web analytics

Hang Facebook

Written By: - Date published: 11:15 am, May 9th, 2021 - 30 comments
Categories: democracy under attack, facebook, human rights, Media, Politics, Social issues - Tags:

The decision by the Oversight Board of Facebook to continue banning Donald Trump is one of the biggest moves against free speech and the modern definition of its limits that the world has seen. The left may laugh now, but they should fight this precedent alongside with political competitors.

The rules that they originally made the decision on could become even more important if Trump decided to run for political office again.

There’s almost zero chance this will not end up as a test in the Supreme Court.

Those rules, the decision, and the fact that this oversight board has zero political mandate for its massive power, mean that they have implications far beyond the politics of the United States.

Political leaders around the globe have been allowed to break some of Facebook’s content rules if public interest outweighed the harm done by their posts.

Republicans are quite reasonably outraged. Every person who is a politician who wants to incite revolt or revolution should also be worried: if it’s good for the right, it’s good for the left. This is what this Facebook “regulator” said in its recent decision that “If a head of state or high government official has repeatedly posted messages that pose a risk of harm under international human rights norms, Facebook should suspend the account for a period sufficient to protect against imminent harm.”

So on that immortal and incredibly woolly judgement, we should expect to see Brazil’s Bolsonaro shut down, and Modi for inciting mass unmasked gatherings, or in fact all the way down to some Greenie protesting in a tree with some human harm around them.

And of course by using the word “hang”, the could probably ban me for use of a metaphor. It’s not of course in their interests either way, but that’s the ‘free speech’ quagmire they are wading into.

I’ve posted before about the need to regulate these massive social media ‘broadcasters’ who simply define themselves as ‘platforms’.

I have zero sympathy for them now.

Facebook, by refusing full state regulation as a broadcaster, have tied another noose around their own reputational neck.

30 comments on “Hang Facebook ”

  1. ghostwhowalksnz 1

    Same goes for the Auckland venues ( both public and private) who banned the Canadian duo, you can ban those speech you dont approve of.

    The suggestion of it ending up in Supreme court shows theres a complete misunderstanding of the 'qualified' free speech in US constitution. It DOESNT apply to companies and individuals. Facebook probably bans or removes material by the truckload every hour of every day.

    So ZERO chance if it even getting past even the lowest level of federal courts

    'First Amendment constraints don’t apply to private platforms, Supreme Court affirms'

    That was a hybrid of public-non profit public access TV channel

    • Tricledrown 1.1

      They were banned from venues but were able to freely speak anywhere else.

      • woodart 1.1.1

        quite correct. there was nothing stopping don brash and chris trotter opening their homes and inviting fellow free speakers to come in and say whatever they liked. maybe if brash, trotter and their fellow travellers had done so, we could have had a good laugh at the resulting dust-up.

  2. RedLogix 3

    A fascinating problem. The tech platforms thrived precisely because they were at the outset content agnostic. In making this transition from an open channel medium, to a publisher taking responsibility for content – they essentially demolish the foundation of their own business model.

    Personally I never engaged with FB, Twitter, Instagram or any of the big social media platforms – with the exception of Youtube, and that mainly because it's not very 'social'.This is something well presaged by Vernor Vinge in one of his later novels, that much of humanity would live a huge fraction of their lives on vast cyber platforms – while another significant fraction, like myself, would turn their backs on it, strictly maintaining their privacy and real world life. Often at considerable personal cost. I don’t understand quite why I’ve always felt like this, but while I opened a bare minimum FB account about a decade ago because my daughter asked me to, I always felt a repulsion toward using it. A few years later I deleted the account (with some difficulty) and have never been tempted since.

    In the medium term I suspect we're seeing an evolution. Already I've witnessed the net migrate from a techo-nerd wild west in the 90's (I rather miss that era), to an expanding commercialism in the 00's, to the rather sudden and deep impact of unlimited streaming video and social media from around 2013 onwards. We're still very much grappling with the implications of all this.

    Personally I think it's driving us all crazy to some degree. Human beings outsource much of their mental health, and the net doesn't give the kind of social feedback that we evolved to respond to. Indeed much of the past decade of social media can be considered a massive unregulated social engineering experiment with little oversight and no circuit breaker. It's not surprising then that FB finds itself obliged to react has it has done this week.

    Whether this OB turns out to be useful remains to be seen, but the potential for this global 'uber-moderator' to go rogue is both obvious – and not obvious as to how to contain it. If nothing else the CCP will be delighted to see the West putting in place the same mechanisms they've long used to rigidly control their own internal internet.

    • ghostwhowalksnz 3.1

      'In making this transition from an open channel medium, to a publisher taking responsibility for content –"

      Thats was always the case, they have had user terms and conditions from the start but often their ability to moderate anything other than a small amount wasnt there, videos especially were a major challenge because the volume and of course watching every one was near impossible.

      ' For years, we’ve had Community Standards that explain what stays up and what comes down. Today we’re going one step further and publishing the internal guidelines we use to enforce those standards. And for the first time we’re giving you the right to appeal our decisions on individual posts so you can ask for a second opinion when you think we’ve made a mistake.'

      https://about.fb.com/news/2018/04/comprehensive-community-standards/

      Trump broke all the terms and conditions for a long time but was given a free pass because of his political position, but he eventually went too far … but trying to set up a putsch was never going to be OK. Im surprised the crocodile tears. He can set up his own platform and thats not something the US government can interfere much at all.

      • RedLogix 3.1.1

        The obvious problem here is that it hasn't just been Trump. There is dubious material all over FB from all possible points of the political spectrum. The big question is how the hell to handle all of this even-handedly.

        Because if this OB sets off down the path with a heavy handed political bias – the reaction will be swift and brutal.

        • Tricledrown 3.1.1.1

          No one else incited a riot and invasion of the capitol building.

          Advertisers put pressure on Facebook they are free to do that as well.

          • RedLogix 3.1.1.1.1

            So the OB is only going to censor Presidents who 'incite riots of the Capital Building'? That should make their job a lot easier.

  3. Stuart Munro 4

    I think Facebook finally got it right about Trump. For commercial purposes however, Facebook might be wise to tell all candidates for national office, to find another platform.

  4. Peter 5

    Do other private companies ban / censor individuals from using their sites?

    Should social media ‘broadcasters’ have different expectations and rules by dint of their size?

    • Ad 5.1

      Twitter blocked Trump.

    • woodart 5.2

      yes ,and no. any organisation, private or not, has the ability, and right, to choose their customers. as it should be. trump, or anybody else, shouldnt have the right to write vwhatever they please, on my wall. as the owner of the wall, shouldnt I have the right to choose who writes on it?

    • Phil 5.3

      If a woman accidentally exposes a nipple on their Instagram post, that can get them temporarily or permanently blocked from the site.

      But, of course, we can all agree that is a far worse 'crime' than, say, calling all Mexican immigrants rapists, or claiming that a legitimate election was fraudulent and having your supporters storm a federal building.

  5. ghostwhowalksnz 6

    So did Reddit, Snapchat, Youtube and a few smaller others. same goes for Trumps well known followers, probably countless others with similar comments

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/01/11/trump-banned-social-media/

  6. bwaghorn 7

    Yeah nah trump is a truly dangerous man.

    He had his supporters attack capital hill ffs.

    Block the fucker out till he dies.

  7. Macro 8

    IMHO Facebook should ban him until 12 days after he commits to stop telling lies, stop spreading misinformation and conspiracy theories and insulting people and generally behaving like a spoilt brat. In other words this ban would only last until the 12th of Never.

  8. McFlock 9

    So on that immortal and incredibly woolly judgement, we should expect to see Brazil’s Bolsonaro shut down, and Modi for inciting mass unmasked gatherings, or in fact all the way down to some Greenie protesting in a tree with some human harm around them.

    How does a hippie up a tree pose harm contrary to international human rights laws?

    I'll also point out that calling for armed insurrection to overthrow the government (aka "revolution" or "storming the capitol") in NZ would seem to already make one a party to treason. Might not pick up a facebook ban, but might pick up jail time.

  9. WeTheBleeple 10

    Trump gaslit the entire world with a ceaseless and merciless barrage of hate and disinformation. He's negligently overseen hundreds of thousands of death. He's increased fear, confusion and mental illness in countless millions and emboldened the most shit people of the planet to bring out their murderous hate.

    Lies is truth, up is down, education is for dumbies – planet Trump!

    His legacy is death and insecurity. If he retained power the planet would have no hope of mitigating climate. He'd let the planet burn, so long as his name was on it. Block him? Tear him, his foul family and criminal cohort out of their beds and flay them till they cease to exist.

    And jam that bible he posed with up his fat ass.

    Free speech. Pffft. He had his chance, he's had a thousand chances.

  10. Phil 11

    banning Donald Trump is one of the biggest moves against free speech and the modern definition of its limits that the world has seen

    I love the irony of your very first sentence containing a mash-up of Trumpian 'greatest hits' – bombastic overblowing of events, creation of an entirely imaginary grievance, and complete ignorance of basic legal concepts.

    • Ad 11.1

      There are several legal avenues to constrain Facebook et al which are already afoot.

      In no particular order:

      1. Regulate them as utilities, as Clarence Thomas was edging for in this recent decision:

      https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-197_5ie6.pdf

      2. Anti-Trust reform that breaks them up. Democrats agree on this …

      https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/resources/editorialfiles/2020/10/06/investigation_of_competition_in_digital_markets_majority_staff_report_and_recommendations.pdf

      … and Republican leadership agrees …

      https://www.cnbc.com/2021/05/05/republicans-ramp-up-threats-to-big-tech-after-trump-facebook-ban-upheld.html

      …they disagree on the next steps to do it.

      3. Revisit Federal Communication Commission regulations. They are entirely insufficient for social media, and they are in dire need of an update. We have never before had communications platforms operating on this scale. It's just a patchwork of US regulations that becomes more fragmented every time a new technology becomes more important.

      Last year following Trump's directive, the Commission were considering how to pare back liability protections under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. No action in this Biden era on it yet.

      https://www.theverge.com/2020/10/15/21518097/fcc-social-media-censorship-moderation-ajit-pai-section-230-nypost-biden

      It could well be the first big agreement that Democrats and Republicans make this term.

      • ghostwhowalksnz 11.1.1

        Trouble with any regulation by the Federal government is that it runs up against the First Amendment… no law ..abridging the freedom of speech..

        Controlling what Facebook and Twitter can or cant allow under a federal government law is exactly the speech regulation the First Amendment prohibits. There is no legal difference between making you 'spout nonsense' or 'preventing the spouting' of same nonsense.

        Didnt notice other utilities having speech rights regarding use of their 'pipes'. Indeed the utility part is the 'inter-network' itself.
        Justice Thomas is the worst person to look for legal guidance.

        • Ad 11.1.1.1

          They had identical thoughts about the freedom of radio on the early 1930s …

          https://www.mitel.com/articles/history-federal-communications-commission-fcc

          … then television content and ownership in the 1950s…

          … followed by cable television in the 1980s…

          https://digitalcommons.nyls.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1554&context=fac_articles_chapters

          So it can be done in both content and in utility forms.

          Personally I'd be looking for the anti-trust breakup as one of the more likely routes. Here's some of why regulation in this sense isn't working at the moment:

          https://medium.com/@riehlenicholas/update-the-policies-are-past-media-monopoly-regulations-enough-f04473b0952e

          Both Republicans and Democrats are gaining the political gumption to have a go at it. They just need to get over themselves and figure their common ground on it.

          • Phil 11.1.1.1.1

            Both Republicans and Democrats are gaining the political gumption to have a go at it. They just need to get over themselves and figure their common ground on it.

            The word 'just' is doing so much heavy lifting in your last sentence that it could power Elon Musk's mission to Mars.

            Personally I'd be looking for the anti-trust breakup as one of the more likely routes.

            I think you're right that this is a risk to the major social media players, but it's entirely wrong to link it to individual freedom of speech on any given platform. The anti-trust concern is how media giants (e.g. Disney, Facebook, Amazon, Apple etc.) have acquired control of entire supply chains and are able to use them to price competitor-platforms out of the market.

          • ghostwhowalksnz 11.1.1.1.2

            Radio and TV have some regulation 'in the public interest' because the air waves they use are owned by the public and only those who have licenses for their frequencies are allowed to braodcast.

            No such 'owned by public' regarding the inter-network at all, In US the comms companies and others own the internet backbone. There isnt any 'power and frequency' issues as required by broadcasters.

            The US has a hybrid broadcaster in their ' cable TV channels' who dont use airwaves.

            Inter-network is already open access, as you only have to have a server and bandwidth to make your content available in competition to Facebook. facebook doesnt prevent other social media sites from working. They may be commercially dominant but they dont care what competitors say, so anti trust competition laws isnt going to get them to run Trumps speech or other nut jobs who break their terms of service regarding false information

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Equitable response to Omicron vital
    The Green Party supports the Government’s decision to move Aotearoa New Zealand to traffic light level Red at 11.59pm tonight, but says its success will depend on the support that is made available to the most vulnerable. ...
    2 days ago
  • How we’re preparing for Omicron
    As countries around the world experience Omicron outbreaks, we’re taking steps now to ensure we’re as prepared as possible and our communities are protected. ...
    5 days ago
  • What’s Labour achieved so far?
    Quite a bit! This Government was elected to take on the toughest issues facing Aotearoa – and that’s what we’re doing. Since the start of the pandemic, protecting lives and livelihoods has been a priority, but we’ve also made progress on long-term challenges, to deliver a future the next generation ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Tackling the big issues in 2022
    This year, keeping Kiwis safe from COVID will remain a key priority of the Government – but we’re also pushing ahead on some of New Zealand’s biggest long-term challenges. In 2022, we’re working to get more Kiwis into homes, reduce emissions, lift children out of poverty, and ensure people get ...
    2 weeks ago

  • 5,000 portable air cleaners for schools on their way
    As schools are preparing to return, Education Minister Chris Hipkins has announced 5,000 air cleaners have been ordered for New Zealand schools. “As we know, along with vaccination, testing, good hygiene and physical distancing, good ventilation is important in minimising the risk of airborne transmission of the virus that causes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 hours ago
  • New Zealand to move to Red from 11.59pm today
    All of New Zealand will move to the Red setting of the Covid Protection Framework (CPF) at 11:59pm today as Omicron is potentially now transmitting in the community, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says. “Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region are now confirmed as Omicron, and a further ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Mandatory boosters for key workforces progressing well
    More than 5,785 (82%) border workers eligible for a booster vaccination at 6 months have received it so far, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins says. “That’s a really strong uptake considering we announced the requirement the week before Christmas, but we need to continue this momentum,” Chris Hipkins said. “We ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • NZ to move to Red
    Nine COVID-19 cases reported yesterday in the Nelson/Marlborough region have now been confirmed as the Omicron variant, and a further case from the same household was confirmed late yesterday. These cases are in a single family that flew to Auckland on 13 January to attend a wedding and other events ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand to provide further help for Tonga
    Aotearoa New Zealand is giving an additional $2 million in humanitarian funding for Tonga as the country recovers from a volcanic eruption and tsunami last weekend, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. This brings Aotearoa New Zealand’s contribution to $3 million. “This support will ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Quarterly benefit numbers show highest number of exits into work
    The Government’s strong focus on supporting more people into work is reflected in benefit figures released today which show a year-on-year fall of around 21,300 people receiving a main benefit in the December 2021 quarter, Minister for Social Development and Employment Carmel Sepuloni said. “Our response to COVID has helped ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Northland to move to Orange, NZ prepared for Omicron 
    Northland to move to Orange Rest of New Zealand stays at Orange in preparedness for Omicron All of New Zealand to move into Red in the event of Omicron community outbreak – no use of lockdowns Govt planning well advanced – new case management, close contact definition and testing rules ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • RNZAF C-130 Hercules flight departs for Tonga as Navy vessels draw nearer to Tongatapu
    A Royal New Zealand Air Force C-130 Hercules has departed Base Auckland Whenuapai for Tonga carrying aid supplies, as the New Zealand aid effort ramps up, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “The aircraft is carrying humanitarian aid and disaster relief supplies, including water ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand prepared to send support to Tonga
    New Zealand is ready to assist Tonga in its recovery from Saturday night’s undersea eruption and tsunami, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Defence Minister Peeni Henare said today. “Following the successful surveillance and reconnaissance flight of a New Zealand P-3K2 Orion on Monday, imagery and details have been sent ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Aotearoa New Zealand stands ready to assist people of Tonga
    The thoughts of New Zealanders are with the people of Tonga following yesterday’s undersea volcanic eruption and subsequent tsunami waves, Foreign Affairs Minister Nanaia Mahuta says. “Damage assessments are under way and New Zealand has formally offered to provide assistance to Tonga,” said Nanaia Mahuta. New Zealand has made an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Record high of new homes consented continues
    In the year ended November 2021, 48,522 new homes were consented, up 26 per cent from the November 2020 year. In November 2021, 4,688 new dwellings were consented. Auckland’s new homes consented numbers rose 25 per cent in the last year. Annual figures for the last nine months show more ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Report trumpets scope for ice cream exports
    Latest research into our premium ice cream industry suggests exporters could find new buyers in valuable overseas markets as consumers increasingly look for tip top quality in food. Economic Development Minister Stuart Nash has released a new report for the Food and Beverage Information Project. The project is run by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Honouring the legacy of legendary kaumātua Muriwai Ihakara
    Associate Minister for Arts, Culture, and Heritage Kiri Allan expressed her great sadness and deepest condolences at the passing of esteemed kaumātua, Muriwai Ihakara. “Muriwai’s passing is not only a loss for the wider creative sector but for all of Aotearoa New Zealand. The country has lost a much beloved ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Have your say on proposed changes to make drinking water safer
    Associate Minister for the Environment Kiri Allan is urging all New Zealanders to give feedback on proposed changes aimed at making drinking water safer. “The current regulations are not fit for purpose and don’t offer enough protection, particularly for those whose water comes from smaller supplies,” Kiri Allan said. “This ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Planting the seeds for rewarding careers
    A boost in funding for a number of Jobs for Nature initiatives across Canterbury will provide sustainable employment opportunities for more than 70 people, Conservation Minister Kiri Allan says. “The six projects are diverse, ranging from establishing coastline trapping in Kaikōura, to setting up a native plant nursery, restoration planting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand congratulates Tonga's new Prime Minister on appointment
    Minister of Foreign Affairs Nanaia Mahuta today congratulated Hon Hu'akavameiliku Siaosi Sovaleni on being appointed Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Tonga. “Aotearoa New Zealand and Tonga have an enduring bond and the Kingdom is one of our closest neighbours in the Pacific. We look forward to working with Prime ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • High-tech investment extends drought forecasting for farmers and growers
    The Government is investing in the development of a new forecasting tool that makes full use of innovative climate modelling to help farmers and growers prepare for dry conditions, Agriculture Minister Damien O'Connor said.  The new approach, which will cost $200,000 and is being jointly funded through the Ministry for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago