web analytics

Between a rock and a hard place

Written By: - Date published: 2:58 pm, January 18th, 2010 - 14 comments
Categories: education, families - Tags:

At the end of the month the new kindergarten year begins. Reading this article in the SSTimes from yesterday reminded me of just how hard the question of childcare is for many parents:

The Kiwi tradition of sending pre-schoolers to kindy is losing favour, as growing numbers of parents seek all-day care for their children.The latest annual census of early childhood education services shows the number of children enrolled in kindergartens has fallen to fewer than 40,000 a drop of 12.4% since 2005. At the same time the number of children enrolled in daycare centres has jumped from 83,889 in 2005 to 101,425 in July 2009 an increase of nearly 21%….

The Ministry of Education census shows the number of children aged three and under enrolled in licensed early childhood centres has jumped in the past five years: there has been an increase of 21% in the number of babies (under one-year-olds); 18.4% for one-year-olds; and 15% for two-year-olds. Home-based services have also gained in popularity, growing 54% in five years.

On average, children enrolled in daycare centres are now spending 23 hours a week there. Most children are enrolled part-time, but since 2005 there has been a 37% increase in the number of fulltime enrolments (more than 27 hours a week). The number of children now classed in fulltime care has jumped from nearly 25,000 five years ago to just over 34,000.

Whether it’s ‘paid-at-home’, creche or kindergarten there are real challenges facing today’s parents (and would-be parents). Whether/ when to return to work, balancing work pressures with the demands of a young family, less money versus more time, growing demands on services. We want parents to return to work, but do we want that to include parents of really young children? Is paid care really the answer? Or longer parental leave? It all adds up to a complex situation that has some fundamental implications further down the track. This young generation will be looking after us in our old age at a ratio we’ve never faced before! Meanwhile parents are hoping they’ve made the best possible choice for their kids.

14 comments on “Between a rock and a hard place ”

  1. ieuan 1

    How long before someone here says ‘the Government should provide a wage for those bringing up children’?

    • Ari 1.1

      Only in as much as we should be supporting a UBI anyway. 😛

    • Descendant Of Smith 1.2

      Actually I think employers should pay enough that someone can afford to raise their children. But many employers don’t value people with families – apparently it’s their own selfish choice to have the 2.6 children needed to replenish the population.

      The most selfish people in our society are those who choose not to have children and then berate others for doing so. I’m not sure who they think is going to serve them in the shops and wipe their bum when they are old – Oh that’s right they want my children to do that.

  2. prosaic 2

    The Government should provide a wage for those bringing up children. Or at least they should ensure wages (or wages plus things like Working For Families) are high enough such that one income can support a family. NZ would have a much healthier future if young children were raised by their mother or father in those earliest years.

    • Lanthanide 2.1

      Actually I think there would easily be some children whom would be better off not being raised by their parents. However as it currently stands, people who fall into this category are also the least likely to be able to afford paid care.

      • prosaic 2.1.1

        Their poverty is much more often than not one of the key factors leading to such families’ inability to parent their kids safely. Provide a decent income to families–hell even just provide jobs for all–and kids’ wellbeing will increase dramatically.

  3. ropata 3

    Should a frugal single person without assets (apart from a student loan), be subsidising families that have a nice car, a house, a plasma TV, 2.4 kids and regular overseas holidays? WFF is fundamentally unjust; single people are marginalised and treated as second class citizens; partnered people have better stats in health, longevity, happiness, income, and are now given extra bribes. These never ending claims for govt largesse have to stop sometime.

    I’m happy to pay tax to live in a just society but then to be scolded by greedy people like D.of Smith, who have chosen to overextend themselves, and think the world owes them something, is repulsive.

    Way to scare off skilled young people, NZ.

    • Descendant Of Smith 3.1

      Firstly I don’t think the world owes me anything – I just think that I should be paid enough for my labour to raise a family. This is how it used to be. If we don’t value raising children ( and this means valuing that in a financial way that enables them to be raised, clothed and fed well ) then we reap what we sow.

      Now either the employer pays me a decent wage or the state provides adittional assistance – my clear preference is for the employer.

      I’m also not sure how you consider I have over-extended myself as you know little about me. I’ve also not ever been overseas as my efforts and finances went into raising my children and supporting my wife.

      If you feel berated then one can assume it is because you don’t value the contribution that people who have children make to the future of this country and you are critical of those who need additional financial support at this time.This is further required for families who have children with disabilities.

      Reasonable support is required – it’s unreasonable to say none is hence I’m quite happy to berate those people who believe that.

      As I said you’ve not yet made any contribution to supplying a future workforce and maintaining the population. I’m sure you don’t mind if my kids choose not to serve you in shops, fix your computers, and look after you in hospital.

      Of course the alternative is that you should only have children when you are completely and totally financially secure. This is usually in your late thirites or forties.

      One difficulty with that premise is that to some extent the baby boomers pushed that concept onto their children – many of whom found in later years they couldn’t have children. I know many women who now regret putting all their effort into getting financially secure first for that reason.

      Secondly there is a biological imperative to have children and I also suspect we are better designed to have children young. These aspects seems like common sense.

      Financial security and best time to procreate are almost mutually exclusive.

      Lastly I understand why people with no kids find this statement difficult. Very really are they challenged with the notion that having children is a positive thing to be applauded and supported. Far too often it’s simply promoted as ” you reap what you sow” and “if you choose to have kids it’s your own bloody fault”.

      Sadly those attitudes don’t reflect that you actually live in a community without which you couldn’t enjoy all the things that you do.

      • ropata 3.1.1

        How very strange, you only value people based on their reproductiveness? The universe does not revolve around you and your little darlings. Other people exist and work hard and pay tax. It is not your employers responsibility to pay more, or the governments. It’s YOUR responsibility to look after your family. I am amazed at your demanding attitude. Life is hard work for everybody.

        you’ve not yet made any contribution to supplying a future workforce
        A family is a blessing to which I aspire, but I have paid for others to do so instead. More fool me.

        • Descendant Of Smith

          You only value people based on their reproductiveness?

          Nope never said that. I value every one. The only people I have been critical of is those who don’t have children and criticise those that do and make statements like they are fools for helping support other families. I think it is an honorable thing to do and you should be proud of your contribution.

          What is it in people’s upbringing that places such little value on people raising children.

          It’s YOUR responsibility to look after your family.

          That’s only a modern individualistic construct since currency and paid employment for work became the norm and people took a more selfish attitude. It is quite normal in most societies to take collective responsibility for the welfare of families. I have supported many other families over the years with free food and equipment, cash at times as well as advice and support.

          Are you saying that no support should be provided? You are advocating for the complete removal of WFF assistance, any help with childcare costs, the disappearance of homes for respite care, a large increase in industrial action as employees with families demand better wages and have no concern at all in the resulting crime increase as a result.

          We don’t live in a society where we have the family farm which we till for food – we live in a society where the means of raising your family is through wages. Not everyone is capable or has the opportunity to earn large incomes.

          See nowhere have I said I should do nothing and expect anyone to support me. My simple expectation is an old traditional one ” A fair days wage for a fair days work”. It’s just that I think a fair days wage is more than what many low paid people get now.

          I’m more than happy for the profits of people’s labour to be shared with them on a more equitable basis.

  4. ieuan 4

    So it’s the Governments responsibility to make sure people have enough money to raise their children?

    Here’s a radical idea, how about it’s the parents responsibility to ensure they have enough money to raise their children? And they can do this by educating themselves to get a better job, making good financial decisions and working toward the goal of providing for a family.

    However I do think there is one thing the Government could do to help those of us with children (I’ve got a 2 year old daughter and 9 month old son) and that’s make child care costs tax deductible for the parent returning to work.

    • Descendant Of Smith 4.1

      “Here’s a radical idea, how about it’s the parents responsibility to ensure they have enough money to raise their children? And they can do this by educating themselves to get a better job, making good financial decisions and working toward the goal of providing for a family.”

      But surely if you had done this then you would not need help with child care costs? I sense a disconnect.

      Sorry just being mischievous. I totally agree that you should get help. Out of interest does your wife want to return to work or is it felt that there is little choice as the money is needed? Would income splitting to reduce your tax and having your wife raise your children be an option for you.

      See for me it’s about the thought that women should have either choice – stay at home and raise the kids ( and have income splitting and maybe Universal Family Benefit) or go to work and have an even higher income but some help with childcare costs.

      The difficulty with low wages is that the choice has to a large extent been removed and for many the choice becomes separating and DPB.

  5. Herodotus 5

    So with 2 earners $40k & $55k = $95k with 3 16-18 year olds you are entitled to $55/week WFF and In work $60/week and after tax of $95k-$20k(PAYE)=$75k + benefits $6k
    Single income same family structure
    $95-$27.6 (PAYE)= $67.4k + $6k
    Both get the same WFF, why does it cost less $150/week for a single earning family to live on than double earners?
    No wonder I get the impression that govts ( esp Labour) do not value parentrs and want to take parents out of the family and into the work force.

  6. prism 6

    The quality time that children in full daycare have may be an exclusive hour with a parent before bedtime if the child is lucky. I have seen an example. The father picks up a preschooler from daycare and they go home. Child curls up in front of tv and watches cartoons. Dad plays computer games in another room. Mum arrives home from work and cooks dinner.

    My contention is that a parent, probably but not exclusively the mother, should be paid to stay home for the first two years with the baby/toddler. At the same time they are offered free a tech course on child rearing and psychology and get NCEA credits for it. This would be organised with a short period on premises and work coming through the net. It’s a great opportunity to raise child rearing standards and also get useful education experience which can then be built on. Being at home can be an isolating experience and having a goal beyond just looking after the child would be good for parents.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Tokelau Language Week reminds us to stay united and strong
    Staying strong in the face of challenges and being true to our heritage and languages are key to preserving our cultural identity and wellbeing, is the focus of the 2020 Tokelau Language Week. Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says this year’s theme, ‘Apoapo tau foe, i nā tāfea ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ announces a third P-3 deployment in support of UN sanctions
    The Government has deployed a Royal New Zealand Air Force P-3K2 Orion (P-3) maritime patrol aircraft to support the implementation of United Nations Security Council (UNSC) resolutions imposing sanctions against North Korea, announced Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters and Minister of Defence Ron Mark. “New Zealand has long supported ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific trade and development agreement a reality
    Pacific regional trade and development agreement PACER Plus will enter into force in 60 days now that the required eight countries have ratified it. Trade and Export Growth Minister David Parker welcomed the announcement that the Cook Islands is the eighth nation to ratify this landmark agreement. “The agreement represents ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Securing a pipeline of teachers
    The Government is changing its approach to teacher recruitment as COVID-19 travel restrictions continue, by boosting a range of initiatives to get more Kiwis into teaching. “When we came into Government, we were faced with a teacher supply crisis,” Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “Over the past three years, we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exceptions for a small number of international students with visas
    The Government has established a new category that will allow 250 international PhD and postgraduate students to enter New Zealand and continue their studies, in the latest set of border exceptions. “The health, safety and wellbeing of people in New Zealand remains the Government’s top priority. Tight border restrictions remain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • First COVID-19 vaccine purchase agreement signed
    The Government has signed an agreement to purchase 1.5 million COVID-19 vaccines – enough for 750,000 people – from Pfizer and BioNTech, subject to the vaccine successfully completing all clinical trials and passing regulatory approvals in New Zealand, say Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods and Health Minister Chris Hipkins. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • International statement – End-to-end encryption and public safety
    We, the undersigned, support strong encryption, which plays a crucial role in protecting personal data, privacy, intellectual property, trade secrets and cyber security.  It also serves a vital purpose in repressive states to protect journalists, human rights defenders and other vulnerable people, as stated in the 2017 resolution of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ministry of Defence Biodefence Assessment released
    The Ministry of Defence has today released a Defence Assessment examining Defence’s role across the spectrum of biological hazards and threats facing New Zealand. Biodefence: Preparing for a New Era of Biological Hazards and Threats looks at how the NZDF supports other agencies’ biodefence activities, and considers the context of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020
    New Approaches to Economic Challenges: Confronting Planetary Emergencies: OECD 9 October 2020 Hon David Parker’s response following Thomas Piketty and Esther Duflo. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening, wherever in the world you might be. I first acknowledge the excellent thought provoking speeches of Thomas Piketty and Esther ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Kaipara Moana restoration takes next step
    A Memorandum of Understanding has been signed today at Waihāua Marae between the Crown, local iwi and councils to protect, restore and enhance the mauri of Kaipara Moana in Northland. Environment Minister David Parker signed the document on behalf of the Crown along with representatives from Ngā Maunga Whakahī, Ngāti ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand and Uruguay unite on reducing livestock production emissions
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor and Uruguayan Minister of Livestock, Agriculture and Fisheries Carlos María Uriarte have welcomed the launch of a three-year project that will underpin sustainable livestock production in Uruguay, Argentina, and Costa Rica.  The project called ‘Innovation for pasture management’ is led by Uruguay’s National Institute of Agricultural ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 3100 jobs created through marae upgrades
    Hundreds of marae throughout the country will be upgraded through investments from the Provincial Growth Fund’s refocused post COVID-19 funding to create jobs and put money into the pockets of local tradespeople and businesses, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta have announced. “A total ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Health volunteers recognised in annual awards
    Health Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 9 teams and 14 individuals are the recipients of this year’s Minister of Health Volunteer Awards.  “The health volunteer awards celebrate and recognise the thousands of dedicated health sector volunteers who give many hours of their time to help other New Zealanders,” Mr Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community COVID-19 Fund supports Pacific recovery
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio says a total of 264 groups and individuals have successfully applied for the Pacific Aotearoa Community COVID-19 Recovery Fund, that will support Pacific communities drive their own COVID-19 recovery strategies, initiatives, and actions. “I am keen to see this Fund support Pacific ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Community benefits from Māori apprenticeships
    Up to 50 Māori apprentices in Wellington will receive paid training to build houses for their local communities, thanks to a $2.75 million investment from the Māori Trades and Training Fund, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Ngāti Toa Rangatira Incorporated to provide its Ngā Kaimahi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Training fund supports Māori jobseekers
    Rapidly growing sectors will benefit from a $990,000 Māori Trades and Training Fund investment which will see Wellington jobseekers supported into work, announced Employment Minister Willie Jackson today. “This funding will enable Sapphire Consultants Ltd. to help up to 45 Māori jobseekers into paid training initiatives over two years through ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Ruakura Inland Port development vital infrastructure for Waikato
    The Government is investing $40 million to develop an inland port at Ruakura which will become a freight super-hub and a future business, research and residential development for the Waikato, Urban Development and Transport Minister Phil Twyford, and Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. The funding has been has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Appointments made to Defence Expert Review Group
    Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today the establishment of an Expert Review Group to review a number of aspects of the New Zealand Defence Force’s (NZDF) structure, information management and record-keeping processes.  The Expert Review Group’s work arises out of the first recommendation from the Report of the Government’s Inquiry ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • No active community cases of COVID-19
    There are no active community cases of COVID-19 remaining in the country after the last people from the recent outbreak have recovered from the virus, Health Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “This is a big milestone. New Zealanders have once again through their collective actions squashed the virus. The systems ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Clean energy upgrade for more public buildings
    More public buildings will be supported by the Government to upgrade to run on clean energy, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. Minister Shaw announced that Lincoln and Auckland universities will receive support through the Clean-Powered Public Service Fund to replace fossil fuel boilers. Southern, Taranaki, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago