web analytics
The Standard
Advertising

Standard scoop: Another senior Nat failed to disclose conflicts

Written By: - Date published: 10:39 am, October 28th, 2008 - 31 comments
Categories: corruption, economy, election 2008, john key, national - Tags:

Last month, Key lied when he was asked whether he had more Tranzrail shares, over which he had failed to declare his conflict of interest. On Sunday, it was revealed on The Standard that Key had also held shares in Fletcher Challenge Forests, which was campaigning for the Government to buy the rails off Tranzrail, at the same time as he was using his powers as an MP to gain information on the prospects for that sale. He didn’t reveal that conflict of interest, either. But Key wasn’t the only Nat breaking the rules.

In between 2002 and 2005, Gerry Brownlee asked numerous written and oral questions, and gave numerous speeches about Contact Energy, and about government policy that relates to Contact Energy’s share price. He often criticised policies that would reduce Contact’s profitability – environmental standards, Kyoto, the establishment of the Electricity Commission – and asked questions on specific Contact projects.

Here is an example from 2002 of just one of the instances in which Brownlee used his powers as an MP to obtain information on Contact Energy:

Gerry Brownlee: In the light of that answer, why has Contact Energy put on hold its combined-cycle gas plant planned for Otahuhu [Hansard,8 Oct, 2002]

Here is another from 2003

Gerry Brownlee: Can the Minister confirm that the Government is considering establishing a systems operator who will buy and sell all generated electricity, doing away with the market and destroying all incentives for investment in new generation that we desperately need?

and one more from 2003

Gerry Brownlee: Is the Minister aware that similar comments from the Prime Minister last week wiped millions of dollars off the capital value of Contact Energy; can he tell us whether he has discussed those threats with the Minister for State Owned Enterprises; and can he also tell us how bringing generators to their knees helps the current crisis?

He seems a little upset about the drop in Contact’s share price, doesn’t he? Well he might, because Gerry Brownlee was a Contact shareholder; he had a financial interest in Contact’s performance and share price. In none of the instances I’ve seen where Brownlee refers to Contact or its interests does he reveal he is a shareholder. He first made it public when the Pecuniary Interests Register came into force in 2006. Prior to that, he did not declare his conflict of interest as he was required to do, even as he used his privileges as an MP to obtain information that gave him special information on the value of those shares.

I discovered Brownlee’s shareholding while examining the share registers of eight New Zealand companies. My primary purpose was to ascertain whether John Key had any holdings in those companies (more on those holdings later); I only checked whether Brownlee has a holding in Contact on a whim. So what are the odds that there are not more, undiscovered, conflicts of interest that the Nats have kept secret?

As with the secret agenda tapes, what we are seeing here is almost certainly just a small snapshot of the full picture. Even more concerning than the secret conflicts of interest that have been discovered is the knowledge that this is just the tip of the iceberg.

[Update: Brownlee’s shares disappear in 2006, when he creates a family trust. Presumably, the shares went into the trust. Parliamentary procedure expert Idiot/Savant argues that, while listing an interest in the pecuniary interests register (as Brownlee has done with his trust) removes the need to reveal conflicts of interest under SO166, a conflict arising from assets within a trust that are not named in the register still needs to be revealed. To put it bluntly, if Brownlee stills owns the shares in his family trust, he still needs to reveal the conflict of interest notwithstanding that he has registered his trust.]

31 comments on “Standard scoop: Another senior Nat failed to disclose conflicts”

  1. yl 1

    Great work Steve,

    Keep the crime busting going. It might not be front page stuff but it is more straw on the camels back. (the camel being National, and the straw being more lies and corruption).

  2. NeillR 2

    even as he used his privileges as an MP to obtain information that gave him special information on the value of those shares
    Howso? I haven’t seen a single piece yet which shows anything other than questions being asked in parliament – a public forum, which is televised. So at the same time Brownlee asked the questions they became a matter of public record and as such, the market was fully aware. Do you really have any understanding of markets and disclosure?

  3. Quoth the Raven 3

    If Gerry Brownlee bashing a pensioner didn’t sully National party supporters opinion of him I doubt this will.

  4. Ianmac 4

    Good Stuff Steve.
    NeillR: Should Bill Ralston declare his interest in John Key as his media trainer, when asking questions on public TV?
    Should David Farrar declare his interest in being a National Party blogger, when appearing as an “independent” commentator on TV or Radio?
    Should Gerry or John declare a pecuniary interest when asking questions in Parliament (which is a privileged position which others outside do not have)? This even before any money is made or shares traded which would lift it to greater more serious levels.
    I ask as a non legal non economist person.

  5. NeillR.The standing orders are clear – it doesn’t matter that these statements and questions go on the public record, it is that someone with a financial interest in the company is asking questions without revealing that interest which is the violation of the rules.

  6. vidiot 6

    NeillR – No he (SP) doesn’t.

    If he (Brownlee) was asking questions behind closed doors, he would have a conflict of interest and could be in breech of insider trading rules. However, as you (NeillR) has pointed out, all matters in the chambers are public record, so no wrong doing can be found.

    Now the questions I would like to ask SP is why do you have such a beef with our politicians who are willing to back NZ companies ? Do you not think it’s a good idea to back NZ made ?

    Next you will be assumpting that because Brownlee has shares in Contact, that he can’t argue against the compulsory introduction of CFB’s as the impact of switching over to these will see Contact’s profit’s lowered. Or promoting the electrification of Auckland Rail, as Contact might be the ones powering that.

    [this has nothing to do with insider trading rules. It is about the rules of Parliament. MPs are given privileges, powers of inquiry that ordinary people don’t have, they have to abide by rules on the use of those powers. MPs are allowed to speak on any issue but they must reveal any conflict of interest when they do so. Brownlee and Key have failed to do so. SP]

  7. coge 7

    Good on NZ politicians for investing in local companies. Sure, some of these investments turned out to be complete dogs, but good on the politicians for backing them. I’m reasonably confident that some Labour pollies have adopted the same approach.

  8. NeillR 8

    NeillR: Should Bill Ralston declare his interest in John Key as his media trainer, when asking questions on public TV?
    I suppose he should if Paul Holmes declares his interest in sleeping over at Helen and Peter’s.

  9. Janet 9

    Declaring a conflict of interest when discussing anything you could potentially benefit financially from, is generally an ethical issue, and, increasingly, a legal one. Best advice is always to declare in the interests of transparency and others can judge whether it is relevant or not.

    Notable examples when people don’t declare conflicts of interest when ethically they should, in my opinion, include some writers on a particular well-known weekly magazine, several contributors to the op ed pages of the newspapers, the sacked Hawkes Bay DHB, as well as the MPs already mentioned.

  10. T-rex 10

    Does the moron Brownlee still own those shares Steve? Because if so, I’d say his behaviour earlier this year during the “Power Crisis OMG WTF That Wasn’t”, namely endlessly talking up the degree of peril the country faced, was fairly self serving. No doubt he wanted to make Labour look bad – that’s self servingness that I can accept from the opposition. But did you see how much money Contact made during the high spot prices? Clyde and Roxborough are basically run of river dams – you can’t just shut them down. If power is cheap, contacts profits are lower.

    I’m mostly bitter because someone who is so clearly an ill-informed idiot leveraged his moronic opinions into more airtime than anyone not accused of blowing up a childcare centre should ever receive.

    Good ol’ Gerry. Tirelessly championing the dire times in the electricity industry… well, you know, at least right up until the point that it rained. Durn rain.

    In fact, when it comes right down to it, how the f*ck can a political parties energy spokesperson EVER have shares in a power company without a conflict of interest, especially in a semi-regulated market. What a joke. I now dislike him even more, and I already disliked him quite a lot.

  11. rave 11

    Have these questions been put to Key and Brownlee by Francesca Mold yet?
    I would like to see Key derailed and Brownlee getting a charge up his whatsit.

  12. T-Rex. Impossible to know. He owned the shares in his own name in the 2006 register but in 2007 he had set up a trust and the shares had disappeared (presumably, but not provably, into the trust). for the purposes of the standing order, that’s ok, so it’s not a breach of the rules, but there should be questions about a shareholder in a power company using his power as Opposition Energy spokesperson trying to scare up a power crisis every year.

    captcha: ‘locked recounts’ are vision of New Zealand, post-election?

  13. rave.. Kevin Taylor responded to the Key story, said it was like saying an MP has a conflict of interest if they talk about petrol prices because they own a car. Not true of course. A conflict of interest arises from a special interest that person has, not something everyone has, and Key owned shares in a company campaigning for the Government to undertake a certain action (buy the rails) at the same time as he was asking questions about that action.

  14. NeillR 14

    SP, it’s not a conflict of interest. A conflict of interest would arise if he were a shareholder in a company – let’s say it made wind generated turbines for power consumption and then the government happened to buy those turbines.
    Or if a DHB decided to contract out part of it’s operation and the company that got the contract was run by that MP’s spouse. Or a conflict of interest might arise if someone was looking to gain residency and the MP in question invited the person along and got them to drop a wad of cash into the collection box and later they got given residency. Those are examples of conflicts of interest.

    [no, you just don’t understand the rules. Here is Standing Order 166(1)
    166 Declaration of financial interest
    (1) A member must, before participating in the consideration of any item of business [business means activity of Parliament], declare any financial interest that the member has in that business.
    If Key had a conflict of interest over his Tranzrail shares, and he conceded he did, then Brownlee had one over his Contact shares. SP]

  15. Daveski 15

    I know this is not a Labour site because LP says so and as much as I disagree with LP’s comments (he’s is openly Labour and says so) I respect his comments.

    But this line of attack contrasts vividly with SP’s line on Winston. Moreover, for this to be relevant, it would need to be accompanied by a similar analysis of the left MP’s to prove that this is of consequence.

    To be more constructive, I think the Standard is having a bit of an identity crisis. I understand the intended purpose but posts such as these illustrate it is less a left wing labour forum of like minded people and more of a surrogate pro-Labour site.

    Yes I have read the About pages :)

    But SP’s line of attack mean this site is becoming more Labour and less labour.

  16. Tane 16

    Daveski. SP, like the rest of us, opposes a National-led government. While in Auckland he had a look at the share register and found Nat MPs had been engaging in dodgy behaviour. He is now making that behaviour public.

    There’s no identity crisis here, just a bunch of National supporters who don’t like seeing their heroes exposed and, in your case, are desperate for a line.

  17. Danny 17

    “Is the Minister aware that similar comments from the Prime Minister last week wiped millions of dollars off the capital value of Contact Energy; can he tell us whether he has discussed those threats with the Minister for State Owned Enterprises; and can he also tell us how bringing generators to their knees helps the current crisis?”

    If Brownlee said that while he was an undisclosed shareholder, he is an idiot, and he is in trouble. Plain and simple.

    NeillR/Vidiot; this is not about “markets and disclosure”. It is not an accustion concerning securities law at all. It is about “conflicts” and “pecuriary interests” (the latter often needing a consideration of the ‘market price’ when the interest is non-direct, which is not the case here).

    Therefore, it is patently obvious that you are either 1. confused; or 2. politically motivated.

  18. Daveski. I’m a Green voter, always have been. Been a member since 2003. Inactive though.

    and I’m not sure how a post revealing the results of research I have conducted for the Standard on National MP’s conflicts of interest has anything to do with whether this site is broad Left or Labour

  19. Quoth the Raven 19

    There’s no identity crisis here, just a bunch of National supporters who don’t like seeing their heroes exposed and, in your case, are desperate for a line.

    Don’t worry DPF will soon provide them with their scripts.

  20. Daveski 20

    Tane/Sp

    Acknowledged your points although you are assuming I am a National supporter.

    I certainly don’t hero worship the Nats – I’ve been quite open about their public failings.

    Clearly, conflict of interest is a valid line of attack. However, this is far from an open case of corruption and as I’ve noted fails the test of whether this is something that is characteristic of just some MP’s or whether similar straw men could be created about Labour or other left MP’s.

    SP – you have acknowledged your Green status before. My comments are based on perception.

    To me, this looks like the left being desperate for a line given the polls.

    I’m not trolling, not trying to deflect, but it’s the equivalent of the Kiwis saying at least we won the haka against the Kangaroos.

  21. Danny 21

    Vidiot?NeillR,

    … and Brownlee can ask/state whatever he damn pleases about Contact as a shareholder and as a member of Parliament, provided he first discloses that interest.

    Securities law does not come into it unless he 1. becomes an information insider, and 2. acts on that information (disclosure of his interest is irrelevant to that point, and besides, it is not even close to what was suggested). You have both mistakenly (deliberately?) confused the two to create a higher threshold for wrongdoing.

    The test is simple.
    1. a member of Parliament; 2. an interest; 3. that interest not being disclosed; and 4. participation in business related to that interest.

  22. Akldnut 22

    NeillR – Daveski You can put up all the different scenarios and whine as much as you like but that dosn’t change the fact that they’ve both been snapped not conforming to parliamentary rules.

    Daveski you need to look at your third scenario again because
    1. The MP in question did not “get” anyone to drop off a wad of cash, it was a donation.
    2. He acknowledged having a form of dealing “as such” with this guy by passing it on to the next person as the rules state that he should. ( Look he ‘s following the rules and he’s not going to make any money out of it – unlike some dodgey pricks)
    3. The dude was hedging his bets by dropping of a wad of cash to national as well. (or was it a donation?…. mmmmm convenietly ommited again)

  23. Steve:
    He owned the shares in his own name in the 2006 register but in 2007 he had set up a trust and the shares had disappeared (presumably, but not provably, into the trust). for the purposes of the standing order, that’s ok, so it’s not a breach of the rules

    Really? SO 165 includes benefits to trusts in which the MP has an interest in the definition of a financial interest. And while SO 166 allows MPs to avoid declaring an interest already contained in the register, if the register simply lists the trust rather than the shares, then there is arguably still a duty to declare. Which likely makes some of his questions and debating points (particularly over climate change) over the last few years in breach of standing orders as well.

    You should do some more digging into this. The results would be fascinating, and help protect our democracy.

  24. Dancer 24

    Good work here Steve. And for those who are unclear on standing orders – they are the rules that MPs live by – and so are important (it was a breach of the SOs that got Winston sent to the priviliges select committee). This is what Mr Key said about SOs over the earler Tranzrail event on Sunrise (23 September)

    JK: at the time in 2002, when I came into Parliament, there wasn’t a pecuniary interest list to register it on so it didn’t work like that. The correct process for me to have followed was if there was a point at which I asked um, information about a company that I had a shareholding under a standing order, I should’ve declared that and ah, I failed to do that. I was, that was a genuine error on my part.

    Now Mr Brownlee is an experienced politician so he should have known better (so should Mr Key but that’s a different story!)

  25. the sprout 25

    Great stuff. If only we had like, journalists, who could do this stuff too.

  26. Danny 26

    Yes quite.

    Of all people, Mr Brownlee is in absolutely no position to downplay the importance of standing orders or the significance of this apparently egregious breach.

  27. Ianmac 27

    Idiot Savant: Having great respect for your perceptions , I think your input is a great help. How do you think the story should be unfolded.

  28. randal 28

    handed out in free broadsheets every morning at wellington and auckland railway stations

  29. Sarah 29

    I think Steve doesn’t like people having shares in the first place. Oh those filthy capitalists.

    [I own shares. Would a perfect world not have this system of wealth ownership? Sure but that doesn’t make it immoral to own shares in the existing system. SP]

  30. Steve,

    Your checking back some and I’d like know whether other related-to-stock issues have been taken up by the mp.. looking for options.. and if available data or details whether option/s and/or option contract rights issued with any such financial asset/s..? The former could be regular to shareholders, the latter privileged and – in the circumstances you describe – most definitely in need of disclosure..

  31. Ianmac 31

    Jerry Brownlee has answered the Standard’s contention in the Press today.
    http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/0a28824.html?source=nav
    Says that there was never any requirement to declare.

Links to post

Important links

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

1 2 3 7

  • Time for NZ to prohibit the killing of great apes
    That ban was widely hailed, and spurred efforts in other countries to get similar bans. However, apes are still being exploited, abused and killed, both in captivity and in the wild. Examples of cruelty, neglect and abuse abound. Apes are… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    2 days ago
  • Auckland building consents: Tragic
    The only word to describe the latest building consent figures for Auckland is ‘tragic’, Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says. “Whatever the Government is doing to address the Auckland housing crisis, it is clearly not working. ...
    2 days ago
  • A whiff of a new biosecurity scandal?
    A pest which could create havoc for New Zealand’s horticulture and agriculture sector must be as much a focus for the Government as hunting out fruit flies, Labour’s Biosecurity spokesperson Damien O’Connor says. “While the Ministry for Primary Industries is… ...
    3 days ago
  • Government shrugs off health sector crisis
    Despite new evidence showing that cuts to health spending are costing lives the Government continues to deny the sector is struggling, Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King says. “Health services in New Zealand are in crisis. ...
    3 days ago
  • Parata lowered the bar for failing charter school
    When Hekia Parata became aware that the Whangaruru charter school was experiencing major problems her first action was to drop standards by reducing the number of qualified teachers they had to employ, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins has revealed. “Hekia… ...
    3 days ago
  • National not being straight about the economy
    John Key and Bill English need to be straight with New Zealanders about the damage their failure to diversify the economy is doing, after new figures show export growth plunged due to a collapse in dairy exports, says Grant Robertson.… ...
    4 days ago
  • Mind the Gap
    This week the International Monetary Fund released a report on the wider economic value in closing the gender pay gap. When even the bastions of free-market economics start to raise concerns about gender pay gaps, we have to realise how… ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie MP
    4 days ago
  • Labour will hold National to parental leave promise
    Labour will hold National to its promise to increase the support given to new parents of premature, multiple birth and babies born with disabilities, Labour’s paid parental leave campaigner Sue Moroney says. "I am naturally disappointed that after battling for… ...
    4 days ago
  • It was all just pillar talk
    Steven Joyce’s confession that he can no longer guarantee a pillar-free design for the New Zealand International Convention Centre shows the Government has abandoned its dream of creating an ‘iconic’ ‘world-class’ structure, says Labour Economic Development spokesperson David Clark. “Steven… ...
    4 days ago
  • Australians move on offshore speculators
    John Key might want to have a quiet word with Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott about Canberra's just-announced crack down on offshore speculators when he visits New Zealand this week, Labour's Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford says."Tony Abbott's centre right government… ...
    4 days ago
  • Government at odds on overseas driver crashes
    National backbencher Jacqui Dean has spoken out about overseas driver crashes, putting herself at odds with Prime Minister John Key who is on record as saying it’s not a big issue, Labour’s Transport spokesperson Phil Twyford says. “I’m not surprised… ...
    4 days ago
  • Human Rights and the Palestine Crisis
    Last week I heard two Palestinians speak at Wellington events about the ongoing crisis in their country. Samar Sabawi spoke to a full house about the history of Palestine and gave us a lucid and disturbing account of the situation… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    4 days ago
  • Time to take real care of our kids
    An Amnesty International report has once again criticised New Zealand’s track record on looking after our kids, Labour’s Children’s spokesperson Jacinda Ardern says. The annual report, which looks at global human rights abuses highlights not only the fact that high… ...
    4 days ago
  • John Key wrong about Labour’s war vote
    John Key’s desperate claims that the former Labour Government didn’t put combat troop deployment to a Parliamentary vote are simply wrong, Labour’s Defence spokesperson Phil Goff says. “It was disgraceful that the Prime Minister ran rough shod over democracy and… ...
    5 days ago
  • Māori language bill needs work
     It is clear that the first draft of the Māori Language Bill was about structures and funding rather than the survival of te reo Māori, Labour’s Māori Development Spokesperson Nanaia Mahuta says.  “Labour is pleased that the Minister of Māori… ...
    5 days ago
  • Report proves troubled school shouldn’t have opened
    The long-awaited release of an Education Review Office report into Northland’s troubled Whangaruru charter school proves it should never have been approved in the first place, Labour’s Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins says. “This report identifies problems with absenteeism and disengaged… ...
    5 days ago
  • Reply to PM’s statement on deploying troops to Iraq
    “The decision of any Government to send troops to a conflict zone is a very serious one, and it is right that this House takes time to consider it, to debate it, and, ideally, to vote on it, but we… ...
    5 days ago
  • Minister must take action on death trap slides
    Workplace Relations Safety Minister Michael Woodhouse must take urgent action to ensure inflatable amusement rides don’t become death traps for children, Labour’s spokesperson on Labour Relations Iain Lees-Galloway says. “No one wants to stop kids having fun, but horror stories… ...
    6 days ago
  • Manus Island and the New Zealand Government
    This week the Greens have participated in awareness activity about Manus Island, the refugee camp on an island in Papua New Guinea where Australia dumps asylum seekers. John Key says that he has every confidence in the Australian Government’s claim… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    1 week ago
  • Election Inquiry – Getting accessible voting on the agenda
    James Shaw has been doing a series of blogs on the Election Inquiry into last year’s general election.  I thought this was a great opportunity to raise an issue very dear to me – accessible voting. Last year’s general election… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    1 week ago
  • RMA changes no solution to Christchurch housing
    Housing will continue to be a big issue in 2015. The latest Consumer Price Index, released last month, shows both good news and bad news on the housing front. After years of being the most expensive place to build a… ...
    GreensBy Eugenie Sage MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Saving kokako in South Auckland’s Hunua Ranges
    It is amazing that you can hear the song of the endangered North Island kokako in South Auckland’s Hunua Ranges, less than 50 kms from the central city. A heavy schedule of policy workshops at the Green Party’s Policy… ...
    GreensBy Eugenie Sage MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Let’s not turn a blind eye to human rights
    The Cricket World Cup has just opened in New Zealand, and it’s an opportunity for us to shine on the world stage. International sport can be a chance for us to build relationships with other countries, and examine what it… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Its Just Not Cricket
    This week it was my privilege to work with Sri Lankan Tamil communities in this country and host Australian journalist and human rights advocate Trevor Grant. I knew a bit about Trevor from his biography but I didn’t know just… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Time for NZ to #BeCrueltyFree
    The Government is about to progress the final stages of the Animal Welfare Amendment bill. This will be our last opportunity to get changes made to improve the bill to ensure a better outcome for animals. I have put forwards… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    2 weeks ago
  • We want access!
    Access to buildings is a big issue for many New Zealanders. It looks like that, due to the hard work and persistence of people in the disability community, the Government may finally be starting to take access to buildings seriously.… ...
    GreensBy Mojo Mathers MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Greens call on Super Fund to divest from fossil fuels
    The Green Party today called on the New Zealand Superannuation Fund (the Fund) to divest from fossil fuels, starting immediately with coal. The call was accompanied with a new report, Making money from a climate catastrophe: The case for divesting… ...
    GreensBy Russel Norman MP
    2 weeks ago
  • Young Kiwis’ housing crisis
    Shelter is a fundamental human need along with food, water and clean air. All humans need adequate shelter; it’s a human right. Warm, safe, stable accommodation is critical for young people to be able learn and grow and just be.… ...
    GreensBy Jan Logie MP
    3 weeks ago
  • On the River Patrol in Te Tai Tokerau
    Last Wednesday, I went on a tour of some of Northland’s rivers with  Millan Ruka from Environmental River Patrol as he monitored water quality throughout Te Tai Tokerau. The dry conditions meant we couldn’t use the boat but we visited… ...
    GreensBy Catherine Delahunty MP
    3 weeks ago
  • Opening of Parliament 2015
    Russel NormanOpening of Parliament Speech February 2015 Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou Tēnā koutou katoa. A brief history of climate change What a summer! It's been hot, even here in Wellington, hotter than any summer I can remember. All… ...
    GreensBy Russel Norman MP
    3 weeks ago

Removed at the request of The Daily Blog.
Public service advertisements by The Standard

Current CO2 level in the atmosphere