web analytics

Freedom of Speech and Expression

Written By: - Date published: 10:14 am, April 24th, 2018 - 47 comments
Categories: humour, you couldn't make this shit up, youtube - Tags: ,

Mark Meechan is a 30 year old Scots guy, and he just got in some deep shit for taking the piss.

In his own words that set context for a video he made –

Ma girlfriend is always rantin’ and ravin’ about how cute and adorable her wee dog is, and so I thought I’d turn him into the least cute thing I could think of, which is –  a nazi.

So Mark trained “Buddha” (his girlfriend’s pug)  to respond to the phrase “gas the Jews” (fairly obviously fcking Nazi I’d have thought) and to lift its paw in a Nazi salute when he said “sieg heil.

And he slammed it up as a youtube video.

Yesterday, a Sheriff slapped him with a £800 (NZ$1 560) fine for being “grossly offensive” (that being the verdict previously thrown at him under the “Communications Act”). In relation to freedom of speech Sheriff  O’Carroll reckons that –   “in all modern democratic countries the law necessarily places some limits on that right”.

Meechan intends to appeal the sentence. As he says, it was a joke that revolved around the “juxtaposition of having an adorable animal react to something vulgar”. In other words, he was communicating humour (or at least attempting to).

Regardless of your sense of humour/ sense of outrage, the more important point might be, as Mark says, that-

A really dangerous precedent has been set for people to say things, their context to be completely ignored and then they can be convicted for it. You don’t get to decide the context of what you said, other people don’t get to, the court gets to – that’s dangerous.

So this guy sets out to rile his girlfriend by portraying her cute little pug as an arse. He wasn’t suggesting that Jews actually be gassed and he wasn’t promoting Nazism. Neither was he a public figure who, arguably, ought to be careful about what they say and/or how they say what they say, because their voices are amplified, and they themselves are held aloft as influential individuals.

The “best” bit is that the guys who do promote and believe in a lot of fascist shite got a free ticket to ride some publicity off the back of this institutional stupidity.

Youtube have disabled a pile of features around the video, and have the following text below the video that requires a two step process to play – In response to user reports, we have disabled some features, such as comments, sharing, and suggested videos, because this video contains content that may be inappropriate or offensive to some audiences.

And I can maybe understand that, given their algorithms would likely link to some pretty vile stuff. But then, that’s not Mark Meechan’s problem to sort out, is it?

Anyway, the video “M8 Yer Dugs a Nazi’ may or may not be behind the link depending on exactly what it is that youtube have disabled.  (I think it will be – watch it if you want, and don’t if you don’t)

 

47 comments on “Freedom of Speech and Expression ”

  1. savenz 1

    You have to wonder about Facebook sense of morality, a mother breastfeeding is apparently offensive but a dog responding to ‘gas the jews’ is ok with a warning?

  2. tracey 2

    As an aside you also have to wonder that a private joke with his girlfriend needed to be uploaded to youtube. I guess he got the attention he sought?

    • Bill 2.1

      I don’t think it’s at all unusual for people to “broadcast” their piss-takes in one way or another – to execute them in the social realm. Maybe not via youtube or whatever, but then, this was a process as opposed to a “moment”.

      • tracey 2.1.1

        “As an aside”…

        Yes people do upload things to youtube presumably because they want alot of people to see them. I can send a video to a select group through Messenger if I want to.

        My point is there are consequences from seeking the widest possible audience, which is what youtube is.

        • Bill 2.1.1.1

          Do you think a NZ$ 1 500 fine is an appropriate consequence in this instance, or that he should have been found guilty of being “grossly offensive” under a “Communications Act”?

          The guy has a (not recommended) youtube channel btw. So I guess dropping up videos is just “what he does” as opposed to having to make much of discrete decision to post a vid for this particular thing.

          I’m also unsure about what numbers has got to do with it.

          What if he’d made the same vid, but left it sitting on his phone and shown it to “mates down the pub” (or whatever). What then?

          Or if he’d not video’d anything but “displayed” Buddha’s subverted responses “just for laughs” to all and sundry who happened to be around at given times?

          I guess he sees himself as a wit, and wits have always sought out audiences, no? (And yes, I reckon you can safely add a couple of ‘t’s to that sentence.)

          But should he, given the context, have been found guilty and fined for being “grossly offensive”? Or should the context be ignored, or supplanted with another? And if so, then who can claim to do that legitimately? That’s not to say there aren’t multiple lenses that can be applied to the carryings on in the vid.

          And “a million and one” other questions.

          • tracey 2.1.1.1.1

            If he had put it on his phone and shown it to mates down the pub I imagine this post wouldn’t exist.

            As I said “as an aside”

            There are more than a few questions. Yes wits seeks audience and ought to expect that some will not like what they have to show.

  3. Gabby 3

    Think of it as a Dickhead Tax.

  4. Lara 4

    I understand the concept of free speech. It’s vital to a functioning democracy.

    AFAIK it’s the freedom to speak truth to power. Most especially (but not confined to) the freedom to openly disagree with our government. To protest, to have published our dissent.

    Because all dictatorships have a common feature of not allowing freedom of speech.

    And so I am rather tired of dumb arse white dudes claiming freedom of speech when they want to vent their racism or misogyny, and calling it “just a joke”.

    Sure, you may have the right to be an arse in public. But that’s not the same as speaking truth to power.

    And not all speech is protected. I can’t threaten someone with violence or death, my speech there is illegal.

    Hate speech is a thing. And calling it “just a joke” still leaves it as hateful.

    • Bill 4.1

      Where exactly was the hate speech?

      Not all humour is tasteful or even good. And responses definitely aren’t universal or predictable – ranging from laughter to disgust to outrage or anger (and then some).

      But who gets to decide on the above? And who should get to impose consequences from that decision on others?

      • Molly 4.1.1

        Youtube have an option to post the video to a selected group, this video was made public. Which really means that – in whatever form – you are a de-facto publisher.

        The merit of the joke is debatable. His choice to post without limits to girlfriends and family, makes it worth discussion.

        These kind of “jokes” are used to belittle a wide range of demographics – and if you are on the receiving end, then it seems never ending, it is not without harm.

        IIRC, hate speech is defined as inciting genocide – killing a group of people based on their race, sex, religion, self-identification etc – ie. saying death to all women, or – in this case – “Gas the Jews”. If he was recorded saying this without waving the paw of a pug, then the horrific nature of his speech is without question. Pug in play, well it becomes a “joke”.

        Would a discharge without conviction have led to a proliferation of videos with requisite fluffy animal to take the possibility of prosecution out? Has this conviction contributed to an understanding that with the ability to post publicly, comes responsibility?

        I guess time will tell, this is a ongoing discussion regarding the changing nature of technology, and the responsible use of it.

      • Lara 4.1.2

        It’s subjective isn’t it.

        As a woman who has a lifetime of harassment and abuse, I simply do not find funny sexist jokes that seek to keep me in my place.

        Making a dog raise it’s paw to “gas the Jews” may be funny for plenty of people, but I’m pretty sure that put in the context of the Holocaust it’s not gonna be funny for plenty of Jewish people.

        I still stand by my original comment. I am rather tired of dumb arse white dudes claiming freedom of speech when they want to vent their racism or misogyny, and calling it “just a joke”

        I made zero comment on “who gets to decide”.. on the above? which above Bill? be specific

        or “who should get to impose consequences for that decision”

        I simply said I’m tired of it, and when dudes do this racist misogynistic shit and then whine “free speech” it’s BS

        • Bill 4.1.2.1

          It’s subjective isn’t it.

          If hate speech is subjective (is that what your saying?) then the question becomes who gets to decide what is and isn’t hate speech, and who gets to determine consequences?

          The object of my original questions is the paragraph preceding the questions.

          And they circle down to the same point, which is to question any assumed authority that would punish others on subjective grounds.

          Is it right that a sheriff of the court makes that call and delivers consequences for example?

          But maybe I misunderstood your original comment, and you were merely commenting that you are tired of confronting stuff you perceive as being (in this case) racist.

          • Lara 4.1.2.1.1

            “But maybe I misunderstood your original comment, and you were merely commenting that you are tired of confronting stuff you perceive as being (in this case) racist.”

            Correct.

            That’s all I was saying really.

            With the added thing that when I see this rubbish it’s inevitably followed by a whine of “but free speech” from people who don’t have to live with the real effects of racism or sexism, but want to say racist and sexist shit (and usually they call it a joke)

            apparently the rest of us just lack a sense of humour SMH

            that’s the only point really that I was making. and it doesn’t necessarily have to lead to me then outlining how / who gets to censor such speech or decide what is hate speech

            • tracey 4.1.2.1.1.1

              Agree 100% Lara

              Your opinion is valid and does not have to be restricted by being shoe-horned into what anyone else thinks “the point” is.

      • Lara 4.1.3

        IMO “gas the Jews” is pretty hateful… even if it gets a cute dog to give a salute

        and when it comes from a young white non Jewish male, it’s not exactly punching up, is it?

        • tracey 4.1.3.1

          Agree. In some ways this guy has well publicised the extent of his ignorance, so it saves some people who can now identify him (presumably he is identifiable in the video?). I would rather, in so many ways that people were open in their “isms” than what we so clearly have in many parts of NZ now which is people who have learned to say the “right” things but scratch the surface and many are still bigotted, racist, sexist etc etc.

          To the privileged equality can feel like oppression. It seems consequences can too.

  5. Ross 5

    Some people, including judges, dont seem to understand that the ability to give offence is a cornerstone of free speech.

    On the eve of Anzac Day I am reminded of Valerie Morse’s action of burning the flag during a dawn service. I am sure that offended many.

    http://i.stuff.co.nz/national/4971083/Court-throws-out-flag-burning-charge

  6. McFlock 6

    Youtube’s response is up to youtube, just as moderation here is up to moderators.

    As for crimes involving communications, has he been done under something equivalent to our Broadcasting Standards act, or is it a more toothy version of the HDCA we have here?

  7. tsmithfield 7

    There are lots of comedians who should be arrested if this is the new criteria for hate speech. Madness.

  8. OctusSpherus 8

    Is it relevant at all that this “grossly offensive” YouTube video received few if any complaints to police? Even from the Jewish community?

    Do we want a society where the courts ignore the context of a joke and decide what is humorous or not?

  9. Stuart Munro 9

    I think part of the problem is trying to have a principled legal position with skirmishers on the fringe trying to exploit it for publicity.

    Easier to have an explicit exception for Nazi material – that it is never protected speech. Fines need not be enormous but the ‘only joking’ defense goes down in flames. Only Trump’s little friends would be hurt by it.

    • KJT 9.1

      What would you have said about my father, and his mates, all who either grew up during WW2, or fought in it.
      I remember their constant piss taking Nazi jokes.
      Best revenge I think. Turning Nazi’s into objects of derision.

      • Stuart Munro 9.1.1

        I agree up to a point – and that point is the protected Nazi speech of the US rally in Charlottesville. I’m not offended by the pug, but neither would I be offended if it were taken down. Publicity being what it is though, if the pug were defended as freedom of expression it might well be adopted as a meme by hate groups, in which case it probably should be taken down.

  10. greywarshark 10

    The public’s especially men’s ability to be really thick, insensitive and cruel is what keeps wars going.

    That the shit didn’t understand the difference between a smart-alec joke of getting the dog to salute to zig heil or whatever, and the horrific attack on people in WW2, not only gassing them, but organising it on an industrial factory scale, and deliberately aiming at particular groups of people such as the Jews, the gypsies; it’s deplorable. If I was in charge in similar circumstances, I would add stupid Scots men to the list. And that would be unfair to Scottish women who apparently are so short of decent Scottish men they would consort with a bloke who would sink to gut-wrenching levels like this.

    My reaction is an example of how bad attitudes can spread in society.
    This awful Scotsman should be sent to an isolated island with a lot of sheep but no people, and live amongst his peers. This would put him in quarantine and save me from becoming infected with his sort of stupid cruelty.

    I fear it is inherent in all of us to some extent. Therefore he needs to be rapped across the knuckles, chastised by the internet provider, and have his access denied for a month at least. That’d larn him and is the best thing to do, because you can’t get the only idea out of the head of a low being like this. Not for all the fines and prison terms, or executions even. All the wars in the world have not taught us all to be better. I suggest we attend some commemoration for Anzac Day tomorrow and think how that rhymes with sorrow, and how we always promise we’ll be better, but tomorrow never comes.

    • bill 10.1

      This awful Scotsman should be sent to an isolated island with a lot of sheep but no people, and live amongst his peers.

      Somewhere like NZ’s South Island then? Or maybe you had one of the near 800 Scottish islands in mind? Either way, a terrible thing to inflict a hipster on peeps (or sheep) just because they happen to live on an island, don’t you think?. 🙂

    • Andrea 10.2

      Too late!
      All available islands have been allocated to the prats in Israel who either say ‘kill the arabs!’ or follow through by shooting Palestinian youngsters several hundred metres from the border – in Palestine.

      All the legislation about ‘hate speech’, no matter where, has not put this attitude in the dustbin. Ask the Rohingya. Or Christians in Nigeria. Or the thousands in Mexico.

      It hasn’t done much to stop assaults on disabled people or rough sleepers or many other groups out of popular favour.

      The Holocaust – safely back more than 70 years. Or not so safely given that any country that wants to move on gets dragged back by luvvies asking people who weren’t even born then to Repent! Feel Guilty! Embrace and accept. Etc.

      How about we deal with the now?

      And before this blew up – how many people had even found/seen his posting? There are pieces that have been up for YEARS and have yet to pass the 100 views mark.

      Just because it’s public doesn’t make it popular. Or give anyone ‘chills.’

  11. mpledger 11

    Of course, being female, I take the female perspective here and think how mean and horrible the boyfriend is. To take a relationship that the girlfriend held dear and try and trash it by making the dog behave in a foul way isn’t funny – it’s just plain mean. It shows an infantile and jealous streak.

    That’s even before we get on to the content of the “joke”. I would guess that Jewish people choose their battles wisely so they don’t waste their time and energy on every piece of antisemitism they come up against and in some sense this is trivial. However, the Nazi’s emotionally tortured and physically tortured many millions of people and to perpetuate their hateful culture by using their slogans and signs is just foul.

    I really don’t agree here.

    • greywarshark 11.1

      One might think that you choose a friend or partner that suits your style and personality. The woman probably chose or accepted him. ‘Birds of a feather flock together’ is an old saying.

    • tracey 11.2

      Nicely put

  12. Wow 12

    I agree with Bill

    No Monty Python / Fawlty Towers fans here then?

    No one was hurt here. And as far as I know no one complained (at least before charges were laid). He is not encouraging people to become nazis, nor suggesting the nazis were in any way good, Christ, he even prefaces the vid with “the least cute thing I could think of, which is – a nazi.” Not exactly a ringing endorsement. I also admit to finding the video pretty funny in a dark kind of a way, fucksake its a cute as fuck dog doing a nazi salute! As I understand it the dude is some sort of low level comedian.

    Surely the threshold for unacceptable speech is inciting / encouraging violence and the like, and he sure ain’t doing that. Youtube didn’t even take it down.

    Jonathan Pie on the matter, who I also agree with:

    • Andrea 12.1

      Thanks, Wow. And thanks to Jonathan Pie. Agree.

      (Though I was ‘offended’ by his saying that Scottish law was backward. 😉 )

      • Bill 12.1.1

        You not aware of “the naked rambler” then?

      • greywarshark 12.1.2

        Mom
        That’s Wow turned upside down. And then he should be spanked. Sounds like one of those he’s who cannot allow himself to stop and think about considering anybody’s feelings, inner pain, because that would get in the way of having a giggle.

        The phrase that the guy used as a trigger for the cute pup’s antics was “ “gas the Jews” – you pillock.

        • Bill 12.1.2.1

          And the reason he used that phrase?

          Seems you’re happy enough to ignore context…which means that you’re guilty of the same “Gross offence” under the UK’s “Communications Act” as Meechan by dint of simply writing that phrase down. Maybe even more so, seeing as how you accentuated it in bold.

          Absurd? Yes.
          The reality of that court decision? Yes.

        • crashcart 12.1.2.2

          Also think of the fact that this precedent is now laid down in an environment of shifting political power. Right now it is a guy who say “Gas the Jews” as a joke that offends and gets fined. So what happens when some one decides that Marx is linked to Stalin and so any thing you say in support of Socialism is there fore offensive?

          The definition of offence and what causes it is far to fluid for it to be the basis of law and punishment. I find a lot of political discourse from the right offensive but I choose to use that as a tool to identify the bloody idiots I don’t want to interact with as opposed to hoping someone can same day prevent me ever feeling bad about others words.

          • tracey 12.1.2.2.1

            Well, we already live in a world, here in lil ole NZ online, where calling nats nazis or akin to Nazis is a no-no but calling people who vote for the “Left” stalinsits, or referring to Helengrad is ok. Despite the Stalin ere probably resulting in the state murder of a hellova lot more folks than under Hitler.

            Some of this discussion appears to presuppose such obvious contradictions do not already operate, unfettered.

            • crashcart 12.1.2.2.1.1

              I am not sure if you are agreeing with me or not on this?

              Yes there is a double standard for how we react to use of slurs. This is a reflection of what people feel is acceptable or not and as I said can and does shift over time. Which is why a law that tries to protect people from being offended is not viable.

        • Wow 12.1.2.3

          Ziz iz no joke!
          Zere vill be konsequences!

    • reason 13.1

      Borat for sure …. He’s a bit like Billy T James was in New Zealand …. allowed to tell jokes or take humor into subjects …. without risking the racist or antisemitic labels.

      In Borat there was a scene in a guns hop where he asks “is this a good gun to shoot the jew ?” … the answer from memory was something along the lines ” it’s a .45 it’ll drop / stop anyone ” … showing no problems in selling a gun to person saying such outlandish / racist statements.

      In another scene he’s at a dog shelter attempting to adopt a dog … and trying to get a dog to attack anyone saying “Shalom” … to the credit of the dog shelter they were not going to release a dog to Borat …. but he did indicate he was going to eat it at the conclusion of his trip around the usa.

      The humor is meant to show something

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Project protects jobs and nature
    A Waitomo-based Jobs for Nature project will keep up to ten people employed in the village as the tourism sector recovers post Covid-19 Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “This $500,000 project will save ten local jobs by deploying workers from Discover Waitomo into nature-based jobs. They will be undertaking local ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 hours ago
  • Minister of Foreign Affairs makes three diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Hon Nanaia Mahuta today announced three diplomatic appointments: Alana Hudson as Ambassador to Poland John Riley as Consul-General to Hong Kong Stephen Wong as Consul-General to Shanghai   Poland “New Zealand’s relationship with Poland is built on enduring personal, economic and historical connections. Poland is also an important ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • Major redevelopment of Wainuiomata High School underway
    Work begins today at Wainuiomata High School to ensure buildings and teaching spaces are fit for purpose, Education Minister Chris Hipkins says. The Minister joined principal Janette Melrose and board chair Lynda Koia to kick off demolition for the project, which is worth close to $40 million, as the site ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • New expert group appointed to advise Government on Oranga Tamariki
    A skilled and experienced group of people have been named as the newly established Oranga Tamariki Ministerial Advisory Board by Children’s Minister Kelvin Davis today. The Board will provide independent advice and assurance to the Minister for Children across three key areas of Oranga Tamariki: relationships with families, whānau, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • COVID-19 vaccine slated for possible approval next week
    The green light for New Zealand’s first COVID-19 vaccine could be granted in just over a week, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern said today. “We’re making swift progress towards vaccinating New Zealanders against the virus, but we’re also absolutely committed to ensuring the vaccines are safe and effective,” Jacinda Ardern said. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • New ACC Board members announced.
    The Minister for ACC is pleased to announce the appointment of three new members to join the Board of ACC on 1 February 2021. “All three bring diverse skills and experience to provide strong governance oversight to lead the direction of ACC” said Hon Carmel Sepuloni. Bella Takiari-Brame from Hamilton ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Economic boost for Southland marae
    The Government is investing $9 million to upgrade a significant community facility in Invercargill, creating economic stimulus and jobs, Infrastructure Minister Grant Robertson and Te Tai Tonga MP Rino Tirikatene have announced.  The grant for Waihōpai Rūnaka Inc to make improvements to Murihiku Marae comes from the $3 billion set ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Celebrating the Entry Into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
    [Opening comments, welcome and thank you to Auckland University etc] It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon to celebrate such an historic occasion - the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a moment many feared would never come, but ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Supporting disabled people to stay connected
    The Government is providing $3 million in one-off seed funding to help disabled people around New Zealand stay connected and access support in their communities, Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The funding will allow disability service providers to develop digital and community-based solutions over the next two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Voluntary saliva testing offered to quarantine workers from Monday
    Border workers in quarantine facilities will be offered voluntary daily COVID-19 saliva tests in addition to their regular weekly testing, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. This additional option will be rolled out at the Jet Park Quarantine facility in Auckland starting on Monday 25 January, and then to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Next steps in firearms buy-back
    The next steps in the Government’s ambitious firearms reform programme to include a three-month buy-back have been announced by Police Minister Poto Williams today.  “The last buy-back and amnesty was unprecedented for New Zealand and was successful in collecting 60,297 firearms, modifying a further 5,630 firearms, and collecting 299,837 prohibited ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature projects target iconic ecosystems
    Upscaling work already underway to restore two iconic ecosystems will deliver jobs and a lasting legacy, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says.  “The Jobs for Nature programme provides $1.25 billion over four years to offer employment opportunities for people whose livelihoods have been impacted by the COVID-19 recession. “Two new projects ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago