web analytics

Apple vs Samsung

Written By: - Date published: 2:38 pm, August 30th, 2012 - 93 comments
Categories: business - Tags: , ,

When businesses like Apple patent hand waving, obvious design, round corners, or software (which in a way is like patenting maths), we all lose.  I’m not pleased with Craig Foss’s “minor amendment” to our block on software patents.

Expect to be paying over the odds for Apple products into the future, and innovation to be stifled.

SMBC today covers the point nicely:

93 comments on “Apple vs Samsung ”

  1. Carol 1

    Yes, I wasn’t impressed by Apple’s extension of their monopolistic behaviour.

    I also wondered how the US company was aided by the US court system in scoring a blow against a Sth Korean company?

    • Colonial Viper 1.1

      I also wondered how the US company was aided by the US court system in scoring a blow against a Sth Korean company?

      And according to wikileaks materials, it would be no surprise if US Government agencies and the US State Department were also actively involved in supporting Apple.

      Apple by the way has more cash reserves in its corporate accounts than most medium and large countries do (US$110B and climbing).

    • Matt 1.2

      Are we using “court system” and ‘jury’ interchangeably now?

      • Colonial Viper 1.2.1

        the latter is a component of the former. Consider also that the judge gave the jury extremely lengthy and detailed instructions on how they were to consider their verdict. And although deliberations were expected to take a couple of weeks, the jury took only 2.5hrs. It was as if they all wanted to fuck off back to their lives and not worry about going through the material which had been presented in court.

        • Matt 1.2.1.1

          “Court system” smacks of some institutional bias that could explain the verdict, but juries are juries. Whether you like the outcome or anything else about the deliberations, like in NZ you draw from the public and you take your chances.

          The next big fight will be between Apple and Google, which as you know is based in S. Korea.

        • insider 1.2.1.2

          The jury chair said they were swung by emails by Samsung officials saying in effect “hey make it more like the iphone cos people won’t like it if it’s not” and the google/android people to samsung “saying don’t make it too much like the iphone”

          Remember the same Jury also halved apples damages claim, threw out the tablet claim and found in favour of samsung in a range of other claims.

          But we should all be happy because, on the bright side, the lawyers are getting paid 🙂

      • mike e 1.2.2

        it won’t be long before apple’s mantle will be undone.
        technology is moving at a very rapid pace.
        jobs has gone.

    • SHG 1.3

      I wasn’t impressed by Apple’s extension of their monopolistic behaviour.

      And in just what market does Apple have a monopoly, exactly?

      • Carol 1.3.1

        I said monopolistic not that it is a total monopoly. It aims to dominate the market as much as possible by limiting use of other aps and technologies on its basic hardware. eg ITunes can only be played on Ipods etc, I can’t play them on my MP3 player.

        • SHG 1.3.1.1

          Point the first: iTunes is an application that runs on OS X and Windows and is a free download.

          Point the second: If you have audio files that your mp3 player can’t play, that means you have a shit player. That’s not Apple’s fault now is it?

        • SHG 1.3.1.2

          Oops ran out of edit time. And point the zeroth:

          From what I can see, Apple has no intention of dominating any markets. Apple doesn’t care about market share. I don’t even think Apple cares about money. It cares about making great products.

          • Colonial Viper 1.3.1.2.1

            What a fucking joke. The dogma of the Steve Jobs faithful.

            Here’s a clue: a US$600B company outsourced all its manufacturing from its own US soil to poorly paid subcontractor peasants in China for no reason other than profit.

            Get a grip on reality man

            • SHG 1.3.1.2.1.1

              What Foxconn offers is turnaround time more than cheapness. If Apple decides “nup, this plastic cover is rubbish, cancel that production run and re-do it with a glass cover instead” Foxconn can turn that around faster than any North American manufacturer, because (yes) Foxconn is a Chinese comp

              Apple could certainly get parts cheaper if it wanted to maximise its margins. What it wants is parts FASTER and EARLIER and GUARANTEED years in advance.

            • infused 1.3.1.2.1.2

              They talked to the US. It would cost 2x more and had a far greater turn around time…

  2. captain hook 2

    pssssssst….
    hey meesta,
    wanna buy a sell fone?

  3. RedLogix 3

    On the other hand if you had spent $500m developing a product (as with one platform I regularly use) … would you continue to invest in developing it if anyone else with cheap slave labour and resources could simply rip it off?

    • Carol 3.1

      I thought Apple also used cheap slave labour to produce its devices….?

      • RedLogix 3.1.1

        So we should all stop buying anything made in China, or any other low wage country ….?

        • Carol 3.1.1.1

          That wasn’t my original point. It was questioning the US court system’s objectivity.

          • RedLogix 3.1.1.1.1

            Which is fair enough …that was my reaction too. America has seen so much of it’s manufacturing base exported to Asia that of course no jury was going to vote for more of it. (Yes I know where the devices are actually made, but Apple is a US corporate and Samsung is not … and that appearance is what probably counts here.)

            So while there is precious little moral high ground for Apple to posture from in this case; neither does this extend the idea that intellectual property rights are nothing more than ‘monopolistic behaviour’.

            • Colonial Viper 3.1.1.1.1.1

              (Responding to RL primarily)

              Quite right, patents should act to encourage innovation, not stifle it.

              Apple should be able to patent protect any innovative and unique technologies it developed. But to copyright a shape and a button placement? That’s just anti-competitive. Samsung showed in court that Apple was not the first to come up with a similar shape or button placement.

              Further, patents need to expire soon after granting, most within 6 or 7 years, and the rest within 10 years. That pushes inventors to get on with doing something with their designs, not just sitting on them waiting to trap other businesses with law suits.

              Patents need to give those who invest in technology a head start, not a license to print money into perpetuity.

              The changes to the NZ software IP legislation are concerning too.

              • RedLogix

                patents should act to encourage innovation, not stifle it.

                Exactly. And I’d suggest that the lawyers are primarily responsible for taking a system that had a positive purpose, and twisting into something else .. as we see in this case.

                I’m not so sure that a fixed time-frame is going to be universally useful. Some ideas have a very short market life, while others might take decades to make a viable return. Compare for instance say the really hot, rapidly moving smartphone business with something quite different like earthquake base-isolators for large buildings.

                Moreover such a short time frame inherently advantages big players who have the resources to bring an idea to market very quickly. And other ideas might well take a decade to develop into an actual product… too many variables for one fixed period to cover effectively.

                • Colonial Viper

                  Moreover such a short time frame inherently advantages big players who have the resources to bring an idea to market very quickly. And other ideas might well take a decade to develop into an actual product.

                  Having had personal experience of this scenario I’m sympathetic, however large corporates are always going to have certain advantages in terms of resources and expertise. Start up entrepreneurs have to play the game smart and to their own strengths; and they have to find sufficient funding (from angel investors and VCs) as well as other partnerships to enable them to move forwards at pace.

                  Also, one might decide not to apply for a patent until closer to launch, or decide that keeping your technology a trade secret would be a better strategy than publishing it for the world to see.

    • Bunji 3.2

      I’m not advocating no patents at all, but software should be protected enough by copyright and code confidentiality. Patents for real inventions that cost money to develop are also quite different to patenting rounded corners, or any future computer user input system that might involve waving your hands around (in 3, 4 or 5 dimensions, without even naming what that 5th dimension might be…).

      The US copyright & patent system where everytime Mickey Mouse is about to lose his protection they extend the dates 10 years isn’t exactly something we want imposed via TPP either…

      • Carol 3.2.1

        Thanks, CV, RL & Bunji. That’s a very useful discussion and background.

      • SoSoo 3.2.2

        Would you accept that Samsung blatantly ripped off Apple, given that internal Samsung documents have them saying that they were blatantly ripping off Apple?

        It’s not hard to look at most Android smartphones and see a ripoff of the iPhone. It didn’t have to be that way – Microsoft has managed to make a decent, original smartphone OS. But of course that doesn’t matter, because what’s really going on here is Freetards whining because Android is the current great hope for Linux (even though it’s really just a play by another megacorp).

        If you want to complain about patents, why blame Apple? They don’t make the laws, and if you don’t defend your IP to the full extent of the law, you lose it.

        • Draco T Bastard 3.2.2.1

          It didn’t have to be that way – Microsoft has managed to make a decent, original smartphone OS.

          And so did Google – what was your point again?

          But of course that doesn’t matter, because what’s really going on here is Freetards whining because Android is the current great hope for Linux (even though it’s really just a play by another megacorp).

          Which really shows which side your on – the megacorps and their supposed right to determine everything and make a profit from it.

          They don’t make the laws, and if you don’t defend your IP to the full extent of the law, you lose it.

          The problem with that assumption is that a lot of people can’t afford to go to the courts to defend their IP and thus lose it by default.

          And then this video, this history and this device from 1994.

          And yet Apple won the patent for rectangular with rounded corners.

          The patent system is very, very sick and it’s being abused by unscrupulous corporations such as Apple.

  4. tc 4

    Job’s was such a hypocrite, much like Foss and his mates, wailed loudly when anyone wanted to patent and protect their creations yet had selective memory when it came to his practices.

    The original GUI interface for Mac him and Wozniak found at Xerox’s Palo Alto research centre, known as the Star OS then, so hardly their original idea.

    Apple shared code with Microsoft to keep office on the mac, then lost the copyright suit with them largely because MS showed they’d been allowed to use the code by Apple.

    Plenty of US business’s duplicate the iPod/iPhone look and feel (Oracle’s CRM is such a blatant copy even they smirk when presenting it) yet Samsung gets the suits.

    has that dotcom feel doesn’t it.

    • Bunji 4.1

      You mean Steve Jobs 1996: “Good artists copy, great artists steal. And we have always been shameless about stealing great ideas.”
      vs Steve Jobs after iPad: “I’m going to destroy Android, because it’s a stolen product. I’m willing to go thermonuclear war on this.” ?

      • Lanthanide 4.1.1

        Steve was a megalomaniac asshole. He used a loophole in California law to avoid having number plates on his car – he simply bought a new one every 6 months.

    • SoSoo 4.2

      “The original GUI interface for Mac him and Wozniak found at Xerox’s Palo Alto research centre, known as the Star OS then, so hardly their original idea.”

      Not this tired old rubbish again. You are wrong on several counts, not least that the Xerox Star post dates Apple’s visit to PARC by some years. IIRC what Apple saw was much earlier than the OS shipped with the Star, and they ended up hiring away many of the developers because Xerox wasn’t really going anywhere with the idea (one reason they let Apple see it). Anyway, the facts:

      http://obamapacman.com/2010/03/myth-copyright-theft-apple-stole-gui-from-xerox-parc-alto/

      The GUI you will find on most personal computers these days mimics the Macintosh interface in most respects (Windows is quite close, for example). Both look like the Xerox Star, but anyone who tried to use a Xerox Star would have a hard time getting it to work, because the interface works quite differently. There are demo videos of it on Youtube.

      Samsung got sued and lost because they copied the iPhone. There are internal Samsung documents stating they were copying the iPhone. It doesn’t get much more obvious than that.

      And let’s not cry for Samsung, a corporation that is regularly had up in its native country for bribery and other corrupt business practices. Apple is squeaky clean next to Samsung.

      • Draco T Bastard 4.2.1

        The GUI you will find on most personal computers these days mimics the Macintosh interface in most respects (Windows is quite close, for example).

        Actually, that would be wrong – most GUIs these days mimics the Amiga.

        The Amiga computer was a dream given form: an inexpensive, fast, flexible multimedia computer that could do virtually anything. It handled graphics, sound, and video as easily as other computers of its time manipulated plain text. It was easily ten years ahead of its time.

        Compared to the Amiga, the Apple stuff was a load of crap. Actually, so was the PC.

        Apple is squeaky clean next to Samsung.

        Does that include the suicides at it’s factories in China?

        • infused 4.2.1.1

          Are they Apple factories?

        • Bastables 4.2.1.2

          How does apples GUI innovations crib from Amiga’s GUI when Macintosh’s and it’s OS ( indevlopment since 79 and in market 84) predate the Amiga 1000 (85)?

          • Draco T Bastard 4.2.1.2.1

            Read what I said carefully. I didn’t say that MacOS cribbed from the Amiga OS but that today’s MacOS more closely resembled Amiga OS from 1985.

            There were a few things on the Amiga that was neither on the Lisa nor the Mac in 1985 but is today. One is the fact that Amiga OS was a multi-tasking OS which was not seen in the either MS or Apple until the 1990s (Win95 for MS and MacOS 9 for Apple).

      • Colonial Viper 4.2.2

        SoSoo you are a fucking corporate shill.

        Intent on hurting consumers to the benefit of a $600B US corporate.

        Samsung got sued and lost because they copied the iPhone. There are internal Samsung documents stating they were copying the iPhone. It doesn’t get much more obvious than that.

        Lies. Samsung copied a rectangle with rounded corners.

        Justify your defence of that, asshole.

        And lets not forget, Apple stole their Mac OS concepts from Xerox R&D in Palo Alto.

        Listen to this ZDnet interview about it.

        http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/parc-scientist-recalls-jobs-famous-xerox-visits-video/63203

        and they ended up hiring away many of the developers because Xerox wasn’t really going anywhere with the idea (one reason they let Apple see it).

        So that excuses the theft by Steve Jobs, does it?

        • SHG 4.2.2.1

          I hate to rain on your parade, but Apple purchased the rights to commercialise Xerox’s GUI concepts in a perfectly normal licensing deal. This is well documented by everyone including Xerox.

          Xerox developed some technologies which were technically cool but barely usable by modern standards (just watch the demos). A guy came along and said “why aren’t you doing anything with this technically cool stuff” and Xerox said “meh, we’re a research lab. Too hard, just give us some shares in your company and you do it”.

          So Xerox sold the rights for a million dollars of options on then-private Apple stock, which — if Xerox had retained it — would now be worth, well, let’s just say “a considerable amount of money”.

          Xerox sold its concepts to Apple knowing that the technology would be commercialised. That was the point of the deal.

          • Colonial Viper 4.2.2.1.1

            I hate to rain on your parade, but Apple purchased the rights to commercialise Xerox’s GUI concepts in a perfectly normal licensing deal. This is well documented by everyone including Xerox.

            You are telling the story very selectively.

            Actually, this was a legal settlement with Xerox which occurred AFTER Apple stole the designs, and only occurred because Apple was threatened by legal action.

            • SHG 4.2.2.1.1.1

              You are completely wrong. Seriously. The Apple-Xerox GUI deal is one of the most well-documented IP transactions in the history of business, and you are completely wrong about it.

    • mike e 4.3

      tc MS insisted that mac install MS os because they bailed out apple and still own shares in apple.

  5. shorts 5

    shouldn’t we, or at least the standard, be advocating the US govt nationalise Apple and share the wealth with all its citizens?

    and advocating the overthrow of all IP and patent styled laws – innovation should be free too all to enrich the species not a select choosen few…

    • Colonial Viper 5.1

      shouldn’t we, or at least the standard, be advocating the US govt nationalise Apple and share the wealth with all its citizens?

      Uh, the big corporates own the US Government, not the other way around, and they do so in order to take the wealth of the citizens of the USA for themselves.

      It’s a bit of a reverse to how it should probably work, but that’s kleptocracy for you.

      • shorts 5.1.1

        well apple should then privatise the US govt and share the wealth with its slave labourers in China…. um, er… 🙂

  6. captain hook 6

    +1 carol
    the US supreme court no longer represents the common man.

  7. Sanctuary 7

    The biggest loser from all this is going to be the U.S. consumer, who will probably as a result of this find they cannot buy a whole raft of “patent infringing” products. They’ll be limited to what a U.S. megacorp thinks they should be able to buy.

    Yet another reason to not be stupid enough to sign up to any agreement that locks us into US intellectual copyright laws.

    • Richard Christie 7.1

      I agree.
      The ruling will discourage legitimate development of competitive product.
      However demand for alternative will not diminish and I suspect pirating and fake product production will only be encouraged.

    • SoSoo 7.2

      Don’t be so melodramatic. Anyone can purchase a Windows Phone, which is an original and striking design that doesn’t rip off Apple’s design for the iPhone. Nothing is stopping any other company from creating a still different design.

      Android vendors like Samsung decided not to do this at their own risk.

      • Colonial Viper 7.2.1

        Windows for phone is shit

        Apple’s design for the iPhone was ripped off a bunch of other companies

        Nothing is stopping any other company from creating a still different design.

        You mean create a phone which isn’t a rectangle? And doesn’t have rounded corners?

        Android vendors like Samsung decided not to do this at their own risk.

        I reckon you’re a corporate hack defending hundred billion dollar Apple’s stifling, monopolistic practices.

        Don’t you believe in capitalism? Where risk is rewarded and anti-competitive behaviour like Apple’s is quashed?

  8. Rusty Hellback 8

    I <3 my galaxy S3!!!

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      Yeah its nice heh

      • Sufi Safari 8.1.1

        And it’s full of cool non-infringing innovations. Turns out Samsung can make great devices without ripping off the iPhone. So why didn’t they do that to begin with?

        • Colonial Viper 8.1.1.1

          Because Apple’s design was generic and indefensible.

          If Apple was worth its chops it would compete with Samsung without resorting to lawyers.

          The fact that a US court has upheld Apple’s patents on a rectangle with rounded edges shows how stupid and gullible the US court system is in supporting Apple’s monopolistic behaviour.

          • Bastables 8.1.1.1.1

            This is a bit of a straw man as the Samsung emails presented in court show Samsung was copying Apples UI, even more damning is the Google emails to Samsung pointing out they need to differentiate their stuff as it is too similar to apples designs.

            Windows tiles system is quite different to Apples IOS app’s system for instance.

            Samsung on the other hand has design documents stating that they had in essence copied too closely Apples icon designs and to improve needed differentiate them more
            http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/samsung-icon-concept-640×510.png

            Apple showed other manufactures icon designs that do not slavishly copy IOS’s icon design
            http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/alternative-designs-640×399.png
            Which sort of shows even with android one is not restricted to aping Apples UI/Iconography.

            Historically Samsung have been caught out copying Sharp’s LCD technology as well. They’ve needed a good kick in the balls for a while.

            Apples argument is that the oblong with rounded corners is symptomatic to much deeper and comprehensiveness stealing of IOS’s look and feel.

            Conversely in differentiation Mac/os and Windows treat full screen quite differently where windows expands a window to fill the screen/desktop and Mac/os expands it into a “separate screen” off the desk top. Windows minimize maximize and close widows buttons are all in the top right as symbols and Mac os uses traffic lights in the top left.
            Using the two different OS’s is functionally different. Samsung did not bother to do this

          • SHG 8.1.1.1.2

            a US court has upheld Apple’s patents on a rectangle with rounded edges

            Which patent would that be, specifically? And exactly which of the jury’s findings upheld this patent?

            Come on. You’re just making stuff up.

            • Colonial Viper 8.1.1.1.2.1

              The patent on rectangles with rounded edges. And the jury took just 2.5 hours to consider thousands of pages of presented evidence and return a verdict.

              US justice system = a corporate rort.

              • Colonial Viper

                2.5 days actually 😎

              • SHG

                The patent on rectangles with rounded edges.

                Come on, which one was it? There were a number of patents being discussed in the Samsung case and they’re all clearly labelled – which is the one that you allege gave Apple ownership of rectangles with rounded edges, and what was the jury’s decision specifically in regard to that patent?

                You don’t know, do you?

                • Colonial Viper

                  There was also the scolling-bouncy patent. Super secret stuff that Apple got all jealous about. I mean, Apple is so out of ideas it has to turn to lawyers to protect its shitty over priced, under-reliable, non-user serviceable designs.

                • Colonial Viper

                  Come on, which one was it? There were a number of patents being discussed in the Samsung case and they’re all clearly labelled – which is the one that you allege gave Apple ownership of rectangles with rounded edges

                  http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=D618,677.PN.&OS=PN/D618,677&RS=PN/D618,677

                  http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=D593,087.PN.&OS=PN/D593,087&RS=PN/D593,087

                  • SHG

                    I don’t see the words “rounded” or “rectangles” in either of those documents. Do you think you might be, hmm, lacking some important info? Are you sure you have the right patents? Or did you just read something somewhere and take it as gospel?

                    For the sake of argument, because it’s not true, let’s assume that those two patents give Apple the rights to assert ownership of “rounded rectangles”. What did the jury decide?

                    • Colonial Viper

                      I’m not your research staffer. Do your own homework lazy boy.

                    • SHG

                      I don’t need to, because I know the answers, because I’ve read the patents, and I know what Apple has claimed, and I’ve read the jury’s decision.

                      If you have a point, porridge for brains, please make it.

                      My point is that you don’t know what you’re talking about. You’ve read an oligarchic megacorp’s calculated use of the intentionally-misleading phrase “rectangles with rounded corners” in a press release following a legal defeat and you’ve latched on to it as gospel because it reinforces a narrative to which you’ve already committed yourself. You WANT Apple to have claimed broad ownership of “rectangles with rounded corners” in portable electronic devices because that would be breathtakingly arrogant and you want to believe that Apple is breathtakingly arrogant. You WANT the jury to have found that Samsung wilfully infringed this supposed ownership of “rectangles with rounded corners” of that because that would be fucking ridiculous and you want to believe that the US patent and legal systems are fucking ridiculous.

                      NONE OF THOSE THINGS HAPPENED. No matter how much you want to believe all that stuff NONE OF IT HAPPENED.

                      You’re imagining it. You are literally making it all up in your head. You’re a guy sitting there saying “two plus two is five, what’s your point?”

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Sorry mate of course it happened. You’ve provided no links, I provided links to the actual patents just as you asked.

                      Apple, a US$600B company, is deliberately limiting technological progress and customer choice – and you are supporting them.

                      and you want to believe that the US patent and legal systems are fucking ridiculous.

                      They are ridiculous. They’re designed to disenfranchise the rights of people around the world. They’ve declared that corporations have the same rights as people, and they’ve declared that Monsanto can patent breeds of rice which Indians have been developing and growing for centuries.

                    • SHG

                      Once again, it’s plainly evident that you haven’t read the patents and you haven’t read the jury’s ruling. You don’t have the foggiest idea what the court actually ruled, and you don’t want to because the facts might conflict with the narrative that you’ve already bought into.

                      NONE OF THE THINGS THAT YOU’RE UPSET ABOUT ACTUALLY HAPPENED.

          • rosy 8.1.1.1.3

            If Apple was worth its chops it would compete with Samsung without resorting to lawyers.

            Absolutely. On the one hand the corporatist apologists support a company that sues on ‘look and feel’ of a product rather than technical innovation, and on the other hand those same apologists support the ‘invisible hand’ of the ‘free’, i.e. competitive, market.

            • freedom 8.1.1.1.3.1

              you are not wrong rosy, it is a laugh. Albeit a sad rather pathetic whimper of a laugh bravely escaping the strangulated throat of invention.

              Often, when this mishegoss pops up and an Apple devotee is slavering over some sensory wonder of the i-phone, it is always fun to lay down the S2 plug in a portable flash drive and demonstrate the most basic of data operations that apple still cannot do …
              … use a usb and share files without needing any other computer.

  9. xtasy 9

    Again, I state, these are to some degree maybe “important”, but to most of us “petty” arguments. Yet when it would come down to Jobs here and there, we would feel differently, but that is no the case.

    Like the US NZ companies have and are outsourcing. They make more money to have oprations in China and so on. We get told all this patriotic stuff by NZ First and the Greens, where is your alternative, please. I am totally in favour of yours, but you must present the alternative, otherwise Key and liars will take you to the cleaners. I hope you can deliver. Regards H

  10. freedom 10

    Here is Apple bending over to protect political interests
    http://rt.com/usa/news/app-begley-drone-strikes-967/

  11. freedom 11

    Here is Apple bending over to protect political interests

    http://rt.com/usa/news/app-begley-drone-strikes-967/

    • freedom 11.1

      Excuse post duplication. phone said it failed to publish. ( editor is also scrolling back to middle of page when you try to type which makes text entry fun as you cannot see what you are doing)

    • Draco T Bastard 11.2

      Developer develops an iPhone app that aggregates news about drone killings, Apple bans it because they think it’s objectionable.

      Not surprised to hear that in the least. The biggest issue I have with Apple is that it’s controlling the apps that are available for the iPhone and iPad through iTunes.

  12. Tiger Mountain 12

    Apple is never going to be universally popular, when tiny and failing in the 90s PC fans and corporates put the slipper in, and now it is huge and mega everyone from Greenpeace down are doing likewise (and justifiably so when it is workers rights in China).

    BUT it’s products have made life easier for this freelancer which is why I buy them. Accurate colour for pre-press and a whole bunch of technical stuff I need not bore readers with. Patent disputes go with the territory in a capitalist system.

    • Carol 12.1

      I has always seemed to me that Macs are usually the best computers for people creating stuff with graphics (video-makers, designers etc) and for programmers. But for most users, like me the cheaper IBM/MS computers do the things we want just fine. There seems to be an added (usually quite middle-class) snobbery that has been built around this central advantage of Apple computers – a corporate-driven status-symbol that goes beyond the main capabilities of the technology/ies.

      Over the last few decades I’ve got a bit fed up with the sneering and put-downs of us PC users from Mac users. They used to characterise MS as the evil capitalist empire, and Apple as the friend to the left. But it turns out Apple is every bit the exorbitant profit-seeking capitalist corporation.

      • rosy 12.1.1

        I has always seemed to me that Macs are usually the best computers for people creating stuff with graphics (video-makers, designers etc) and for programmers.

        Yes, my child the designer agrees with this, my other children, the gameplayer and IT, geek don’t. You could say that Apple lost the graphics kudos as soon as geographic information systems were developed for PCs, imo of course.

  13. brybry 13

    I don’t understand how the shape of a general use item can be patentable. Is this not the same as patenting the shape and key placement on a keyboard? Or the aerodynamic tube shape of an aircraft? To be useful, a phone has to be held in your hand, the microphone must be near your mouth when the speaker is close to your ear, and it needs to fit in your pocket – what other shape can it be?

  14. Fortran 14

    Anything which the American’s do not like – like competition, is UnAmerican, and you can guarantee the American courts will support anything which is UnAmerican whatever it is.
    Remember is only about Money – because that is the American God.
    I once worked for an American Financial Group and am fully aware how agressive they are in everything – because it is only they who are right, and the rest of the World must accept that role.

    • Matt 14.1

      Yeah those bad American guys, They’re not altruistic like NZ companies. The ones who have done nothing but mercilessly extort every last cent from a captive NZ audience. If a German company can import fiberglass insulation and retail it for HALF what Fletcher has been extorting people for, you know the jig is almost up. And none of the typical excuses for high costs in a remote country hold up; NZ can produce radiata pine faster than anywhere else, yet timber prices here are obscenely expensive. The country is overflowing with dairy but milk is ridiculously expensive, because rather than be ‘nice’ to their fellow Kiwis, they charge you as much as they can. Same goes for lamb, etc. Thanks NZ business!

      The same piece of crap Chinese made 1″ PVC plumbing elbow that would cost 23 cents at Home Depot in the US is $11 at Placemakers, where also a packet of fifty deck screws (maybe it was 25) was something like $24. Are you fucking kidding me? Don’t tell me simple volume explains the difference, because I can cruise Alibaba just like anyone else and know what the landed cost is for 10K units. It’s pure exploitation of customers which, they hope, either don’t know any better or are too compliant/lazy to revolt.

      Buy a Coke at the petrol station here, where they want $3.60 for the smallest bottle. Conversely, go to a gas station in the US and pick up a Super Mega Gulp for a little over a buck. The business model is completely flipped; Here the goal is to gouge you for convenience purchases since you’re already there buying fuel. In the US, the model is to offer deals to attract you to this gas station instead of a different one.

      So tell me how nice NZ companies are again? Even Hugo Chavez makes sure his people get cheap petrol, as do many (otherwise horribly repressive) Gulf states, yet NZ companies systematically screw you on stuff which is locally produced in massive quantities. 

      NZ companies are, by and large, monopolistic dinosaurs whose business plan has been to exploit a captive customer base mercilessly. They are among the worst anywhere.

      • Colonial Viper 14.1.1

        Welcome to the capitalist free market. What you talk about is also the reason that big Oz chains like Bunnings and JB Hi Fi have just waltzed into the NZ market and become quick successes. While typically, NZ retailers always do badly when they try and set foot in Australia.

        BTW in the US all that stuff has to be really cheap because 66M of their population live within a stones throw (25%) of the Federal poverty line.

        In other words, the US imported product price deflation from China, and have simply accepted the employment, wage and living standard deflation which came along with it.

        • Matt 14.1.1.1

          What I have described in the US is how it’s been for decades, in the fat years as well as the lean ones. I’m sorry if that doesn’t quite mesh with your peak oil/fading empire themes.

  15. He he this is funny.

    Samsung paid it in 5c pieces … 

  16. Draco T Bastard 16

    And Japan throws Apple’s case out.

    Two men say they’re Jesus,
    one of them must be wrong

    • Carol 16.1

      Yes, on Al Jazeera, I just saw a report on the current score line in the ongoing Apple vs Samsung battle.

      http://www.aljazeera.com/news/asia-pacific/2012/08/20128315959128736.html

      The Tokyo court’s three-judge panel awarded legal costs to Samsung on Friday and refused Apple’s claim that Samsung’s Galaxy smartphones and tablets had infringed its patent.

      “The defendant’s products do not seem like they used the same technology as the plaintiff’s products so we turn down the complaints made by [Apple],” Presiding Judge Tamotsu Shoji told the court.

      Al Jazeera’s conclusion was that Apple are ahead on cases won, including cases in Aussie and other countries.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Report into Aotearoa New Zealand’s export controls system released
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today welcomed the findings of an independent review into Aotearoa New Zealand’s export controls system, which regulates the export of goods to foreign militaries, police forces or paramilitaries. Produced by David Smol, a former Chief Executive of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • New District Court Judge appointed
    Attorney-General David Parker has announced the appointment of Brett Crowley of Wellington as a District Court Judge.  He is currently the Wellington Public Defender and started his career as a staff solicitor working in a range of litigation including criminal defence work. He went to the bar in 1999 specialising ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Mental health stocktake shows strong progress
    The first report of the Government’s Implementation Unit has found strong progress has been made since the Mental Health and Addictions Package was announced in 2019. “The report notes most initiatives funded in the Budget 2019 package are on track to deliver what is expected by 2023/24,” Grant Robertson said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Working together to grow the West Coast
    A project that has been crucial in allowing businesses to continue during the tourism downturn is among a number of initiatives to receive a boost from the Government’s Jobs For Nature programme, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. Sustaining South Westland is an extension of an initiative set up last year ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 hours ago
  • Next steps to improve safety in wake of Whakaari White Island tragedy
    The Government is moving to improve safety in light of the Whakaari White Island tragedy and has released proposals to reinforce safety standards in registered adventure activities. The package of proposals includes: Strengthening requirements for how operators, landowners and the regulator manage natural hazard risks Improving how risks are monitored, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • New Zealand donates more COVID-19 vaccines to COVAX and the Pacific
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta and Associate Health Minister Aupito William Sio announced today that New Zealand is donating additional Pfizer vaccines to the Pacific and AstraZeneca vaccines to the COVAX Facility, to support equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines. “New Zealand is donating 708,000 doses of the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Speech to the Property Council of New Zealand
    Kia ora koutou katoa   Is it a pleasure to be able to speak with you today, and to be able to answer some questions you may have. I would like to acknowledge the organisers of this event, the Property Council. The theme of this year’s conference is City Shapers. Together ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    22 hours ago
  • Additional MIQ for Christchurch
    An additional hotel will be added to our network of managed isolation and quarantine facilities, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “I have approved and Cabinet is in the final stages of signing off The Quality Hotel Elms in Christchurch as a new managed isolation facility,” Chris Hipkins said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • NZ COVID-19 response earns another major digital investment
    Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications Dr David Clark welcomes Amazon’s Web Services’ (AWS) decision to establish a Cloud Region on New Zealand shores, further boosting New Zealand’s growing digital sector, and providing a vote of confidence in the direction of New Zealand’s economic recovery. “Amazon is the second ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New Zealand invests in cutting edge cancer R&D
    Scaling up the manufacture of CAR T-cell cancer therapy for clinical trials Advancing New Zealand’s biomedical manufacturing capability Supporting future international scientific collaborations Transforming cancer care with targeted, affordable solutions Research, Science and Innovation Minister Hon Dr Megan Woods has announced that the fight against COVID-19 will not stop the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Expert group appointed to lead New Zealand’s future health system
    An outstanding group of people with extensive and wide-ranging governance and health experience have been appointed to lead the Māori Health Authority and Health New Zealand, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “This Government is building a truly national health system to provide consistent, high-quality health services right across the country. This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Funding to help clean up contaminated sites
    The Government is supporting the clean-up of contaminated sites in Northland, Dunedin and Southland to reduce risk to people’s health and protect the environment. Environment Minister David Parker said the funding announced today, through the Contaminated Sites Remediation Fund, will help us turn previously hazardous sites into safe, usable public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Predator Free apprenticeships open up new job opportunities
    The expansion of a predator free apprenticeship programme is an opportunity for more people to kick-start a conservation career, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The Predator Free Apprenticeship Programme is focused on increasing the number of skilled predator control operators in New Zealand through a two-year training programme. “The Trust ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Further NCEA support confirmed for Auckland students
    The number of Learning Recognition Credits for senior secondary school students will be increased for Auckland students, Education Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. This recognises the extended time these students will spend in Alert Levels 3 and 4. “It means students in Auckland will have a fair opportunity to attain ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Long-term pathway next step to better mental wellbeing for New Zealanders
    The Government is taking a new approach to support people who experience mental distress, Health Minister Andrew Little says. “Kia Manawanui Aotearoa – Long-term pathway to mental wellbeing (Kia Manawanui) is the first 10-year plan of its kind that targets the cause of mental distress and also sets out how ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Keeping our Police safe to keep our communities safe
    The Government is committed to keeping our frontline police officers safe, so they in turn can keep New Zealanders safe – with one of the largest investments in frontline safety announced by Police Minister Poto Williams at the Police College today.   The $45 million investment includes $15.496 million in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Clean Vehicles Bill passes first checkpoint
    The Land Transport (Clean Vehicles) Amendment Bill will help New Zealand drive down transport emissions by cleaning up the light vehicle fleet, Transport Minister Michael Wood says. The Bill passed its first reading today and will establish the legislative framework for key parts of the Government’s Clean Car Package, including ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Funding boost supports ongoing Māori COVID-19 response
    The Government is responding to the need by whānau Māori and Māori Health providers to support their ongoing work responding to COVID-19 and to continue increasing rates of Māori vaccination, Associate Minister for Health (Māori Health), Peeni Henare and Minister for Māori Development Willie Jackson announced today.   This increased ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Significant increase to COVID-19 penalties
    Penalties for breaches of COVID-19 orders are set to significantly increase from early November 2021 to better reflect the seriousness of any behaviour that threatens New Zealand’s response to the virus, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Throughout this Delta outbreak we’ve seen the overwhelming majority of people doing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Counter-Terrorism Legislation Bill returns to Parliament
    The Counter-Terrorism Legislation Bill has returned to Parliament for its second reading in an important step towards giving enforcement agencies greater power to protect New Zealanders from terrorist activity. “The Bill addresses longstanding gaps in our counter terrorism legislation that seek to protect New Zealanders and make us safer,” Justice ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Joint Statement: New Zealand and Australian Trade Ministers
    Hon Damien O'Connor MP, New Zealand Minister for Trade and Export Growth, and Hon Dan Tehan MP, Australian Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment, met virtually on Monday 20 September to advance trans-Tasman cooperation under the Australia-New Zealand Closer Economic Relations Trade Agreement (CER). CER is one of the most ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Prime Minister’s Post Cabinet Press Conference/COVID-19 Update opening statement
    ***Please check against delivery***   E te tī, e te tā, nau mai rā [To all, I bid you welcome]   As you will have seen earlier, today there are 22 new community cases to report; three of which are in Whakatiwai in the Hauraki area, and the remainder in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Major milestones for Māori COVID-19 vaccine rollout as new campaign launches
    Whānau Ora and Associate Health (Māori Health) Minister Peeni Henare acknowledges two major milestones in the rollout of the COVID-19 vaccination programme for Māori. “I am very pleased to announce more than 50 percent of eligible Māori have received their first dose and 25 per cent are now fully vaccinated,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government funding to fight infectious diseases
    $36 million for research into Covid-19 and other infectious diseases The investment will improve our readiness for future pandemics Research will focus on prevention, control, and management of infectious diseases The Government’s investing in a new Infectious Diseases Research Platform to boost Aotearoa New Zealand’s Covid-19 response and preparedness for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Quarantine-free travel with Australia to remain suspended for a further 8 weeks
    Suspension to be reviewed again mid to late November Decision brought forward to enable access from Australia to first tranche of around 3000 rooms in MIQ Air New Zealand working at pace to put on more flights from Australia from October    The suspension of quarantine-free travel (QFT) with Australia has ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Extra support for Ethnic Communities to share vaccination information
    Extra support is being made available to Ethnic Communities to help them share COVID-19 vaccination information within their communities, Minister for Diversity, Inclusion and Ethnic Communities Priyanca Radhakrishnan said. “We know we need to get every eligible person in New Zealand vaccinated. A fund being launched today will allow for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • School holidays remain unchanged for Auckland region
    School holidays in Auckland will continue to be held at the same time as the rest of the country, starting from Saturday, 2 October, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “I’ve carefully considered advice on the implications of shifting the dates and concluded that on balance, maintaining the status quo ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government continues crackdown on gangs and organised crime
    Operation Tauwhiro extended until March 2022 Since it was launched in February, Operation Tauwhiro has resulted in:   987 firearms seized $4.99 million in cash seized 865 people charged with a firearms-related offence Gangs and organised crime groups will continue to be relentlessly targeted with the extension of Police’s successful ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to Body Positive 'HIV Treatments Update Seminar 2021'
    E ngā mana E ngā reo E ngā iwi Tēnā koutou katoa Ka huri ki ngā mana whenua o te rohe nei. Tēnā koutou. He mihi hoki ki a tatou kua tau mai nei I raro I te kaupapa o te rā. Nō reira tēnā koutou katoa Acknowledgements It’s a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Power bill changes bring fairness to charges
    A key recommendation of an independent panel to make electricity charges fairer across all households will be put in place, the Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods has announced. “Phasing out the regulations on ‘low-use’ electricity plans will create a fairer playing field for all New Zealanders and encourage a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • NZ economy’s strong momentum will support rebound from Delta outbreak; COVID fund replenished
    The economy showed strong momentum in the period leading up to the recent Delta COVID-19 outbreak, which bodes well for a solid economic rebound, Grant Robertson said. GDP rose 2.8 percent in the June quarter, following on from a 1.4 percent increase in the previous March quarter. This was a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Projects create benefits into the future
    Making a well-known lake swimmable and helping to halt the decline of the endangered hoiho/yellow-eyed penguins are among a suite of new projects being supported by the Government’s Jobs for Nature programme across the southern South Island, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “It’s no secret that many of our most ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Opening statement for Whāriki Indigenous Small Business Roundtable
      Kei ngā tōpito e wha o te āo e rere ana te mihi maioha ki a koutou nō tawhiti, nō tata mai e tāpiri ana ki tēnei taumata kōrero mo te ao hokohoko arā mā ngā pākihi mo ngā iwi taketake Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa – Pai Mārire.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New members appointed to Kāpuia
    The Government is adding four additional members to Kāpuia, the Ministerial Advisory Group on the Government’s Response to the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the terrorist attack on Christchurch mosques. “I’m looking forward to having Pamela MacNeill, Huia Bramley, Melani Anae and Katherine Dedo  join Kāpuia and contribute to this group’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Timeline confirmed for Emissions Reductions Plan
    Cabinet has agreed to begin consulting on the Emissions Reduction Plan in early October and require that the final plan be released by the end of May next year in line with the 2022 Budget, the Minister of Climate Change, James Shaw confirmed today. “Cabinet’s decision allows organisations and communities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pay parity pathway for early learning teachers confirmed
    Pay parity conditions and higher funding rates for education and care services will come into force on 1 January, 2022, Minister of Education Chris Hipkins confirmed today. The Government signalled this work in Budget 2021. “From 1 January, 2022, centres opting into the scheme will receive government funding and be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Conference 2021
    Kia Ora tatau katoa.   Ka tuku mihi ki nga nēhi, He pou Hauora o Aotearoa, E ora ai tatou.   Whakatau mai  I runga i te kaupapa o te ra Te NZNO conference.   Tena koutou tena koutou Tena tatou katoa   Good morning, and thank you inviting me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government investment in farmer-led catchment groups sweeps past 150 mark
    171 catchment groups have now been invested in by the Government 31 catchment groups in the Lower North Island are receiving new support More than 5,000 farmers are focussed on restoring freshwater within a generation through involvement in catchment groups  Government investment in on-the-ground efforts by farmers to improve land ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Fight to protect kauri on track
    The Government is pitching in to help vital work to protect nationally significant kauri forests in Auckland, Minister of Conservation Kiri Allan says. “Ensuring the survival of these iconic trees for future generations means doing everything we can to prevent the potential spread of kauri dieback disease,” Kiri Allan said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Joint statement of Mr Bernard Monk; Hon Andrew Little, Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry,...
    [Note: The Parties have agreed on terms to fully and finally settle the proceeding and will jointly issue the below statement.] At the heart of this litigation are the lives of the 29 men tragically lost at the Pike River mine on 19 November 2010 and to whom we pay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago