web analytics

Bunnings workers strike to close wage gap

Written By: - Date published: 2:05 pm, February 21st, 2008 - 41 comments
Categories: workers' rights - Tags:

bunnings-200.jpgWhile media, politicians and the Kiwi blogosphere are arguing about the wage gap with Australia, around four hundred NDU members at Bunnings Warehouse are taking matters into their own hands with a two-hour nationwide strike action today.

Bunnings workers in New Zealand start on just $12 an hour compared to $19 for their counterparts in Australia. This is from a company that could afford to give its Australian CEO a raise of 61% recently, bringing his salary up to more than $6 million or, in an ordinary wage earner’s terms, $2,885 an hour.

It also brings some context to the wages debate. No amount of tax cuts will give these workers the $7 pay rise they’d get from moving across the ditch, and to pretend that’s the case is just dishonest.

These workers have unionised themselves in an industry that had the guts torn out of it by the Employment Contracts Act and are standing together to fight for decent wages. They deserve our full support.

You can help by calling your local Bunnings store manager on 0800 HARDWARE or by emailing Bunnings New Zealand’s General Manager at brad.cranston@bunnings.co.nz. Tell them to get back to the table and pay their workers properly.

More info at NDU.

41 comments on “Bunnings workers strike to close wage gap ”

  1. Steve Pierson 1

    Good to see ordinary kiwis standing up and demanding their bosses stop expoliting them.

    I worry what would happen to people like these if National ever gets to introduce its union breaking laws.

  2. mike 2

    Yes and its also Nationals fault that their Aussie counterparts are more productive, pay a lot less tax have cheaper homeloans and pay less for petrol/food etc…

  3. Steve Pierson 3

    It was under National that the wage gap opened up.

    Under Labour the gap has stayed steady (which has required NZ wages to grow faster than Aussie ones, once National let us fall so far behind it becomes very hard to catch up)

    captcha: “difficulty of”. quite

  4. Santi 4

    “I worry what would happen to people like these if National ever gets to introduce its union breaking laws.”

    Why would you worry? Are you afraid of losing your grip on power, aren’t you? Don’t claim concern for the workers for whom you got none, otherwise you would be complaining and shouting loudly about the miser Minister of Finance who denies the workers the share of their money via rapacious taxation.

    Steve, spare me the pain of seeing you playing the concerned unionist.

  5. Yes Santi – that’s right. Naughty Dr. Cullen. Now who says wages need to “drop” again? Oh that’s right John Key.

    Oh and by the way Santi, fuck off.

  6. Tane 6

    the miser Minister of Finance who denies the workers the share of their money via rapacious taxation.

    You really are a walking, talking National Party spin machine are’t you Santi?

    Taxation in New Zealand is not out of line with other countries and it’s certainly not an issue for people on $12 an hour who’d pay the bottom rate anyway (what is it, 19.5%?). What taxes do mean is that these families can now take their kids to the doctor, give them a decent education and live in a society where they need not live in fear of poverty and indignity in old age.

    The tax system is the least of these workers’ problems. What they need is higher wages, and it’s good to see they’re standing up for themselves.

  7. mike 7

    Oh dear I think the lefties are a bit niggly cause Labour President has just offered to resign – how long until clark follows… http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10493743

  8. Steve Pierson 8

    He needn’t have offered to resign, but it is better when a public figure makes the offer over a small thing, rather than refusing to do so over a big thing (oh, like, saying kiwis wages should be lower, for example)

  9. Tane 9

    Mike brother, you’re a punter in this game but I’ll let you off this time. Williams ain’t going anywhere, it was an offer as he felt he’d let the party down, and the PM rightly rejected it. Bugger, guess that means it’s back to Key’s wage drop revelations eh?

  10. The Double Standard 10

    Tane – since you seem to have all the stats on this issue I wonder if you have anything on the number of workers per store in NZ vs Oz?

    After all, it’d be a shame if asking for a wage rise ended up in job losses of some of those striking wouldn’t it?

    Of course, it could be that the Bunnings shareholders are just greedy rich pricks.

    Interesting to find that the Jacks Links staff were striking a few years back for higher wages, then found themselves laid off because the business wasn’t making money. Another little oops from Anderton’s “Jobs Machine”

  11. Santi 11

    Tane, defender of the poor and champion of the workers:
    what would happen if as a result of your proposed wage increase a number of small businesses in NZ are no longer viable and had to lay their workers off?

    Aren’t we risking killing the golden goose in your laudable attempt?

    The end result will be more people on the dole, benefits and the like, and more nanny statism. It might be what you want, but NZ does not need that.

  12. r0b 12

    Tane, defender of the poor and champion of the workers:
    what would happen if as a result of your proposed wage increase a number of small businesses in NZ are no longer viable and had to lay their workers off?

    This same tired line has been trotted out every time Labour has raised the minimum wage, which is every year for the last 8 years. And yet, strangely, the unemployment rate is at a 20 year low.

  13. Tim 13

    The minimum wage has increased dramatically over the past few years and the unemployment rate has dropped dramatically too. There is no evidence to show that wage increases mean job losses in this country.

    Businesses aren’t going to be run into the ground if wages increase, they just won’t be able to compete with each other by continually reducing labour costs (a euphemism for wage cuts).

  14. Tim

    A fair point, but there is a lot more going on in an economy than minimum wage settings and unemployment figures. It would be difficult to make a categorical claim one way or another based simply on NZ’s headline unemployment stats of the last few years.

  15. Phil 15

    The starting wage in Aus ($18.44 NZD – which is $16.04 AUD) is nominally better than the starting wage here ($12 NZD). However, there’s no discussion of living costs, no discussion of the relative profit margin of Bunnings here vs Aus, and no consideration of the rate at which people move off the starting salary,and no mention of any other independant costs of hiring or training staff.

    All these things could go toward explaining the difference in starting rates, and it pays not to go off half-cocked.

  16. Phil 16

    With respect to minimum wage, it needs to be noted that increases during the last decade have FOLLOWED ON FROM rises in the general level of income (look at Stats NZ’s LCI and/or QES…)

    It could quite reasonably be argued that in such cases there will be no impact whatsoever on unemployment. Additionally, it could also be argued that legislating the minimum wage in such cases has done nothing what-so-ever for workers, as their wages were already on the increase anyway.

  17. Steve Pierson 17

    So, just to be clear Phil. You are arguing these workers should not be striking over the fact they are being paid $12 an hour.

    And your arguemnt over minimum wages is wrong. If you read the submissions around minimum wage rate increases you would see they are not tied to prior increase in average wages. No: National did not raise the minium wage until force to by New Zealand First, and since Laobur has come to power there have been 8 (on April 1, 9) increases in the minimum wage. Not raising the minimum wage is an ideological, not an economic decision.

    National has always opposed reaising the minimum wage: check out KBB’s graph of the minimum wage going right back to 1977. http://kiwiblogblog.wordpress.com/2007/12/18/hmm-who-to-trust/

  18. Interesting footnote to the NDU release illustrates the unions dishonesty:

    “Wesfarmers, Bunnings parent-company and Australia’s biggest company”

    Tell that to BHP. Elsewhere Wesfarmers is rated at Australia’s 17th largest company.

    When they lie in such ways in one part of a press release, it makes me wonder what other lies are present. In particular how accurate is the wage comparison?

  19. Good to see you’ve got that research unit hard at work, Frank. A productivity example to us all. Oh no, wait a minute you don’t produce anything but spam. How ironic.

  20. insider 20

    So the logic is, because the company pays workers $X in one country the workers in another country should be paid the same?

    Where does this ‘logic’ end? Should I be paid the same as a US employee of the same company? What about a Brit or a Fijian or a Chinese?

    It seems a rather lame protest with little principle to it.

    Perhaps someone can explain it to me

  21. Bart 21

    You keep talking about the wage gap that opened up under National. FFS, that was 8 years ago. Labour have had nearly 9 years to fix it.

    Is it fixed…..????

  22. I’m afraid you’ve lost me there Mickey. Who is Frank?

    Or are you just trolling again? Do try and keep up a reasonable discussion will you, instead of spreading lies and abuse.

  23. Leftie 23

    Insider: “So the logic is, because the company pays workers $X in one country the workers in another country should be paid the same?”

    Hell yes, when the headlines from National refers to the number of Kiwis moving to Australia and the difference in hourly pay.
    Isn’t that what a reasonable employer would do?: I don’t want my knowledgable, skilled workers going down the road (or over the ditch) to work for my competitor for $X more an hour, I want to keep them, so I will pay them the same.

  24. Why Francis, you know exactly who I’m talking about. Love your work. Might catch up with you later. Yes?

  25. Matthew Pilott 25

    Bart, by your logic, shouldn’t Labour need at least nine years to undo the damage wrought by National? Far easier to destroy than build and all… They opened up the gap, Labour has managed to stop it increasing. If National didn’t drop the ball, we’d be fine, if you’re going to be so simplistic about it!

    That’s like saying Labour have had eight years to fix [insert problem here] – what you’re saying is that they are perfect, or at least should be. Nice you hold them in such high esteem!

  26. Tane 26

    You keep talking about the wage gap that opened up under National. FFS, that was 8 years ago. Labour have had nearly 9 years to fix it.

    Is it fixed ..????

    It opened up under National and has stopped growing under Labour. I’d like to see it closed, but it takes a lot longer to build a house than it does to burn one down.

  27. Mickey – I still don’t understand what you are trying to say. Have you made a post today that is more than lies and innuendo?

    Although I have to say that you are slipping a bit as the resident attack dog.

    http://www.viewimages.com/Search.aspx?mid=697941

    Anyway, time to throw some snarlers on the barbie. And I can assure everyone that Mickey won’t be seeing me today.

  28. Oh I wouldn’t say that with such certainty if I were you, Francis.

  29. Phil 29

    Steve, that’s not what I’m saying at all. I deliberately left the two posts separate so that people didn’t bring the two (separate) issues together. I thought that was fairly obvious.

    For minimum wages, I never said “tied” to anything (yet another case of those on the left confusing correlation and cause-and-effect, but I digress)
    I was pointing out that the legal rise in minimum wage has predominantly followed on from existing economic conditions already having done the work of pushing overall wages up. Whether you choose to call this an ideological or economic argument is largely irrelevant.

  30. Tim 30

    “Additionally, it could also be argued that legislating the minimum wage in such cases has done nothing what-so-ever for workers, as their wages were already on the increase anyway”. I don’t agree Phil.

    Even if wages grow under favourable economic conditions this does not automatically mean an increased wage for those at the bottom. For example, for the hundreds of thousands of workers who work within $1 of the minimum wage the recent minimum wage increases have been the biggest pay increases they’ve seen in 20-odd years (cleaning industry, hotel industry etc.).

    Even in the past 5 or so years, when wage levels were rising in NZ in general, the wages for people on close to the minimum wage were not, except when the minimum wage was increased. If employers can profit from paying poverty wages they will.

    It’s irritating when right wingers say “Increases in the minimum wage will lead to unemployment!” but at the same time they are the most vocal opponents of the unemployment benefit.

    The minimum wage is still far too low. It should be set at 66% of the average wage. This is the OECD norm (as employers like to argue so much about OECD norms when talking abour probationary periods).

  31. iiq374 31

    Tim – It’s irritating when left wingers say “If employers can profit from paying poverty wages they will.”
    Especially when they fail to differentiate between large and SME employers.

    Yes, it is frequently a hallmark of large business that they pin down wages. It is also a hallmark that being employed within one of those types of industries is a poverty trap for those who ‘choose’ it. One of the issues you have in battling this with increases in minimum wage levels is a decrease in the employment within the SME industry, constraints of growth in SME’s, encouragement of increased employment in low skill areas, etc.

    All of which vastly benefit the Labour party and the “ruling elite” but do nothing to actually assist the eradication of a lower class.

  32. Tim 32

    Well, I guess the difference is that the left-winger’s statement is true, the right-winger’s statement is not.

    While SMEs make up 96% of businesses, they only employ about 30% of employees, and the majority of SMEs do not employ anyone. I don’t see why there should be one law for SMEs and one law for any other employer.

    There is no evidence to show that minimum wage increases and increased workers’ protection in recent years have led to decreases in employment in SMEs or stifled SME growth.

    Nobody ‘chooses’ to be paid the minimum wage, you’re always going to have someone who needs to do those jobs and there is no justice in implying they deserve the poor wage they are being paid.

    I don’t see how minimum wage increases benefit the “ruling elite” (whoever they may be) or the Labour Party.

  33. iiq374 33

    Well, I guess the difference is that the left-winger’s statement is true, the right-winger’s statement is not. Ah, except you are showing the true difference between left and right; right debating a point, left going “la, la, la” ;-p

    While SMEs make up 96% of businesses, they only employ about 30% of employees, and the majority of SMEs do not employ anyone. I don’t see why there should be one law for SMEs and one law for any other employer. Thanks for providing my proof for me.

    I don’t see why there should be one law for SMEs and one law for any other employer. I don’t see why there should either – however at least I’m recognizing that both exist before creating a slap down to both.

    There is no evidence to show that minimum wage increases and increased workers’ protection in recent years have led to decreases in employment in SMEs or stifled SME growth. Is there any showing it hasn’t?? The only research I have seen on minimum wages is that in a less than full employment scenario it impacts most heavily on the most vulnerable. Although I can’t quote from my own business as the lowest paid worker gets > $60,000 p.a. I can quote from my wifes where the impact wouldn’t show in reduced employment – because students are already classified as fully employed…

    Nobody ‘chooses’ to be paid the minimum wage Jeez – I thought it was the right’s job to be out of touch? How long since you went to school and watched people explicitly choosing to leave and take up minimum wage careers?

    there is no justice in implying they deserve the poor wage they are being paid. There is no justice in implying that just because they are working that they deserve more…

  34. Tim 34

    “right debating a point, left going “la, la, la’ ;-p” ???

    I don’t agree for good a reason. I said “If employers can profit from paying poverty wages they will”. Look at any fast food company and most international cleaning contractors in New Zealand and almost any international business trading in China (Nike, GAP etc.).

    You said minimum wage increases lead to decreases in employment. This is not correct. As I’ve stated before the minimum wage has increased significantly in the past few years while unemployment has dropped significantly, most markedly in unemployment amongst Maori, Pacific Islanders and youth, the so-called “vulnerable” workers. You can get these statistics from the DOL or Statistics NZ.

    People don’t choose to work for the minimum wage, think of someone in Otara who has to leave school to support the family because Mum and Dad get such poor wages. It’s a cycle, not a choice.

    I assume you own a SME. If you can afford to pay your lowest paid worker $60,000 then you can certainly afford to comply with employment laws and pay people the minimum wage. What’s your issue with current employment laws?

    Your last two responses make me think that you believe that people who “choose” to work in low paid jobs are not worthy of more. Sure, there are always going to be people who are lazy and stupid, some of them might work for the minimum wage but an equal if not greater number of them are wealthy.

  35. iiq374 35

    You said minimum wage increases lead to decreases in employment
    Actually I didn’t…

    Sure, there are always going to be people who are lazy and stupid
    Has nothing to do with being lazy nor stupid; it has to do with the relative benefit that they are able to offer. I have a couple of people who are lazy (admittedly none who are stupid) who are worth more to me than some of my hard workers – because the fact is they are more productive in the 20-30 hours actual work they put in than some who put in 40-50.

    I assume you own a SME. If you can afford to pay your lowest paid worker $60,000 then you can certainly afford to comply with employment laws and pay people the minimum wage. What’s your issue with current employment laws?
    Ah – beautiful example of left thinking; this law doesn’t affect your self interest so why should you care? Just because you seem to only care about something that directly affects you doesn’t stop others caring about the wider community and consequences.

    People don’t choose to work for the minimum wage, think of someone in Otara who has to leave school to support the family because Mum and Dad get such poor wages. It’s a cycle, not a choice.
    Sorry this is an argument around the level at which a safety net is required – not at which a minimum wage should be set. Also raising the minimum wage exacerbates this issue as it becomes more attractive to turf the hypothetical kid out to get $25K more in rather than $20K more in. It makes the argument of delayed gratification for higher education even harder to make.
    Unless of course you prefer a greater proportion of our young leaving school to “work at the meatworks”.

  36. Tim 36

    “Just because you seem to only care about something that directly affects you doesn’t stop others caring about the wider community and consequences.” The purpose of a business is to make profit. Businesses are not altruistic. Don’t try to pretend that you are running a business because you “care about the wider community”. You may do so in general terms, but that’s not the purpose of your business.

    If, as you say, you care about the community, then you should be concerned about low wages and the damage they do to society. There are a lot of social costs to low wages, and ultimately paying people such low wages is economically inefficient. Just increasing productivity or getting more people into work is not going to fix low wages in itself. Because a business is there to maximise profit, it is not going to increase its workers’ wages unless it has to, regardless of how much its productivity increases.

    “Also raising the minimum wage exacerbates this issue as it becomes more attractive to turf the hypothetical kid out to get $25K more in rather than $20K more in” – the whole point is that if Mum and Dad did not need to survive on poverty wages, their children wouldn’t have to work to help support the family. It’s not a question of “turfing out”, it’s a question of need. The minimum wage is a safety net, $12 an hour is not enought to raise a family.

  37. LabourMustBeLiquidated 37

    If Labour gave a damn about workers they would stop taxing the living daylights out of them. Never mind, Klark and her commie cronies will be off into the dustbins of history come election 08.

  38. PaulL 38

    Tim, you’re failing to discern between iiq374’s business interests, which are probably to make a profit, and his political interests, which occur in his non-working time. He cares politically that we not enact policies that reduce employment – even though those policies don’t impact his company directly. Why do you believe that his only interest here is whether or not his company is impacted – did he give up his rights as a NZ Citizen when he became a filthy capitalist?

  39. r0b 39

    G’day LMBL, welcome to The Standard. We look forward to further intelligent and constructive contributions from you in the future. Have a Nice Day.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Twenty highlights of 2020
    As we welcome in the new year, our focus is on continuing to keep New Zealanders safe and moving forward with our economic recovery. There’s a lot to get on with, but before we say a final goodbye to 2020, here’s a quick look back at some of the milestones ...
    3 weeks ago

  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    60 mins ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • PM congratulates New Year Honour recipients
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has added her warm congratulations to the New Zealanders recognised for their contributions to their communities and the country in the New Year 2021 Honours List. “The past year has been one that few of us could have imagined. In spite of all the things that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • David Parker congratulates New Year 2021 Honours recipients
    Attorney-General and Minister for the Environment David Parker has congratulated two retired judges who have had their contributions to the country and their communities recognised in the New Year 2021 Honours list. The Hon Tony Randerson QC has been appointed a Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Year’s Honours highlights outstanding Pacific leadership through challenging year
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio says the New Year’s Honours List 2021 highlights again the outstanding contribution made by Pacific people across Aotearoa. “We are acknowledging the work of 13 Pacific leaders in the New Year’s Honours, representing a number of sectors including health, education, community, sports, the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Supporting seniors to embrace technology
    The Government’s investment in digital literacy training for seniors has led to more than 250 people participating so far, helping them stay connected. “COVID-19 has meant older New Zealanders are showing more interest in learning how to use technology like Zoom and Skype so they can to keep in touch ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago