Facilitating, (not forcing), people back in to the workforce when jobs become available seems like a good idea in my mind. Given the fact that a right leaning government is not going to follow standard left wing presciptions and create a bunch of artifical jobs via increasing Government spending I don’t see what your problem with this is. If there are no suitable jobs then these people won’t lose their benefits. If there are suitable jobs then they will be expected to take them if they are offered the opportunity. Surely encouraging people to participate as a productive member of the wider economy is a good thing no matter what side of the political divide you are on.
oddly enough gormless, many many years ago i entered that very answer in a Dept of Social Welfare registration form asking about jobs i wanted and got told it was not a suitable answer
The Gormless Fool formerly known as Oleolebiscuitbarrell 1.1.1.1.1
Good question. I’d suggest one that fits in with the particular circumstance of the person involved without causing undue hardship. Admittedly it is a fine line determining this hence why I think it is best not to force people to take something. That stated I also believe in time limits in terms of many benefits. Anything more than a half a dozen or so years is unacceptable. The benefit system is a safety net not a lifestyle choice.
Gosman, when 85% of your body is burn scar tissue and more than fifteen minutes of any sort of effort leaves you near tears as your body screams for you to stop moving, how long should that person be allowed to receive an invalids benefit?
The world is a lot more complex than your dog whistle mantras.
Did you not notice I used the term ‘many benefits’ as opposed to ‘all benefits’? I am comfortable with the idea that a certain amount of people will need support from the state on an ongoing basis. That does not apply to all beneficiaries now does it?
no it does not apply to all beneficiaries, and neither should the ‘solutions’ being promoted from the current ideologues in power, Individuals are just that, individual and one size fits all is no way to run a complex and critical service such as welfare.
I think that is the whole point of the policy change. It is a far more individualised approach. MSD will be working with each beneficiary to see how they can assist them getting back into suitable work. If they need help with child care arrangements then there is assistance in this regard. If they need other assistance then they can see if they can get that. It certainly isn’t one sized fits all. So what is your problem with it again?
So what you are essentially stating here is you don’t believe it will be an individualised approach. Fair enough, it is your right to believe anything you want. However you can’t deny that the concept of the policy is far more individualised than a one sized fits all approach.
@ McFlock
You seem to be implying that frontline MSD staff are bullies. Interesting that Public servants should act in such a manner. Perhaps we need a restructure in MSD if the staff are behaving so appallingly.
“However you can’t deny that the concept of the policy is far more individualised than a one sized fits all approach. ”
apart from an obvious pavlovian belief in whatever spews from the orifices of the policy makers, i cannot see how you are able to state this conclusion with any sincerity.
Funnily enough, MSD staff seem to become bullies and, e.g., not tell clients what their entitlements are only when National are in government. They seemed to be much more helpful 2000-2008 for some reason.
So an independent Public service somehow manages to change it’s fundamental behaviour based on the political leanings of the government of the day does it?
Something seriously wrong with the Public service if that is indeed the case wouldn’t you agree McFlock? I’d be looking at some serious reforms if the people delivering the service can’t do so impartially.
Gos, ever hear the expression that shit flows downhill?
The public service operates according to the priorities set by the government. This is how it should be. Tory governments prioritise getting people off specific benefits (e.g. limiting unemployment creep by kicking people onto SB, then when priorities change re-evaluating SB entitlements). Liberal / left governments prioritise helping people into work via the benefit system – e.g. training, income security, courses.
Government provides the service parameters through legislation, regulation, funding, and ministerial oversight. Public servants implement services within those parameters. You obviously don’t know anything about public policy, either. Tool.
National’s approach is like the one in UK, where they get people off benefits by harassing those who should get them until they give up. And pay private firms megabucks to pretend to help them into work. Neither has been effective.
This Government is big on repeating measures that have failed overseas.
I suppose that if your view is from those who benefit by wasting taxpayers money in boosting private profits it is a success.
… which is why these policies don’t apply to every situation. People in horrible situations like that you’ve described will still receieve unlimited support.
Given that, I’ve ignored the rest of your emotive scaremongering because it just isn’t relevant.
I am confident that the process works well for those that are truly invalid. There should indeed be hurdles to cross to get on it – you are essentially saying that you are too sick to ever work again.
The person I know is definitely in that category, and it wasn’t that hard to convince anyone of that at all.
Have you been through the process? What did you see?
In terms of long term unemployed (as opposed to other benefits) the figures here show that it largely depends upon the economy and economic policy settings. (Hardly news, but the trends over the past decades are interesting).
‘People spend as little time out of work as possible‘ would be the obvious hypothesis to explain these figures. Across the board coercion (which is what these proposals involve – not ‘facilitation’) does not seem to be justified (or efficient) based on these figures.
Note that ‘long term’ unemployed is defined as unemployed for one year or longer – substantially less than your ‘half dozen years’.
Nope. Giving them jobs distorts the economy. You just have to look at countries that tried to ensure full employment in the past. Take the economies of Eastern Europe under soviet Communism. East Germany had pretty much full employment and a good social system in place. However they created crap mainly. As soon as they had to compete with the West without protection they failed. If you want a distorted economy which is uncompetitive and lacking innovation then by all means support government policies for state managed full employment.
Strawman. Who said anything about government funded full employment? Oh, that’s right it was you and no-one else. If you’ve got a response to the point I made then respond to it. Otherwise don’t expect to get fed.
Gosman this has nothing to do with reality or addressing a problem or, gasp, getting value for money. It is a bit of raw meat thrown out to the supporters. Give them a bash, camoflague it with some senstive language and do nothing at all about the core problem
The right of the political spectrum tends to support the idea that Private sector is the best method of job creation so long as the conditions are put in place for them. The left tends to think that it is beholden on the Government to take a more activist role in this regard. I can accept you have your way of looking at things and that’s fine with me. However I don’t think you should expect a Right leaning government to follow left leaning policy prescriptions for job creation. Therefore that side of the equation is not something the National led Government is going to be interested in much, (beyond setting up the conditions for growth). So if we remove that aspect from this discussion we come down to the question over whether encouraging beneficiaries to engage more actively with finding work is a good or a bad thing. I think it is a good thing myself.
I don’t think you should expect a Right leaning government to follow left leaning policy prescriptions for job creation.
Agreed that is the essence of the problem. Those of the right do not care that others lives are being blighted by unemployment, those of us on the left think it is a travesty and that the Government’s role is to do something, anything, to improve matters.
However this story about how the left cares more about unemployment than the right doesn’t tend to be reflected in reality.
If you take countries in Europe for example and compare those with strict labour market regulations and/or welfare provisions, (e.g Sweden or say Italy), with countries with more flexible labout markets and smaller governments you tend to find that the countries with more right leaning policies have lower unemployment rates.
So equally I could argue that someone like you mickeysavage is only paying lip service to the idea that you care about unemployed people when the policies you promote tend to lead to the opposite outcomes from what you claim they do.
Try this interesting rundown of the generosity of unemployment benefits in US states versus the unemployment rate in those states.
Yes, it’s correlational – but the most generous states tend to have lower unemployment rates; and vice versa. How does that fit into a theory that people are prone to ‘welfare dependency’?
The government no matter if it’s left or right leaning should do the correct thing Gosman. If you look around the world at the countries that weathered the recession the best you’ll find that they all invested in job creation. The countries that haven’t recovered properly didn’t. They relied on austerity measures, which have proven to be a complete failure.
When you say encourage you actually mean punish. National is reducing benefits at the very time costs have increased dramatically. This will simply push more people into desperation, increase inequality and be socially destructive. They are implementing a regime of punishment for those that do not conform while not ensuring there are enough jobs. This makes any rhetoric concerning training largely redundant.
Job creation is all about having enough money in communities. National has been removing money from communities that are already struggling, which will ensure less job creation and reduced economic growth. They are in fact making the conditions for job creation worse. We cannot remove that aspect from the discussion because it’s the reality of the situation.
Which countries are you comparing Jackal? The US spent billions on job creation yet the unemployment rate hardly moved. Perhaps you are meaning countries running large budget deficits in Europe. What is happening with them at the moment?
Where is your evidence that benefits are being reduced? Are you meaning the total number of beneficiaries or the amount paid to each person?
I’m comparing the countries that have recovered from the recession faster than those that haven’t. Think Asia because China invested 4tn yuan in 2008 vs Europe and the US.
I believe the US is still debating the Jobs Bill, which will input around $447 billion into tax cuts, public works, unemployment benefits etc. They seem a bit slow to realize that the best way out of recession is investing into the domestic economy.
Benefits are being reduced all the time because the annual increase does not match inflation, the accommodation supplement has not increased to match rental price increases, the abatement rate means it is not worth working part time and the fact that some benefits have actually been reduced Gosman.
If I meant the total number of beneficiaries, I would have said so.
I don’t even think China went in to recession post 2008. Certainly the problem there is one of the economy overheating, which massive government spending tends to exacerbates. Also Japan hasn’t seen much pay back for the Trillions of Yen of stimulus money they have pumped into the economy via Government spending since the 1990’s.
China was in recession from December 2008 to August 2009 with millions laid off. By the end of 2009 they had pretty much alleviated the problem by forward planning, proper managerial strategies and injecting money into the local economy. Japan has the third largest economy in the world. Can you get anything right today Gosman?
Simply put, the economics is by no way clear here AT ALL. It is wholly possible that all of this new-Keynesian stimulus is just being pissed away against the Chicago-wind. Or its also possible that the impacts are not being seen yet.
Either way, you’re pretty bold in your comeback Todd. Or have I missed something – care to link to it if I have?
[lprent: Try The Economist. There have been a number of articles over the last year or so looking at the credit contraction and the effect that has had on the property market in particular. Wolfram isn’t exactly a good source because it isn’t a active search engine. The data is only there if it has been entered.
Or are you only interested in poseur answers like the one you gave QoT? (and which attracted my attention) ]
I believe the dates for China’s recession are correct. There are numerous official documents that talk about the effects of the recession in China. I’m pretty sure you can find the corresponding data using Google search.
As for Japan, they still have the third largest economy (some say second) in the world, a high living standard and relatively low unemployment. Japan has a national debt to GDP of around 197% in part due to their extensive investments in construction projects and stimulus packages since 1990 to reinvigorate their economy. The problem Japan has is that often the money allocated is made irrespective of how efficient or socially beneficial a project is.
It’s much the same in New Zealand where National is financially awarding their mates in the road building and oil industries with our tax money while projects where the money is required and that would show better returns are largely ignored.
As I have already pointed out, much of the United States stimulus package hasn’t been enacted yet. Their problems are also more entrenched, so it will take longer to see any proper recovery.
I think the economics are clear: the countries that quickly implemented stimulus packages by investing into their local economies have recovered faster. Meanwhile countries like New Zealand that did not react properly to the recession are still stagnant.
In other words, National’s policies that are designed to funnel revenue out of our local economies are completely the opposite of what should be happening.
“Given the fact that a right leaning government is not going to follow standard left wing presciptions and create a bunch of artifical jobs via increasing Government spending ”
More corporate welfare, ( Not) followed by “trickle down”, sounds like govt spending to me!
When you state Corportate welfare are you meaning the money the Government spent on the Deposit Guarrantee scheme which was set up under the previous Labour led administration? While I agree with you that this sort of funding is unproductive on the whole I would hardly place it in the same category as say spending government money on paying private businesses to employ people for the sake of employing them.
When you state Corportate welfare are you meaning the money the Government spent on the Deposit Guarrantee scheme which was set up at a sustainable level under the previous Labour led administration and then grossly expanded to include, among others, SCF by National, resulting in bailout payments of hundreds of millions to a bunch of auckland speculators who had only recently invested in SCF?
The DGS was introduced on the 12th October 2008 and was set to expire on 12th October 2010.
SCF came in on the 19th November just after the election (8th).
I can’t find any indication that the incoming National government made any changes to the DGS during this period.
Certainly National created the smaller extended scheme & admitted SCF to it in on the 1st April 2010, but SCF went bust before that was due to start (13th October 2010). Treasury argue that once SCF was admitted, SCF depositors were guaranteed until the DGS expired, even if SCF was removed from the DGS.
I do recall PM Clark saying that the Australian guarantee had forced the governments hand and I agreed with that, but it was never clear to me why the guarantee was not for the banks only.
Reserve Bank Governor Bollard thought at the time that finance companies might be a liability.
If Labour had continued in government, I see no reason why SCF would not have been admitted to the DGS.
Doubtful, the Reserve Bank made an amendment to the DGS on the 16th October 2008 that low rated finance companies would have to pay a fee on their deposit growth since 12th October. Clearly a disincentive, not a restriction from increasing their deposits.
The first banks came in on the 29th October 2008. The first finance company (NZF Money Limited) came in on the 7th November, i.e. the day before the election.
It was a done deal.
Here’s the kind of nonsensical crap John Key gets away with. From Stuff :
Prime Minister John Key said this morning he “just didn’t buy the argument around job creation”.
“Obviously if the economy is poorer and not creating as many jobs or in fact contracting jobs – that hasn’t been the case in the last few years – of course the unemployment role will rise,” he told TV3’s Firstline programme.
The reforms focused on making people ready for work by offering them support back into the workforce and childcare.
“If they don’t get a job, if there isn’t a job there for them, then nothing changes in terms of their entitlements.”
“But there are plenty of jobs out there for people if they look really hard.”
Basically he agreed with the proposition that if there isn’t jobs out there then you can’t expect people to work.
He then mentioned that the policy change is meant to make it easier for people to get back to work with help around childcare and other support. If you think this is not correct then point out the issues.
Finally he mentioned there are jobs out there. There are. I work in an area with a shortage of qualified people. My flatmate is a manager of a retail store and has trouble finding good quality workers. It is not true to state there are no jobs.
If the jobs are out there then why has the number of unemployed jumped so massively in the last five years. Are you saying tens of thousands of people have just decided to make unemployment their lifestyle choice?
I prefer to believe the numbers over a blog commentator and a PM with an agenda.
So you basically agree with what John Key stated in the first part of the statement. If there are no job because the economy is not doing as well as it could then of course there will be difficulty getting a job.
It’s a bullshit statement Gosman. Whether I agree with it or not makes no difference to the fact that Key is asleep at the wheel.
What changed between Key thinking that the government could make jobs through building a cycle way and holding a job summit and Key now saying he can do nothing to make jobs. Apparently the economy is in better shape now that it was during the job summit ‘talkfest’…
o you basically agree with what John Key stated in the first part of the statement.
Definitely not as he was lying.
“Obviously if the economy is poorer and not creating as many jobs or in fact contracting jobs – that hasn’t been the case in the last few years – of course the unemployment role will rise,” he told TV3′s Firstline programme.
Unemployment has increased in the last few years which indicates that job creation hasn’t been happening.
Actually, you can have job creation at the same time as increased unemployment. All that has to happen is for the number seeking jobs rising faster than the increase in new jobs.
Yeah. The 20 or so people that hassle me every week because WINZ instructs them to apply for half a dozen jobs a week are still at it because the jobs are there if you look really hard.
Except there are not jobs for 25000 unemployed in Northland.
So they have a number of options. Either move to somewhere where there are appropriate jobs for them, (people do this all the time), or work with the local community to create the jobs locally.
I’m kind of sick of seeing people place the blame for a lack of employment on the Government. If you think there is a viable business opportunity that will employ people then pursue it. As far as I am aware there are plenty of potential up north with farming and tourism. Even light and heavy industry could take place in somewhere like Whangarei.
As for getting capital for any ventures, well considering a large number of unemployed people up there are Maori I’d suggest there is some Maori owned land up there which could be leveraged for this.
Hey gos, you might have a go-bag by your bed ready to relocate, but most people don’t have thousands to spend relocating on the off-chance that they’ll find work somewhere else – those that do go to Aus.
You know what – unemployment IS the govt’s problem. They create the legislative and the bulk of the economic conditions within the country, they choose whether to invest in real infrastructure or holiday highways, they choose whether to bollock the apprenticeships scheme or not, they set interest rates, they support new businesses, they choose whether to fund or cut part time community education night courses in business studies.
Blaming someone in northland for not starting a light manufacturing business is like blaming someone caught in an arctic blizzard for not lighting a fire. Sometimes life isn’t a simple slide rule, which you’d know if you weren’t a complete banker.
“move to somewhere where there are appropriate jobs for them, (people do this all the time)”
Indeed they do.
Thanks for highlighting one of the ways in which (especially unregulated) markets act like giant machines for generating incentives for the unravelling of the ‘social fabric’. The same fabric that maintains – or at least ‘facilitates’ – individual wellbeing.
Yes, I’ve been watchingwith interest the drip, drip, drip of bad stories coming about about these back to work programmes in the UK that have the taxpayer paying corporate wage bills.
Yes, scary stuff, such as PhD graduates being forced to work full time stocking shelves in the supermarket for no pay, apart from their benefit – while the corporations get taxpayer money for providing such opportunities.
Like Gossman, I fail to see the beef of the left on this one.
If the outcome is to make beneficiaries more work-ready, then they will be more readily able to take up jobs when they become available. They will also have higher likelihood of remaining in employment. Also, they may have a better chance of getting part-time work to augment their income.
If they still can’t get a job, then they lose none of their benefits, so their only seems to be the potential of upside gains for them with no downside risk.
Instead of making people ‘work ready’ the government should invest in getting the tens of thousands of people made unemployed in the last five years back in to the employment that they are already trained for.
I cannot understand why the right fail to see that getting employers to employee people and pay them a wage that they can actually live on, without supplement, is the easiest way to make welfare for unemployment and the working poor a safety net solution only.
Because it distorts the economy and make work schemes don’t tend to have a large impact on the unemployment rate. Sweden is a good example of this. The official unemployment rate is higher than New Zealand’s but it is the hidden unemployment rate via various training and make work schemes which is the real tragedy. This is why right leaning people don’t tend to look favourably on them.
So given the fact that a right leaning government is hardly going to turn all lefty and start investing taxpayers money in massive job creation schemes what is your fundamental beef with this policy again? I mean if it comes down to ‘I’d prefer a left leaning government in charge’ then that is kind of a given as you are a lefty.
My beef with the policy is it achieves no real substantial outcome, it will not result in a drop in the unemployment rate of it’s own accord.
When you have a high rate of unemployment only one thing can fix it, having more jobs.
When you have a high rate of welfare being given to working poor only one thing will fix it, higher wages.
In my opinion there is no such thing as a ‘make work scheme’. There are business which people, companies or governments start that employee people. If those businesses are started based on a solid plan with a viable ROI then I don’t see the problem with them whether privately or publicly run.
If you want a simple policy that would actually get people employed it’s paying the unemployment benefit to an employer as a reducing subsidy for up to 24 months, if they agree take on an unemployed person, at a rate which pays them more that the benefit, and provide a plan which shows that the business will be able to continue to support that employee once the subsidy ends.
What better way to encourage companies to take on new employees, improve their service or product, reduce unemployment, help increase wages and reduce the welfare budget.
– Put them in a temporarily subsidised McJob where they can gain experience and train on the job
or
– Put them in training so they can get a… oh I’m sorry there are no McJobs available at the moment, would you like a flight to Australia with that.
Put them in a temporarily subsidised mcjob where the Government pays the wages and the Mc sacks them/makes the hours so low they have to quit, as soon as the subsidy ends.
After cutting the hours of or forcing out their full time workers to make room, so they can get the subsidy.
Really good increasing employment, training, work ethics and moral building opportunity. Not!
and in the meantime they’re working fulltime in go-nowhere work, while their skills stagnate and they have neither the time nor the money to look for work elsewhere. Wage slavery.
I’m not sure I get what you are trying to convey here. Surely you don’t think helping beneficiaries to get back into employment is the same as businesses training their staff.
If it involves training it’s a business cost being loaded onto the tax-payer. Minimum wage is for un-skilled workers – if these skills are going to be useful in an employment context they count as an asset and should be rewarded with higher pay.
Businesses have already managed to pass on all their training costs to taxpayers.
Taxpayers subsidise their businesses by topping up inadequate wages (WFF), paying benefits to casual workers in their labour pool, supplying infrastructure and trained workers to an extent beyound most other countries and they still want subsidies to train people.
Not to mention if they fail to train enough staff or cannot afford to pay the going rate they can bleat to the immigration department to get cheap labour.
If business was not so mollycoddled in NZ they may have had to actually invest some capital in plant and training.
Jeez, I agree with Gooseman about government job creation (if not for the same reason). Government when it creates jobs often “distorts” the market for labour because it gives in general better pay and conditions and leaves employers (like me) having to pay higher wages and with less power over employees….no wonder the Right does not like “job creation”. The flip side employers seem to like is that the “market” gets primed with money for consumption. I reckon they cant have it both ways.
The reality is that the government could create a lot more jobs in a hands off manner: we could for example repudiate all those “free trade” treaties and replace them with “fair trade” treaties. We could close the doors and import substitute for those things that we cant make here at a price depressed by cheap foreign labour. We might also tell capital to fekk off from those parts of the economy they seem to want to buy up (power, water) because it has no risk profile, just a rent value. We could tax the crap out of rentier parts of the economy (finance, utilities etc) and run an encouragingly low tax regime for export / wealth creating ventures. We might just create more jobs by the simple realisation that a working week of 30 hours is more equitable and a little wealth redistribution desirable.
There are a lot of alternatives: one thing is obvious…leaving hands off and allowing the “invisible hand of the market” to do the deed is the lazy behavior of a parasitic bludgers party (National).
To me, there is something really ugly about a guy worth $50m in a tailored suit and a morbidly obese woman in designer clothes telling folks on the breadline to ‘get a job’.
when an article says this
“…essential costs, such as rent and power, paid directly on their behalf. Money for living costs will be loaded on a payment card and they will receive a maximum weekly allowance of up to $50”
and a person thinks this
“Wow, wish I could pay myself a weekly allowance of $50 …. $50 a week would mean I could actually go out for a coffee at lunch time. And I wouldn’t have to tell my kids ‘no’ all the time when they ask for something as simple as an ice-cream. ”
there is definitely a problem.
The comment above is only a single example of numerous comments (now closed btw) upon the welfare reform policies about to be introduced. A single comment among many that are highlighting nought but the the ignorance and selfishness that has permeated our society.
It highlights that the policies have a lot of support in the wider community. You lefties are big on that I thought. I mean you bang on all the time about how much people don’t like the partial sale of some SOE’s as if the government needs to take in to account this support. Yet somehow support for Welfare reform is not something the Government should think about.
I’m with you on this Gosman – the government should consider the weight of evidence for and against policies rather than the level of support for them.
How can “the people” engage with this process? The government should ask them what they want in terms of outcomes, not policy.
Fair enough. However obviously measuring outcomes of something that hasn’t occured is open to interpretation. It is still going to based largely on which side of the political divide attracts you.
No. Outcomes need definition and measurement; eg: a reduction in unemployment or crime rates, or infectious “third world” diseases. Otherwise they are worthless as policy tools.
You can argue anything you damn well please, but unless you provide substantive evidence in support, for policy purposes any competent administration would dismiss your ideas out-of-hand.
Has he ever tried to find work (which usually doesn’t exist) with children in tow and in the way he suggests whilst already working flat out (if you are parenting properly) to bring up one, two, three or perhaps more children on your own because your partner has left for whatever reason. The pressure to parent is ginormous and Key just adds more and more unreasonable pressure and burden.
How this man and his acolytes forget children and their needs. His simplistic, monetary answers to his cronies demands for profits and irresponsibly greedy tax cuts is gutting this nation and her innocent children. I weep at his ignorance.
“Some people are more aggressive at looking for work than others and those that are more aggressive tend to find work.”
That’s a pretty stupid comment from the PM. It’s only relative there, if everyone got more aggressive then they wouldn’t tend to find work. There’s plenty of advice you can give an individual to help them find work but it still won’t create more jobs; they’ll just be taking the job off someone else also looking for work.
Exactly. The right tend to prefer behavioural engineering to social/economic engineering, despite the fact that it is far more directly intrusive on individuals’ freedoms.
Yet, if a society cannot produce the conditions for personal autonomy then it is a bit rich to then go demanding it from everyone, at pain of being further disempowered.
@ seeker. Shipley gave us the same bullshit when there was huge unemployment, her aim was to drive wages down and unfortunately she succeeded. John Key’s aim is also to drive wages down and he too is succeeding. Both these nasties had that other nasty Bill Englsh as Minister of Finance. He was there to make sure that the economy would be wrecked so as to supply the hordes of unemployed to be forced into non existing jobs.
Bill English is a trougher and rorter, Jenny Shipley is a trougher on the Public Purse. John Key, I am sure, will get some troughing seats on the boards of corporations he’s given welfare to. These people do not care about the people of NZ, they don’t give a stuff about our children. They are greedy, thieving traitors. PM in their case means Plunder Meister.
But hey, don’t let a small thing like facts get in the way of you getting all indignent at those nasty evil Tories. I’m sure you can find something else about them to get upset about. Perhaps you could focus on John Key’s smile and wave.
ahh Gosman, facts matter, like the fact when you set that table to show a period relevant to your statement, ie to show results from November 2008, it is odd how the pesky numbers show a 4.6% unemployment rate at the time Bill English took the reins. I also note it has climbed steadily, not falling below 6% since National took office.
Facts Gosman, they do get in the way of good ol’ fashioned data fabrication don’t they!
The only time it has been close to 7% is the January 1/4 of 2010.
Where exactly did you get this 7.3% from?
No, specifically I am looking at the period between June 1999 and Jan 2000. This was when Bill English was first Treasurer/Finance Minister (under Jenny Shipley). This was one of marsman’s points in his emotiove rant, that Bill English was attempting to wreck the economy to supply the hordes of unemployed people for something or rather and he did this under Jenny Shipley and John Key.
Yeah National deserve a pat on the back little jim, look at the graph (if you are able to understand it) , they have done nothing to turn the situation around.
Now get back to your paper-round idiot.
When you finish school in 2020 come back and post some FACTS rather than regurgitating your crap.
Yup have looked at it Fender am use to interpreting Graphs the upward swing under Labour has slowed since National came in ,and the World wide economic times are worse.
Which just goes to show what an abysmal job Labour were doing in better economic times. Anyway I cant hold you up you better push those trolleys in for the shoppers before they get all wet!
Are you looking at the graph while standing on your head james?
Theres certainly no good news on this graph, even the best Nact spin-doctor would fail like you have to paint a positive picture regarding these stats.
With regard to trolleys….I think you are off yours.
On this sunny day the only moisture I see is behind your ears.
Unemployment rose majorly in 2008 and levelled off after 2009. Given any policy change that Governments implement tend not to work immediately you’d expect a delay of say 6 months for a New Government to take effect. Unless you are trying to claim that the mere liklihood of the National party getting into Government causes unemployment to rise Labour seems to have been responsible for and increase in unemployment from 3.5% at the end of 2007 to 5.1% by mid 2009. As it seems to have peaked at about 7% I’d argue it is only another 1.9% that you can directly attribute to National. To put it another way of the rise in unemployment from it’s low point under Labour at end of 2007 through to now Labour was resposible for about half the increase.
Thank godness james has gone to bed, however his father Gos is not much better. I read the daily tennis matches you have with Gos and you have more patience than I have McFlock, you deserve a medal putting up with his BS.
James reckons he’s used to interpreting graphs (on cartoon channel ?) but the fact remains it doesn’t look good and National are bereft of ideas to turn it around.
Oh sorry National do have an idea, beat up on solo parents as deflection.
The trouble is that if these pricks go unchallenged, nek minnit they’re arguing that position X is a commonly accepted truth that supports their even nuttier position Y.
Fortunately my job enables multitasking, and trying to figure out where gos is trying to go keeps me mentally active. Although such happy confluences are seasonal – probably going to have to lower activity here soon for a wee bit.
As stated it was already falling steeply under the Jenny Shipley and Bill English by the time Labour came to power in 1999. At most you can say Labour continued the trend. They certainly didn’t turn anything around (well not until the end of their time in office but it was the other way).
Why are you bringing up marsman’s comment here? A distracting conflation much?
I took the low point of your 1999 figures (not sure where you got the 6.4% from, but no mind) to illustrate that Labour took as pretty much their high point the unemployment level which was pretty much the nat’s lowest unemployment rate.
And before you plead global conditions, oecd figures place labour as having better success keeping NZ unemployment low compared to OECD etc than national.
Real business people??? Who determines what qualifies as one of those – you perchance?
As stated above I’d suggest National has the support of more business people than any left leaning party. Certainly a survey that came out before the last election supported this view.
Really. From Managers in the big firms that benefit from Nationals thieving, perhaps.
The institute of Management and chambers of commerce run business confidence surveys. The dip when the polls showed NACT was getting back in was the biggest since the 1990’s
You keep telling yourself that ‘real’ business owners don’t support the National party. Meanwhile National will quietly continue to receive the support from these same people.
They don’t though. The bulk of NACT’s support comes from dimwits,. cynically manipulated by those who have something to gain from destroying our society..
Just like the republican anti intellectuals in the USA.
Kotahi have they let you out of Socialist training school early today was it Stalin or Mao Se Tung you were reading, and all the beautiful humanity they brought to this world. I kind of like this quote
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.
[lprent: Personally I’m just looking for not having to rescue idiots from the troll traps like you just fell in. It is full of tiresomely overworked words and phrases that are invariably dropped into the debate by people who cannot argue and who merely want to start flamewars (see the policy). Don’t waste my time using them because to me it just indicates that someone’s alleged brain got switched offline. After a warning I usually just start handing out educational bans until the behavior ceases. ]
It is very obvious to me that it is possible for the unemployed to create work for themselves! They merely need to follow the example of the money market people like Shonkers himself and ignore any respect for the law.
Loot and rob, if it is good enough for the financial elite its good enough for the rest of us!
They never appear before the courts, why should you?
Treat the Police and the Courts as just another criminal gang keeping your criminal corporation from its just deserts.
Form a criminal cooperative.
Seize capital from people who own Porsches etc and reinvest in more heists to grow the capital.
If it is good enough for our leaders it is good enough for us.
.
Did the people who traded with John Key or his traders have a problem with him C.V?
Did the people who ultimately paid his salary have a problem with the amount he earned?
Interesting you seem to look down on middlemen. It is an awful lot of people you think aren’t doing anything. Everybody who works in retail for example.
If you want to demonise hundreds of thousands of hard working New Zealanders feel free. It isn’t going to win you many converts to your Social credit fantasy land solution I’d suggest.
Yes. I do have a problem with banks, and others playing with the value of assets so they can lend more money to increase their profits at everyone else’s expense.
And. If we cannot make it illegal we should have capital gains and financial transaction taxes at a level that removes capital from unproductive playing with money, to productive enterprise.
As a good little capitalist you should be interested in addressing this manifest failure of the market also.
Taking advantage of an overvalued currency did not really mean increased lending. I’m not sure where you got this idea from.
They are also not playing with the value of the assets. They made a calculated bet that the currency was overvalued. They were correct and made made money on their bet.
Speculation serves a purpose in markets. For one thing it provides liquidity and therefore tends to reduce volatility. They certainly facilitate transactions taking place.
All the profits that John Key made would have been taxed. Whether you think they should have been taxed at a higher rate or a different way is a seperate matter. Maybe you will get enough people supporting the FTT. Good luck with that.
What is clear is John Key did nothing illegal or even unethical in his role as a FX trader.
All you seem to be doing is regurgitating the leftist nonsense you have been fed about this topic without actually using your brain to analyse the information.
Let me help with this process for you by posing you some questions:
How is an overvalued exchange rate beneficial in the long run for an economy ?
Are there any negative economic impacts for having an overvalued exchange rate?
Even if there were some benefits for having an overvalued exchange rate how is influincing the market to move to a more realistic level causing harm for millions of people i.e. what is the mechanism that directly leads to their pain?
Also you state that we are still suffering the effects of what ‘they’ did. What evidence do you have for this, or at least what is your logic behind this thinking? No major economist, left or right, has made this claim as far as I am aware. Yet you seem quite adament about it. I personally think you have no idea what you are writing about but am willing to be convinced otherwise.
Of course we’re still suffering from the effects of his FX.
The present day is always impacted by the past. Massive shifts in speculative capital have upended whole countries and their peoples, and the effects are generational.
So no evidence then C.V. just your usual biased opinion which you attempt to dress up as if it is informed in some manner.
Anyway I am curious to know what you are actually doing to promote your brand of Social Credit ideology. Aren’t you in anyway put off by the abject failure of the Social Credit movement in NZ to get their ideas accepted by the mainstream in the past?
“For one thing it provides liquidity and therefore tends to reduce volatility.”
My understanding is that, since the start of (global) deregulation of financial markets in the 1980s, there has been greater volatility than in the preceding decades since the Second World War (’87 stock market crash, savings and loans debacle, dotcom boom and bust, the latest chaos since 2007). Each cycle of volatility has been significantly larger than the previous one, certainly in terms of government bailouts.
If you are correct about the stabilising function of speculation, why has there been so much volatility during a period in which opportunities for financial speculation have been permitted to increase (e.g., through the creation of arcane derivatives)?
The Stuff comments on today’s benny-bashing special are interesting.
While the usual idiots are out in force, calling for beneficiaries to be sterilised, kicking the teen jobseeker in the article in the teeth and generally displaying their ignorance and lack of empathy, there are quite a few there who I think would have barked if that dog-whistle had been blown three years earlier, who are having doubts now.
Joblessness has risen to a level where many more people are personally affected by it, or know someone who is, or fear losing their own job soon.
I think a few people are starting to get worried about the Key government. Worried about the day when the harsh measures they want to see enacted on others come down on them or their loved ones instead.
Interesting reading Gosman’s measured, reasonable and logical comments, and comparing their quality with those of the individuals replying. He is just stating a few basic facts:
Government creating jobs for the sake of it out of thin air distorts the economy and is unsustainable in the long-run, take for instance the massive increase in the public service under Labour – the correction now taking place is necessary, and the pain of those people losing their jobs can be attributed directly to Labour’s economic naivety.
This policy is not punishing people who need a benefit. Those who need government aid permanently will get it. Where there are jobs available or potentially available people will be assisted on an individual basis to move off their benefit. The benefit system as it is basically says to people, here is some money, now fuck off and rot. This policy deals with people on an individual basis. That is a huge/massive/unprecedented change. People will be dealt with as people, not as groups, and not as statistics. Now what is wrong with that?
Horizon, are you the latest off that ceaseless production line of fools (both left and right) like Gos and TS who can only think at a superficial level using logic that begins with invalid assumptions you state as facts?
Dealing with people on an individual basis….so what is different? To quote you lovely line it may well be “now fuck off and rot” Mr Individual. Does that mean by the warped logic applied that there is no massed unemployment, only masses of unemployed individuals?
Government creating jobs for the sake of it out of thin air distorts the economy and is unsustainable in the long-run
I’m sorry that you think school teachers, nurses, police, border patrol, biosecurity, universities, Crown Research Institutes and diplomacy are all a waste of time. Or is it your neoliberal free market which is a waste of time?
Fact of the matter is that Government is a powerful and necessary player in the economy, because the private sector cares only about a narrow set of interests: its own profits, even at the expense of society as a whole.
And what is truly unsustainable: annual private sector growth in an economy which no longer needs or values people or workers. Its like a cancer consuming the remaining scarce resources of the body faster and faster.
“I’m sorry that you think school teachers, nurses, police, border patrol, biosecurity, universities, Crown Research Institutes and diplomacy are all a waste of time. ”
Not a waste of time but you can’t have those unless you are able to afford them via a productive sector. That is what Greece failed to understand. They learned the lesson the hard way. Now all of the public spending on those areas are being slashed. Still you live and learn.
So now you are saying those people are unproductive.
Greece failed because the rich not paying taxes was a national sport, combined with the Euro distorting their economy to the benefit of higher waged economies like Germany.
In your funny little world Soviet Russia and Cuba would have never had doctors because they had no private sector.
Singapore should be failing because the Government owns almost everything.
By the way I agree with you that their tax system was inefficient and corrupt. However there was no way you would have been able to fund their bloated and inefficient State just by improving revenue collection. If it was possible then the austerity programme forced upon them by other Euro members would have just focused on this area not on cutting spending.
Yes it is wrong. Because it is from the voodoo economics view. The view that caused the collapse of most Western economies.
Note that austerity in Greece, as the voodoo economists advocate, is making the situation worse, not better. Even the IMF are beginning to have doubts.
I don’t think you understand what economies collapsing actually means. Certainly no western economy has yet collapsed. The closest that has come so far is Greece and as stated it was because of massive overspending on the part of the Government which caused this not neo-liberal economic policy. Neo-liberal economic policy would have meant that Greece wasn’t in the position it now faces. You have yet to explain why this is not the case.
pretty voodoo right there – you come up with a position on what would have happened in a hypothetical situation and assume that the burden is on other people to disprove it.
And Kirk would have kicked Picard’s arse after screwing Janeway. Show why this is not the case.
So McFlock, what is your take on the situation in Greece if it is not the Greek Government constantly spending more than they earn? Have you got any reputable economists backing you up on this view?
Given that traditional neo-liberal economic policy prescription would be to reduce the deficit by a combination of creating an efficient tax collecting system, (including reducing loopholes), and reducing wasteful spending how would this not have helped the Greeks.
But it would also have included massive cuts to the public service, including health, infrastructure and education, and cuts to welfare and pension entitlements, and contracting out of essential public services, all of which would definitely have hurt the majority of the Greeks. Yet again you present the “good” half of the equation – a bit like our current crop of cabinet ministers.
Are they better off now than they would have been if they’d followed a tory approach? Moot point, really. Probably just as fucked either way – we’re not exactly doing so well compared to the OECD, and that’s after only 3 years.
The Neo-liberal prescription is to remove taxes and Government entirely. Except for police, funnily enough. As one Neo-Lib said. “I want Government to be small enough to drown in the bathtub”. Translation “I do not want anyone genuinely representing the population to stop me making money by ripping them off”.
Greece spent a lot less on Government and welfare per head and overall than Germany.
Germany paid their workers enough to pay taxes and live without borrowing.
“In your funny little world Soviet Russia and Cuba would have never had doctors because they had no private sector.”
Ummmm…no.
Please note I stated productive rather than private sector. Even the Soviet Union and Cuba had/have a productive sector. They were/are just not very productive. Hence if they wish to have a world class medical system they can by spending a large proportion of the income from their productive sector on this. However they have to sacrifice some other aspect to achieve this. This involved pretty much all consumer goods, or at least quality consumer goods.
In fact both the UK and Greece have a higher percentage of GDP taken up by Government spending. New Zealand is less than Germany it is true but not by that much.
Interesting to note that those economic power houses Zimbabwe and Cuba are near the top of the list.
That is an assumption. What makes you think it is ‘necessary‘, apart from your ideological commitments?
“People will be dealt with as people, not as groups, …”
Well, as I said, that’s one way of describing direct, coercive intervention in the lives of individuals. There are more realistic ways of describing it, however (e.g., ‘direct, coercive intervention’ – perhaps more familiar when phrased in the following way: “We’re making you an offer you can’t refuse.”)
Lovely little speech Horizon but even if it came from Paulas mouth I’d still doubt its sincerity.
And better end all Govt jobs pronto to stop any more destortion to the econemy. What utter crap. You mean Govt creating jobs destorts the profits of corporates, better give the welfare to them instead.
So essentially you don’t have a problem with the policy just whether the people promoting it are sincere in their aims. Considering you are a hard core lefty I wouldn’t expect anything else but at least you acknowledge potential benefits in what they are doing.
I was not saying that all government jobs distort the economy. Of course any advanced country needs an efficient and functioning public sector commensurate to its needs.
I was just pointing out that the enormous expansion of the public sector from 1999 to 2008 was unsustainable. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were added to the public service which were not producing output to match the taxpayer salary input.
It got to the point that a private business in Wellington could not find any commercial rental space because the government sector completely dominated the property market. The size of government was doubling and doubling again. It was simply unsustainable and also wasteful as money for instance going to say the Education assessment research unit academics and policy analysts was not going to say the teacher aide budget for vulnerable children in Southland/Otago.
Year on year budget increases occured with only nominal increases or even decreases in measurable output. I think it is a tragedy that the people losing their jobs today are a victim of naive economics and wasteful government.
“I was just pointing out that the enormous expansion of the public sector from 1999 to 2008 was unsustainable. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were added to the public service which were not producing output to match the taxpayer salary input.”
“By number of workers, share of the economy, or per capita size, our public service is smaller than it was in the 1980s. Some rebuilding was needed after the cuts and privatisation in the 1990s. But the public service is now smaller than it was in 1990 despite the population increasing by 700,000 and greater demands being placed on public services.”
As for “hundreds of thousands of jobs were added“, the same report (same page) claims that, as of 2007, there were 42,047 full time jobs in the public service.
More arse about face dogma from the government. I was aware yesterday that submissions for the Green Paper (child welfare) closed yesterday and what happened earlier in the week, punitive welfare change for women and children.
Were I the Social Development Minister, I would not have made ANY changes to welfare affecting single parents and children until I addressed the Green Paper. Bennett may have a social workers degree, but she needs to listen to the medical clinicians/family advocates first. Bennett is not even listening to the family advocates who are against some of her her welfare changes, (work testing, widows recepients and youth).
There are now only a few days left to give feedback on the Draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) on Land Transport 2024-34 (see our earlier post this week on GPS submission guides). As we’ve reported, the GPS is a disaster for Local Government, so we were particularly interested to hear ...
Willis has pledged to go ahead with the debt-funded tax cuts, despite growing opposition from her own supporters worried about appearing fiscally irresponsible. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for ...
Open access notables A survey of interventions to actively conserve the frozen North, van Wijngaarden et al., Climatic Change:The frozen elements of the high North are thawing as the region warms much faster than the global mean. The dangers of sea level rise due to melting glacier ice, increased ...
Bryce Edwards writes – New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure. The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On ...
In 2015, then-Prime Minister John Key announced plans for a huge ocean sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands, banning fishing and mining from 15% of Aotearoa's EEZ. It was bold, it was ambitious, and it suggested that National might actually care about the environment. Except they fucked it up: Key failed ...
1. Who has just been given the accolade New Zealander of the Year?a. The Kokakob. The Cook Strait Ferryc. Fair God. Dr Jim Salinger 2. Which of these is an affront to decent society?a. Dame Edna Everageb. Mrs Doubtfire c. Dr. Frank-N-Furterd. Brian 3. Who is Penny Simmonds?a. The aspiring actress in Big ...
New Zealand’s biggest-ever political donations scandal is finally at an end. But what is the conclusion? No one can really be sure.The Court of Appeal released its judgement on Tuesday about the Serious Fraud Office case against the NZ First Foundation. On the face of it, the court found ...
Buzz from the Beehive Waves of rain are set to lash much of the North Island during Easter Weekend as a low-pressure system forms east of New Zealand, according to a weather forecast published in the past day or so. Niwa was warning of a “moisture-laden” long weekend, with rain expected ...
Look around us…Nicola Willis’ promises of balancing the books, of cutting spending without reducing services, and of delivering game changing tax cuts are disappearing before her eyes.Everyday we see stories of violent crime ending in horrific injuries, or worse. The cost of living worsens, whereas the PM claimed renters would ...
TL;DR: My top six news of note on the morning of Thursday, March 28 include:The Government will have to borrow between $10 billion to $15 billion more than previously expected in order to make up for a slowing economy and to pay for $14.9 billion of tax cuts, according to ...
This story by Naveena Sadasivam and Kate Yoder was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. The long-awaited jobs board for the American Climate Corps, promised early in the Biden administration, will open next month, according to details shared exclusively ...
Should landlords be able to deduct the interest on the loans they take out to bankroll their property speculation? The US Senate Budget Committee and Bloomberg News don’t think this is a good idea, for reasons set out below. Regardless, our coalition government has been burning through a ton of ...
Treasury’s first report on the economy since the change of government presents a damning indictment of Labour’s economic management. The problem for National is that it is so damning that logically, coupled with a rapidly slowing economy, Finance Minister Nicola Willis should respond to it by postponing or even cancelling ...
Budget tensions are becoming evident within the Coalition Government. Winston Peters made numerous political points in his speech to the NZF annual conference. But the attack on his own government’s fiscal policies raised issues of substance. ‘Today in the Sunday Star Times, journalist and former advisor to the Labour ...
Buzz from the Beehive The media – sure enough – have been binging on Finance Minister Nicola Willis’ release of the Budget Policy Statement and a statement headed Government announces Budget priorities This assures us – or rather, this parrots the Luxon team mantra – that the Budget “will deliver ...
The Ides of March brought me COVID followed by a bereavement. No wonder they tell you to be careful of them.I’m home now and have resumed the interrupted recuperation. Very much looking forward to getting back to regular things. Meanwhile, some thoughts…OneThis new Prime Minister guy just keeps getting more dire. ...
News that the Chinese ATP 40 cyber-hacking unit penetrated parliamentary internet networks in 2021 has renewed concerns about the PRC’s malign intentions in Aotearoa. But is the hack that significant given the length of time that has passed since its … Continue reading → ...
When Parliament passed the Intelligence and security Act in 2017, they assured us all that it was full of safeguards. Any intrusive surveillance of New Zealanders would be subject to a "triple lock", requiring the approval of the Minister and (supposedly independent) Commissioner of Intelligence Warrants, as well as post-facto ...
Eric Crampton writes – Richard Harman’s Politik newsletter provides a bit of the context that ought to have been showing up in other media reports on potential reductions in public service staffing. Media has been reporting on staffing cuts on the order of about 7%. Is that ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – It’s becoming increasingly apparent that many perceive free speech to have become the preserve of the politically right wing, the religiously conservative, the libertarian fringe, the anti-trans, the anti-Māori and…. well, just fill in with whatever groups or individuals you don’t like and don’t ...
Don Brash writes – As everybody who is not blind and deaf is aware, there is a huge political preoccupation with climate change at the moment, a widespread (though by no means unanimous) belief that global temperatures are rising mainly as a result of the greenhouse gases created ...
TL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy on Wednesday, March 27 include:Chris Bishop laid out his vision for filling Aotearoa-NZ’s $100 billion infrastructure deficit in a speech yesterday, emphasising user pays and private funding, but failed to say how to achieve bipartisanship on population, public borrowing and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Former Finance Minister Grant Robertson and former Prime Minister Chris Hipkins have been conveying how unhappy they are with the tax system. Last week in his valedictory speech, Robertson called for the introduction of a wealth or capital gains tax. And this week Hipkins ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Buzz from the Beehive China has loomed large in Beehive considerations over the past 24 hours, largely because of that country’s mischief-making in the cyber espionage department. Two media statements emerged on that subject hard on the heels of the PM baulking at questions put to him on RNZ’s Morning ...
Chris Trotter writes – WHY IS THE NATIONAL PARTY doing so much for landlords, property developers, trucking, and construction companies, and so little for everybody who isn’t already pretty well-off? It’s as if protecting landlords’ investments and building apartments and roads now constitute the whole of National’s ...
Bryce Edwards writes – When she was campaigning to be Minister of Finance last year, Nicola Willis pledged that she would resign from the job if she failed to deliver tax cuts in her first Budget. Now, it’s that pledge, along with Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s ...
Robert MacCulloch writes – The Reserve Bank has doubled staff numbers in five years to 510, with personnel costs rising to $80 million in 2023 from $32 million in 2018 – up by a whopping 150%. I guess when you print $50 billion and flood markets with liquidity, ...
The furore. In case you didn’t notice there was a controversy in the weekend involving dolphins in a little town off the South Island. Don’t panic, they haven’t declared independence and resumed whaling, this was simply a sailing event.The problem began when racing was cancelled on the opening day of ...
For 20 years or more, the case for a meaningful capital tax gains has been mulled over and analysed to death, including by the tax working group chaired by Sir Michael Cullen. More than once, the International Monetary Fund has said a CGT would be a good idea for New ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: The Public Health Communications Centre (PHCC) call for urgent preventive action and a risk assessment survey of long covid in this briefing noteLocal scoop: NZ road deaths surpass OECD rates, so why is the govt reversing safety plans? ...
This story was originally published by Grist and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. This story is part of a collaboration with Grist and WABE to demystify the Georgia Public Service Commission, the small but powerful state-elected board that makes critical decisions about everything from raising ...
This is a guest post from Robert McLachlan Global warming is accelerating; 2023 was off the charts. We need to stop burning fossil fuels. In New Zealand, transport accounts for half of all fossil fuels burnt. In the Emissions Reduction Plan, transport emissions fall 41% by 2035. As the ...
Labour productivity has been receding rapidly over the past two years, reversing a post-lockdown rise. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things to note in Aotearoa’s political economy as at 6:26am on Tuesday, March 26 include:Workers have been treading water in output per hour worked for 12 years, ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 2 include:Today, Parliament resumes sitting at 2pm for the second week of a two-week session. Officials for SIS and GCSB report their annual reviews in public to the Intelligence and Security Select Committee from 5.10pm.Tomorrow, ...
Faced with a barrage of criticism over the promised tax cuts from usually supportive commentators, Finance Minister Nicola Willis yesterday reaffirmed her intention to include them in this year’s Budget. The Government is up against it over the cuts just about every way it turns. Commentators like Fran O’Sullivan, Matthew ...
Here’s my pick of today’s substack posts as of 6:26pm on Monday, March 25: writes via his substack that Market-rate housing will make your city cheaper writes via his substack about the problems talking to double-cab ute (truck) drivers about their vehicles. today about moments of radicalisation in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Just before Christmas, Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivered something that was pitched as a mini-budget and brayed about the decisive action being taken to repair the Government books and support income tax relief in Budget 2024. In a statement headed Fiscal repair job underway. she introduced ...
My sister Belinda asked Dad yesterday what one word would describe Mum best. He said: vivacious.If you only knew her from the photos on the slideshow we've made for today,you might wonder about that, because the camera tended to lie with Mum.If ever she saw a camera pointed at her, she ...
There are two major public consultations closing in the next week, Auckland Council’s Long Term Plan (LTP), and the draft Government Policy Statement on Land Transport (GPS). Closing dates and times: LTP closes Thursday 28 February, at 11.59pm – a minute to midnight! GPS closes Tuesday 2 April, at 12pm noon – note that’s ...
From Kiwiblog’s David Farrar – Bryce Wilkinson writes: Senior Fellow Bryce Wilkinson’s analysis reveals that since March 2009, New Zealand has spent $158 billion more overseas than it has earned, but its NIIP has only fallen by $32 billion.Statistics New Zealand shows that receipts from overseas reinsurers have ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition? Brian Easton writes – The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could ...
Dear Nicola Willis,Right now you’ve probably got lots of competing demands coming at you. Ministers who’ve inherited quite a mess, or so you’ve told us, looking for money in the budget to improve things. I imagine that’s why they came to parliament - to make things better.You’ll have to make ...
The Local Government, Transport and Auckland Minister hasthreatened councils with intervention if they don’t merge water assets to take them off balance sheet, just as the now-repealed Three Waters plan directed. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: My six things of note this morning for Monday, March 25 include:Simeon ...
A listing of 36 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 17, 2024 thru Sat, March 23, 2024. Story of the week Thanks to John Mason having the stamina to sit down to watch "Climate - the Movie" ...
This morning the Q&A programme had Simeon Brown on to talk about National’s replacement for Three Waters. In case anyone’s forgotten the three are - drinking water, waste water, and sewerage. It’s quite important not to get them mixed up. In much the same way that you wouldn’t want to ...
Today’s newsletter comes with a mini-podcast conversation between me and my buddy Liv Tennet, talking about her time as a child actor in Lord of the Rings. It’s a conversation with a lot of giggles as she talks about falling off a horse, and becoming a meme. Read ...
The Desmog Climate Disinformation Database documents, "individuals and organisations that have helped to delay and distract the public and our elected leaders from taking needed action to reduce greenhouse gas pollution and fight global warming." It's a who's who of the organised climate change denial movement, in other words. In ...
Bob Edlin writes – A High Court judge has decided miscreants who have mana – or who claim to have mana – should be treated differently from miscreants who have none. It’s a ruling that suggests indigenous law-breakers have a better chance of securing a discharge without conviction ...
Welcome to the first, and possibly last, edition of Brickbats, Bouquets and Bull’s Wool. In which I’ll take a look at the events of the last week or so, and rate them.In such ratings the numbers usually have more to do with the opinions of the reviewer, than the actual ...
Roger Partridge writes – My earlier column this month, New Zealand’s highest court could be facing a turning point, prompted a flood of feedback from business readers and lawyers alike. A common query was what Parliament can do to restrain an overreaching judiciary. This week I discuss two steps Parliament ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.16pm on Friday, March 22: writes about New Zealand's Building Boom—And What the World Must Learn From It over at his substack. challenges the Auckland Council’s use of a 3.8 degrees of warming forecast to oppose a wave-park and data centre project ...
Is she hinting that the Coalition Government will have to back down on key promises it made in Opposition?The Minister of Finance, Nicola Willis, is telling an evolving story about her fiscal challenges. In Opposition she was confident that she could deliver her promised income tax cuts. Appointed minister, she ...
Buzz from the Beehive Ministers of the Crown have drawn attention to one sector of the science sector which is unlikely to be subjected to heavy spending cuts, a state-funded broadcaster which is doing nicely, thank you, and a sporting event that had $5.4 million from the public purse puffed ...
Abbott’s Freestyle Libre sensors allow continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The sensor is applied to the back of the patient’s arm, with a thin filament under the skin measuring glucose levels constantly. But it costs around $100 per sensor and must be replaced once every 14 days. Photo by BSIP/Universal Images ...
The Inspector General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) recently released a report in which he exposes the existence of a foreign intelligence partner-controlled technological “capability” inside the headquarters of the GCSB, NZ’s 5 Eyes-affiliated signals intelligence collection and analysis agency. … Continue reading → ...
Peter Dunne writes – Nearly three decades after the introduction of MMP and multiparty governments there should be a greater level of understanding about their finer points than often appears to be the case. The reaction to the despicable outburst from the Deputy Prime Minister at the weekend highlights ...
The sweet kisses from fruit of summerHave slowly been turning dullerYou say, "those times"And "remember the daysWhen we went outside and there still was the shade?"Taking no reason into play…Autumn. Clear, blue days shortening to longer nights, growing colder. Aotearoa.That’s us. The temperature dropping, the looming car crash - so ...
Bryce Edwards writes – “It is often said that behind every great man is a great woman”. This is the pitch by the National Party Botany electorate branch to attend their “Ladies Afternoon Tea with Amanda Luxon”. For $110 including GST, you can turn up on Saturday 20 April ...
David Farrar writes – The Electoral Commission has published the expense returns for political parties for the 2023 election. I’ve put them in a table with how many votes a party got so we can see the spend per vote. National only spent $3.34 for every vote they got, almost ...
Winston Peters’ headline-making actions over the past week may have been a show of political power intended to strengthen his hand in Budget negotiations. It was no accident that his State of the Nation speech was as it was. He made it as New Zealand First Leader, not as Deputy ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:Former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson bowed out of politics this week, giving a series of exit ...
Graham Adams writes — If you love the law or sausages, as the saying goes, best not to look too closely at how they are made. And after watching the orgy of self-pity when Newshub’s closure was announced on February 28, television journalism should definitely be added to the list of those ...
Venerable New Zealand political commentator, Chris Trotter (https://bowalleyroad.blogspot.com/), is a sad creature these days. Once one of the most reliable Leftist writers out there – Economic Left at that – Trotter seems to have absorbed the worldview of Auckland culture-war obsessives. It is not for me to categorise what he ...
The cruelty of short-term memory loss is that each time you ask where she is, you get the fresh shock and grief of the news. That was Dad's day yesterday.Comfortingly, it seems to be less so today. Last night he looked crumpled, today he seems more settled. There's a card ...
Photo by Alvan Nee on UnsplashIt’s that new day of the week (Thursday rather than Friday) when and I co-host our ‘hoon’ webinar with paying subscribers to The Kākā for an hour at 5 pm. Jump on this link on YouTube Livestream for our chat about the week’s news ...
Buzz from the Beehive One minister is talking tough while a colleague – whose ministry had acted tough and drawn a barrage of flak – has shown an official softening. Some ministers are doing what Labour was good at, which is distributing public funds to causes regarded as worthy or ...
A ballot for 4 Member's Bills was held today, and the following bills were drawn: Insurance Contracts Bill (Duncan Webb) Income Tax (Clean Transport FBT Exclusion) Amendment Bill (Julie Anne Genter) Crimes (Increased Penalties for Slavery Offences) Amendment Bill (Greg Fleming) Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) ...
The Coalition Government’s plan to ‘get Auckland moving’ is a cuts cover-up that will ultimately cost Aucklanders more to move around the city, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Slashing the Ministry of Pacific Peoples by 40% will have a devastating impact on pacific communities and further highlights how little this government cares about anything other than cutting taxes for the wealthiest few. ...
Labour has proposed an urgent inquiry to investigate the ever-increasing profits of supermarkets, aiming to lower costs for shoppers and food producers alike, says Labour Spokesperson for Commerce and Consumer Affairs Arena Williams and Primary Production Spokesperson Cushla Tangaere-Manuel. ...
With 14% of jobs on the line at the Ministry for Ethnic Communities, the responsible Minister Melissa Lee is failing to stand up for the very communities she’s meant to be representing. ...
COURT OF APPEAL: TRIFECTA OF VICTORY FOR NZ FIRST, TRIFECTA OF FAILURE FOR OPPONENTS For the third time since April 2020, New Zealand First has defeated the Serious Fraud Office and all those complicit in a malicious attack against a political party going about its lawful business in a lawful ...
The Green Party stands with people who live in public housing, people in dire housing need, experts and advocates in demanding better than the Government’s archaic approach to housing those who need our support the most. ...
New Zealand has recently lost the hosting rights of some major international sporting events including the America’s Cup, the Rugby Championship, Netball World Cup, and the Wellington Sevens. We are now at a huge risk of losing SailGP as well. And it won’t stop there. The recent issues with SailGP ...
A Member’s Bill drawn this week would modernise insurance law and make things fairer and more transparent for consumers, Christchurch Central MP Duncan Webb said. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues has confirmed she was aware of funding issues in mid-December and did nothing to stop it. On 14 March, she signed off on changes that were announced and implemented on 18 March without any consultation with disability communities. ...
Green Party MP Julie Anne Genter says her members' bill is an opportunity for the coalition government to plug the gap in electric vehicle incentives. ...
The National Government continues to talk about irresponsible tax cuts that will only drive up inflation, despite the country entering a technical recession. ...
The Minister for Disability Issues must act urgently to reinstate flexibility around the funding for disability support and apologise to disabled carers. ...
This story has been initiated by a leftie shill reporter who proactively sought to call a member of a former band, which disbanded twelve years ago, give their biased appraisal of what was said in my speech, and concocted a ham-fisted attempt at a story that does nothing but show ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Many in the mainstream media have taken what was said in New Zealand First’s State of the Nation Speech in Palmerston North on Sunday and deliberately, deceitfully, and ignorantly misrepresented what I said and why I said it. The headlines and commentary on the news stated that I compared ‘co-governance ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
Good afternoon. Thank you for, in your very busy lives, turning up to this meeting today. On October 14th last year New Zealanders overwhelmingly voted for change. That is exactly what this new government is bringing. New Zealand First campaigned to ‘take back our country’ and stop the disastrous economic ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April. “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates. Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend. “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says. Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track. “Dam safety regulations ...
The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis. “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says. “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says. “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009. ...
The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government. “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function. The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union. “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says. “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
Good morning, it’s great to be here. First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning. I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed. “Northland has faced a number ...
New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
Jesus had dinner with his 12 disciples right before he died. Noted historian Madeleine Chapman finds out who really deserved to be there.First published in 2018 but let’s be honest, the subject is timeless. As you sit on your couch this Easter Sunday, eating a chocolate egg you know ...
The newly-promoted Northern League club is on a mission to return to the National League for the first time in two decades. Plenty about domestic football in New Zealand has changed in that time – but the sense that this amateur competition is not an entirely level playing field remains. ...
Comment: Every year on February 2, a dozen men in tuxedos and top hats approach the burrow of a groundhog in Gobbler’s Knob, Pennsylvania and entice the beaver-like rodent to emerge and predict the weather. If the groundhog, named Punxsutawney Phil, sees its own shadow when it is summoned, legend ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 29 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Auckland Council has put a deadline on new weather-impacted property owners applying for categorisation as government funding looks set to run out. Councillors have voted to support a deadline of September 30 for property owners who haven’t accessed support to come forward and engage with the council’s recovery office. It ...
NONFICTION 1 BBQ Economics by Liam Dann (Penguin Random House, $40) “It’s official,” wrote Dann nine days ago in the Herald, where he works as business editor at large, “we’re in recession.” Yeah, great. He delivered the bad stats: “GDP fell 0.1 percent in the December 2023 quarter, compared with ...
By Anneke Smith, RNZ News political reporter A petition urging the New Zealand government to provide urgent humanitarian assistance to the Palestinian people has been tabled in the House. More than 200 people gathered on Parliament’s forecourt today and they were met by MPs from Labour, the Greens and Te ...
Pacific Media Watch The Paris-based global media freedom watchdog RSF (Reporters Without Borders) has appealed for information about the “disappearance” of Palestinian journalist Bayan Abusultan. She was reportedly last seen on March 19 among people “sequestered” in this week’s raid and siege of Al Shifa hospital by Israeli troops in ...
EDITORIAL:The Jakarta Post It happens again and again; indigenous Papuans fall victim to Indonesian soldiers. This time, we have photographic evidence for the brutality, with videos on social media showing a Papuan man being tortured by a group of plainclothes men alleged to be the Indonesian Military (TNI) members. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robyn J. Whitaker, Director of the Wesley Centre for Theology, Ethics, and Public Policy & Associate Professor, New Testament, Pilgrim Theological College, University of Divinity A strange and eclectic range of activities takes place across these few weeks of the year. Some ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University It’s Easter weekend, which means many of us will be kicking back with the greatest hits on repeat. But whether you’re a boomer, or an ‘80s or ’90s kid, you might be ...
RNZ Pacific Fiji’s Acting Public Prosecutor has filed an appeal against the sentences of former prime minister Voreqe Bainimarama and suspended police chief Sitiveni Qiliho in their corruption case. Bainimarama was granted an absolute discharge for attempting to pervert the course of justice while Qiliho received a conditional discharge with ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Arosha Weerakoon, Senior Lecturer and General Dentist, School of Dentistry, The University of Queensland Casezy idea/Shutterstock How does toothpaste work? What did people use before toothpaste was invented? – Amelia, age 7, Meanjin (Brisbane) Thanks for your ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brett Hallam, Associate professor, UNSW Sydney IM Imagery/Shutterstock Solar SunShot is well named. The Australian government announced today it would plough A$1 billion into bringing back solar manufacturing to Australia, boosting energy security, swapping coal and gas jobs for those ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Clare Dix, Research Fellow in Nutrition & Dietetics, The University of Queensland Easter is the time for chocolate. The shops are full of fantastically packaged and shiny chocolates in all shapes and sizes, making trips to the supermarket with children more challenging ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emma Felton, Adjunct Senior Researcher, University of South Australia Even in a stubborn cost-of-living crisis, it seems there’s one luxury most Australians won’t sacrifice – their daily cup of coffee. Coffee sales have largely remained stable, even as financial pressures have ...
Mining company Trans-Tasman Resources has unexpectedly withdrawn its application for a consent to suck the valuable metals vanadium and titanium from the Taranaki seafloor, as it apparently wagers on the Government’s new fast-track process. It had spent two-and-a-half days putting its case to the Environmental Protection Agency’s decision-making committee, at ...
Contrary to the Associate Minister of Education’s claims, analysis of Healthy School Lunches Programme - Ka Ora, Ka Ako assessments has revealed it provides excellent value for the taxpayer dollar, as a groundswell of public opposition to Government ...
Greenpeace says wannabe Taranaki seabed miner Trans-Tasman Resources is likely banking on Christopher Luxon’s fast-track process to side-step proper scrutiny of its Taranaki seabed mining proposal by bailing out of the Environmental Protection Agency hearing ...
Kiwis Against Seabed mining today slammed Australian owned would-be seabed miner Trans Tasman Resources (TTR) for abandoning its application to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to mine the seabed of the South Taranaki Bight. The company ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Katie Attwell, Associate Professor, School of Social Sciences, The University of Western Australia Ground Picture/Shutterstock Months after COVID vaccines were introduced in 2021, governments and private organisations mandated them for various groups. Health and aged care workers were among the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Dzurak, Scientia Professor Andrew Dzurak, CEO and Founder of Diraq, UNSW Sydney Diraq For decades, the pursuit of quantum computing has struggled with the need for extremely low temperatures, mere fractions of a degree above absolute zero (0 Kelvin or ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne A national Essential poll, conducted March 20–24 from a sample of 1,150, gave the Coalition a 50–44 lead including undecided, a reversal ...
The Taxpayers’ Union has today made a formal request under the Regulations of the People’s Republic of China on Open Government Information () for information held about how New Zealand Members of Parliament are spending taxpayer ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Nelson, Honorary Principal Fellow, The University of Melbourne A Byzantine depiction of the Eucharist in Saint Sophia Cathedral, Kyiv.Jacek555/Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA A nasty quarrel arose in the 11th century over what kind of bread should be used in holy ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Patrick Hesp, Professor, Flinders University Patrick Hesp In some parts of Australia, coastal dunes are retreating from the ocean at an alarming rate, as waves carve up the beach and wind blows the sand inland. But coastal communities are largely ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Luke Heemsbergen, Senior Lecturer, Digital, Political, Media, Deakin University With an impressive 60% of the US smartphone market, Apple is undeniably big, but not a clear monopoly. Yet, years of innovation by Apple have effectively given the company its own exclusive ...
Whether you’re facing layoffs or are just an emotional junior staffer, it’s always a good idea to scout out a good crying place before you need it. It’s an incredibly hard time for Wellington. Across the city, thousands of public servants are hearing tough news about redundancies and layoffs. Government ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James Miller-Jones, Professor, Curtin University Nuclear explosions on a neutron star feed its jets. Danielle Futselaar and Nathalie Degenaar, Anton Pannekoek Institute, University of Amsterdam, CC BY-SA How fast can a neutron star drive powerful jets into space? The answer, it ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Daryl Adair, Associate Professor of Sport Management, University of Technology Sydney Earlier this week, independent MP Andrew Wilkie accused the AFL of conducting “off the books” illicit drug testing to identify players using substances of abuse, then inappropriately withdrawing them from matches ...
The Government’s announcement that it will scrap plans for a vast marine sanctuary around the Kermadec Islands is ‘shameful’ and will make it impossible for Aotearoa New Zealand to meet its international commitments, says the World Wide Fund for Nature ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Quiggin, Professor, School of Economics, The University of Queensland Shutterstock The federal government has bowed to pressure from the car industry, announcing it will relax proposed emissions rules for utes and vans and delay enforcement of the new standards ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Suzanne Rutland, Professor Emerita, University of Sydney In his latest book, Jewish Life in Medieval Spain, Jonathan Ray focuses on the tumult of the 14th century in Spain – a time of the plague, civil strife and war between the two largest ...
While creating a slate of world-class shows, Whakaata Māori also developed a generation of world-class creatives. Television is an odd word. It mixes the Ancient Greek and Latin languages, and its most literal meaning is “far-off sight”. In the contemporary and living language of te reo Māori, “whakaata” as a ...
Yesterday the UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Israel’s war on Gaza. This significant step and the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza prompted an urgent debate in the New Zealand Parliament. Leader ...
The Government’s decision to reduce access to continuous glucose monitors (CGM) not only threatens the lives of children with type 1 diabetes and increases the potential for ‘Dead in Bed’ syndrome, but also threatens the health of their parents an ...
Apples are available year-round, but the wide variety on offer involves intensive scientific research – and large-scale commercialisation. What’s beautiful, red, sweet and crunchy? Tony Martin’s favourite kind of apple: Sassy. The CEO of apple and pear breeding organisation Prevar, Martin’s fondness for Sassy represents professional success as well as ...
Family violence specialist service Shine is calling on employers to stop asking for proof of domestic violence in order for employees to access domestic violence leave. The call comes five years after the introduction of the Domestic Violence ...
The Deputy Chairperson of the Finance and Expenditure Committee is calling for public submissions on the Budget Policy Statement 2024. The Budget Policy Statement 2024 (BPS) sets out the Government's priorities for the 2024 Budget. It explains the approach ...
Brutal government spending cuts that will see the size of the Ministry for Pacific Peoples slashed by 40% will hit Pasifika communities hard, the PSA says. The Ministry has told staff that it is seeking voluntary redundancies, and to redeploy and reassign ...
I live with five people I mostly love, but our different ideas about generosity are starting to really irk me.Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,This is a bit of a random one but here goes. I’m 22 and work an OK job (OK meaning I get paid ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Maria Nicholas, Senior Lecturer in Language and Literacy Education, Deakin University Earlier this month, the New South Wales government announced it would roll out programs for gifted students in every public school in the state. This comes amid concerns gifted school ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Rudge, Law lecturer, University of Sydney Massachusetts General Hospital In a world first, we heard last week that US surgeons had transplanted a kidney from a gene-edited pig into a living human. News reports said the procedure was a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Tombs, Howard Paterson Chair of Theology and Public Issues, University of Otago The 5th-century Maskell panel showing Jesus in a loincloth.British Museum, CC BY-NC-SA When Jesus is shown on the cross, he is almost always depicted wearing a loincloth around ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Panizza Allmark, Professor Visual & Cultural Studies, Edith Cowan University Shutterstock When you think about a red object, you might picture a red carpet, or the massive ruby in the Queen’s crown. Indeed, Western monarchies and marketing from brands such ...
COMMENTARY:Jewish Voice for Peace The UN Security Council passed a resolution demanding an immediate ceasefire in Gaza on Monday — and for the first time since the beginning of the Israeli military’s genocide of Palestinians, the United States abstained rather than vetoing it. Security Council resolutions are legally binding, ...
Asia Pacific Report A New Zealand investigative journalist and author says the US spy system hosted by the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) appears to be a controversial intelligence system used in global capture-kill operations. Writing a commentary for RNZ News today, Nicky Hager, author of Secret Power, a 1996 ...
While Nicola Willis wouldn’t give any details on its size, she said a package of tax cuts is definitely still coming in this year’s budget, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming the investigation into the Department of Internal Affairs after it was revealed that the Department’s Chief Executive personally reached out to expedite a DJs passport application. Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns ...
Finance minister Nicola Willis delivers her first budget statement, and unwittingly helps Joel MacManus save his relationship. Nicola Willis strode into the Beehive Theatrette. Around me, on the green foldout seats, were the country’s top business and political journalists. They were all here to see her announce the Budget Policy ...
Twenty years ago today, Māori Television launched after much controversy. Jamie Tahana looks back on its survival and impact across two decades. Chad Chambers stepped onto the stage, the brim of his cap casting a shadow across his face. His smile beamed as bright as his white freezing works gumboots, ...
Tauranga, Rotorua, Wellsford, Onehunga, Westhaven marina – Gavin Strawhan walks the meanish streets of New Zealand in his entertaining debut novel The Call, almost sure to roar into the number 1 position on the Nielsen bestseller chart, its front cover bearing a rave from somebody: “A really good and genuinely ...
On a Thursday in February, at Wellington’s Conservation House, the Conservation Authority, a statutory body advising the eponymous department and minister, Tama Potaka, opened its 195th meeting. Under consideration that afternoon was an agenda item written by Tim Bamford, chief advisor in the Department of Conservation’s biodiversity, heritage and visitors ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 28 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
A lengthy response to the recently released draft Government policy statement on transport will soon be delivered from Auckland Council to Minister of Transport Simeon Brown. A submission raising concerns about funding distribution and the plan’s treatment of Auckland passed through the council’s transport committee on Wednesday, despite some councillors ...
The unidentified foreign intelligence operation discussed in a scathing report by New Zealand’s Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security (IGIS) last week appears to be a controversial United States intelligence system. The IGIS report said the Government Communications Security Bureau (GCSB) decision to host a foreign system from 2012-2020 was “improper” ...
Facilitating, (not forcing), people back in to the workforce when jobs become available seems like a good idea in my mind. Given the fact that a right leaning government is not going to follow standard left wing presciptions and create a bunch of artifical jobs via increasing Government spending I don’t see what your problem with this is. If there are no suitable jobs then these people won’t lose their benefits. If there are suitable jobs then they will be expected to take them if they are offered the opportunity. Surely encouraging people to participate as a productive member of the wider economy is a good thing no matter what side of the political divide you are on.
What is a suitable job?
Helicopter pilot.
oddly enough gormless, many many years ago i entered that very answer in a Dept of Social Welfare registration form asking about jobs i wanted and got told it was not a suitable answer
I always put “astronaut” for occupation in those cards you have to complete when returning to the country.
Good question. I’d suggest one that fits in with the particular circumstance of the person involved without causing undue hardship. Admittedly it is a fine line determining this hence why I think it is best not to force people to take something. That stated I also believe in time limits in terms of many benefits. Anything more than a half a dozen or so years is unacceptable. The benefit system is a safety net not a lifestyle choice.
Gosman, when 85% of your body is burn scar tissue and more than fifteen minutes of any sort of effort leaves you near tears as your body screams for you to stop moving, how long should that person be allowed to receive an invalids benefit?
The world is a lot more complex than your dog whistle mantras.
Did you not notice I used the term ‘many benefits’ as opposed to ‘all benefits’? I am comfortable with the idea that a certain amount of people will need support from the state on an ongoing basis. That does not apply to all beneficiaries now does it?
no it does not apply to all beneficiaries, and neither should the ‘solutions’ being promoted from the current ideologues in power, Individuals are just that, individual and one size fits all is no way to run a complex and critical service such as welfare.
I think that is the whole point of the policy change. It is a far more individualised approach. MSD will be working with each beneficiary to see how they can assist them getting back into suitable work. If they need help with child care arrangements then there is assistance in this regard. If they need other assistance then they can see if they can get that. It certainly isn’t one sized fits all. So what is your problem with it again?
Because National’s individualised approach to beneficiaries is to bully each and every one of them.
“assist”, “facilitate”, “encourage” – what a load of shit. It’s been a while since you were on the receiving end of the welfare system, if ever. Tool.
wow gosman, you must buy a lot of bridges
So what you are essentially stating here is you don’t believe it will be an individualised approach. Fair enough, it is your right to believe anything you want. However you can’t deny that the concept of the policy is far more individualised than a one sized fits all approach.
@ McFlock
You seem to be implying that frontline MSD staff are bullies. Interesting that Public servants should act in such a manner. Perhaps we need a restructure in MSD if the staff are behaving so appallingly.
“However you can’t deny that the concept of the policy is far more individualised than a one sized fits all approach. ”
apart from an obvious pavlovian belief in whatever spews from the orifices of the policy makers, i cannot see how you are able to state this conclusion with any sincerity.
Funnily enough, MSD staff seem to become bullies and, e.g., not tell clients what their entitlements are only when National are in government. They seemed to be much more helpful 2000-2008 for some reason.
Really???
So an independent Public service somehow manages to change it’s fundamental behaviour based on the political leanings of the government of the day does it?
Something seriously wrong with the Public service if that is indeed the case wouldn’t you agree McFlock? I’d be looking at some serious reforms if the people delivering the service can’t do so impartially.
Gos, ever hear the expression that shit flows downhill?
The public service operates according to the priorities set by the government. This is how it should be. Tory governments prioritise getting people off specific benefits (e.g. limiting unemployment creep by kicking people onto SB, then when priorities change re-evaluating SB entitlements). Liberal / left governments prioritise helping people into work via the benefit system – e.g. training, income security, courses.
Government provides the service parameters through legislation, regulation, funding, and ministerial oversight. Public servants implement services within those parameters. You obviously don’t know anything about public policy, either. Tool.
National’s approach is like the one in UK, where they get people off benefits by harassing those who should get them until they give up. And pay private firms megabucks to pretend to help them into work. Neither has been effective.
This Government is big on repeating measures that have failed overseas.
I suppose that if your view is from those who benefit by wasting taxpayers money in boosting private profits it is a success.
… which is why these policies don’t apply to every situation. People in horrible situations like that you’ve described will still receieve unlimited support.
Given that, I’ve ignored the rest of your emotive scaremongering because it just isn’t relevant.
You ever tried to get an invalids benefit, Baron. (When you fit all the criteria, including having paid for it all your life).
The process leaves you a lot sicker than you were before you started.
Not to mention it is so miserly, you end up going back to work, destroy your health even more and end up on it for longer than you should have been.
National has made it worse.
Happily, no. But someone very close to me has.
I am confident that the process works well for those that are truly invalid. There should indeed be hurdles to cross to get on it – you are essentially saying that you are too sick to ever work again.
The person I know is definitely in that category, and it wasn’t that hard to convince anyone of that at all.
Have you been through the process? What did you see?
Hi Gosman,
In terms of long term unemployed (as opposed to other benefits) the figures here show that it largely depends upon the economy and economic policy settings. (Hardly news, but the trends over the past decades are interesting).
‘People spend as little time out of work as possible‘ would be the obvious hypothesis to explain these figures. Across the board coercion (which is what these proposals involve – not ‘facilitation’) does not seem to be justified (or efficient) based on these figures.
Note that ‘long term’ unemployed is defined as unemployed for one year or longer – substantially less than your ‘half dozen years’.
“Surely encouraging people to participate as a productive member of the wider economy is a” lot easier if there are jobs for them.
What is the difference between giving them money and giving them jobs? Giving them jobs is actually encouraging, giving them money isn’t.
Nope. Giving them jobs distorts the economy. You just have to look at countries that tried to ensure full employment in the past. Take the economies of Eastern Europe under soviet Communism. East Germany had pretty much full employment and a good social system in place. However they created crap mainly. As soon as they had to compete with the West without protection they failed. If you want a distorted economy which is uncompetitive and lacking innovation then by all means support government policies for state managed full employment.
Strawman. Who said anything about government funded full employment? Oh, that’s right it was you and no-one else. If you’ve got a response to the point I made then respond to it. Otherwise don’t expect to get fed.
Gosman this has nothing to do with reality or addressing a problem or, gasp, getting value for money. It is a bit of raw meat thrown out to the supporters. Give them a bash, camoflague it with some senstive language and do nothing at all about the core problem
The right of the political spectrum tends to support the idea that Private sector is the best method of job creation so long as the conditions are put in place for them. The left tends to think that it is beholden on the Government to take a more activist role in this regard. I can accept you have your way of looking at things and that’s fine with me. However I don’t think you should expect a Right leaning government to follow left leaning policy prescriptions for job creation. Therefore that side of the equation is not something the National led Government is going to be interested in much, (beyond setting up the conditions for growth). So if we remove that aspect from this discussion we come down to the question over whether encouraging beneficiaries to engage more actively with finding work is a good or a bad thing. I think it is a good thing myself.
I don’t think you should expect a Right leaning government to follow left leaning policy prescriptions for job creation.
Agreed that is the essence of the problem. Those of the right do not care that others lives are being blighted by unemployment, those of us on the left think it is a travesty and that the Government’s role is to do something, anything, to improve matters.
Nice emotive little rant there mickeysavage.
However this story about how the left cares more about unemployment than the right doesn’t tend to be reflected in reality.
If you take countries in Europe for example and compare those with strict labour market regulations and/or welfare provisions, (e.g Sweden or say Italy), with countries with more flexible labout markets and smaller governments you tend to find that the countries with more right leaning policies have lower unemployment rates.
So equally I could argue that someone like you mickeysavage is only paying lip service to the idea that you care about unemployed people when the policies you promote tend to lead to the opposite outcomes from what you claim they do.
source?
Try this interesting rundown of the generosity of unemployment benefits in US states versus the unemployment rate in those states.
Yes, it’s correlational – but the most generous states tend to have lower unemployment rates; and vice versa. How does that fit into a theory that people are prone to ‘welfare dependency’?
The government no matter if it’s left or right leaning should do the correct thing Gosman. If you look around the world at the countries that weathered the recession the best you’ll find that they all invested in job creation. The countries that haven’t recovered properly didn’t. They relied on austerity measures, which have proven to be a complete failure.
When you say encourage you actually mean punish. National is reducing benefits at the very time costs have increased dramatically. This will simply push more people into desperation, increase inequality and be socially destructive. They are implementing a regime of punishment for those that do not conform while not ensuring there are enough jobs. This makes any rhetoric concerning training largely redundant.
Job creation is all about having enough money in communities. National has been removing money from communities that are already struggling, which will ensure less job creation and reduced economic growth. They are in fact making the conditions for job creation worse. We cannot remove that aspect from the discussion because it’s the reality of the situation.
Which countries are you comparing Jackal? The US spent billions on job creation yet the unemployment rate hardly moved. Perhaps you are meaning countries running large budget deficits in Europe. What is happening with them at the moment?
Where is your evidence that benefits are being reduced? Are you meaning the total number of beneficiaries or the amount paid to each person?
I’m comparing the countries that have recovered from the recession faster than those that haven’t. Think Asia because China invested 4tn yuan in 2008 vs Europe and the US.
I believe the US is still debating the Jobs Bill, which will input around $447 billion into tax cuts, public works, unemployment benefits etc. They seem a bit slow to realize that the best way out of recession is investing into the domestic economy.
Benefits are being reduced all the time because the annual increase does not match inflation, the accommodation supplement has not increased to match rental price increases, the abatement rate means it is not worth working part time and the fact that some benefits have actually been reduced Gosman.
If I meant the total number of beneficiaries, I would have said so.
I don’t even think China went in to recession post 2008. Certainly the problem there is one of the economy overheating, which massive government spending tends to exacerbates. Also Japan hasn’t seen much pay back for the Trillions of Yen of stimulus money they have pumped into the economy via Government spending since the 1990’s.
China was in recession from December 2008 to August 2009 with millions laid off. By the end of 2009 they had pretty much alleviated the problem by forward planning, proper managerial strategies and injecting money into the local economy. Japan has the third largest economy in the world. Can you get anything right today Gosman?
Todd,
I can’t find anything credible that talks about a Chinese recession. For example the annual stuff is pretty clear that 2008 was another 8% year of growth: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=china+gdp+growth+2007-2011
Japan however hasn’t seen much return at all since falling into a hole in the 1990s: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=japan+gdp+growth+1990-2011&dataset= I assume this is the basis of Gos’ argument.
Likewise, all of the stimulus already provided to the US doesn’t seem to have done diddly: http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=usa+gdp+growth+2007-2011
Simply put, the economics is by no way clear here AT ALL. It is wholly possible that all of this new-Keynesian stimulus is just being pissed away against the Chicago-wind. Or its also possible that the impacts are not being seen yet.
Either way, you’re pretty bold in your comeback Todd. Or have I missed something – care to link to it if I have?
[lprent: Try The Economist. There have been a number of articles over the last year or so looking at the credit contraction and the effect that has had on the property market in particular. Wolfram isn’t exactly a good source because it isn’t a active search engine. The data is only there if it has been entered.
Or are you only interested in poseur answers like the one you gave QoT? (and which attracted my attention) ]
Please use my current handle Baron.
I believe the dates for China’s recession are correct. There are numerous official documents that talk about the effects of the recession in China. I’m pretty sure you can find the corresponding data using Google search.
As for Japan, they still have the third largest economy (some say second) in the world, a high living standard and relatively low unemployment. Japan has a national debt to GDP of around 197% in part due to their extensive investments in construction projects and stimulus packages since 1990 to reinvigorate their economy. The problem Japan has is that often the money allocated is made irrespective of how efficient or socially beneficial a project is.
It’s much the same in New Zealand where National is financially awarding their mates in the road building and oil industries with our tax money while projects where the money is required and that would show better returns are largely ignored.
As I have already pointed out, much of the United States stimulus package hasn’t been enacted yet. Their problems are also more entrenched, so it will take longer to see any proper recovery.
I think the economics are clear: the countries that quickly implemented stimulus packages by investing into their local economies have recovered faster. Meanwhile countries like New Zealand that did not react properly to the recession are still stagnant.
In other words, National’s policies that are designed to funnel revenue out of our local economies are completely the opposite of what should be happening.
Facilitating, (not forcing), people back in to the workforce when jobs become available seems like a good idea in my mind.
Ooh, is it time for another round of Make Completely Generic Positive Statements To Support Unrelated Bullshit? I love this one!
Giving puppies cuddles seems like a good idea in my mind.
Teaching kids to read seems like a good idea in my mind.
Drinking pina coladas and getting caught in the rain seems like a romantic idea in my mind.
Yay, my point is now unassailable!
My argument is so powerful its not necessary to talk about it.
Lawl, which reminds me, I so need to give the certain actoid who gave us that gem some major shit next time I run into him.
“Given the fact that a right leaning government is not going to follow standard left wing presciptions and create a bunch of artifical jobs via increasing Government spending ”
More corporate welfare, ( Not) followed by “trickle down”, sounds like govt spending to me!
Worked well to this point hasn’t it!
When you state Corportate welfare are you meaning the money the Government spent on the Deposit Guarrantee scheme which was set up under the previous Labour led administration? While I agree with you that this sort of funding is unproductive on the whole I would hardly place it in the same category as say spending government money on paying private businesses to employ people for the sake of employing them.
When you state Corportate welfare are you meaning the money the Government spent on the Deposit Guarrantee scheme which was set up at a sustainable level under the previous Labour led administration and then grossly expanded to include, among others, SCF by National, resulting in bailout payments of hundreds of millions to a bunch of auckland speculators who had only recently invested in SCF?
FIFY
The DGS was introduced on the 12th October 2008 and was set to expire on 12th October 2010.
SCF came in on the 19th November just after the election (8th).
I can’t find any indication that the incoming National government made any changes to the DGS during this period.
Certainly National created the smaller extended scheme & admitted SCF to it in on the 1st April 2010, but SCF went bust before that was due to start (13th October 2010).
Treasury argue that once SCF was admitted, SCF depositors were guaranteed until the DGS expired, even if SCF was removed from the DGS.
I do recall PM Clark saying that the Australian guarantee had forced the governments hand and I agreed with that, but it was never clear to me why the guarantee was not for the banks only.
Reserve Bank Governor Bollard thought at the time that finance companies might be a liability.
If Labour had continued in government, I see no reason why SCF would not have been admitted to the DGS.
Yeah it probably would have been admitted with provisions that no additional new deposits would be covered.
Doubtful, the Reserve Bank made an amendment to the DGS on the 16th October 2008 that low rated finance companies would have to pay a fee on their deposit growth since 12th October. Clearly a disincentive, not a restriction from increasing their deposits.
The first banks came in on the 29th October 2008. The first finance company (NZF Money Limited) came in on the 7th November, i.e. the day before the election.
It was a done deal.
Actually – that would seem to be a well–sourced, well–written fair cop, unless someone comes up with something else.
I guess SCF is something that I can’t blame national for, much as I’d love to.
Consider this a retraction.
Although Gos is still a tool.
Nats accepted SCF into the extended guarantee in april 2010.
The intial acceptance was labours scheme, and it was agreed to by the nats too.
I love you to McFlock 😉
I don’t know which is more depressing – the typo, the lack of punctuation, or the lack of emotional perception.
Here’s the kind of nonsensical crap John Key gets away with. From Stuff :
Prime Minister John Key said this morning he “just didn’t buy the argument around job creation”.
“Obviously if the economy is poorer and not creating as many jobs or in fact contracting jobs – that hasn’t been the case in the last few years – of course the unemployment role will rise,” he told TV3’s Firstline programme.
The reforms focused on making people ready for work by offering them support back into the workforce and childcare.
“If they don’t get a job, if there isn’t a job there for them, then nothing changes in terms of their entitlements.”
“But there are plenty of jobs out there for people if they look really hard.”
What is wrong with what John Key stated there?
Basically he agreed with the proposition that if there isn’t jobs out there then you can’t expect people to work.
He then mentioned that the policy change is meant to make it easier for people to get back to work with help around childcare and other support. If you think this is not correct then point out the issues.
Finally he mentioned there are jobs out there. There are. I work in an area with a shortage of qualified people. My flatmate is a manager of a retail store and has trouble finding good quality workers. It is not true to state there are no jobs.
If the jobs are out there then why has the number of unemployed jumped so massively in the last five years. Are you saying tens of thousands of people have just decided to make unemployment their lifestyle choice?
I prefer to believe the numbers over a blog commentator and a PM with an agenda.
So you basically agree with what John Key stated in the first part of the statement. If there are no job because the economy is not doing as well as it could then of course there will be difficulty getting a job.
It’s a bullshit statement Gosman. Whether I agree with it or not makes no difference to the fact that Key is asleep at the wheel.
What changed between Key thinking that the government could make jobs through building a cycle way and holding a job summit and Key now saying he can do nothing to make jobs. Apparently the economy is in better shape now that it was during the job summit ‘talkfest’…
Definitely not as he was lying.
Unemployment has increased in the last few years which indicates that job creation hasn’t been happening.
Actually, you can have job creation at the same time as increased unemployment. All that has to happen is for the number seeking jobs rising faster than the increase in new jobs.
Yeah. The 20 or so people that hassle me every week because WINZ instructs them to apply for half a dozen jobs a week are still at it because the jobs are there if you look really hard.
Except there are not jobs for 25000 unemployed in Northland.
So they have a number of options. Either move to somewhere where there are appropriate jobs for them, (people do this all the time), or work with the local community to create the jobs locally.
I’m kind of sick of seeing people place the blame for a lack of employment on the Government. If you think there is a viable business opportunity that will employ people then pursue it. As far as I am aware there are plenty of potential up north with farming and tourism. Even light and heavy industry could take place in somewhere like Whangarei.
As for getting capital for any ventures, well considering a large number of unemployed people up there are Maori I’d suggest there is some Maori owned land up there which could be leveraged for this.
A lot do. Move to Australia that is. 700k at the last count.
Even that requires a bit of capital.
Hey gos, you might have a go-bag by your bed ready to relocate, but most people don’t have thousands to spend relocating on the off-chance that they’ll find work somewhere else – those that do go to Aus.
You know what – unemployment IS the govt’s problem. They create the legislative and the bulk of the economic conditions within the country, they choose whether to invest in real infrastructure or holiday highways, they choose whether to bollock the apprenticeships scheme or not, they set interest rates, they support new businesses, they choose whether to fund or cut part time community education night courses in business studies.
Blaming someone in northland for not starting a light manufacturing business is like blaming someone caught in an arctic blizzard for not lighting a fire. Sometimes life isn’t a simple slide rule, which you’d know if you weren’t a complete banker.
“move to somewhere where there are appropriate jobs for them, (people do this all the time)”
Indeed they do.
Thanks for highlighting one of the ways in which (especially unregulated) markets act like giant machines for generating incentives for the unravelling of the ‘social fabric’. The same fabric that maintains – or at least ‘facilitates’ – individual wellbeing.
Better still, privatize the welfare services…..
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/exclusive-a4e-and-a-200m-backtowork-scandal-7440966.html
There have been mumblings about this sort of ‘reform’ in NZ. Wonder how far away it is?
Yes, I’ve been watchingwith interest the drip, drip, drip of bad stories coming about about these back to work programmes in the UK that have the taxpayer paying corporate wage bills.
Yes, scary stuff, such as PhD graduates being forced to work full time stocking shelves in the supermarket for no pay, apart from their benefit – while the corporations get taxpayer money for providing such opportunities.
Like Gossman, I fail to see the beef of the left on this one.
If the outcome is to make beneficiaries more work-ready, then they will be more readily able to take up jobs when they become available. They will also have higher likelihood of remaining in employment. Also, they may have a better chance of getting part-time work to augment their income.
If they still can’t get a job, then they lose none of their benefits, so their only seems to be the potential of upside gains for them with no downside risk.
Instead of making people ‘work ready’ the government should invest in getting the tens of thousands of people made unemployed in the last five years back in to the employment that they are already trained for.
I cannot understand why the right fail to see that getting employers to employee people and pay them a wage that they can actually live on, without supplement, is the easiest way to make welfare for unemployment and the working poor a safety net solution only.
Because it distorts the economy and make work schemes don’t tend to have a large impact on the unemployment rate. Sweden is a good example of this. The official unemployment rate is higher than New Zealand’s but it is the hidden unemployment rate via various training and make work schemes which is the real tragedy. This is why right leaning people don’t tend to look favourably on them.
So given the fact that a right leaning government is hardly going to turn all lefty and start investing taxpayers money in massive job creation schemes what is your fundamental beef with this policy again? I mean if it comes down to ‘I’d prefer a left leaning government in charge’ then that is kind of a given as you are a lefty.
My beef with the policy is it achieves no real substantial outcome, it will not result in a drop in the unemployment rate of it’s own accord.
When you have a high rate of unemployment only one thing can fix it, having more jobs.
When you have a high rate of welfare being given to working poor only one thing will fix it, higher wages.
In my opinion there is no such thing as a ‘make work scheme’. There are business which people, companies or governments start that employee people. If those businesses are started based on a solid plan with a viable ROI then I don’t see the problem with them whether privately or publicly run.
If you want a simple policy that would actually get people employed it’s paying the unemployment benefit to an employer as a reducing subsidy for up to 24 months, if they agree take on an unemployed person, at a rate which pays them more that the benefit, and provide a plan which shows that the business will be able to continue to support that employee once the subsidy ends.
What better way to encourage companies to take on new employees, improve their service or product, reduce unemployment, help increase wages and reduce the welfare budget.
You have a problem with youth being in training instead of dead end mcjobs?
– Put them in a temporarily subsidised McJob where they can gain experience and train on the job
or
– Put them in training so they can get a… oh I’m sorry there are no McJobs available at the moment, would you like a flight to Australia with that.
Put them in a temporarily subsidised mcjob where the Government pays the wages and the Mc sacks them/makes the hours so low they have to quit, as soon as the subsidy ends.
After cutting the hours of or forcing out their full time workers to make room, so they can get the subsidy.
Really good increasing employment, training, work ethics and moral building opportunity. Not!
and in the meantime they’re working fulltime in go-nowhere work, while their skills stagnate and they have neither the time nor the money to look for work elsewhere. Wage slavery.
UK Tesco screwed over participation in “Workfare”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/22/protest-tesco-workfare
Yeah more to come, much more.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/24/workfare-criticism-must-be-constructive
And that one covers off the shallow expedient non-philosophy of the “Right” on the issue.
Why is getting people “work-ready” the taxpayers’ responsibility? Businesses should train their staff properly, not expect us to do it for them.
What increases in starting rates can these taxpayer funded training graduates expect?
What???
I’m not sure I get what you are trying to convey here. Surely you don’t think helping beneficiaries to get back into employment is the same as businesses training their staff.
If it involves training it’s a business cost being loaded onto the tax-payer. Minimum wage is for un-skilled workers – if these skills are going to be useful in an employment context they count as an asset and should be rewarded with higher pay.
Businesses have already managed to pass on all their training costs to taxpayers.
Taxpayers subsidise their businesses by topping up inadequate wages (WFF), paying benefits to casual workers in their labour pool, supplying infrastructure and trained workers to an extent beyound most other countries and they still want subsidies to train people.
Not to mention if they fail to train enough staff or cannot afford to pay the going rate they can bleat to the immigration department to get cheap labour.
If business was not so mollycoddled in NZ they may have had to actually invest some capital in plant and training.
Increasing NZ productivity.
Easiest way to make a dollar more profit is to take another dollar off a worker.
Gordon Campbell exposes Bennett for the snake she is.
http://werewolf.co.nz/2011/02/ten-myths-about-welfare/
Jeez, I agree with Gooseman about government job creation (if not for the same reason). Government when it creates jobs often “distorts” the market for labour because it gives in general better pay and conditions and leaves employers (like me) having to pay higher wages and with less power over employees….no wonder the Right does not like “job creation”. The flip side employers seem to like is that the “market” gets primed with money for consumption. I reckon they cant have it both ways.
The reality is that the government could create a lot more jobs in a hands off manner: we could for example repudiate all those “free trade” treaties and replace them with “fair trade” treaties. We could close the doors and import substitute for those things that we cant make here at a price depressed by cheap foreign labour. We might also tell capital to fekk off from those parts of the economy they seem to want to buy up (power, water) because it has no risk profile, just a rent value. We could tax the crap out of rentier parts of the economy (finance, utilities etc) and run an encouragingly low tax regime for export / wealth creating ventures. We might just create more jobs by the simple realisation that a working week of 30 hours is more equitable and a little wealth redistribution desirable.
There are a lot of alternatives: one thing is obvious…leaving hands off and allowing the “invisible hand of the market” to do the deed is the lazy behavior of a parasitic bludgers party (National).
To me, there is something really ugly about a guy worth $50m in a tailored suit and a morbidly obese woman in designer clothes telling folks on the breadline to ‘get a job’.
Tom. They are ugly people with ugly intent.
Ugly inside
No matter how expensive the rags they wear they can barely disguise the shit show within.
‘kinoath!
when an article says this
“…essential costs, such as rent and power, paid directly on their behalf. Money for living costs will be loaded on a payment card and they will receive a maximum weekly allowance of up to $50”
and a person thinks this
“Wow, wish I could pay myself a weekly allowance of $50 …. $50 a week would mean I could actually go out for a coffee at lunch time. And I wouldn’t have to tell my kids ‘no’ all the time when they ask for something as simple as an ice-cream. ”
there is definitely a problem.
The comment above is only a single example of numerous comments (now closed btw) upon the welfare reform policies about to be introduced. A single comment among many that are highlighting nought but the the ignorance and selfishness that has permeated our society.
How braindead do you have to be not to understand that the $50 is for food, travel, clothes, healthcare, etc etc. Without even beginning to touch on nice to haves like a phone, so you can be contacted about a legendary yet “noble” ghost job
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/6489563/Welfare-changes-PM-says-there-are-jobs
It highlights that the policies have a lot of support in the wider community. You lefties are big on that I thought. I mean you bang on all the time about how much people don’t like the partial sale of some SOE’s as if the government needs to take in to account this support. Yet somehow support for Welfare reform is not something the Government should think about.
I’m with you on this Gosman – the government should consider the weight of evidence for and against policies rather than the level of support for them.
How can “the people” engage with this process? The government should ask them what they want in terms of outcomes, not policy.
Fair enough. However obviously measuring outcomes of something that hasn’t occured is open to interpretation. It is still going to based largely on which side of the political divide attracts you.
No. Outcomes need definition and measurement; eg: a reduction in unemployment or crime rates, or infectious “third world” diseases. Otherwise they are worthless as policy tools.
I which case you could argue left leaning policies lead to higher unemployment if you comapre countries in Europe for example.
If you counted unemployment consistently, chose it to be your only socioeconomic indicator, and provided a source, maybe you could.
You can argue anything you damn well please, but unless you provide substantive evidence in support, for policy purposes any competent administration would dismiss your ideas out-of-hand.
@marsman 9.35am
Quoting JKey’s nonsensical remarks:
“But there are plenty of jobs out there for people if they look really hard.”
and this Key remark from the link below:
“Some people are more aggressive at looking for work than others and those that are more aggressive tend to find work.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/6489563/Welfare-changes-Children-lose-say-advocates
Has he ever tried to find work (which usually doesn’t exist) with children in tow and in the way he suggests whilst already working flat out (if you are parenting properly) to bring up one, two, three or perhaps more children on your own because your partner has left for whatever reason. The pressure to parent is ginormous and Key just adds more and more unreasonable pressure and burden.
How this man and his acolytes forget children and their needs. His simplistic, monetary answers to his cronies demands for profits and irresponsibly greedy tax cuts is gutting this nation and her innocent children. I weep at his ignorance.
“Some people are more aggressive at looking for work than others and those that are more aggressive tend to find work.”
That’s a pretty stupid comment from the PM. It’s only relative there, if everyone got more aggressive then they wouldn’t tend to find work. There’s plenty of advice you can give an individual to help them find work but it still won’t create more jobs; they’ll just be taking the job off someone else also looking for work.
Exactly. The right tend to prefer behavioural engineering to social/economic engineering, despite the fact that it is far more directly intrusive on individuals’ freedoms.
Yet, if a society cannot produce the conditions for personal autonomy then it is a bit rich to then go demanding it from everyone, at pain of being further disempowered.
@ seeker. Shipley gave us the same bullshit when there was huge unemployment, her aim was to drive wages down and unfortunately she succeeded. John Key’s aim is also to drive wages down and he too is succeeding. Both these nasties had that other nasty Bill Englsh as Minister of Finance. He was there to make sure that the economy would be wrecked so as to supply the hordes of unemployed to be forced into non existing jobs.
Bill English is a trougher and rorter, Jenny Shipley is a trougher on the Public Purse. John Key, I am sure, will get some troughing seats on the boards of corporations he’s given welfare to. These people do not care about the people of NZ, they don’t give a stuff about our children. They are greedy, thieving traitors. PM in their case means Plunder Meister.
Hmmmm… the facts don’t seem to support this rather emotive drivel you have written marsman.
Unemployment fell from 7.3 % to 6.4% in the very short time Bill English was in charge of finance under Jenny Shipley. (check it out here http://www.tradingeconomics.com/new-zealand/unemployment-rate)
But hey, don’t let a small thing like facts get in the way of you getting all indignent at those nasty evil Tories. I’m sure you can find something else about them to get upset about. Perhaps you could focus on John Key’s smile and wave.
So you obviously agree with all my other points!
ahh Gosman, facts matter, like the fact when you set that table to show a period relevant to your statement, ie to show results from November 2008, it is odd how the pesky numbers show a 4.6% unemployment rate at the time Bill English took the reins. I also note it has climbed steadily, not falling below 6% since National took office.
Facts Gosman, they do get in the way of good ol’ fashioned data fabrication don’t they!
The only time it has been close to 7% is the January 1/4 of 2010.
Where exactly did you get this 7.3% from?
No, specifically I am looking at the period between June 1999 and Jan 2000. This was when Bill English was first Treasurer/Finance Minister (under Jenny Shipley). This was one of marsman’s points in his emotiove rant, that Bill English was attempting to wreck the economy to supply the hordes of unemployed people for something or rather and he did this under Jenny Shipley and John Key.
@ Gosman. O woop di do.
Very steep climb from 2008 Leveled off in 3rd quarter 2009 in a world wide economic recession Well done by national.
Which Government was in 2008 again?. Need we say anymore when things turn pear shape and the cupboards are empty they have no answer
Tin whistle from James111 squealing nonsense in a world wide tea-party trainwreck let’s join it!
Which facts does James111 have? Need we say more? When he tries to cite any he trips over his knuckles and reverts to this level of vacuous drivel.
Yeah National deserve a pat on the back little jim, look at the graph (if you are able to understand it) , they have done nothing to turn the situation around.
Now get back to your paper-round idiot.
When you finish school in 2020 come back and post some FACTS rather than regurgitating your crap.
Yup have looked at it Fender am use to interpreting Graphs the upward swing under Labour has slowed since National came in ,and the World wide economic times are worse.
Which just goes to show what an abysmal job Labour were doing in better economic times. Anyway I cant hold you up you better push those trolleys in for the shoppers before they get all wet!
Are you looking at the graph while standing on your head james?
Theres certainly no good news on this graph, even the best Nact spin-doctor would fail like you have to paint a positive picture regarding these stats.
With regard to trolleys….I think you are off yours.
On this sunny day the only moisture I see is behind your ears.
Unemployment rose majorly in 2008 and levelled off after 2009. Given any policy change that Governments implement tend not to work immediately you’d expect a delay of say 6 months for a New Government to take effect. Unless you are trying to claim that the mere liklihood of the National party getting into Government causes unemployment to rise Labour seems to have been responsible for and increase in unemployment from 3.5% at the end of 2007 to 5.1% by mid 2009. As it seems to have peaked at about 7% I’d argue it is only another 1.9% that you can directly attribute to National. To put it another way of the rise in unemployment from it’s low point under Labour at end of 2007 through to now Labour was resposible for about half the increase.
yup.
Damned labour, cutting it from 6-7% under Shipley.
Thank godness james has gone to bed, however his father Gos is not much better. I read the daily tennis matches you have with Gos and you have more patience than I have McFlock, you deserve a medal putting up with his BS.
James reckons he’s used to interpreting graphs (on cartoon channel ?) but the fact remains it doesn’t look good and National are bereft of ideas to turn it around.
Oh sorry National do have an idea, beat up on solo parents as deflection.
Cheers.
The trouble is that if these pricks go unchallenged, nek minnit they’re arguing that position X is a commonly accepted truth that supports their even nuttier position Y.
Fortunately my job enables multitasking, and trying to figure out where gos is trying to go keeps me mentally active. Although such happy confluences are seasonal – probably going to have to lower activity here soon for a wee bit.
As stated it was already falling steeply under the Jenny Shipley and Bill English by the time Labour came to power in 1999. At most you can say Labour continued the trend. They certainly didn’t turn anything around (well not until the end of their time in office but it was the other way).
Right wing motto: to reduce unemployment we have to lay more people off.
Did unemployment fall sharply in NZ during the first time Bill English was in charge of finance policy?
Why are you bringing up marsman’s comment here? A distracting conflation much?
I took the low point of your 1999 figures (not sure where you got the 6.4% from, but no mind) to illustrate that Labour took as pretty much their high point the unemployment level which was pretty much the nat’s lowest unemployment rate.
And before you plead global conditions, oecd figures place labour as having better success keeping NZ unemployment low compared to OECD etc than national.
“you’d expect a delay of say 6 months for a New Government to take effect”.
I don’t know about that. Business around here stopped hiring and started retrenching as soon as it looked like a National win in the polls.
Business around where?
Also what business reason would they have for retrenching staff just on the basis of a likely National party victory?
Maybe because businesses like mine dont trust a pack of financial grifters to run the country for the benefit of all businesses.
I’d suggest to you that businesses have more confidence in the National party than any left leaning party.
Because the National Government is taking money away from the economy of communities.
Because every time a right wing party gets in customers spending power is reduced, dipshit!
Real businesspeople, not cost cutting and asset stripping experts know this.
Real business people??? Who determines what qualifies as one of those – you perchance?
As stated above I’d suggest National has the support of more business people than any left leaning party. Certainly a survey that came out before the last election supported this view.
Really. From Managers in the big firms that benefit from Nationals thieving, perhaps.
The institute of Management and chambers of commerce run business confidence surveys. The dip when the polls showed NACT was getting back in was the biggest since the 1990’s
You keep telling yourself that ‘real’ business owners don’t support the National party. Meanwhile National will quietly continue to receive the support from these same people.
They don’t though. The bulk of NACT’s support comes from dimwits,. cynically manipulated by those who have something to gain from destroying our society..
Just like the republican anti intellectuals in the USA.
Authoritarian followers.
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~altemey/
Kotahi have they let you out of Socialist training school early today was it Stalin or Mao Se Tung you were reading, and all the beautiful humanity they brought to this world. I kind of like this quote
Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word, equality. But notice the difference: while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude.
[lprent: Personally I’m just looking for not having to rescue idiots from the troll traps like you just fell in. It is full of tiresomely overworked words and phrases that are invariably dropped into the debate by people who cannot argue and who merely want to start flamewars (see the policy). Don’t waste my time using them because to me it just indicates that someone’s alleged brain got switched offline. After a warning I usually just start handing out educational bans until the behavior ceases. ]
Well said (lprent), stop feeding the animals and they will go and trough elsewhere.
It is very obvious to me that it is possible for the unemployed to create work for themselves! They merely need to follow the example of the money market people like Shonkers himself and ignore any respect for the law.
Loot and rob, if it is good enough for the financial elite its good enough for the rest of us!
They never appear before the courts, why should you?
Treat the Police and the Courts as just another criminal gang keeping your criminal corporation from its just deserts.
Form a criminal cooperative.
Seize capital from people who own Porsches etc and reinvest in more heists to grow the capital.
If it is good enough for our leaders it is good enough for us.
.
What activity did John Key carry out that was illegal or in any way similar to what you are suggesting here while working as a FX trader?
Make money by manipulating and ticket clipping, not by producing or adding to society.
Did the people who traded with John Key or his traders have a problem with him C.V?
Did the people who ultimately paid his salary have a problem with the amount he earned?
Interesting you seem to look down on middlemen. It is an awful lot of people you think aren’t doing anything. Everybody who works in retail for example.
If you want to demonise hundreds of thousands of hard working New Zealanders feel free. It isn’t going to win you many converts to your Social credit fantasy land solution I’d suggest.
We are still suffering from What Key and his mates did to the NZ dollar.
It may not be illegal, but anyone with a shred of ethics knows it was definitely wrong, and should be illegal.
Just like selling off vital infrastructure, so his backers can profit at our expense
Some of us refrain from doing things that we know will harm others, whatever the law says..
Others are sociopaths. .
LOL!
What in fact did ‘Key and his mates’ do to the NZ dollar again?
You mean that little incident back in 1987 or was it the one around the Asian crisis?
Why is taking advantage of an overvalued currency somehow bad in your book?
Do you begrudge people who take advantage of overvalued markets in other areas making money or is it just bad when it comes to foreign exchange?
Yes. I do have a problem with banks, and others playing with the value of assets so they can lend more money to increase their profits at everyone else’s expense.
And. If we cannot make it illegal we should have capital gains and financial transaction taxes at a level that removes capital from unproductive playing with money, to productive enterprise.
As a good little capitalist you should be interested in addressing this manifest failure of the market also.
Taking advantage of an overvalued currency did not really mean increased lending. I’m not sure where you got this idea from.
They are also not playing with the value of the assets. They made a calculated bet that the currency was overvalued. They were correct and made made money on their bet.
Speculation serves a purpose in markets. For one thing it provides liquidity and therefore tends to reduce volatility. They certainly facilitate transactions taking place.
All the profits that John Key made would have been taxed. Whether you think they should have been taxed at a higher rate or a different way is a seperate matter. Maybe you will get enough people supporting the FTT. Good luck with that.
What is clear is John Key did nothing illegal or even unethical in his role as a FX trader.
You have a strange idea of ethics.
Something that harms millions of people is ethical?
All you seem to be doing is regurgitating the leftist nonsense you have been fed about this topic without actually using your brain to analyse the information.
Let me help with this process for you by posing you some questions:
How is an overvalued exchange rate beneficial in the long run for an economy ?
Are there any negative economic impacts for having an overvalued exchange rate?
Even if there were some benefits for having an overvalued exchange rate how is influincing the market to move to a more realistic level causing harm for millions of people i.e. what is the mechanism that directly leads to their pain?
Also you state that we are still suffering the effects of what ‘they’ did. What evidence do you have for this, or at least what is your logic behind this thinking? No major economist, left or right, has made this claim as far as I am aware. Yet you seem quite adament about it. I personally think you have no idea what you are writing about but am willing to be convinced otherwise.
Of course we’re still suffering from the effects of his FX.
The present day is always impacted by the past. Massive shifts in speculative capital have upended whole countries and their peoples, and the effects are generational.
So no evidence then C.V. just your usual biased opinion which you attempt to dress up as if it is informed in some manner.
Anyway I am curious to know what you are actually doing to promote your brand of Social Credit ideology. Aren’t you in anyway put off by the abject failure of the Social Credit movement in NZ to get their ideas accepted by the mainstream in the past?
“For one thing it provides liquidity and therefore tends to reduce volatility.”
My understanding is that, since the start of (global) deregulation of financial markets in the 1980s, there has been greater volatility than in the preceding decades since the Second World War (’87 stock market crash, savings and loans debacle, dotcom boom and bust, the latest chaos since 2007). Each cycle of volatility has been significantly larger than the previous one, certainly in terms of government bailouts.
If you are correct about the stabilising function of speculation, why has there been so much volatility during a period in which opportunities for financial speculation have been permitted to increase (e.g., through the creation of arcane derivatives)?
The Stuff comments on today’s benny-bashing special are interesting.
While the usual idiots are out in force, calling for beneficiaries to be sterilised, kicking the teen jobseeker in the article in the teeth and generally displaying their ignorance and lack of empathy, there are quite a few there who I think would have barked if that dog-whistle had been blown three years earlier, who are having doubts now.
Joblessness has risen to a level where many more people are personally affected by it, or know someone who is, or fear losing their own job soon.
I think a few people are starting to get worried about the Key government. Worried about the day when the harsh measures they want to see enacted on others come down on them or their loved ones instead.
Interesting reading Gosman’s measured, reasonable and logical comments, and comparing their quality with those of the individuals replying. He is just stating a few basic facts:
Government creating jobs for the sake of it out of thin air distorts the economy and is unsustainable in the long-run, take for instance the massive increase in the public service under Labour – the correction now taking place is necessary, and the pain of those people losing their jobs can be attributed directly to Labour’s economic naivety.
This policy is not punishing people who need a benefit. Those who need government aid permanently will get it. Where there are jobs available or potentially available people will be assisted on an individual basis to move off their benefit. The benefit system as it is basically says to people, here is some money, now fuck off and rot. This policy deals with people on an individual basis. That is a huge/massive/unprecedented change. People will be dealt with as people, not as groups, and not as statistics. Now what is wrong with that?
Horizon, are you the latest off that ceaseless production line of fools (both left and right) like Gos and TS who can only think at a superficial level using logic that begins with invalid assumptions you state as facts?
Dealing with people on an individual basis….so what is different? To quote you lovely line it may well be “now fuck off and rot” Mr Individual. Does that mean by the warped logic applied that there is no massed unemployment, only masses of unemployed individuals?
Which assumptions made by either Horizon or myself are invalid and why?
I’m sorry that you think school teachers, nurses, police, border patrol, biosecurity, universities, Crown Research Institutes and diplomacy are all a waste of time. Or is it your neoliberal free market which is a waste of time?
Fact of the matter is that Government is a powerful and necessary player in the economy, because the private sector cares only about a narrow set of interests: its own profits, even at the expense of society as a whole.
And what is truly unsustainable: annual private sector growth in an economy which no longer needs or values people or workers. Its like a cancer consuming the remaining scarce resources of the body faster and faster.
“I’m sorry that you think school teachers, nurses, police, border patrol, biosecurity, universities, Crown Research Institutes and diplomacy are all a waste of time. ”
Not a waste of time but you can’t have those unless you are able to afford them via a productive sector. That is what Greece failed to understand. They learned the lesson the hard way. Now all of the public spending on those areas are being slashed. Still you live and learn.
So now you are saying those people are unproductive.
Greece failed because the rich not paying taxes was a national sport, combined with the Euro distorting their economy to the benefit of higher waged economies like Germany.
In your funny little world Soviet Russia and Cuba would have never had doctors because they had no private sector.
Singapore should be failing because the Government owns almost everything.
Another D for economics Gosman.
You are just priceless KJT.
So all the analysis on Greece that is out there that states the problem was that the Government spending was out of control is wrong is it? even this piece here that is critical of the bail out programme admits as much http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Columns/2012/02/13/Why-the-Greek-Bailout-Wont-Work-in-the-Long-Run.aspx
By the way I agree with you that their tax system was inefficient and corrupt. However there was no way you would have been able to fund their bloated and inefficient State just by improving revenue collection. If it was possible then the austerity programme forced upon them by other Euro members would have just focused on this area not on cutting spending.
Yes it is wrong. Because it is from the voodoo economics view. The view that caused the collapse of most Western economies.
Note that austerity in Greece, as the voodoo economists advocate, is making the situation worse, not better. Even the IMF are beginning to have doubts.
I don’t think you understand what economies collapsing actually means. Certainly no western economy has yet collapsed. The closest that has come so far is Greece and as stated it was because of massive overspending on the part of the Government which caused this not neo-liberal economic policy. Neo-liberal economic policy would have meant that Greece wasn’t in the position it now faces. You have yet to explain why this is not the case.
pretty voodoo right there – you come up with a position on what would have happened in a hypothetical situation and assume that the burden is on other people to disprove it.
And Kirk would have kicked Picard’s arse after screwing Janeway. Show why this is not the case.
So McFlock, what is your take on the situation in Greece if it is not the Greek Government constantly spending more than they earn? Have you got any reputable economists backing you up on this view?
Given that traditional neo-liberal economic policy prescription would be to reduce the deficit by a combination of creating an efficient tax collecting system, (including reducing loopholes), and reducing wasteful spending how would this not have helped the Greeks.
But it would also have included massive cuts to the public service, including health, infrastructure and education, and cuts to welfare and pension entitlements, and contracting out of essential public services, all of which would definitely have hurt the majority of the Greeks. Yet again you present the “good” half of the equation – a bit like our current crop of cabinet ministers.
Are they better off now than they would have been if they’d followed a tory approach? Moot point, really. Probably just as fucked either way – we’re not exactly doing so well compared to the OECD, and that’s after only 3 years.
“reputable economists”.
You so funny.
The Neo-liberal prescription is to remove taxes and Government entirely. Except for police, funnily enough. As one Neo-Lib said. “I want Government to be small enough to drown in the bathtub”. Translation “I do not want anyone genuinely representing the population to stop me making money by ripping them off”.
Greece spent a lot less on Government and welfare per head and overall than Germany.
Germany paid their workers enough to pay taxes and live without borrowing.
“In your funny little world Soviet Russia and Cuba would have never had doctors because they had no private sector.”
Ummmm…no.
Please note I stated productive rather than private sector. Even the Soviet Union and Cuba had/have a productive sector. They were/are just not very productive. Hence if they wish to have a world class medical system they can by spending a large proportion of the income from their productive sector on this. However they have to sacrifice some other aspect to achieve this. This involved pretty much all consumer goods, or at least quality consumer goods.
More bollocks.
Brainlessly quoting mantras from totally discredited economic hypothesis does not make them true.
And we get such quality consumer goods now?
Well let’s see KJT.
I presume you are typing this on an internet compatable device of some sort. Do you have a problem with the quality of that?
Do you have a problem with the quality of your T.V., DVD player, MP3 player, Washing maching, Fridge/Freezer, Microwave, etc, etc?
Do you think the average Cuban has many of these items and even if they do would they be the same quality as what we have?
German State sector is much larger than ours, or that in Greece.
Perhaps we should follow the more successful countries.
Not according to this link it isn’t
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_spending
In fact both the UK and Greece have a higher percentage of GDP taken up by Government spending. New Zealand is less than Germany it is true but not by that much.
Interesting to note that those economic power houses Zimbabwe and Cuba are near the top of the list.
Don’t recall saying “as a percentage of GDP”.
Both per capita and overall German State spending is much higher than ours. Or Greece’s.
It is a lower proportion of GDP because they did not buy into the Neo-liberal crap like the UK, Ireland, USA and us.
Germany still makes things and pays workers properly.
“the correction now taking place is necessary”
That is an assumption. What makes you think it is ‘necessary‘, apart from your ideological commitments?
“People will be dealt with as people, not as groups, …”
Well, as I said, that’s one way of describing direct, coercive intervention in the lives of individuals. There are more realistic ways of describing it, however (e.g., ‘direct, coercive intervention’ – perhaps more familiar when phrased in the following way: “We’re making you an offer you can’t refuse.”)
Lovely little speech Horizon but even if it came from Paulas mouth I’d still doubt its sincerity.
And better end all Govt jobs pronto to stop any more destortion to the econemy. What utter crap. You mean Govt creating jobs destorts the profits of corporates, better give the welfare to them instead.
So essentially you don’t have a problem with the policy just whether the people promoting it are sincere in their aims. Considering you are a hard core lefty I wouldn’t expect anything else but at least you acknowledge potential benefits in what they are doing.
I was not saying that all government jobs distort the economy. Of course any advanced country needs an efficient and functioning public sector commensurate to its needs.
I was just pointing out that the enormous expansion of the public sector from 1999 to 2008 was unsustainable. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were added to the public service which were not producing output to match the taxpayer salary input.
It got to the point that a private business in Wellington could not find any commercial rental space because the government sector completely dominated the property market. The size of government was doubling and doubling again. It was simply unsustainable and also wasteful as money for instance going to say the Education assessment research unit academics and policy analysts was not going to say the teacher aide budget for vulnerable children in Southland/Otago.
Year on year budget increases occured with only nominal increases or even decreases in measurable output. I think it is a tragedy that the people losing their jobs today are a victim of naive economics and wasteful government.
“I was just pointing out that the enormous expansion of the public sector from 1999 to 2008 was unsustainable. Hundreds of thousands of jobs were added to the public service which were not producing output to match the taxpayer salary input.”
This report from the PSA points out:
“By number of workers, share of the economy, or per capita size, our public service is smaller than it was in the 1980s. Some rebuilding was needed after the cuts and privatisation in the 1990s. But the public service is now smaller than it was in 1990 despite the population increasing by 700,000 and greater demands being placed on public services.”
As for “hundreds of thousands of jobs were added“, the same report (same page) claims that, as of 2007, there were 42,047 full time jobs in the public service.
You mean Horizon was grossly over stating the “facts”? Well, colour me blue.
More arse about face dogma from the government. I was aware yesterday that submissions for the Green Paper (child welfare) closed yesterday and what happened earlier in the week, punitive welfare change for women and children.
Were I the Social Development Minister, I would not have made ANY changes to welfare affecting single parents and children until I addressed the Green Paper. Bennett may have a social workers degree, but she needs to listen to the medical clinicians/family advocates first. Bennett is not even listening to the family advocates who are against some of her her welfare changes, (work testing, widows recepients and youth).