web analytics

Bugger the polls

Written By: - Date published: 9:48 am, November 28th, 2011 - 140 comments
Categories: election 2011, polls, spin - Tags: , ,

Do polls reflect public opinion or do they shape it? Bit of both of course, but my guess is there’s more of the shaping effect than is really good for us.

I think NZ is way over-polled, and consequently polls are way over-discussed. For the last 3 years we’ve been bombarded with messages about National’s popularity. National are popular, it’s true, but in terms of specific numbers, the polls were wrong.

Individual polls are full of noise of course, and should never be trusted. But over time, averaging polls should (if their methodology is sound) give us an accurate picture. It has been claimed that “poll of polls” average measures have been accurate in the past. Not this time. Here’s Pundit’s poll of polls on the day before the election, and the corresponding analysis by Rob Salmond:

Final Poll of Polls Update

Five more polls this week. Four today. Little change. National can govern alone. Winston will not make it (but it could be close).

Five new polls have come out since we last updated our poll of polls. Four of them came in the last 24 hours. Together, they show National continuing to be able to govern alone, according to our latest estimates (available on the left hand side of the pundit front page). We estimate National will win 52% of the vote tomorrow, giving them 67 seats. There have been 57 polls released this year by the five firms we follow, and all 57 of them estimated National would win the seats to govern alone. Fifty of those also estimated that National had an absolute majority of the votes, too.

Got that citizens? 57 out of 57 polls (four of them just a day or so before the election) predict National with the seats to govern alone. Did that happen on the night? No. Let’s compare actual results with poll of polls:

		Actual	Polls
National Party	47.99	52.4
Labour Party	27.13	27.6
Green Party	10.62	11.3
NZF		 6.81	 3.3
Māori Party	 1.35	 1.5
ACT   		 1.07	 1.3
Mana		 1.00
United Future	 0.61	 0.2
Conservative 	 2.76

 

The error is not from Rob Salmond and the Pundit team, I’m sure their averaging methodology is fine. It’s the error in the underlying polls that’s the problem (57 out of 57 wrong). So let’s get something on record for 2014. The polls systematically over estimate National’s support to the tune of about 4%. They need to rethink their methods. Bugger the polls!

140 comments on “Bugger the polls”

  1. Blue 1

    I’ve been saying for weeks that if National got 50% or over I’d eat my hat.

    Thankfully the hat is safe now 😀

    You can’t really blame a lazy media for making a meal out of polls, which are basically a story for no effort on their part. Well, unless you think they should be making an effort to do their jobs.

    The yawning chasm between those whacked-out polls that had National at 56% the week before the election really need looking at. The 8% gap is way outside the posted margin of error.

    Personally I think they need to have larger sample sizes if they insist on continuing with landline phone polling.

    • Deadly_NZ 1.1

      “You can’t really blame a lazy media for making a meal out of the polls” Lazy??? More like Sycophantic. My god I wouldn’t have been surprised if he’d been caught getting a sneaky blowie from some appreciative media person. And his popularity rating would have climbed. SO now here we are again with 3 years of asset stripping, higher Unemployment, (A BILLION Bucks from the public service (called savings)) Lower wages, Oh joy it’s not going to be a nice 3 years, and I hate to think what joys he has for us now X sickness and other beneficiary’s.

      You should have a poll and see how many are still feeling secure, in the cold light of day when they finally realise what they have done, and how they are going to be repaid.

      And what happened in Christchurch ? A dead heat now who would have picked that one?

  2. gingercrush 2

    In fairness both NZ Herald Digipoll and Roy Morgan picked up the momentum changes. Both showed the rise of NZ First and over the threshold. Roy Morgan had NZ First at 6.5%. Roy Morgan crucially had National below 50% and Labour’s vote was very close as well. I think everyone anticipated that the Greens weren’t going to poll what they were and that was accounted for. The most spinning I’ve seen is from Horizon which is doing all sorts of justifications for why their results stated National so low.

    I would personally like to see some consolidation of polling with maybe a partnership between TVNZ and one of the Newspapers and the same with TV3. That is done in Australia. I also see a need for a tracking poll. Tracking polls are not necessarily anymore accurate but they tend to be good at showing momentum and change.

    Edit: Electorate polling on the other hand surely has been shown to be troubling. I wonder if its the same affect as 2005 and the mayoralty race in Auckland. When its essentially between two people or in 2005’s case two parties (ignoring the minor parties for a second or two). They can shown incredible difference to what the results actually were.

    • lprent 2.1

      A few days before the election they were quite incorrect.

      A week before the election what were they showing? Something that was quite different from the result – differences that far exceed the error rates. Why – because they only show people they managed to contact and not those they failed to contact.

      Basically you’d have to say that chicken entrails and a ear to the political ground would have been more accurate. Quite simply the only thing that polls are good for is to show momentum. Because the pollsters don’t publish either their methodology or their actual numbers (like the various failure to contact rates or in most cases the refused to answer rates) they are essentially useless.

      But needless to say the lazy commentators insist on using the inadequate inaccurate things as being gospel for prediction numbers.

      Polls these days are essentially useless because they don’t sample randomly. They sample listed land-lines of those who are home at the right time and are willing to answer a poll – a group that you’d have to characterize as being rather strange in NZ urban society these days. The no-contact rate is enormous. The refusal levels are high.

      I think it is time to ban them from the public discourse. Either that or require that polling companies publish their whole methodology and results so it can be analyzed for the real error rates.

      • wtl 2.1.1

        I agree re: banning. I’m pretty sure other countries do so during the election period (France maybe?). The led up to this election has shown how poll-focussed the political discourse in this country has become, which isn’t a good thing as it moves the focus away from discussing advantages/disadvantages of various policies etc.

        The only real argument for publishing poll results is to aid tactical voting, but our voting system can be tweaked to make move tactical voting unnecessary.

        • Draco T Bastard 2.1.1.1

          I agree re: banning.

          We could make it slightly more complex. Have it so that polls that ask about candidate/party support are banned but polls that ask about issues and policies are allowed.

          The only real argument for publishing poll results is to aid tactical voting, but our voting system can be tweaked to make move tactical voting unnecessary.

          Tactical voting shouldn’t be necessary. That’s one reason why, while we keep a representative system, that I think electorates should be done away with (I mean, really, how many politicians live outside of their electorate anyway?) and go full proportional. Local conditions can be addressed at the local government level.

          EDIT:
          Here is a study on countries that ban polling.

      • Ari 2.1.2

        Disclosing methodology and contact rate statistics, more information about undecided voters, etc… would be very useful, especially a “why are you going to vote for X?” type question.

        Polls have a place in election coverage, but it ought to be a low-key one and be less frequently published. A ban on releasing polls to the public during say the month before the election could be very helpful.

        • lprent 2.1.2.1

          Outright bans are difficult because they’d run directly into BORA. Someone (Draco?) put in a link to a 2003 paper that is worth reading. Methodology looks more effective..

  3. Jimmie 3

    You could also take the message that the polls got Labour’s support just about bang on – no more harping on about cell phones vs land lines.

    • Lanthanide 3.1

      Yeah, I read something on the horizon site about a survey they did for land lines vs cell phones, that they used as the basis for why their internet methodology was so much better. Their results to me looked like those using cellphone only were spread fairly evenly across the income bands, meaning the actual cellphone-only bias should be fairly balanced and easy to ignore. Roy Morgan have said that they actually do include a small sample of cell phones in their polling, as well.

      I think now, we can all agree to ignore Horizon.

      • felix 3.1.1

        Where did Horizon have NZFirst and the Greens?

        • Lanthanide 3.1.1.1

          Here’s their last forecast: http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/188/6-3-more-could-vote-no-party-governs-alone

          Here’s a slightly older one: http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/180/nz-first-10-

          Here’s their rather bizarre assertion that they were “close” to the final results: http://www.horizonpoll.co.nz/page/192/election-results-close-to-forecasts

          It seems they’re claiming the percentages are “of total eligible 18+ population”, so they claim that their forecast of National at 33.7% was therefore close to the final outcome of 29.2%. But that means their other figures for NZFirst at 11.2% and Conservatives on 5.3% were wildly off. If 29.2% of all eligible 18+ voters gave National 47.99%, it means that 11.2% of all voters would’ve given NZFirst 18.4% (11.2 / 29.2 * 47.99) and Conservatives 8.7%.

          Using the same extrapolation, they had the Greens at 20.3% and Act at 4.43%.

          In this case Horizon have tried to use a strange statistic that no other polling company uses and cherry-pick what parts of the results they show have been predictive, while completely ignoring the rest.

          • Ari 3.1.1.1.1

            Yep, Horizon is clearly even worse than traditional polling with their current methodology, and should be having a re-think, not spinning their figures.

      • Olwyn 3.1.2

        Although if you look at the actual percentage that voted for Nation, including the non-voters who amount to something like 27% and 32%, it is closer to 30% that 48%, which is roughly where Horizon had them. Horizon, however, did overestimate the vote for other parties, so their weakness may lie in the opposite direction than the other pollsters – pressing people to say who they would vote for if they did vote does not take into account the possibility that they may not vote at all.

      • Deadly_NZ 3.1.3

        Yeah but they give stuff away so it’s only time and very little effort. I am more inclined to hang up on phone pollsters ( the forced happiness gets me ) but offer me a chance to win a grand or an I pod for 5 mins of my time. I’m in, and I was.

    • RedLogix 3.2

      Or you might want to consider that 35% of the registered voters, that’s almost a million people, have either not voted or are specials that have not yet had their vote counted.

      This is potentially a significant effect that the polls don’t pick up.

      • Lanthanide 3.2.1

        I wish all those people had voted for Aotearoa Legalise Cannabis :/

      • Vicky32 3.2.2

        or are specials that have not yet had their vote counted.

        Does anyone know how many specials there are this time? My son, daughter in law and niece all had to cast special votes as their changes of address had not been registered (although they notified them in plenty of time!) I heard this morning that the specials won’t be counted until December 10th. Shocking! (All 3 voted Labour – so therefore I have some hope.) Being young people they will have been tarred as apathetic non-voters – not so!

    • lprent 3.3

      Jimmie: you are a bullshit artist. What was being said was that the National support was over represented – you know the 56% a week before the election that was splashed all over TV. Because it was being advertised as being a foregone conclusion people didn’t vote

      What did National get? 48%. I wonder what happened to the other 8%?

      What was the turnout. Massively down, much of it from the left.

      Now have a look at the polls again you idiot, and this time use your brain….

      I guess that the polls should be banned as their inaccuracies appear to be affecting the election results.

      • Gosman 3.3.1

        Hang on here. Are you trying to state that a Poll showing a likely National majority government will impact on the support for the the left or the Right? If it is the left what is the logic behind this? Surely this should galvinise the left to get out the vote to avoid the situation ever coming to fruition.

        • lprent 3.3.1.1

          That is exactly what I am saying – inaccurate polls are dangerous for the democratic process (regardless of which party they favour).

          You’re being disingenuous if you’re trying to say that having grossly inaccurate polls published week after week and daily during the last weeks doesn’t have an effect on voting patterns.

          We live in an age of mass media. In the mass media you find that people tend to see the lead stories more than others.

          Go back on the front page of the herald for the last 6 months and count how many stories there are about poll results compared to Labour policies or Nationals policies. I’d bet that poll results are more than National’s policies and a order of magnitude more than Labours. This is in a period when Labour has been releasing quite innovative and new policy. Same for TV. Policy gets washed out by cheap polling headlines.

          So your advice to overcome the cheap publicity engendered by lazy journalism is for Labour supporters to contact people one by one? Yeah right.

          Polls aren’t part of the democratic system. They are now getting in the way of it operating properly. I don’t think that they can be fixed as a predictive mechanism.

          Nope I think that banning polls all together as being grossly inaccurate is the most effective solution..

          • McFlock 3.3.1.1.1

            The classic example was the “worm” in 2002. 
             
            At least this time Winston’s exposure was due to the good old fashioned beat up of a story, rather than inventing something to go berserk over.

          • Gosman 3.3.1.1.2

            I’d suggest this is your opinion only and one that doesn’t have much in the way of empirical evidence to back it up. Indeed I know of the opposite effect being mentioned in elections in the past where Political Parties well out in the lead in the Polls were worried they would fail to get the support on election day because their support base would think it was a done deal and they didn’t need to bother to vote. Now this is the polar opposite to the effect you mention, one that I have never seen discussed before.

            You seem to be using the fact that the National party had consistently high support in opinion polls as an excuse for Labour’s loss when the reality is that one term Governments in NZ are rare, especially on the right of the political spectrum. There wasn’t much Labour or the left could have done to swing this one unless they pulled something miraculously from the campaign bag of tricks. This they failed to do. It had little to do with what the Polls stated prior to the election.

            • McFlock 3.3.1.1.2.1

              Um, no – people seem to be suggesting that there is a systemic bias in the polls which makes them useless, and can skew the vote. Nobody has stated that this was the sole, or even main, contributing factor to labour’s returns at the election booth.
               
              The fact is that the polls consistently overestimated national’s support, seemed okay-ish for labour, but were quite a bit off for the smaller parties. Which kind’ve suggests that the orgasms the media were having over each almost daily poll result, losing no opportunity to stroke their touch screens, was all a complete waste of time.

              • lprent

                Pretty much my point. The journo’s appear to use polls as cheap political filler. But they are of dubious value in the political debates normally because they are so inaccurate and the media keep the details opaque. They are outright harmful in ultra-short election campaigns like this one wound up as.

            • lprent 3.3.1.1.2.2

              I suspect you’re missing the point (deliberately?). Work it the other way around.

              What value do the polls have for the political process?

              I’d suggest that because they are so inaccurate they have little to offer apart from cheap media filler.

              We just had 4 weeks worth of an election campaign where the polls probably accounted for at least a third of the media news coverage of the election (and probably closer to a half). Those polls were either essentially meaningless in political terms or harmful in that they dominated the political debates that people saw on mass media.

              But that media discussion was quite inaccurate because it was well outside the usual expected error levels. They were predicting results that weren’t even close to the eventual results and that virtually every political commentator was predicting that at least one part of which (the mid-50’s National figure) would never happen.

              It is in exactly line with what was predicted by the people like myself who’d looked at the issue of systematic inaccuracies of polling methodologies on the basis of far far larger samples done directly on the electoral roll. Specifically the ever reducing numbers of listed landlines and the demographics of who had the remaining ones.

              So remind me again – what is the value of the highly inaccurate polls?

              • Gosman

                “So remind me again – what is the value of the highly inaccurate polls?”

                You claim they are highly inaccurate yet I am arguing they were surprising accurate meassures of both trends and outcomes.

                As for their use well for a start any information on the mood of a population is useful in my view. It allows you to guage impacts of various actions. For example the Teapot tapes sage. Without the polling information National was getting on the topic the only driver in the discussion would have been the media’s response. As it was National had advice that people thought it was all much ado about nothing and this led to the PM call to get back to policy while ignoring calls to release the tapes.

                It also allows voters in MMP to make decisions over who they give their party vote for in an election so that they can be more confident they don’t waste them. This probably led to more people voting for NZ First as the polls showed over the last two weeks that he was likely to get over the 5% threshold. It also probably lessened ACT’s party vote as people were unsure that Bank’s would win Epsom. I think this is quite a useful service myself. I hate to see my vote going to waste, don’t you?

                • lprent

                  So having a poll saying that National is going to get 55-56% a week out from the election is “accurate” when they actually got 48%.

                  That over the course of a week the same polling company dropped almost 5% is “accurate”. When they’d had the figure for National at that 55% sort of level for months.

                  I’d suspect that there was a systematic sampling error somewhere. But I can’t tell because the information to evaluate the accuracy of the technique is conveniently unavailable.

                  I guess you have a different idea of what is “accurate” than I do. And I’d say that you idea of “accurate” would make me to never give you accounts to control, programs to write, or hardware to maintain. Salesman are you?

          • Deadly_NZ 3.3.1.1.3

            But if you ban all polls then how are you A: Going to know where you are in relation to your opponents. And B: How are you going to let your supporters know whom to vote for. Therefore inaccurate or not Polls seem to be needed. Sort of a necessary evil.

            • lprent 3.3.1.1.3.1

              A. All parties poll already.

              B. WTF? The polls don’t tell anyone that.

              The polls that are done by the media are inaccurate and don’t give the full information about the poll figures and lack any significant information about methodology which means they are not transparent. Therefore they distort the political debate with consistently inaccurate information. Quite simply they are pretty much complete bullshit except in terms of overall trend.

              I fail to see any particular point of use to them. Tell me why you do (but please please use your frigging brain first).

              • Gosman

                The only supporting evidence you supply that the polls are inaccurate is that in the outcome NZ First got more of the party vote and National less than the average of polls over the preceding period of weeks and over the past three years. In every other criteria they were remarkably accurate and they also picked up on the trend where National was falling back towards 50% and below and NZ First was on the rise above 5% in the past two weeks. That is accurate in my book.

                I also note noone has commented on the Ipredict market which has proven to be remarkably good at predicting the results. I believe National was sitting at a likely 48-49% on Ipredict during the last week. Would you ban Ipredict as well during the last part of the election?

                • lprent

                  iPredict is quite open about their methodology and its weaknesses – unlike the polling companies. That methodolgy has certain flaws as well (the classic insider trading ones and small market manipulation) that showed up in various ‘stocks’ at different points, and as you say it has proved to be more accurate especially further out from the election. They also don’t claim to any kind of ridiculously over-hyped “scientific” basis. Effectively it is reporting the aggregate opinion of a number of people about the aggregate opinion on the actions of other people. It is opinion….

                  You’d probably have noticed that with the exception of the Stratos hour, a few blogs, and the continuous promitional e-mails from Matthew Hooten they weren’t widely reported in the media? Probably because the figures didn’t make a good story because they were too mundane.

    • Peter 3.4

      I disagree.

      Landline factor is significant, it’s just that the landline factor decided not to vote 🙂

    • Colonial Viper 3.5

      Landline polls predicted landline voters intentions, and with a million people not voting that’s what we got.

      If the youth (under 25) vote had turned out, or turnout had suprassed 80%, the polls would look as outrageously skewed as they are.

      • Gosman 3.5.1

        Yes and IF my Aunt was born with testicles she would be my Uncle. The polls were broadly accurate even in predicting the number of undecided’s (that in the end didn’t vote it seems).

        • Ari 3.5.1.1

          I’m not sure how you can call a consistent error of four times their margin accross all landline-based polls for a major party “broadly accurate”. Next you’ll be trotting out the joke about the statisticians going hunting.

  4. Lanthanide 4

    The only real big differences here are National and NZFirst. The Greens and Labour were about right.

    Adding the numbers up for poll of polls: 97.6% voted for the listed parties. Actual result: 99.34%. Taking out Conservatives and Mana drops it to 95.58%.

    • felix 4.1

      Good point.

      If a bunch of Nat voters decided to vote for Winston at the last minute (which wouldn’t be surprising given the horrible things Key is presumed to have said about old people on the teapot tapes) then that’d just about square everything up.

  5. Ms X 5

    I think polls do shape the voting patterns, and while most of them rely on landline calling – if not all – what does that say? That people with cellphones only don’t vote? Are they the missing 40%?
    Personally, I’d like to see the ban mentioned on here yesterday, for a couple of weeks before the election. If people are going to vote, they should not be deciding by what others think. And yes, we do have a lazy news media – how often do we see stuff that might be going to happen, hasn’t happened but could…. that’s NOT news!

  6. Brendon O'Connor 6

    What is this modern day obsession with polls who phone 1000 or less phone landlines and those that dont tell them to bugger off, ask them who they are going to vote for. Apart from the land lines flaw, they never say how many calls get hung up on and they seem to all ignore the fact that they don’t ignore the people who say they are not going to vote which seems to be about 30% of the eligable voters, which means that even the closest polls were out by 30%, which is a massive margin of error.
    Is there anyone out there who has half a brain who actually answers phone polls? I personally don’t know anyone who admits to not hanging up the phone on pollsters, especially as they all phone you at dinner time.

    • Vicky32 6.1

      I personally don’t know anyone who admits to not hanging up the phone on pollsters, especially as they all phone you at dinner time.

      I live in a state housing area (in a State house – er dump…) and in 15 years here, have been phoned exactly once for a political poll… (It shows the power if stereotypes that I am constantly having to tell Sky TV to bleep off)… Oh, no, I remember now, I  was phoned twice – the first time, I got as far as expressing my preference – supervisor comes on and tells me “We won’t be using your result – we have already got enough in your demographic…” Pretty blatant! The pollsters don’t want to hear from people in poor areas. When they do call one, and get an old lady, they’re fine with that, until they find out that the old lady is a leftie… BUGGER THE POLLS ALL RIGHT! 😀

  7. Carol 7

    I support a ban on polling throughout the election period.

    The problem with the apparent accuracy of the Labour and Green poll stats, is that it may have been a self-fulfilling prophesy, with many potential voters feeling they these parties were a lost cause – hence the low voter turn-out.

    But also the amount of time the MSM spends on looking at polls is indicative of very lazy journalism – that and the way they focus on “the game”. They treat politics as if it were a politics idol game show, complete with undemocratic phone-ins and online comments & digipolls that get flooded with right-wing astroturfers.

    Instead they should be encouraging critical debate of all policies and political activity, including a much more in-depth debate of government & opposition performance.

    The MSM are like poll junkies and it’s time, and in the interest of the country they they get over their addiction. Maybe they should go cold turkey for a while, and see if they can find a different focus for their political coverage.

    • Gosman 7.1

      As far as I am concerned the media was focused on the policy debate, at least until the Teapot tape intervened. The media generally treated Labour’s policy focused campaign very well. That is why every commentator I have read or heard, (including those on the right), have stated that Phil Goff ran a good campaign. Name me one thing you think the media should have focused more on other than perhaps not getting caught up in the distraction of the Teapot tapes?

      • rosy 7.1.1

        It’s not often I agree with you Gosman, but yeah. And that’s why the teapot tape derailed Labour’s campaign more than it derailed NActs because Labour had set the policy agenda and the MSM had picked up on it. It gave National to take the focus off policy and no-shows, and re-set the narrative to gossip and innuendo.

      • kriswgtn 7.1.2

        Nationals lack of policy

        • Gosman 7.1.2.1

          The cornerstone of Labour’s campaign though was attacking a key part of the National party’s policy – Part selling of certain SOE’s. It is obviously illogical to state that the Media should have focused on a lack of policy on National’s side when Labour was drawing attention to perceived dangers of it.

          Now I agree that National didn’t have much in the way of new policy but I suspect that was a deliberate ploy on their part to make the case that it would be pretty much business as usual. This obviously worked for them.

          It is also difficult to see how the media could criticise this when National’s obvious response is that it doesn’t want to radically change things from where they were before the election. What’s the media to do then?

      • Hanswurst 7.1.3

        I disagree. There was a lot of reporting that certain policies had been announced. However, any analysis was largely focussed on how those policies would affect polling, rather than how they would affect the country in the event that they were enacted. Policy seems to be presented as a sort of makeup that parties occasionally put on to make themselves more sexy, rather than a tool that they use to get their important work done.

  8. Gosman 8

    Come on here. Other than overestimating National and underestimating NZ First the polls were pretty much spot on. What was also clear from polling was there was a move away from National to NZ First in the last two weeks. This was reflected in the election result. You can hardly state there is something seriously wrong with the polls when they generally got trends and even results right.

    • lprent 8.1

      So that explains why the polls throughout that whole of the last three years didn’t even get close to predicting the actual results.

      A two week trend? And they were still way out.

      Don’t make me laugh… You have just defined why the polls are useless in the political arena.. They carry a systematic set of biases

      • Gosman 8.1.1

        Why would polls taken over a three year period somehow reflect the reality of what happens on one particular day in the future? All they can really do is indicate respective positions and trends. This is what they were very good at predicting.

        The polls showed National well in the lead. They were on Election night. The polls showed the left split between Labour and the Greens with Labour being the bigger party but the Greens picking up a lot of support. This was the case. The polls showed all of the minor parties other than NZ First at or below the margin of error which they were.

        The only thing they polls didn’t reflect accurately was the eventual level of support for NZ First. However I would suggest this was a result of the last two weeks of the campaign rather than something that the Polls missed over the past three years.

        By the way noone has mentioned how accurate Ipredict was proven. I remember people on here claiming some bizarre right wing bias in this that meant it was a complete joke.

  9. Werent the polls saying the greens would get 13%?

  10. Richard Down South 10

    Asking too many people driving $100k cars imo
     

  11. queenstfarmer 11

    But over time, averaging polls should (if their methodology is sound) give us an accurate picture.

    This makes no sense. Parties release policies over time, debates are won and lost, and various scandals and other unexpected events unfold. Why do you think that an average of polls taken before and after such events should magically given an “accurate picture”?

    • RedLogix 11.1

      Well exactly.

      Averaging lots of polls effectively reduces their noise and improves their long-term accuracy, but introduces a delay which degrades their short-term responsiveness to events.

      Fundamental statistics makes it very hard to have both. (Although not impossible… just that the methods involved are way more sophisticated than these companies are using at present.)

    • Lanthanide 11.2

      Because barring exceptional circumstances (tea parties, earthquakes), the core support for any specific party does not change much, whereas the polls themselves will statistically fluctuate because they use a different sample each week. Averaging lets us remove the statistical noise and focus on the real underlying figures, which are what matters.

      The problem with averaging of course is that it obviously flattens out everything: noise and genuine poll movements. But the idea is that the noise makes up a bigger proportion of the fluctuations, so genuine poll movements shouldn’t be negatively impacted too much.

    • Craig Glen Eden 11.3

      Good point QF which kind of points to”bugger the polls” then aye?

  12. Jackal 12

    Polling or propaganda?

    There’s never been an election campaign in New Zealand with so much polling. Nearly every day we had hacks like Duncan Garner saying that the polls were putting National into a commanding lead while all other social indicators were telling a different story…

  13. marco 13

    It looks like the missing Nat vote was picked up by NZ First in the last days of the campaign. Probably several reasons for that but mainly their increased profile over the last two weeks of the campaign. Winston was everywhere.

    I’m pleased to see him back in parliament. Whilst I don’t agree with his politics he is a capable performer who would destroy Key in a one on one debate. His resurgence has, in my opinion, strengthened the opposition benches.

    • Jackal 13.1

      So effectively we had the mainstream media choosing who get’s into parliament by how much airtime they give to different factions… and who owns the MSM?

  14. Generally polls are ok as a general indication of past preferences for those who chose to take part. Variations between polls show it is only approximate.

    The biggest problem with polls in relation to elections is there is a hig number of ‘undecided’ and very late (possibly in the booth) decision making, and a growing number that decided not to go and vote at all.

    Polls are to slow to react to the late movements, and they are not a standard pattern across all parties, so projections can be meaningless.

    • Jackal 14.1

      The undecided and non voter turnout is an indication that political parties are failing to engage with the public. If people are making up their mind on the day, they are not aware of the various policies and the effect the proposed changes will have on their lives.

      You might note that the results were far outside of the margin of error Pete George. Projections are not meaningless if they unduly influence the public.

      • Gosman 14.1.1

        Only two of the poll predictions were well out. National’s level of support, (which was still at record high’s in an MMP environment), and that for NZ First. I’d suggest the reason for the second has more to do with the impact of the last two weeks rather than some inherent flaw in polls.

        • Jackal 14.1.1.1

          I’d suggest that the election result has more to do with over-inflated polls leading up to the election than any proper discorse about privatization.

          • Gosman 14.1.1.1.1

            That’s an interesting PERSONAL opinion. However I seem to remember the Labour Party making a big deal about Privatisation of Assets and Phil Goff banging on about this constantly during the election campaign. I also remember the Media reporting on this issue and highlighting the fact that the public doesn’t like the idea much according to opinion polls. What more did you want the media to do? Come out and state that any Government advocating partial provatisation of SOE’s was evil and didn’t deserve to govern? Would have missed a bit of balance if they did that don’t you think?

            • Colonial Viper 14.1.1.1.1.1

              Publishing of plling results should have been banned in the last 7 days. Repeated expectations of a massive National win depressed voter turn out significantly.

              National’s mandate to sell of strategic state assets comprises what…backing from 35% of the voting public? JOke.

              • Gosman

                “Repeated expectations of a massive National win depressed voter turn out significantly.”

                Where is the evidence for this? I don’t mean just you stating well it must follow that because there was polls showing a massive National party lead going in that the low turn out was the result. I mean actual studies done which point to disillusionment caused by high poll ratings for other parties. The most I have seen is a link to Bryce Edward which suggest band wagon jumping as a result of high poll results. That is different from disillusionment caused by low poll results.

                • Jackal

                  Coercive Persuasion and Attitude Change

                  Encyclopedia of Sociology Volume 1, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York
                  By Richard J. Ofshe, Ph.D.

                  Coercive persuasion and thought reform are alternate names for programs of social influence capable of producing substantial behavior and attitude change through the use of coercive tactics, persuasion, and/or interpersonal and group-based influence manipulations (Schein 1961; Lifton 1961). Such programs have also been labeled “brainwashing” (Hunter 1951), a term more often used in the media than in scientific literature. However identified, these programs are distinguishable from other elaborate attempts to influence behavior and attitudes, to socialize, and to accomplish social control. Their distinguishing features are their totalistic qualities (Lifton 1961), the types of influence procedures they employ, and the organization of these procedures into three distinctive subphases of the overall process (Schein 1961; Ofshe and Singer 1986). The key factors that distinguish coercive persuasion from other training and socialization schemes are:

                  The reliance on intense interpersonal and psychological attack to destabilize an individual’s sense of self to promote compliance

                  The use of an organized peer group

                  Applying interpersonal pressure to promote conformity

                  The manipulation of the totality of the person’s social environment to stabilize behavior once modified

                  • Gosman

                    So you make a rather tenuous linkage to the impat of Polls to Brainwahing techniques based on what seems like papers on brainwashing and expect that to be persuassive do you? You were that person on Kiwiblog pretending to be a Zombie weren’t you Jackel? Because it looks like you might have canabalised your own brain with that last post.

                    • Jackal

                      It appears that I ate your brain at some stage there Gosman. You asked for information concerning how polls could influence an election result… some of those studies outlined in that article date back to the 50’s.

                      Coercive Persuasion and Attitude Change are very well researched topics. In the right hands they can be used for immense good but in the wrong hands they can do untold damage. There is no tenuous link between those studies and the current dynamic.

        • mik e 14.1.1.2

          Gooseman national had 100,000 votes less than last election Voters stayed at home and National got only 30% of eligible voters .But got 48% of those who turned up to vote so apathy was the winner by far!

    • Zaphod Beeblebrox 14.2

      Saw Colin Craig on Bomber’s iPredict show- he said their polling showed the getting 2-3%.

      On the same show Winston said he would get 8-10%.

      I’m wondering if its the way they ask the questions that miss the votes. 

  15. muzza 15

    Are the polls trying to be right or are they trying to shape peoples vote patterns?

    • Colonial Viper 15.1

      They are being used to shape voting patterns.

      • Gosman 15.1.1

        Being used by whom and what actual evidence do you have for this other than just your extremely left wing biased view of the world?

        • Puddleglum 15.1.1.1

          Well, there is this series of posts by Bryce Edwards which gives an overview of some of the effects found in the literature.

          Of course, you might think he is also ‘biased’ but, hopefully, not the student’s work he mentions.

          • Gosman 15.1.1.1.1

            There’s nothing in there that suggests that polls are being used to deliberately shape public opinion just that outcomes can influence public opinion. To argue that they are being used to shape public opinion you have to produce evidence that the people who publish them are doing so with the aim of influencing opinion. I have yet to see this.

            • Jackal 15.1.1.1.1.1

              You’re asking for information that is only held by those producing the polls Gosman… they’re not likely going to admit to their corruption.

              58% Think National’s response to the Rena disaster was bad
              26% of people thought Keys handling of the tea pot tapes was good
              53% of people prefer Phil Goff as Prime Minister

              Yet National still wins? Either people are widely voting against what they believe in or they are being unduly influenced.

              • Gosman

                That’s right Jackel. It is all an evil right wing conspiracy to control your mind through manipulating polls. Of course the only evidence you supply supporting this is some polls which somehow show Phil Goff has the support of 53% of people to be PM over presumable John Key (WTF?!?) as well as some other polls. Who commisioned those polls by the way Jackel? Was it perchance the media?

                • Jackal

                  So you think that a contradiction in the polling is irrelevant because it was commissioned by the MSM? They have subsequently removed their findings… WTF indeed.

  16. Polls have far too much influence on the discourse around elections and not just directly on voting choices.

    For example, Labour’s policy announcements were often discursively framed in terms of ‘desperate’ attempts to counteract low polling.That meant that the discourse was all about whether the policy announcement ‘succeeded’ in changing the poll ratings (i.e., ‘let’s wait to see the next polls’) rather than being a detailed analysis of the pros and cons of a policy.

    That means that even when the media were supposedly covering ‘policy’ and ‘issues’ they were often largely just continuing to report on the polls. The difference is subtle but real and, potentially, more pernicious as it undermines what little coverage there is of policy. Policy effectiveness becomes measured primarily in terms of its effects on polling.

    Polls also, of course, affect general conversations about elections amongst ordinary people. 
    I had, for example, a conversation (pre-election) with an educated and intelligent friend. He said that ‘Labour is a shambles’ and so he was voting Green.

    I asked him how Labour was a shambles. His answer?: “Look at the polls.” I pressed him further. Did he think Goff was about to be rolled? (No). Did he think their policy announcements were incoherent or irrational (No). Did he think their campaign was falling apart? (No).

    I think the claim about a ‘shambles’ was a justification for a feeling he had about Labour but was, itself, not supported by anything except their unpopularity. Being educated he probably didn’t want to acknowledge that his voting preference was primarily based on that sort of concern with popularity.

    • Colonial Viper 16.1

      Yep.

      Now I’m thinking that a ban on the publication (or discussion of) of any poll results for the 7 days before election day would be appropriate.

      That last week must be based on policy and substance, not popularity. This would also give the minor parties more of a chance to shine.

      It would stop the Friday newspaper headlines and editorials saying “Labour to be smashed on Saturday, Key complete triumph most likely”. Which is what happened on the 25th.

      • queenstfarmer 16.1.1

        Ah, the not-unprecedented socialist response to failing to win power: restrict democratic rights, because the foolish people just can’t be trusted to make the right decision. Any other democratic rights you’d like to ban while you’re at it? Perhaps banning negative discussion about any party’s policies would also help.

        • Gosman 16.1.1.1

          Yeah I suspect that the Media would also be forced to report negatively on any right wing policy and positively on any that the left promotes. Can’t have balance now can we as otherwise people might vote incorrectly and that would lead to (Gasp! Horror!) a Right Wing government (Dun dun dah!).

          • Colonial Viper 16.1.1.1.1

            watch your grandkids assets being sold out to a small proportion of the wealthy, and foreigners, Gosman. And relax in the knowledge that you are helping it all happen.

            • Gosman 16.1.1.1.1.1

              Unlike you I don’t want my Government owning what is essentially commercial enterprises. I would prefer Governments stick to the business of governing and Business stuck to the business of business. It is what distinguishes the left from the right in politics. You have your reasons for disagreeing. I have seen them and obviously reject them just as you have obviously rejected the right wing arguments over why it is better for the State to stay out of businesses. Therefore you are wasting your time using silly emotive statements such as non-existing grandkids being adversely impacted by the results of part privatisations. Tell it to one of your leftist buddies and you can all commiserate together.

              • I don’t want my Government owning what is essentially commercial enterprises

                Neither do I. That’s why I opposed them being turned into businesses via the SOE Act.

                They are not businesses and should not be forced into that unnatural form. They are the vital infrastructure of a modern nation state. I’d support your implicit call for returning them to the status of a government department.

                • Gosman

                  Really???

                  So are you stating that Solid Energy, Air NZ, and Kiwibank should be changed into Government departments then? On what basis would they compete with the private companies they are in the same market with if not using the commercial model?

                  • Colonial Viper

                    key infrastructure should be Govt owned and controlled with no bias for profit generation.

              • Vicky32

                  such as non-existing grandkids

                Why am I not surprised? If you had kids or grandkids, you might have to be responsible for someone else! :O

              • *_*

                +10 on cock-smaking those douches

        • Colonial Viper 16.1.1.2

          Restricting polling release is about increasing democratic rights, fool.

          It increases it by forcing the media to focus on policy substance, you see. Something that the NATs are weaker on, coincidentally.

          • Gosman 16.1.1.2.1

            Written like only a hard core leftist could. Restricting what someone can publish is actually increasing people’s freedom. George Orwell would be proud of the use of Newspeak inherent in that statement.

            • Jackal 16.1.1.2.1.1

              It’s increasing democratic process to ensure the media does not unduly influence the public from making an informed decision.

              If you were properly read Gosman you would know that what you’re advocating for has been used in the past to disastrous effects. I would prefer that society learns from its mistakes.

              • Gosman

                And if you were properly read you will know that what you are advocating has been, and continues to be, used by totalitarian regimes the world over to get the ‘correct’ message out to the population. Zimbabwe is a prime example where they have a media commission in place to ensure noone in the country is ‘manipulated’ too much by the private media.

                • Colonial Viper

                  No publishing or discussion of polling data for 7 days before an election. Gives people more free room to think for themselves, not think what someone else is finding popular.

                  Also prevents the media from using polls to shape outcomes. Eg. Friday newspaper headines saying “Labour smashed, National expected to rule alone with El Presidente Don Key!”

                • Jackal

                  Wrong! I’m not advocating for that type of system at all. I’m advocating for more responsible reporting and a few rules that determine the extent of influence the media can have on the public.

                  You might not have noticed but the New Zealand public has been manipulated by propaganda over the last three years. Our news services are completely ineffectual at delivering concise and correct information that is not slanted. Even the Australian news is by far superior to ours.

                  One new practice I’ve recently noticed in New Zealand is news that is very old being rebroadcast to fit the current discourse of information when it is totally irrelevant.

                  Not as irrelevant as your comparison though Gosman.

          • queenstfarmer 16.1.1.2.2

            So now you want to “force” the media to report certain things (I wonder who determines what “policy substance” is?). Well., state controlled media is a feature of all socialist regimes.

            • Colonial Viper 16.1.1.2.2.1

              Corporate controlled media is a feature of all capitalist and corporatist regimes. So?

        • Puddleglum 16.1.1.3

          I would support some period of restriction of polling/publication of polls or rules around how they are reported.

          The election period is a regulated period of time and the election is a highly regulated event in all sorts of ways – spending limits, authorisation statements, misleading claims in election advertisements, no electioneering on election day, no reporting in the media on election day of anything that encourages someone to vote for one party or candidate or another, etc..

          This degree of regulation is accepted by all parties (so far as I’m aware) as in keeping with the importance of the election and election period and the seriousness of voter decisions.

          In that spirit, there is a legitimate debate about the reporting of polls for some period or for regulating the methodology of reported polls or in some other way ensuring that information provided to electors via polling is not misleading.

          An election is an exceptional circumstance and so exceptional steps to regulate the event seem reasonable to me. There is also enough evidence in the literature on the effects of polling to suggest that a look at some form of regulation is justified (see the links in another comment by me on this thread – 15.1.1.1), especially in light of the growing use of polls by media.

          Both ‘freedom’ and ‘truth/honesty’ are virtues but that does not mean that they are always closely aligned. That’s why we have defamation laws, restrictions on the reporting of court cases and the like.

          • queenstfarmer 16.1.1.3.1

            There is a massive difference between requirements such as authorisation statements, and CV’s proposal to ban publication (or even discussion!) of certain things.

            What CV wants is to ban anyone from saying “I asked 500 people what they thought about Party X’s policies. Here are the answers they gave me…”. He would even ban you and me from having a discussion about the same thing.

            • Jackal 16.1.1.3.1.1

              I don’t think that is what CV is saying exactly… the thing you seem to be failing to comprehend is that people can be influenced.

              If the polling is inaccurate as has been highlighted and you tell somebody about that inaccuracy then their decision could be based on disinformation instead of facts. That’s not how a democracy should be run.

              • queenstfarmer

                So you want to prevent the spread of “disinformation” (which would presumably include such vicious disinformation as someone accurately reporting that they asked 500 people who they planned to vote for, and what their response were.) So your plan would clearly need some central authority to determine what qualifies as disinformation versus fact. Perhaps you could call it the Ministry of Truth?

                • Jackal

                  That might be a bit much for you right winger’s… as I don’t think you can handle the truth.

                  • Gosman

                    No you just need a Media commission that determines what balance and fairness is. Of course it would need to be staffed by the ‘right’ kind of people.

                    • Jackal

                      Personally I think that our Press Council and BSA are completely ineffectual in their current format. They are most definitely staffed by the “right” kind of people ie cronies.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Nah fuck off what I am saying is no publishing of any political party poll results or discussion of those results for up to a week before election day. (I personally think 24 hours to 48 hours would be enough).

                      Its not rocket science, it is designed to allow people to think about their options already knowing how the parties are positioned, but without stupid polling based media narrative driving the daily discussion right up to E-Day.

          • Gosman 16.1.1.3.2

            You actually make quite a persuassive case. However what you overlook is if in fact there is an impact caused by polls and it favours the right there is no way you can get this changed without a sh*tfight. Why would the right of the political spectrum allow the left to change the rules to make the political environment more favourable to the left? It would be like the Electoral finance act all over again but much worse.

            • Jackal 16.1.1.3.2.1

              The simple answer to that is because the right should want a stable and sustainable political process. If the public continues to be manipulated and basically lied to we will have even more people becoming less engaged in politics.

              This might work in favour of those doing the manipulating at first, but the end result is never good. Effectively the less public engagement with politics the less influence politicians have on the public. This is partly to blame for the spiraling violence overseas.

              It might seem a bit strange to someone like yourself Gosman, so obviously stuck in rightwing ideology, but having a process that does not unduly influence the public is the only way to increase political influence. The media seem unable to self regulate in this area… so there’s really only one choice.

              • Gosman

                What???

                Please explain that again? How does changing a system that inherently favours the right, ( according to many views expressed on here), lead to a situation which the right will benefit from that change as well? They will only benefit if at some time in the future the system is used to benefit the left over the right. You have yet to show how this could happen.

                • lprent

                  Personally I don’t know if it favours the right or the left. I really don’t care.

                  What I dislike is that we get a pile of debate about something that is grossly inaccurate whilst pretending to be statistically accurate in representing the whole voting population. It wastes everyones time and clogs up the political debate with something that is largely irrelevant to it.

                  I figure the best approach would be to require the polling companies and the media to publish the whole of the sampling methodology and all of the figures from the survey including failed contacts for each poll. Then we could get some transparency on how accurate the bloody things are based on how they sample.

                  At present the polls look to me to be less accurate than simply having a large sample of people guessing the probable outcomes (ie iPredict).

            • Puddleglum 16.1.1.3.2.2

              I’m not convinced that the effects of polling have any inherent tendency to favour the right. Polls do, however, have some effect. It would be strange if they didn’t – as if people would have them simply go in one ear and then straight out the other.

              The kinds of effect they do appear to have, though, are ones that we wouldn’t usually argue would be beneficial to an effective political debate in a democratic society (e.g., encouraging the pursuit of momentary popularity over deep discussion and analysis).

              Polls also affect the behaviour of political parties and operatives. It could be reasonably argued, also, that polls reward behaviour that enhances perceptions independently of substantive issues. In that regard, I’ve noticed – and am particularly concerned about – an increase in ‘specially designed polls’ with curiously specific questions.

              The obvious examples of this are on media websites but there are also commissioned polls that ask about fictional scenarios (e.g., ‘If you had to choose between tax cuts and increases in welfare benefits, which would you prefer?’). We’ve seen a lot of that kind of polling this time around. I wonder both about the motives of such ‘push polling’ and the soundness of the methodology.

              An example of this latter kind of polling would be the poll that I understand was carried out by Farrar’s company (?) in Epsom that suggested to those polled various scenarios around National’s overall polling in the country and, in that event, how they would vote in Epsom.

              That seems to me to do two things: (1) Alert those polled (and those later reading about the poll’s ‘findings’) to the ‘danger’ of voting particular ways if National’s party vote were at particular levels, and (2) frame a poll in Epsom in relation to other polling, suggesting that the pollster in this case clearly believed that such other polling is something that voters do (and should?) take into account.

              In fact, now that I think about it, this kind of polling does reveal one way in which widespread use of polls does have an ‘inherent’ bias to the right. On the assumption that right wing political parties tend to be better funded, they would also be able to fund more polls and, in particular, more of these specific, scenario-based and self-referencing ‘push polls’ that then become news stories and further ‘advertise’ a particular framing of elections and election issues. 

      • Gosman 16.1.2

        I presume you agree you would need cross party support for this restriction of free speach or do you think the left could just ram this through by itself like it did with the original Electoral Finance Act?

        • Colonial Viper 16.1.2.1

          The media needs guidelines to prevent the use of polls from shaping election results and shaping election turnout.

          “Free Speech” requires that the media pay attention to people and issues, not push/pressure polls. And in the last 7 days before election day, that is what they must do.

          Further let’s not get too precious about ‘free speech’ given that Key threatened the media with police action, and there are already a lot of rules around ensuring a fair democratic process via media limitations.

          • Gosman 16.1.2.1.1

            So would you think this policy needs cross party support or is it something the left should just ram through without reference to those across the political divide?

            • lprent 16.1.2.1.1.1

              Do you mean like the cross-party support across the divide on asset sales?

              • Gosman

                Ahhhh. So are you stating that you would like this to become the policy of one of the main parties of the left and they would campaign on it before an election so they could claim a mandate if they win?

                If so then I too would love to see this. I would love to see that mainstream left wing party being attacked for being anti-freedom of speech. Nothing I think would be as enjoyable politically as seeing a left wing party commit political suicide by advocating something like this during an election campaign.

                • Jackal

                  Your inference there is that the media has so much control of the political process during and election campaign that no political party should move to curb that influence… thus showing that you agree the dynamic exists and that the MSM does in fact unduly influence the election result through their manipulations.

                  • Gosman

                    No. I’m stating that any decent right leaning party would make mince meat of a left leaning party campaigning on the stated policy of denying the media the right to publish polls during an election campaign. The media would then run with this because the policy is a restriction on their freedom of speech. This last point is irrefutable. You might like to argue that it is a necessary restriction but it is a restriction nonetheless. I can just imagine the headlines now. It is simply too delicious to describe.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      No. I’m stating that any decent right leaning party would make mince meat of a left leaning party campaigning on the stated policy of denying the media the right to publish polls during an election campaign.

                      Sorry mate using push polling to shape the outcome of an election is not a “democratic right”.

  17. J Mex 17

    The polls were FAR more accurate than ‘The Standard’ authors and posters.

    Should we ban predictions by media and bloggers, because they are generally incorrect and may shape public opinion?

    • Colonial Viper 17.1

      Yeah which Standard posters got their opinion on to the front page of the NZ Herald, or on the 6pm news bulletin?

      Oh that’s right none, moron.

      • J Mex 17.1.1

        I see, it’s about readership size is it CV?

        So should a small newspaper be allowed to express likely poll outcomes, but big one not? Where is the cutoff?

        According to the NZ Herald, they have an annual readership of 582,000.

        I don’t know the readership of The Standard, but last year it was stated as 212,000 unique visitors (up 45% from the year prior).

        The issue seems to be that election outcome scenarios, seen by voters, affect elections. So to those who want to ban the publishing poll outcomes (and to you CV), my question is this… “At what point (readership size) should “The Standard” or another publisher be “banned from expressing likely election outcome scenarios? ?

        • lprent 17.1.1.1

          But we don’t run inaccurate psuedo-scientific polls with fundamental methodological flaws and try to pass them off as being accurate – to the point of stating the expected outcomes from them. What is written here is stated to be opinion.

          Can you see the difference, or are you blinded by something? A blighted future perhaps?

          • Gosman 17.1.1.1.1

            Hang on a minute here. You stated in a post above above that many of the polls you are unable to identify if they are scientific or not because they don’t publish their methodology. Now you seem to be claiming that they have fundamental methodological flaws. How do you know this if you don’t know the methodology used?

          • J Mex 17.1.1.1.2

            Ohhh, everyone seems a bit touchy today.

            Don’t come over all high and mighty on the polls now fellas. The Standard authors spent vast column inches every time a poll came out that was good for Labour/bad for National.

            A bit hard to take a “bugger the polls” and “ban the polls” attitude a couple of weeks after getting all wet over polls that were good for your “team”

            Polls good for Left

            Let’s be clear. You have people here asking to ban polls. For the primary reason that they are not accurate, and they affect the way people vote. They are more accurate than a lot of things that affect the way people vote. They are up front about what they are and their methodology. They show their margin of error. They are treated with scepticism.

            Any analysis here about whether the polls were correct within their margin of error. Nope. Just a bunch of angy left wing party supporters feeling hard done by because their team didn’t win.

            How about throwing the same spotlight on yourselves.. “National’s beginning to leak too. I’ve just been hearing about their latest internal polling, and it ain’t pretty – Eddie”. Opinion posing as fact?

            Here’s CV giving tacit approval to political parties publishing bullshit information ito supress turnout

            “Colonial Viper 15.1.1.2
            2 November 2011 at 10:04 am

            wtf? A political party suggesting that their own candidate is ahead of the game in order to, amongst other things, try and suppress opposition turnout is somehow “dishonest”?

            What are you, 16 and participating in your first election campaign?”

            That is o.k? but independent polls are not o.k? Pretty strange world you guys live in.

            Polls are never going to be 100% accurate. But let’s be honest, they are impartial*

            *Except the Horizon poll – which incidental seemed to be the most enthusiastically received around here.

            • r0b 17.1.1.1.2.1

              The Standard authors spent vast column inches every time a poll came out that was good for Labour/bad for National.

              I mostly wrote about the polls – but only because someone has to, it would be odd for a political blog not to provide a forum for discussing them. I have made my own opinion on polls clear many times, they are not very accurate. Why do you think the image that accompanies each post on polls is a dart board?

              Except the Horizon poll – which incidental seemed to be the most enthusiastically received around here.

              Oh what rubbish. I don’t think you’ll find a single post here pushing or even discussing Horizon polls, except to be critical of the methodology. We never even reported them during the election campaign.

            • lprent 17.1.1.1.2.2

              The Standard authors spent vast column inches every time a poll came out that was good for Labour/bad for National.

              I think that you’re confusing us with kiwiblog and trying to rewrite history. We don’t have any particular vested interest in polls. As you can see when you look at the top posts on polling where our authors have been criticizing their methodology for a long time….

              /?s=poll&isopen=block&search_posts=true&search_sortby=relevance

              Just taking the first ones by relevance rather than your rather disturbing habit of cheery picking one post on polls by its headline (because you can’t have read the post and considered that it was good about the polls. It merely linked some msm stories, and it was critical of the media use of the polls)

              Pretend polling

              On the perils of polls

              Reviewing the weekend polls

              Why the polls suck.

              Polls everywhere

              A week of polls

              Now if you actually read the posts rather than reading your navel to try to rewrite history, you’d note that damn near every post we write on polls criticizes them and their usage. Why? Because they are as stupid as well… you are…

              Throughout the years since the last election the authors tended to write about every second Morgan poll as they were the only ones that arrived with much consistency (about every 2 weeks) and one every other month of so we’d look at another poll. We did a few more closing to the election – but mainly those would be a single post on several polls.

              The usual complaint is that we don’t write about every poll. You have to go to the obsessional blogs like kiwiblog, nominister, or whaleoil if that is your taste.

              Most of the posts written about the Horizion poll here have been either cautious or critical of its methodology

              As for the other posts. In each case where and why an opinion was formed including if it was hearsay was stated. I guess you don’t actually read the posts – do you have illiteracy issues?

              What I’m saying is that the polls are useless for political debate because they do not even come close to being inside their “margins of error”. That because of the methodology of the polls they should be regarded as being psuedo science. That the lack of transparency on the polls means that the obvious errors cannot be corrected. An d that I believe that the news media know all this and choose to treat them as being factually correct because they are a cheap way of filling headlines. All of your bullshit doesn’t change any of that.

              We’re not responsible for commentators. Talk to CV.

              You really are a bit of a useless pillock aren’t you…

              • J Mex

                Here’s my summary:

                – The polls were accurate, there or thereabouts.
                – They were certainly more accurate than every author on Red Alert
                – I think that many people changed their vote based on the final polls. They realised Labour were certainly goneburger and were almost certain to govern alone. They threw votes to NZF, Conservative as a brake on National.
                – Many Standard commentators and Authors did the same thing and voted tactically for NZF because of poll results. You can’t tell me that The Standard authors are big NZF fans, or they ‘naturally’ sensed the election outcome. Bollocks – They voted NZF based on what the polls were telling them, (which they knew was the truth)

                Questions for you (or others)

                – Do you honestly believe that polling is not useful for gathering information on likely outcomes? I think that is easily the best (but not perfect) method for finding out the most likely outcome. Asking your friends certainly isn’t. Gauging doorknocking reception certainly isn’t. That is why politicians and the media poll.

                – Do you think that publishing poll results leading up to an election should be banned? That’s what a few of your commenters are saying. And you aren’t calling them idiots. Although they almost certainly are.

                For every voter put off voting by polls, there would be two that vote because of them. Polls are one of the the only things that give elections colour and excitement. Without polls, New Zealanders (other than the political junkies) would be bored witless. Close polls inspire and motivate supporters, they galvanize candidates, they allow parties to focus resources.

                But you have commenters who want to ban polling, and you don’t call them for the idiots that they are. You are either so far into the red hole, that you have lost all perspective, or you are supremely disingenuous. I’m leaning toward you being a disingenuous pillock, but it’s most likely a little from column A and a little from column B

                • lprent

                  I have already answered most of those questions. Just read down the post or use the search in comments for @author lprent by date and do some reading. If you find something that you don’t understand (quite probable based on these ‘questions’ framed as invalid statements) , or find something not covered, then ask something specific.

                  You really are lazy about reading aren’t you? Are you as lazy in real life?

                  • J Mex

                    I’m going to ignore your lazy barbs. I am sure that if you and I were in the same room together, people wouldn’t be picking me as the lazy one of us two.

                    I see that you are a “ban the polls” or publish full methodology

                    I don’t think we need legislation around polls, there is no need. The ones that are more accurate get more attention and more credibility. The ones that aren’t don’t. Horizon will have a hard job maintaining any credibility after this election.

                    I stand by what I said about polls making the election more interesting. I don’t think that anyone can credibly argue the corollary.

                    I also stand by the fact that polls allowed your authors and your commenters the chance to vote tactically. Nobody would have known how far away Labour was without polls. Nobody would have known how close NZF was from 5%. People stopped National getting an outright majority because of the information that the polls told them.

                    You can’t credibly argue that the number of your authors and commenters would have voted tactically for NZF without the information that the polls provided.

                    But fuck it, ban em’. eh?

                    And drop the “you are stupid” and “you are lazy”. It is beneath you and it makes you look like a complete cock

                    • I stand by what I said about polls making the election more interesting. I don’t think that anyone can credibly argue the corollary. [I think you mean ‘converse’]”

                      Contrary to what you claim, prior to opinion polling elections were still very interesting to many participants. (Think the first half of the 20th century).

                      The interest and excitement came from attendance at public meetings, arguments (and even fights) between opponents and a generally intense debate over deeply important issues.

                      I’d go further; elections appear to have been far more interesting and exciting prior to ubiquitous polling. That’s because elections were understood to be about argument and conflict (which, if nothing else, is pretty exciting stuff) and no-one could be sure how the debate would go, overall. That is, lack of knowledge of (or presumed insight into) the outcome added intensity and emotional investment to the event.

                      In addition, to support your claim you’d have to argue that, without constant polling, turnout today would be even lower.

                      I think we can assume that much of the non-voting adult population were not overly excited by the political spectacle (including polls every other day towards the end of the campaign).

                      I guess from your perspective, far from banning polls perhaps we should have compulsory polling every hour on the hour in order to apply the democratic defibrillators to these apparently terminally unexcitable people?

                    • lprent

                      See, I knew you could find out what I’d said if you only tried a little. The accuracy of the polls is pitiful unless of course you think people magically make up their minds at the last minute and the polls just happen to see it. There is no ability to determine accuracy of a poll a month or even a week out from an election which makes your statements ridiculous. The only way to determine if they are likely to be accurate is to examine the methodology and figures. For one unstated reason or another, the polling companies aren’t willing to do that.

                      But I see that your attitude is that the polls are basically entertainment. In that I suspect you are probably correct..

                      Anyone could have known how close NZF was to 5%. All they had to do was to think about constituencies. Read my comments from three years ago – I was predicting that he would be back and why. It was obvious then that it was likely.

                      I call people as I see them.. If you act like fuckwit, then I will treat you as one. – including giving you a mirror in words. Don’t get too proud of it, I’d do it to anyone playing testosterone games here. You should know because you have seen it before – have you forgotten?.

                      And I really don’t care what people think – around here I react in a appropriate way to what others do. It prevents people from trying to set the rules

  18. Faversham 18

    IMHO the polls were out mostly in their over-estimation of the turn out.

  19. Brendon O'Connor 19

    The irony is in my heart I wanted some form of semi socialist government in NZ, but I knew it wasn’t going to happen, so I moved to Australia with my family in September. I could see no other option. It turned out I didn’t able to need polls to tell me the outcome then, and I turned out to be sadly correct.
    NZ is going down the toilet as the majority, or at least slightly more than 35% of them (which is what it would take to beat National) still haven’t worked out that what makes businesses successful is when the average Joe has money to buy the goods and services, not just blow their meagre wages on the essentials which is what the majority of kiwis are now only able to do.
    Plus there will be reduced incomes streams for the Government so this and future governments will have to get by on spending less on the essentials or tax individuals more. We know this government opposes taxing the greedy and supports taxing the needy, so the only way to redistribute income for them is to keep lowering taxes for the wealthy and increase taxes on the poor. If wages were higher and taxes were lower for the poorer then the would have more money for buying extras and then make businesses richer that way.

    • mik e 19.1

      Not only are the right wing taking over NZ but it looks like they are trying to take over the left as well.Never happy until they have ground NZ into the ground hook line and sinker just like Muldoom did!

  20. Campbell Larsen 20

    Haven’t had time to sift all of this thread, but have skimmed enough to ask a possibly pertinent question:
    Gosman – pollster????
    Can’t for the life of me think of another reason why he would submit so many comments defending the statistical equivalent of televised crystal ball gazing.
    Good money in polling…..what was the name of that penguin-like fellow who writes PR for the Nats and has a polling company….? Friend, relative or just kindred soul/ clone?

    • Colonial Viper 20.1

      you must be thinking of Farrar and his firm Curia. I recently met some young Tory grad who used to do polling for him. Small place, NZ.

      • felix 20.1.1

        Gee it would be so weird if the Nats were paying Farrar to do polling and he was hiring staff who spend their work time pushing the Nats’ agenda on political blogs.

  21. Georgy 21

    All polling results should be banned during the election campaign period. The unreliability, the effect on voters thinking, and the precedence poll results take over policy announcements and discussion are all very good reasons for polls to be banned during the campaign period.

    BAN THE POLLS ! ! !

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Gun nuts say they’re criminals
    The government gun buyback ends this week. One problem with the buyback is that, thanks to our previously lax gun laws, the police have no idea how many soon-to-be-illegal guns are actually out there. And the gun-nuts are keen to paint it as a failure by claiming that most of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 hours ago
  • Why do people criticise emergency services and their decisions following a disaster?
    Why we have seen some criticisms of the emergency response to the decision to delay recovery rather than take immediate action? Why do some people think they can make better decisions that the Police and other authorities? To understand this better, we need to think about how and why we ...
    SciBlogsBy Sarb Johal
    6 hours ago
  • Sleep disorders and fluoride: dredging data to confirm a bias
    Sleep disorders are common and have many causes. But anti-fluoride activists will now be blaming them on community fluoridation. Image credit: Sleep Disorders and Problems There is a pattern to the recent research aimed ...
    7 hours ago
  • Climate Change: Wasting our time again
    For the past two weeks delegates were meeting at the UN climate change talks in Madrid. The meeting finally ended, having achieved... nothing. The IPCC has made it clear that we need to halve emissions by 2030 if we are to avoid making the planet uninhabitable, so countries needed to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    8 hours ago
  • From sewing machinist to software programmer
    Amelia Sharman I’m sure you’ve heard some version of this popular prediction – about two-thirds of children entering primary school today will end up working in jobs that don’t exist yet.1 This prediction assumes rapid or accelerating technological change. But looking at historical trends and current data, rates of technological ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    9 hours ago
  • Some fluoride-IQ researchers seem to be taking in each other’s laundry
    Image credit: Publish Peer Reviews. Illustration by David Parkins Scientific peer-review is often touted as a guarantee of the quality of published research. But how good is peer-review? Does it guarantee poor ...
    1 day ago
  • Spread the Word
    If you like any article please help promote it (and the blog). Link to it on facebook and other social media, write about it anywhere or re-blog it. We’re very happy to have other people re-blog our material, all we ask is that you mention the original source and put ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • Pronouns etc
    by The Council of Disobedient Women   John Fenaughty is a senior lecturer in the Faculty of Education and Social Work at the University of Auckland. In a recent column Fenaughty suggested that school teachers should use students’ “correct names and pronouns (e.g., he, him, they, them, she, her, etc.)” ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 days ago
  • “People’s Faces” by Kate Tempest
    Heard this on Radio NZ this afternoon. Perfectly captures how I'm feeling just now.It's always good to find new music, though it would be nice to be hearing something celebratory. Even "Things Can Only Get Better" would be welcome, if it was accompanied by a thumping Labour victory. ...
    2 days ago
  • A reflection on the British general election
    by Don Franks Like New Zealand, Britain is officially a country of equal opportunity under the rule of law, with increasing hardship for those at the bottom. When there’s an election, and the party most obviously callous towards poor people wins, decent folks are dismayed and bewildered. “What the hell ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • Well, crap
    UKanians went to the polls yesterday in early elections aimed at resolving the Brexit impasse. And they certainly have, delivering a huge majority to the Tories, and (barring internal rebellions of the sort which delayed Brexit) giving them the power to do whatever they want. And thanks to the UK's ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Austerity meets fresh resistance in Iran
      by Karim Pourhamzavi Mass protests are occurring across Iran, taking place in over 100 cities.  The protests have been sparked by the government’s cutting of fuel subsidies, a measure which caused fuel prices to double overnight. Mass protests are hardly new in Iran, but there is an important difference ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    3 days ago
  • Oh No! It’s a …..
    What other song could we play as the UK's political rule book gets torn up and thrown away?Video courtesy of YouTubeThis post is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
    3 days ago
  • Election 2019 – The Legendary Liveblog
    Legendary in my own mind, I mean.  All times are NZ, which is an hour10.00am (NZ) There's about an hour to go until the exit poll is released.  At that point, half of the British voting public will devastated, and the other half celebrating wildly.  Unless everyone is simply confused.Turnout seems ...
    3 days ago
  • Some Thoughts On Socialism As Jeremy Corbyn Loses The UK General Election.
    Forlorn Hope: When the call came down to make Corbyn unelectable, the Establishment's journalists and columnists rose to the challenge. Antisemitism was only the most imaginative of the charges levelled against the old democratic-socialist. There were many more and, sadly, they appear to have worked. Boris Johnson may not be much ...
    4 days ago
  • Cartoonist David Low’s Radical Sympathy.
    "Rendezvous" by David Low, September 1939.DUNEDIN IS THE BIRTHPLACE of, for my money, the world’s greatest cartoonist, David Low. At the height of his powers, in 1930s London, Low’s cartoons represented the visual conscience of the civilised world. His most famous cartoon, “Rendezvous”, penned a few weeks into the Second ...
    4 days ago
  • The UK has a choice as to whether it chooses to be manipulated… or not.
    If you want to study propagandist techniques, you are typically told to study Dictatorships. Not unfair, but what’s always been more interesting to me is so-called “democratic” countries and their broader information systems. Why? Because people opt for it, even as they decry “totalitarian regimes!”.. It’s quite an eye ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    4 days ago
  • Today’s secrecy legislation
    Introducing legislation which shits on the public's right to know seems to have become a daily occurrence for this government. Today's example is the Infrastructure Funding and Financing Bill. The bill establishes a framework for the establishment of "special purpose vehicles" (SPVs) to hide debt from local government balance sheets ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Hard News: Public Address Word of the Year 2019: Time to vote!
    Below is the longlist of words and phrases generated in the korero phase of Public Address Word of the Year 2019, with some editorial moderation. Now it's time to vote. As you'll doubtless be able to see, you get three ranked choices. Use your power wisely. Or frivolously, whatever.As usual, ...
    4 days ago
  • Encryption, passwords, and self-incrimination
    The University of Waikato and New Zealand Law Foundation have released a report today on the law around encryption in New Zealand. There's stuff in there about principles and values, and how proposed government policies to provide for "lawful access" by creating backdoors would destroy the trust which makes encryption ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Drawn
    A ballot for two Member's Bills was held today, and the following bills were drawn: Insurance (Prompt Settlement of Claims for Uninhabitable Residential Property) Bill (Stuart Smith) Social Security (Exemption for Ex Gratia and Compensation Payments) Amendment Bill (Willow-Jean Prime) Neither bill seems likely to be particularly controversial. This is ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Bougainville votes for independence
    Earlier in the month, Bougainvilleans went to the polls in a landmark referendum to decide on whether they would remain part of Papua New Guinea or become independent. Yesterday, the results came in, with over 97% support for independence. The referendum wasn't binding - instead it means negotiations with the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Bus strikes, suspensions and solidarity
    by Daphna Whitmore This week 800 unionised bus drivers in Auckland were suspended from work after they refused to collect fares as part of a campaign of industrial action. Drivers working for Auckland’s largest bus company NZ Bus are asking for more pay and better working conditions after being offered ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    4 days ago
  • How to support after the Whakaari/White Island volcanic eruption
    As details emerge about what unfolded on Whakaari / White Island two days ago, my thoughts go out to all the families affected by this terrible event. My thoughts are also with the first responders who worked in perilous circumstances to assist and protect those affected. Both local and ...
    SciBlogsBy Sarb Johal
    4 days ago
  • Final BMG poll – nothing to see here
    BMG research have unleashed their final poll of the 2019 campaign:Westminster voting intention: CON: 41% (-)LAB: 32% (-)LDEM: 14% (-)GRN: 4% (-)BREX: 3% (-1)via @BMGResearch , 06 - 11 Dec Chgs. w/ 06 Dec That's a bit of a "Dunno why we bothered" sort of poll. "Phillip, I'm afraid I've been a ...
    5 days ago
  • Grant Robertson Spends Up Large – On The Establishment!
    Grant Keeps On Trucking: Out of the $12 billion Robertson has announced for infrastructure investment, $8 billion will be allocated to specific projects, with the balance of $4 billion held in reserve. What does it say about this Government's "transformational" ambitions that 85 percent of that $8 billion is to ...
    5 days ago
  • Boris Johnson … Hides … In a Fridge
    I am not making this up.First few lines of the Dail Mail write up:Boris Johnson's exasperated media minder swore on live TV today as the PM refused to speak to Good Morning Britain before trotting into a fridge as he started an early milkround in Yorkshire. Piers Morgan was visibly ...
    5 days ago
  • Shy Labour Voters?
    In previous elections pollsters have bemoaned the 'shy Tory' - the respondent who is so fearful of being judged as a cruel and heartless bastard by an anonymous pollster, or their spouses, workmates and friends, that they lie about their intention of voting Conservative, skewing the poll figures in Labour's ...
    5 days ago
  • Seven reasons to be wary of waste-to-energy proposals
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz I was in Switzerland recently and discovered that they haven’t ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    5 days ago
  • Reviewing the whitewash
    Back in 2015, then Ombudsman Beverley Wakem conducted a review of the OIA, Not a game of hide and seek. The "review" was a whitewash, which found no need for legislative change, and instead criticised the media and requesters - which destroyed Wakem's reputation, and undermined that of the Office ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • You Gov MRP Poll Out
    So, You Gov's MRP poll - the weird one that tries to reflect what will happen at a constituency level and which pretty much nailed the hung parliament in 2017 - is not looking too good for Labour:
    UK #GE2019 MRP seat projection:CON: 339 (-20)LAB: 231 (+20)SNP: 41 (-2)LDEM: 15 ...
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: Accountability?
    We've known about climate change for over forty years now,and it has been a major political issue for twenty. And yet fossil fuel companies have kept polluting with impunity, while government have looked the other way and twiddled their thumbs and refused to do anything because "the economy", or just ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Delusional And Irrational: The Rise Of Paranoid Politics In New Zealand.
    Sheer Loopiness: Many of those expressing bemusement at the antics of these #turnardern effacers, were convinced that they were yet another expression of the National Party’s increasingly spiteful anti-government propaganda campaign. They marvelled at the oddness of the perpetrators’ mindset and questioned the common-sense of allowing the rest of New Zealand ...
    5 days ago
  • Things to know about Whakaari/White Island
    Brad Scott, GNS Science VolcanologistThis post was originally published by GeoNet. Following the 9 December devastating eruption at Whakaari/White Island we have put together some information about the island. New Zealand’s most active volcano Whakaari/White Island is currently New Zealand’s most active volcano, it has been since an eruptive episode ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • Status quo supports status quo
    The Justice Committee has reported back on its Inquiry into the 2017 General Election and 2016 Local Elections, with a host of recommendations about how to improve our electoral systems. Some of their recommendations are already incorporate din the Electoral Amendment Bill currently before Parliament, but there's also a recommendation ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • The Greens abandon NeoLiberalism
    Back in 2017, in order to make themselves "electable" in the eyes of rich people who oppose everything they stand for, the Greens signed up for NeoLiberalism, adopting a restrictive set of "Budget Responsibility Rules" which basicly prevented them from using government to make things better. Now, they're finally abandoning ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Lying about a failed war
    Since invading in 2001, the US has consistently claimed that their war in Afghanistan has been going well, even when it continued year after year after year. Of course, they were lying, and thanks to the Washington Post and the US Freedom of Information Act, we get to see just ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Artificial Intelligence and You
    How should we think about artificial intelligence and the implications that it has for our work and leisure? There are many articles on artificial intelligence and its potential impacts on jobs, and the ethics of applications. These are important topics, but I want to focus on some less discussed aspects, ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert Hickson
    6 days ago
  • Statistical manipulation to get publishable results
    I love data. It’s amazing the sort of “discoveries” I can make given a data set and computer statistical package. It’s just so easy to search for relationships and test their statistical significance. Maybe relationships which ...
    6 days ago
  • More lies on the Twitter (Dan Hodges edition)
    The other big story concerning Leeds Hospital is Boris Johnson's bizzare behaviour at Leeds Hospital, where he was confronted by a journalist and challenged about a four year old boy with suspected pneumonia who was left sleeping on the floor, rather than getting  abed like a sick kid would in ...
    6 days ago
  • LabourActivistPunchedMattHancock’sSPADGate
    So, for a brief period of history, it was alleged that a protester had punched Matt Hancock's SPAD (not a euphemism; special adviser) when Hancock visited Leeds Hospital.This was reported by the likes of Robert Peston and Laura Keunssberg, as well as the less credible Guido Fawkes.  It also quickly ...
    7 days ago
  • France’s anti-Zionism is anti-liberté
    by Daphna Whitmore Last week France passed a law that equates anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism. It is based on a definition of anti-Semitism that includes criticism of Israel such as: “Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Another bus lockout
    Over the past year we've seen major bus problems in Hamilton and Wellington, as drivers have sought better wages and an end to the bullshit of split shifts, which basicly see them "married to the job". And now its Auckland's turn. When NZBus's drivers planned low-level strike action of not ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Showing us how its done
    The government has been congratulating itself over the passage of the Zero Carbon Act, which sets out long-term emissions targets. But those targets are insufficient. Meanwhile, Denmark is showing us how its done:Denmark’s parliament adopted a new climate law on Friday, committing to reach 70% below its 1990 emissions in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • New Fisk
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Public sector dysfunction should not be allowed to undermine freedom of information
    Another day, another piece of legislation with a secrecy clause. This time its the innocuous-seeming Mental Health and Wellbeing Commission Bill, which (after establishing a new body and making it subject to the OIA in three different ways) includes the rapidly-becoming-standard clauses enabling it to request information from other public ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • “This is England, this knife of Sheffield steel…”
    The state of the United Kingdom is fractured, torn up, shredded. The Empire is gone, it died a long time ago. And yet, the country is still tracking with a lead in favour of the ones who play to the ingrained, class-bound division for political gain. It is a disgrace ...
    exhALANtBy exhalantblog
    1 week ago
  • CORSIA, coming soon to an airport near you
    On 27 September, Greta Thunberg addressed a crowd of 500,000 at the School Strike for Climate in Montreal, saying: “You are a nation that is allegedly a climate leader. And Sweden is also a nation that is allegedly a climate leader. And in both cases, it means absolutely nothing. Because ...
    SciBlogsBy Robert McLachlan
    1 week ago
  • Cloaking hate speech and fake news in the right to free expression.
    It should be obvious by now but let’s be clear: The same folk who regularly traffic in disinformation, misinformation and “fake news” are also those who most strongly claim that their freedom of expression rights are being violated when moves are made to curb hate speech (as opposed to protected ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    1 week ago
  • The Physics (and Economics, and Politics) of Wheelchairs on Planes
    Michael Schulson When Shane Burcaw flies on an airplane, he brings along a customized gel cushion, a car seat, and about 10 pieces of memory foam. The whole arsenal costs around $1,000, but for Burcaw it’s a necessity. The 27-year-old author and speaker — who, alongside his fiancée, Hannah ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • To Advance Civil Rights, Oppose Transgender Extremism
    We are very pleased to publish this submission is from Lucinda Stoan. She is a social justice activist, mother, and educator, based in Washington State in the  US.   This detailed and comprehensive source-linked overview of trans issues and what is at stake will be useful for many people, especially in ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Faafoi should be fired
    Newshub last night reported that Broadcasting Minister Kris Faafoi had apparently promised to help out a mate with an immigration issue. While its normal for people to approach MPs for assistance in this area, when you're a Minister, the rules are different: as the Cabinet Manual says, Ministers must "at ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Adrian Orr – The Reserve Bank’s Revolutionary Governor?
    New Zealand's Underarm Banker: It bears recalling that the “independence” of the Reserve Bank Governor was for decades held up by neoliberal capitalists as the most compelling justification for passing the Reserve Bank Act. Interesting, is it not, how the ruling class’s support for the Bank’s independence lasted no longer than ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Driving Us Up The Poll.
    Rubbish In, Rubbish Out: Put all this together, and it’s difficult to avoid the conclusion that anyone who responds positively to a pollster’s request to “answer a few questions” is just ever-so-slightly weird. Desperately lonely? Some sort of psephological train-spotter? Political party member primed to skew the poll for or against ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Jordan Williams, Colin Craig podcast series announced
    “Free at last, Free at last, Thank God almighty we are free at last.” ― Martin Luther King Jr. A long and bitter court feud between former Conservative Party leader Colin Craig and Jordan Williams has been settled, with an apology and compensation from Williams. On Tuesday, Craig sent out ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    2 weeks ago
  • How plant-based meat is stretching New Zealand’s cultural and legal boundaries
    Samuel Becher, Victoria University of Wellington and Jessica C Lai, Victoria University of Wellington Earlier this year, the New Zealand-based pizza chain Hell Pizza offered a limited-edition “Burger Pizza”. Its customers weren’t told that the “meat” was plant-based. Some customers complained to the Commerce Commission, which enforces consumer law in ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • Scientific integrity requires critical investigation – not blind acceptance
    Some people seem to want to close down any critical discussion of the current research into the relationship between water fluoride and child IQ. They appear to argue that claims made by researchers should not be open to critical review and that the claims be accepted without proper consideration ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: The shameful reality
    The government has been congratulating itself over the passage of the Zero Carbon Act, which sets out long-term emissions targets. Meanwhile, Climate Action Tracker has the shameful reality: those targets are insufficient:While New Zealand is showing leadership by having passed the world’s second-ever Zero Carbon Act in November 2019, under ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • More secrecy
    The government introduced a Racing Industry Bill today. As an urban who horse racing as pointless-to-cruel, and gambling as a tax on stupidity and/or hope, this isn't normally a bill which would interest me in the slightest, beyond grumpiness at more government money for a dying industry. But there is ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Unlikely online bully, Liam Hehir
    Check. Check. One, two, three, four. Is this thing ON? Hello readers, I logged in last night (yeah, it’s been a while) to mark THE END of the landmark legal case, Jordan Williams v Colin Craig, which (gulp) reached The Supreme Court, in which New Zealand’s most-defamed man was suing the politician he ...
    The PaepaeBy Peter Aranyi
    2 weeks ago
  • The Birth Of Israel: Wrong At The Right Time.
    Before The Birth: Israel’s most fervent supporters set their clocks ticking in Biblical times. They cite the kingdoms of David and Solomon as proof that, in the words of the Exodus movie’s theme-song: “This land is mine.” The majority of Israel’s backers, however, start their clocks in 1933 – the year Adolf ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Hard News: Public Address Word of the Year 2019: Korero phase
    In an unreliable, strange and confusing world, Public Address is proud to present a measure of comfort and stability by annually asking everyone what words or phrases sum up the year that's been – and then giving some of them consumer goods as prizes for being clever or simply lucky.Well, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Generalist to specialist
    Both my parents are pretty handy – and they seem to have the right tools for most jobs in the garage and they know how to fix practically anything. A similar story could be told about their generation’s experience in the workforce – being a generalist was not unusual and ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • A “coincidence”
    When it was revealed that NZ First had tried to enrich itself from public office via the Provoncial Growth Fund, the Prime Minister assured us that everything was OK as Shane Jones, the Minister responsible for the fund, had recused himself. Except it seems that that recusal came very late ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Member’s Day
    Today is a Member's Day, and probably the last one of the year. After the marathon of the End of Life Choice Act, most of the bills up for debate today are uncontentious. First up is the second reading of Chlöe Swarbrick's Election Access Fund Bill. This will be followed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Worse than I thought
    The Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Committee has reported back on the government's odious and tyrannical control orders bill. As expected, the fraudulent select committee process has made no significant changes (partly because they couldn't agree, but mostly because it was a stitch-up from the start, with no intention of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • The cannabis bill and the referendum
    Yesterday, the government released its draft Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill, which will be put to a non-binding referendum at the next election. I'm not a drug policy expert, but Russell Brown is, and he thinks its pretty good. And pretty obviously, it will be a massive improvement on the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Hard News: The Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill: pretty good so far
    As you're probably aware, the draft bill outlining the proposed legal cannabis regime to be put to a referendum late next year was published yesterday, and has already attracted a flurry of comment. It's notable that a good deal of the comment is about proposals that aren't actually new.A minimum ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Climate Change: Alignment
    One of the big problems in New Zealand climate change policy is the government working at cross-purposes with itself. It wants to reduce fossil fuel use, but encourages oil and gas exploration. It wants to reduce transport emissions, but then builds enormous new roads. The problem could be avoided if ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • How climate change will affect food production and security
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz According to the United Nations, food shortages are a threat ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • More bad faith
    Last year, the government announced it was ending offshore oil exploration by no longer issuing new permits. The idea was that the industry would then die off as permits expired. Except almost immediately the government revealed its bad faith, by saying they would extend permits and alter conditions to keep ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Banning foreign money from our elections
    The government has said it will ban foreign donations to political parties and candidates, and will be introducing legislation to be passed under all-stages urgency this afternoon. While I agree with the goal, I don't see a particular case for urgency, unless the government is concerned about a flood of ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Reforming the Education Acts
    The government introduced the Education and Training Bill to Parliament yesterday. Its a massive bill, which replaces both existing Education Acts, as well as various other bits of legislation (including some which are still proceeding through the House). I'll leave the serious analysis to teachers and people who actually know ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Bite-sized learning
    Amelia SharmanThere’s no one-size-fits-all when it comes to micro-credentials, those bits of bite-sized learning that can help workers stay on top of technological change.  What’s a micro-credential? While definitions vary, micro-credentials can be understood as short courses that allow people to learn new skills or have an existing competency recognised. ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    2 weeks ago
  • “Not The Labour Party We Once Knew.”
    All Smiles Now: Claire Szabo is taking up her presidential role after serving as the CEO of Habitat For Humanity. Which is absolutely perfect! After KiwiBuild was so comprehensively mismanaged by Phil Twyford, the party has not only elected a new president from a thoroughly respectable not-for-profit, but one who ...
    2 weeks ago

  • New Zealand will continue to showcase ambitious climate action
    With the global climate change talks closing overnight, the Minister for Climate Change, James Shaw said New Zealand will continue to show the world what meaningful, ambitious and lasting climate action looks like. “Lasting action on climate change demands that we keep working every single day. This is the only ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • More progress in delivering te reo Māori in schools
    600 new te reo advocates are being sought following the success of a programme that supports the Government’s plan to integrate te reo Māori into education, Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Registrations for Te Ahu o te Reo Māori 2020 are now open, with courses starting from February ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Maori voice to help shape tertiary education
    Education Minister Chris Hipkins has announced the members of Te Taumata Aronui, a group to work with Government on tertiary education policy from a Māori community and employer perspective. “Te Taumata Aronui is an opportunity for Māori and the Crown to work more closely on changes to the tertiary education ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Courthouse redesign a model for the future
    The Government will invest $100 million on a new courthouse in Tauranga which will be a model for future courthouse design for New Zealand, Justice Minister Andrew Little has announced. The courthouse will be designed in partnership with iwi, the local community, the judiciary, the legal profession, court staff and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Government enables early access to 5G spectrum
    The Government has given the go ahead to enable further development of 5G networks by making appropriate spectrum available. The Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media Minister, Kris Faafoi, has confirmed Cabinet approval for the allocation of short-term rights to an unused portion of 3.5 GHz spectrum. 3.5GHz is the first ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    13 hours ago
  • Record export highs picked for primary sector
    Sustained high growth in primary industry exports looks set to continue over the next two years with strong prices predicted for farmers, fishers, growers and rural communities. Minister of Agriculture and Minister of State for Trade and Export Growth Damien O’Connor today released the latest Situation and Outlook report for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New partnership to boost screen sector job opportunities
    Auckland’s growing screen sector is the catalyst for a new partnership between the Ministry of Social Development and Auckland’s economic development agency Auckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development (ATEED). The launch today at FilmFX in Henderson, is to celebrate the partnership which looks to capitalise on the social and economic development opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • A minute’s silence for Whakaari White Island victims
    A minute’s silence will be observed at 2.11pm on Monday 16 December in honour of the victims of the Whakaari White Island eruption, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has confirmed. “Wherever you are in New Zealand, or around the world, this is a moment we can stand alongside those who have ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ to help fund fight against measles in the Pacific region
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced New Zealand will contribute NZ$1 million of funding towards the joint United Nations Fund for Children (UNICEF) and World Health Organisation (WHO) Pacific Regional Action Plan for Measles.   “Prevention through vaccination is the most effective way of avoiding illness and a costly health emergency. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand remembers Sir Peter Snell
    New Zealand is today remembering one of our true sporting heroes, triple Olympic gold medal winner Sir Peter Snell. “He was a legend, here and around the world,” Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said. “Our thoughts are with Sir Peter’s wife Miki and their family.” “Sir Peter is recognised as New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • PM congratulates Boris Johnson on election victory
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated United Kingdom Prime Minister Boris Johnson on his election victory.  “New Zealand and the United Kingdom are close friends and despite our distance we are strongly connected by our history and people,” Jacinda Ardern said.  “I look forward to continuing to work with Prime ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Building a platform for the future of rail
    The Government has released its long term vision for a sustainable 21st Century rail network that gets our cities moving, connects our regions and gets more freight off the roads.   Deputy Prime Minister and State Owned Enterprises Minister Winston Peters said the Government is committed to rebuilding New Zealand’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Prime Minister statement Whakaari White Island recovery operation
    I want to start by acknowledging the families who have experienced such grief and such loss since the extraordinary tragedy on Monday. Today was all about reuniting them with their loved ones. We've just come from the airport where many of them were gathered and in amongst what you can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand medical specialists to provide further support to Samoa
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters today announced further support for Samoa’s longer term needs as it continues to respond to a devastating measles epidemic. “Samoa’s health system has experienced massive strain in the wake of the measles epidemic. The volume of patients needing care during this outbreak, and the number of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Discounted electric-bikes offered to public sector workers
    Discounted electric bikes will be offered up to public sector staff across the country as part of the Government’s work to reduce transport emissions and support healthier transport options.  Associate Minister of Transport Julie Anne Genter officially launched the new initiative at Wellington Hospital today.  “The Government has negotiated bulk-purchase ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Australia and New Zealand confirm joint bid for FIFA Women’s World Cup
    The Australian and New Zealand Governments today launch an historic joint bid to bring the FIFA Women’s World Cup to the Southern Hemisphere for the first time. Australian Minister for Youth and Sport, Richard Colbeck and New Zealand Minister for Sport and Recreation Grant Robertson will announce the bold campaign, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Blackwater gold mine gets PGF boost
    The Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) has approved a $15 million loan to help re-establish a gold mining operation at Blackwater Gold Mine, near Reefton, Rural Communities Minister and local MP Damien O’Connor announced at an event on the West Coast today. “This is great news for the Coast that could ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Papakāinga model inspires whānau well-being
    Papakāinga model inspires whānau well-being A housing project by Kohupātiki whānau in Hastings is an outstanding example of a Māori-led housing initiative that can reduce financial pressure and reconnect whānau to their whakapapa says the Minister for Māori Development Hon Nanaia Mahuta.  Minister Mahuta officially opened the Aroha Te Rangi ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government provides more funding for major community wetland restoration project
    Restoration efforts for a significant wetland in the Hawke’s Bay are getting more support announced Associate Minister for the Environment Eugenie Sage. “Wetlands are vital to healthy landscapes and ecosystems. They function as nature’s ‘kidneys’, filtering and protecting water quality, acting as nature’s sponges after rain and are home to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Housing First to help Nelson Tasman homeless
    Nelson has today seen the launch of Housing First Nelson Tasman. Today’s launch marks the expansion of the Government’s homelessness programme, Housing First, to the top of the South Island. “Housing First is a proven programme that puts people who are experiencing homelessness and multiple, high and complex needs into ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New funding to support Environment Centres working for sustainable local solutions
    New Government funding announced today will help communities make a difference in tackling environmental issues Associate Minister for the Environment Eugenie Sage announced in Hawkes Bay today. The Ministry for the Environment’s Community Environment Fund is dedicating $243,101 to growing the capacity and capability of the Environment Hubs Aotearoa’s (EHA) ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government takes bite out of loan sharks
    The days of vulnerable consumers falling victim to loan sharks, truck shops and other predatory lenders are numbered, following the Credit Contracts Legislation Amendment Bill passing its third reading tonight. “Too many Kiwis are being given loans that are unaffordable and unsuitable, trapping them in debt and leaving their families ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Zealand safer as Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders Bill) becomes law
    A Bill that prevents terrorism and supports the de-radicalisation of New Zealanders returning from overseas has passed its third reading, Justice Minister Andrew Little says. The Terrorism Suppression (Control Orders) Bill is a carefully targeted response to manage the risk posed by a small number of New Zealanders who have ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Foreign Minister and Pacific Peoples Minister to visit Samoa
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters and Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio will travel to Samoa on Friday, where New Zealand medical teams are helping Samoa respond to an outbreak of measles. “New Zealand has been working closely with the Government of Samoa and offering our assistance from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Pastoral Care Code will support tertiary students in 2020
    The Government has changed the law to improve student safety and welfare in university halls of residence and other student accommodation. The Education (Pastoral Care) Amendment Bill passed its third reading this afternoon and details of an interim Code of Practice setting out the Government’s expectations of tertiary providers have also been released. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New infrastructure funding tool to build housing developments faster
    A new tool to help councils fund and finance infrastructure could mean some housing developments happen a decade earlier than currently planned, Urban Development Minister Phil Twyford said today. “This new tool, developed by the Government in partnership with industry and high-growth councils, will allow councils to access private debt ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Vision to unite the primary sector launched today
    Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor has welcomed the release of a bold new vision for the country’s vital food and fibre sector. “I’m delighted that New Zealand’s major farmer and grower organisations are today supporting the Primary Sector Council’s vision – Fit for a Better World,” he said. “The international consumers ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • NZ congratulates PNG and Autonomous Bougainville Government on referendum
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has congratulated the Government of Papua New Guinea and the Autonomous Bougainville Government for completing a well-conducted referendum on the future political status of Bougainville. “New Zealand supported the referendum process by providing technical advice through the New Zealand Electoral Commission and leading a Regional Police ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Next steps for Upper North Island logistics
    In light of Cabinet’s position that freight operations on prime land in downtown Auckland are no longer viable, the Government will now embark on a short work programme to enable decision-making in the first half of next year, Associate Transport Minister Shane Jones says. Minister Jones is today releasing the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Surgical mesh restorative justice report received
    Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter has received the report back from a surgical mesh restorative justice process undertaken by Victoria University. The process heard stories, either in person or online submission, from more than 600 people affected by surgical mesh. “The report made for heart-breaking and confronting reading,” says ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • The Water Services Regulator Bill – Taumata Arowai a milestone for drinking water safety
    The Water Services Regulator Bill – Taumata Arowai , introduced to Parliament today, is a milestone for drinking water safety in New Zealand and will help improve environmental outcomes for urban waterways, rivers and lakes.  “This is a breakthrough for New Zealanders in terms of providing safe drinking water throughout ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Speech to new direction for criminal justice reform announcement
    Kia ora koutouE ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā matā wakaTēnā koutou katoaHaere ngā, moe maiKoutou ma ngā Rangatira Ko Anaru ahauKo au te Minita mo ngā TureHe Honore tino nui kei roto I ahau No reira tena koutou katoa Today, we are releasing two reports that are the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New direction for criminal justice reform
    The Government is looking to turn around the long-term challenges of criminal justice by taking a new approach to break the cycle of offending to ensure there are fewer victims of crime. Justice Minister Andrew Little released two reports today, Turuki! Turuki! from Te Uepū Hāpai I te Ora, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New law sets up $300m Venture Capital Fund
    New Zealand firms expanding beyond the start-up phase are set for more support after today’s passage of the Venture Capital Fund Bill, Associate Finance Minister David Parker said. The Bill, which establishes a $300 million Venture Capital Fund, puts in place a key initiative of the Wellbeing Budget’s economic package. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand’s National Statement to COP25
    E ngā mana, e ngā reo, e ngā iwi, e ngā rau rangatira mā. Tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou, tēnā koutou katoa. Señora Presidenta, Excellencies, Delegates. International action A common thread that runs through the Paris Agreement is the commitment we have made to each other to do what we can to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $12 billion in extra infrastructure investment
    The Government is lifting capital investment to the highest level in more than 20 years as it takes the next step to future-proof New Zealand. Finance Minister Grant Robertson has announced $12 billion of new investment, with $8 billion for specific capital projects and $4 billion to be added to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Strong economy, careful spending gives $12bn of surpluses
    The Government is forecast to run $12 billion worth of surpluses across the four years to 2023/24 as the economy continues to grow. The surpluses will help fund day-to-day capital requirements each year. These include fixing leaky hospitals, building new classrooms to cover population growth and take pressure off class ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Priorities for 2020 Wellbeing Budget outlined
    Budget 2020 will continue the Coalition Government’s focus on tackling the long-term challenges facing New Zealand while also investing to future-proof the economy. When the Government took office in 2017 it was left with crumbling infrastructure, severe underinvestment in public services, degraded rivers and lakes, a housing crisis and rising ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister welcomes data-rich coastline mapping tool
    The Minister responsible for the Marine and Coastal Area (Takutai Moana) Act 2011 (te Takutai Moana Act 2011), Andrew Little has welcomed the launch of an online geospatial tool that provides data-rich, dynamic coastline maps that will significantly boost research and evidence-gathering under the Act. Te Kete Kōrero a Te ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Chief Victims Advisor reappointed for a further two years
    The Chief Victims Advisor to Government Dr Kim McGregor, QSO, has been reappointed in her role for a further two years. Dr McGregor has held the role since it was established in November 2015. She provides independent advice to government on how to improve the criminal justice system for victims. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago