Daily review 29/04/2025

Written By: - Date published: 5:30 pm, April 29th, 2025 - 8 comments
Categories: Daily review - Tags:

Daily review is also your post.

This provides Standardistas the opportunity to review events of the day.

The usual rules of good behaviour apply (see the Policy).

Don’t forget to be kind to each other …

8 comments on “Daily review 29/04/2025 ”

  1. Dennis Frank 1

    Looks like Trump rescued Carney from likely defeat: https://edition.cnn.com/2025/04/28/americas/canada-election-results-carney-poilievre-intl-hnk/index.html

    Conservative opposition leader Pierre Poilievre conceded defeat early Tuesday, saying Carney had won enough seats to form a “razor thin minority government.” …Another upset on Tuesday was the future of the National Democratic Party, which has so far not won enough seats to keep its party status. The NDP, a centre-left party, has played a key role during previous Liberal Party minority governments.

    So Carney faces a precarious outcome if the NDP don't remain as a support option.

  2. Joe90 2

    Best Bill Lawry voice …yes, he's gone!

  3. Chris 3

    Luxon says he doesn't care the Supreme Court declared removing voting rights from prisoners is inconsistent with the NZBORA.

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/nz-news/360670649/prisoner-voting-ban-be-reinstated-government

    He probably feels smug in the sad likelihood most of the population is behind him.

    • Puckish Rogue 3.1

      Prisoners should never have had the right to vote, all this is doing is righting a wrong (also doesn't go far enough)

      • Muttonbird 3.1.1

        According to who?

        Looks like this policy was restricted to prisoners serving terms of 3 years or less and presumably we want them back into society participating in some form. Giving them agency and including them in a core function as part of rehabilitation seems reasonable.

        We get it, you're a corrections officer and see things the rest of us don't, but because of that it also might mean your opinion should not be counted.

        Having said that, can you expand on the “doesn’t go far enough” comment, does it mean you think prisoners currently have too many rights which need to be stripped?

        • Drowsy M. Kram 3.1.1.1

          Having said that, can you expand on the “doesn’t go far enough” comment, what does that mean?

          Just a guess – maybe continuing disenfranchisement after release from prison?

          Felon Voting [updated 27 March 2025]
          Should Felons Regain the Right to Vote?

          Internationally, the United States is an outlier. The Sentencing Project and Human Rights Watch state that the organizations “know of no other democracy besides the United States in which convicted offenders who have served their sentences are nonetheless disenfranchised for life.

          On the other end of the spectrum, many countries allow and even encourage voting from prison, including: Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Japan, Kenya, Netherlands, Norway, Peru, Poland, Romania, Sweden, and Zimbabwe.

          Out of Step: U.S. Policy on Voting Rights in Global Perspective
          [27 June 2024]
          As of 2022, over 4.4 million people in the United States were disenfranchised due to a felony conviction.

          Did any of the CoC party election campaign policies hint at the reintroduction of universal disenfranchisement?

          https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-16-01-2024/#comment-1985502

        • Puckish Rogue 3.1.1.2

          Former CO and yes, specifically those on home detention shouldn't be able to vote

          (Home D should be something a prisoner earns for good behaviour)

Leave a Comment