Comments on: Labour’s earworm

By: Why’d you do it Chris? at thestandard.org.nz

Why’d you do it Chris? at thestandard.org.nz — Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:09:21 +0000

[...] Knox had a good piece in the Dom Post today explaining why he wrote Labour’s new campaign song. Here’s an extract: Good grief! I’ve gone and written a campaign song for a mainstream [...]

By: Phentermine

Phentermine — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:36:33 +0000

phentermine

Halla everybody! I want pharmacist this tbl. Need phentermine otwpm

By: ahod

ahod — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:07:01 +0000

Really… Damn!

Can it be emailed?

By: Anne Elliot

Anne Elliot — Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:06:16 +0000

Use a Mac . Worked for me.

By: ANGUS

ANGUS — Fri, 09 Nov 2007 23:33:37 +0000

I CAN’T DOWNLOAD IT!

ANY SUGGESTIONS?

By: Insolent Prick

Insolent Prick — Wed, 07 Nov 2007 22:36:58 +0000

It’s not consistent of you to benefit-bash, Robinsod.

By: Sam Dixon

Sam Dixon — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:57:21 +0000

Milo – it wouldn’t be ‘ – national bad’ all the time if National didn’t have stupid policies designed to benifit a few rich buggers at the expense of the rest of the country.

By: roger nome

roger nome — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:18:24 +0000

chris knox is possibly the most melodically talented musician that NZ has ever had. So similar in his musical sensibilities to the Beatles and Elliot Smith – who of course are/were left-wing also. What is it that no real musical talents are ever right wing?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pAfPfcwgUM8

By: Robinsod

Robinsod — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 01:05:06 +0000

IP – I’d charge you but I don’t think you could afford to pay me out out of your benefit. Go back to punter-land son.

By: Insolent Prick

Insolent Prick — Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:01:08 +0000

You should charge people for your investigative services, Sherlock.

By: Robinsod

Robinsod — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:28:18 +0000

No Prick – you’re just some nobody who is seeking attention via blogging (you probably also delude yourself that you’re active in some important cause due to this vanity). Santa on the other hand is someone with inside knowledge of similar circles to DPF, ready access to the same sort of stats DPF uses (and a propensity to use the same techniques to spin them) and a very similar lexicon and style to DPF (despite his attempts to hide them). When you add the fact that santa seems to take the standard as a personal affront and his handle doesn’t show anywhere else. I’d say it’s about 90% certain he’s DPF. I’m sure an analysis of posting time between the two would show significant correlation but who could be arsed with that? DPF Claws it is…

By: Insolent Prick

Insolent Prick — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 22:01:12 +0000

Yes, Robinsod. DPF has the time to set up alternative noms de plume and comment at length on your blog. I’m DPF, too. So is Murray McCully. And Cactus Kate? Also DPF. Whaleoil, definitely him. Pete Cresswell as well.

By: Robinsod

Robinsod — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:58:23 +0000

DPF Claws – interesting to see you commenting on my ban at KB only minutes after DPF posted it in the demerits section without comment on the main thread (even I didn’t find out ’til this morning). You are DPF and it’s real sad I must say that you feel you have to come over here to boast – what’s the matter bro, do you miss engaging with me already?

Oh and if we’re talking unpaid creative contribution I’d be real interested to know how much Ansell got paid for National’s billboards and taxathon ad last time around…

By: illuminatedtiger

illuminatedtiger — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:04:00 +0000

Doesn’t mean its bad though, I really do like it . Definitely has an old “flying-nun” feel to it.

By: Benodic

Benodic — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:00:26 +0000

I know, me too. It just goes round, and round, and round, and round and won’t go away.

Though I guess there are worse things in the world for Labour than NZ’s voters having “you’re better off with Labour” stuck in their heads in the weeks leading up to the election!