Background on the Weinstein case.
When contacted by Newshub, Mr Plunket originally claimed no knowledge of the tweets. Later in the night, he clarified that he did not know which tweets we were referring to as he “hadn’t tweeted [tonight]”.
“I’ve deleted my Twitter,” he said when first contacted and asked about the tweets.
However when the tweets were read out to him, he eventually acknowledged responsibility – but said he sent the messages to prove a point.
“People on Twitter were pre-disposed to take the worst away from my post,” he said.
“It shows Twitter’s not a place for conversation.”
Mr Plunket said several of the replies were mild, simply stating, “No”, they did not “feel for” the man accused of sexual harassing multiple women.
Others, he said, “launched into foul-mouthedly attacking myself personally”.
He denied by saying “anyone else”, it implied he did “feel for” Weinstein. He then followed up by saying “feels for” didn’t have to mean someone supported Weinstein.
“Feels can be a lot of different things,” he said.
Mr Plunket told Newshub he planned to delete his account again on Wednesday night, after he figured out how to do so. He said when he previously announced he would leave the site, he deleted the app from his phone.
Plunket was recently appointed to the Broadcasting Standards Authority, and the Electoral Commission has referred two of his tweets to the Police for allegedly breaching the law on election day.
Powered by WPtouch Mobile Suite for WordPress