Why am I not surprised? You asked, I delivered. Labour brought in students on visitor visa's KNOWING they could not work, yet they offered them '30-40 hours' work per week. They knowingly offered them remuneration, again illegally. If you don't understand ...
Hi Weka. 1. Labour Party advertising called for overseas students to 'volunteer' for a 'fellowship' scheme, in which they would be working, but not for any financial compensation. 2. Those students were facilitated into NZ on Visitors Visas. 3. Visitors ...
Goff and Cunliffe brought themselves down. Goff was toast even before the 'show me the money' moment. Cunliffe, well where to start. Apologising or being a man. The baby bribe. Breaching the electoral act in a tweet. Padding his CV. Lying about Shane Jones...
"A minor short-term management cock up..." Breaking the law. Lying to cover up. Your description is a delightful euphemism.
Labour breached immigration laws by offering employment in exchange for compensation (http://bskstage.weblog.leidenuniv.nl/files/2017/05/New-Zealand-Labour-Party-2017-Campaign-Fellowship-1.pdf). Then there's the lies, like claiming the scheme failed ...
Meanwhile...Labour are so poor they illegally hire immigrants, lie about it, lie to the students, stick them in substandard accommodation and then push all the blame on to the greatest political failure of all time, Matt McCarten. Follow the money, eh? ["...
“Sat on that one for a while lol.” Correctness, yes. Not necessarily obligation. You obviously sat on it too long! “Really? Is that the only “should”? What if we don’t feel like it?” Then, because there is no obligation or entitlement, you shouldn’t. It's ...
"Yes, you’ve already said that things like “giving advice” aren’t things. Funny how they can be referred to as things, though, even though (according to you) they aren’t things." I don't think they can be referred to as 'things'. But we're entitled to ...
"And my nose is not a nose." Your nose is a 'thing'. Giving advice is not a 'thing'. "Where?" I summarised as followed. "That’s super. But that’s you being free to give someone something to which they are not entitled, not why you should give someone ...
"This from the guy who thinks that things aren’t things." Because they aren't. "where? Linkies, please – I see lots of claims that you do all these nice things for people who aren’t entitled to them, but you’ve never said why you should do those things." I...
"And, if the incident had involved an actual crime. In other words, not very “just like” at all." Ah, no. The incidents have significant similarities, including silly claims made by opponents for ideological reasons only.
No, it's beltway. The NZ Herald site is driven by clicks, and this is already off the page.
"But she didn’t." You've taken that an extra step, which isn't logical. Clark knowingly signed a picture she didn't paint. In the narrow minds of some that is dishonesty, just as in the narrow minds of some (and by the way this issue is already dead in the...
Penny did you watch Parliament yesterday? I did, and the opposition were pale.
That from the same Chris Darby who voted for a 10% rates hike. Stuff off.
"So the fundamental difference, once again, is that you don’t understand basic English the way human beings use it." No, the difference is you can't follow simple logic, and you tie yourself in knots trying to justify the point at which you lost. "You’ve ...
And Little is within the margin of error (or close to it!!).
"I really do not think , you have convinced anybody of your viewpoints..." I really didn't expect I would. My point was to demonstrate how silly the 'liar liar' claims really are, because on the basis of this example you could accuse anyone of anything.
"“You can’t prove Bill English hadn’t forgotten what he said..." Just like no-one can prove Helen Clark set out to deliberately deceive by signing a painting she didn't paint. It's just silly claims based on irrational bias.
"They can’t look in the mirror. They’re dead." Whose dead? The parents of dead children are dead?? "And as I pointed out, what actually happens is not necessarily what should happen." So? "The question is whether what you claim should happen is a ...
"As I’ve said – the proof has been posted." This is classic denialist behaviour. What you have posted is Bill English saying he didn't recall the specifics of something that happened months ago. You have posted NO evidence he lied. None.
Barclay seems to be the liar here.
So now you're quoting A Little as a source? Desperate as.
Shane Jones.
True that.
Probably cheaper than a by-election though?
...Richard Worth...
"So those things I mentioned aren’t things?" That's right. "So in the absence of the state standing as last resort, there is no support for the people who need state support.So the government DOES have to do it for those people. Otherwise you’re leaving ...
"Those answers were all lies," You simply cannot prove that. [You are trolling. PM set out the proof for you. Keep this up and your commenting ability will be suspended - MS] No, he didn't. He quoted the context, but cannot prove English lied. If that ...
What lie?
So you have made an accusation without proof? Thanks.
Recent Comments