Polity: Why announce the election date this week?

18 comments on “Polity: Why announce the election date this week? ”

• Comments are now closed

1. Poission 1

   11 March 2014 at 3:21 pm

   It is hard to avoid the conclusion that it was a deflection from something

   The economy is an obvious answer.The raising of false flags (literally) takes the media from the failure of treasury forecasts again.The rising interest rates ( 3 steps to the election 0.75%)the soaring TWI and AK house prices fueled by off shore purchasing and unsustainable immigration ( where do we house any additional 30000 ?)
2. The Real Matthew 2

   11 March 2014 at 4:01 pm

   Whenever the election date was announced you could come up with some conspiracy theory along similar lines to this article.

   It has to be announced sometime!
   • karol 2.1

     11 March 2014 at 4:04 pm

     Did you read the post? It’s not just that it was announced, but that the decision to announce it yesterday was made very suddenly.
     • lprent 2.1.1

       11 March 2014 at 4:40 pm

       Yeah, even the usual insider traders on iPredict were caught out. It sounds like the decision was made on the weekend and they immediately proceeded to inform the Governor General. Everyone was caught a little wrong-footed.
   • lprent 2.2

     11 March 2014 at 4:47 pm

     It is usually pretty well signalled beforehand. Look at 2011 for instance.

     When it wasn’t announced at the start of the year, the Beltway geeks were predicting that it’d be announced closer to John Banks court date in May. Then even if he got convicted in June as it was within 6 months of the latest election date it would not trigger a by-election. With the speakers vote, parliament would still function ok.

     This announcement fell out of thin air. Quite puzzling.
     • Lanthanide 2.2.1

       11 March 2014 at 5:07 pm

       “Then even if he got convicted in June as it was within 6 months of the latest election date it would not trigger a by-election.”

       Actually Parliament have to specifically vote to avoid a by-election. I’m not sure if this means they need to know the actual date of the election in order to hold the vote, or if they can logically say “the election must be this year, there are no other calendar dates left, therefore it’s within 6 months” without giving a date.
3. Tautoko Viper 3

   11 March 2014 at 4:16 pm

   Another possibility regarding conflicts of interest. NSA have probably given funds to GCSB. (GCSB won’t deny this)
   Now we see that Snowden says it is highly likely that the NSA have been involved in writing/interpreting our new GCSB law that was rushed through. And who is in charge of the GCSB? More leaks to come?

   I think that there is going to be a lot of pressure from the US on our electoral process in an effort to keep this compliant Government in power. The stakes are high.

   We need a good turnout in the anti TPPA rallies on 29 March to wake up the public to the fact that our country is being manipulated to our detriment and that the TPPA will further reduce our sovereignty. What won’t our leader do for a game of golf or a photo with Obama?
4. wyndham 4

   11 March 2014 at 4:25 pm

   And in question time today Judith Collins came out really swinging. She’s always unpleasantly and usually needlessly agressive but today she was even more so. And in the midst of that, Robertson’s questions about Oravida got completely sidelined.
   I must say, the Nats are clever at this tactic and Key is a master of it. Today he made mincemeat of Cunliffe in what appears to be another gaffe – – – Cunliffe posted a Tweet about power prices that played straight into Key’s hands.
   There is something seriously wrong in the Labour camp – – – when will they realise that they really have to lift their game to come within a bull’s roar of Key?
   • karol 4.1

     11 March 2014 at 4:41 pm

     I think this is because the Nats are very good at BSing. Key reeled of so many stats so fast, it was hard to tell how accurate his replies were. This is the bit in Question Time that you are referring to.

     OK, the graph does look show more of the rises during Clark’s government than under Key’s. The price rises started after about 1988.

     However, Julie Anne Genter tweeted that Key’s argument that power prices weren’t rising was weak.
     • marty mars 4.1.1

       11 March 2014 at 4:56 pm

       So many stats so fast – checking them sounds like a job for the new editor of that political fact checking site.
       • David H 4.1.1.1

         11 March 2014 at 11:46 pm

         Oh Petey boy, your up. TricKEYis being fast n loose with the facts. But Petey wont do anything thats against this bunch in power because he’s still in love with the Hair.
5. peterlepaysan 5

   11 March 2014 at 7:50 pm

   Key is a puppet of the USA. I stress puppet, his media exposure has always been well scripted and rehearsed.
   The man is a phoney. He is here to promote USA interests, not ours.
   • RedBaronCV 5.1

     11 March 2014 at 9:12 pm

     I’ve always assunmed that he is a US citizen – but is this correct?
6. RedBaronCV 6

   11 March 2014 at 9:10 pm

   Can the prime minister just declare a referendum and waste our money or does he have to go out to get those signatures? If he can just declare one could he declare lots of them. Can the opposition parties do the same. All seems a bit one sided to me. Whre is the taxpayer’s union?
7. captain hook 7

   12 March 2014 at 10:33 am

   This prime minister is not a real prime minister. he is a ring in carpetbagger headhunted by Boag and Hooton to lead a a gang of treasury looters and self servers.
   His job description has led him to believe that he can do whatever he pleases.
   Apart from the deflections of public scrutiny into nationals own rorting of election financing rules he needs to make sure that he can close out his ‘puts’, swaps’ and’options’ positions after he gets the push and before the triple witching hour on Wall Street in October.
8. captain hook 8

   12 March 2014 at 10:35 am

   and to Red |Baron where is the taxpayers union. They ar enothing but a tory front.
   They must have run out of wet bus tickets and red herrings by now.
9. NZ Jester 9

   12 March 2014 at 1:40 pm

   You know how all good pickpockets operate, they work in teams and have someone distract you while the other half of the team robs you. Or if working alone they will set up what seams like an accidental bump to distract you while they grab your wallet.
   National are great at distracting a lot of the NZ Public with rubbish stories while they rob us blind of our assets and freedoms.
   Strange this national flag debate he was not interested in before is now seemingly so important to him he will only answer question on it instead of other important question.
   As for me I think a nice big white flag with a red fish on it will be perfect to replace our current one.
   The white flag part to symbolize National surrendering our country to Warner Brothers and the NSA.
   The red fish of course on the flag will be the much beloved herring that seems to have become a media favorite to report on.
10. Whateva next? 10

    12 March 2014 at 9:47 pm

    Sorry, how many people signed the petition asking for a referendum on the flag?

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS