DPF doesn’t care about democracy

Written By: - Date published: 12:23 pm, March 31st, 2010 - 4 comments
Categories: blogs, democracy under attack, dpf - Tags:

Reproduced with permission from No Right Turn

A couple of years ago, DPF went apeshit about the then-Labour government’s Electoral Finance Act. While intended to protect democracy from the unequal influence of the rich, DPF saw it as an attack on democracy. So he vented online, raised funds, even launched billboards comparing the government to Mao Zedong, Kim Jong-Il, and Frank Bainimarama. So you’d think that when the present government announced plans to sack an elected council and strip 560,000 people of their vote in regional council elections for four years, as a “defender of democracy”, he’d be similarly outraged about it, right?

Yeah, right. He supports it. Taking people’s votes off them is fine if you take them from people who vote the “wrong” way.

So much for DPF’s commitment to democracy.

lprent: DPF mounted a rather pathetic ‘defense’ of his position in this post yesterday afternoon. It amounted to ‘the Labour government did it too’, which pretty much appears to be his repetitive stock response to everything these days. Usually he is incorrect because he compares unalike situations. This may not be deliberate, as the comparisons may simply exceed his cognitive abilities.

There is a considerable difference between this case and a council requesting its dissolution on behalf of its constituents because they are having problems as in Rodney in 2000. In that case, the government held elections at the earliest possible opportunity.

In the current Canterbury situation, organisations and people external to the council appear to want a dissolution for more pecuniary motivations. With the exception of the irrigation lobby it is hard to see any other group that was actively seeking a dissolution. Most people including the local mayors appear to have wanted a hurry-up on some decision making. However it is clear that some farmers, especially dairy farmers,  were upset on decisions on water by the council.

Wyatt Creech has a long association with the dairy industry who are pushing for more water allocations in the area. Asking him to look at water allocation issues in Canterbury looks a bit like a case of asking a stoat where it would like kereru to site their nests. His answer appears to be to ignore all of the other work by the council, get rid of the bothersome local democracy, and shift to an unelected divvy up of the water spoils.

The key factor in this case is that elections are not being called for at the next available opportunity, and there are indications that the voters of Canterbury are about to lose control of their water. If that isn’t an attack on democracy and the ability of populations to have a say in their own resources, then I don’t think that DPF fully understands the basic concept.

4 comments on “DPF doesn’t care about democracy”

  1. DeepRed 1

    For all the faults of the EFA, I suspect the Granny Herald’s real reason for its “Democracy under attack” demagoguery was because it perceived a threat to its advertising revenue, not because it was genuinely concerned about democracy itself.

  2. tc 2

    The US have Fox news we have Kiwiblog/DPF as evidence of ownership of outlets by political persuasions being alive and well in NZ just like in america.

  3. Draco T Bastard 3

    If that isn’t an attack on democracy and the ability of populations to have a say in their own resources, then I don’t think that DPF fully understands the basic concept.

    He, the same as everyone in NACT, is a capitalist and capitalists are all about having control of limited resources in their hands so they can make a profit. If this profit comes at an expense to everybody else then so be it as far as they’re concerned. Democracy stands in their way of such absolute control.

    They understand democracy and they don’t want it.

  4. It is completely different. You all know that. You just see it as an an opportunity for your favourite sport: DPF-bashing.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Safety focus in improved drug driver testing
    Improving the safety of all road users is the focus of a new public consultation document on the issue of drug driver testing. Plans for public consultation on options to improve the drug driver testing process have been announced by ...
    4 days ago
  • Making it easier to get help from Police
    Police Minister Stuart Nash says calling a cop suddenly got a whole lot easier with the launch of a ground-breaking new service for non-emergency calls. “The single non-emergency number ‘ten-five’ is designed to provide better service for the public and ...
    1 week ago
  • More Police deployed to the regions
    Frontline Police numbers have been boosted with today’s deployment of 77 new officers to the regions. Police Minister Stuart Nash today congratulated the recruits of Wing 325 who graduated at a formal ceremony at the Royal New Zealand Police College. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Taxpayers get a smarter and fairer system
    One of the biggest IT projects ever undertaken in the state sector has successfully passed its latest hurdle with the transition of more than 19.7 million taxpayer accounts from one Inland Revenue computer system to another. Revenue Minister Stuart Nash ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Early insights into use of restricted drugs
    The first nationwide snapshot of the consumption of restricted drugs indicates the prevalence of methamphetamine use in New Zealand, says Police Minister Stuart Nash. “The first quarterly analysis of the nationwide wastewater testing programme reinforces the coalition government’s determination to ...
    3 weeks ago