web analytics

Heartless government

Written By: - Date published: 3:00 pm, June 13th, 2015 - 123 comments
Categories: bill english, child welfare, health, housing, national, workers' rights - Tags: , , ,

A few stories of recent weeks which show exactly what kind of government we have.

Last August, Emma-Lita Bourne died of pneumonia because the state house her family lived in was cold and damp. Soesa Tovo died after being admitted to hospital with heart and lung problems and pnuemonia. His house was so cold and damp they had to wipe down the ceiling every morning.

The response from Minister of Housing Nick Smith?

“People dying in winter of pneumonia and other illnesses is not new.”

Because people who expect state houses to not be so cold they kill people are clearly confused about the concept of mortality.

Marnia Heke and her children are living in their car because they can’t find stable accommodation. She doesn’t want to go to a motel for a night because it’ll get the kids’ hopes up.

The response from WINZ?

“We have told her that the Ministry would help her to cover the financial cost of temporary accommodation. We wouldn’t be paying for all of the accommodation as it would be reasonable to expect her to contribute.”

Because when a woman and her three kids are sleeping in their car what’s really important is making sure we spend the absolute minimum amount required to put a roof over their heads.

Peter Talley is given a knighthood for “services to business”. His business involves locking out workers, paying women less because they’re women, and trying to force workers to sign individual employment agreements which deny them the right to hold workplace meetings, criticise Peter Talley and his mates publicly, or deny their boss access to their entire medical history.

The response from the Deputy Prime Minister?

“It’s a big complicated business and I’m sure there’s been things go wrong over time, but I think the contribution he has made over the years has been beneficial.”

Because systematically, repeatedly exploiting your workers is just a boo-boo.

This is heartless government. A government that literally does not care about people. Not about providing warm safe housing (it might cost too much). Not about making sure they can come home every day after work (it might cost too much). Not about protecting workers’ right to freedom of speech and forming unions (it would definitely cost too much).

New Zealand is surely a better country than this.

123 comments on “Heartless government”

  1. weka 1

    “We have told her that the Ministry would help her to cover the financial cost of temporary accommodation. We wouldn’t be paying for all of the accommodation as it would be reasonable to expect her to contribute.”

    That’s unclear. Do they mean they can pay something separate to accommodation supplement, TAS etc?

    Why can they not just pay her accommodation supplement and TAS for whatever accommodation is available?

  2. Andy 2

    If I had my way Govt would fit log fires to all state houses and grow forests to supply free firewood for all state house tenants,plu I would make sure all State house tenants had the very latest of computer and cellphone techknowledgady plus widescreen TVs fitted to the walls. These people have gone without for too long.

    [Stephanie: do not troll this post. Basic, liveable housing is not a goddamn luxury only to be afforded to the privileged.]

  3. The government can’t force you to heat your house, nor prevent you from making it damp. For all that Nick Smith’s a mean-spirited piece of shit, if I was Minister for Housing I wouldn’t let journos pin this on me either.

    [Stephanie: This is perilously close to victim-blaming. I will not tolerate this kind of “well Emma-Lita’s parents should have ~made better choices~” rubbish in general, but especially when Housing New Zealand has admitted it didn’t handle her case or the Tovo case properly.]

    • It has admitted it didn’t handle their cases properly, yes. At the least it didn’t have carpets on the floors in their houses. However, you’re saying they died because their houses were “cold and damp,” and implying that this is Housing NZ’s fault. That’s an unfair implication and it’s reasonable for me to point out why.

      • It’s not an unfair implication at all. We have case after case of people living in state houses dying from preventable illness, with coroner’s findings supporting the fact their houses weren’t liveable. That is clearly the responsibility of Housing NZ and the government.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 3.1.1.1

          So charged, HNZ would be best advised to instruct their lawyer to call attention to systemic underfunding and neglect, and failed right wing nonsense like ‘market rents’, not to mention failed right wing nonsense like ‘Max Bradford’.

          The SOE model is broken and is killing state housing tenants.

        • Psycho Milt 3.1.1.2

          The fact that their houses were cold and damp is not “clearly the responsibility of Housing NZ and the government,” for the reasons provided in my first comment. It is “allegedly” the responsibility of Housing NZ and the government, but so far nobody’s made a case for it.

          • One Anonymous Bloke 3.1.1.2.1

            I’ve alluded to the case, as have others, several times.

            In a nutshell, the SOE model is broken, and any government that maintains it fails in its statutory duties.

            • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.1.2.1.1

              Its a Labour model and it helped make Cullen made 9 budget surpluses off of it. Can’t be that broken, can it?

            • Psycho Milt 3.1.1.2.1.2

              That’s the thing – you allude to things, without actually presenting an argument to support it.

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                Are you familiar with the phrase “the buck stops here”? The government is responsible for the condition of state houses, period.

                Are you familiar with medical advice regarding cold, damp housing?

                Can you perhaps point to an State Owned “Enterprise” that has lived up to the free market hype?

                • Are you familiar with the phrase “the buck stops here”? The government is responsible for the condition of state houses, period.

                  The buck did stop there, in that Housing NZ accepted some work needed to be done on the houses. However, if we’re to hold the government to a completely unconditional level of accountability, then the government would have to take some basic steps to protect the condition of the nation’s state houses: warning and if necessary evicting tenants who won’t ventilate the house, and evicting and blacklisting tenants who wilfully/negligently damage the house. If we won’t let it do that (and we don’t, and shouldn’t), we can’t hold it solely responsible for what tenants do to its houses.

                  Are you familiar with medical advice regarding cold, damp housing?

                  Yes. Its relevance to the question of Housing NZ culpability for these two houses being cold and damp?

                  Can you perhaps point to an State Owned “Enterprise” that has lived up to the free market hype?

                  Have you stopped beating your wife?

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    From your last sentence, can I take it that you agree that the SOE model is broken?

                    “Difficult” tenants come with the territory. The high inequality, low wages, anti-worker territory swells their numbers. All these conditions are the direct responsibility of Parliament.

          • RedLogix 3.1.1.2.2

            Well before you can have that discussion, you’d need to agree on what constitutes “made a case for it”.

            Certainly we’d find no smoking Ministerial Memo requiring maximum cold and damp delivered to the households concerned.

            Nor is it likely any HNZ official went to work that day thinking “how many kiddies can I kill from pneumonia today?”

            Yet when we look at the big picture it’s not hard to discern a toxic mix (sometimes literally) of poor housing design and maintenance, lack of affordable heating, overcrowding, poor diet, under-education and so on that everyone recognises are definite contributors to these kinds of deaths.

            While it’s true we are unlikely to find any individual culpable for these deaths, it is nonetheless reasonable to suggest that government and it’s agencies hold a level of responsibility for addressing these contributory factors.

            And that these on going deaths (not to mention the thousands of unnecessary illnesses and hospital admissions) are evidence to suggest they have failed in this responsibility. And should be held politically accountable.

            • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.1.2.2.1

              Seems to me like some people are more interested in making excuses, than accepting that there is a real problem and then participating in setting out solutions.

            • One Anonymous Bloke 3.1.1.2.2.2

              “…politically accountable.”

              I disagree. There are responsibilities that come with being in government. Chief of these is the protection of human rights. Where governments fail those duties for reasons of, for example, famine or war, these may be mitigating factors. Ideology, not so much.

              Prosecute human rights violators.

            • Psycho Milt 3.1.1.2.2.3

              Well before you can have that discussion, you’d need to agree on what constitutes “made a case for it”.

              How hard can it be? We’ve had multiple posts and comments saying that Housing NZ is responsible for the houses being cold and damp. OK – how, exactly? What exactly did Housing NZ do or not do to make these houses cold and damp?

              • RedLogix

                Well as a private landlord you would no doubt want to pin the responsibility onto me if the houses I rented were cold and damp shit-holes.

                Quite possibly the term ‘slumlord’ would get an airing.

                But you are of course being selective; as I clearly stated in my argument there is a mix of contributory factors going on here, not all of which (power prices for example) can be laid onto HNZ.

                But most of which one way or another can be sheeted home to government inaction. In my world we elect and fund governments to undertake a number of serious responsibilities. One of them is to protect public health – and this issue clearly falls into that remit.

                • As a private landlord, what would your approach be if you found your tenants were making your property damp? Mine has been to tell them they need to open the windows occasionally. One in particular I was seriously concerned was damaging the place, fortunately they moved out before it came to giving them the boot. Housing NZ doesn’t have that luxury, it has to suck it up when its tenants make its houses damp, and apparently it also has to suck it up when bloggers then declare it responsible for the houses being damp.

                  Agree re the mix of contributory factors: low wages, ludicrously high property values, high electricity prices, Housing NZ failing to keep up with maintenance – also, ignorant tenants failing to ventilate the property, not using contraception, letting their church tithe them etc. Some of it’s definitely the government’s responsibility, but blaming it for killing people is ridiculously over the top.

                  • When people have literally no money to heat their homes properly, how do you propose they “just open the windows occasionally” when it’s freezing outside? Soesa Tovo’s family tried exactly that – and it was too cold for them to air the house properly.

                    I’m going to advise you once again that this kind of victim-blaming “well poor people should just stop breathing and cooking indoors, it makes the house damp” crap is not welcome on my post and if you really must, take it to Open Mike.

                    • You are attributing blame for these deaths, but you don’t welcome people disputing your attribution of blame. Fair enough, the blog owner’s judgement is final, but if you can’t stand people disputing your claims, why enable comments?

                    • I’m not attributing blame, the coroner did, Housing NZ accepted it, and I’m quite happy to be an unreasonable moderator when it comes to blaming people who lost a partner or child to preventable illness for ~just not opening the windows enough~.

                      It feeds a frankly hateful narrative about poor people and beneficiaries being stupid/wilfully negligent/deserving of their deaths.

                    • RedLogix

                      Absolutely Steph.

                      Even if PM would argue that both the families AND the govt have in their own manner contributed towards this tragedy – Soesa Tovo’s family have most certainly paid a very high price, while this heartless govt has completely denied, indeed openly washed it’s hands, of any accountability for it’s own inaction.

                    • Housing NZ accepted responsibility for a tenant’s death? Please provide a citation. Also, the coroner did not blame Housing NZ for these deaths, on any reasonable reading of the report.

                      Even if PM would argue that both the families AND the govt have in their own manner contributed towards this tragedy – Soesa Tovo’s family have most certainly paid a very high price, while this heartless govt has completely denied, indeed openly washed it’s hands, of any accountability for it’s own inaction.

                      I would argue that nobody’s presented any coherent argument for Housing NZ’s culpability for these deaths, that the Coroner did not hold Housing NZ responsible, and that anyone wanting to claim it is responsible needs to actually present a fucking argument in support of that claim – is that too much to ask?

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      a child dies and but you don’t seem interested in the simplest question of all – what could the government have done differently to save the young life.

                    • RedLogix

                      needs to actually present a fucking argument in support of that claim – is that too much to ask?

                      Yes I have. Repeatedly. Either address it or fuck off.

                    • Yes I have. Repeatedly. Either address it or fuck off.

                      You’ve argued that in general terms the government is responsible for poverty, ignorance, high power prices and deferred maintenance on Housing NZ properties, so if people die in Housing NZ houses it’s the government’s responsibility. In the vague sense implied, the government does bear some responsibility for these deaths. However, you haven’t presented an argument for the specific claim being made by journos and bloggers: that Housing NZ caused these houses to be cold and damp. How exactly did it cause these houses to be cold and damp, and how do we know that it, rather than the tenants, was responsible? After three different comments threads on the subject I still haven’t seen a reasonable answer.

                    • RedLogix

                      No I have been quite specific. This is not a complicated or difficult matter as I outlined below:

                      Heartless government

                      Of course the root problem here is that this pack of Tory arses have – from Pike River onwards – have sought to dilute or deny the collective responsibilities we elect and fund governments to fulfill.

                      In a word – heartless.

                    • Your argument in that comment is effectively the same as mine: that there is distributed responsibility in cases like this, and that both landlord and tenant are likely to have contributed to these incidents to a greater or lesser extent, said extents being at this point unknown. It’s not an argument for Housing NZ having made these tenants’ houses cold and damp.

                    • Lanthanide

                      @ PM:
                      If it takes education for tenants to be ventilating their houses so they’re not cold and damp, then HNZ should be providing that education when the tenant first takes up residency in the house.

                      If it takes weekly visits from a HNZ agent to go to the house and check that it isn’t damp, and remind the tenants on how to keep the house damp-free, and also do whatever is required to achieve that goal (ie, install carpet, fix up / install extraction fans / range-hoods / vented dryers), then that is what HNZ should have done.

                      Did HNZ do those things? Almost certainly they did not do the latter things, and I doubt that they did the former.

                      Could HNZ do those things? Yes. They would of course need more funding from the government.

                      If HNZ had done all of those things, would the house have been damp and contributed to the death of the child? The house may still have had a likelihood of being damp, but much lowered if all practicable steps were being taken (and the steps I have listed *are* practicable, but of course require more money to achieve).

                      Therefore, HNZ is responsible, for having *not* taken these practicable steps. The government is responsible for under-funding HNZ and also not requiring such practicable steps be taken.

                    • RedLogix

                      @PM

                      Lanth puts a solid bold on the argument. I’ve nothing more to add.

                    • Could HNZ do those things? Yes. They would of course need more funding from the government.

                      Yes, Housing NZ could hire an army of inspectors to visit its 30,000 Auckland properties weekly to ensure its tenants aren’t damaging the property through ignorance, negligence or malicious intent, if the government were that profligate with taxpayers’ money. But if we’re going down the money-no-object path, it could build brand new houses for all its tenants with the latest in passive systems for heating, ventilation and energy conservation, with more funding from the government. No matter what the level of funding, the government can’t be and shouldn’t be entirely and completely responsible for adult citizens unless they’re mentally incapacitated.

                    • RedLogix

                      No that’s the Angry Dick argument – taking a position to an extreme in order to mock it.

                      It’s also the same argument I encountered in an interesting legal case I was peripherally involved in back in the 80’s.

                      A good mate of mine (a lawyer would you believe) took on a case of gross negligence against a major industrial operator. His client had lost a leg in a horrible accident where he was caught in a hydraulic ram that was used for crushing scrap aluminium into billets. About 3-4 times a shift he had to physically enter the machine and clean out the bore to keep it working well.

                      A workmate of his started it while he was in it … and while he got most of himself out … one leg didn’t.

                      In those days the employer was adamant that it was nothing to do with them. It was entirely the fault of the employee for not making sure his fellow workers knew where he was and the fault of the guy who started the machine. No sirree … no liability on us! Stupid workers go killing and maiming themselves all the time – what are we expected to do about it?

                      Of course these days the pricks would be hung six ways for Christmas. The machine design was a death trap and by even the most elementary analysis it was obvious there was no tag out or basic isolations in place. No-one had done a risk analysis, there was no procedures in place, there was no training, there was absolutely nothing from the employer to mitigate this blindingly obvious risk.

                      Now over 30 years later we accept without question that the employer would have been liable in this situation. Their inaction and failures would see them prosecuted, fined and quite possibly put senior management in prison.

                      The parallel with what is going on here in State Housing (and other substandard rentals) is pretty obvious, just on a bigger scale. Government does have a public health responsibility in this matter – a broad corporate (in the widest sense of the word) responsibility they are openly refusing to acknowledge.

                    • I don’t think it’s unreasonable to characterise weekly visits by Housing NZ staff to 30,000 Auckland properties as a “money-no-object” approach. “Angry Dick” better describes the practice throughout the threads on this subject of presenting extreme outliers (“What if the house was X?” “I lived in a house once that…” etc) as though they disproved the idea that your house will get damp if you put lots of people in it and never open the windows.

                      As to the employer analogy, not even Housing NZ is saying it did nothing wrong in these incidents. The claim is though that Housing NZ caused these houses to be cold and damp – and there’s no evidence it did.

                    • RedLogix

                      @PM

                      The claim is though that Housing NZ caused these houses to be cold and damp – and there’s no evidence it did.

                      There was zero evidence that the employer pressed the start button on that machine either. But that does not mean they carried no responsibility for what happened.

                      Management at Pike River probably didn’t go down the mine and light a match – but the Royal Commission was absolutely scathing about their shoddy failures all the same.

                      And while no-one is suggesting that HNZ actively created or caused the cold and damp in these homes – they most certainly failed to do enough to prevent it.

                      It baffles me why you’re so stuck on this simple distinction. As we said above, the families of these children have through whatever actions they did or did not take, paid a very high price. That is a personal matter which no decent human would pick over in a public forum.

                      But at the same time HNZ and the government have openly absolved themselves from their responsibility here. And that is a matter of political accountability – and this is a political forum.

                    • Lanthanide

                      @ PM:
                      Where did I say that all 30,000 houses had to be visited weekly? Nowhere, in fact. You made that strawman up yourself.

                      Obviously there are some houses that will be more problematic than others. Also there are some tenants that will be more problematic than others. The good ones to initially target are the ones that have been complaining for years to HNZ that their house is cold and damp.

                      For houses and tenants that have shown no long-term issues, a courtesy call once during winter may be sufficient.

                      Also, saying “30,000 houses in Auckland” makes it sound terrible. But if HNZ owns every house on a street, then 1 or 2 people could likely visit all the houses in a day or two (assuming there’s someone home).

                      Nevertheless, this is *not* impossible, and it is practicable for it to be done, if only the government would spend more money on it. Which requires the public at large to not keep electing these amazing economic wizkids that cut taxes during a recession and then wonder why they can’t reach surplus.

                      Investing in preventative health care for citizens on a large scale should also reduce the cost of the health budget. So while the HNZ budget might go up, the health budget could go down (or, stay the same, and have a better service offering).

                    • It baffles me why you’re so stuck on this simple distinction.

                      It’s straightforward: far from “no-one suggesting that HNZ actively created or caused the cold and damp in these homes,” multiple posts and commenters have directly blamed Housing NZ for these deaths. If you’re going to leap to blaming people for a death, there’s a hefty burden of proof, and “I have a burning sense of injustice” isn’t a substitute for that proof.

                      There’s a big gap between Housing NZ not doing a good enough job at replacing carpets, and Housing NZ being responsible for people’s deaths. If authors/commenters avoid evidence-free blame attribution, I’ll avoid pointing out the landlord can’t prevent you making your house damp.

                  • RedLogix

                    I can appreciate where you are coming from. As I’ve said before – some tenants are a problem and about two years ago we finished up with a $6k bill for exactly that reason. Major bathroom repairs (and I didn’t have the time to fix them) because some twat put an unventilated clothes dryer in there.

                    The same tenant also came with other major problems, like getting months behind on rent. On top of this she had relationship problems and a sick baby which meant we held off acting for way too long. In the end we just made an offer to waive the back-rent and found her (via the manager we now use) a place she could afford.

                    So despite what you are imagining I’m not trying to evade the fact that tenants (well all householders really) have a responsibility for some basic understanding of how moisture works. On the other hand in my experience people rarely come with just one problem, any many of them are not of their own making.

                    (And now I think about it, back in the early days we did have one person who was just unaware of the need to ventilate – and a simple request entirely solved the problem. But this person was a fine tenant in every other respect.)

                    But often just asking them to ‘open a window’ isn’t necessarily the whole solution. They may well feel that this lets out the heat, or it they’ll have security issues around this, or maybe just no-one responsible is at home during the day.

                    In my case I just installed a properly vented clothes dryer … and in three other units I’ve got a decent ventilation system in place. None of these solutions are perfect but so far I’ve not had a repeat of the problem.

                    Landlords despite what people imagine generally do far more than just collect the rent and clip the ticket. We do have a responsibility for the maintenance and upkeep of the property – and the tenant is involved in the process as well. But if either party abdicates their part of the deal – then problems are guaranteed.

                    And to try and drag this back on topic … the evidence is that this do nothing govt has entirely ignored it’s role in this rather massive public health issue.

                  • David H

                    Are your houses Insulated warm and dry? or are they just ways of making money and to hell with the health of the tenants. Oh and they must open the Windows, which usually means they are cold and damp, as warm insulated walls don’t weep.

                    • My houses are as insulated as most other NZ houses, ie there’s insulation in the ceilings and that’s about it. They’re warm if the tenants heat them (it’s up to them whether they run the heating or not) and dry unless the tenants make them damp (it’s up to them whether they air the place or not). Are these questions relevant to the OP in some way?

              • maui

                Heard of a coroner’s report.. guess not.

          • infused 3.1.1.2.3

            Pretty much the comment made below. The only place I’ve seen where these deaths have been said to be caused by the state house is The Standard.

            • Colonial Rawshark 3.1.1.2.3.1

              The condition of the house will have been one of the primary factors, but not the only one.

              • infused

                So if that’s true, which it may well be, where is the evidence? As to date, I’ve seen none, except from the experts here.

                • Given that every single news story about Emma-Lita Bourne’s death this month has been triggered by a coroner’s report saying the state of the house was a contributing factor I’m calling bullshit on your “oh but I haven’t seen this proven anywhere”.

                  http://www.stuff.co.nz/auckland/69095130/damp-state-house-played-part-in-toddlers-death

                  Now you’re probably going to complain that “contributing factor” doesn’t mean “one and only cause” and make various other excuses for our government’s neglect leading to a child’s death but that’s on your conscience, not mine.

                  • Look at the headline you’re linking to there: “Damp state house played part in toddler’s death.” You’re making the bold claim that this damp was caused by Housing NZ, when damp is largely a matter of whether the people living in the house open the windows and doors occasionally or not. Explain how it was caused by Housing NZ.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      You seem to be fixated on ventilation when there are multiple other causes. Why is that?

                      http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2008/mar/01/diy.homes8

                      Yes, poor ventilation is the commonest cause but in old houses I’d put the main cause into all the rest of the problems listed in that article. For houses 50+ years old we’re probably looking at pulling them down building new ones. Hell, for a number of the Leaky Buildings that happened in the 1990s that was the only option as well.

                    • Multiple other causes? Which ones, exactly? Rising damp isn’t a significant problem in this country. Leaks can be a problem, but the richest source of those is houses built under National’s “improved” regulatory regime of the 1990s. Few state houses fall into that category. In this country, unless your house is on a southern slope among tall trees, damp is almost certainly down to insufficient ventilation.

                      As for houses 50+ years old, there’s nothing wrong with them unless they haven’t been maintained over a long period or they’ve had successive tenants who don’t ventilate them. Which applies in the case of damp Housing NZ houses is still an open question.

                    • Colonial Rawshark

                      So apart from making excuses, what course of action are you suggesting?

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Leaks can be a problem, but the richest source of those is houses built under National’s “improved” regulatory regime of the 1990s.

                      Probably but that doesn’t mean that other houses aren’t leaking or afflicted by other forms of damp that can’t be addressed by simply opening the windows.

                      As for houses 50+ years old, there’s nothing wrong with them…

                      And that’s a load of BS as well. As I’ve said before, several members of my family are in the construction business. My nephew is a builder and has been in the trade for 20+ years and he tells me that the places he really hates working on is old houses because the walls are inevitably rotten. He and others in the building industry refuse to do refurbishments on anything but an hourly rate because of it.

                      You deluding yourself if you think that simply opening the windows will fix everything.

                    • Probably but that doesn’t mean that other houses aren’t leaking or afflicted by other forms of damp that can’t be addressed by simply opening the windows.

                      Sure it doesn’t. Any evidence that either of the two houses in question featured one of these uncommon sources of damp?

                      My nephew is a builder and has been in the trade for 20+ years and he tells me that the places he really hates working on is old houses because the walls are inevitably rotten.

                      Well, yes. The only times I’ve ever asked a builder to work on an old house was because something was rotten, so it’s unsurprising that a builder would never work on an old house that didn’t have rot. Most of the houses I’ve owned and lived in have been upwards of 50 years old – the oldest was 100. There was nothing wrong with any of them, other than that every few decades the owner needs to get builders in to work on them.

                      So apart from making excuses, what course of action are you suggesting?

                      I’m not the Coroner. Based on the coroner’s report mentioned above, however, it sounds like Housing NZ needs to make clear to incoming tenants what their responsibilities are when it comes to ventilating the place.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      Any evidence that either of the two houses in question featured one of these uncommon sources of damp?

                      How about evidence that it wasn’t lack of ventilation?

                      [77] They confirm a number of interventions were carried out as part of their Healthy Housing Programme. This included the Hometech passive and window ventilation system; and installation of an electric heater in the lounge.

                      Bold mine.

                      Then we have to consider that it is an old house which is evidence that it has other difficulties that haven’t been discovered yet:

                      However, with the average age of HNZ homes sitting at 43 years, there were properties that were old, cold and difficult to maintain, she said.

                      The only times I’ve ever asked a builder to work on an old house was because something was rotten, so it’s unsurprising that a builder would never work on an old house that didn’t have rot.

                      He wasn’t there to do repairs but renovations. The rot was discovered after other work had been started.

                      Based on the coroner’s report mentioned above, however, it sounds like Housing NZ needs to make clear to incoming tenants what their responsibilities are when it comes to ventilating the place.

                      According to the coroners report, it’s highly probable that they did.

                      Really, you’re stuck on your first explanation as being the only factor when the evidence would suggest that that was only one of the problems – and one that looks to have been taken care of.

                    • How about evidence that it wasn’t lack of ventilation?

                      Occam’s razor. Damp in an NZ house is nearly always caused by lack of ventilation. Which means, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, lack of ventilation is by far the most likely explanation for damp in a house.

                      …a number of interventions were carried out as part of their Healthy Housing Programme. This included the Hometech passive and window ventilation system;

                      In other words, the problem was lack of ventilation. It also suggests the tenants were so resistant to ventilating the house via its built-in systems that Housing NZ was forced to spend taxpayers’ money working around this unwillingness to ventilate.

                  • infused

                    Nice cop-out at the end there Steph.

                    Have you actually read the report?

                  • Ovid

                    As an aside, it’s unhelpful that the NZ Coroners Court website doesn’t appear to have been updated since 2013 and the reports on NZLII haven’t been updated since December last year. It would be useful to have the original report available with the coroner’s weighting of the contributing factors rather than just through the lens of the media.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  Did you miss the coroner’s report?

                  • infused

                    Yeah, read it?

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      “…the house unfortunately was unhealthy for this family…”

                      You read that, and now you’re here claiming the house wasn’t a factor.

                      What a low-life you are.

          • tricledrown 3.1.1.2.4

            Psycho we are supposed to be a civilised developed nation you are proof that neanderthal thinking is still alive and well ,laws of the jungle still rule by your heartless emotional
            Aloofness!
            Only the strongest fit and cunning deserve to live .

  4. lprent 4

    Meanwhile over at Kiwiblog, David Farrar is running a National party probe piece for the people who want their blood money in the form of minor tax cuts. It has the usual range of stupid greedy fools.

    I think that there was a single mention of the need to drop back the massive government debt that National has foisted on us for the last 6 and half years, and absolutely none on the need to fund the obligations of an aging population heading into retirement and increasing healthcare with a much smaller tax base. That would seem to me to be the core of a debate about tax changes right now as we head to the non-working demographic peak in 15 years.

    It might be a heartless government, but it appears to accurately reflect the more vocal of the ignorant short-term layabout parasitical shitheads who seem to support it. Looking through the list of people that I recognize writing comments on that post there, then considering what they have revealed about themselves over the years, my impression is that we could drop them from NZ society and improve society as a whole. Most of them seem to work in the more parasitical internal economy occupations.

    None of them appear to have any other redeeming qualities that you couldn’t find in a baboon troop.

    • Policy Parrot 4.1

      In order to National to pay for broad based tax cuts, it will have to shift the public mindset away from the “era of austere” that it has presided over up until now; and yet the statistics have not got any better:
      – Record government debt (in absolute dollar terms).
      – Failure to produce a surplus despite seven years in government.
      – Claim of insufficient funds to equalise accommodation supplement payments in Auckland and Christchurch (costed at $100m), despite rents now being roughly equivalent (and incomes in Christchurch being lower on average).
      – Failure to restart contributions to the NZ Superannuation Fund.

      Its like that guy (everyone knows at least one of them) who always claims poverty when it is their turn to pay for something, yet they always can come up with the readies if/when it suits – usually referred to as “cheapskates”; “short arms, deep pockets” etc.

  5. David 5

    If government is heartless, why do many here seem to want government to own all the housing?

    • You are confusing the general “a government” with the specific “this government”, and I’m giving you the benefit of the doubt as to this being a genuine mistake.

      • David 5.1.1

        Government is Government regardless of the colour of the rosette, or do you really think that these cases never occur when your preferred colour rules?

        [Stephanie: This is a blatant derail. The post is commenting specifically on the actions of a specific government and makes no such claims about “my preferred colour”. Given your previous commenting history of facetious off-topic trollbait I’m giving you a warning about your behaviour on this thread.]

        • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1.1.1

          Meanwhile, on Earth, in New Zealand, whenever the National Party occupies the Treasury benches, unemployment rises, per-capita GDP falls, the GINI coefficient goes up, median wages fall, and the social gradient of child morbidity gets steeper.

          Why are you ignorant of these things David? Is it because you’ve never attempted to measure a single one of your deeply held beliefs against reality in your whole life? Or what?

        • David 5.1.1.2

          You seriously think this is a problem that has arisen in the last 8 years? Shate houses have been like this for decades, it’s not specific to ‘this’ government.

          • One Anonymous Bloke 5.1.1.2.1

            Do you seriously think your deeply held beliefs mean anything outside of the confines of your own mind? I asked you a question: why do you keep yourself ignorant?

          • linda 5.1.1.2.2

            but in past decades income covered the cost of living that is no longer the case the issue is one of the collapse of real income and trashing of the economy this could be a case of intergenerational injustice the baby bloomers have looted the economy and there needs to be some form of pay back for there greed

    • One Anonymous Bloke 5.2

      “Many”.

      Really? can you list them?

  6. Colonial Rawshark 6

    It is time to bring voters some materially different options. But beware – upgrading NZ’s substandard housing stock will cost many billions of dollars. And with housing related deaths every month it can’t be done over say ten years. It has to be done ASAP.

    Is there a political party in Parliament publicly willing to commit to this level of additional expenditure?

    • wyndham 6.1

      Isn’t a big part of the cause of rundown stock due to the government demanding a large (like multi-millions of $) “contribution” from Housing N Z ?

      • Colonial Rawshark 6.1.1

        Likely. Trying to close the deficit gap.

      • weka 6.1.2

        “Isn’t a big part of the cause of rundown stock due to the government demanding a large (like multi-millions of $) “contribution” from Housing N Z ?”

        Do you mean part of the rents go into the general accounts rather than being for HNZ to spend?

    • weka 6.2

      “But beware – upgrading NZ’s substandard housing stock will cost many billions of dollars”

      Where does that estimate come from?

    • RedLogix 6.3

      But beware – upgrading NZ’s substandard housing stock will cost many billions of dollars.

      I’d think a fair chunk of the job could be done quite cheaply with a fleet of bulldozers. The ChCh earthquake gave us a fair old head-start. 😉

      Meanwhile back in the real world … it’s not like we don’t know how to build really good housing, it’s just that the current market model really doesn’t want to deliver it. Or at least not at a sensible price.

      Nor has there been a shortage of capable, well-intentioned people who’ve tried to address this one way or another. What we need is a circuit breaker like the 1930’s State Housing intervention. The big disrupter from that initiative was not so much the number of houses that got built, but the introduction of (for the time) innovative techniques and skills into the industry.

      There are relatively few houses left built prior to the 1930’s mainly because they were such awful shacks. But all those people who’d worked on the State Housing plan – all took their new ideas and skills with them into the wider industry. It was a transformation.

      I’ve said it yesterday – the problem with these moneyed Tory arses is not so much maliciousness, but that because so few of them have done a real days work in their lives, they have no sense of what it takes to get anything real DONE. Sure they all know how to cut deals, massage a spreadsheet and work the room – but when it comes to so much as holding a hammer – they’re useless.

      • Draco T Bastard 6.3.1

        …but that because so few of them have done a real days work in their lives, they have no sense of what it takes to get anything real DONE.

        I’m certain that that was behind the sale of Telecom that has now cost us so many billions dollars for no benefit.

        Apparently no one in government since the 1970s has truly understood the sheer physical nature of doing anything. The idiots just see the money.

    • But beware – upgrading NZ’s substandard housing stock will cost many billions of dollars.

      Coincidentally enough I have a subsequent draft post noting the fallacy of the “cost” argument (as in, sure, it’ll take a hell of a lot to repair NZ’s housing stock – but how much does it ultimately save in education/healthcare/law enforcement).

    • maui 6.5

      The current Government are bulldozing the existing state housing stock and in their place putting in more private homes, with a much reduced number of state homes. So we’re heading in the opposite direction of what you’re proposing. The party that seems to be most serious about building new homes and addressing the needs of the disadvantaged is Mana. I think they proposed 10,000 state built houses.

  7. infused 7

    Because people who expect state houses to not be so cold they kill people are clearly confused about the concept of mortality.

    Where has it been stated the house killed her?

    • One Anonymous Bloke 7.1

      The Lancet is very explicit about the health costs of poor housing. You will deny the evidence for as long as you can.

      • infused 7.1.1

        So no where then? Good to know.

        • maui 7.1.1.1

          You obviously didn’t read any of the media reports when the news broke.

          • infused 7.1.1.1.1

            I have, as well as the corners report.

            • maui 7.1.1.1.1.1

              You better read them all again then.

            • RedLogix 7.1.1.1.1.2

              Sighs … in the industrial health and safety arena this question of ‘responsibility’ is pretty well understood.

              The employer has a responsibility to provide a safe workplace which will entail providing systems, equipment and training to ensure that the job can be done at the ‘lowest reasonably practical risk’.

              Equally the employee has a responsibility to use the systems, equipment and training in a manner that avoids harm to themselves and their workmates, or avoids damage and loss.

              In the event of a fatality or serious harm incident, the investigation will generally find a chain of contributory causes … often called the ‘swiss cheese model’ in which a series of factors all lined up on the day to cause the actual event. Almost always both the employer and employee are found to have contributed their part in the chain.

              Substitute HNZ for employer and tenant for employee; and the concept is exactly the same. Just on a larger scale.

        • One Anonymous Bloke 7.1.1.2

          You keep telling yourself that, denial boy.

  8. infused 8

    And the women in the car…

    “We have told her that the Ministry would help her to cover the financial cost of temporary accommodation. We wouldn’t be paying for all of the accommodation as it would be reasonable to expect her to contribute.”

    The Ministry had also offered to help her pay for a bond and rent in advance to get her into permanent accommodation and to set up a redirection of benefit payment directly to a landlord if that would help her obtain temporary or permanent accommodation, Dowding said.

    While it seems there was an issue to begin with, they have been offered accommodation, but refuse to take it?

    • weka 8.1

      That’s not an offer of accommodation, that’s an offer of bond and paying the landlord directly.

      What makes you think she refused?

  9. Scintilla 9

    In my dreams, the government builds a massive processing plant to produce a range of pre-fabricated houses, that don’t require specialists to put together onsite (gosh maybe put some of the unemployed to work erecting them), and concurrently develop other prefabs for export. Apparently the govt has plenty of land for housing, we’ve got lots of trees, wool for insulation – is it really that difficult to do something so sensible??

    It’s that ongoing, sustainable, added value model that always seems to elude these cretins.

    • Plus the benefits of a strong, well-supported manufacturing sector, plus adding value to our primary exports instead of shipping them overseas in their raw form, plus job creation … yep, it doesn’t seem like rocket science, does it?

    • Karen 9.2

      I’m with you, Scintilla, except rather than one huge processing plant, there are a few scattered around the regions making various components for prefabricated houses. It needs to be for export as well as for home use because of the scale required.

      These would be truly affordable homes but they would start out as state houses that are rented out, and they would be insulated and have a heat pump or efficient log burner, plus pv panels for solar power. A certain proportion would be available for the renters to buy if their situation made it possible, but any house sold would need to replaced so that there was always enough rentals.

      IMO everybody has a right to a warm, dry, safe home, and it is up to the government to make sure it is possible,.

      In my experience right wingers are always stupid, greedy, or ignorant – and sometimes they are a combination of all three.
      Is this government heartless? Absolutely.

    • Colonial Rawshark 9.3

      +1

    • linda 9.4

      its not a dream they do in Europe and the us once an house automation and prefabrication is widely used https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1MdojvTwig

  10. Bill 10

    Here’s a question.

    If governments can bail out banks to the tune of x million/billion or whatever $….y’know, they suddenly ‘found’ the money, then where the fuck are the powerful voices demanding that they ‘find’ the money to bail out us?

    Retrofit all housing, provide the social means for health. Make all homes resilient in the face of future climate shock…

    Hmm. Flies in the face of wish fulfilling sentiments such as

    New Zealand is surely a better country than this.

    It’s not. We’re not.

    • You’re welcome to your own view of course, Bill, but if I really believed we’re not better than this I’d probably stop wasting time and energy trying to do good in the world and apply for a job with Carrick Graham.

      • lprent 10.1.1

        I’d second that.

        Besides, I did see a number of beneficial changes in society in the 5th Labour led government. Not the least of which was a pretty credible attempts to increase the diversity of our economic base towards a higher returning job base, to spread the benefits of economic growth wider, and to cut back on debt in preparation for the aging population issues due to hit us. Certainly enough to try for a 6th.

        You’d have to look frigging hard to find *any* benefits in this current government unless you are financing government debt or offshore buy ups of local property or have bets on the number of corrupt, expelled and downright stupid ministers.

        Certainly their attitude towards the economy more resembles a drug addict given free access to the bank than anything ‘responsible’. They radically shifted us towards a milk powder monoculture by shutting almost all incentives for anyone apart from crony businesses, sucked out most of space in our forward government budgets, and have been flogging off productive government assets largely to overseas buyers who are busy raising costs for NZ businesses.

        Moreover they have been completely useless at doing the basic roles of government in managing the economic infrastructure. The shortage of new housing in Auckland is a direct consequence of the National housing ministers like Williamson not providing any reason to build the required numbers of houses because the liabilities arising out of their leaky building screwup in the 1990s.

        BTW: Best thing that ever happened to NZ recently was the price crashing back on milk powder back to normal in the last 18 months. Hopefully it has stopped these National idiots from chasing their el dorado white gold (heroin?) for a while. Being lazy arseholes, they will instead probably spend the 2.5 years explaining how this is all Labours fault, and that even more unaffordable taxcuts will fix it.

  11. aaron 11

    numerous other examples of heartless government over recent times…with a trend toward neglecting social supports…introducing social bonds for mental health, sudden pull funding for relationship counseling, lack of financial support for domestic violence NGOs (Shine) and lack of support for sexual assault support groups.

  12. Reddelusion 12

    With climate change damp and cold houses will be a thing of the past. Problem solved

    • weka 12.1

      Try telling that to people in South Dunedin.

    • tricledrown 12.2

      Research has shown that rightwing fundamentalists don’t think deeply.
      Bluebaiter so how is it that I paid high taxes to help pay for John Key’s State house free education mums widows pension.
      Power and house prices were extremely low in those days so keeping the house warm wasn’t a problem

  13. Drowsy M. Kram 13

    Given the content of Stephanie’s post, Reddelusion’s ‘joke’ (it is a joke, right?) comes across as tasteless. “Heartless Government” is putting it mildly.

    “Last August, Emma-Lita Bourne died of pneumonia because the state house her family lived in was cold and damp. Soesa Tovo died after being admitted to hospital with heart and lung problems and pneumonia. His house was so cold and damp they had to wipe down the ceiling every morning.”

  14. Ovid 14

    The World Health Organisation, along with the Ministry of Health, recommends a minimum internal household temperature of 18 degrees. 20 if there are vulnerable people including infants and the elderly.

    If public housing cannot meet that standard, then steps have to be taken to bring them up to scratch. Ventillation systems, double glazing, ceiling and underfloor insulation and thermal drapes should be standard along with a heat pump, pellet fire or wood burner. The Greens warm housing scheme along with the work of a lot of local authorities has been excellent in this field, but clearly there is work yet to be done.

    • Lanthanide 14.1

      Yes, this is true, but, if all state houses were raised to this level, it would instantly put them in the top quartile of housing in the country. Possibly even the top 10%.

      Apart from already being unaffordable, this would immediately be met with cries of “why should bludgers get better housing than what I can afford?”. So the only fair response would be for the government to upgrade *all* housing in NZ, both private and publicly owned, which would be astronomically unaffordable, and there wouldn’t be enough skilled and qualified people to do the work even if we wanted. Also I would expect that at least 10% of housing, probably even up to 20-30%, would more cost-effectively (over a future payback period of 50 years) be demolished and re-built which is again even more unaffordable and logistically impossible as there wouldn’t be enough excess housing available to house those who had to move out of their houses until they were rebuilt.

      In short, the whole situation is intractable and will only be very gradually dealt with over a long period of time.

      What can be done very quickly however, is significantly beef up the building code, to ensure that newly built houses are much more energy and resource efficient.

      The rebuild of Christchurch also represents a massive missed opportunity by this government. They could have instituted a special building code in Christchurch, equivalent to a homestar 5 rating. All the builders that came to CHCH would be forced to up-skill, and they’d take these skills with them back to the rest of the country. The large building companies would have been forced to up-skill themselves into designing better homes to meet these requirements, and again these skills would filter into the rest of the country.

      • Sable 14.1.1

        And yet the narrow minded, self serving little Kiwi voter still trots out and votes for them.

  15. Sable 15

    Hate to say it but New Zealand is not really a very nice country. It has a history of taking a shit on anyone who is poor, mentally ill, a minority or in any way disadvantaged.

    The sort of Dickensian bullshit we are seeing now is simply history repeating itself. Go back in time to the 1930’s and it was just the same. My parents lived though it and this all sounds horribly familiar.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand joins global search for COVID-19 vaccine
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Deputy Prime Minister, Minister of Foreign Affairs Hon Megan Woods, Minister of Research, Science and Innovation Hon Dr David Clark, Minister of Health Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters, Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods,  and Health Minister David Clark today announced a COVID-19 vaccine strategy, ...
    20 hours ago
  • Budget 2020: Five things to know
    Budget 2020 is about rebuilding together, supporting jobs, getting business moving and the books back into the black. It’s an integral part of our COVID-19 economic response, and our plan to grow our economy and get New Zealand moving again. Here’s a quick look at the five top things you ...
    2 days ago
  • Coalition Government approves essential upgrades on Ōhakea Air Base
    The Coalition Government has approved $206 million in essential upgrades at Ōhakea Air Base.  Defence Minister Ron Mark said the money would be spent on improving old infrastructure. He said safety issues would be addressed, as well as upgrades to taxiways, accommodation and fresh, storm and waste water systems. "This ...
    6 days ago
  • Attributable to the Rt Hon Winston Peters
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First “I am not persisting with this case just for myself, but for all people who have had their privacy breached. Privacy of information is a cornerstone of our country’s democracy. Without it our society truly faces a bleak future. We now ...
    1 week ago
  • Forestry Minister Shane Jones moves to protect sawmills
    Forestry Minister Shane Jones has introduced a Bill to Parliament that he says will "force more transparency, integrity and respect" for the domestic wood-processing sector through the registration of log traders and practice standards. The Forests (Regulation of Log Traders and Forestry Advisers) Amendment Bill had its first reading in ...
    1 week ago
  • Green MP joins international call to cancel developing countries’ debt
    Green MP Golriz Ghahraman is joining over 300 lawmakers from around the world in calling on the big banks and the IMF to forgive the debt of developing countries, in the wake of the COVID crisis. ...
    1 week ago
  • Forestry Minister Shane Jones swipes back at billion trees critics
    Forestry Minister Shane Jones says concerns that carbon foresters are planting pine trees that will never be harvested are the result of "misinformation". "The billion tree strategy is an excellent idea, unfortunately from time to time it's tainted by misinformation spread by the National Party or their grandees, hiding in scattered ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Budget boost for refugee families a win for compassion
    The Green Party welcomes funding in the budget to reunite more refugees with their families, ensuring they have the best chance at a new life in Aotearoa New Zealand. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • How Budget 2020 is supporting jobs
    This year’s Budget is about rebuilding New Zealand together in the face of COVID-19. Jobs are central to how we’re going to do that.There’s a lot of targeted investment for employment in this year’s Budget, with announcements on creating new jobs, training people for the jobs we have, and supporting ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters says China didn’t want NZ to go into lockdown
    Speaking to Stuff's Coronavirus NZ podcast, Foreign Minister Winston Peters revealed China tried to dissuade New Zealand from going into lockdown. “Without speaking out of turn, they wanted a discussion as to why we were doing it, because they thought it was an overreaction,” Mr Peters told Stuff’s Coronavirus NZ podcast. He also ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Changes made to Overseas Investment Act to protect New Zealand assets
    The Coalition Government is making changes to the Overseas Investment Act to ensure New Zealand assets don't fall into the hands of foreign ownership in the economic aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic. Associate Minister of Finance David Parker announced the Act will be amended to bring forward a national interest ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters: Trans-Tasman bubble to help tourism industry make swift recovery
    A quick start to a trans-Tasman bubble could see the tourism industry make a swift recovery, according to Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters. "I believe tourism will turn around dramatically faster than people think," Mr Peters told reporters after Thursday's Budget. "Why? Because I think the Tasman bubble is [going ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Rt. Hon Winston Peters: Budget Speech
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First   Please check against delivery https://vimeo.com/418303651 Budget 2020: Jobs, Business and Balance   Introduction Acknowledgements to all Cabinet colleagues, and party ministers Tracey Martin, Shane Jones and Ron Mark, Under-Secretary Fletcher Tabuteau and to caucus colleagues. Thank you for your support, your ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Jacinda Ardern’s 2020 Budget Speech
    Read Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern's Budget 2020 Speech. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Budget 2020: Next steps to end family and sexual violence
    The 2020 Budget includes significant support to stabilise New Zealand’s family violence services, whose work has been shown to be so essential throughout the COVID-19 lockdown. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Investment in housing gives more people access to the home they deserve
    The Green Party says huge new investment in public and transitional housing will get thousands more families into the warm, safe homes they deserve.  ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Budget 2020: Huge investment in green nature based jobs jump starts sustainable COVID recovery
    The Green Party says the $1.1 billion environmental investment in this year’s budget to create thousands of green jobs will help jump start a sustainable recovery from the COVID crisis. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Grant Robertson’s 2020 Budget Speech
    Read Minister of Finance Grant Robertson's Budget 2020 Speech. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters tells struggling migrant workers ‘you should probably go home’
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters said today the Coalition Government told foreigners at the start of the Covid-19 crisis that if their circumstances had changed dramatically, they should go home. "And 50,000 did," Mr Peters said. Official advice to Cabinet revealed there is potentially 380,000 foreigners and migrant workers in ...
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand First welcomes today’s Alert Level 2 announcement
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, Leader of New Zealand First New Zealand First welcomes the decision today to go to Alert Level 2 from midnight Wednesday, says Leader Rt Hon Winston Peters. Alert Level 2 will mean a return to work for the vast majority of New Zealand’s businesses. A return ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Nurses to be protected after amendment to First Responders Bill
    Nurses now look set to get more protection from violence at work, under a proposed new law. This after NZ First MP Darroch Ball's "Protection for First Responders Bill", which introduces a six-month minimum sentence for assaults on first responders, will now also cover emergency department healthcare workers. The ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Nurses to get more protection, added to ‘First Responders’ legislation
    Darroch Ball MP, New Zealand First Law and Order Spokesperson An amendment to the ‘Protection of First Responders Bill’ is being tabled which will see emergency department healthcare workers included in the legislation. “During this COVID-19 crisis we have seen reports of violence and specifically increased incidents of spitting towards ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Shane Jones: Northland port could be economic haven
    Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones is breathing new life into the proposal to move Auckland's port to Whangārei to help in the economic recovery post Covid-19 pandemic. If New Zealand First was returned in the September general election, Minister Jones said a priority would be development of an "economic haven" at Northport, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • PGF grant for Ventnor memorial
    The plan to build a memorial to the SS Ventnor, and those who were lost when it sank off the Hokianga coast in 1902, has been granted $100,000 from the Provincial Growth Fund. Originally planned for a site near Rāwene cemetery, the memorial will now be built at the new Manea ...
    3 weeks ago
  • 75th anniversary of V.E Day
    Rt Hon Winston Peters, New Zealand First Leader Leader of New Zealand First, Rt Hon Winston Peters said: “Today is the 75th anniversary of VE Day – marking the end of World War II in Europe." Millions died in the six years of war, and families were torn apart. 75 years ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Week That Was: Getting the job done
    From the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, our Government has committed to providing calm, clear, and consistent communication, including regular press conference updates from the Prime Minister. While New Zealand is at Alert Level 3, we're making sure that New Zealanders are kept informed and up-to-date with all the latest ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Winston Peters responds to Simon Bridges’ ‘my sweetheart’ comment
    New Zealand First leader Winston Peters spoke to The Country's Jamie Mackay. A day earlier, National Party leader Simon Bridges was on the radio show and referred to the Deputy Prime Minister as, "my sweetheart Winston". Mr Peters swiftly dismissed the question of whether Bridges had changed his mind about ...
    3 weeks ago

  • Milestone in cash flow support to SMEs
    Almost $1 billion in interest-free loans for small businesses More than 55,000 businesses have applied; 95% approved Average loan approx. $17,300 90% of applications from firms with ten or fewer staff A wide cross-section of businesses have applied, the most common are the construction industry, accommodation providers, professional firms, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 hour ago
  • Parliament returns to a safe normal
    The special Epidemic Response Committee (ERC) has successfully concluded its role, Leader of the House Chris Hipkins said today. The committee was set up on 25 March by the agreement of Parliament to scrutinise the Government and its actions while keeping people safe during levels 4 and 3 of lockdown. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Foreign Minister makes four diplomatic appointments
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today announced four diplomatic appointments: New Zealand’s Ambassador to Belgium, High Commissioners to Nauru and Niue, and Ambassador for Counter-Terrorism. “As the world seeks to manage and then recover from COVID-19, our diplomatic and trade networks are more important than ever,” Mr Peters said. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Mycoplasma bovis eradication reaches two year milestone in good shape
    New Zealand’s world-first plan to eradicate the cattle disease Mycoplasma bovis is on track the latest technical data shows, says Agriculture and Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor. “Two years ago the Government, DairyNZ and Beef + Lamb New Zealand and industry partners made a bold decision to go hard and commit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    21 hours ago
  • New payment to support Kiwis through COVID
    Further support for New Zealanders affected by 1-in-100 year global economic shock 12-week payment will support people searching for new work or retraining Work programme on employment insurance to support workers and businesses The Government today announced a new temporary payment to support New Zealanders who lose their jobs due ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • PGF reset helps regional economies
    The Provincial Growth Fund will play a vital role in New Zealand’s post-COVID-19 recovery by creating jobs in shorter timeframes through at least $600 million being refocused on projects with more immediate economic benefits, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The funding is comprised of repurposed Provincial Growth ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents
    Government exempts some home improvements from costly consents Homeowners, builders and DIYers will soon have an easier time making basic home improvements as the Government scraps the need for consents for low-risk building work such as sleep-outs, sheds and carports – allowing the construction sector to fire back up quicker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Concern at introduction of national security legislation for Hong Kong
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says the New Zealand Government has reacted with concern at the introduction of legislation in China’s National People’s Congress relating to national security in Hong Kong.  “We have a strong interest in seeing confidence maintained in the ‘one country, two systems’ principle under which Hong ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Samoa Language Week theme is perfect for the post-COVID-19 journey
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples Aupito William Sio, says the theme for the 2020 Samoa Language Week is a perfect fit for helping our Pacific communities cope with the unfolding COVID-19 crisis, and to prepare now for the journey ahead as New Zealand focuses on recovery plans and rebuilding New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Adult kakī/black stilt numbers soar
    A nearly 40-year programme to protect one of New Zealand’s most critically endangered birds is paying off, with a record number of adult kakī/black stilt recently recorded living in the wild, the Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced today. “Thanks to the team effort involved in the Department of Conservation’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Waikato-Tainui settlement story launched on 25th anniversary of Treaty signing
    The story of the Waikato-Tainui Treaty process and its enduring impact on the community is being told with a five-part web story launched today on the 25th anniversary of settlement, announced Associate Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “I am grateful to Waikato-Tainui for allowing us to help capture ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Taita College to benefit from $32 million school redevelopment
    Taita College in the Hutt Valley will be redeveloped to upgrade its ageing classrooms and leaky roofs, Education Minister Chris Hipkins announced today. “The work is long overdue and will make a lasting difference to the school for generations to come,” Chris Hipkins said. “Too many of our schools are ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Redeployment for workers in hard-hit regions
    The Government is allocating $36.72 million to projects in regions hard hit economically by COVID-19 to keep people working, Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. Projects in Hawke’s Bay, Northland, Rotorua and Queenstown will be funded from the Government’s $100 million worker ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $35m to build financial resilience for New Zealanders
    A $35m boost to financial capability service providers funded by MSD will help New Zealanders manage their money better both day to day and through periods of financial difficulty, announced Social Development Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “It’s always been our position to increase support to key groups experiencing or at risk ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New District Court Judge appointed
    Dunedin barrister Melinda Broek has been appointed as a District Court Judge with Family Court jurisdiction to be based in Rotorua, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Ms Broek has iwi affiliations to Ngai Tai. She commenced her employment in 1996 with Scholefield Cockroft Lloyd in Invercargill specialising in family and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • $206 million investment in upgrades at Ohakea Air Force Base
    The Coalition Government has approved a business case for $206 million in upgrades to critical infrastructure at Royal New Zealand Air Force Base Ohakea, with the first phase starting later this year, Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today. The investment will be made in three phases over five years, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Review of CAA organisational culture released
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford today released the Ministry of Transport’s review of the organisational culture at the Civil Aviation Authority. Phil Twyford says all employees are entitled to a safe work environment. “I commissioned this independent review due to the concerns I had about the culture within the CAA, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Board appointed at Stats NZ
    Ensuring that Stats NZ’s direction and strategy best supports government policy decisions will be a key focus for a new Governance Advisory Board announced today by the Minister for Statistics, James Shaw. The new Governance Advisory Board will provide strategic advice to Stats NZ to ensure it is meeting New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • New Principal Environment Judge
    Environment Judge David Kirkpatrick of Auckland has been appointed as the Principal Environment Judge, Attorney-General David Parker announced today.  Judge Kirkpatrick was appointed an Environment Judge in February 2014. From December 2013 to July 2016 he was Chair of the Auckland Unitary Plan Independent Hearings Panel. Prior to appointment he ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Digital connectivity boost for urban marae
    A programme to connect marae around the country to the internet has received $1.4 million to expand to include urban marae in Auckland, Wellington and Christchurch, Broadcasting, Communications and Digital Media Minister Kris Faafoi and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones announced today. The funding for the Marae Connectivity Programme ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Govt increases assistance to drought-stricken Hawke’s Bay farmers
    The Government will provide $500,000 to the Hawke’s Bay Mayoral Drought Relief Fund to help farmers facing one of the worst droughts in living memory, says Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “Yesterday afternoon I received a letter from Hawke's Bay's five local Government leaders asking me to contribute to the Fund. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Investment in New Zealand’s history
    Budget 2020 provides a major investment in New Zealand’s documentary heritage sector, with a commitment to leasing a new Archives Wellington facility and an increase in funding for Archives and National Library work. “Last year I released plans for a new Archives Wellington building – a purpose-built facility physically connected ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Driving prompt payments to small businesses
    Government Ministers are asking significant private enterprises to adopt prompt payment practices in line with the state sector, as a way to improve cashflow for small businesses. The Ministers of Finance, Small Business, Commerce and Consumer Affairs have written to more than 40 significant enterprises and banking industry representatives to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Rotorua tourist icon to be safeguarded
    Maori Arts and Crafts will continue to underpin the heart of the tourism sector says Minister for Maori Development Nanaia Mahuta.  “That’s why we are making a core investment of $7.6 million to Te Puia New Zealand Māori Arts and Crafts Institute, over two years, as part of the Government’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • $14.7m for jobs training and education
    The Government is funding more pathways to jobs through training and education programmes in regional New Zealand to support the provinces’ recovery from the economic impacts of COVID-19, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones and Employment Minister Willie Jackson have announced. “New Zealand’s economic recovery will be largely driven by ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Is it time to further recognise those who serve in our military?
     Minister for Veterans Ron Mark has announced the launch of a national conversation that aims to find out whether New Zealanders think there should be a formal agreement between service people, the Government, and the people of New Zealand. “This year marks the 75th anniversary of the end of World ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Paving the way for a fully qualified early learning workforce
    The Government’s drive to improve the quality of early childhood education (ECE) is taking another step forward with the reintroduction of a higher funding rate for services that employ fully qualified and registered teachers, Education Minister Chris Hipkins has announced. “Research shows that high-quality ECE can improve young people’s learning ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Sport Recovery Package announced
    The Sport and Recreation sector will receive a multi-million dollar boost as part of the COVID-19 response funded at Budget 2020.  Grant Robertson says the Sport and Recreation Sector contributes about $5 billion a year to New Zealand’s GDP and employs more than 53,000 people. “Sport plays a significant role ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major boost in support for caregivers and children
    A major increase in funding and availability of support will improve the incomes and reduce the pressure on 14,000 caregivers looking after more than 22,000 children. Children’s Minister Tracey Martin says that caregivers – all those looking after someone else’s children both in and outside the state care system – ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Great Walks recovery on track for summer
    Vital conservation and visitor infrastructure destroyed by a severe flood event in Fiordland earlier this year is being rebuilt through a $13.7 million Budget 2020 investment, announced Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage.   “This investment will mean iconic Great Walks such as the Routeburn track and the full length of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Māori – Government partnership gives whānau a new housing deal
    The Government is investing  $40 million in a partnership with Māori to get more whānau into warm, dry and secure accommodation, Associate Minister for Housing (Māori Housing) Hon Nanaia Mahuta says.. “We are partnering with Māori and iwi to respond to the growing housing crisis in the wake of COVID-19. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Keeping New Zealanders Safe In The Water
    Keeping New Zealanders safe in the water Our lifeguards and coastguards who keep New Zealanders safe in the water have been given a funding boost thanks to the 2020 Budget, Minister for the Community and Voluntary Sector Poto Williams has announced. The water safety sector will receive $63 million over ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Legal framework for COVID-19 Alert Level referred to select committee
    The COVID-19 Public Health Response Act 2020, which set a sound legal framework ahead of the move to Alert level 2, has been referred to a parliamentary select committee for review.  Attorney-General David Parker said the review of the operation of the COVID-19 specific law would be reported back to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand condemns shocking attacks on hospital and funeral in Afghanistan
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters says New Zealand condemns the targeting of civilians in two terrorist attacks in Afghanistan earlier this week. “The terrorist attacks on a hospital in Kabul and a funeral in Nangarhar province are deeply shocking. The attacks were deliberate and heinous acts of extreme violence targeting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government to close tobacco tax loophole
    The Government will close a loophole that allowed some people to import cigarettes and loose leaf tobacco for manufacturing cigarettes and ‘roll your owns’ for sale on the black market without excise tax being paid, says Minister of Customs Jenny Salesa. The legislation, which doesn’t affect duty free allowances for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • $62 million package to support families through the Family Court
    The Coalition Government has made a significant $62 million investment from the COVID-19 Response and Recovery Fund to start the reform of the Family Court and enable it to respond effectively to the increased backlog caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Today Justice Minister Andrew Little introduced the Family Court (Supporting ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Tailored help supports new type of job seeker – report
    The Government’s expanded services to support people into jobs will help an emerging cohort of New Zealanders impacted by COVID-19. The impacted group are relatively younger, have a proportionately low benefit history and have comparatively higher incomes than most who seek support, as captured in a report published today from ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • A modern approach to night classes
    New funding to boost Government-funded Adult and Community Education (ACE) will give more than 11,000 New Zealanders more opportunities to learn, Education Minister Chris Hipkins said. “This includes a modern approach to rebuilding night classes, which were slashed in the middle of our last economic crisis in 2010,” Chris Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Christchurch Call makes significant progress
    Significant progress has been delivered in the year since the Christchurch Call to Action brought governments and tech companies together in Paris with a single goal to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content online, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardent says. On its first anniversary, Ardern and French President Emmanuel Macron as ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Christchurch Call: One year Anniversary
    Joint statement: the Right Honourable Jacinda Ardern Prime Minister of New Zealand and His Excellency Emmanuel Macron President of the French Republic. One year since we launched, in Paris, the Christchurch Call to Action, New Zealand and France stand proud of the progress we have made toward our goal to eliminate terrorist ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago