Chart o’ the day: Not on target

Written By: - Date published: 11:01 am, September 20th, 2011 - 74 comments
Categories: ETS - Tags:

This graph is from the review of the Emissions Trading Scheme. A few points to note:

  • Net emissions rise when the pine forests planted in the 1990s are felled and then fall as the next generation of trees mature are replanted, before starting to rise again with the next round of deforestation beginning in the middle of the century.
  • The ETS actually does make a difference, a big one – over half a billion tonnes of CO2 emissions less than without it which equates to tens of billions in savings for the country in carbon credits, not to mention helping to slow climate change.
  • But this is the weakened National ETS, with the $100 billion worth of subsidies to polluters by 2050. Remember, National promised to reduce emissions to 50% of current levels by 2050. They won’t even come close.

– Dean

74 comments on “Chart o’ the day: Not on target ”

  • Comments are now closed

  1. queenstfarmer 1
    20 September 2011 at 11:44 am

    The ETS actually does make a difference, a big one – over half a billion tonnes of CO2 emissions less than without it

    I presume you mean that between now and 2050, NZ might produce a cumulative, additional 500 million tonnes of CO2 (ie over the full 39 years).

    Just last year, China alone produced 7,700 million tonnes of CO2. So without an ETS (assuming the above – happy to be corrected), over the next 39 years NZ would save about 6.5% of what China pumps out in a single year, merely at its current level. On an annualised basis, that is 0.16% of what China alone produces. With all the coal plants etc coming on line in China, you can be that figure will be much less.

    You call that a big difference? I beg to differ.

    • Colonial Viper 1.1
      20 September 2011 at 11:59 am

      qstf according to your logic we can shit on our environment and our people to the nth degree and it won’t make any difference because China and its billion point four people will average it out.

      What you forget is the mindset that we carry around as a society, and as individuals.

      • Joe Bloggs 1.1.1
        20 September 2011 at 12:08 pm

        Nup Viper you’re misattributing and your logic is flawed…

        QueenStreetFarmer is simply pointing out that as far as contributions go the potential savings generated by NZ over 39 years amounts to something akin to the size of a mayfly on the rump of a rather large elephant.

        Logically, in order to make a big difference one would start with controlling the elephant before swatting mayflies

        • Puddleglum 1.1.1.1
          20 September 2011 at 12:45 pm

          This is odd.

          When it comes to New Zealand’s public debt, the argument often run by the right is that, even though private debt (the ‘elephant’) is the main problem, cutting public sector debt and doing next to nothing to hold back private sector debt (e.g., through a CGT) is still a ‘good strategy’.

          Yet, when it comes to something far more serious in its consequences (the planet), the logic reverses. No point in doing anything if you can’t control the elephant. 

          I think it needs to be pointed out that innovation tends to come out of constraint – not out of limitlessness. NZ could fashion its economy into something robust and innovative by exercising a little self-discipline. 

          • queenstfarmer 1.1.1.1.1
            20 September 2011 at 1:07 pm

            You seem to be running the argument that NZ should financially hamstring itself to encourage innovation in green technology. Well the US has just undertaken a massive exercise, spending billions of “stimulus” dollars to kick-start green tech. It has been a massive disaster. The technology isn’t there, the demand isn’t there – though of course it will be in future.

            And this is putting aside the fact that the ETS won’t make any difference in reality.

            • Colonial Viper 1.1.1.1.1.1
              20 September 2011 at 7:48 pm

              Well the US has just undertaken a massive exercise, spending billions of “stimulus” dollars to kick-start green tech. It has been a massive disaster.

              Ahem.

              The disaster was not the green tech.

              The disaster was typical US style crony corporate capitalism.

            • Pascal's bookie 1.1.1.1.1.2
              20 September 2011 at 8:00 pm

              “Well the US has just undertaken a massive exercise, spending billions of “stimulus” dollars to kick-start green tech. It has been a massive disaster.”

              Really?

              “Massive” sounds like an objective sort of thing, but of course it’s relative.

              The US economy is certainly massive in comparison to ours. But how many billions would amount to a “massive exercise” of stimulus in the US economy? I’d say it would have to be some hundreds of billions at a minimum, to be reasonably described as ‘massive’ in that context.

              Likewise for “massive disaster”. What does that mean? As disastrous for the US books as the unfunded wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Or perhaps GWB’s tax cuts? If it was less ‘disastrous’ than those events, then calling it a “massive disaster” would mean that those events were what? Unthinkable calamities? Horrors from the dark that mortal men know not what of?

              I’m sure you have some reasonable and sober link that justifies your massive rhetorical flourish.

              I’d be enormously interested in casting an eye over such. I’ll just die if I don’t get to see it.

              • queenstfarmer …
                20 September 2011 at 8:35 pm

                I’m not sure what you’re asking for here – justification that the biggest stimulus in history can fairly be called “massive”?

                • Pascal's bookie …
                  21 September 2011 at 7:10 am

                  Your claim was that there has been a massive exercise of green tech stimulus and that it has been a massive disaster.

                  Now you seem to be saying that the whole stimulus package could be described as massive, not just the green tech compnent of it. Was the green tech component bigger or smaller than the taxation aspect of the stimpak?

                  In any case, your sophistry is showing.

                  • queenstfarmer …
                    21 September 2011 at 9:09 am

                    The entire stimulus is the biggest in history, and the green tech component is also the biggest of its kind in history. You seem not to know the basic background to all this. You might want to do your own research before jumping back in.

                    • Pascal's bookie …
                      21 September 2011 at 9:23 am

                      More sophistry. You claimed that there had been a massive green tech stimulus that had been a massive disaster.

                      Now you are saying that the overall stimulus was massive, and the the green tech aspect of it was the biggest ever, (which doesn’t make it massive in terms of the US economy, or massive in terms of stimulus), and still haven’t given me anything to back up the massive disaster claim.

                      It’s obvious you can’t back either of your initial claims about ‘massive’ up, so you are shifting the goal posts and claiming I need to do research about the new goal posts.

                      You pretty much suck at this qs.

                      BTW, did you used to comment here under another handle, your style is very familiar.

                    • queenstfarmer …
                      21 September 2011 at 10:41 am

                      ^ Nothing inconsistent with anything I have said. There has been a massive green stimulus, the overall stimulus was massive, and it has been a disaster (whether it is a disaster is clearly opinion, which I share). I have already posted links. There are many more, but when I posted links proving you wrong when you scoffed at the suggestion that the “-gate” suffix would be applied to the solar company, you dismissed the sources off hand.

                      No, I have never posted here under any other handle. I’m sure the person with a similar style is a very wise and smart person.

                    • Pascal's bookie …
                      21 September 2011 at 11:18 am

                      Good lord.

                      I wasn’t scoffing at the idea that ‘gate’ would be affixed. That’s like scoffing at the idea that FOX would be up in arms. Of course right wingers will be beating up the story and saying all sorts of things.

                      You really are all about sophistry aren’t you. It’s all about what people say, and not about what anything means.

                      That’s not wise, it’s pathetic.

                    • bbfloyd …
                      21 September 2011 at 1:48 pm

                      queeny… you assume the right to shift your arguments to suit your agenda, and seem not to understand why you get called out on it…. why don’t you go and ask someone with some real brains to explain to you why that happens…..

                    • Bazar …
                      22 September 2011 at 3:31 pm

                      QFarmer, thanks for your putting the time in to debate these left wings, its nice to see someone with a sane head debate for common sense.

                      I used to do it here, but frankly it wore me out.
                      Still as thanks for your work, i’ll rebuff floyd.

                      Here floyd, for your easy peruse, is a simplified transcript of this thread:

                      QFarmer: We aren’t big enough to make a differance, isn’t worth hamstring our economy
                      Viper: Huuur Duur
                      Blogs: Quiet Viper
                      Pugglegum: Right wingers are hypocritical; We’d also be better off if we had a handicap to encourage innovation.
                      QFarmer: The US spent billions to kick-start green tech and its been a disaster
                      Viper: HUUUUR DUUR
                      Puddlegum: It wasn’t a disaster, the US is so large, its only a small disaster when put in perspective.
                      QFarmer: So you’re saying it wasn’t a huge disaster then?
                      Puddlegum: The green investment was only a small part of the huge investment.
                      QFarmer: It was still the largest investment in green technology ever
                      Pascal: Links or it didn’t happen
                      QFarmer: I already have elsewhere
                      Pascal: You’re pathetic
                      Floyd: You keep changing your arguement QFarmer, i think you’re too stupid to hold a real debate.

                      To me this shows why i stopped bothering with this site, you provide sound logic and you’ll get shifty responses, and if you pursue those responses you’ll get called out on it, even if you’re in the right.

                      It reminded me of a saying my sister said. “Never argue with an idiot, they’ll only drag you down to their level and beat you with experience”.

                • Colonial Viper …
                  21 September 2011 at 7:43 am

                  I’m not sure what you’re asking for here – justification that the biggest stimulus in history can fairly be called “massive”?

                  The only truly massive stimulus Obama conducted in the last 3 years was US$12T (or more) injected into the banking and shadow banking systems.

                  Actual ‘real’ industry got fuck all in comparison.

            • Puddleglum 1.1.1.1.1.3
              20 September 2011 at 8:09 pm

              Qsf, economies – being in the real world – are ‘hamstrung’ as a matter of course. Japan has no oil, Singapore has no land, European countries lacked labour (hence immigration), New Zealand lacks …

              ‘Necessity is the mother of invention’ and all that. It’s not the end of the world to work under constraints – even self-imposed ones, when they are imposed for good reason and with an eye to the future. Health and safety regulations are a ‘constraint’, labour laws are a ‘constraint’ – yet most developed economies have these self-imposed ‘constraints’. It makes those economies, and the people in them, envied by people in other economies.

              Short term thinking is just that. It doesn’t prepare you for the long haul. Countries are, presumably, concerned about the long haul – companies (or at least the capital upon which they depend), typically, less so. 

              • vto …
                20 September 2011 at 8:14 pm

                I don’t think the three of you will get much of an answer out mr queen street this late at night – he is a farmer after all. Though I never seen where that farm is..

              • queenstfarmer …
                20 September 2011 at 8:37 pm

                Having no land or oil is, usually, not by choice. Imposing self-inflicted taxes that harm the economy, is by choice.

                • McFlock …
                  20 September 2011 at 9:28 pm

                  What about self0-imposed skill shortages caused by stuffing apprenticeships and burdening the educated with student loans that will be evadable, or more easily paid back, if you leave the country?

                • Draco T Bastard …
                  21 September 2011 at 12:14 am

                  The costs are there – it’s just that the idiots like you are trying to ignore them. That’s the whole point of the ETS – to put the costs on businesses that are presently avoiding them (economics calls it “externalities”) which means that the community will end up paying for them.

                  It’s completely insane to argue the non-existence of something that has been proven to exist.

                • Colonial Viper …
                  21 September 2011 at 12:42 am

                  Having no land or oil is, usually, not by choice. Imposing self-inflicted taxes that harm the economy, is by choice.

                  Short term pain for long term pain. Think about it.

                  Economic growth must be decoupled from carbon emissions.

                  Don’t keep putting your foot down on the pedal even as the cliff gets closer, faster. Get it?

                  • Bazar …
                    21 September 2011 at 8:38 am

                    No, its a case of short term pain WITH long term pain, or just long term pain. (thats assuming you believe carbon causes global warming)

                    Even if NZ was carbon neutral tomorrow onwards, we wouldn’t even affect the global carbon output beyond a statistical anomaly.

                    Racing to be so carbon friendly can have adverse results as well…
                    The kyoto treaty has shown such wonderful promise in getting industries to reduce commissions… of course a lot of those regulated industries just started outsourcing to china instead which has NO regulation on industries.

                    The result was more overall pollution due to the lower pollution standards/requirements in china.

            • AAMC 1.1.1.1.1.4
              20 September 2011 at 8:52 pm

              This chart puts their investment in green tech into perspective.

              http://m.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/09/solyndra-vs-military-boondoggles

      • queenstfarmer 1.1.2
        20 September 2011 at 1:00 pm

        Just making the point that an ETS won’t make much of a difference to the environment while the major (make that gargantuan) emitters are carrying on as usual. It will be negligble, if anything. That is a fact – nothing to do with mindsets.

        • Pascal's bookie 1.1.2.1
          20 September 2011 at 8:02 pm

          Obviously what we need to do is break up all the big countries into little countries of around 4 million people each.

          Then no one will have to do anything.

          • queenstfarmer 1.1.2.1.1
            20 September 2011 at 8:38 pm

            No-one has to do anything now.

            • Colonial Viper 1.1.2.1.1.1
              21 September 2011 at 12:45 am

              One reason being is people like you making excuses for NZ to stay timid at the back of the pack.

              Let’s show the world some clean green leadership mate.

            • bbfloyd 1.1.2.1.1.2
              21 September 2011 at 1:57 pm

              if we don’t have to do anything now, then we have the ideal govt to achieve that… johnny sparkle and the bowlegged sisters quartet are experts at doing nothing….

              i have to assume you hate your children, and resent the fact that there will be a whole new generation following that… but don’t worry too much, because the “do nothing” approach will ensure that there may not be too many pesky descendents to follow……

              cockroaches, on the other hand, will become hugely successful…. warms the heart to think humanities legacy will be carried forward in such an efficient manner….

              as long as they keep the rats from the halls of power, then it will be great…..

            • Macro 1.1.2.1.1.3
              21 September 2011 at 10:17 pm

              Again qsf you need to keep up with what is ACTUALLY happening:
              “New research, to be published in the journal Climatic Change in November, suggests humankind may have to remove carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere on a vast scale if emissions keep rising after 2020.”
              http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/20/us-carbon-climate-idUSTRE78J3IK20110920

    • mik e 1.2
      20 September 2011 at 11:49 pm

      QSFChina’s New coal plants are more modern more efficient and are replacing outdated inefficient plants.China is putting huge money into modernizing its energy production .As well as there steel production adapting NZ pollution control technology in their steel plants.They are not standing still they Know what the customer wants and will move heaven and earth to get that customer. Pity our farming sector doesn’t take the same approach it usually takes our farmers 20 or 30 years to wake up before they do whats needed by then its to late China Germany etc will own all the farms.

  2. infused 2
    20 September 2011 at 12:16 pm

    I’ll give a shit about an ETS in NZ when other countries that actually matter get behind it. NZ outputs %0.2 of all carbon world wide.

    That sums it up for me really.

    Lets kill our economy so we feel a little better inside.

    • Macro 2.1
      20 September 2011 at 12:21 pm

      Your argument is analogous to a thug kicking someone who is down – I’ll stop kicking when someone else does! Bastard!

      • infused 2.1.1
        20 September 2011 at 12:23 pm

        Yeah, no.

        You are trying to fix a problem that can’t be fixed until countries at the top of the chain do something. Until they do, it’s a waste of time, more so money.

        • Macro 2.1.1.1
          20 September 2011 at 12:52 pm

          Didn’t think you had the moral capacity to understand what I was saying. Unfortunately I’m not mistaken. Your morality is solely based on the ten commandments written in the gospel of the “hidden hand”. Those who worship money will ultimately pay for it.
          When the seas are 1-2 m higher by the end of this century and ave global temps head even more higher because of a lack of will by current western govt’s I’m sure you grandchildren will bless you for it.

        • Macro 2.1.1.2
          20 September 2011 at 4:52 pm

          So those who want to delay – are really asking for more of this!
          http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmJfsjYfVNU&feature=player_embedded

    • Lanthanide 2.2
      20 September 2011 at 12:24 pm

      Maybe having a local ETS will encourage innovation in technology here, which could be exported to other countries earning us huge revenue while also reducing their greenhouse gas output immensely?

      We should be at the forefront of agricultural research. Having an ETS that encourages green agricultural research seems like a good nudge in the right direction.

      • queenstfarmer 2.2.1
        20 September 2011 at 1:12 pm

        The US has spent billions to encourage green technology, it has been a disaster. Would it be any different here?

        Research is happening and innovation will continue around the globe, and of course a breakthrough could happen here. NZ should do what it sensibly can. But I don’t see an ETS giving NZ any appreciable advantages, while potentially harming the entire economy for no sensible reason.

        • Macro 2.2.1.1
          20 September 2011 at 4:33 pm

          “The US has spent billions to encourage green technology, it has been a disaster. Would it be any different here?”

          Well that’s your perception of reality – Others actually see it differently.

          As for the “disaster”. One solar company that pursued a non-silicon based pv solution that goes bust because the price of solar electricity falling is hardly a “disaster”. It’s what happens in the market place, or are you not aware of that?

          • queenstfarmer 2.2.1.1.1
            20 September 2011 at 5:25 pm

            I wasn’t even thinking of the solar company scandal. The green jobs programme was a failure before that – here’s an article from no less than the New York Time from a month ago:

            Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed, government records show… “Companies and public policy officials really overestimated how much consumers care about energy efficiency,” said Sheeraz Haji, chief executive of the Cleantech Group, a market research firm…. “The demand’s just not there to take this to scale,” said Fred Lucero, project manager at Richmond BUILD…

            And if that’s what the New York Times is saying, you can imagine how much worse it really is.

            • Macro 2.2.1.1.1.1
              20 September 2011 at 6:11 pm

              “scandal” Your words qsf. Not mine. So a company goes bankrupt. That’s a scandal?
              As for the burgeoning energy inefficiency of the USA … Well what do you expect with boneheads like the GOP putting their oar in every which way they can. With no legislation to either encourage or impel companies towards more efficient energy use – the practice will always be to use the least cost alternative – especially the alternatives like oil coal and gas which have largely externalised costs – Costs to be picked up by everyone else – like you and me.
              Now if you were to instance China as a country and an economy – you would find that that country is moving rapidly towards increasing energy efficiency. But that’s a MANAGED economy and that won’t do will it!

              • queenstfarmer …
                20 September 2011 at 6:21 pm

                So a company goes bankrupt. That’s a scandal?

                No – you need to read up. The scandal is the fact that the Govt loaned hundreds of millions of dollars with no apparent oversight or checks on what the company was doing with it, despite having Board representation. The FBI has been to executive’s homes. The President is severely embarrased and even Democratcs are bailing from this. It is a total scandal (soon to be something-gate, no doubt).

                • AAMC …
                  20 September 2011 at 10:24 pm

                  “It is a total scandal”

                  I’ll post a comparison with the real scandal here, in case you didn’t see it above QSF

                  http://m.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2011/09/solyndra-vs-military-boondoggles

                • Macro …
                  21 September 2011 at 11:48 am

                  No qsf you need to keep up! And don’t believe everything you read on Right wing blog sites.
                  There are more politically inspired witch hunts in that god forsaken sick society called the USA than you can poke a stick at! I have not heard of one such “investigation” that has revealed anything of substance. Every “investigation” has ended up exonerating those under investigation. And in one such instance the instigators themselves are now under investigation for political interference. It’s McCarthyism all over again! This time instigated by the oil barons and the ultra right wing nutcases who will stoop to nothing in their efforts to avoid facing the obvious. – Western and Developed nations HAVE TO STOP BURNING FOSSIL FUELS.
                  Just because someone in the USA has the influence to instigate a FBI investigation does not make it a “scandal”. In many cases the scandal is that the investigation is initiated in the first place!

            • mik e 2.2.1.1.1.2
              20 September 2011 at 11:55 pm

              The republicans pulled funding on R&D . R&D doesn’t give you immediate returns and rarely do the initial steps prove profitable especially in our instant reward society.MSM media is not interested right now in the US . Any left wing policy is put down. But when the Arab spring is over you can bet oil prices will sky rocket and green initiative will be back on the agenda.

        • MrSmith 2.2.1.2
          20 September 2011 at 5:41 pm

          “The US has spent billions to encourage green technology, it has been a disaster. Would it be any different here?”

          Q/ST just making shit up won’t cut it, I couldn’t care less about the US but you will have to provide us with some facts, Billions, how many Q/ST? Disasters more than two please? Would it be any different here? I won’t even bother!

          The US position on climate change has been laughable but their politicians have a huge problem, in so far as half the country are still waiting for the second coming, plus there endless warmongering, we don’t have that excuse, so saying we can’t lead is just spin, you know it’s the party/Farmers line Q/St and you have swallowed it, but your not fooling anyone here except yourself.

          • queenstfarmer 2.2.1.2.1
            20 September 2011 at 6:14 pm

            See my post above Mr Smith – linking to a New York Times article stating that “Federal and state efforts to stimulate creation of green jobs have largely failed”. And there are many, many more articles far more critical than that. Let me know when (if) you cease to be in denial.

            As for the money, this headline gives a clue:
            $38B loan program not giving much bang for buck – CBS News

            I like this quote:

            “There are good reasons to create green jobs, but they have more to do with green than with jobs,” Princeton University economics professor and former Federal Reserve vice chairman Alan Blinder has said.

            Sums it up well – the far-Left here (the Greens) are pretending that “green mandates” will effectively grow the economy. They won’t – the evidence is in.

            • MrSmith 2.2.1.2.1.1
              20 September 2011 at 6:25 pm

              “Let me know when (if) you cease to be in denial.”

              Q/St from your link: said Sheeraz Haji, chief executive of the Cleantech Group, a market research firm. “People care about their wallet”

              The article in the NYT Q/st that’s if you read it, wasn’t nearly as negative as you make out either considering the US are in recession with unemployment over 10%, I haven’t got time to read the CBS link but here are some figures for you.

              The world economy last year worth US$61.96 trillion Q/St, Stern report estimates Climate change could cost between 5-20% so 3 to 12 trillon or simplified for you between three thousand billon and twenty thousand billon, makes your few billon look like small change Q/St, but you don’t care do you, because you will be dead soon, but we have a responsibility to the children and those that will live after we are long dead.

              • queenstfarmer …
                20 September 2011 at 7:41 pm

                You said I was “making shit up”, so I posted a NYT article confirming what I said, and confirming you are wrong. Pretty simple really.

                • mik e …
                  21 September 2011 at 12:01 am

                  Short term short sighted thinking .Just about every new technology we have ever used started with a lot of failure.Even right wing economists agree there is no low hanging fruit any more and it will take years of high spending R&D to make forward progress. National have cut R&D in this country and messed it around for cheap political gain.

            • Puddleglum 2.2.1.2.1.2
              20 September 2011 at 8:22 pm

              Correct me if I’m wrong (please), but it looks to me that the ‘green stimulus’ was almost the direct opposite of a self-imposed constraint – what I was talking about in my responses to you up above.

              Penalising fossil fuel use is a different mechanism from simply putting aside large amounts of money for ‘green initiatives’.

              Notice that the reason, so far as I can tell, that the stimulus ‘flopped’ is that it remained cheaper to go for the fossil fuel alternatives – oil use was still too cheap, comparatively.

              Now, I’m no expert on the ETS – my gut is to go with a carbon tax (but I haven’t put the ‘brainpower’ – yet – into carefully thinking it through). But isn’t its supposed ‘mechanism’ precisely that it makes things more expensive for CO2/methane/etc. emitting industries?

              Has the US tried something like that to stimulate ‘green jobs’? I don’t think so.

              • queenstfarmer …
                20 September 2011 at 8:45 pm

                Yes there are many different “levers” and methods. Eg: Has the US tried something like that to stimulate ‘green jobs’? I don’t think so.

                They have. For example they were the first (I think?) to introduce their particular car emmission standards that penalised poor-mileage cars. Since then car efficiency has improved. The extent to which A led to B is something that I’m sure economists & politicians will argue about, although Obama recently lowered (or delayed) the latest round of standards, much to the annoyance of the environment lobby.

    • Blighty 2.3
      20 September 2011 at 1:02 pm

      The EU has one as do many other countries and China is about to introduce one http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_tax

  3. outofbed 3
    20 September 2011 at 12:59 pm

    I thought we had one of the highest emission rates per capita in the world?
    Great if we had the lowest eh? I could kinda see lots of benefits to that. We cold run a 100% clean Green Campaign perhaps (might have to get the cow shit out of the rivers first though)

  4. Steve Wrathall 4
    20 September 2011 at 5:43 pm

    Macro, re your YT video of “scientist” K Trenberth. This is the same Trenberth who in private admits “The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t”.

    So when even the so-called experts on whose authority we are being bullied into putting the world on an energy diet, doubt their prophesies. I refuse to join you on your guilt-trip of anguish about rising emissions of a gas vital to life itself.

    • Draco T Bastard 4.1
      20 September 2011 at 6:14 pm

      This is the same Trenberth who in private admits…

      Link to a credible source (ie, not any of the denier sites which have been proven to be lying (all of them)).

    • One Anonymous Bloke 4.2
      21 September 2011 at 7:24 am

      I can’t believe someone is still trolling this denialist garbage.
      This is what Trenberth was discussing.
      …sigh…

      • Macro 4.2.1
        21 September 2011 at 10:14 pm

        Wrathall is in complete denial and will unfortunately remain so. Nothing anyone here, can say, or demonstrate, would alter his complete conviction and unwavering belief in his own brilliance and certainty. Frankly it’s a waste of space even replying to him – but your reference to the true matter in hand is valuable to the casual reader.

  5. Afewknowthetruth 5
    20 September 2011 at 6:43 pm

    The acknowledged upper limit for maintenance of the climate stability that permits civilisation to continue to exist is 350ppm. (That figure may in fact be on the high side, since the historic norm that allowed agriculture to come into existence was around 280ppm.)

    We are currently at 390ppm, i.e. 40ppm above the ‘safe’ limit. When the leaves start to drop in the northern hemisphere the next surge in atmospheric CO2 will take place, taking us to around 396ppm early in 2012.

    There is considerable debate concerning the meltdown of the Arctic Sea in 2011. Although the extent is marginally above the all-time low recorded in 2007,

    http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/

    the density of the ice is arguably somewhat lower than in 2007.

    The Sun seems to be finally coming out of the unusually long minunum in its cycle. Although relatively tiny, the increase in activity will be more ‘grist to the mill’.

    Acidification and the general assault on the oceans by fishing and petroleum interests are forecast to generate largely dead oceans within two decades.

    Peak Oil occurred around 2005-2006, and we are now in the early stages of collapse of present economic arrangements. The collapse will gather speed between 2012 and 2015, as we slide down the oil depletion curve, and present economic arrangments will be pretty much ‘all over’ by 2020.

    The decrease in Global Dimming that will accompany delcining industrial activity will undoubtedly have a dramatic effect on insolation and will cause a surge in positive feedbacks.

    The big unknowns are how much longer the European banksters can hold their Ponzi scheme together and how much longer the US can continue to function (with the vast majority of states and municipalities now insolvent and incapable of carrying out even basic maintenance on roads and bridges). And then there is Texas, of course, which is currently experiencing environmental meltdown.

    http://droughtmonitor.unl.edu/

    ETS is delusional nonsense, completely disconected from reality. However, it will make some short term profits for a few banksters before everything collapses.

  6. Puddleglum 6
    20 September 2011 at 8:33 pm

    “ETS is delusional nonsense, completely disconected from reality. However, it will make some short term profits for a few banksters before everything collapses.”

    Yes, that’s my worry. I remember listening to the radio back in the 90s (late at night, driving home from work) and the neoliberals were the ones pushing for a CO2 market (ETS). That was hotly contested by those who wanted either a carbon tax or, simply, agreed planned reduction in oil use – i.e., more direct regulation.

    Now, the ETS seems to be defended by the same people (or at least political positions) that argued against such schemes previously. Staunch right wingers, meanwhile, seem to be talking about doing nothing (so they’ve moved position, too). The political sand has shifted in a mere 10 or 15 years.

    I’m going to have to get on top of the history and details of all of this. 

  7. grumpy 7
    21 September 2011 at 11:05 am

    If NZ go it alone with an ETS (without the major polluters China, Russia India etc), we will be both paying the ETS AND paying to mitigate the effects flowing on from the major polluters.

    In effect paying at least twice!!!

    • thejackal 7.1
      22 September 2011 at 7:45 pm

      And if we don’t have an ETS and China, Russia and India etc don’t either, we will still have to pay the mitigating costs from the effects flowing on from the major polluters. It will be normal taxpayers meeting those costs instead of the industries creating pollution.

      We wont be able to take advantage of our forests and already strong renewable energy sector from hydro and trade with the countries that are involved. Having a strong ETS means we protect our environment and have a stronger trading position if we meet our quotas within the first commitment period 2008 to 2012 and beyond.

      So either the taxpayer and environment pay or we have an effective ETS and ensure our emissions are reduced and all make money at the same time. I really fail to see any relevant argument for not having an ETS.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • $41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
    New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 hours ago

  • Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
    The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago

  • Judicial appointments announced
    Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago

  • Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
    Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa.  The summit is co-hosted ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago

  • Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
    A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago

  • Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul.    “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago

  • Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
    Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago

  • Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr.  The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    22 hours ago

  • Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
    The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Taupō takes pole position
    The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
    Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners.  “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Government backing mussel spat project
    The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Government focused on getting people into work
    Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
    The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago

  • Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
    The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
    RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Inflation coming down, but more work to do
    Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • School attendance restored as a priority in health advice
    Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sector
    Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago

  • Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International Congress
    Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector.    "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • Removing red tape to help early learners thrive
    The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago

  • RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tape
    Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • McClay reaffirms strong NZ-China trade relationship
    Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Prime Minister Luxon acknowledges legacy of Singapore Prime Minister Lee
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.   Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • PMs Luxon and Lee deepen Singapore-NZ ties
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. While in Singapore as part of his visit to South East Asia this week, Prime Minister Luxon also met with Singapore President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and will meet with Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong.  During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Antarctica New Zealand Board appointments
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has made further appointments to the Board of Antarctica New Zealand as part of a continued effort to ensure the Scott Base Redevelopment project is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner.  The Minister has appointed Neville Harris as a new member of the Board. Mr ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Finance Minister travels to Washington DC
    Finance Minister Nicola Willis will travel to the United States on Tuesday to attend a meeting of the Five Finance Ministers group, with counterparts from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom.  “I am looking forward to meeting with our Five Finance partners on how we can work ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Pet bonds a win/win for renters and landlords
    The coalition Government has today announced purrfect and pawsitive changes to the Residential Tenancies Act to give tenants with pets greater choice when looking for a rental property, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Pets are important members of many Kiwi families. It’s estimated that around 64 per cent of New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago

  • Long Tunnel for SH1 Wellington being considered
    State Highway 1 (SH1) through Wellington City is heavily congested at peak times and while planning continues on the duplicate Mt Victoria Tunnel and Basin Reserve project, the Government has also asked NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) to consider and provide advice on a Long Tunnel option, Transport Minister Simeon Brown ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • New Zealand condemns Iranian strikes
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have condemned Iran’s shocking and illegal strikes against Israel.    “These attacks are a major challenge to peace and stability in a region already under enormous pressure," Mr Luxon says.    "We are deeply concerned that miscalculation on any side could ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago

  • Huge interest in Government’s infrastructure plans
    Hundreds of people in little over a week have turned out in Northland to hear Regional Development Minister Shane Jones speak about plans for boosting the regional economy through infrastructure. About 200 people from the infrastructure and associated sectors attended an event headlined by Mr Jones in Whangarei today. Last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Health Minister thanks outgoing Health New Zealand Chair
    Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has today thanked outgoing Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Chair Dame Karen Poutasi for her service on the Board.   “Dame Karen tendered her resignation as Chair and as a member of the Board today,” says Dr Reti.  “I have asked her to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Roads of National Significance planning underway
    The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has signalled their proposed delivery approach for the Government’s 15 Roads of National Significance (RoNS), with the release of the State Highway Investment Proposal (SHIP) today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says.  “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Navigating an unstable global environment
    New Zealand is renewing its connections with a world facing urgent challenges by pursuing an active, energetic foreign policy, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.   “Our country faces the most unstable global environment in decades,” Mr Peters says at the conclusion of two weeks of engagements in Egypt, Europe and the United States.    “We cannot afford to sit back in splendid ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • NZ welcomes Australian Governor-General
    Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Australian Governor-General, His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley and his wife Her Excellency Mrs Linda Hurley, will make a State visit to New Zealand from Tuesday 16 April to Thursday 18 April. The visit reciprocates the State visit of former Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Pseudoephedrine back on shelves for Winter
    Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced that Medsafe has approved 11 cold and flu medicines containing pseudoephedrine. Pharmaceutical suppliers have indicated they may be able to supply the first products in June. “This is much earlier than the original expectation of medicines being available by 2025. The Government recognised ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • NZ and the US: an ever closer partnership
    New Zealand and the United States have recommitted to their strategic partnership in Washington DC today, pledging to work ever more closely together in support of shared values and interests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says.    “The strategic environment that New Zealand and the United States face is considerably more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • Joint US and NZ declaration
    April 11, 2024 Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters We met today in Washington, D.C. to recommit to the historic partnership between our two countries and the principles that underpin it—rule ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

  • NZ and US to undertake further practical Pacific cooperation
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has announced further New Zealand cooperation with the United States in the Pacific Islands region through $16.4 million in funding for initiatives in digital connectivity and oceans and fisheries research.   “New Zealand can achieve more in the Pacific if we work together more urgently and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-04-19T08:23:30+00:00