On Gattung’s revisionist history of Telecom

15 comments on “On Gattung’s revisionist history of Telecom ”

• Comments are now closed

1. the sprout 1

   5 March 2010 at 11:45 am

   The CEO who surprised everyone with her kamikaze swansong speech openly admitting her company’s successes were built on exploiting the ignorance of its customers.
   • Draco T Bastard 1.1

     5 March 2010 at 12:00 pm

     Not only ignorance but the simple fact that the customers of a monopoly don’t have any power to influence that monopoly.
2. Policy Parrot 2

   5 March 2010 at 11:56 am

   Telecom’s shareholders should be blaming her and her team for the fall in their share prices over the last three years, not David Cunliffe. Their chronic underinvestment and anti-competitive attitude made LLU a necessary reality, when, it could really have happened on Telecom’s own terms. I would even go further, and say that Paul Reynolds, whilst grossly overremunerated is reasonably competent, and that the problem with the XT network lies in the culture of management fostered by Gattung and her predecessor, one Roderick Deane.
3. tc 3

   5 March 2010 at 11:58 am

   Nice stuff…..Cunliffe did an excellent job and had no end of heavy hitting telecom lawyers and the usual obstructionist/confusion tactics (as endorsed by TG herself as stock in trade tactics for telcos) being used but eventually he prevailed, all kiwi’s owe him for that.

   Gattung admits it was about profit above all so by default she takes responsibility for failure to invest in the network…..annual reports show depreciation exceeding re-investment…..a very bad sign in a technology dependant business.

   Gattung’s simply a lightweight, chosen by Deane and co because they wanted someone they could direct and is a marketing type when they should’ve appointed a techy/engineering type to ensure they kept up……the telecom board is the problem but no surprises they all blame the gov’t….pathetic. Deane’s such a whinger…..Boyd’s a joke also.

   Note the outgoing sacrificial Lamb (Mount) crowing about a great job on separation which was meant to have been done and dusted yet Joyce keeps giving them extensions…..What The ?
   • mickysavage 3.1

     5 March 2010 at 12:19 pm

     I agree.

     Cunliffe should wear Gattung’s criticism as a badge of honour. Gordon Campbell’s comment should be repeated:

     In the early 1990s, Telecom was milking the market advantage it had been handed by Prebble and was delaying its capital investment in new technology. That was one prime reason why New Zealand (and its export effort) have lagged so far behind the rest of the world in broadband take-up which has been merely one example among many of our telecommunications deficit.

     That situation is now belatedly changing, largely thanks to Cunliffe’s reforms.

     It was absolutely vital that Telecom was broken down and he achieved it.

     The nat rollout of superfast broadband, provided of course by Telecom, is a surreptitious attempt to roll back Cunliffe’s reforms. It should be avoided at all costs.
4. deemac 4

   5 March 2010 at 12:06 pm

   her interview on RadioNZ this morning was classic arse-covering stuff – you have to admire her chutzpah if nothing else!
5. Clarke 5

   5 March 2010 at 12:53 pm

   Gattung can spin the past all she likes, but the most telling blow against her is that she’s proved to be completely unemployable post-Telecom.

   As the HR types say, “past performance predicts future performance.” – and on that basis, who in their right mind would want a repeat performance of Theresa?
6. tc 6

   5 March 2010 at 1:18 pm

   Spot on Clarke..,…aside from that shambolic Wool consolidation body (ah the hand of Norgate ….again) TG’s a marketeer who admitted they mudkateered to enhance the bottom line…..stupid stupid stupid…..that’s why there’s so many lawyers at the ‘top’, they never admit anything so nothing sticks to them.

   So stupid loose comments and no tech savvy leaves her with little to offer.

   So unless anyone wants a female markateer culpable for wiping off half a business’s value and recuding it’s market dominance forever she’ll struggle and deserves to….her arrogance is out of place except at her former employer where it’s thriving under the grumpy scot.
7. John Dalley 7

   5 March 2010 at 2:10 pm

   While i dont have an ounce of sympathy for Gattung, she is only the puppet with the proverbial hand shoved up its backside. Rodderick Deane and the rest of the board should be held just as culpable as Gautting for the fiasco that is Telecom.
8. Rex Widerstrom 8

   5 March 2010 at 2:36 pm

   “Messing with your mind”? Yeah right.

   The President of a party doesn’t risk making a personal offer unless it’s serious… there’s always the possibility that the person being wooed will say no and blab and… err… make you look like a dick. Or if your greedy, ambitious, unsuitable target actually says yes and blabs it… err… makes you look an even bigger dick.

   If they wanted to “mess with her mind” maybe Clark shouldn’t have left her boot prints all over Paul Swain when she over-ruled him on local loop unbundling after a cosy meet with Gattung.

   Perhaps Cunnliffe, as an effective Minister and communicator and thus a threat to the ordained succession, would have been moved aside for Gattung as Comms Minister in her first term… now that would have been fun to watch.
   • Clarke 8.1

     5 March 2010 at 2:58 pm

     You’re probably right about the “messing with your mind” thing, Rex – based on two incontrovertible bits of evidence:

     – Mike Williams doesn’t really do subtle, so the idea that he would develop and run a disinformation campaign against TG specifically to further the government’s LLU ambitions is stretching credulity a bit far
     – However Mike does have the “loose cannon” reputation …
9. Ed 9

   5 March 2010 at 3:31 pm

   Theresa Gattung’s legacy to Telecom as a marketing guru and acolyte of Rod Deane was serial convictions courtesy of the Commerce Commission, a reputation in the market for inferior product, deviousness, incompetence, concern only for shareholders, and underinvestment in people and products. That even National have not given her a job must be extremely embarrassing for her.
10. Rich 10

    5 March 2010 at 9:11 pm

    So, she’s a dyed in the wool Tory and demonstrately incompetent.

    And Mike Williams saw her as an ideal Labour candidate. Hmmm.

    Maybe we got off lightly with Phil Goff?
    • mickysavage 10.1

      5 March 2010 at 9:23 pm

      I think we should ask Mike Williams for his side of the story before giving Gattung’s story any credence.
      • Sam 10.1.1

        6 March 2010 at 12:06 am

        Exactly. It’s not as if Gattung has given us much evidence to trust her to tell the truth now is it?

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS