web analytics

Australia: screaming backwards with CGT

Written By: - Date published: 1:51 pm, July 13th, 2011 - 57 comments
Categories: brand key, capital gains, Economy, making shit up, russel norman - Tags:

Russel Norman put a dagger into John Key yesterday in question time asking whether a series of national and international economic authorities really wanted to “put a dagger through the heart of growth” with a CGT.

Key waffled and whined and contradicted himself: ‘it won’t raise any money’, ‘it’s a tax grab’, ‘it’ll send the economy backwards’, ‘everyone will avoid it’, ‘it’s hideously complex’, ‘we already have one’, ‘it won’t solve the problem’, ‘we already basically did this and fixed the problem’.

But the best moment was when Norman looked at the evidence across the Tasman.

Dr Russel Norman: Has the Prime Minister seen the evidence that the Australian economy has outperformed the New Zealand economy every year since 1985, the same year that Australia first introduced a capital gains tax, which would supposedly put a dagger through the economy?

Rt Hon JOHN KEY: There are many differences between the New Zealand and Australian economies…. (followed by over a minute of increasingly hysterical non sequiturs)

So, is Norman right? Not precisely, New Zealand grew faster than Australia a couple of times,  but the Australian economy vastly outstripped New Zealand’s overall, growing 58% per capita since 1985 compared to New Zealand’s 28%. It was after CGT was introduced there, and the neoliberal reforms took hold here, that the gap really opened up.

And it’s clear that did not go “screaming backwards” when CGT was introduced, as Key would have you believe:

Australia’s growth per capita has averaged 0.5% per quarter since CGT came in compared to 0.4% before had as far back as records go.

I don’t know about you, but if CGT is a dagger through the heart, I would prefer it to slow starvation via neglect from Key and co.

– Bright Red

57 comments on “Australia: screaming backwards with CGT ”

  1. freedom 1

    ( sardonic tone ) hate to point out the obvious but NZ is not on that graph so how is the all important visual comparison meant to be made? We know it is true because all data supports the facts, but the RWNJ brigade will cry foul that the post is confusing and murray already has a headache from all the whistling

  2. queenstfarmer 2

    My take on Key’s claims:

    ‘it won’t raise any money’ – partially true. Indications are it will raise close to a billion, after about a decade. In the short term (next few years) it won’t raise much.

    ‘it’s a tax grab’ – it’s a tax increase, that’s for certain, though it won’t be felt immediately.

    ‘it’ll send the economy backwards’ – probably false (i.e. unlikely), but unknown.

    ‘everyone will avoid it’ – partially true. People will try to avoid it, and wealther people tend to (legally) avoid tax much more than others.

    ‘it’s hideously complex’ – compared to other taxes, true.

    ‘we already have one’ – true, but it’s a bit kneecapped.

    ‘it won’t solve the problem’ – true, if the problem is how does Labour propose to fund extravagent spending promises.

    • Colonial Viper 2.1

      ‘it’s hideously complex’ – compared to other taxes, true.

      Not compared to the earnings from foreign investments regime mate. Not one bit as complex.

      • Jim Nald 2.1.1

        Complex? Difficult? The sky will fall?

        On the eve of Labour’s tax policy announcement, I am relaxed.

        I have, just this afternoon, scheduled an appointment with my bank about my plans in the next few months to buy another house.

        I am working out my own finances and long term plans, and come what may with Labour’s policy, I will be comfortable.

    • Reality Bytes 2.2

      Sure It may take a decade to raise a billion annually by some forecasts.

      BUT…

      What about the capital that gets redirected into other productive areas like business investment, as more investors shy away from property speculation. What about the increased tax revenue due to that?

      The decreased social welfare costs from the knock on effect of greater available employment opportunities…

      And from that the increased tax revenue from PAYE due to the greater number of people employed…

      And from that the increased tax revenue from GST due to a greater number employed having greater disposable income…

      And increased tax revenue from businesses that would not exist if the capital was tied up in over-priced property speculation…

      And all of the above repeated as more people with more disposable income have more potential to invest.

      Oh and more reasonably priced housing, meaning less of a brain-drain, as less people jump the ditch to Aussie.

      The direct tax take from the CGT is just the icing on the cake, I suspect the benefits from all of the above mentioned would be far far greater than the basic amount that CGT would bring in.

      • queenstfarmer 2.2.1

        That is possible – and actually why I am cautiously in favour of a limited CGT – although note that the Aussie graph above didn’t take off after CGT, as well as not going down. So it is far from clear whether it would boost the economy (though again I like the rationale)

  3. davidc 3

    Why compare ourselves to Oz? They are more than a little different to lil ole NZ. 57% of what they export comes out of a hole in the ground, and frankly who cares? nice place to visit but wouldnt wanna live there!

    • Blighty 3.1

      are you saying that mining is the reason why cgt didn’t send Australia ‘screaming backwards’?

      Please explain how.

      • davidc 3.1.1

        Record earning thru mining so the export earnings are fantastic and the service industries that support mining are coining it all keeps gdp boyant, but really my point was that its not an apples to apples comparison.

        • Blighty 3.1.1.1

          um. are you claiming that Australia was going through a mining boom in the mid 80s and that was all that stopped Australia from going ‘screaming backwards’ due to the introduction of CGT?

          • davidc 3.1.1.1.1

            Yip 🙂

            Remembering that CGT takes a long time to get into gear and by the time it did the mining boom was well underway.

            • Blighty 3.1.1.1.1.1

              that’s retarded.

              you have no evidence. You just want something, anything, up to avoid the clear facts that CGT didn’t hurt the Australian economy

              • Colonial Viper

                Australia wasn’t hurt by the CGT not because of the mining which is merely a confounding factor, but because large deserts make countries less susceptible to the negative economic affects of a CGT. And Australia has plenty of those.

                Aussie Rules also plays a part as that changes the social dynamics of the society, which studies have shown reduce the potential negative effects of a CGT.

                New Zealand, absent these protective factors, is definitely at heightened risk from going backwards so Key is right.

            • Robert M 3.1.1.1.1.2

              This is part of the truth, but Australia is a vastly wealthier country. The rich list people in Australia are ten times wealthier than their compatriots in NZ. Education and health are vastly more private domains in Australia. Half the school age population in Australia goes to private schools. \Much of the Australian middle class will draw the majority of their income from shares, inheritance and company and business ownership. That isn’t remotely the case here. Australias reliance on mineral wealth may be regarded as an exception-but it is also true that NZ excessively relies on agricultural industries which have largely reached their sustainable limit. \Investment of new tech in agriculture will not necessarily produce great medium term gains. CGT is another tax on the bright and the professional classes. It will be a furthur barrier to keeping talent in the country. It is a tax born of ignorance, cynicism and envy.

              • Colonial Viper

                CGT is another tax on the bright and the professional classes. It will be a furthur barrier to keeping talent in the country. It is a tax born of ignorance, cynicism and envy.

                Singing for your supper on behalf of the top 5% of NZ society eh? Or is that the top 1%?

                US style tax welfare for the wealthy is wrecking their country and it isn’t welcome here. The chant of the Republican Party is simple: tax cuts for the rich, service cuts for the poor!!!

                It will be a furthur barrier to keeping talent in the country.

                Actually I am hoping that all the speculators and ticket clippers will go and we can get on with building a properly productive NZ.

        • mik e 3.1.1.2

          AUS also introduced the compulsory super scheme around that time as well.now they have$1.4trilion in savings no wonder Australia hasn,t had a recession since 1980 while we,ve had 6 most of them on nationals watch only one on Labours , in fact National have only managed to get 9.5% economic growth by volume in 12years Labour manged 28% in 9 years !

          • Jim Nald 3.1.1.2.1

            NZ could have come out much better now if our super wasn’t killed?

            Brian Gaynor’s pieces:

            http://www.nzherald.co.nz/super-fund/news/article.cfm?c_id=468&objectid=10465138

            http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10667652

            “A dreadful political decision, announced on December 15, 1975, transformed New Zealand from the potential Switzerland of the Southern Hemisphere into a low-ranking OECD economy.

            “Without this decision we would now be called “The Antipodean Tiger” and be the envy of the rest of the world. We would have a current account surplus, one of the lowest interest-rate structures in the world and would probably rank as one of the top five OECD economies.

            ….

            “The irony is that we once had a fantastic superannuation scheme which was terminated by Prime Minister Robert Muldoon on December 15, 1975.

            “This was the worst economic decision by any New Zealand government in the past 50 years and turned the country from being a potential Switzerland of the Southern Hemisphere into a low-ranking OECD country that is falling further and further behind its next-door neighbour.”

  4. Herodotus 4

    Key waffled and whined and contradicted himself: ‘it won’t raise any money’, ‘it’s a tax grab’, ‘it’ll send the economy backwards’, ‘everyone will avoid it’,
    There is already a CGT it was just that the IRD and various govts decided for what ever reasons not to enforce the legislation and interpretations at the time. I am sure we all know of examples where individuals were trading in property and not contributing their fair share to society, and from this insightful link !!!
    http://www.national.org.nz/Article.aspx?articleId=9733
    For example, in 2004, IRD targeted property investment in Queenstown, Wanaka and some parts of Auckland. They gathered an extra $106.6 million in tax from those investigations, including $52.9 million from Auckland alone.
    So I would love to ask P.Dunn, and senior members of previous govts why they did not have as a priority enforcement of this legislation ? Why was it acceptable for many to avoid paying their due taxes ? and finally what steps are in place currently to hold people accountable for taxes they owe from any previous capital gains (its not rocket science to search LINZ database for patterns of property trading)?

    • davidc 4.1

      Herodotus, I agree.
      There is a vast black ecconomy that could be taxed if IRD got of its arse.
      Typical scenario is the self employed builder/plumber/sparkie who builds or tarts up a house using materials that have been purchased thru his company and written off on other jobs so not only does he not pay income tax on the materials he claims the GST and then gets a tax free profit on the house when its sold.
      Enforcement is the answer not renaming the tax.

      • Colonial Viper 4.1.1

        Need a wealth tax of around 0.5% p.a.

        • sean maitland 4.1.1.1

          All you envious little lefties, jealous with rage, wanting to grab other peoples money and get your filthy little bludging paws all over it……

          • rosy 4.1.1.1.1

            You think? I’m one of many who doesn’t need anyone else’s money, but I do think broadening the tax base, including a CGT is a really good idea. A few very rich people around the world are also thinking broadening the tax base is a really good idea. I particularly like this headline:

            German Rich Demand Higher Taxes

            You need to get with the programme Sean, being greedy is losing its cool.

    • Draco T Bastard 4.2

      There is already a CGT it was just that the IRD and various govts decided for what ever reasons not to enforce the legislation and interpretations at the time.

      No, it’s that the rules around it are so amorphous as to be impractical to apply. They have to work at it proving every single case which would mean that, if it was applied across the board, it would most likely cost more to administer than it could possibly collect.

      • Herodotus 4.2.1

        DTB I would question
        They have to work at it proving every single case which would mean that, if it was applied across the board, it would most likely cost more to administer than it could possibly collect.
        As when the IRD took individuakls to court and were sucessful a history of precedent would build up. Sure there would be some who would escape, this would have reduced the necessity for a CGT as much of whatthis may collect would already have been collected !!!!!!
        – yet those who assigned a Sales & Purchase comtract to a 3rd party and took a gain would find it difficult to argue that there was an element of non speculation, also those who traded property 3,4 5+ or more properties over say a 6 yr period, and there were many in this boat. For this it should have been the easily picked fruit thatthe IRD went after, instead of NO FRUIT !!!
        With my limited knowledge I would be surprised it over the 5th Lab govts tenor I could not have collected 100+ million p.a.
        Perhaps the CGT is Phils/labs conscience acting up over what previous govts were entitle to and failed to collect.

        • Draco T Bastard 4.2.1.1

          Perhaps they could have but why not make it easier and cheaper to do so?

  5. freedom 5

    There’s a vast in your face economy too and only a fraction of the Tax debt has been paid

    All the major banks and so many other Multinationals have regularly had extensions for hundreds of millions in tax and you want to thumbscrew the chippies and the house cleaners
    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=10601998

  6. Herodotus 6

    I am aware of many builders who “lost” materials when building their own home/bach on other projects. This allowed them to min the cost of their home (max the capital gain) and to claim as deductions for coy tax and GST on the business (saving over 40% in materials costs 12.5% GST and the 33% on the 87.5% on materials).
    It was a standing joke that whenever a builder built a pool for himself there was also 1 being constructed for a client-funny how many pools required 2 filter pumps, extra concrete and pool fencing, and how is the IRD to know who is a builder when as an occupation they entered Company Director?
    I had at the pub one night the priviledge of listening to a builder complain how hard it was for him to lose a $70k cash job and for the IRD not to know. How some are so unfortunate 😉

    • davidc 6.1

      On your ACC paperwork you have to say what you do, that shouldnt be too hard for IRD to work out.

      Also shouldnt be too hard to line up company directors names/company names and vendors on LINZ or RPNZ that keep popping up. If company sells houses and same director sells houses then director should be audited!
      Also spot audits on companies would turn up all sorts. I was in construction for nearly 20 years and never once audited, but I course I was clean anyways!
      I had read but I cant remember where that for every dollar expended by IRD on audit they bring in $8.

    • Ianupnorth 6.2

      People laugh or go into denial when I tell them I know of a 25m long salt water lap pool built as a ‘fire dam’ on a BOP dairy farm, and a Bijon Frise that has its food and vet bills claimed as business expenses as it ‘catches rodents’.
       

  7. Ianupnorth 7

    BTW, how do you put a dagger into growth when there isn’t any?

  8. RedLogix 8

    I have to agree Herodotus; the real failure lay with the govt in the 90’s which according to my own accountant, who is himself ex-IRD, deliberately directed IRD not to put much resource into enforcing this aspect of tax law.

    I’ve said this before… almost all of the effect of a CGT tax would be achieved simply by properly enforcing the existing tax law.

    Now I do know that it took the 5th Labour govt some years to gain an appreciation of what was going on. It was as late as 2005 before Dr Cullen directed IRD to beef up it’s resources in this area and immediately on doing so started finding all amounts of avoided tax.

    And that on gaining office one of this National govt’s first priorities has been stripping that same resource out of IRD.

    And the existing law is not actually all that ill-defined. The current rules are actually quite clear and difficult to avoid.

    I’m not so much against a CGT, after all I’m quite comfortable with the current rules which I believe amount to much the same thing, I’m just underwhelmed by it all.

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      I’m not so much against a CGT, after all I’m quite comfortable with the current rules which I believe amount to much the same thing, I’m just underwhelmed by it all.

      Its just a start mate. Rest of the package comes out tomorrow. Asset taxes and capital/currency controls are needed as well.

    • wtl 8.2

      Your comment suggests that one of the main problems with the current law is that enforcement is dependent on the whims of the government of the day. On that basis, a change to the law, as Labour is proposing, would help overcome this problem – any future government would have to repeal the new law, making their intent plain for all to see, rather than the current rather nebulous approach of turning a blind eye.

      • RedLogix 8.2.1

        any future government would have to repeal the new law, making their intent plain for all to see, rather than the current rather nebulous approach of turning a blind eye.

        Yes.. that’s not a bad point. But then again while I can accept a CGT rule would perhaps work better from an avoidance point of view, you have to recall that the current rule pings the entire capital gain at the applicable marginal tax rate, usually 33%… while Labour’s proposed policy is only rated at 15%.

        Worse still because the ‘grandfathering’ date would 2012 at the earliest, it would effectively give a free pass to huge amounts of capital gain accumulated over the last decade.

        The other thing that generally concerns me about these kinds of rules is that they penalise improvements. In other words if I do the place up, and pay for it out of my own tax paid income… then if I sell the asset for a gain… then I effectively pay tax on the value of the improvements a second time.

        The other effect often seen in other countries is that the small mum and dad rental investors are slowly but surely pushed out of the market, which is gradually concentrated into the hands of a few relatively few very large landlords.

        Combine these two effects and I wonder if it isn’t a bit a recipie for slum-landording. Just thinking..

        • Colonial Viper 8.2.1.1

          The other thing that generally concerns me about these kinds of rules is that they penalise improvements. In other words if I do the place up, and pay for it out of my own tax paid income… then if I sell the asset for a gain… then I effectively pay tax on the value of the improvements a second time.

          Let’s say an investment in improvements of $10,000 secures a capital gain of $5,000 at sale a couple of years later.

          That investment has just returned you $5000 beyond the capital you originally put in.

          It appears to me that $5000 investment gain should be taxed, just like it would have been if you had received it as dividends, interest payments or wages (albeit at different rates).

          The other effect often seen in other countries is that the small mum and dad rental investors are slowly but surely pushed out of the market

          Why would this concentration occur? Currently we have an effect where younger New Zealanders are unable to afford houses at current prices, but a small number of New Zealanders can afford several.

          Combine these two effects and I wonder if it isn’t a bit a recipie for slum-landording. Just thinking..

          There are a few student flat districts I am aware of which isn’t too far off this.

          • Herodotus 8.2.1.1.1

            Come tomorow I hope that Lab (D.Cunliffe) has filled in the small print.

            There to me appears that there will be plenty of scope for the gains that have accumulated over the years to be lost for all time. It would be great to read that in association with any (rumoured) CGT that the IRD will be able to retrospectively review past trading activities pre 2005 (7 yrs previous from this years election). So to be fair those that have profited from marginal activity in the past will also be caught (using the existing legislation and extending to cover more than 7 yrs).

            I have yet to hear of any investigations into share trading and tax being applied to this activity.

            The other aspect I have yet to hear is how the govt will be able to serve a tax notice on non-residents, as if the tax is payable based on the tax year, profits that have been obtained how will these be collected. As the basis for withholding tax is to receipt payment at source so should there be flight the govt has already received payment, how will this be captured with a CGT? I have not read how other countries overcome this, and it was previlent in 04-07.

            • Colonial Viper 8.2.1.1.1.1

              There to me appears that there will be plenty of scope for the gains that have accumulated over the years to be lost for all time.

              What gains? Its worth taking stock here.

              Virtually every dollar of “gains” in the property market was backed my another dollar of mortgage debt.

              • Herodotus

                The gains I am referring to are those whereby property was purchased in the 01-04 period whereby the greatest gains were achieved, and even with the current depressed market there are still capital gains that have not been realised.
                The background effort that Lab has placed will be evident by tomorrows announcement. If it is well planned with detail or if it is just chasing headlines with little detail, just like the 39% tax rate and all the loopholes that were allowed that resulted for many to divert income and pay lower tax rates.
                Knowing the number of non resident Kiwis in 2 areas in Auckland that have traded in property I am worried that they will escape this tax, as they will not appear in any tax records. just lik ethe current tax that allows GST registered to purchaes land GSt excl. Now I wonder how many people have a made upGSt no?

            • Lanthanide 8.2.1.1.1.2

              “It would be great to read that in association with any (rumoured) CGT that the IRD will be able to retrospectively review past trading activities pre 2005 (7 yrs previous from this years election).”

              Electoral suicide if declared before the election.

              But you are advised to keep tax records for 7 years, so all of these people currently evading tax don’t really have any excuse if they’re audited.

          • RedLogix 8.2.1.1.2

            @CV

            It appears to me that $5000 investment gain should be taxed, just like it would have been if you had received it as dividends, interest payments or wages (albeit at different rates).

            I’m not sure the numbers you give work out the way you intended.

            If I had invested say $10,000 in a bank account and then close the account at the end of the year (the equivalent of selling)… you expect the say $400 interest earned to be counted as income and therefore taxable. But you’d be outraged if the taxman counted the entire $10,400 as income and taxed you 33% on the whole amount.

            So if I have spent the same $10k (from tax paid income) adding improvements to a property (maybe even just my own labour), and it gained an extra $15k on resale as a result… I’d happily pay tax on the $5k surplus… but the whole $15k would be a different matter would it not?

            So what was my ‘capital gain’ again?

            Why would this concentration occur? Currently we have an effect where younger New Zealanders are unable to afford houses at current prices, but a small number of New Zealanders can afford several.

            Well it does seem to be the experience in some overseas countries I can think of. For example in Scotland IIRC some 90% of the houses are owned by less than 4% of the population. Landlords owning 10,000’s of houses for generations are commonplace.

            If you make landlording unattractive for ordinary investors the residential rental market might shrink somewhat (but never drop below I’d guess 25% of homes) it would likely be taken up by large cashed up entities via the usual processes of capitalism.

        • Lanthanide 8.2.1.2

          “Yes.. that’s not a bad point. But then again while I can accept a CGT rule would perhaps work better from an avoidance point of view, you have to recall that the current rule pings the entire capital gain at the applicable marginal tax rate, usually 33%… while Labour’s proposed policy is only rated at 15%.

          Worse still because the ‘grandfathering’ date would 2012 at the earliest, it would effectively give a free pass to huge amounts of capital gain accumulated over the last decade.”

          I don’t believe Labour’s new law is going to replace the existing one. It simply means if you are buying deliberately for a capital gain and no other purpose, you should have the gain taxed as income. If you aren’t buying deliberately for capital gain, you’ll just pay the 15%.

          Therefore, the grandfathering law isn’t going to stop people who bought properties deliberately for the capital gains for having to declare that as income. I guess it’s possible that IRD may ease off on their collections and prosecutions in this area once the new law is passed, though.

        • mikesh 8.2.1.3

          A similar sort of thing occurs with shares when profits are retained, since retained earnings would normally be expected to cause an increase in the share price. But even though the company has already paid tax on those earnings, a shareholder selling subsequently will have to pay CGT, so the earnings end up being taxed twice.

    • Draco T Bastard 8.3

      And the existing law is not actually all that ill-defined.

      Apparently, as reported on here a few days ago, Treasury and the IRD disagree with you.

  9. alex 9

    Dr Norman should be made finance minister if Labour win, after all, Labour are mining Green policies pretty heavily.

    • Reality Bytes 9.1

      For sure.

      If greens are the kingmaker’s, it’s a virtual certainty. And Norman/Metiria being co-deputy prime-ministers will be part of the deal.

      • felix 9.1.1

        Are you both high?

        • Reality Bytes 9.1.1.1

          “If” is a conjunction that can introduce a conditional clause.

          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_clause

          IF Greens are the kingmakers, you CAN GUARANTEE Key will be offering them co-deputy prime ministerships, and the Greens will get the same offer from Labour.

          Governments say we won’t work with this or that party, but speeches or promises are not the same thing as actual power. They will quickly change their tune and backtrack on said promises, arguing we had to change or mind because it’s important for the country we are in power etc…

          Exactly the same as Goff will work with Mana even though he says he won’t.

          No I am not high, thanks for asking. Interesting segway, but please try to keep on topic.

          • felix 9.1.1.1.1

            Maybe if you got high you wouldn’t be so patronising. Give it a go.

            What you’re suggesting is of course possible but would represent a major break with convention which wouldn’t be undertaken on a whim if at all.

            For post election negotiations to result in such an outcome, at least one of the two larger parties would need to be willing to countenance such an unprecedented governing arrangement. Possible, but if neither are then no dice.

            Therefore there’s no such guarantee anyone can make.

            Contrary to what’s often thrown around in these discussions, being in a “kingmaker” position doesn’t mean you get whatever you want. It means you get whatever the “kings” are willing to give up.

            • Reality Bytes 9.1.1.1.1.1

              Mate, I think getting accused of having an opinion for merely being high, to be patronizing, hence my response, so what goes around comes around. But I laugh it off and give a bit of quid pro quo patronizing response myself, no offense intended, just a bit of friendly dueling 🙂

              But back to the topic, I agree, being a Kingmaker doesn’t guarantee anything, but boy does it make a difference! It all comes down to how much balls/ovaries the theoretical kingmaker has.

          • Lanthanide 9.1.1.1.2

            “Exactly the same as Goff will work with Mana even though he says he won’t.”

            Not really, because Mana will NEVER go with National. The only situation in which Labour need to actively deal with Mana is the case where, without Mana, Labour is beaten by a repeat of the current government makeup: Nat + Act + MP + UF. Such an outcome as this is quite unlikely, because you could flip MP over to Labour’s side and therefore not need Mana.

  10. Georgecom 10

    Nice stuff from Norman using Keys comments over and over again to expose the hysteria that Key tried to inject into the debate. A nice clinical disection of the prime Minister. Basically Key was done over with his own words. Also nice interjection by Cunliffe that Key may want to try quoting McBeth.

  11. alex 11

    All I’m saying Felix is that Dr Norman has the chops as an economist, I’m not saying that the Greens will be offered high cabinet positions, after all, they continually get shafted by Labour, and the membership would never accept supporting National.
    But seriously, a strong Green party would do wonders for both the quality of policy produced by Parliament and the quality of debate. They play the ball, not the man.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand provides additional funding to COVAX for vaccine delivery
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced additional funding will be provided to COVAX to support vaccine delivery in developing countries. “New Zealand remains cognisant of the dangers of COVID-19, especially as new variants continue to emerge. No one is safe from this virus until we all are and this ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • COVID-19 Community fund providing support for 160 organisations focused on women and girls
    Minister for Women Jan Tinetti today announced financial support will be allocated to the 160 successful applicants for the COVID-19 Community Fund, to support organisations helping women/wāhine and girls/kōtiro in Aotearoa New Zealand affected by the pandemic. “COVID-19 has had a disproportionate effect on women around the world including in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Government delivers reactivation package as Aucklanders reconnect for summer
    A new support package will help revive economic, social and cultural activities in our largest city over summer, and ensure those in hardship also get relief. The Social Development and Employment Minister Carmel Sepuloni and the Economic and Regional Development Minister Stuart Nash have announced a Reactivating Tāmaki Makaurau Auckland ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Mobile services and broadband come to Chatham Islands for first time
    World class mobile and broadband services have been switched on for the 663 residents of the Chatham Islands, Minister for the Digital Economy and Communications, David Clark and Minister for Economic and Regional Development, Stuart Nash announced today. “This eagerly awaited network will provide fast broadband and mobile services to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Crown accounts reflect strong economy amid pandemic
    The Government’s financial accounts continue to reflect an economy that has performed better than expected, despite the latest Delta COVID-19 outbreak. The Crown accounts for the four months to the end of October factors in the improved starting position for the new financial year. Core Crown tax revenue was $2.5 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago
  • Applications open for new 2021 Resident Visa
    The first round of applications for New Zealand’s new 2021 Resident visa open today (6am). “This one-off pathway provides certainty for a great many migrant families who have faced disruption because of COVID-19 and it will help retain the skills New Zealand businesses need to support the economic recovery,” Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • More Vietnam Veterans to receive compensation for Agent Orange Exposure
    Minister for Veterans, the Hon Meka Whaitiri announced today that two new conditions associated with Agent Orange exposure have been added to the Prescribed Conditions List. Under the 2006 Memorandum of Understanding signed between the Crown and representatives of Vietnam veterans and the Royal New Zealand RSA. Vietnam veterans in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government commits to international effort to ban and regulate killer robots
    Minister of Disarmament and Arms Control Phil Twyford announced today that New Zealand will push for new international law to ban and regulate autonomous weapons systems (AWS), which once activated can select and engage targets without further human intervention. “While the evidence suggests fully autonomous weapons systems are not yet ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New freedom camping rules – right vehicle, right place
    Tougher freedom camping laws will be introduced to prevent abuse which has placed an unfair burden on small communities and damaged our reputation as a high quality visitor destination. Tourism Minister Stuart Nash has confirmed that new legislation will be introduced to Parliament following an extensive round of public consultation ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government invests to support a classic Kiwi summer
    Vaccinated New Zealanders can look forward to Kiwi summer events with confidence, while artists and crew will have more certainty, following the launch of details of the Arts and Culture Event Support Scheme, Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Carmel Sepuloni announced today. “The Government recognises that the arts and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Grace period for expired driver licences cruises into 2022
    Due to the ongoing Delta outbreak and extended lockdowns, all New Zealand driver licences and licence endorsements that expired on or after 21 July 2021 will now be valid until 31 May 2022, Transport Minister Michael Wood announced today. “This further extension to the validity of driver licenses recognises that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Delivered: 1,000 extra transitional homes
    A further 1,000 transitional homes delivered  New housing development starts in Flaxmere, Hastings  The Government has delivered the next 1,000 transitional housing places it promised, as part of its work to reduce homelessness. Housing Minister Dr Megan Woods is marking the milestone in Hastings at a new development that includes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Traffic light levels announced
    The levels at which different parts of New Zealand will move forward into the COVID-19 Protection Framework this Friday have been announced. Northland, Auckland, Taupō and Rotorua Lakes Districts, Kawerau, Whakatane, Ōpōtiki Districts, Gisborne District, Wairoa District, Rangitikei, Whanganui and Ruapehu Districts will move in at Red The rest of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Financial support to move to traffic light system
    A new transition payment will be made available particularly for affected businesses in Auckland, Waikato and Northland to acknowledge the restrictions they have faced under the higher Alert Levels. Transition payment of up to $24,000 as businesses move into traffic light system Leave Support Scheme and Short Term Absence Payment ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Ambassador to Russia announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Sarah Walsh as New Zealand’s next Ambassador to Russia. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Russia have a long-standing relationship, engaging on a range of regional and global interests including disarmament and Antarctica issues. We also work together as members of the East ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Permanent Representative to the UN announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced the appointment of Carolyn Schwalger as Permanent Representative to the New Zealand Permanent Mission to the United Nations in New York. “Aotearoa New Zealand is a founding member of the UN and we have worked hard to ensure our stance on human rights, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Further COVID-19 economic support for Cook Islands and Fiji announced
    Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta today announced a further package of support for the Cook Islands and Fiji for COVID-19 economic support and recovery. “Aotearoa New Zealand remains committed to supporting our Pacific fanau and vuvale to respond to the impacts of COVID-19 on their economies, and move towards long-term ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New law will clear the air for tamariki in vehicles
    From today, it’s illegal to smoke or vape in most vehicles carrying children aged under 18 years old - whether the vehicle is moving or not. “Second-hand smoke poses an unacceptable risk to our tamariki and rangatahi,” Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall said. “We know children in vehicles ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Nine countries designated very high risk
    Nine southern African countries are being added to the very high risk countries list following public health advice around the newly discovered COVID-19 variant Omicron, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said. This afternoon, a public health risk assessment was carried out to assess the emerging evidence and any risk to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Foreign Affairs Minister concludes final stage of world trip
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta today departed North America to return home to Aotearoa, concluding the last stage of her 17-day world trip. The final leg of her trip saw her visit the United States of America and Canada for a number of high-level discussions. While in Washington D.C., ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Milestone launch of Pacific Languages Unit
    Today’s official launch of the Pacific Languages Unit is a milestone for our Pacific communities, the Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio said. The Pacific Languages Unit brings together a new set of language supports within the Ministry for Pacific Peoples to provide advice, commission research, maintain standards, promote ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Public Health Lecture – University of Otago
    Public Health - Lessons from New Zealand’s COVID-19 response and opportunities for the future E nga mana, E nga reo,                                          E nga iwi. Tēna koutou katoa. Ka huri ki nga mana whenua o te rohe nei. Tēna koutou. He mihi hoki ki a tatou kua tau mai nei I raro I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand statement on situation in Honiara, Solomon Islands
    Aotearoa New Zealand is deeply concerned by the events which have been unfolding in Honiara, Solomon Islands, since Wednesday. “New Zealand is a long-standing partner of Solomon Islands, and there are deep and enduring connections between our two countries,” Acting Foreign Affairs Minister David Parker said. “Our engagement in Solomon ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Nailed it! Over 500 apprentices get jobs boost
    Over 500 apprentices and cadets have been placed into work across New Zealand thanks to the Government’s booming build programme, that’s both constructing public houses, and maintaining older homes. Housing Minister Megan Woods announced the milestone today at a public housing construction site in Riccarton, Christchurch. “This Government’s investment in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Investment to support maternal mental health
    Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall has announced an investment to help expand maternal mental health services in five District Health Boards. “Supporting parent’s mental wellbeing during their child’s first 1000 days, from conception to two years of age, is critical to the long-term emotional, mental and physical wellbeing ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Workplace vaccination requirements extended to cover Police and NZ Defence Force
    With the support of the organisations, additional vaccination requirements will cover sworn members, recruits and authorised officers of the New Zealand Police, and all New Zealand Defence Force staff. First doses of the vaccine for workers in these organisations are required by 17 January 2022, and second doses by 1 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand and Canada to pursue greater Indigenous collaboration
    During her visit to Ottawa, the Honourable Nanaia Mahuta, New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs and Associate Minister for Māori Development, met with the Honourable Patty Hajdu, Canadian Minister of Indigenous Services, and the Honourable Marc Miller, Canadian Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations, to further expand and develop the positive relationship ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Māori vaccination rates reach 80% first dose
    Associate Minister of Health (Māori) Hon Peeni Henare today confirmed that Māori across the motu have now reached 80 percent for first doses of the COVID-19 vaccination nationally. “We have seen a huge increase in vaccinations for Māori throughout November, since the beginning of the month the increase for first ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Subsequent Children legislation to change
    The Government has today introduced legislation that will reverse provisions in the Oranga Tamariki Act as part of a path to rebuild trust and confidence in the organisation. “The Oranga Tamariki Amendment Bill makes a number of changes but by far the most important is the partial repeal of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill introduced to Parliament
    The Minister of Justice has confirmed the introduction of the Security Information in Proceedings Legislation Bill to Parliament. National security information is information which, if disclosed, would be likely to prejudice New Zealand’s security, defence, or international relations. “This Bill adds to the Government’s work to strengthen New Zealand’s protections ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Shortcomings revealed in power cut investigation
    No household should have had their power disconnected 18 recommendations, mostly EA and Transpower related The EA must strengthen its oversight of the system operator An investigation into power cuts that left more than 34,000 households without electricity on one of the coldest nights of the year has found that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • COVID-19 Protection Framework supported by new testing and contact tracing strategy
    Wider use of rapid antigen testing from 1 December Increasing daily laboratory capacity to 60,000 PCR tests Q1 2022 A new national telehealth case investigation service with 475 investigators A nearly $1 billion investment in testing, contact tracing and case investigation A new national testing strategy will provide better protection ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Supporting New Zealanders to recover from COVID-19 in the community
    $300 million boost to Pharmac to buy new medicines to treat COVID-19 Care in the Community approach will see most cases receive initial contact from a healthcare provider wiithin 24 hours Support pack provided within 48 hours Regular health checks throughout recovery The Government is increasing the support for New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Additional support for people isolating at home
    New regional MSD COVID-19 welfare teams to coordinate social service support for those isolating at home Regional teams working alongside other government agencies, iwi/Māori and community providers for housing, food and income support Government investment of $204.1m into welfare system support for Care in the Community Minister for Social Development ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Tax bill provides vital support for families
    A boost to Working for Families tax credits, as part of a package of financial support that will see 346,000 families better off, has been passed into law late last night.  Revenue Minister David Parker said the measures would lift the incomes of those receiving the Family Tax Credit, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New text service to support disabled peoples’ vaccinations
    Efforts to support disabled peoples’ vaccinations go from strength-to-strength with the launch of a new text service, Minister for Disability Issues Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The service, run by Whakarongorau Aotearoa on behalf of the Ministry of Health, is in response to feedback from the disability community and is an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Proactive Calendar Release – October 2021
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific community reach vaccination milestone
    Pacific communities across the nation have rolled up their sleeves and played their part to reach a major vaccination milestone, 90 percent  have now had their first vaccination, Aupito William Sio, Minister for Pacific Peoples and Associate Minister of Health said. “Reaching this milestone reflects the work Pacific Health Providers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Reconnecting New Zealand – the next steps
    Fully vaccinated Kiwis and other eligible travellers can travel to NZ from Australia without staying in MIQ from 11.59pm Sunday, 16 January 2022 Fully vaccinated Kiwis and other eligible travellers can travel to NZ from all other countries from 11.59pm Sunday, 13 February 2022 All fully vaccinated individuals will be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Shot in the arm for Canterbury tourism
    A brand new tourism attraction launched in the Canterbury high country is designed to transform the regional economy from seasonal peaks and troughs of past visitor trends. Regional Economic Development and Tourism Minister Stuart Nash has officially opened the Ōpuke Pools at Methven, which received government backing from the Provincial ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago