web analytics
The Standard
Advertising

Open mike 03/01/2014

Written By: - Date published: 7:06 am, January 3rd, 2014 - 286 comments
Categories: open mike - Tags:

openmike

Open mike is your post.

For announcements, general discussion, whatever you choose.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Step right up to the mike …

286 comments on “Open mike 03/01/2014”

  1. “I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice… who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait.”

    a quote from martin luther king, which seems relevant to the discussions happening here over the last few days. so many of us are being told to just shut up, and wait for the “more important” issues to be sorted, because our issues aren’t considered important enough.

    and it really is more destructive when those on the left give that message, because they are the ones who supposedly understand marginalisation, who claim to be allies of the marginalised. but when even they tell us to sit back and be quiet while the “more important” stuff is being sorted, then what hope is there?

    a living wage is supposed to sort the gender pay gap or racial discrimination? a living wage only helps those who can get into full-time paid employment. i can give you any number of examples of people shut out of paid employment because of their religious beliefs, their skin colour, their ethnicity and their gender. i remember, a few years ago, being told not to apply for a job because they’d tried employing a woman the last time around & it hadn’t worked out. so if i can’t even get a job because of discriminatory practices in employment, then what does it matter to me whether we have a living wage or one that’s lower?

    and a universal income is not going to solve the problem of being beaten to death because of sexuality (i recall a couple of cases of this in nz in the last year). a person won’t be getting that income if they’re dead. climate change won’t be affecting me if i can’t face getting through the next week due to sexual abuse or bullying or any number of other experiences that affect the mental health of those suffering from marginalisation. we have one of the worst teen suicide rates in the world. are we supposed to treat that as tier 2 and keep letting our young people die, because climate change is so much more important?

    there are no tiers, no need for priority lists. and it’s just plain cruel to tell people to wait, and to dismiss their issues as boutique or “identity politics”.

    i’d like to salute all of the wonderful people who have put in the time and energy in the last few days, over the last few months, and for years, to fight against this framing that pits issues of economic marginalisation against other marginalisation. all of the points above have been made by you much more eloquently. you have shown incredible patience and tolerance, and a willingness to keep engaging even when opponents can’t be bothered to take you seriously. i know how exhausting and demoralising this work can be, and i want to make clear that there are plenty of people who are appreciating the fact that you have taken the trouble to speak up and to challenge people who want us to sit back and keep quiet. thank you.

    • AsleepWhileWalking 1.1

      Excellent post.

      “….examples of people shut out of paid employment because of their religious beliefs, their skin colour, their ethnicity and their gender.” And disability. Don’t forget that.

      The official line that blames disabled persons “work ethic” is an attempt to negate the very real barriers and discrimination disabled face when obtaining employment.

      How many disabled are suffering in bad work conditions because they know that it will be difficult to obtain any alternative?

      Some disabled also may not ever qualify for the IWTC due to their medical limitations.

      • karol 1.1.1

        Agreed AWW.

        When there was talk of focusing on the needs of the bigger proportion of people on low incomes, and to ignore the needs of minorities, I remembered the many years when I worked with children with “special needs” – various kinds of disabilities. When working in this education sector in London, I also became aware that the highest proportion of children designated “special needs” (ie with some disability), is the state system, came from low income/working class backgrounds, with Afro-Caribbean boys being over-represented.

        Any disability most often results in people being marginalised and stigmatised, adding to an already difficult situation. Low income +plus disability, makes life a real struggle.

    • just saying 1.2

      Just this.

      Thank you Stargazer.

      Here’s the irony CV, and I know you are still reading this, and to all your brothers in arms, because this is hardly an unusual situation –

      We could be allies. By stint of geography and coincidence. I thought that might be obvious, but due to my status as a mere woman, I suspect it’s more likely that you haven’t noticed. Your list of the three important issues (which you’ve never remotely stuck to yourself) – I care very much.

      We could be on the same team right here right now. Jesus wept CV, we actually are. But you’ve made it clear that you don’t want my kind on your team unless I’m prepared to STFU. I’m picking you assume that those of us living in the Margins “Boutique” will support you anyway, for the sake of the “big picture”. Despite being belittled by you.

      Well nah – I’d rather paint my toenails, because if this is the best we can do we really are going to hell in a handcart. Why bovver?

    • Zorr 1.3

      Same

      One of the funniest things that I just realized is that a large part of the argument for shelving “identity” politics until later is that we need to reform the economic system first in order to provide equality for all. It honestly feels like everyone is clamoring to be the person that gets to save NZ from the nasty disease of capitalism – despite the fact that in order for this change to occur they will need a very large base of support.

      So what do they do – tell everyone who could possibly be invested in the fight for greater equality that their issues are secondary until the adults finish talking.

      It’s days like these that highlight why I try not to invest too much in politics. The stupidity burns so much and it is depressing to see would-be-comrades undermine our position on the left more effectively than a Len Brown sex tape would.

    • karol 1.4

      Thanks, stargazer. So well put. It is important to be aware of and work against, any oppression of specific groups, that damages lives:

      there are no tiers, no need for priority lists.

      And this bit also is something that is worth highlighting:

      a living wage is supposed to sort the gender pay gap or racial discrimination? a living wage only helps those who can get into full-time paid employment. i can give you any number of examples of people shut out of paid employment because of their religious beliefs, their skin colour, their ethnicity and their gender. i remember, a few years ago, being told not to apply for a job because they’d tried employing a woman the last time around & it hadn’t worked out. so if i can’t even get a job because of discriminatory practices in employment, then what does it matter to me whether we have a living wage or one that’s lower?

      Because the claims to support low income and working people, from some of the “priority list”, “boutique” dog whistlers, aim for a gender blind approach to solutions for those on low incomes and or unable to find work.

      • phillip ure 1.4.1

        a ‘marginalisation’-issue i have with labour @ the moment is that the party seems unable to talk about the real poor..

        ..i have commented before how..when ardern/anyone from labour is asked about their solutions to poverty/inequality..they will only speak of ‘the working poor/need to raise minimum wage’..

        ..a ‘tutored/curated-message’ that must set a new benchmark in ‘the sliver approach’..

        ..to a large/complex..but totally solvable..problem..

        phillip ure..

        • weka 1.4.1.1

          “a ‘marginalisation’-issue i have with labour @ the moment is that the party seems unable to talk about the real poor..”

          Yep, so let’s keep on critiquing Labour and pushing for them to get their shit together.

          (not sure about the ‘real’ bit though).

      • Olwyn 1.4.2

        I have stayed away from this debate so far, mainly because I have been sick with an infection. However, I read CV’s claim as far more nuanced than the many commentators who have been angered by it did. The word “boutique” suggests a sub-class of issues rather than a whole class, as in the difference between “boutique beer” and “beer.” A “boutique gain” in this context would mean a sub-class of gains that can be trumpeted as making much more difference than they do. You could arguably get a “boutique gain” that was sold as advantaging working class men, when it neither seriously advantaged them nor off-set a greater disadvantage, as happened in the Simpsons episode when Mr Burns tried to replace the workers’ dental plan with a keg.

        As I read CV, the general thrust of his recent comments is that there is no room left for neo-liberal accommodation, and that “boutique gains” allow politicians to maintain an accommodation while denying that they are doing so. As the neo-liberal fangs sink deeper, this increasingly means appealing to people to vote against their interests, including the putative beneficiaries of these gains. And if I have him right then I agree with him.

        • weka 1.4.2.1

          Yes and no Olwyn. The addition of ’boutique’ came rather late in the piece. For quite some time it was ‘identity politics’ with no qualifier. If CV had used the term ’boutique politics’ (not ’boutique identity politics’) at the start, AND explained what he meant by that, he might have coined a useful term to refer to the parts of the Labour party who are privileged by neoliberalism and so will only move on the things that benefit them or suit them, all the while ignoring the poor (not totally convinced that would have worked, but possible).

          The problem is though, that when you put his use of the term ‘identity politics’ alongside his politics around some identities (esp gender), it just starts to look really bad. Because he doesn’t just mean the toffs in Labour, he does actually mean that we (not just him) should put aside all our other concerns and focus on his vision.

          I think part of why this has been so messy is that the focus on economics, which lots of people agree with, has been mixed up with the anti-identity stuff and that’s mixed up with probably prejudicial views.

        • greywarbler 1.4.2.2

          Olwyn
          Good points. I look forward to seeing this matter settled and put aside when CV comes back. I think primarily he is concerned to get action on climate change matters so we prepare ourselves for likely violent weather that will change our lives for ever. This means that there will have to be time allocated for looking at how the poor and the disadvantaged through health problems etc. can best be provided both in the middle future as well as the next few years.

          This has to be watched – I remember thinking Lange’s Labour making a stand against nuclear proliferation was right but we at the same time were being undermined by neo liberalism. It was as if only one big thing took all the energy – the view was outward and the at home problems just got passed over.

          I do believe Labour must keep working to assist people who are struggling and need more resources. But Labour has got intoxicated in the past with ideas without pragmatism. One case is the swingeing changes for special needs education.

          Mainstreaming in education was imposed by Labour. It could just have been introduced, with more opportunities for special needs children on what they already had, so they could choose to go where they could achieve and were happiest. But no, and what a costly imposition it has been on the education system, and on teachers who are also burdened by new reporting systems.

          I heard two fathers speaking on Radionz last week on the need for individual help in classes for their special needs children. The fathers had gone to central government and got another 30 teachers allocated nationwide. Good for them. But schools can buckle under the cost of numerous special needs. The idea that teachers can adequately teach a disparate class and also cope with special needs with no drop in outcomes is risible. It cannot be overlooked when viewing the nasty attacks on teacher success and achievement of recent years.

          • Olwyn 1.4.2.2.1

            “I look forward to seeing this matter settled and put aside when CV comes back.”

            So do I, very much so. It’s election year. Let’s hope we are just getting a few tensions out of the way, and can work toward a win for the left.

          • karol 1.4.2.2.2

            On special education, gw: I worked in special education under Thatcher’s PM-ship – and it was part of the neoliberal shift to “mainstream” education of children with disabilities. I agree with your comments on what would have been a better way.

            I came to the conclusion that the pressure for mainstreaming was done to save money. It meant some children were put into classes where teachers had neither the specialist training, nor the time to provide the education some of those children needed.

            • greywarbler 1.4.2.2.2.1

              karol
              That was most interesting. I felt that about money saving, hidden under concern for better opportunities etc which was false. But it did deliver advantages for some. But then I considered that those who could have gained most from mainstreaming could have had time at other schools teaching appropriate subjects where the youngster could extend their learning while still homing at the special school. Which has been done in some places.

              The other thing that has concerned me is the feeding into the hopes of some parents who have unreasonable expectations for their youngster. One has to be careful about squashing hopes I know but with every chance some couldn’t manage. When Labour first started the mainstreaming there was a young woman trying to get accounting who attended the same course for at least two years. She might have been able to get a book-keeping position, but would not have been accepted as an accountant in a charitable institution or private company. Her appearance, speech, communication alone would not inspire confidence and the standard of work would be in doubt even if she achieved certification.

              Heard Alexei Sayle on Britain and politics Panic (manic)
              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p39rOr0amCE

              • karol

                Yes, to the fact that some students benefit from mainstreaming – partly it has to do with class sizes and the amount of time a teacher can give to a child with “special needs”.

                I have worked on some programmes to iintegrate primary school children in mainstream classrooms – eg me spending time with them in a mainstream class for part of the day – providing guidnce to classroom teachers, etc. That is another alternative, but it can’t be done on the cheap. And there is also the danger of the child being seen by others as “different”. So the other children need to be encouraged to accept diffferences in others.

                Ah, yes, acceptance in a workplace. Again, part of that would be educating the general population on accepting differences. And maybe more focus on jobs to suit people’s skills –

                Then we need the wider approach to work – shorter work weeks for all, more opportunities for divrse jobs.

              • swordfish

                Yeah, I broadly agree with you, greywarbler. My mother was an IHC special needs pre-school teacher for more than a decade. She’s not a great fan of mainstreaming. Special needs kids used to get one-to-one / small-group tuition from very qualified, specialised teachers. These days with mainstreaming they generally don’t seem to receive the focussed/specialised attention anymore.

    • tinfoilhat 1.5

      Wonderful post stargazer

    • Bill 1.6

      Hmm. Something strange is going on here. Both ‘sides’ of this recent debate are both right and wrong and both are arguing for the introduction of ‘back burners’ to ensure that meaningful change can occur.

      On the one side, there would appear to be a wish that issues around gender etc should be put there. Thing is, that’s putting people on the back burner and basically taking them right out of the equation. So, okay, it’s true that all the gains in all the areas we might imagine will mean nought if…when resource depletion and global warming hit. But what’s the point, from an anthropological point of view, of tacking these things if people aren’t brought along?

      None or little? Okay.

      But people are being left out of the equation on the other side of the coin too. Subtly. Males and females and whatever other way you want to define and divvy up or categorise people as are there. But not people. So, just as elevating certain issues above people removes people from consideration, so by default, does any elevated list of categories or identities.

      I’ll put it like this. I’m a person. First and foremost and elevated way above any self selected or imposed identity, I’m just a person. Secondary to that simple fact come all types of definition or identity, that constantly shift in relation to one another in accordance with circumstance…ie, a perspective of whiteness might take precedence over maleness or whatever else in given situations. But always I’m first and foremost just a person. Not white. Not male. Not working class. Not a fat, thin, tall, short or adult anything. Just a person.

      Now sure, society doesn’t see it that way because most of us don’t view ourselves that way. So a host of divisive and destructive dynamics have become embedded in the cultures, societies and institutions we develop which then get magnified back for us to adopt as ‘normal’….cue, racism, sexism, fatism or any other fucking ism you care to mention.

      But if I see myself and you see yourself and we view each other first and foremost in terms of ‘just a person’, then we have what we might call an incorruptible commonality.

      And the flow on effect of that is that all the schisms created by elevating secondary identity markers to positions of preeminence begin to lose their potency…the feedback loop mentioned above would weaken.

      But from what I can tell, most people see themselves, and others too, first and foremost in terms of those secondary markers of definition or identity. So (sheesh – the language is about to get a bit tautological here) most men see themselves as primarily men as opposed to seeing themselves as people with a given gender.

      And when ‘man’…or any of the other identity markers you might consider get’s assigned an importance that displaces the simple notion of ‘person’…then an environment of division ensues such that difference tends to become a source of judgement and evaluative comparison rather than one of simple curiosity and value free acknowledgement. And we continue to inflict inordinate levels of suffering on each other as a result.

      Curtailing this comment by simply reiterating. You want rid of the shit? Then for one thing, stop viewing yourself and those around you in terms of the shit. and blah, blah “The personal is political”. Or…seeing as how it came to mind cause it was being played recently… “Free your mind and your ass will follow”. Except, I guess we should insert ‘society’ in the place of ass ;-)

      Or we can run around on the spot fighting fire with fire and see where we end up.

      • just saying 1.6.1

        In reply, four words:
        fiddler on the roof.

        • Bill 1.6.1.1

          Am I right to interpret that as some code meaning you see no problem with buying into and even encouraging an endless antagonistic scenario of contesting identities? Men/women…black/white…French/German…2 legs (good or bad)/4 legs(bad or good) and all the catechisms each will, by and by, formulate to enhance themselves at the expense of denigrating all others?

          I dunno js…maybe I’m not understanding your comment, in which case a wee bit of explanation would be appreciated.

          • just saying 1.6.1.1.1

            Why fight discrimination and victim-blaming in one place but not another?

            Bigotry has real-world effects on recipients, which I thought you recognised when you pushed back against it in that instance.

            You can’t be selectively zen, otherwise it looks like you’re using the rhetoric to demand your interests are attended to while demanding others being bullied stfu.

            • Bill 1.6.1.1.1.1

              Why fight discrimination and victim-blaming in one place but not another?

              Pass. No idea why. And haven’t suggested such.

              Bigotry has real-world effects on recipients, which I thought you recognised when you pushed back against it in that instance.

              Yup. you thought right.

              You can’t be selectively zen, otherwise it looks like you’re using the rhetoric to demand your interests are attended to while demanding others being bullied stfu.

              As I’ve commented in response to QoT below, I’m not suggesting that anyone stfu. Not in any way, shape or form.

              I wrote the comment because ‘both camps’ – or however you want to phrase it – are right and both are wrong in their own way and on their own terms and both camps exclude people (one overtly and the other far more subtly). And it’s just really fucking weird and a bit depressing at least to my way of thinking… while still slowly trying to get my head around the ramifications of Adele’s comment about whanau being a principle or primary foundation of self..

      • QoT 1.6.2

        Bill, this sounds like you’re saying if we just agree to ignore the prejudices and oppressions imposed on different groups by society, we’ll overcome them.

        But unfortunately, those prejudices and oppressions exist. They have serious effects on people’s lives. And it’s frequently those in the most privileged positions who want to say “just ignore colour/gender/sexuality/ability”.

        I can’t just “stop viewing myself” as a woman, as a person who is treated differently by society, who faces specific prejudices and disadvantages because I am a woman. And frankly I shouldn’t have to.

        “The personal is political” is an incredibly important idea. I’m not going to throw it out just because more privileged people can’t get over the fact that some discussions aren’t about their personal lives.

        • Bill 1.6.2.1

          No. I’m not suggesting that any prejudices and oppressions get ignored. Also, I’m not suggesting you “stop viewing yourself” as a woman any more than I’m suggesting I stop viewing myself as a man…all I said was that we are all principally…first and foremost…use whatever term you want – people. I’m a person…and a man and white and whatever. You are a person and a woman and whatever. What we have in common…and in some cases what may be the only thing that we have in common when looking at respective culture, gender and christ knows what… is the fact that we are just people. But it seems to me that if we (individually or as a society) routinely and for no good reason of circumstance….ie, in a neutral default space….elevate gender or race or whatever in our minds eye as the principle defining ‘me’ and supplant the primacy of us just being people, then we invite ‘othering’ and all that tends to lead to in terms of dominance, subjugation and so on.

          And yes, I know ‘the personal is political’ idea is a powerful and important one. That’s why I wrote it in as part of my comment.

          • QoT 1.6.2.1.1

            Um … you didn’t “write it in as part of your comment”, you dismissed it:

            You want rid of the shit? Then for one thing, stop viewing yourself and those around you in terms of the shit. and blah, blah “The personal is political”.

            This plainly says that the problem is *my* (or other people’s) “viewing myself” as part of an identity group. Your solution is for *me* to withdraw from discussions of identity politics.

            The best articles I’ve seen discussing why this kind of thing is problematic are specifically about the idea of “colour blindness”, or “not seeing race”, but I think the same ideas apply:

            http://whiteseducatingwhites.com/2012/09/03/race-101-colorblindness-and-the-privilege-of-not-seeing-race/
            http://www.racebending.com/v4/campaigns/airbender/the-problem-with-colorblindness/

            • Bill 1.6.2.1.1.1

              No QoT. I didn’t dismiss it. Definitely not. The ‘blah, blah’ – if that’s where the misunderstanding is coming from, was where I was running out of ways to express what I was trying to convey. It wasn’t a dismissive qualifier to be attached to ‘The personal is political’. Is that what you did when reading it? Anyway…

              Also I said one thing…ie, not the ‘be all and end all’….not the solution, but possibly one tool we could use (because insofar as we can, it would ‘break the cycle’ of reinforcing prejudice via the subtle habits of ‘othering’ we are inculcated with) would be to stop viewing (perceiving might have been a more accurate term) ourselves and others principally through the bounded ‘norms’ or various lens supplied back to us and taught to us by our society. And that (as said before) was in no way a suggestion to dance around with gormless beatific smiles deluding ourselves in some sincerely insincere way that everything is hunky dory.

              • weka

                I also took the ‘blah, blah’ as a dismissal, so thanks for clarifying.

                • Bill

                  shit Nice to know I can write clearly enough for people to take the precise opposite meaning to what I intended.

          • just saying 1.6.2.1.2

            So whose interests do I exclude Bill? Who does QoT, Karol, Weka….exclude?

            How I view myself has sweet fuck all to do with how others categorise me, and how others treat me according to those categorisations. To say I see myself as principally anything because I wish to have my own, and the interests and needs of others who are deemed less important or irrelevant listened to is bollocks. We return to them again and again because of the responses we get, not because of some unhealthy preoccupation. To say this is about identity rather than human rights and equality beggars belief. I don’t know about anyone else but I loathe these particular conversations. I don’t even feel particularly angry, just drained and disillusioned.

            The reason I brought up your fight regarding the fiddler on the roof thing is because I’d like to know what the difference is. Do you “principally and first and foremost” see yourself as a beneficary, or were you fighting for justice human rights and respect, and because what Shearer said was bollocks?

            • Bill 1.6.2.1.2.1

              Why you referring to me by name in a comment when the comment is full of stuff I haven’t said said or even hinted at?

              Fucking completely over people (apparently) not reading stuff properly and being content to jump to conclusions and criticisms. Anyway…

              The one bit of relevance I can see in your comment is the last para. Yes, js…odd as it may seem, I see myself as a person. It’s what I am. And just like you or anyone else I’m multifaceted….and different facets come to the fore depending on circumstance. Does that stop people categorising me and landing bullshit or whatever because of their prejudice, assumptions and so on? Of course not. Does it make it easier for me on a personal level (cue someone to land the fucking ‘you’re just an individualist‘ bullshit again)…anyway, does it make it easier to recognise, negotiate and/or reject the bullshit (attitudes, mores etc) I’m ‘meant’ to adopt as part of being a man in this society? Yup. Is that to my advantage in any way that society might measure? Nope.

              That a comprehensive enough answer to your question?

              • just saying

                Yes, I’m well and truly dismissed.

                edit: just adding this quote:
                …both camps exclude people (one overtly and the other far more subtly)…

                Now I’m dismissed.

                • Bill

                  You do understand I was merely referring to a concept right? I mean, right after your fragmented cut ‘n paste is this….Males and females and whatever other way you want to define and divvy up or categorise people as are there. But not people.

              • stargazer

                “cue someone to land the fucking ‘you’re just an individualist‘ bullshit again”

                and yet that’s all you’re talking about. how it affects you personally, how you personally deal with prejudice, what your personal attitude should be, and how everyone should just adopt that attitude because it will make it so much easier to fix all the problems without actually telling us how exactly. how exactly are we supposed to talk about beneficiary rights without talking about beneficiaries as a class of people and about the way they are as a class are scapegoated by the right & by this current government, and by david shearer in his beneficiary on the roof speech? if they are “just people”, then the label beneficiary has no meaning, and there is no injustice and nothing to talk about. the fact that the right smear them should just be ignored because if we talk about beneficiaries as a class or an identity, then they aren’t “just people” anymore and we’ve suddenly marginalised all the not-beneficiaries, and excluding them is just as bad as mentioning that being a beneficiary carries with it some levels of prejudicing and stereotyping.

                i’m trying to understand what you;re saying here, and i can’t make any sense of it. i can’t see the whole “just a person” thing as anything other than a silencing tactic. your explanation in this comment reinforces that more than it does anything else.

                • enjoy every sandwich

                  Why should we talk about just beneficiaries!? How about red-haired, freckled beneficiaries?? How dare you just lump them in with ‘just beneficiaries’. You insensitive clod!

                  It’s turtles all the way down…

                  • QoT

                    See, and this is exactly what stargazer’s saying (from my interpretation). Even within the group “beneficiaries” there will be people who are harder hit by National Party reforms, or who are already at a disadvantage – parents, migrants, people in rural communities, people with disabilities.

                    Your snide little comment about “red-haired, freckled” beneficiaries just shows that you don’t have a fucking clue.

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      Hell, maybe it is me that’s not getting it?

                      My point was that there is no end to the sub divisions you can create. You’d have all politics discussed within the perspective of every individuals perspective. Not only that, you happily jump on any possible interpretation of what someone has said if you think it doesn’t closely prescribe to the manner
                      in which you think it should be discussed.
                      Look at the hoops you and stargazer have tried to make Bill jump through, pulling him up on petty, minor points, I’m astounded at his patience.

                      Of course some beneficiaries are more disadvantaged than others but divvying them up into an infinite number of subgroups doesn’t help things, it unnecessarily complicates things. Much more effective, and less divisive, to say, ‘Hey I’m a person, if I was a beneficiary, LGBT, female, insert label here, I could understand the difficulties that could present’ and go from there.

                      This is what I was saying about CV being Asian, he doesn’t channel all his politics through that. That would be divisive and cause unnecessary conflicts.
                      You on the other hand appear to love the divisiveness that comes from channeling your politics through the personal because you thrive on conflict.

                    • Sacha

                      “This is what I was saying about CV being Asian, he doesn’t channel all his politics through that. That would be divisive and cause unnecessary conflicts.”

                      How are you sure they’re unnecessary?

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      How are you sure they’re unnecessary?

                      ffs, because they use up valuable time in an election year when we should be figuring out how to beat National!
                      Instead we’re looking like asshats with this stupid in fighting which has been in part created by the devisive language games of QoT and karol and still they refuse to take any responsibility for it.

                    • Sacha

                      If only we could all listen to waitakere man about what’s important.
                      Oh wait, tried that..

                    • Sacha

                      “in an election year when when we should be figuring out how to beat National!”

                      too late

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      yay, here we go again, trotting out the strawmen again. So because I don’t agree with you I must therefore be a misogynist male?

                    • Sacha

                      irrelevant much

                    • karol

                      ees,

                      you seem to be doing a lot of infighting…. on and on you go…. And you seem to be prepared to continue to sew discord in order to create CV martyrdom and silence us nasty feminists/women.

                      there is plenty of room for criticism on the left.

                      Remind me again who was one of the leading Standardistas in criticising Shearer, and told to shut up because he was spi=litting the Labour Party at a crucial time – and is still crtiical of Cunliffe’s Labour for not taking a strong enough line on beneficiaries etc?

                      Or is it only feminist/gay critiques you want to silence?

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      you seem to be doing a lot of infighting…. on and on you go…. And you seem to be prepared to continue to sew discord in order to create CV martyrdom and silence us nasty feminists/women.

                      I like to think I’m bringing something fresh to the party, not many people have challenged the language games that have been played here. Possibly many readers/commentators have watched as others tried to challenge the scripture and get accused of being misogynist white males etc and so have either stayed quiet. Either that or they’ve tired of it and lost interest, moved to other blogs.

                      Also, there is no CV martyrdom and none of the usual leftist commentators has accused you of being nasty feminist women. That is completely in your head.

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      Give me a break, karol. You and your passive-aggressive posse maraud around here insisting others play your language game, if someone disagrees you all pile on. The heretics are labelled mysogynists, or waitakere man or insensitive or offensive or patriarchal or trying to silence you or blah blah blah.

                      What swordfish says around here is pretty close to what I am driving at.
                      http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-02012014/#comment-752806

                      You’re so interested in fighting oppression? Then maybe you should have a think about the power you wield around here…

                    • karol

                      Mate – yes, I have some privileges and power compared with others. Never denied it. But I’m not the only one here with that. Your (alleged) martyred victim also has that.

                      You and swordfish exaggerate, to make a case of your (and/or your guy’s) alleged victimhood.

                      Goes back to the original points you made here.

                      I do not got on about gender, patriarchy etc at every opportunity, as you claimed – and I showed you the evidence – but you said that doesn’t matter cause you could find evidence I mentioned it a couple of times…. and now it’s you who are going on and on about it and ignoring any other discussions on TS..

                      CV’s “boutique” phrase was not just some obscure passing phrase.

                      You object do any critical arguments, discussion around issues of patriarchy, gender, feminism, sexuality etc – you use your muddle arguments making QoT, me and others being so all powerful above other authors and commenters here, that we must be silenced.

                    • enjoy every sandwich

                      Ok I take back that I said ‘everything is about gender etc with you’. That’s not true and I know you write a lot of good stuff about many different things. But that’s not to say you haven’t used the usual strawmen, such as accusing people of being white-dudes who are trying to silence you.

                      That’s like saying you and QoT and Weka are anti-asian for disagreeing with CV.

                • Bill

                  Did I suggest exclusivity of perspective? No. Primacy and exclusiveness are entirely separate beasts and I only made reference to the former, not the latter.

                  If you don’t understand what I was getting at, then hey. I can’t explain or clarify beyond what I’ve tried to do so far. I’ll just reiterate (and you don’t have to believe me), but there is absolutely no desire by me to silence anyone. And there is no suggestion that people turn a blind eye to any form of oppression.

                  All I can suggest is that you think it through for yourself….there is bad shit in society….the ‘isms’. Where does it come from? Maybe you think there is a one way street and that it all originates in our institutions and is then imposed on us. Or maybe you think the street runs the other way. Whatever. Or maybe it’s a self reinforcing cycle or spiral between us and our institutions…backwards and forwards and backwards and forwards.

                  If it’s the latter, how do we break that continual flow? Maybe you don’t care.

                  Or maybe if we want to bust oppressions, then we have to find the root cause. Well, we built the institutions – not the other way around (at least, not in a chicken and egg scenario, although there are very powerful institutional drivers that shape us). So…know of any revolution that just focused on overthrowing any institution (as all the recorded ones have) that ever did much beyond tweaking the forms of oppression we visit on one another and swap a new boss in to take the place of the old boss?

                  Know of any reforms that didn’t just ‘shuffle the deck’ of oppressions before commencing to deal?

                  Maybe we should we just carry on with the ‘same old same old’ in the hope it pans out differently next time? Who knows. Maybe it will.

                  • stargazer

                    “If it’s the latter, how do we break that continual flow? Maybe you don’t care.”

                    or maybe it’s that you haven’t cared to read the rather lengthy response to your “by magic” comment below. and again, you’re providing us with either/or alternatives – either we bust all the institutions or we do nothing. i’m not actually seeing any solutions from you. i don’t see how the “just a person” thing is any kind of solution at all. it’s not even anything, other than saying a change of internal attitude by an already marginalised person will fix all the problems.

                    i’m ok with working on incremental change within existing structures, while also working to dismantle those structures. yes, i’m happy that domestic violence is now a crime, that rape within marriage is now a crime, that married women are allowed to open bank accounts in their own names without their husband’s signature, that so many more areas of tertiary education are now open to women, that there is single mothers can get support from the state.

                    yes, we are losing some of the gains and we need to fight back. yes, the neoliberal model of running the economy is damaging to the majority of people and needs to be changed and dismantled. i’m perfectly happy to work on that (& have been doing so in my own way), as long as we also work on the marginalisation stuff at the same time (which i am also doing a lot of). are you ok with that or not? should i be doing both or stop doing one or the other? it really is impossible to tell from your comments here.

                    “…know of any revolution that just focused on overthrowing any institution (as all the recorded ones have) that ever did much beyond tweaking the forms of oppression we visit on one another and swap a new boss in to take the place of the old boss?”

                    ok. so no revolution. no over-throwing of institutions. what exactly are you arguing for here? you accept that there are all sorts of problems, but then what? a lot of words but nothing concrete about how change should occur. what is your magic bullet then? that we stop talking about marginalisation, or what? i don’t know what it is that you want to happen, or even what you think marginalised people are doing wrong. you say we are excluding people when we speak of issues around marginalisation. so if we shouldn’t stop speaking about that (because you’re saying you genuinely don’t want to silence us), then what exactly is it that you want?

                  • RedLogix

                    Thanks Bill. I appreciate what you are attempting.

                    Or maybe if we want to bust oppressions, then we have to find the root cause.

                    That was my instinct too. Sadly a lot of people here seem quite attached to ‘their oppression’ and don’t take too kindly to being told it’s just a symptom.

                    • stargazer

                      “Sadly a lot of people here seem quite attached to ‘their oppression’”

                      in what way, RL? does talking about it mean we are attached? if we propose solutions, that from our lived experience, know will make things better for us, does that mean we’re attached? if we stopped talking about the way oppression affects us, does that prove that we’re unattached? if we make sure we never say a word, and assume that economic changes will do away with all other forms of oppression (even though there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary, as i’ve shown in many comments here today), will that prove we’re unattached?

                    • RedLogix

                      Symptoms need dealing to. By all means struggle to find ways of relieving them, by all means talk about them with other people to learn from their experience, or educate in order to fight ignorance and disrespect. Things ain’t going to get better by magic.

                      But what if there was an underlying root cause? What if with humility and insight there was something that could be changed which would change the picture completely?

                    • just saying

                      What if with humility and insight there was something that could be changed which would change the picture completely?
                      LOL
                      Oh the fucking irony

                    • karol

                      I wondered about RL’s comment on being attached to oppressions, too, stargazer.

                      I have been pondering since my teenage years on my (lesbian) sexuality, from just about every angle – including the issues of the oppression, and its causes.

                      I’m wondering which “root cause/s” I have missed during all those years…. and how come I’ve missed them? An what it is (allegedly) a sympom of?

                      Ditto for the oppression of women…. damn I’ve studied, discussed, read in depth about such things and various other toppressions….. what’d I miss?

                    • stargazer

                      i’m hoping this comment comes in the right order since there’s no reply button to your last comment RL.

                      but please, since you know what the root causes are and i clearly don’t, since you are so much smarter than me about my own life and experiences, tell me what the answer is. what is this one thing that would change the picture completely, and why hasn’t it been done up til now, when there have been so many minds much more brilliant than yours or mine on the planet? minds that have had access to power and platforms, and could have implemented this one single great and wonderful thing that would simultaneously remove all social/cultural marginalisation along with economic marginalisation.

                      please do tell me, because i’m genuinely interested in the answer. and it better not be 42.

                    • RedLogix

                      but please, since you know what the root causes are and i clearly don’t, since you are so much smarter than me about my own life and experiences, tell me what the answer is

                      The word humility should have been a clue, because that’s the spirit I intended it in. Like Bill it’s my instinct to explore this idea.

                      I’m wondering which “root cause/s” I have missed during all those years…. and how come I’ve missed them? An what it is (allegedly) a sympom of?

                      Everywhere there is injustice, oppression and disparity of every possible kind. All of which are based on differences – gender, sexuality, disability, skin colour and so-on. All of which are external and superficial.

                      I realise that’s a statement of the obvious.

                      Underlying all these externalities, is what we authentically have in common, what makes us ‘people’ as Bill says. From that starting point there is absolutely no excuse or justification for prejudice, discrimination or disparity – of any kind.

                      I keep coming back to the idea that each of us has an essential inner freedom, which is our birthright, yet as a culture we have discarded this for a ‘freedom to shop’. We give freedom to the elites and corporates to rape the planet, while imposing judgement, disadvantage and turning our faces away from cruelty inflicted on the people around us. We seem to have everything completely upside-down.

                      I’m not suggesting you missed anything at all karol. It’s probably just the old engineer in me, who when confronted with a bunch of diverse fuck ups – starts casting about in the less obvious corners for clues.

                    • stargazer

                      but the thing is, RL, i already work on the commonalities between people, for example with the stuff i’m doing as part of the waikato interfaith council. even so, recognising commonalities necessarily also involves respecting and valuing our differences. if we can’t do the latter, then the former has no meaning. and we support each others communities when one group is facing some kind of discimination – i can give concrete examples of that if you like.

                      but also, that work would be meaningless if we ignored that marginalisation is a thing and that some communities within the interfaith movement face more of it than others. so the main christian groups represented on the council do very much recognise that and raise their voices when one of the smaller religions are attacked. they don’t just ignore it or pretend it doesn’t exisit or doesn’t matter as much as other things.

                      i can give similar examples with other groups i work with, but i have to go now.

                    • just saying

                      The ‘free your mind’ (like I have) line, really is the gold standard of patronising.
                      Twinning it with ‘you’ve made victimhood your identity – let it go’, for me a kind of acme of the paternalistic, yet weirdly passsive aggressive put-down. And when you think about it, a pretty nasty one.
                      And of course the triple whammy is telling us we need to be more humble and pay more attention to what they are saying. About our experiences, our minds and our lives…..

                      One of the holy trinity’s of sexism really. (and every other ism in the boutique)…….

                      (But then, maybe you’re onto something, guys. This could have loads of applications. Imagine if you gave this advice to the wharfies in Auckland – to workers in industrial disputes everywhere……..)

                    • karol

                      Oh dear, RL.

                      A let down. You really are not telling me anything I didn’t know already – is why I will challenge any kind of oppression, and am not primarily focused on those that impact on me. If I was, most of my TS posts would be on gender and sexuality. It’s why I am firmly located on the left.

                      An awareness of your “root causes” changes nothing re my politcs or arguments.

                    • RedLogix

                      @js

                      As Bill said, nice to see how I can write something that is read as 100% the opposite of intended. It appears I have quite the talent in this.

                      Fuck off sweetie.

                      @karol

                      No I didn’t imagine for an instant I was going to change yours or anyone else’s politics. This debate is a self-discovery as much as anything else.

                      And yes we all have our particular political passions. Mine is a fairly obscure thing (public access to wilderness) that got me politicised a decade ago. It has a root cause (the notion of ‘private property’ taking supremacy over all other rights). I never blog on it.

                    • Sacha

                      “the idea that each of us has an essential inner freedom, which is our birthright”

                      Universal human rights, then?

                    • stargazer

                      “And yes we all have our particular political passions. Mine is a fairly obscure thing (public access to wilderness) that got me politicised a decade ago. It has a root cause (the notion of ‘private property’ taking supremacy over all other rights). I never blog on it.”

                      so because you never blog on an issue you feel strongly about, everyone else should also just not talk about things? what’s the purpose of this comment?

                      and having thought about it some more, the whole “let’s just focus on what we have in common” is really just another way of saying “oh, there’s something affecting you which doesn’t affect me? well never mind, let’s just focus on what we have in common so that we don’t have to talk about that thing at all. that way, i will never be made to feel uncomfortable or have to deal with things that don’t affect me”.

                      see, i’m not a beneficiary and never have been. this doesn’t make me any better a person than someone who has been on a benefit all their lives. that person and me are of equal value and worth. but that’s not the way that society is treating the two of us. i’m not going to focus on what the two of us have in common. i’m going to use my voice to call out people who bash beneficiaries, i’m going to advocate for a raise in the basic benefit, i’m going to fight for the right of people to have an adequate level of income when they are unable to work for whatever reason, and i’m not going to put up with one or two examples of beneficiaries behaving badly being used to vilify a whole group. i will do that because it’s the right thing to do, and i won’t be talking about victim mentalities, and about how it’s divisive to talk about beneficiary issues, or that non-beneficiaries are being subtly marginalised when we talk about beneficiary issues. if we just focus on what we have in common, RL, then i wouldn’t be able to do any of that advocacy, i couldn’t be an ally to beneficiaries and i would just keep quiet when the right continue to slag beneficiaries. that is an unacceptable position to me.

                      now if this is not what you’re saying, then as with bill, please explain what is the correct way to deal with the issue above re beneficiaries. because i’m really unclear about what you think is wrong with the way i’m approaching things.

        • enjoy every sandwich 1.6.2.2

          Yes shame on Bill for saying that perhaps the commonalities between us should be emphasised rather than the differences.

          Shame on Bill for trying to find some common ground between rival factions.

          Many of us, including myself, could consider themselves as a member of a one or other prejudiced and disadvantaged group. But we don’t keep trying to emphasise it because it takes valuable time, space and energy away from focusing on the shared problems between different groups.

          CV is asian, if he followed your lead he could justifiably harp on day and night about the injustices that asians suffer in New Zealand. He could argue that anyone here who is non-Asian has no right to question his authority on the topic because they haven’t had his personal experience. But he doesn’t. I don’t think I’ve ever seen him talk about it, if he has it is definitely a rare event because I have been reading this blog for a long time and I’ve never seen it. Probably the reason he doesn’t is because he knows it would be something that would be divisive, cause tension and just wouldn’t be helpful.

      • Adele 1.6.3

        Kiaora Bill

        But if I see myself and you see yourself and we view each other first and foremost in terms of ‘just a person’, then we have what we might call an incorruptible commonality.

        Well, from an indigenous perspective, the ‘person’ is an alien concept. The smallest social unit is ‘whanau.’

        Besides, the blank slate of ‘person’ doesn’t exist outside of the skin as so much of your rhetoric is wrapped up in a cultural ethos that is not universally appreciated or comprehended.

        • Bill 1.6.3.1

          Hi Adele,

          I get that I’m limited to speaking from a discrete cultural perspective (European) and, yeah…so only to a limited European perspective.

          Hmm. At pains of maybe sounding as though I’m simply asking you to repeat yourself, but just so I’m clear on exactly what I’m trying to get my head (somewhat) around – when you say that whanau is the smallest social unit, are you saying that whanau constitutes the core sense of identity or being?

          • just saying 1.6.3.1.1

            I’ll be interested to hear Adele’s reply, I enjoy learning from her.

            But in the meantime…as I understand it, there is no word for “individual” in Maaori, and there was no particular concept of “individual” before Pakeha.

            Maybe the capitalist concept of ownership and money as the basic unit of human interaction has something to do with the difference in thinking. I believe tradionally, Maaori don’t even believe that they own their own bodies – these belong to the ancestral Papatuanuku (Mother Earth) and must be returned to her.

            I hope I’ve got this right. Love to hear more from you on this topic, Adele.

            • Bill 1.6.3.1.1.1

              Thanks for that js….suggesting that there could be no ‘power over’ one person by another. And..yeah…

            • Adele 1.6.3.1.1.2

              Tēnā kōrua Bill and Just Saying

              I am sorry it has taken so long to get back to you both.

              I originally thought to respond in some really indigenously inspired way. To serve up a huge pot of allegory boiled to metaphysical perfection and served with dumplings of weighty meaning. But no, I have had a crap holiday break and being pleasantly philosophical does not currently fit my temperament.

              My son is 20 years old and is a complete dick. He spent Christmas day in a Police cell through my instigation.

              I am not feeling particularly high-minded as I so want to taser the little prick. I even went so far as to ask the Police if they could taser the boy but apparently that’s not really how they do things. But then, he’s Māori, so what more reason do they really need.

              This son of mine simply has no regard for family or friends or neighbours or the community at large. He cares very little for the people to his left or for the people to his right. He cares even less for the people before him and is dismissive of the people in his wake. He is totally disrespectful of people above his status and would happily piss on those beneath his feet. He is completely untethered.

              His Individualism is like a cancerous cell. It serves no useful purpose to the host organism and causes only corruption from the inside out. Dr Spock sucks.

              Now I am off to make a taser from a cattle prod which can easily be plugged into the national grid.

      • weka 1.6.4

        Hmm, most of that was a bit abstract for me I’m afraid Bill, but I liked this

        “Then for one thing, stop viewing yourself and those around you in terms of the shit.”

        It’s why I shuddered when I read a comment stating that the working classes were all prole fodder for the capitalist machine. I just don’t see oppressed people on those kinds of terms.

        It’s also why I personally don’t believe that my feminism disappears if NZ suddenly becomes a paragon of egalitarianism. I love women’s culture and there are many beautiful, creative and deeply satisfying things that come out of that.

        Personally I don’t feel that my mind needs to be freed from… not sure what you were meaning exactly, but it did sound like you were telling a whole bunch of people how to do their politics your way ;-)

        I get that the whole banner-waving, sloganeering thing is hard. But you know what, for me personally, the conversations here on ts around this stuff are too often below 101 level. My mind and politics goes far beyond that and yet here we are constantly brought down to this lowest common denominator level simply because as a woman (or whatever) I speak from that place. The left should be lifting its game above this by now. That’s one big reason why we haven’t backed down and why the issue won’t go away.

        I don’t feel like I exist in some dualistic man vs woman, white vs black mentality. I’m just trying to ensure that I have a place at the table amongst my peers, and that my other peers do too. I also love diversity, so am never going to be someone makes a heirarchy of identity (human, then woman, then white etc). I don’t see anything wrong with that. And my ability to engage with diversity enhances my commonality with all humans (and other beings), it doesn’t diminish it.

        If that’s not true for you, than I have no problem with you working it out how it works for you :-) I’m just not clear why you would not afford others the same. But perhaps I’ve misunderstood. I think you bring up important paradigmic issues, I just hope we don’t all have to be in the same place.

      • stargazer 1.6.5

        “I’ll put it like this. I’m a person. First and foremost and elevated way above any self selected or imposed identity, I’m just a person. Secondary to that simple fact come all types of definition or identity, that constantly shift in relation to one another in accordance with circumstance…ie, a perspective of whiteness might take precedence over maleness or whatever else in given situations. But always I’m first and foremost just a person. Not white. Not male. Not working class. Not a fat, thin, tall, short or adult anything. Just a person.”

        and that’s privilege talking right there. you have the ability to just see yourself as a person. i don’t. i get reminded by other people of my differences all the fucking time. i get excluded and rejected by people all the time. as a local body candidate, i was told that i wasn’t a kiwi, i was told all sort of things that shouldn’t have mattered. i was defined by so many people based on my characteristics. that happens in the realm of politics, in education, in health, in employment, in virtually every aspect of society where i have to interact with others. not everybody is like this, but there are so many that my access to all of those things is hampered by the way other people categorise and stereotype me. in an interview for a managerial position, i had my potential employers query my ability to be assertive, in a way that i’m sure they wouldn’t have queried a male. maybe you should go and read the micro-agressions site, and learn about the small experiences that happen every single day to people, that build up to a huge well of marginalisation, a pit that sometimes feels impossible to climb out of.

        you’ve basically said that all of this shit is my fault. if only *I* could see myself as just a person, then all of this shit that i face on a daily basis would just stop. can you really not see how incredibly insulting and offensive that is? you don’t hold society responsible, you don’t hold other people who treat me in this way responsible, you don’t hold our structures & institutions responsible nor the people who work within them, you don’t hold the way those structures are set up and designed responsible. no, it’s just me and my own attitude that is as fault here, according to you.

        which is highly convenient isn’t it? because then you don’t have to address any of my issues. they’re all in my head after all, so there’s no need to push for policies and political narratives that would change the reality of my situation. because you don’t experience it personally, you’re happy to just shove it aside.

        it’s also pretty much the line taken by sheryl sandberg, in her book “lean in” – a neoliberal, individualist look at problems of marginalisation which puts the solution solely in the hands of the marginalised individual, blind to her own privilege and the institutional, structural and cultural forces that create marginalisation.

        i’ll repeat what i said in my first comment: it’s just plain cruel.

        • Bill 1.6.5.1

          Stargazer, do you see how you only took one ‘half’ of what I was saying and how that meant everything fell over? The other ‘half’ was about seeing others as people…that is, all people seeing all people in the light of them being people. Take half of what I said, as you did, and of course the whole fucking thing falls over and appears like victim blaming. But since what you are saying I said is not in fact what I said, well…

          And I do hold our social structures and institutions responsible, like (to quote myself from above)….”a host of divisive and destructive dynamics have become embedded in the cultures, societies and institutions we develop which then get magnified back for us to adopt as ‘normal’….cue, racism, sexism, fatism or any other fucking ism you care to mention.

          Seems to me you’ve jumped to the same incorrect conclusions as others…that I’m suggesting we turn a blind eye to all the oppressive shit and damage we do to one another as though that would be any kind of solution.

          We and our attitudes/perspectives become part and parcel of our society which then reinforces those self same attitudes/perspectives. It’s a cycle. And it’s a part of the reason why economics can’t be tackled in isolation from other oppressions if we want a result that isn’t oppressive. But somewhere, the self-reinforcing cycle of shit that flows from us to our society and back to us again has to be weakened or broken.

          How do you think that can be done, short of changing our perspectives of what we are and what each and one another of us are? And how do you think we can change the perspectives we hold so dear or that others force on us? By magic? Or maybe by recognising what’s going on and, where possible, not buying into it or contributing to it? (And yes, there’s a heap of other shit that needs to be being donw in conjunction with whatever!)

          Of course, we could, as I commented in my final line, try to get us and our perspective further up the heap instead of working to level the heap.

          Children and some other people do it quite well in little ways…y’know, that honest curiosity that hasn’t been besmattered with expectations of prejudice and thrown into a, gawd only knows, how deep a pit that demands injurious judgmental garbage and nonsense from us in our interactions?

          • stargazer 1.6.5.1.1

            i’m sorry bill, but i really can’t take someone telling me to just see myself as a person as anything other than patronising and offensive, regardless of “the other side” of your comment. i can’t get past that and pretend it doesn’t matter just because you said some other stuff as well.

            how do we change marginalisation? by listening to the experiences of marginalised people, and listening to the solutions they offer. by not telling that their issues aren’t important, are just boutique, draining, irrelevant, distracting us from the “important” stuff. i’ve found that every community has the solutions to their problems, they know what works. for example, the stuff that weka wrote about her experiences of disability, of what she needs from society and what changes structural changes need to be made in order for her to simply become “just a person” within in that society: let’s treat that as worth listening to, let’s see how we can incorporate it into our social and economic reforms so that we bring her with us. instead of patting her on the head, telling her that we know she has issues, we know that something should be done about it, but if we listen to her, we’re somehow marginalising and excluding other people.

            is this magic, bill? that simple two words “by magic?” is symptomatic of the dismissiveness, the offensiveness of the “boutique identity issues” arguments that is so much worse than swear words or other expressions of anger by people who are already marginalised and who continue to be by the way lefty progressives carry on the discourse. there’s nothing magic about listening. there’s nothing magic about saying that the revolution can be fought on many fronts, not just one.

            you want solutions for discrimination in employment? look at some of the work the office of ethnic affairs has been doing for many years; look at the work that was being done by settlement support services until the funding got cut by this government; look at the work being done by the human rights commission also now suffering from funding cuts & redundancies. there are plenty of programmes, big and small, being run across the country that are effective but need more resources and more staff.

            similarly in the area of rape prevention. heaps of work done, heaps of programmes that will be effective if only we as a society would fund it adequately and roll it out across all schools. is that magic? no, it’s simple practical solutions that do make a difference.

            there are ways to change attitudes, and there are plenty of us who are working solidly in our communities and who could with the support of the “boutique identity politics” crowd, instead of us being blamed for the lack of the dismantling of the neo-libreral market economy. because guess what, those of us working on changes in attitudes around marginalisation are ALSO pushing for changes to the economy. we’re not telling the “boutique indentity politics” crowd to shut up about economic and environmental and climate change issues. we’re fighting alongside you on all of that, and asking that you fight alongside us as well, on the issues that are vitally important to our well-being. but all we get in return is “shut up, you’re a distraction”. not good enough.

            • Bill 1.6.5.1.1.1

              Aside from the fact you keep attacking me for what you think I’ve said and stuff I’ve obviously simply never said, fact is I don’t disagree with much, if anything you’re saying there

              • stargazer

                well, as i’ve just said in my comment up above, if i’m misunderstanding you then what exactly are you saying then? i just can’t understand what you think we’re doing wrong here. and if you agree with everything i’ve said, then what were all the words from you about? now i’m just confused.

                or maybe i should just be happy that we want all the same things, and can count on you being an ally on issues of both economic and social/cultural marginalisation? in which case, yay!

                • weka

                  I’ve read a fair bit but not all of this sub-thread. Stargazer, can I just say that I think you have in fact heaped some judgements on Bill that don’t belong there. He’s not someone ignorant of oppression nor how it affects people other than himself, and he’s one of the men on ts who generally makes an effort at acknowledging the deeper complexities of this before he disagrees with someone or puts forward his view.

                  I don’t actually agree with his concept* here (that as a general strategy one way out of the trap of oppression is to relate firstly as humans), and I’m still raising my eyebrows from the approach taken (“free your mind”), but I do think that much of this is largely about communication rather than Bill being ignorant of the issues and dynamics.

                  *I struggle with the abstractness of it, and like you want something more concrete to work with.

                  On the other hand, I can also see why you have reacted in the way you have and I’m sure that the validity of the degree of anger here is not appreciated by some.

                  • stargazer

                    ok, i can accept that about the heaping judgement thing. and i read most of the posts and comments on the standard, have done for many years, so i do know what bill is like generally & appreciate what he brings to debates. i guess in my comments in this bit, i’ve responded as much to what other people having been saying over the past few months as much as i am to what bill is saying here. it’s a chance for me to express my own anger and frustration at the way the debate has been framed, and the dismissiveness of so many of the commenters (see the sandwich person below, for instance).

                    but yes, i’m still at a loss as to what exactly he thinks we’re supposed to do differently to achieve the changes that need to happen around social and cultural marginalisation.

          • Sacha 1.6.5.1.2

            “try to get us and our perspective further up the heap instead of working to level the heap”

            Bill, ‘we’re all just people’ is about as levelling as “he iwi tahi tatou”. And as useful.

            • Bill 1.6.5.1.2.1

              Nah. You’re missing the point completely. Level – dismantle, obliterate etc. So sure, I’m just really bad at explaining some shit. Anyway.

              • weka

                “So sure, I’m just really bad at explaining some shit. Anyway.”

                yeah, what is with that lately? You’re usually much better at that.

        • enjoy every sandwich 1.6.5.2

          you’ve basically said that all of this shit is my fault. if only *I* could see myself as just a person, then all of this shit that i face on a daily basis would just stop. can you really not see how incredibly insulting and offensive that is?

          How you can possibly extract that interpretation from what Bill said is beyond me. And then you pull out the insulting and offensive chestnut. I find everything you’ve said is insulting and offensive to me because you haven’t taken into consideration that I’m not a nutter who plays the victim to the extreme on TS like yourself. How completely selfish and insensitive of you.

    • thechangeling 1.7

      Realistically as you say the living wage campaign is only relevant for the 500,000 or so people in paid employment earning less that the $18-40 per hour rate it supports, because there’s another 150,000 to 400,000 living on benefits who constitute the ‘ dirt poor’ in New Zealand now as opposed to the working poor living at or between the minimum wage of $14-30 and the living wage of $18-40.
      Then there’s people working 2 or more jobs to cobble together 40 hours of work a week to stay alive (the underemployed) that casualisation, temporary and part-time work has created particularly by temping agencies that cream off a good proportion of the hourly wage the worker would have received if they had been hired directly by the employer.
      Anyway, another damn good post and a great read even if the topic is endlessly depressing.

    • Draco T Bastard 1.8

      there are no tiers, no need for priority lists.

      Actually, there is. Although we can do many things concurrently we can’t do everything all at once. It’s a simple physical limitation that cannot be overcome.

      • weka 1.8.1

        I tend to agree with that Draco. For me the bridge between stargazer and your positions is to use egalitarian processes.

        If people from a group stand up and say, hey, this thing here is important, then let’s listen eg gay people talking about extreme homophobic violence. If working class men want to stand up and say, hey, this thing here is important, then let’s listen. If they, or people wanting to represent them, want to stand up and say, hey, all your issues need to be in the second tier so get to the back of the line (which frankly is how this whole ‘identity politics/Waitakere man’ thing comes across), then to me it not only dismisses other voices, but it completely fucks the egalitarian process we are so dependent on for finding solutions.

        If a whole lot of people want to focus on economics, all power to them. I’m saying that to do that in a useful way, we need to make sure that the politicised voices of whichever groups want to be heard are heard. If they are not allowed presence as politicised around their own needs and desires then the process becomes just another round of power and control. This is what I was getting at previously – how do we replace the current paradigm with something that isn’t just a shinier version of the same?

        Thinking about it, maybe this is coming close to what Bill was talking about as true democracy. Let’s complete the circle then. If the Big 3 crises are a natural consequence of shifts in some human cultures at the ‘5000 years ago’ mark, whereby protection and control of commodities and land was structurally built into the hands of the ruling classes, and this then changed the cultures into ones of domination processes (chicken and egg), then do we not now, at the end point, have to deconstruct not just the structure but the process?

        • Draco T Bastard 1.8.1.1

          For me the bridge between stargazer and your positions is to use egalitarian processes

          WTH is an "egalitarian process"? Democracy perhaps?

          If they, or people wanting to represent them, want to stand up and say, hey, all your issues need to be in the second tier so get to the back of the line

          Good job nobody’s actually saying that then.

          If a whole lot of people want to focus on economics, all power to them. I’m saying that to do that in a useful way, we need to make sure that the politicised voices of whichever groups want to be heard are heard.

          And I’m saying that we need to prioritise and work together to achieve those which are important to all of us so that we can actually achieve them. Once higher priorities are achieved then we can go on to lower priorities and, as I say, we can do several high priorities at the same time – just not all of them at once.

          If the Big 3 crises are a natural consequence of shifts in some human cultures at the ’5000 years ago’ mark, whereby protection and control of commodities and land was structurally built into the hands of the ruling classes, and this then changed the cultures into ones of domination processes (chicken and egg), then do we not now, at the end point, have to deconstruct not just the structure but the process?

          No. We have to invent a new structure and a new process to bring about that structure. It will be multi-pronged addressing economic and social/cultural aspects.

          • weka 1.8.1.1.1

            Depends what you mean by democracy.

            “Good job nobody’s actually saying that then.”

            Um, actually that’s not an uncommon thing to happen, even if you believe it hasn’t happened here on ts this week.

            “No. We have to invent a new structure and a new process to bring about that structure. It will be multi-pronged addressing economic and social/cultural aspects.”

            Different side of the same coin. The question still stands of how to do this without creating another power-over structure.

            • Draco T Bastard 1.8.1.1.1.1

              Depends what you mean by democracy.

              One person, one vote.

              Different side of the same coin.

              No it’s not. Deconstruction leaves nothing while what we’re after is to replace the present system with a new one.

              The question still stands of how to do this without creating another power-over structure.

              Discussion and voting while upholding principles such as egalitarianism, freedom, and responsibility.

      • karol 1.8.2

        DtB, I think here you remind me, partly of Lynn’s post yesterday. There sometimes seems to be some confusion between the Labour Party and the wider left on TS. I do agree a political party and/or government will have a priority list. But each left wing party will also have different priorities. Those of us not affiliated with any party, will tend to have those topics we post on more than others.

        But in the wider left, I do agree with no one group or party laying down the law about what other people’s priorities are.

        I have been pretty critical of the apparent priorities of the Labour Party in the past – I am more in accord with the main focus of the Green & Mana parties. On here we get some disagreement around that – fine – all are open for discussion.

        • Draco T Bastard 1.8.2.1

          But in the wider left, I do agree with no one group or party laying down the law about what other people’s priorities are.

          See, I happen to think we should come to an overall agreement on what the priorities are for the next election so that we can work on those priorities rather arguing over what those priorities are.

          • weka 1.8.2.1.1

            Who is the ‘we’ in that sentence? (eg is Josie Pagani included). How would you see that happening? Informally or formally?

            • Draco T Bastard 1.8.2.1.1.1

              Who is the ‘we’ in that sentence?

              The left in general.

              How would you see that happening?

              Personally, I’m in favour of democracy.

  2. Here are some key facts about the historic roll-out of legal marijuana.

    http://www.alternet.org/6-things-you-should-know-about-buying-pot-colorado

    phillip ure..

  3. North 3

    The essence of all of the above is why I like The Mana Movement.

    • @ north..

      ..try being a vegan/animal-rights-freak in mana..

      ..whoar..!

      ..’holy marginalisation..!..batman..!..’

      ..hangi to the left of me..hangi to the right of me..

      ..heh..!

      ..those issues haven’t even yet been invited on to the marae..

      ..let alone coming anywhere near coming to the table/discussions..

      ..but i do have a plan so cunning..it should come with a gold toothpick..

      ..eh..?

      phillip ure..

      • AsleepWhileWalking 3.1.1

        Unfortunately most people would rather die than change their diet. Or accommodate freakish vegan fantasies.

        I’ve offended many aunties by refusing their boiled up death / wheat / sugar combo.

    • North 3.2

      Err, the Stargazer comment……PU not up when I commented. No problem with the common sense @ 2 though.

      • North 3.2.1

        Reckon our minds meat PU but let me vegetate on that for a while…….Whoar !

        • phillip ure 3.2.1.1

          heh..!..ok..!

          phillip ure..

        • phillip ure 3.2.1.2

          @ north..

          ..and to make my journey on the good ship mana even more fraught..

          ..my sirname..(scottish in origin)..

          ..means something quite different in te reo..eh..?

          ..whoar..!

          ‘holy geographical/linguistic-accident..!..batman..!..’

          phillip ure..

  4. Ennui 4

    Something from yesterday, courtesy of Draco T Bastard (hope you dont mind me pasting and adding as it is very relevant to discussions here.

    It is the cult of self that is killing the United States.
    This cult has within it the classic traits of psychopaths: superficial charm, grandiosity and self-importance; a need for constant stimulation; a penchant for lying, deception and manipulation; and the incapacity for remorse or guilt. Michael Jackson, from his phony marriages to the portraits of himself dressed as royalty to his insatiable hunger for new toys to his questionable relationships with young boys, had all these qualities. And this is also the ethic promoted by corporations. It is the ethic of unfettered capitalism. It is the misguided belief that personal style and personal advancement, mistaken for individualism, are the same as democratic equality. It is the nationwide celebration of image over substance, of illusion over truth. And it is why investment bankers blink in confusion when questioned about the morality of the billions in profits they made by selling worthless toxic assets to investors.

    And, yes, the same is happening in NZ seemingly at the behest of those same psychopaths.

    Then there is behavior on the net, commented on yesterday by a prof of psychology, the subject being narcissism.

    http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/summernoelle/audio/2581569/psychology-with-professor-nathan-considin

    There are some interesting comments here with regard to how people say things online with little regard to others….enjoy.

    • aerobubble 4.1

      You mean like having Paul Henry, who failed Australians failed to take to, read the late news. Its was noticeable how right leaning the Herald was and is, when I arrived in NZ, and how mainstream media embed the thinking (and uncontested) of the economic right into the debate. Even, funnily enough, where even Moro couldn’t stop himself ignoring a classic last month, when a guest made the weird observation that migrants should move here to change NZ, Moro immediately brought up captain Cook. Usually Moro is helping with the digging when it comes to general ignorant statements the economic right need to shore up its vacant desperate hold on the media narrative.

  5. Tracey 5

    Stargazer

    many thanks for taking the time to post such a good summary of some of my own thoughts.

    you have summarised one reason I am a greens supporter. They manage to base their world view on something holistic and despite being chided for it I believe they provide a practical solution. Turn the model upside down put and equal focus on people and environmental. Everything else is a subset of these two.

    The current model has a few peoples interest at heart and their theories and practices flow from that limited world view and self interest.

  6. this is pretty cool..

    ..it is issac asimovs’ predictions from 50 yrs ago..

    ..about what life would be like in 2014..

    ..he got a surprisingly high number of things right..

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/02/isaac-asimov-2014_n_4530785.html

    phillip ure..

  7. RedBaronCV 7

    If ylou want to ruin your morning try Stuff. Our revered leader getting his next set of instructions

  8. NOT fisiani 8

    [deleted]

  9. RedBaronCV 9

    Is this the new official photographer at work justifying his existence?

  10. TMI/Philj 10

    Good post Stargazer.

    When I see the to and fro invectives between posters. I think of three things
    !. Its a healthy sign
    2. Its self abuse.
    3. The ‘righties are laughing their bottoms off.
    So before posting please think of the ‘righties’

    • weka 10.1

      ” 3. The ‘righties are laughing their bottoms off.”

      I’ve seen comments like this alot lately. You know what though? I don’t care. I don’t care what the righties think. I don’t think we need to be afraid of having due process and that being visible. We’re probably better off doing this in a public place like ts than in a private space. Hashing out conflict in public isn’t the issue, it’s what we do with it from here that is important.

      • Sacha 10.1.1

        Need a process moderated better than is possible here. It also needed to happen a lot earlier than now, and I believe the left political parties are well-advanced in their own internal policy and campaign prep processes. Perhaps haven’t done such a good job of bridging between themselves and to other non-party allies yet.

        However if Labour for one can’t get its shit together enough to know by now whose interests it represents then we’re all in trouble. Anyone acting like it’s still FPP or trying to reactivate ‘Waitakere Man’ after the last monumental election defeat deserves a swift kick in the jacksie on their way out the door.

        • weka 10.1.1.1

          I was quite hopeful about Labour for a bit, what with all the membership stuff and the leadership change. Now I’m back to thinking that I won’t hold my breath. I think the left will win by luck and good fortune rather than Labour getting its shit together, and then if/when they do win our jobs will be to hold them accountable. It’s not hopeless, but it’s all such a waste of time and effort when we don’t have that to spare.

        • weka 10.1.1.2

          “Need a process moderated better than is possible here.”

          Do you mean facilitated or moderated?

      • lprent 10.1.2

        We’re probably better off doing this in a public place like ts than in a private space. Hashing out conflict in public isn’t the issue, it’s what we do with it from here that is important.

        Otherwise the issues just fester and cause larger problems later. While we do get the occasional person removing themselves from commenting on this site, it is more often because it has been sucking up far too much of their time than their getting wound up about a spat.

        Of course there are the people who commit self-immolation by moderator. But most of them seem more surprised than doing it deliberately.

  11. Rosie 11

    The reply buttons seem to have gone a.w.o.l. This is a reply to stargazer at #1 who I quote

    “there are no tiers, no need for priority lists. and it’s just plain cruel to tell people to wait, and to dismiss their issues as boutique or “identity politics”.”

    Thank You.

    I don’t know if it’s because I was nurtured by (non related) hippies when I was young and forming my world views but I have always be drawn towards the concept of unity and working collectively to achieve a common goal, hence I’ve often been bemused by the amount of barriers and angst that I have observed at some points within the Left, once I made the Left my ideological home.

    I do understand the need for questioning points of view, and challenging them when they feel they don’t fit, or when new ideas need to come to light, – sometimes conflict can shape and form those new ideas.I see the purpose in conflict. But at what point does debate move from constructive into destructive?

    On New Years Day I woke up feeling a new sense of hope. (an incredibly rare feeling) I linked a very positive anthemic song to illustrate the power of collective work and said “we can do it!” I had to smile when a bit later on there was an image of Ms Riveter, the embodiment of “we can do it” and a a wonderful post by QOT. That good feeling didn’t last long after reading the comments section though.

    What a crap start to the year when we have so much work to, and it’s the kind of work that requires unity in order to be successful!

    So to come back to your statement stargazer, I really really hope the good, wise and intelligent folks that are members of TS community can find a way to minimise their differences and maximise their talent.There’s an abundance of it and it must be harnessed.

  12. Morrissey 12

    Radio NZ’s grossly substandard new “Middle East correspondent”
    He ran rings around Caitlin Cherry this morning

    Friday 3 January 2014

    Radio New Zealand has a shameful history of employing extremely biased commentators on the middle east. Both Kathryn Ryan and Bryan Crump continue to go to the egregious trio of Liat Collins, Lana Shaheen and Irris Makler, and at other times Radio New Zealand National uses the sardonic ex-BBC hack Simon Marks and a string of Daily Telegraph and CNN “journalists”, none of them a credible or reliable source of information or opinion. [1]

    This morning, long-suffering listeners were introduced to the latest in this partisan, solidly pro-Israel lineup: its new “Middle East correspondent”, Blair Cunningham.

    Any eternal optimists out there who might have harboured some hope for this latest addition to the roster would be quickly disabused by checking on his recent work and having a look at his Twitter account.

    Back in March 16, 2012, Blair Cunningham drew praise from Cameron Slater for an extremely biased “report”, actually nothing more than acting as a megaphone for the Prime Minister, that he’d done about David Shearer…..
    http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2012/03/a-good-summary/

    As can be seen by a quick visit to his Twitter account, Blair Cunningham is really getting down to some serious, insightful journalism in Israel….
    Israel pizza hut looks a-maz-ing (20 Nov)

    On November 7th, he was keen to share his admiration for one of the leading thinkers of our time….
    @pollyzm excellent inspiration today. ZM’s Polly says we are passive observers. “Do anything but nothing.” Perfect given this week
    https://twitter.com/BriskyBlair

    Blair Cunningham is, in other words, exactly the kind of “talent” that fits in perfectly with the Hoskings, Smiths, Lackwit-Williamses, Russells and ohoWmads at NewstalkZB, where Cunningham continues to work as a “reporter”. Unfortunately for more intelligent and discerning radio listeners, who expect a higher standard than extended racist rants, expressions of admiration for Communist China’s repressive policies and endless plugs for Sky City, Cunningham has also scored a choice gig as Radio NZ’s “middle east correspondent.”

    The U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry is trotting off to Israel to—try not to laugh bitterly here— “attempt to broker peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.”

    The obscenity of that cruel falsehood is obvious to anyone who knows anything about the situation in the Occupied Territories—but it didn’t seem to worry Radio NZ National’s Summer Report host Caitlin Cherry this morning. She repeated that ridiculous pat formulation without demur, and then crossed to “our Middle East correspondent Blair Cunningham”.

    Caitlin Cherry evidently knows next to nothing about the situation in the Occupied Territories, but she’s obviously twigged that this is a subject that has to be treated with the utmost trepidation, even if one knows fuck-all about it….

    CAITLIN CHERRY: [with as much solemnity as she can muster] Many have tried to broker peace between the Israelis and Palestinians. What are the chances of this succeeding?

    Cunningham began his “report” by noting that “Mr Kerry’s thoughts are for the family” of the ailing Ariel Sharon. He then observed that Kerry will be visiting “Ramallah in the West Bank”. Throughout his spiel, he studiously made sure that he never once mentioned the crucial word: “occupied”.

    Caitlin Cherry knows next to nothing, but she clearly felt she had to say something….

    CAITLIN CHERRY: [with maximum solemnity] Obviously both sides are expected to make large concessions….

    Cunningham cynically said nothing to disabuse either the bewildered Cherry or the listeners. He is exactly the sort of uncritical empty vessel that Israel wants “reporting” to overseas outlets like Radio New Zealand….

    [1] http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-29032011/#comment-314173

    • swordfish 12.1

      Yeah, this never-bloody-ending so-called “peace-process” has always been about Israel and its Super-Power sponsor bullying a compliant/dependent PA into abrogating fundamental Palestinian rights under International Law by accepting the “Separation Wall’ – built deep inside Palestinian Territory – as the permanent border. And if Israel can’t do that, then, as always, it at the very least buys more time for expanding the settlement-building and consequent ethnic-cleansing (while minimising outside criticism/sanctions).

      The ignorance/compliance in so much of the western media is really quite something to behold. The US/Israel contrive the official narrative, the MSM cheerfully regurgitate it.

      • Draco T Bastard 12.1.1

        Peace, Propaganda and the Promised Land

        It’s no accident that the Western media fails to tell the true story of what is happening in Palestine.

        • swordfish 12.1.1.1

          Cheers for that, Draco. I’ll definitely watch that right through when I’ve got time in the next day or two. Looks excellent.

      • Morrissey 12.1.2

        The ignorance/compliance in so much of the western media is really quite something to behold.

        Governments, whether in Israel or the United States or the United Kingdom or Russia or China or New Zealand, depend on cynical “correspondents” like Blair Cunningham and, even more importantly, on empty vessels like Caitlin Cherry.

  13. chris73 13

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2014/01/a_damning_critique_of_the_so_called_living_wage.html

    – Interesting points brought up such as basic necessity costs including Sky TV, pets, international travel and video games

    • Lanthanide 13.1

      The living wage is meant to be a wage upon which you can live and have a reasonable life. Not a subsistence level survival (minimum wage). So it is sensible to include standard entertainment costs as part of the calculation.

      • chris73 13.1.1

        Good luck selling international travel as basic necessity costs also:

        Only 12% of low income households are two adults and two dependents, which the Waldegrave calculation is based on

        and

        The calculation includes insurance for dwellings and mortgages, despite assuming they are renting

        It seems…shonkey to say the least

        • Lanthanide 13.1.1.1

          Once again, it is not supposed to cover only “basic necessity costs”. $18.40 at a full time of 2080 hours a year only comes to $38,272, which is $591 per week after 3% kiwisaver, tax and assuming no student loan. You’d be hard-pressed to take a family of 4 to Oz on a single wage at that level; although 2 parents earning that amount could probably manage it without too much hardship.

          Further, if only 12% may have 2 adults and 2 dependents, which suggests that many more low income households will have 1 adults and 2+ dependents, or 2 adults and 2+ dependents, in which case argueing about all of these unnecessary ‘extras’ makes you look quite foolish, because the money to provide those ‘extras’ that you argue aren’t necessary for 2A/2C families, but will start to go towards necessities in the other situations. Unless you’re suggesting that workers get paid a wage that is dependent on the number of children they have…

          As for insurance for people who are renting, it really depends on the basis on which the calculation was done. Because most rental properties will be insured and the landlords will be passing this cost on to the renters. If the cost of insurance goes up by 30% in a year, as has recently been happening, that raise is generally passed on to the occupants in rent increases. Breaking that out as a separate costed item will better help to account for those increases.

          So on the face of it, that does seem dodgy, but actually investigating further is needed to really say whether it’s inappropriate or not. Given the simple mistakes already made re: entertainment and the number of dependents in a family, I don’t hold all that much faith that the ‘insurance for renters’ issue will also hold up under scrutiny.

          • chris73 13.1.1.1.1

            While the living wage is good in theory it probably needed to go into greater detail and be less vague

            • Lanthanide 13.1.1.1.1.1

              Hard to disagree with that – nearly everything should be more detailed and less vague.

              • Lanthanide

                Including National’s statements about where 180,000 new jobs are going to come from, and exactly what is “a brighter future”, etc.

            • RedBaronCV 13.1.1.1.1.2

              $591 per week is the rent, the power, food – $250, $50 and $300. And remind me , why do low income earners have to justify their need for every dollar when high income earners don’t have to justify theirs? Different standards or tests of behaviour surely.

              • chris73

                “Why do low income earners have to justify their need for every dollar when high income earners don’t have to justify theirs?”

                – They don’t but no ones pushing for high-wage earners to get more money which will come out of the tax we all pay

                • Pascal's bookie

                  Higher salaries commission much?

                • wtl

                  Actually, high income earners like council CEOs are continually getting more money (out of the taxes that we all pay), are you equally opposed to such pay increases?

                  • chris73

                    Actually yes which is why I’m hoping Dalziel can do something with the CCC salaries

                • RedBaronCV

                  Maybe I was not clear – high income earners should have to justify why they have funds and use resources so in excess of their basic needs or lose it? Now that would be interesting.

                  As to your assertation that “getting more money comes out of the tax we all pay” –
                  increased wages come from the employer, tax is paid on those wages and as wages go up the amount paid in WFF/other benefits decreases. So the employer pays less tax at 28 cents, the employee pays more at 28c to 33c (treasury win, employee win, employer loss) and WFF decreases (treasury win).

                  Us taxpayers are onto a winner with this one, so remind me why don’t the right support it?

                  • Hitch64

                    Agree employer loses. These are the people that the cost falls on. This is OK if the business is making good profits, but there are a lot of small businesses out there who aren’t in this category & the extra wage cost is something they could be concerned about.

                    • RedBaronCV

                      So far it is voluntary which protects all employers. Yes, some small businesses would struggle with it although many use family labour. If wage rates were two dollars an hour some businesses would still struggle. If changes are voluntary/ legislated for gradually then structural adjustment can take place. If higher wages were aimed at profitable employers (say the banks) then there needs to be other measures around gouging monopoly rents with price increases.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  They don’t but no ones pushing for high-wage earners to get more money which will come out of the tax we all pay

                  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10794629
                  http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/9460393/Pay-top-state-bosses-even-more-report

                  Yeah, you’re obviously living on Planet Key.

      • infused 13.1.2

        I earn… a lot… and I still can’t afford to travel overseas.

        • fender 13.1.2.1

          You may need to adopt the strict spending discipline beneficiaries do in order to keep themselves from living on the streets. Maybe reconsider that expensive gym membership or something..

        • Lanthanide 13.1.2.2

          Bollocks. You could afford to travel overseas if you wanted to. It would mean spending less money on other things that you currently spend money on.

    • millsy 13.2

      If Farrar wants wages held down, why doesnt he just admit it.

      All he has to say on his blog is:

      “Workers should not get high wages at all. Wages and conditions for all workers really need to be held down, and, in some cases, cut. Workers earn way too much money and should only get enough money to pay their rent and a few packets of 2 minute noodles. They should also lose their sick leave and paid holidays This is to ensure that inflation is kept within the 0-2% band and interest rates are kept affordable for mortage holders”.

      • chris73 13.2.1

        Why don’t you just come out say you hate kittens and puppies, all you have to say is you think they’re not cute, fluffy and adorable and that NZ would be better off without them

        • McFlock 13.2.1.1

          Ah, so if I interpret your delphic reference to kittens correctly, Farrar deliberately avoids saying what he really wants because his true opinions would disgust and alienate the majority of NZers?

          I agree, that is why he obscures his true loathing for workers.

      • Saarbo 13.2.3

        Yes, Farrar must be incredibly proud of himself publicising this. When I was a finance manager for a large corporate I was instructed to annually budget for 2% to 3% wage increase for “the workers” and 5% for management salaries. This was during the 90’s, these are the years during which inequality really grew.

        I struggle to understand how people who criticise the living wage think, just do the maths…once you take away rental cost from your income you are left with sweet f.a.

        • Lanthanide 13.2.3.1

          Seems pretty unfair, since managers would be starting on higher salaries already.

      • thechangeling 13.2.4

        [deleted]

        [lprent: Advocating violence in any way will get you banned from this site. ]

      • Pascal's bookie 13.3.1

        dunno, but according the bio in his little paper ha has a “batchelor” degree with honours in bidniz shizzle. I’m picking this hasn’t been anything even faintly resembling peer reviewed. But it comes to the ‘right’ conclusion so the usuals will pimp it.

      • joe90 13.3.2

        Look whose stickies are all over it.

        Brian scott (1 comment) says:
        January 3rd, 2014 at 12:02 pm
        I would be remiss if I did not mention that Lindsay Mitchell reviewed drafts and gave me valuable feedback. Thanks Lindsay.

    • QoT 13.4

      You’re absolutely right, chris. I applaud David Farrar for now advocating that our government invest serious resources in determining a raft of 1,500 different living wage rates to accommodate as wide a variety of circumstances as possible, and agreeing that the government should enforce those living wage rates.

      Oh wait. You mean it’s actually just nitpicking, because Farrar and his mates actually disagree with the concept of a living wage?

      I always love it when the left comes up with a fairly simple, generic way to deal with a serious problem in our society, and the right’s counter-argument would involve massive increases in government oversight and bureaucracy.

      • Draco T Bastard 13.4.1

        and the right’s counter-argument would involve massive increases in government oversight and bureaucracy.

        Yeah, there’s a reason for that – it allows them to can it ASAP or just not put it in place with the excuse that it costs too much.

        • QoT 13.4.1.1

          But that’s the thing, they don’t! They come up with ridiculous ideas like giving beneficiaries special credit cards to limit what they can buy, and then … the idea just goes away, and they never have to answer questions like “how the fuck are you ever going to manage that without massive loopholes and huge funding increases to MSD?”

          • Draco T Bastard 13.4.1.1.1

            They come up with ridiculous ideas like giving beneficiaries special credit cards to limit what they can buy, and then … the idea just goes away,

            Well, that idea is in place and probably failing badly – haven’t heard anything about it lately.

            See, the thing about National is that they won’t attack their own ideas that increase bureaucracy and costs (Just look at the BS that Paula Bennet has added to WINZ). They’ll only attack them if they come from the left and they’ll add all sorts of BS that was never part of the idea to make it sound worse and more expensive which they never get called on from the MSM.

  14. RedBaronCV 14

    These things are only for the likes of you? Colour you miserable. Looking at my budget the living wage isn’t going to be providing anything much beyond food, shelter, work related transport, doctors, school costs, clothes and not too much of all those things.
    BTW assuming you are being paid for this stirring, haven’t you been late for work over the holiday period?

    • chris73 14.1

      For what its worth I don’t have sky and don’t take overseas holidays but I don’t really consider sky and overseas holidays as being of vital importance

      Of course I’m being paid for this, don’t you know that nobody truly supports a right-wing agenda

      Oh well you know how it is so many things to do so little time to do them

      • Lanthanide 14.1.1

        The living wage is not about things of “vital importance”.

        • chris73 14.1.1.1

          No it isn’t but do you think that middle NZ will think that overseas holidays and Sky subscriptions is something that should be calculated for? Which means anyone pushing it is going to find it difficult to implement (unless you’re the WCC of course)

          • miravox 14.1.1.1.1

            Yes, I do think reasonable overseas travel should be included. I don’t think less than $500 return to Sydney (see AirNZ flights in June for e.g.) to see the new niece or nephew is outrageous – free accommodation by staying with the family. A person on a low income could easily pay more than that for a NZ holiday when the rellies have moved offshore for a brighter future.

  15. Blue 15

    Guys, I think the CV-bashing festival has gone on long enough. Starting the new year with a massive shitfight on the Standard is not a great way to begin an election year.

    Can we agree to disagree here? Because the debate between idealism and pragmatism is as old as the hills and it’s not going anywhere. We are not going to finally resolve it once and for all.

    CV and those who agreed with him have been thoroughly, massively and comprehensively shot down in flames over the past three days and I’m pretty sure there are many people now too scared to raise their heads above the parapet. You’ve made your point.

    This is a plea for peace on earth and goodwill amongst men and women.

    • infused 15.1

      Must have missed that whole fight. Damm.

      CV has some pretty interesting stuff to say sometimes, which I agree with a lot. And a lot I don’t. But then he goes around in funny circles. I’m sure whether that’s to troll or whatnot.

    • chris73 15.2

      Look CV had some good points to raise unfortunately he came up against someone who isn’t interested in someones else viewpoint (unless it mirrors their own) and chooses to ban rather then debate

      Which is fine when its their post

    • Red Blooded 15.3

      massive plus 1 to that Blue. “Can’t we all just get along”

    • BM 15.4

      Personally I don’t know why CV bothers with the Labour party.

      He’s Male, owns and runs a couple of businesses and wants to get things done instead of endlessly talking about bull shit for months/years on end, let’s be honest that’s not exactly labour material.

      Poor prick was probably being driven mad.

      • karol 15.4.1

        I think the Labour Party should definitely be supporting small businesses. They struggle to survive in a corproate dominated world.

        I would expect CV is a person to get things done. He also spends one of the most frequent commenters on this site – done a lot of talking here.

        A time to talk…. a time to act……

    • Sacha 15.5

      “Can we agree to disagree here?”

      Yes. Successful political movements have processes for agreeing to disagree, and agreeing what to work on together. And they do not tolerate idiots blathering on after that agreement has been reached, until scheduled review points like annual policy processes or conferences. People need to grow up and act like it’s an election year.

    • fender 15.6

      You may be getting a little over emotional about this. Many here (me included) love CV and what he offers, it’s just hard to reconcile such a thoughtful comment he makes here ( ” it’s about the stuff which cuts to the bone and pressuring the parties on the Left to do more (in whichever policy field is the topic of the day), because so much more needs to be done in this nation.”) with the apparent dismissal inherent in what comes across as a dog-whistle when he uses “boutique identity politics” and the 5 min limit for discussing issues other than economics and climate change.

    • Zorr 15.7

      To repeat from Stargazer above:
      “I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro’s great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen’s Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to ‘order’ than to justice… who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man’s freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait.”

      Yeah, lets all just shut up about the politics of gender, race, sexual orientation, ablism etc etc because it is making people uncomfortable… and hey, it’s an election year, don’tcha know? Can you please just keep quiet and move to the back of the bus where you belong… and, oh yeah, don’t forget to vote for us. At least we let you on the bus.

      To put it simply, if this is the Labour that you want to elect, then John Key can go ahead and win again for all I care because at that point Labour no longer represents my interests. Give me free market capitalism from those with Hollow Hearts and Empty Minds over selling out my progressive vision for some token attempt at altering capitalism.

    • QoT 15.8

      the CV-bashing festival

      Yes, you are definitely approaching this from a neutral perspective. :roll:

    • wtl 15.9

      Agreed. Some of the stuff CV said (and has said in the past) was a little over the top, and he deserved to be called on it. However, even though he is taking a hiatus, there are those that are still attacking and sniping at him, which I think is quite unfair.

      • Sacha 15.9.1

        what would be ‘fair’?

        • wtl 15.9.1.1

          Not attacking and sniping at CV when he isn’t around.

          • Sacha 15.9.1.1.1

            So anyone can spend weeks stirring and then voluntarily take a holiday and no one else is allowed to say anything while they’re gone? Nice try.

            • wtl 15.9.1.1.1.1

              Is attacking CV really that important that you have to do it all the time? Is there really nothing that can be discussed without mentioning CV? If CV has spent weeks stirring surely the worst thing you can do is keep letting him interfering with the conversation when he isn’t even around?

              • Sacha

                All the time? Not me. Far more concerned about the process. However after the last few days I’m beginning to see why a certain political party may have had trouble with that guy thinking rules don’t apply.

                • wtl

                  All the time? Not me.

                  Then why are you criticising what I said? If it doesn’t apply to you, then ignore it.

                  … that guy thinking rules don’t apply.

                  I fail to see how this applies to CV. On this recent occasion, he hasn’t been banned from this site or even been warned by the moderators. He followed the rules and butted out of QoT’s post once he was banned from it.

                  • Sacha

                    “Then why are you criticising what I said?”
                    I’m criticising the notion that someone can stop a conversation in its tracks by leaving the room. That’s all. Nothing “all the time” about it. Perhaps you’re confusing me with others?

                    “He followed the rules and butted out of QoT’s post once he was banned from it.”
                    He tried commenting there again after being banned, actually. And coming to Open Mike and relitigating the matter isn’t much of a sign of acceptance either. But I don’t know the guy and it’s only the behaviour I’m noting.

                    I’d rather see people discussing how the left can work together constructively to win the election in about 6 months time.

                    • wtl

                      I’m criticising the notion that someone can stop a conversation in its tracks by leaving the room…

                      If your conversation involves continuing to attack the person who has left the room, I would question the value of said conversation.

                  • QoT

                    He followed the rules and butted out of QoT’s post once he was banned from it.

                    No, he didn’t. He jumped back in to respond to Sosoo:
                    http://thestandard.org.nz/its-2014-and-we-have-a-job-to-do/#comment-752086

                    And then left another comment which was deleted, saying: “Not supposed to comment on this thread under pain of death, but for the idiocy of Sosoo I could not help myself…”

                    • wtl

                      No, he didn’t. He jumped back in to respond to Sosoo:

                      Fair enough, I stand corrected. He shouldn’t have done so and deserves to be criticised for that. I still don’t think he deserves all the further attacks on him, but I don’t suppose my opinion on the matter will change anything.

                    • QoT

                      What further attacks? Because from my perspective, it’s been CV and KJT who have continued the argument in multiple threads here – and many of the “attacks” have been targeted firmly at me.

                    • karol

                      Yep, QoT, and personalised attacks have continued towards the likes of you and me for the last 24hours, even while the claims have been that we are conducting the personalised persectution.

                      The double-think/contradictions are glaring.

                      Meanwhile the main points you raised in your post get avoided by many.

                      Thank-you, stargazer, for focusing some of us on the central arguments today

            • Treetop 15.9.1.1.1.2

              Everyone needs to butt out and just leave Qot and CV to sort it out in their own way and in their own time. They both have a lot to contribute on topics each one is passionate about.

              • QoT

                No, Treetop. This isn’t a personal “QoT vs CV” debate. My post didn’t even mention CV, and he isn’t the only person whose behaviour and attitudes towards identity politics discussions I was criticising.

                This is a much wider issue and having it categorised as a personal spat is a bit shitty, given how many other people have commented to say they have seen the same things I’ve seen.

                • Treetop

                  When it comes to identity politics how would you change the behaviour and attitude?

                  Are there some issues which you consider to be harder to change and why?

                  • QoT

                    Well, I did just kinda try to kick off a discussion about how we create a wider strategy in which all the different issues we choose to focus on play a part.

                    But that kind of got shitcanned, so I’ll have to think about it.

                    • lprent

                      Yeah it was unfortunate. Unfortunately holiday time is often not a good time to do that type of post. I’m not in my usual position of being planted in front of a computer for most of the day where I can mete out a behavioural adaptation early enough.

                      Mind you I didn’t pick that post to cause any particular problems… So I wasn’t even monitoring it when I was trying to write code for the site over the New Years eve hangover.

                      I’d suggest that you should use the “Moderate Post” option in the Edit Post screen when something does start going way off track with a post. That should be available to you and acts as a pretty good brake on things going too far off track. Does mean that moderating the post requires computer time though.

                      I’m pre-emptively doing it on Josie Pagani’s guest post.

                    • QoT

                      It’s not that big a deal, lprent, I actually preferred the post going up when I knew I’d be at home in front of my computer to deal with it myself.

                      But now I think it’s very clearly established what kind of reception my posts get, I might use the function in future.

                    • lprent []

                      Yeah do so. I am not particularly worried about you removing my fun. But some charity when the trolls are light would be appreciated – so I can keep in practice. Don’t forget to write posts when the duckheads aren’t being fools on jet skis (or more likely dreaming of it)

                  • karol

                    For myself, to beging with, I’d ditch the term “identity poltics” – it’s become too negatively loaded. The politcs of gender and sexuality are no more about “identity” than working class politics”. It’s about the politics of oppression, difference, disadvantage, privilege, patriarchy, … etc.

                    I already use the alternative terms most often.

                    • QoT

                      I like it, and part of that is because I personally won’t let dudebros chase me away from a very important concept.

                      I also quite like some inroads we’ve been making on establishing that class is as much an “identity” as anything else.

                • Treetop

                  The wider issue was not overlooked.

      • karol 15.9.2

        And some are still attacking some others of us.

  16. The Murphey 16

    Q: What is TURMOIL/TURBINE/QFIRE

    A: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b0w36GAyZIA

  17. Hitch64 17

    chris73 raises a good point. The living wage has a lot of merit, but including an allowance for overseas travel means a lot of voters who think this is a good idea will likely not vote for it when National brings this issue up.

  18. tricledrown 18

    Sorry CV
    We on the left need to be careful not to hand ammunition to the right.
    Hooten and Key have already signalled that Labour are moving to the far left as part of their attack strategy.
    We on the left need to outsmart
    Nactionals CrosbyTextor strategy.
    The right have the Media in theirback pocket.
    We are better to change tack
    Not offer them one little tidbit
    Of ammunition to use against us
    This election is probably going to be one of the hardest fought elections in recent times.
    In 1981 the radical left of the labour party including myself pushed for socialist utopic policies Muldoon wasn’t that popular but the media storm over our radical policy agenda gave muldoon a free home run
    .
    Jim Anderton was the president of the labour party then and asked us to moderate until after the election we didn’t listen.
    So we ended up with Muldoon for another 3 years Douglas for 6 then bolger shipley for 9 years .
    18 years of right wing govt because we didn’t play a smart game.
    You have said in past comments that this is MMP and it doesn’t matter.
    Well how many times has HawaiiKey been compared to Muldoom on this site.
    Then add Crosby Textor MSM
    Hooten and HawaiiKey’s comments on labour moving to the far left.
    On the positive side your idea of
    Targeting the younger voters and therfore their parents on global warming is a very good idea very good.
    Young people are very concerned about our enviroment
    The don’t vote in large numbers
    This policy strategy would entice 18 to 30 yearolds to vote if we can get the message to them it will need a lot of work to get these nonparticipants to vote.
    Registering communicating
    through facebook twitter etc.
    CV IT have A lot of respect for you.
    It takes a lot of balls to run as a candidate in an election,To stand against blinglish in CluthaSouthland even more balls.
    But this election as I reiterate We are going to have to be very smart very careful.
    If the likes of the right have no ammunition to paint the picture of us on the left as say communists thenorth koreans etc which no doubt they will use then that’s one less stick to beat us with.
    Make no mistake they will use it at every opportunity.
    Again in the past under FPP it was largely Labour verses National.
    Today we have left verse’s right
    Branding within each cohort.
    We don’t need to be over competitive with each other we are all on the same side on the left block.
    We need to be a united team that can compete at every level vigorously against the right.
    Once again sorry CV.
    Let’s do everthing that is required to win this election.

  19. captain hook 19

    ITS OFFICIAL!
    four out of five new zealanders say that wail oil is inane!
    somebody pleeze do something immediately.

  20. tricledrown 20

    Zorr no one is saying that to effect change we need to win an election not run round sulking and dumping on each other.
    Focus on core policies and not
    let the right have the narrative.
    The liveable wage
    Affordable housing
    Enviromental issues
    ,Getting rid of poverty
    We on the left need to focus on our core policy not complicate it to much.
    Their are other core policies their to.
    But what’s brilliant about being in opposition is we can focus on the govts fuckups and weaknesses.
    Key lauding it up in Hawaii.
    While his poor little Minions can’t afford Sky Tv toyota prado overseas holidays.
    Make you wonder why they back a govt that is looking after the uber rich who are all on holidays living it up to the max .
    While poor c73Bminfused are left here explaining their untenable position.

    • Zorr 20.1

      tricledrown – what *are* core policies though? Shouldn’t “equality for all regardless of X, Y and Z” be a core manifesto of any truly progressive party?

      You list a few there and it’s fair that you have your own priorities. The fact is though that CV suggested that anyone who prioritized (as he coined it) “boutique identity politics” was undermining the larger push by the Left and he has never stepped back from this. It isn’t about haranguing him until he “comes around to my way of thinking” but if he is going to be the kind of jerk that expects others to give way to his personal priorities with no understanding of what they give up when they do, then he can go rot.

      For all that people seem to want this to just go away, it isn’t. We need to confront the fact that everyone needs to compromise – it’s just that people like CV don’t appear to be used to it. We all have competing interests but, because of that, we should be ever more accommodating to listening to each other and understanding rather than railroading and ignoring.

      Next time this crops up or, even now, go back over it with an eye for seeing how much effort it takes to stand up to CV compared to how easy it is for him to maintain his position. At the end of all this, his position is still defended by others and the hope seems to be that this whole kerfuffle just gets swept away and forgotten in the rush of an election year. Thereby maintaining the status quo of the Left.

      Screw that.

  21. i am now in full censorship/deleting-mode from qot..

    ..and i think i now am officially a new mortal-enemy of the qot-crew..

    (they were lining up to take a swipe/throw an insult my way..)

    ..and i am going to link to that thread from whoar..

    ..i was accused of ‘incoherent-derailing’..

    ..so i will let my 22,000+ subscribers/readers decide where the ‘incoherence’ lies..

    ..with the headline title all that’s left to be decided..

    ..and really..the (only?) laugh-out-loud moment on that thread was the cartman-quote/riff being recycled..eh..?

    ..oh..!..and btw..frank..i said chrs to you for yr thanks for the link to the libertarian to socialist story..

    ..but it was also censored/deleted..

    .so..’chrs frank’..

    ..and..did someone say there is a caption-contest somewhere..?

    ..i need some light-relief..

    phillip ure.

    • weka 21.1

      “i am now in full censorship/deleting-mode from qot..”

      [citation needed] (esp seeing as how you were able to post here).

      • Sacha 21.1.1

        don’t give the sad character any more oxygen to waste

        • phillip ure 21.1.1.1

          “.. sad character..”

          heh..!..how did you know..?

          ..have you heard my existential-howls into the void..?

          ..you just keep on staying ‘classy’ there..eh sacha..?

          ..(but seriously..?..serial personal abuse is what you get/deserve for trying to argue against the concept/realities of censorship..?..whoar..!..)

          ..and i do kinda get an irony-twitch when i consider that those arguing loudest for censorship..

          ..those who demand that others will ‘respect my authority – as a moderator!’..

          ..also have as a major complaint..their being ‘silenced’ by others..

          ..i know..!..i know..!..)

          ..phillip ure..

    • veutoviper 21.2

      Hang in there, PU. Some of us appreciate your comments including your unique commenting style.

      I have not commented on what has been happening on this blog the last few days, nor am I going to get into the details of it – other than to say that I endorse the comments of Rosie @ 10, Blue @1.4, Olwyn @ 1.4.2, and Bill @ 1.6.

      While I was initially impressed and supportive of QOT’s 2014 post, what then ensued in the comments under that post and in the OM’s yesterday and today leaves me disappointed and disillusioned in terms of their toxicity * and venom to anyone who had differing views. This is not the TS I have come to know – and currently it is not a blogsite I want to be part of.

      * EDIT As a woman, I change that to “bitchiness” – because that is what it has been for the most part and continues to be, as demonstrated by weka and sacha’s replies to this comment of yours. It reminds me of teenage girls, not adult women – and makes me ashamed to be of the same gender.

      • weka 21.2.1

        And so it goes on.

        How exactly is it bitchy for me to ask phil to provide some evidence that he is “now in full censorship/deleting-mode from qot..” ? It’s not an unreasonable request and is done routinely on ts. I think he is overstating the case considerably, but am willing to be proved wrong, hence my request.

        • chris73 21.2.1.1

          As a neutral observer the attacks on CV were disproportionate to what he said (imho)

          • McFlock 21.2.1.1.1

            that’s nice. Irrelveant to the comments above, though.

            Oh, and a mutual enemy isn’t “neutral”. It simply takes shots at whichever side is stronger.

      • phillip ure 21.2.2

        chrs veutoviper..

        phillip ure..

      • Sacha 21.2.3

        Checking email notifications, of yesterday’s 95 comments on the “2014 and we have a job to do” thread, 23 were by Phil and 17 were direct replies to him.

        I figure when someone keeps on talking after dominating 42% of a conversation and they’re not listening to reason, ridicule is the next option. What would you suggest?

        What really reminds me of teenagers is the whining that everyone must listen to every word I feel like saying and no one is allowed to impinge on my ‘freedom’ or it’s censorship by those big bad grown-ups.

    • enjoy every sandwich 21.3

      @ phillip ure: it is toxic here and Qot, karol, weka, fender etc not admitting their part in it doesn’t help. Good on you and people like CV, KJT, veutoviper for standing up against the toxic climate they have created here.

      • fender 21.3.1

        Gawd, you are getting desperate. I won’t be swallowing your shit sandwich nor accept that I’m responsible for some imagined toxic climate here. I actually have much respect and love for CV, hence the urge for him to take on board the excellent advice from Rhinocrates here , here , here and here

        • enjoy every sandwich 21.3.1.1

          That’s not excellent advice from Rhino, it’s shitty advice that will alienate many potential left voters.
          Something that Rhino and QoT have in common is that they’re both love bleating on about their own personal experiences to all and sundry about the prejudices they have suffered. I usually don’t mind (although I can’t help thinking how self-absorbed they are), but now QoT et al have used that as an excuse to censor people, to accuse them of imagined bigotry and to create a hostile climate for no good reason.

          As I have said above, many people have suffered prejudice but that doesn’t make them demand that everyone else cater to their personal situation when discussing things that effect everyone. That’s madness.

          • fender 21.3.1.1.1

            Tat Loo (CV) has political aspirations so IMO Rhinocrates had great advice for him. I’ve only ever wished Tat the best of luck ( I even asked him to relocate to my electorate so I could vote for him) because I can tell he is switched on and not a dictator.

            Everyone is allowed an opinion, it’s healthy, but I’ll not offer mine for a while in case I’m accused of this toxic stuff you speak of.

            • Rosie 21.3.1.1.1.1

              If you don’t mind me saying fender, I don’t know how you could ever be accused of being toxic mi amigo.

              Right now though, I’m off, it’s too hot in here.

              Solidarity, to all and with you all.

          • phillip ure 21.3.1.1.2

            @..ees…

            ..”.. many people have suffered prejudice but that doesn’t make them demand that everyone else cater to their personal situation when discussing things that effect everyone. That’s madness..”

            + 1..

            ..you just succinctly said what i was thrashing about trying to say..(at which i obviously failed..after expending much energy/words..that is it..in a nutshell..)

            ..where were you when we needed you…way back..?

            ..and yep..!..that’s what was doing my head in..

            ..the seeming demand that everything must be filtered through that personal-experience..

            ..and that if you didn’t..no matter what yr previously loudly-repeated/shouted support for all those policies called for by the censors..

            ..you become ‘the enemy”..

            ..that too..is ‘madness’..

            phillip ure..

            • enjoy every sandwich 21.3.1.1.2.1

              ..the seeming demand that everything must be filtered through that personal-experience..

              ..and that if you didn’t..no matter what yr previously loudly-repeated/shouted support for all those policies called for by the censors..

              ..you become ‘the enemy”..

              exactly, phil.

            • phillip ure 21.3.1.1.2.2

              and as for those calls/demands that censorship is ‘necessary’..

              i’ll hand over to pitt the younger..

              “..“necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom.

              It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”

              phillip ure..

          • QoT 21.3.1.1.3

            they’re both love bleating on about their own personal experiences

            Actually I blog very rarely about my personal experiences, since I’m well aware that I’m in a comparatively privileged position in society. But let’s not let the facts get in the way of a good whinge.

            • enjoy every sandwich 21.3.1.1.3.1

              Oh yeah QoT, we hardly knew thee…

              What you’ve just said doesn’t match up with what you said earlier though..

              “The personal is political” is an incredibly important idea. I’m not going to throw it out just because more privileged people can’t get over the fact that some discussions aren’t about their personal lives.

              Pretty confused philosophy you’ve got there.

              Also:
              Actually I blog very rarely about my personal experiences, since I’m well aware that I’m in a comparatively privileged position in society.

              Why do only underprivileged people get to blog about their experiences?

      • veutoviper 21.3.2

        And good on you also, ees, as I have followed your comments, The pity is that, as you say, “Qot, karol, weka, fender etc not admitting their part in it doesn’t help” – and in fact, part of my disillusionment is that in the past, I have had a lot of respect for their views although not always agreeing totally.

  22. joe90 22

    My 2 cents: what CV could have said – gains made by various groups within the larger movement will not in themselves be enough – but no, he went all condescending twit from Manistan and deigned other peoples causes and priorities boutique, you know, all chintzy and nice to have fluffy stuff that sparkles and makes for happy happy but not really that important, and QoT quite rightly delivered a swift and well deserved kick to the slats.

    Which is where it may well have ended had CV not come back for more and got himself properly beaten up and then chucked out so he’s doing what one tends to do after a savaging, taken to his kennel to lick his sore bits and have a wee think about how he could get it so wrong.

    I’m sorry dude, self inflicted and no sympathy from me but if you’re the man I think you are you’ll be suitably chastised and back soon enough.

  23. tricledrown 23

    Zorr I’m not advocating for my policy preferences
    I meant to use them as examples of our core policies
    We need to focus on core policy its very similat to what CV was saying.
    But bringing in lybia not agood idea.
    Philip I am only suggesting we need to focus on core policy these were just examples.
    But I am not censoring any body but saying we need to have very smart strategy till after the election.
    The left all want rid of poverty
    Equal rights pay oportunity for all genders.
    We need to identify our policy
    Not release to much detail as C73 suggests as the right will steal it or rubbish it.
    If we are going to win this election the left are going get out and talk and convince voters Not convince a few dedicated activists on our blog sites.

  24. Ennui 24

    I am with Blue, there has been a serious bashing of CV (as opposed to reasonable disagreement). And that is because the main protagonists are using a power position….the power they garner through sitting long behind the screen, longer than anybody else has or can be bothered giving. Its a form of volume, shout and keep shouting. Bullying from a remote position because they know the person on the blog cannot look them in the eye and demand to be treated in a civil manner. Point this out and all hell breaks loose, cries of troll and worse.

    A few years back I got hooked blogging here and it became detrimental to my work, home life and state of mind. Prism pointed out it was best to leap in on occasion, thanks Grey for that advice. I wont engage in a full time battle with Karol, Weka or Q, nor their acolytes because to me they have missed the point. Other people are allowed opinions.

    You have to wonder how these good souls can afford the time: I see them on line whilst I am working and don’t have the time to comment. I see them on line on good days when the garden or the river beckons. I see them on line when I have a glance late at night before I sleep. For fekk sake, how can I treat their opinions with any respect when they appear to never leave the keyboard, go for walk, have a coffee with a mate and chew the fat with a real person?

    Guys, take a breather, it irks me that people might think that you by dint of voluminous blogging are representative of the Left.

    • greywarbler 24.1

      Ennui+1
      I care about TS and what people say here and find I can easily spend too much time to the detriment of my own chores but I did hate getting sandbagged at one time. It shouldn’t be boring with the same points repeated ad infinitum this year, I hope. Look forward to you dropping in Ennui.

      It is obvious that the problem now is to get one’s head around the idea of apparently exponential rise in dangerous heat and effects and to understand that it won’t just be violent things occasionally overseas. Such as tornadoes regularly that wipe people’s homes and wealth accumulation out, fires, drought etc that are coming close to home, ie Oz (in Waikato they are already on water allocation and summer hasn’t started). At the same time we have a financial system that is malfunctioning and just when we need to say – as Rutherford said ““We haven’t got the money, so we’ve got to think!” we have pollies encouraging people to think it is okay to run away from the challenges.

      It’s inward-looking just to be concentrating on people policies with costs to come from government coffers as these have to go hand in hand with economic policy.

    • chris73 24.2

      Words of wisdom

      • Anne 24.2.1

        Words of wisdom indeed Chris 73 from Ennui and greywarbler.

        Ennui, please keep coming here. It’s a place of learning and you have so much to teach. And throw a tanty or two from time to time. Imo, it make’s life fun and worth while.

    • wtl 24.3

      And that is because the main protagonists are using a power position….

      I also find it ironic that it seems to me to be an expression of ‘dominance’ on their part.

    • karol 24.4

      Ennui, I agree – people should take a breather.

      By way of reply to your and some recent comments: I see misinformed, off target attacks coming my way.

      You do realise, don’t you, that CV is one of the most frequent commenters on this site, and just before he took a break, I had real difficulty keeping up with his comments directed to me and others?

      You do realise he also has a very strong presence on this blog and within the Labour Party?

      I have respect for his views and knowledge on many things, and I hope he is back here commenting before too long. We disagree on some topics/politics and approaches.

      In the last 24 hours or so, there’s been a steady stream of people continuing with this “witchhunt” to use your term, against some of us who talk critically, on occasions about the politics of gender and sexuality.

      I’m trying to step back from it – but I keep seeing all this misinformation being perpetuated, some of it about me.

      As far as I can see, some people will never accept some of us spending a small part of our time providing some critical comments/discussion on gender and sexuality and the politics thereof, without being constantly told/implied we should keep quiet about it.

      That is the issue.

      Can we get back to the central and relevant topic – about the kind of politics we are interested in, and how to talk about them?

      • Ennui 24.4.1

        K, if I could buy you a coffee I would! Yes, I should have included CV, he needs to allow other bloggers space. At some point we all need to walk away and recover, refresh and reconsider. That was the wisdom Greywarbler offered me.

        And yes, we can get back to the central topic. I am out of motivation to go toe to toe for another 15 rounds.

        • Anne 24.4.1.1

          Karol. You’re not the problem. You go out of your way to be reasonable and just with everyone. We may not always agree, but I (and others) appreciate your honesty and fairness – and your incredible breadth of knowledge.

    • stargazer 24.5

      “there has been a serious bashing of CV (as opposed to reasonable disagreement)”

      and yet CV was the one who made a personal attack on deborah russell, commented about her workplace and how her colleagues see her, without any proof whatsoever. nobody here has talked about CV in any context other than the things he has said here, and the way he has said them. no-one has commented on his workplace or his personal life. we have called him to account for some particularly nasty comments to many others here which went way beyond mere “reasonable disagreement”. but somehow you seem to be willing to ignore all of that and treat this as some kind of witch-hunt.

      and if other people are allowed opinions, then why are you complaining about weka, karol, QoT and others expressing theirs? it appears that you only want people who agree with you to have the right to express opinions, without having to face any kind of response. it’s not going to happen.

      • Ennui 24.5.1

        Star, because somebody sins must we sin against them? A little introspection goes a long way. As I said I am out of motivation to carry this fight on, neither side has a monopoly on virtue or rectitude..

        • stargazer 24.5.1.1

          how have we sinned against them? i don’t agree that anyone has sinned against CV at all. we’ve responded, and as far as i’m concerned, it’s been in an entirely reasonable fashion. and that “neither side” line sounds pretty much like a cop-out to me.

          • Ennui 24.5.1.1.1

            CV may have done what several accused him of…this reaction in my opinion was over the top and pursued unreasonably. That is my viewpoint to which I am entitled. You are welcome to disagree, meanwhile I disengage.

            • veutoviper 24.5.1.1.1.1

              Well said, Ennui – and also in you comment at 24.

            • stargazer 24.5.1.1.1.2

              you keep using that word unreasonably and reasonable, and yes it is just your opinion because you’ve failed to show how any of the other commentors here attacked CV personally, in the way that he has attacked others. everything i’ve read, and believe me, i’ve taken the time to read up all the various threads, show people people talking about CV’s language, his arguments, the way he operates here on this site. i can’t see what’s unreasonable about that.

              • Lanthanide

                I think CV has started treating TS a bit like his own personal soapbox / policy platform, ever since he outed himself as a Labour candidate.

    • enjoy every sandwich 24.6

      Great comment Ennui. And the concept that being glued to TS all day, every day might just have a detrimental effect on their perspective hasn’t seemed to enter their heads.

      • Ennui 24.6.1

        Not such a great comment: rather an observation that is born out by the evidence. It does not give me any great pleasure to make the statement, it is certainly not designed to antagonise.

  25. greywarbler 25

    Standout news.

    NYTimes calling for clemency Edward Snowden.

    Key playing with Obama on golf course (talking about defence? and close ties – are we to choose between USA and China?) Is there a requirement that all our PMs have golf-playing capability.

    UK youngsters feeling they have nothing to live for, unemployment critical factor.

    Cuts in student allowance for older NZs. Not allowing action to be taken to upskill, and get current education for people who left school around mid last century.

  26. greywarbler 26

    lprent
    I don’t know if it’s just me. But I usually have to make a two-touch trip from right hand list to chosen comment. I click the choice, the page moves to top of the comments thread ((not always the right one) and there I sit. I then have to click again on right hand to be taken to comment.
    But
    Sometimes between the first click on rhand list and then wanting to go back and click same one again, it has vanished. It’s as if it moves back to an earlier list and the latest ones vanish. To bring them back I have to refresh. This makes it slow to move around and check on replies etc.

    • marty mars 26.1

      Is it because the comments at the top of the list haven’t finished going up yet – still waiting on the counter to count down and when they finish counting down, the comment is visible. May be different if logged in.

      [lprent: it is. You get less caching if you are logged in. ]

  27. greywarbler 27

    Go for it. Just what are you achieving with all your scrapping. Jumping on every remark that rubs up against your sensitive hides. Are you matches that flame up at a touch? Wouldn’t pass OSH controls. Bloody boring and pathetic the lot of you. You can ignore that or turn around and flame me out of your dragon mouths. I don’t care.

    • Ennui 27.1

      Time for a rugby story,,,when I was a boy I madly watched the 71 Lions, who beat the ABs in NZ by way of powerful scrummaging and Barry Johns boot. Fabulous side.

      The ABs were captained by Meads, locking the NZ scrum so often in reverse. At one scrum Sean Lynch, a powerful Irish Lion bulldozed forward, capitulating the ABs into high speed reverse. “Hows that for scrummaging?” Lynch taunted Meads.

      The reply from Meads was “Very impressive Sean, by the way, while you were doing that we just scored a try!”

      Sounds like the last few days, mayhaps the Right has us on the run.

  28. Tracey 28

    This gave me the biggest laugh of the day. Thanks chris. Whose emperor still has no clothes

    ” As a neutral observer “

  29. Draco T Bastard 30

    For Financial Speculators, Profit Means Plunging the Masses into Crippling forms of Debt

    The establishment of city, regional and state banks, such as the state public bank in North Dakota, permits localities to invest money in community projects rather than hand it to speculators. It keeps property and sales taxes, along with payrolls for public employees and pension funds, from lining the pockets of speculators such asJamie Dimon and Lloyd Blankfein. Money, instead of engorging the bank accounts of the few, is leveraged to fund schools, restore infrastructure, sustain systems of mass transit and develop energy self-reliance.

    NZ is too small for the local banks that the article is talking about but a public banking system is definitely what we need to bring prosperity to NZ as well as sustainability.

  30. Ennui 31

    Draco, we have forgotten too quickly Credit Unions, Building Societies and local banks, all deceased since the late 80s. They all worked on the principle that the government was the lender of the last resort via the Reserve Bank, under the then (old) Reserve Bank Act that allowed the Reserve Bank and government to highly regulate these organisations. Our version of Glass Steagel. Small was and is beautiful (and entirely possible).

    • Draco T Bastard 31.1

      Credit Unions, Building Societies and local banks are great for building houses, buying cars etc but for infrastructure that spans the nation such as rail, telecommunications and power? Yeah, na, sorry – too small. For things like that you need investment from the entire population.

      They all worked on the principle that the government was the lender of the last resort via the Reserve Bank,

      The reserve bank still acts like that giving the private banks unlimited ability to create money.

  31. Poission 33

    Spying or at least the use of federal agencies to gain a commercial advantage during intergovernmental arbitration will be a focus of attention shortly,with Australia in the frame.

    Timor-Leste and Australia,s ongoing dispute and recent bugging allegations

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/28/timor-leste-australia-spying-resources-treaty

    have made a turn for the worse with the Australians spy agency, sending in special agents (91 unleaded) and ( 96 octane) to seize legal documents on the Arbitration case from TL lawyers.

    http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/156/17844.pdf

  32. tricledrown 34

    Credit Unions still exist.

  33. Draco T Bastard 35

    NAFTA’s 20 Years of Unfulfilled Promises

    “Before NAFTA, Mexico was a developing country,” says Victor Suarez, who leads an association of Mexican small farmers. “But now it’s an underdeveloping country, with 70 percent of people in rural areas and 85 percent of the indigenous population living in poverty.”

    But, hey, some people are doing well out of it:

    Not everyone is a loser, of course. Mexico boasts the richest man in the world, Carlos Slim — who amassed his fortune from privatisation schemes related to NAFTA. Mexico’s economic elite, with its wealth securely deposited in banks in the United States and elsewhere, finds a lot to like in NAFTA.

    So, just how much damage will the TPPA do to us?

  34. SPC 36

    Day one

    Less time on identity politics to focus on the right issues from CV. Judge

    Day two

    But this is part of who we are. Jury

    Day 3

    This attack on CV is overdone and as the issue is divisive we should avoid identity politics as a topic. Executioner.

    Er we do not need to agree on this on a blog. And there is no right or wrong view for us that we need to share on any issue.

  35. Penny Bright 37

    Happy New Year folks!

    Been a grrrly swot in the wilds of Golden Bay, doing a lot of study on anti-corruption and related matters – while catching up with family – it’s been GREAT.

    I predict that there will be LOTS of developments on a variety of anti-corruption matters, both locally, nationally and possibly internationally in 2014.
    _______________________________________________________________________________

    Speaking of predictions – FYI – my (published) comment on David Farrar’s 2014 political predictions article in NBR:

    http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/my-2014-predictions-ck-150526

    No predictions on the outcome of the John Banks electoral fraud trial in 2014?

    (Potentially could be quite a significant political event?)

    Wasn’t predicted in 2013 that John Banks would ever face trial for alleged electoral fraud?

    Happy New Year!

    Kind regards,

    Penny Bright

Important links

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • The Greens are wacky?
    It is a bit like a game of pin the tail on the donkey, the National Government and their supporters are desperately attempting to stick the wacky label on the Greens again, but it is becoming harder to make it...
    Local Bodies | 31-10
  • Novopay Exemplifies National’s Governance
    This National led Government is strong on ideology, weak on process and reluctant to accept responsibility. The Novapay debacle exemplifies all of these well.When questioned about Novopay, National Ministers will never accept full responsibility. Initially the Government blamed Labour because they...
    Local Bodies | 31-10
  • Stuart’s 100 #47: The Forgotten Triangle
    48: The Forgotten Triangle What if the forgotten triangle behind Shortland Street was more than a parking lot? Continuing the series on forgotten or underutilised spaces within the city, the steeply rising wedge of land between Shortland Street, Albert Park...
    Transport Blog | 31-10
  • World News Brief, Friday October 31
    Top of the AgendaTensions Flare in Jerusalem...
    Pundit | 31-10
  • Guest post: Plain English is radical
    @aaronincognito is an anonymous soulless bureaucrat who blogs at fundamentallyuseless.wordpress.com. Despite all the ups and downs of the past few months, there has been one constant in left wing politics: jargon. Regardless of whether Nicky Hager, Judith Collins, or Eminem...
    On the Left | 31-10
  • Long past time
    The Dominion-Post reports that the government is considering wiping past convictions for homosexuality. Good. As a guest-poster to On The Left has recently explained, living with a criminal conviction isn't easy; employers and agencies will simply dump applications from people...
    No Right Turn | 31-10
  • Define Instruments Expands into South Africa
    It’s always great to see companies grow – and Define Instruments recently took their first big leap. The team has followed existing international sales by setting up a South African office. It’s the first of many new overseas offices we hope to...
    Lance Wiggs | 31-10
  • MacLennan on fixing the OIA
    Journalist and lawyer Catriona MacLennan has some suggestions on Fixing Official Information Act Abuses . She identifies three problems with the law: lack of resources to enforce the law; deliberate flouting of the act; and inadequate understanding of the legislation...
    No Right Turn | 31-10
  • All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
    It's Halloween! Time for a jolly pumpkin to remind everyone that there is chocolate nearby The weather is terrible, and while it can't rain all the time, I suspect there may be an absence of ghosts and ghouls. Whatever shall...
    No Right Turn | 31-10
  • Indistinguishable from totalitarianism
    SF author Charles Stross has a lovely alternate-history thought experiment which demonstrates quite neatly how British surveillance is indistinguishable in practice from totalitarianism. And if you're in any doubt, you've only got to read today's news:The Government is facing calls...
    No Right Turn | 31-10
  • Rate my minister
    Tertiary education minister Steven Joyce wants to introduce a new ranking system, Rate My Qualification, where employers rate tertiary education courses and then students can look up the results. Well perhaps employers should be able rate other things too, such as their ministers....
    Tertiary Education Union | 31-10
  • To the field experiments!
    In the wake of the Stanford / Dartmouth schnozzle this week, this political science article caught my eye: The way your brain reacts to a single disgusting image can be used to predict whether you lean to the left or...
    Polity | 30-10
  • NZ cranks finally publish an NZ temperature series – but their paper’s ...
    You can’t teach old dogs new tricks, it seems — certainly not if they’re gnawing a much loved old bone at the time. The lads from the NZ Climate Science Coalition — yes, the same boys who tried to sue...
    Hot Topic | 30-10
  • West Auckland Network with new interchanges
    Last week Auckland Transport began consultation on the new network for West Auckland. I and many readers were highly critical of it as it seemed to ignore much of the network design philosophy and elements AT are implementing elsewhere and...
    Transport Blog | 30-10
  • This ‘boom’ might save the world – 10 quick facts about r...
    As the world's leading climate scientists finalise the latest and most comprehensive report on climate change and ways to tackle it, a key question is: What is new? What has changed since the release of the UN climate panel's last Assessment Report (AR4) in...
    Greenpeace NZ blog | 30-10
  • A lack of commitment
    New Zealand has finally joined the Open Government Partnership. A requirement of membership is to submit an action plan about how you will improve open government over the next two years. So what's in ours? Sweet fuck-all:Our Action Plan will...
    No Right Turn | 30-10
  • Smartphones are meant to bend
    You’ve no doubt heard of the issues surrounding the newly released iPhone 6, but do […] The post Smartphones are meant to bend appeared first on Connected....
    Potentia | 30-10
  • Tea Party takes on “President Obola”
    OK, so this happened: Theatricality is one of the best ways to shake the sleepwalking public awake. One brave liberty advocate made a bold statement when he donned a Hazmat suit and an Obama mask, and took to the president’s...
    Polity | 30-10
  • CTU welcomes forestry review recommendations
    The CTU is welcoming the today's release of the independent forestry safety review panel findings. "These recommendations must be implemented to ensure that everything possible is done to make forestry safer." CTU President, Helen Kelly said.  Photo:  ...
    CTU | 30-10
  • Herald vs Hosking-in-Herald on teabreaks
    The New Zealand Herald editorial today is distinctly unimpressed with the government’s decision to remove mandated tea breaks for workers: It is a pity that almost the first legislative act of the Government's new term is an act abolishing mandatory...
    Polity | 30-10
  • Forest Safety report first step in making our forests safe to work in
    Our forests are a very dangerous place to work. Between 2008 and 2013 there have been 32 fatalities and more than a thousand serious harm incidents in this industry. The Council of Trade Unions and First union have been doing...
    frogblog | 30-10
  • Ghost Dancing?
    Ghost Dancing circa 1890: With the buffalo effectively exterminated, the material basis for the Native American cultures of the Great Plains was destroyed. The Ghost Dance, it was believed, would reconstitute the basis for an independent indigenous existence. Has the...
    Bowalley Road | 30-10
  • I have seen one future, and it is bleak
    . . Way back in March, 2012,  I wrote this story regarding a march to support striking workers at Ports of Auckland. It appears there was some prescience about some of my observations at the time… . | | 18...
    Frankly Speaking | 30-10
  • WINZ: Bureaucratic Befuddlement and Confustication
    Yeah, I know. Confusticate isn’t a word, unless you’re quoting Urban Dictionary. Definition: This word is the coalescing of the English words “confuse” and “complicate”. It refers to anything of, or relating to the process of being both confused and...
    On the Left | 30-10
  • The idiot
    Here’s why this Steffan Browning/Ebola/Homeopathy thing is a really big deal for the Green Party. (a) Historically they’ve been stereotyped by their opponents as a bunch of nutters (b) The main focus of the party for the past five years –...
    DimPost | 30-10
  • The idiot
    Here’s why this Steffan Browning/Ebola/Homeopathy thing is a really big deal for the Green Party. (a) Historically they’ve been stereotyped by their opponents as a bunch of nutters (b) The main focus of the party for the past five years –...
    DimPost | 30-10
  • Climate change and New Zealand cities
    Environmentalists sometimes have an uneasy relationship with cities. Because they concentrate a lot of people and economic activity in relatively small places, they also concentrate a lot of negative environmental effects. All that concrete, all that energy being consumed, the...
    Transport Blog | 30-10
  • Got a mystery? Just ask John!
    Tuesday, November 24, 2009John Key has learned the identity of the entertainer guilty of an indecency charge through the grapevine of people circumventing the suppression order....
    Pundit | 30-10
  • Shameful attack on all workers
    The Government has passed the Employment Relations Amendment Act slashing the rights of all Kiwi workers. “These changes are shameful. New Zealand now has some of the worst employment protections in the OECD....
    CTU | 30-10
  • Blocked
    It is safe to say before the election last month I was fairly prolific in the blogosphere as we headed to an election. Was it because there was a glimmer of hope for we on this side of the coin?...
    My Thinks | 30-10
  • Blend with the Bruntletts Group Ride
    While Vancourerites Chris and Melissa Bruntlett are here for their Auckland Conversation talk, Generation Zero, Frocks on Bikes and TransportBlog have organised a slow, family friendly ride around the city centre. The map is below. The ride is designed to be self-directed so...
    Transport Blog | 30-10
  • Rawshark – Is she Maori or Pakeha?
    Cameron Slater blamed someone for being behind the hacking of his emails and passing them on to Nicky Hager. And then he named someone he thought was Rawshark. John Key says someone told him who Rawshark is but he ain’t telling. @B3nRaching3r is...
    Te Putatara | 30-10
  • Employment law: it’s toasted
    In an early episode of Mad Men, when the company’s going for the Lucky Strike account, sleazebag antihero Don Draper asks the client exactly how cigarettes are made. They talk through the process, mentioning the tobacco is toasted – and...
    On the Left | 30-10
  • Owners of the wind
    Thirty-odd years ago in the Kingdom of Denmark lived some brave people who disliked nuclear power and loved renewable energy. Determined to keep their country clean and safe, they began building their own wind turbines. Today, thanks to these passionate...
    Greenpeace NZ blog | 30-10
  • Te Wakaputanga – What we did not learn at school
    This week saw the 179th anniversary of the signing of Te Wakaputanga, the Declaration of Independence of the United Tribes of Niu Tireni. Most of us did not learn about this fundamentally critical document at school, we barely learned about...
    frogblog | 30-10
  • NZ goes backwards on gender equality
    It is no coincidence that in the same week New Zealand is singled out for going backwards on child poverty under National,  we’ve also dropped in global rankings for gender equality. In one year New Zealand has dropped from 7th...
    frogblog | 30-10
  • TPPA Bulletin #58
    NATIONAL DAY OF ACTION 8 NOVEMBER 2014 Auckland, Hamilton, Raglan, Tauranga, Rotorua, Gisborne, New Plymouth, Napier, Palmerston North, Levin,Wellington, Nelson, Christchurch, Timaru, Dunedin,Invercargill. REGIONAL UPDATES Auckland (1:00 pm at Aotea Square): speakers include Robyn Malcolm (Actors Equity), Bunny McDiarmid (Greenpeace), Dayle Takitimu...
    NZ – Not for sale | 30-10
  • Seabed mining: drums in the deep
    Out on the Chatham Rise, the ridge jutting into the waters off Christchurch and extending out beyond the Chathams, Chatham Rock Phosphate has a mining permit and is now seeking EPA approval for its project to mine phosphate for fertiliser,...
    Pundit | 30-10
  • CTU Runanga calls on iwi leaders
    Maori workers are calling on iwi leaders to speak out against the employment law changes expected to go through today.“Iwi leaders have previously spoken out when workers in Aotearoa have been under attack, we believe they should do so again...
    CTU | 30-10
  • An unmanaged conflict
    Katherine Rich is a member of the government-appointed Health Promotion Agency, responsible for (as it says on its website) "inspiring all New Zealanders to lead healthier lives". Katherine Rich is also Chief Executive of the New Zealand Food and Grocery...
    No Right Turn | 30-10
  • Robert Fisk
    Isis in Syria: A general reveals the lack of communication with the US - and his country's awkward relationship with their allies-by-default...
    No Right Turn | 30-10
  • A stretch
    This morning the Herald revealed that Kim Dotcom had been convicted and fined for dangerous driving in 2009, but had not declared it on his application for residency. Immigration is now talking about deporting him. So, this is what we...
    No Right Turn | 30-10
  • Tauranga port happy to take the money – but not happy to accept responsib...
    Comments from a Port of Tauranga manager about deaths and injuries in their port during a Radio New Zealand interview are unacceptable....
    MUNZ | 30-10
  • New Ebola Toys for Xmas. Yay?
    From the "too soon?" file, here are two oddly successful exercises in niche marketing. First, the molecularly-sort-of-correct ebola plush toy. Apparently it has sold out: And, of course, the sexy ebola nurse outfit: Ebola, as everyone knows, ignores cleavage. And...
    Polity | 30-10
  • Temporary, discriminatory and an admission of Faliure
    The PM says that the legislation his government proposes to pass under urgency allowing for the confiscation of passports of NZ citizens in order to combat the threat of returning foreign fighters will be “tightly focused” on those traveling to...
    Kiwipolitico | 30-10
  • Climate change harming ocean health
    New Zealand is responsible for one of the largest areas of sea in the world – an area 14 times the size of our land area. The National Government is promising new marine protected areas legislation with a discussion document...
    frogblog | 30-10
  • Experiment-gate update
    Readers may recall the saga around an experimental mailer some Stanford / Dartmouth researchers sent into the state of Montana. In a randomised trial, it provided voters with some added information about two candidates running for a judicial election, and...
    Polity | 30-10
  • Why are our Politicians Auckland Toll Chickens?
    Yesterday both the National Government and Green Party opposed the suggestion to place a toll on Auckland’s roads, but for completely different reasons. The Government opposes it because they see it as a new tax. The Greens because they would...
    Gareth’s World | 29-10
  • The obvious question
    John Key says he knows who the hacker Rawshark is. So, will the police be raiding his home for ten hours and taking all his data, or is that something they only do to enemies of the National Party?...
    No Right Turn | 29-10
  • Guest post: Living with a criminal conviction
    What happens when one moment of bad judgement changes everything anyone ever thinks about you? Mike Jones* used a weapon to defend his girlfriend from an aggressive man at a party seven years ago. He’s still paying for that choice....
    On the Left | 29-10
  • James Shaw speaks on the four Bills formerly known as the Accounting Infras...
    The assurance industry is a critical component of our economic framework. The idea that there is a trusted independent watchdog of the public interest underpins investor confidence and ensures financial probity on behalf of our country's leading institutions. New Zealand...
    Greens | 31-10
  • ANZ needs to look after its workers after another super profit
    The ANZ bank needs to acknowledge the super profits it makes are coming at the expense of its workers, the Green Party said today.Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (ANZ) 2014 full year results show a lift in performance...
    Greens | 31-10
  • James Shaw’s maiden speech
    Tena Koe, Mr Speaker. I would like to take this opportunity to speak a little of the past, the present and the future. The privilege to serve in this Parliament was given to me by all those who gave their...
    Greens | 31-10
  • Feed the kids members bill
    Education is the best route out of poverty. But hungry kids can't learn and are left trapped in the poverty cycle. Let's break that cycle lunchbox by lunchbox. We can feed the country's hungry kids, if we work together.I have...
    Greens | 31-10
  • Feed the kids members bill
    Education is the best route out of poverty. But hungry kids can't learn and are left trapped in the poverty cycle. Let's break that cycle lunchbox by lunchbox. We can feed the country's hungry kids, if we work together.I have...
    Greens | 31-10
  • National’s “Auckland housing boom” a fizzer
    Falling Auckland consent numbers show the Government’s housing policy is going backwards contrary to wild claims by Building and Housing Minister Nick Smith that we are on the cusp of a massive construction boom, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. ...
    Labour | 31-10
  • Job losses major blow to Bay community
    Job losses at Wattie’s Hastings plant will hit families and the community hard, Hawke’s Bay-based Labour MP Stuart Nash and MP for Ikaroa-Rawhiti Meka Whaitiri say. “I know a number of the Wattie’s staff and these job losses will be...
    Labour | 31-10
  • Local job losses major blow to Bay community
    Job losses at Wattie’s Hastings plant will hit families and the community hard, Hawke’s Bay-based Labour MP Stuart Nash and MP for Ikaroa-Rawhiti Meka Whaitiri say. “I know a number of the Wattie’s staff and these job losses will be...
    Labour | 31-10
  • Zero tolerance for forestry accidents a must
    The Government must adopt a zero tolerance approach to workplace accidents in the forestry sector to stop people being killed, Labour’s Forestry spokesperson Chris Hipkins says. “It is time for the Government and the forestry sector to put an end...
    Labour | 30-10
  • Return to less holidays on the cards?
    John Key needs to lay his cards on the table regarding the Government’s intentions around holiday pay and annual leave entitlements, Labour’s Acting Deputy Leader Annette King says. “A day after National pushed through laws that take away the legal...
    Labour | 30-10
  • Forest Safety report first step in making our forests safe to work in
    Our forests are a very dangerous place to work. Between 2008 and 2013 there have been 32 fatalities and more than a thousand serious harm incidents in this industry. The Council of Trade Unions and First union have been doing...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Catherine Delahunty Speaks on the Employment Relations Amendment Bill
    Kia ora, Mr Assistant Speaker. He mihi nui ki te Whare Paremata. Welcome to the glorious 19th century, dressed up in the not-so-new flexibility-speak. At the final moment of this bill, let us drop the charade. The Government has a...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Ruataniwha Feds refuse to present a balanced view
    A bid to sell the Ruataniwha water project to Hawkes Bay farmers has turned in to an incredibly one sided affair, says Labours spokesperson on Water Meka Whaitiri.  “It’s being promoted as ‘Ruataniwha it’s now or never’ and it promises...
    Labour | 30-10
  • Worker’s rights dealt severe blow with Bill’s passing
    The passing of the Employment Relations Amendment Bill is another blow to workers' rights in New Zealand, the Green Party said today.This afternoon, National's Employment Relations Amendment Bill passed with the support of Act and United Future."This bill will force...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Barriers to reporting sex crimes must go
    Both the Government and police need to take action to ensure that, in future, sexual abuse victims know they will be taken seriously, Labour’s Associate Police spokesperson Kelvin Davis says. “The young women involved in the Roast Busters case, and...
    Labour | 30-10
  • Te Wakaputanga – What we did not learn at school
    This week saw the 179th anniversary of the signing of Te Wakaputanga, the Declaration of Independence of the United Tribes of Niu Tireni. Most of us did not learn about this fundamentally critical document at school, we barely learned about...
    Greens | 30-10
  • NZ goes backwards on gender equality
    It is no coincidence that in the same week New Zealand is singled out for going backwards on child poverty under National,  we’ve also dropped in global rankings for gender equality. In one year New Zealand has dropped from 7th...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Kevin Hague questions the Minister of Health on management of Katherine Ric...
    Is he satisfied that all conflicts of interest that arose by the head of Food and Grocery Council Katherine Rich being a member of the Health Promotion Agency were managed in accordance with the provisions of the Crown Entities Act...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Bennett parks numbers on social housing
    Social Housing Minister Paula Bennett admitted today that well over 1000 families have been subsidised through the accommodation supplement to stay in the Ranui campground, somewhere she has previously described as not the right place for children to be growing...
    Labour | 30-10
  • 50,000 sign petition against anti-worker law
    More than 50,000 Kiwis have signed Labour’s petition against the Government’s scrapping of tea break entitlements, Labour’s Acting Deputy Leader Annette King says. “That’s the equivalent of five people signing our petition every minute for a week. It shows the...
    Labour | 30-10
  • Address in Reply Debate – Dr Kennedy Graham on UN Security Council- 2...
    In the Speech from the Throne last week the Prime Minister identified the usual domestic goals for his Government. I counted 17. They are not my subject today. I wish instead to focus on matters beyond our shores. In the...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Climate change harming ocean health
    New Zealand is responsible for one of the largest areas of sea in the world – an area 14 times the size of our land area. The National Government is promising new marine protected areas legislation with a discussion document...
    Greens | 30-10
  • Key misled public over Jason Ede
    Information contained in a new chapter of the book Key: Portrait of a Prime Minister, that Jason Ede stopped working for the National Party on the night the book Dirty Politics was released, shows Mr Key and senior ministers hid...
    Greens | 29-10
  • Greenpeace report highlights better path for NZ agriculture
    A Greenpeace International report highlights a better way forward for New Zealand agriculture than the GE and chemical mutation technologies supported by Federated Farmers, and the National Government through its research funding packages, the Green Party said today. "This report...
    Greens | 29-10
  • BNZ post record profits while leaving savers vulnerable
    A small part of the $850 million record profit posted by the Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) today needs to be set aside to protect savers' deposits in the future, said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman today.Dr Norman was...
    Greens | 29-10
  • RBNZ U-turn shows monetary settings were wrong
    The Reserve Bank's U-turn on interest rates today shows monetary policy settings were wrong and New Zealanders have suffered unnecessarily through the loss of jobs and having to pay higher interest rates, the Green Party said today.Reserve Bank Governor Graeme...
    Greens | 29-10
  • Ports must take responsibility for shameful death toll
    Port companies must step up and take responsibility for a shameful toll of seven deaths and 133 serious accidents in the past three years, Labour MP Iain Lees-Galloway says. The frightening figures – released by the Rail, Maritime and Transport...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Please help me get my Feed the Kids Bill to Select Committee
    Last week I took over the Feed the Kids Bill that Hone Harawira had introduced to Parliament. If passed, my Bill will provide government-funded breakfast and lunch in all decile 1 and 2 schools. Hungry kids can’t learn and are...
    Greens | 29-10
  • TVNZ Outsourcing Pasifika and Maori Programmes
    I’ve always been a big fan of our state broadcaster and I’ve particularly liked their range of current events programmes. But after Friday’s announcement that TVNZ will be sacking up to 40 staff by contracting out the Pacific and Maori...
    Greens | 29-10
  • Labour urges iwi leaders to meet with National
    Labour’s Māori Caucus has called on iwi leaders and national Māori organisations to seek urgent meetings with the National Government to directly express their concerns about employment law changes which will harm Māori workers. In an open letter sent today...
    Labour | 29-10
  • ACC’s reputation needs fix, not glitz
    Restoring public trust and confidence in ACC will take a lot more than a new communications strategy or social media blitz, says Labour’s ACC spokesperson Iain Lees-Galloway. “Under National, ACC has come to be perceived as insensitive, difficult to deal...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Lessons to be learned from police investigation
    The outcome of the so-called Roast Busters case should not put victims off reporting sexual crimes, Labour’s Acting Deputy Leader Annette King says. “This case has been mishandled from the start. Within days of police initially saying no charges had...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Anti-worker legislation is anti-Pacifica
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Peseta Sam Lotu-Iiga, will go down in history as being part of a Government that harmed his own people through anti-worker legislation, says Labour’s Pacific Island Affairs spokesperson Su’a William Sio.  “Pacific people are among...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Five-year tax holiday for overseas tax dodgers
    National has just gifted a five-year tax holiday for foreign companies dodging their tax payments, says Revenue spokesperson David Clark. “Todd McClay has pretended he is doing something about overseas companies dodging their tax duties by joining an international initiative...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Traffic Jam Tax must be given the red light
    Auckland Council’s proposed Traffic Jam Tax could cost some households thousands of dollars a year just to use roads they had already paid for with their taxes and must be rejected, says Labour’s transport and Auckland Issues spokesperson Phil Twyford....
    Labour | 29-10
  • National has chance to show leadership on limos
    The National Party has the opportunity to show leadership by transitioning our vehicle fleet towards renewable electricity when a new contract to supply Government limousines for VIPs goes to tender next month, the Green Party said today. "This is a...
    Greens | 29-10
  • The Māori Party can’t have it both ways over labour laws
    The Māori Party has to fess up over its voting record on the Employment Relations Amendment Bill, says Labour’s Māori Caucus.  “It’s simply not good enough to oppose the bill at the same time  as they helped speed up its progress through...
    Labour | 29-10
  • Equal pay and the aged care sector
    Today the High Court upheld the historic ruling by the Employment Court that our Equal Pay Act could be used to consider work of equal value cases; the government has been telling the UN and ILO that it could for...
    Greens | 29-10
  • Court case perfect opportunity for Government to improve gender pay gap
    If the Government wants to halt New Zealand’s slump in international rankings on the gender pay gap it should act on the court finding that women deserve equal wages, Labour’s Women’s Affairs spokesperson Sue Moroney says. “The World Economic Forum’s...
    Labour | 28-10
  • All Auckland transport options should be considered
    All options for meeting Auckland's transport needs should be considered, including reprioritising the transport budget away from wasteful spending on motorways, the Green Party said today.Auckland mayor Len Brown is today releasing a transport report by the Independent Advisory Board,...
    Greens | 28-10
  • Another report highlights Govt failure on child poverty
    An international report measuring the impact of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) on child poverty rates, showing children in New Zealand have done worse than children in other countries, is further proof the Government needs to urgently take additional steps...
    Greens | 28-10
  • Address and Reply Debate Part 55: Inequality and Disability
    I rise on behalf of the Green Party to talk about inequality and disability.The recent census showed that nearly one in four New Zealanders lives with a disability—up from one in five in the previous census. These figures include some...
    Greens | 28-10
  • Address and Reply Debate Part 55: Inequality and Disability
    I rise on behalf of the Green Party to talk about inequality and disability.The recent census showed that nearly one in four New Zealanders lives with a disability—up from one in five in the previous census. These figures include some...
    Greens | 28-10
  • Child poverty: No more wake-up calls
    A new report which shows the National Government has made no inroads whatsoever into child poverty should do more than just set alarm bells ringing, Labour’s Acting Deputy Leader Annette King says. “UNICEF’s  latest Innocenti Report Card highlights the fact...
    Labour | 28-10
  • Eugenie Sage speaks in the 2014 Address in Reply Debate
    I congratulate you, Assistant Speaker Mallard, as Assistant Speaker and look forward to your knowledge, your fairness, and your light touch in being a referee of proceedings in this House. I congratulate also the other Assistant Speaker, Lindsay Tisch; the...
    Greens | 28-10
  • James Shaw’s Maiden Speech
    Tena Koe, Mr Speaker. I would like to take this opportunity to speak a little of the past, the present and the future. The privilege to serve in this Parliament was given to me by all those who gave their...
    Greens | 28-10
  • Govt airs real views on public broadcasting
    An admission by the Government that it is happy to experiment with Pacific and Maori audiences shows just how weak its vision for public broadcasting in New Zealand is, Labour’s Broadcasting spokesperson Kris Faafoi says. “National today admitted it doesn’t...
    Labour | 28-10
  • Does Judith Collins have a get out of jail card?
    Former justice minister Judith Collins appears to have been gifted a get out of jail free card based on the Prime Minister’s answers in Parliament today, Labour’s Acting Deputy Leader Annette King says. “Judith Collins claimed in an Official Information...
    Labour | 28-10
  • Solid Energy decision delay sensible
    Today’s announcement by the Board of Solid Energy that it will delay making a final decision on re-entering the Pike River mine is a sensible move, Labour’s MP for  West Coast-Tasman Damien O’Connor says. “It has been clear for some...
    Labour | 28-10
  • New York Green Bank off to a $1B start
    New York Governor Andrew Cuomo announced late last week the New York Green Bank’s first NZD$1 billion tranche of green energy investments. The projects, which are difficult for the private sector to finance, are now possible by New York Green...
    Greens | 28-10
  • GUEST BLOG: Blockade the Budget
    The ‘Independent’ Police Conduct Authority’s report into the policing of student protests in 2012 is a whitewash The report released by the Independent Police Conduct Authority into the policing of student protests in 2012 is a whitewash riddled with inaccuracies....
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • When National claim new anti worker laws provide ‘flexibility’ they mea...
    And so it comes to pass. The first law National ram through as part of their victory march are new anti worker laws they pretend will generate ‘flexibility’. The new law denigrate the unions ability to protect workers and provide...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • City Transport: A Taxing Matter
    This week the prospect of paying tolls on Auckland motorways became a hot topic. (See Mathew Dearnaley:Motorway tolling could hit some hard, NZ Herald, 30 Oct 2014.) As we might expect, the kneejerk response has been quite negative. But, as with...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • Open Letter to Amy Adams: Please Reopen The Review Into Sexual Violence Cou...
    Ms Amy Adams, Justice and Courts Minister, Right now in this country it seems that although rape is illegal, it is not being prevented by the agents who uphold the law. It almost feels like rape is only illegal on paper,...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • MEDIA WATCH: Does ‘No-Surprises’ Also Apply To TVNZ News?
    When you stand back and look at NZ media outlets, most of them have at least one or two people who attempt to hold the government to account: John Campbell on TV3, Guyon Espiner and others at Radio NZ, David...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • Things That Make You Go Hmmmmmmm
    Every so often in politics, a public figure comes out with something so absurd and so outlandish … that it really does just make you go “Hmmmmmmmmmm”. We’re accustomed to this from certain quarters – by mid point through the...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • Poverty & inequality don’t need protest marches – they need a riot:...
    The global level of inequality continues to skyrocket… Number of billionaires doubled since financial crisis The number of billionaires has doubled since the start of the financial crisis, according to a major new report from anti-poverty campaigners. According to Oxfam,...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • If Key knows who Rawshark is…
    I’m sorry, what? John Key ‘given Rawshark’s name’The Prime Minister believes he knows who hacked Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater’s computer and produced the source material for Nicky Hager’s Dirty Politics, according to a new edition of a recently published...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • Child Poverty stats in NZ
    Child Poverty stats in NZ...
    The Daily Blog | 30-10
  • Crimes Act + Police Investigation = WTF
    Just to frame the farce that is the Roastbuster’s investigation and conclusion – here are the parts of the Crime Act http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1961/0043/latest/whole.html#DLM329057  the Roastbusters are proven to have violated – that the police (and some suspects!) themselves acknowledge occurred: Crimes...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • Publishing Journalists’ Home Addresses Is A Tactic Of The Right, Not The ...
    I think I’m starting to get rather annoyed with the conduct of some pro-MANA people over this ongoing Parliamentary Services crew complement issue. Yes, we get that there are legitimate issues to be raised with how some political reporters in...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • Aucklanders caught between a tarseal-addicted government and a weak mayor
    Len Brown’s proposal for motorway tolls to reduce congestion and provide funding for better public transport is a weak response to a critical issue. The $12 billion dollar shortfall on transport funding he talks about is mainly for projected new...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • A Very Weird Story: Deconstructing Darren Aronofsky’s Noah.
    NOAH is a curious movie. Conceived as a biblical epic, it’s target audience was originally the millions of Americans who regard the Bible as God’s inerrant word. With the sin-filled works of Hollywood forbidden to these true-believers, Christian movie-makers have developed...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • You Can Get Away With Rape In New Zealand
    Jessie Hume with last years petition against rape     The police have sent a strong message today.  In fact they’ve been sending a strong message for a while; a message that our government supports. “You can literally get away...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • Roast Buster case – no charges. In the immortal words of NWA…
    Roast Busters case: No prosecutions Police are to make an announcement this afternoon on Operation Clover, the investigation into the “Roast Busters” allegations. The Herald understands the victim has been told that the alleged offenders will not be prosecuted due...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • Key’s flag change distraction to cost $26million!
    No. Way. Bid to change NZ flag to cost millions The cost of holding two referendums and consulting on a change of flag has been estimated to be just under $26 million. Look. We all appreciate that the sleepy hobbits...
    The Daily Blog | 29-10
  • Why NZ Herald’s Labour Party crocodile tears are so audacious
    The front page the NZ Herald would use if they thought they could get away with it No one can take the recent columns by NZ Herald seriously… John Armstrong: Shadow lingers on National John Roughan: Labour’s leadership vote matters...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • The beginning of the end of Cameron Slater?
    Slater postings on man bizarre, court told A businessman has changed his appearance and had to install extra security at his home after Whale Oil blogger Cameron Slater posted his business and personal documents online, he says. Mr Slater has...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • We are a milk power republic and Fonterra our unelected senate
    Wow. Just wow… Deputy mayor says he’ll be sacked South Taranaki deputy mayor Alex Ballantyne says he expects to be sacked because he has spoken out about the impact gasses coming from dumped Fonterra dairy products have had on his...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • MEDIA WATCH: “…But *actually* this is about ethics in political-game jo...
    Yesterday, a piece of mine on the recent revelations about Hone Harawira employing several gentlemen either accused or convicted of sex offences was published on The Daily Blog. Predictably, given the fierce loyalty which Hone inspires in his party faithful and...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • Privilege cheque
    There was no race problem in my childhood. Living in central Wellington I was well-insulated from what was going on not so far away. This was the 60s and 70s, where the teachers enjoyed free love in the staff room...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • A brief word on Key’s claim that it will be raining carnage
    Isis will ‘rain carnage on the world’ – John Key Left unchecked Isis would “rain carnage on the world”, Prime Minister John Key says, but he has yet to make a decision on whether New Zealand troops will join a...
    The Daily Blog | 28-10
  • Meanwhile…
    ...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • How does Andrew Little win Labour Leadership and unify the caucus?
    Audrey Young’s excellent column on how the Caucus vote  is shaping up shows how Andrew Little becomes the next leader of the Labour Party. She identifies the factions as the following… Andrew Little 6: Andrew Little, David Cunliffe, Iain Lees Galloway,...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • GUEST BLOG: Joe Trinder – Right of response to Curwen
    You have asked that Hone Harawira deserves to explain what happened, how would he explain when his next door neighbour is an alleged sex offender. What explanation can Hone offer he wasn’t involved, Hone had no idea this offending was...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • MEDIA WATCH: That Hella-Weird Feeling When You Defend Tova O’Brien
    Oh dear. Yesterday morning I blogged that Hone deserved a chance to explain what exactly had happened as applies his office’s Parliamentary Services crew complement – and, importantly, that we deserve to be able to judge him on the strength of...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • Canadian Green MP warns against harsh anti-terror measures
    Canada’s Green Party has provided a welcome counterpoint to Prime Minister Harper’s call for tougher anti-terrorism laws in the wake of a soldier outside the Canadian Parliament. On October 22, while she was still locked in her parliamentary office, Green...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • When is an asset sale not an asset sale? When it robs from the poor and ste...
    National have turned state housing on its head. At no time during the 2014 election did the Key Government even hint that they were going to privatise 30% of the Housing NZ stock of state homes. Not once. Key even...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • Housing; broken promises, families in cars, and ideological idiocy (Part To...
    . . Continued from: Housing; broken promises, families in cars, and ideological idiocy (Part Rua) . Bill English comes clean on National’s intentions for HNZ privatisation . On 14 October, in a report on The Daily Blog, I wrote, In...
    The Daily Blog | 27-10
  • The Questions Have Been Asked – They Deserve An Answer
    A few days ago, allegations that had been percolating for some time about Hone Harawira employing three either accused or convicted sex offenders on his Parliamentary pay-roll came to light. (one imprisoned before working for MANA; one who found himself convicted and...
    The Daily Blog | 26-10
  • I have seen one future, and it is bleak
    . . Back in  March 2012, I wrote this story regarding a march to support striking workers at Ports of Auckland. It appears there was some prescience about some of my observations at the time… . | | 18 March...
    The Daily Blog | 26-10
  • US air strike war Key wants us in has killed a civilian a day so far
      The US air strike war that John Key wants us to join has killed a civilian a day so far. From the Washington Post... The United States launched its first airstrikes on militants in Syria on Sept. 23, and has continued...
    The Daily Blog | 26-10
  • The instant Jihad syndrome
    My favourite new term is ‘self-radicalised’ – it suggests the reasons for terrorism are totally divorced from the actions of the West. This need to suddenly ramp up terror laws because of lone wolf, self-radicalised Jihadists seems convenient and counter-productive....
    The Daily Blog | 25-10
  • We have nothing to fear from Ebola but fear itself
    I suspect most Americans perceive Ebola like this   I can’t work out if the fear being spread within the media about Ebola is deliberate or just ignorance. Yes Ebola is a terrible plague that kills a large percentage of...
    The Daily Blog | 25-10
  • GUEST BLOG: Anjum Rahman – “Meritocracy? I wish.”
    I’d like to start by linking to a post I had published at another site in support of Nanaia Mahuta for the Labour Party leadership election.  She has a reasonable chance, given that she already has the endorsement of Te...
    The Daily Blog | 25-10
  • Chocolate milk shortage and creepy Santa? Let’s talk about real news
    Child poverty is still a scarily serious problem in this country and house prices are soaring through the roof to the point where it is simply impossible for the average New Zealander to buy a home. There is also little...
    The Daily Blog | 25-10
  • It’s time to celebrate Kiwi schools and teachers
    Some would have you believe that New Zealand’s schools are in a state of collapse, that your children are not being educated well and that things are going to hell in a hand basket.  That there is no innovation, no...
    The Daily Blog | 25-10
  • Ideological Blitzkrieg – Privatization of state housing, more charter sch...
    Pundits in pundit land will tell you that this Government is boring, that Key is the great pragmatist and that it is his ability to create elegant solutions that keeps him the firm favourite in many Kiwi eyes. This ability...
    The Daily Blog | 24-10
  • Hegemony rules but resistance is fertile
    The Prime Minister is a puppet. Not just our current Prime Minister, but given the forces of multinational globalisation, the role of any head of state, is less as independent actor, and more as a puppet of international trends and...
    The Daily Blog | 24-10
  • An open Letter to Sir Bob Jones: demanding a ‘liveable wage’ is not “...
    How out of touch with reality is Sir Bob Jones? You know, that white dude who invested in privatised SOEs after the selling off of our assets in the eighties and made a ludicrous and disgusting amount of money and is...
    The Daily Blog | 24-10
  • My insecurity about the Security Council
    As I write this (on 24 October) it is international UN Day. Of course, you all knew that already, right? Well, the day celebrates the entry into force of the UN Charter in 1945. With the ratification of this founding...
    The Daily Blog | 24-10
  • GUEST BLOG: Catherine Delahunty – Back in That House
    Parliament opened this week and I still find it a very odd place. Most of the people are reasonably courteous and friendly, but the rituals are archaic and the rules around issues like the swearing in oath are oppressive and...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • Marae Investigates No More
    TVNZ yesterday announced the closure of their Māori and Pacific programmes department. That means they’ve chosen to stop making Fresh, Tagata Pasifika, Waka Huia and Marae Investigates to let independent producers get their hands on these lucrative contracts. This is...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • BLOGWATCH: An Un-Civil War in Labour, eh?
    Earlier today, my attention was directed to an entry that’s just recently appeared on the Slightly Left of Centre blog. It purports to contain the ‘inside word’ from a highly placed NZF source – which is funny, because I’m pretty sure...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • Santanomics 101
    Santanomics could mean a number of things. It could be the study and practice of giving. Or it could mean the study and practice of rampant end-of-year commercialism. However, for me today it is the economics of erectingAuckland’s giant Santa...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • SkyCity boss misleads public over workers lost shifts
    SkyCity CEO Nigel Morrison has defended the employment practices at his company in an “Opinion” piece entitled “Human Capital key to corporate success” in the NZ Herald on Thursday. A number of his claims are misleading, contain only partial truths...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • Review: Perfect Place
    I went to a Perfect Place on Tuesday night, and what a delight it was. The marshmallows sweetly (and forcefully) handed out pre-show, set the tone for the next hour. Walking up the stairs at The Basement was a complete...
    The Daily Blog | 23-10
  • 5AA Australia – NZ on UN Security Council + Dirty Politics Lingers On
    5AA Australia: Selwyn Manning and Peter Godfrey deliver their weekly bulletin Across The Ditch. General round up of over night talkback issues: Thongs, Jandals and flip-flops… ISSUE 1: New Zealand has been successful in its campaign to become a non...
    The Daily Blog | 22-10
  • When I mean me, I mean my office & when I call whaleoil I mean not as m...
    This. Is. Ludicrous. Green Party co-leader Russel Norman put the first of what are likely to be many questions about Mr Key’s relationship with Slater, asking him how many times he had phoned or texted the blogger since 2008. “None...
    The Daily Blog | 22-10
  • A brief word on describing the Government as ‘boring and bland’
    The narrative being sown is that this Government will be a boring and bland third term. Boring and bland. Since the election, Key has announced he is privatising 30% of state houses without reinvesting any of that money back into housing society’s most...
    The Daily Blog | 22-10
  • Roast Busters: Turn Indignation into Action
    People raged about the Roast Buster case. The indignation was justified – it was horrible. “Where were their parents!?” Fair question. I am sure the Roast Busters’ parents and the victims’ parents all wish they had been more proactive in...
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Stats NZ only have themselves to blame for postponement
    The Public Service Association (PSA) says Statistics NZ only have themselves to blame for the indefinite postponement of the release of the Food Price Index: November 2014....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • NZ Diversity Survey – benchmarking workplace diversity
    AUT University’s New Zealand Work Research Institute (NZWRI) has released a report on diversity in New Zealand workplaces....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Māori Language (Te Reo Māori) Bill
    Tutehounuku Korako, Chair of the Māori Affairs Committee, is inviting further public submissions on this bill. The closing date for submissions is Friday, 5 December 2014....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • ERA amendments a mixed bag
    The Employment Relations Amendment Act has the potential to put vulnerable workers in a more precarious position, says Equal Opportunities Commissioner, Dr Jackie Blue. However, the commissioner says the right for all to request flexible work hours is...
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Sensible Sentencing calls for appeal of judicial activivism
    The Sensible Sentencing Trust is appalled that Justice Jill Mallon has today refused to apply the Life without Parole (LWOP) provisions of the Three Strikes law as enacted by Parliament....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Global Rally against ISIS – for Kobanê – for Humanity, Nov 1
    The New Zealand Kurdish Community will march in solidarity with Kurdistan as part of the “GLOBAL RALLY AGAINST ISIS – FOR KOBANÊ – FOR HUMANITY” on 1 November 2014, 2pm....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Does ‘No-Surprises’ Also Apply To TVNZ News?
    When you stand back and look at NZ media outlets, most of them have at least one or two people who attempt to hold the government to account: John Campbell on TV3, Guyon Espiner and others at Radio NZ, David...
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Safer roads are better for everyone
    Recent pedestrian versus vehicle incidents highlight the real issues being addressed by delegates as the 2Walk and Cycle conference concludes....
    Scoop politics | 31-10
  • Law change creates more flexible labour market
    The Employment Relations Amendment Act, passed yesterday, will bring new flexibility to the labour market and will reduce the ability of unions to organise and to recruit....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Bumper ANZ profits mean no excuse for insecure hours
    A big rise in profits at New Zealand's largest bank needs to be reflected in a better pay offer and more security around hours of work, the bank workers’ union said today....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Count down to lowered alcohol limit
    With just a month to go until a new lower alcohol limit for adult drivers comes into effect, Police and road safety agencies are reminding drivers of the impending change....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • WorkSafe Supports Forestry Review Findings
    WorkSafe NZ says the Independent Forestry Safety Review has clearly identified the problems facing an industry in which ten workers were killed last year. “The Review’s analysis matches our own view and leaves no doubt about the need for comprehensive,...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • CTU welcomes forestry review recommendations
    The CTU is welcoming the today's release of the independent forestry safety review panel findings. "These recommendations must be implemented to ensure that everything possible is done to make forestry safer." CTU President, Helen Kelly said....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Activists will confront animal abusers
    Today animal rights activists will confront a group of wealth advisers who want to build the biggest egg factory-farm in New Zealand....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Turia: Women’s Refuge Conference 2014
    This is a milestone moment in my life. This will be my last official address as Co-leader of the Maori Party. On Saturday night at our Hui-a-Tau, I will be standing down from that role and enabling a new co-leader,...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Rodeo Code of Welfare ‘Sick Joke’
    Animal advocacy organisation SAFE says the revised Code of Welfare for Rodeos just released is nothing but a sick joke. “Rodeo animals are goaded, tormented and forced to endure needless suffering and gross mistreatment, all for the sake of so-called...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Conservative Party applauds binding referenda on flag
    The Conservative Party are congratulating the Government on the decision to hold two binding referendums to decide the fate of New Zealand’s flag – and believes it will pave the way for binding referenda to form part of New Zealand...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Walk the Talk – Opposing violence against women
    Soroptimist International of Auckland have organised a walk on 22 November from Silo Park at the Wynyard Quarter through the Viaduct and back to Silo Park, to show their opposition to violence against women. This event hopes to raise awareness...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Recommendations on the Design of Pecuniary Penalties
    The Law Commission has reviewed the use of pecuniary penalties as a regulatory tool. Pecuniary penalties are financial penalties that policymakers are increasingly opting to use in place of criminal sanctions in order to punish and deter misconduct in...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Every worker will be affected by employment law changes
    Every worker will feel the effects of the government’s new employment laws and should join a union if they want to maintain and increase their wages and conditions, says New Zealand’s largest private sector union, the EPMU....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Shameful attack on all workers
    The Government has passed the Employment Relations Amendment Act slashing the rights of all Kiwi workers. “These changes are shameful. New Zealand now has some of the worst employment protections in the OECD. It is embarrassing that a country which...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Unnecessary law changes more to do with ideology
    The government’s employment law changes are simply ideological and are at odds with its approach in the related areas of health and safety and immigration law, FIRST Union said tonight....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • CTU Runanga calls on iwi leaders
    Maori workers are calling on iwi leaders to speak out against the employment law changes expected to go through today. “Iwi leaders have previously spoken out when workers in Aotearoa have been under attack, we believe they should do so...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Educating children not the best solution to alcohol harm
    Alcohol Healthwatch says we need to look beyond educating children and young people to address deeply embedded attitudes and behaviours concerning alcohol....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • New code of welfare for rodeos released
    New standards to strengthen the animal welfare requirements for rodeos have been issued today by the Minister for Primary Industries, Nathan Guy....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • IPCA report riddle with inaccuracies, say students
    A report by the Independent Police Conduct Authority into the policing of student protests in 2012 is riddled with inaccuracies, say students who laid the original complaint with the IPCA....
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • CT v The Queen – indecency convictions quashed
    This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Rameka v The Queen – murder convictions quashed
    This summary is provided to assist in the understanding of the Court’s judgment. It does not comprise part of the reasons for that judgment. The full judgment with reasons is the only authoritative document. The full text of the judgment...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Auckland Council Out of Control
    Responding to the NZ Herald article that some Auckland households will face a rates rise of up to 9.6 per cent next year, Taxpayers’ Union Executive Director Jordan Williams says: “Len Brown’s pledge to cap rates rises at 2.5 per...
    Scoop politics | 30-10
  • Stats NZ staff escalate action with ‘no more meetings’ rule
    Statistics NZ staff have voted to escalate their ongoing industrial action in an effort to get Stats NZ back to the bargaining table with a reasonable offer. The staff, who are members of the Public Service Association (PSA), have been...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Rape Crisis calls for changes to criminal justice system
    Wellington Rape Crisis has added its voice to the public outcry following the announcement that there will be no charges in the teen rape gang case. Butterworth says the decision not to lay charges will not have been a surprise...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Police action justified in Blockade the Budget demonstration
    Police actions in dealing with a demonstration in Central Auckland known as Blockade the Budget on 1 June 2012 were justified and appropriate, an Independent Police Conduct Authority report released today found....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • NZDF Joins with Australia to Commemorate WWI Centenary
    A contingent of New Zealand Defence Force (NZDF) personnel will join their Australian counterparts at Australia’s first major commemoration of the First World War centenary in Albany, Western Australia this weekend....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Reserve Bank should reduce interest rate
    “The Reserve Bank should be reducing its policy interest rate, the OCR”, says CTU Economist Bill Rosenberg in response to the Bank’s announcement today that it is not increasing it....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • 2015 Stout Fellow will write about Māori & Criminal Justice
    Kim Workman, founder and advocate for the Robson Hanan Trust, which administers the Rethinking Crime and Punishment and Justspeak initiatives, has been awarded the 2015 John David Stout Fellowship at Victoria University....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • What John Key thought about ‘dirty politics’
    On September 20, John Key swept to victory to become one of New Zealand’s most successful and popular Prime Ministers. Rocked by scandal, the 2014 election campaign was one of the most brutal – and riveting – in recent history....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Trade Deal Threatens Farmers and Food Businesses
    The secret Trans Pacific Partnership negotiations are a direct threat to food businesses and farmers, and a moratorium on the release of GE crops must be enshrined in law before the TPP is signed....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • CTU announces election of new Secretary
    The contested election for the position of CTU Secretary has been won by Sam Huggard. Sam officially takes office on Monday 1 December 2014. Sam has worked in the union movement and brings a wealth of experience and a commitment...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Kim Workman awarded 2015 J.D. Stout Fellowship
    The Victoria University of Wellington 2015 J.D. Stout Fellowship, funded by the Stout Trust, has been awarded to justice reform advocate Kim Workman. Mr Workman (Ngati Kahungungu ki Wairarapa, Rangitaane) is well known for his work on criminal justice,...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • TPPA causing concern
    Concern over the secretive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) negotiations is being expressed in two public meetings over the next week; one at a presentation on 5th November by former councillor Robin Gwynn to the Napier City Council, the...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Kiwis rally to demand justice for ‘Roast Buster’ survivors
    Over 1,500 kiwis have rallied to demand justice after the announcement of the NZ Police decision not to lay charges in the ‘Roast Busters’ saga....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • New employment law will hurt the most vulnerable NZers
    The Public Service Association (PSA) says changes to the Employment Relations Act, expected to be passed in Parliament tonight, will hurt vulnerable workers and their families more than anyone....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Consultation to close on proposed place names
    The New Zealand Geographic Board (NZGB) Ngā Pou Taunaha o Aotearoa today advised that only one month remains before public consultation closes for 18 name proposals for geographic features and places around Te Ika ā Māui (the North Island)....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Operation Clover – Statement from Police Commissioner
    I have taken a close interest in this investigation and I am confident police have conducted a thorough and professional enquiry in what has been a challenging and complex case. The Operation Clover team has ensured that victims have been...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Better policy would have protected children from recession
    Child Poverty Action Group says an international report released by UNICEF today shows good policy can protect and improve child well-being, even during a recession....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Outcome of Operation Clover investigation
    Police have completed a multi-agency investigation, Operation Clover, into the activities of a group calling themselves “The Roast Busters”. The 12 month enquiry focused on incidents involving allegations of sexual offending against a number of girls...
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • False birth registration brings home detention
    A Whangarei woman who attempted to register the birth of a fictitious child to claim a sole parent benefit was sentenced to six months home detention in the Whangarei District Court today....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Family of Robert Ellis demand a proper investigation
    The family of a New Zealander killed in Indonesia are growing increasingly concerned at the lack of information they’ve received, and the handling of the investigation into his murder....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
  • Minister of Health must account for aged care workers’ pay
    The New Zealand Federation of Business and Professional Women (BPW NZ) congratulates rest-home worker Kristine Bartlett on her landmark claim for equal pay from her employer and successfully pursuing this to the Court of Appeal....
    Scoop politics | 29-10
Public service advertisements by The Standard

Current CO2 level in the atmosphere