Written By:
Mike Smith - Date published:
10:59 am, May 4th, 2011 - 15 comments
Categories: Media, spin, us politics -
Tags:
These #3billboards are going round London today, organised by ex-Labour people, horrified by what their party has become. Their principles haven’t changed, they’re ...
same old stuff from the same collection of creeps masquerading as civilised people.
The same mistake was also made by BBC and Al Jazeera English, at least, in the hour or so following the announcement. I blame panicked studio juniors being drafted into write slugs and ticker items rather than subliminal conspiracy, as pleasing as that hypothesis is.
L
How does a “subliminal conspiracy” work?
If I told you it wouldn’t be subliminal any more, would it?
L
And if you don’t, it won’t be a conspiracy…
Its a three pronged attack: subliminal, liminal, and super-liminal
Not very well, I usually find.
The comment is ok, just requires some punctuation to read correctly Obama “Bin Laden dead”. Perhaps in this time of txt speak some refinements in grammar are not taught !! ;-).
Yeah, lots of people are making this mistake – it’s very easy to do.
It would be interesting if someone were to analyse the incidents of it though. See if right-leaning media were more or less likely to make the slip than left-leaning. Could be chalked up to any number of things, including the intelligence/capability of the presenters, to the script writers, to simply inherent propaganda/bias.
I heard a presenter on National radio make this slip, when talking with a former CIA analyst. Yesterday I think it was.
That’s not actually ‘Fox News’, but rather a local Fox affiliate station, which are not the same thing….
Eh? What’s Fox40?
Normally when people talk about Fox News they are talking about the news on the (nationwide) Fox News Network. However these affiliate stations get a lot of stuff (including graphics) direct from Fox News Network
So where did the ticker come from?
Fox News, fux news on demand.