- Date published:
12:25 pm, August 25th, 2022 - 89 comments
Categories: Economy, housing, labour, poverty - Tags:
It is possible that within the next year New Zealand’s housing supply crisis will be resolved.
In 2017 when Labour gained power it was estimated that there was a national shortfall of 71,000 houses and Phil Twyford said that the Government had inherited a disaster.
Next year the disaster may be resolved.
From Liam Dann at the Herald:
The ongoing construction boom and the net loss of population as borders open will likely mean New Zealand will finally be rid of its long-running housing shortage in about a year, Kiwibank says.
In its annual look at the state of the housing market, Kiwibank senior economist Jeremy Couchman the country will “start accumulating a surplus of housing” over the coming years as projected building activity outstrips rising demand.
“Despite all the disruption from Covid, despite the lack of materials, and despite the difficulty finding staff, StatsNZ estimates a total of over 41,000 homes were built in the year to June 2022,” he says.
“That is by far the largest addition to Aotearoa’s housing stock in the data going back to 1991.”
To put the gain in homes in context, the peak in construction during the mid-2000s only managed to produce a net 30,000 homes, Couchman says.
“Looking at the 2018 census data 41,700 dwellings is roughly the same as the number in the whole Southland region.”
As a recent trip through Auckland will show there are huge numbers of new houses coming onto the market and house prices are reducing and rentals in real terms are also reducing. As I previously commented the QV House Price Index has dropped 7% since December last year. Median rentals have increased from $520 to $545 since October last year which given current inflation rates is a decrease in real terms. And recent anecdotal evidence is that rentals are dropping as housing supply improves.
If and when we reach balance this will be a cause for celebration. And then work needs to continue on repairing the damage caused by inflated house prices and too expensive rents.
Anyone wanting to see this in action should have a drive around the Hendon Ave area in Owairaka. Apartment blocks going up on New North Road, a mix of apartments/ townhouses and flats on Hendon Ave and the surrounding streets. Whole HNZ areas that used to have 1 drafty and cold 2br house on 600m2 sites are have had them replaces with warm and dry dwellings that meet 21stC building standards. Similar in Waterview and Northcote as well, These areas are all well served with public transport.
Cannon's Creek, Northcote, New Lynn, Point England, Avondale, Mangere, Oranga, Hobsonville and multiple more coming. This is the state operating on a house building scale not seen since the 1970s.
If they get a shot at Light Rail we are going to see the largest urban renewal since the Christchurch Rebuild.
And even if this government falls, Kainga Ora will roll on.
I just hope the building work is not performed by cowboys. We need good quality housing that will last a long time, otherwise it is the leaky home saga repeated and a lot of taxpayer money wasted.
Yep. I …and many others, have said for years, that NZ should have been training our own NZ Apprentices..for NZ specific conditions. Of course with Tech/Innovative updates.
Taken a long time…but starting to happen. Needs way more support. These Guys and Girls will Vote…Cmon Labour. !
Using RBNZ methodology (which uses new electrical connections to allow for demolition and substitution) there were 33365 new completions,which is 10% higher then the mid 2000's quoted and when the NZ population was 15% less,so a lot of used car salesmanship here.
As most countries have had building booms,funded by low interest rates,high building rates caused by global demand for construction materials and high profits,there is now globally a decrease in house prices accompanying high interest rates,increases in inventory etc.
The real fact is they are still too expensive and the 20% decrease in house prices (rbnz forecast) may not be enough, to sustain 8-10% mortgages.
Whether the 2022 price decrease is 15 or 20%, it's blowing the froth off the last two years. From the current bankruptcy rate, most are coping.
The best response to the market power of Fletcher Building materials is a state housing builder that gets to 20% build market share. The Kainga Ora ambition hasn't abated, thankfully.
Also helpful is NZs immigration collapse, and little sign of a post-lockdown baby boomlet.
We are still a long, long way from the demolition of the FIRE economy, but this is a good start.
Housing corp debt has blown out to 7.8 billion,and increasing.When they start some renewals of loans the interest servicing costs will be greater then 20% of revenue,which is already struggling with increased council taxes.
Only shows that trying to right much of the housing market using SOE Act disciplines is fundamentally wrong.
Kiwirail and NZTA get regular shovel-loads of fresh taxpayer cash. As does the health system.
Building all these homes is good and well but Kainga Ora has a massive antisocial tenant problem. So they house people but the housing is often not so safe or suitable.
They call them people with "complex needs" as if the rest of their clients wound up on their door after a sweet deal and a sweet life. They re-traumatise the already downtrodden by doing nothing to protect clientele from sociopaths and gangs.
People have sold houses to get away from such clients. Tenants have no such option. Assault, rubbish tipping, vandalism, intimidation… living in fear is not living.
It might be complex, it's certainly not cricket.
Completely agree. Last year we sold our house which was next door to three brand new Kainga Ora family homes which had been occupied for about a year when we left.
All three families had plainly come from difficult circumstances and had some complex needs. Two families excellent neighbours and we were perfectly happy living next to them – no problem at all. The third family (thankfully the furthered away from us) were loud (music blasting at all hours), hostile, gang-affiliated, had people sitting outside in cars at all hours (we suspect small-time drug dealing), threw cigarette butts over the fence onto our property etc – a general lack of respect for the community.
Kainga Ora passes the buck by saying that they can't evict antisocial tenants because then those people will have nowhere to go so it is just "moving the problem". That is true, but it is also true that there's tens of thousands of people waiting for a state house right now who already have nowhere to go and I'd bet the majority of them are more like the first two families than the third. If an existing tenant repeatedly proves incapable of meeting the most fundamental social expectations, maybe give someone else a go?
Our experience was by no means as bad as some of the horror stories you hear. We didn't sell specifically to get away from the antisocial KO tenants (we were going anyway) but we were certainly glad to be rid of them when we moved.
It will come to a head as the prisons are emptied and those people are housed in the community. I see this organically. Its like a cancer, instead of retaining the social illness is now let out and infects everybody one way or another. There is no such thing as rehabilitation in a normal functioning community, the criminal just recruits more youngsters to their lifestyle and thus the problem (cancer) grows. Its pie in the sky, like tomorrows schools that is now leaving 30% functionally illiterate.
So DB what are the solutions to the social problems you outline?
I don't know Patricia it's not my responsibility it is Kainga Ora's. And from where I'm sitting they've failed a lot of people.
If one bad apple's spoiling the bunch the bunch should not be discarded.
I'm probably going to need a few weeks to answer this properly, if at all.
The concept of mixed housing seems sound. Place people mixed into the community. Integrate not separate. The problem lies in the sociopaths, not the bulk of KO clientele.
While basic human needs above and beyond food clothing and shelter are to belong and to contribute, some people simply don't want to belong or contribute, at all.
There might be a special place in hell for such people, but while they're still on earth???
Prison doesn't rehabilitate. But it also houses those who've refused rehabilitation.
Rehabilitation, integration… we try. We need more mental health services, wrap around services etc. But some people refuse all help except handouts.
There's only so many cheeks one can turn.
TBH I don't really give a dam about the anti social types. Offer them something remote. Leave them to it. They make life hell for decent people around them (very often other social housing tennants). The contract should be clear. Move in and if you cause problems you are out. A confidential 0800 number to dobe them in, although I suspect the powers that be know these people are anti social before they move in.
It would suck to have anyone's tenancy at the whim of other tenants feelings. There's some nasty busybodies out there too who'd love a hotline to hurt their neighbor for slights as large as parking outside or using empty space in the bins. And we've all had moments we'd rather forget.
But a tenancy manager should be aware of repetitive antisocial behavior and that is what's required to take action. Out of respect for the rights of everyone else.
Fair enough DB Brown. I don't care how its done and I take your point a hotline.
KO, like HNZ before it seems to be rubbish with bad tenants. And with WINZ now in charge of putting people into the houses it is even worse. I have several friends in KO housing, both long term tenants. One friend is an elderly African woman who came here as a refugee over 20 years ago, She lives in a duplex house. HNZ put a violent, racist drunk into the other half of the duplex and then did nothing about a number of complaints including letters to the Minister. Finally, the problem was solved by one of his drunken mates who hit him with a shovel and then set fire to his body on the front lawn.
Another case was living in the same block as a friend – he also terrorised the neighbourhood, and the social worker who was supposed to be providing support to him was also supplying him with alcohol and the occasional use of her body. Fortunately KO managed to find a family member who would take him in and he was moved on.
The main problem is not the accommodation, but the lack of the wrap around services that support people and protect the neighbours. Also, the lack of more supervised accommodation options.
You mean supporting the victims not the perpetrator? It would certainly send the right signal. Right now judges shake hands with people killing someone. What does that say?
Where to start? With the kids. But we cant use discipline to tasks, (no you cannot attack a teacher with a knife etc.. old concept this, cause and effect) its soooo politically incorrect. You reap what you sow.
Pretty much describes my elderly parents' situation for the last 4 and a half years … slightly different in that they own their house, have lived there for almost 60 years, nice, leafy community-minded street with beautiful sea-views, very socially-mixed (tending mildly toward lower income but not exactly "downtrodden") …
… but largely the same as you broadly outline in that their social housing neighbour's extremely violent intimidation & all-night in-your-face noise (essentially a kind of on-going domestic terrorism) has come close to killing each of my parents more than once (esp my mother), including in recent months (heart attacks, strokes immediately following violent multi-hour explosions, usually through the early hours of the morning – both inside on the other side of their dividing-wall and outside including running onto their property at 1, 2 or 3am & shouting a mix of threats & swearing, interspersed with a lot of gibberish).
Police have been rung multiple, multiple times over last 4 years, by concerned neighbours, by my parents & by me. Raised with a number of authorities … nothing gets done … he faces zero consequences for his behaviour so why the hell should he stop.
Basically, the Govt has destroyed the social contract with its tacit 'No Eviction' policy … fundamental break down of law and order (so often ridiculed by cowardly, self-regarding luvvies on this site intent on establishing their "unsually refined sensibilities" and "radical" credentials while courageously ensuring they're living as far away from the violence & mayhem they're enabling as possible) … the terrorization of people in their early 90s is apparently just fine.
Local Iwi now managing social housing in the area & have done precisely zero to help.
Brave New Woke World.
I'm so sorry they've been through all that.
I'm meeting with a KO tenancy manager and his manager tomorrow with regards to another difficult KO client. I'll be discussing that meeting with a lawyer.
If they can't help I'll certainly be sharing the story, and may be looking to start some form of class action if they continue to gaslight me. I've realised like you have, it's not just about me, how many others lives and homes are unsafe/insecure thanks to Kainga Ora's immutable tenant policy.
Question Swordfish….what would you like done about your parents situation?
Thanks for asking, Pat. Deserves a considered response … have a few major things to deal with at moment … but I'll respond here in next few days.
It seems that the experiment is to have an open prison amongst the population and perhaps some will rehabilitate. The price the general population pays is huge. Someone please get those wanna be sociologist off the government payroll.
The KO tenancy model is to pepper-pot KO homes interspersed with 'affordable' and 'market' homes, in new developments.
Which is a nice theory.
The problem with it, is, that owner-occupiers are (legitimately) wary of purchasing an apartment or terrace house next to a KO-owned home – with the possibility of an anti-social tenant as a neighbour – and the virtual certainty that, if this happens, KO will do nothing about it.
So, what actually happens is that the majority of these non-KO dwellings are sold to various social housing trusts – and you end up with what is effectively a social housing estate under another name.
Interesting. So the whole social experiment is laudable till we come once again to the problem of immutable tenants.
Law needs to change. As I said above:
If you have one bad apple, you don't discard the bunch.
My landlord and his supervisor arrived. The first thing she said was a lie. She had no mask, she was pushy, and she tried stare me down when I said I'll probably go to the courts anyway as I'm not the only person affected by this.
My anti-social problem had another KO house before the one next door. They moved him on when former neighbours were about to lynch him. Now, they're planning the same tactic, and will foist him upon another unsuspecting community. It's ridiculous, and criminal.
According to the residential tenancies act I have rights to quiet enjoyment without repetitive antisocial behaviour from others. They moved him here knowing exactly who/what he was. Now they're set to do it again.
We've seen some real estate adverts get slammed recently as prejudice ("No Kainga Ora Tenants in sight"). The antisocial clown ruining the peace on my street is white.
It takes all sorts to make a community, except those who refuse to be part of it.
"It is possible that within the next year New Zealand’s housing supply crisis will be resolved"…well I guess locally, we will know, if there isn't the constant flow of people (including lots of whole families) living in their cars/vans on Napier's waterfront this time next year won't we…however with Labours track record on these matters over the past couple of decades, I won't be holding my breath….but do I really really hope that I will have to eat my words on this one.
"however with Labours track record on these matters over the past couple of decades"
John Key: Homeless don't want help
Salvation Army: Key wrong on homeless visit
Good grief … John Key still living rent free in your head after all this time.
As sad as the people that still bang on about Helen Clark etc.
Looks like you missed the point higherstandard.
Well said Adrian. After the big Labour win in 2020 there were expectations even among some Torys of them smashing it regarding housing–but no–the Labour Caucus is neo Blairist to the core.
They seem unable to acknowledge that there are various alternatives to for profit developers, bent suppliers, and bludging Aussie bank mortgages.
Oh they can acknowledge those things just fine, but they (sadly for us) can't do anything about any of those things you rightly point out, because they are Third Way Free Market fundamentalists, so consequently cannot operate outside of the rigid ideological parameters that they (and National) have trapped themselves and unfortunately the whole country in.
But I know that you know all this already….
Turn Labour Left!
But I wonder how many more prime agricultural areas will be sold, subdivided and turned into housing estates whilst the price of fruit and veges steadily increases and the number of growers/suppliers steadily decreases?
Get with the program,they are building high rise apartments in an earthquake zone,at a million dollars a unit (excluding land leased from WCC)
All funded on debt.
As a home is supposed to provide shelter for 50 years plus, there is always debt.
Build anywhere in New Zealand you build on shaky ground.
At least they are trying to provide amenities and the community framework.
The Auckland Unitary Plan debated that at length.
What we will see is a lot more Northland farms convert to horticulture just to support Auckland and its export markets.
North of Kaitaia you can see ridgeline after ridgeline of Avocados. And right now they are cheap as chips. We'll see further expansion from Whangarei to Kaikohe as well.
That's got to be a plus, lowers our live stock emissions and still keeps jobs in the community, far better than the offset pines cluster.
Also minuses; those Avocados suck a bushel of water.
Are they always irrigated?
Water hungry crop for northland but if they design in some ponds it'd raise the land value, aesthetics, stability of the systems…
Love to see more variety, but I'm sure we will in time. And you certainly won't find me complaining when I make guacamole tomorrow night.
Not much of an export market now due to Australian glut.
The number of growers is decreasing mainly through the agglomeration into fewer and larger scale businesses.
Orchardists and vineyards seem happy to keep planting more vines and trees.
There's plenty of fruit – the price is kept high by the growers themselves – not a true supply and demand model at all.
Taylor said if he redirected his export apples to the local market it would be flooded. This would drive down price and destroy the businesses of growers who serviced only Kiwis.
And contrary to AD'S assertion the other day shipping was a problem. Other orchardists have said the same.
Ships bypassing Napier port because of the impact that Covid-19 had on labour in the shipping industry, and a lack of export containers, also affected profits of growers because a lot of apples could not be sent to market on time and had to be discarded, Taylor said.
Ha ha calling a $25 a wek rent raise a lowering in "real terms" is some of the most fantastic spin I've ever heard almost makes me wonder if the rest is bs as well.
New Zealand includes the smaller centres, cities and towns. These areas have not been addressed. They are invisible to all governments.
You mean like:
Nelson. Blenheim. Ashburton. Westport. Kaitaia. Whangarei. New Plymouth. Queenstown. Wanaka. Invercargill. Napier. So much CAPEX, so little time. Hmmm.
I mean like Kerikeri or Kawakawa or Kaikohe or even Kaeo. Where housing is substandard by any measure and the state sees no obligation to improve the lot of people living 14 to an old state house because there are no other options.
Absolutely. Up North is the first place in NZ I met people who lived in sheds, caravans…
They were amazing hosts considering they had no money or infrastructure. Such a gorgeous summer holiday.
The fact some of the elders lived in caravans didn't really sink in till that Winter. Not bloody good enough.
A nuanced look at a complex issue.
Using the US example (as HQ data is very available) as investors in Housing left the room (corporates came in and brought lots in high growth areas) and the FED jumbo hiked prices and inventory returned affordibility returned to norms.
The fly in the ointment is that the new build inventory has meant recession in previous cycles.
The shortage was never a physical shortage. While Labour have made some changes that have impacted at the margins they continue to refuse to address the driver (perhaps understandably)…it is worth noting the actions of the Gov that continue to support house prices at north of 8 times median incomes
Yes median incomes are TWO household incomes.
The old measure of house prices=3-4x median income was based on 1 income.
The ramping up of property prices has long term,enduring social consequences and Labour have not done ..enough.
God knows what property investor Cluxon has in store…for NZ if he becomes P.M.
Depends upon the slant the commenter wishes to place on it…the original affordability measure was single income but some use household income which is (obviously) more than single income.
It took thirty years of unrelenting neoliberal failure to create our housing crisis – I hardly think it will be resolved in the space of a year or two, however great the progress that may have been made in some areas.
41 000 houses would seem to be a solid start – but if we are going to use crude numbers, then they begin to turn positive when there is an appreciable rise in owner/occupiers, or a fall in rents of at least, say, $50 per week. In the absence of such indicators there is every reason to suppose that the crisis continues unabated.
" "If and when we reach balance this will be a cause for celebration. And then work needs to continue on repairing the damage caused by inflated house prices and too expensive rents "
This from Stephen Minto.
" Labour/Greens actions of supporting private enterprise with huge subsidies (tax breaks on interest) for ‘build to rent’ companies, and granting property developers power to bully build and override community democractic rights, shows the lack of courage and intellectual/economic insight in the centrist political pragmatism that dominates both these parties "
" The problem is; there are too many housing markets in New Zealand and they are all more profitable than building affordable housing "
" Prime Minister plays with red herrings while children sleep in cars "
This from John Minto.
The housing catastrophe (Salvation Army description) for tenants and families on low incomes has been thrown into sharp relief by the appalling statistics that more than 200 children are now living in cars because there are not enough state houses.
Under the Labour government this number has gone from 51 at the end of 2017, to 228 in June this year. Similarly, the number of people living in tents has also climbed from 21 at the end of 2017 to 84 in June this year.
Are we there yet?
The danger of an over supply of houses.
"If and when we reach balance this will be a cause for celebration….." MICKYSAVAGE
Hardly, more likely it will be this administration's biggest neo-liberal disaster yet.
Make no mistake about it.
If the question of unaffordability, resulting in unsold homes is not addressed the demolitions will start.
Ideally the government should enact legislation preventing the demolition of newly built or uncompleted new homes, on pain of confiscation.
At the very least the government needs to pass legislation to prevent Kiwibuild homes being demolished, as a condition of their sale.
Build it and they will come
I know for many the things this Government have done are deemed to be insufficient.
They should be recognised as trying to help right the housing problem.
What they did not see coming was the Pandemic of covid, the meth crisis and a war.
Yet strides have been made in spite of that.
Some Councils have provided poor support for their citizens. imo.
Patricia Bremner. Not to mention building supply constraints and tradie shortages after National slashed apprenticeships. Labour are working on that too, tens of thousands of kiwis are benefitting from Labour’s free apprenticeship program.
"10,000 more permanent public homes added under the Labour Government" is a phenomenal effort for less than 5 years. This number doesn't include kiwibuild. If memory serves, the Clark Labour led govt added 8,000 over 9 years.
Yep. For that one thing (there are many more ! ) I so rate Labour. nats slashed apprentices..Tradies headed off to to Aus. And nats brought in cheap immigrant trades workers..who basically had to be taught nearly everything anyway ! (FYI and I def support the poor Immigrant guys/gals who are getting screwed by unscrupulous employer scum)
Indeed how quick the clock would be turned back….if nact get back. Labour not perfect…(needs attention)..but so much better than nact alternative !
Not sure who's administering these claimed 10,000 houses since 2017 as KO's own stats show only 4,481 (including community and emergency/transitional)…..ghost houses??
The stats are in the link at 15.1
Somebody better tell KO they have around 6000 properties they arnt administering then.
KO know exactly what properties they are administering.
Do people know about the govt's interactive housing dashboard?
You would expect that they do….which is why it is somewhat odd their numbers dont match the Gov claims….and not by an insignificant amount, but thousands.
Where do you think the govt gets its KO figures from? and your link is dated 2021.
Dec 2021…do you imagine the gov have added 6000 units in the six months to their release?….especially when they added206 units in the 3 months to the end of March 2022.
I imagine the Gov get their figures from KO….what they do with them is another story….and they have form.
How do you reconcile the disparity?
There is a massive building program going on. The govt's figures are from KO. The housing dashboard has all the stats.
The govt have form? Got evidence to back up that statement?
"There is a massive building program going on. The govt's figures are from KO. The housing dashboard has all the stats'
There is a building programme underway, and not massive …but that dosnt answer why the claimed numbers dont in any way match KO own numbers.
"The govt have form? Got evidence to back up that statement"
Indeed they do, they have been pulled up a number of times, from kiwibuild, to child poverty, to tree plantings…..and on this specific topic…July last year
"So, how many new public housing spaces has the Government actually built out of the 7934 it has delivered since Labour came to power? The answer is 3716, fewer than half of the total amount. "
Am not sure what a link to the KO home page is supposed to support…especially when you appear determined to ignore the relevant KO statistics links provided….Kiwibuild had a similar promo page promising 100,000 affordable homes…..people cant live in a website any more than they can live in non existent state houses.
Talking about the NZ housing crisis is an old political 'game':
Crisis, or opportunity? Fudging housing data is also an old game:
This Govt seems to be moving in a better direction – no one’s perfect.
Ah that old trope…'they did it too'
Perfection isnt expected, however honesty is.
The basis of governance (without force) is trust….they do themselves (and us) a disservice when they persistently undermine that trust through their actions.
And then we wonder why trust is lacking?
There is a massive building program, it's just not on the books, you can see construction going on everywhere. Your link doesn't show the govt have form, if I recall correctly, that was debunked, not the first time media and Nicola Willis have got it wrong. Don't know what website you are looking at since Kiwibuild was reset a few years ago, it doesn't say what you claim, and it's still building, selling to first home buyers.
Why don't you ask KO to explain it to you?
"Figures released today by Stats NZ show all nine child poverty measures continuing to trend downwards resulting in 66,500 children being lifted out of poverty and the Government meeting the first round of child poverty targets on two of the three primary measures"
I haven't seen any media articles from Willis or the National party disputing the recent numbers of 10,037 additional public homes.
Pat, I dont think Drowsy M. Kram's response was "they did it too" and you assume the numbers have to be wrong, so, as suggested in another post, link provided, why don't you ask KO
"Your link doesn't show the govt have form, if I recall correctly, that was debunked, not the first time media and Nicola Willis have got it wrong"
We see what we want to see
"Bernie Smith, CEO of CHP Monte Cecilia, fears the change could force hundreds of families to remain homeless, because there simply isn't enough housing stock.
He says the change is expected to force over 200 families – totalling over 1000 people, 700 of whom are children currently in Monte Cecilia accommodation – to wait years in temporary housing for the Kāinga Ora build programme to catch up.
"When Labour came to power there were just over 67,000 state houses and a waitlist of 5000. Five years later, the state house numbers have grown by less than a 1000 while the public housing waitlist has soared to 24,000."
Im pretty sure Nicola Willis isnt moonlighting as Bernie Smith.
The facts are there for those who can add and read
KO stock 31/3/2017 64,068
KO stock 31/3/2022 68,765
KO stock 30/9/2015 67,198
KO stock 30/9/2017 63,209
Not enough of an increase after 5 years moving in a better direction.
I trust that the Gnats prefer tax cuts – time will tell.
It is true some will only see what they want to see.
"the state house numbers have grown by less than a 1000" is clearly wrong.
No mention that the National govt changed the criteria and removed people from the state housing wait list and made it harder for people to access it. The wait list under National was not a true reflection of the need during National's time in office.
Thousands to come off housing list
"State tenants who turn down the offer of a house without good reason could soon be dumped from the waiting list"
The Social Housing Reform Bill was passed into law…clearing the way for Housing New Zealand to shed up to 8000 homes
Like I have suggested, why don't you ask KO to explain it to you. I have provided a link.
Agree Louis and Drowsy M Kram.
Hi Patricia. More than some, sadly. Truth is a lot of Councils in NZ…(incl regional ) are majority conservative…if not actually true blue Nats.
So were never really going to help those less fortunate…..and even less under a commu..sociali…lef…Labour Govt. We have to keep trying. Good on you : )
“The good news is that we can turn the situation around. National has a plan for doing this and we will be resolute in our commitment to the goal of ensuring more young Kiwis can aspire to buy their own home.”
Well Key misrepresented a great deal and was a compulsive devious liar and was never interested in doing anything that was going to have any effect unless it lined the pockets of his mates and donors.
Yes, we on the Left are fighting Counterspin and those promoting selfish ideas of individuality over community. in every area.
We have to avoid white anting, and fight tooth and nail for promotion of the actual good being achieved. It will not help everyone, as some like Sharma have a self destruct button. imo.
This programme is like housework, never done. Perseverance and honesty is a feature of Megan Woods' work. Now the fruits are starting to arrive.
Snarky critics need to pause, look at their partisan motives and admit when efforts are being made. imo.
"Poised" for the last five years.
5 years is a very short time to bridge a whopping 71,000 housing shortfall left by the previous National govt. Phenomenal effort.
That lovely young Mr Key pointed out the problem very early on – expect Luxon will too.
“Wasn’t he fine? (Oh so fine)” "GREAT! Super."
And after John key said there was no housing crisis in Auckland, and Paula Bennett said there was no housing crisis in NZ, John key then turned round and blamed Helen Clark.