Searching: posts, comments Sorted by: newest Page: 1 of 6 Results: 1-30 of 173
Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 6:37 pm, March 5th, 2025
$5.3 trillion worth of goods, including those from the US, EU, UK, Australia and NZ, transit through the South China Sea annually. China has no such strategic interest in the open waters of the Tasman, does it? It's overkill to protect a few fishing ships, ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 10:59 am, March 4th, 2025
Um, no, I mean the countries bound together by Article 5 of NATO and the countries of Central and Eastern Europe who still have very raw memories of Russian occupation. The Ukrainians don't need much urging. I expect an illegal invasion and the various ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 8:38 pm, March 3rd, 2025
I think China just told us very clearly that we aren't special, but then as has been established, I am a mindless idiot.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 8:37 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Yes, again I agree with you. And that is always going to hinge on interoperability with Australia and whoever Australia is aligned with. It may be a vain hope on my part, but I don't think Trump and MAGA is permanent. I think they're going to get kicked in ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:53 pm, March 3rd, 2025
They're still doing it today, though it's less amusing right now. EU fighter jets get scrambled every couple of months to intercept Russian jets and drones. Intimidation combined with plausible deniability.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:50 pm, March 3rd, 2025
I think she's being obtuse there. It doesn't need to be the Spanish Armada because it's not the sixteenth century and we certainly don't have the equivalent English navy. China's tactic in the South China Sea and around Taiwan has all been relatively low- ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:32 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Yes, it's not like it's our most strategic stretch of communication and transport with our nearest and most important economic and defence partner or anything, but then I'm just an idiot.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:30 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Obviously, which is why the focus has always been on our interoperability with Australia.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:28 pm, March 3rd, 2025
I'd be hugely surprised if they didn't. And it's only going to get busier if Australia gets those nuclear submarines.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 5:26 pm, March 3rd, 2025
That's like saying Russia flying a MiG right up to the edge of EU airspace isn't provocative. I mean, obviously it's not a standard Chinese intimidation tactic, it's not like they did exactly the same thing in the Gulf of Tonkin two months ago when Vietnam ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:55 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Or rather, it's all well and good for the individual to be a pacifist and seek a non-combat role, but it's quite another to espouse it as the only right position in the middle of a war, especially one as brutal as this one.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:52 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Macron, rather surprisingly, seems to have stood up as the rallying point for Europe's independent defence in the event of the US pulling out troops and withdrawing from NATO. On the one hand that's good, as the US can no longer be relied upon. On the ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:49 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Us witnesses from very afar, should probably acknowledge that the whole of Europe is terrified of Putin and what might happen if Trump kneecaps NATO.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:43 pm, March 3rd, 2025
Same thing in a warWritten By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:40 pm, March 3rd, 2025
What Clark ignores is that decision was already largely set in stone in WW2 and by our geographical location. Our defence, economic, social and geographical relationship with Australia is so closely entangled, wither they go, we go. If they are in the US ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 12:28 pm, March 3rd, 2025
I agree, and to an extant I get annoyed with the way she almost tries to run an independent foreign policy through social media. Although for the most part she was a great PM, she is still very attached to what I call "Clark Doctrine" - that our part of ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:32 pm, March 2nd, 2025
About the only two people that seem to know how to handle Trump are Macron and King Charles.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:31 pm, March 2nd, 2025
Did you have your sense of humour surgically removed at birth? Actually, forget I said anything. I don't want to give the impression that I am interested.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:28 pm, March 2nd, 2025
Russia has more nukes than the US, resources, vast territory and the total petro-dependency of countries that hate it. It might not be a superpower anymore in the classic sense, but it is certainly more than a mere regional power.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:24 pm, March 2nd, 2025
Even moral support is something, though we should probably consider taking refugees as well.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 6:03 pm, March 2nd, 2025
Maybe the Ecuadorians made him put the toilet seat down once in a while.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 6:02 pm, March 2nd, 2025
Well, he hates the US and NATO as well, so you have that in commonWritten By: Populuxe - Date published: 8:32 am, March 2nd, 2025
Oe we just admit that most New Zealanders are thoroughly ignorant about our system of government beyond voting along partisan lines every three years and we should include civics in the curriculum. And vested media interests mean very little to anyone ...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 1:08 pm, February 28th, 2025
Lord Rothermere of the Daily Mail was literally spruiking for Hitler. As for Rupert Murdoch...Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:46 am, February 28th, 2025
I think some people must have short memories because up until the big media corp mergers of the 1980s almost every newspaper you could name was privately owned and followed the editorial line of their owner.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 9:18 pm, February 24th, 2025
Commercial vessels have every right to be protected both from pirates and from states illegally attempting to annex open waters.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 11:06 am, February 24th, 2025
Twenty years ago.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 10:46 am, February 24th, 2025
Maybe the parents are working double shifts just to keep a roof over their heads? Maybe, for whatever reason, kids shouldn't be made to suffer because of it?Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 10:45 am, February 24th, 2025
It's a classic neoliberal pattern. Deliberately make a mess of it. Privatise it. Let private company run it into the ground for profit.Written By: Populuxe - Date published: 10:42 am, February 24th, 2025
The chief difference being that while the South China Sea is a major shipping route for the countries involved, unless China has extended the Silk Belt to the penguins in Antarctica, it's a lot less justifiable.
Recent Comments