web analytics

If they didn’t want to sell it, we would all own it

Written By: - Date published: 11:30 am, September 5th, 2012 - 85 comments
Categories: act, Maori Issues, national, privatisation - Tags:

The National/Act government wants to sell essential public infrastructure assets that we all own and that returns a public dividend to a few of its mates who have the money, so some of its other mates can clip the ticket on the way.

If water-dependent assets are going to be sold to a few, Maori want their rights regarding water acknowledged and recognised. Fair enough. But if hydro-based power companies were not going to be sold, and stay in public ownership so we all have a stake in them, it becomes much easier to establish exactly what those rights are, and how they should be acknowledged and managed.

It’s private appropriation of public assets that causes the problem. Take that away and the problem is different, and the process of resolution much easier to work through.

Asset sales don’t make economic sense, cultural sense, legal sense, and increasingly political sense.

Time to stop them now, and by the way save the taxpayer a couple of hundred million dollars that otherwise flushes down the drain.


85 comments on “If they didn’t want to sell it, we would all own it”

  1. Gosman 1

    I’m not sure this logic is sound. Maori are interested in the commercial aspects of water involved in these companies. They would still have this interest even if the State was the 100 percent owner. I have yet to see any major players from the Maori side argue that interest in gaining commercial water rights would diminish if there was no asset sales.

    • mike e 1.1

      Goose Maori were Quite happy to leave water usage off the table so long as everybody benefited now only a few will benefit if it is partially privatised.

  2. Dr Terry 2

    Gosman, have you gained qualifications in logic? If so, you must surely have failed any tests. What you spout about Maori is so frightfully ignorant as to be unworthy of comment. Never fear, however, for Maori will have plenty more to say, so much that even you might care to listen.

  3. fabregas4 3

    I am not sure your understanding of Kaitiakitanga is sound. Maori understand that water is for us all. They are happy for this. But once Key and his mates try to sell it for private gain then they object.

    Try this analogy:

    I let you live in my spare house for free. All good. You rent out a room and get some money for it why shouldn’t I get a share?

    • Mr Burns 3.1

      You mean you think there are people who will let you stay in their home and not charge you?

      What sort of world do you live in?

  4. Uturn 4

    This is not a way to investigate Te Ao Māori in good faith i.e. using it as a pakeha political convenience. Clearly today is going to be wierd.

  5. captain hook 5

    these assets belong to the people of new zealand and not some transient gang of political bludgers who move in and move out taking as much as they can with them.
    why not have a referendum.
    that would be sound logic.

  6. insider 6

    What is essential infrastructure about a coal company?

    If power companies are so essential in terms of govt ownership, how do countries like the US, UK and Aus manage stable and efficient and cheap power systems without owning them?

      • insider 6.1.1

        And yet the US tends to outperform us in terms of fewer supply interruptions and their power is significantly cheaper too. And NZ performance is better now than it was under a national system.

        • Colonial Viper

          What bullshit assertions. ENRON anyone. US infrastructure is falling apart. They have a two trillion dollar infrastructure deficit.

          And what about the widespread blackouts experienced in the US in July in the middle of the heatwave.

          Someone is dreaming.

        • Draco T Bastard

          …and their power is significantly cheaper too.

          I think you’ll find the correct terminology is that profits aren’t as high and power provided as a national service could do without the profits altogether.

          And NZ performance is better now than it was under a national system.



          • insider

            Do you know what SAIDI, SAIFI and CAIDI are? Look them up and compare the 90s to the present to see how reliability is trending.

            But thanks for pointing out all those failures by ‘people’ owned monopolies.

            • Draco T Bastard

              Do you know what SAIDI, SAIFI and CAIDI are?

              Will wonders never cease? We learn things and thus do things better. Amazing111!!1

              But thanks for pointing out all those failures by ‘people’ owned monopolies.

              The failure is the business model that we’ve had forced upon us over the last three decades. Have the power companies publicly owned and run as a public service and those failures are likely to disappear.

              BTW, your distraction didn’t work. You said that NZs power system was better now, I proved that it isn’t.

              • insider

                Make up your mind. In the one post you both accepted “We learn things and thus do things better” and ‘proved’ that it isn’t better. I’m not quite sure how a couple of isolated power cuts in isolated locations is proof that things are somehow worse than weekly rolling power cuts over months and months across a much wider geography. It seems a highly unusual proof.

                • Draco T Bastard

                  “We learn things and thus do things better”

                  That was the physical aspect. The management has gone to hell.

                  I’m not quite sure how a couple of isolated power cuts in isolated locations is proof that things are somehow worse than weekly rolling power cuts over months and months across a much wider geography.


                  You’re either truly as stupid as you make out or you’re wilfully misinterpreting what’s happening. The ones in the 1970s were planned to take into account limited resources – basic, real world economics. The latter ones were unplanned outages caused by crappy management which itself was brought about by the neo-liberal revolution we had in the 1980s.

        • mike e

          california through the 90;s and early 2000’s

    • tc 6.2

      Imagine how much cheaper it’d be without profit taking private interests and the regulatory oversight required to keep them in some form of balance.

      Aus is cheap because they burn valleys of coal and you’d be surprised how inefficient the entire system here is. The grid and distribution systems itself use SCADA type systems to ensure power keeps running with little human intervention.

      They’re very robust, proven, and incredibly forgiving as they’ve been engineered to be that way for decades as some pieces are kept many years beyond useful life.

      It’s the overhead of layers of parties, profit, beauracracy, regulation and the legal/audit costs they tow behind them that makes our power bills so large.

      We have less than 5 mill, declining industry and 75% renewable generation, bring back the NZED !

      • Colonial Viper 6.2.1

        NZED 😎

        • insider

          Ah yes the NZED, the days of rolling blackouts…

        • joe90

          Ah yes the NZED, the days of rolling blackouts…

          Really, when?.

          • insider

            The last systemic rolling blackouts in NZ were in the 1970s. These were regular and driven by long term supply insecurity rather than short term response to climate or network failures. It was a centrally planned and operated system then.

            • lprent

              I can’t remember them in Auckland (which would have been the first place hit) and I’d have been quite aware of them from at least 1974. I was delivering the Star and would read the copy either then or when I got home every day.

              • insider

                I can remember them. Television broadcast hours were cut. Power was cut in the evenings and on weekends. Aucland may have been managed differently

                • mike e

                  Outsider when did Auckland have its major black out it was after privatisation.
                  We had oil fired power stations then oil shortages and you can Guarantee it was a National govt in power then.
                  Next in the early seventies our economy was expanding.
                  Now our enegy use is declining

                  • insider

                    Which one Mike? The central city one which went on for weeks was due to the failure of a community owned monopoly company’s poor management of its assets. Basically no checking and no accountability. The 06? one was due to poor maintenance management by the state owned monopoly

                    • mike e

                      the 06 outage was only for a few hours not months

                    • mike e

                      The state owned enterprise had under invested since its break up into parts from NZED.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      Right wing bullshit meme of privatisation vs public ownership.

                      The real difference is leadership and investment. That’s when the advantages of public ownership can come shining through as the assets are run for the benefit of the country.

                    • insider

                      Don’t forget to storm the barricades on your way out cv.

                      It’s you and Draco that are pushing a simplistic ‘state is great’ line – its just faith based polemic.

                      I say the evidence in nz and overseas shows things are much more mixed. You have private dominated systems that work well and some that don’t, and the same with state dominated.

                    • Socialist Paddy

                      Insider I hear there were also blackouts during the 1930s. Is this the fault of the first Labour Government?

                    • Colonial Viper

                      It’s you and Draco that are pushing a simplistic ‘state is great’ line – its just faith based polemic.

                      Yeah sorry dickhead, that’s not my position at all. Please just speak for yourself in future.

                    • insider

                      But the Assets owned and operated by ‘we the people’ in he form of a council organisation. The kind of model being championed by a few here.

                    • Socialist Paddy

                      But the problem is these democratic institutions are set up but then a bunch of penny pinching tories get elected and make a name for themselves by cutting costs and saving on maintenance.

                      And then shyte like this happens.

                      Blame the right people insider.

                      And then explain how Enron, the pinnacle of free market enterprise, screwed things up so badly. 

                    • Colonial Viper

                      And then explain how Enron, the pinnacle of free market enterprise

                      Well, up to that date, Enron was the pinnacle of free market fraud.

                    • Herodotus

                      No CV Enron was also a failure of regulation e.g. Auditors, disclosure and the regulators. Also with the 401k employees pension fund
                      sad thing is I see history repeating itself. There will be more Enrons, and with the crap regulation with Kiwisaver and other pension funds many retirees and pension fund investors to incur more pain. We need more regulation and regulators with real muscle.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      No CV Enron was also a failure of regulation

                      Sure. But only if you consider deliberate fraud, outright lying to shareholders and investors, destruction of data, and neck deep collusion between Enron’s executive management and their auditors, as ‘a failure of regulation’.

                      Me, I just call it financial fraud. Or more specifically, a control fraud.

            • joe90

              Best you start trawling the yearbooks for any references to your assertion because I reckon you’re making shit up.

              • insider

                Take it with the electricty regulator. I’m sure they’ll be fascinated by your insight and throw all their research out of the window.

            • Draco T Bastard

              And you know what happened in the 1970s, yes?

          • joe90

            You’ll have to be a little more specific because in the seven years, 1971 – 1978, I worked for the NZED I was never aware of the rolling blackouts you describe.

              • Te Reo Putake

                Be more specific. Have you any evidence of blackouts in the seventies or not? I’m picking not.

                • Colonial Viper

                  insider’s ridicuolous penchant for assigning power failures down to private vs public ownership just shows the shallowness of right wing thinking.

                • insider

                  Have you read the paper with the big chart listing the various cuts shown in the 70s? I think not

                  • Te Reo Putake

                    Yep, that’s right, I’m not wading through the document. Better things to do. Be more specific, fool.

                  • Draco T Bastard

                    They weren’t cuts but public conservation measures. There’s a big difference. I certainly recall having to do the same thing since the implementation of faux competition and the profit drive.

                    • insider

                      That has got to be the biggest piece of newspeak today. There were cuts. Regular ones.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      If you’ve got a limited supply then you don’t get to do everything that you want to do. Basic economics. The limited supply wasn’t due to the functioning of the state power system but basic physical limitations. Those limitations were recognised and conservation measures put in place. Same thing happens today when we get dry years.

                      If power had been in private we would have been far worse off.

                    • insider

                      You don;t get regular cuts and restrictions over three or four consecutive years in a centrally planned system just due to weather. This was a systemic failure, and that can only have been because in this case central planning did not work.

                      To sayit would have been worse if privately operated is not only slightly childish but ignores the complete lack of blackouts in similar if not worse weather circumstances in the following 40 years.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      yeah dude because the weather never goes into 3 or 4 year wet cycles or dry cycles 🙄

                      All you’re railing against is the fact that Nature Rules OK.

                    • insider

                      Unfortunately once again the hydro inflow data just doesn’t back you up. The seventies cycles were no better or worse than the following 30 or so years.

                    • Colonial Viper

                      And I’m afraid your spouting of gobbledegook doesn’t count for much.

                    • insider

                      and your continual avoidance of inconvenient facts (or ‘gobbledegook’ as you delightfully like to call them) regularly shows you up as a blowhard. Do you stick your fingers in your ear and go ‘wah wah wah I’m not listening’ at the same time?

                  • RedLogix

                    And on page 56 Table 3 of this document it states:

                    This was a period of relatively tight supply with conservation measures required in 1973, 1974, 1975 and 1976. This situation appeared to develop as a result of higher than anticipated demand growth over that period.

                    This clearly implies that the economy was growing more rapidly than normal … umm … which party was in government during this period in question?

                    • Carol

                      Hot water was also rationed in the 50s and, I think early 60s in Auckland. The water heating was switched off at the supply for a certain amount of time each day. In my family in my childhood, we could only get enough hot water for a couple of baths a day. People tended to not have showers installed in those days.

                      I think the unrestricted access to electricity is pretty recent….. and we may go back to rationing before too long, given peak everything.

                    • lprent []

                      The ripple control on hot water is still there. Used to get really irritated at one place in the mid 90s with a crap relay or something. Would make a loud distinct click..

                    • mike e

                      the kirk govt expanded the economy at breakneck speed something that hasn’t happened since nor likely to ever again.

                    • lprent

                      That was also about when the marsden B was meant to commission to run on oil for peak loads. Bad choice of fuel. Don’t think they could afford to run it.

                  • Colonial Viper

                    Sure, because if power had been privately owned, the dams would have filled up faster.

                    • Carol

                      Actually, if you look at the history of electricity in NZ, you can see it’s development really only became “sufficient” in the late 70s.

                      Also, I know when I was growing up we just didn’t have all the electricity-guzzling equipment people now take for granted:

                      in my (middleclass) house:
                      no fridge until somewhere in the mid to late 1950s;
                      no washing machine until mid to late 1960s;
                      only one radio til some time in the 60s – no record players
                      no TV til late 60s, but then only one b/w set
                      no sure when we got heaters, but mostly we just had an open fire in the living room

                      And this history shows that development of electricity supply was limited during WWII:


                      But World War II slowed down progress and, as a result of the huge increase in demand after the war, a 30-year hydro building programme was established. Dams were built at Tongariro, Lake Manapouri, the Mackenzie Basin and on the Clutha and Waikato rivers.

                      More power stations were built in the years between 1958 and 1978, including: Meremere (coal); Wairakei (geothermal); Marsden A (oil); New Plymouth (gas, with oil as a backup); Huntly (dual gas/oil); Otahuhu A (gas turbine) and Whirinaki (gas turbine). By 1965, the North and South Islands were linked by huge submarine electricity cables across Cook Strait.

                • lprent

                  The main blackouts I remember were in 1997. Someone let the lights go out in Auckland..

              • Draco T Bastard

                Ah, supply restrictions resulting in the populace having to save power but not actual power outages.

                If all those projects assessed as highly likely to proceed did in fact proceed,
                dry-year margins would likely rise to levels not seen since the late 1980s.
                Figure 43: Estimated dry-year energy supply margins (1971 to 2015)

                So, things haven’t been as good in the supply of power since the 1980s. Hmmm, broken up and commercialised in the early 1990s…

    • mike e 6.3

      Outsider Where’s the cheap in Australia get your facts upto date.
      Carbon taxes have put an end to cheap power because over 80% of Australia power is generated using coal.

  7. BernyD 7

    The politicians have always tried to divide NZ using Maori rights.

    The fact is Maori are another group of civilians in NZ who voice their beliefs.
    They have historical and documented precedents on their side when they do it.
    Their voice and opinion has just as much merit as any other group in NZ.
    It’s not about numbers it’s about civilised debate, a good idea is always worthy.

    The fact that they have a Historical precedent to help them get their beliefs heard is beneffiting everyone.

    From what I know they have never tried to claim money for the use of water.

    It’s about maintaining the water ways of NZ, which we can’t do if they are “Owned” by some third party (All the shareholders would be a third party).

    They always “Listen” to the politician but the reverse is rarely true.

    So I Bless them as Good Civilised People and hope they can help find a solution for all NZers.

  8. joe90 8

    Wow, insider was right, for two years there were outages which were so serious that twenty years later the electricity industry needed reforming.


    Figure 8: Retail demand conservation measures during dry periods

    1973 – July-Sept – Supply authorities ordered to cut
    consumption by 5%. Water heating restrictions. TV broadcast
    hours reduced. Power cuts in some areas in evening peak
    periods & weekends

    1974 – Feb-July Public conservation campaign. Water
    heating restrictions. Public lighting restrictions. TV
    broadcast hours reduced. Rolling blackouts

    • Carol 8.1

      1973-4 was the time of the “oil crisis”. There was a lot of concern about long term energy shortages. I went to the UK for the first time early 73 on a ship. The ship had to go slower than usual to conserve fuel. When I got to London, the friends I stayed with were talking about just having lived through the a year or two of some 3 day work weeks. This was partly due to a miners strike but also due to the “oil crisis” of 1973:


  9. Colonial Viper 9

    despite insider’s rampant misdirection DTB is right. Private profit is a dead loss on the community. Add to the fact that core infrastructure like energy has to be run strategically for the benefit of the nation: our power generation needs to be 100% NZ owned and managed.

    • Poission 9.1

      Core infrastructure with natural oligarchical properties need to be managed differently.This was an argument that Gareth Morgan postulated.

      The assets and revenue (cost increases) are based on revalued asset cost (so called fair value) and not on their historical cost.This is in effect a windfall profits stream and is widely used eg airport companies.

      Morgan suggested that if the accounting change generated a capital gain constraint, that there would be two significant responses.First the assets would return across the ledger very quickly, and price increases would reduce to the cpi creating market stability for both large and small users.

      This would broaden the tax base ,and stabilize inflation from internal forcing.

      As an interesting aside Rusal the Russian alu producer,has agreed to invest in modernization of one of its plants (efficiency) following large scale protests after threats to reduce production (and jobs) due to the high cost of energy.

      The government energy supplier agreed to reduce the existing energy increases.

      Unemployment in the RF has reduced to 5.1% which is the level at the start of the GFC.

      • Colonial Viper 9.1.1

        Just by coincidence Russia also happens to have one of the largest foreign currency reserves in the world, as well as one of the largest gold reserves in the world.

        And they can still send men into space. The US can’t.

        • Populuxe1

          And yet they never put a man on the moon, or successfully landed a probe on Mars, or sent probes to the outer planets, and so forth and so on if you must insist on spouting irrelevancies.
          They certainly manage to beat the US in the area of millions slaughtered in the 20th century and appalling civil rights today – not that any of this is relevant of course…. Shall we sing the Third International now?

          • Draco T Bastard

            You’ll note that Pop1 is being rather picky about what the Russian Space Program achieved.

            • Populuxe1

              Not especially – I’m just questioning its relevance to the topic. After all, a lot of the rocket technology on both sides was due to the work of Nazi scientists and Hitler made Germany into one of the most industrially advanced and wealthy countries in Europe – that’s if you’re actually trying to make some sort of connection between technological capacity and ideology.

              • Draco T Bastard

                …that’s if you’re actually trying to make some sort of connection between technological capacity and ideology.

                If I was going to make that connection then I’d point out that a supported populace does better technologically than one that isn’t even if that support is of the authoritarian type. To put it another way, a government active in R&D and manufacture produces better results than the free-market.

          • Colonial Viper

            Pop said:

            And yet they never put a man on the moon,

            After 40 years, the US won’t again. If that makes you feel better.

        • Poission

          Just by coincidence Russia also happens to have the lowest govt debt gdp ration in the G8.


          Surprising is that the decrease occurred after suspension of the sale of strategic energy assets

          • Colonial Viper

            Yep. Putin gave those energy oligarchs some very clear guidelines to follow…”or else”.

            • Poission

              Indeed the role of the Oligarchs is ubiquitous.There is a nice paper on the GFC and Oligarchs ie unbridled power.


              Another ingredient that helped create the mix that nearly brought the U.S. financial industry to its knees was the cozy relationship that had built up over the years between Wall Street and Washington. As Johnson noted, “Oversize institutions disproportionately influence public policy; the major banks we have today draw much of their power from being too big to fail. [Wall Street] benefited from the fact that Washington insiders already believed that large financial institutions and free-flowing capital markets were crucial to America’s position in the world.” By the time of the crisis, 90% of all the money deposited in the United States was in 20 banks.

              It was no secret that Wall Street firms were big political contributors. The securities and investment industry—which included Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Merrill Lynch, Lehman, and Bear Stearns—gave $97.7 million to federal political candidates during the 2004 election and $70.5 million for the 2006 congressional election.

              • mike e

                poi the same people that caused the GFC(18 current or former directors of the federal reserve) are profiting because the govt has handed them 4 trillion in interest free loans

  10. Feargal 10

    Strangely enough, or maybe it’s not strange, Nationals’ Sell the Assets campaign appears to take no notice of the reason why many of our assets are/were Government owned.
    It was /is the very same reason that most responsible Companies won’t be interested now.
    If NZ was a vibrant large country filled with many consumers Private Business would have built the Dams and there Reticulation systems many many years ago. They would have also built Large Ports, Railways and alternate Transport Systems. Maintained and improved them over
    the years.
    But it wasn’t that attractive then and it isn’t now.
    It is however attractive to ” Thrash the Donkey Merchants” & “Profit few at the expense of the many Merchants” and get a quick buck
    and get out fast.
    Let’s be honest here Fat Cats. None of you then, or now, would as mentioned, build a new Port, Dam, Railway or Road off your own bat.
    Not now, just as you wouldn,t back in the latter part of the 19th Century. New Zealand wasn’t large enough in user uptake to make these things profitable enough. These Government assets weren’t Govt owned because of some ideological love of Government ownership. It was done for practical reasons. The infrastructure was considered necessary for a small group of Pacific Islands to become more in tune with the developing world economy and to encourage more settlement in NZ.
    This situation still exists. Globalist economic fairy tales re the better running of these assets. And “Why should Governments own
    Power stations”, rhetoric doesn’t stack up!
    What does stack up is the Greedy Rhetoricians lust to make a fast buck at the expense of generations of poor isolated peoples desire and bloody hard work to have more comfortable and decent Lifestyle at a reasonable cost. These reasons are just as valid today. It buggers
    belief that we should forsake these very same reasons and pay some greedy ass more, for what we have had for years.
    Not to give these assets to a bloated few money hungry Corporations. Whose interests lie far beyond a decent and equitable lifestyle
    for the peoples of these far flung Islands’.

    But that’s alright we can buy them back.Oh wait a mo, we already have. Isn’t this having to pay the thieves to get your stolen
    property back!!

    • insider 10.1

      Of course the first electric power scheme built in NZ was funded by private entrepreneurs through a public share issue

      • felix 10.1.1

        And what? How did it pan out for them?

      • lprent 10.1.2

        And from memory wound up being subsidized by the city to prevent bankruptcy. Or are you thinking of the one that was put in for the mine?

        Of course we could check ourselves if you’d put in a link, I could find out which fairy story you are peddling.

        Partial stories with unstated moralities are ok for children. But realities seldom contain nice beautiful princesses – they usually have bad PMT and neat making obsessions

      • Draco T Bastard 10.1.3


        While industrial use quickly took off, it was only government programmes in the first two thirds of the 20th century that caused private demand to climb strongly as well. Especially the rural areas were beneficiaries of subsidies for electrical grid systems, where supply literally was provided to create demand, with an intention to modernise the countryside. The results were notable – in the 1920s, electricity use increased at a rate of 22% per year. In fact, the ‘load building’ programmes were so successful that shortages started to occur from 1936 on, though a large number of new power stations built in the 1950s enabled supply to catch up again.[8]

        So, we have electricity in the country pretty much solely due to government action.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts


  • September benefit figures disappointing
    The Government is out of touch with the reality that fewer people are going off the benefit and into employment or study, says Labour’s Social Development spokesperson Carmel Sepuloni.  “The quarterly benefit numbers for September are concerning. They show that ...
    3 days ago
  • MFAT officials refuse to back Prime Minister on Saudi sheep claims
    An Ombudsman’s interim decision released about the existence or otherwise of legal advice on the multimillion dollar Saudi sheep deal shows MFAT has failed to back up the Prime Minister’s claims on the matter, says Labour MP David Parker. “The ...
    3 days ago
  • Nats still planning to take Housing NZ dividend
    Housing New Zealand’s Statement of Performance Expectations shows that the National Government intends to pocket $237m from Housing New Zealand this year including a $54m “surplus distribution”, despite promises that dividends would stop, says Labour’s Housing spokesperson Phil Twyford. “After ...
    4 days ago
  • Parliament must restore democracy for Ecan
    Parliament has a chance to return full democracy to Canterbury with the drawing of a member’s bill that would replace the Government’s appointed commissioners with democratically elected councillors, says Labour’s Canterbury Spokesperson Megan Woods. “In 2010, the Government stripped Cantabrians ...
    4 days ago
  • Police struggle to hold the line in Northland
    Labour’s promise of a thousand extra police will go a long way to calming the fears of people in the North, says the MP for Te Tai Tokerau Kelvin Davis.  “Police are talking about the Northland towns of Kaitaia and ...
    4 days ago
  • Urgent action on agriculture emissions needed
    Immediate action is required to curb agricultural emissions is the loud and clear message from Climate change & agriculture: Understanding the biological greenhouse gases report released today by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment, says Labour’s Climate Change spokesperson Megan ...
    5 days ago
  • Super Fund climate change approach a good start
    Labour Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson and Climate Change Spokesperson Dr Megan Woods have welcomed the adoption of a climate change investment strategy by the New Zealand Super Fund. “This is a good start. It is a welcome development that the Super ...
    5 days ago
  • Raising the age the right thing to do
    The announcement today that the Government will leave the door open for young people leaving state care still means there is a lot of work to do, says Labour's Spokesperson for Children, Jacinda Ardern "The Government indicated some time ago ...
    5 days ago
  • Coleman plays down the plight of junior doctors
    Junior doctors are crucial to our health services and the industrial action that continues tomorrow shows how desperately the Government has underfunded health, says Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King.  “Jonathan Coleman’s claim that he has not seen objective evidence of ...
    6 days ago
  • Inflation piles pressure on National and Reserve Bank
    While many households will welcome the low inflation figures announced today, they highlight serious questions for both the National government and the Reserve Bank, Labour’s  Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson said.  "While low inflation will be welcomed by many, the ...
    6 days ago
  • Officials warned Nat’s $1b infrastructure fund ineffective and rushed
    Treasury papers show the Government rushed out an infrastructure announcement officials told them risked making no significant difference to housing supply, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “Like so much of National’s housing policy, this was another poll-driven PR initiative ...
    6 days ago
  • More cops needed to tackle P
    New Police statistics obtained in Written Questions show John Key is losing his War on P, highlighting the need for more Police, says Opposition Leader Andrew Little.  “New Zealanders expect serious action on P but today’s hodgepodge of half-measures won’t ...
    7 days ago
  • MBIE docs show country needs KiwiBuild, not Key’s pretend “building boom”
    John Key’s spin that New Zealand is in a building boom does not change the massive shortfall in building construction as new MBIE papers reveal, says Labour Party housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “We can fix the housing crisis, by the ...
    7 days ago
  • 1 in 7 Akl houses now going to big property speculators
    Speculators are running riot in the Auckland housing market making life tougher for first home buyers, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  Newly released data from Core Logic shows a 40 per cent increase in the share of house sales ...
    1 week ago
  • Labour mourns passing of Helen Kelly
    Helen Kelly was a passionate advocate for working New Zealanders and for a safe and decent working life, Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little says.  “Helen Kelly spent her adult life fighting for the right of every working person to ...
    1 week ago
  • Andrew Little: Speech to the Police Association Conference 2016
    Police Association delegates, Association life members and staff, representatives from overseas jurisdictions. Thank you for inviting me here today. The Police Association has become a strong and respected voice for Police officers and for policing in New Zealand. There is ...
    2 weeks ago
  • 1,000 more police for safer communities
    Labour will fund an extra 1,000 Police in its first term to tackle the rising rate of crime, says Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. “Labour will put more cops on the beat to keep our communities safe. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Call for all-party round table on homelessness
    Labour is calling on the Government to take part in a roundtable meeting to hammer out a cross-party agreement on ending homelessness.  Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford said the country wanted positive solutions to homelessness, and wanted the political parties ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Working people carrying the can for the Government
    Today’s announcement of a Government operating surplus is the result of the hard work of many Kiwi businesses and workers, who will be asking themselves if they are receiving their fair share of growth in the economy, Grant Robertson Labour ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Breast cancer drugs should be available
    Labour supports the Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition’s campaign for better access to cancer treatments as more patients are denied what is freely available in Australia, says Labour’s Health spokesperson Annette King.  “In the last three years, PHARMAC’s funding has been ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Community law centres get much needed support from banks
      New Zealand’s network of community law centres, who operate out of more than 140 locations across the country, have today received a much needed boost, says Labour’s Justice spokesperson Jacinda Ardern.  “After more than 8 years of static funding ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Just 18 affordable homes in Auckland SHAs – It’s time for KiwiBuild
    New data revealing just 18 affordable homes have been built and sold to first home buyers in Auckland’s Special Housing Areas show National’s flagship housing policy has failed and Labour’s comprehensive housing plan is needed, says Leader of the Opposition ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Pasifika wins big in Auckland elections
    The Labour Party’s Pacific Candidates who stood for local elections in Auckland came out on top with 14 winners, says Labour’s Pacific Island Affairs spokesperson Su’a William Sio. “Our candidates have won seats on one ward, four local boards, two ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Seven7 hikoi to stop sexual violence
    2 weeks ago
  • Road toll passes 2013 total
    The road toll for the year to date has already passed the total for the whole of 2013, raising serious questions about the Government’s underfunding of road safety, says Labour’s Transport spokesperson Sue Moroney.  “According to the Ministry of Transport, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Bay principals slam charter school decision
    A letter from Hawke’s Bay principals to the Education Minister slams the lack of consultation over the establishment of a charter school in the region and seriously calls into question the decision making going on under Hekia Parata’s watch, says ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Government needs to act on voter turnout crisis
    With fewer than 40 per cent of eligible voters having their say in the 2016 local elections, the Government must get serious and come up with a plan to increase voter turnout, says Labour’s Local Government Spokesperson Meka Whaitiri. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Inquiry presents solutions to homelessness – Govt must act
    Labour, the Green Party and the Māori Party are calling on the Government to immediately adopt the 20 recommendations set out in today's Ending Homelessness in New Zealand report. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • A good night for Labour’s local government candidates
    It has been a good night for Labour in the local government elections. In Wellington, Justin Lester became the first Labour mayor for 30 years, leading a council where three out of four Labour candidates were elected. Both of Labour’s ...
    2 weeks ago
  • More contenders for fight clubs
    Allegations of fight clubs spreading to other Serco-run prisons must be properly investigated says Labour’s Corrections spokesperson Kelvin Davis. ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Minister runs for cover on job losses
    Māori Development Minister Te Ururoa Flavell’s refusal to show leadership and provide assurances over the future of the Māori Land Court is disappointing, given he is spearheading contentious Maori land reforms which will impact on the functions of the Court, ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Kiwisaver contribution holiday not the break workers were looking for
    The number of working New Zealanders needing to stop Kiwisaver payments is another sign that many people are not seeing benefit from growth in the economy, says Grant Robertson Labour’s Finance spokesperson. "There has been an increase of 14 ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Fight Club failings
    The Corrections Minister must take full responsibility for the widespread management failings within Mt Eden prison, says Labour’s Corrections spokesperson Kelvin Davis. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Rethink welcomed
    The Labour Party is pleased that Craig Foss is reconsidering the return of New Zealand soldiers buried in Malaysia, says Labour’s Foreign Affairs spokesperson David Shearer. “For the families of those who lie there, this will a welcome move. The ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Disappointment over UN vote
    Helen Clark showed her characteristic drive and determination in her campaign to be UN Secretary General, and most New Zealanders will be disappointed she hasn't been selected, says the Leader of the Opposition Andrew Little. "Helen Clark has been an ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Māori need answers on Land Court job losses
    Māori landowners, Māori employees and Treaty partners need answers after a Ministry of Justice consultation document has revealed dozens of roles will be disestablished at the Māori Land Court, says Ikaroa-Rāwhiti MP Meka Whaitiri. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Key’s ‘efficiencies’ = DHBs’ pain
          John Key’s talk of ‘efficiencies’ ignores the fact the Government is chronically underfunding health to the tune of $1.7 billion, says Labour’s Acting Health spokesperson Dr David Clark.       ...
    3 weeks ago
  • More than 1,300 schools to face budget cuts
    The latest Ministry of Education figures reveal thousands of schools will face cuts to funding under National’s new operations grant funding model, says Labour's Education spokesperson Chris Hipkins. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Speculation fever spreads around country
    House prices in Wellington, Hamilton and Tauranga are going off as a result of uncontrolled property speculation spilling over from the Auckland market, says Labour’s housing spokesperson Phil Twyford.  “Speculators who have been priced out of Auckland are now fanning ...
    3 weeks ago
  • New Zealand lags on aid targets
      The National Government needs to live up to its commitments and allocate 0.7 per cent of Gross National Income on development assistance, says Labour’s spokesperson on Pacific Climate Change Su’a William Sio.  “The second State of the Environment Report ...
    3 weeks ago
  • War on drugs needs more troops
    The Minister of Police must urgently address the number of officers investigating illegal drugs if she is serious about making a dent in the meth trade, says Labour’s Police spokesperson Stuart Nash.  “Answers from written questions from the Minister show ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Doctors strike symptom of health cuts
    The notice of strike action issued by the junior doctors today is the result of years of National’s cuts to the health system, says Labour’s Associate Health spokesperson Dr David Clark. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Government starves RNZ into selling Auckland asset
    Just weeks after TVNZ opened its refurbished Auckland head office costing more than $60 million, RNZ (Radio New Zealand) has been forced to put its Auckland office on the market to keep itself afloat, says Labour’s Broadcasting spokesperson Clare Curran. ...
    3 weeks ago
  • Government must be more than a bystander on the economy
    Despite what he might think John Key is not a political commentator, but actually a leader in a Government who needs to take responsibility for the conditions that mean a rise in interest rates, says Labour’s Finance Spokesperson Grant Robertson.  “John ...
    3 weeks ago