How can NZ incomes be lifted to match housing costs?

Written By: - Date published: 10:37 am, December 12th, 2020 - 68 comments
Categories: benefits, housing, jacinda ardern, labour, minimum wage, tenants' rights, wages, welfare - Tags:

One of the more useful things in recent weeks in the debate about housing is the clarity of Jacinda Ardern’s position,

Jacinda Ardern says ‘sustained moderation’ remains the Government’s goal when it comes to house prices, as people ‘expect’ the value of their most valuable asset to keep rising


Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern says she would like to see small increases in houses prices, acknowledging most people “expect” the value of their most valuable asset to keep rising.

Two things there. One is that the government has no intention of dropping or even preventing further increase of house prices.

The other is inferred, that Ardern sees property as investment as more of a priority than housing being primarily for homes. It also says to me that protecting the investor classes is more important than raising people out of poverty.

This more than anything else I have seen from her or Labour tells me that they are governing for the middle and wealth classes. With kindness for other classes of course, but still.

I can see a kind of rationale for her position in that we need a strong economy to support the underclass, and with the impacts of covid, eg halving tourism, we need the property market to prop up the economy. But it’s still very much let’s prevent people from dropping down a class and doing that at the expense of the people already at the bottom.

Even if that made sense as a strategy it doesn’t explain the lack of support for beneficiaries, for which there is no plan at all for increases in income, including the tens of thousands of New Zealanders who are in no position to ever take advantage of Labour’s main strategy of ‘work will save us’.

So I’m hoping the people that believe that instead of dropping housing prices we could raise incomes might explain how that might happen. Not a vague let’s raise wages and benefits explanation, but an in-depth, number crunching, evidence-driven explanation. Where is it?

Such an explanation would centrally need to take into account Accommodation Supplement (available to beneficiaries and people on very low wages), and benefit rises, because of the way that increases and AS tend to end up in the pockets of landlords. I’m curious if that happens with minimum wage increases too.

And while indexing wages and benefits to house prices might help once the massive gap between income and housing affordability is lessened, I’m yet to see any good explanations for how we get to that more even playing field starting point.

Maybe I’ve missed them or maybe I’m pointing to the Emperor’s state of undress.

68 comments on “How can NZ incomes be lifted to match housing costs? ”

  1. Grafton Gully 1

    The two things – the government could nationalise the construction industry and lead a massive new housing project with location, site development and architecture based on what people actually need (plenty of science on this) as opposed to what we want (often irrational and unsustainable). Secondly, I want our home to value down for two main reasons – it reduces the rates bill and more importantly it encourages us to donate, spend or save cash we don't need into a wider spread of investments instead of putting every egg into one basket.

    • weka 1.1

      agree. However the government including the PM are currently stating that they want house prices to increase, and I see some lefties arguing that we can raise incomes to make this ok. I'd like to know if there is any credibility to this position (I can't see it).

      • Cricklewood 1.1.1

        The only way this would work is ig the govt found a way to cap house price inflation at 1 percent and at the same time lifted incomes in the lower quartile by over to 10 percent…

        Basically in the never going to happen basket.

        Was very easy to make a heap of noise in opposition and to say the right things in a first term dominated by Covid. But anger is going to grow as the rentier class realizes they have been sold down the river…

    • Tricledrown 1.2

      [Deleted]

      [You have a Moderation note waiting for you here: https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-11-12-2020/#comment-1770573 ]

    • NOEL 1.3

      It doesn't reduce the rates bill by much.

      The only components not a Uniform Annual General Charge adds around 15 dollars to my new rates bill.

      Those are measured against land value.

      Glad it isn't Capital Value.

      For the past five years my RV has been pretty near One Roofs figure.

      The latest revaluation sees land value increase by 75,000 and capital value by 80,000 for a total of 90,000 over One Roofs top market value.

      One wonders if this has influence on sellers decision to sell.

  2. 'we need a strong economy to support the underclass'..we've basically had a strong and growing economy since the '84 reforms….I'm not exactly convinced thats been used to 'support the underclass'..or, infact, even the middle class..beyond encouraging their housing fetish…The Economy is for the Players not The People.

    • Cricklewood 2.1

      The strong economy is built on the backs of the under and middle classes. The middles classes are essentially kept placated by the illusion of wealth via house prices.

      Sadly we are distracted by identity politics when the real battle that needs to be fought is essentially around class.

      It runs through everything… education, health care, employment even who will take the brunt of climate change…

    • weka 2.2

      support the underclass in this context would mean enough welfare that people aren't dying in the streets or revolting. I think Labour's kindness intentions are more real than that, and I still believe they significantly better than NACT on welfare and low waged people, but it's hard not to strip it back to bare bones and see that there's really no intention or plan to end poverty and that Labour are in a holding pattern instead.

  3. Pat 3

    I dont believe we can achieve housing affordability from an income increase.

    If we accept that 'affordability' is 3 -4 times the median income then the median income would need to over double….the inflationary impacts of such would be counterproductive, certainly in the short/medium term…It may be possible to improve the (net) ratio by careful remuneration redistribution (i.e. taxation) to compress the wage band but not to the extent we could double the median wage so therefore the problem must be addressed from the other end and that requires Government action.

    That will require state provision of quality (and suitable) housing at around 25% of income and the removal of rent/mortgage subsidies from the private market….7000 new state house aint going to be anywhere near enough and they know it….nor will underwriting private developments.

    • weka 3.1

      If we accept that 'affordability' is 3 -4 times the median income then the median income would need to over double….the inflationary impacts of such would be counterproductive, certainly in the short/medium term

      Can you please explain the inflationary bit?

      What are the rent/mortgage subsidies?

      • Pat 3.1.1

        An income ratio of 3.5 (mid point) for an Auckland property with the current median of $1,000.000 would require a median income of $285,000 pa and even outside Auckland the national median (excluding Auckland) is $600,000 and would require a median income of $171,000 pa….now think about how that will feed into any business/industry and the impact on export competitiveness and the likely impact on the NZD value in relation to our trading partners….everything produced here will cost a substantially more and that will reduce our ability to export.

        The rent /mortgage subsidies are

        https://www.workandincome.govt.nz/products/a-z-benefits/accommodation-supplement.html

        With suitable social housing provision they are unnecessary and all they do is fuel property prices by distorting the markets ability to pay.

        • Foreign waka 3.1.1.1

          Venezuela is beckoning…. if NZ cant find a way to house and feed its people, and more and more are on the loosing side, a silent protest with increasing numbers in gangs (are we there yet?) will be the result. Where are the ideas to find a way that is sustainable and just?

          • Pat 3.1.1.1.1

            https://www.interest.co.nz/opinion/108376/brendon-harre-offers-part-two-his-analysis-new-zealand%E2%80%99s-rack-rent-housing-crisis

            Some ideas here…though it is too slow IMO, but I agree with much of what he proposes but Id put the state housing build on steroids and let the investors know in no uncertain terms their investment capital growth and yields are history in the very near term….and be ready to take on the banks bad loans.

            • Brendon Harre 3.1.1.1.1.1

              I would like it to be faster. But the Empress With No Clothes On has dictated that house prices cannot fall. So the fastest 'allowable' way out of this housing shemozzle is a massive social housing build programme. On a per capita basis the social housing build programme needs to be as big as the First Labour Government – which would be about 10,000 houses a year. Like the first generation of state houses – it should target not just destitute beneficiaries but also the working poor as well. Also like the first state houses – it should be higher quality than current building practices. It should integrate housing with public transport. Like state housing in Lower Hutt http://www.valleysignals.org.nz/documents/hvsettlement1925.html And the communities should have mixed incomes, mixed social and affordable (KiwiBuild) and market rate housing. Ideally 15 minute neighbourhoods where most day-to-day activities can be achieved in a short walk.

              More here https://medium.com/land-buildings-identity-and-values/if-not-now-when-f995dd596c1

              • Pat

                And those public utterings fuel the problem.

                10,000 a year would be fast enough (IMO) to return the social housing ratio per capita back to the level of the 70s which would require around another 60,000 (assuming no great population increase meantime) but as importantly is the public position communicated on the desired effect (the affordability of the wider housing market) and the strength of the commitment to achieve the outcome.

                The market (players) need to understand the new reality

                • Exactly. If there was a credible plan to build 10,000 social houses a year. If it was fully budgeted for. The housing model locked down – Austrian/ Singaporean/ whatever. If there was some sort of housing accord or housing commissioner or both ensuring all the relevant players knew their part and adjustments could be made as the initiative progresses. Then the whole housing capital gains economy would stop. Expectations would change and I think for low socio-economic groups housing conditions would improve quite quickly and for everyone else there would be a more gradual transition.

        • mpledger 3.1.1.2

          The real estate market is a free market. People can essentially spend what the bank is willing to lend them. Giving people more money will just make house prices go up because they will just spend the extra to beat out the competition.

          If we want house prices to go down then we need to build more houses or accept fewer people into NZ (or both) and put some kind of restraint on the banks. The banks make up the money and all it does is get exported as profit, mostly off the backs of income earners.

          • Pat 3.1.1.2.1

            Largely agree….and thats why the gov need to act as the circuit breaker and flood the (rental) market with affordable housing…the flow on impacts on residential prices will follow and banks and investors will need to find a new form of investment if they wish a return….hopefully a more productive one.

            …a carbon neutral economy perhaps

            • Herodotus 3.1.1.2.1.1

              Dear PM you are the problem when we were sold the story that you were the solution.

              When you have a government in 2017 basing affordability as $600k then a few months later increased to $650k, what do you think it is now ? And IMO we were sold a lie and manipulated into accepting that $650k was the affordable ceiling.

              And since Labour won the power in 2017 what has happened since ? Property has boomed thanks to government and its agencies enacted policies.

        • mikesh 3.1.1.3

          Mortgage costs are not true costs since they are matched by the value of the freehold property that the landlord will own once the mortgage is paid off. This applies just as much to the interest component of the mortgage as to the principal. When the mortgage payments are completed the landlord is in much the same position as a family home owner whose mortgage is paid off, but who does not receive tax deductions in respect of the interest included in his mortgage payments.

          In thinking about tax we need to distinguish between "ownership" costs and "business" costs. Mortgage payments, as ownership costs, should not be taken into account in determining rental values. At present, however, we subsidize landlords by allowing them tax deductions in respect of interest.

  4. Ad 4

    New Zealanders certainly have a right to "adequate housing", but they don't have a right to own a house. Nor is there a duty on any kind of government to generate salaries that would support a mortgage on a house.

    https://www.hrc.co.nz/files/4215/1363/5639/2017_07_25_-_Right_to_housing_flyer_-_updated.pdf

    Having said that, the government intervenes at scale a fair bit – but not with the purpose of supporting mortgages.

    The core public service employs over 50,000, the education sector a further 100,000, the health sector over 50,000 with other government entities and those entities they hold majorities in a further 100,000. On average they are all paid pretty well. No doubt many fought hard for those pay rises – but that just shows the government working with the last of the unions. Add in 50,000 local government employees and you've got around 400,000 who have their living subsidised in full by we taxpayers and ratepayers.

    So when you look around for how government generates salaries that support mortgages, there's 400,000 out of a total of 2.7 million employed of all kinds (part time and full). That's your base scale of 'market intervention' for supporting mortgages.

    https://www.publicservice.govt.nz/assets/Legacy/resources/public-service-workforce-data-2017-v2.pdf

    Secondly there's the pay intervention it's done this year – over $40 billion worth – to keep jobs going. That's to stop the economy collapsing. Who knows it appears to have propped up the housing market as well – ain't hindsight a thing.

    Thirdly there's over $30 billion in infrastructure works. Many of those can support mortgages, though that's not the funding purpose. Again it's to keep jobs going, on stuff worth doing.

    There will be plenty who will demand even greater interventions into New Zealand: child poverty being IMHO a whole lot more important than whether you can afford a mortgage or not.

    But saying they're not doing enough this year to sustain incomes is just on the facts wrong.

    • Sabine 4.1

      There will be plenty who will demand even greater interventions into New Zealand: child poverty being IMHO a whole lot more important than whether you can afford a mortgage or not

      child poverty is an issue because generally the parents to whom these children belong are a. so deep in poverty that it affects the children, b. at this stage can't afford to neither pay rent nor mortgage.

      I know its en vogue to discuss child poverty as if the poor kidlings are just a job short of affluence, but really, it ain't the child poverty that is dragging the country down, its the parents who are dirt poor, piss poor – or even worse, so poor they can't afford to piss in a pot. And so far we have no government action on that other then maybe maybe a sandwich for the urchins once they go to school. As for the wages and the houses….lol

      • weka 4.1.1

        yep.

        And some rents are higher than mortgages so the whole "Nor is there a duty on any kind of government to generate salaries that would support a mortgage on a house" thing is a nonsense in this context.

        There's no way to meaningfully talk about poverty now (including child poverty) without talking about housing.

      • Child poverty or family poverty or whatever NZ wants to call it cannot be fixed while we have the most unaffordable rents in the OECD.

    • weka 4.2

      very interesting Ad, but two things:

      1. you've completely ignored the actual question in the post
      2. you've supported my contention that Labour is looking after the middle classes as a primary objective.
      • weka 4.2.1

        also cost of housing doesn't mean home ownership here.

      • Ad 4.2.2
        1. You didn't even try.

        2. Prove it with a fact.

        If you really want an answer to your question, start yourself.

        In the meantime.

        As well as the state doing plenty of intervention already as I pointed out above, we have been using mortgage debt to mask the economic fact that our salaries don't support our mortgages. Our economy remains strongly tilted towards high mass low value agricultural commodities, which on average don't support high salaries.

        Property investment is still the last confident place to make money. So that's why money keeps following money into property.

        The industries that have the highest-value salaries here are: mining and petroleum, telecommunications, energy, and tech development such as gaming.

        Which one of those does this coalition government support? Answer: none.

        In fact it actively undermines mining and petroleum, is massively re-regulating energy, and is letting telecommunications just decline and slip into being just another regulated utility.

        Again, tech development and gaming have small but useful government support.

        But most new listings on our sharemarket – if you wanted an alternative for your estwhile deposit to a house – are about property. Even Xero went to Australia to list.

        So the coalition government has pretty minimal effect so far, and would need a multi-term economic development plan to really tilt our economy towards generating mortgages that could support mortgages.

        • weka 4.2.2.1

          again, all very interesting, but still doesn't address the question. If I knew how to answer the question I'd have written a post about that, but you appear to have misunderstood even the reason for the question. I don't believe that it's possible to raise incomes in NZ to afford rent or mortgages. I want someone who does believe it's possible to explain how.

          In the absence of that I will assume that Labour have no plan to end poverty or the housing crisis, and are simply adapting around it for whatever reason. As I said in the post, it's useful that Ardern has made her position more clear, it makes it easier to pull back the kindness rhetoric curtain and talk about poverty in real terms and what govt policy is going to mean.

    • Stuart Munro 4.3

      Nor is there a duty on any kind of government to generate salaries that would support a mortgage on a house.

      No – the duty on the government is to prevent speculation distorting the market to this degree in the first place. To describe them as an abject and shameful failure is being much too kind – they are massively corrupt, having participated in and exacerbated the dysfunction.

      One does not get "anomalies" like slave workers in economies where the MPs are not irredeemably corrupt.

      • mikesh 4.3.1

        Speculators would not be doing their speculating if prices were not already rising, or if they did not think prices were about to rise. Speculation is a symptom of price rises rather than a cause.

        • Stuart Munro 4.3.1.1

          Regulate them out of the market and most of the extraneous demand goes with them.

          • Stuart Munro 4.3.1.1.1

            101 homeowners locked out by a speculator under a Labour government – John A Lee would've died of shame!

          • mikesh 4.3.1.1.2

            The way to get rid of them is to stop prices rising in the first place.

            • Stuart Munro 4.3.1.1.2.1

              The way to stop prices rising is to get rid of them. Two houses is plenty for anyone – 100 or more should attract massive and costly punitive taxes. Koreans pay a sumptuary tax on second and subsequent apartments – 50 million people in a small area can't afford the level of political corruption we 'enjoy' in NZ.

              But Labour are hooked on their neoliberal delusion, and they will protect the rights of the speculators ahead of first home buyers till we grow old and die. Their shame is bottomless – they might as well be National or ACT.

              • mikesh

                Speculators hold properties hoping to sell them at a profit at some future date. Investors purchase for the rental income that those properties can earn. There is always a demand for rental accommodation. Not everybody wishes to own.

                You seem to be confusing speculators and investors.

                • Stuart Munro

                  The distinction is false.

                  When the property market is unregulated, they all become speculators – making large unearned rewards and locking tenants out of ownership. This is the biggest factor in our burgeoning poverty and inequality growth, and it has to stop.

                  Rentiers are no better for a society or economy than any of the other signature features of feudalism. We are a democracy, in spite of the wretched troughers who have ended up in power, and the job of our government – any government – is to create sufficient economic social justice for society to be stable.

                  A housing bubble is no basis for a healthy economy, and even relative economic noobs like Grant Robertson know it perfectly well.

                  Govern, you lazy greedy no-hopers – or rack off!

                  • mikesh

                    As I said, there exists a demand for for rental accommodation. Not everybody who rents is doing so simply because they cannot get into an own-your- own property, so renting out properties is a legitimate business.

                    However, it is certainly true that many landlords are making little or no profit from there renting activities and are relying on an eventual capital gain to justify their operation. These should probably not be in business, and making mortgage interest non deductible for tax purposes would lumber these landlords with a large tax bill each year, which they would have to pay from their own pocket in the absence of profit to cover it. I suggest that this would be much more of a deterrent to taking on a highly leveraged rental property than any capital gains tax.

                  • mikesh

                    Even if we "got rid of speculators" property values would still rise because of low interest rates coupled with a shortage of houses.

                    • Stuart Munro

                      True – and there are hundreds of things that could be done. Thus far our governments have chosen to be ineffectual in serving the public interest. Giving free rein to speculators is just one of many sociopathies that neoliberalism relabels 'good'.

                      I suppose we are to be thankful that the wretched scoundrels have not sold our drinking water off to Nestle. But with corrupt governance like this it's only a matter of time.

    • Phil 4.4

      you've got around 400,000 who have their living subsidised in full by we taxpayers and ratepayers.

      I'm one of those 400,000. You're paying me to do a job that makes the lives of nearly 5 million New Zealanders a little less stressful and more financially secure. You can fuck right off with that subsidising bullshit, mate.

  5. AB 5

    “How can NZ incomes be lifted to match housing costs? ”

    To afford houses over $1M without the kick-start of inherited money (lots of it), incomes need to be very, very high. And even then, for all but a tiny few, it's a sentence to lifelong debt serfdom f that will suck demand out of the economy into debt servicing. There is no pathway to raising incomes sufficiently that will not correspondingly inflate house prices. Therefore to say that house prices cannot fall, is an unstated admission that it's all over and the 40-year postwar interlude of spreading the wealth around was an intolerable experiment that has been crushed.

  6. Nic the NZer 6

    The unemployment pool approach is a real problem here. Especially around recessions we leave the overall level of employment to the state of the economy. The result is a significant pool of people who are impacted longer term by any slips in economic activity (as they transition through unemployment). This not only impacts their income but gaps in employment history have a further impact on their employment. The alternative is to have available guaranteed employment as an alternative to welfare.

    There are follow on benefits including the country enjoying the product of whatever they are employed to do, employees would always have an alternative to whatever employers are offering in wages and in hours.

    Additionally the government should stop implementing harmful policies like public sector pay freezes (which contribute to lowering private sector wage increases).

    The better prevailing conditions should assist with legislated unionisation and employment conditions which should result in more of the income going to wages.

    I dont know if that is sufficient to keep pace with the housing market without much additional financial regulation, but it should see the country start keeping pace with Australia in terms of wage growth. The main economic advantage Australia having had is the small number of recessions across recent decades.

  7. bwaghorn 7

    You dont need to be a beneficiary to be forever locked out of housing . As nearly 50 ( fuck I'm getting old) low income worker who foolishly didnt jump straight back into ownership after a divorce 4 years ago I feel like I fell of my yacht l in the the Pacific and am treading water while it salls off into the distance and short of a miracle I'm fucked.

    • weka 7.1

      yep. We will see if anyone comes up with a credible theory on how Ardern's position might work, but I'm close enough to believing we're being lied to. Not Key-esque type lies, but what she says in that quote basically equates to low waged workers and beneficiaries and a chunk of the precariat not being looked after and I don't think they're being honest about that. When they say governing for all NZers, they don't actually mean they will do right by everyone.

      Or maybe they are being honest, just not bluntly so. Maybe this is exactly the plan. Stop as much downward tumble as they can, pull up some people, leave the rest behind.

      • Tiger Mountain 7.1.1

        A “group” (working class) has been left behind since the original mass sackings of Rogernomics, entrenched by the Nat 1991 MOAB-not retrained, not looked after, just discarded.

        Few seem immune to neo liberal individualist psychology. Which is what was so amazing about the high level of support for COVID lockdowns. But the Majority Govt. now seems back on some “Chicago Boys” script with a vengeance.

        What to do is rather obvious, but, it will need wide community support, organisation and action. Which is tricky with so many low waged, precarious workers, exorbitant rents and “user pays” charges.

        Move to higher wage economy, Fair Pay Agreements, rent control, build state Houses & Apartments (lots), clean out the public sector, retire The Reserve Bank Act and neo lib State structures, tax and restrict the parasite class, etc.

        Jacinda and Robbo and the Labour Caucus are only going to tinker and let Finance Capital go wild-as kids are in agony for want of dental care, and hidden homeless live unnecessarily miserable lives. Do something in the real world to change this Standard Readers-build a movement and understanding, leading into 2023 that leaves no doubt that “Blair Lite” is no way to run NZ.

  8. RosieLee 8

    You've got it the wrong way round. How can housing costs, especially rents, be controlled so that basic wage and income earners afford a roof over their heads?

    • weka 8.1

      It's not me that needs to be told, it's Ardern and Robertson. Or more correctly, the people that voted them in as a majority govt.

    • Ad 8.2

      Why are rent controls that scary really?

      We used to have rent maxima in Council housing.

      • RedLogix 8.2.1

        Why are rent controls that scary really?

        Go for it, but at the same time can we have rates, insurance and maintenance prices freezes too? And a hold on all those lovely (but expensive) Healthy Homes initiatives?

        Because this year our average costs on just these items alone was a bit over 40% of all rental income.

        (Just for comparison typical rates here in Australia are about A$1500 pa and insurance about the same or less … and Aus might not have the same earthquake hazard, but it sure gets fire and floods.)

        I’ve said this before, a lot of people renting who resent their landlords for ‘creaming it’ would get a nasty sticker shock if they tried to own the house they lived in.

        Of course the downside of this lack of cash flow, is that it pushes people to invest for capital gain instead, which NZ has been doing for far too long.

        • Phillip ure 8.2.1.1

          pity the poor landlord…eh..?

          yeah..nah..eh..?

          do you factor in the rise of capital values on those properties..in yr 40% calculations…?

          and how much higher than the/any mortgage repayments are the rents you charge..?

  9. KSaysHi 9

    The PMs out of touch with this one – offensively so.

    Increasing income would be catastrophic on small businesses, and unemployment would rocket.

    A couple of solutions. Community Land Trusts where the land is leasehold, therefore controling the bulk of the price. Kotare is an example. Building underground with new builds might work. I know that mega wealthy in London do elaborate luxury builds under exisitng homes, but not sure if it would be economically viable for additional living space or even safe to live in.

    • KSaysHi 9.1

      The assumption that rental prices should be expected to go up (because the excuse for rent increases has always been paired with rises in sale price) is the worst part.

  10. Sam 10

    Premiss 1) Arderns cabinet is shit (I said it, fuck you).

    2) National will always be shit.

    In conclusion, well I would recommend testing all or most policy formula on a small scale locally before rolling it out nationally or at least to find the limits of growth in what ever idea because my fucking god, none of you have a fucking clue, not labour, not the Maori party and especially not the fucken greens so please, don't pretend to know and listen you nubs.

  11. gsays 11

    I have to put my hand up as one who has said raise wages and benefits.

    To be able to provide for a family on one income has many benefits. It allows for more care-giving, be it children or elderly parents. Hobbies, volunteer or community work…

    How. In the short term, look at the non payment of taxes- the Googles, Apples, Amazons etc. The 1/4th of landlords that are non compliant in their dues:

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300160946/oneinfour-property-speculators-dodging-housing-tax

    Reform of the tax system, introduce a FTT, Tobin tax or Robin Hood tax, brighter minds than mine imply it can replace GST and PAYE:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYtNwmXKIvM

    While we are at it, get rid of GST on wholefoods, veges, fruit, menstruation products.

    Banks, get rid of the four big banks. After all, time and time again they are in disgrace, from their economists not being able to forecast, to gouging New Zealand customers with their fees, to being implicated in money laundering.

    https://www.interest.co.nz/banking/107213/westpac-banking-group-and-australian-anti-money-laundering-regulator-austrac-agree

    https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/123659871/retailers-and-shoppers-likely-to-share-spoils-from-hard-caps-on-bank-card-fees

    Medium term, invest in education. Teacher aide for every classroom and reform of the universities. Undo the elitism by changing entry to uni by ballot, not ability to pay. A few vice chancellors may have to go without their subsidised mansions… Increasing diversity in the tertiary sector will change the decisions that are made for society.

    All property investors must be building new houses, not buying exsisting stock.

    Scattergun approach here, but it is the third time I have written this. Twice on my fone but I some how deleted it… A gorgeous sunny day in the Manawatu is beckoning me outside.

    • KSaysHi 11.1

      Yes, we should make it less appealing for investors to buy exisitng stock. Loan to value ratios on new builds should be low, say 15%, compared with existing housing where the loan to value is currently 30% (two banks so far at that rate, more will follow).

      • RedLogix 11.1.1

        Steven Keen proposed some years back that property loans could be regulated to a fixed multiple of their imputed rental income.

        So for example if the estimated market rent for house was say $30,000 pa, then the maximum a bank could lend on it would be say 12 times this, or $360,000. This way prices and incomes could be kept aligned more easily.

        Of course right now the ratios are way higher than this, more than about 24 times instead of 12 times (which was the value Keen had proposed as a historically 'affordable' number.)

        To get from where we are now, to where we should be, maybe we could start with imposing a limit of say 24 times this year, and reduce it by 2% pa each year for decade in order to stabilise gradually and without crashing the economy.

        • gsays 11.1.1.1

          Apply the same ratio logic to wages and salaries. By that the wages rise to meet the CEO etc renumeration. Start with the Public Service, local government…

    • gsays 11.2

      And union membership. What ever form that may look like. Renting union, trades union, churches, sports groups… Power lies in our collectivism.

  12. Bearded Git 12

    A Wealth Tax on the top 5 percent is really the only way…..where the tax raised is used to boost the incomes of the bottom 25 per cent so they may be able to afford a house….house prices may fall a bit too if a WT is imposed.

    The greens WT is a good starting point.

  13. Brendan 13

    Here is what I see happening today to make this happen.

    Simplicity Kiwisaver has the lowest fees on the market – over a life time this gives the average person $60K more in the hand. They are non profit and thus they don't have to keep shareholders happy. (and non govt and thus this keeps the tax payers happy).

    Simplicity is actually introducing super low interest mortgages (as they don't have to have a profit margin). Again this is going to make lots of people better off.

    Kiwisaver itself is one of the best ideas of the Clark govt. $1 of local investment is worth twice as much as $1 of international investment (one day the money has to go home).

    There are somethings the government can do. But what can you do?

    • Bearded Git 13.1

      That entirely missed the point of the question being asked….how the wages/wealth of the poorest be increased so that they can afford a house.

      See my wealth tax post above.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • EV road user charges bill passes
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed the passing of legislation to move light electric vehicles (EVs) and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) into the road user charges system from 1 April.  “It was always intended that EVs and PHEVs would be exempt from road user charges until they reached two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 hours ago
  • Bill targets illegal, unregulated fishing in international waters
    New Zealand is strengthening its ability to combat illegal fishing outside its domestic waters and beef up regulation for its own commercial fishers in international waters through a Bill which had its first reading in Parliament today. The Fisheries (International Fishing and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2023 sets out stronger ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    8 hours ago
  • Reserve Bank appointments
    Economists Carl Hansen and Professor Prasanna Gai have been appointed to the Reserve Bank Monetary Policy Committee, Finance Minister Nicola Willis announced today. The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is the independent decision-making body that sets the Official Cash Rate which determines interest rates.  Carl Hansen, the executive director of Capital ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    9 hours ago
  • Stronger protections for apartment owners
    Apartment owners and buyers will soon have greater protections as further changes to the law on unit titles come into effect, Housing Minister Chris Bishop says. “The Unit Titles (Strengthening Body Corporate Governance and Other Matters) Amendment Act had already introduced some changes in December 2022 and May 2023, and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Travel focused on traditional partners and Middle East
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters will travel to Egypt and Europe from this weekend.    “This travel will focus on a range of New Zealand’s traditional diplomatic and security partnerships while enabling broad engagement on the urgent situation in Gaza,” Mr Peters says.   Mr Peters will attend the NATO Foreign ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    11 hours ago
  • Keep safe on our roads this Easter
    Transport Minister Simeon Brown is encouraging all road users to stay safe, plan their journeys ahead of time, and be patient with other drivers while travelling around this Easter long weekend. “Road safety is a responsibility we all share, and with increased traffic on our roads expected this Easter we ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Cost of living support for over 1.4 million Kiwis
    About 1.4 million New Zealanders will receive cost of living relief through increased government assistance from April 1 909,000 pensioners get a boost to Superannuation, including 5000 veterans 371,000 working-age beneficiaries will get higher payments 45,000 students will see an increase in their allowance Over a quarter of New Zealanders ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Tenancy reviews for social housing restart
    Ensuring social housing is being provided to those with the greatest needs is front of mind as the Government restarts social housing tenancy reviews, Associate Housing Minister Tama Potaka says. “Our relentless focus on building a strong economy is to ensure we can deliver better public services such as social ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    14 hours ago
  • Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary plan halted
    The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary will not go ahead, with Cabinet deciding to stop work on the proposed reserve and remove the Bill that would have established it from Parliament’s order paper. “The Kermadec Ocean Sanctuary Bill would have created a 620,000 sq km economic no-go zone,” Oceans and Fisheries Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Cutting all that dam red tape
    Dam safety regulations are being amended so that smaller dams won’t be subject to excessive compliance costs, Minister for Building and Construction Chris Penk says. “The coalition Government is focused on reducing costs and removing unnecessary red tape so we can get the economy back on track.  “Dam safety regulations ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Drought support extended to parts of North Island
    The coalition Government is expanding the medium-scale adverse event classification to parts of the North Island as dry weather conditions persist, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced today. “I have made the decision to expand the medium-scale adverse event classification already in place for parts of the South Island to also cover the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Passage of major tax bill welcomed
    The passing of legislation giving effect to coalition Government tax commitments has been welcomed by Finance Minister Nicola Willis.  “The Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill will help place New Zealand on a more secure economic footing, improve outcomes for New Zealanders, and make our tax system ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Lifting economy through science, tertiary sectors
    Science, Innovation and Technology Minister Judith Collins and Tertiary Education and Skills Minister Penny Simmonds today announced plans to transform our science and university sectors to boost the economy. Two advisory groups, chaired by Professor Sir Peter Gluckman, will advise the Government on how these sectors can play a greater ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government announces Budget priorities
    The Budget will deliver urgently-needed tax relief to hard-working New Zealanders while putting the government’s finances back on a sustainable track, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says.  The Finance Minister made the comments at the release of the Budget Policy Statement setting out the Government’s Budget objectives. “The coalition Government intends ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Government to consider accommodation solution
    The coalition Government will look at options to address a zoning issue that limits how much financial support Queenstown residents can get for accommodation. Cabinet has agreed on a response to the Petitions Committee, which had recommended the geographic information MSD uses to determine how much accommodation supplement can be ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Government approves extension to Royal Commission of Inquiry into Abuse in Care
    Cabinet has agreed to a short extension to the final reporting timeframe for the Royal Commission into Abuse in Care from 28 March 2024 to 26 June 2024, Internal Affairs Minister Brooke van Velden says.                                         “The Royal Commission wrote to me on 16 February 2024, requesting that I consider an ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • $18m boost for Kiwis travelling to health treatment
    The coalition Government is delivering an $18 million boost to New Zealanders needing to travel for specialist health treatment, Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says.   “These changes are long overdue – the National Travel Assistance (NTA) scheme saw its last increase to mileage and accommodation rates way back in 2009.  ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • PM’s Prizes for Space to showcase sector’s talent
    The Government is recognising the innovative and rising talent in New Zealand’s growing space sector, with the Prime Minister and Space Minister Judith Collins announcing the new Prime Minister’s Prizes for Space today. “New Zealand has a growing reputation as a high-value partner for space missions and research. I am ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Concerns conveyed to China over cyber activity
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters has confirmed New Zealand’s concerns about cyber activity have been conveyed directly to the Chinese Government.     “The Prime Minister and Minister Collins have expressed concerns today about malicious cyber activity, attributed to groups sponsored by the Chinese Government, targeting democratic institutions in both New ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry
    Independent Reviewers appointed for School Property Inquiry Education Minister Erica Stanford today announced the appointment of three independent reviewers to lead the Ministerial Inquiry into the Ministry of Education’s School Property Function.  The Inquiry will be led by former Minister of Foreign Affairs Murray McCully. “There is a clear need ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Brynderwyns open for Easter
    State Highway 1 across the Brynderwyns will be open for Easter weekend, with work currently underway to ensure the resilience of this critical route being paused for Easter Weekend to allow holiday makers to travel north, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Today I visited the Brynderwyn Hills construction site, where ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Speech to the Infrastructure Funding & Financing Conference
    Introduction Good morning to you all, and thanks for having me bright and early today. I am absolutely delighted to be the Minister for Infrastructure alongside the Minister of Housing and Resource Management Reform. I know the Prime Minister sees the three roles as closely connected and he wants me ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Parliamentary network breached by the PRC
    New Zealand stands with the United Kingdom in its condemnation of People’s Republic of China (PRC) state-backed malicious cyber activity impacting its Electoral Commission and targeting Members of the UK Parliament. “The use of cyber-enabled espionage operations to interfere with democratic institutions and processes anywhere is unacceptable,” Minister Responsible for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ to provide support for Solomon Islands election
    Foreign Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Judith Collins today announced New Zealand will provide logistics support for the upcoming Solomon Islands election. “We’re sending a team of New Zealand Defence Force personnel and two NH90 helicopters to provide logistics support for the election on 17 April, at the request ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • NZ-EU FTA gains Royal Assent for 1 May entry to force
    The European Union Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill received Royal Assent today, completing the process for New Zealand’s ratification of its free trade agreement with the European Union.    “I am pleased to announce that today, in a small ceremony at the Beehive, New Zealand notified the European Union ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • COVID-19 inquiry attracts 11,000 submissions
    Public consultation on the terms of reference for the Royal Commission into COVID-19 Lessons has concluded, Internal Affairs Minister Hon Brooke van Velden says.  “I have been advised that there were over 11,000 submissions made through the Royal Commission’s online consultation portal.” Expanding the scope of the Royal Commission of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Families to receive up to $75 a week help with ECE fees
    Hardworking families are set to benefit from a new credit to help them meet their early childcare education (ECE) costs, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. From 1 July, parents and caregivers of young children will be supported to manage the rising cost of living with a partial reimbursement of their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Unlocking a sustainable, low-emissions future
    A specialised Independent Technical Advisory Group (ITAG) tasked with preparing and publishing independent non-binding advice on the design of a "green" (sustainable finance) taxonomy rulebook is being established, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says.  “Comprising experts and market participants, the ITAG's primary goal is to deliver comprehensive recommendations to the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Chief of Army thanked for his service
    Defence Minister Judith Collins has thanked the Chief of Army, Major General John Boswell, DSD, for his service as he leaves the Army after 40 years. “I would like to thank Major General Boswell for his contribution to the Army and the wider New Zealand Defence Force, undertaking many different ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders
    25 March 2024 Minister to meet Australian counterparts and Manufacturing Industry Leaders Small Business, Manufacturing, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly will travel to Australia for a series of bi-lateral meetings and manufacturing visits. During the visit, Minister Bayly will meet with his Australian counterparts, Senator Tim Ayres, Ed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Government commits nearly $3 million for period products in schools
    Government commits almost $3 million for period products in schools The Coalition Government has committed $2.9 million to ensure intermediate and secondary schools continue providing period products to those who need them, Minister of Education Erica Stanford announced today. “This is an issue of dignity and ensuring young women don’t ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Speech – Making it easier to build.
    Good morning, it’s great to be here.   First, I would like to acknowledge the New Zealand Institute of Building Surveyors and thank you for the opportunity to be here this morning.  I would like to use this opportunity to outline the Government’s ambitious plan and what we hope to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Pacific youth to shine from boost to Polyfest
    Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti has announced the Government’s commitment to the Auckland Secondary Schools Māori and Pacific Islands Cultural Festival, more commonly known as Polyfest. “The Ministry for Pacific Peoples is a longtime supporter of Polyfest and, as it celebrates 49 years in 2024, I’m proud to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • 2024 Ngarimu VC and 28th (Māori) Battalion Memorial Scholarships announced
    ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to Breast Cancer Foundation – Insights Conference
    Before moving onto the substance of today’s address, I want to recognise the very significant and ongoing contribution the Breast Cancer Foundation makes to support the lives of New Zealand women and their families living with breast cancer. I very much enjoy working with you. I also want to recognise ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Kiwi research soars to International Space Station
    New Zealand has notched up a first with the launch of University of Canterbury research to the International Space Station, Science, Innovation and Technology and Space Minister Judith Collins says. The hardware, developed by Dr Sarah Kessans, is designed to operate autonomously in orbit, allowing scientists on Earth to study ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Speech to the New Zealand Planning Institute
    Introduction Thank you for inviting me to speak with you today and I’m sorry I can’t be there in person. Yesterday I started in Wellington for Breakfast TV, spoke to a property conference in Auckland, and finished the day speaking to local government in Christchurch, so it would have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Support for Northland emergency response centre
    The Coalition Government is contributing more than $1 million to support the establishment of an emergency multi-agency coordination centre in Northland. Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell announced the contribution today during a visit of the Whangārei site where the facility will be constructed.  “Northland has faced a number ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Celebrating 20 years of Whakaata Māori
    New Zealanders have enjoyed a broader range of voices telling the story of Aotearoa thanks to the creation of Whakaata Māori 20 years ago, says Māori Development Minister Tama Potaka. The minister spoke at a celebration marking the national indigenous media organisation’s 20th anniversary at their studio in Auckland on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Some commercial fishery catch limits increased
    Commercial catch limits for some fisheries have been increased following a review showing stocks are healthy and abundant, Ocean and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The changes, along with some other catch limit changes and management settings, begin coming into effect from 1 April 2024. "Regular biannual reviews of fish ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago

Page generated in The Standard by Wordpress at 2024-03-28T11:15:17+00:00