John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001 http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
A year on, the Syriza party is faithfully implementing the austerity policies that it once decried. It has been purged of its left wing and Tsipras has jettisoned his radicalism to stay in power at all costs.
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
Show me some examples.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said:If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money.
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
You want to get rid of the rich.
Yes.
Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
National’s bringing them back.
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
DTB There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday? The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation. The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA:[affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
TL;DR: In today’s ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Tuesday, March 19:Kāinga Ora’s dry rot The Spinoff DailyBill McKibben on ‘Climate Superfunds’ making Big Oil pay for climate damage The Crucial YearsPreston Mui on returning to 1980s-style productivity growth NoahpinionAndy Boenau on NIMBYs needing unusual bedfellows Urbanism SpeakeasyNed Resnikoff's case ...
Negative yesterday, negative today. Negative all year, according to one departing reader telling me I’ve grown strident and predictable. Fair enough. If it’s any help, every time I go to write about a certain topic that begins with C and ends with arrrrs, I do brace myself and ask: Again? Are ...
Bryce Edwards writes – It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support ...
Inspirational: The Family of Man is a glorious hymn to human equality, but, more than that, it is a clarion call to human freedom. Because equality, unleavened by liberty, is a broken piano, an unstrung harp; upon which the songs of fraternity will never be played.“Somebody must have been telling lies about ...
Tax Lawyer Barbara Edmonds vs Emperor Justinian I- Nolo Contendere: False historical explanations of pivotal events are very far from being inconsequential.WHEN BARBARA EDMONDS made reference to the Roman Empire, my ears pricked up. It is, lamentably, very rare to hear a politician admit to any kind of familiarity ...
It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just show a minimal amount of flux in public support for the various parties in ...
Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka KotahiThe fact that a ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st CenturyThe SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims StuffSteve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
David Farrar writes – We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how labour went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promiseThe result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
“I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
.“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
“It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet – is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
Bob Edlin writes – And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ HeraldThomas CoughlanSimeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
TL;DR:Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it: We want our country to be a ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading → ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
What was that judge thinking?Peter Williams writes – That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop:Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
Buzz from the BeehiveThe text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary. It can be quickly analysed ...
For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
Questions need to be asked on both sides of the worldPeter Williams writes – The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop:The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
TL;DR:Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
Bob Edlin writes – The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
The Government has accepted Labour’s change to the Road User Charge (RUC) discount for hybrid vehicles, meaning there will still be some incentive for people to buy greener vehicles. ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
The New Zealand public voted for a change in direction at the 2023 general election and that is exactly what this coalition government has been delivering in its first 100 days. There was an immediate focus on the economy, easing the cost of living, cracking down on law and order ...
The Government has left the health system as an afterthought, announcing half-baked targets at the last minute of their 100-day plan, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
Kiwis are still waiting for their promised cost of living support after 100 days of a National Government that is taking us backwards, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
100 days of National taking NZ backwardsThe National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
The Government must commit to funding free and healthy school lunches, as thousands of people sign the petition to keep them, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti says. ...
If the Government was serious about moving families into public housing, they would build more houses so there is actually somewhere for people to go. ...
The free and healthy school lunches programme feeds our kids, helps them to learn, and saves families money – but it is at risk under this Government, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti said. ...
The Government’s proposed changes to Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPO) add almost nothing new and are merely an attempt to distract from its plans to loosen gun laws, police spokesperson Ginny Andersen and justice spokesperson Dr Duncan Webb said. ...
The great Victorian era English politician Lord Macauley stood in the British House of Parliament and said, "The gallery in which the reporters sit has become a fourth estate of the realm".He understood and outlined even way back then, the significant role and influence media have in a democracy. ...
The government’s attack on Māori health this week is committing tangata-whenua to a premature death, says Te Pāti Māori. “The government have begun their onslaught on Māori health with the abolishment of the Māori Health Authority and smokefree laws in the same day” said health spokesperson and co-leader, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. ...
"The Government is moving quickly to realise an additional $46 million in tariff savings in the EU market this season for Kiwi exporters,” Minister for Trade and Agriculture, Todd McClay says. Parliament is set, this week, to complete the final legislative processes required to bring the New Zealand – European ...
New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April. ...
Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand. Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships. “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland Acknowledgements and opening Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says. “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024 Acknowledgements and opening Morena, Nga Mihi Nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country. “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week. “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee. “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today. “The Amendment Paper represents ...
Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level. “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024. “Lower fruit and vege ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction. Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness. It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology. It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Deborah Lupton, SHARP Professor, Vitalities Lab, Centre for Social Research in Health and Social Policy Centre, and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Automated Decision-Making and Society, UNSW Sydney kitzcorner/Shutterstock The assertion from Queensland’s chief health officer John Gerrard that ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Shutterstock Why are musicians so keen to get played on the radio? It can’t be because of the money. In Australia they are paid at rates so low they ...
"Farmers make a point not to tell our urban cousins how to live, yet Chlöe from central Auckland is hell-bent on having her say about farmers," says ACT Rural Communities spokesman Mark Cameron. “On her first day in the House as Green ...
Analysis by Dr Bryce Edwards – Democracy Project (https://democracyproject.nz)Political scientist, Dr Bryce Edwards. It’s been a tumultuous time in politics in recent months, as the new National-led Government has driven through its “First 100 Day programme”. During this period there’s been a handful of opinion polls, which overall just ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Curran, Associate Professor of Ecology, Lincoln University, New Zealand Getty Images/Gerald Corsi In the latest move to reform environmental laws in New Zealand, the coalition government has introduced a bill to fast-track consenting processes for projects deemed to ...
Uber has argued it does not have as much control over drivers as the unions suggest, and wants a judgment ruling that drivers are employees and not contractors set aside and sent back to the Employment Court. The 2022 ruling followed a three-week hearing in which four drivers sought to ...
What can and can’t be purchased by disabled people or their carers has been slashed in an effort by the Ministry of Disabled People Whaikaha to save money. The purchasing guidelines, a set of rules that sets out what can be purchased using the various streams of Government disability funding, ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Tod Wright and Hien Nguyen, Fiscal incidence in New Zealand: The effects of taxes and benefits on household incomes in tax year 2018/19 . Analyses of the distributional impact of taxation and government ...
The Treasury has published today a new Analytical Note by Cory Davis, Boston Hart and Benjamin Stubbing, Household cost-of-living impacts from the Emissions Trading Scheme and using transfers to mitigate regressive outcomes . This Analytical Note ...
A coalition of public transport and climate organisations, united as ‘Transport for All’, is actively opposing the government’s transport proposals. The draft Government Policy Statement (GPS) includes plans for higher fares for public transport, ...
Greater Wellington is inviting feedback on proposed changes to its Revenue and Financing Policy. The Revenue and Financing Policy covers the Council’s various sources of funding, and how the cost of services is shared across the region. This includes ...
Labour has conceded it could have done more to deal with disruptive state housing tenants while in government but says the current coalition is going too far. ...
The band has asked their record label to issue a cease and desist to stop the NZ First leader using their 1997 hit to support his ‘misguided political views’. “I get knocked down, but I get up again,” blared through the speakers on Sunday as Winston Peters took the stage ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Food rationing is underway in remote areas in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands following torrential rain and flash flooding. More than 20 people have been reported dead in Chimbu Province. In nearby Enga Province, the centre of last month’s massacre, a 15-year-old boy has been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Hughes, Lecturer, Research School of Management, Australian National University After months of debate and intrigue, the AFL’s 19th and newest team, the Tasmania Devils, finally launched its jumper, logo and colours in Devonport this week. The Devils will wear green, ...
Brannavan Gnanalingam reviews the debut novel by Saraid de Silva.One of the most baffling things for children who move to a new country is what their parents’ (or grandparents’) lives were like prior to moving – for kids in particular, they’re too busy trying to fit in in their ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Gaunson, Associate Professor in Cinema Studies, RMIT University Narelle Portanier/Binge “If you don’t know who your mob are, you don’t know who you are,” Detective Andrea “Andie” Whitford (played by Leah Purcell) is told early into the new crime ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elise Klein, Associate professor, Australian National University It’s commonly accepted that women do the vast majority of caregiving in Australian society. But less appreciated is that Indigenous women do larger amounts of unpaid care than any other group. Working with the Aboriginal ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Joe Biden and Donald Trump have both secured their parties’ nominations for the November 5 United States general election by winning a ...
Comment: There has been a striking contrast in trans-Tasman interest about Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi’s visit to New Zealand and Australia. While the Australian press has been full of articles about the visit – including his curious decision to meet with former prime minister and China booster Paul Keating ...
After years of pressuring banks and other institutions to stop investing in fossil fuels, climate campaigners are making some progress. So how does divestment work?For years, climate activists have been pushing banks and other big institutions to divest from fossil fuels. New research from climate advocacy group 350 Aotearoa ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. The three young Polynesians are part of a K-pop fan community in Tāmaki Makaurau. It’s one of many that have sprung up worldwide as K-pop has gone ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. This one-off documentary presents three intimate portraits of young Polynesians who are pulled into a Korean cultural phenomenon. K-POLYS is directed by Litia Tuiburelevu, Produced by Hex ...
There’s ample evidence demonstrating free school lunch programmes provide wide benefits across schools, households and communities according to public health researchers. ACT Minister David Seymour wants to reduce the spending on Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
By Wata Shaw in Suva Fiji is facing an exodus of Fijians as many are leaving for overseas seeking employment and education and others are migrating, says Opposition MP Viliame Naupoto. Speaking in Parliament, he said: “His Excellency’s speech (Ratu Wiliame Katonivere) comes after a little over one year of ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming comments from Christopher Luxon this morning recommitting to ‘no new taxes’ as part of Budget 2024. “Mr Luxon’s refusal at the Post-Cabinet press conference yesterday to repeat the ‘no new taxes’ promise ...
SAFE is urgently calling on the Environment Committee to reject the Government’s Fast-Track Approvals Bill, and is urging New Zealanders to rally behind the call. The proposed Bill, currently under consideration with the Environment select committee, ...
Teammates who spend all their time picking fights with spectators are only helpful for the other team, writes Madeleine Chapman. Anyone who has ever played a team sport competitively, particularly as a child and particularly, for some reason, basketball, will know that there’s a lot of politics involved. While there ...
The long-running Wellington music festival is too focused on the Jim Beam-ness and not enough on the Homegrown-ness.There is something about Homegrown that’s difficult to place. A barely perceptible-ness. Like feeling a ghost is watching you from the corner of the room but when you look, there’s nothing there. ...
The latest Ipsos New Zealand Issues Monitor reveals that fewer New Zealanders believe crime / law and order is one of the top issues facing our country. In 2018, Ipsos New Zealand started tracking the key issues facing New Zealand. In this wave ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Griffiths, Deputy Program Director, Budgets and Government, Grattan Institute Australia’s political donations rules are woefully inadequate, but donations reform is finally on the agenda. The federal government has signalled its interest in reform and will soon begin briefing MPs on its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Patrick Taylor, Chief Environmental Scientist, EPA Victoria; Honorary Professor, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University Naiyana Somchitkaeo/Shutterstock A recent study published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine has linked microplastics with risk to human health. The study ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Albert Van Dijk, Professor, Water and Landscape Dynamics, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University Global climate records were shattered in 2023, from air and sea temperatures to sea-level rise and sea-ice extent. Scores of countries recorded their hottest year ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a teacher explains why he and his partner are in frugal mode – and how they’re making it work. Gender: Male Age: 35Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: I am an intermediate school teacher and my partner is ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Bendall, Senior Lecturer, Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, Australian Catholic University Binge Mary & George, the new British television drama series, depicts the real-life story of Mary Villiers and her son George, and their social climbing at the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jason Nassios, Associate Professor, Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University This article is part of The Conversation’s series examining the housing crisis. Read the other articles in the series here. Australian state and federal governments spend money in many ways to ...
The finance minister is denying that there’s a $5.6b shortfall in paying for the government’s campaign promises, including tax cuts. At his post-cabinet press conference yesterday, the PM refused to rule out new taxes to pay for the cuts, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s ...
Kāinga Ora tenants abused by their neighbours are doubting the government's crackdown on disruptive tenants will make a difference on their behaviour. ...
Kāinga Ora is New Zealand’s biggest residential landlord, housing more than 180,000 vulnerable people in more than 67,000 properties. Yesterday the government announced a crackdown on its tenants who fall behind on rent. One longtime Kāinga Ora tenant shares her experience.For 18 years I lived in a 1960s standalone ...
Why does this myth persist, and what’s the real reason our skin is suffering?It’s one of the biggest international grievances New Zealanders hold, up there with the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and 1981’s underarm incident. We’re quick to tell international travellers that the world’s pollution led to the ...
When the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act was introduced in 2009 it was firmly targeted at gangs and drugs. The legislation means police no longer need a conviction to seize assets that criminals can’t prove were paid for legitimately, as long as their alleged offences are punishable by more than a ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 19 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Bob’s relationship with certain members of Lincoln’s academic staff continued to deteriorate in the 1990s. Others supported him publicly, though articles such as Roland Clark’s 1993 piece in Growing Today cannot have pleased the university management. Clark wrote that Bob was selling onions from the Biological Husbandry Unit to a ...
SailGP’s races feature in-your-face action, with agile, hydro-foiling catamarans tacking and jibing for the title over several days. However, public comments ahead of the global series’ return to New Zealand have left this past year’s controversy in the shadows, as a key appointment attracts criticism from dolphin advocates. A year ...
Opinion: We are fast approaching a fundamental change in prisons. As the number of people on custodial remand looks set to overtake the number of sentenced prisoners, the main function of prisons in New Zealand may become incarcerating un-sentenced people who may not be guilty of offending. We have already ...
A huge seven months lies in store for the White Ferns, beginning this week with the visit of England and culminating with the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh in September and October. Starting on Tuesday in Dunedin, the world ranked No. 2 visitors will play five T20s and three ODIs, ...
Opinion: In a move that has shocked road safety advocates across the country, the new Minister of Transport, Simeon Brown, is poised to abandon the previous government’s speed limit reduction policy, particularly around schools. Even more alarmingly, he wants school speed limits to be variable rather than full-time, arguing ...
Auckland Council is opposing a fast-track development backed by Sir John Kirwan and Spark NZ, because it doesn’t meet stringent new climate adaptation requirements The post Surf-data centre faces new 3.8C climate warming rules appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The letters, which were published last week, were addressed to Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) Chairperson Megawati Sukarnoputri, National Democrat Party (NasDem) Chairperson Surya Paloh, National Awakening Party (PKB) Chairperson Muhaimin Iskandar, Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS) President Ahmad Syaikhu and United Development Party (PPP) Chairperson Muhammad Mardiono. In ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
The government says it still intends to deliver tax cuts by July, but will not lock them in until they have got them past their coalition partners. ...
Kiingi Tuheitia Pootatau Te Wherowhero VII has hosted members of the Green Party Caucus at Tuurangawaewae Marae in Ngaaruawahia. The audience follows the King’s Hui-aa-Motu on 20 January, where more than 10,000 people gathered to discuss national ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dr Rachael Potter, Research Associate and Lecturer in Work and Organisational Psychology, University of South Australia Ground Picture/Shutterstock Pregnant women and workers with children are often unfairly treated by their bosses and colleagues, despite laws to protect against workplace discrimination ...
Reacting to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s refusal to rule out introducing new taxes at the budget, Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Connor Molloy, said: “Today’s refusal to rule out new taxes suggests the Government is nothing more ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne Aila Images/Shutterstock Aged-care workers will receive a significant pay increase after the Fair Work Commission ruled they ...
He’s bringing ‘Sophie’ back, yeah. Goodshirt’s ‘Sophie’ music video is one of the most instantly recognisable New Zealand music videos of all time. Featuring a woman listening to the song on headphones while her entire house is burgled behind her, the video won the New Zealand music award for Best ...
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
I am sure you find it all very interesting, and will have great fun finding some way to blame John Key for the gentleman’s failings.
However. Is it not true that John Key had left the company before this fellow became the CEO?
Prior to becoming President of the firm in 2001 O’Neal was never responsible for any part of the company that included John Key’s bailiwick. He may, as president been Key’s titular superior but it could not have been for more than a few months.
Key became an MP in 2002. O’Neal became the CEO in 2003. Your numbers really don’t line up do they?
Perhaps you should consider a more reasonable proposition. The company failed because they lost their most competent people. People like John Key for example.
Or do you prefer conspiracies?
With respect, you are incorrect. You confuse General Motors with Merrill.
It is relevant to NZ due to his current membership of Alcoa. He is a significant player in our economy.
Why was an article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch expunged from certain Google searches ?
But the thing I am commenting on is this statement.
“There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.”
How do you work out that John Key was his protégé?
Sure O’Neal was incompetent. That is hardly a rare trait though is it?
However while John Key worked there they did very well, as you will probably agree. As you say “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”. Key however wasn’t there when they went downhill and your first sentence is irrelevant to him
“John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board …”
Key didn’t work under O’Neal except, possibly for a few months, while O’Neal was first in the President’s job. By the time he was CEO and Chairman of the Board Key was long gone.
With respect, I think you should check your timeline.
I don’t see where I have got it wrong as you seem to imply.
As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.
He entered Parliament in July 2002.
O’Neal became CEO and Chairman in 2003.
In your words “Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914”
The problems seem to be after Key left the firm.
What part of the timeline do you think is wrong?
“As far as I can discover Key returned to New Zealand in 2001
http://www.nzhistory.net.nz/people/john-key
It must have been late in the year as he was still with Merrill Lynch on September 11.”
That sounds right.
The man behind John Key.
John Key worked at Merrill Lynch under Stanley O’Neil, former CEO and Chairman of the Board who had served in numerous senior management positions at the company.
“O’Neal was criticized for his performance during his tenure as chief executive at Merrill Lynch, where he oversaw the deterioration of the firm’s stability and capital position, which resulted in his ouster in September 2007, and the firm’s eventual fire sale to Bank of America one year later. Prior to his tenure as Chairman and CEO, Merrill Lynch had thrived as a stand-alone company since 1914.
O’Neal was a member of the board of directors of General Motors from 2001 through 2006.
He currently serves on the board of Alcoa.”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanley_O%27Neal
10 Gaffes by Doomed CEOs on http://www.usnews.com
https://www.blackentrepreneurprofile.com/profile-full/article/stan-oneal/
An article about the ousting of Stan O’Neal from Merrill Lynch was one of an estimated 50000 expunged from certain Google searches.
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-searc...
There is a large literature on the topic if one cares to look for it – raising questions about his protege – John Key’s – role, competence, and CV.
http://deeperweb.com/results.php?cx=%21004415538554621685521%3Avgwa9iznfuo&cof=FORID%3A11%3BNB%3A1&ie=UTF-8&q=%22Stanley+O%27Neal%22+%27merrill+Lynch%22&as_qdr=
More relevant references ..
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=15768986
http://www.nbcnews.com/id/…/ns/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-walk-out-m/
http://www.motherjones.com/…/last-hired-first-fired-merrill-lynchs-black-ceo-had- it-coming
http://www.cnbc.com/…/ex-merrill-lynch-ceo-story-excised-from-google-search. htmldealbook.nytimes.com/2014/02/11/one-view-of-merrill-lynchs-fall/
http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2008/03/31/subprime-suspect
http://www.vanityfair.com/news/2010/11/financial-crisis-excerpt-201011
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.blackenterprise.com/mag/75-most-powerful-blacks-on…/2/
https://hbr.org/product/Stanley-O-Neal…Merrill/…/405029-PDF-ENG
http://www.publicintegrity.org/2013/…/five-years-later-where-are-they-now
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-merrill-lynch-and-the-right-to-be-forgotten -2014-7
http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/…/merrills_peril.html
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/business/09magic.html
http://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jan/25/unilever-boss-warns-uk-against-sugar-tax
ISDS anyone?
+1
sugar taxes……More fuel for the ISDS industry
http://corporateeurope.org/trade/2012/11/chapter-5-speculating-injustice-third-party-funding-investment-disputes
The Unilever man happens to be correct about taxing sugar, if nothing else. There’s no point in taxing sucrose while at the same time publishing dietary guidelines that recommend an obesity-generating diet consisting largely of other kinds of sugar or near-sugar, and having doctors, journalists, politicians and others constantly refer to the obesity-generating stuff by the misnomer “healthy food.” A sugar tax would be like putting a bandage on someone who’s cut an artery.
that debate would barely rate a mention in an ISDS hearing I would suggest
Meh. If ISDS were such a trump card, we’d have more to fear from tobacco companies overturning taxes on tobacco than we would about a non-existent tax on sucrose.
you mean like tobacco companies using deals with Asia and the Ukraine to sue the Australian government (and small, poor nations) about plain packaging laws?
No, not like that. Any instances of tobacco companies successfully using ISDS to overturn excise duty on tobacco?
Tobacco is different to sugar – tobacco is addictive, so a core chunk of users will simply pay more regardless of tax rate, to a certain degree. Doesn’t hugely impact the profit margin until they get really high or are used with other measures like quit support services.
Packaging is what affects sales. It reminds addicts trying to quit, and also affects market share.
Taxes on sugar is different, because cost is a major factor in food choices and production costs.
A reasonable run down from a left wing perspective of the year since Syriza gained power in Greece . I believe it pretty much happened as I predicted it would.
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/25/one-year-on-syriza-radicalism-power-euro-alexis-tsipras
Apologies but forgot the link.
No surprise that the Socialists here seem to have lost interest in Greece….
Equally predictable, over in Venezuela the Socialist response to the continuing collapse of their policies is to use it as a pretext to subvert democracy.
A darker scenario than Greece…just a matter of time before guns become part of the ‘solution’…
http://www.wsj.com/articles/venezuela-congress-rejects-maduros-economic-plan-1453503298
The lost sheep
By all means please keep us informed about the latest happenings in Greece. It is true one can be diverted from things that should be watched and followed. The world is coming apart under our fingers and people like yourself who make sure that they keep up with developments and pass that information on to the other interested people are of great, inestimable value.
Thank you Greywarshark.
I am a strong believer in the value of learning from mistakes wherever they occur, and thus avoiding repeating them ourselves. IMO opinion that is the way to prevent the world from falling apart.
Gosman, how is your reading programme going? Have you even started yet?
Yep, the capitalists moved in and undemocratically imposed their ideas upon the Greeks. That’s what happens when we have dictatorships running things.
Syriza needed to default, drop out of the European Union and go back to their own currency. Anything else was going to have them doing what the capitalists told them.
The big boys have taken over its to late democracy has been unsurped.
Funnily enough Latent Smith has been pushing the same lines.
Saying that Key changing the flag and signing the TPPa is turning us into an outpost where we loose our sovereignty.
Sorry but its to late.
We are one of the last to fall into line.
Why doesn’t Andrew Little just SAY that Labour opposes the whole of the TPP?? He did not sound like a positive Leader just now, talking to Guyon Espiner. I felt very disappointed.
Why?
A caucus that includes Shearer and Goff and a party that never has renounced neo-liberalism.
Simple solutions.
Vote for a different party.
And communicate to the Labour leadership why you will not vote for them.
If they don’t stand against the TPP, they will stand against nothing.
Because he supports the TPPA, but many Labour voters don’t.
Bit of a dilemma really, maybe he needs to be honest and explain to his supporters why he is pro TPPA.
I agree that if Little supports the TPP, he should be honest.
I think, though, that he is more conflicted than that.
He knows that the majority of Labour supporters are against the TPP and he also knows that the power brokers in the caucus are for it.
And so you end up with a debacle of an interview with Espiner.
Labour stands for very little if it can’t summon up the courage to vociferously oppose the TPP.
It is not just the power brokers in caucus, it is also the power of what Key calls “the club” that invites caution. It looks to me as if Little reckons he is more likely to prove successful in challenging particular issues within the agreement than he would be if he came out against the whole thing. You can point to Winny of course, as someone who has taken a stand against the whole thing, but Winny is not likely to come under such strong pressure from the big players, and his view expresses a long term stance that everyone knows about.
One reason we need a nonaligned left wing movement in this country is so that we can at least start to turn ourselves into a force whose endorsement or rejection of politicians is able to make a difference. The UK left has Corbyn in part because they had the People’s Assembly to put their weight behind him. Without such movements, politicians are at the mercy of the powerful like the rest of us.
+1
We really do need to get rid of the rich and prevent them rising again.
You can’t because we’re all different, some people have the drive, some people are willing to sacrifice the short term for the long, some are born privileged and some are born with everything they need to succeed (some do and most don’t which is interesting…)
Nor should we for that matter
We’re all different but equal in those differences.
Besides, rich people aren’t rich because they’re different but because they’re stealing from everyone else.
https://vimeo.com/71074210
So the rich people that’re on this site (and I’ll bet theres more than a few) are rich because they steal from others?
dude you really need to get some perspective
How’s that going to happen its never worked before and it won’t in the future.
Pure communism ends up being totalitarian just like capitalism.
A balance between them is the best outcome.
You are a dreamer if you believe you can.unsurp human behaviour.
Humans are not civilized on the whole we just behave as nature behaves the strongest and fitest survive.
Because we have harnessed our envirment we think we are civilized but no we carry on behaving in a competitive way like in the rest of nature.
You are part of that competitive urge trying to push your tangent that everybody must be equal but no where in nature has that succeeded.
No where in human nature has that succeeded.
Show me some examples.
Utopian thinking just like the laissez faire brigade!
We happen to be intelligent and thus can over-ride our instincts but it must be learned. Of course, the greed and anti-social aspects of capitalism also have to be learned.
Actually, it’s always worked before – then capitalism comes along and destroys what’s been built up.
I can show you 5000 years of collapse caused by capitalist systems including the USSR. China is about to join it. Thing is, that same 5000 years of collapse by capitalism is also joined with 5000 years of societies being built up via communism/socialism.
Societies simply do not work under competitive stresses.
I agree with you BM. A little bit of clarity goes a long way. Even if it’s not what you want to hear. There is nothing worse than listening to a stuttering ,stammering, waffling attempt at an answer that says beggar all. It’s like he’s trying to have a bob each way. Not sounding strong at all.
bloody good question…they must have a reason for this shambles…..but I’m buggered if I can see it…..this undermines Littles presentation of a gov in waiting
The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall and Andrew Little knows this but because Nationals pushing it hard and because most of Labours supporters don’t want it he has to walk a very precarious tightrope of placating his supporters while still leaving the door slightly ajar
So you have him bagging the TPPA and hinting that Labour will take NZ out of it which his supporters like but still not categorically stating that’s what he’ll do so he has an out when Labour gain power and the TPPA stays
‘The thing is the TPPA is good for NZ overall ‘
How?
Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA then not in and Andrew Little (and probably a great deal of Labour) know this
Hence his stopping short of actually stating Labour will withdraw NZ from the TPPA which you’d think he’d say because it would please the people on the left
‘Because overall the NZ economy will be better off for being in the TPPA ‘
How?
Dull
OK I’ll ask the question in a different way.
Can you provide some evidence that the positive outweigh the negatives for the TPP?
Evidence please, not opinion.
I’m not sure how you expect me to provide evidence of something that hasn’t happened yet but I’ll go with this
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1510/S00065/tpp-delivers-significant-benefits-for-nz.htm
a press release from grosser?
its like youve stopped trying 🙂
Ahhh, faith based. Once again.
LOL
Well if you believe that rubbish you will believe anything?
Independent analysis say otherwise. Like a 0.2% increase in GDP per annum. You regard that as significant?
Tell me how many fairies are at the bottom of your garden?
I’m not wanting to make excuses but I’ve run out of plutonium and as well know plutonium is what is required to make the nuclear reaction to produce the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor
I tell you what as soon as I source some (or can predict where lightning is going to hit) I’ll jump in my time machine, go the future (because the TPPA hasn’t happened yet so its a tad difficult to produce something that hasn’t happened yet) and get you the evidence that will satisfy one and all
Sound good?
“the 1.21 gigawatts needed to fire the flux capacitor”
didnt that get an upgrade to a recyclables fuel capacitor? 🙂
So it’s simply your uninformed, opinion
The timeline got distorted
And your opinion of this by Simon Terry, Executive Director of The Sustainability Council
The environment under TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep4-environment.pdf
And this by Barry Coates, Rod Oram, Dr Geoff Bertram and Professor Tim Hazledine
The economics of the TPPA
https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/12/ep5-economics.pdf
If the NZ economy will be worse off as a result if being in the TPPA then it should be a no brained to simply leave the agreement. This is what Little should have stated but didn’t for some reason.
I agree with you.
And the NZ economy will not benefit.
World Bank Report: TPP Will Bring Negligible Economic Benefit
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160119/09463933377/more-realistic-modelling-tpps-effects-predicts-450000-us-jobs-lost-gdp-contraction.shtml
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20160112/07433333306/world-bank-report-tpp-will-bring-negligible-economic-benefit-to-us-canada-australia.shtml
Except Little doesn’t agree as he wont come out and state that the Labour party will leave the agreement if they are in power after the next election.
The amount of growth in GDP from TPPA i oops .2%s (0.7%)
The growth of debt is 10.3% pa of GDP!!!!
I’m sure you know this, but situations change over time.
– Would NZ be better off if the TPP wasn’t happening?
– Would NZ be better off if TPP existed in a different form?
– Now that it does exist would NZ be better of if the country was sidelined?
My view is it trade agreements generally can be either good or bad. The TPP in its current form is bad for NZ. However, it would be difficult for NZ to be the only one in the Pacific region not signing.
– NZ can be worse off than now with the agreement, and
– worse off than now if NZ is the only Pacific rim country left out.
I guess Little is mulling over his own set of conundrums and working out strategies to address them.
No we won’t as the studies have clearly shown. We going to be losing jobs and being forced to be a resources supplier to the powerful nations which means an increase in poverty and stagnation of our economy and society.
so you’ll bend over for the corporates for $40p.a (in 2030)?…I think that is what is known as a cheap date
Yeah, it was really lame of him.
I’m not sure if Andrew could have said anything differently. The bottom line is that a Labour led government will vote down any attempt by corporate or foreign governments to interfere with our sovereign democratic decision making.
Problem is, they do not get to ‘vote’ on that at all. Last year’s general election was where they needed to pull their socks up. Too late now.
“The bottom line is that a Labour led government …….. ”
Really?
You managed to get that out of the drivel that Little was uttering?
I have heard more sense from the gurgling of a six month old baby that I heard from Little on morning report.
Surely there is someone in the Labour party who can do better than the current leader? Is it time to try Mallard?
Just because you never heard what you wanted to hear, doesn’t mean nothing of value was said.
Alwyn “heard” exactly what they wanted to hear, which is to say they weren’t in fact listening at all.
Yes, he could have said it differently. He could have said:
“In government, we plan to legislate against selling land to foreigners. If that puts us in breach of the TPPA, then we will need to re-negotiate the TPPA. If we can’t re-negotiate, we will simply leave it”.
Seems like a reasonable thing to say to me. Of course National would immediately say that Labour are trying to sabotage the future of NZ etc.
Exactly. The guy needs strong competent people who are not lawyers to coach him on making clear statements rather than eternal fence-sitting waffle.
That interview is infuriating. Little is trying to argue for being partially pregnant. Dolt.
guys, I do not want to keep repeating this again. Important sections of the Labour caucus are pro-TPPA.
Andrew Little’s statements have to reflect that, or his time as Leader is over.
As an experienced lawyer, Little knows exactly what he is communicating and how clear/unclear he wants it to be, and where he wants lots of ambiguity in his statements and arguments for future wiggle room.
TL/DR Labour is no longer fit for purpose.
“competent people who are not lawyers”
Half of Little’s problem is that he IS a lawyer.
He is trying so hard to avoid saying something he wouldn’t be able to wriggle out of that he ends up saying nothing intelligent at all.
Anyone else remember the 1985 Tom Paxton album?
“One million lawyers and other disasters” .
Because he and the Labour caucus actually believe in the TPPA and FTAs in general.
Because several significant Labour MPs are pro-TPPA and pro-US/anglo imperial strategy.
Shearer, I guess?
With the independent analysis of the TPP pointing to the prospect of an very minor and insignificant increase in GDP, the potential (as in all FTA) of the loss of jobs in our economy, the restrictions on Intellectual property, the inability to control foreign investment and the loss of sovereignty, the dangers imposed across all countries on the loss of indigenous rights (in complete contravention of the UNDIR), and the resultant dumbing down of our economic structure to one of resource supply, to say nothing of the surreptitious attack on The Treaty of Waitangi, our Nations founding Document, and the effect it will have on our ability to buy our medicines, one has to wonder just what it is that makes this so called “Deal” so attractive to Labour?
One wonders if some in the Labour Caucus are too busy arse licking the corporates to truly understand just whom it is they are supposedly elected to represent?
I don’t wonder about it, I’m sure that’s exactly what they’re doing.
If he does that he will be in the shit with Aunty Helen!!!
The reason Little cannot be up front and oppose the TPPA is because the US have put a gun to everyone’s head.
You are either for, or against us.
John Key has made this clear to Little, so what is he to do. When Key talks about his top draw, these are some of the things he is talking about.
Look at how frantically South Korea is trying to join the party after they missed the boat. They have China as their biggest trading partner, they hate Japan with an intensity you cannot believe, and the US only slightly less. They already have FTAs with 75% of the world’s GDP. Why would they want to join, but to be “on the right side”.
And then there is Taiwan. Same thing, but different of course.
Who hs been left out of the TTP and the TTIP?
The BRICS, Saudi Arabia, Indonesia and Turkey from within the top 20 countries in the world by GDP (assuming Euro as one country).
Then look at Carter’s words on TPP, and Obama during SOTU speech. The primary reason for the TTP and TTIP is to declare economic and possibly military war on the BRICS attacking the USD through trying to steal the world’s reserve currency.
Unfortunately, whether or not you like it, Little is not bigger than these powers.
That is why the TPP will be shoved down your throat, whether you like it or not.
I disagree with Winston Peters on some things, but at least he’s staunch on the TPP>
Smart politics, NZF will take votes off natz and labour by saying it how it is and whilst I am no big fan of winnie he sticks to his guns which voters identify with.
Watch the natz go hard again on NZF as winnie could see shonky bog off back to bankstaland by galvanising the swinging dissaffected masses toward NZF
Winnie could also give two fingers to the left and go with National and get his knighthood
National could also go with Act, Peter Dunne and the MP and not even bother Winnie
He won’t and he’ll probably still get his knighthood. If there’s a politician anywhere that deserves a knighthood it would be Winston simply for hanging the fuck in there 😈
Yep. And successfully returning back to political life after being stabbed in the back and left for dead by National.
” he’ll probably still get his knighthood”
Is this another policy flip-flop that Little is proposing? Is he going to swing around and start supporting knighthoods. My, my. What will “she who must be obeyed” in New York have to say?
Knighthoods are meaningless in NZ these days we give them away to criminals.
Sir Michael Cullen?
touche.
close another post shop?
Why would you associate what I say with what Labour or Andrew Little support? I’m not a Labour supporter.
And, no, I don’t support the monarchy or the psychopathic awards system that we have.
Just for curiosity’s sake – does anyone know what happened with John Key’s invitation on Waitangi Day 2014 for Joel Bristow, or other representative of the deepsea drilling protestors to go to Wellington and have their minds changed?
I have’t seen the PM out protesting
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
Very interesting graph. Obviously not predictive but disconcerting. Democracy is helped when there is a competent opposition.
Another interesting graph.
Democracy is helped when there is a competent media.
Democracy is helped when there is a healthy economy that benefits everyone, not just the 0.0001%.
https://hitlersingleptystate.wikispaces.com/file/view/image14.gif/295733426/image14.gif
Democracy is dead in NZ we are operating under an elected Dictatorship at present?
I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault
Says a troll to a troll….
You’re not amusing enough to be considered a troll
you think you’re amusing?
No but then I don’t think I’m a troll either
Another suffering from SPS perhaps?
That is amusing .
A bridge to far.
“I’m heartened that slowly, ever so slowly some people on here are coming to see that the problem with the left in NZ isn’t solely John Keys fault”
This is a “straw man” argument. Nobody claims that the left’s problems are John Key’s fault.
But he is still a piss-poor PM.
Well yes I concede I could have written that better. I guess a better way of putting it would be instead to say that some on here are starting to see that maybe the problem with Labour are predominantly internal
It seemed to me that some on here would prefer to make excuses for Labours poor performance rather then look within
CV a notable exception of course
You would say that, because the war a tory really likes to see is one where the workers fight each other and the tories collect profits from both sides.
The historical lesson you want us to forget is united we stand, divided we fall.
That’s just a little grandiose don’t you think
I’d say that McFlock was spot on. The Tories are here to try and split the Left apart so that they can win.
Well I can’t spoken for everyone on the right but for me I want to see Labour improve and this is why:
At the moment National is coasting along very middle of the road, don’t scare the horses because it doesn’t have to do anything to win, it doesn’t have to do anything that might upset some of the demographics
If Labour improve and start looking likely then National will have to try something a little different, it might actually have to come up with something different to Labour-lite
NZ need Labour to be strong so that National can come up with some policy because at the moment Nationals coasting
Holy crap PR I basically agree with what you are saying here.
(Having said that I believe that Labour is now culturally and organisationally incapable of improving. I currently rate a 50/50 chance that they will get less than 25% in 2017).
Well I say Labour but really I just use them because they’re the biggest left wing party in NZ at the moment
I’m taking the rough estimate in NZ that to get into power under MMP 35% is the bare minimum you’d be looking at and even then that opens you up to some massive amounts of horse trading
Yep, a 35% election result for Labour will leave Winnie grinning from ear to ear. (Especially as an election result that high for Labour suggests that the Greens will fall to 10% or less).
HC CV PR OK!
It’d make for interesting times as it sounds like based on that Labour would still need both the Greens and Winston
It’d be time for the Greens to demand some concessions I reckon
If National tried anything other than Labour-lite they’d lose. As John Banks said: If I wear my policy on my sleeve, I won’t get elected.
The same truly does apply to National. If their MPs and supporters got the policies that they truly want then they’d never get elected.
The real problem that we have is that Labour is trying to be National while wearing red.
Desperate times call for desperate measures but at the moment National doesn’t have to worry
PR, the problem for the right is partially as you describe, but the other factor is the failure of ACT.
Everyone in the beltway rates young whatsisname, and he’s amiable enough, but he can’t shift them polls.
His decision to not take a cabinet role is part of it all too. Got praised by the likes of DPF et al, but really, he’s opting to have less influence.
the politics around why that decision is made is the politics that supporters of a more active Right wing government need to get to grips with.
Given:
National has swallowed all of the right bar ACT’s rump and whoever the hell it is that votes for Colin Craig,
and the widely accepted general icompetence of the Labour party
and the personal liekability of their leader,
why aren’t they doing more?
you claim that it’s down to Labour sucking and not giving them udeas to rail agin, but that doesn;t really hold a lot of water (it holds some, but not much)
Labour, for all their faults, have produced ideas in oppo, they then abandon them after losing an election, or watch National roll out weaker versions to placate the electorate. (this is a net huge plus for the left as national is giving the concepts of the policy a big old tick for further development).
My point is, that of you want National to not be Labour light, the right needs to get a threat to National from the right happening. At the moment, the ‘right wing’ is either completely smitten with National and not seeing sense, or this is as far right wing as the NZ electorate gets.
I have to admit I’m surprised that Act hasn’t managed to rise in the polls, I thought they might be around 3-4% by now
But yes I see your point
Whereas I’m amazed that anyone still votes Act. They’ve had their heyday back in the 1980s and everyone now knows that their policies do too much damage. It’s why National still put on the mask of being Labour-lite.
Some are starting to realise that Labour were relevant when working people were hard done by. Those days are gone and so the need to support Labour is diminishing year by year.
http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/RM-Labour.png
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
The internal problems of Labour mean that a white middle aged professional centrist candidate cannot be selected without the allegiance of the many factions within Labour who are so unlike the general public. The quality of Labour candidates is thus vastly inferior to the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. Being put on the list is no guarantee of a seat. Andrew Little just scraped into parliament after the specials. At least he will feel safer as long as he remains leader. It will only get worse for Labour as the deselection campaigns get underway. Their low poll of 2014 is not their nadir. Those votes will go in all directions but clearly many are drifting to support National.
“On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer”
Only one wee problem with that. We can’t all be “rich” can we.
The top 5% are earning more than the bottom 50%, and actually society is not structured to have a lot of “rich”.
You right wingers are a greedy self serving bunch, and you know what, eventually the low income and those in the middle (the aspirational ‘hope we get some too’) will wake up to the sham that Key is selling and realise it.
Good God – the first thing key did was give $100 a week to the top 10%, and sold that the rest can have $10 or so. Nice fucking scam. 7 years on they are trying to move the poor out of Auckland with $3000 payments to regions with no jobs, as a way of dealing with the housing crisis.
What a total sham.
You right wing wankers don’t give one iota for this in retail, gas stations, cleaners, bus drivers, you WANT them all to get fuck all so you have have it all.
Fisiani – your nasty greedy tone and posts post after post stand you out above almost all of the horrid rightees
^ This!
Well said.
+1
+2, go Appleboy!
We can’t all be “rich” can we
On this we agree, some people don’t want to be rich because they’re happy with what they have, some aren’t born lucky enough to have the advantages to become but then some aren’t born with the drive to become rich and some don’t want to pay the cost of becoming rich
Becoming rich is largely a choice, for some its easier and for others its harder but its still a choice
We can all be rich if we define wealth in human ways rather than sociopathic ones.
Fair enough, we’re all free to define rich for ourselves
Yes, we are, but that doesn’t make it real.
heh
I recently heard an alternative definition to “billionaire”: someone who has improved the lives of a billion people, even in some little way.
Interesting goal to go for. Much better than just getting a billion bucks.
If that’s what makes you happy then by all means go for it
The day I need moral guidance or encouragement from you would be a very interesting day indeed.
I have no problem with people becoming rich, as long as they don’t create a system where other people become poor as a means for them to become rich.
+1. Well said, appleboy. My jaw simply dropped at these two sentences: There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money. On the other hand 70% want the chance to be richer.
30% is a hell of a big percentage to be kicked to the kerb and spat on. And as for 70% wanting to be richer, since when has “git rich” expressed the highest human aspiration? Oh for one of those old-fashioned right wingers who thought they owned the copyright on decency – I might not agree with them but at least I could respect the fact that their view involved a conception of the greater good.
That 30% of the adult population is pretty much the same 30% which has given up on voting and participating in our political system.
Not a coincidence, I suspect.
Who is kicking to the kerb and spitting on??????
How can you possibly read that into my words.
i was not even being disparaging. do you really think there are no people who simply want other people’s money. If so what percentage do you reckon it is?
Such people exist of course – just not on the Left. And they’ll take from the poor faster than they’ll take from the rich. Just have to watch National’s attacks on beneficiaries to see that.
Draco let me quote you what the Finance Minister said in the House.
Hon BILL ENGLISH: Our tax and transfer system is highly redistributive, and the number of people paying income tax is surprisingly small. The lowest-income 43 percent of households currently receive more in income support than they pay in income tax. The 1.3 million households with incomes under $110,000 a year collectively pay no net tax—that is, their total income support payments match their combined income tax. The top 10 percent of households contribute over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers—over 70 percent of income tax, net of transfers. This system is highly redistributive and we believe it is fair.
The rich give a fair share to the poor – which part of the quote is hard to understand or do you think their contribution should be even more than 70%.
as for attacks on beneficiaries , What part of “The biggest rise in benefits in a generation” constitute attack.
Instead of slogans can you explain why you think the rich do not give to the poor when clearly they do and how raising benefits is an attack. It’s like I’ve wandered into an asylum.
No they don’t, the rich steal from the poor. That’s how capitalism works and it’s worked that way for thousands of years. It’s what causes it to always fail.
Watch the video
Draco stop using slogans and simply answer the question. Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of taxI if so why and how much.
I’m not using slogans – you are as you usually do because you really don’t understand what’s happening.
We have to get rid of the rich. That’s not just about income but also about ownership.
I would like to see you explain, in non-disparaging terms, the difference between your 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money and the 70% who want the chance to be richer. Both want to be richer, by your account, and both must get money from somewhere if they are to do so.
Here’s how I see it: I think that the current system privileges wealth extractors over wealth creators. The latter might just lead to the tide that raises all boats, the former certainly does not. The eagerness of the already wealthy to get their claws on state infrastructure that comes with a guaranteed cash flow is one example of what I mean by wealth extractor – nothing of is value added, but an existing cash flow is diverted toward a privately owned pocket. Being privately owned, this piece of infrastructure then becomes answerable to the shareholder (so the wealthy) over the public good. The 30% under such conditions are the victims of this form of economic extraction, being removed from consideration by the public-to-private transference and in no position to defend themselves.
Draco
the rich steal from the poor IS a slogan.
You want to get rid of the rich. Like in Cambodia?. Like in North Korea or like in Albania?
No it’s not – it’s a statement of fact. National’s slogans, which you come on here repeating such as the BS about people being envious of the rich, aren’t connected to reality.
Yes.
None of those got rid of their rich which is why they’re still capitalist in form, structure and oppression.
“Do you feel that the top 10% of earners ought to pay more than 70% of tax…”
Is that the top 10 percent of of people who declare all their income, or the top 10 percent who accumulate the money?
Can’t answer the question if the definitions aren’t clear.
The thing is, if fisi’s little 30% social experiment were imposed on NZ, as I’m sure it would be, next claim would be 50%. In America the hopeless poor are about 60%.
It’s like Bill English’s 5% structural unemployment, once he instituted it it became the lower baseline, and unemployment varied above it.
“the high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National. ”
Hilarious. Wastes of space like Melissa Lee would appreciate your faith.
Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive then Labours, I will admit there are some in National that have reached for use by date and then some
For some time now Labour has been picking candidates in accordance with where its own internal logic, internal factions and internal culture currently sit – but which results in a serious mismatch with what the electorate is looking for.
I remember reading that in the 1970s UK Labour still had very many MPs from coal mining and trades/shop floor backgrounds.
Today there are almost none, instead, Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured.
“Oxford grads and Eaton old boys seem to be favoured”.
Oxford grads in the Labour party are hardly new, and Eton isn’t that uncommon
Since 1935 there have been 11 leaders of the party.
Of these 6 went to Oxford. Attlee, Gaitskell, Wilson, Foot, Blair and Miliband.
What has happened in British Labour in the same as in the Conservative party there and the New Zealand Labour Party.
Their candidates go through student politics, get a job working in an MP’s or a Party office, may work for a Cabinet Minister, find an electorate and go into Parliament. Many of them have never held a normal job in their life.
It happens a bit with National but not quite as much. Paula Bennett is one example.
Those rich advantaged kids have reversed the film named Eating the Rich to eaton’ the poor!
You are looking back a long way with that comment PR.
“Person for person Nationals line up is considerably more impressive”
A gender neutral version of the 1972 National Party campaign slogan.
“Man for man, the stronger team”.
That one, although the shambles of the later Kirk/Rowling Governments showed that it was probably true, didn’t work out too well in the campaign did it?
National’s line up is almost entirely corrupt.
Thinking about it I suppose that could be considered fairly impressive.
I don’t know mate – any shambles with Brownlee involved in it is a pretty hopeless mess.
Un-PC – ‘a not-so-pretty hopeless mass.
Mustn’t mention electorates like northland, eh…
I wonder if Winston has set up an electorate office yet, and if he has, has he ever visited it?
Anyone here live in the electorate and have you ever seen him at a public function?
Awww, you can’t google it yourself and find the electorate office in Kerikeri?
Anyway, I was referring to the previous Northland MP, one of the “high calibre candidates who were selected and elected for National”.
National’s bringing them back.
And they all vote National.
It’s just another point where reality contradicts the delusional beliefs of the right-wing.
DTB
There will always be a group of people, perhaps 30% who are jealous of the rich and want to be given their money.
And they all vote National.
Can’t speak for all, but there seems an insatiable attraction for more, for bigger, amongst people who have acquired wealth and they are wedded to it ‘to have and to hold, from this day forward, for better or worse’…ad infinitum.
They are wannabe John Keys
Fisi I think you are right Labour aren’t sure where their support base is especially after Roger Douglas took them hard right even further right than National?
That figure does not include gst or corporate taxes poor pay more GST than the rich or corporates who shift the cost GST back to the customers.
Or go on overseas trips operate Swiss bank accounts or don’t pay any tax like like google Facebook Amazon etc.
Fisanal a paid spin doctor of the right.
Employers not paying a living wage are being subsidized by the socold wealthier earners.
The speculators are being subsidized by those on higher declared incomes.
The corporate tax evaders are also being subsidized.
Pollutors the same.
The debt financier’s who Bill English has borrowed $80 billion+ for election bribes for his parties tax cuts are being subsidized $5.8 billion a year.
Labour is not the whole opposition. You may have heard of this thing called MMP.
A weak Labour won’t be able to cobble together a government, Labour needs to be reasonably strong and if the Greens ever want to get into parliament then Labour need to be really strong
Nope. Time for the Left to give up on Labour and vote either Greens, Mana or IP.
Ok then but its still the same, there needs to be at least one strong left wing party
Why?
Numbers really, the left are on what 40% at the moment so if Labour crumble its not really going to attract any votes from the right so the total percentage isn’t to increase all that much
But if you have a strong party, a party that can convince people it can lead then that’s what will attract non-voters to vote for them (and swing voters of course)
That’s illogical BS.
A few parties that show that they can work together can, and will, get votes. The problem we’ve been having is that, Labour especially, the parties on the Left have been attacking each other rather than working together.
Yes they might be able to get some swing votes and maybe even from the missing million but I’m thinking Labour doesn’t want to cut the pie any smaller then it needs to
Short sighted though that may be
Electorate seats.
If the left were composed of several competitive small parties without one being clearly dominant, there would need to be a lot of pre-election co-operation to avoid splintered left votes in electorates. If National won enough extra electorates due to fragmented “left” votes, then it could end up with enough overhang to skew the proportionality of Parliament. It’s very unlikely now, but as there get to be fewer list seats and more electorate seats as the population increases, it becomes more possible.
True but they could always work together. And then, once they have power, change electorate voting to preferential voting. This would allow all parties to put up candidates with the most preferred winning rather than the one with the most votes which is often a significant minority.
@Andre.
Your proposal is theoretically possible but it looks extremely unlikely.
In practice the National Party would have to win at least 61 of the 64 electorates they contest.
Surely there are going to be at least 4 Labour MPs who could win one of the General electorates?
By the way the number of electorate seats doesn’t go up just because the population increases. It goes up only if the percentage increase in the North Island, or in the Maori roll, goes up faster than the rate of growth in the South Island. That is because the South Island is guaranteed 16 general electorates.
Another example of the TPPA as being more of a trade restrictions agreement than a free trade agreement: the NZ Library Association’s standing committee on copyright is concerned about the impacts of making copyright provisions more restrictive. Apart from concerns about underestimation of the cost to NZ of the additional restrictions, there’s this about the prospect of over-hasty legislation:
In particular, bringing New Zealand law into line with US law could prove problematic if provisions favouring rights holders (such as extension of term) are adopted, but exemptions that US law affords are not also adopted. However, because there will not be sufficient time for MBIE to extensively consider the effects of broadly-worded exemptions, it is more likely that any exemptions will be narrow in wording and limited in effect.
In other words, the nett effect could be that we end up with all the draconian proscriptions of US copyright law but few of the exemptions, making us even more restrictive than the US.
The above quote is from an email, so no link – however, you can obtain more info from the committee by writing to copyright@lianza.org.nz.
They are quite correct – NZ lacks exemptions for things like satire and parody, let alone other aspects of fair use.
Let’s buy a little piece of heaven and donate it to NZ
https://givealittle.co.nz/project/abeltasmanbeach2016
Eyes and ears open for the start of the political year here.
– Winston Peters’ opening speech for the year tonight
– Post-Cabinet signals this afternoon
– Prime Minister’s first big speech, in Auckland tomorrow afternoon
– Labour Party’s first big speech on Saturday
– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?
Anyway, let the games begin.
TPP Auckland meeting and livestream tonight 😉
Rod Oram on TPP: Well worth the listen!
“Business commentator Rod Oram on the recently available New Zealand research papers on the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement, and New Zealand’s role in the TPPA.”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/ninetonoon/audio/201786811/business-commentator-rod-oram
“– Green Party’s one I think it’s Friday?”
Oh dear. It shows how irrelevant the Green Party is, doesn’t it.
I gather they had a speech today. Even people who follow politics quite closely, like yourself, didn’t know about it.
I wonder how many people went to it. Outside of Green MPs and party staffers of course who would have been conscripted.
Anyone here go to the speech? That is anyone not on the public payroll as a Green staffer or MP.
Did anyone hear Stephen Franks’s bumptious and
ignorant performance on Jim Mora’s program yesterday?
The Panel, RNZ National, Monday 25 January 2016
Jim Mora, Stephen Franks, Josie Pagani
There seems to be no code of behavior in place at Radio New Zealand. Some years ago, Bomber Bradbury was banned from this program for the crime of criticizing the Prime Minister’s loutish and irresponsible behavior in parliament. Yet Franks, whose disrespectful and contemptuous behavior is far worse, continues to be a guest.
This afternoon, Franks was frothing with indignation about state house tenants who have the cheek to complain about substandard conditions. His rage extended to the afternoon’s first guest, Otago University Professor Michael Baker; Franks treated him with derision, referring to him repeatedly as “these guys”, in between his frequent imprecations of state house tenants.
Luckily for Franks, the other guest was not the superior Dita Di Boni, who has firmly put him in his place in the past, but the giggling Josie Pagani.
I really haven’t got the heart to transcribe Franks’s nonsense today, but aficionados of bad radio and cranky shouting should click on this link…..
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/thepanel/20160125
OMG! Morrissey – I don’t know how you do it!
Listening to both Franks and Pagani!
It would make me want to spew.
The so called “Panel” is an appalling programme – hosted by a sanctimonious prick and has not merit what so ever. A complete waste of space-time continuum.
Evidently Paula put the boot into the PI’s yesterday.
He’s an angry fellow and his stroke is well overdue, but he had a point about incomplete/selective surveys. Still an utter dick though.
Latest news heading on Radionz.
Putin is corrupt, says US Treasury
Russian President Vladimir Putin during his meeting with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Antalya, Turkey, November 15, 2015. Michael Klimentyev/RIA Novosti
The US Treasury has told a BBC investigation that it considers Russian President Vladimir Putin to be corrupt.
‘Pot meet kettle.’
For those of you who are taking a responsible approach to social drinking
by choosing the very refreshing low alcohol “citrus” beers.
If you are on Statins, you should be aware that the “citrus” apparently includes grapefruit juice.
Well now, this is interesting
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11579449
He indicated he was hoping for redemption within caucus. “Politics is a rollercoaster. You know that and I’ve been around long enough to know that.”
Could be Cunliffe v Robertson 2 (or is that 3?) after the next election…
I suspect there is another reason that is much more relevant.
I think he has found that he is quite unemployable outside of Parliament. To be blunt there is probably no-one who will give him a job. This is the only way he has any chance of retaining the lifestyle to which he has become accustomed.
I’d say you’re on the money there alwyn.
Also goes a long way in explaining why it’s so hard to get rid of old Labour mps.
I reckon the Labour party should make a rule where the maximum term for a Mp is 4 terms with a clause that this time period can be extended by the party membership vote only.
That way you’d be able to ditch the leeches like Mallard or the unpopular ones like Cunllife but keep the ones performing well.
3 moneykeys in a row – all typing to create a dictionary – so cute
What a great pseudonym you chose.
Marty “The film depicts thirty-six hours in the life of the main character: 34 year-old, bug-eyed Marty”
and Mars.
That’s of course the Mars Bar. The one that is full of nuts.
ka boom! well done alwyn comedy genius – well pretty good – sorta dated ha ha – nah – hey at least you had a go
But BM might have a sensible suggestion there Marty. Not all left suggestions are workable, and not all right ones are hopeless.
I disagree grey. bm sows seeds of discord – some subtle, some obvious. I think right wing solutions are hopeless and I do agree that a few left wing suggestions may be unworkable in our current system.
I don’t think Cunliffe can be bothered with all that shit again, he will concentrate on being a politican, the media crucified him. He is too intelligent to waste his energy on another leadership battle. Let Robertson take the shit from the Tory MSM media aka Mike Hoskings and Paul Henry.
I don’t think the ego of the Cunliffe will settle for merely being an electorate MP, I think the Cunliffe has his sights set higher
it’s not just ego – it’s ability. And Cunliffe has it in spades. Problem is though, Cunliffe is not as cunning on the playing field as GR2020 is. He has also been in the beltway a bit too long now.
LOL 😈
Serves him right
Know about this?
Screening tomorrow night in Auckland:
http://www.aucklandlibraries.govt.nz/EN/Events/Events/Pages/aplacetocallhomescreening.aspx
Briar’s 2015 film A Place to Call Home provides a revealing examination of New Zealand’s state housing situation.
The documentary tells the stories of two women who share the same passionate values and deep concern for the vulnerable and often voiceless members of their respective communities.
Ironically, they find themselves in a tug of war where the creation of a much needed community housing project in the Far North is dependent on the dismantling of another equally valuable and deeply entrenched community in Glen Innes, Auckland.
A Place to Call Home is raw and brave and explores a topic that is extremely relevant in today’s environment of unaffordable housing and social reforms.
_________________________________
For the public record – I believe that State (and Council) housing is PUBLIC, and ‘social housing’ is PRIVATE.
I oppose the privatisation of STATE (and COUNCIL) housing by (private) ‘social housing’ providers.
I support the directly-affected State tenants in their fight to STOP the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
Unlike the Co-Convenor of the Child Poverty Action Group, and Salvation Army employee Alan Johnson, who supports the transfer of 2,800 Housing NZ properties to the Tamaki Redevelopment Company.
How do I know this?
Because he told me to my face.
Penny Bright
‘Anti-corruption / anti-privatisation Whistle-blower’
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Penny Bright
2016 Auckland Mayoral candidate.
Weekly Economics Podcast – Inequality
https://soundcloud.com/weeklyeconomicspodcast/inequality
The euthanasia submissions. If you care about people and them having a right to decide when to die when they are terminally ill or in pain without much life to enjoy and wish to disembark in their own time while they can still smile at others and enjoy knowing them, then please follow the guide below and support quality euthanasia. Submissions finish on MONDAY 1 FEBRUARY 2016 AND CAN GO IN UNTIL 23.59.
(Remember 1/2 is the anniversary of various provinces so perhaps do it the day before in case you want to be out and about enjoying life.)
Euthanasia submission end Jan –
http://www.ves.org.nz/news/3520054
and
you can remind yourself of Lecretia’s Seales wishes.
http://lecretia.org/you-can-help
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/76243294/euthanasia-debate-the-international-context
You know, it’s still too damn hard to make a submission to a select committee. You’d think that they were making it so as to dissuade people.
So I was looking at this
http://www.theonion.com/article/marxists-apartment-a-microcosm-of-why-marxism-does-1382
but then I scrolled a bit more and this was even funnier
http://www.theonion.com/article/congress-allocates-90-million-protect-remaining-ea-52210
(Save Kenny!)
The first article, and it’s photo look just like Labour’s fish and chip brigade of the 1980s
http://www.michaelbassett.co.nz/archive_fc80.htm
The second story is a disgrace. The Eagles deserve much more than that. They should get at least as much as Obama will get for his Presidential Library. At least people will still listen to The Eagles. Can you imagine anyone reading through a hundred million pages of the Obama archives?
I prefer Kenny Loggins to The Eagles, at least his songs were fun and you don’t hear third-rate buskers at markets murdering his songs
That’s not really the point of a Presidential ‘Library’.
No a Presidential Library is MEANT to be a repository of documents but they have become a cross between a library and a theme park.
Have a look at some of the things in Reagan’s one.
Air Force I is there (well an old one)
There is a Ronald Reagan Pub
They have got a Presidential motorcade.
and a President’s helicopter.
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/DETAILS_F.ASPX?P=LM2023EAF1&H1=3&H2=7&LM=LIBRARYANDMUSEUM&ARGS_A=CMS&ARGS_B=34&ARGSB=N&TX=18&SW=18
They also have temporary exhibits including one on American Football
http://www.reaganfoundation.org/details_f.aspx?p=LM2024ETEX&h1=0&h2=0&lm=libraryandmuseum&args_a=cms&args_b=35&argsb=N&tx=3171&sw=3171
Clinton’s isn’t quite as extreme but it is definitely close.
There are probably some earlier ones that are more restrained.
ps. I was only joking about the Eagles getting more taxpayer money than the Obama Library. He is going to have to find a lot of generous donors who will put up the money. On the other hand the Eagles aren’t going to get any money either.
More evidence that luck is the arbiter of business success.
Suck it up, wingnuts.
And?
weren’t you the one upthread saying being rich is a choice?
Congratulations to Bill English on his eighth year of miserable and unrelenting economic failure. If we must have crazed far-right governments from time to time the least we must ask is that the useless assholes learn to balance the books.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/64004654/Budget-deficit-worse-than-forecast
@stuart
He wasn’t a complete failure, don’t forget the “surplus” last year and the generous tax payer funded entitlement to live in his wifes property for the last 7/8 years, yes he’s done very well for himself.
(sarc)
Balancing the books will be the task of the next non National govt to take power, this is the historical cycle NZ has followed for decades.
There are too many “sheeple” and not enough real people like most of those who contribute to ts.
Why does the Left always insist on a Budget Surplus as a sign of economic competence?
Are you really daring English to go down the road of slashing Government spending and enforcing austerity through the nation?
Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.
Why would you encourage that?
Hey CV
“Just remember that a budget surplus occurs when the Government takes more money out of NZ households, savings accounts and business activity than it puts back in.”
You have a funny definition of a surplus and how it should be derived, the scenario which you adamantly describe is the one which English used to produce the surplus he boasted about, but normal surpluses are usually a result of a well run economy where the money is plowed back into the pockets of many, one of the criteria for a well run, healthy economy is near full employment, not increasing unemployment, for which is the current situation.
During the Clark years, the Govt then was contributing 40c of every dollar spent in NZ and a surplus every year and very low unemployment , Key swore to get that down to 20c and now look where we are today.
The economic and social policies of the Key govt will only result in massive increases in debt as they have failed to achieve the basic fundamentals of a well run economy and one of the main failures is the deliberately high unemployment.
Under the Clark govt you saw considerable redistribution of wealth from the haves to the havenots, we now have the exact opposite (redistribution from the havenots to the haves) and the exact opposite result, the proof of this is there now for every one to see, increasing poverty, extreme wealth, and high unemployment and a deficit and a massive increasing debt.
From your analysis above, I certainly wouldn’t take any advice from you as a financial adviser.
Jim Mora claims ACT’s leader is “cogent”; sadly for him,
neither of today’s guests is stupid enough to endorse that provocation.
The Panel, RNZ National, Tuesday 26 January 2016
Jim Mora, Mai Chen, Bernard Hickey
Today’s Panelists are several notches higher on the intelligence scale than yesterday’s dire offering [1], but the major problem persists: it’s the same host. About 4:15, after the long and tedious introductions have finally come to an end, the host decides to make the first of his glib and shallow statements for the day….
JIM MORA: [affecting a serious tone] The ACT leader David Seymour makes the point, and it seems to be a cogent one, when he says “Those who grumble about a lack of a capital gains tax should look at the ten least affordable markets in the Demographia Survey. All of them except Auckland are there despite having a capital gains tax.”
Mai Chen doesn’t even bother to snort in derision, but her fellow guest manages to say, in an exquisitely indirect way, that David Seymour is an ignoramus….
BERNARD HICKEY: Hmmmm. The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.
The rest of the program, unfortunately, seems to be as dire and as determinedly trivial as ever. Mora has just attempted to manipulate his guests into saying something disrespectful about Kanye West; neither of them indulged him. He should have tried it yesterday: Stephen Franks would have launched into an insane racist fugue for five minutes.
[1] http://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-26012016/#comment-1123541
What Hickey actually said, and you quote it was
“The counter-factual, which we don’t know, would possibly show that the inequality would be much worse if it were not for the presence of a capital gains tax.”
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It is Hickey saying I don’t like that example he came up with. He hasn’t the slightest idea of the facts but he’ll try and deflect attention.
He even admits he hasn’t the faintest idea what he is talking about when he admits “which we don’t know”. All that means is HE doesn’t know.
Hickey was never one to let his ignorance get in the way of his political bias.
David Seymour can’t even park a car properly so I’m not sure what you expect him to know about the housing crisis.
That isn’t saying that Seymour is an ignoramus.
It’s saying it in an arch and subtle manner. Every listener—including your good self—would have understood quite clearly that Hickey has no respect for ACT’s risible “leader”.
Hickey has no respect for anyone except Hickey.
So what? Hickey is just a hack journalist isn’t he.
?
Bernard Hickey is a solid financial commentator and a serious journalist.
I would say he had been a serious journalist, but that was a fair while ago.
His financial commentary is pretty risible though.
Proof Alwyn you have no credibilify other than being a proffessional whinger for the far right.Bernard Hickey goes against what most big banks economist commentary because big banks just want a speculative market that loads every one up with debt.
NZ govt debt stands at $120 billion and rising at $ 27 million per day.
I am for full and open discussion on economic matters
“a proffessional whinger for the far right”?
No I’m not a professional when I comment here. I am merely trying to bring some knowledge to the ignorant. A very hard task with some of them though.
Did you hear Jordan Williams on the Panel today?
His intervention was of the sort that usually gets you to transcribe Mora’s dismal show!
I missed it, Paul, but I’m sure I know exactly what he said.
And…. shouldn’t he have been carrying Whaleoil’s bags somewhere instead of making a fool of himself on radio?
https://www.national.org.nz/news/news/media-releases/detail/2016/01/21/Benefit-numbers-continue-steady-yearly-decline Some great news for some of the poorest in society
Seriously?
On the day it breaks that one of those bludging beneficiaries off the pension is a veteran whose benefit they cut because of a trespass arrest, you bastards are gloating about it?
Just a comment from someone who is sick of this country being dealt to by Mr Key and his crony capitalist mates.
Can you stop getting sucked in by the lies in relation to income and tax paid, ie the top 10% of earners pay 70% of the tax.
It’s the top 10% of the wealthy that pay next to no tax you need to focus on.
I am sick of Fisiani and others spreading the lie that (implied) the wealthiest 10% pay 70% of the tax.
It is a lie and stamp it out.
The wealthiest 10% pay far less than 10% of all the tax.
Don’t rush into TPP, US critics tells Kiwis
A leading American critic of the Trans Pacific Partnership, Lori Wallach, said New Zealand should not rush into the TPP because there were not the numbers to pass it in the United States Congress.
It was not a done deal and could yet become a “5000-page doorstop.”
She could not understand why the New Zealand Government was pushing the deal so strongly as it was not a done deal.
It had very little upside for New Zealand and enormous downsides, she told a meeting of about 1000 at the Auckland Town Hall tonight.
Yet New Zealand had been one of the most enthusiastic.
“So I thought it was really important to dig out of the snow and come and say ‘guys this is far from a done deal and your Government is trying to run you guys towards a cliff.
“This is no done deal – this is likely to be an undone deal. ”
New Zealand might change its laws to meet the terms of an agreement that might never get finished.
“And you’ll have screwed yourselves over by passing that law,” she said.
“So for God’s sake don’t go rushing into this because in all likelihood it ain’t going to happen.”
Lori Wallach is the director of the Washington-based Public Citizen Global Trade Watch Group and tonight began a speaking tour with Auckland University law professor Jane Kelsey against the TPP.
She suggested that discontent in the United States on issues such as the period of exclusivity for biologic drugs or barring tobacco companies from investor-state dispute settlement could be changed in side-letters between the US and other countries.
That was how binding changes could be made to an agreement without opening up the text for renegotiation.
She also said the investor-dispute settlement (ISDS) rules were an enormous risk.
She disputed the New Zealand Government’s claim that ISDS – allowing disputes to be settled by private tribunal – would not attract cases.
While the US has had 50 agreements with ISDS and had had hardly any challenges over 50 years, there were now more than 50 a year. And under TPP – an agreement of 12 countries – it would double its exposure with 9500 new corporations from TPP countries being a possible new threat.
And while New Zealand had had no ISDS cases taken against it, it could face exposure to 1608 United States companies – and the US was the most litigious country in the world.
“This is brand new liability. So when your Government says ‘we’ve never been sued,’ I say ‘hold on to your wallet and your tax dollars because if TPPA happens, it is just a matter of time.”
“A propaganda exercise”
Jane Kelsey, New Zealand’s leading campaigner against TPP over the five years it was negotiated, took her place at the lectern with a stuffed toy – a “dead rat” she has called Tim, after former Trade Minister Tim Grose has talked of New Zealand having to swallow dead rats.
She said the national interest analysis on the TPP released today by the Government was “devoid of any independent insight” because it was drafted by the officials who negotiated the agreement.
“It is nothing more than a propaganda exercise,” she said.
She said the $2.7 billion estimated increase in gdp by 2030 would be, on current growth rates, a mere 0.9 per cent of gdp in 2030.
Next Thursday the Trade Minister of the TPP countries would sign the deal – but that was the end of it.
The national interest assessment would be presented to the House and legislation drafted – but it could not come into force for at least two years.
“We need to make our voices heard from that for at least the next two years.”
Politicians from Labour, the Greens, New Zealand First and the Maori Party spoke as well.
Grant Robertson: Agreement undermines NZ’s sovereignty
Labour finance spokesman Grant Robertson the Government had undertaken a “secretive, exclusory, unaccountable process driven by the galactic ego and arrogance of Tim Groser.”
He quoted from the national interest analysis the sentence he said identified the source of Labour’s objection.
“The agreement places new limitations on Government’s ability to modify New Zealand’s policy settings to ensure they are appropriate for our domestic circumstances.”
“That is the nub of the problem here,” he said. It undermined sovereign rights.
It could, for example, prevent a Government legislation to get proper public broadcasting.
He said the agreement undermined New Zealand’s sovereignty and while there were modest economic benefits from TPP “you cannot put a price on our democratic and constitutional freedoms to make our own law.”
“It’s about power
Greens’ co-leader Metiria Turei said the point of the TPP was “to take power away from democratically elected Government, to give it to multinational corporations” and where their interests clashed with the interests of New Zealand, the investors interests would come out on top. “It’s not about trade; it’s about power.”
Marama Fox: Issue unifying for Kiwis
Maori Party co-leader Marama Fox said the issue had been unifying because now people might understand how Maori felt to have lost their sovereign rights.
“We have been fighting this fight for 175 years.”
The party objected to the Government having the power in the TPP to interpret what rights were under the Treaty of Waitangi.
There had been an irrational fear in New Zealand that if you give Maori more rights it would take away others’ rights, or that Maori “might do to us what we have done to them.”
“”That is wrong. We want to live in a country where we recognise our duality of nationhood, that we are here as partners.”
“Undermining NZ business”
New Zealand First’s Fletcher Tabuteau claimed that New Zealand First had been the most vocal against the TPP and the most consistent.
He said ISDS would give multi-national corporates an unfair advantage over New Zealand companies in New Zealand because only they would have access to ISDS.
He suggested that minimum wage measures or environmental laws passed by the Government could trigger the ISDS and let overseas companies sue the Government but New Zealand companies would have to “like it and lump it.”
“It will undermine New Zealand business into the future.”
He said National still had the numbers to approve the national interest analysis but opponents of the TPP needed to talk to National MPs.
“Some of those National MPs must fold under your pressure.”
Lori Wallach has public meetings planned in Wellington, Christchurch and Dunedin.
– NZ Herald
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11580056