I do hope that this pantomime of the two johns keeps on going. They are the joke that just keeps n on giving. I just need to listen to either of them with their rehearsed patter to start my day off with a really good laugh.They are hilarious.Surely they can’t POSSIBLY BELIEVE that the people of NZ are actually BELIEVING anything that comes out of their mouths.Smirk away key,you just look like an uneducated simpleton and your sidekick just looks like a sad little man.
Surely they can’t POSSIBLY BELIEVE that the people of NZ are actually BELIEVING anything that comes out of their mouths.
The crucial point is that the mayoral electoral expense thing is not fatal. (Unless of course Key is covering up for the possibility of him being involved with Dotcom as well … same electorate after all.)
What is fatal is that they are lying about it. If you cannot trust a person in a little matter you cannot trust them in larger ones. Sure we all spin, and creatively manipulate the truth in order to present the best possible face on matters … but there is a line.
Bald lies are over the line. Our PM is now a proven liar and NOTHING he now says has credibility. This is the fatal problem.
Spot on Red. Even the most ardent silver-spoon tory knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is utterly inconceivable that Key hasn’t read the report. They know with absolute certainty that he’s lying.
It’s BLIAR all over again. Two esteemed right-wing leaders caught red-handed and refusing to budge.
The difference this time is that they genuinely thought he was different. The golden messiah, blessed by God with money and a refreshing honesty. The anti-politician money-trader from heaven who would pave our driveways with gold.
Now a spoiled, stubborn brat, insisting to a stunned public that the dog ate his homework.
Totally agree Red. “Forgetting” the chopper ride tipped the balance on this one. I don’t expect MPs to be flawless, but I do expect them to be honest about their mistakes. Maybe it would help if fellow MPs, bloggers, the media and Joe Public were gracious enough to let them, instead of dragging up decade-old errors which, if dealt with properly in the past, need to be left there.
You can only leave their actions in the past if the person in question has changed their behaviour.
If justice is served people would leave them alone.
If they continue to live in denial then we have to keep them honest.
Agreed, Banks currently faces the music of his own making, and I wish he’d just front up. My qualifier was, that IF is stuff dealt with properly in the past, it needs to be left there. We don’t always see that happen, which is unfortunate. A lot of good people would find it difficult to get into politics cos whole research departments are set up to drag through their past.
I recently heard from someone who had travelled through Spain that there was a certain tension in the air – a sense of deep discontent.
And this morning I just read that more than 25% of the entire population of Catalonia took to the streets to demand independence. I’d call that major, no?
There has been an ever present movement for independence from Spain in Catalonia. The difference now is the horrific mismanagement of the economy and financial crisis coming out of Madrid. We’re used to the sight of dictatorships in the developing world turning out soldiers to keep civil unrest under control. Chances are in the next year or three, the western world is going to find that it is still developing after all.
Another reason why Barca V Real Madrid matches are so tetchy (besides Madrid’s abrasive manager) as Real madrid represent royalty and playing the catalan giants is seen as freedom V being ruled over by many catalonians.
The Declaration of Equality
Target: 50000
Number of people who have signed: 17897 http://www.nzcpr.com/petition_EqualRights.php
We, New Zealanders, having founded our society in the equality of comradeship, and living here at home in the land we have made, utterly oppose any laws which establish or promote racial distinction or division.
There shall be one law for all:
We refuse to accept any reference to the Treaty of Waitangi or its principles in any constitutional document.
We require that such references be removed from all existing legislation.
We require that race-based Parliamentary seats be abolished.
We require that race-based representation on local bodies be abolished.
We require that the Waitangi Tribunal, which has outlived any usefulness it may have had, be abolished.
And we pledge ourselves to oppose and resist all those of whatever rank or degree who, whether by force or the devious processes of the law, attempt to impose the fetters of racial inequality on the free citizens of New Zealand.
The Declaration
The Government’s constitutional review provides an opportunity to usher in a new era of democracy for New Zealand based on equality under the law.
Help us create a movement for change by signing the DECLARATION OF EQUALITY and calling on others to do the same. Our initial target is 20,000 signatures, but we hope to build to 50,000, 100,000 and more. We will deliver the Declaration to Government Ministers in September next year to coincide with the report back from the Maori Party’s Constitutional Advisory Panel. We will keep you informed of progress…
Don’t know about your detail there griff but with you on the equality thing re increasing maori governance etc. Many early New Zealand settlers escaped birthright privilege and oppression in their homelands. They had experienced centuries of oppression and inequality and wanted to create a place where those evil strictures were absent.
Unfortunately those evil strictures are returning. In this mornings paper there was an article about one of the first new buildings being proposed in the Chch CBD. It requires consent from three commissioners – one from Cera, one from the Council and one from Ngai Tahu. What is the one from Ngai Tahu doing there? Are we subject to governance by unelected, race-based birthright privileged bastards as we were in our past? If so then they can get fucked. This system has no place in NZ.
If the treaty provides for these things then the treaty is an ass.
I understood that was what the Maori version of the ToW says. That the iwi chiefs never ceded any of their sovereignty over their lands, peoples and treasures. No if’s no buts.
For Nga Tahu I understood that is pretty much the whole South Is.
After all this is why no NZ govt will contemplate allowing a case to go to any International Court of any sort … because they know that the NZ Crown be shown to have no written legitimacy would lose the case.
I can work with an equal partnership between Māori and the Crown but that would need to be real not the imagined equality we have now. Until then the country is doomed because the foundations are crooked and built on inequality.
“I can work with an equal partnership between Māori and the Crown ”
Marty, I think most people understand how that comes about under the Treaty etc, and that is all well and good – under the cocoon of the Treaty with all its warts and limitations.
But what you imply in the quoted bit above is that you would expect all NZers to be subject to that joint partnership. This is exactly in line with my main point – New Zealanders are then subject to the authority of an unelected, race-based (or treaty-based, take your pick) birthright privilege. Do you not see that this strikes at the very heart of representative democracy? Do you understand how and why this system of democracy has come about and what it tried to escape and then achieve? If so, how does this fit inside your views? And, where it doesn’t fit inside your views, how would you attend to the distortions and their effects?
It’s a funny thing vto but the limitations of the Treaty all disadvantage Māori, not the other way round.
If some people move to a country and then impose their worldview on the people living there and they do it all because they are trying to create utopia or a better life for their children – they are wrong and illicit no matter how much they pray to their god.
When the people displaced, as described above, then assert their right to live their lives based on their beliefs and values, the people who have gained advantage from the imposed system argue that the assertion of those rights is detrimental to the established society. What they mean is that it affects, or more rightly potentially affects, their advantage.
I understand that and it makes sense within the circumstances of migration and colonisation. However, it doesn;t make sense in a bigger view, which is what I refer to – hence my point about representative democracy and its aims and settings. Your belief, I believe, is too small for today’s world and you are pushing that belief out into areas that it can’t operate in. Perhaps your belief needs expanding to accomodate other factors present in the human condition.
Yes I think vto and I agree that the military, economic and political dominance of the colonial settlers worked very much against the interests of the real owners of this country. No need to re-litigate all of that yet again right now.
What vto and I are thinking about is the future. You are supporting the idea of two equal sovereign entities in this country working in partnership. What I’m asking is for some details. Especially for how to proceed when the two parties do not agree.
For instance one sovereign right now thinks it can sell power stations and their rights to use water. The other sovereign thinks that it is the sole owner of those water rights. Spot the problem?
Would it not just be easier to have only one sovereign entity like every other nation on earth? And logically is that not the iwi’s?
So your suggestion is sort out the current problems first.. That makes some sense. But the problem in going down this path is that in putting things equal, or right under the Treaty, it is beginning to create very large issues that will be problems when it comes to that future. For example, in putting things right under the treaty a co-governance approach is developing and that co-governance, by an unelected group, strikes right at the heart of the way the future should be developed i.e. equality for all.
The way in which the wrongs of the past are being attended to is creating wrongs for the future.
edit: oops, meant to be in reply to 11.14 comment below
But the problem in going down this path is that in putting things equal, or right under the Treaty, it is beginning to create very large issues that will be problems when it comes to that future.
It’s not beginning to create issues. The issues have been there all along. It’s just that Pakeha now have to come to grips with those issues. Maori have been carrying more than their fair share for the last century and a half.
For example, in putting things right under the treaty a co-governance approach is developing and that co-governance, by an unelected group, strikes right at the heart of the way the future should be developed i.e. equality for all.
Iwi are not unelected, please stop saying that. They might not be elected by you, but they are elected and have legitmate forms of governance.
I cannot see how we can have equality for all if Maori are expected to give up their sovereignty.
To get what you want we would have to turn NZ from being a single state to being many states and those states would be separated both through geography and race. NZ is far too small and interconnected to be able to do that.
Using knowledge of the past can help us with current and future issues. In fact i’ve just finished an essay on that topic but that was relating to reducing reoffending rates of Māori through re-enculturalisation.
Both of you are trying to run before we walk. Until we get equality we will have to fight the battles within the system and often those battle align with other inequalities.
Our imposed system chooses to believe it can have only one sovereign but we could change that really easily. Until then we get on with the job of challenging each and every inequality we come across. That is forward looking and that is working from what we have got not a hypothetic what if.
Ngai Tahu sold land in the 1800s, under British law.
The idea that Ngai Tahu own the South Island is a Pakeha idea.
Kai Tahu aren’t the only iwi in the South Island. Other iwi exist within the area sometimes considered as Kai Tahu’s.
Edit: that was in response to RedLogix,
“I understood that was what the Maori version of the ToW says. That the iwi chiefs never ceded any of their sovereignty over their lands, peoples and treasures. No if’s no buts.
For Nga Tahu I understood that is pretty much the whole South Is.
After all this is why no NZ govt will contemplate allowing a case to go to any International Court of any sort … because they know that the NZ Crown be shown to have no written legitimacy would lose the case.”
Three sentences there marty. Barren empty sentences. Nothing. But then again, you never outline reasons for any of your strange positions, you just shout an empty pithy slogan and attach some kiddy abuse.
Let me tell what this country does not need and that is race-based, unelected, birthright privilege.
We had it before and maori didn’t like it, yet here they are acting to restore it again. It is your views that are unwelcome in New Zealand marty. They have been proven unsustainable and oppressionary in the past. Why would you think that you are somehow different this time?
Yeah, we need different levels of citizenship in NZ. Where your rights are decided by whats in your blood and nothing else. We should have a sexy name for it though – how does apartheid sound?
“Many early New Zealand settlers escaped birthright privilege and oppression in their homelands. They had experienced centuries of oppression and inequality and wanted to create a place where those evil strictures were absent.”
A somewhat rosey view of colonials. The idea that the oppressed want to go somewhere else to live a better life free from oppression is contradicted by the reality once they get where they’re going, which is (apart from being tricked back into worse conditions for some) that they themselves became the oppressors. A common problem, of misunderstanding basic human motivations. For many people it’s not that they hate power, it’s just that they don’t have any. Wanting the gains of civilised society without taking the risks necessary to get them locates people within a specific psychological sphere. Early settlers may not have been informed enough to realise it, but failing to label reality doesn’t make reality any less true.
If you want to free people of oppression, I would have thought you would start with the greatest threat, which isn’t anything to do with Maori issues. At least you can understand the outrage that indigenous people feel.
Maori, circa 1840: I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
VTO, 2012: “I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
And the millions of oppressed Chinese huddling under oppressive Indian colonial rule in “New Beijing” (aka New Zealand) … grumbling about how this place is “getting stinkier every day”.
Not a bad assessment uturn. You’re right in that the colonial period is somewhat more complex. In a broad sense however, the point made stands – unelected, race-based birthright privilege has no place in New Zealand.
And this point of yours sums it up perfectly…
“Maori, circa 1840: I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
VTO, 2012: “I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!””
Interesting thread. I just started reading Ask the Mountain chronicling the Taranaki land wars & Parihaka. I’m only a chapter in but I find it interesting that in the years leading up to the conflict the Maori on all accounts seem to have been consistently playing by Colonial rules up until the colonials themselves began the descent to conflict.
We converted them to christianity and then burnt their churches and bibles against everything we’d just taught them was holy. We barred them from New Plymouth unless they pledged allegiance to Queen Victoria and forsake their own culture, so they tolled the roads around the coast.
From the very outset Maori have shown that they can best colonialism at it’s own games. We have set the rules through crown law and capitalist structures, yet now we thumb our nose at a people who, through a system imposed, have a legal right to challenge government and are.
Change our capitalist structures is a better answer, because the Maori have shown time and time again that they are happy to work within the system. And that system is ,last time I checked, a colony of the Monarch who is an unelected, race-based birthright privilege.
The idea that the oppressed want to go somewhere else to live a better life free from oppression is contradicted by the reality once they get where they’re going, which is (apart from being tricked back into worse conditions for some) that they themselves became the oppressors. A common problem, of misunderstanding basic human motivations.
Although that is what happened I also think it was more a case of them putting in place structures that they were familiar with.
If you want to free people of oppression, I would have thought you would start with the greatest threat, which isn’t anything to do with Maori issues.
And what is, in your opinion, this greatest threat?
VTO, Ngai Tahu do run their society by elections. And you are not subject to governance by Kai Tahu. You are subject to governance by authorities who are expected to work alongside local iwi, as laid out by those authorities. The Crown signed the treaty remember. Would you like to undo the Crown’s authority to do that?
“It requires consent from three commissioners – one from Cera, one from the Council and one from Ngai Tahu. What is the one from Ngai Tahu doing there?”
Why don’t you do some actual research and come back and tell us why, specifically? There is an answer, but you’re avoiding that so that you can just play the race card.
CERA, CCC, Ngai Tahu…. that you consider Ngai Tahu to be the one that is undermining your sovereignty speaks volumes.
That’s an interesting question Red. I will have to think about it. My first thoughts are that there are different kinds of sovereignty. There’s an obvious legal one to do with the crown and the queen, but I have other allegiances as well.
I think this is a very important conversation to be having.
weka, I actually don’t know the answer as to why Ngai Tahu are there, perhaps you could explain. All I know is that they are making governing decisions on the rebuilding of Chch.
As for the rest of the hair-splitting, well the wig remains intact in spite of it. You claim they have elections and do not exercise authority over others, but that is clearly not the case. They do exercise authority over others through this ‘working alongside’. How can you not see that? Why are so many people turning a blind eye to these realities?
vto, if I lived in Chch I would certainly want to understand why Ngai Tahu is involved in that way, and I think it works better if you treat the question as non-rhetorical. I think it is up to you to find that out though, given the issue is yours (I don’t even know what building you are talking about, this is not my issue). I think if you engaged with that finding out, and with Ngai Tahu in an open way, you might find that interesting. Why not phone them up, or go visit them, and ask?
At the most superficial level Ngai Tahu are involved in the rebuild because the local authorities recognise them as treaty partners. What that means in legal, ethical, social terms I don’t know, but I think the process of finding out is a crucial one for pakeha at this time. That we don’t know is to our discredit.
I’m not hairsplitting. I’m teasing out detail that enables us to understand and think in more complex ways about a very complex situation. There are all sorts of people who have influence in the Chch rebuild, lots of them most definitely not elected. The crux of this is about how we share power, and who gets power and who doesn’t. Kai Tahu are one of the big players, and legitimately IMO. This is their land after all.
I will say this, Kai Tahu are on the ascendant. They are becoming a force to be reckoned with. They are getting very good at playing pakeha at their own game, as well as solidifying their own culture. Best that we get on board with that, and engage with them as partners. They’re not going away. Even if the treaty was abolished, Ngai Tahu would still wield influence and power. If you are concerned about Kai Tahu influence then start supporting the parts of the iwi that are allied with your values system, in the same way that you might with pakeha society.
“They do exercise authority over others through this ‘working alongside’. How can you not see that? Why are so many people turning a blind eye to these realities?”
Please give me some examples of how Ngai Tahu has authority. I’m not sure if we are talking about the same thing.
In general, it’s not that I don’t see Ngai Tahu’s influence. It’s that I see it and think it is legitimate. (this doesn’t mean I agree with everything they do btw, but then I don’t agree with everything that councils or central govt do either).
“At the most superficial level Ngai Tahu are involved in the rebuild because the local authorities recognise them as treaty partners. ”
It’s likely that there are politics involved that I am largely unaware of. I think this is another case of Pakeha wanting to run society in a certain way and then getting upset when Maori get on board with that. I’m sure that Ngai Tahu are quite capable of playing the power game at that level as anyone else, and there may be things to be concerned about. But the thing that jumps out at me, again and again, is that Pakeha attempt to engage in debate about this without knowing even the basics of what is going on. We have to educate ourselves and the only way to do that is to learn from Maori. It’s up to us though.
weka, I don’t disagree with a lot of what you say there. Fyi, interests take me to direct dealings with Ngai Tahu. I have experience with this authority thing and with being subject to an unelected cabal. I suggest that two separate things are being confused again – firstly, the Treaty with all its warts etc and honouring that; and secondly, the settings required for people to live contendly in these lands in the future. Those two things are entirely different but there is an assumption that one equals the other.
I am also well aware of their current ascendancy, and that is fine. Rather locals than some foreign entity who doesn’t give a hoot.
All I can do is repeat the original point which is that being subject to an unelected authority of any sort is inherently wrong and inconsistent with representative democracy. It will lead to failure. It ignores the reasons for that democracy developing and what it was trying to escape. Ignores it. Bit like Key sticking his head in the prophylactic and pretending it doesn’t exist.
The fact that this unelected authority is also based on race and birthright simply makes that situation worse again.
It is about the future. The Treaty has clear limits in what it can offer to that future.
All I can do is repeat the original point which is that being subject to an unelected authority of any sort is inherently wrong and inconsistent with representative democracy. It will lead to failure. It ignores the reasons for that democracy developing and what it was trying to escape. Ignores it.
I don’t consider Ngai Tahu to be an undemocratic body. They are treaty partners, and are operating within the dominant culture’s values that you espouse. I think you just don’t like sharing power. I also think that there is probably little useful discussion to be had if you view NT as an ‘unelected cabal’, when patently they hold elections, and they’re not a secret political faction. That you view them as that will always limit your capacity to move into a positive future with them.
btw, Maori (and many other cultures in the world) managed themselves successfully without democracy. Let us at least be honest that when you talk about the reasons for democracy and what it was trying to escape, you are talking about a specific set of cultures at a specific time in history, not a universality for all humans.
Weka, in the context I am talking about, namely being subject to another authority, it is absolutely not electable. Non-members of Ngai Tahu do not get to vote so there is no accountability and no democracy. Your suggestion is like suggesting that peerage in the House of Lords is democratic. It’s nothing of the sort. I think that, like many others, the straws are being clutched at to decipher support for a predetermined position.
And I also understand that many most cultures have managed quite well without democracy. But that is the framework we currently sit under. If we want to asssess another framework then that is another separate question.
Our current framework includes Te Tiriti. As such it includes the system we inherited from the British and it includes the systems we inherited from te ao Maori. You seem to want to remove only one side.
If we honour the treaty, then Maori are entitled to govern themselves alongside the Crown. If that had happened in the 1800s I don’t know what our society would look like today (interesting thought experiment). But instead we have a system that has evolved that tries to redress some of the wrongs, including the fact that NT have been denied access to their resources for all that time. I disagree with RL that the redress is about handing back all resources and letting NT govern. I think it’s about sharing equitably.
One way of doing that (instead of giving back stolen land) is for Ngai Tahu to be involved at levels where decisions are made about management of collective resources. In terms of Chch, you have the CCC and Ngai Tahu (let’s leave CERA out of it for now). Residents of Chch elect CCC, members of Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu elect their representatives. They then work in partnership. Maori get two votes I guess, but given how the odds have been stacked against them, and still are, I personally don’t have a problem with that. We’re not talking about equal slices of the pie, we’re talking about who needs nutrients and who is overfed. It’s about what is fair, and what is necessary.
At some point in the future, that will no doubt change. Maybe we end up with truly equal partnership. But in the meantime, what’s the problem?
As far as I can tell, you just want the treaty to be gone. This means that you don’t believe that Maori and non- Maori should be in partnership, and that means that Maori will be expected to assimilate into the dominant culture (they can keep their cultural pretties, but they are not allowed power).
I don’t think the House of Lords comparison is valid. You’re just trying to point out that whakapapa is exclusive*. But what you are missing is that (a) we have two, valid systems side by side, and (b) there are useful things in terms of governance about the tribal system that we would lose if it was rendered invalid.
*and it is only exclusive if you don’t belong to a tribal society that shares resources in that way.
I’m curious, what are your thoughts about the Tuhoe settlement?
Sorry weka, aint got much time for a decent answer (you weren’t the weka caught running off with one of my mates chook eggs the other day per chance?)
The model you outline imo is not sustainable. The reason is the very first one outlined. It is unelected (by the majority of people on one side only). It is based on birthright and race. These things cause resentment. Resentment leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred and then it is all over.
Look, I understand completely the Treaty concepts etc and how it foresaw partnership in the maori version etc etc. That has all been well and truly debated etc. And that is what is being attended to now – those rights and wrongs.
But my view stems from a base concpt of fairness and equality. Such a system as you propose fails thoses tests and will not stand the test of time, imo. It sets up divisions within society. It sets up resentment. It means some are in a position to lord it over others who have no control over the lorders. It has a faulty foundation. History has generally shown this to be the case and I cannot understand why so many are hell bent on going down the same pathway again.
There are surely problems in meshing the Treaty with equality but that is no reason to give in. There will be a solution. Time will probably the provider of that solution.
“you weren’t the weka caught running off with one of my mates chook eggs the other day per chance?”
I couldn’t possibly say ;-p
I disagree about the resentment and the anger. We watched that when the first settlements were being negotiated and settled. IMO most of that shifted over time, largely due to Pakeha becoming more informed about what the actual issues are. So, we already know that we can not only survive resentment and anger but that we can move on to something more constructive.
Secondly, much of the resentment and anger that people feel is misplaced IMO. It comes from people who are increasingly disenfranchised from their own culture. And it gets misdirected and fed by the MSM and evil bastards like Ansell using the tools of the mainstream to bash Maori. Both those things (loss of value within one’s own culture, and the acceptance of targeting Maori unfairly and unjustly) are things that we are going to have to resist and change anyway.
The other thing to consider is that within the next couple of generations, Pakeha will be outnumbered by non-Pakeha, Polynesians in particular (Maori, Pacifica). What do you think will happen to their anger at that point if we spend the next 50 years trying to subsume them into the dominant culture?
“But my view stems from a base concpt of fairness and equality”
I disagree. I think you have some abstract ideas about those things from within your own cultural ideas, but they don’t work in the world we live in because they don’t extend to Maori. I might be wrong, so please do tell me how you see the place of Maori in NZ in the future if things were to go the way you suggest (in a later conversation if you don’t get back to it today).
Which is my assertion too. Logically Nga Tahu are the owners and sovereign of the entire South Is and should be making ALL the decisions about it. Why should they be sharing their property and authority with anyone?
Either it is their land or it is not? Or are we talking about something less cut and dried? ‘Owned’ and ‘not owned’ at the same time?
answer straight – are you being ironic or sarcastic or do you believe it? The reason I ask is that this view of yours seems different from your previous views that I have read and I’ve been treating the repeated sentence that way so far.
No I’ve changed my mind. Like it or not the ToW is quite clear, that the iwi chief’s never ceded tino rangatiratanga. This is reinforced by the fact that the Maori version of the Treaty takes precedence. All this you know because you have been telling us this for years.
So like it or not we now have to take this position to its proper conclusion and determine that the iwi chiefs are indeed the proper owners and sovereigns in this land.
A conclusion that of course has more than a few logical consequences. Ones that are worth exploring I would have thought.
I’m interested in your thoughts on the way forward.
One area that is interesting is that traditionally during times of conflict Māori would work together under iwi or waka groupings and within those groupings the mana of each rangatira was maintained. That same principle could build a pan-Māori grouping focused on the Māori Nation. It is a tough issue for Māoridom in some ways – ensuring mana is maintained and strengthened for all.
Well one way forward is to abolish the illegitimate Crown entity, disestablish New Zealand as a country and return to each iwi it’s legitimate territory that can be governed by the chiefs as their own nation. This is the solution supported by a simple and direct reading to the Treaty, made worse because the white settler government in their hubris and rush to exploit the country, failed to do their paperwork properly … and never established a written Constitution to cover their arses.
By tradition Maori have been proven to be generous hosts so I’m assuming that if any non-Maori are happy to pay a proper rent then they will be welcome to stay.
And if you think I’m being silly here, then what for example is the Maori view on Tuhoe having regained effective sovereignty over their land? I have to guess that most other iwi will unwilling to settle for less themselves?
But I’m guessing that there would be some practical difficulties with such an arrangement. Certainly I’d not be personally offering to explain the new regime to Federated Farmers.
Any alternate path is going to involve an ongoing tension between two competing/parallel sovereigns with two differing world views. Either that is a process that slowly converges over time … or not.
I don’t believe that Pakeha have to give away their sovereignty. Am happy to look at what the Crown is and whether it’s still useful. And the idea of devolving to regional autonomy appeals, we should be doing this anyway with the coming of peak oil and CC.
“This is their land after all.” Which is my assertion too. Logically Nga Tahu are the owners and sovereign of the entire South Is and should be making ALL the decisions about it. Why should they be sharing their property and authority with anyone? Either it is their land or it is not? Or are we talking about something less cut and dried? ‘Owned’ and ‘notowned’ at the same time?
It’s the latter IMO. Kai Tahu sold some land. Some was stolen. Some falls inbetween. The British forced Maori into a form of land ownership that meant that individuals could sell land, instead of that being an iwi/hapu decision. Other iwi existed here as well as Kai Tahu. Lots of complexities.
Afaik Kai Tahu like other Maori were pragmatic, they could see that the British weren’t going to go away. They could see there were benefits to having the British here. And benefits to having a treaty.
When I said the land is theirs, I meant they belong to the land and have that historical relationship around things like mana whenua, ahi kaa, kaitiaki. I didn’t mean they are the legal owners under Pakeha law, although obviously they do own some land in that sense. The big difficulty in these conversations is the word ‘own’.
To what extent the Ngai Tahu settlement was fair and reasonable, I don’t know. I know that they lost land in the 1800s that was rightfully theirs to live on, manage, be a part of, and that has never really been addressed. I also think they made very smart decisions around the settlement in terms of accessing resources within the Pakeha world that would allow them to move on. I don’t consider the settlement to be an end point, it’s a starting point.
So, “Either it is their land or it is not? ” is the wrong question.
VTO – The questions you ask are too difficult for most to wrap their head around, it simply implies regardless of which “ethnicity” people identify with, they are being ruled over, and have little to no control or say in it!
WTF is “The Crown” anyway – Good luck finding the way to the bottom of that lie.
We are all being ruled over by entities which are used to keep control of power over resources, whatever those resources might be.
Democracy does not exist, we see evidence of it on a daily basis.
Why not just add all religions/political ideals in, you want equality after all.
The heading should be “Anarchy in NZ”, sign the petition and say “Get F*cked too every one elses opinion.”
Out of curiosity, how could the treaty be made null and void? Is there international law that protects it? National law? I’m guessing that trying to eliminate the treaty would be extremely difficult.
Out of curiosity, how could the treaty be made null and void?
By discussion and writing of a constitution that replaced Te Tiriti. Such a constitution would have to have the removal of multiple sovereignties as it’s absolute minimum with sovereignty then being held by the people of NZ/Aotearoa rather than “the Crown” or other artificial entity.
Griff, I’ll believe that you bigots really believe in one law for all when you start pushing for Banks to be kicked out of Parliament. Until then, if you don’t like living in a country which has Te Tiriti as its founding document and basis of legitimacy, feel free to leave. The society that you want is one of privilege, not comradeship.
Kate Sheppard fought for New Zealand women’s political and economic independence and thanks to her more than five generations of women have now been able to influence decision-making through their vote.
There are things that we have achieved that I think would make her smile, like Marriage property laws, Equal Pay laws, the election of the first woman, Elizabeth McCoombs to Parliament and many more including Mabel Howard as the first female cabinet minister, and our female Prime Ministers Jenny Shipley and Helen Clark.
But there are some things that I think would make her frown. What would she think about female accountants being paid 30% less on average than their male counterparts in 2012? Or about the National Council of Women, which she founded, supporting the removal of working women’s rights in the first 90 days of employment? What would she think about the fact just 6% of private company boards having female directors; or that just 32.5% of our House of Representatives are female, when women make up 51% of the population?
Governor Lord Glasgow signed a new Electoral Act into law, making New Zealand the first self-governing country in the world to grant all women the right to vote in parliamentary elections. more…
This was followed by legislation in 1919 enabling women to stand for Parliament. Elizabeth McCombs was the first woman elected as a member of Parliament in 1933.
Also, has anyone pointed out that there’s more to fighting for “equality” than bashing the Treaty?
Your post makes no mention of actual equality issues: No mention of equal pay for women, or equal right for ALL parents regardless of work status, or equal rights for LGBT citizens.
Sounds to me like your petition is all about abdicating treaty responsibilities and absolutely nothing about equality.
Ben. Presumably your reply is to Griff. Use the ‘reply’ button beneath his post or use his name so there is no confusion. I agree with your comment by the way.
Exactly Ben. That petition and their review is all about removing any remaining limits to rich white privilege. At a point in history when Maori might be gracious enough to save state assets for all of us, I am deeply disturbed that some here, on a “left” which has spectacularly failed to do this, are turning against Te Tiriti. When Brownlee removes democracy from Canterbury and “lefties” see Ngai Tahu as the problem, something is very, very wrong.
So key is doing gagagags as well as the fake hui and it’s all for the court case to come.
“Prime Minister John Key says a decision by some Tainui iwi to boycott the Government’s water consultation hui strengthens the Government’s legal position should the matter end up in court.”
“On his way into caucus at Parliament this morning he was asked about the unity around the water issue at the national hui last week called by King Tuheitia.
He suggested that from the media reports he had seen there wasn’t unity.
“There are kind of more positions than Lady Gaga’s got outfits.”
Deliberate and it will fail, as I have said on my post
His deliberate ignorance is not an advantage it is a weakness and the more he speaks, the more that weakness is revealed. He thinks he is smarter than he really is – but he isn’t.
“On behalf of the 1200 who attended the hui called by the King last week to discuss Maori water rights and voted unanimously to ask the government to put a halt to its asset sales programme, and on behalf of the tens of thousands of Maori who have already expressed their opposition to the government’s asset sales programme, I wish to thank the people of Tainui for their refusal to buy into National’s ‘consultation’ proposals” said MANA leader and MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Hone Harawira.
…
“Yesterday the Prime Minister stated his government’s position” said Harawira. “They will not consult with Maori; they are simply calling hui so that when this case goes to court they can say they ‘acted in good faith’”.
“Furthermore, government is only meeting with those iwi leaders whose people hold mana whenua across those waterways critical to the government’s asset sales programme. Tainui’s response has been clear and admirable – no consultation, no deal – a position MANA wholeheartedly supports”.
“The clear challenge now lays with those iwi leaders from Tuwharetoa and Te Arawa”.
It made my day, Ianmac, when I read it a few hours ago, but did not have time then to provide a link here. So thanks for doing so, and highly recommend it to others here.
So the Government’s proposed “Public Protection Orders” legislation has finally been rolled out. In a nutshell, it will permit prison authorities to go to the High Court and seek an order that because “there is a very high risk of imminent serious sexual or violent offending by the respondent”, an individual should be detained indefinately in accommodation on prison grounds.
This is targeting sexual offenders, in response to some over-heated lynch-mob mentality. But, the legislation doesn’t seem to be limited to the nastiest of sexual offenders, but to anyone deemed “dangerous” and who might re-offend, even though the evidence shows it’s impossible to predict exactly who will re-offend.
First of all, the proposed legislation won’t just target “dangerous prisoners” who are soon to be released from prison. Under clause 7(1)(b)(i), it also will apply to a “person [who] is subject to an extended supervision order andis, or has been, subject to a condition of full-time accompaniment and monitoring”. That is, individuals who presently are out in the community under a watchful eye can get yanked back behind prison walls because they are considered too dangerous to be out there in public … even though they’ve actually been living in the community without doing any harm (otherwise they’d already be back in jail for doing so).
I’ve long been very leery of this lynch-mob mentality around sex offenders. Sure few will waste much in the way of sympathy for them.
But somehow their crimes are being magnified beyond all rationality .. they’ve become the new ‘devil incarnates’ in a secular world otherwise bereft of demons.
Purpose ?, it’s a reflection of divorce from society because of fear, lock your doors etc.
If their is a purpose it can only be the criminals’, which is why there is fear.
And that is not justice.
Its extremely suspicious. One step away from preventative incarceration for ‘pre-crime’. Very Judge Dredd / AD 2000 / Minority Report.
In the US indefinite detention without trial or charge is now a distinct legal possibility, as long as you are deemed to pose some kind of threat to national security. Which does not have to be defined or justified publically – due to the threat to national security doing so may entail. See how it works.
More specifically in the NZ case, there is no mention of additional counselling, resources or support for these sex offenders. Just chuck them back in prison if you decide you don’t like the looks of them. It’s atrocious.
According to the Canadian Government the final cost of Prince Charles and Camilla’s (The Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II) three-day visit to Canada in May was NZD 1.25 million, not including security. The Canadian Royal Mounted Police will not reveal the total security expenditure as (Request # A-2012-03344) is only disclosed in part. Security is about 1.5 times of taxpayers funding for motorcades, hotel expenses and meals etc for the entourage and the royal toadies. So the cost of Prince Charles and his wife’s pompous six day visit to New Zealand in November will be about $3.75 million, that is 1 and a quarter million cups of tea with John Banks, 5 and a half million tampon fantasies Charles can have about Camilla, 195 hip replacements or 94 (total hospital and surgeon costs) of Bypass Surgery. The list goes on. And to think in a country like ours, 270,000 deprived New Zealand children.
Nothing from Labour about the welfare legislation.
However, shad/cab* social development spokesperson, Jacinda Ardern described National’s “reforms” as announced on Monday, as an overstatement.
Apparently Bennett has been making a big fuss about what turns out to be not much at all. Nothing “bashing” about them apparently. Not unjust, demonising, undermining, humiliating, demoralising, discriminatory, dehumanising, creating greater poverty, inequality and human misery. No sireee, National are in fact making a big fat fuss about sweet f. a.
“Once again we have Paula Bennett talking up what she says is the most comprehensive reform of the welfare system in decades.
“Once again today’s ‘news’ isn’t news, but regurgitates a raft of previously announced measures that, in real terms, will change little for those trying to find work.
Glad you get it Jacinda.
Just remember the first rule of breakfast club!
*Love the way this sounds just like cab-sav. Fitting really, though I understand Pinot Gris is more fashionable atm
A new study by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has found that over the past 65 years, tax cuts for the rich have not led to economic growth and instead are linked to greater income inequality in the United States.
The study found that cutting taxes for the rich does not increase saving, investment, or productivity growth. “The top tax rates appear to have little or no relation to the size of the economic pie,” the study said.
Things is, I’m pretty sure that the Tories already knew this but keep saying that tax cuts increase growth just so as to justify the tax cuts that they give out which predominately favour the rich.
POAL is trying on theft by managment.
by some mysterious process known only to themselves the mangement of POAL have decided that they have a right to acquire the property of the community.
It is time the Auckland City Council fired the lot of them and hired some people who are comitted to public service and broadening the asset base for all and not just the greedy little bastards who have wormed their way into the executive suite.
I woke up hearing a chuckle this morning – it was the ghost past of Rob Muldoon.
When Labour, Greens and Winston parties all want to take control of the Reserve Bank and manipulate it to reduce the exchange rate I am sure he laughed.
Muldoon would have to chuckle to see that his policy was being copied.
The thing about being the only good boy in school is that everyone else rips you off, steals your lunch money, and forces you to do their homework.
Sometimes you need to break the rules just to get along – especially if the rules are only theoretically sound and are a bit stupid in practise, anyway.
[lprent: Removed the troll that answered you, and also your reply. ]
Muldoon would have to chuckle to see that his policy was being copied.
You must be mistaken. Muldoon never used an FTT on NZD forex transactions. Muldoon never used capital controls targetted solely at financial speculation.
BTW during Muldoon’s time families could buy a house and raise a family on one working class income. Pretty good eh.
And he could give a decent speech unlike John Key.
Yesterdays thoughts before parley-a-ment (is it Yesterday once more?)
Stretch forward, i say.
Big aroha to the female Labour MP Representing Christchurch and Education in the House yesterday. Go Lianne (no time to spell check)
Schools consolidation-children to travel further. cost of fuel. More Time
(just another Brick in The Wall)-maori immersion in particular.
freakin “Claytons consultation”.
“colour-coded name badges”- more rationaliZation
is Turei a-rising?
Shirley Boys! Rock On!
Rhys Darby selling-out
anyone see the “money is Bad” wee add on 3 between current events?
imo, religion-straw men. Prophets-real men (not necesarily their interpreters though Mitt)
xtsy-Rock On!
greivances? OBLIGATIONS!!
these commentators who like to “throw” the odd PhD in? Everyman (and Woman, and Child)
a well- meaning Man said to me the other day; Socialism is “thought control”.
Whatever! Neo-lib Capitalism is thought, behaviour and emotion control.
(despair for the psych/soc graduate Pushers) cos the Pusher-Man don’t care if you live, or if you die…
Cyber-Bullying? censorship inevitably. Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword; death by a 1000 cuts. Words cannot be taken back. (Read James, he was on to it. Maybe he too struggled with a big, immoderate mouth-Martyrdom)
Regretably, authoratative Judges may need to shut some of the social-networking Web Down
(poor ol’ Spidey. and he was such good fodder for the Media)
yet,
the god of this age blinds..
ol’ Bollard aye. ïn hindsight, could have done more to put lid on property market. oh well, false foundations of costly stones and straw etc.
assimilation and accommadation. remember the Premack Principle.
ol’ John (figjam) Key -fcuk im good; just ask me!
Évery Good and Perfect Gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the Heavenly Lights, who does not change like Shifting Shadows.-James, again.
(don’t hide your light under a bushel)
Joy, is the strength of Love
Peace, is the security of Love
Patience, is the endurance of Love
Kindness, is the conduct of Love
“Goodness”is the character of Love
Faithfulness, is the confidence of Love
Gentleness, is the nature of Love
Self-Control-the Victory of Love
(be gentle on self)
Yet,
‘what is truth?”, asked Pilate.
-off to watch the animal circus now ( i do declare! the Nat MP’s have been observed to be braying like donkeys-asses)
The Obama Administration does not deal directly with the armed opposition, but it has authorized a nonprofit organization, the Syrian Support Group (SSG), to fundraise for the FSA. The SSG is composed of Syrian exiles in the U.S. and Canada as well as a former NATO political officer.
Well done to the Labour and Green activists in Christchurch who got their banners displayed on a live cross, TV 3 tonight (6.20 ish). That was about a minute’s worth of free, positive publicity! (Please contact head office ASAP, they need you to show them how it’s done).
The Prime Minister is running the risk of losing all credibility in trying to protect Banks as everyone can see right through his disingenuous semantics. It seems inevitable that the Act “leader” cannot hide forever behind the slippery John Key, who is obviously losing patience and would rather that the whole damaging affair just went away. That will only happen when Banks is sent back down the river on the next cabbage boat…
PDF payslips.
My employer sends her payroll notification slips in PDF format as email attachments.
They are passworded. When you save them to your payroll file on your desktop, they remain passworded. Anyone out there know how to permanently unlock these things. Employer does not appear to be concerned. “Tuff” she says.
Thanks for the feedback.
Dv – Brilliant – problem partially solved. Still a hassle but good work-around – thanks!
DTB – the password is the employee number – just a pain having to locate it everytime you want to read it. You’d think that once opened on a private system that it would bypass the password screen hassle.
I don’t think Hekia gives a shit. She appears hell-bent on upsetting the complete teaching profession.
In the neoliberal polity, it makes no more sense for citizens to rally than in does for, say, users of Apple computers to hold a march. In both cases, their role is simply to consume, with the ballot box understood as an extension of the cash register. If the latest iPhone is a dud, buy an Android; if the Labor Party’s been in power too long, vote Liberal.
Because democracy is understood as a market, rallies, protests, demonstrations and strikes seem, to the neoliberal, not as expressions of the popular will but as outrageous assaults on the democratic system.
To be clear, we’re not seeing the end of the right to protest, so much as its hollowing out. In the neoliberal era, tightly-controlled top-down events are still considered legitimate – witness the staged spectacles at the recent Republican and Democratic conventions in the US.
IMO, protests are seen as a less legitimate way of raising awareness of issues than in previous decades. The question is: Is this a result of neo-liberalism or is it a result of some other change that is taking place?
Neoliberalism. I think of it in terms of personal greed having been elevated for 2 or 3 decades – politics is about what individual have to gain rather than the collective good.
And the consequent yuppification of the culture. Why bother with all that dirty, noisy, unseemly street protest when you can sign a petition or tweet support for/against an idea while sitting at home with a latte?
Does saying that John Banks is guilty also result in readers here getting banned for a month like Eddie did to tsmithfield? And I quote “the police don’t decide whether there was an offence or not. That’s for the courts. Ambrose has been found guilty of no offence. By saying he was you’re guilty of defamation. I won’t have our website legally exposed like that. Take a month ban. Eddie”
[lprent: see my later note. Saying a politician is guilty before the courts has said they are, stated as fact, will usually earn a warning if we see it. Saying a non politician is will earn a ban. There is a public interest argument difference. Perhaps you should look at the legalities that limit the moderation rather than mindlessly jerking off. ]
Bob, the difference between the two cases is simple.
Ambrose was very open and forthcoming about what he did. He never claimed he could not recall. He gave many media interviews and explained his actions, in detail. He did not run and hide, nor did he refuse to allow his statements to be published. Quite simply, he knew he had done nothing wrong, so he was very happy to say so.
Whereas Banks knows perfectly well that he did wrong, both legally and ethically. He is the opposite of Ambrose. The innocent man wants to talk about it – to proclaim his innocence. The guilty man doesn’t want to talk about it. Banks steadfastly refuses to answer media questions. We all know why.
But only one of the two men was publicly pronounced “guilty” by the Prime Minister, and it’s not John Banks.
So Bob, the question for you is – whose ethics and principles are more important? Some guy on a blog, or the leader of our country? Would you like John Key’s e-mail address?
[lprent: Ambrose is also not a poliician. Whereas Banks was one both when the event was done and now. It is in the public interest for the public to scrutinize and speculate on one more closely than the other. The courts have established this particularly clearly in Lange va Atkinson. ]
My point is the hypocrisy around innocent until proven guilty, either you believe in the premis or you don’t. As I have pointed out, the likes of Eddie only seem to believe in it when it suits his/her agenda, happy to use it as a reason to ban people against his/her stance, but turning a blind eye when the comments fit their stance (below (25) are examples I was supposed to reply to Flock with).
Does refusing to answer questions by the media automatically lead to a presumption of guilt in your books? By that reakoning David Bain is guilty, cos the Police said so, and he didn’t directly answer media requests saying otherwise (obviously this is not the case as shown by the privy council).
[lprent: An interesting but quite inaccurate view. You just haven’t thought it through looking at the sites liability.
The actual test I tend to use is somewhat more sophisticated than that and is based more around the actual legal limits we operate under rather than your somewhat arbitrary standards. Eddie and other moderators use roughly the same tests.
1. Is the case in front of a court? We severely limit speculation then.
2. Are people making an assertion of fact rather than speculating or expressing an opinion. Is that clear? Is the fact established?
3. Are they a politician? There the limits are much more relaxed due to Lange vs Atkinson and arguments based on public interests (which has a somewhat more limited legal meaning than selling tabloids)
4. Are they a minor or incapacitated intellectually. We will operate to defend them because they are less able to defend themselves.
There are several other factors – but those are the most prevelant. Plus we are volunteers and moderating gets done when we have time.
So saying that the police think there is enough to charge on is a fact if they have put it in a statement or a report. Saying that you think they should charge or not is an opinion. Saying someone is a criminal or guilty is not allowed as that is something that must be done by a court. Saying that you think the court got it wrong or right is an opinion. Neither Ambrose nor Bain are politicians so we severely limit what is said about them compared to Banks. Etc etc…
The language about how something is expressed is crucial, and simple minded assertions of fact without the qualifiers (like “I think”) establishing a statement as an opinion (which I find is a characteristic of some people who think they are always right) are the most dangerous to the site.
As far as we are concerned the law is our usual limit because it is where society specifies where the limits are. It is also where the site carries the can for the comments of others. We expect commentators to follow the legal limits of NZ and we expect them to know where they are. We will moderate or ban mostly on the threat to the site posed by the commentators behaviour.
We usually warn rather than ban unless people persist. But for example stating as fact about guilt on a non politician when the case is in front of a court will almost certainly earn someone an immediate ban for extreme stupidity. Idiots doing comments like that are a danger to the site.
But in practice, Eddie seldom moderates outside his own posts and he mostly does so to prevent people from thread jacking away from his topic or misrepresenting what he has said. It is usually myself, Anthony, Irish, or RL who will moderate on legal dangers to the site. ]
Mike
“Also that the PM has a damn duty to the public to read a fricken police report that says his minister lied to us and (apparently) him about breaking the law”
Carol (via tweets she has read)
“Does Key dread Aaron Gilmore coming back on Nat list so much he has to support a corrupt Minister”
Lanthanide
“John Key continues to back John Banks, despite the police report showing that John Banks broke the law and then lied about it”. and again “It’s worth noting here that the specifics around Banks leaving parliament were around him being convicted for a crime that had a possible sentence of at least 2 years in jail, even if the punished he received was no jail term or less than 2 years. Banks is lucky that there’s a (stupid) 6 month limit on bringing charges for the law he broke, so managed to wiggle out of that tangle.”
Mike (again)
“Because while forensic analysis is not his job what is his job is to consider and act on evidence that his minister is a corrupt liar. I’m sure Key already knew that and has no problem with it, but the thing is that Banks got caught”
[lprent: In each comment it was about politicians with the public interest issue. Most of these express opinion (corrupt for instance is a description not a legalism in NZ), or refer only to established facts in the police report, or are speculations about what-ifs. You clearly lack a good assessment on what is required for moderation. Read my note on 24.2.1
There are a couple there that would have gotten a warning if it’d been in front of a court. But it isn’t. Similarly if it wasn’t politicians. ]
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder.In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére SosouMarket gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...
Buzz from the Beehive Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ...
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...
Eric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...
Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Two-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...
In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...
A factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...
“You talking about me?”The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...
Roger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...
Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...
Introduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...
Abstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...
Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
The Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...
Paul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nzDear Hera,May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...
“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...
While Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view.The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell.First published in 2022.The high school’s head girl and ...
Australian and New Zealand volunteers fought together in the Waikato War, yet still its place in the Anzac tradition is unacknowledged by our defence forces or Returned Services Association.First published in 2018.When I was a boy cub I attended Anzac Day services in the South Auckland suburb of ...
A poem by Wellington writer Tayi Tibble.Hoki Mai She kisses him goodbye with her eyes still wet and alight from their last swim in the Awatere river. At the train station celebration, she leads the Kapa Haka but her voice keeps breaking under and over itself like waves. ...
A poem from Bill Manhire’s 2017 book of verse Some Things to Place in a Coffin.My World War I Poem Inside each trench, the sound of prayer. Inside each prayer, the sound of digging. Image courtesy of Auckland War Memorial Museum. ...
There are three books I have wolfed down in one sitting over the last two years. Colleen Maria Lenihan’s gorgeous and sad debut Kōhine, Noelle McCarthy’s memoir Grand about becoming her mother and then unbecoming her, and now Hine Toa, a staunch yet gentle self-portrait by living legend Ngāhuia te ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Asia Pacific Report Students and activist staff at Australia’s University of Sydney (USyd) have set up a Gaza solidarity encampment in support of Palestinians and similar student-led protests in the United States. The camp was pitched as mass graves, crippled hospitals, thousands of civilian deaths and the near-total destruction of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James B. Dorey, Lecturer in Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong Australian teddy bear bees are cute and fluffy, but get a look at that massive (unbarbed) stinger! James Dorey Photography Most of us have been stung by a bee and we ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jen Roberts, Senior Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong Aussie~mobs/FlickrVictor Farr, a private in the 1st Infantry Battalion, was among the first to land at Anzac Cove just before dawn on April 25 1915. Victor Farr ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Gregory Moore I had the good fortune to care for the sugar gum at The University of Melbourne’s Burnley Gardens in Victoria where I worked for ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Ong ViforJ, ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University Just when we think the price of rentals could not get any worse, this week’s Rental Affordability Snapshot by Anglicare has revealed low-income Australians are facing a housing crisis like ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918.Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tracey Holmes, Professorial Fellow in Sport, University of Canberra When the news broke last weekend that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive to a banned drug in early 2021 and were allowed to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games six months later ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cally Jetta, Senior Lecturer and Academic Lead; College for First Nations, University of Southern Queensland Australian War MemorialAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people, as well as sensitive historical information ...
RNZ News Melissa Lee has been ousted from New Zealand’s coalition cabinet and stripped of the Media portfolio, and Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues portfolio in a reshuffle. Climate Change and Revenue Minister Simon Watts will take Lee’s spot in cabinet. Simmonds was a minister outside of cabinet. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University laurello/Shutterstock Some reports and popular books, such as Bill Gammage’s Biggest Estate on Earth, have argued that extensive areas of Australia’s forests were kept open through frequent burning by ...
Analysis - Christopher Luxon framing the demotion of two ministers as the portfolios getting "too complex" is a charitable way of saying they weren't up to the job. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With Jim Chalmers’s third budget on May 14, Australians will be looking for some more cost-of-living relief – beyond the tax cuts – although they have been warned extra measures will be modest. As ...
Analysis: Melissa Lee has lost the media portfolio and her spot in Cabinet after multiple failed attempts to find solutions for a media industry in crisis. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister announced Lee would be losing her spot in Cabinet along with her media and communications ministerial portfolio. The job ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Wilmot, Senior Lecturer, Film, Deakin University Among the many Australian who served during the second world war, there is a small group of people whose stories remain largely untold. These are the Muslim men and women who, while small in number, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathy Gibbs, Program Director for the Bachelor of Education, Griffith University zEdward_Indy/Shutterstock Around one in 20 people has attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It’s one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and often continues into adulthood. ADHD is diagnosed ...
The Fairer Future coalition of anti-poverty groups say Whaikaha must be properly funded going forward, and that to argue that poor financial management of the new Ministry is a red herring by the Prime Minister. ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is today congratulating Hon. Paul Goldsmith on his appointment as Minister for Media and Communications and urges him to rule out state intervention in the private media sector. ...
Asia Pacific Report The West Papuan resistance OPM leader has condemned Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden, accusing their countries of “six decades of treachery” over Papuan independence. The open letter was released today by OPM chairman Jeffrey P Bomanak on the eve of ANZAC Day ...
Welcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits and quirks of New Zealanders at large. This week: writer and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2024, Lauren Groff.The book I wish I’d writtenIf I wish I’d written a ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Fechner, Research Fellow, Social Marketing, Griffith University mavo/Shutterstock Imagine having dinner at a restaurant. The menu offers plant-based meat alternatives made mostly from vegetables, mushrooms, legumes and wheat that mimic meat in taste, texture and smell. Despite being given that ...
“Three Strikes is a dead-end policy proposed by a dead-end government. The Three Strikes law ignores the causes of crime, instead just brutalising people already crushed by the cost of living.” ...
By Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist An Australian-born judge in Kiribati could well face deportation later this week after a tribunal ruling that he should be removed from his post. The tribunal’s report has just been tabled in the Kiribati Parliament and is due to be debated by MPs ...
With its clear mandate for police use, political nuances, and nuanced public trust, Denmark's insights provide valuable considerations for Australia and New Zealand. ...
Books editor Claire Mabey reviews poet Louise Wallace’s debut novel. A famous poet once said to me that he’s always suspicious when a poet publishes a novel. I never really understood why but maybe it’s something to do with cheating on your first form. Louise Wallace is a poet. She’s ...
For a few months at the turn of the millennium, TrueBliss burned bright as the biggest pop stars in the country. Alex Casey chats to two superfans who still hold the flame. During a humble backyard wedding in Nelson, 1999, one of the cordially invited guests had to excuse themselves ...
How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...
Despite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...
A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...
A leaked document shows the Canterbury/Waitaha arm of health agency Te Whatu Ora is scurrying to save $13.3 million by July. The “financial sustainability target”, which was “allocated” to Waitaha, is consistent with what’s happening in other districts, says Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. ...
A look at the state of the previous government’s affordable housing scheme, and what could come next.Remind me: What’s KiwiBuild again?First announced in 2012, KiwiBuild was a flagship policy of the Labour Party heading into both its 2014 and 2017 election campaigns. With Jacinda Ardern as prime minister, ...
Labour in opposition will be shocked to learn which party had six years in power but squandered any chance to make real change. Grant Robertson’s valedictory speech was a predictably entertaining trip down memory lane. The acid-tongued incoming Otago University chancellor administered a sick burn to the coalition government. He ...
Opinion: It has been announced that nine percent of roles at Oranga Tamariki will be disestablished, presumably to help fund the tax cuts promised by the coalition Government. I am reminded of the graphics used to illustrate pandemic events, where five thousand people are standing in a field and then ...
After more than two sleepless days, running through savage terrain, Greig Hamilton didn’t know if he was going to finish one of the most gruelling psychological assaults in sport. He was metres away from the finish line, a yellow gate made famous in a Netflix documentary; a race he’d dreamed ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The following interview with former Green Party MP Sue Kedgley came about because she features in the new memoir Hine Toa by activist Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku; the two knew each other at the University of Auckland in the early 70s, when they were both took on leadership roles in the ...
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is seen some as its ‘silicon shield’ against invasion – but how will overseas expansion affect that protection? The post The state of Taiwan’s silicon shield appeared first on Newsroom. ...
There’s relief for building owners bending under the weight of earthquake strengthening rules – and costs – that came into force seven years ago. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced a scheduled 2027 review of the earthquake-prone building regulations will now start this year. Owners will also get ...
COMMENTARY:By Murray Horton New Zealand needs to get tough with Israel. It’s not as if we haven’t done so before. When NZ authorities busted a Mossad operation in Auckland 20 years ago, the government didn’t say: “Oh well, Israel has the right to defend itself.” No, it arrested, prosecuted, ...
NEWSMAKERS:By Vijay Narayan, news director of FijiVillage Blessed to be part of the University of Fiji (UniFiji) faculty to continue to teach and mentor those who want to join our noble profession, and to stand for truth and justice for the people of the country. I was privileged to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Three weeks from now, some of us will be presented with a mountain of budget papers, and just about all of us will get to hear about them on radio, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dan Lowry, Ice Sheet & Climate Modeller, GNS Science Hugh Chittock/Antarctica New Zealand, CC BY-SA As the climate warms and Antarctica’s glaciers and ice sheets melt, the resulting rise in sea level has the potential to displace hundreds of millions of ...
I do hope that this pantomime of the two johns keeps on going. They are the joke that just keeps n on giving. I just need to listen to either of them with their rehearsed patter to start my day off with a really good laugh.They are hilarious.Surely they can’t POSSIBLY BELIEVE that the people of NZ are actually BELIEVING anything that comes out of their mouths.Smirk away key,you just look like an uneducated simpleton and your sidekick just looks like a sad little man.
Surely they can’t POSSIBLY BELIEVE that the people of NZ are actually BELIEVING anything that comes out of their mouths.
The crucial point is that the mayoral electoral expense thing is not fatal. (Unless of course Key is covering up for the possibility of him being involved with Dotcom as well … same electorate after all.)
What is fatal is that they are lying about it. If you cannot trust a person in a little matter you cannot trust them in larger ones. Sure we all spin, and creatively manipulate the truth in order to present the best possible face on matters … but there is a line.
Bald lies are over the line. Our PM is now a proven liar and NOTHING he now says has credibility. This is the fatal problem.
Spot on Red. Even the most ardent silver-spoon tory knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that it is utterly inconceivable that Key hasn’t read the report. They know with absolute certainty that he’s lying.
It’s BLIAR all over again. Two esteemed right-wing leaders caught red-handed and refusing to budge.
The difference this time is that they genuinely thought he was different. The golden messiah, blessed by God with money and a refreshing honesty. The anti-politician money-trader from heaven who would pave our driveways with gold.
Now a spoiled, stubborn brat, insisting to a stunned public that the dog ate his homework.
Tipping point. Now JOHNNY LIAR forever.
Totally agree Red. “Forgetting” the chopper ride tipped the balance on this one. I don’t expect MPs to be flawless, but I do expect them to be honest about their mistakes. Maybe it would help if fellow MPs, bloggers, the media and Joe Public were gracious enough to let them, instead of dragging up decade-old errors which, if dealt with properly in the past, need to be left there.
You can only leave their actions in the past if the person in question has changed their behaviour.
If justice is served people would leave them alone.
If they continue to live in denial then we have to keep them honest.
Agreed, Banks currently faces the music of his own making, and I wish he’d just front up. My qualifier was, that IF is stuff dealt with properly in the past, it needs to be left there. We don’t always see that happen, which is unfortunate. A lot of good people would find it difficult to get into politics cos whole research departments are set up to drag through their past.
“…but I do expect them to be honest about their mistakes.”
Banks’s actions were not “mistakes”. He consciously, deliberately, cynically broke the law, and he has continued to lie about it.
Agreed, my mistake 🙂
“If you cannot trust a person in a little matter…”
Repeatedly telling lies about massive financial donations is not “a little matter.”
I recently heard from someone who had travelled through Spain that there was a certain tension in the air – a sense of deep discontent.
And this morning I just read that more than 25% of the entire population of Catalonia took to the streets to demand independence. I’d call that major, no?
http://www.zcommunications.org/farewell-spain-catalan-independence-march-sends-shockwave-by-dick-nichols
There has been an ever present movement for independence from Spain in Catalonia. The difference now is the horrific mismanagement of the economy and financial crisis coming out of Madrid. We’re used to the sight of dictatorships in the developing world turning out soldiers to keep civil unrest under control. Chances are in the next year or three, the western world is going to find that it is still developing after all.
Another reason why Barca V Real Madrid matches are so tetchy (besides Madrid’s abrasive manager) as Real madrid represent royalty and playing the catalan giants is seen as freedom V being ruled over by many catalonians.
fascinating.
The Declaration of Equality
Target: 50000
Number of people who have signed: 17897
http://www.nzcpr.com/petition_EqualRights.php
We, New Zealanders, having founded our society in the equality of comradeship, and living here at home in the land we have made, utterly oppose any laws which establish or promote racial distinction or division.
There shall be one law for all:
We refuse to accept any reference to the Treaty of Waitangi or its principles in any constitutional document.
We require that such references be removed from all existing legislation.
We require that race-based Parliamentary seats be abolished.
We require that race-based representation on local bodies be abolished.
We require that the Waitangi Tribunal, which has outlived any usefulness it may have had, be abolished.
And we pledge ourselves to oppose and resist all those of whatever rank or degree who, whether by force or the devious processes of the law, attempt to impose the fetters of racial inequality on the free citizens of New Zealand.
The Declaration
The Government’s constitutional review provides an opportunity to usher in a new era of democracy for New Zealand based on equality under the law.
Help us create a movement for change by signing the DECLARATION OF EQUALITY and calling on others to do the same. Our initial target is 20,000 signatures, but we hope to build to 50,000, 100,000 and more. We will deliver the Declaration to Government Ministers in September next year to coincide with the report back from the Maori Party’s Constitutional Advisory Panel. We will keep you informed of progress…
my my you Act people do like rewriting the rules to suit your self interests.
I accidentally posted a reply to this comment in the wrong place, oops:
http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-19092012/comment-page-1/#comment-523072
Don’t know about your detail there griff but with you on the equality thing re increasing maori governance etc. Many early New Zealand settlers escaped birthright privilege and oppression in their homelands. They had experienced centuries of oppression and inequality and wanted to create a place where those evil strictures were absent.
Unfortunately those evil strictures are returning. In this mornings paper there was an article about one of the first new buildings being proposed in the Chch CBD. It requires consent from three commissioners – one from Cera, one from the Council and one from Ngai Tahu. What is the one from Ngai Tahu doing there? Are we subject to governance by unelected, race-based birthright privileged bastards as we were in our past? If so then they can get fucked. This system has no place in NZ.
If the treaty provides for these things then the treaty is an ass.
unelected
race-based
birthright privilege
New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day
sign the petition then
your views are the opposite of what this country needs
“unelected, race-based birthright privileged bastards ” = sad little vto
Yes marty. After all why should the Nga Tahu iwi have to kowtow to a couple of colonialist squatters types?
After all Nga Tahu are the legitimate owners of the entire South Is are they not?
Is that what the Waitangi Tribunal said red?
I understood that was what the Maori version of the ToW says. That the iwi chiefs never ceded any of their sovereignty over their lands, peoples and treasures. No if’s no buts.
For Nga Tahu I understood that is pretty much the whole South Is.
After all this is why no NZ govt will contemplate allowing a case to go to any International Court of any sort … because they know that the NZ Crown be shown to have no written legitimacy would lose the case.
Not sure what your point is red.
I believe in tino rangatiratanga so you already know what I think.
Why not just say what you want to say you know you want to say it.
So which entity do you believe is sovereign in this land?
I can work with an equal partnership between Māori and the Crown but that would need to be real not the imagined equality we have now. Until then the country is doomed because the foundations are crooked and built on inequality.
“I can work with an equal partnership between Māori and the Crown ”
Marty, I think most people understand how that comes about under the Treaty etc, and that is all well and good – under the cocoon of the Treaty with all its warts and limitations.
But what you imply in the quoted bit above is that you would expect all NZers to be subject to that joint partnership. This is exactly in line with my main point – New Zealanders are then subject to the authority of an unelected, race-based (or treaty-based, take your pick) birthright privilege. Do you not see that this strikes at the very heart of representative democracy? Do you understand how and why this system of democracy has come about and what it tried to escape and then achieve? If so, how does this fit inside your views? And, where it doesn’t fit inside your views, how would you attend to the distortions and their effects?
It’s a funny thing vto but the limitations of the Treaty all disadvantage Māori, not the other way round.
If some people move to a country and then impose their worldview on the people living there and they do it all because they are trying to create utopia or a better life for their children – they are wrong and illicit no matter how much they pray to their god.
When the people displaced, as described above, then assert their right to live their lives based on their beliefs and values, the people who have gained advantage from the imposed system argue that the assertion of those rights is detrimental to the established society. What they mean is that it affects, or more rightly potentially affects, their advantage.
That is what I believe vto.
I understand that and it makes sense within the circumstances of migration and colonisation. However, it doesn;t make sense in a bigger view, which is what I refer to – hence my point about representative democracy and its aims and settings. Your belief, I believe, is too small for today’s world and you are pushing that belief out into areas that it can’t operate in. Perhaps your belief needs expanding to accomodate other factors present in the human condition.
innit marty!
Yes I think vto and I agree that the military, economic and political dominance of the colonial settlers worked very much against the interests of the real owners of this country. No need to re-litigate all of that yet again right now.
What vto and I are thinking about is the future. You are supporting the idea of two equal sovereign entities in this country working in partnership. What I’m asking is for some details. Especially for how to proceed when the two parties do not agree.
For instance one sovereign right now thinks it can sell power stations and their rights to use water. The other sovereign thinks that it is the sole owner of those water rights. Spot the problem?
Would it not just be easier to have only one sovereign entity like every other nation on earth? And logically is that not the iwi’s?
Thanks vto but I’m pretty sure equality is a belief that encompasses a pretty wide area and is applicable today.
So your suggestion is sort out the current problems first.. That makes some sense. But the problem in going down this path is that in putting things equal, or right under the Treaty, it is beginning to create very large issues that will be problems when it comes to that future. For example, in putting things right under the treaty a co-governance approach is developing and that co-governance, by an unelected group, strikes right at the heart of the way the future should be developed i.e. equality for all.
The way in which the wrongs of the past are being attended to is creating wrongs for the future.
edit: oops, meant to be in reply to 11.14 comment below
But the problem in going down this path is that in putting things equal, or right under the Treaty, it is beginning to create very large issues that will be problems when it comes to that future.
It’s not beginning to create issues. The issues have been there all along. It’s just that Pakeha now have to come to grips with those issues. Maori have been carrying more than their fair share for the last century and a half.
For example, in putting things right under the treaty a co-governance approach is developing and that co-governance, by an unelected group, strikes right at the heart of the way the future should be developed i.e. equality for all.
Iwi are not unelected, please stop saying that. They might not be elected by you, but they are elected and have legitmate forms of governance.
I cannot see how we can have equality for all if Maori are expected to give up their sovereignty.
To get what you want we would have to turn NZ from being a single state to being many states and those states would be separated both through geography and race. NZ is far too small and interconnected to be able to do that.
Using knowledge of the past can help us with current and future issues. In fact i’ve just finished an essay on that topic but that was relating to reducing reoffending rates of Māori through re-enculturalisation.
Both of you are trying to run before we walk. Until we get equality we will have to fight the battles within the system and often those battle align with other inequalities.
Our imposed system chooses to believe it can have only one sovereign but we could change that really easily. Until then we get on with the job of challenging each and every inequality we come across. That is forward looking and that is working from what we have got not a hypothetic what if.
Ngai Tahu sold land in the 1800s, under British law.
The idea that Ngai Tahu own the South Island is a Pakeha idea.
Kai Tahu aren’t the only iwi in the South Island. Other iwi exist within the area sometimes considered as Kai Tahu’s.
Edit: that was in response to RedLogix,
“I understood that was what the Maori version of the ToW says. That the iwi chiefs never ceded any of their sovereignty over their lands, peoples and treasures. No if’s no buts.
For Nga Tahu I understood that is pretty much the whole South Is.
After all this is why no NZ govt will contemplate allowing a case to go to any International Court of any sort … because they know that the NZ Crown be shown to have no written legitimacy would lose the case.”
Three sentences there marty. Barren empty sentences. Nothing. But then again, you never outline reasons for any of your strange positions, you just shout an empty pithy slogan and attach some kiddy abuse.
my sentences were indeed pithy and I have not abused you. Your views are not the views with any future in this country – that’s all I’m saying.
Let me tell what this country does not need and that is race-based, unelected, birthright privilege.
We had it before and maori didn’t like it, yet here they are acting to restore it again. It is your views that are unwelcome in New Zealand marty. They have been proven unsustainable and oppressionary in the past. Why would you think that you are somehow different this time?
Your first sentence is a repeat of your original comment – umm I read it the first time.
Equality vto – it is as complicated and as simple as that.
That’s all you are “saying” mm ? What you are “showing” is pure grandiosity.
Yeah, we need different levels of citizenship in NZ. Where your rights are decided by whats in your blood and nothing else. We should have a sexy name for it though – how does apartheid sound?
“Many early New Zealand settlers escaped birthright privilege and oppression in their homelands. They had experienced centuries of oppression and inequality and wanted to create a place where those evil strictures were absent.”
A somewhat rosey view of colonials. The idea that the oppressed want to go somewhere else to live a better life free from oppression is contradicted by the reality once they get where they’re going, which is (apart from being tricked back into worse conditions for some) that they themselves became the oppressors. A common problem, of misunderstanding basic human motivations. For many people it’s not that they hate power, it’s just that they don’t have any. Wanting the gains of civilised society without taking the risks necessary to get them locates people within a specific psychological sphere. Early settlers may not have been informed enough to realise it, but failing to label reality doesn’t make reality any less true.
If you want to free people of oppression, I would have thought you would start with the greatest threat, which isn’t anything to do with Maori issues. At least you can understand the outrage that indigenous people feel.
Maori, circa 1840: I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
VTO, 2012: “I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
Fast forward to 2112.
And the millions of oppressed Chinese huddling under oppressive Indian colonial rule in “New Beijing” (aka New Zealand) … grumbling about how this place is “getting stinkier every day”.
clever RL (and Ut)
Not a bad assessment uturn. You’re right in that the colonial period is somewhat more complex. In a broad sense however, the point made stands – unelected, race-based birthright privilege has no place in New Zealand.
And this point of yours sums it up perfectly…
“Maori, circa 1840: I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!”
VTO, 2012: “I’m tired of this unelected, race-based, birthright privilege! New Zealand is getting stinkier by the day!””
say no more
Interesting thread. I just started reading Ask the Mountain chronicling the Taranaki land wars & Parihaka. I’m only a chapter in but I find it interesting that in the years leading up to the conflict the Maori on all accounts seem to have been consistently playing by Colonial rules up until the colonials themselves began the descent to conflict.
We converted them to christianity and then burnt their churches and bibles against everything we’d just taught them was holy. We barred them from New Plymouth unless they pledged allegiance to Queen Victoria and forsake their own culture, so they tolled the roads around the coast.
From the very outset Maori have shown that they can best colonialism at it’s own games. We have set the rules through crown law and capitalist structures, yet now we thumb our nose at a people who, through a system imposed, have a legal right to challenge government and are.
Change our capitalist structures is a better answer, because the Maori have shown time and time again that they are happy to work within the system. And that system is ,last time I checked, a colony of the Monarch who is an unelected, race-based birthright privilege.
Although that is what happened I also think it was more a case of them putting in place structures that they were familiar with.
And what is, in your opinion, this greatest threat?
“Are we subject to governance by unelected, ”
VTO, Ngai Tahu do run their society by elections. And you are not subject to governance by Kai Tahu. You are subject to governance by authorities who are expected to work alongside local iwi, as laid out by those authorities. The Crown signed the treaty remember. Would you like to undo the Crown’s authority to do that?
“It requires consent from three commissioners – one from Cera, one from the Council and one from Ngai Tahu. What is the one from Ngai Tahu doing there?”
Why don’t you do some actual research and come back and tell us why, specifically? There is an answer, but you’re avoiding that so that you can just play the race card.
CERA, CCC, Ngai Tahu…. that you consider Ngai Tahu to be the one that is undermining your sovereignty speaks volumes.
that you consider Ngai Tahu to be the one that is undermining your sovereignty speaks volumes.
OK weka … exactly who do you regard as YOUR sovereign?
That’s an interesting question Red. I will have to think about it. My first thoughts are that there are different kinds of sovereignty. There’s an obvious legal one to do with the crown and the queen, but I have other allegiances as well.
I think this is a very important conversation to be having.
weka, I actually don’t know the answer as to why Ngai Tahu are there, perhaps you could explain. All I know is that they are making governing decisions on the rebuilding of Chch.
As for the rest of the hair-splitting, well the wig remains intact in spite of it. You claim they have elections and do not exercise authority over others, but that is clearly not the case. They do exercise authority over others through this ‘working alongside’. How can you not see that? Why are so many people turning a blind eye to these realities?
vto, if I lived in Chch I would certainly want to understand why Ngai Tahu is involved in that way, and I think it works better if you treat the question as non-rhetorical. I think it is up to you to find that out though, given the issue is yours (I don’t even know what building you are talking about, this is not my issue). I think if you engaged with that finding out, and with Ngai Tahu in an open way, you might find that interesting. Why not phone them up, or go visit them, and ask?
At the most superficial level Ngai Tahu are involved in the rebuild because the local authorities recognise them as treaty partners. What that means in legal, ethical, social terms I don’t know, but I think the process of finding out is a crucial one for pakeha at this time. That we don’t know is to our discredit.
I’m not hairsplitting. I’m teasing out detail that enables us to understand and think in more complex ways about a very complex situation. There are all sorts of people who have influence in the Chch rebuild, lots of them most definitely not elected. The crux of this is about how we share power, and who gets power and who doesn’t. Kai Tahu are one of the big players, and legitimately IMO. This is their land after all.
I will say this, Kai Tahu are on the ascendant. They are becoming a force to be reckoned with. They are getting very good at playing pakeha at their own game, as well as solidifying their own culture. Best that we get on board with that, and engage with them as partners. They’re not going away. Even if the treaty was abolished, Ngai Tahu would still wield influence and power. If you are concerned about Kai Tahu influence then start supporting the parts of the iwi that are allied with your values system, in the same way that you might with pakeha society.
“They do exercise authority over others through this ‘working alongside’. How can you not see that? Why are so many people turning a blind eye to these realities?”
Please give me some examples of how Ngai Tahu has authority. I’m not sure if we are talking about the same thing.
In general, it’s not that I don’t see Ngai Tahu’s influence. It’s that I see it and think it is legitimate. (this doesn’t mean I agree with everything they do btw, but then I don’t agree with everything that councils or central govt do either).
Wanted to add…
“At the most superficial level Ngai Tahu are involved in the rebuild because the local authorities recognise them as treaty partners. ”
It’s likely that there are politics involved that I am largely unaware of. I think this is another case of Pakeha wanting to run society in a certain way and then getting upset when Maori get on board with that. I’m sure that Ngai Tahu are quite capable of playing the power game at that level as anyone else, and there may be things to be concerned about. But the thing that jumps out at me, again and again, is that Pakeha attempt to engage in debate about this without knowing even the basics of what is going on. We have to educate ourselves and the only way to do that is to learn from Maori. It’s up to us though.
weka, I don’t disagree with a lot of what you say there. Fyi, interests take me to direct dealings with Ngai Tahu. I have experience with this authority thing and with being subject to an unelected cabal. I suggest that two separate things are being confused again – firstly, the Treaty with all its warts etc and honouring that; and secondly, the settings required for people to live contendly in these lands in the future. Those two things are entirely different but there is an assumption that one equals the other.
I am also well aware of their current ascendancy, and that is fine. Rather locals than some foreign entity who doesn’t give a hoot.
All I can do is repeat the original point which is that being subject to an unelected authority of any sort is inherently wrong and inconsistent with representative democracy. It will lead to failure. It ignores the reasons for that democracy developing and what it was trying to escape. Ignores it. Bit like Key sticking his head in the prophylactic and pretending it doesn’t exist.
The fact that this unelected authority is also based on race and birthright simply makes that situation worse again.
It is about the future. The Treaty has clear limits in what it can offer to that future.
All I can do is repeat the original point which is that being subject to an unelected authority of any sort is inherently wrong and inconsistent with representative democracy. It will lead to failure. It ignores the reasons for that democracy developing and what it was trying to escape. Ignores it.
I don’t consider Ngai Tahu to be an undemocratic body. They are treaty partners, and are operating within the dominant culture’s values that you espouse. I think you just don’t like sharing power. I also think that there is probably little useful discussion to be had if you view NT as an ‘unelected cabal’, when patently they hold elections, and they’re not a secret political faction. That you view them as that will always limit your capacity to move into a positive future with them.
btw, Maori (and many other cultures in the world) managed themselves successfully without democracy. Let us at least be honest that when you talk about the reasons for democracy and what it was trying to escape, you are talking about a specific set of cultures at a specific time in history, not a universality for all humans.
Weka, in the context I am talking about, namely being subject to another authority, it is absolutely not electable. Non-members of Ngai Tahu do not get to vote so there is no accountability and no democracy. Your suggestion is like suggesting that peerage in the House of Lords is democratic. It’s nothing of the sort. I think that, like many others, the straws are being clutched at to decipher support for a predetermined position.
And I also understand that many most cultures have managed quite well without democracy. But that is the framework we currently sit under. If we want to asssess another framework then that is another separate question.
Our current framework includes Te Tiriti. As such it includes the system we inherited from the British and it includes the systems we inherited from te ao Maori. You seem to want to remove only one side.
If we honour the treaty, then Maori are entitled to govern themselves alongside the Crown. If that had happened in the 1800s I don’t know what our society would look like today (interesting thought experiment). But instead we have a system that has evolved that tries to redress some of the wrongs, including the fact that NT have been denied access to their resources for all that time. I disagree with RL that the redress is about handing back all resources and letting NT govern. I think it’s about sharing equitably.
One way of doing that (instead of giving back stolen land) is for Ngai Tahu to be involved at levels where decisions are made about management of collective resources. In terms of Chch, you have the CCC and Ngai Tahu (let’s leave CERA out of it for now). Residents of Chch elect CCC, members of Te Runanga o Ngai Tahu elect their representatives. They then work in partnership. Maori get two votes I guess, but given how the odds have been stacked against them, and still are, I personally don’t have a problem with that. We’re not talking about equal slices of the pie, we’re talking about who needs nutrients and who is overfed. It’s about what is fair, and what is necessary.
At some point in the future, that will no doubt change. Maybe we end up with truly equal partnership. But in the meantime, what’s the problem?
As far as I can tell, you just want the treaty to be gone. This means that you don’t believe that Maori and non- Maori should be in partnership, and that means that Maori will be expected to assimilate into the dominant culture (they can keep their cultural pretties, but they are not allowed power).
I don’t think the House of Lords comparison is valid. You’re just trying to point out that whakapapa is exclusive*. But what you are missing is that (a) we have two, valid systems side by side, and (b) there are useful things in terms of governance about the tribal system that we would lose if it was rendered invalid.
*and it is only exclusive if you don’t belong to a tribal society that shares resources in that way.
I’m curious, what are your thoughts about the Tuhoe settlement?
Sorry weka, aint got much time for a decent answer (you weren’t the weka caught running off with one of my mates chook eggs the other day per chance?)
The model you outline imo is not sustainable. The reason is the very first one outlined. It is unelected (by the majority of people on one side only). It is based on birthright and race. These things cause resentment. Resentment leads to anger. Anger leads to hatred and then it is all over.
Look, I understand completely the Treaty concepts etc and how it foresaw partnership in the maori version etc etc. That has all been well and truly debated etc. And that is what is being attended to now – those rights and wrongs.
But my view stems from a base concpt of fairness and equality. Such a system as you propose fails thoses tests and will not stand the test of time, imo. It sets up divisions within society. It sets up resentment. It means some are in a position to lord it over others who have no control over the lorders. It has a faulty foundation. History has generally shown this to be the case and I cannot understand why so many are hell bent on going down the same pathway again.
There are surely problems in meshing the Treaty with equality but that is no reason to give in. There will be a solution. Time will probably the provider of that solution.
“you weren’t the weka caught running off with one of my mates chook eggs the other day per chance?”
I couldn’t possibly say ;-p
I disagree about the resentment and the anger. We watched that when the first settlements were being negotiated and settled. IMO most of that shifted over time, largely due to Pakeha becoming more informed about what the actual issues are. So, we already know that we can not only survive resentment and anger but that we can move on to something more constructive.
Secondly, much of the resentment and anger that people feel is misplaced IMO. It comes from people who are increasingly disenfranchised from their own culture. And it gets misdirected and fed by the MSM and evil bastards like Ansell using the tools of the mainstream to bash Maori. Both those things (loss of value within one’s own culture, and the acceptance of targeting Maori unfairly and unjustly) are things that we are going to have to resist and change anyway.
The other thing to consider is that within the next couple of generations, Pakeha will be outnumbered by non-Pakeha, Polynesians in particular (Maori, Pacifica). What do you think will happen to their anger at that point if we spend the next 50 years trying to subsume them into the dominant culture?
“But my view stems from a base concpt of fairness and equality”
I disagree. I think you have some abstract ideas about those things from within your own cultural ideas, but they don’t work in the world we live in because they don’t extend to Maori. I might be wrong, so please do tell me how you see the place of Maori in NZ in the future if things were to go the way you suggest (in a later conversation if you don’t get back to it today).
Who voted for the Ngai Tahu leaders? Or is that passed down from father to son? When do the daughters get a go?
Why don’t you go an find out? Or are you just interested in having a racist stir?
This is their land after all.
Which is my assertion too. Logically Nga Tahu are the owners and sovereign of the entire South Is and should be making ALL the decisions about it. Why should they be sharing their property and authority with anyone?
Either it is their land or it is not? Or are we talking about something less cut and dried? ‘Owned’ and ‘not owned’ at the same time?
answer straight – are you being ironic or sarcastic or do you believe it? The reason I ask is that this view of yours seems different from your previous views that I have read and I’ve been treating the repeated sentence that way so far.
No I’ve changed my mind. Like it or not the ToW is quite clear, that the iwi chief’s never ceded tino rangatiratanga. This is reinforced by the fact that the Maori version of the Treaty takes precedence. All this you know because you have been telling us this for years.
So like it or not we now have to take this position to its proper conclusion and determine that the iwi chiefs are indeed the proper owners and sovereigns in this land.
A conclusion that of course has more than a few logical consequences. Ones that are worth exploring I would have thought.
Thanks red.
I’m interested in your thoughts on the way forward.
One area that is interesting is that traditionally during times of conflict Māori would work together under iwi or waka groupings and within those groupings the mana of each rangatira was maintained. That same principle could build a pan-Māori grouping focused on the Māori Nation. It is a tough issue for Māoridom in some ways – ensuring mana is maintained and strengthened for all.
Well one way forward is to abolish the illegitimate Crown entity, disestablish New Zealand as a country and return to each iwi it’s legitimate territory that can be governed by the chiefs as their own nation. This is the solution supported by a simple and direct reading to the Treaty, made worse because the white settler government in their hubris and rush to exploit the country, failed to do their paperwork properly … and never established a written Constitution to cover their arses.
By tradition Maori have been proven to be generous hosts so I’m assuming that if any non-Maori are happy to pay a proper rent then they will be welcome to stay.
And if you think I’m being silly here, then what for example is the Maori view on Tuhoe having regained effective sovereignty over their land? I have to guess that most other iwi will unwilling to settle for less themselves?
But I’m guessing that there would be some practical difficulties with such an arrangement. Certainly I’d not be personally offering to explain the new regime to Federated Farmers.
Any alternate path is going to involve an ongoing tension between two competing/parallel sovereigns with two differing world views. Either that is a process that slowly converges over time … or not.
I don’t believe that Pakeha have to give away their sovereignty. Am happy to look at what the Crown is and whether it’s still useful. And the idea of devolving to regional autonomy appeals, we should be doing this anyway with the coming of peak oil and CC.
“This is their land after all.”
Which is my assertion too. Logically Nga Tahu are the owners and sovereign of the entire South Is and should be making ALL the decisions about it. Why should they be sharing their property and authority with anyone?
Either it is their land or it is not? Or are we talking about something less cut and dried? ‘Owned’ and ‘not owned’ at the same time?
It’s the latter IMO. Kai Tahu sold some land. Some was stolen. Some falls inbetween. The British forced Maori into a form of land ownership that meant that individuals could sell land, instead of that being an iwi/hapu decision. Other iwi existed here as well as Kai Tahu. Lots of complexities.
Afaik Kai Tahu like other Maori were pragmatic, they could see that the British weren’t going to go away. They could see there were benefits to having the British here. And benefits to having a treaty.
When I said the land is theirs, I meant they belong to the land and have that historical relationship around things like mana whenua, ahi kaa, kaitiaki. I didn’t mean they are the legal owners under Pakeha law, although obviously they do own some land in that sense. The big difficulty in these conversations is the word ‘own’.
To what extent the Ngai Tahu settlement was fair and reasonable, I don’t know. I know that they lost land in the 1800s that was rightfully theirs to live on, manage, be a part of, and that has never really been addressed. I also think they made very smart decisions around the settlement in terms of accessing resources within the Pakeha world that would allow them to move on. I don’t consider the settlement to be an end point, it’s a starting point.
So, “Either it is their land or it is not? ” is the wrong question.
VTO – The questions you ask are too difficult for most to wrap their head around, it simply implies regardless of which “ethnicity” people identify with, they are being ruled over, and have little to no control or say in it!
WTF is “The Crown” anyway – Good luck finding the way to the bottom of that lie.
We are all being ruled over by entities which are used to keep control of power over resources, whatever those resources might be.
Democracy does not exist, we see evidence of it on a daily basis.
I wonder if democracy was ever more than an unrealised ideal?
A word used to deceive and pacify.
Why not just add all religions/political ideals in, you want equality after all.
The heading should be “Anarchy in NZ”, sign the petition and say “Get F*cked too every one elses opinion.”
Out of curiosity, how could the treaty be made null and void? Is there international law that protects it? National law? I’m guessing that trying to eliminate the treaty would be extremely difficult.
Considering it was a civilised answer too war, I’d say the Maori voice will always be heard.
By discussion and writing of a constitution that replaced Te Tiriti. Such a constitution would have to have the removal of multiple sovereignties as it’s absolute minimum with sovereignty then being held by the people of NZ/Aotearoa rather than “the Crown” or other artificial entity.
dribble….or drivel?
btw, i concur with Margaret Mutu re rationalization re-colonisation
Griff, I’ll believe that you bigots really believe in one law for all when you start pushing for Banks to be kicked out of Parliament. Until then, if you don’t like living in a country which has Te Tiriti as its founding document and basis of legitimacy, feel free to leave. The society that you want is one of privilege, not comradeship.
Today is Women’s Suffrage Day. Some people are tweeting with hashtag #suffrageday
Sue Moroney asks people to use the hashtag: #wwkst (What would Kate Sheppard Think?)
http://blog.labour.org.nz/2012/09/18/what-would-kate-sheppard-think-2/
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/timeline/19/09
Today in History:
http://www.parliament.nz/en-NZ/Features/2/5/1/00NZPHomeNews201209181-Suffrage-Day-celebrates-women-s-right-to-vote.htm
I wonder how long Sue Moroneys husband had to wait for his dinner while she wrote this drivel.
Birds have never had it better. We only pay you less because you let us.
Predictable from Primitive Primate!
Not @ the Divorce bud, we’re working on the rest
Mmmmm….nah.
Also, has anyone pointed out that there’s more to fighting for “equality” than bashing the Treaty?
Your post makes no mention of actual equality issues: No mention of equal pay for women, or equal right for ALL parents regardless of work status, or equal rights for LGBT citizens.
Sounds to me like your petition is all about abdicating treaty responsibilities and absolutely nothing about equality.
Might be time to call a spade a spade, eh?
Ah, Ben, I thought for a minute you were replying to my comment on Women’s Suffrage Day.
But, on reflection, I see you are replying to Griff @8.29am
And I agree with you, Ben, not with Griff.
Especially agree with this:
Sounds to me like your petition is all about abdicating treaty responsibilities and absolutely nothing about equality.
You don’t agree with Equality. ok.
Ben. Presumably your reply is to Griff. Use the ‘reply’ button beneath his post or use his name so there is no confusion. I agree with your comment by the way.
Oops – I actually thought I had hit reply. Perhaps posting from the bus on the smartphone isn’t the best bet!!
Yes, my reply was to Griff. Sorry for confusion.
“Might be time to call a spade a spade, eh?”
Might be time to call a rich white bloke a rich white bloke:
http://www.nzcpr.com/ConstitutionalReviewABOUT.htm
Pretty much what you’d expect, really, isn’t it.
Maybe that link should come with some kind of warning, Weka?
yeah, sorry bout that. Although ‘rich white bloke’ alert might have been enough 😉
Exactly Ben. That petition and their review is all about removing any remaining limits to rich white privilege. At a point in history when Maori might be gracious enough to save state assets for all of us, I am deeply disturbed that some here, on a “left” which has spectacularly failed to do this, are turning against Te Tiriti. When Brownlee removes democracy from Canterbury and “lefties” see Ngai Tahu as the problem, something is very, very wrong.
+1
So key is doing gagagags as well as the fake hui and it’s all for the court case to come.
“Prime Minister John Key says a decision by some Tainui iwi to boycott the Government’s water consultation hui strengthens the Government’s legal position should the matter end up in court.”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/7692845/Water-hui-boycott-strengthens-Governments-position-Key
“On his way into caucus at Parliament this morning he was asked about the unity around the water issue at the national hui last week called by King Tuheitia.
He suggested that from the media reports he had seen there wasn’t unity.
“There are kind of more positions than Lady Gaga’s got outfits.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/maori/news/article.cfm?c_id=252&objectid=10834827&ref=rss
Deliberate and it will fail, as I have said on my post
His deliberate ignorance is not an advantage it is a weakness and the more he speaks, the more that weakness is revealed. He thinks he is smarter than he really is – but he isn’t.
http://mars2earth.blogspot.co.nz/2012/09/undo-gag.html
Thanks Marty.
From one of your blog links:
Treaty Negotiations Minister Chris Finlayson said…
“These are our views, prove us wrong if you want to. That’s what consultation is about.”
I despair sometimes. The cultural ignorance in his statement, for all cultures involved, is profound.
Thanks, marty. Well said – Key is arguing from a weak position and exposing his manipulations.
Also this press release out in the last half hour from Mana:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1209/S00281/no-consultation-no-deal.htm
“There are kind of more positions than Lady Gaga’s got outfits.”
Last Sunday a lady on Marae mentioned three positions on water which need to be settled.
1. Who owns it?
2. Who manages it?
3. Who has the right to sell it?
Any one read this clever piece of satire? “Next Weeks Q&A”
Would make a brilliant Youtube clip.
http://www.imperatorfish.com/2012/09/next-weeks-q.html
It made my day, Ianmac, when I read it a few hours ago, but did not have time then to provide a link here. So thanks for doing so, and highly recommend it to others here.
Andre Geddis latest post on Pundit is worth a read. It has very worrying implications for civil liberties and democracy:
http://www.pundit.co.nz/content/just-when-i-thought-i-was-out-they-pull-me-back-in
This is targeting sexual offenders, in response to some over-heated lynch-mob mentality. But, the legislation doesn’t seem to be limited to the nastiest of sexual offenders, but to anyone deemed “dangerous” and who might re-offend, even though the evidence shows it’s impossible to predict exactly who will re-offend.
I’ve long been very leery of this lynch-mob mentality around sex offenders. Sure few will waste much in the way of sympathy for them.
But somehow their crimes are being magnified beyond all rationality .. they’ve become the new ‘devil incarnates’ in a secular world otherwise bereft of demons.
I’ve always wondered at the purpose behind this.
Purpose ?, it’s a reflection of divorce from society because of fear, lock your doors etc.
If their is a purpose it can only be the criminals’, which is why there is fear.
And that is not justice.
Its extremely suspicious. One step away from preventative incarceration for ‘pre-crime’. Very Judge Dredd / AD 2000 / Minority Report.
In the US indefinite detention without trial or charge is now a distinct legal possibility, as long as you are deemed to pose some kind of threat to national security. Which does not have to be defined or justified publically – due to the threat to national security doing so may entail. See how it works.
More specifically in the NZ case, there is no mention of additional counselling, resources or support for these sex offenders. Just chuck them back in prison if you decide you don’t like the looks of them. It’s atrocious.
Society must find convenient scapegoats, for sure – it helps people to feel better about life.
On RNZ’s Sunday Morning Wayne Brittenden’s Anglo Saxon attitudes towards punishment went some way in explaining the origins of the nasty wee underbelly.
edit: here’s the link that wont work.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/sunday/audio/2532444/wayne-brittenden's-counterpoint-punishment-anglo-saxon-style
Dangerous and might reoffend.
Banks?
(Both sortsT
According to the Canadian Government the final cost of Prince Charles and Camilla’s (The Diamond Jubilee of Queen Elizabeth II) three-day visit to Canada in May was NZD 1.25 million, not including security. The Canadian Royal Mounted Police will not reveal the total security expenditure as (Request # A-2012-03344) is only disclosed in part. Security is about 1.5 times of taxpayers funding for motorcades, hotel expenses and meals etc for the entourage and the royal toadies. So the cost of Prince Charles and his wife’s pompous six day visit to New Zealand in November will be about $3.75 million, that is 1 and a quarter million cups of tea with John Banks, 5 and a half million tampon fantasies Charles can have about Camilla, 195 hip replacements or 94 (total hospital and surgeon costs) of Bypass Surgery. The list goes on. And to think in a country like ours, 270,000 deprived New Zealand children.
kester, your last sentence is particularly poignant.
Nothing from Labour about the welfare legislation.
However, shad/cab* social development spokesperson, Jacinda Ardern described National’s “reforms” as announced on Monday, as an overstatement.
Apparently Bennett has been making a big fuss about what turns out to be not much at all. Nothing “bashing” about them apparently. Not unjust, demonising, undermining, humiliating, demoralising, discriminatory, dehumanising, creating greater poverty, inequality and human misery. No sireee, National are in fact making a big fat fuss about sweet f. a.
“Once again we have Paula Bennett talking up what she says is the most comprehensive reform of the welfare system in decades.
“Once again today’s ‘news’ isn’t news, but regurgitates a raft of previously announced measures that, in real terms, will change little for those trying to find work.
Glad you get it Jacinda.
Just remember the first rule of breakfast club!
*Love the way this sounds just like cab-sav. Fitting really, though I understand Pinot Gris is more fashionable atm
Isn’t Ardern Labour?
If so, the Labour spokesperson did say something.
How tax changes affect growth.
From NYTimes via interest.co
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/16/opinion/sunday/do-tax-cuts-lead-to-economic-growth.html?_r=3&hp
Tax Cuts For The Rich Linked To Income Inequality, Not Economic Growth, Study Finds
Things is, I’m pretty sure that the Tories already knew this but keep saying that tax cuts increase growth just so as to justify the tax cuts that they give out which predominately favour the rich.
POAL is trying on theft by managment.
by some mysterious process known only to themselves the mangement of POAL have decided that they have a right to acquire the property of the community.
It is time the Auckland City Council fired the lot of them and hired some people who are comitted to public service and broadening the asset base for all and not just the greedy little bastards who have wormed their way into the executive suite.
I woke up hearing a chuckle this morning – it was the ghost past of Rob Muldoon.
When Labour, Greens and Winston parties all want to take control of the Reserve Bank and manipulate it to reduce the exchange rate I am sure he laughed.
Muldoon would have to chuckle to see that his policy was being copied.
The thing about being the only good boy in school is that everyone else rips you off, steals your lunch money, and forces you to do their homework.
Sometimes you need to break the rules just to get along – especially if the rules are only theoretically sound and are a bit stupid in practise, anyway.
[lprent: Removed the troll that answered you, and also your reply. ]
You must be mistaken. Muldoon never used an FTT on NZD forex transactions. Muldoon never used capital controls targetted solely at financial speculation.
BTW during Muldoon’s time families could buy a house and raise a family on one working class income. Pretty good eh.
And he could give a decent speech unlike John Key.
RNZ National have just reported that Kim Dotcom is attending Question Time in the House this pm in the public gallery!
John Banks will be in Bellamy’s sucking up on the Geritol.
Yesterdays thoughts before parley-a-ment (is it Yesterday once more?)
Stretch forward, i say.
Big aroha to the female Labour MP Representing Christchurch and Education in the House yesterday. Go Lianne (no time to spell check)
Schools consolidation-children to travel further. cost of fuel. More Time
(just another Brick in The Wall)-maori immersion in particular.
freakin “Claytons consultation”.
“colour-coded name badges”- more rationaliZation
is Turei a-rising?
Shirley Boys! Rock On!
Rhys Darby selling-out
anyone see the “money is Bad” wee add on 3 between current events?
Civil Disobedience + Non- violence. “truth” begets Hatred
imo, religion-straw men. Prophets-real men (not necesarily their interpreters though Mitt)
xtsy-Rock On!
greivances? OBLIGATIONS!!
these commentators who like to “throw” the odd PhD in? Everyman (and Woman, and Child)
a well- meaning Man said to me the other day; Socialism is “thought control”.
Whatever! Neo-lib Capitalism is thought, behaviour and emotion control.
(despair for the psych/soc graduate Pushers) cos the Pusher-Man don’t care if you live, or if you die…
Cyber-Bullying? censorship inevitably. Freedom of speech is a double-edged sword; death by a 1000 cuts. Words cannot be taken back. (Read James, he was on to it. Maybe he too struggled with a big, immoderate mouth-Martyrdom)
Regretably, authoratative Judges may need to shut some of the social-networking Web Down
(poor ol’ Spidey. and he was such good fodder for the Media)
yet,
the god of this age blinds..
ol’ Bollard aye. ïn hindsight, could have done more to put lid on property market. oh well, false foundations of costly stones and straw etc.
assimilation and accommadation. remember the Premack Principle.
ol’ John (figjam) Key -fcuk im good; just ask me!
Évery Good and Perfect Gift is from above, coming down from the Father of the Heavenly Lights, who does not change like Shifting Shadows.-James, again.
(don’t hide your light under a bushel)
Joy, is the strength of Love
Peace, is the security of Love
Patience, is the endurance of Love
Kindness, is the conduct of Love
“Goodness”is the character of Love
Faithfulness, is the confidence of Love
Gentleness, is the nature of Love
Self-Control-the Victory of Love
(be gentle on self)
Yet,
‘what is truth?”, asked Pilate.
-off to watch the animal circus now ( i do declare! the Nat MP’s have been observed to be braying like donkeys-asses)
Interesting piece on who’s arming who in Syria.
http://world.time.com/2012/09/18/syrias-secular-and-islamist-rebels-who-are-the-saudis-and-the-qataris-arming/
The Obama Administration does not deal directly with the armed opposition, but it has authorized a nonprofit organization, the Syrian Support Group (SSG), to fundraise for the FSA. The SSG is composed of Syrian exiles in the U.S. and Canada as well as a former NATO political officer.
That’s who is arming Syria. Guess who is arming the world at a record rate, and doing so by far.
Is it China? Is it Russia?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW4CvAorvf0&feature=g-user-u
U are still the Bomb C.V!!!!!
(read ém and weep whale-boy)
Romney says if you get handouts then you’ll be voting Obama.
Bank CEOs included???? Military industrial complex???? Halliburton?
Did Dick Cheney for vote Obama??
He’s also disgusted that some Americans apparently believe that food is a right that they are entitled to.
What a cock.
Well done to the Labour and Green activists in Christchurch who got their banners displayed on a live cross, TV 3 tonight (6.20 ish). That was about a minute’s worth of free, positive publicity! (Please contact head office ASAP, they need you to show them how it’s done).
National’s protection racket
The Prime Minister is running the risk of losing all credibility in trying to protect Banks as everyone can see right through his disingenuous semantics. It seems inevitable that the Act “leader” cannot hide forever behind the slippery John Key, who is obviously losing patience and would rather that the whole damaging affair just went away. That will only happen when Banks is sent back down the river on the next cabbage boat…
has len brown fired the management at POAL yet?
PDF payslips.
My employer sends her payroll notification slips in PDF format as email attachments.
They are passworded. When you save them to your payroll file on your desktop, they remain passworded. Anyone out there know how to permanently unlock these things. Employer does not appear to be concerned. “Tuff” she says.
Open them is something like preview, and do a save as worked for novopay slips.
Does that mean that you can’t read them? Because if so then she’s probably breaking a law somewhere.
Thanks for the feedback.
Dv – Brilliant – problem partially solved. Still a hassle but good work-around – thanks!
DTB – the password is the employee number – just a pain having to locate it everytime you want to read it. You’d think that once opened on a private system that it would bypass the password screen hassle.
I don’t think Hekia gives a shit. She appears hell-bent on upsetting the complete teaching profession.
Found this article an interesting read:
IMO, protests are seen as a less legitimate way of raising awareness of issues than in previous decades. The question is: Is this a result of neo-liberalism or is it a result of some other change that is taking place?
Neoliberalism. I think of it in terms of personal greed having been elevated for 2 or 3 decades – politics is about what individual have to gain rather than the collective good.
And the consequent yuppification of the culture. Why bother with all that dirty, noisy, unseemly street protest when you can sign a petition or tweet support for/against an idea while sitting at home with a latte?
Has anyone read this post lately? http://thestandard.org.nz/key-tries-to-save-face-over-tea-tapes/#comment-451251
Does saying that John Banks is guilty also result in readers here getting banned for a month like Eddie did to tsmithfield? And I quote “the police don’t decide whether there was an offence or not. That’s for the courts. Ambrose has been found guilty of no offence. By saying he was you’re guilty of defamation. I won’t have our website legally exposed like that. Take a month ban. Eddie”
[lprent: see my later note. Saying a politician is guilty before the courts has said they are, stated as fact, will usually earn a warning if we see it. Saying a non politician is will earn a ban. There is a public interest argument difference. Perhaps you should look at the legalities that limit the moderation rather than mindlessly jerking off. ]
got a comment to compare it with? You can’t have a comparison between only one item…
[lprent: http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-19092012/#comment-523412 ]
Bob, the difference between the two cases is simple.
Ambrose was very open and forthcoming about what he did. He never claimed he could not recall. He gave many media interviews and explained his actions, in detail. He did not run and hide, nor did he refuse to allow his statements to be published. Quite simply, he knew he had done nothing wrong, so he was very happy to say so.
Whereas Banks knows perfectly well that he did wrong, both legally and ethically. He is the opposite of Ambrose. The innocent man wants to talk about it – to proclaim his innocence. The guilty man doesn’t want to talk about it. Banks steadfastly refuses to answer media questions. We all know why.
But only one of the two men was publicly pronounced “guilty” by the Prime Minister, and it’s not John Banks.
So Bob, the question for you is – whose ethics and principles are more important? Some guy on a blog, or the leader of our country? Would you like John Key’s e-mail address?
[lprent: Ambrose is also not a poliician. Whereas Banks was one both when the event was done and now. It is in the public interest for the public to scrutinize and speculate on one more closely than the other. The courts have established this particularly clearly in Lange va Atkinson. ]
My point is the hypocrisy around innocent until proven guilty, either you believe in the premis or you don’t. As I have pointed out, the likes of Eddie only seem to believe in it when it suits his/her agenda, happy to use it as a reason to ban people against his/her stance, but turning a blind eye when the comments fit their stance (below (25) are examples I was supposed to reply to Flock with).
Does refusing to answer questions by the media automatically lead to a presumption of guilt in your books? By that reakoning David Bain is guilty, cos the Police said so, and he didn’t directly answer media requests saying otherwise (obviously this is not the case as shown by the privy council).
[lprent: An interesting but quite inaccurate view. You just haven’t thought it through looking at the sites liability.
The actual test I tend to use is somewhat more sophisticated than that and is based more around the actual legal limits we operate under rather than your somewhat arbitrary standards. Eddie and other moderators use roughly the same tests.
1. Is the case in front of a court? We severely limit speculation then.
2. Are people making an assertion of fact rather than speculating or expressing an opinion. Is that clear? Is the fact established?
3. Are they a politician? There the limits are much more relaxed due to Lange vs Atkinson and arguments based on public interests (which has a somewhat more limited legal meaning than selling tabloids)
4. Are they a minor or incapacitated intellectually. We will operate to defend them because they are less able to defend themselves.
There are several other factors – but those are the most prevelant. Plus we are volunteers and moderating gets done when we have time.
So saying that the police think there is enough to charge on is a fact if they have put it in a statement or a report. Saying that you think they should charge or not is an opinion. Saying someone is a criminal or guilty is not allowed as that is something that must be done by a court. Saying that you think the court got it wrong or right is an opinion. Neither Ambrose nor Bain are politicians so we severely limit what is said about them compared to Banks. Etc etc…
The language about how something is expressed is crucial, and simple minded assertions of fact without the qualifiers (like “I think”) establishing a statement as an opinion (which I find is a characteristic of some people who think they are always right) are the most dangerous to the site.
As far as we are concerned the law is our usual limit because it is where society specifies where the limits are. It is also where the site carries the can for the comments of others. We expect commentators to follow the legal limits of NZ and we expect them to know where they are. We will moderate or ban mostly on the threat to the site posed by the commentators behaviour.
We usually warn rather than ban unless people persist. But for example stating as fact about guilt on a non politician when the case is in front of a court will almost certainly earn someone an immediate ban for extreme stupidity. Idiots doing comments like that are a danger to the site.
But in practice, Eddie seldom moderates outside his own posts and he mostly does so to prevent people from thread jacking away from his topic or misrepresenting what he has said. It is usually myself, Anthony, Irish, or RL who will moderate on legal dangers to the site. ]
Here you go
http://thestandard.org.nz/bankskey-water-on-a-stone/
Mike
“Also that the PM has a damn duty to the public to read a fricken police report that says his minister lied to us and (apparently) him about breaking the law”
Carol (via tweets she has read)
“Does Key dread Aaron Gilmore coming back on Nat list so much he has to support a corrupt Minister”
http://thestandard.org.nz/none-so-blind-3/
Lanthanide
“John Key continues to back John Banks, despite the police report showing that John Banks broke the law and then lied about it”. and again “It’s worth noting here that the specifics around Banks leaving parliament were around him being convicted for a crime that had a possible sentence of at least 2 years in jail, even if the punished he received was no jail term or less than 2 years. Banks is lucky that there’s a (stupid) 6 month limit on bringing charges for the law he broke, so managed to wiggle out of that tangle.”
Mike (again)
“Because while forensic analysis is not his job what is his job is to consider and act on evidence that his minister is a corrupt liar. I’m sure Key already knew that and has no problem with it, but the thing is that Banks got caught”
[lprent: In each comment it was about politicians with the public interest issue. Most of these express opinion (corrupt for instance is a description not a legalism in NZ), or refer only to established facts in the police report, or are speculations about what-ifs. You clearly lack a good assessment on what is required for moderation. Read my note on 24.2.1
There are a couple there that would have gotten a warning if it’d been in front of a court. But it isn’t. Similarly if it wasn’t politicians. ]