Written By:
mickysavage - Date published:
1:35 pm, May 6th, 2025 - 9 comments
Categories: Abuse of power, elections, electoral systems, human rights, national, paul goldsmith, Politics, same old national -
Tags:
I wonder if the recent announcement that National wants to take away voting rights from all prisoners is nothing more than a distraction from its real intent, screwing the electoral scrum by making it harder to vote for some of us.
A few weeks before the latest announcement Minister of Justice Paul Goldsmith announced that the Government intended to change the electoral law and adopt 23 recommendations that came from Parliament’s Justice Committee review of the 2023 election.
Goldsmith said:
Many of these recommendations are practical, like … amending the cut-off date for enrolments prior to polling day.”
This particular change has been on the drawing board for a while. After the 2023 election result Christopher Luxon expressed incredible frustration that the count had taken so long. He could not understand why it would take so long to complete the count, despite it always taking some time to make sure that all votes are valid and all votes are counted.
Parliament’s Justice Select Committee’s report report reviewing the 2023 election considered the question of election day enrolments.
National Party, New Zealand First, and ACT New Zealand members of the committee had proposed that the cut off date for enrolments be the day before election day.
About this the report records this response from Labour and the Greens:
The Labour and Green parties strongly oppose any restrictions on the ability to enrol, including any restrictions on same-day enrolment. We know that approximately 110,000 people either enrolled or updated their enrolment details on election day (over 3 percent of the total vote cast). This is a very significant number of votes that could affect the outcome of an election and the constitution of the government. We consider any restriction on enrolment to be an effective disenfranchisement. We are deeply concerned with any suggestion that there should be changes put in place making it harder for people to enrol and vote. We consider that efforts should be made in the opposite direction—exploring ways to enable automatic enrolment and automatic updating of the roll, and improving the accessibility of voting places and voting more generally for everyone.
The proposal has shades of Donald Trump about it.
In 2020 he famously wanted to stop the count of votes as a late surge effectively removed him from office. And Republican attacks on the right to vote are numerous including a sustained attack on same day voter registration.
If you want to maximise the number of people voting then same day enrolments are a no brainer. If you want to skewer things away from the poor and the young then you will remove it. Given that the poor and the young tend to vote left the intent behind this proposal is pretty clear.
There is pristine evidence to confirm this. After the postal and late enrollment votes were counted National lost two seats, Te Pati Maori picked up two seats and the Green Party picked up one. Obviously National and its partner parties want to stop or minimise this happening in the future.
Removing prisoner voting rights appears to be a pretext for what they really want to achieve, making it harder for ordinary people to vote to improve the right’s electoral prospects.
"After the 2023 election result Christopher Luxon expressed incredible frustration that the count had taken so long."
Oh the poor dear. Thin skin on a par with Donald.
Boohoo to Luxon. After this charade who in their right mind would vote that idiot back in.
Interesting that National is suddenly interested in electoral reform: but only but only when it restricts the franchise.
And all after declining to implement any of the major recommendations made by the Independent Electoral Review in 2024.
And 2014.
And 2012.
And 2011
Somehow, it's never too expensive to undermine the Bill of Rights and ban prisoners from voting. Again.
But letting citizens exercise their rights as citizens by enrolling and voting on the same day? Too much hassle and administrative overhead.
I guess democracy is just too darn expensive these days, kids.
Trump won the US election due to vote suppression tactics. This was legalized using literal Jim Crow era laws.
Trump Lost. Vote Suppression Won. – Greg Palast
They funded many a legal battle across the USA since 2016 to get voters removed one way or another, undermine DEI and generally push the culture wars hard.
Even before orange45 loomed large on the political scene access to polling stations in certain areas with the longer the queues the better being a tactic. Then try removing folk from that queue.
Micky get an up to date picture showing his growing paunch and disassociated stare.
Absolutely no chance that this coalition will agree to the Independent Electoral Commission's recommendations regarding political donations – limit donating to enrolled voters only, maximum donation over an electoral cycle of $30,000 (IIRC), etc.
Yeah, and it's not too hard to see that this restricts voting from a certain community–who may include people who aren't what Luxon thinks of as 'sorted', where with two jobs per adult and several kids, getting registered to vote isn't something you may have the leisure to do months or years ahead of time.
And some too may fall foul of this appalling voting ban on prisoners, among whom are a shocking proportion of Maori who got prison sentences where Pakeha who committed the same offence did not.
This coalition hasn't the remotest interest in serving the folks who need a government that cares. And they will tweak this, and fiddle that, to ensure that wherever possible, a government that cares is deprived of every vote that can be nulled out of existence.
Why does it feel like the right is on a global indicative to be angry little men with no thought for their voters have they not heard of revolution ?