Discussion starter for the day…

Written By: - Date published: 7:49 pm, March 10th, 2015 - 116 comments
Categories: Abuse of power, International, monetary policy, overseas investment, Politics, us politics, war - Tags:

picking-brain-goldOne of the things I’ve found interesting about being involved in writing for The Standard is getting to recognise the particular thoughtfulness of some of those who regularly comment. There are some good brains out there, and some highly informed people. Therefore I’d like to share two posts I’ve read/watched of late. I’m a scattergun reader, usually trying to fit it in around my ‘real’ writing, in the little gaps throughout my day. So I’d appreciate your thoughts. True? False? If so, so what? Does this scare the bejezus out of you or is it just another conspiracy theory? (though I hesitate to use the phrase, given our PMs love affair with it when confronted by the truth!) I have to say just seeing the words ‘World War III’ written so starkly is pretty damn unsettling.

The first info came in the form of a video posted via Facebook:

The Geo-politics of World War III

I don’t know much about this crowd so was unsure how much to believe. But it certainly unsettled me.

Then, a couple of weeks ago I came across this, from John Pilger, which seems to be backing the essential facts of the video up: “Why the rise of fascism is again the issue

So here you go – would love to know your thoughts! Let the game begin!

116 comments on “Discussion starter for the day…”

  1. lprent 1

    I couldn’t resist adding the right image 😈

  2. One Anonymous Bloke 2

    The video strikes me as propaganda – complete with emotive dissonant soundtrack.

    As for Pilger, he makes bold statements – “they” want this, “they” want that. He’s very short on evidence.

    That said, the struggle against fascism, against oppression and human rights abuses, is always with us.

    Today, we heard that Putin reveals secrets of Russia’s Crimea takeover plot. Perhaps the BBC is lying, and if not, where does that leave Pilger’s claim that “the US is dragging us to war”.

  3. Chooky 3

    Wow thankyou for those links….makes horrible, terrible sense….sobering stuff indeed….and will need another listening and reading and digesting

  4. Colonial Rawshark 4

    I’ve just watched 13 minutes of the Geopolitics video. It is spot on in the most important ways although little technical details may be off.

    The US has the privilege of being the sole issuer of the world’s pre-eminent reserve currency, the US dollar. A reserve currency is one which is very widely accepted and very widely demanded for trade and investment. By going off the gold standard and pushing for financialisation of the entire world economy, the US has constructed a system whereby there will always be global demand for US dollars even as the US Federal Reserve “prints” unlimited billions of extra IS dollars a weak by keyboard strokes. While on the gold standard, there was a strict physical limit to the amount of USD which could be issued. Ensuring key commodities like oil is only bought and sold in US dollars also ensure ongoing demand for US dollars as stated in the video. But today, more than that, a huge quantity of the world’s financial assets (stocks, shares, bonds, derivatives) are denominated in US dollars. If you want to invest in anything serious, you have to get US dollars.


    So demand for US dollars is at an all time high even though “quantitative easing” has pushed trillions of new US dollars into the world financial system.

    The video correctly states two reasons why the US dollar system is absolutely critical to American empire.

    1) The US government can electronically ‘print’ money by keystrokes, and people all over the world are happy to exchange those electronic credits with real goods, real labour and real services. Thinking about this for a few minutes makes it clear the extent of the power, colonisation and illusion behind this.

    2) The US dollar system, including the debt, investment, transaction and payment system associated with it can indeed be used as a weapon. “Financial weapons of mass destruction” can actually do exactly what a military war can do: take over land and property, seize control of a government and its machinery, destroy productive assets, lay fields, roads and rail as disused wastelands, capture whole companies and industries, take hostage valuable skills and expertise, leave a peoples destitute, hungry and broken.

    • M Scott 4.1

      However, a really interesting new book by an American ‘forensic economist’ entitled “The Death of Money”, don’t have it with me and can’t remember author’s name, paints a different picture of the future of the US dollar. Especially because of quantitative easing and the way the US has decided to approach the GFC, as opposed to massive structural changes to the way they let all those greedy merchant bankers operate.

  5. Colonial Rawshark 5

    One more note – remember that American exceptionalism sees the United States as the one indispensable nation in the world. Think about what that implies about every other nation.

    Out of interest:

    “Reserve currency status does not last forever”


    • nadis 5.1

      The whole gold standard/fractional banking/fed controlled by shadowy global elite conspiracy thing is just another far right delusion, in fact so far right that it appears to meet up with some delusional far lefties.

      Some really simple questions to ask yourself and points to reflect on (the video actually raises dozens more inaccuracies and general crazy things):

      1. Does the Fed (not banks) control money creation? (Hint: Yes. I’ve explained fractional banking before and guess what, Banks don’t have the ability to create infinite new money. Every dollar they lend is matched by a dollar they or another bank must borrow from the central bank. Please don’t make me explain it again…….)

      2. Who owns the Fed? You can get your answer here: http://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/about_14986.htm

      or here:

      http://www.globalresearch.ca/who-owns-the-federal-reserve/10489 (this link is either for balance or comedic effect. It is actually quite humorous for the ridiculously large logical flaw in the description of how reserve banking works)

      3. Who is forcing the world to use USD as a reserve currency? (Hint: No-one. Real answer #1: US creditworthiness is regarded by investors as being better than anywhere else. So far no-one doubts that Uncle Sam will not be able to pay his loans back. Remember, it is not how much debt you have, it is your ability to service that debt that really matters. #2: Rule of law for commercial disputes is better or equal to anywhere else. #3: The best environment to invest in. #4.10 carrier groups. #5. The largest 2 air forces in the world.) #6. Military forces deployed or seconded in around 150 countries. (i’m guessing the only country where they aren’t welcome (at least by the govt) is Cuba).

      4. Unsurprisingly, US foreign policy is primarily concerned with maximising US interests (just like the UK, just like Russia, just like China, just like NZ etc)

      5. Why is the US so wealthy? 200 years of resource extraction from the second most resource rich country in the world. 200 years of relatively open immigration. Favourable demographics for the last 200 years and and the next 25. Educational freedom. Innovation. Rule of law. Property rights. Human rights (usually). Some bad things come with that combination but also lots of good. If Russia hadn’t been ruled by thieving gangsters for the last 300 years and had the same English and French influence that the founding fathers had, then it too would be a rich country, rather than coming first (for a large country) on every negative social indicator you can think of. Not only does Russia have terrible demographics, its’ middle class (except for the 70% who are government employees) is voting with their feet. Emigration under the last few years of Putin has rocketed. The third largest offshore ethnic Russian community outside Russia is in the USA (after Ukraine and Kazahkstan). Then come Germany and Israel. (I suppose the majority of them might be FSB sleeper agents, mafia, billionaires and high frequency trading software developers).

      6. Want a gold standard? Go ahead and buy gold right now at US$1158 an ounce (or the equivalent currency of your choice). LOOK! the USD (and the NZD and every other currency) are freely convertible into gold!!! You can create your own gold standard! Without pesky government control! Only right now it is easier than the old days when you had to go down to the Central Bank and fill out a bunch of forms and pay a transaction tax to the govt. Just lucky you didn’t buy it back in 2011 at US$1860 an ounce (Alos please don’t get sidetracked by paper versus physical gold. Anyone who understands how futures markets works knows that gold manipulation via futures is impossible, in fact the physical delivery futures market provides a GUARANTEED way to turn paper gold into physical at zero cost and within 3 days). Most gold standard/paper gold proponents you see on the interwebs are making a living out of their shock horror claims. The number of people I have come across who have bought physical gold at a 15-20% bid offer spread astounds me. Stupid.

      7. Why a gold standard. Why not silver? Or Aluminum? Or Natural Gas? Or sea shells? Or bacon and egg pies? Or unicorn antlers?

      8. Oil is not “only tradeable in USD”. Ever heard of freely convertible currencies? The recent sell off in oil has many likely causes. One of which is that the demand for oil priced in Chinese Renmimbi fell. Demand for oil priced in US dollars actually hasn’t fallen that much.

      9. When the “inevitable societal breakdown occurs” (as described by your average right wing US conspiracy theorist) occurs, why own gold? Personally I’d put my faith in a shotgun, canned food, seeds, a water source, shelter, fire and a first aid kit.

      10. Yes a large chunk of the US economy profits from US defense spending and has created a mutually reinforcing circle of taxation and spending. This actually really started in WW2 and was notably identified by President Eisenhower in 1960. Surprised large companies lobby politicians for spending? Same thing happens in every industry from health care to education to agriculture etc, and in every country where you have a central government spending tax money.

      11. US and Russia are in the 71st year of a dick waving contest about who’s the biggest, and both countries believe they have legitimate influence to wield just about everywhere. The Russians have a fear of foreigners which has been stoked by 100 years of shitty governments combined with a sad propensity for allowing said government to exploit and rob them blind. The US has an evangelical belief that its’ way is the preferred choice of everyone else, and if “they” don’t make it then a few prods in the right direction are in order. Thus Ukraine and dozens of other countries around the world. Easy to see the US POV when 95% of economic refugees (for the last 200 years) choose it or the UK as their preferred destination.

      12. Just because the US can “print money with a keystroke” – not quite lets go with it – doesn’t automatically bestow status on that as a weapon, or a force for evil. If people sell goods or land or services for USD presumably it is a willing transaction (otherwise it would be theft) and transacted becausethe seller values the USD more and the buyer values the item more. It’s called “commerce”.

      • felix 5.1.1

        Could you re-do no.6 please, it’s absolute nonsense.

        • Colonial Rawshark

          Yep. And some of the rest of it. Convertibility of a US dollar note into gold not just *guaranteed* by the issuer of the US dollar note, but actually *by* the issuer has very different characteristics to trying to convert a dollar into gold via the market.

          Of course, there is no where enough gold available in the world to meet the conversion needs of the money which has been printed – that’s the point of having gone off the gold standard.

          The other thing about gold – it is seen by central banks as a valid reserve. Even the German central bank has been working hard over the last few years to take back its gold which has been stored by the NY Fed. Russia and China reserve banks have been buying up gold to add to their non-dollar reserves.

          • Jones

            “There is no where enough gold available in the world to meet the conversion needs of the money which has been printed”… surely that just means the price of gold goes up?

            It’s seen as a valid reserve because it has thousands of years as a recognised form of money… it’s baked into the human psyche. The banks are hedging against a future loss of public confidence in the paper money.

          • nadis

            Two things on the gold standard.

            Why is buying gold from the market with $1 different from buying it from the central bank with $1? The exchange rate in both cases is the market price as defined by the relevant market (the gold exchange or the central bank)

            There is of course enough gold. You are assuming that gold would convert at the current gold price. Why?

            Gold is seen as a valid reserve by many banks, but as admitted by most central bankers for diversification or historical reasons. In the same way some central banks hold equities and mortgage securities and corpoorate bonds etc. And guess who holds many of the short futures positions? (Hint: it might be official institutions who want to hedge the price risk on the gold they have. Not an unusual response in a deflationary environment).l

            • Sans Cle

              …..and you are assuming a market structure similar to the institution(s) we have today, which is a bit presumptuous. Why do you assume this?

              The value theory of gold was just a means to store value/wealth or future consumption in a trusted system (ala John Locke’s labour theory of value).

              Now it has turned into a system of fractional reserve banking, based on trust – with no real logical basis. Just because it is the dominant system of exchange in the world doesn’t mean that it is irreplaceable.

            • Colonial Rawshark

              Why is buying gold from the market with $1 different from buying it from the central bank with $1?

              Because the latter is an obligation of the central bank, and not an operation of the market subject to market conditions. And in the early 20th century when you converted a paper US dollar into gold at the central bank you weren’t “buying” the gold from the central bank. It wasn’t a sale and purchase transaction.

              Just to be clear – I am not an advocate of the gold standard at all.

        • nadis

          Which part? It looks factually correct to me. What do you want assistance with?

          If it is the paper/physical gold thing why don’t you explain how manipulation works given physical delivery futures and I’ll critique it for you?

          • felix

            Then I guess you don’t see any difference between trading 1NZD for 1NZD and trading 1USD for 1NZD.

            Cool, let’s swap some.

      • Colonial Rawshark 5.1.2

        The Reserve Bank “prints” (by crediting retail banks accounts that it holds itself) a huge amount of brand new money on a daily monthly yearly basis. Every reserve bank does similarly.

        • nadis

          Technically the settlement banks (those that deal with the central bank) borrow the money. An important qualification, and one almost always overlooked by fractional banking nutjobs because by acknowledging it their whole “infinite money creation by bankster” argument is invalidated.

          • thatguynz

            Sorry mate but “fractional banking nutjobs” loses you all credibility even though your intent was obviously the opposite.

            • nadis

              I think nutjob is a good description of someone who believes in something despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Perhaps I should qualify that a litte. Fractional banking is obviously a fact. What is not true is that commercial banks can create as much money as they like without any cost or control of the central bank. That is patently and provably false yet many still believe it. They are therefore nutjobs.

              If those nutjobs focused on actual bank mis-bheaviour (related to frctional banking) around regulatory capital arbitrage that would be an interesting discussion, but sadly that level of dialog is beyond the nutjobs.

              • thatguynz

                OK just so we’re clear on your position. From your perspective what %age of lending outflow from a retail bank do they either need to retain on account (as deposits) or to have borrowed from the relevant central bank?

                • nadis

                  Depends on the required capital adequacy ratio which is a function of the actual capital structure of the bank (. That has to be held in certain assets. All money lent to clients has to come from somewhere. Ultimately that is the central bank and iit comes at a cost.

                  Roughly speaking, if your reserve ratio is x%, then the largest a bank balance can (should) be is 1/x. Which implies the total loan book is 1/x -x. The difference between 1/x and x is either borrowed form the market (deposits, bonds etc which carry their own reserve requirement) or from the central bank (which also carries an implicit reserve requirement as the bank must post collateral to back the borrowing). And it is not free to borrow form the Central bank.

                  • thatguynz

                    Good – so you acknowledge that the loan book itself less the capital holding is money “created” by the bank yes?

                    The bank then charges interest on the full loan book at y% and pays interest to it’s lender on the capital holding of z% right?

                    Easy question – where does the differential (ie. total $ value of y% less z%) come from?

                    • nadis

                      There’s a really important definitional issue here. Technically it is not created by the bank. The bank creates demand for it, but it is created by the central bank. Only the central bank can magic money out of thin air, trading banks can’t.

                      The difference (not differential) is a combination of deposits, bonds, equity and loans from the central bank, all of which the trading bank pays interest or dividends on. Your point?

                      Basic accounting requires that the asset side of the balance sheet equals the liability side. On the asset side you have loans to bank customers and financial assets and buildings and computers etc. On the liability side you have equity plus borrowings (including from the central bank). One side must equal the other. If you do more lending you make the asset side bigger. You must then also make the liability side bigger by borrowing the amount you have lent.

                    • nadis

                      Just to clarify, I do not accept that

                      the loan book itself less the capital holding is money “created” by the bank

                      That creates a demand for new money. The demand is met either by:

                      – the bank borrowing from the market (equity,deposits, bonds etc)
                      – borrowings from the central bank.

                      The new money is ultimately created by the central bank, not the retail bank. Unless you understand that point you will never understand how central banking works. Never. If you can’t get your head around that any discussions about banking with you will ultimately be fruitless.

                    • thatguynz

                      Hold on, let’s go back a step – the G/L already balances in a purely accounting sense when the loan is made. From the banks perspective it looks like this:

                      Assets: $Assortment of loans within the loan book
                      Liabilities: $Accounts of those that have taken the loans

                      As an example say Kiwibank approves a mortgage for me. They will create an asset entry for say $500k for the money that I will be repaying them. Correspondingly they create a liability which is the $500k they have deposited in my account to enable me to purchase a house.

                      Simplified example I know but you get the drift.

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      Retail bank money is created first by the bank approving a loan and crediting the borrower’s account. The retail bank goes looking for the reserves they need at the end of the day (or month) AFTER this happens.

                      Yes there are controls and limitations to this retail bank money creation process, but I also don’t think anyone here said that retail banks can create an infinite amount of new retail bank money/retail bank credit without limit. And yes, one of the limitations is the amount of base money created by the central bank.

                      Correspondingly they create a liability which is the $500k they have deposited in my account to enable me to purchase a house.

                      To better visualise it, I wouldn’t say they “deposited” anything in your account. Nothing physical is being moved. They simply incremented the numerical value stored in your bank account.

                    • thatguynz

                      Yes you are right Tat, it’s simply 1’s and 0’s 🙂 I was trying to keep it simple for the purpose of illustration 😉

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      The loanable funds model of banking has been trashed for half a century or more now. Yet people keep going back to the idea that if a bank lends $250,000, it has to first find $250,000 in deposits from savers or monies from other institutions to do so.

                      Its been really clear for a long time now – loans create deposits, not the other way around.

                    • thatguynz

                      That was the point I was headed to. No less luminaries than the Bank of England and the IMF have acknowledged it so I was trying to get to the bottom of why they were to be considered “fractional banking nutjobs”.

                      Nadis may have a completely justifiable view – I’m interested in finding out what it is and how it relates to the aforementioned.

                  • The Murphey

                    Basic accounting requires that the asset side of the balance sheet equals the liability side

                    Except for off balance sheet liabilities

                    Yours Truly

                    Arthur Anderson

                    • nadis

                      heh….. you’ll notice I did say:

                      “the largest a bank balance can (should) be is 1/x”

                      But that doesnt actually change the money supply or creation situation. Those off balance sheet transactions are just a way of fiddling capital adequacy regulations (nb I did mention that also earlier). It just changes the risk profile of the bank, but $100 invested in an off balance sheet transactions still requires the $100 to come from somewhere, just not necessarily the bank.

                    • nadis

                      ok keep working the example, you’ll get there. I’ll make it slightly exaggerated so the point is clear.

                      Starting point is Kiwibank books balance but they have zero cash in the bank.

                      You borrow 500k. Kiwibank now has an asset of 500k (your loan) and a liability of 500k (the money they have to give you). Books still balance, but the liability is unfunded, and the overall balance sheet is larger by 500k.

                      Now you write a check to the house seller who banks at BNZ.

                      What happens when the check clears? 500k is transferred from Kiwibank to BNZ. The liability now has to be funded funded.

                      Kiwibank now has to fund that 500k from somewhere? Where does it come from?

                      Only one possible source. Kiwibank has to borrow it from either depositors, the bond market or the central bank.

                    • thatguynz

                      So you’re suggesting from your understanding, that while it is actually a “creation” of money it’s only transitory until the loan is actually drawn down on?

                      To directly answer your question, the balance sheet after the draw down of the loan still balances:

                      Assets: less $500k reserves
                      Liabilities: less $500k from my deposit account

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      Kiwibank now has to fund that 500k from somewhere? Where does it come from?

                      Why does that money have to come from anywhere? The $500K went from Kiwi Bank to BNZ. No money left the banking system. Why would Kiwi Bank now need to find an extra $500K from somewhere to put into the banking system?

              • thatguynz

                And I haven’t heard too many people suggest that banks can “create as much money as they like without any cost or control of the central bank” – just that they create money. Caveat – I haven’t as yet watched the videos in the OP so I apologise if that is what you are referencing as your starting point.

                • nadis

                  maybe I’m exaggerating, but that is usually where these discussions end up. “The FED is a tool of Bank America, Goldman Sachs and the Bilderbergs, and the banksters control money creation.”

                  • Colonial Rawshark

                    With QE several trillion dollars at near zero interest rates have gone – straight to the banksters and the investment bank prop desks. So it matches pretty well.

                    • nadis

                      Don;t forget the businesses and families who have been able to borrow money at record low interest rates too.

                      If you look at bank P&L over the last 5 years you’ll actually see it hasnt gone to the prop trading desks. In fact most banks have closed them down.

                • nadis

                  CR – really? You do this all the time – create a thought experiment that works in your head and then argue reality should match it, thereby proving your argument, even though that is completely at odds with reality.

                  Lets continue with the example. It’s me selling the house. I bank with Kiwibank. You borrow 500k form kiwibank.I want to sell the house and spend 500k on drugs. I take the 500k out of the bank in $20 notes. Where did it come from?

                  And no thatguynz it doesnt balance, your example balance sheet makes no sense at all. Your loan from the bank ADDS to the balance sheet – how could you possible believe it reduces the bank assets? It is an asset to the bank and a liability to your personal balance sheet. Before you write those things please apply some logic. The reductio ad absurdum approach would really help you. For instance- start your balance sheet example with a balance sheet of zero and see how you go.

                  You guys actually lack the basic knowledge required to converse about this. There is no common tongue here. My 15 year old son doing year 11 business studies already has a vastly more sophisticated understanding of what a balance sheet is and how lending works than you do.

                  In actual fact, on this subject you are less knowledgable than 13th century Florentine traders. thats when these concepts were first developed. They could grasp them – I’m stunned you cant..

                  • Colonial Rawshark

                    Wait, we know that year 11 business studies is fatally flawed at every level up to and including drawing demand/supply curves.

                    CR – really? You do this all the time – create a thought experiment that works in your head and then argue reality should match it, thereby proving your argument, even though that is completely at odds with reality.

                    Lets continue with the example. It’s me selling the house. I bank with Kiwibank. You borrow 500k form kiwibank.I want to sell the house and spend 500k on drugs. I take the 500k out of the bank in $20 notes. Where did it come from?

                    As you know, almost now bank branch today holds more than $20K in physical cash on hand. So even the bank branch is going to have to go far and wide to get that cash and they will probably say to you to go back to them in 2 days. At which time the police will probably be waiting for you.

                    Now I do not know the details intricately, but I do know that you are pushing the obsolete “loanable funds” model (where there is a market for loanable funds and that banks must engage in that market to find funds to loan out to borrowers) which was discredited many many decades ago.

                    • nadis

                      Wow – your anti- science, anti -learning bias knows no bounds. Not content with demolishing medicine and engineering your’re now taking on the social sciences? You actually know better than the millions of academics who have developed our current broad body of multi-disciplinary knowledge. Now that is ego!

                      Nothing I’ve said here is even closely related to the loanable funds model. At least read the research behind the buzzwords you are googling.

                      I’m describing the mechanics of how current banking works. Please detail where I am incorrect?

                      And CR – again you are displaying your lack of knowledge around accounting. What happens when you borrow or withdraw money from the bank in a balance sheet sense? Clearly not what you think.

                      Do you run a business? If you do, heres something that might help you. When your accountant does your accounts and provides you with the finished accounts – read them. Look at what is in the assets and liabilities column, the profit and loss statement. You might get it then.

                      (FYI I have worked in finance all my life including a stint at the reserve bank as a fresh faced grad back in the day. I do kind of know this stuff.)

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      I’m describing the mechanics of how current banking works. Please detail where I am incorrect?

                      I’m not as familiar with monetary operations as you are, nevertheless money creation into an economy matches the creation of debt, and the level of money creation is typically only very lightly governed by the central bank. These are the observed facts.

                      Do you run a business? If you do, heres something that might help you. When your accountant does your accounts and provides you with the finished accounts – read them. Look at what is in the assets and liabilities column, the profit and loss statement. You might get it then.

                      But how is that even relevant? A bank keeps all kinds of things on and off balance sheet that I cannot do as a sole trader or small company. I do not have cash balances moving in and out of my business in anyway resembling what a bank does and I do not need to square up with the RBNZ at the end of every day. It’s like how a household budget has nothing to do with the budget of the nation.

                      Nothing I’ve said here is even closely related to the loanable funds model.

                      Really? You said that banks need to hunt for funds to loan out. You specifically said that if Kiwi Bank lends out $500K they now need to go find that $500K in funding, in the market place. THAT seems to me to meet the essence of the loanable funds model of banking operations.

                  • Colonial Rawshark

                    Steve Keen describes this better: the theory of exogenous money vis a vis the theory of endogenous money (which he has empirically verified)

                    The root of this belief is the Neoclassical “exogenous” model of money creation, in which “nothing is so unimportant as the quantity of money expressed in terms of the nominal monetary unit” (Friedman 1969, p. 1), the money supply is determined by the actions of the Central Bank, the level of private debt is determined by the supply of and demand for loanable funds, and private banks, as mere intermediaries between savers and borrowers in the loanable funds market, can be ignored in macroeconomics…

                    (Other) results call for a hypothesis that is consistent with them: the endogenous money hypothesis…

                    The essence of endogenous money hypothesis is that banks create spending power for borrowers without reducing the spending power of savers. If true, this makes banks far more than mere intermediaries, and a crucial part of a valid theory of macroeconomics. An essential pre-requisite of this theory is that bank lending is not effectively constrained by the Central Bank.

                    Both the essence and the pre-requisite receive substantial support from existing empirical research (as well as the results above), and from information on the actual practices of Central Banks.


                    • greywarshark

                      banks create spending power for borrowers without reducing the spending power of savers
                      Is this the nub of why everybody must dance around the camp fire of low CPI while in the distance the conflagration of housing prices burns high for the citizens of Mordor but can be kept separate from the CPI that rules us all.

                      “One does not simply walk into Mordor. Its black gates are guarded by more than just Orcs. [A gated community, we know about those.] There is evil there that does not sleep. The great Eye is ever watchful. It is a barren wasteland, riddled with fire, ash, and dust. [This is an area of demolished Housing NZ bungalows.] The very air you breathe is a poisonous fume.”
                      —The Fellowship of the Ring, The Council of Elrond


                    • nadis

                      In case you don’t understand what it is you have googled, here is a very short Wikipedia description. Its called Monetary Circuit Theory (note use of the word theory). And no Steve Keen hasnt empirically proved it. If he had it wouldnt be called a theory, it would be called the law of monetary circuitry.


                      Funnily enough, the Graziani theory doesnt say that you cannot create money without the central bank. Essentially the argument between Graziani and the traditional view is whether the banks create the demand or the central bank pushes out the supply. You should also be careful refereincing Keen and Graziani because one of the outcomes of their theory is that a gold backed economy is a barter economy, not a currency economy..

                      Think QE – (central bank pushing out supply) – it certainly created demand in the US and Japan.

                      As Ben Bernanke said “QE works in practice, but not in theory”

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      Think QE – (central bank pushing out supply) – it certainly created demand in the US and Japan.

                      It created a Wall St demand for financial assets as investment banks and other institutions wondered what to do with all the USD arriving on their doorstep at next to no interest.

                      Demand on Main St – not so much.

                      So you agree that the central bank usually applies minimal effective constraints on bank lending, yes?

                  • thatguynz

                    Just wow. You patronising prick. I suggest you re-read what I said the balance sheet movements were as you’ve gone off half cocked.

                    I think you may need to rethink who’s the fractional reserve “nutjob” here as you’ve just demonstrated every characteristic of one. Or perhaps you’d suggest the people/institutions below are the “nutjobs”?

                    As a starting point try:

                    Or you could read “Economics” by David Begg

                    Or perhaps Don Brash is more your scene?
                    “Commercial bank deposits are created by banks’ lending. When a bank makes a loan, it will, in the first instance , deposit the proceeds to the borrowers account. Of course, the the borrower invariably raises funds to spend them, so the proceeds (deposit) typically will end up in a bank account of someone other than the borrower – often at another bank than that which made the loan. However, it remains that bank loan transactions ultimately lie behind the deposit balances that banks hold. By influencing interest rates, the Reserve Bank is able to influence the rate of growth in bank lending and hence the rate of (bank deposit) money growth.”

                    • nadis

                      er I did re read it. Unless I dont understand, you say they got smaller? And I don’t know what you mean by reserves. Or have I misread it somewhow?

                      Assets: less $500k reserves
                      Liabilities: less $500k from my deposit account

                      Fractional banking cant work if the money supply gets smaller everytime you lend.

                      Here’s what actually happens:

                      Assets: increase by 500k (that asset is the loan to you)
                      Liabilities: increase by 500k as the bank funds your loan and creates a liability to someone else by borrowing money from them. (Could be a deposit, could be a another bank, could be the reserve bank, could be a bond issue). Whats hard about that?

                      I don’t mean to be patronizing, but seriously, double entry accounting was invented in the 13th century and you pretend like it doesn’t exist.

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      Liabilities: increase by 500k as the bank funds your loan and creates a liability to someone else by borrowing money from them. (Could be a deposit, could be a another bank, could be the reserve bank, could be a bond issue). Whats hard about that?

                      And voila, you’re pushing the loanable funds model of banking where the bank has to go out and secure the funds that it loans out.

                    • thatguynz

                      No, you have clearly overlooked the part that says that is the G/L effect AFTER the loan has been drawn from. Scroll up, we’ve already discussed the G/L entries of when the loan is written.

              • Colonial Rawshark

                What is not true is that commercial banks can create as much money as they like without any cost or control of the central bank.

                But that’s more a formality than a real constraint. The central bank is never going to deny a retail bank reserves overnight if that is what the retail bank requires to stay within the rules.

                The retail bank is never in the position of having to turn down a credit card transaction or mortgage application because it doesn’t have sufficient reserves at the central bank.

                The shortage that constrains banks from issuing more and more credit money into an economy is therefore not limits on central bank reserves, but the supply of credit worthy borrowers.

                • nadis

                  Recent evidence in NZ would suggest you are 100% wrong. Don’t you recall what happened when the RBNZ introduced minimum deposit rules for new mortgage applications?

                  I hesitate to point it out but please see comment

                  ipso facto and all that.

                  • Colonial Rawshark

                    What is not true is that commercial banks can create as much money as they like without any cost or control of the central bank. That is patently and provably false yet many still believe it.

                    There are multiple constraints on retail bank money creation. For instance, the money can only be created if there are borrowers, and in particular, credit worthy borrowers. In the USA of course they ended up not worrying about the second part too much.

                • nadis

                  Maaan. Red herring. Not important.

                  Just reword it all and say the bank has the balance sheet and generates demand for a loan through advertising. Same process, but not your loanable funds model (which is actually something different to what you think it is by the way.) I’m talking about where the money creation occurs not where the demand for it comes from .

                  And this?

                  Assets: $Assortment of loans within the loan book
                  Liabilities: $Accounts of those that have taken the loans

                  What does that even mean? It is gobbledegook and doesnt match any known financial system I’ve heard of. So you’re saying I take a loan from the bank and that becomes a bank liability? Please, read here:


                  and here


                  I’m done with this- I’ve got better shit to shovel.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    Thanks for the education Nadis. Kia kaha.

                  • thatguynz

                    For someone that has supposedly spent an entire working career in the finance sector with a brief sojourn at The Reserve Bank (or was it the Treasury?) your understanding of money creation is scant yet you have the gall to label others as nutjobs. Astounding.

                    By all means go and shovel your other shit – I sure hope you don’t analyse accounts for a crust these days.

                    • Phil

                      Picking up on Nadis’ points, there’s one key factor in bank activity that the “banks can create all the money they like” proponents consistently ignore; prudential regulation.

                      Going back to basics again: A = L + C.
                      Assets must always equal liabilities plus capital. That’s not an economic or political statement – it’s the accounting identity that underpins all accounting since double-entry book keeping began in the middle ages.

                      If a bank could create money at will (i.e. make more loan assets and deposit liabilities) it would grow its balance sheet. The ‘A’ and ‘L’ in that equation would both grow with ‘C’ remaining constant.

                      This is where prudential regulation comes into play…

                      The rules and regulations banks in NZ have to comply with are vast and complicated. They cover everything from liquidity standards to governance to OBR to high-LVR lending. You can get a sense of the rules here: http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/regulation_and_supervision/banks/banking_supervision_handbook/

                      The one part of the rules that, in my view, are the keystone component to any prudential regime is capital standards.

                      Capital standards set down the minimum value of capital (“C” in the equation) that a bank has to have as a percent of assets. A good rule of thumb for understanding capital is that the global base-line is 8%. It’s been refined and adjusted and developed over the last 30 or so years by the Basel Committee, but 8% is a reasonable enough starting point for understanding how much capital is required. In essence; for every $100 of assets a bank has, they must hold at least $8 of capital.

                      Failure to meet minimum standards is a breach of the law and has very serious repercussions for a bank and it’s owners/executives.

                      A bank cannot grow its balance sheet with impunity. To do so would lead to breaching its requirement to hold sufficient levels of capital, and the regulators would put it our of business.

                    • thatguynz

                      Precisely Phil.

                      I mentioned something similar (obviously without your depth and quality explanation) earlier in the discussion.

                      “And I haven’t heard too many people suggest that banks can “create as much money as they like without any cost or control of the central bank” – just that they create money.”

                      That’s part of the reason I quite like the approach of Michael Kumhof’s (IMF) “The Chicago Plan Revisited” – it introduces much more substantive controls around the C.A.R

          • Phil

            @Nadis, Colonial rawshark

            In October last year I took a shot at explaining a bank balance sheets to CViper. The debate was good, but got lost as the thread moved further down the front page of The Standard…

            It’s technically incorrect to say that banks ‘create money’. What they do, when making a loan to you or I, is record a series of accounting entries today that represent future commitments to repay a financial transaction. By international standards and convention (see the IMF’s Monetary and Financial Statistics Manual 2000) we choose to call those bank liabilities ‘money’ because of the connections those transactions have to other macro-economic variables like inflation, GDP, and the balance of payments.

            All hail RBNZ independence! – Armstrong

      • les 5.1.3

        1,6,7,8,11,and 12 your opinion only and do not withstand objective scrutiny.

        • nadis


          #1 is factual
          #6 is factual
          #7 Clearly I’m not advocating for a Bacon and Egg pie backed currency. Thee point is, if you want a physical backed currency rather than a “full faith and credit” you can actually use anything. And something you have good access to is a good start. A big misconception is that the gold standard actually worked. Plse see “economic history”. The gold standard – like most financial experiments – worked until it didnt.
          #8 is factual, ridiculously so
          #11 is my opinion, but seems reasonably well founded. Can’t see anything egregious in it.
          #12 hard to see anyhting wrong with that/

          Happy to debate – can you explain your issues?

          • les

            well #1 has been debated,and I dont think you make a case as to the finite amount of credit that can be created.Do you believe that there is an alliance of western central banks that largely dictate global financial transactions?The link re the Fed has the Fed claiming to be owned by no one.The shareholders are member banks,and the structure of the FOMC is designed to make it apolitical but it is an exclusive club that historically does not answer to Congress.The repeal of Glass Steagal allowed banks to engage in riskier practices. Capital reserve ratios of a mere 2% became the order of the day.Where are the checks and balances you imply with your simplistic…’every dollar they lend is matched by a dollar they or another bank must borrow from the central bank’….if they existed banks would not become too big to fail and would not need govt guarantees and bailouts.The creation of CDO’s and CDS financial instruments and the explosion in derivatives fueled the so called ‘irrational exuberance’ that culminated in the GFC.Talking about creating ‘money’ is quite misleading…transfers of credit is more accurate.

            • nadis

              Les – you are just flat out making stuff up.

              The Federal Reserve system is subject to various statutes in the US including Title 12 US Code Chapter 3. Google it.

              Amongst other things this sets out procedures for appointing governors (by the president, confirmed by senate). Required testimony to congress – also see Humphrey Hawkins Act, powers of the Fed, rules the Fed has to follow, required audits etc. So how again does it not answer to congress given congress wrote the laws it operates under?

              Whats contentious about the “every dollar they lend bit?” How else could it possibly work? It doesn’t mean the money you lent cant disappear a la GFC – where did I suggest that? Or that fractional banking doesnt exist. IT just describes the mechanism of how fractional banking works.

              But you are quite right, there is an alliance of central banks to promote international payment systems – its called BIS or Bank for International Settlements. See here for what they do – guess what, it is not dictating global transactions….

              • Colonial Rawshark

                The Federal Reserve system is subject to various statutes in the US including Title 12 US Code Chapter 3. Google it.

                So who was held responsible when Fed funds were used by big bank executives, their spouses and relations as cheap personal loans for financial speculation with?

                When was the last time the Fed submitted to an audit by Congress?

                I don’t think the controls you are referring to are worth much in practice.

                Whats contentious about the “every dollar they lend bit?” How else could it possibly work? It doesn’t mean the money you lent cant disappear a la GFC – where did I suggest that?

                That money didn’t “disappear”, it was pocketed by the worst most egregious financial market speculators.

              • les

                there is a plethora of information as to how the Fed has behaved and could not even answer the most simple questions as here for instance…

                You must realise economics is not a science its theory or philosophy.

                To open the batting on your #6..where you speak of physical gold as opposed to ‘paper’ gold and the risk factor!….the investors who were rinsed by NZX listed Goldcorp would be interested, as selling the same physical gold to numerous parties via paper contracts was the m.o of the company.

      • thatguynz 5.1.4

        Oh my word. I actually expected more of you Nadis. What twaddle.

        • nadis

          Happy for you to join the debate with facts or well founded opinions. Or you could just lob smarmy insults.

          • thatguynz

            Seemingly as could you when your assertions are challenged. Pot meet kettle.

    • Chooky 5.2

      “American Exceptionalism” reminds me of the concepts of the ” Master Race” of Nazism or “The Chosen” ones of the God of Zionism

      … in other words all concepts of male arrogance and fascism ( not to be encouraged if we want WORLD PEACE)

  6. tc 6

    It mostly always comes back to the oil.

    Daniel yergins Pulitzer winning ‘the prize’ Published in 1990 just after bush senior went into Kuwait and a 6 part PBS series is a great background as is his follow up in 2011 ‘the quest’

    The US use of financial weapons on nations highlighted in ‘inside job’ is also as relevant as ever.

    • Colonial Rawshark 6.1

      And not just oil, but also gas.

      And not just oil and gas, but where the pipelines have to go to get that energy to where it is wanted and where there are $$$ for it.

      • les 6.1.1

        its really about military power and the influence of the U.S…do you want dollars or…bombs…!

        • Jones

          +1… there is a direct correlation between the US dollar as the world’s reserve currency and the world’s largest military. It’s a protection racket on a global scale.

          • nadis

            There is no compulsion to use the USD as a reserve currency. Countries choose it for economic reasons. Why else would China, Russia and almost every other country in the world hold most of their reserves in USD?

            • Colonial Rawshark

              I find it odd that you say this. A massive amount of the world assets, liabilities, commodities and liquidity is denominated in USD. That alone makes the USD in high demand, and that demand perpetuates itself. Go anywhere in South America, Europe, Africa or the Middle East with a stack of US $100’s and you will do just fine transacting with the locals.

              • nadis

                That is the exact point I am making. There is no compulsion to use the USD. People choose to use it because it is the most liquid, most creditworthy, most clearly priced, and most fungible choice. No-one is compelled to make that choice. Think Zimbabwe or Russia and many other countries. It’s often easier and cheaper to use USD rather than the local currency.

                Its like when you buy something from a shop. Technically you can use anything from gold to Thai Baht to tractors, but you choose to use NZD because that is most convenient for you. That’s the reason why most of the world uses USD.

                • The $US holds its value not because it represents the strength of the US economy which is stagnating and has a debt to GDP of 100%, (it is worse as GDP misrepresents value because it includes unproductive military production etc) but because the US uses it global power to compel nations to use the dollar in trade in commodities, critically, oil.

                  China is in the process of setting up an alternative global financial structure that will allow nations to genuinely opt out of the $US protection racked for the yuan. This will see the BRICS and potential BRICS eg Egypt, Iran, Turkey and Argentina move to the yuan. The $US will then become one of two or more global currencies and its value will decline relative to the performance of its economy.

                  So long as China and the developing world aligned to the BRICS grow their real GDP relative to the US currency bloc, then paper currencies backed by actual commodities will see gold left as a reserve for the time when China faces the same terminal economic crisis that is facing the US.

                  An interesting comment on the state of the global economy https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/a-fictitious-boom/

                  • nadis

                    dave- your comment doesnt make logical sense. If I am Venezuela and I want to sell oil to China, who is compelling me to use USD?

                    The US produces roughly 8% of global crude and consumes around 18% (guesstimates off the top of my head).

                    Wheres the compulsion for the other 200 crude producing countries to trade only in USD? (Hint: There is none, it’s just easier). But non-USD energy and commodity deals do happen all the time. I remember the NZDB selling milk powder to Russia and getting crappy Ladas in return.

                    • Nadis, you should ask that question to the countries that use the $US. And to those that are already trading in yuan.
                      Venezuela has moved from $US bloc towards yuan bloc as a result of China investing billions in oil etc.
                      But that was as a result of a semi-revolution in which Venezuela threw out most of the US oil companies took back control of the national oil company and asked China to bankroll ALBA.
                      Take Ukraine. US tries to pull Ukraine into EU and its $US bloc. Only to find that Russia shrugs off this offensive and tightens its alliance with China.
                      My main point was that the $US value is not based on real production of commodities which is stagnating (note the Roberts link), but on a political/military/financial mafia scam.
                      The Yuan value is much more based on China’s economic performance and expansion into Eurasia, Africa and Latin America.
                      That is why the $US is doomed and the Yuan is on the rise.

                • greywarshark

                  It then doesn’t have to be compulsory to use US$, it’s monopoly money and that is the only game in town. You can take some NZ dollars with you but it will likely be nada. In Oz in the 1970’s shops weren’t keen to use NZ travellers cheques thought I though these were readily accepted.

  7. McFlock 7

    The video applied cynicism to US foreign policy, and fair enough. But applying that cynicism to only one nation in geopolitical matters is a curious combination of cynicism and naivity.

    • Colonial Rawshark 7.1

      Not just any nation – the worlds one and only hyperpower.

      • miravox 7.1.1

        “…the worlds one and only hyperpower”

        Can’t we stick with ‘super’ as a superlative? Hyperpower is a bit of hyperbole isn’t it?

        • Colonial Rawshark

          It was all the talk in US foreign policy circles in the 1990s after the Soviet Union fell.

      • Lanthanide 7.1.2

        I don’t think they’re a hyperpower. Maybe in the 50’s and 60’s.

        They’re a waning superpower. They still have impressive military force, but their economics and politics are truly fucked up.

        China hasn’t really flexed its muscles, yet.

        • Colonial Rawshark

          Indeed…although I think that Deng Xiao Ping’s exhortation to China to “bide it’s time” is just about over…

      • McFlock 7.1.3


        That expression still doesn’t explain why similar cynicism wasn’t applied to Russia, China, Iran, Libya, Germany, Japan…

        • Colonial Rawshark

          Still. Only one country has triple the military budget of all those you listed put together.

          • McFlock

            well, double-ish, but that still doesn’t mean that it’s the only country primarily motivated by cynical self-interest. Putin didn’t send troops to the Crimea to raise funds for the Red Cross.

          • nadis

            On a percentage of GDP, USA military budget actually ranks behind Saudi Arabia, UAE and Russia according to the frst table in Mcflocks wikipedia reference). 3.8% of GDP for the USA doesn’t seem too out of line with the rest of the world.

    • nadis 7.2

      not cynicism and naivety. More like pseudo-intellectual posturing. “USA bad, therefore everybody else good”

  8. Colonial Rawshark 8

    The future of freedom: NSA whistleblower Bill Binney

    This has been linked to on the Standard a few times now, but it is very good for putting in the context of – why implement this absolutely massive security and surveillance state?

    • Chooky 8.1

      +100….thanks for this!….It is a MUST WATCH!…even although it is so long and I missed the last part because I went to sleep in my chair after midnight ( will have to watch that part again)

      ….this Bill Binney is as brave as Edward Snowden !….Binney was high up in NSA and resigned before 9/11 !.

      …they tried to throw him in jail on false reasons but he was smart enough to defend himself….this guy is a true American HERO! …(from a straight shooting , humble ,hill billy background)

      ( Snowden took his lessons from Binney’s experience in the way he released information to the public without going higher up in NSA and the usual channels)

      …Bill Binney is warning us that if we dont curb mass surveillance urgently and soon ….. it is going to get worse for our hum,an rights and democracies !….fascism

      (….he also has questions about 9/11….along with other USA engineers and scientists)

      OK Andrew Little and David Shearer …as you have put yourselves on the spy committee….you are now ACCOUNTABLE ….what are you doing to protect New Zealanders from mass spying?!

      • Colonial Rawshark 8.1.1

        Binney is the kind of guy who reminds me of what a certain old fashioned kind of America was like – before the American ethos was replaced with the corporate ethos.

        • Chooky

          yes sadly ….many Americans are most admirable people!…and it is a great country!…but it has been let down by certain politicians and secret government organisations which operate secretly contrary to the democratic LAW of the USA …what Binney would call now is pre -fascism

          I am particularly interested in what Binney and other NSA whistle blowers propose to remedy the NSA situation of mass spying …it is important that this is itemised and debated in public …. because it is a strategy for reigning in the mass surveillance and hence democratic and human rights abuses…. and at the same time making it more effective against real terrorism

          … as i recall it from this video ( and I would appreciate it if someone else would summarise what Binney has said because this is rather a hasty and brief summary and does not do Binney justice at all …also a detailed Post on what he has said would be great):

          1. stop bulk collection of metadata

          2. nothing into storage except from “target” focus groups

          3. list reasons for “targets”

          4. the name(s) of the operative(s) who list the “targets” must be registered…so there is “accountability” ie the person(s) who compile “watch/kill” lists must be held “accountable”….at the present time they are NOT! ….(shocking because it is open to abuse and corruption!)

          ( people are being killed on the basis of metadata…it is possible some Americans are being killed in their own country )

          Everyone should watch this video…and make up their own minds!

  9. barry 9

    It is good to have an alternative to the invisible propaganda that we get all the time in our media. It is a ptiy that Pilger has to publish on ICH where it can be dismissed as crazy conspiracy talk.

    OTOH Pilger goes a bit too far the other way.

    The only good thing that can be said about Putin is that he is rather unsubtle and only a danger to Russians and his neighbours. He wants to control his neighbours but all he can offer Ukraine is money and guns. Nato offered “Europe” which is tantalising enough to gloss over the fact that the money they offer never actually materialises.

    I travelled through Kosovo and Serbia before the main troubles began. The local Kosovo population were definitely resentful of the Serbs but i never feared for my safety. I didn’t get to know any Kosovars and the Serbs I knew explained the history and the importance of Pecs to their cuture, took me to Skull Tower (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_Tower). The situation is very complicated, but the bombing was hardly justifiable. The Serbs were being punished for being politically too close to Russia. but the ordinary people of Serbia DID have a deep bond with Russia.

    I also got to know some refugees from the fighting in Afghanistan after the Russian invasion. These were educated Muslims, some of them Hazara. They would have hated the Teleban, but at that time hated the Russians. They were Muslim and religion was a large part of the justification for their opposition the the Russians. So the Teleban may have been in part created by the CIA, but the other part is also due to the Russians.

    So Pilger’s article has some value, but pitched for ICH it is never going to be a serious counter to the everyday one-sided stuff we see in our papers.

    • Colonial Rawshark 9.1

      I think the people of Serbia are mostly Slavs, which a majority of Russians consider themselves as.

  10. philj 10

    Try listening to Dan Carlin’s Podcasts on Hardcore History and Commonsense. He does a great job at presenting a critical overview of US politics and US involvement in world affairs. His Hardcore History podcast is excellent, albeit lengthy. He has great ability to entertain in a storytelling style.

    • Phil 10.1

      I’m also a fan of Carlin. His series on the ‘decline and fall of the roman republic’, in particular, deserves to be transcribed and kept for the ages.

  11. Colonial Rawshark 11

    Pepe Escobar notes that the US driven TTIP excludes Russia, while the TTPA excludes China.


  12. Huginn 12

    There’s a link to the transcript which is easier going than the video. This quote from the transcript points to Bashir Assad as the commissioner, it also dates the video.

    ‘In 2013 these same Al-Qaeda linked Syrian rebels launched two sarin gas attacks. This was an attempt to frame Assad and muster international support for military intervention. Fortunately they were exposed by U.N. and Russian investigators and the push for airstrikes completely fell apart when Russia stepped in to broker a diplomatic solution.’

    Things have moved on since this was made.

    — New EU Syria sanctions reveal regime collusion with Isis – http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/324b07f6-c42a-11e4-9019-00144feab7de.html

  13. Ennui 13

    Nice conversation starters thank you MH. Good links. I suggest the mega trends are obvious. Russia is doing what it always does when confronted by western aggression which is to retreat East to regroup before it sends the bill. The USA is on some divinely ordained mission to spread good old democracy all around whilst vacuuming the energy resources of the world…yes this is the oil play and those pesky Arabs and Russians have got it. Then to fascism..let’s just say it wears a corporations face and deals in zero hours contracts at the minimum wage. We are at war already.

  14. Colonial Rawshark 14

    Max Keiser and Stacey Herbert have put together their latest edition of the Keiser Report just for you. (First half is on “war is a racket” and how the imperial power levers are moving once again to war, for economic reasons.)

  15. Tracey 15

    I enjoy being provoked (intellectually) but I also like to see supporting evidence. The problem with wanting everything set out that way is that it doesn’t account for those instances where, for reasons connected to the issue at hand, the evidence is not available… something people like Key rely on. He may have knowledge of the evidence but due to confidentiality/”National interest”/shredder he believes it can never come to light so makes his grand statements…

    Since 1989 there is not alot of evidence that the recent Russian leadership has worked to benefit their majority of people. They did throw open the doors to capitalism with some gusto (practically giving away major industry) in the belief that profits would benefit the country, as would employment etc… BUT Greed has dominated… and while all the people are not queuing for bread all the time… they all are sometimes and some are often.

    I am aware that Russia is doing some military creeping but why not the same amount of focus and angst on China? We keep basing summits there, olympic games and so on and yet they have a very poor human rights record… democracy campaigners, rightly, fear for their lives.

    And then there is Saudi Arabia… Saudi freaking Arabia. I remember when the first George Bush went to “help” Kuwait. he did it for democracy… that’s right, to bring democracy… women did get the vote in 2001 (2002?)

    But Saudi Arabia is immune from such advances as human rights, rights for women and democracy… and nadis (above), how much of their military budget is stuff purchased from the USA? Do you know if the weapons and hardware SA purchases are traced (do we know where they all end up?)

    • Colonial Rawshark 15.1

      Since 1989 there is not alot of evidence that the recent Russian leadership has worked to benefit their majority of people.

      There is a trans-national oligarchic class in power and we are seeing some internal argey-bargey within that class in these geopolitical games. Ordinary people are regularly, deliberately and easily sacrificed.

      When American senators talk about sending arms to Ukraine to “raise the cost” to Russia of the Ukrainian war, they mean of course the cost in terms of Ukranian blood, in a war that German intelligence says at least 50,000 people have already died in.

      The leadership of the UK, USA and other major countries have also not worked to benefit the majority of their people. In fact, to achieve their goals they are quite willing to sacrifice tens and hundreds of thousands of civilians – Madeline Albright reveals the power elite mindset in this 24s clip:

      Let alone the historical revelations around Operation Northwood.

  16. Tracey 16

    I wagged school to march down/up Queen St in Auckland to be nuclear free. I remember those days and the devastating impact of cold war rhetoric (from both sides), my generation genuinely feared we could all be obliterated by an old guy in washington or Moscow who was arguably insane.

    I don’t feel the same sense of immediacy I remember then, but I was young.

    Such times called for courageous leaders and brave (not always populist) decision-making. We got Homosexual law reform within a few years of that event too.

    It is the unravelling of crucial social fabric that i fear the most today… we are, in my opinion, well into the dismantling of certain fabrics with the almost cheering aquiescence of people who should know better. THAT has been a deliberate, thought out strategy to marginalise certain people and make it ok to be dismissive of the vulnerable by proxy, in society to enable them to be economically and in other ways disenfranchised.

  17. Once was Tim 17

    The problem with American Exceptionalism (the CORE) is that the periphery (that democratic majority that Key understands as ‘winner takes all’) ALWAYS eventually get restless (in the case of NZ very very very EVENTUALLY).
    Like those split ends – “it won’t happen overnight – but it will happen”. Meantime, pass me the bottle of Pantene and I’ll wash my mouth out

  18. Murray Simmonds 18

    Thank you for the two extremely interesting. links, MHager.

    My gut instinct is to believe that the stories that they tell are probably pretty close to the truth.

    Some 50 years ago I half-jokingly argued among a group of friends that World War III would be fought “by economic means – by opposing nations shifting money around.”

    Of course everyone laughed at me. We all knew that there was an arms race on at the time, the cold war was burgeoning, and nations were busily stockpiling enough nuclear weapons to annihilate the planet several times over.

    Then came the sobering idea of the” Nuclear Winter” that would follow even a small-scale nuclear encounter between the superpowers.

    After that, global population control became the big issue . . . but that soon got put in the “too hard” basket. And so on and so on . . . down to the present.

    Less than 6 months ago, I commented on ‘The Daily Blog’, that world events were already beginning to feel like they were shaping up towards World War III. I got voted down for it – perhaps deservedly. My comment was based on some historian’s observation I’d heard about somewhere – the idea that major wars erupt about every 100 years (1812 – ask Tchaikovsky; 1914 (ask the Kaiser); 2016, ask ???.

    Unfortunately, 1710, or thereabouts seems to buck the trend.

    Gut instincts aside, however, I am not a great fan of conspiracy theories – except for those of them that I personally believe in, of course!

    And the one thing that I do firmly believe is that Mainstream Economic Theory (MET) is one great big con. It is a con that is perpetuated by the 1% and it is foisted upon us, the remaining 99% for one reason only:

    That reason is that MET enables the 1% to hang on to their vast stockpile of wealth, and thus to hang on to their power and privilege. After all, that is the system under which they amassed their vast wealth in the first place – and so of course they HAVE to believe in it!

    It is not beyond the ingenuity of humankind to devise an economic system that works fairly for all, and not just for the 1%. But it will never happen while the 1% firmly remain in control of the purse strings. Money means power. Those who have it aren’t going to give it up any time soon.

    Sorry, all you old-fashioned main-stream economic believers out there. But you’ve got it wrong, wrong, wrong!

    Ask any “average Greek” that you might happen to meet wandering unemployed in the streets of Athens. They know, they understand, and they and may yet provide an interesting test case for the EU. But the odds (in the form of the well-heeled) will be making damned sure that they don’t succeed!

    And thanks again to Nicky Hager for all his contributions to the health and well-being of NZ society. I just wish I hadn’t gotten too old to fully comprehend and react to the two articles that MHager drawing our attention to above. (I’d much prefer to be responding to them with something more useful than mere ‘gut feeling’, . . . )

    Good luck to Nicky Hager with whatever major topic he decides to take on next. And likewise to you, MHager, (whoever you might be.)

  19. AmaKiwi 19

    “Obama declares Venezuela a national security threat” (March 10,2015) and imposes sanctions (using its control of the US dollar).

    It is absurd to think Venezuela can militarily threaten the USA. But their oil wealth makes possible Venezuelan socialism which is a threat to the security of America’s vision of a corporate controlled global empire.

    “Diosdado Cabello, the head of the Venezuelan National Assembly, said, “These types of measures (US sanctions) . . . are only threats from an empire that has power, but that lacks scruples,”

    He also urged the general population to be prepared for an armed US-led attack.

    “These emergency resolutions are used by the North American empire every time they are going to attack a country. They say they feel threatened. What weapons do we possibly have to threaten the United States?”


    What weapons did Vietnam, Serbia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Yemen, Syria, etc., have that they could possibly threaten people living in the USA?

    Regrettably I, too, have concluded World War Three began with 9/11. Now it only remains for us to see which countries line up on which sides and which stay on the sidelines.

  20. Vaughan Little 20

    The argument of the video is flawed.

    The US can’t even come up with decent strategy for engagement with a single one of the nations listed; how could anyone accuse them of coordinating some global geopolitical conspiracy?

    Many people believe that the US dollar’s status as the global fiat currency gives the US some kind of advantage. If I understand it correctly, this thinking is a key element in the video’s argument. I side with Michael Pettis (strongly recommend his blog, mpettis.com) in believing the opposite: the US economy would be better off if its currency weren’t the global fiat, because other nations’ use of it, done at scale, can have disruptive effects on the domestic economy. The US would have greater economic sovereignty if some other instrument were the global fiat.

    Geopolitics is complex, but it’s essentially a human story. people are justified in being fearful of Russia, and the video does itself no credit in its silence on that dimension of the story.

    Lastly, I recommend a recent blogpost by Pettis which goes over some of the ground covered in the video, but from a much healthier perspective:


Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Pissing-Off The Israelis Is A High-Risk Strategy.
    Dangerous Foes: For those readers of Bowalley Road who feel disposed to dismiss any prospect of an Israeli destabilisation of New Zealand politics, the example of the United Kingdom repays close attention. Ever since the election of Jeremy Corbyn as leader of the British Labour Party, the Israelis have sanctioned, funded and ...
    1 hour ago
  • Something to go to in Wellington
    Make It 16, the youth-led campaign to lower New Zealand's voting age, is holding an official campaign launch at Parliament this Friday from 16:30. If you'd like to attend, you can register using EventBrite here. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 hours ago
  • A founding member responds to Peace Action Wellington
    by Don Franks It was a lovely sunny Wellington afternoon with blue skies above  the beaches.  In Courtenay Place, political activists packed out a stuffy upstairs room for an important meeting. The assembled pacifists, anarchists, communists and independent young radicals of Peace Action Wellington felt the need for a mission ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 hours ago
  • “Mistakes and errors”
    Current and former NZDF top brass are being publicly grilled this week by the hit and run inquiry over their public responses to allegations of civilian casualties. Previously, they've claimed there were no casualties, a position which led them to lie to Ministers and to the public. Now, they're saying ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 hours ago
  • “Homosexuality is same-sex attraction and relationships, not heterosexuals with delusions of gende...
    by Rafael D. Quiles (gender-critical gay man from Puerto Rico) The writing on the wall is right in people’s faces and people just don’t see it or don’t want to. What could actually possess a heterosexual male to want to feminize himself and claim that he is a lesbian? Because ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    19 hours ago
  • Trump: “Where’s my favourite dictator?”
    From the Wall Street Journal:Inside a room of the ornately decorated Hotel du Palais during last month’s Group of Seven summit in Biarritz, France, President Trump awaited a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi. Mr. Trump looked over a gathering of American and Egyptian officials and called out in ...
    1 day ago
  • Magdalen Burns, 1983-2019, fighter for women’s liberation
    by the Redline blog collective At Redline we are very saddened to hear of the death of Magdalen Burns who passed away on the morning of Friday, September 13 (British time). Magdalen was a great fighter for the rights of women in general and lesbian women in particular, a defender ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 days ago
  • Parliament and the Executive
    The Brexit issue has certainly brought with it a series of apparently difficult constitutional issues, many of them concerning the respective roles of the executive and parliament. Most of them arise because of the unwillingness of MPs, despite their professions to the contrary, to be bound by a constitutional rarity ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 days ago
  • The Abigail Article; Martyn Bradbury’s Article, and My Response
    . . This blogpost is different to my usual format of reporting on issues… Since July 1011, I have blogged on a variety of political issues; near always political and/or environmental; mostly highly critical of the previous National Government. Other issues included Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and repression of ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    2 days ago
  • Police will have to wear silly Buckingham Palace hats from now on, says Police Minister
    Those close to the Police Minister believe the initiative may be the result of Nash “seeing a great deal” on AliExpress. In a move that comes seemingly out of nowhere, Police Minister Stuart Nash announced this afternoon that he expects all frontline staff to don bearskin hats, famously worn by ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    3 days ago
  • A sensible crackdown
    The government has released its Arms Legislation Bill, containing the second tranche of changes to gun laws following the March 15 massacre. And it all looks quite sensible: a national gun register, higher penalties for illegal possession and dealing, tighter restrictions on arms dealers and shooting clubs, and a shorter ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • California bans private prisons
    Private prisons are a stain on humanity. Prison operators explicitly profit from human misery, then lobby for longer prisons terms so they can keep on profiting. And in the US, prison companies run not only local and state prisons, but also Donald Trump's immigration concentration camps. Faced with this moral ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Why PPPs are a bad idea
    When National was in power, they were very keen on Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) - basicly, using private companies to finance public infrastructure as a way of hiding debt from the public. They were keen on using them for everything - roads, schools, hospitals. But as the UK shows, that "service" ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • A Movement That No Longer Moves.
    Moving And Shaking: There was a time when people spoke matter-of-factly about the “labour movement” – a political phenomenon understood to embrace much more than the Labour Party. Included within the term’s definition was the whole trade union movement – many of whose members looked upon the Labour Party as ...
    3 days ago
  • NZ ‘left’ politically embracing extreme postmodernism
    by Philip Ferguson Much of the left, even people who formally identify as marxists, have collapsed politically in the face of postmodern gender theory of the sort pioneered by American philosopher Judith Butler. For Butler even biological sex is socially constructed. “If the immutable character of sex is contested, perhaps ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    4 days ago
  • The obvious question
    The media is reporting that the (alleged) Labour party sexual assaulter has resigned from their job at Parliament, which means hopefully he won't be turning up there making people feel unsafe in future. Good. But as with everything about this scandal, it just raises other questions. Most significantly: why the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • The moment I found out that you found out, I acted swiftly
    By Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern I am every bit as angry as you are. I am every bit as disappointed as you must be. The people with power, oversight and the ability to do something about these processes within the Labour Party should be ashamed. Whoever those people are, I ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    4 days ago
  • This is why people hate property developers
    Property developers think there is an "oversupply" of houses in Auckland:High turnover rates and falling prices may be a sign that there are too many new houses going in to some parts of Auckland, commentators say. [...] Property developer David Whitburn said there was a "bit of an oversupply" in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Australia to Pacific: “Fuck you, you can all drown”
    World leaders are meeting in New York in two weeks for the 2019 Climate Action Summit, where they are expected to announce new and more ambitious targets to stop the world from burning. But the Australian Prime Minister won't be there, despite being in the USA at the time:Scott Morrison ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Implausible ignorance
    Labour Party president Nigel Haworth resigned yesterday over the party's sexual assault scandal. But while that's good news, its unlikely to take away the stench of a coverup. Because according to Paula Bennett in Parliament yesterday, pretty much everyone in the Prime Minister's office was involved as well:I have been ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Labour’s Fatal Flaw.
     Two-Faced? Labour insiders' commitment to the neoliberal status quo puts them at odds with their party’s membership; its trade union affiliates; and a majority of Labour voters, but this only serves to strengthen the perception they have of themselves as a special elite. Among the lesser breeds, they’ll talk up a ...
    4 days ago
  • Ten reasons the Tories do NOT want an election
    There has been a lot of talk about Boris Johnson wanting an election, and he has blustered with great gusto about 'chicken' Jeremy Corbyn refusing one, but I think there are many reasons why he is secretly glad he has been refused the opportunity:The Tories are an utter rabble,tearing themselves ...
    5 days ago
  • Prorogation Illegal, rule Scottish judges
    Scottish appeal court judges have declared that Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament in the run-up to the October Brexit deadline is unlawful. The three judges, chaired by Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge, overturned an earlier ruling that the courts did not have the powers to interfere in the prime ...
    5 days ago
  • Let me explain what I meant by Everyday New Zealanders
    By Simon Bridges. The following is a press release from the office of Simon Bridges, leader of The National Party. Key ora, New Zealand. Happy Maori Language Week. Look, I’m writing to you today because I want to clear something up. There’s been a lot of kerfuffle around some things ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    5 days ago
  • Yes, the SIS is subject to the Public Records Act
    I understand there's some stuff going round about how the SIS "was removed from the list of public offices covered by the Public Records Act in 2017". The context of course being their records derived from US torture, which will be disposed of or sealed. The good news is that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • An evidence-based discussion of the Canadian fluoride/IQ study
    Dr. Christopher Labos and Jonathan Jarry discuss the recent Canadian fluoride/IQ research. They provide an expert analysis of the paper and its problems. Click on image to go to podcast. The critical debate about the recent ...
    5 days ago
  • Climate Change: Australia in denial
    Australia is burning down again, and meanwhile its natural disaster minister is denying climate change:Australia’s minister responsible for drought and natural disasters, David Littleproud, has said that he doesn’t “know if climate change is manmade”. Clarifying earlier comments that the question is “irrelevant” when considering the Coalition government’s response to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Philippines activist speaking on the Duterte tyranny
    Auckland Philippines Solidarity is excited to host Professor Judy Taguiwalo for a speaking tour of NZ in September. She is a well-known activist in the Philippines and was a political prisoner under the Marcos dictatorship. Professor Taguiwalo briefly served as a Cabinet member under President Duterte but was forced from ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    5 days ago
  • Disgust
    I have no special insights to offer on the Labour sexual assault coverup. All I have is disgust. Disgust that an organisation could fail its people so badly. Disgust that they punished the victims rather than the perpetrator. Disgust that its party hacks are apparently blaming the victims for demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Speak Up for Women calls out Greens’ censorship
    This open letter to the Green Party was penned after an opinion piece by Jill Abigail, a feminist and founding member of the party, was censored by the Greens’ leadership. (Redline has reprinted her article here).The intolerance of the Green Party leaders and their acceptance of the misogyny of gender ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    5 days ago
  • Member’s Day: End of Life Choice, part 3
    Today is a Member's day, and David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill continues its slow crawl through its committee stage. They're spending the whole day on it today, though the first hour is likely to be spent on voting left over from last time. After that they'll move on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Flight to Los Angeles turned back after passengers decide they don’t want to go anymore
    An ambitious plan to fly to Los Angeles petered out into a brief sight-seeing trip and a desire to return home and get some sleep before work tomorrow. Air New Zealand has confirmed a flight to Los Angeles last night was turned back about a quarter of the way into ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    6 days ago
  • Indigenous Futures: defuturing and futuring – an analytical framework for policy development?
    There appears to be consensus – by omission – that the concept of indigenous futures should be accepted at face value. So I scavenged the internet to see if I could locate an academic descriptor or a framework around how we think about it as a concept, and whether it ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    6 days ago
  • Cadbury rumoured to be releasing the Pineapple Trump
    Here’s another novelty chocolate to shove in your gob, New Zealand Cadbury could be seeking to make itself great again with a rumoured new release: Pineapple Trumps, a spin on its classic chocolate-encased pineapple treat and do-it-yourself tooth remover. The global confectionery manufacturer and bumbling “before” character in an infomercial, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    6 days ago
  • The coming resource war.
    During my time in the Pentagon I had the privilege of sitting down with military leaders and defence and security officials from a variety of Latin American nations. Sometimes I was present as a subordinate assistant to a senior US defence department official, sometimes as part of a delegation that ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    6 days ago
  • Māori Language Week with The Civilian
    Kia ora, Aotearoa. It’s that magical time of year. Te Wiki o te Reo Māori. In English, the week that frightens talk radio. As you probably know by now, all your favourite media outlets are participating, some more successfully than others. Stuff has changed its name to Puna for the ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    6 days ago
  • Will Horizons act on climate change?
    Local body elections are coming up next month. And it looks like all Palmerston North candidates for Horizons (the Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council) want to take action on climate change:Climate change is set to be a key issue in Palmerston North for the next three years if those wanting to get ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • BORA reform is stalled
    Eighteen months ago, the government promised to strengthen the Bill of Rights Act, by explicitly affirming the power of the courts to issue declarations of inconsistency and requiring Parliament to formally respond to them. So how's that going? I was curious, so I asked for all advice about the proposal. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Corbyn and Brexit
    As the Brexit saga staggers on, the focus is naturally enough on the Prime Minister and his attempts to achieve Brexit “do or die”. But the role played by the Leader of the Opposition is of almost equal interest and complexity. The first problem for Jeremy Corbyn is that he ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    6 days ago
  • A ditch for him to die in
    Last week, English Prime Minister Boris Johnson boldly declared that he would rather die be dead in a ditch than delay Brexit. Unfortunately for him, the UK parliament accepted the challenge, and promptly dug one for him. The "rebellion bill" requires him to ask for and secure yet another temporary ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Warning! Warning! Danger Jacinda Ardern! Danger Marama Davidson! Warning!
    Lost In Political Space: The most important takeaway from this latest Labour sexual assault scandal, which (if I may paraphrase Nixon’s White House counsel’s, John Dean’s, infamous description of Watergate) is “growing like a cancer” on the premiership, is the Labour Party organisation’s extraordinary professional paralysis in the face of ...
    6 days ago
  • Union solidarity with Ihumatao land occupation
    by Daphna Whitmore Every Sunday for the past two months unionists from First Union, with supporters from other unions, have set out to the Ihumatao land protest, put up gazebos and gas barbeques, and cooked food for a few hundred locals and supporters who have come from across the country. ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    7 days ago
  • Climate Change: The wrong kind of trees?
    Newsroom today has an excellent, in-depth article on pine trees as carbon sinks. The TL;DR is that pine is really good at soaking up carbon, but people prefer far-less efficient native forests instead. Which is understandable, but there's two problems: firstly, we've pissed about so long on this problem that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • No freedom of speech in Turkey
    Canan Kaftancioglu is a Turkish politician and member of the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP). Like most modern politicians, she tweets, and uses the platform to criticise the Turkish government. She has criticised them over the death of a 14-year-old boy who was hit by a tear gas grenade during ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    7 days ago
  • Speaker: Tadhg Stopford: Why I’m standing for the ADHB
    Hi there, just call me Tim.We face tough problems, and I’d like to help, because there are solutions.An Auckand District Health Board member has nominated me for as a candidate for the ADHB, because her MS-related pain and fatigue is reduced with hemp products from Rotorua.  Nothing else helped her. If I ...
    1 week ago
  • Good little vassals
    The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has published their report on whether the SIS and GCSB had any complicity in American torture. And its damning. The pull quote is this:The Inquiry found both agencies, but to a much greater degree, the NZSIS, received many intelligence reports obtained from detainees who, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Who Shall We Turn To When God, And Uncle Sam, Cease To Defend New Zealand?
    Bewhiskered Cassandra? Professor Hugh White’s chilling suggestion, advanced to select collections of academic, military and diplomatic Kiwi experts over the course of the past week, is that the assumptions upon which Australia and New Zealand have built their foreign affairs and defence policies for practically their entire histories – are ...
    1 week ago
  • The Politics of Opposition
    For most of the time I was a British MP, my party was out of government – these were the Thatcher years, when it was hard for anyone else to get a look-in. As a front-bencher and shadow minister, I became familiar with the strategies required in a parliamentary democracy ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • More expert comments on the Canadian fluoride-IQ paper
    The Green et al (2019) fluoride/IQ is certainly controversial – as would be expected from its subject (see If at first you don’t succeed . . . statistical manipulation might help and Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear). Anti-fluoride campaigners have been actively promoting it ...
    1 week ago
  • The return to guerrilla war in Colombia
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh On August 29th a video in which veteran FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) commander Iván Márquez announced that they had taken up arms again was released. There was no delay in the reaction to it, from longtime Liberal Party figure and former president Uribe, for ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Air New Zealand identifies this enormous plot of unused land as possible second airport site
    Air New Zealand couldn’t believe its luck that this seemingly ideal piece of real estate had so far gone entirely unnoticed. Air New Zealand’s search for a site to build a second Auckland Airport may have made a breakthrough this afternoon, after employees scanning Google satellite imagery spotted a huge, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Redline on the Labour Party
    No-one on the anti-capitalist left in this country today puts forward a case that Labour is on the side of the working class.  There are certainly people who call themselves ‘socialist’ who do, but they are essentially liberals with vested interests in Labourism – often for career reasons. Nevertheless, there ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • New Fisk
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Labour’s failure
    When National was in government and fucking over the poor for the benefit of the rich, foodbanks were a growth industry. And now Labour is in charge, nothing has changed: A huge demand for emergency food parcels means the Auckland City Mission is struggling to prepare for the impending arrival ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Ardern attempts to vaccinate Clarke Gayford live on television to prove that it’s safe
    Gayford, pictured here on The Project, before things got wildly out of control. A bold public relations move by the Government to encourage parents to vaccinate their children has gone horribly wrong. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern appeared on tonight’s episode of Three’s The Project, where the plan was for her ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Has Mr. Whippy gone too far by parking on our front lawns?
    Mr. Whippy’s business model has driven it down a dark road of intimidation. Residents in major centres around the country are becoming disgruntled by the increasingly aggressive actions of purported ice cream company Mr. Whippy, who have taken to parking on people’s front lawns and doorsteps in a desperate attempt ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Cleaning up the water
    Today the government released its Action Plan for Healthy Waterways, aimed at cleaning up our lakes and rivers. Its actually quite good. There will be protection for wetlands, better standards for swimming spots, a requirement for continuous improvement, and better standards for wastewater and stormwater. But most importantly, there's a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Fronting up
    Today I appeared before the Environment Committee to give an oral submission on the Zero Carbon Bill. Over 1,500 people have asked to appear in person, so they've divided into subcommittees and are off touring the country, giving people a five minute slot each. The other submitters were a mixed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear
    Anti-fluoride activists have some wealthy backers – they are erecting billboards misrepresenting the Canadian study on many New Zealand cities – and local authorities are ordering their removal because of their scaremongering. Many New Zealanders ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Democracy – I Don’t Think So
    So, those who “know best” have again done their worst. While constantly claiming to be the guardians of democracy and the constitution, and respecters of the 2016 referendum result, diehard Remainers (who have never brought themselves to believe that their advice could have been rejected) have striven might and main ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 weeks ago
  • Government says it will now build just one really nice home
    Following publication of this article, the Ministry has requested it to be noted that this supplied image is not necessarily representative of what the final house will look like, and it “probably won’t be that nice.” As part of today’s long-anticipated reset of the Government’s flagship KiwiBuild policy, Housing Minister ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Imperialism and your cup of coffee
    Over the next week or two we will be running three synopses of parts of the opening chapter of John Smith’s Imperialism in the 21st Century (New York, Monthly Review Press, 2016).  The synopsis and commentary below is written by Phil Duncan. Marx began Capital not with a sweeping historical ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Still juking the stats
    The State Services Commission and Ombudsman have released another batch of OIA statistics, covering the last six months. Request volumes are up, and the core public service is generally handling them within the legal timeframe, though this may be because they've learned to extend rather than just ignore things. And ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Hard News: Time for a New Deal: 25 years on
    In 1994, I was editing an ambitious street mag called Planet, from a fabled office at at 309 Karangahape Road. The thirteenth issue of the magazine was published in the winter of that year and its cover embodied a particularly ambitious goal: the end of cannabis prohibition.I wanted to do ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Not impressed
    KiwiBuild was one of the Ardern government's core policies. The government would end the housing crisis and make housing affordable again by building 100,000 new homes. Of course, it didn't work out like that: targets weren't met, the houses they did build were in the wrong place, and the whole ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Solar beats coal
    As the climate crisis escalates, it is now obvious that we need to radically decarbonise our economy. The good news is that its looking easy and profitable for the energy sector. Wind is already cheaper than fossil fuels, and now solar is too:The levellised cost of solar PV has fallen ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • A Step Too Far.
    A Crown Asset? For reasons relating to its own political convenience, the Crown pretends to believe that “No one owns the water.” To say otherwise would re-vivify the promises contained in the Treaty of Waitangi – most particularly those pertaining to the power of the chiefs and their proprietary rights ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Where Money Comes From
    Most people would say, no doubt, that they have a pretty good idea of what money is. They live with the reality of money every day. It is what is needed to buy the necessities of life and to maintain a decent standard of living. You get money, they would ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 weeks ago
  • Banned by the Green Party leadership: Jill Abigail on women’s rights and trans rights
    The article below was an opinion piece that appeared in the Spring 2019 issue of Te Awa (the NZ Green Party’s newsletter) and on the Greens website.  In keeping with their policy of hostility to women defending women’s right to female-only spaces, Green bureaucrats have since removed the opinion piece.  ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • The fallacy of the proximity argument.
    Longer term readers may remember my complaining that, as a political scientist, it is burdensome to have non-political scientists wanting to engage me about politics. No layperson would think to approach an astrophysicist and lecture him/her on the finer details of quarks and black holes, but everybody with an opinion ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    2 weeks ago
  • Where We Stood: Chris Trotter Replies To Stevan Eldred-Grigg.
    Joining The Fight: Stevan Eldred-Grigg's argument for New Zealand staying out of the Second World War fails not only on the hard-headed grounds of preserving the country’s strategic and economic interests; and not just on the soft-hearted grounds of duty and loyalty to the nation that had given New Zealand ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Universities back the climate strike
    On September 27, School Strike 4 Climate will be striking for a future to pressure the government for meaningful climate action. This time, they've asked adults to join them. And now, Lincoln University and Victoria University of Wellington have signed on:Victoria University of Wellington has joined Lincoln University in endorsing ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Another constitutional outrage
    Another day, another constitutional outrage in the UK. This time, the government is saying that if parliament passes a law to stop Brexit before being prorogued, they may just ignore it:A senior cabinet minister has suggested Boris Johnson could defy legislation to prevent a no-deal Brexit if it is forced ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Ending dairy in Canterbury
    Environment Canterbury has finally proposed nitrogen limits to stop dairy farmers from poisoning Christchurch's water supply. And naturally, farmers are whining about it:A proposed move by Environment Canterbury (ECan) to protect Christchurch's drinking water by setting tough – some would say, draconian – nitrate reductions in the decades ahead and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Is National the party of climate arson?
    The Zero Carbon Bill is currently before select committee. While its targets are weak, its a generally sensible bill that promises to establish a long-term framework to guide emissions reductions. But National hasn't made up its mind on whether it will support it - and according to Andrea Vance in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago

No feed items found.