web analytics

Do nothin’: drink-driving

Written By: - Date published: 10:37 am, November 1st, 2010 - 59 comments
Categories: alcohol, transport - Tags:

The latest drink-drive crash has reignited the debate over the legal blood/alcohol level. It’s clear from John Key’s excuse-making on Breakfast this morning that the Nats have no intention of reducing the limit from 0.8 to 0.5. The argument against a reduction is that most drink-drivers have accidents when they are well over 0.8 but that misses the point.

By the time you’re over 0.5 your judgement and motor skills are already becoming impaired. Crucially,the experts say that this is the point where people start to behave more irresponsibly and drink more. If people know they can drink up to the 0.8 level, they’re more likely to become irresponsible and drink more then drive at a dangerous level of intoxication. Tell people that they are not permitted to drink beyond 0.5 if they want to drive and they will have to confine themselves to a lower level of intoxication that is less likely to end up drinking to a more dangerous level.

Setting the legal blood/alcohol level for driving is not just about putting a line in the sand and saying ‘above this level, driving is too dangerous’ it’s also about reducing the likelihood of drinkers grossly exceeding this limit and then driving.

Last week Whale or the Penguin did a post with a highly selective group of countries that showed the country with the highest permissible blood/alcohol level (25% higher than ours), Sweden, also had the lowest road fatality rate (50% below ours). That’s obviously not the kind of data that either is going to spend the time to assemble themselves, so it came from the Nats, which reinforces the fact that National doesn’t want to lower the rate.

But why does Sweden have such low road fatalities?
– like the other Scandinavian countries, they control their populations’ love of the booze through very high taxation.
– Investment in safer roads. In particular, they make extensive use of wire median barriers, like we have on the Kapiti Coast and a few other places. These barriers make head-on crashes, the most deadly type of crash, virtually impossible. There are actually more accidents because of the barriers but they are far less likely to be serious because vehicles bounce of the barriers rather than crossing the centre line.

If they don’t want to lower the drink-drive level, maybe the Nats should look at what Sweden has done successfully to curtail drink driving and accidents. Sin tax on booze and investment in safer roading technology – can you see the Nats doing that? Nah, me neither. They’re going to do what they always do: nothing.

59 comments on “Do nothin’: drink-driving”

  1. Alcohol Industry 1, Humanity 0

  2. Bill 2

    Putting this in a slightly different context, if a machine operator drinks, then not only is alcohol consumption looked at, but the broader safety mechanisms of the machine involved. (Safety shields, kill switches, running speeds etc)

    But cars just get more and more bloody dangerous as manufacturers sell us on so-called ‘higher’ performance. The fact that the operators are wrapped up in a ‘safety zone’ of air bags and crush zones ironically adds to the danger.

    I’m not excusing drink driving in any way, but genuinely safer machines ( ie ones that don’t require air bags etc to save lives in a crash) would mitigate some of the damage they inflict.

    I’m sure the market will sort it out, eh?

    edit would deliberately ‘hazardous’ automobiles that required far more awareness on the part of the operator and that didn’t offer them a ‘get out of hospital’ free card via hi-tech crash impact mitigators help matters? Just a thought.

  3. Tigger 3

    Actually they are doing something – they’re protecting their mates in the alcohol industry.

    • Draco T Bastard 3.1

      And specifically Jonkey who has shares in the wine industry through his “blind” trust.

  4. Colonial Viper 4

    Someone has got to get a handle on how to manage repeat drink drive offenders i.e. take them and keep them off the road; they are the small group who do the most harm. Will lowering limits affect their behaviour? I’d say prob not, go ahead and do that and but much more will be required.

  5. Horse 5

    but they are far less likely to be serious because vehicles bounce of the barriers rather than crossing the centre line

    Unless you’re on a motorbike, in which case you lose limbs or die. We call them “cheesecutters” for a reason. WRB don’t do the job they’re claimed to do (stop head-on crashes) and are lethal to motorcyclists, which is why they’ve been banned in Norway and the Netherlands.

    More info here

  6. zimmer 6

    [sorry you’re currently banned. — r0b]

  7. James Stephenson 7

    I think you’re ignoring the major difference between NZ and Sweden – the actual skill level of the driving population.

    This comes from both the degree of difficulty to obtain a licence and the seriousness with which the Swedes approach their driving. They are one of the only countries that require you to pass a “skid course” and I’d bet their theory test is somewhat harder than our “scratch & win”.

    Lower alcohol and speed limits are addressing the symptoms. We need to address the cause which is that our drivers aren’t skilled enough and don’t take the whole thing seriously enough to make the right decisions.

  8. Carol 8

    I think a lot of the debate around drink driving focuses on our drinking culture, but fails to really critique our “car” culture. It’s cars that add the most lethal element to the mix. It’s a very dangerous technology to have as the basis of the transport system for citizens and other residents.

    Anti-spam CARS – what is this technology a mind-reader?

    • Colonial Viper 8.1

      $4/L petrol should sort out that car culture pretty quick: the cost-demand curve will do all the work for us.

      Oh yeah, massively increasing licensing costs for all vehicles with engines >2.0L or with turbos/superchargers will also help. (A more European approach)

      • Craig Glen Eden 8.1.1

        Its not cars or the size of the engines that kill people its impaired drivers and poor decision making. Not everyone can live in a city and use public transport so lets stop the argument that public transport is the answer to this social ill. While I am supportive of public transport NZers have to change our attitude to drinking and driving and this Government is doing nothing to address that issue. Alcohol is our problem not cars or Motor bikes or cyclists, Alcohol!

        Just another small point to get a full license these days is way tougher than when I got mine 24 years ago.So lets not make out that its sooo easy for young ones to get in a car and go driving because its not and its expensive to get a license and lots of less well of and lower educated people/workers need to be able to get a license and drive to earn a living.

        Tigger is right in my view the Tories are protecting their money supply again.

        • Carol 8.1.1.1

          The “car culture” issue is broader than just about having access to public transport. It lies behind the (largely right wing) resistance to public transport in urban areas, but it also lies behind attitudes to driving everywhere. It’s linked to issues of identity, individualism and hypocritical or contradictory attitudes that glamourise ‘boy racers’ at the same time as demonising them.

      • ianmac 8.1.2

        Pity that the Nats cancelled the few cents petrol tax which would maybe have made cars less popular and created a fund for light rail?

        • Lanthanide 8.1.2.1

          No, they didn’t cancel it. What they did is said that individual regions cannot raise their own fuel tax (up to 10 cents). Instead the government has raised the tax nationally and chooses where to spend the money itself.

          On Oct 1st the price of petrol went up by 7 cents, IIRC 4 cents was from GST and 3 cents was from the increase in the excise tax as I noted above.

          Personally I would like to see petrol costing about $2.20/L at the moment, based on the oil price (then again I spend about $80 on petrol every 3 weeks or so). Adding extra tax to decrease demand will also allow the government to move to counteract the impact from oil price spikes – for example if the price of petrol goes up by 20 cents overnight due to market forces, drop the tax by 10 cents to help cushion the blow.

      • Draco T Bastard 8.1.3

        Properly set up turbo-chargers can improve efficiency this seems to be especially true of diesel engines. The inefficiency comes from having a lead foot.

  9. OleOlebiscuitBarrell 9

    The latest drink-drive crash has reignited the debate over the legal blood/alcohol level.

    Not sure why. The guy in this particular case was twice the legal limit. For it to have been in any way relevant to the question, he would have needed to have been between 0.5 and 0.8.

    • SHG 9.1

      +5 Insightful

      • Zorr 9.1.1

        “By the time you’re over 0.5 your judgement and motor skills are already becoming impaired. Crucially,the experts say that this is the point where people start to behave more irresponsibly and drink more.”

        -100 reading skills

        • SHG 9.1.1.1

          I dispute that it causes one’s judgement to become impaired. In all the evidence in all the refereed academic publications I’ve seen – and that’s a lot – there isn’t anything to suggest that alcohol itself impairs judgement.

          Alcohol induces feelings of mild euphoria in small doses, impairs coordination and motor control in mild doses, and impairs respiration and other essential physiological processes in large doses. That’s what alcohol does to your body. End of story.

          The way one ACTS while drunk is an entirely learned response. In other words, if you’re a dickhead after using alcohol, it’s because you either think that “being a dickhead” is what you’re supposed to do when pissed, or you think that “being a dickhead” is something you can get away with while pissed. Alcohol qua alcohol does not CAUSE you to be a dickhead.

          If “drinking more and getting behind the wheel of a car” is what you do when you’re pissed, that’s probably because “drinking more and getting behind the wheel of a car” is something that you have learned, at a formative stage, is acceptable behaviour. Addressing that as the issue is something that will require much harder questions about alcohol’s role in NZ society. Reducing it to “this percentage in blood good, that percentage bad” is pointless.

          • Colonial Viper 9.1.1.1.1

            Not arguing that any of the points you raise are incorrect per se, but also not sure that the academics have any great practical ideas on things which can be done to make any difference either.

            Alcohol qua alcohol does not CAUSE you to be a dickhead.

            But what if I said alcohol is ASSOCIATED with people being dickheads. Would that now be an agreeable statement?

            I propose it is at least one that everyone has seen in action with their own eyes, multiple times.

            • SHG 9.1.1.1.1.1

              Your statement seems uncontroversial to me – but the problem is a social one rather than a physiological one. If NZers have learned that doing fucking stupid things while drunk is acceptable, then no amount of quibbling about blood-alcohol percentages will fix it.

  10. Lanthanide 10

    Nitpick – the proposal is dropping the rate from the present 0.08 to 0.05, not 0.8 to 0.5.

  11. Frederick 11

    OleOlebiscuitBarrell – you are incorrect, according to my Dominion Post he was actually three times over the limit.

    But your point is well made. Whether the limit was 0.08 to 0.05 would not have made any difference whatsoever to preventing this fatality so why this is being used as a case for lowering the limit is completely beyond me.

    • Craig Glen Eden 11.1

      Read the article / post Frederick.Second Para Line two

      “By the time you’re over 0.5 your judgement and motor skills are already becoming impaired. Crucially,the experts say that this is the point where people start to behave more irresponsibly and drink more”.

      Did you read the article or……………………………?

  12. Setting the legal blood/alcohol level for driving is not just about putting a line in the sand and saying ‘above this level, driving is too dangerous’ it’s also about reducing the likelihood of drinkers grossly exceeding this limit and then driving.

    For that to work, you’d need very minimal penalties for low-level offences. Someone just over the limit might even get a warning (if it was their first offence) and would know in future how many drinks they could safely have (and of course would not be allowed to continue driving that evening). But no, our punitive culture prevails and we take away the licence (and often the livelihood) of anyone caught.

    Obviously if you’ve drunk a lot of booze you’re impaired. But people right on the limit have no empirical way of knowing they’re there. And apparently the breath alcohol level rises over time after your last drink, so when you leave you may be under but by the time you encounter the RBT you’re over. Pretty arbitrary.

    Of course the wowsers will say “well don’t drink anything then”. But why should people who want to do the right thing and have a few drinks with friends but drive home safely be banned from do doing? Others will say “catch a taxi”, conveniently forgetting that this is a luxury well beyond most people and likely to eclipse the cost of the rest of their night out by an exponential amount.

    Which is why I prefer sobriety tests, not abritrary breath alcohol limits. If an initial screen (could still be a breath alcohol test, so we don’t waste the technology) suggests you’ve been drinking, you’re put on a machine that tests reaction times and other driving skills – a simulator, in other words.

  13. Meanwhile an article in the latest Lancet says alcohol is “more dangerous than crack cocaine and heroin” “when considering their wider social effects”.

    But that study concludes:

    …countries should target problem drinkers, not the vast majority of people who indulge in a drink or two. He said governments should consider more education programs and raising the price of alcohol so it wasn’t as widely available.

    So pretty much the Swedish model, which seems eminently sensible (though the problem I have with many alcohol takes is they penalise my bottle of good wine (unlikely to be bought to abuse) as harshly as a six pack of RTDs).

    • B 13.1

      Riiiiiiight. Because of course its only poor losers who buy cheap booze to get drunk. Maybe we could legislate a tax break- to take into consideration the better judgement of those who are morally superior enough to afford ‘good wine’.

      • No, idiots buy cheap booze to get drunk. Poor idiots, rich idiots, white idiots, brown idiots. If I want to get maggoted and spend my night groping people, spewing and possibly bashing passers-by I’m not going to invest in six bottles of Martinborough Pinot at $30 a pop I’m going to buy a six pack of the strongest RTD lolly water I can find.

        Ergo, to reduce binge drinking and the ill effects it produces, any tax should be aimed at those forms of alcohol which are commonly drunk in excess. As was the “alcopops” tax in Australia. And as no less a source than The Lancet recommends.

        Nothing to do with moral superiority. The only people who ought to take offence at my original comment are the inherently stupid.

        Oh look, one has.

        • felix 13.1.1.1

          “If I want to get maggoted and spend my night groping people, spewing and possibly bashing passers-by I’m not going to invest in six bottles of Martinborough Pinot at $30 a pop I’m going to buy a six pack of the strongest RTD lolly water I can find.”

          That’s a truly weird comment Rex. I’m still parsing it so I’ll keep my mouth shut for now, except to say that the groping, spewing, and bashing aren’t compulsory.

          • RedLogix 13.1.1.1.1

            felix,

            the groping, spewing, and bashing aren’t compulsory.

            The had an old saying in the Navy (and likely elsewhere) that you never really knew what really made a man tick until you was him ‘maggoted’.

            Having read so much from you felix, I’d be willing to guess you’d very fine company to drink with. But not so the guys living next door. Get them pissed and they’re shit magnets….everytime.

            Now you tell me why the difference and between us we’ll have solved the problem. Sincererly.

            • felix 13.1.1.1.1.1

              Practice, practice, practice 😉

              But seriously, one observation I’d make is that if your whole life revolves around drinking/other drugs then you’re far more likely to be a shit-magnet when you drink than someone who has to fit their drinking into an active and rounded lifestyle. The devil makes work and all that.

            • Rex Widerstrom 13.1.1.1.1.2

              I’d hazard a guess and say you don’t drink to get drunk. Some people do, either as an end in itself or to excuse (or so they think) the groping, spewing and bashing. Like RL says, if we knew why we wouldn’t have a problem.

              I’m not sure what Felix finds “weird” about my asserting this… of course I wasn’t implying everyone who buys alcohol (or even everyone who buys RTDs) do so with this as a goal.

              A very good friend of mine will start the night having two drinks to my one and as the night draws on the ratio increases (partly because I slow down but partly because he speeds up). I go out to have a drink with him and other friends, and – much as I resent it – to make sure he gets home safely… though even with me keeping an eye on him he often manages to get into (minor) trouble.

              While he might say he joins us for the pleasure of our company he’s basically joining us as an excuse to get maggoted. He’s not the only person I know who’s like that… I well recall another, whom I told to wait at the top of the steps while I got the car, simply falling forward and being too drunk to even put his hands out.

              Of course these things aren’t compulsory for everyone. But sadly they are for a few – those friends would never agree to my suggestion that we share a nice bottle of wine… they want the budget to buy as much alcohol by volume as possible 🙁

              • felix

                I get the point you’re making (even if I don’t agree with the underlying assumptions) but what do you hope to achieve by making people pay more for this cheap booze?

                I’m guessing you think that people will buy less of it. And some will, but who? Not the friends you’ve just told us about. Nah, you’re talking about punishing the responsible for the sins of the idiot.

                Which is exactly what you’ve been bemoaning elsewhere in the thread re: breath/alcohol limits.

        • Colonial Viper 13.1.1.2

          Although I know a number of well off alcoholics who think that the best way to get through their 60 standard drinks per week quota is with expensive booze.

          OK, these people aren’t likely to commit violent crime, start a police chase or throw up on the foot path, but their alcoholism is still a very major impact on both them and society around them

  14. SHG 14

    If people know they can drink up to the 0.8 level, they’re more likely to become irresponsible and drink more then drive at a dangerous level of intoxication

    This claim presupposes that people who are drinking know exactly what their blood alcohol levels are at any given time.

    • Vicky32 14.1

      But they know when they are shickered, surely? My father used to drive drunk.. we kids didn’t even realise but my mother did…
      However when the ex did it as well, he was just nasty!
      I have sympathy for my father because he was really a victim of PTSD, and he never (more by luck and harsh enforcement back in those days) harmed anyone. The ex is another matter, he’s just a selfish stupid bar-steward!

  15. RedLogix 15

    All this arguing over a ‘limit’ is a self-deluding nonsense.

    The only way to get a change in behaviour is to insist that ANY amount of alcohol and driving is not acceptable. No if’s or maybe’s….if you are going to drive, you don’t drink. Period.

    If you are stopped and tested, then an increasing regime of fines based on blood alcohol level kicks in, culminating in automatic and permanent loss of license on the third offense.

    If you are caught driving drunk again while disqualified, then it’s a ‘reckless endangerment’ charge with a five year sentence.

    If you maim or kill someone with ANY blood alcohol level over 0.05, then it’s an attempted or actual manslaughter charge with a minimum 10 year non-parole period.

    Introduce these penalties progressively over 5-10 years with a major parallel investment in rehabilitation and treatment.

    Draconian yes. But appeal to reason and persuasion has demonstrably failed.

    • Vicky32 15.1

      I agree! (Although I think not a lot of people will…)
      Deb

    • Colonial Viper 15.2

      And prey tell, why should people be blood alcohol limited only when they are driving? Surely under your proposed regime if they commit violent crime or property damage while under the influence, penalties should be ratcheted up as well?

      And why have such harsh punishments when the Government continues to allow cheap alcohol to be so easily available to all who seek it?

      • RedLogix 15.2.1

        Logically you are right CV, but I believe you have to start somewhere. Change does not arrive all fully formed and perfect overnight.

        Once someone starts drinking, the more they drink the more likely they are to make bad decisions. The correct time for them to make the decision is BEFORE they drink. Drink OR drive….you cannot choose both.

        And why have such harsh punishments when the Government continues to allow cheap alcohol to be so easily available to all who seek it?

        Yes again true. This leads the discussion into the deeper reasons WHY people use drugs. Primarily it’s to antidote chronically painful emotions like fear, anxiety, anger and grief. Because of injustice and inequality most humans suffer lives of ‘quiet desperation’ hoping that they get through without the pain overwhelming them. That directly leads to fundamental moral and political questions.

        But the status quo is not good enough, because ‘vehicular homicides’ like the one at Te Horo are predictably routine. There will another one just as awful within weeks. Pretending it won’t and doing nothing simply condemns more innocents. I know I’m treading perilously close to an ‘ends justifies the means’ line here, but equally, big problems sometime demand determined solutions.

      • SHG 15.2.2

        Surely under your proposed regime if they commit violent crime or property damage while under the influence, penalties should be ratcheted up as well?

        Right now the opposite is the case: if one commits violent crime or property damage while under the influence, the penalties are often reduced. Because the offender wasn’t in control of his actions, or didn’t know what he was doing, or some dumb shit that means nothing. See previous discussion about cultural attitudes to drinking. People commit crimes when drunk because they’ve learned that the penalties are less severe.

    • Substitute “tiredness” for “alcohol” in your second sentence and you’d have an equally valid argument.

      Actually, substitute a lot of things that might have the effect of not making you sit up straight with 100% of your attention on the road at all times and you’d have a point.

      For instance “ANY amount of screaming kids and driving is not acceptable” makes sense too.

      People are capable of acting responsibily and making rational decisions, and have a right to be permitted to do so. Save your draconian nanny statism for those who can’t or won’t.

      • RedLogix 15.3.1

        Rex,

        Are you arguing that just because doing something about ‘vehicular homicide’ that is perfectly extensive and consistent (ie covers all cases) is difficult, that we should do nothing?

        Nah…as with all change you start with the low hanging fruit. Alcohol incapcitated drivers routinely and predictably kill people…time we pulled our collective head out of our collective arse and did something about it. When we’ve shown some signs of fixing that, then maybe we can figure a way of dealing with idiots who carry on driving when they’re about to fall asleep.

        Or for example, we dealt with child slavery first; we got around to eight hour days and four weeks annual leave somewhat later.

        • Rex Widerstrom 15.3.1.1

          Alcohol incapcitated drivers routinely and predictably kill people

          I agree. But the key word is “incapacitated”. You’re conflating “people who have consumed any amount of alcohol prior to getting behind the wheel” with “people incapacitated by alcohol”.

          It’s a pity that police statistics say “X cars were stopped, and Y were found to be over the limit”. What I want to know is “and Z were found to have had consumed some alcohol but not enough to put them over the limit” because I’ve been stopped any number of times and blown less than .05 (which it already is over here).

          I would posit that, while your statement stands up to scrutiny, if you changed it to say “people who have consumed any alcohol at all routinely kill people” the statistics wouldn’t support you.

  16. B 16

    What a load of privileged paternalism. Yeah lets take alcohol away from the poor as well shall we? After all only the rich are truly responsible enough to be trusted with it.

    • RedLogix 16.1

      I agree. While cheap alcohol exacerbates the problem greatly, raising the price has exactly the effect you point to.

      Besides raise the price too much and people just make it for themselves.

      Edit: Reading Rex’s comment above, I’ve changed my mind….he’s right.

      • Thanks RL. I should make clear that I’m all for the draconan approach when someone is caught well over the limit, especially if it’s a second or subsequent offence.

        I’d like to see prison become commonplace, as it is overseas, for instance. And intervention, as you say, to help those who are drinking becasue of some underlying problem to tackle their addiction – contact with the criminal justice system is an ideal time to tip someone over the edge into wanting to do something about their problems.

        • RedLogix 16.1.1.1

          Rex,

          We’ve crossed comments a little. I agree with your comment here making the distinction between cheap booze for getting muntered on, and alcohol that’s intended and priced for social enjoyment.

          But expecting drunk people to make rational and responsible decisions is bollocks. It’s like telling nicotine addicted people that they can ‘quit’ by just cutting down to one or two packets a day. Doesn’t work, there is no half-way house.

          In order to change behaviour the line has to be drawn at either drink OR drive…never both.

          • Rex Widerstrom 16.1.1.1.1

            But I’m not expecting drunk people to make rational decisions RL, I’m expecting sober people to make rational decisions not to get drunk… whilst still enjoying a modicum of alcohol with dinner at a restaurant for instance… something a total prohibition of breath alcohol would ban.

            Then we take the sober people who didn’t make a rational decision and put the rest of us at risk and make their actions have some pretty serious consequences. I’m sure there’s a miniscule handful of people who’ve driven drunk for the very first time and killed or maimed someone but the vast majority are recidivists. A true zero tolerance approach (backed with rehabilitation) would deal with them without penalising those of us capable of acting rationally.

          • SHG 16.1.1.1.2

            In order to change behaviour the line has to be drawn at either drink OR drive…never both

            Will never happen. And rightly so, that would be bloody stupid.

            • RedLogix 16.1.1.1.2.1

              So you are content with the status quo then? A steady stream of entirely predictable killings being the price you are happy to pay for your bloody stupid addiction to alcohol?

              I’m expecting sober people to make rational decisions not to get drunk… whilst still enjoying a modicum of alcohol with dinner at a restaurant for instance… something a total prohibition of breath alcohol would ban.

              That’s more or less the deal you’ve had for decades. Hasn’t worked…. idiots use it as an excuse and routinely kill people. The privilege of being able to determine for yourself whether you have drunk too much gets abused. Time to revoke the privilege…tough.

            • Vicky32 16.1.1.1.2.2

              “Will never happen. And rightly so, that would be bloody stupid.”
              I think it should happen! Why do you think it’s bloody stupid?

        • Vicky32 16.1.1.2

          Years ago, I saw a great example of that same thing working successfully! My friend Carol had a friend I’ll call Ken, who one horrendous weekend went off on a tear, got completely bladdered and hit a fine crime spree.
          Being poor and working class, he ended up being sent to Rotoroa Island, where he got straightened out. Really!
          Granted not everyone sentenced to compulsory treatment is a success story, but Ken was. At the time (early 80s) his life was a disaster. The next time I saw him, 10 years later, he was doing wel, with a wife, children and an alternative lifestyle* that suited him perfectly – and no problems with drugs or alcohol! When I think of what could have become of him, I thank God (as does he) for what seemed at the time to be a complete disaster (his being sentenced to Rotoroa…)
          *Note he did not become a middle class self-satisfied yuppie! 🙂
          Deb

  17. Herodotus 17

    decreasing the level is only one aspect of the decusion. There as mentioned by others a well thoughtout progressive penality/fine/imprisonment regime, then there is the alignment of penalities with other offenses. As with red Logic (or was that the Act policy 😉 haha had to take a swipe)suggestion that makes somesense of a progressive “3 stikes” type of system.
    Yet are we trying to change behaviour or just make us feel good by ever stronger penalties to those that breach? Then if those in selected employment e.g. police, Mp’s are caught do they get stiffer penalties?
    10 or so years ago the drink drinving was viewed as anti social behaviour and many would in my circles stop mates from D/D. This anti social attitude has reverted back to if caugh bad luck mate scenario, why the change in attitude?
    If there is a law change I would hope that there would be real education and the level of alcohol intake that would be within the 0.05 level conveyed with time periods and food intake. Otherwise we are passing a law to catch the unwitted, as many would not have an understanding of what consumption is within the proposed levels.
    And on a side for me to make it far safer for the ladies to socialise in town and get home, it is daunting enough for a few males to have a night out with safety of nos.

    • 10 or so years ago the drink drinving was viewed as anti social behaviour and many would in my circles stop mates from D/D. This anti social attitude has reverted back to if caugh bad luck mate scenario, why the change in attitude?

      Declining respect for the police due to the exponential rise in their unacceptable behaviour and their incessant harrassment of otherwise law-biding citizens for minor traffic matters. A reaction against the increasing totalitarian streak in politicians and police officers.

      Treat people reasonably and most will behave reasonably… and censure those who don’t. Treat everyone like criminals and we’ll fee like the underdogs and find sympathy for the real criminals. Well done, successive governments.

  18. Frederick 18

    Craig Glen Eden
    Yep read the article word for word.
    My point is that whether the limit was 0.05 or 0.08 it is exceptionally unlikely that this would have made any difference to a driver who caused this accident. With people like him whether the limit be it zero, 0.02 or whatever makes no difference – they will drive absolutely pissed out of their brains.
    Therefore I am perplexed as to why the media are using this as an example for lowering the limit. If he was 0.06 I could see some point but three times over the limit – can’t see the relevance.

    • Colonial Viper 18.1

      Frankly I’ve seen no initiatives proposed in the media which will make the slightest dent in repeat drink drive offending/driving while disqualified numbers, nor in the numbers of people driving and killing at 0.12, 0.16, 0.24, 0.32 levels of alcohol.

      Passing new legislation is relatively easy, but actually sorting out the above seems beyond everyones ken. Yet that is where the road toll damage is being done and it seems to me that people are actively avoiding confronting that.

      By all means then lower the limit from 0.08 to 0.05, or even 0.04. You’ll save a couple or five lives a year, maybe. But it probably won’t be significant in the statistics because (IMO) the bulk of alcohol related road deaths are not related to any effective dynamics between a law at 0.08 and a law at 0.05.

  19. The guy in the Otaki crash was 3 times the legal limit. Making the limit lower wouldn’t have done a thing. Putting people in jail for longer is part of a wider agenda afoot to make private prisons into a growing and profitable business investment.

    I used to work in prisons. Bottom line? If you want more criminals, build more prisons. They are a University for Crime and a key recruiting environment for gangs.

  20. Peter 20

    There is no mystery that John Key is reluctant to go for 0.5. The National party has a huge rural constituency and rurals favour 0.8. That’s politics. The real mystery is why over nine years Labour with a largely supportive urban constituency did nothing. Harry Duynhoven tried but got nowhere with the Labour cabinet. Before sneering at Key, Labour supporters should reflect on that.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Govt supports King Country farmers to lift freshwater quality
    Healthier waterways are front and centre in a new project involving more than 300 King Country sheep, beef and dairy farmers. The Government is investing $844,000 in King Country River Care, a group that helps farmers to lift freshwater quality and farming practice, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor announced today. “Yesterday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • Support for arts and music sector recovery
    A jobseekers programme for the creative sector and four new funds have been set up by the Government to help our arts and music industry recover from the blow of COVID-19. Thousands of jobs will be supported through today’s $175 million package in a crucial economic boost to support the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • Legislative changes to support the wellbeing of veterans and their families
    Minister for Veterans Ron Mark has welcomed the First Reading of a Bill that will make legislative changes to further improve the veterans’ support system.  The Veterans’ Support Amendment Bill No 2, which will amend the Veterans’ Support Act 2014, passed First Reading today. The bill addresses a number of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Christ Church Cathedral – Order in Council
    Views sought on Order in Council to help fast track the reinstatement of the Christ Church Cathedral  The Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, Hon Poto Williams, will be seeking public written comment, following Cabinet approving the drafting of an Order in Council aimed at fast-tracking the reinstatement of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New Zealanders’ human rights better protected in new Bill
    The law setting out New Zealanders’ basic civil and human rights is today one step towards being strengthened following the first reading of a Bill that requires Parliament to take action if a court says a statute undermines those rights. At present, a senior court can issue a ‘declaration of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Deep concern at Hong Kong national security legislation
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today reiterated the deep concern of the New Zealand Government following confirmation by China’s National People’s Congress of national security legislation relating to Hong Kong. “New Zealand shares the international community’s significant and long-standing stake in Hong Kong’s prosperity and stability,” Mr Peters said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government invests in New Zealand’s cultural recovery
    Thousands of artists and creatives at hundreds of cultural and heritage organisations have been given much-needed support to recover from the impact of COVID-19, Prime Minister and Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Jacinda Ardern announced today. “The cultural sector was amongst the worst hit by the global pandemic,” Jacinda ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Better protection for New Zealand assets during COVID-19 crisis
    Key New Zealand assets will be better protected from being sold to overseas owners in a way contrary to the national interest, with the passage of the Overseas Investment (Urgent Measures) Bill. The Bill, which passed its third reading in Parliament today, also cuts unnecessary red tape to help attract ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Cleaning up our rivers and lakes
    Setting higher health standards at swimming spots Requiring urban waterways to be cleaned up and new protections for urban streams Putting controls on higher-risk farm practices such as winter grazing and feed lots Setting stricter controls on nitrogen pollution and new bottom lines on other measures of waterway health Ensuring ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Record year for diversity on Govt boards
    The Government is on the verge of reaching its target of state sector boards and committees made up of at least 50 percent women, says Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter and Minister for Ethnic Communities Jenny Salesa. For the first time, the Government stocktake measures the number of Māori, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New appointments to the Commerce Commission
    The Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister and Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media Minister, Kris Faafoi, has today announced the appointment of Tristan Gilbertson as the new Telecommunications Commissioner and member of the Commerce Commission. “Mr Gilbertson has considerable experience in the telecommunications industry and a strong reputation amongst his peers,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Historic pay equity settlement imminent for teacher aides
    The Ministry of Education and NZEI Te Riu Roa have agreed to settle the pay equity claim for teacher aides, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. This will see more than 22,000 teacher aides, mostly women, being valued and paid fairly for the work they do. “Teacher aides are frontline ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Govt delivers security for construction subcontractors
    Subcontractors will have greater certainty, more cashflow support and job security with new changes to retention payments under the Construction Contracts Act says Minister for Building and Construction, Jenny Salesa. A recent review of the retentions money regime showed that most of the building and construction sector is complying with ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • New Zealand and Singapore reaffirm ties
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong have marked the first anniversary of the New Zealand-Singapore Enhanced Partnership with a virtual Leaders’ Meeting today. The Enhanced Partnership, signed on 17 May 2019, provides the framework for cooperation across the four main areas of trade, defence and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • JOINT STATEMENT BY THE PRIME MINISTERS OF NEW ZEALAND AND THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE ON THE FIRST AN...
    On 17 May 2019, New Zealand and Singapore established an Enhanced Partnership to elevate our relations. The Enhanced Partnership – based on the four pillars of trade and economics, security and defence, science, technology and innovation, and people-to-people links – has seen the long-standing relationship between our countries strengthen over the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government investment supports the acquisition of new Interislander ferries
    State-Owned Enterprises Minister Winston Peters has welcomed KiwiRail’s announcement that it is seeking a preferred shipyard to build two new rail-enabled ferries for the Cook Strait crossing. “This Government is committed to restoring rail to its rightful place in New Zealand. Bigger, better ships, with new technology are yet another ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Better protection for seabirds
    Better protection for seabirds is being put in place with a new National Plan of Action to reduce fishing-related captures, Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash and Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage announced today.   The National Plan of Action for Seabirds 2020 outlines our commitment to reduce fishing-related captures and associated seabird ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Milestone in cash flow support to SMEs
    Almost $1 billion in interest-free loans for small businesses More than 55,000 businesses have applied; 95% approved Average loan approx. $17,300 90% of applications from firms with ten or fewer staff A wide cross-section of businesses have applied, the most common are the construction industry, accommodation providers, professional firms, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government protects kids as smoking in cars ban becomes law
    Thousands of children will have healthier lungs after the Government’s ban on smoking in cars with kids becomes law, says Associate Minister of Health Jenny Salesa. This comes after the third reading of Smoke-free Environments (Prohibiting Smoking in Motor Vehicles Carrying Children) Amendment Bill earlier today. “This law makes it ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Parliament returns to a safe normal
    The special Epidemic Response Committee (ERC) has successfully concluded its role, Leader of the House Chris Hipkins said today. The committee was set up on 25 March by the agreement of Parliament to scrutinise the Government and its actions while keeping people safe during levels 4 and 3 of lockdown. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Foreign Minister makes four diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today announced four diplomatic appointments: New Zealand’s Ambassador to Belgium, High Commissioners to Nauru and Niue, and Ambassador for Counter-Terrorism. “As the world seeks to manage and then recover from COVID-19, our diplomatic and trade networks are more important than ever,” Mr Peters said. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New Bill to counter violent extremism online
    New Zealanders will be better protected from online harm through a Bill introduced to Parliament today, says Internal Affairs Minister Tracey Martin. “The internet brings many benefits to society but can also be used as a weapon to spread harmful and illegal content and that is what this legislation targets,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Mycoplasma bovis eradication reaches two year milestone in good shape
    New Zealand’s world-first plan to eradicate the cattle disease Mycoplasma bovis is on track the latest technical data shows, says Agriculture and Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor. “Two years ago the Government, DairyNZ and Beef + Lamb New Zealand and industry partners made a bold decision to go hard and commit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • New payment to support Kiwis through COVID
    Further support for New Zealanders affected by 1-in-100 year global economic shock 12-week payment will support people searching for new work or retraining Work programme on employment insurance to support workers and businesses The Government today announced a new temporary payment to support New Zealanders who lose their jobs due ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • PGF reset helps regional economies
    The Provincial Growth Fund will play a vital role in New Zealand’s post-COVID-19 recovery by creating jobs in shorter timeframes through at least $600 million being refocused on projects with more immediate economic benefits, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The funding is comprised of repurposed Provincial Growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents
    Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents Homeowners, builders and DIYers will soon have an easier time making basic home improvements as the Government scraps the need for consents for low-risk building work such as sleep-outs, sheds and carports – allowing the construction sector to fire back up quicker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Concern at introduction of national security legislation for Hong Kong
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says the New Zealand Government has reacted with concern at the introduction of legislation in China’s National People’s Congress relating to national security in Hong Kong.  “We have a strong interest in seeing confidence maintained in the ‘one country, two systems’ principle under which Hong ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Samoa Language Week theme is perfect for the post-COVID-19 journey
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio, says the theme for the 2020 Samoa Language Week is a perfect fit for helping our Pacific communities cope with the unfolding COVID-19 crisis, and to prepare now for the journey ahead as New Zealand focuses on recovery plans and rebuilding New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Adult kakī/black stilt numbers soar
    A nearly 40-year programme to protect one of New Zealand’s most critically endangered birds is paying off, with a record number of adult kakī/black stilt recently recorded living in the wild, the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced today. “Thanks to the team effort involved in the Department of Conservation’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Waikato-Tainui settlement story launched on 25th anniversary of Treaty signing
    The story of the Waikato-Tainui Treaty process and its enduring impact on the community is being told with a five-part web story launched today on the 25th anniversary of settlement, announced Associate Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “I am grateful to Waikato-Tainui for allowing us to help capture ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Taita College to benefit from $32 million school redevelopment
    Taita College in the Hutt Valley will be redeveloped to upgrade its ageing classrooms and leaky roofs, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. “The work is long overdue and will make a lasting difference to the school for generations to come,” Chris Hipkins said. “Too many of our schools are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Redeployment for workers in hard-hit regions
    The Government is allocating $36.72 million to projects in regions hard hit economically by COVID-19 to keep people working, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. Projects in Hawke’s Bay, Northland, Rotorua and Queenstown will be funded from the Government’s $100 million worker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $35m to build financial resilience for New Zealanders
    A $35m boost to financial capability service providers funded by MSD will help New Zealanders manage their money better both day to day and through periods of financial difficulty, announced Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “It’s always been our position to increase support to key groups experiencing or at risk ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New District Court Judge appointed
    Dunedin barrister Melinda Broek has been appointed as a District Court Judge with Family Court jurisdiction to be based in Rotorua, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Ms Broek has iwi affiliations to Ngai Tai. She commenced her employment in 1996 with Scholefield Cockroft Lloyd in Invercargill specialising in family and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $206 million investment in upgrades at Ohakea Air Force Base
    The Coalition Government has approved a business case for $206 million in upgrades to critical infrastructure at Royal New Zealand Air Force Base Ohakea, with the first phase starting later this year, Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today. The investment will be made in three phases over five years, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Review of CAA organisational culture released
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford today released the Ministry of Transport’s review of the organisational culture at the Civil Aviation Authority. Phil Twyford says all employees are entitled to a safe work environment. “I commissioned this independent review due to the concerns I had about the culture within the CAA, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Board appointed at Stats NZ
    Ensuring that Stats NZ’s direction and strategy best supports government policy decisions will be a key focus for a new Governance Advisory Board announced today by the Minister for Statistics, James Shaw. The new Governance Advisory Board will provide strategic advice to Stats NZ to ensure it is meeting New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Principal Environment Judge
    Environment Judge David Kirkpatrick of Auckland has been appointed as the Principal Environment Judge, Attorney-General David Parker announced today.  Judge Kirkpatrick was appointed an Environment Judge in February 2014. From December 2013 to July 2016 he was Chair of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel. Prior to appointment he ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Digital connectivity boost for urban marae
    A programme to connect marae around the country to the internet has received $1.4 million to expand to include urban marae in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media Minister Kris Faafoi and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. The funding for the Marae Connectivity Programme ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt increases assistance to drought-stricken Hawke’s Bay farmers
    The Government will provide $500,000 to the Hawke’s Bay Mayoral Drought Relief Fund to help farmers facing one of the worst droughts in living memory, says Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “Yesterday afternoon I received a letter from Hawke's Bay's five local Government leaders asking me to contribute to the Fund. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago