web analytics

Hard core drunk drivers

Written By: - Date published: 9:01 am, November 15th, 2010 - 32 comments
Categories: alcohol, john key, leadership, national - Tags:

In April this year the Law Commission published a detailed report, “Alcohol in our lives: Curbing the harm”. The report has been described as creating “a once-in-a-generation opportunity” to address New Zealand’s sick drinking culture and its destructive consequences. But the Key government doesn’t want to act. To keep the alcohol lobby happy the Nats are going to ignore or water down the recommendations, or delay in the name of “further research”.

The result of this evasion is The Alcohol Reform Bill, which passed its first reading in Parliament on Thursday. Labour were quick to condemn it:

Labour’s justice spokeswoman, Lianne Dalziel, said the Government had squandered a once-in-a-generation opportunity and had “gutted” the Law Commission’s report which was the basis for the proposals.

“This bill doesn’t even begin to meet the challenge posed by the evidence that the Law Commission presented to the Government,” she said.

With respect to the headline issue of drunk driving, Key is refusing to implement the recommendation to lower the legal blood alcohol limit:

The call to lower the limit follows advice from the Ministry of Transport – with scientific support – that a drop would save up to 33 lives a year and prevent 686 injuries.

However, Transport Minister Steven Joyce has delayed a cut from 80mg of alcohol per 100ml of blood to 50mg in favour of more research.

Funny how the Nats are all for “research”, except when they are all for ignoring it (hello national standards). Funny how Joyce is so ignorant of the facts that he had to admit that his own figures make no sense. Anyway, The Herald, which has been running a “Two Drinks Max” campaign, has ripped in to Key’s inaction in the strongest possible terms:

Again justifying the need for research, Key said: “If we want New Zealanders to obey a new law, I think we’ve got to be able to go out and say ‘here’s the harm’.”

Here is the harm PM: More drivers are dying than necessary now. How much more blood do you want on your hands before the next election?


The latest Nat line on this must have been sent out over the weekend, because we had a rush of headlines trying to divert attention to the issue of the worst drink drivers: ‘Hard core’ of killers on our roads, and Drink-driving deaths due to ‘problem drivers’, and 72% of drink-driving deaths caused by problem drivers, and The real problem, and so on. The “logic” goes that since most deaths are caused by the worst drivers, we only need to focus on them. Naturally a quick techno-fix is preferred, “alcohol interlocks” on their vehicles

The stupidity of this argument would be funny if it wasn’t so serious. It is classic ambulance at the bottom of the cliff limited thinking. Why wait until we have problem drunk drivers and then try and pick up the pieces? Wouldn’t it be better to prevent people from becoming problem drunk drivers in the first place? There is no quick easy techno-fix. We need to change our drinking culture. Reducing the blood alcohol limit would be a big part of this change. Instead of the ambulance at the bottom, build the fence at the top. Do everything that we can to stop repeat drunk drivers before they start. All that it takes is a government with courage and vision…

32 comments on “Hard core drunk drivers ”

  1. higherstandard 1

    re:drink driving

    1. lower the limit to zero
    2. first offence loss of licence for 12 months
    3. second offence home detention for two years
    4. third offence death


    • jbanks 1.1

      I hope that you’re joking.

      Lowering the limit to zero is ridiculous.

      Home detention for repeat offenders would be a step in the right direction. NZ has a long history of being too lenient on repeat offenders.

      • higherstandard 1.1.1

        Why is lowering the limit to zero ridiculous ?

        Are people incapable of not having alcohol if they’re going to drive ?

        • jbanks

          Because it’s nanny-state overkill.

          Drivers with low alcohol levels are not the problem and those that are will drink regardless of the limit and so a zero limit will not stop them.

          • higherstandard

            jbanks does alcohol impair a driver’s ability ?

            Why on earth do we want to send the message out there that you can have x number of drinks and still be OK to drive, if one wants to drink that’s fine but you shouldn’t then get behind the wheel of a car

            • jbanks

              does alcohol impair a driver’s ability ?

              That entirely depends on how much. If a certain percentage of drivers in accidents have low levels of alcohol in their system this in no way necessitates that the alcohol is the “cause” of the accident.

              People can & do drink responsibly and safely.

              • Lats

                In fact I recall seeing some stats (link not at hand sadly) which suggested peoples reflexes/reaction times were in fact slightly improved with small quantities of alcohol (1 or 2 drinks) and then started to go the other way. I’ll see if I can dig that out if folk are interested enough.
                I’m actually not too certain that lowering from 0.08 to 0.05 will make that much difference. I’m prepared to be proven wrong, but my gut feeling is that in those accidents where alcohol is the causal factor the driver is likely to be over the existing limit already.

              • Vicky32

                My father was a recidivist drink-driver. I assure you we (his family) did not feel at all safe.
                The evil-ex was the same only worse. My father at least *tried* to be careful, he simply didn’t realise how impaired he was. The ex didn’t give a stuff.
                Zero tolerance, Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

                • Lats

                  And lowering the drink driving limit will have what impact on recidivist offenders? I’m guessing none whatsoever. If they are prepared to flout the current laws changing the limit will not make a skerrick of difference.

                  • Vicky32

                    But such lowering will make it much easier for these people to get pinged without the usual excuses (I was only a bit over the limit, ossifer… etc..)
                    Also, it makes the argument of their family easier – “Dad, you could lose your licence!”
                    When my Dad lost his licence for 3 years his behaviour seriously changed. He got public transport to work, and he conscientiously obeyed the terms of his licence loss. I think he *wanted* that external discipline! He certainly benefitted from it.

                    • Lats

                      So your dad’s behaviour changed once he’d gotten caught. Against the current limit. That suggests to me that the current system works, it is the attitude of folk like your dad that is at fault.
                      I don’t know this for a fact, but I doubt very much if a plaintive “I was only a bit over the limit, ossifer” would do any good against police today, they seem to stick quite slavishly to the limit of 0.08. You test over that and you’re in trouble, excuses or not.
                      Lowering the limit doesn’t make it easier for drunks to get pinged, it makes it easier for a whole bunch of safe drivers to end up having to pay fines for doing nothing wrong. I know you have an emotional attachment to this issue, but I don’t want a bunch of well-meaning but emotively driven people from infringing my (and countless others) freedom to have a glass of wine with dinner, or to have a beer after work with my workmates, and then drive home perfectly safely. Because thats what I do, when I know I’m going to be driving I limit my intake to one drink. It isn’t difficult.
                      Zero tolerance is targetting the wrong people, the ones who are causing the problems are the ones who drive over the limit as it is currently set. Like the chap who got tanked at the pub in Rolleston recently, then drove home in his 4WD and ran into and killed a cyclist that he was too drunk to see. Lowering the limit would have no impact on d*ckheads like that, they drive intoxicated already.

    • Lanthanide 1.2

      Can everyone just ignore the troll please?

    • felix 1.3

      1. Yep, as long as it’s not going to pick up mouthwash etc. Why the fuck not?
      2. Yep
      3. Maybe. Sounds expensive though.
      4. You’re a psycho.

      • higherstandard 1.3.1

        Cue shower curtains and scree, scree, scree etc

        Can’t see what problem people have with zero limit, if one accepts that alcohol impairs ability and one needs to have their full faculties available to drive a zero limit is a reasonable proposition.

    • Vicky32 1.4

      Lower the limit to zero, yes! Why on earth not? Is everyone so undisciplined?
      No 4, third offence death – absolutely not. The death penalty is an abomination no matter what the crime!

  2. ianmac 2

    Actually your No 1, zero limit would make it easy to monitor even though a trifle unpopular.

    The Herald might do some good by identifying a driver at .07 say, involved in a fatal accident. Headlines could be very explicit. People identify much better with a particular rather than a general.

  3. M 3


    In El Salvador your first drink driving offence is your last – execution by firing squad.


    I agree with your zero alcohol limit for driving. Given that alcohol is expensive at bars anyway, people should be able to spring for a cab or get the bus home if not too late – it all needs to factored into the cost of having an evening out.

    The price of alcohol needs to also rise another 50% to discourage abuse.

    Unfortunately Key keeps his balls in a brown paper bag and only brings them out when it’s for something really important like enacting the 90-day fire at will law instead of doing something really useful.

    • Blighty 3.1

      but you can have an above zero alcohol reading from all kinds of things, it doesn’t have to mean you’ve been drinking or hat you are intoxicated.

      • higherstandard 3.1.1

        blightly see felix’s comment above – one could easily set parameters around this to ensure people didn’t get pinged if they’d had some mouthwash etc.

        Oh don’t get hung up on my death penalty comment – apart from the fact we’d never go there it was a throw away comment.

    • Blighty 3.2

      “In El Salvador your first drink driving offence is your last – execution by firing squad.”

      don’t believe everything you read on the internet. That site also claims execution on the second offence in Bulgaria. Bulgaria doesn’t even have the death penalty.

      • M 3.2.1

        OK Blighty, but I wouldn’t want to run the risk and it’s not really a concern for me as I rarely drink.

    • Draco T Bastard 3.3

      Given that alcohol is expensive at bars anyway,…

      But damn cheap when the boss puts in on free at the office.

  4. Augustus 4

    Crap post. Like the “News” last night. Quote (following news of a road death): “Police are investigating whether alcohol was involved.”
    Perhaps they should be investigating that first, before making a news item of it? Or is the statement just intended to create hysteria? Like this post?

    • Maynard J 4.1

      Well aren’t you all confused… Let me help:

      A) The police are investigating

      B) The media are reporting

      C) The media are not doing the investigating, and the police aren’t reporting on the story.

      I hope that helps you.

      • Joachim's 4.1.1

        Actually any decent reporting requires some investigation work and digging around.

        Repeating what someone else says != Journalism.

  5. Treetop 5

    Less alcohol consumed more unemployment. Just watch the unemployment stats in a month, (uni students) and in two months, (school leavers).

    Not lowering the limit to 0.05 mg is very telling on how bloody minded and reckless this government is regarding drinking and driving. The recidivisit drunks on the road are a separate issue and need to be treated accordingly.

    • Vicky32 5.1

      “Less alcohol consumed more unemployment. ”
      I don’t understand this!

      • Treetop 5.1.1

        If people drink less, sales will be down and bar/bottle store staff may be laid off. With unemployment rising due to the time of the year and a drop in alcohol revenue, this may also affect bar/bottle store staff being employed. Cafes with a license may also be affected.

        I’m not talking about big unemployment/employment numbers.

        • Vicky32

          Ah, I see… I think that fewer alcohol sales would have a negligible effect on unemployment, myself…

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    22 hours ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison over
    The prisoner disorder event at Waikeria Prison is over, with all remaining prisoners now safely and securely detained, Corrections Minister Kelvin Davis says. The majority of those involved in the event are members of the Mongols and Comancheros. Five of the men are deportees from Australia, with three subject to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Pre-departure COVID-19 test for travellers from the UK and the US from 15 January
    Travellers from the United Kingdom or the United States bound for New Zealand will be required to get a negative test result for COVID-19 before departing, and work is underway to extend the requirement to other long haul flights to New Zealand, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins confirmed today. “The new PCR test requirement, foreshadowed last ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago