web analytics

Key needs to read the GCSB Act

Written By: - Date published: 8:37 am, October 2nd, 2012 - 23 comments
Categories: democracy under attack, john key, Spying - Tags:

I’ve just heard a clip on the radio from yesterday’s post-Cabinet press conference where Key says that we would all be very scared if he had control over the GCSB. That might be an insight into his vision of dictatorship on Planet Key, but it’s also wrong. Key is the only democratic control on our spies and he has extraordinary oversight. Every warrant the spooks need – which is “some” per year according to the GCSB’s annual report – has to be approved by Key.* The legislation says that he has to exercise “control” over the spies. Is he exercising that role properly, or is he just signing whatever the GCSB puts under his nose?

*(the spying on Dotcom, we’re told, would not have required a warrant had it been legal because it didn’t involve installation of bugs or hacking of computer systems)

23 comments on “Key needs to read the GCSB Act ”

  1. Hilary 1

    I thought that the GCSB Act actually specifies the Minister has ‘control’ of the agency. This wording is not found in other Acts.

  2. I agree that we should be more afraid if there is no democratic overview of GCSB.  If there was no overview I predict that GCSB would make a habit of overstepping its powers, acting without legal authority and showing no respect for the rights of individuals … just like it is now funnily enough.

  3. framu 3

    also – hes deliberately (or not) confusing the issue – i dont think anyone saying he should be controlling every aspect of GCSB operations.

    Its the fact he didnt seem to know about a huge multi national and multi agency operation and didnt catch that it was illegal (or get it checked to make sure for himself) – he didnt do his job of ministerial oversight

    not that the GCSB decided to do it or what colour shoes they wore

    Its not the first time a pollie has deliberately reworded things to muddy the waters

    • Draco T Bastard 3.1

      +1

      He definitely should have known about a multi-national operation that the GCSB was taking part in.

      • insider 3.1.1

        is he a psychic? How can he know if it is kept from him (either deliberately or by oversight)? What process or method should he employ?

        “hey guys, just in case I get asked, you haven’t been doing anyhting illegal this month have you?”

        • framu 3.1.1.1

          yeah your missing the point too

          – Keys is using the “people are saying i should be deciding every detail” line to reframe the criticism

          when the issue isnt him knowing every detail – but him knowing the major detail

          do you think key needs to be making decisions about who gets investigated in order to be informed about whats going on?

          Please dont tell me your that silly

          • insider 3.1.1.1.1

            I come back to the question: How does he know if he is not told by the people in positions of trust in his department? What systems would you put in place that balance the separation of the minister from operational issues with those things he ‘needs’ to know?

            • framu 3.1.1.1.1.1

              you can come back to your question till kingdom come – but its still got nothing to do with john key trying to frame the criticsim of his performance as being somehow a call for him to decide who the gcsb investigates.

              do you think taking an active decision making role is the same as being informed?

              because thats what key is trying to claim

              • insider

                It is not a reframing it is pointing out the delicate balance that exists between ministers and depts and the risks entailed when people like you and Russel Norman, with the benefits of hindsight, demand perfect knowledge. What should he have done and when, and how should he have known to do that?

                Ministerial oversight does not include directing the bureau or digging in to find out what operations it is carrying on, and that if he takes on that role there are very real risks. The Director is responsible for operations. If the minister starts digging round wanting to randomly know details of operations, there is a risk he then starts telling them what to do and to whom – look at what happened to Benson Pope and Nick Smith for examples of how easily and badly that can go wrong. That is not something I want and not something history tells us is a good thing when it comes to state security agencies.

                • Colonial Viper

                  It is not a reframing it is pointing out the delicate balance that exists between ministers and depts and the risks entailed when people like you and Russel Norman, with the benefits of hindsight, demand perfect knowledge.

                  But we don’t need Key to have “perfect knowledge”, do we?

                  We simply want to know what Key knew about a major surveilliance operation carried out by the organisation he happens to oversee. An operation which was carried out in preparation for a major US-NZ armed law enforcement action. It seems like Key should know if the GCSB is helping out the FBI in preparation for an armed raid, don’t you think?

                  You seem to be saying that there is nothing to answer for at the top in what was a very clear balls up.

                  Ministerial oversight does not include directing the bureau or digging in to find out what operations it is carrying on, and that if he takes on that role there are very real risks.

                  Again, it’s not what we’re asking for. Ministerial oversight includes ensuring that the organisation you are responsible for is not acting illegally and outside of their mandate. And if concerns of that nature are raised, Ministerial oversight includes finding out what the fuck happened, and how the fuck it happened.

                  • insider

                    Who said it was ‘a major surveillance operation’? Only you and only in hindsight. It could be fairly mundane in terms of what they do day to day. And they weren’t working with the FBI, they were working with the NZ Police. And if that is the threshold for telling the minister, that’s a pretty low threshold for an organisation that is probably working daily with a number of major overseas intelligence agencies.

                    Key accepts that he is accountable for the bureau activity. He’ told them he should have been briefed on the operation (given its high profile) and presumably set new rules of engagement in place.

                    There is an ongoing failure to point out when he shoudl have known and how he should have known that in the absence of his own people telling him.

                    • Draco T Bastard

                      And they weren’t working with the FBI, they were working with the NZ Police.

                      The police were working for the FBI and so, by extension, was the GCSB. This should have been communicated to the GCSB by the police and then on to the minister(s) responsible. This raises two questions:
                      1.) If that information wasn’t passed on why wasn’t it and who failed to do so?
                      2.) If that information was passed on why is John Key now telling us that it wasn’t?

                    • Colonial Viper

                      There is an ongoing failure to point out when he shoudl have known and how he should have known that in the absence of his own people telling him.

                      How do you know this is what happened? Have the results of the investigation been published somewhere?

                • McFlock

                   If the minister starts digging round wanting to randomly know details of operations, there is a risk he then starts telling them what to do and to whom – look at what happened to Benson Pope and Nick Smith for examples of how easily and badly that can go wrong. That is not something I want and not something history tells us is a good thing when it comes to state security agencies.  

                    
                  So in other words, the minister who is required by legislation to “control” the department should not know what the department is doing in case it tempts the minister to control that department? 
                         
                  The very fact that the GCSB apparently broke the law and did not inform its democratic master before, during or after doing so demonstrates that the greater risk comes from an unsupervised security department.
                            
                  Therefore Key and English were negligent in their oversight of the security services. With consequences that edge us closer to the banana republic dictatorship those services should protect us from. Couple that with shit like ECANZ and CERA, key looks less like a dick and more like a psycho driving the country to the lip of an abyss.

                  • insider

                    People break the law deliberately and inadvertantly all the time. Govt departments and employees aer no exception. We don’t have precogs to stop that. Unless you come up with some new miracle cleaner that can stop it, no amount of law writing or controls will ever be enough. All you can do is clean up the mess afterwards and try to learn.

                    GCSB broke the law, but only after taking legal advice from qualified people experienced in the field that it wasn’t. There is nothing ministerially negligent in that. The minister wasn’t told about involvement in KDC at the time. That was a judgement call by officials. Again how is the minister negligent? The minsiter was told when GCSB realised its legal error. Yet again, what should he have done? Sought an alternative legal opinion about something he didn’t know was happening, that had been legally misinterpreted before he even knew it had been, just in case?

                    • BloodyOrphan

                      Hang on a minute, If Dotcom had an application for residency in the works, then he must a given certain rights within NZ while it’s being processed.
                      Furthermore he was granted residency, so those rights would have been upheld.

                      Those minister(s) must have ordered the Investigation, otherwise the above fact would have stopped the GCSB in it’s tracks.

                    • McFlock

                      1: the minister failed to communicate and demand acceptable standards of behaviour from his department;
                        
                      2: the minister failed to hold his department accountable when failures in those standards eventually came to light;
                        
                      3: the minister has fostered a culture within his department, cabinet and government which regards “legality” as a negotiable value that should be pushed to the limit that you can buy a legal opinion around, rather than a line that should be avoided on the side of caution;
                       
                      4: the minister failed to keep tabs on the department he is legally obliged to control;
                         
                      5: the minister failed to maintain communication with his deputy regarding important decisions made in his absence;
                          
                      6: the minister failed to ensure that the other security services overseer kept tabs on the activities of the minister’s department;
                           
                      7: the minister tasked an overseer who failed to detect an apparent illegality by the department at the time to determine why the apparent illegality occurred, leading to a conflict of interest (if the responsibility for the apparent illegality rests with the department the investigator was overseeing, the investigator failed in their monitoring duties. This is an incentive to scapegoat someone other than the department).
                           
                           
                      All in all, Key’s demonstrated gross incompetence in governing a single department, let alone the country.

                    • framu

                      “The minsiter was told when GCSB realised its legal error”

                      um – wasnt the illegal spying continued after that point?

                      didnt key previously say he hadnt heard of KDC till the day before the raid?

                      So which is true?

                      i dont think key was kept in the dark at all – but even if we take him at his word – it still doesnt add up – hes telling fibs somewhere.

                      And for the record – im not demanding perfect knowledge – just the teeny tiniest skerrick of knowledge

                    • McFlock

                      Ah, but when the GCSB were originally told that they were in error, they had followed Key’s “water quality scientist” example and reckoned they had legal opinions to say different. They only “realised their error” when it became obvious to them that their legal opinions were bullshit and they were in the crap. I.e. September, when the court case began to make it relevant.
                               
                      And that’s the “best-case scenario for Key, even though it stinks like a waterway in dairy country (“perfectly clear, 100% pure” reckons Key’s science consultant). 

                    • insider

                      1: where’s the evidence for this?

                      2: so why the investigations going on?

                      3: again you are making this up.

                      4: no evidence of that

                      5: perhaps but I think this is more an official’s job.

                      6: again no evidence

                      7: the overseer is not a permanent placement looking at decisions made in the course of the working day. You need to read the act to understand his powers. He either carries out formal inquiries or he audits processes and warrants. He doesn’t look at individual decisions unless there is a complaint or he has reason – he had no reason because there was no knowledge of a breach.

                      Your Personal distaste for key and vivid imagination is not a good substitute for analysis.

                      @framu

                      The illegality was only discovered in recent weeks. Do you not get that?

                    • McFlock

                      1: The fact he had to issue an apology

                      2: Which investigation? The initial 5 page report Key thought was good enough, the additional investigation by the cabinet sec’y after it was obvious 5 pages was bullshit, or the police investigation that comes from a criminal complaint filed by the opposition?

                      3: Reasonable evaluation based on the disagreement between cops&GCSB re: legality of GCSB actions.

                      4: The department he controls apparently committed illegal actions in a major case of which he claims to have had no knowledge. No idea what his department is doing in general, no idea of major instances of concern

                      5: It’s his job to ask question about the department he allegedly controls.
                         
                      6: The overseer failed to… (see 7)

                      7: audits processes and warrants. Like, for example, the processes by which the department ensures that it is not spying on New Zealanders. The processes by which the department confirms that changes in residency status are updated as quickly as possible and surveillance legality re-evaluated. The processes by which agents and managers are held accountable for ensuring the basic legality of their operations.
                         
                      I.e. your claim there was no knowledge of a breach points to a failure to ensure that systems were in place to prevent breaches and identify those that occur.
                           
                      The fact of the apology suggests that any systems in place failed to prevent a specific failure. That is a failure in process analysis, which is a failure in management and a failure in oversight. Assigning the overseer to investigate a possible failure in the overseer’s ability to audit the department’s processes is an apparent, even if it turns out to not be an actual, conflict of interest. 

                      Key’s an incompetent dilettante. I think he’s an incompetent dilettante because of multi-threaded clusterfucks like this.

  4. ianmac 4

    Surely the PM’s role would be at least to be kept in the loop? Even if he doesn’t sign off approval for each and every surveillance, I cannot believe that at least a year ago the PM was not looped/head upped into the pending Dotcom raid. How can Mr Key be so proud when he said I had not even heard of Dotcom until the day before the raid? Sort of “Ha ha. I didn’t know anything about Kim Dotcom or anything about an international operation about one of our residents. Aren’t I a clever chap to know nothing?”
    No Mr Key. It stinks.

  5. captain hook 5

    I doan fink kweewee can ekshilly rede.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Celebrating the Entry Into Force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons
    [Opening comments, welcome and thank you to Auckland University etc] It is a great pleasure to be here this afternoon to celebrate such an historic occasion - the entry into force of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. This is a moment many feared would never come, but ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Supporting disabled people to stay connected
    The Government is providing $3 million in one-off seed funding to help disabled people around New Zealand stay connected and access support in their communities, Minister for Disability Issues, Carmel Sepuloni announced today. The funding will allow disability service providers to develop digital and community-based solutions over the next two ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Voluntary saliva testing offered to quarantine workers from Monday
    Border workers in quarantine facilities will be offered voluntary daily COVID-19 saliva tests in addition to their regular weekly testing, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. This additional option will be rolled out at the Jet Park Quarantine facility in Auckland starting on Monday 25 January, and then to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Next steps in firearms buy-back
    The next steps in the Government’s ambitious firearms reform programme to include a three-month buy-back have been announced by Police Minister Poto Williams today.  “The last buy-back and amnesty was unprecedented for New Zealand and was successful in collecting 60,297 firearms, modifying a further 5,630 firearms, and collecting 299,837 prohibited ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Public Housing Plan announced
    The Government has released its Public Housing Plan 2021-2024 which outlines the intention of where 8,000 additional public and transitional housing places announced in Budget 2020, will go. “The Government is committed to continuing its public house build programme at pace and scale. The extra 8,000 homes – 6000 public ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Prime Minister congratulates President Joe Biden on his inauguration
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has congratulated President Joe Biden on his inauguration as the 46th President of the United States of America. “I look forward to building a close relationship with President Biden and working with him on issues that matter to both our countries,” Jacinda Ardern said. “New Zealand ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Jobs for Nature funding will create training and employment opportunities
    A major investment to tackle wilding pines in Mt Richmond will create jobs and help protect the area’s unique ecosystems, Biosecurity Minister Damien O’Connor says. The Mt Richmond Forest Park has unique ecosystems developed on mineral-rich geology, including taonga plant species found nowhere else in the country. “These special plant ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Pre-departure testing extended to all passengers to New Zealand
    To further protect New Zealand from COVID-19, the Government is extending pre-departure testing to all passengers to New Zealand except from Australia, Antarctica and most Pacific Islands, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “The change will come into force for all flights arriving in New Zealand after 11:59pm (NZT) on Monday ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Bay Cadets learn skills to protect environment
    Bay Conservation Cadets launched with first intake Supported with $3.5 million grant Part of $1.245b Jobs for Nature programme to accelerate recover from Covid Cadets will learn skills to protect and enhance environment Environment Minister David Parker today welcomed the first intake of cadets at the launch of the Bay ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Cook Islanders to resume travel to New Zealand
    The Prime Minister of New Zealand Jacinda Ardern and the Prime Minister of the Cook Islands Mark Brown have announced passengers from the Cook Islands can resume quarantine-free travel into New Zealand from 21 January, enabling access to essential services such as health. “Following confirmation of the Cook Islands’ COVID ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting communities and landowners to grow employment opportunities
    Jobs for Nature funding is being made available to conservation groups and landowners to employ staff and contractors in a move aimed at boosting local biodiversity-focused projects, Conservation Minister Kiritapu Allan has announced. It is estimated some 400-plus jobs will be created with employment opportunities in ecology, restoration, trapping, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Border exception for some returning international tertiary students
    The Government has approved an exception class for 1000 international tertiary students, degree level and above, who began their study in New Zealand but were caught offshore when border restrictions began. The exception will allow students to return to New Zealand in stages from April 2021. “Our top priority continues ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Tiwai deal gives time for managed transition
    Today’s deal between Meridian and Rio Tinto for the Tiwai smelter to remain open another four years provides time for a managed transition for Southland. “The deal provides welcome certainty to the Southland community by protecting jobs and incomes as the region plans for the future. The Government is committed ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New member for APEC Business Advisory Council
    Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has appointed Anna Curzon to the APEC Business Advisory Council (ABAC). The leader of each APEC economy appoints three private sector representatives to ABAC. ABAC provides advice to leaders annually on business priorities. “ABAC helps ensure that APEC’s work programme is informed by business community perspectives ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Govt’s careful economic management recognised
    The Government’s prudent fiscal management and strong policy programme in the face of the COVID-19 global pandemic have been acknowledged by the credit rating agency Fitch. Fitch has today affirmed New Zealand’s local currency rating at AA+ with a stable outlook and foreign currency rating at AA with a positive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Additional actions to keep COVID-19 out of NZ
    The Government is putting in place a suite of additional actions to protect New Zealand from COVID-19, including new emerging variants, COVID-19 Response Minister Chris Hipkins said today. “Given the high rates of infection in many countries and evidence of the global spread of more transmissible variants, it’s clear that ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • 19 projects will clean up and protect waterways
    $36 million of Government funding alongside councils and others for 19 projects Investment will clean up and protect waterways and create local jobs Boots on the ground expected in Q2 of 2021 Funding part of the Jobs for Nature policy package A package of 19 projects will help clean up ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • New Zealand Government acknowledges 175th anniversary of Battle of Ruapekapeka
    The commemoration of the 175th anniversary of the Battle of Ruapekapeka represents an opportunity for all New Zealanders to reflect on the role these conflicts have had in creating our modern nation, says Associate Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Kiri Allan. “The Battle at Te Ruapekapeka Pā, which took ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Better care for babies with tongue-tie
    Babies born with tongue-tie will be assessed and treated consistently under new guidelines released by the Ministry of Health, Associate Minister of Health Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Around 5% to 10% of babies are born with a tongue-tie, or ankyloglossia, in New Zealand each year. At least half can ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago