Searching: posts, comments Sorted by: newest Page: 1 of 2 Results: 1-30 of 33
Written By: Poptech - Date published: 9:48 pm, January 13th, 2014
Typical censorship when you are unable to debate the facts. I have never seen someone be on the receiving end of abuse like I have here and then get banned for defending myself. [lprent: That was why I provided a link to all of your comments at the point I ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 5:00 pm, January 13th, 2014
... ://thestandard.org.nz/?s=%40author+poptech&isopen=block&search_comments=true& ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:45 pm, January 13th, 2014
Childish name caller, you are welcome for the education.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:38 pm, January 13th, 2014
For people are not computer illiterate like yourself, they have all her quotes at their fingertips - it is called the Internet. Would you like an education on how to use it properly too?Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:32 pm, January 13th, 2014
Childish name caller, I am glad I can help with your political science education, http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ar_libertarianism_qa Q: What do you think of the libertarian movement? AR: All kinds of people today call themselves “ ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:11 pm, January 13th, 2014
Oh Ray is a scientist at NASA? It looks like I will need to make an example out of his libelous lies. Thank you for that information as I had no reason to look into who he was before.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:05 pm, January 13th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, You really need to read the, "Rebuttals to Criticisms" section on the list, Quote mining Roger Pielke Jr. and using it here out of context is intellectually dishonest, Full quote: "Assuming that these are Hypothesis 1 type ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 1:59 pm, January 13th, 2014
Only 2011? ...and from RealClimate, the site I am censored from replying? As I could so easily lay waste to all the lies, misinformation and strawman arguments they posted in those comments. Instead you simply spam more dishonest personal attacks. I don't ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 1:36 pm, January 13th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, You can't attack the list because no one has managed to come up with a valid criticism. You simply spam long debunked links that have no relation to the current version of the list. Feel free to post any criticism you think ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 1:16 pm, January 13th, 2014
What exactly is "Pielke et al."? Yet all the emails I receive are constantly thanking me for making these resources available to them. When people are intellectually dishonest like yourself, people can see it and your propaganda does not work. Incoming ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 1:12 pm, January 13th, 2014
The only bullshit can be found in those who desperately attack the list with lies, misinformation and strawman arguments. I deal with amateurs like yourself all the time.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 12:50 pm, January 13th, 2014
How does it feel to know you have been spiking inbound traffic from this website?Written By: Poptech - Date published: 12:49 pm, January 13th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, I am here simply to correct your misinformation for anyone else reading this. Amateurs like yourself just drive traffic to my site, thanks puppet.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 12:03 pm, January 13th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, 1. Which counted paper is not peer-reviewed? (surely you can name one) 2. Which paper does not support a skeptic argument? I see you continue to post long debunked nonsense that is found in the, "Rebuttals to Criticisms" ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 11:54 am, January 13th, 2014
You seem incredibly confused as I am only commenting here to correct your nonsense about my work, other than that I have no interest in anything you say.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 7:05 pm, January 12th, 2014
Like I said.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 6:56 pm, January 12th, 2014
It seems childish comments and no real arguments is all that can be stated here.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 6:51 pm, January 12th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, What is the title of the list?Written By: Poptech - Date published: 6:50 pm, January 12th, 2014
Alarmist childish name caller, Quote a single thing I lied about.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 6:29 pm, January 12th, 2014
Your alarmism can be well established by you comments. Quote a single thing I lied about. Please continue with your childish name calling, as you continue to have no real argument and it is getting more embarrassing each time you post.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 6:06 pm, January 12th, 2014
I am well aware you are incapable of actual debate but instead rely on childish name calling. Everyone reading this can clearly see it. There is nothing unusual about my appearance here as I always correct any misinformation about my work when found. ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 11:56 am, January 12th, 2014
I will, thanks.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 5:42 pm, January 11th, 2014
This is a great collection of childish name calling and dishonest ad hominems. Thanks, I use these are examples for others.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 5:40 pm, January 11th, 2014
Did you try and explain to your son how to call people childish names and use logical fallacies when arguing? No wonder he was cynical.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 5:32 pm, January 11th, 2014
You failed to make a valid argument to notice and instead continue with childish name calling and dishonest ad hominems. The only conspiracy theories are yours, including your smears relating to "creationism", "big tobacco", and "links to petrochemical ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 3:24 pm, January 11th, 2014
One Anonymous Knucklehead, more meaningless rhetoric and childish name calling, yet not a single valid argument. Surely you can formulate an actual argument and not continue to embarrass yourself here like this.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 10:11 am, January 11th, 2014
Pasupial, you falsely claim I am saying something that is not true. Surely you can support your baseless argument or do you need an education on how the Web of Science works like James Powell? Maybe you have not read this article enough, http://www. ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 9:50 am, January 11th, 2014
Pasupial, what part of all the results that Powell posted are not peer-reviewed do you not understand? Do you not understand that the Web of Science does NOT have a peer-reviewed filter? If you do not understands these elementary arguments then I suggest ...Written By: Poptech - Date published: 9:28 am, January 11th, 2014
Let me know when you can address my actual arguments without simply more childish name calling.Written By: Poptech - Date published: 8:19 pm, January 10th, 2014
One Anonymous Knucklehead, Any likely criticism you have against the list (outside of childish name calling) has been rebutted in the extensive, "Rebuttals to Criticism" section of the list, http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers- ...
Recent Comments