But the door was open…
Written By:
- Date published:
5:00 am, August 15th, 2014 - 277 comments
Categories: accountability, brand key, corruption, David Farrar, democratic participation, election 2014, Ethics, john key, Politics, spin, Steven Joyce -
Tags: dirty politics, Hacking, nicky hager
If I forget to lock my front door before leaving the house is that an open invitation to come and help yourself to my worldly possessions? According to the Crimes Act: No. Walking into someone’s house and helping yourself to their possessions, even when they have left their front door open wide open, is Burglary.
If I invite you over for dinner is that an invitation to pocket something that belongs to me? According to the Crimes Act: No. Taking something that doesn’t belong to you, even if you have permission to be there, is Theft.
If I leave you as a guest in my living room while I go to the bathroom is that an invitation for you to plug a USB stick into my computer and copy documents that belong to me? According to the Crimes Act: No. Copying my documents without my permission is Data Theft.
These are all criminal offenses in New Zealand that carry penalties of imprisonment.
The intention of this post is to examine the similarities and differences between the hacking of Cameron Slater’s communications on the one hand, and the hacking of the Labour Party donor database on the other. There are two important issues to determine in both cases and I will cover them separately. The first is the legality of the hacking and the second is the ethics of using the resulting information regardless of whether the obtaining of the information in the first instance was unlawful.
In the case of John Key’s senior staffer Jason Ede and blogger Cameron Slater accessing the Labour Party donor database they are relying solely on a convincing legal defense. We have heard over the past couple of days John Key himself, his minister Stephen Joyce, and National Party blogger David Farrar all arguing that the hacking was morally justified on the sole basis that it was lawful. I haven’t heard any moral justification for their actions that goes beyond arguing the legalities. John Key himself has condoned and defended the hacking on this basis. It is my view that it is a mistake to confuse legal justification on the one hand with moral or ethical justification on the other. I’m sure we can all think of plenty of examples of quite lawful actions which are morally and ethically reprehensible.
In the case of Nicky Hager using stolen/hacked communications belonging to Cameron Slater he is relying solely on moral and ethical arguments to justify his position. Hager acknowledges that the material was obtained unlawfully (though not by his own hand). He claims however that the overwhelming public interest in the material is adequate justification. One only has to look at the many historical acts of civil disobedience and whistle blowing that have led to good outcomes to know that unlawfulness is not always immoral or unethical.
The only issue to be determined in the Labour Party donor database hacking is that of lawfulness. There has been no suggestion of public interest in the information obtained. The leaked communications between Cameron Slater, Jason Ede, and their other collaborators make their intentions quite clear: To create a political distraction and embarrassment for their political opponents. In the absence of any moral or ethical justification beyond a defense of lawfulness it is my view that if their legal justification does not stand up to scrutiny then the entire weight of their argument falls over. Further even if their actions are found to be lawful they do still have very serious questions to answer about their motivations.
The hacking of Cameron Slater’s communications was unlawful, pure and simple, and no one is arguing otherwise. Therefore the first issue to be determined is that of whether the public interest in the material really was substantial enough to ethically justify the breaking of the law. The second issue to be determined is whether once the deed was done the public interest was justification for a journalist, not involved in the unlawful act, publishing the material.
1. The lawfulness of hacking into the Labour Party donor database
In 2003 the New Zealand Parliament passed amendments to the Crimes Act adding in specific offenses to cover crimes involving computers. Here are some relevant sections that I believe apply in this case:
Section 249 Accessing computer system for dishonest purpose
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 7 years who, directly or indirectly, accesses any computer system and thereby, dishonestly or by deception, and without claim of right, –
(a) obtains any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) causes loss to any other person
(2) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 5 years who, directly or indirectly, accesses any computer system with intent, dishonestly or by deception, and without claim of right, –
(a) to obtain any property, privilege, service, pecuniary advantage, benefit, or valuable consideration; or
(b) to cause loss to any other person
dishonestly, in relation to an act or omission, means done or omitted without a belief that there was express or implied consent to, or authority for, the act or omission from a person entitled to give such consent or authority
claim of right, in relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right in property in relation to which the offence is alleged to have been committed, although that belief may be based on ignorance or mistake of fact or of any matter of law other than the enactment against which the offence is alleged to have been committed
The definitions of “dishonestly” and “claim of right” in the Crimes Act make it pretty clear that express authorisation is required and the “door left open” defense doesn’t work any better for data theft than any other property theft. I can’t see how they could possibly argue any “claim of right” to even access, let alone download and copy, the Labour Party donor database. Their actions well fit within the definitions of the offenses of both 249(1)(a), 249(1)(b), 249(2)(a) and 249(2)(b).
249(1)(a) and 249(2)(a) both apply as they obtained property and potentially other material advantages, arguably with the intent required to meet the more severe penalty listed for 249(2)(a).
249(1)(b) and 249(2)(b) also both apply at least insofar as their intention was to cause loss, both material (deterring people from donating to Labour – explicitly stated as an intention in their correspondence) and non-material (loss of votes). Whether they actually caused material or non-material loss is possibly questionable but there is no doubt that was their intent.
Section 252 Accessing computer system without authorisation
(1) Every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who intentionally accesses, directly or indirectly, any computer system without authorisation, knowing that he or she is not authorised to access that computer system.
(2) To avoid doubt, subsection(1) does not apply if a person who is authorised to access a computer system accesses that computer system for a purpose other than the one for which that person was given access.
Labour’s political opponents were absolutely not authorised to access the donor database. The donor database is quite arguably a separate computer system from their public website even if they are both hosted on the same server. To argue otherwise would be to argue that my authorisation to access my own materials on a shared hosting server gives me authorisation to help myself to anyone else’s material residing on the same server. The public website had no links to the donor database that could result in them being confused for the same computer system. One was clearly intended to be public, and the other clearly intended to be private and confidential.
These reasonably new sections of the Crimes Act covering crimes involving computers have not up until this point been tested to any great extent in the New Zealand courts so there is unfortunately very little case law available to aid in interpreting any limits on the scope of the offenses. One can however make some educated guesses about how the courts would interpret this case. Where there is any ambiguity in the scope of legislation the courts usually attempt to determine the intention of Parliament in passing the legislation by reading back through the Hansard record and select committee reports.
Reading back through Hansard to figure out what Parliament was thinking when they passed the Crimes Amendment Bill (No 6) in 2003 it quickly becomes clear that there was a pretty explicit intention in creating the new criminal offenses: To remedy a situation in which our laws had become outdated. To create a new hoard of crimes involving computers to fill the gaps created by new technologies and as closely as possible align the legal position of theft of data with the theft of other property. David Parker (Labour) said in the debate:
It became apparent that even if we were eventually able to pin anything, with any degree of proof, on the people attempting to steal the information, there was no effective remedy available to the New Zealand authorities because of a lacuna in the legislation, which would mean that nothing was being stolen. This legislation remedies that by introducing provisions that say that trade secrets stored in electronic form can be property for the purposes of theft.
This case easily fits well within the definitions of the offenses under sections 249 and 252 as I have outlined. There is no argument to be made that the scope of the offenses in question should be limited as they quite clearly fit with the intentions of Parliament in creating them. “The door was open” is simply not a credible legal defense – express authorisation is required whether you are entering someone’s home or accessing their computer system.
2. The public interest in Cameron Slater’s communications
The moral and ethical justification for obtaining and publishing Cameron Slater’s stolen communications relies entirely on whether it was in the public interest. There are three factors to be considered here:
- What is the definition of public interest and does the material published fit within it?
- If the material published was in the public interest, were there other, more lawful, means available to find the information?
- Does the good in publishing material of public interest outweigh any harm done in this particular situation?
Public interest is a very abstract concept and difficult to define without reference to a particular context. The context in which we are assessing public interest in this case is about government and political transparency and participation in the democratic process. It would be hard to argue that protecting the fundamentals of our democratic process is not in the public interest; that premise produces a useful starting point. Does Nicky Hager’s book serve to protect the fundamentals of our democratic process?
Fundamental to our democratic process are elections where the public gets to vote on who will represent us in Government for the next three years. In order for elections to have any meaning there must be transparency around what each political party and candidate stands for. The democratic process is undermined if voters are tricked or misled by false representations by either parties or candidates. That puts any evidence of false representations firmly in the public interest. The entire thesis of Nicky Hager’s book is a political party and its leader who have intentionally tricked the public into believing they do not engage in dirty politics whilst collaborating with third parties to do their dirty politics for them with plausible deniability.
It is quite clear that Nicky Hager has been very thoughtful and careful in his assessment of the public interest. There is no doubt that in thousands of emails Hager will have also found loads of other damaging, scandalous, embarrassing personal information. He has not published anything which is not in the public interest. All of the stories in the book are about exposing matters of public interest that were intended to be kept secret by those acting outside of the public interest.
Were there other, more lawful, means available to find the information?
As I mentioned in my post yesterday, most people inside the “political beltway” have long suspected links between John Key’s office and blogs like Whale Oil. Despite many people wishing they could prove it for a very long time no one until now has managed to uncover the evidence. In regards to the corporate PR stories in the book many of those really had gone under the radar (the anti-breastfeeding stuff in my post yesterday a key example) and even those that were obvious (like the Ports of Auckland union-busting) remained out of reach of the general public. I cannot see other realistic and lawful means of obtaining the information that was published in Dirty Politics.
What is the harm and does it outweigh any public interest good?
The book is embarrassing to those exposed carrying out activities they kept secret in the knowledge that the public would not favour them if the truth were ever to come out. There is no harm here to innocent parties and any harm to those exposed is due to their own unethical behaviour.
Unfortunately in this day and age if the material obtained had been given to any mainstream media journalist I don’t doubt for a second that the headlines being run would have related to the personal scandals rather than any material of real public interest. That the hacker in this case chose to give the material to Nicky Hager, a journalist renowned for his integrity and interest only in the stories of real importance, says a lot about their motivation.
While Nicky Hager has been fully transparent about the unlawfulness of the means of obtaining Cameron Slater’s communications his selection of only that material clearly falling within the scope of public interest makes a good case for the moral and ethical justification of its use. On the other hand no moral or ethical justification has even been put forth for us to refute in defense of one political party hacking the donor database of another. No claims of public interest in the material have been made. The Prime Minister himself has defended it solely on the basis of a merit less “but the door was open” defense to theft.
On a final note I am disappointed that I have felt the need to write this post. To me there are obvious distinguishing factors between the Cameron Slater communications hacking and the Labour Party donor database hacking. That I have to lay them out step-by-step says a lot about our so-called Fourth Estate. Do they no longer teach ethics and public interest in media and journalism studies?
277 comments on “But the door was open… ”
- Comments are now closed
Links to post
- Comments are now closed
Recent Comments
- Maori Party (with “disgust”) draws attention to Chhour’s race after the High Court rules on Wa...
Buzz from the Beehive A statement from Children’s Minister Karen Chhour – yet to be posted on the Government’s official website – arrived in Point of Order’s email in-tray last night. It welcomes the High Court ruling on whether the Waitangi Tribunal can demand she appear before it. It does ...2 hours ago - Who’s Going Up The Media Mountain?
Mr Bombastic: Ironically, the media the academic experts wanted is, in many ways, the media they got. In place of the tyrannical editors of yesteryear, advancing without fear or favour the interests of the ruling class; the New Zealand news media of today boasts a troop of enlightened journalists dedicated to ...4 hours ago - “That's how I roll”
It's hard times try to make a livingYou wake up every morning in the unforgivingOut there somewhere in the cityThere's people living lives without mercy or pityI feel good, yeah I'm feeling fineI feel better then I have for the longest timeI think these pills have been good for meI ...8 hours ago - “Comity” versus the rule of law
In 1974, the US Supreme Court issued its decision in United States v. Nixon, finding that the President was not a King, but was subject to the law and was required to turn over the evidence of his wrongdoing to the courts. It was a landmark decision for the rule ...15 hours ago - Aotearoa: a live lab for failed Right-wing socio-economic zombie experiments once more…
Every day now just seems to bring in more fresh meat for the grinder. In their relentlessly ideological drive to cut back on the “excessive bloat” (as they see it) of the previous Labour-led government, on the mountains of evidence accumulated in such a short period of time do not ...19 hours ago - Water is at the heart of farmers’ struggle to survive in Benin
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Megan Valére Sosou Market gardening site of the Itchèléré de Itagui agricultural cooperative in Dassa-Zoumè (Image credit: Megan Valère Sossou) For the residents of Dassa-Zoumè, a city in the West African country of Benin, choosing between drinking water and having enough ...22 hours ago - At a time of media turmoil, Melissa had nothing to proclaim as Minister – and now she has been dem...Buzz from the Beehive
Melissa Lee – as may be discerned from the screenshot above – has not been demoted for doing something seriously wrong as Minister of ... 24 hours ago - These people are not our friends
Morning in London Mother hugs beloved daughter outside the converted shoe factory in which she is living.Afternoon in London Travelling writer takes himself and his wrist down to A&E, just to be sure. Read more ...1 day ago - Some advice from our tertiary history for the University Advisory Group
Mike Grimshaw writes – The recent announcement of the University Advisory Group, chaired by Sir Peter Gluckman, makes very clear where the Government’s focus and priorities lie. The remit of the Advisory Group is that Group members will consider challenges and opportunities for improvement in the university sector including: ...1 day ago - Still no prudential regulation case around climate changeEric Crampton writes – The Reserve Bank of New Zealand desperately wants to find reasons to have workstreams in climate change. It makes little sense. They’ve run another stress test on the banks looking to see if they could find a prudential regulation case. They couldn’t. They ...1 day ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links for Wednesday, April 24
TL;DR: These six news links stood out to me in the last 24 hours or so onWednesday, April 23:Scoop: 'Released in error': Treasury paper hints at axing $6b flood resilience plan by NZ Herald-$$$ Thomas CoughlanScoop: EY launches new misconduct review amid Fonterra ban. Fonterra tells EY to remove some ...1 day ago - How National can neutralise serious allegations of corruption should the “Fast Track” Bill becom...Rob MacCullough writes – Pundits from the left and the right are arguing that National’s Fast Track Bill that is designed to speed up infrastructure decisions could end up becoming mired in a cesspool of corruption. Political commentator ...1 day ago
- Cleaning Up After Gabrielle.
Looking at the headlines this morning it’s hard to feel anything other than pessimistic about the future of humanity.Note that I’m not speaking about the future of mankind, but the survival of our humanity. The values that we believe in seem to be ebbing away, by the day.Perhaps every generation ...1 day ago - Gordon Campbell on bird flu, AUKUS entry fees and Cindy Lee
Swabbing mixed breed baby chicks to test for avian influenzaUh oh. Bird flu – often deadly to humans – is not only being transmitted from infected birds to dairy cows, but is now travelling between dairy cows. As of last Friday, Bloomberg News reports, there were 32 American dairy herds ...1 day ago - Tolling Existing Roads
One of the government’s transport policy and agreements with it’s coalition partners made it clear that they were looking at options like tolling and road pricing. This was reinforced in it’s draft Government Policy Statement released at the start of March which made a couple of references to it. Road pricing, ...1 day ago - At a glance – The difference between weather and climateOn February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...2 days ago
- More criminal minersWhat is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...2 days ago
- Photos from the road
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...2 days ago - RMA reforms aim to ease stock-grazing rules and reduce farmers’ costs – but Taxpayers’ Union w...Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...2 days ago
- Luxon Strikes Out.
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...2 days ago - In many ways the media that the experts wanted, turned out to be the media they have gotChris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...2 days ago
- The Waitangi Tribunal Summons; or the more things stay the sameGraeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...2 days ago
- Both Parliamentary watchdogs hammer Fast-track bill
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General, John Ryan, has joined the ...2 days ago - India makes a big bet on electric busesThis is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah Spengeman People wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...2 days ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 6:36am on Tuesday, April 23
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 6:36am on Tuesday, April 22:Scoop & Deep Dive: How Sir Peter Jackson got to have his billion-dollar exit cake and eat Hollywood too NZ Herald-$$$ Matt NippertFast Track Approval Bill: Watchdogs seek substantial curbs on ministers' powers ...2 days ago - What is really holding up infrastructureThe infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...2 days ago
- “Pure Unadulterated Charge”
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...2 days ago - Bernard's six-stack of substacks for Monday, April 22
Tonight’s six-stack includes: writes via his substack that’s he’s sceptical about the IPSOS poll last week suggesting a slide into authoritarianism here, writing: Kiwis seem to want their cake and eat it too Tal Aster writes for about How Israel turned homeowners into YIMBYs. writes via his ...3 days ago - The media were given a little list and hastened to pick out Fast Track prospects – but the Treaty ...Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...3 days ago
- Just trying to stay upright
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...3 days ago - “Unprecedented”Today, former Port of Auckland CEO Tony Gibson went on trial on health and safety charges for the death of one of his workers. The Herald calls the trial "unprecedented". Firstly, it's only "unprecedented" because WorkSafe struck a corrupt and unlawful deal to drop charges against Peter Whittall over Pike ...3 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: Time for “Fast-Track Watch”
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...3 days ago - Gordon Campbell on fast track powers, media woes and the Tiktok banFeel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...3 days ago
- The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruption
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...3 days ago - Maori push for parallel government structuresMichael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...3 days ago
- An announcement about an announcementWithout a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...3 days ago
- All the Green Tech in China.
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...3 days ago - Western Express SuccessIn our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...3 days ago
- Bernard’s pick ‘n’ mix of the news links at 7:16am on Monday, April 22
TL;DR: These six news links stood out in the last 24 hours to 7:16am on Monday, April 22:Labour says Kiwis at greater risk from loan sharks as Govt plans to remove borrowing regulations NZ Herald Jenee TibshraenyHow did the cost of moving two schools blow out to more than $400m?A ...3 days ago - The Kaka’s diary for the week to April 29 and beyond
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...3 days ago - 2024 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #16A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...4 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: The Government’s new fast-track invitation to corruptionThe ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...4 days ago
- Thank you
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...4 days ago - Determining the Engine Type in Your Car
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...5 days ago - How to Become a Race Car Driver: A Comprehensive GuideIntroduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...5 days ago
- How Many Cars Are There in the World in 2023? An Exploration of Global Automotive StatisticsIntroduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...5 days ago
- How Long Does It Take for Car Inspection?Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...5 days ago
- Who Makes Mazda Cars?Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...5 days ago
- How Often to Replace Your Car Battery A Comprehensive GuideYour car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...5 days ago
- Can You Register a Car Without a License?In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the Rule If you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...5 days ago
- Mazda: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Reliability, Value, and PerformanceMazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...5 days ago
- What Are Struts on a Car?Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...5 days ago
- What Does Car Registration Look Like: A Comprehensive GuideCar registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...5 days ago
- How to Share Computer Audio on ZoomZoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...5 days ago
- How Long Does It Take to Build a Computer?Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...5 days ago
- How to Put Your Computer to SleepSleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...5 days ago
- What is Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT)?Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...5 days ago
- iPad vs. Tablet Computers A Comprehensive Guide to DifferencesIn today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...5 days ago
- How Are Computers Made?A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...5 days ago
- How to Add Voice Memos from iPhone to ComputerVoice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...5 days ago
- Why My Laptop Screen Has Lines on It: A Comprehensive GuideLaptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...5 days ago
- How to Right-Click on a LaptopRight-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...5 days ago
- Where is the Power Button on an ASUS Laptop?Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...5 days ago
- How to Start a Dell Laptop: A Comprehensive GuideDell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...5 days ago
- Bryce Edwards: Serious populist discontent is bubbling up in New ZealandTwo-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...5 days ago
- How to Take a Screenshot on an Asus Laptop A Comprehensive Guide with Detailed Instructions and Illu...In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...5 days ago
- How to Factory Reset Gateway Laptop A Comprehensive GuideA factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...5 days ago
- The Folly Of Impermanence.“You talking about me?” The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...5 days ago
- A crisis of ambitionRoger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...5 days ago
- Have 308 people in the Education Ministry’s Curriculum Development Team spent over $100m on a 60-p...Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...5 days ago
- 'This bill is dangerous for the environment and our democracy'Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...5 days ago
- The Bank of our Tamariki and Mokopuna.
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...5 days ago - The worth of it all
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...5 days ago - What is the Hardest Sport in the World?Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...5 days ago
- What is the Most Expensive Sport?The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...5 days ago
- Release: Working together on consistent support for veterans this Anzac Day
Our two-tiered system for veterans’ support is out of step with our closest partners, and all parties in Parliament should work together to fix it, Labour veterans’ affairs spokesperson Greg O’Connor said. ...1 day ago - Release: Penny drops – but what about Seymour and Peters?Stripping two Ministers of their portfolios just six months into the job shows Christopher Luxon’s management style is lacking, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said. ...1 day ago
- Release: Budget blunder shows Nicola Willis could cut recovery fundingIt appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...2 days ago
- Further environmental mismanagement on the cards
The Government’s resource management reforms will add to the heavy and ever-growing burden this Government is loading on to our environment. ...2 days ago - Release: RMA changes will be a disaster for environmentThe Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...2 days ago
- Release: Labour supports urgent changes to emergency management systemLabour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...2 days ago
- Release: Labour calls for New Zealand to recognise PalestineThe Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...3 days ago
- Release: Three strikes law political posturing of worst kindThe Government is bringing back a law that has little evidential backing just to look tough, Labour justice spokesperson Duncan Webb said. ...3 days ago
- Release: Government cuts unbelievably target child exploitation, violent extremism, ports and airpor...Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...3 days ago
- Three strikes has failed before and will fail againResurrecting the archaic three-strikes legislation is an unwelcome return to a failed American-style approach to justice. ...3 days ago
- Release: Environmental protection vital, not ‘onerous’The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...3 days ago
- Release: Govt cuts doctors and nurses in hiring freezeCuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...6 days ago
- Fast-track submissions period must be extendedThe Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...6 days ago
- Release: Progress on climate will be undone by GovtNew Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...6 days ago
- Release: Dark day for Kiwi kids as a third of Govt cuts affect themNews that 1000 jobs at the Ministry of Education and Oranga Tamariki could go is devastating for future generations of New Zealanders. ...1 week ago
- Release: Alarm as Government signals further blow to school lunchesMore essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...1 week ago
- Release: Quick, submit – stop Govt’s dodgy approvals billThe Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...1 week ago
- Government throws coal on the climate crisis fireThe Government’s policy announced today to ease consenting for coal mining will have a lasting impact across generations. ...1 week ago
- Release: Public transport costs to double as National looks at unaffordable roading project insteadCancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...1 week ago
- Release: Cost of living in Auckland still not a priorityA laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...1 week ago
- Greens look to fast-track submissions on harmful lawThe Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Govt should stop making people’s lives harder and build more homesThe National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Melissa Lee missing in action on mediaThe action Melissa Lee promised to protect democracy and the media sector is missing, Media and Communications spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...2 weeks ago
- Landlord Government leaves little hope for rentersThe Government’s announcement on tenancy rules prove that it does not care about renters. ...2 weeks ago
- Opportunity to build a more sustainable economyGreen Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...2 weeks ago
- Significant step forward in fixing cruel and unjust pastA significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...2 weeks ago
- Missed opportunity but NZ will surely one day recognise the right to a sustainable environmentNew Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Don’t cut our lunches – clear message sent to GovernmentTens of thousands of people are demanding the Government commits to fully funding free and healthy school lunches. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Govt makes U-turn on Suicide Prevention OfficeLabour welcomes the Government’s U-turn on the closure of the Suicide Prevention Office, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...2 weeks ago
- CCC issues warning over further climate delayToday’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...2 weeks ago
- Luxon targets lame and lousy example of leadershipIf talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...2 weeks ago
- Luxon targets are lousy example of leadershipIf talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...2 weeks ago
- Release: Commitment to disability communities missing from Govt prioritiesMinister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...2 weeks ago
- Methane target review is dangerous duplicationThe Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...3 weeks ago
- Anzac Commemorative Address – Dawn Service, Gallipoli, Türkiye
Mai ia tawhiti pamamao, te moana nui a Kiwa, kua tae whakaiti mai matou, ki to koutou papa whenua. No koutou te tapuwae, no matou te tapuwae, kua honoa pumautia. Ko nga toa kua hinga nei, o te Waipounamu, o te Ika a Maui, he okioki tahi me o ...2 hours ago - PM announces changes to portfoliosPaul Goldsmith will take on responsibility for the Media and Communications portfolio, while Louise Upston will pick up the Disability Issues portfolio, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon announced today. “Our Government is relentlessly focused on getting New Zealand back on track. As issues change in prominence, I plan to adjust Ministerial ...1 day ago
- New catch limits for unique fishery areasRecreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...1 day ago
- Minister welcomes hydrogen milestoneEnergy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...2 days ago
- Urgent changes to system through first RMA Amendment BillThe coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...2 days ago
- Overseas decommissioning models consideredOverseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...2 days ago
- Release of North Island Severe Weather Event InquiryEmergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...2 days ago
- Justice Minister to attend Human Rights CouncilJustice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...3 days ago
- Patterson reopens world’s largest wool scouring facilityAssociate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...3 days ago
- Speech to the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective Summit, 18 April 2024Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...3 days ago
- Government to introduce revised Three Strikes lawThe Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...3 days ago
- New diplomatic appointmentsForeign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...3 days ago
- Humanitarian support for Ethiopia and SomaliaNew Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...3 days ago
- Arts Minister congratulates Mataaho CollectiveMinister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...4 days ago
- Supporting better financial outcomes for KiwisThe Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...4 days ago
- Trade relationship with China remains strong“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...4 days ago
- PM’s South East Asia mission does the businessPrime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...5 days ago
- $41m to support clean energy in South East AsiaNew Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...6 days ago
- Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder listThe Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...6 days ago
- Judicial appointments announcedAttorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...6 days ago
- Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in SingaporeEducation Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...6 days ago
- Value of stopbank project proven during cycloneA stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...6 days ago
- Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visitForeign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...6 days ago
- Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac DayScience, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...6 days ago
- Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the PhilippinesPrime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...7 days ago
- Government commits $20m to Westport flood protectionThe Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...7 days ago
- Taupō takes pole positionThe Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...1 week ago
- Cost of living support for low-income homeownersLocal Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...1 week ago
- Government backing mussel spat projectThe Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...1 week ago
- Government focused on getting people into workBenefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...1 week ago
- Clean energy key driver to reducing emissionsThe Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...1 week ago
- Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forwardThe Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...1 week ago
- Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic PartnershipPrime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...1 week ago
- Government consults on extending coastal permits for portsRMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...1 week ago
- Inflation coming down, but more work to doToday’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...1 week ago
- School attendance restored as a priority in health adviceRefreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...1 week ago
- Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sectorOceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...1 week ago
- Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International CongressAssociate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...1 week ago
- Removing red tape to help early learners thriveThe Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...1 week ago
- RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tapeChanges to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...1 week ago
- ‘It bucked our lads up wonderfully’: the lightning-quick battle that marked the birth of the US-...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918. Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...1 hour ago - GCSB refuses to release details of spy deal 'to protect interests'
The spy agency is refusing to release a copy of its deal with a foreign agency to run a secret operation out of this country. ...2 hours ago - Die In for Palestine Marks ANZAC day
Pōneke based peace activists staged a silent protest at the ANZAC day service to highlight New Zealand’s complicity in war and genocide, and urge the government to take concrete steps to stop the genocide in Palestine. ...2 hours ago - Ancient nomads you’ve probably never heard of disappeared from Europe 1,000 years ago. Now, DNA an...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Magdalena M.E. Bunbury, Postdoctoral Researcher, James Cook University Burial with a horse at the Rákóczifalva site, Hungary (8th century AD). Sándor Hegedűs, Hungarian National Museum, CC BY How do we understand past societies? For centuries, our main sources of information have been ...5 hours ago
- Don’t mention the war: On grandparents and Anzac biscuits
Amanda Thompson doesn’t really do Anzac Day. But what she does do is remember the people she knew who had a lifetime to remember stuff they didn’t really want to, because of a war they didn’t ask for. And she does make Anzac biscuits. First published in 2021. All my ...5 hours ago - If plastic manufacturing goes up 10%, plastic pollution goes up 10% – and we’re set for a huge ...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathryn Willis, Postdoctoral Researcher, CSIRO Xavier Boulenger/Shutterstock In the two decades to 2019, global plastic production doubled. By 2040, plastic manufacturing and processing could consume as much as 20% of global oil production and use up 15% of the annual carbon ...5 hours ago
- Governor-General's Anzac Day Dawn Service AddressWith our collective remembrance, and steadfast belief in our common humanity, we strengthen our hope and resolve to do what we can to foster dialogue and understanding, and to heal divisions in our pursuit of peace. ...5 hours ago
- Angling-Conservation Group Sees Fast Track Bill As UndemocraticPrincipal reasons for the opposition is the loss of the public’s democratic right to have “a fair say” and the vital need for a government free from corruption, said Casey Cravens of Dunedin, president of the New Zealand Federation of Freshwater ...6 hours ago
- Remembering the great TrueBliss vs Bardot national anthem sing-offNever mind the scoreboard – in the 2000 Bledisloe Cup decider, the real trans-Tasman battle was won before kickoff. First published in 2016. The dawn of the new millennium was a dark time for the All Blacks. Their final game pre-Y2K was a 22-18 loss to South Africa in the ...6 hours ago
- Help Me Hera: Do I even want the public sector job I might be about to lose?I’m on the wrong side of 40, I never pursued creative work and now my job is killing my soul. Help! Want Hera’s help? Email your problem to helpme@thespinoff.co.nz Dear Hera, May I start with the least original conversation opener you’re likely to hear around the motu at the moment, particularly in Wellington: ...7 hours ago
- ANZAC Day Wreath Calls For No Future Deaths From AUKUS“Never again - No AUKUS” was the message of the wreath laid at this morning’s national ANZAC Day commemorative service at Pukeahu National War Memorial Park this morning by the Stop AUKUS group. ...9 hours ago
- Swimmer does everything and more to get to Paris
Until this month, Auckland swimmer Hazel Ouwehand had never met a qualifying time in an Olympic event for a New Zealand team, even as a junior. Now she’s very likely off to the Paris Olympics after swimming well under the qualifying standard in the 100m butterfly twice – both in ...10 hours ago - Seize the dayWhile Anzac Day has experienced a resurgence in recent years, our other day of remembrance has slowly faded from view. The Sunday Essay is made possible thanks to the support of Creative New Zealand. Original illustrations by Hope McConnell. First published in 2022. The high school’s head girl and ...11 hours ago
- The first, forgotten Anzacs, more than 50 years before GallipoliAustralian and New Zealand volunteers fought together in the Waikato War, yet still its place in the Anzac tradition is unacknowledged by our defence forces or Returned Services Association. First published in 2018. When I was a boy cub I attended Anzac Day services in the South Auckland suburb of ...11 hours ago
- Poem for Anzac Day: ‘Hoki Mai’ by Tayi TibbleA poem by Wellington writer Tayi Tibble. Hoki Mai She kisses him goodbye with her eyes still wet and alight from their last swim in the Awatere river. At the train station celebration, she leads the Kapa Haka but her voice keeps breaking under and over itself like waves. ...11 hours ago
- Poem for Anzac Day: ‘My World War I Poem’ by Bill ManhireA poem from Bill Manhire’s 2017 book of verse Some Things to Place in a Coffin. My World War I Poem Inside each trench, the sound of prayer. Inside each prayer, the sound of digging. Image courtesy of Auckland War Memorial Museum. ...11 hours ago
- Book of the Week: Talia Marshall on living legend Ngāhuia Te AwekōtukuThere are three books I have wolfed down in one sitting over the last two years. Colleen Maria Lenihan’s gorgeous and sad debut Kōhine, Noelle McCarthy’s memoir Grand about becoming her mother and then unbecoming her, and now Hine Toa, a staunch yet gentle self-portrait by living legend Ngāhuia te ...11 hours ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 AprilLoading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...11 hours ago
- Daily crossword, Thursday 25 AprilThe post Daily crossword, Thursday 25 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...11 hours ago
- High Court overturns Waitangi Tribunal summons to Minister for Children Karen ChhourThe minister was due to give evidence on Friday regarding the government's plans to repeal section 7AA of the Oranga Tamariki Act ...19 hours ago
- Sydney University students set up Gaza solidarity camp as war marks 200 daysAsia Pacific Report Students and activist staff at Australia’s University of Sydney (USyd) have set up a Gaza solidarity encampment in support of Palestinians and similar student-led protests in the United States. The camp was pitched as mass graves, crippled hospitals, thousands of civilian deaths and the near-total destruction of ...20 hours ago
- Most bees don’t die after stinging – and other surprising bee factsSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By James B. Dorey, Lecturer in Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong Australian teddy bear bees are cute and fluffy, but get a look at that massive (unbarbed) stinger! James Dorey Photography Most of us have been stung by a bee and we ...21 hours ago
- How Anzac deaths changed the way we mourn to this daySource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jen Roberts, Senior Lecturer, School of Humanities and Social Inquiry, University of Wollongong Aussie~mobs/Flickr Victor Farr, a private in the 1st Infantry Battalion, was among the first to land at Anzac Cove just before dawn on April 25 1915. Victor Farr ...21 hours ago
- Sugar gums have a reputation as risky branch-droppers but they’re important to bees, parrots and p...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Gregory Moore, Senior Research Associate, School of Ecosystem and Forest Sciences, The University of Melbourne Gregory Moore I had the good fortune to care for the sugar gum at The University of Melbourne’s Burnley Gardens in Victoria where I worked for ...21 hours ago
- Inflation is slowly falling, while student debt is climbing: 6 graphs that explain today’s CPISource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Hawkins, Senior Lecturer, Canberra School of Politics, Economics and Society, University of Canberra BagzhanSadvakassov/Upsplash, CC BY-SA Australia’s inflation rate has fallen for the fifth successive quarter, and it’s now less than half of what it was back in late 2022. ...21 hours ago
- Our housing system is broken and the poorest Australians are being hardest hitSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rachel Ong ViforJ, ARC Future Fellow & Professor of Economics, Curtin University Just when we think the price of rentals could not get any worse, this week’s Rental Affordability Snapshot by Anglicare has revealed low-income Australians are facing a housing crisis like ...21 hours ago
- ‘It bucked our lads up wonderfully’: the lightning-quick WWI battle that marked the birth of the...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Meighen McCrae, Associate Professor of Strategic & Defence Studies, Australian National University American and Australian stretcher bearers working together near the front line during the Battle of Hamel in 1918. Australian War Memorial While the AUKUS alliance is new, the Australian-American partnership ...21 hours ago
- Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tracey Holmes, Professorial Fellow in Sport, University of Canberra When the news broke last weekend that 23 Chinese swimmers had tested positive to a banned drug in early 2021 and were allowed to compete at the Tokyo Olympic Games six months later ...21 hours ago
- First Nations Anzacs sacrificed life and limb for Country. Why aren’t their stories shown onscreen...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Cally Jetta, Senior Lecturer and Academic Lead; College for First Nations, University of Southern Queensland Australian War Memorial Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains names and images of deceased people, as well as sensitive historical information ...21 hours ago
- NZ’s Media Minister Melissa Lee demoted after Newshub crisisRNZ News Melissa Lee has been ousted from New Zealand’s coalition cabinet and stripped of the Media portfolio, and Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues portfolio in a reshuffle. Climate Change and Revenue Minister Simon Watts will take Lee’s spot in cabinet. Simmonds was a minister outside of cabinet. ...21 hours ago
- Our tall, wet forests were not open and park-like when colonists arrived – and we shouldn’t be b...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Lindenmayer, Professor, Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University laurello/Shutterstock Some reports and popular books, such as Bill Gammage’s Biggest Estate on Earth, have argued that extensive areas of Australia’s forests were kept open through frequent burning by ...22 hours ago
- Aces in their places: Luxon plays coy over ministers' competenceAnalysis - Christopher Luxon framing the demotion of two ministers as the portfolios getting "too complex" is a charitable way of saying they weren't up to the job. ...22 hours ago
- Politics with Michelle Grattan: Economist Chris Richardson on an ‘ugly’ inflation result and the...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra With Jim Chalmers’s third budget on May 14, Australians will be looking for some more cost-of-living relief – beyond the tax cuts – although they have been warned extra measures will be modest. As ...22 hours ago
- Melissa Lee’s media Hail Mary comes up shortAnalysis: Melissa Lee has lost the media portfolio and her spot in Cabinet after multiple failed attempts to find solutions for a media industry in crisis. On Wednesday, the Prime Minister announced Lee would be losing her spot in Cabinet along with her media and communications ministerial portfolio. The job ...22 hours ago
- Northland council continues four-year Māori ward fight in face of government changesA council that played a key role in getting Māori ward polling removed is now lobbying against government plans to reinstate binding referendums. ...22 hours ago
- Education Ministry cuts: Roles providing support for disabled kids among those proposed to be axedLeaked documents show which divisions will bear the brunt of hundreds of proposed job cuts at the Ministry of Education. ...23 hours ago
- Land Information New Zealand proposes 57 job cutsIt is the latest department to announce job cuts as part of the government's cost-cutting measures. ...23 hours ago
- Watch: Government's 'wheels are falling off already', Hipkins says, after ministers d...The Labour leader says the demotion of two ministers today shows the PM "didn't have particularly good judgement". ...24 hours ago
- The stories of Australia’s Muslim Anzacs have long been forgotten. It’s time we honour themSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Simon Wilmot, Senior Lecturer, Film, Deakin University Among the many Australian who served during the second world war, there is a small group of people whose stories remain largely untold. These are the Muslim men and women who, while small in number, ...1 day ago
- National emergency response facing 26 separate inquiries: What have we learnedThe country's emergency response is besieged by inquiries, despite years of reviews and efforts to make laws that deliver. ...1 day ago
- Sexual assault victims give evidence in court, but alleged perpetrators don’t have to. Bruce Lehrm...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kelly Saunders, PhD Candidate, University of Canberra There has been much analysis and praise of Justice Michael Lee’s recent judgement in Bruce Lehrmann’s defamation case against Channel Ten. Many people were openly relieved to read Lee’s “forensic” and “nuanced” application of law ...1 day ago
- What’s the difference between ADD and ADHD?Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kathy Gibbs, Program Director for the Bachelor of Education, Griffith University zEdward_Indy/Shutterstock Around one in 20 people has attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). It’s one of the most common neurodevelopmental disorders in childhood and often continues into adulthood. ADHD is diagnosed ...1 day ago
- Watch: Government's 'wheels are falling off already', Hipkins says, after minsters de...The Labour leader says the demotion of two ministers today shows the PM "didn't have particularly good judgement". ...1 day ago
- Anti-Poverty Groups Urge New Minister For Disability Issues To Reverse Funding CutsThe Fairer Future coalition of anti-poverty groups say Whaikaha must be properly funded going forward, and that to argue that poor financial management of the new Ministry is a red herring by the Prime Minister. ...1 day ago
- New Media Minister Must Rule Out State Intervention In Private MediaThe Taxpayers’ Union is today congratulating Hon. Paul Goldsmith on his appointment as Minister for Media and Communications and urges him to rule out state intervention in the private media sector. ...1 day ago
- OPM leader’s open letter condemns Australia’s ‘treachery’ over PapuaAsia Pacific Report The West Papuan resistance OPM leader has condemned Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and US President Joe Biden, accusing their countries of “six decades of treachery” over Papuan independence. The open letter was released today by OPM chairman Jeffrey P Bomanak on the eve of ANZAC Day ...1 day ago
- ‘Emily Dickinson made me into a writer’: Lauren Groff on the power of readingWelcome to The Spinoff Books Confessional, in which we get to know the reading habits and quirks of New Zealanders at large. This week: writer and one of Time Magazine’s 100 most influential people of 2024, Lauren Groff. The book I wish I’d written If I wish I’d written a ...1 day ago
- Watch live: Chris Hipkins speaks after ministers Melissa Lee, Penny Simmonds lose portfoliosThe Labour leader speaks from Parliament after the prime minister's sudden Cabinet reshuffle. ...1 day ago
- What kind of diner are you? 6 types of diners who avoid plant-based meat dishesSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Fechner, Research Fellow, Social Marketing, Griffith University mavo/Shutterstock Imagine having dinner at a restaurant. The menu offers plant-based meat alternatives made mostly from vegetables, mushrooms, legumes and wheat that mimic meat in taste, texture and smell. Despite being given that ...1 day ago
- Auckland University Criminologist Slams ‘Racist’ Three Strikes Law“Three Strikes is a dead-end policy proposed by a dead-end government. The Three Strikes law ignores the causes of crime, instead just brutalising people already crushed by the cost of living.” ...1 day ago
- Australia-born judge facing potential deportation from KiribatiBy Don Wiseman, RNZ Pacific senior journalist An Australian-born judge in Kiribati could well face deportation later this week after a tribunal ruling that he should be removed from his post. The tribunal’s report has just been tabled in the Kiribati Parliament and is due to be debated by MPs ...1 day ago
- Can Body-Worn Cameras Work In Australia And New Zealand? Lessons From Milestone’s Denmark SurveyWith its clear mandate for police use, political nuances, and nuanced public trust, Denmark's insights provide valuable considerations for Australia and New Zealand. ...1 day ago
- Media Minister Melissa Lee demoted from Cabinet, Penny Simmonds stripped of portfolioMelissa Lee has been stripped of the Media portfolio, while Penny Simmonds has lost the Disability Issues role. Follow as the PM explains. ...1 day ago
- Climate change and human rights: how a landmark legal victory in Europe could affect NZSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Vernon Rive, Associate Professor of Law, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images A seven-year campaign by a group of over 2,000 Swiss women – average age 73 – recently ended with a European Court of Human Rights decision variously ...1 day ago
- Page-turning rural gothic: Ash by Louise Wallace, reviewedBooks editor Claire Mabey reviews poet Louise Wallace’s debut novel. A famous poet once said to me that he’s always suspicious when a poet publishes a novel. I never really understood why but maybe it’s something to do with cheating on your first form. Louise Wallace is a poet. She’s ...1 day ago
- Lower catch limits in force for Fiordland, Chatham IslandsNew catch limits in Fiordland mean recreational fishers will only be able to take much smaller bags of finfish and shellfish. ...1 day ago
- New emergency management legislation delayed after bill pulled by GovernmentThe bill was introduced by the previous government in June last year. ...1 day ago
- ‘It was my Eras tour’: Meet the world’s biggest TrueBliss fansFor a few months at the turn of the millennium, TrueBliss burned bright as the biggest pop stars in the country. Alex Casey chats to two superfans who still hold the flame. During a humble backyard wedding in Nelson, 1999, one of the cordially invited guests had to excuse themselves ...1 day ago
- No more Census forms? Stats NZ mulls form of future surveysThe traditional Census form could become a thing of the past, as Stats NZ starts to rely more heavily on administrative data. ...1 day ago
- The voices that vanish in a decimated newsroom How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...1 day ago
- Half our colleagues suffer pain and discomfort from periods. But they’re still a taboo subject at ...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...1 day ago
- 'We're going to be banning gang patches' – Police Minister adamantDespite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...1 day ago
- Is it possible to ‘objectively’ judge music? We asked 5 expertsSource: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...1 day ago
- Gloomy vibe from infrastructure sector as RMA changes unveiledA new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...1 day ago
- From Gallipoli to Gaza: remembering the Anzacs not as a ‘coming of age’ tale but as a lesson for...Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...1 day ago
- The end of the Census? Stats NZ to look at whether survey is still neededThe traditional Census survey could become a thing of the past as Stats NZ starts to rely more heavily on administrative data. ...1 day ago
- Leaked document reveals millions of dollars of cuts at Te Whatu OraA leaked document shows the Canterbury/Waitaha arm of health agency Te Whatu Ora is scurrying to save $13.3 million by July. The “financial sustainability target”, which was “allocated” to Waitaha, is consistent with what’s happening in other districts, says Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. ...1 day ago
- Hiring freeze leaves Oranga Tamariki with no lawyers in Gisborne or SouthlandThe ministry's lawyers work with vulnerable children across the country, often in the youth and family courts. ...1 day ago
- Is KiwiBuild finally on its last legs?A look at the state of the previous government’s affordable housing scheme, and what could come next. Remind me: What’s KiwiBuild again? First announced in 2012, KiwiBuild was a flagship policy of the Labour Party heading into both its 2014 and 2017 election campaigns. With Jacinda Ardern as prime minister, ...1 day ago
- Labour has forgotten it was in governmentLabour in opposition will be shocked to learn which party had six years in power but squandered any chance to make real change. Grant Robertson’s valedictory speech was a predictably entertaining trip down memory lane. The acid-tongued incoming Otago University chancellor administered a sick burn to the coalition government. He ...1 day ago
- Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 AprilLoading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- ‘I was in awe of Germaine Greer’s face, her neck, her hands’The following interview with former Green Party MP Sue Kedgley came about because she features in the new memoir Hine Toa by activist Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku; the two knew each other at the University of Auckland in the early 70s, when they were both took on leadership roles in the ...1 day ago
- Can social investment shift the dial on welfare and wellbeing?Exploring the arguments for and against a social investment approach The post Can social investment shift the dial on welfare and wellbeing? appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- Lessons identified must become lessons learned for emergency preparednessOpinion: It cost too much, apparently, to implement a ‘common operational picture’ The post Lessons identified must become lessons learned for emergency preparedness appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
- The state of Taiwan’s silicon shieldTaiwan’s semiconductor industry is seen some as its ‘silicon shield’ against invasion – but how will overseas expansion affect that protection? The post The state of Taiwan’s silicon shield appeared first on Newsroom. ...1 day ago
Great post, Rocky. Came here based on this article http://m.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11309076 which contains this Keyism:
“Mr Key suggested that even if Mr Ede had accessed the records, “of course it would be fine to go and do that” because they were unprotected.”
He didn’t just ‘access’ the records. That would be him wandering into the open house and just standing there, creepy behaviour but not as bad as taking something from the house and giving it to someone else.
Good post Rocky. I agree with your comment that:
“We have heard over the past couple of days John Key himself, his minister Stephen Joyce, and National Party blogger David Farrar all arguing that the hacking was morally justified on the sole basis that it was lawful. I haven’t heard any moral justification for their actions that goes beyond arguing the legalities. John Key himself has condoned and defended the hacking on this basis. It is my view that it is a mistake to confuse legal justification on the one hand with moral or ethical justification on the other.”
The claim that the accessing of the site was legal is bunkum. Under the Crimes Act “access” in relation to a computer system is defined as “instruct, communicate with, store data in, receive data from, or otherwise make use of any of the resources of the computer system”.
As you say section 252 makes it an offence for someone to “intentionally accesses, directly or indirectly, any computer system without authorisation, knowing that he or she is not authorised to access that computer system, or being reckless as to whether or not he or she is authorised to access that computer system.” Even if the other sections were not breached it seems abundantly clear that this section was.
We have had the debate in the past but to me it has always been very clear. The site was crippled. The nats had a field day. Of course you are right that even if it was somehow not illegal the morality of their behaviour sucks.
Oh, I think Rocky has conclusively proven that their actions were illegal. Now for Labour to do something about it.
What sucks is the absolute stupidity of the Sysop’s leaving such an important back door wide open for anybody to take a look inside.
I’d agree. However I’d also say that it is damn easy to do. I’d expect that almost everyone who has set up a apache site has managed to do it at some stage. Even if it was only in practice.
It pains me to say it, but I don’t see unlawful activity here. My involvement with such things is more to do with copyright and licencing than with data privacy, but that involvement has taught me the basic principle that if you put files on a public-facing web server, you’re publishing them. For example, if I upload copyrighted material to my web site but don’t link to it, the copyright owner can nevertheless claim that I published their copyrighted material.
Which means, in this case, the analogy isn’t so much leaving your door open and someone coming in and taking stuff, it’s more like putting confidential files in a public waiting area and figuring it’ll be OK because you hid them behind a pot plant. It won’t be OK, and you can hardly complain when people find the files and read them.
What do you think about the morality of what they did? And why did Ede use dynamic IP addresses if they had nothing to hide?
Morally abhorrent any decent person discovering it would have informed the party immediately. Certainly not downloaded / taken screen shots to use against a political party or donor. Obviously the pms office wouldn’t have wanted to get caught red handed looks and is terrible. Slater probably didn’t care…
Guess its fair to say they will reap what they have sown now it is in the public arena rather than a suspicion or unprovable common knowledge as it was previously…
“Morally abhorrent any decent person discovering it would have informed the party immediately” just like Nicky Hager did? The moral high ground is impossible to take on this even given Rocky’s great effort to do so.
As Psycho Milt has stated, these were details ‘published’ on the Labour website, whether they were meant to be or not is an issue for Labour to sort out (although it doesn’t give you confidence in there ability to control a country when they can’t even lock down personal details on their website). Slaters emails wer hacked, i.e not published, this is illegal and the use of these illegally obtained documents is morally wrong and potentially illegal (Slater is no better with the Bloomfield case).
Here is a similar situation: http://thestandard.org.nz/this-is-going-to-be-big/ The big difference being this wasn’t on a public website (which is worse)
My favourite comment:
Colonial Viper8.1.1.2
15 October 2012 at 11:06 am
Its important to realise that this isn’t an IT problem. This is a massive failure of competence and leadership.
National will try and spin this as a minor technical glitch.
From what I can see, MSD left virtually every part of their internal networks completely open. Any polytech student who has a 1 year network admin course knows not to do that and how to prevent it.
Was it morally right then?
Of course it was Bob , the other side did it and that makes it just fine
Yes, any decent person would have. Since they didn’t and they planned to use the data for unethical ends and that they obviously weren’t supposed to have access to that data we can conclude that the law was not, and never will be, on their side.
Re the morality of what they did, you just have to compare it with Keith Ng’s response to finding confidential files publicly available on MFD servers to realise Ede and Slater are scum and that the Prime Minister is declaring himself scum-by-association in publicly backing Ede. I was just responding to the claim that what they did was unlawful – it doesn’t look like it was unlawful to me, but it’s instructive that “it wasn’t illegal” has now joined “it was within the rules” as a catchphrase of the Key government…
Psychol: it wasn’t illegal” has now joined “it was within the rules” as a catchphrase of the Key government…
I think that’s the most important point, same as mickysavage has claimed. It was not illegal. But yes, it was immoral. An important distinction. Woe the country where what is not illegal is determined to be moral.
I’m on your side here, but I honestly can’t believe that Ede using dynamic IP addresses is anything other than him (like the rest of NZ) having no reason to purchase a static IP address.
The IPV4 space is crowded so ISPs prefer to use dynamic ip addresses as it means they have to hold less addresses because they can cycle them. It’s not some 1337 hax0rz type shit, it’s just what every nz’er has. What that discussion really shows is agency, which is more troubling.
There is an email in the book where Ede says “thank you for dynamic IP Addresses.”
Presumably he is not thanking any specific person, but saying something like “thank god for dynamic IP addresses”.
That doesn’t mean he’s gone deliberately out of his way to acquire dynamic IP addresses (as Chris says, they are the default offering in NZ). It may mean that he has access to a service that he knows has a static IP address, and instead has deliberately chosen to use one which has dynamic IP addresses.
But I think we should give him the benefit of the doubt in this case and just say that dynamic IP address, given that they’re the default, are not any proof of nefarious behaviour here.
When you have a dynamic IP address you can use it to your advantage by turning your modem off and on so as to be allocated a new IP address ( from the same pool). Normally the IP address would last for a few days before it was refreshed and might not change even then.
The Oily Orca sought to hit back at me at one stage by publishing the IP address of my comments on his blog. As my computer wasnt connected to a company ( static) network some of his commentators looked up the physical location using the usual methods and thought they pinned me down to a location in near Mt Eden Prison. Of course to my amusement, they didnt realise this was just the location of a Vodafone server farm
Whether the IP addresses are cycled rapidly or not is rather irrelevant, as your own example illustrates: dynamic IP addresses will geo-locate to server farms or ISPs, not people’s residences or businesses.
If he was thanking God for dynamic IP addresses, he must have known he was up to know good with it. Otherwise, why the thanks?
I don’t thank God for anything much when I’m putter about on the internet. But then, I’m not knowingly doing things I think may be illegal. If Ede was thanking God for the benefits of anoymity, he must have had some inkling that he was doing, or had done, something shady.
The media doesn’t understand that Chris. No one does. ISP’s obviously record these things and they can turn up the actual account given any ip address in no time when the police sent then a warrant.
But perhaps Jason was more referring to the reverse ip: for dynamic ip addresses that leads to nothing, for static it usually gives more interesting information like .nationalparty.org.nz.
PM: doesn’t matter. Picking up stuff in a lobby would be theft.
As has been said elsewhere: leaving stuff on a public server is more akin to finding stuff in a library.
But you can’t take stuff away from the library without authorisation i.e. through using a library card.
But you can photocopy the pages you want in the library and leave with them… or take a picture… then put the book back on the shelf… Poor anology
I think photocopying a book would be a bit illegal. There’s rules about that sorta thing. Even schools are told they can only copy 10%, or something like that. And that’s an explicitly given exemption to the general rule. The default is that you aren’t to do it.
So the attack on the analogy is also poor …
If the library had a secure room with authorised access only, but someone left the door to that open, and you knew you weren’t allowed in, then just being in there would be trespass.
Whether you read, borrowed, copied or stole anything in there, the fact that ytopu were allowed in the main floor of the library does not mean that you were automatically allowed in the secure room. Yes, the person who left the door open would be in the shit, but you still walked bast the “authorised person’s only” sign.
Come on. You know that taking stuff is worse than looking.
Yes going in was wrong on National’s behalf, but the fact that emails were stolen from whale oil then used is far worse.
[lprent: Actually it isn’t. The intent revealed in the book was quite clear. Slater and Ede both copied the information and intended to use it maliciously. There is no difference to the hacker who accessed Slaters site. That constitutes the same crime. Read the Crimes Act (and probably our policy as well).
As a matter of simple interest in the degrees of hypocrisy on the right, do you apply the same logic to Cameron copying a hard drive stolen from Blomfield? ]
when it comes to information law, looking is taking.
No, there is no way that Slater et al accessing Labour’s data was legal.
It might have been easy for Slater to access the data (which if so, is Labour’s fault). But just because something is easy doesn’t make it legal.
Slater (and Ede) were not authorised to access that data. That is the sole test.
Now, Slater and Ede could try to claim that due to the circumstances (easily accessible, etc) that they mistakenly assumed that they were authorised to access it. However, once they were aware of the content of the data, it would not be reasonable for them to continue to assume that. And their apparent conversations and subsequent conduct make it clear that they did not think they were authorised to access it.
I stand corrected – a VUW law professor thinks it probably was unlawful, which kind of trumps my ignorance-based assessment.
That’s a great article Psycho, thanks for bringing that up.
That’s exactly right and what I’ve been saying. Leaving the door open in this case is the wrong analogy.
They (whoever) put documents on a ‘public’ web server.
by mistake.
weka: by mistake
Which is not a legal defence.
against what?
I think you’ll find that it is. People have, IIRC, been prosecuted for theft after walking in a door that had been left open on purpose and taking stuff. They hadn’t been invited in and they certainly hadn’t been invited to take stuff.
I’d love for this to be tested.
It will fall over though, but putting those documents on a public web server, technically, kinda fucks any argument you have.
Nope. The door accidentally left open applies perfectly – according to NZ law.
Yep this is also the defense of those who take cars with keys in lock at petrol stations, open display goods in public areas such as shops and anything that is not bolted to the floor. Good one, every wrong doing has a mitigator – congrats.
CANON – Canon Media Award-winning right-wing blogger Cameron “Whale Oil” Slater
, I just feel the need to write that All The time now..
+1
😈
The reference to leaving house open is incorrect when it comes to a web page that is unsecure. Email maybe, where a password is usually required to access…
The unsecure webpage is more like leaving you laptop in public and expecting it to still be there days later.
Sure, its morally wrong to take someone elses property but no illegal in that case and we know not to do it lest we lose all our stuf…
You have a strange idea about what is criminal or not. Perhaps you should read the crimes act
Flippants on fire I think you had better read Criminal Law just because you find something someone has lost if you Don’t hand it into the Police station you can be Charged with Theft!
But deliberatly steeling something with intent i.e. like slater and the Deceased drivers mates they have both broken the Law .
.i.e. John key using the SIS GSCB and the police to gain political advantage is also breaking the law!
SlaterGate is bringing out some interesting arguments from under the veil of what’s good for the country!
Brain Fade Key’s you can trust me I Know Every body on the list who is being spied on is coming back to bite him .
And you Right Whingers can’t bear the the thought of him being outed!
Yes, this mindset and support within is why NZ is becoming so quickly a country that is being avoided by all but the parasitic investors.
There is no equivalence between leaving your house door open and putting things on a website open to the public.
You put things on a public website so that people can look. There was no hacking of the Labour website in this case. The house equivalent would be putting a big sign outside saying “come help yourself” and then leaving an open door.
Whoever put the membership stuff in the public portion made a mistake. Accusing folks of hacking in this case is just wrong. There were no locks to be picked or avoided.
Excellent argument Andrew. Ipso facto it was on a public webserver…
Ahhh here come the march of the morally decadent.
If National and it’s agents were moral agents, it would have informed the Labour Party that its systems were not secured, instead of pissing on the privacy rights of thousands of Labour Party supporters.
But that was the point right?
I agree it was immoral. But that’s not the point this post is making.
You’ve been denying the point that the post was making the entire time – and haven’t put forward an argument yet. And everything you’ve agreed with is wrong.
The intent to get the file list was to breach the public part of the website. This is why they passed the info among each other. Plus downloading the database is definitely taking something you are not entitled to.
Its a pity the former typewriter salesman who started it all is out of the country and cant be ‘doorknocked’
It was a crippled website. Really weird to think that a house that has been hit by an earthquake can be raided with legal and moral impunity.
It wasn’t crippled in anyway. Someone deleted the .htaccess file.
did that not cripple the security?
Glad you’re not my defence lawyer, Andrew! The law around accessing computers (which Rocky partially covers in the OP) is clear. If you know you’re not supposed to have access but snoop anyway, you have committed a crime. If you disseminate what you find, knowing that you do not have right of access, for gain or to disadvantage another, then you commit a further offence.
I think Slater has a similar defence to Hager (acting in the public interest, though his journalistic credentials are a lot vaguer than Hager’s). Ede has no defence. He knew it was wrong and laughed about how he was hiding his tracks. I think there is a very good chance Ede is going to be arrested. The question is whether PC Plod will wait until the election is over to feel his collar.
It’s probably not as clear as you think. From a link posted in this thread:
A public webserver is not a lobby, and it’s not a house.
You miss the point. It’s not an argument about property rights. It’s a breach of the Crimes Act (well, 2 breaches to be precise). Knowingly going into a computer system without authorisation and/or disseminating the info is criminal behaviour. Ede’s email about hiding his tracks shows he had a guilty mind. That’s crucial to proving a charge. It’s the intent to harm (the use of the info) that will be at the heart of any case against Ede.
So, if a shopkeeper leaves their wallet on the counter of their shop for a few seconds, and someone steals it…. the thief hasn’t broken the ,law?
If you someone says “may I have your wallet” and the shopkeeper responds “yes” then I’d hazard a guess that no law has been broken.
It wasn’t on a website. It was in a directory that required people to actually look for it.
Rocky: The public website had no links to the donor database that could result in them being confused for the same computer system.
It seems you are unaware that the material was indexed by Google. If what whaleoil did was a crime, is the Labour Party going to sue Google as well? Labour didn’t sue in 2011 for a very good reason.
Interesting. The parallel here is the PM telling Slater how to craft correct searches via the OIA to get the dirt he wanted Slater to find. Without having already acquired information unethically, search an OIA (or Google search) would never have been successful. This was an unethical backwards/parallel reconstruction, in other words.
According to Slater he was pressured to pull his OIA http://www.whaleoil.co.nz/2014/08/two-biggest-lies-hagers-book/ not to put one in,
“The parallel here is the PM telling Slater how to craft correct searches via the OIA to get the dirt he wanted Slater to find” You better watch what you are saying there Tat, that seems to be touching on slander, unless you have proof of the PM being involved with anything? Nicky Hager has made it clear he doesn’t.
“According to Slater”??? Baawhhaaahahaha. Let John Key take court action then. I hear that there’s a line.
That is a fairly unethical response from a man spouting on about ethics, with hypocrisy like that you should join the Labour Party….oh wait
Bereft the boring Keys involvement with the SIS speeding up the release of politicly damaging files for the benefit of National needed to be exposed at any cost !
The very man the prime minister who was a shoe in at the Elections anyway couldn’t be trusted could even trust his own abilities now from Hero to Zero!
This shows Key will stoop lower than low.
Now you are the latest in the line of dirty tricks brigade looking all clean and above board, coming on here to undermine democracy like Slater and Key you must be well down the Rank!
“Keys involvement with the SIS speeding up the release of politicly damaging files for the benefit of National needed to be exposed at any cost !” See reply to CV above, that seems to be touching on slander, unless you have proof of the PM being involved with anything? Nicky Hager has made it clear he doesn’t.
So many people claiming the moral high ground in their comments along the lines of this post and then revert to slander! Where is that moral line again?
Are you trying to deliberately shut discussion up with your “it might be slander” bullshit? Like I said above, if the man thinks he has a case, he can bring charges up and it can go to court. There’s going to be a lot of questions for him to answer, though.
I am trying to point out that you cannot get on your high horse talking about morals and ethics while talking unsubstantiated slanderous bullshit. That is just playing ‘Dirty Politics’ and brings you down to the same level as Cameron Slater, an irony obviously completely lost on you.
BdB – Using Google is morally wrong! Unless it holds information about National politicians, then it is freely available information which is fine to use without any moral issues.
Bob, using google is not morally wrong, pissing on the privacy rights of thousands of Labour Party supporters instead of warning the sysop that the system was wrongly configured, that’s the part which is “morally wrong.”
Not that I expect you to get that through your rather obvious spin and bullshit, of course.
The Labour Party were the ones pissing on their supporters, just like you said here don’t try to spin this:
http://thestandard.org.nz/this-is-going-to-be-big/
Colonial Viper8.1.1.2
15 October 2012 at 11:06 am
Its important to realise that this isn’t an IT problem. This is a massive failure of competence and leadership.
National will try and spin this as a minor technical glitch.
From what I can see, MSD left virtually every part of their internal networks completely open. Any polytech student who has a 1 year network admin course knows not to do that and how to prevent it.
[citation needed]
Because the site was wide open with no restrictions it was all indexed by Google, including the donor lists and other files stored in the /backups directory. You could download those files directly from the Google cache without going anywhere near the labour.org.nz server.
For a week or so the facepalmiest search on the Internet was
https://www.google.com/search?&q=site%3Ahealthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz+password
because then Google would show you every document on labour.org.nz that contained a password. One of the most cringeworthy results was the config file (with login credentials) for the internal SQL server. And because it was cached by Google all that stuff was still up and searchable and downloadable long after labour.org.nz got locked down.
Cite? Well… it all worked when I did it.
I don’t recall that being what slater did in his instructional youtube video, however.
He wasn’t googling, he was navigating the system directly.
Yeah, I was just responding to Draco, who was searching for some sort of verification about the site being indexed by Google. I have no idea what Slater’s video showed.
It’s like the people commenting have not read or understood Rocky’s post. Her point is not how accessible the material was but rather whether the person accessing it was authorised or thought they had authorisation to access it.
This was not material accidentally published to the front page of a website, it was clearly not meant for public access or dissemination.
As an aside this is often what “hacking” involves finding places where security does not exist and going in and taking material.
If I was in the reception of an office building and found a dossier of confidential documents amongst the magazines it would be clear to me that despite them being amongst other reading material they were not meant for me to read. The case with Slater and Ede required even more work to find and access than this.
Ede’s fear of being outed goes some way to proving that he did not believe he should be poking around in that material.
“If I was in the reception of an office building and found a dossier of confidential documents amongst the magazines it would be clear to me that despite them being amongst other reading material they were not meant for me to read.”
Yip. I’d like to see someone in a hospital find a bunch of patient files in the waiting area, and merrily pick them up and read them as if they were intended for public reading, like a stack of womens day magazines.
Anyone who came across this Labour donor information knew that it was private information that was accidentally put onto the website. Therefore, by knowingly choosing to read it (beyond the initial identification of what it was), and further publish it, they broke the law.
Lanthanide, the question is whether a public webserver is an office building or an hospital. I suspect courts will think it’s more like a library.
And there is no difference, legally or morally, whether you happened to find a dossier of obviously private information in an office, a hospital or a library or anywhere else.
Yip.
So say I go to the library, and find a file of information that is clearly patient information from a nearby hospital.
Berend’s strange logic seems to be, that because it is in a library, it’s ok to read through all of these details, and then also publish them or do whatever I want with them.
But yet if I found the same file of patient information in a hospital waiting room, that would be illegal?
Lanthanide: Berend’s strange logic
If you had perused my comments here, you would seen I make no such claim. This post was about the legality, not the morality. Don’t confuse the two.
If you find something in a library, I’m pretty sure you can make a good case that what you found there was for public consumption. Because if it wasn’t, it would be there right?
The second legal issue is for those who should have secured that data. They really failed in a legal sense.
I hope you are also arguing that because Nicky Hager had stolen emails, he did not have the right to publish confidential correspondence that was never intended to be public, 1. by the very fact that it was secured (but hacked), 2. Nicky knew it was stolen, 3. He used stolen information for private gain.
Unlike hollow man where we had a whistle blower, this book is on far shakier ground legally speaking.
“If you find something in a library, I’m pretty sure you can make a good case that what you found there was for public consumption. Because if it wasn’t, it would be there right?”
No. Not even slightly. Not at all.
The analogy is finding obviously private information in a public place.
Your logic falls at the first hurdle.
“This post was about the legality, not the morality.”
Did you even bother to read the post, Bellend?
It is of course about finding data that can be reasonably assumed to be private, that happens to be in a public place.
Patient records from a hospital should be reasonably assumed to be private, because of their nature.
Donor records for labour party members should be reasonably assumed to be private, because of their nature.
Now, if the Labour party had directly linked to the records on their site, and said “hey everyone, look here at this”, then you would have a point. But they did not do such a thing – what they did is the equivalent of leaving a file folder on a table on a library. But there was no invitation for people to look at it, and anyone who opened the file folder, saw what the contents was, would think “this is private information that has been accidentally left here, I shouldn’t read it any further and should report it to the librarians”.
It’s more like a precious book being in a glass case in the library when the glass case has been unintentionally left unlocked. The library had the book in a public place, obviously didn’t want the public to have access to it but didn’t correctly secure it.
No, the analogy of being left on a library table is more apt.
The Labour party did not deliberately store this information on a public-facing webserver, which is what you are suggesting by saying it was in a glass case.
a library table behind the librarian’s desk.
“I hope you are also arguing that because Nicky Hager had stolen emails, he did not have the right to publish confidential correspondence that was never intended to be public”
Yes he did. Public interest in this case overrides privacy rights. Privacy rights are not absolute, which I’m sure you know given you have cited the Privacy Act today.
I’m curious as to what you think about the Blomfield case.
A list of people who donate to the Labour Party is not in the public interest?
But stolen private correspondence used for private gains is in the public interest?
“A list of people who donate to the Labour Party is not in the public interest?”
Generally, no.
If there was a particular individual who made a big deal about hating the Labour party, and how despicable they were, and it was then discovered that they donated sizeable amounts of money (minor amounts wouldn’t be a big deal), that could be in the public interest.
But the names and addresses of everyday NZers who have no public profile is not.
Slater, Collins and other figures do have very high public profiles, and the things discussed in the correspondence does have public interest. Note that Hager did not publish personal private information about Slater which he said he also had in the correspondence, because it was not in the public interest.
“A list of people who donate to the Labour Party is not in the public interest?”
No. Why would it be? The law specifies donations of certain amounts are made public, apart from that there is no public interest except as Lanth describes.
“But stolen private correspondence used for private gains is in the public interest?”
You need to rewrite that sentence so it means something. No-one is arguing that there is public interest in Slater/Ede/Key because the book is for sale.
It’s of great interest to the Right Wing, and their well oiled, whale oiled smear and black listing machinery.
Which for some on the right equates to the public interest.
No, because you can read the information and see what it is. Once you read it, it should be obvious that it is private information and you know that it shouldn’t really be in the library. The correct thing to do is then turn the information over to the appropriate authorities. You could report the fact that you found this information to the press so they could make a report about bla-and-bla being careless in handling private information.
If used that information for private gain, e.g. sold the information, then it would be illegal. Of course, if you discover something in the information that is of public interest, then you would have a defence for publishing or revealing that particular piece of information.
wtl: No, because you can read the information and see what it is.
I think you are arguing from a moral point of view (I agree with that), but the legal point of view may well be very different (and I think it is).
You’re wrong.
As detailed in the post, if you know it’s meant to be private and you know it’s not for you, it’s illegal.
I think that this exchange is revealing a heck of a lot about Berend’s attitudes to security, information confidentiality, and privacy ethics.
not to mention the relative priority of things.
Rocky: It is quite clear that Nicky Hager has been very thoughtful and careful in his assessment of the public interest.
Not true. Just one example: in his books he repeats an allegation that Hon. Peter Dunne receives money from the tobacco industry without declaring it. What’s the public interest in that? There is no proof. All we can rely on is that he 1. he correctly has read stolen emails, 2. take his word this was even in the emails. And what was in these emails? An attempt by whaleoil to use this tactic to take out Peter Dunne. That’s all!! There was no conceivably public interest to put this in the book. He has come out defending this, but this is just an example of the dirty tactics employed by Nicky: just put it out there, and the media will report on it. One person puts dirty unproven allegations on his blog, the other in a book.
Oh don’t be an asshole.
Peter Dunne taking money from the Tobacco industry then issuing pro-Tobacco statements is knowledge which is very much in the public interest.
Knowledge of this coming out may not be in Peter Dunne’s interest, but he’s a big lad, he doesn’t need you to defend him – if he can deliver any facts contrary to these allegations.
Colonial Viper: if he can deliver any facts contrary to these allegations.
Guilty until you can prove the contrary. Wasn’t that one of Labour’s policies?
Oh bullshit. An allegation has been made, and Dunne can refute it any time he likes.
You seem a bit desperate to defend Ede and Slater. Why?
felix: An allegation has been made, and Dunne can refute it any time he likes.
That’s really the world you want to live in?
Um, that actually is the world we live in?
Dunne hasn’t been convicted of anything. An allegation has been made. That’s all.
Just like when an allegation was made that Labour had received thousands of dollars in donations from Donghua Liu, which turned out to all be crap in the end.
I find it difficult to interpret Bellend’s bizarre question as anything other than a veiled threat.
Can’t say I like it much either.
Berend is just a defender of the principles of law and order. Or is that protecting the powerful and the establishment from the masses, etc.
Careerist lick spittles, they always multiply.
Gee Bellend, that’s the fastest development of a moral compass from thin air I’ve ever seen.
Was the door open? I think the analogy needs explaining. I was of the impression that a certain level of technical expertise was needed that most people wouldn’t have, so it’s more like climbing through an open window but only if you are physically capable of shimmying up the drainpipe first.
weka, it was indexed by Google. It was stored in the Google cache. You didn’t even have to retrieve it from the Labour Party public web servers.
Can you explain that a bit more? The credit card details of Labour supporters were on part of the Labour party website, google indexed and cached them because it wasn’t secure, and then those details turned up in a google search? What kind of keywords would have been needed for the search?
I can be wrong (only had a quick look), but I think it was sufficient to simply ask Google to list all urls stored on the healthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz site (and other sites).
So no specific keyword was needed. Simply ask Google: what urls do you have cached for this site?
Ok, so you are arguing that the Labour party left the website public, but you don’t actually know how it was done? You appear to be a geek, so what are you basing your opinions on if not technical know-how of what actually happened?
At that time whaleoil extensively documented how/where the information was accessed with relevant links to the Google caches (now expired).
Whaleoil is not a reliable source of information on this (or anything). So can I now take it that despite you having technical expertise, your opinion is based on the blog of a known liar and manipulator but you still don’t know what actually happened?
Technically I’m restricted from posting here, I think until after the election, but this one is on-point so hopefully the moderators will let it through and if they do I thank them for their courtesy.
Discussion here at TS of the technical ins-and-outs of how the Labour webserver was publishing info to the world took place at the time back in June 2011, mainly in this thread:
http://thestandard.org.nz/blown-up-in-nationals-faces/
There’s a lot of info there that would otherwise need to be copied and pasted into this thread, so go and read if you’re actually interested.
What the Labour server administrator appeared to have done was make a simple mistake involving multiple domain names being served off the same running instance of the apache webserver, and at least one of them (healthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz) was set up to publish the contents of the server to the world. At the same time someone had unwisely used that server as a backup file location for a repository of confidential files, so they too were being published to the world. All that information was duly picked up by the Google search engine as it indexed the contents of the Internet, so (for example) one could just say (as Berend de Boer commented above)
“Google, list for me all the files that are marked as viewable by the public at the server healthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz”
…and you could browse through them to your heart’s content.
More specifically you could say
“Google, list for me all the files that match the following conditions: marked as viewable by the public AND contain the word ‘donors’ at the server healthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz”
…and Google would comply.
And, since Google makes its own copy of anything it indexes unless told otherwise, you could very specifically say
“Google, list for me all the files that match the following conditions: marked as viewable by the public AND contain the word ‘donors’ AND are of the type ‘Excel spreadsheet’ AND were indexed on the server healthyhomeshealthykiwis.org.nz AND have a duplicate copy archived within the Google search engine”
…and Google would comply. Then you could click on whichever spreadsheet took your fancy and download it from Google. Note: FROM GOOGLE.
How does one talk to google exactly?
The law makes no distinction about where the information was obtained – only whether it would be considered private. So regardless of whether it was obtained via Google or the website itself, if the person who obtained the information clearly knew it wasn’t intended for the general public, they would be in breach of the law if they used it for their own gain.
and Labour apologised unreservedly
http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/politics/5139124/Labour-says-database-use-breaches-privacy
.
So Jason Ede ( our own little Andy Coulson perhaps?) could be leaving the 9th floor anytime soon with some blue company perhaps? Just who was Jason working for and who was supervising him if JK denies the honour. oh to be at NAct headquarters.
Cunliffe during his excellent monologue on Radio Live today said he had some staffer try & ring Ede yesterday & the phone call went through the parliament switchboard.
For the people arguing the open door allows access, does that mean that the MSD’s mistake trumps privacy law? Did the people on Labour’s database lose their privacy rights too?
Excellent post, Rocky. Explains the issues, law and ethics very clearly.
It is worth reading this about the fact NZ courts are not treating digital data as property.
Is that being applied to music and video too?
I think the correct analogy in this situation is to view the internet as if it were a library. People come in and browse wherever they are able to go. There is only an issue of illegality if people break through an area that has been locked or prohibited from entry. If Labour hadn’t locked up the areas they wanted to keep private, I can’t see any issue with people browsing.
So you are ok with anyone accessing, copying and using for their own purposes the personal data of CYFS clients held by the MSD that Keith Ng was able to find?
weka: So you are ok with anyone accessing,
Seems the MSD was ok with it, given they didn’t secure it…
So if pay a locksmith to put a lock on my door, and they don’t do it properly, that means I’m ok with anyone coming into my house even if I don’t know that the lock is not working properly?
The MSD were patently not ok with it, because once the access was brought to their attention it was immediately fixed. Futher, irrespective of the MSD view, the people’s whose information they had collected and were holding still have rights under the law. So my question still stands.
My sympathy is definitely not with businesses who take short cuts in securing their information.
Obviously. But the MSD is not a business, neither is the Labour party. And my question is about the rights of the people whose information is being stored, not the people who are storing it.
Those people should have sued MSD. The way to deal with this is not to prosecute the whistleblower. MSD had clear statutory duties to secure their client’s private data.
“The way to deal with this is not to prosecute the whistleblower”
Oh, I completely agree, which is why all the focus on Hager using the emails is bullshit.
“Those people should have sued MSD.”
What, children in foster care? Seriously?
Irrespective of that, the issue is still whether you, and tsmithfield believe that if someone fails in their statuatory obligations to protect data that the people whose data it is should lose their rights and that anyone who accesses the data can do what they want with it.
weka: whether you believe that if someone fails in their statuatory obligations to protect data that the people whose data it is should lose their rights and that anyone who accesses the data can do what they want with it.
I’ll answer you if you can answer this question for me: whaleoil failed in keeping his email secure (mind you, he had it secured), does that give Nicky Hager the right to publish details and gossip about everyone mentioned in those details? Have they lost their rights?
No, it doesn’t, and no they haven’t. Can you please answer my question now?
You need to include public interest concepts into this or you are leaving out an important aspect.
Nicky Hager made it quite clear that there was a lot of personal stuff in the emails that he would not publish. He has standards. The Seaslug army don’t.
By the way, your arguments about Labour not caring about the security of their donor list reminds me a lot of people saying women who wear miniskirts at night deserve to be raped.
I agree with you: people have not lost their rights, and those who accessed that data cannot do with it what they’d like.
So tsmithfield’s analogy is incorrect.
Edit: as is your using it elsewhere in this thread (the analogy of the library).
My analogy is still correct. If I am in the library and I find that someone has left a stack of private letters lying around by accident, I don’t have the right to take them and publish them.
That’s different to what you said originally,
I think the correct analogy in this situation is to view the internet as if it were a library. People come in and browse wherever they are able to go. There is only an issue of illegality if people break through an area that has been locked or prohibited from entry. If Labour hadn’t locked up the areas they wanted to keep private, I can’t see any issue with people browsing.
There you say that if the access is freely available to the public, then people can read the information (and presumably use their knowledge of that information). Now you are saying that some information is private irrespective of whether it is in the public domain or not.
See the case of Brambles in australia and citibank v blomkampf and white for a discussion of use of private data.
A disk of client information, legally obtained, could not be published because the clients never gave permission for their data to go public.
Labour party donors and members have to have given permission for their stuff to be publicly released, otherwise it cannot be used.
Yep, good analogy except of course how much of the information browsed was public information? And if private information was accessed how much of it was used by Slater as an attempt to score points?
Just had a look at Whale oil – he even posted a video on You Tube boasting about how he accessed the info!
The problem is he accessed the parts of website that contained credit card info.
There is no way that Labour would have ever intended for this kind of info to be made public.
So I reckon while good, your analogy falls apart when this is taken into account & that Rocky’s analogy of the opportunistic burglar taking stuff because a door was left open fits a lot better.
If we are going to have a go at analogies, and websites non-public information is free to publish publicly when it contains sensitive material, have you ever seen that reference section at the library? You know with all that potentially sensitive information in it.
Or go a step further, if the library is a free for all then doesn’t that mean we can all go onto the library staffer’s computers if they leave their desks unattended & computers unlocked & copy the info for our own benefit?
Hell, skip the library altogether. Why don’t we all just walk in the Beehive and grab any documents not locked away securely?
OMG we totally should, I mean it’s not like we’d be doing anything wrong! Oh hang on, that’s right, it’s one rule for the guttersnipes born with a silverspoon in their mouth but entirely another for the rest of us! 😉
I saw someone on Kiwiblog yesterday try to defend Slater et al’s access to Labour’s documents as being the same as if someone had left a couch on the side of the road & then complained when it was taken. Ridiculous.
This person seems to be unfamiliar with the Crimes Act as even if you say, see stuff left outside the Salvation Army you cannot legally take it as it is deemed to be a gift therefore the property of the Sallies. How do I know this? I left a whole heap of stuff for the Sallies as knew they would be round to check within the next hour & some little scrote had the audacity to take it. Luckily like most thieves he was dumb enough to try & sell it on Trade Me so I managed to track him down & he got charged with theft (amongst many other things as tends to be the case with such people).
Further & more importantly the Labour party didn’t deliberately leave their website wide open for the world to see, they didn’t put up a sign saying ‘here you go, a free for all, have a nose & take what you want’ so unfortunately for Slater this has more in common with an opportunistic burglar stealing something from an unlocked house than it does with taking junk left on the side of the road.
The big question is why didn’t Labour pursue this earlier?
As for the hacking of Cameron’s blog, Facebook & Gmail – this was illegal as is the publication of those emails.
As far as I am concerned they should ALL be charged – someone needs to take the higher ground as illegally accessing and/or taking private information without someone’s specific permission & using it to your own advantage shouldn’t be OK with anyone ever.
That said sunlight is the best disinfectant (as Slater often loves to say!) so it is good to see the sun shining so brightly on him to the point that no one can deny he is truly an awful person whose convictions last about as long as it takes for the next cheque to come in the post. As someone who was completely duped by what I thought was his sincere convictions on some issues (until he picked on a 10 year old boy last year – called him Fat, crap & dumb & claimed just because the boy said himself he felt fat & crap that it was OK to call him dumb), I am hopefully that this will be the start of people finally realising he is nothing more than an uneducated, foul-mouthed, morally repugnant, bottom-feeding guttersnipe.
unsol: Further & more importantly the Labour party didn’t deliberately leave their website wide open for the world to see,
Yes they did. It was indexed by Google.
@ Berend, you are missing the point, but I will play. OK, so even if they deliberately left their door unlocked or even invited Slater in for tea the law still doesn’t say this gives the intruder or guest the right to take something does it? Or is it that it is just no OK for someone to walk in & take your TV, but it is OK for Slater to take confidential Labour party info? I will never be a Labour voter, but that doesn’t mean I can’t see the issue for what it is – screaming hypocrisy on the part of Slater & possibly the Nats (like I said yesterday I have my doubts as to how far this reaches – my guess it just extends to Collins & a few lackeys including Lusk as I am not convinced Key & Collins are super tight. Farrar appears to be too naive/idealistic to be that involved).
I think what you are trying to ask if it was moral to take that information. No. He should have informed the Labour Party. But I really have very little sympathy for people who leave confidential stuff out in the open. They really failed in their moral obligation. Because that’s what we really should talk about: the Labour Party should have treated their information as they donor would have expected.
What whaleoil did is minor compared to their moral failings.
Berend can you please direct me to the sites that specifically show Labour saying they were OK for the donor credit card & personal info being publicly accessed?
I can’t see anywhere they did say this?
Which means that they made a mistake as may have invited people into their home, but not into their bedrooms with free access to all their drawers……
unsol, I will point you to where Labour said it was OK that their data was publicly accessible, if you can point me to the section in the privacy act where it says that if you simply do not publish a statement to the effect that data can be accessed by anyone, you have fulfilled your legal obligations regarding the requirements of the Privacy Act.
Berend it doesn’t work that way – onus probandi, burden of proof rests with you.
Further it isn’t just about access – Slater copied the info which by Rocky’s definition means he broke the law as it was theft of data so, ignoring the credit card/donor stuff, even if Slater technically had permission to access the labour party sites, he did not access them for the intended purpose.
How many is that? 5-0? We can play this all day, but there is no defending the indefensible.
“Yes they did. It was indexed by Google.”
Citation for Labour doing this deliberately please.
Ever heard of the Privacy Act? It does not recognise “organisation made a mistake they sincerely regret.”
I’m not sure that is exactly true about the Privacy Act, but that in no way answers my question. Did you not understand it?
It does. The simple fact that the data was indexes by Google indicates it was publicly accessible. And I think you can make the case that if your data can be indexed by Google, you intended to have it publicly accessible. Because there is no other intend we use on the internet: if you don’t forbid indexing it, you intend to index it.
If that’s true, it still doesn’t prove that the Labour party intended for the credit card details of its supporters to be publicly accessible eg it could have been the mistake of the person managing the technical side of the website.
Do you have any proof that the NZ Labour party intended for that information to be publicly available?
According to this article there was no credit card data:
fair enough, you can then easily substitute “donor details” in all of my relevant comments.
Can you please answer my question? Do you have proof that the NZ Labour Party intended for that information to be publicly available?
Why didn’t Labour sue Cameron Slater or at least report him to the Police if what he had done was illegal? He was quite open about being able to access their website. There was none of this anonymous hackers nonsense that Hager uses as a defence.
Simple. At the time he was asserting that he wasn’t using it for any neferious intent.
The emails make it quite clear that he was lying about that. His intent was nefarious. That means legally that mens actus now has a mens rea and the police would now be able to make a charge stick.
He is toast. (and perhaps you should learn some law sometime)
246 Receiving
(1) Every one is guilty of receiving who receives any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence, knowing that property to have been stolen or so obtained, or being reckless as to whether or not the property had been stolen or so obtained.
(2) For the purposes of this section, property that was obtained by any act committed outside New Zealand that, if it had been committed in New Zealand, would have constituted an imprisonable offence is, subject to subsection (5), to be regarded as having been obtained by an imprisonable offence.
(3) The act of receiving any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence is complete as soon as the offender has, either exclusively or jointly with the thief or any other person, possession of, or control over, the property or helps in concealing or disposing of the property.
(4) If—
(a) any property stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence has been returned to the owner; or
(b) legal title to any such property has been acquired by any person,—
a subsequent receiving of it is not an offence, even though the receiver may know that the property had previously been stolen or obtained by any other imprisonable offence.
(5) If a person is charged with an offence under this section and the property was obtained by an act committed outside New Zealand, it is to be presumed, unless the person charged puts the matter at issue, that the doing of the act by which the property was obtained was an offence under the law of the place where the act was done
He could still have been reported to the Police regardless of his public position. It would have been up to the Police to make the call whether he was going to use it for nefarious purposes or not, Regardless even if you are correct about his current legal position I have yet to see Labour lay a complaint to the Police about it. We have The Greens doing all sorts of stuff around this (curiously not on getting the Police involved on this though) but not Labour.
🙄
So Labour get a legal opinion saying that Slater hasn’t done anything wrong unless he uses the information nefariously, and you still think that they should report him to the police. Why exactly? So that they can get negative media attention?
She may have said that but Slater admitted many times on his blog he accessed them and made a You Tube video about how he did it.
Slater lied. But apparently that still puts him on higher moral ground than labour, in berends mind anyway
So slater lied?
Maybe not, but the Crimes Act recognises data theft (access may be OK, copying without express permission is not) & accessing information for a purpose other than what was intended…..
That wasn’t an intention that was ignorance. Google indexed it because it’s robots assume everything should be indexed unless requested otherwise by a specific command – the robots can’t tell if an unsecured file is unsecured by intent or ignorance.
Exactly. Google robot indexing isnt authorisation. Only the people, the donors and members could legal authorise the use of their info.
Does anyone know why Labour didn’t pursue a prosecution back at the time? This may reflect the legality of it. I’m assuming Labour would have taken a case at the time if they could have.
It is not until now that the identity of the hackers of the Labour Party site have been identified in order to focus the charges.
Incidentally my adult son found a $20 note on the footpath and handed it in to the Police. (They were stunned.) After some time they gave it to him as it was unclaimed. The contents of the Labour Party site were like the $20.
I believe that to take home a pencil from work is technically theft.
What a load of bullshit.
Slater even put up a you tube video showing the process and how easy it was.
Theft is often easy. Doesn’t mean it’s ok.
Slater admitted he did it. There was no dilemma over who provided him the data. He did it himself.
He claimed he did it himself. He’s probably going to regret that.
And he wouldnt lie… Yet key and others are essentially saying slater was fantasising about his links to them and others.
Whaleoil told everyone he did it back at the time. If they wanted to prosecute they could have done it then. Thats why I assume there is a reason legally that they didn’t.
There is one other difference. I believe Cameron Slater admitted he went in to the Labour Party website and then blogged about how it was unsecured. The information Hager based his book on was hacked and not just accessed randomly.
Yes, what Hager based his book on was hacking in the true sense of the word. It’s very regrettable people are using the word hacking also for cases where you type in a url and get stuff that is not secured and some people don’t want you to see it.
And it seems clear Hager also based his book on information stolen from Curia premises (chapter 9, footnote 17-21, pages 156-157).
How can it be stolen?
According to you, if he is able to access it then it’s all fair game.
If you don’t believe that “if he is able to access it then it’s all fair game”, I assume you sincerely regretted the publication of Nicky’s book, and have begged him not to release it?
Of course not. It is ethically justifiable to publish the information.
In Slater/Ede/Key’s case, no such justification exists.
Using the example of Facebook might help explain the difference.
If I post some pictures on my Facebook page that I was only meaning for certain of my close friends but I fail to set my privacy settings correctly so everybody can see them then when someone does view them they are not hacking my Facebook page. If on the other hand I do set my privacy settings correctly and someone accesses my account directly to get the photos then that is hacking.
Your legal opinions are fascinating, but only from a psychological point of view.
If it was as cut and dried legally as you make out how come Labour never took Cameron Slater to court over the subject? He bragged about accessing the site quite openly at the time
Do I look like the Labour party, dickhead?
charming level of debate
Yes felix has a few problems in that regard.
I’m telling the truth, albeit abrasively.
Gosman is spreading cancer, albeit politely.
And you can go fuck yourself, any way you like.
You are a sensitive sausage aren’t you.
Calm down and breath. Life will be fine.
You’re the one taking offense, fucko. 🙄
And you added…????
Are you seriously suggesting if no one is sued a law wasnt broken?
Politicians and others frequently choose not to sue, not because they have no case but for financial and pr reasons.
No. The analogy is your friends agree to give you their photos but not for public use, you hit the wrong button. Anyone who accesses and uses them needs permission from your friends to use them and not you pudgy fingered person.
The right wing bullies running an orchestrated defend and attack campaign today!
Weren’t you guys banned under other pseudonyms for running the same attack lines!
The only chance you have of stopping Nicky Hager of releasing more damning emails is to stop this orchestrated bullying and admit you have been trying to usurp democracy!
Cameron Slaters attacks on the deceased motorist on the West Coast was what sparked the retaliation Mates of the Deceased driver vowed they would bring Slater Down at any cost now they have done so you guys are up shit creek and still trying to peddle your orchestrated lies and bullying!
The Reason labour have not prosecuted is their is nothing to hide on their website for if their was Slater would have it all out in the Open as he is an a attention seeking Narcissistic bully twice Convicted!
They were conspicuous by their absence yesterday… Hadnt received their lines yet?
Seems the crucial point is being missed – the real concern with Slater vs the Labour party websites is that he accessed credit card info & personal contact info that Labour would never have intended to make public. Slater may not have published this info, but nonetheless he still used it for personal gain (blog ratings/hits against the Labour party).
May I point out that Slater had never intended for his emails to go public? And that Nicky Hager nonetheless has used this for personal gain (selling his book/hits against the National Party)?
Bereft the borer anyone that claims that as the head of the SIS and GSCB says you can trust him as their are only a few people that are being spied on at last count five was Keys words ,
Then uses those spying agencies for his own political gain needs to be outed otherwise democracy doesn’t mean jack ! that may be alright in South Africa but not New Zealand!
I don’t give monKeys uncle if it was the Labour or Greens using the SIS i wouldn’t care if they were outed it just shows we need more Transparency with our spy Agencies!
Re-read my first comment Berend, I haven’t disputed that & in fact think any profits from Hager’s book should be treated as proceeds of crime under the Crimes Act.
But we are talking about the legality of Slater’s access of the Labour party websites, particularly the donor info.
unsol: But we are talking about the legality of Slater’s access of the Labour party websites, particularly the donor info.
Don’t forgot about Google accessing that data too. That’s an easy to understand key point. You think Google was guilty of indexing the data?
The legal point of view is that if the data is not secured, you cannot bring a claim:
The Labour Party did not secure their donor list. And to repeat myself once more: by far the biggest moral and legal issues are with the Labour Party here. What Whaleoil did is irrelevant in comparison. And that’s why the Labour Party didn’t go to court.
That was a very specific search conducted for nefarious purposes, probably reconstructed AFTER Labour’s confidential information had been breached.
My question to you is: why are you spending so much energy defending the unethical but well paid actions of Slater and the PM’s associates? What’s in it for you to do so?
My thoughts entirely.
Mr de Boer seemed pretty quick to take offence at some random statement on RNZ by an interviewer of Pauline Hanson. While nothing to do with this matter – he seems to hold a very selective set of ethical standards.
Indeed. Might have to start flying a few more Combat Air Patrols around The Standard…
So here we are – the slippery slope of the right wing spin doctor. Berend, reading your comments is like watching paint dry.
It’s the lies that hurt
It would be helpful if you pointed out a single lie. And right win spin doctor? You probably don’t know me.
I never said you lied, it’s a phrase that means when you lie to yourself, the only person your hurting, is yourself. I’ll leave that for you to think over.
Well when you talk like a right wing spin doctor, then use their lines
“May I point out that Slater had never intended for his emails to go public? And that Nicky Hager nonetheless has used this for personal gain (selling his book/hits against the National Party)?”
You sound like a right wing spin doctor – so, when the cap fits…
You say that Labour deliberately made all their files on their website open. How is it credible to believe that Labour would deliberately make all their donor files public.
It seems to me that this has gone beyond the point of people being really interested in arguing over the finer points of the law but an effort to divert attention from the content by arguing over the process.
Your indignation at the supposed slight on ACT by RNZ some years back would certainly indicate that you are a right whinger
And this is a classic spin doctor response. A non-answer taking up space.
Bereft de Borer imported right wing fundamentalist christian creationist political strategist and spy!
Bereft de Borer imported right wing fundamentalist christian creationist political strategist and spy!
If we can lay aside all the legal and moral arguments for a second (just so we can get to the nub of the matter)….
Power should always be held to account. Centers of power using given techniques to augment their influence or power is completely different from those seeking to hold them to account using the same given techniques. Maybe there are parallels here with how we view satire. Satire can only be considered as such when it is aimed at the privileged and powerful. Otherwise it is abusive and/or discriminatory. In other words the same or similar dynamics, enacted from different positions of power, can be vastly different to one another in terms of legitimacy and impact.
“Centers of power using given techniques to augment their influence or power is completely different from those seeking to hold them to account using the same given techniques”
Why so? Surely those distinctions are in the eye of the beholder.
You being serious? The motivation of one is utterly self serving while the other is to do with accountability. Hardly ‘eye of the beholder’ stuff.
Hmm that becomes a bit of a circular argument as you are saying the means sometimes justify the ends and I think if we want to complain about a lack of standards then we need to set some standards which should dictate the means must always be above board.
To allow the hacker & Hager to get away with taking/publishing stolen emails because they pose some serious question for the government is to say it was OK for the person who tipped Slater off re Goff vs the SIS because it provided he made false statements.
The law is quite clear when it comes to what the police can and can’t do when it comes to establishing & proving a case against the accused, so why should it treat Hager & his hacker any different?
The intentions behind someone’s wrongdoing are very rarely accepted as a defence in court (e.g. you can’t go & steal of a fraudster just because you want to provide support to their victims) so should not be something that determines our political ethics.
The political ethics should be a set of standards in their own right…….otherwise we do end up going down a slippery slope where Blackstone’s formula is ignored & everyone is assumed guilty & tried in the media or on blogs before all the facts have been established.
I’m not saying anything about ‘means and justified ends’. I’m only commenting on actions of self serving power versus a similar (note: not ‘same’) action that serves to hold that power to account. The former is unconscionable while the latter is an imperative.
Yep I agree in that it is definitely imperative however, there is always a legal way to do these things & Hager has just taken the easy way out – my guess because like most so-called moral crusaders, he is thinking this will benefit him (money in the bank…it’s not like he does an awful lot in between these books is it!).
“You being serious? The motivation of one is utterly self serving while the other is to do with accountability”, it’s still in the eye of the beholder, if Hager wanted to bring the Government to account he could have released this information via the news media, he could have released it via a series of editorials, instead he decided to release it via a book from which (unless I am mistaken) he would recieve all of the royalties from personally.
It could be argued therefore that this is self-serving from Hager rather than holding the Government to account. I don’t remember Snowden or Greenwald having to write a book?
and if it took Hager a year to write the book, what should he live on in the meantime?
I am sure the papers would have paid him for his work and it wouldn’t have taken as long as completing a book, as he could have released this in sections rather than having to go a whole year without income.
On that note though Weka, how did Snowden make a living? How does Slater make a living?
The point being this is not black and white as Bill or Rocky are making it out to be.
Which paper did you have in mind exactly? I can’t think of any that would have let Hager write what he has written in his book.
“On that note though Weka, how did Snowden make a living? How does Slater make a living?”
No idea about Snowden. Slater gets paid by various people who use his website for PR, astroturfing and smear purposes. I would assume he has other sources of income too (click through advertising being one). I don’t see how that’s relevant to your point about Hager though.
Of course it’s fucking black and white Bob.
It seems an elected government has (at least!) contemplated ways in which it could compromise the integrity of journalists, smear and/or compromise various politicians, and given a nod and a wink for ministers to operate in a unilateral and unaccountable fashion (with regard prisoner locations for example). This is just some of what I’ve gleaned from reporting. I haven’t read the book.
Now, what you are suggesting is that any revelation of a ‘roadmap’ relating to any systemic and/or dubious political activities should have been buried unless the ‘roadmap’ was obtained in an ‘above board’ and ‘proper’ manner. In other words, you are arguing that cases of corruption, graft, patronage and such like should be given free passage unless a clear and obvious demonstration that ‘butter_won’t_melt_in_my_mouth_or_in_the_mouth_of_any_persons_either_known_ or_unknown_to_me_who_may_associate_themselves_with_me’, is given by any whistle blower.
Fuck that.
So tsmithfield then the whole concept of propaganda is an illusion? That the state and it’s cohorts don’t use modern psychological methodology to influence great numbers of people? That lies and misdirection by people in power are somehow OK?
I’m confused by your statement, I really am. The right acknowledge it does this things, even the left does, when it’s in power.
Bill I think, an educated guess, is talking about the actions and behaviours of the elites in society. Those who, for want of a better analogy – hold the purse strings. And before anyone goes rabid right on me, yes there are liberal elites and yes they should be held accountable. Actually I think I agree with Chris Hedges on this one, the liberal elites should be held more accountable by the left. Well, they should fear working stiffs at a bear minimum. I digress.
Final point, why shouldn’t we laugh at the buggers at top, they all do stupid shit sometimes, we should be having a laugh at their expense.
Fantastic post Rocky.
I would add the example of hackers stealing 77 million accounts from Sony. There too was an ‘open door’ a security flaw. By National’s logic it’s ok to for hackers to steal anything as long as there is an open door in the security.
National can’t have much faith in the New Zealand public if they expect us to swallow that horrendous argument – It constitutes a pretty basic logical fallacy to assume that because a door is left open, the owner of the property is happy for anyone to take that property and use it for their own means. It is simply a non sequitur.
In fact, now that I think about it, logical fallacies are a common breed among National arguments. Take for example the continuous ad hominems that John Key tacks on to his one word responses to valid and important questions during Parliamentary question time.
Perhaps National expects that our nation is not by and large capable of critical thought? If that’s their gamble, I think they’re going to be sorely mistaken.
KJSOne: By National’s logic it’s ok to for hackers to steal anything as long as there is an open door in the security.
By Nicky Hager’s logic it’s OK to steal information and use that for private gains?
Nope, that’s your logic Bellend.
Citation for where Hager has said that please.
Ah, but he didn’t steal the information, it was leaked to him by others that did, there is a difference, it might not be obvious, but there it is. And in examining this case, I think it is worth turning towards prominent examples of similar instances of leaked documents used by the media.
Take Glen Greenwald over the Edward Snowden case. Another journalist who published documents obtained illegally, for overwhelming public interest.
I’m quite happy for there to be two trials here, a trial for the hacker who stole the documents from Slater, and a trial for those in John Key’s office who instigated the hacking of the Labour parties servers for political advantage and a smear campaign against the then Labour leader. Let a jury of our peers decide the fates of both, that would only be fair.
Regarding the ethics of publishing hacked, stolen or leaked documents, I think one has to examine whether publishing the documents will advance the interests of the public. In this case I think it is very pertinent to know that John Key and his office have not only condoned but encouraged criminal theft and abuse of ministerial power.
Finally, let’s not be distracted from the issue, let us not fall for the smokescreen of alleged hypocrisy, being disseminated as a response tactic from the spin doctors within the National edifice. Let us address the food that’s on the plate before us, rather than incessantly questioning the cook of his credentials.
KJS0ne: I’m quite happy for there to be two trials here
I also think there should be. In the case of Snowden (or the Labour Party donor list that was put on their public webserver) there should be three: against those who had the duty to secure confidential information as well.
One issue you have not mentioned is that making private gains from stuff you know has been stolen, is morally and legally questionable. If this was a journalist on the payroll, or if Nicky had given the proceeds to charity, we would have a different case.
Berend I do not think those who designed Labour’s server protection need to be put on trial as a result of others stealing the documents.
But I do agree that Nicky Hager is going to profit from this ordeal, and that that should be a narrative that is questioned. It’s hard to say what Hager’s intentions are. We can speculate, we can guess, based upon his past actions, but we do not know his mind and it would be unfair to be categorical in making judgments of his character. I do think though that had he decided to give the proceeds to a charity after recouping investment (and he still has that opportunity) his motivations would not be called into question.
That said. This is Hager’s job, it’s the way he earns his living, pays his bills etc. Is it morally reprehensible that he makes his way in the world selling a book that contains leaked documents stolen by hackers? I think it really depends where you’re standing. It’s not a black and white situation, but like many thing in this world a shade of grey.
I cannot argue in good faith though that it is not a question that needs to be asked.
KJS0ne: Berend I do not think those who designed Labour’s server protection need to
Apologies for being unclear. I certainly wasn’t referring to the foot soldiers. But to the party leadership. They control the resources (personnel, time, money).
KJS0ne: is it morally reprehensible that he makes his way in the world selling a book that contains leaked documents stolen by hackers?
Good point. As someone who makes money from securing information I have somewhat sympathetic views for those leaking information obviously, good for business 🙂
Funny how you aren’t pointing any fingers at the NATIONAL PARTY leadership then are you? What is your skin in the game here, my friend?
Actually, you’ve shown yourself to be amoral on the entire issue of information privacy and information ethics, and from your comment here, guided mainly by money and self interest. There are organisations out there who want people like you, for sure.
“I also think there should be. In the case of Snowden (or the Labour Party donor list that was put on their public webserver) there should be three: against those who had the duty to secure confidential information as well.”
What should the Labour leadership be charged with?
“One issue you have not mentioned is that making private gains from stuff you know has been stolen, is morally and legally questionable. If this was a journalist on the payroll, or if Nicky had given the proceeds to charity, we would have a different case.”
What’s the difference between a payroll journo and an independent writer who does investigative journalism? What are the legal questions in that regard? And the moral ones?
Not quite sure why Hager is not entitled to make a living. Given the amount of time involved, it’s ridiculous to expect him to do this on a voluntary basis.
And so it was written, in the book of Berend, “Thos shalt never blow whistle against immoral happenings, unless it is Labour” and the people rejoiced and sung hallelujah to the GodKey.
David: Thou shalt never blow whistle
Eh what? I’m a great Snowden fan. I think Nicky Hager has written a very readable book. Only he has the business acumen to get this publicity and sell this many books.
But the difference is obviously one of leaking versus stolen goods. But we’ll see that play out.
Is there a public interest? Probably.
On your “immoral happenings”, what do you mean there exactly? What Nicky complains about is a style of politics (attack politics), leaking of information through sympathetic channels, and some innuendo. It may be immoral, but I have not read something that is illegal.
Look, Nicky Hager is a political animal, he wants to destroy John Key, and he does that by attacking his image, and linking him to whaleoil. I get all that. But perhaps you can point out what specifically Nicky claims are “illegal” actions, either by whaleoil, or dpf, or John Key, or who else.
Berend de Boer, great defender of the power elite and their establishment machinery, claims to be “a great Snowden fan” but Snowden would immediately identify him as an establishment loyalist technocrat and apparatchik, one of the type that Snowden worked with everyday for years, tell me one thing: you say that Nicky Hager is a “political animal” how is it you are such a “political animal” as well?
Ladies and gentlemen the great Berend de Boer demonstrates the well worn strategies employed in the US against whistle blowers and leakers. Major wrong doing by those in charge or with money or allied to the power elite: minimised or ignored. Minimal wrong doing by those attempting to challenge the narrative of the power elite: a big deal.
See Berend for what he is: a well paid tool of the establishment.
Colonial Viper: See Berend for what he is: a well paid tool of the establishment.
I wish I was! To dispel any such notations I am not: National Party please I’m available for hire.
Hey mate I’ve got nothing against you, other than your intellectual defending of the rotten PR issuing out from the PMs office, that will fuck this country for the 95%
I threw one red herring in, and got a whole net back, hallelujah. Praise be the miracle. Thou hast been annointed by the holy trinity, the GodKey, the son, and the holy penguin.
Did he want to destroy Clark too?
And Mr Slater what do you think he wants, having read Hagers book, and presumably some of what Slater has written over tge years
The opportunity to dent the Tories before this election lies in stirring public outrage. The legal path takes yonks, is technical and bores the general public.
The lines that the public will respond to will be about Fair Play, Decency, Integrity and Mis-use of Taxpayer funds. I heard that formerly-a good-broadcaster Sean Plunket insist that the relevent clause of the Crimes Act be cited by a caller before he would take the Hager book seriously.
The response to the Hager book must be political and emotional: not legalistic.
When a private email from Hone Harawira, in which he referred to ‘white motherfuckers’, was made public – I didn’t hear the Right complaining about the breach of his privacy – nor was he allowed to make the excuse being made by Collins that what’s said in private emails between people should not be made public and has no political relevance. They went into attack mode as did the amygdala brigade.
The difference is that Harawira’s email was leaked. Not stolen. Because that’s a bit of a key problem here. Nicky wrote a book based on STOLEN emails. Not leaked.
What’s the difference between leaked and stolen?
mpledger: What’s the difference between leaked and stolen?
If Nicky Hager doesn’t know the identity of the person who gave him the e-mails than how does he know if they were leaked or stolen. Even if the person says they are stolen, how does Nicky Hager know whether the person is telling the truth or not. A leaker from the National party isn’t going to give themselves away by saying so.
Berend doesn’t have a fucking idea of the difference between “leaked” or “stolen”. All he cares about is whether Hager’s revelations are in the interests of the power elite and the establishment they work from.
Why is this thread so tediously long?? Psycho Milt answered the issue early today – ain’t no crime here chaps. Hacking into WO’s website and stealing private emails may be however.
Let me see. There’s a smoking gun revealing how the PM’s and National’s smear machine co-ordinates a nation wide system of taking down political opponents via Slater, and you are worried about what? Protecting Slater?
“tediously long” to you because your concentration and comprehension span is lousy.
very stimulating and thoughtful for readers who follow the thread and are focused.
Psychmily could be wrong, and i think he is for reasons outlined.
Is slater demanding hager reveal his sources you think?
Hey there’s some juicy stuff here alright – just not this (i.e. pick the attack lines).
I do believe you are trying to tell a Standard author what to write about. Fuck off.
Dear oh dear oh dear. Ranting and raving about the legalities or niceties of Hagar’s latest bit of Labour propaganda. The issues are being blurred by the source debate. Hagar is a labourite. Timing is wonderful – trying to hit National just a few weeks before the election. No mention from Labour about the legalities or niceties of the Hagar diatribe.
The realities are : We are in the run up to an election. Both parties are trying to find “king hits” on the other side. If we really want to examine “attack politics” then interview Mike Williams on his visit to Oz. Or ask DC about his blunders in trying to attack JK – Annoyed his “leafy suburb doer upper” is only worth $2.5M while JK’s is worth $10M. Or what about secret trust accounts?
So far this election, National haven’t had to worry about attack politics – Labour and DC in particular have done a superb job of self inflicted foot shooting. The only possible game changer for Labour is a complete clean out of it’s management and leadership.And everyone knows that will happen AFTER the election. The polls have been consistent for 18 months or so, and it’s all doom and gloom for the left – the majority of New Zealanders don’t want you to run the country. Get used to it and look at the management and policies of the Labour Party instead of somehow trying to find a way to blame National for the LP’s own woes.
Have you heard of MMP?
“The majority of New Zealanders don’t want you to run the country” –
The inaccuracy of your estimate aside – is that the ‘I’m all right and I don’t give a toss about anyone who isn’t’ brigade? Those who think that ‘do-gooder’ is an insult and that people who care about the environment are a greater danger to the common good than those who heedlessly exploit and despoil it for short term profit? Is that those right-minded souls of honour and virtue who think the blowhard Slater is funny and the National Party’s political machinations are just the normal rough and tumble of politics? Is that the sort of people who, when they see someone who is kind and empathetic and gentle, are compelled to mock and deride them or kick the shit out them?
If that’s your ‘majority of NZers’ then you’re welcome to them.
You can have the shallow, brittle airheads, the sour, resentful dogs in the manger, the smug, insular know-alls, the brash, swaggering nouveau rich and the haughtily contemptuous old money elites – and that pathetic pack of media poodles – because who in their left mind would want them?
It is a good thing that the old spirit of NZ – a bit shabby, a tad shy and socially awkward but honest and decent to the core – is still alive. It took a hell of a beating from those people who sold the nation’s soul for a handful of baubles with built in obsolescence – but it’s still there.
So, even if the forces of reaction, greed and self-absorption do manage to scrape in again in this election, history will judge them.
And in the meantime we will be living in a country with such gaping divisions that all the baubles and bullshit in the world will not cover them up.
The “majority of NZ’ers” are voicing their opinion on who they want to run the country through many polls, and (at present, anyway) will have their final say (for the next 3 years) on Sept 20.
I personally don’t have any particular axe to grind – I’m currently “Blue”, but in the past have voted also for Labour and (once only, I’ll admit) the Greens. I DO look at the state NZ is in, what the rest of the world is like, unemployment in other countries, standard of living etc. etc. and give my vote to the party which is more likely to fulfill my needs. What I can say is that all current data shows NZ has recovered fastest and best from the GFC – NZ is top of numerous polls for quality of living, education, health, employment and many many more indicators. This has been achieved in the last 6 years under National, and looks likely to continue. I do worry about DC’s promises on spending, and at present prefer the “steady as she goes” attitude from National. The last 6 years prove (to me and many others) that they have NZ’s recovery and growth under control. So, I will vote for them this time too. I have no problem with voting Labour when appropriate, but IMHO it is NOT appropriate under DC and the current left leaning factions who look more and more disorganised.
DC could and perhaps should draw a line in the sand (particularly regarding the IMP) and his failure to do so puts a big question mark over his judgement – NOT something I want to see in an incoming PM.
I don’t know of any NZ political poll that has a sample size of 1.5million.
Most of them are in the region of 800-1000.
Have you noted that the Public Debt has enormously over the last 6 years?
The tax cuts which benefited the wealthy will have to be paid for by citizens of the future. This was not good management by National as the people on the lowest incomes had an increase in tax (GST increase). You must live in an area where you don’t see the poverty, hardship and hopelessness of people who are truly suffering.
“One legacy is greater ongoing public debt.
The government’s 2013 budget projected that net core Crown public debt in June 2015 will be $68 billion, up from a low point of $10b in June 2008.
That $58b increase represents about $33,000 per New Zealand household.
Future ministers of finance are saddled with higher ongoing interest costs and future taxpayers are saddled with higher taxes to cover those costs. ”
http://www.stuff.co.nz/business/opinion-analysis/9840884/New-Zealands-debt-legacy
@ BBL I share many of your views & tend to vote the same way for the same reasons.
That said I find Collins remaining in govt hugely problematic. She appears to lack any ethics, foresight & continually exercises poor judgment when it comes to the type of behaviour we expect from our MPs (Bain, Orivida & now these conversations with Slater including tipping him off re the ministerial staffer whose character he assassinated as a result of the information she gave him). She makes Mallard look like an angel and that is saying something. Her relationship with Slater & in fact his relationship with the entire party brings them into disrepute. Slater is not honourable & represents a level of gutter politics we should be trying to avoid, not encourage.
So yes, while policies are absolute paramount, I think you are wrong to assume NZers won’t care that our MPs are not as decent as what they make out. After all, it is personality that gets voted on more than the nitty gritty stuff on the policies (well, except of course those polices people feel will directly benefit them – e.g increased WFF or tax cuts!). That is why they Helen & Key were/are brands.
Bingo!
Hasnt read the book
Big blowhole corngate brethren slatergate!
At AUT University in Year 3 of the BCS degree for we offer a paper called Journalism Law and Ethics. We teach it. Cheers.
Doesn’t seem to have had much effect with the current crop though does it. 🙁
Berend and his right wing ilk know that the Left love to get involved in intellectual discussion and the minutiae of rights vs wrongs. So the goal is to bog issues down in a mire of clever sounding BS designed to confuse, side track and turn off the general public who might be reading the comments.
Remember, ‘to Berend’ is the tactic. Suppressing understanding and turnout amongst citizens is the strategy.
Plus 1
I thought arguing with de Boer today was like shooting fish in a barrel. Then of course it got boring after a while.
The conversation has side-tracked…let’s re-group: as David so pointedly asks, is it ok for any of us to just “walk in the Beehive and grab [or make copies of] any [unclassified of course] documents not locked away securely”?
If not then why not? It was OK for Slater et al so why not us? What is the difference?
If it is not OK then that people is case and point.
So why did a tape left in a public place generate almost immediate police action if Key doesn’t see a problem with accessing private data bases?
I don’t understand how google crawled Labour’s donor file**. Google only crawls across files that have been linked to from somewhere it has already been. It seems unlikely that Labour would create a public link to a private file. The other way is to submit the URL of the donor file to one of those websites that try to give the file a higher profile on googles search results page. I don’t see Labour doing that for a private file either.
So then how did google get that URL?
**based on my knowledge which is probaby out of date.
I can believe these guys justify corruption there unbelievable these wankers have access to our tax money assets private information they not of good character
There needs be independent investigation the root
out what has been going criminal chargers brought and jail
The bastards. Key should resign now and Collins