The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling and other policy changes

Written By: - Date published: 9:09 am, September 17th, 2013 - 134 comments
Categories: admin, notices, The Standard - Tags:

the-standard-logo_with_dolphinThis may be shades of getting over-Apple’d as they mercilessly flay people on iTunes with their gargantuan pile of boilerplate each time they change a word (does anyone actually read that crap?). A good reason not to use the worthless and unworkable lump of bloatware.

However there are a couple of policy changes on this site that people should be aware of. In addition to the Gosman ruling, I realised that I’d probably get a better quality of implied threat from the occasional lawyers letter if we laid down some rules for them as well.

In the Rules section

This site doesn’t allow anonymous comments or posts. Everyone must have a pseudonym and we don’t allow people to change them whenever they feel like it. We collect IP numbers and email addresses and have an active moderation policy. Ultimately the trust is responsible for comments put on the site and we will act against anyone who puts us at what we perceive as a legal risk.

This does not mean that simple blanket threats from people and their lawyers upset about content will be acted upon. At a bare minimum complainants should email our contact addresses with a link to the comment or post in question and explain exactly why they think it should be changed or removed and the legal basis (if any) for doing so.

If we and/or our lawyers feel that the the comment or post oversteps a legal bound, violates good taste, invades the privacy of people outside the public domain, or goes beyond the scope of our site – then and only then will we do something about it.

As guidelines to consider. Publishing facts that are manifestly false is relevant to our decision, but clearly stated opinion is not. Hurt feelings or career damage are not particularly relevant. If you wish to claim copyright then you need to provide checkable details rather than merely asserting an unsubstantiated claim. The required freedom of expression for a democracy to function effectively is relevant as is the restraint required to continue exercising it in the future.

Most of the time the moderators will tend to be harsher on offending content than any court in NZ is likely to be.

In the section on Banning, in the list marked self-martyrdom offenses

  • The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling. People using a pseudonym to comment who then claim that other people commenting/posting anonymously (or any words construed to mean that) will have their own comments treated as being anonymous. Since this site does not support anonymous comments, they will receive an immediate long ban.

     

updated: with corrections in italics

134 comments on “The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling and other policy changes”

  1. fender 2

    This is way more attention than Gosman deserves, but it’s an excellent addition that was entertaining to watch unfold. Never mind Gossamer, TDB might let you throw your crap about in their living room.

  2. weka 3

    I felt a bit sad at Gosman’s long ban the other day (no idea what came over me), but then I reflected on the number of regulars getting bans until after the next election, and how interesting next year is going to be on ts and how the quality of the debate will change without the steady naysaying/hatemongering/tr0lling.

    I don’t know if it’s coincidence, or if it’s the sea change from the last month, but I’ve been enjoying the debate here more lately. There have been a couple of examples that stand out where a rightwinger posts something and a series of Standardistas reply with clear, concise, logical (and sometimes passionate as well) refutals, without any of the abuse and tiresome “you’re a complete fuckwit/no you’re a complete fuckwit” posts.

    Here’s a case in point from today –

    Cunliffe declares war on National and the TPPA

    I loved the quality of the replies, where questions are asked to expose the flaws in the original comment, and the differences between fact and opinion are pointed out. Then people like Karol go and dig up actual evidence that refutes what the right winger has been saying, and so on. It’s the intelligent, thoughtful stuff that should make up good debate. It’s just beautiful, and I hope we get more of that here. (Labour isn’t the only place on a roll).

  3. geoff 4

    The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling. People using a pseudonym to comment who claim that other people doing so to comment or post anonymously or any words construed to mean that will have their own comments treated as being anonymous. Since this site does not allow anonymous comments, they will receive an immediate long ban.

    Wtf? I do not understand that paragraph.

    • blue leopard (Get Lost GCSB Bill) 4.1

      Yes, there appears to be a bit of an error. An “are” added might be needed. ( I added a couple of commas too, however am not excellent at applying them in the correct places.)

      Suggested correction:

      The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling. People using a pseudonym to comment who claim that other people are doing so to comment or post anonymously, or any words construed to mean that, will have their own comments treated as being anonymous. Since this site does not allow anonymous comments, they will receive an immediate long ban.

  4. George D 5

    What does this mean for people who post under names like my own, semi-pseudonyms? It seems to be increasingly popular on the internet to protect yourself from a cursory Google search, while retaining an identity.

    (Not that I intend on getting banned. When I disagree with how the authors of this site manage their content, comments, and their regulation, I recuse myself.)

    • karol 5.1

      I think pseudonyms and semi pseudonyms are fine. Especially if used consistently. The problem is with people trying to comment without a specific identity (ie anonymously). The differentiation is between pseudonyms and being anonymous.

      Gos complained about people posting “anonymously” on TS. In fact, no-one is allowed to do that. People use their real names or pseudonyms or a mixture of both. Gosman was actually referring to people using pseudonyms – but, the hypocrite was commenting about that, while using a pseudonym.

    • lprent 5.2

      Basically all handles here are pseudonyms including people’s real names. Under normal circumstances we won’t bother to check if someone calls themselves lprent or Lynn Prentice or AncientGeek, even if any of those refer to a person’s real name.

      What we are concerned about is that AncientGeek is the same person in all of their comments. We don’t get concerned particularly if AncientGeek is the same person as lprent and Lynn Prentice unless they start replying to their other selves. We regard this as gaming the system for mana.

      If you have more than a couple of active pseudonyms then we may get irritated and ban all of them or insist that you pick only one if you misbehave with them. But it is a hard task to develop and sustain more than one viable handle because if they sound like a chorus of the same person then we regard that as astroturfing…

  5. Lanthanide 6

    “The Gosman (hypocrisy) ruling. People using a pseudonym to comment who claim that other people doing so to comment or post anonymously or any words construed to mean that will have their own comments treated as being anonymous. Since this site does not allow anonymous comments, they will receive an immediate long ban.”

    Just to clarify, if someone used a name that appeared to be their genuine real life name, they would be free to makes claims about other people posting anonymously and not be subject to a ban, because there is no hypocrisy involved?

    • weka 6.1

      How do you know if it is their RL name? How would ts admin/moderators know?

      • lprent 6.1.1

        We actually don’t care much. As far as we are concerned all names are just pseudonyms because there is literally no way to check that it is their real name. Not to mention the duplicate names like “Mike Smith” of which I have two in my facebook.

        About the only thing we will check is if the name is for someone well known in real life and we think that someone is trying for some identity theft, we will either disallow the handle or check that they are who they say they are. The choice is up to the moderators.

      • Murray Olsen 6.1.2

        I assume they wouldn’t know for sure, unless they put some real effort into verification. I also don’t think it matters. I use what might be my RL name because I’m in a situation where I don’t care about any consequences to myself of saying what I think. Not everyone is in a similar situation.

        Whatever name I use, I realise I post here at lprent’s pleasure. When he says something I don’t like, well it’s his blog and I’ll get over it. Anyway, I won’t miss Gosman and I can still vote his comments down at TDB.

    • lprent 6.2

      Yes. Of course that means they’d have to word it very carefully because they’d not want to fall foul of the self-martyrdom offense that says:-

      Abusing the sysop or post writers on their own site – including telling us how to run our site or what we should write. This is viewed as self-evident stupidity, and should be added as a category to the Darwin Awards.

      Pseudonyms are the policy on this site. Real names are not because generally we don’t check or generally guarantee that they are the person that the claim they are.

      There are a few times that we will check them out when people claim specialised knowledge on the basis of who they are. Sometimes we will check if someone is claiming to be a well known personality (ie implied special knowledge). And there have been the odd cases of people trying to hijack other people’s pseudonyms.

  6. captain hook 7

    The owners of this blog are entitled to do what ever they want with no comeback from anyone.
    The problem with gosman is that his smartphone is smarter than he is!

  7. andyS 8

    What exactly do you mean by “anonymous”?
    You track IP addresses, you can check for a valid email address, at least a well-formed one. But unless you email each and every commenter you can’t tell if this is an active email address.

    So you are saying that you need a valid email address to comment?
    Or you need a unique handle within this blog?

    It isn’t very clear, not to me, anyway

    • captain hook 8.1

      go back to school.
      do not pass go.
      do not collect $100.

    • weka 8.2

      andyS, I assume it means that ‘andyS’ has a specific meaning on ts. Moderators/admin can tell by checking the IP and email address for ‘andyS’, so that if someone else posts as andyS or David Cunliffe or Gosman, they can see if that person has posted before. They can also see if the IP/email address that someone uses while posting here as andyS is used under another pseudonym (eg as a sockpuppet).

      Having pseudonyms means that each commenter (and author) has a consistent handle. Anonymous means any given comment could have been written by anyone.

      ‘Anonymous’ is often seen on blogger.com blogs. It’s a pain in the arse and I have no idea why blogs like The Hand Mirror ask that people don’t use it instead of just disabling it. Anonymous commenters create confusion in long threads, because it becomes hard to tell who is talking in each comment, and who is being replied to.

      • andyS 8.2.1

        @weka, thanks, that is a good explanation.
        Maybe the wording should be that the blog “does not support anonymous comments, as Blogger does”, rather than “does not allow”.

        If the platform doesn’t support a feature, then you can’t do it. It is not a rule that has to be enforced by a moderator.

        • McFlock 8.2.1.1

          That implies that it was not a decision made by the administrators, though.

          The gravatar to the left of your name also ensures consistent identification by other users, and I believe is unique to your handle/email combo. So if we got into a rip-roaring argument and than another commenter used the handle “andyS” (until the mods made them change), I as another commenter would be able to tell them from you and vice versa.

          And of course the moderators here make a conscious decision to require unique handles- if a new commenter used “andyS” and it came to the mods’ attention, the new user would have to change their handle.

          When you think about it, “anonymous” is just another handle, one that everyone can use. It’s the administrators/moderators who stop people changing handles constantly (especially astroturfers trying to use multiple handles), and who ensure that commenters’ handles are unique. I’ve never tried, but it’s not too difficult to make up a fake email address, and half the time google think I’m in auckland (I think based on my IP address). And there are ways to mask your real IP, anyway.

          [lprent: gravatar/identicon relates only to your email address.

          Masked IP’s usually get a much closer scrutiny of content by me. They stand out because they tend to come from a relatively small number of well-known (to sysops) local address ranges or they come from strange places offshore. If the content looks ok then I allow that user/IP range a keyhole. Otherwise they keep getting caught in traps.

          They help with man-in-the middle issues, but aren’t that useful if you’re wanting to be inconspicuous on a site that has between 95% of its human traffic coming from australasia and 90% from NZ ]

        • lprent 8.2.1.2

          The platform could support the feature with a simple click. I wrote a complete anonymizer some time ago in case we ever needed it. It mangles all of the email addresses and IP numbers in a non-reversible way. It allows comparison of uniqueness without carrying identifiable information unless you had the originating details.

          It is only really useful if we then force a high level of encryption of connections to prevent man-in-the-middle (ie GCSB) pickups of the details.

      • stargazer 8.2.2

        @ weka: we don’t disable anonymous comments because blogger doesn’t allow us to. unless something has changed recently. the only option we have is to turn moderation on or off, & if we turn it on, then we have to approve every single comment, which is a hassle. we’ve only had to do that twice or three times that i can remember, when the blog was under attack.

        • weka 8.2.2.1

          “we don’t disable anonymous comments because blogger doesn’t allow us to”

          How come? I’ve commented on blogger.com sites and Anonymous hasn’t been an option. A quick look on google shows how to disable Anonymous comments. Is there something specific about http://thehandmirror.blogspot.co.nz/ ? Is it the template being used?

    • lprent 8.3

      We don’t even care about email addresses. If people give us valid addresses then that is fine. If not then that is fine. But you aren’t thinking deeply enough. We just don’t care who people are in real life. But we protect ourselves against proliferation of identities…

      Anonymous would mean that we carry no details about the person making a comment.

      But we collect the handle, the email address that they used (which doesn’t need to be valid), the IP making a comment and the timestamp of the comment. Each new email address (valid or otherwise) is a shared secret between this site and the commenter. It is what gives you your hopefully unique identicon or your specific cross site gravator.

      Each new combination of handle and email address we receive gets automatically moderated on their first comment and has to be released by a moderator.

      We scrutinize these for people currently under a ban. I also look at new combos for where their IP is coming from, who else comments on that IP range, and the content of their comment. About a third of all ‘new’ people get tossed straight into the trash or spam for one reason or another.

      Generally we can track anyone back from their IP and a timestamp if we want/need to. Unless they run it through a masking proxy server. People doing that who we don’t know often find that it is hard to get past our automatic and manual defenses.

      The effect of all of these is that few commenters are truly anonymous on this site if I choose to track them. They are mostly guarded by our privacy rules against me.

      The other side is that pseudonyms are hard earned on this site. We don’t let people change them for the hell of it. The aggravation we give to people changing their pseudonyms and/or email addresses even accidently is palpable. Not to mention that losing your “name” means that you start from the bottom in getting credibility for your comments.

      People usually won’t really engage with “unknowns” for a while while they check them out. And moderators tend to treat “unknowns” with a deep suspicion. When I “notice” them in my moderating role they usually wind up with a warning to read the policy or a permanent ban that I wouldn’t give to people who have had a few dozen comments.

  8. The Gormless Fool formerly known as Oleolebiscuitbarrell 9

    You might want to get someone who has English as a first language re-look at that ruling.

  9. Not Another Sheep 10

    Every fact is an opinion.
    Opinions are only a biased selection of facts; facts are constructed from biased opinions.

    It’s people’s perspective that defines each and which side of an argument they choose to ‘research’ to give validity or disqualify. Every piece of ‘fact’ can be objectively taken apart and thus once unproven, negated, shown to be a partial truth only or a total mistruth then that ‘fact’ becomes an historic opinion.

    Facts and opinions are only as true as the uttering person’s world view.

    E.g. Weka’s are a nuisance yet a Gosman encourages us to question and be open minded.

    http://www.google.co.nz/imgres?sa=X&hl=en&qscrl=1&rlz=1T4ACAW_en___NZ431&biw=1214&bih=618&tbm=isch&tbnid=DFyJ2AwEzKhEKM:&imgrefurl=http://zachthelibertarian.com/2013/03/31/wolves-and-sheeps/&docid=TxW6jb_axOyPrM&imgurl=http://zachthelibertarian.files.wordpress.com/2013/03/wolves-and-sheep.jpg%253Fw%253D560&w=560&h=616&ei=idE3UrfQJMrqkgXOxIDoCw&zoom=1&ved=1t:3588,r:90,s:0,i:356&iact=rc&page=5&tbnh=182&tbnw=152&start=76&ndsp=18&tx=92&ty=87

    P.S. Every pseudonym is used to remain anonymous.

    [lprent: So is every name. There is virtually nowhere on the net outside of the banking system (maybe) and the government sites using a verified id, where a “real name” being used *must* relate at all to a the person using it. If you are naive enough to believe anything else then you really are a fool. ]

    • Rogue Trooper 10.1

      that’s a bit harsh on weka, imho 🙂 although, a comment worth reading.Stone the Crows!

      • weka 10.1.1

        I’m still trying to make sense of that apostrophe. Looks like weka mischief to me. Or the crows getting their own back.

    • weka 10.2

      “Facts and opinions are only as true as the uttering person’s world view.”

      Go on then, tell me how the following is an opinion but not a fact.

      Not Another Sheep made a comment on thestandard.co.nz on 17 September 2013 at 3:59 pm

      edit: oops, just seen the convo below…

    • QoT 10.3

      All “a Gosman” encourages me to do is ponder whether it’s worth the effort to respond – just so others can see Gosman is full of shit – or just ignore it.

    • Draco T Bastard 10.4

      Every fact is an opinion.

      Nope. The temperature outside is what it is and your opinion on it won’t change it. This applies to all of reality which is why National and other RWNJ parties need to lie, prevaricate and misdirect when reality proves them wrong.

      • weka 10.4.1

        oh dear, I think you just proved Sheep’s point.

        The temperature outside varies depending on how you measure it. If you use a thermometer, it will be one thing. If you ask three people to go outside and say how cold it is, it will be three different things (four, if they take the thermometer with them). In some situations, the thermometer is the best tool. In others it is the experience of people that matters.

        Noise levels are similar – remember how TV networks argued that adverts aren’t technically any louder than tv programmes, they just sound louder to humans 🙄

        • Colonial Viper 10.4.1.1

          DTB thinks that there is an objectively measurable and definable world out there which exists independently and irrespective of subjectivity, observer or perception.

          • Draco T Bastard 10.4.1.1.1

            That’s because there is. Believing anything else is delusional.

            • marty mars 10.4.1.1.1.1

              It is all assessed subjectively by that lump on top of our shoulders. A temperature is meaningless unless someone interacts with it.

              • Draco T Bastard

                A thermometer is objective. What you may do due to that temperature may be subjective but the temperature itself is objective.

        • McFlock 10.4.1.2

          A properly functional thermometer records the objective fact.
          Whether I think it is hot or cold is my opinion. Just because I think it is hot doesn’t mean the snow will melt.

          • Colonial Viper 10.4.1.2.1

            you’re another one.

          • weka 10.4.1.2.2

            “A properly functional thermometer records the objective fact.”

            Yes. But “it’s colder outside tonight than it was this morning” can be a fact or an opinion depending on how you measure it.

            “Just because I think it is hot doesn’t mean the snow will melt.”

            Also true. But what you think about the relative temperature will affect how you feel and how other people feel.

            Just because people’s experience of temperature is a less accurate measurement of hot/cold than a thermometer doesn’t mean it’s not a measurement.

            • Draco T Bastard 10.4.1.2.2.1

              Yes. But “it’s colder outside tonight than it was this morning” can be a fact or an opinion depending on how you measure it.

              No it can’t because you can’t measure it by opinion.

              Just because people’s experience of temperature is a less accurate measurement of hot/cold than a thermometer doesn’t mean it’s not a measurement.

              Yes, actually, it does.

              • weka

                “No it can’t because you can’t measure it by opinion.”

                How do you personally tell if it’s cold outside and you don’t have thermometer? If if the bath is too hot to get into? Are you seriously telling me that you don’t use your hand to measure the temperature?

                “Yes, actually, it does.”

                Why not? See my examples above.

                (I could have just said “no, actually, it doesn’t”, but see where that would go?)

                • McFlock

                  I for one have left the house and quickly wished I’d worn another layer, or had to remove a jacket.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  Are you seriously telling me that you don’t use your hand to measure the temperature?

                  Precisely, I use my hand to determine if it’s too hot or too cold for me, personally, to use. What I don’t do is give a specific temperature.

                  Why not?

                  Because every opinion will be different and thus the “measurement” is useless.

                  • Zorr

                    What you are discussing here becomes very simple when you frame it correctly.

                    There is an objective method for measuring temperature – it is called a thermometer. The reason it can be used objectively is because there has been an agreement reached regarding the frame of reference.

                    There is also many subjective methods for measuring temperature – how many layers do I need to put on? Did my cat freeze in to an icicle last night? Is my skin blistering? How warm do I feel? These are all subjective because you are defining the frame of reference in a way that matters to you but is unlikely to be relevant to anyone else when they go to compare their experiences to yours.

                    There should be a variant of a Gish Gallop defined by when a right wing troll makes one stupid argument and then the rest of the people in the room with half a brain cell spend the rest of their time arguing with each other over their interpretation of the troll argument.

        • Draco T Bastard 10.4.1.3

          If you use a thermometer you’ll get the temperature. Asking three people will get their opinions and nothing else unless they use a thermometer in which case they’ll get the temperature.

          Noise levels are similar – remember how TV networks argued that adverts aren’t technically any louder than tv programmes, they just sound louder to humans

          Was reading about that. The TV networks recorded ads at the same level as TV programs but they used a different compression routine which cut out a lot more of the information. I believe someone finally actually measured it and, lo and behold, the ads were actually louder due, in large part, to the different compression routines. The same is true of compression routines for graphics as well which is why some pictures are highly pixelated and some aren’t.

          • weka 10.4.1.3.1

            “If you use a thermometer you’ll get the temperature. Asking three people will get their opinions and nothing else unless they use a thermometer in which case they’ll get the temperature.”

            So? I’m not disputing that*. I’m pointing out that temperature can be measured in different ways, some factually accurate, some subjective, therefore sometimes something can be a fact or opinion (“it’s cold outside”)

            *I do however disagree with the implication in your phrasing that a thermometer is inherently the more useful tool. A thermometer won’t tell me how many clothes to wear (ask anyone who feels the cold and has tried to use the metservice ‘layers of clothing’ measurement). It also won’t tell me when I’m getting too hot or too cold. My body and experience tell me that.

          • marty mars 10.4.1.3.2

            “If you use a thermometer you’ll get the temperature.”

            Fahrenheit, Celsius or Kelvin?

            These systems are constructs to try and understand/measure the phenomena of ‘temperature’ and its effects, they are not absolutes and the temperature x is meaningless unless it is contextualized. For instance saying that the temperature is treesnail means nothing unless you have a brain which knows the scale that treesnail falls in – thus providing context for the measurement treesnail.

            The other point i’d make is that temperature is hard to pin down too – a bit like trying to measure the coastline – depends upon your unit, although granted, a thermometer is already graded to accepted units.

  10. Blue 11

    “Every fact is an opinion “. Horseshit. Gravity keeps you on the ground. Is that an “opinion”? I await your alternative view.

    • Colonial Viper 11.1

      Will gravity always keep you on the ground?

      Did gravity always exist at the strength it does right now?

      Was there a time or place or circumstance where gravity did not exist?

      What if a technology or method was discovered to oppose or negate gravity? eg. anti-grav or levitation?

      • McFlock 11.1.1

        a) as long as there is a “you”, and barring the intervention of other forces like planes or spacecraft, multi-storey buildings, or if you are attached to differential-density vessels, pretty much yes.

        b) no, see below

        c) yes, for example a very narrow window at the beginning of the universe

        d) Does nothing to negate the point of the argument. Gravity is an objective fact. Aliens firing a levitation ray at me would not mean that it does not exist. They would also be an objective fact. You can’t pretend one fact does not exist simply by inventing another fact. The scenario was our observer, standing on the ground, would be held to the ground by one of the basic forces in the universe. All you’re saying is that this is true unless you change the scenario to include a levitation ray.

        • weka 11.1.1.1

          I think the point is that Blue’s statement is only factual in a specific context (eg “Gravity keeps you on the ground” is only true where the physical rules of gravity apply. It’s not a fact in other situations).

          • McFlock 11.1.1.1.1

            But the point is that in the bare-bones situation described by blue, it is objectively true.

            You can change the scenario by adding other objective facts, but that doesn’t mean objective facts don’t exist. It just means that the greater number of objective facts you have, the more accurate your model’s predictions will be.

            • weka 11.1.1.1.1.1

              Blue didn’t specify the situation, that’s what makes the statement an opinion or a fact.

              • McFlock

                Do you really think that if you have the wrong thought or just believe it hard enough you will fall off the planet?

                • weka

                  No, I don’t. Don’t be stupid McFlock. Although if you can’t follow my argument and put up a counter, then maybe you don’t have a choice in the matter.

                  • McFlock

                    Your argument seems to be that if we find some aspect of the scenario that Blue didn’t describe, and then inject new objective facts into those gaps in order to create a different scenario where gravity won’t keep you on the ground.

                    But in every real instance of Blue’s situation (where someone is in contact with the ground), they are objectively on the ground and gravity objectively keeps them there. If there is some real scenario where they are not objectively kept on the ground due to gravity, then there is some other objective fact that has not been accounted for. To say being on the ground is subjective, or that gravity is subjective, is just nuts.

                    • weka

                      Shit, I forgot what it is like to argue with literalists.

                      I was thinking of people in space, inside spacecraft, where there is no gravity. A rare enough occurence true, but not in the realms of alien anti-gravity rays.

                      (btw, I took Blue’s comment at face value and agreed with it. It was only when Draco used an example that was clearly able to be argued as fact or opinion that the conversation went this way. And I got involved in this sub-thread because technically, Blue’s comment could be seen as opinion, depending on context, if one wanted to be pedantic and argue a point).

                    • McFlock

                      there’s no “ground” in space, either.

                      But there is still a minute gravitational pull from the mass of the spacecraft hull.

                    • weka

                      Like I said, I forgot I was arguing with a literalist.

                    • McFlock

                      I suppose it’s sort of the crux of the philosophical problem, really.

                      Maybe figuratively there is no objective reality. But literally (and, more importantly, practically) there is.

                    • weka

                      See I would say that practically is where there is much grey area, and that’s where the metaphorical, figurative and relative are so useful (eg my example above about temperature and going out side or running a bath).

                      Literal excells when you want to know the best temperature to pasteurise something (although Marty addresses that too).

                      To be fair, by the time we got this far down the thread it’s a pretty abstract argument.

                    • McFlock

                      not to mention one that’s been going on for a couple of thousand years with no clear resolution 🙂

                    • Rogue Trooper

                      evocatively not 😉

        • Colonial Viper 11.1.1.2

          d) Does nothing to negate the point of the argument. Gravity is an objective fact. Aliens firing a levitation ray at me would not mean that it does not exist.

          How can gravity be an “objective fact” when many of the “facts” to do with gravity are completely and objectively unknown?

          • McFlock 11.1.1.2.1

            So we know nothing until we know everything all at once?

            Nope.
            We make observations, build models, test facts, adjust models to incorporate the new facts (aka “experimental results”), oh shit we’ve moved past epistemology and moved into science. Yay!

            • Colonial Viper 11.1.1.2.1.1

              Science yeah, ok. Most serious problems our country experiences is not solvable by science. But appreciate the shout out for it.

              • McFlock

                Well, I’m off to bed shortly. Try not to accidentally fall off the planet overnight.

                Most serious problems our country experiences is not solvable by science.

                How’s your polio been lately? Acting up at all?

  11. Tracey 12

    Can you identify the fact in the following statement

    “Weka’s are a nuisance yet a Gosman encourages us to question and be open minded.”

    My perspective doesnt magically change ANY of that statement to a fact. The only thing my perspective might do is mistakenly believe it is a fact.

    • Not Another Sheep 12.1

      There is gravity everywhere even microgravity. The force of gravity is proportional to the mass of the planet. Hence if I was a native Plutonian ie. my world view; then your fact stated “Gravity keeps you on the ground.” could then be deemed “horseshit”.

      • Tracey 12.1.1

        are you or is anyone a native Plutonian?

      • McFlock 12.1.2

        So basically the argument that “fact is merely opinion” is based on exploiting the very semantic imprecision in the communicative shorthand we must use in order to make our comments as concise as they are accurate?

        Blue’s comment would more accurately (though again not perfectly accurately) be phrased as “every point mass in the universe attracts every other point mass with a force that is directly proportional to the product of their masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them”.

        However, while that phrasing might be more strictly correct, it does seem to lose some of the apparently intended metamessage, which seems to be along the lines of (and I apologise, Blue, if I am insufficiently precise in this explication) “if you stand on the ground, on earth, and jump up, then barring any intervention by another force, you will return to the ground. If you think that this is simply an ‘opinion’, rather than a fact, you’re an idiot”.

        Indeed, if you genuinely believed it to be merely an opinion (to take from Tim Minchin), why have you never walked out of your house to the mailbox via a second-floor window? Are you merely lucky to have existed in bungalows all your life?

        • QoT 12.1.2.1

          I believe Terry Pratchett put it best:

          I am sorry. It is hard to convey five-dimensional ideas in a language evolved to scream defiance at the monkeys in the next tree.

          • Rogue Trooper 12.1.2.1.1

            Try considering (a little mental arithmetic occurs) what is behind the world-view of three to four hundred regular commentors.

            (erases hard-to-see workings) Lots, anyway.

      • Blue 12.1.3

        Desperation and grasping does not prove that facts are only opinions. Just that you’re so desperate to justify your horseshit you have to go as far as Pluto. My advice – engage your brain before spewing your ……”facts”.

      • Draco T Bastard 12.1.4

        Hence if I was a native Plutonian ie. my world view; then your fact stated “Gravity keeps you on the ground.” could then be deemed “horseshit”.

        The stupidity, it hurts.

        Gravity will keep you on the ground on Pluto as well.

        • Psycho Milt 12.1.4.1

          Ah, he has you, sir! If you are on Pluto (well, if your your asphyxiated and deep-frozen corpse is on Pluto, I guess), gravity will not keep you on the ground on Earth! Therefore science is bollocks and objective fact doesn’t exist – or something. It’s hard to tell what their point is.

    • Not Another Sheep 12.2

      You’ve got the point then! “Facts and opinions are only as true as the uttering person’s world view.” You’ve illustrated nicely . It was never stated that the quote you selectively chose was a “fact” at all.

      Open mindedness could possibly lead persons to question each and every one of their “perspectives” in case they too are based on selective or skewed information. All perspectives are only a skewed snapshot of one moment of time and place. As the minutes tick over… there is always a new truth be one a ‘lefty’ or a ‘righty’.

      Thus Gosman’s presence on The Standard, facts and opinions from another’s perspective, means he was not a nuisance to be banned because he questioned or caused others to question, but that Gosman’s input could have been viewed as an asset to challenge readers to look further. It’s all “perspective”.

      • Tracey 12.2.1

        you wrote

        “Facts and opinions are only as true as the uttering person’s world view.

        E.g. Weka’s are a nuisance yet a Gosman encourages us to question and be open minded.”

        The example pertains to the statement which precedes it, so where is the fact in the example?

        Weka’s are a nuisance = fact or opinion? Fact because to me they are annoying? No, still an opinion. Weka’s are a bird. Not an opinion, perspective is irrelevant.

      • Huginn 12.2.2

        NAS:
        You’re thinking of Wayne, whose presence on TS really does brings fact and uncomfortable opinions from a far off perspective. Wayne challenges and invites challenge and he manages to do so in a way that raises the standard of debate (except when he’s jet-lagged and he gets a bit scruffy, but then you just have to wait a while for him to sort himself out).

        When Wayne pitches in, he is often asked to think about putting up a post – that attests to his standing as a valued contributor to The Standard, and of course also to The Standard for making this possible.

        Gosman is a troll. His toxicity is degrading; his cynycism erodes value. His bitter, thoughtless comments contributed nothing to the debate. It was talkback radio.

        Gosman is a liability and I’m glad he’s been banned.

  12. Not Another Sheep 13

    So McFlock ( son of Flock) quotes directly from Wikipedia , part of “Newton’s law of universal gravitation”. Newton’s work in deriving his theories was from his perspective analysing his ‘earth-bound’ observations. Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica (1687). A truth for Newton’s time and place? Newton had hence elbowed Hooke’s work ( Hooke’s perspective, “System of the World” Royal Society on 21 March 1666) and historic other learned ‘theorists’ aside (e.gs Descartes, Bullialdus, Borelli, Galilei), to form what was then accepted as a “truth”; or if you like what has long been held as “facts”.

    However as the minutes ticked over…. further perspectives added to or dismissed those ‘facts’ of the great, early mathematicians. Cavendish, Clairaut, …. and quote “ Newton’s law has since been superseded by Einstein’s theory of general relativity.” ( 1916). And the following quote too has been selectively left out by McFlock in the same article that he took phrases from; “Attempts by physicists to identify the relationship between the gravitational force and other known fundamental forces are not yet resolved..”

    Thank you McFlock for your perspective, it challenged me to contemplate further and revise my view.

    In my opinion then Tracey, you stating that “perspective is irrelevant” would mean that nothing including your thinking would ever be advanced; that you then Tracey have singularly solved the “Theory of Everything.” ( try Jaki.S. 1966).
    Inferred in dismissing other’s perspectives as irrelevant, or for example, banning alternative voices (views, perspectives, opinions..) until after the next election, would in my opinion be counter-productive to the purpose of The Standard.

    • McFlock 13.1

      Newton’s Laws perfectly sufficiently explain why you have not yet fallen into the void of space. They are superseded when that level of accuracy is insufficient to explain all observed phenomena.

      This does not mean that it is mere opinion that, barring some additional force at play, you will not fall into space tomorrow when gravity stops working. It is a fact. If you suddenly do find yourself bumping your head on the moon, kindly inform us and I will admit my error.

      • Not Another Sheep 13.1.1

        Read the rest of the article you selectively quoted from. Theories have moved on from Newton’s Laws or his would then have been the “ToE” and for one you or I would not be posting here.

        NB. Voids in space are still under speculation as to there existence too. Cheers McFlock for the stimulating thoughts

        • McFlock 13.1.1.1

          Science advances.

          That doesn’t mean that gravity no longer holds your feet on the ground.

          I mean, a parallel to your suggestion that gravity is merely an opinion is Bishop Berkeley, who argued that material objects are only ideas in our minds. Apparently he went to visit his friend Jonathan Swift one day, and Swift refused to open the door and let him in, on the grounds that there was no door that existed. Berkeley was apparently unimpressed.

          It’s all very well asking what we truly know, and therefore whether there can be any objective facts we can hold on to, but if you throw away practical reason because all knowledge is illusion then there’s really not a hell of a lot you’re good for. Descartes speculated upon the possibility that all his experiences were illusions created by an evil demon, but he still invented coordinate geometry. (heh – first draft I wrote “coordinated geometry”, which sounds like a notation for describing gymnastics choreography 🙂 )

          • Rogue Trooper 13.1.1.1.1

            Berkeley was one of the first to take my fancy ; had this Learn to.. overview ; can still recollect (or, reconstruct 😉 ) reading on the rail-car to ‘the big smoke’ to do my trade training in Petone as a teenager. Who’d a thunk it (ok, I’m smiling at my own humours).
            😀
            anyway, Berkeley was a long way from the top of the mountain!

            • McFlock 13.1.1.1.1.1

              If Swift had caught me in the wrong mood, I would have headbutted the door until he opened it, and then said the blood and bruising was a figment of his imagination. But I can be bloody-minded sometimes 🙂

              • Colonial Viper

                The vast proportion of the “door” is completely empty space. Science said so.

                • McFlock

                  Yeah. The weak and strong nuclear forces and electromagnetism are a bitch, though.

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Huh? All those fundamental forces are irrelevant in this scenario. The door is almost all empty space. As is your head. (nb not an insult, just a statement of fact…)

                    • McFlock

                      lol not everyone is so generous 🙂

                      No, they are not irrelevant. They differentiate the door from sawdust.
                      They also stop me turning into a ball of gas and some associated atomic dust.

                      Using your example, the discrete object “me” and the discrete object “door” cannot pass through each other at walking speed. But we do know that empty space is most of the volume of each of us. There is some force, or combination of forces, that does not allow me to walk through a door. I’ll call it “solidity”. It’s an objective fact (which we can test, with me and with other people, or by throwing chickens at a door, because scientists are evil). Further experiments identify three major forces at play to create the phenomenon of “solidity”.

                      But it is still objectively factual to say that the door’s solidity prevents me walking through it.

                      Same with gravity. Others might find more useful descriptions in the curvature of spacetime, but it’s still a damned fact that gravity stops me falling off the planet.

        • Murray Olsen 13.1.1.2

          NAS is a great example of why failing first year philosophy is not sufficient grounding to discuss physics.

  13. Rogue Trooper 14

    not a two-tooth then.

  14. RedBaronCV 15

    Am I one of the few who find the appearance of a troll on a thread interesting from “the discerning a pattern point of view”?
    Not the content of their post but the topics or individual comments that suddenly provoke them?
    Are they giving away by default, the information as to what their sensitive or weak points are?
    Better than a focus group perhaps?

    • Rogue Trooper 15.1

      Nope
      Yes
      Yes
      and Yes. 🙂

      • RedBaronCV 15.1.1

        Must ask -have trolls been heavily moderated over the leadership contest posts or was there some other reason for their absence?

        • Rogue Trooper 15.1.1.1

          strategy, on their part; never forget the ‘watchers’

        • lprent 15.1.1.2

          The site traffic has started gearing up for spring (and next years election). We’re now running at 40% higher traffic than three months ago in mid-winter. So I’ve started increasing ban times and escalations. After previous elections I find that it pays to start a more vigorous policy a year out so we don’t get so bogged down later when we have other things to do. At present we have the following in moderation.

          3 people due for release over the next month.
          5 people due for release after the next election.
          4 or 5 people on permanent bans.

          We’ve been letting through most of the new commenters who manage to not look like either idiot or a really dumb troll. So no, this is pretty normal moderating levels after any significiant rise in traffic.

          As the numbers of comments rise in spring you tend to get a lot more people commenting both new and old. You’ll see the trolls rising percentage wise the winter after next years election.

          • Chooky 15.1.1.2.1

            @Lprent ….I like ” idiots” and “really dumb troll[s}”….they are FUN and they make me feel good!…(also I think once I was a troll…or at least the machine said I was a troll….but I said I was a chooky)

  15. tricledrown 16

    gosman just keeps repeating the same lies hoping they become the truth.
    Hey has been caught out so many times its not funny anymore!
    If He offered something new relevant and truthful Hey wouldn’t be banned.

  16. Not Another Sheep 17

    The Standard.

    Poster #1: ( insert any name but Gosman) “this is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth”

    Poster #2: -Yep, I agree

    Poster #3: -Yep, I agree

    Poster #4: -Yep, I agree

    Poster #5: -Yep, I agree

    Poster #6: -Yep, I agree

    Poster #7: -Yep, I agree

    Poster#8 – Hang on there, we’ve just discovered that there are both winners and losers under both a ‘left’ or ‘right’ government. Goodness,there’s even poor right leaning people who are suffering too and want to have a view!

    So new ruling; Under a left-leaning government we’ll have no right leaning views; in fact under a left- leaning government all those who disagree shall be ousted out of the house and denied democratic participation ( because they tell lies you know and we never do!)…. and we’ll all live happily ever after having cups of tea and a chat together ( with ear muffs on) because outside the house all is well with the world and everyone else is happy too…tralalalatralalalalala

    Same scenario as the current government ??

    [ Poster#8…You’re gone!]

    [lprent: None of the moderators would ban on that. In fact I wouldn’t even notice it because it doesn’t attack the site. It is just rather hackneyed wishy washy mythologies because it doesn’t neither mentions a causation nor a rationale and doesn’t link to anything substantive. Personally I’d pretty much tag the style as indicating a wooly headed dickhead and I’d keep an subsequent eye on the amount of gore as commenters dissected the sap making such a comment – regardless of their political persausion. ]

  17. RedBaronCV 18

    Trouble with banning them is that it interferes with the T baiting game. How many posts does it take to make them quit voluntarily is good sport

    [lprent: I’m uninterested to watching the merely mediocre getting dissected. They have to have passion, persistence or intelligence. All of these are interesting to deal with. They also must interact with other commenters. Showing the basic cunning/courtesy of actually reading the policy tends to help because some of the almost genetically embedded strategies tend to be a bit suicidal. A lot of our moderating is pretty automatic (like attacking an author personally or complaining about the way the site is run).

    Still once the rejects head to the whaleoil or the sewer, the remainder usually give people some good arguments/sport. ]

  18. xtasy 19

    lprent – I have no problem with this. It is fair from my point of view.

    By the way, has dear old Dr Bratt been getting his lawyer(s) onto TS yet?

    It seems that at least some persons have been “offended” in the past, going by the explanations you have given.

    But as I do all necessary to make my points based on facts or reliable information found via internet and elsewhere, and on factual comments by living persons, I trust I will have little to fear, nor should TS. Apart from that I have opinions and will continue to have opinions. I have also not forgotten one warning from not so long ago. We will make all efforts to keep it “tidy” and within acceptable bounds.

    “Nothing to fear, nothing to hide” (I am NOT John Banks!).

    Thanks X

    • lprent 19.1

      It has been such a small set that it took 5 years to get a big enough sample to write a catchall for the policy. Been meaning to do it for the last year. We get 2 or 3 actual complaints per year, most of which I agree with and correct (when they finally give me the links). A few are just people and lawyers who don’t appear to know the law (or don’t expect us to do so) and expect us to take material down because they are upset about it.

      You can see me stomping on people when they try to state something as fact when it is clearly opinion. And most people have gotten the message that linking to facts even if it is just wikipedia is a hell of a lot safer than merely asserting them.

  19. Tiger Mountain 20

    Having at first read, then admittedly bored, skimmed, over hundreds of his posts there are few persons worthier imo than Gosman to have their moniker associated with a ruling intended to further accurate discussion on this very popular blog site.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • “Homosexuality is same-sex attraction and relationships, not heterosexuals with delusions of gende...
    by Rafael D. Quiles (gender-critical gay man from Puerto Rico) The writing on the wall is right in people’s faces and people just don’t see it or don’t want to. What could actually possess a heterosexual male to want to feminize himself and claim that he is a lesbian? Because ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    30 mins ago
  • Trump: “Where’s my favourite dictator?”
    From the Wall Street Journal:Inside a room of the ornately decorated Hotel du Palais during last month’s Group of Seven summit in Biarritz, France, President Trump awaited a meeting with Egyptian President Abdel Fattah Al Sisi. Mr. Trump looked over a gathering of American and Egyptian officials and called out in ...
    7 hours ago
  • Magdalen Burns, 1983-2019, fighter for women’s liberation
    by the Redline blog collective At Redline we are very saddened to hear of the death of Magdalen Burns who passed away on the morning of Friday, September 13 (British time). Magdalen was a great fighter for the rights of women in general and lesbian women in particular, a defender ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 day ago
  • Parliament and the Executive
    The Brexit issue has certainly brought with it a series of apparently difficult constitutional issues, many of them concerning the respective roles of the executive and parliament. Most of them arise because of the unwillingness of MPs, despite their professions to the contrary, to be bound by a constitutional rarity ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 days ago
  • The Abigail Article; Martyn Bradbury’s Article, and My Response
    . . This blogpost is different to my usual format of reporting on issues… Since July 1011, I have blogged on a variety of political issues; near always political and/or environmental; mostly highly critical of the previous National Government. Other issues included Israeli occupation of Palestinian lands and repression of ...
    Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
    2 days ago
  • Police will have to wear silly Buckingham Palace hats from now on, says Police Minister
    Those close to the Police Minister believe the initiative may be the result of Nash “seeing a great deal” on AliExpress. In a move that comes seemingly out of nowhere, Police Minister Stuart Nash announced this afternoon that he expects all frontline staff to don bearskin hats, famously worn by ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 days ago
  • A sensible crackdown
    The government has released its Arms Legislation Bill, containing the second tranche of changes to gun laws following the March 15 massacre. And it all looks quite sensible: a national gun register, higher penalties for illegal possession and dealing, tighter restrictions on arms dealers and shooting clubs, and a shorter ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • California bans private prisons
    Private prisons are a stain on humanity. Prison operators explicitly profit from human misery, then lobby for longer prisons terms so they can keep on profiting. And in the US, prison companies run not only local and state prisons, but also Donald Trump's immigration concentration camps. Faced with this moral ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Why PPPs are a bad idea
    When National was in power, they were very keen on Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) - basicly, using private companies to finance public infrastructure as a way of hiding debt from the public. They were keen on using them for everything - roads, schools, hospitals. But as the UK shows, that "service" ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • A Movement That No Longer Moves.
    Moving And Shaking: There was a time when people spoke matter-of-factly about the “labour movement” – a political phenomenon understood to embrace much more than the Labour Party. Included within the term’s definition was the whole trade union movement – many of whose members looked upon the Labour Party as ...
    3 days ago
  • NZ ‘left’ politically embracing extreme postmodernism
    by Philip Ferguson Much of the left, even people who formally identify as marxists, have collapsed politically in the face of postmodern gender theory of the sort pioneered by American philosopher Judith Butler. For Butler even biological sex is socially constructed. “If the immutable character of sex is contested, perhaps ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    3 days ago
  • The obvious question
    The media is reporting that the (alleged) Labour party sexual assaulter has resigned from their job at Parliament, which means hopefully he won't be turning up there making people feel unsafe in future. Good. But as with everything about this scandal, it just raises other questions. Most significantly: why the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • The moment I found out that you found out, I acted swiftly
    By Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern I am every bit as angry as you are. I am every bit as disappointed as you must be. The people with power, oversight and the ability to do something about these processes within the Labour Party should be ashamed. Whoever those people are, I ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    3 days ago
  • This is why people hate property developers
    Property developers think there is an "oversupply" of houses in Auckland:High turnover rates and falling prices may be a sign that there are too many new houses going in to some parts of Auckland, commentators say. [...] Property developer David Whitburn said there was a "bit of an oversupply" in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Australia to Pacific: “Fuck you, you can all drown”
    World leaders are meeting in New York in two weeks for the 2019 Climate Action Summit, where they are expected to announce new and more ambitious targets to stop the world from burning. But the Australian Prime Minister won't be there, despite being in the USA at the time:Scott Morrison ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Implausible ignorance
    Labour Party president Nigel Haworth resigned yesterday over the party's sexual assault scandal. But while that's good news, its unlikely to take away the stench of a coverup. Because according to Paula Bennett in Parliament yesterday, pretty much everyone in the Prime Minister's office was involved as well:I have been ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Labour’s Fatal Flaw.
     Two-Faced? Labour insiders' commitment to the neoliberal status quo puts them at odds with their party’s membership; its trade union affiliates; and a majority of Labour voters, but this only serves to strengthen the perception they have of themselves as a special elite. Among the lesser breeds, they’ll talk up a ...
    3 days ago
  • Ten reasons the Tories do NOT want an election
    There has been a lot of talk about Boris Johnson wanting an election, and he has blustered with great gusto about 'chicken' Jeremy Corbyn refusing one, but I think there are many reasons why he is secretly glad he has been refused the opportunity:The Tories are an utter rabble,tearing themselves ...
    4 days ago
  • Prorogation Illegal, rule Scottish judges
    Scottish appeal court judges have declared that Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend parliament in the run-up to the October Brexit deadline is unlawful. The three judges, chaired by Lord Carloway, Scotland’s most senior judge, overturned an earlier ruling that the courts did not have the powers to interfere in the prime ...
    4 days ago
  • Let me explain what I meant by Everyday New Zealanders
    By Simon Bridges. The following is a press release from the office of Simon Bridges, leader of The National Party. Key ora, New Zealand. Happy Maori Language Week. Look, I’m writing to you today because I want to clear something up. There’s been a lot of kerfuffle around some things ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    4 days ago
  • Yes, the SIS is subject to the Public Records Act
    I understand there's some stuff going round about how the SIS "was removed from the list of public offices covered by the Public Records Act in 2017". The context of course being their records derived from US torture, which will be disposed of or sealed. The good news is that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • An evidence-based discussion of the Canadian fluoride/IQ study
    Dr. Christopher Labos and Jonathan Jarry discuss the recent Canadian fluoride/IQ research. They provide an expert analysis of the paper and its problems. Click on image to go to podcast. The critical debate about the recent ...
    4 days ago
  • Climate Change: Australia in denial
    Australia is burning down again, and meanwhile its natural disaster minister is denying climate change:Australia’s minister responsible for drought and natural disasters, David Littleproud, has said that he doesn’t “know if climate change is manmade”. Clarifying earlier comments that the question is “irrelevant” when considering the Coalition government’s response to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Philippines activist speaking on the Duterte tyranny
    Auckland Philippines Solidarity is excited to host Professor Judy Taguiwalo for a speaking tour of NZ in September. She is a well-known activist in the Philippines and was a political prisoner under the Marcos dictatorship. Professor Taguiwalo briefly served as a Cabinet member under President Duterte but was forced from ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    4 days ago
  • Disgust
    I have no special insights to offer on the Labour sexual assault coverup. All I have is disgust. Disgust that an organisation could fail its people so badly. Disgust that they punished the victims rather than the perpetrator. Disgust that its party hacks are apparently blaming the victims for demanding ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Speak Up for Women calls out Greens’ censorship
    This open letter to the Green Party was penned after an opinion piece by Jill Abigail, a feminist and founding member of the party, was censored by the Greens’ leadership. (Redline has reprinted her article here).The intolerance of the Green Party leaders and their acceptance of the misogyny of gender ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    4 days ago
  • Member’s Day: End of Life Choice, part 3
    Today is a Member's day, and David Seymour's End of Life Choice Bill continues its slow crawl through its committee stage. They're spending the whole day on it today, though the first hour is likely to be spent on voting left over from last time. After that they'll move on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    4 days ago
  • Flight to Los Angeles turned back after passengers decide they don’t want to go anymore
    An ambitious plan to fly to Los Angeles petered out into a brief sight-seeing trip and a desire to return home and get some sleep before work tomorrow. Air New Zealand has confirmed a flight to Los Angeles last night was turned back about a quarter of the way into ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    5 days ago
  • Indigenous Futures: defuturing and futuring – an analytical framework for policy development?
    There appears to be consensus – by omission – that the concept of indigenous futures should be accepted at face value. So I scavenged the internet to see if I could locate an academic descriptor or a framework around how we think about it as a concept, and whether it ...
    EllipsisterBy Ellipsister
    5 days ago
  • Cadbury rumoured to be releasing the Pineapple Trump
    Here’s another novelty chocolate to shove in your gob, New Zealand Cadbury could be seeking to make itself great again with a rumoured new release: Pineapple Trumps, a spin on its classic chocolate-encased pineapple treat and do-it-yourself tooth remover. The global confectionery manufacturer and bumbling “before” character in an infomercial, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    5 days ago
  • The coming resource war.
    During my time in the Pentagon I had the privilege of sitting down with military leaders and defence and security officials from a variety of Latin American nations. Sometimes I was present as a subordinate assistant to a senior US defence department official, sometimes as part of a delegation that ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    5 days ago
  • Māori Language Week with The Civilian
    Kia ora, Aotearoa. It’s that magical time of year. Te Wiki o te Reo Māori. In English, the week that frightens talk radio. As you probably know by now, all your favourite media outlets are participating, some more successfully than others. Stuff has changed its name to Puna for the ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    5 days ago
  • Will Horizons act on climate change?
    Local body elections are coming up next month. And it looks like all Palmerston North candidates for Horizons (the Manawatu-Whanganui Regional Council) want to take action on climate change:Climate change is set to be a key issue in Palmerston North for the next three years if those wanting to get ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • BORA reform is stalled
    Eighteen months ago, the government promised to strengthen the Bill of Rights Act, by explicitly affirming the power of the courts to issue declarations of inconsistency and requiring Parliament to formally respond to them. So how's that going? I was curious, so I asked for all advice about the proposal. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Corbyn and Brexit
    As the Brexit saga staggers on, the focus is naturally enough on the Prime Minister and his attempts to achieve Brexit “do or die”. But the role played by the Leader of the Opposition is of almost equal interest and complexity. The first problem for Jeremy Corbyn is that he ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    5 days ago
  • A ditch for him to die in
    Last week, English Prime Minister Boris Johnson boldly declared that he would rather die be dead in a ditch than delay Brexit. Unfortunately for him, the UK parliament accepted the challenge, and promptly dug one for him. The "rebellion bill" requires him to ask for and secure yet another temporary ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    5 days ago
  • Warning! Warning! Danger Jacinda Ardern! Danger Marama Davidson! Warning!
    Lost In Political Space: The most important takeaway from this latest Labour sexual assault scandal, which (if I may paraphrase Nixon’s White House counsel’s, John Dean’s, infamous description of Watergate) is “growing like a cancer” on the premiership, is the Labour Party organisation’s extraordinary professional paralysis in the face of ...
    6 days ago
  • Union solidarity with Ihumatao land occupation
    by Daphna Whitmore Every Sunday for the past two months unionists from First Union, with supporters from other unions, have set out to the Ihumatao land protest, put up gazebos and gas barbeques, and cooked food for a few hundred locals and supporters who have come from across the country. ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    6 days ago
  • Climate Change: The wrong kind of trees?
    Newsroom today has an excellent, in-depth article on pine trees as carbon sinks. The TL;DR is that pine is really good at soaking up carbon, but people prefer far-less efficient native forests instead. Which is understandable, but there's two problems: firstly, we've pissed about so long on this problem that ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • No freedom of speech in Turkey
    Canan Kaftancioglu is a Turkish politician and member of the opposition Republican People's Party (CHP). Like most modern politicians, she tweets, and uses the platform to criticise the Turkish government. She has criticised them over the death of a 14-year-old boy who was hit by a tear gas grenade during ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Speaker: Tadhg Stopford: Why I’m standing for the ADHB
    Hi there, just call me Tim.We face tough problems, and I’d like to help, because there are solutions.An Auckand District Health Board member has nominated me for as a candidate for the ADHB, because her MS-related pain and fatigue is reduced with hemp products from Rotorua.  Nothing else helped her. If I ...
    6 days ago
  • Good little vassals
    The Inspector-General of Intelligence and Security has published their report on whether the SIS and GCSB had any complicity in American torture. And its damning. The pull quote is this:The Inquiry found both agencies, but to a much greater degree, the NZSIS, received many intelligence reports obtained from detainees who, ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Who Shall We Turn To When God, And Uncle Sam, Cease To Defend New Zealand?
    Bewhiskered Cassandra? Professor Hugh White’s chilling suggestion, advanced to select collections of academic, military and diplomatic Kiwi experts over the course of the past week, is that the assumptions upon which Australia and New Zealand have built their foreign affairs and defence policies for practically their entire histories – are ...
    6 days ago
  • The Politics of Opposition
    For most of the time I was a British MP, my party was out of government – these were the Thatcher years, when it was hard for anyone else to get a look-in. As a front-bencher and shadow minister, I became familiar with the strategies required in a parliamentary democracy ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    6 days ago
  • More expert comments on the Canadian fluoride-IQ paper
    The Green et al (2019) fluoride/IQ is certainly controversial – as would be expected from its subject (see If at first you don’t succeed . . . statistical manipulation might help and Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear). Anti-fluoride campaigners have been actively promoting it ...
    1 week ago
  • The return to guerrilla war in Colombia
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh On August 29th a video in which veteran FARC (Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia) commander Iván Márquez announced that they had taken up arms again was released. There was no delay in the reaction to it, from longtime Liberal Party figure and former president Uribe, for ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • Air New Zealand identifies this enormous plot of unused land as possible second airport site
    Air New Zealand couldn’t believe its luck that this seemingly ideal piece of real estate had so far gone entirely unnoticed. Air New Zealand’s search for a site to build a second Auckland Airport may have made a breakthrough this afternoon, after employees scanning Google satellite imagery spotted a huge, ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Redline on the Labour Party
    No-one on the anti-capitalist left in this country today puts forward a case that Labour is on the side of the working class.  There are certainly people who call themselves ‘socialist’ who do, but they are essentially liberals with vested interests in Labourism – often for career reasons. Nevertheless, there ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • New Fisk
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Labour’s failure
    When National was in government and fucking over the poor for the benefit of the rich, foodbanks were a growth industry. And now Labour is in charge, nothing has changed: A huge demand for emergency food parcels means the Auckland City Mission is struggling to prepare for the impending arrival ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Ardern attempts to vaccinate Clarke Gayford live on television to prove that it’s safe
    Gayford, pictured here on The Project, before things got wildly out of control. A bold public relations move by the Government to encourage parents to vaccinate their children has gone horribly wrong. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern appeared on tonight’s episode of Three’s The Project, where the plan was for her ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Has Mr. Whippy gone too far by parking on our front lawns?
    Mr. Whippy’s business model has driven it down a dark road of intimidation. Residents in major centres around the country are becoming disgruntled by the increasingly aggressive actions of purported ice cream company Mr. Whippy, who have taken to parking on people’s front lawns and doorsteps in a desperate attempt ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 week ago
  • Cleaning up the water
    Today the government released its Action Plan for Healthy Waterways, aimed at cleaning up our lakes and rivers. Its actually quite good. There will be protection for wetlands, better standards for swimming spots, a requirement for continuous improvement, and better standards for wastewater and stormwater. But most importantly, there's a ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Fronting up
    Today I appeared before the Environment Committee to give an oral submission on the Zero Carbon Bill. Over 1,500 people have asked to appear in person, so they've divided into subcommittees and are off touring the country, giving people a five minute slot each. The other submitters were a mixed ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Politics of science – making a silk purse out of a sow’s ear
    Anti-fluoride activists have some wealthy backers – they are erecting billboards misrepresenting the Canadian study on many New Zealand cities – and local authorities are ordering their removal because of their scaremongering. Many New Zealanders ...
    1 week ago
  • Democracy – I Don’t Think So
    So, those who “know best” have again done their worst. While constantly claiming to be the guardians of democracy and the constitution, and respecters of the 2016 referendum result, diehard Remainers (who have never brought themselves to believe that their advice could have been rejected) have striven might and main ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • Government says it will now build just one really nice home
    Following publication of this article, the Ministry has requested it to be noted that this supplied image is not necessarily representative of what the final house will look like, and it “probably won’t be that nice.” As part of today’s long-anticipated reset of the Government’s flagship KiwiBuild policy, Housing Minister ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Imperialism and your cup of coffee
    Over the next week or two we will be running three synopses of parts of the opening chapter of John Smith’s Imperialism in the 21st Century (New York, Monthly Review Press, 2016).  The synopsis and commentary below is written by Phil Duncan. Marx began Capital not with a sweeping historical ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • Still juking the stats
    The State Services Commission and Ombudsman have released another batch of OIA statistics, covering the last six months. Request volumes are up, and the core public service is generally handling them within the legal timeframe, though this may be because they've learned to extend rather than just ignore things. And ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Hard News: Time for a New Deal: 25 years on
    In 1994, I was editing an ambitious street mag called Planet, from a fabled office at at 309 Karangahape Road. The thirteenth issue of the magazine was published in the winter of that year and its cover embodied a particularly ambitious goal: the end of cannabis prohibition.I wanted to do ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Not impressed
    KiwiBuild was one of the Ardern government's core policies. The government would end the housing crisis and make housing affordable again by building 100,000 new homes. Of course, it didn't work out like that: targets weren't met, the houses they did build were in the wrong place, and the whole ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Solar beats coal
    As the climate crisis escalates, it is now obvious that we need to radically decarbonise our economy. The good news is that its looking easy and profitable for the energy sector. Wind is already cheaper than fossil fuels, and now solar is too:The levellised cost of solar PV has fallen ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • A Step Too Far.
    A Crown Asset? For reasons relating to its own political convenience, the Crown pretends to believe that “No one owns the water.” To say otherwise would re-vivify the promises contained in the Treaty of Waitangi – most particularly those pertaining to the power of the chiefs and their proprietary rights ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Where Money Comes From
    Most people would say, no doubt, that they have a pretty good idea of what money is. They live with the reality of money every day. It is what is needed to buy the necessities of life and to maintain a decent standard of living. You get money, they would ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    2 weeks ago
  • Banned by the Green Party leadership: Jill Abigail on women’s rights and trans rights
    The article below was an opinion piece that appeared in the Spring 2019 issue of Te Awa (the NZ Green Party’s newsletter) and on the Greens website.  In keeping with their policy of hostility to women defending women’s right to female-only spaces, Green bureaucrats have since removed the opinion piece.  ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    2 weeks ago
  • The fallacy of the proximity argument.
    Longer term readers may remember my complaining that, as a political scientist, it is burdensome to have non-political scientists wanting to engage me about politics. No layperson would think to approach an astrophysicist and lecture him/her on the finer details of quarks and black holes, but everybody with an opinion ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    2 weeks ago
  • Where We Stood: Chris Trotter Replies To Stevan Eldred-Grigg.
    Joining The Fight: Stevan Eldred-Grigg's argument for New Zealand staying out of the Second World War fails not only on the hard-headed grounds of preserving the country’s strategic and economic interests; and not just on the soft-hearted grounds of duty and loyalty to the nation that had given New Zealand ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Universities back the climate strike
    On September 27, School Strike 4 Climate will be striking for a future to pressure the government for meaningful climate action. This time, they've asked adults to join them. And now, Lincoln University and Victoria University of Wellington have signed on:Victoria University of Wellington has joined Lincoln University in endorsing ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Another constitutional outrage
    Another day, another constitutional outrage in the UK. This time, the government is saying that if parliament passes a law to stop Brexit before being prorogued, they may just ignore it:A senior cabinet minister has suggested Boris Johnson could defy legislation to prevent a no-deal Brexit if it is forced ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Ending dairy in Canterbury
    Environment Canterbury has finally proposed nitrogen limits to stop dairy farmers from poisoning Christchurch's water supply. And naturally, farmers are whining about it:A proposed move by Environment Canterbury (ECan) to protect Christchurch's drinking water by setting tough – some would say, draconian – nitrate reductions in the decades ahead and ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Is National the party of climate arson?
    The Zero Carbon Bill is currently before select committee. While its targets are weak, its a generally sensible bill that promises to establish a long-term framework to guide emissions reductions. But National hasn't made up its mind on whether it will support it - and according to Andrea Vance in ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 weeks ago
  • Experts warn Harold the Giraffe “well past” typical giraffe life expectancy, may not have long
    Dum-de-doo. Children across New Zealand have known him for generations as the lovable giraffe who tells them to exercise, hydrate and not to shove lit cigarettes up their nostrils. But a world renowned giraffe expert says we shouldn’t be getting attached to Life Education’s Harold the Giraffe, as he is ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago
  • August ’19 – NZ blogs sitemeter ranking
    Image credit: 22 BLOGGERS WITH ADVICE FOR RESEARCHERS AND EVALUATORS, ILLUSTRATED I notice a few regulars no longer allow public access to the site counters. This may happen accidentally when the blog format is altered. If your ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Bye, bye to the collusion lie
    Sums it up, really. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Opinion: Treat your car by buying extra petrol to snack on while you aren’t driving
    By Mike Hosking. Yesterday morning, I waltzed into work, and as I walked past the drones aggressively typing out news on the computers I’ve repeatedly asked to be moved further away from, I caught a glimpse of the words “climate change”, and noticed that suspiciously they weren’t in condescending quotation ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    2 weeks ago

No feed items found.