How low will they go?

11 comments on “How low will they go? ”

• Comments are now closed

1. lprent 1

   20 February 2012 at 12:55 pm

   The more you look at National’s asset sales strategy, the harder it is to see any reason for it apart from simple minded ideological stupidity.
2. Kotahi Tane Huna 2

   20 February 2012 at 1:03 pm

   What about money? The Pengxin donation shows us that they are well paid for their services, and I’m sure there will be finance company and other directorships up for grabs later.

   Speaking of the Pengxin donation, and given the widely-accepted fact of CCP cheap loans and links to property development companies, to what extent can the National Party be said to be financed by a foreign government?
3. vto 3

   20 February 2012 at 1:06 pm

   .

   With Crafar, asset sales and now ACC privatisation …..

   They are entirely like the emperor with no clothes just before he was sprung.
4. Draco T Bastard 4

   20 February 2012 at 1:26 pm

   Or are they determined to sell our assets no matter what because this is about ideology, not good government?

   They’ll sell our assets no matter what and it’s not even about ideology – it’s about transferring the communities wealth into the hands of the rich and making all the rest of us serfs.
5. felix 5

   20 February 2012 at 2:09 pm

   “Which raises a question: what is the minimum net return that National is prepared to sell for? Is there one? Or are they determined to sell our assets no matter what because this is about ideology, not good government?”

   John Key was asked that very question in the house last week. His answer was that it’s good for NZ to sell the assets regardless of the price.

   Entirely ideological, stated very clearly.

   ps I’ll find the video in a minute cos some dweeb (hi Gos) is sure to question the precise wording.
   • felix 5.1

     20 February 2012 at 2:23 pm

     Here ’tis:

     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=so8CVIq-cRs

     The money shot is at 2:30, but the whole thing is worth a look if you enjoy that softly pathetic and unconvincing “feigned innocence” look that John Key gets when he’s lying through his teeth.

     David Shearer: Is there a bottom line below which he would not sell our profitable assets; if so, what is that bottom line?

     Rt Hon JOHN KEY: The bottom line is that it has got to be the right thing for New Zealand, and it is.

     And that’s that. Pure ideology, no bottom price.
     • aerobubble 5.1.1

       20 February 2012 at 3:04 pm

       Key does not believe that NZ has any significant National sovereignty at stake. Why would he, the banking system is already overwhelmingly foreign owned? Even the Government banks with a foreign owned bank. We’re already serfs…
       • marsman 5.1.1.1

         20 February 2012 at 4:03 pm

         Well, we need to fight to slough off this serfdom and we need to fight with everything at our disposal to prevent the thieving Nact parasites from selling OUR State Assets.
     • Bored 5.1.2

       20 February 2012 at 4:41 pm

       Has anybody cared to think this thing through with regard to our position as a client of the international banking system?

       The Nats have chosen to give 4 years worth of tax cuts that have since inception NEVER been revenue neutral. They have created a debt level as a consequence that places the NZ citizens at the mercy of these offshore banks.

       Have no doubt the economics of this from an NZ viewpoint are completely subsidiary to the bankers wishes to recoup the money borrowed and / or take a stake in our productive assets at the same time. This sale process is a sure sign that Key has blithely given away economic sovereignty for electoral success.
6. bbfloyd 6

   20 February 2012 at 8:13 pm

   after all the technical stuff has been debated ad infinitem…. we are still left with the reality that this is just the aristocracy taking back what we shed blood to gain….. dignity in our work… a future for our kids…a balanced, healthy, democratic society that works for the whole of society…..

   they were never going to accept that they had to share any of the loot in order to create a better reality for the masses… they are the masses after all… no explanation required……

   why spend time debating minutiae when we should be planning round three of the revolution?

   whether we want to face it, or not, we are at war with those who would have us in chains working as they see fit for as little as required to keep us alive so that we can keep working for as long as it takes to replace us with younger, healthier, slaves….
   • Draco T Bastard 6.1

     20 February 2012 at 10:10 pm

     +1

• Comments are now closed

• Log in
• Donate
• Contribute post

• Articles RSS