the other banks in the world are doing it, why aren’t isn’t the Reserve Bank of NZ?
      (Some freakin contract they signed MAYBE?)

      Instead we’re bailing banks out with taxpayer dollars ….. who was meant to veto those investments?
      The Gnats’ that’s who, It’s all gone under for them, and they’re denying it and blaming our welfare system.

      Meanwhile, jobs are being lost cos they let the banks run rampant with our pensions which they promptly lost in most cases.

      And the Gnat’s want to pull back on Welfare, the one answer to those peoples problems since the collapse of SCF and many others.

      Add major damage too Christchurch, insurance companies with no cash, and no one to underwrite them (Which is what the EQC is all about apparently).

      As always it’ll be good people that fix the problems one by bloody slow one,
      Gnat’s will sit back afterwards claim the success for their own
      But the fact is they did nothing.

  36. OneTrack 38

    The Greens alway dreamt of an unlimited money tree and now their prayers have been answered, and its got a much sexier name that “printing money”. Whats not to love?

    • mike e 38.1

      One trick phoney did you know our PM got between $5 to $10 million of his wealth from the federal reserves QE1 ML was saved from insolvency by printed money funny that!
      BofA got $45 billion US of printed money to save Merrill Lynch!
      Otherwise Key would not be as rich as he is today!
      New Zealand is borrowing a lot of printed money (52 Billion)at between 6and7% thats only costing the lender 1/2%!

  37. Jeff 39

    What Keys is really doing when he insults this policy is drawing a line in the sand, one between the mega rich and everybody else. He’s making it clear that banks will not be for the virtue of the people, but for the continued siphoning of money, the funnel down which we pour our lives, feeding the relentless cogs of the wealth extraction machine.

    What really makes me angry about The PM’s “whacky” comments is that this denigrative political rhetoric is the norm in NZ, and sadly many will swallow this down with a swig of nasty NZ red, fall back into thier pseudo middle class slumber, content with their share of the crumbs, their SSRIs and three dollar lunches. Rats in the cage squabling over the last shreads of rancid bread.

    I dont know if its sad or pathetic, or something else, what I do know is the voice of the sleeping giant is roused in Europe, but for the most part remains docile. While Athens burns Stockholm sleeps, the pain is not felt everywhere, yet, and most believe it can’t happen here. Is that the definition of denial? Use the same tools, same rules, expect a different outcome. For fucks sake, these banks are all owned by the same people, you really think NZ wont crash and burn? You’d have to be stupid, or lied to, convincenly, over decades. The wealth extraction machine is a slow grind to an inevitable conclusion. The USA is close, Greece on the edge, the lemmings are lined up behind them. Go on NZ, take the leap, suicide might be a fine alternative to surfdom.

    Most do not believe the true disparity between the obscenly rich and everyone else, cognitive dissonance someone else mentioned, easier to believe in the myths we are sold in fairlytails, the lies we are told in school, lies our uneducated parents rarely questioned, those which the meek and powerless accept as their lot, those which the likes of Keys will regurgitate add inifitum, anything to protect the legalised rackettering we call banking.

  38. It’s not the fact that Russell Norman wants to print money out of thin air. Heck everybody else is. It is the fact that he wants to do it within the interest/Debt system killing the global economy. It shows him up for the ignoramus that he is and for a leader of a “Green” party who needs to emphasize the unsustainablility of the current extraction and destruction economy that is inexcusable!

  39. TightyRighty 41

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2215301/Annuity-rates-gone-freefall–Money-printing-triggers-slump–worse.html

    fuck the savers, people who are actually sensible with their money. Oh, and the oldies. them too. QE is a continuation of the system most pro-standardites hate. Just too intellectually bankrupt to realise.

    • RedLogix 41.1

      I sort of agree.

      The problem has been that QE so far has been targetted at buying bank bonds to inject liqidity into the banking system. But as Steven Keen has forcefully demonstrated over and again, when the system is debt saturated this does not have intended effect because no-one wants to borrow.

      If instead the money was directed at the people directly, for instance in the form of a Universal Basic Income or in the form of a large lump sum to everyone on the condition that if you have debt it must be repaid then the debt would be rapidly unwound and the real economy would get going again.

      • insider 41.1.1

        “on the condition that if you have debt it must be repaid”

        How could that be enforced? I don’t think it could realistically. Would it only apply to formal debts with contracts? What about undocumented loans between family members. Just cut out the middleman and just give it to banks and finance companies direct if that’s your aim. Their shareholders will love it…

        • Colonial Viper 41.1.1.1

          Dude, wtf, its not debts between family members and mates which are weighing down the balance sheets of this country.

          Just cut out the middleman and just give it to banks and finance companies direct if that’s your aim. Their shareholders will love it…

          Another wtf from you. Banks and their shareholders would hate to see their income producing asset base destroyed in this fashion. They are definitely not going to “love it”.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • At a glance – Does CO2 always correlate with temperature?
    On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
    58 mins ago
  • Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6.06 pm on Tuesday, March 19
    TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Tuesday, March 19:Kāinga Ora’s dry rot The Spinoff DailyBill McKibben on ‘Climate Superfunds’ making Big Oil pay for climate damage The Crucial YearsPreston Mui on returning to 1980s-style productivity growth NoahpinionAndy Boenau on NIMBYs needing unusual bedfellows Urbanism SpeakeasyNed Resnikoff's case ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    3 hours ago
  • Relentlessly negative
    Negative yesterday, negative today. Negative all year, according to one departing reader telling me I’ve grown strident and predictable. Fair enough. If it’s any help, every time I go to write about a certain topic that begins with C and ends with arrrrs, I do brace myself and ask: Again? Are ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    4 hours ago
  • Scoring 4.6 out of 10, the new Government is struggling in the polls
    Bryce Edwards writes –  It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 hours ago
  • Promiscuous Empathy: Chris Trotter Replies To His Critics.
    Inspirational: The Family of Man is a glorious hymn to human equality, but, more than that, it is a clarion call to human freedom. Because equality, unleavened by liberty, is a broken piano, an unstrung harp; upon which the songs of fraternity will never be played. “Somebody must have been telling lies about ...
    4 hours ago
  • Don’t run your business like a criminal enterprise
    The Detail this morning highlights the police's asset forfeiture case against convicted business criminal Ron Salter, who stands to have his business confiscated for systemic violations of health and safety law. Business are crying foul - but not for the reason you'd think. Instead of opposing the post-conviction punishment and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 hours ago
  • Misremembering Justinian’s Taxes.
    Tax Lawyer Barbara Edmonds vs Emperor Justinian I - Nolo Contendere: False historical explanations of pivotal events are very far from being inconsequential.WHEN BARBARA EDMONDS made reference to the Roman Empire, my ears pricked up. It is, lamentably, very rare to hear a politician admit to any kind of familiarity ...
    5 hours ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Scoring 4.6 out of 10, the new Government is struggling in the polls
    It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support for the various parties in ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 hours ago
  • Bishop scores headlines with crackdown on unwelcome tenants – but Peters scores, too, as tub-thump...
    Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    7 hours ago
  • Will it make the boat go faster?
    Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    9 hours ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Is Simon Bridges’ NZTA appointment a conflict of interest?
    Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi The fact that a ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    10 hours ago
  • Is Simon Bridges’ NZTA appointment a conflict of interest?
    Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    10 hours ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' at 10:10am on Tuesday, March 19
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st Century The SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims Stuff Steve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    10 hours ago
  • Bernard's six newsy things on Tuesday, March 19
    It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    11 hours ago
  • New Life for Light Rail
    This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail  Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
    Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
    12 hours ago
  • Why Are Bosses Nearly All Buffoons?
    Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    15 hours ago
  • Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6.06 pm on March 18
    TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    1 day ago
  • Peters holds his ground on co-governance, but Willis wriggles on those tax cuts and SNA suspension l...
    Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    1 day ago
  • Labour’s final report card
    David Farrar writes –  We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how  went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promise The result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • “Drunk Uncle at a Wedding”
    I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    1 day ago
  • Wang Yi’s perfectly-timed, Aukus-themed visit to New Zealand
    Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    1 day ago
  • Gordon Campbell on Dune 2, and images of Islam
    Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
    1 day ago
  • New Rail Operations Centre Promises Better Train Services
    Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
    2 days ago
  • Bernard's six newsy things at 6.36am on Monday, March 18
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: Wang Yi’s perfectly-timed, Aukus-themed visit to New Zealand
    Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    2 days ago
  • The Kaka’s diary for the week to March 25 and beyond
    TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    2 days ago
  • Bitter and angry; Winston First
    New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #11
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
    2 days ago
  • 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #11
    A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
    2 days ago
  • Out of Touch.
    “I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    2 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • Bring out your Dad
    Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
    More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
    3 days ago
  • The bewildering world of Chris Luxon – Guns for all, not no lunch for kids
    .“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    3 days ago
  • Expert Opinion: Ageing Boomers, Laurie & Les, Talk Politics.
    It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
    3 days ago
  • Manufacturing The Truth.
    Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet –  is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
    3 days ago
  • A Powerful Sensation of Déjà Vu.
    Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
    3 days ago
  • Can you guess where world attention is focussed (according to Greenpeace)? It’s focussed on an EPA...
    Bob Edlin writes –  And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    3 days ago
  • Further integrity problems for the Greens in suspending MP Darleen Tana
    Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    3 days ago
  • Jacqui Van Der Kaay: Greens’ transparency missing in action
    For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    3 days ago
  • Bernard’s Dawn Chorus with six newsey things at 6:46am for Saturday, March 16
    TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ Herald Thomas Coughlan Simeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • How Did FTX Crash?
    What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    4 days ago
  • Elections in Russia and Ukraine
    Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
    4 days ago
  • Bernard’s six stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15
    TL;DR: Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it:  We want our country to be a ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    4 days ago
  • National’s clean car tax advances
    The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Government funding bailouts
    Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Two offenders, different treatments.
    See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    4 days ago
  • Treaty references omitted
    Ele Ludemann writes  – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • The Ghahraman Conflict
    What was that judge thinking? Peter Williams writes –  That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    4 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' for March 15
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop: Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • The day Wellington up-zoned its future
    Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    4 days ago
  • Weekly Roundup 15-March-2024
    It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
    Greater AucklandBy Greater Auckland
    5 days ago
  • That Word.
    Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • The Hoon around the week to March 15
    Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Labour’s policy gap
    It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
    PolitikBy Richard Harman
    5 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #11 2024
    Open access notables A Glimpse into the Future: The 2023 Ocean Temperature and Sea Ice Extremes in the Context of Longer-Term Climate Change, Kuhlbrodt et al., Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society: In the year 2023, we have seen extraordinary extrema in high sea surface temperature (SST) in the North Atlantic and in ...
    5 days ago
  • Melissa remains mute on media matters but has something to say (at a sporting event) about economic ...
     Buzz from the Beehive   The text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary.  It can be quickly analysed ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    5 days ago
  • The return of Muldoon
    For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Will the rental tax cut improve life for renters or landlords?
    Bryce Edwards writes –  Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Geoffrey Miller: What Saudi Arabia’s rapid changes mean for New Zealand
    Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    5 days ago
  • Racism’s double standards
    Questions need to be asked on both sides of the world Peter Williams writes –   The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • It’s not a tax break
    Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • The Plastic Pig Collective and Chris' Imaginary Friends.
    I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
    Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
    5 days ago
  • Who is responsible for young offenders?
    Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    5 days ago
  • Gordon Campbell on National’s fantasy trip to La La Landlord Land
    How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
    5 days ago
  • Bernard's Top 10 @ 10 'pick 'n' mix' for March 14
    TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop: The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • No, Prime Minister, rents don’t rise or fall with landlords’ costs
    TL;DR: Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
    The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
    5 days ago
  • Cartoons: ‘At least I didn’t make things awkward’
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
    5 days ago
  • Solving traffic congestion with Richard Prebble
    The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
    Greater AucklandBy Patrick Reynolds
    6 days ago
  • I Think I'm Done Flying Boeing
    Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
    David FarrierBy David Farrier
    6 days ago
  • Invoking Aristotle: Of Rings of Power, Stones, and Ships
    The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
    6 days ago
  • Van Velden brings free-market approach to changing labour laws – but her colleagues stick to distr...
    Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago
  • Why Newshub failed
    Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
    Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
    6 days ago
  • Māori Party on the warpath against landlords and seabed miners – let’s see if mystical creature...
    Bob Edlin writes  –  The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they  follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
    Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
    6 days ago

  • Government moves to quickly ratify the NZ-EU FTA
    "The Government is moving quickly to realise an additional $46 million in tariff savings in the EU market this season for Kiwi exporters,” Minister for Trade and Agriculture, Todd McClay says. Parliament is set, this week, to complete the final legislative processes required to bring the New Zealand – European ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Positive progress for social worker workforce
    New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Minister confirms reduced RUC rate for PHEVs
    Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    10 hours ago
  • Trade access to overseas markets creates jobs
    Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand.  Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • NZ and Chinese Foreign Ministers hold official talks
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Kāinga Ora instructed to end Sustaining Tenancies
    Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Speech to Auckland Business Chamber: Growth is the answer
    Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Singapore rounds out regional trip
    Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships.      “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Minister van Velden represents New Zealand at International Democracy Summit
    Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Insurance Council of NZ Speech, 7 March 2024, Auckland
    ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland  Acknowledgements and opening  Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho.  Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau  My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Five-year anniversary of Christchurch terror attacks
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says.  “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024
    Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024  Acknowledgements and opening  Morena, Nga Mihi Nui.  Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau  Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Early visit to Indonesia strengthens ties
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country.   “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • China Foreign Minister to visit
    Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week.  “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister opens new Auckland Rail Operations Centre
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Celebrating 10 years of Crankworx Rotorua
    The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee.  “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government delivering on tax commitments
    Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today.  “The Amendment Paper represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Significant Natural Areas requirement to be suspended
    Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government classifies drought conditions in Top of the South as medium-scale adverse event
    Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government partnership to tackle $332m facial eczema problem
    The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced.  “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • NZ, India chart path to enhanced relationship
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level.   “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Ruapehu Alpine Lifts bailout the last, say Ministers
    Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt takes action to drive better cancer services
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt takes action to drive better cancer services
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Work begins on SH29 upgrades near Tauriko
    Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Work begins on SH29 upgrades near Tauriko
    Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Fresh produce price drop welcome
    Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024.  “Lower fruit and vege ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the 68th United Nations Commission on the Status of Women (CSW68)
    Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all.  Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Statement to the 68th United Nations Commission on the Status of Women
    Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all.  Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government backs rural led catchment projects
    The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to Auckland Business Chamber
    Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction.   Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Commission’s advice on ETS settings tabled
    Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government lowering building costs
    The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Trustee tax change welcomed
    Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister’s Ramadan message
    Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness.  It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister appoints new NZTA Chair
    Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to Life Sciences Summit
    Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology.  It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Progress continues apace on water storage
    Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government agrees to restore interest deductions
    Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Minister to attend World Anti-Doping Agency Symposium
    Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-19T07:21:03+00:00