Searching: posts, comments Sorted by: newest Results: 16
Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 10:47 am, April 4th, 2013
So I ask for verification that these buildings are like the WTC, and in response; Strawman arguments. Typical, but sad that you'd rather talk about anything else than the question I asked. Why's that? Mind made up is it? Do.Not.Question.The.Truther. ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 9:55 am, April 4th, 2013
So why do either of you think the building is of the same construction type as WTC? Please respond with some substantiation of the claim that these buildings are of the same construction type as WTC. I'd really prefer not to have to conclude you really are ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 9:36 am, September 17th, 2012
"To PB this proves that all buildings will collapse like the Twin towers and WTC 7 if exposed to fire." I'll just leave this one here as a fine example of Eve's honesty for those who can find me saying or implying anything like it. (HINT: You won't find me ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 8:58 am, September 17th, 2012
So the one link you provide that is at all relevant says that the madrid building was very different to the WTC buildings, but that the parts of the building that were most like the WTC buildings did collapse. (And we are not talking about 'chunks' here, ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 6:34 pm, September 15th, 2012
it only takes 6.5 if you ignore the penthouses, there is no reason to do that. I've seen arguments that there were two series of explosions, the first to weaken the structure, the second to bring it down. But that doesn't explain why we see the penthouses ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 2:30 pm, September 15th, 2012
They are questions Eve. I don't need to provide links to verify questions. Question have answers, you have none however, which is fascinating. It's almost as if the answers to those questions are things you are not interested in. Do the answers to those ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 2:13 pm, September 15th, 2012
What happened to the top section of the Madrid building Eve? What was the difference in construction between the top section and the bottom section, how does that relate to the WTC and why don't truther sites ever talk about that? Not mentioning these ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 1:01 pm, September 11th, 2012
How much do ya reckon would be needed to bring down the WTCs? I've asked a few times but no one wants to discuss the mechanics alternate theories.Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 4:30 pm, August 25th, 2012
Great source. And I do so love youtube clips. Why don't truthers ever type shit out so it can be easily quoated and analysed? Weird. Here's an interview with the fire dept chief who ordered the pullout: http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/nyregion/ ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 2:10 pm, August 25th, 2012
hey CV. Reporting WTC 6 as collapsed 20 minutes before it actually did was the classic. It was never satisfactorily explained how that line was approved and inserted into the news presenter’s script, or where the original report originated from. It was put ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 8:59 am, August 4th, 2011
Link for that: http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfmWritten By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 7:30 am, August 4th, 2011
Not the video. I was wondering about this: The remark that NIST states that their collapse theory has only a low probability of actually happening was a remark in the WTC 7 report and was added after they had to withdraw several hypothesis because there ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 9:30 pm, August 3rd, 2011
Re conspiracies in general vto, sure, they are real. But they are hard to get the truth of, so it comes down to guess work and evaluation right. On this one, what kills it for me is this: Assuming AQ was involved, (and there is very very good reason to ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 7:59 pm, August 3rd, 2011
vto. WTC 1 http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfmWritten By: travellerev - Date published: 5:46 pm, August 3rd, 2011
In response to Pascal's bookie here is a link to a thorough debunking of the popular mechanics articles. It's only part 1 of 9 but you can find the other parts on the same page. Here is an analysis the collapse of WTC 7 of Tony Samboti engineer ...Written By: Pascal's bookie - Date published: 5:13 pm, August 3rd, 2011
vto. here's popular mechanics summary of the NIST report on WTC7: "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to ...
Recent Comments