National’s campaign to muzzle union continues

Written By: IrishBill - Date published: 4:14 pm, May 21st, 2008 - 139 comments
Categories: dpf, election funding, same old national - Tags: Electoral Commission, electoral law, epmu, national

It seems National has succeeded in the first step of its campaign to muzzle the EPMU and the fifty thousand workers it represents. Over at the bog our mate Davey is crowing about the high court win that recognises the union as a legal person for the purposes of the act. This still means that the Electoral Commission has to decide whether the union is sufficiently involved in the affairs of the Labour Party to be precluded from third-party registration or not but it certainly weakens their case.

There is going to be a lot of gloating from the right over this, but let’s be clear. Crown Law advice was that the EPMU was not a person and it’s clear as day that the EFA was never intended to exclude democratic organisations such as the EPMU from campaigning. This is a weak point of the law that has failed under heavy (and expensive) legal attack by National and it needs to be fixed.

National has repeatedly stated that it does not want the EPMU excluded from its democratic right to campaign for the rights of its members but just wanted to test the law. Given the fact that the EPMU has run aggressive and successful campaigns against National in the past, I don’t think that’s true. But if it is then I would say National better put its money where its mouth is and support an amendment to clear this issue up. I’m not holding my breath on that one.

In the meantime we’ll all just have to wait for the Electoral Commission’s decision.

139 comments on “National’s campaign to muzzle union continues ”

Comments are now closed

Bryan Spondre 1

21 May 2008 at 4:18 pm

And it is Nationals fault that Labour wrote and past bad law ? Yeah right!!!
mike 2

21 May 2008 at 4:22 pm

So “common sense” didn’t prevail then.
Hoolian 3

21 May 2008 at 4:23 pm

But Labour designed and sponsored the Bill.

Either the EFA is doing what its supposed to or the Bill is so flawed that even opponents of it can use it against the Govt.

IrishBill, your soooo lame.
Matthew Pilott 4

21 May 2008 at 4:27 pm

Hoolian, I think you’ll find many people agree parts of the law were poorly written.

There is a fair bit of daylight between your two very simplistic standpoints.

Do you support National’s effort to try and muzzle a 50,000 strong democratic organisation?

mike – ‘fraid not. Pity it took a cynical court case to make the point though.

Bryan – no one said that.
Tane 5

21 May 2008 at 4:27 pm

All law requires testing, and sometimes amending. National didn’t raise their concern that the EPMU could be muzzled and issue a press release offering to amend the law to make sure no unions were caught by it.

Instead, they used a proxy to whinge to the Electoral Commission, then when he failed used the vast resources of their big business backers to silence 50,000 New Zealand workers. Even after this decision I’m yet to see National offer to amend the law.

Why would they do this? It wouldn’t have anything to do with National wanting to silence one of its strongest and most effective critics, would it? We all know work rights is one issue where National is very weak – look at Bill English tying himself in knots over National’s plans for workers on Agenda on Sunday.

This whole thing stinks of National using its wealth and power to muzzle ordinary working New Zealanders. Those who defend National’s actions have shown where they really stand on democracy.
Robinsod 6

21 May 2008 at 4:28 pm

Hoolian – it’s “you’re” not “your”. I’d say that someone so retarded they can’t even understand writing is probably not going to grasp the subtleties of a legal argument.

Mike – no common sense didn’t prevail. National’s team of high priced lawyers prevailed. Now that’s what I call democracy.

Bryan – the 1993 electoral act was just as bad but it didn’t have a cynical oppositions throwing vast wads of cash into attacking its every minor flaw.
killinginthenameof 7

21 May 2008 at 4:28 pm

I heard on the radio in passing that Davies friends the Sensible Sentacing Trust and Family Fist are also co complainants? any substance to this?
milo 8

21 May 2008 at 4:30 pm

This is what happens when you ram through partisan legislation in the face of massive criticism and opposition. “Full speed ahead and damn the torpedos” sometimes leads to bad consequences, you know.

I even commented on this blog, before the EFA was passed, that the bill would be turned against its sponsors, and that you should be ready for election-year lawsuits.

It gives me little joy to be proved right. This is a bad law.
Bryan Spondre 9

21 May 2008 at 4:32 pm

“It seems National has succeeded in the first step of its campaign to muzzle the EPMU and the fifty thousand workers it represents.” Surely it is the Electoral Finance Act that is muzzling the EPMU ? Unless you are saying the High Court is somehow in the pocket of the National Party ?
Tane 10

21 May 2008 at 4:32 pm

I heard on the radio in passing that Davies friends the Sensible Sentacing Trust and Family Fist are also co complainants? any substance to this?

I understand they’re party to John Boscawen’s claim that the EFA breaches the Bill of Rights.
Robinsod 11

21 May 2008 at 4:35 pm

It gives me little joy to be proved right. This is a bad law.

The last one was just as badly written but it wasn’t put up at a time there was a well oiled, well funded and viciously cynical opposition campaign machine running.
Tane 12

21 May 2008 at 4:37 pm

This is what happens when you ram through partisan legislation in the face of massive criticism and opposition.

Possibly. More likely it’s what happens when you pass legislation stopping National from rorting election campaigns with big money.

I even commented on this blog, before the EFA was passed, that the bill would be turned against its sponsors, and that you should be ready for election-year lawsuits.

So did this blog. National has a lot of money but no way to spend it. What better way than buying high-priced lawyers to gag your opponents and score some free PR points? Bear in mind as well that Labour and its Parliamentary allies passed the EFA – the unions potentially affected by this didn’t.
Bryan Spondre 13

21 May 2008 at 4:40 pm

Tane: “Labour and its Parliamentary allies passed the EFA – the unions potentially affected by this didn’t.” Surely Labour and the Unions are so closely entangled they are effectively the same thing ?
Whaleoil 14

21 May 2008 at 4:41 pm

Their voice isn’t silenced, they can stand on the street corner just like anyone else, just their right to buy $120,000 of speech in one big lot.

Where have I heard those arguments before, that’s right from here on why the much vaunted law was going to stop the eviiiiiil Brethren from saying anything again.

Face facts fools, it isn’t about free speech it is about compliance with YOUR law. You guys supported, you campaigned for and your sponsor-party put it through with the barest majority possible.

Suck it boys, suck it up, there is more hurt to come.

[Tane: Whale, so thick you have to misrepresent arguments to make your point. No one who supported the bill said organisations should be forbidden to spend money campaigning, or restricted to anywhere near as low as $12,000.]
Robinsod 15

21 May 2008 at 4:42 pm

Surely Labour and the Unions are so closely entangled they are effectively the same thing ?

We’ll have to wait for the Electoral Commission to decide that. Just as an aside Bryan, have you noticed what I did to your site yet?
Tane 16

21 May 2008 at 4:44 pm

Surely Labour and the Unions are so closely entangled they are effectively the same thing ?

You obviously don’t know a lot about Labour or unions. Farrar is playing on your ignorance – try to have some self-respect.
Nick C 17

21 May 2008 at 4:46 pm

“Do you support National?s effort to try and muzzle a 50,000 strong democratic organisation?”

“What better way than buying high-priced lawyers to gag your opponents and score some free PR points?”

Thats just such a stupid way to frame the arguement. Clearly national has every right and a responcibility to ensure that the law is being applied properly to all participants, no matter how many members they have. The fact that the law labour wrote is so crap only makes your position so much more shakey. The real question here is whether the high court made the correct desision.

[Tane: Interestingly though, they’re only targeting their critics, and one of their most effective ones at that. Where’s National’s test case against the Free Speech Coalition or Sensible Sentencing?]
Robinsod 18

21 May 2008 at 4:48 pm

[a_y_b: Woah there Sod. Deleted.]
Hoolian 19

21 May 2008 at 4:50 pm

Hoolian – it’s “you’re’ not “your’. I’d say that someone so retarded they can’t even understand writing is probably not going to grasp the subtleties of a legal argument.

Dude, take a chill pill. Whoops, a tiny, small discrepancy but it doesn’t change a thing of what I said. To be frank, I don’t expect someone who insults people over grammar to be much of a legal expert either.

Possibly. More likely it’s what happens when you pass legislation stopping National from rorting election campaigns with big money.

And look it stopped Labour playing with big money too! Neat, huh?

Surely Labour and the Unions are so closely entangled they are effectively the same thing ?

Why yes, if you want to be a member of EPMU then you are automatically a member of the Labour Party which is retarded. Its like saying if you want to run a business then you must be part of ACT, or if you want to grow organic carrots, then a membership to the Greens is expected. Absurd! But what else can we expect?
erikter 20

21 May 2008 at 4:51 pm

“This whole thing stinks of National using its wealth and power to muzzle ordinary working New Zealanders.”

Tane, could you please stop being disingenuous?

The EFA was and is a bad piece of legislation. The High Court has ruled and it’s now the Electoral Commission’s turn to review its initial decision.

The fact that the National Party was the complainant does not alter the fact that the same law written, sponsored and rammed through Parliament by the Labour Party is now being used to shut the EPMU’s voice.

A dismal legislative failure of this socialist government.
Lew 21

21 May 2008 at 4:52 pm

This blow to the EPMU pains me, but it’s a government own-goal. If you pass law, you need to be prepared to live with it. The blame rightly lies at the feet of those who drafted the EFA. The EPMU should be furious about this one, at the government for drafting weak law, not at National for exploiting its weakness.

That said, I think the question of whether the EPMU is materially involved in the running of the Labour party is self-evident, and the Electoral Commission should find in their favour and name them a third party.

L
Matthew Pilott 22

21 May 2008 at 4:53 pm

Nick C, it’s not a poor way to frame a question just because you don’t like the implications. As explained above, there are numerous other avenues to ensure the law is correct. The avenue National chose was to muzzle a 50,000 strong democratic organisation.

If you don’t like the question, perhaps you should reconsider what you think of the people that made me ask it.

Do you support national’s attempt to muzzle a 50,000 strong democratic organisation? Or perhaps do you think they sould have pursued another method for ensuring the electoral law was correct?

I’ll put it to you this way: Do you think National would have taken the same court case against the Business Round Table, if the other circumstances were the same?
Lew 23

21 May 2008 at 4:54 pm

Matthew Pilott: I expect Labour might have. And they’d have been entitled to do so.

L
Nick C 24

21 May 2008 at 4:56 pm

“Possibly. More likely it’s what happens when you pass legislation stopping National from rorting election campaigns with big money.”

Thats a seperate arguement altogether, but what you did there was suggest that its ok that for the law to be poorly written, confused and have many unintended side effects so long as it clamps down on your political opponents. Well done Stalin.
Robinsod 25

21 May 2008 at 4:58 pm

Why yes, if you want to be a member of EPMU then you are automatically a member of the Labour Party which is retarded

Um no what’s retarded is getting shit like this wrong. If you are a member of the EPMU (or any affiliate) you can be a member of the Labour party if you chose to be and pay no party membership. I should know because I used to be an EPMU member.

erik – sorry bro but there is a lot of legislation that has weaknesses in it and there always has been and most of it works just fine because nobody spend tens of thousands of dollars challenging it. If National had not spent big money putting strain on this clause the intention of the act would still be intact.
Tane 26

21 May 2008 at 4:59 pm

And look it stopped Labour playing with big money too! Neat, huh?

What big money? And how is it Labour’s? National has merely silenced a democratic organisation from campaigning for the rights of its members.

Why yes, if you want to be a member of EPMU then you are automatically a member of the Labour Party which is retarded.

Again, so ill-informed. Members of affiliate unions are entitled to the benefits of Labour membership if they wish. They are not members of the Labour Party.

Nor is it ‘retarded’ or ‘absurd’. Read up on the history of the party and why it exists in the first place. Here’s a hint: it’s in the name.

Tane, could you please stop being disingenuous?

Except that National does have motivation to muzzle the EPMU and that’s, funny enough, the very organisation it decides to target. Why is that?

[captcha: ‘critical Pierson’, I kid you not]
randal 27

21 May 2008 at 5:00 pm

I think the EPMU will have found the correct response by the time of the election. anyway they unlike the National Party and the EB’s were never involved in anonymous campaigns to buy elections
barnsleybill 28

21 May 2008 at 5:02 pm

Confusion reigns.
Remind me again who it was that drafted and introduced the applicable law that caused this muzzling of the epmu.
I Have immense respect for you guys at the standard. Fighting to the last man under insurmountable odds.
A modern day Custers last stand. This entire debacle had it’s genesis in Heather Simpsons bullying of parliamentary services to approve the labour party’s plundering of the public purse.
The end game has begun.
I look forward to the day that the incoming government ends forever the dodgy money go round between the government and the unions.
And on a different note we may have reached the terrible milestone of 2000 announced redundancies for the month today.
Perhaps we can all hope that todays decision will hasten the day that Phill Goff and Andrew Little can work together to restore labour to the point where our parents and grandparents (who all voted Labour) will stop spinning in their graves at what Helen and Heather have done to what was the workers party rather than it’s current incarnation as the party workers party.
CAPTCHA survived mrs
Tane 29

21 May 2008 at 5:02 pm

The EPMU should be furious about this one, at the government for drafting weak law, not at National for exploiting its weakness.

Lew, all law can be challenged on interpretation. National saw what they thought was a loophole that would let them silence their opposition and went to town with high-priced lawyers. If they really cared about free speech National would have raised the issue and offered to amend the legislation. Instead they chose to try and silence their opponents and take great pleasure in doing so. Why do you think that is?
Nick C 30

21 May 2008 at 5:04 pm

“I’ll put it to you this way: Do you think National would have taken the same court case against the Business Round Table, if the other circumstances were the same?”

Interesting hypothetical. Firstly the BRT has no involvement whatsoever with any party on an admin level.

Secondly I dont think so, because Labour would beat them to it. And they would have every right to. Theres nothing wrong with taking someone to court in order to apply a law, so long as you have a case. Clearly the high court decided National did.
Whaleoil 31

21 May 2008 at 5:04 pm

Yes I am sure they would take such action unfortunately though the President of the BRT isn’t a candidate for National or any other party, none of the members of the executive of the BRT sit on any branch, board or decision making team of the National Party. Given that I would suspect such a legal action would be considered vexatious and fivilouos but the court.

Now about the EPMU and Labour….well join the dots

President is candidate
EPMU is affliate
Nat Sec on board of party
50,000 members also members by affliation of Labour…..hmmmm wonder where that will go
sean14 32

21 May 2008 at 5:05 pm

Tane –

Even after this decision I’m yet to see National offer to amend the law.

The government didn’t need National to pass the law, surely it doesn’t need it to amend the law?

This whole thing stinks of National using its wealth and power to muzzle ordinary working New Zealanders.

Are you saying that the High Court is in the pocket of the National Party?

It beggars belief that you object to the law of the land, as passed by the government of the day, being enforced by the courts. The Standard? More like no standards.
barnsleybill 33

21 May 2008 at 5:08 pm

And on another note. How many of us are getting heartily sick of the poster who calls himself LEW being so smart. Every time he posts my brain grows a little bit. Lew please stop being smart and right about everything, you are adding gravitas and respectability to a blog that does not deserve it.

[lprent: now that is a really smart back-handed compliment. See – Lew’s treatment is working already.]
Nick C 34

21 May 2008 at 5:11 pm

“If they really cared about free speech National would have raised the issue and offered to amend the legislation. Instead they chose to try and silence their opponents and take great pleasure in doing so. Why do you think that is?”

I think you are applying a double standard to national that you would never in a million years apply to Labour. National tried to make dozens of ammendments to the EFA but they were all turned down stupid. Would you really exepect Labour to do that if the sides were flipped? No, you would be furious.
Bryan Spondre 35

21 May 2008 at 5:13 pm

Tane: “We know that there is much still to do and that the party and the CTU have a range of new policies we want to see actioned this year and in the next Parliamentary term.” http://union.org.nz/policy
Lew 36

21 May 2008 at 5:18 pm

Tane: I agree that National’s actions aren’t charitable here – but why should they be? The EFA was passed despite much wailing and gnashing of teeth by National, and widespread predictions of just this sort of thing happening.

Perhaps if the government had compromised and made some significant amendments in response to National’s wishes they could have expected National to `go easy’ on them in the courts. They didn’t and now they (and unfortunately the EPMU, who are the innocent party in this all) are paying the price. A prudent government would have made certain this wasn’t possible. Crown Law seem to have dropped the ball on this one.

I do agree it’s bad, and there’s a black irony to it, but it’s surely not unexpected.

L

Captcha: `cocktail scout’. Hooray!
Robinsod 37

21 May 2008 at 5:19 pm

Hey Cameron. When you tried to rip off the tax payer and your other creditors did your dad bail you out? It’s just it looks like the liquidator never followed up on a pretty clear-cut case so I’m assuming you settled. Oh and how are things with the Staples?
Tane 38

21 May 2008 at 5:19 pm

The government didn’t need National to pass the law, surely it doesn’t need it to amend the law?

No, National opposed it tooth and nail, on the face of it because of their dislike of its drafting, but more substantively because it meant they could no longer buy elections with the ease they used to.

And of course, they’re not going to offer an amendment. But they’ll sure raise hell as soon as Labour or the Greens try to do so themselves.

Are you saying that the High Court is in the pocket of the National Party?

No, I’m pointing out that the National Party’s motives in this case are not pure – in an election year they are trying to silence some of their opponents on a issue where they are weak. They have chosen deliberately to take this course of action when there were others available. Now we have the Orwellian prospect of a party claiming it’s saving free speech by crushing it.
Tane 39

21 May 2008 at 5:21 pm

Bryan: Yes, the CTU works with the Labour Party, just as a range of community and business organisations do. And it’s not even affiliated. In any case, so what?
Tane 40

21 May 2008 at 5:28 pm

The EFA was passed despite much wailing and gnashing of teeth by National, and widespread predictions of just this sort of thing happening.

Except that it’s actually the National Party doing this, not some abstract agent they’d predicted might get litigious. They’re not sitting back laughing, they’re actually doing it, and to an innocent party at that.

I’m not sure how National or anyone else can defend muzzling free speech in the name of protecting free speech when numerous other options were open to them.
Ali 41

21 May 2008 at 5:29 pm

And you’re claiming that national is trying to muzzle free speech?! How outrageous! Who passed the efa again?
Nick C 42

21 May 2008 at 5:33 pm

Tane 2 points:

Firstly you missed the point on your first responce, clearly the question is whether National has some sort of obligation to offer an ammendment to the law, rather then take Labour to court. Of course not, National are not the govt (although they will be on the latest poll numbers), its not their job to make laws! Why should national show mercy to Labour and change the few parts of the law that disadvantage them, letting them off the hook when that same law is spesifically designed to crush national?

Secondly what are the alternatives (other then changing the law)? Its Labour who crushed free speech by making this law. When it is said that North Korea has no free speech do we blame the leaders like Kim Jong Il who make the law, or the army who follow it? Of course its the law makers who we blame.
Scribe 43

21 May 2008 at 5:35 pm

Tane,

Yep, this is outrageous. A court of law interpreting legislation!!! Call the UN.

If Labour had taken a case against the Business Roundtable or â€” gasp â€” the Exclusive Brethren and there had been the same result, this would have been legislation working as designed. Because it’s the other way around, it’s an absolute travesty of justice.
higherstandard 44

21 May 2008 at 5:39 pm

I can’t believe you chaps didn’t see this coming after the number of commentators who have repeatedly pointed out that this was hastily put together poorly conceived legislation
randal 45

21 May 2008 at 5:40 pm

by your logic nic c the National Party would be right at home in north korea. serioulsy the EPMU is not going to resile from anything and according to Andrew Little on the news just now they intend to carry out the campaign on workers rights they had already planned right up to the election. good on them. workers rights left up to national means no rights as all.
Robinsod 46

21 May 2008 at 5:44 pm

HS – I repeat this: there is a lot of legislation that has weaknesses in it and there always has been and most of it works just fine because nobody spend tens of thousands of dollars challenging it. If National had not spent big money putting strain on this clause the intention of the act would still be intact.

The thing is bro, legislation is an attempt to taxonomise the infinite possibilities of the real world. The reason most law works is there is a consensus based around the spirit of the law. National has done all it can and spent a lot of money to attack that model for political ends. This will come back to bite them.
Scribe 47

21 May 2008 at 5:45 pm

higherstandard,

I can’t believe you chaps didn’t see this coming after the number of commentators who have repeatedly pointed out that this was hastily put together poorly conceived legislation

Heck, National warned them too, but Labour kept talking about how “the law of common sense” would apply. The law of the law has been applied.

The irony that National didn’t want this law, then Labour forced it on the country, and now Labour suffers the consequences, is delicious.

Robinsod,

This will come back to bite them.

I doubt that. Have a nice evening.
higherstandard 48

21 May 2008 at 5:48 pm

Yes RS

National is exploiting the flaws in the law for their own political purposes just as Labour passed the legislation for their own political purposes in the first place – such as punishing the exclusive bretheren and also to tilt things in their own favour during election year.

And I agree the reason most law works is there is a consensus based around the spirit of the law – in this case there never was and there never will be.
Rex Widerstrom 49

21 May 2008 at 5:52 pm

Of course National’s hands aren’t entirely clean, and there are probably some within the party who would be delighted if the EPMU were actually silenced as a result of this. Whoever they are, they’re as much enemies of free speech as the people who drafted, defended and voted for this iniquitous piece of legislation. Sad to say, some of those people I once counted as friends and a handful I used to admire.

But there are no doubt others within National who are simply taking great delight in the fact that the end result of all of this may be that Labour is faced with a choice between sacrificing the EPMU’s legitimate right to political engagement or repealing this travesty; between the rights of a union becoming “collateral damage” in their attempts to muzzle opposition, or an embarrassing back-down.

Labour and its allies should real this law fortwith and replace it with a simple piece of legislation requiring full disclosure. That’s all that’s needed, because the NZ populace aren’t stupid. I don’t care how much money you throw at me, I couldn’t devise a political campaign that convinced enough of them to back something that was fundamentally against their best interests, particularly if they knew who was paying for it… and I doubt anyone else could, either.

To go beyond disclosure and try to cherry pick who can spend what to say what about whom invites just this sort of mess. The proponents of this law (who, as Tane points out, wasn’t just Labour but didn’t include the unions) are reaping what they’ve sown, so a degree of schedenfreude amongst those of us who opposed it from the outset, while not perhaps our finest moment, is at least understandable.
Nick C 50

21 May 2008 at 5:53 pm

Randal I was merely trying to prove with that analogy that Labour, being the people who made this law are the ones obstructing free speech, not the people who applied the law in the high court.

I absolutely support the EPMU’s right to campaign on workers rights. Perhaps you should ask yourself this: which of the two main parties passed the law that is now obstructing the EMPU’s right to campaign? National is merely trying to ensure that the law is applied consitently and fully.
Daveski 51

21 May 2008 at 5:53 pm

Talk about LMAO.

The courts are wrong.

DPF is wrong.

The Nats are wrong.

Isn’t is strange that everyone is wrong EXCEPT for Labour and the law?

Why doesn’t someone come with the Labour’s Always Right Even When It’s Wrong Act … you’d have to be worried about the ability to draft it tho!

Still LMAO
higherstandard 52

21 May 2008 at 5:59 pm

Rex W

Perfect pragmatism.

Labour and its allies should repeal this law fortwith and replace it with a simple piece of legislation requiring full disclosure.

Agreed absolutely.
AncientGeek 53

21 May 2008 at 5:59 pm

hs: There never is in electoral law. There have always been challenges to it in the courts whenever it is changed.

The only thing that is different this time is the 3rd party provisions being done before an election. Usually it is done after the election.

But we’d expect the Nat’s to try to make side-issues the focus of the election campaign. Means that they don’t have to do anything substantive about policy. What was that old roman thing – to avoid politics amongst the masses, provide bread and circuses. The current equivalent is taxcuts and shallow soundbites.

The act was always going to get challenged. But it is still good law. I’m sure that the Electoral Commission will uphold the EPMU’s right to become a 3rd party. I’m also sure that the Nats or someone will haul that decision back to court again.

It is basically pointless amending the act until the legal battle subsides. The judges will show the way if any improvements are needed.

BTW: Has anyone any idea when the EC will rule again?
Nick C 54

21 May 2008 at 6:00 pm

“The reason most law works is there is a consensus based around the spirit of the law.”

We are talking about a law here that was passed for one reason: To hurt national. That is its only ‘spirit’.

Perhaps National should follow the spirit of the law by hurting itself. But either way this is just Annette’s stupid “law of common sense” which is so flawed in another guise.
AncientGeek 55

21 May 2008 at 6:05 pm

NC:

We are talking about a law here that was passed for one reason: To hurt national.

Bullshit. If you don’t understand the issues that caused a majority in parliament to vote for the bill, then perhaps you should find out.
higherstandard 56

21 May 2008 at 7:06 pm

AG

No don’t divert the issue the bill was designed by Labour for their own political purposes not out of the goodness of their heart and a sense of fair play.
Shaneo 57

21 May 2008 at 7:30 pm

Bad luck guys. You thought the EFA was next best thing since sliced bread. Well its not – it muzzles free speech and now the consequenses are yours to live with.
AncientGeek 58

21 May 2008 at 7:44 pm

hs: As far as I’m concerned the act was designed to fix the following flaws in the 1993 act (in my order of relevance with examples of each problem):-

1. recognize that the MMP campaign period was longer than 90 days (nationals billboards)
2. ensure that third parties had to register with the electoral commission if they wanted to campaign in the election. (brethren)
3. tighten up on the use of electoral offices for campaigning (these had become much better funded because they’re effectively becoming social work offices of the final resort).
4. deal with the accounting issues raised against all parties by the AG and EC after the 2005 election.
5. tighten up on the accounting for party campaigns (several court cases since 1996 have shown parts of the act to be ambiguous on the electorate limits)

The political parts of the bill largely got shed during select committee and inter-party negotiation.

What is wrong with each of these? What would have you done for each of them?
AncientGeek 59

21 May 2008 at 7:49 pm

There are a number of other things I would have liked to have in there. For instance a requirement for parties to report their spending commitments on a month by month basis to the EC, including copies of the paperwork. The EC to provide these online for public scrutiny.

Completely abolish blind trusts.

etc..
sweeetd 60

21 May 2008 at 7:51 pm

Oh come on, the EFB is an ass. It was all about getting even with the EB’s.

A simple ‘must disclose’ statment would have fixed all the problems with the EB’s ’05 campaign.

Labour et al lost today due to a poor drafted bill rushed through at haste.
KenS 61

21 May 2008 at 7:54 pm

This is terrible news! I hope they change the law to exempt the uinions because I think unions wanted an exemption when the law was being considered.

Here’s hoping Labour finds some way around this case to get the unions and workers’ voices out and heard. Without union help we are in real trouble.
randal 62

21 May 2008 at 7:55 pm

I dont want to be at Natoinal HQ on the night they lose the election!
illuminatedtiger 63

21 May 2008 at 7:59 pm

Question:

Why can’t the Free Speech Coalition Trust be struck off as a third party in light of David Farrar’s connections to the National Party as both their pollster and operator of their blog?
sweeetd 64

21 May 2008 at 8:00 pm

AncientGeek, “Bullshit. If you don’t understand the issues that caused a majority in parliament to vote for the bill, then perhaps you should find out.”

What, Labour and its patsys??!? This was and always has been about the EB’s, a private organistion, having the gall to oppose labour. That is what annoyed labour. Dress it up anyway you want AncientGeek, it still looks the same.
higherstandard 65

21 May 2008 at 8:05 pm

Randal if you’re dressed as you are in your atavar methinks you are more likely to be at Rainbow Labour HQ than at the Nats on election night.

AG Think we’ll have to agree to disagree on this while I an sure each of your points was raised during the select committee briefings I’m still of the belief that the primary reason for the EFB was a vindictive one and that as Rex suggests as long as there is full disclosure about where the money’s coming from to pay for electioneering and there’s rules in place for how much everyone can spend who really cares
burt 66

21 May 2008 at 8:05 pm

Hands up all the people here who have defended the EFA, defended the partisan way it was drafted, defended the passing of it under urgency and defended it’s intentions to stop parallel campaigns?

Now all of you with your hands up – wipe your noses and go to the front of the class, don’t take your books you’ll all be down the back again shortly once the EPMU are through abusing you for supporting this miserable piece of legislation simply because Labour created it. The short bus will be along soon to take you to the 9th floor for a debrief and communal tears in the coffee session.

What really makes me laugh though is the way you apologists frame it – you supported it, you supported Labour passing it under urgency, you laughed at and ridiculed people opposing it and warning against it’s consequences and now you blame National & DPF for this outcome – who slapped you all with the I’m a victim stick?
higherstandard 67

21 May 2008 at 8:07 pm

sweetd

From memory the EB had a go at the Greens as well as Labour as it was they pretty much f’d it up for National who without the ensuing shambles probably would have got in at the last election.
burt 68

21 May 2008 at 8:09 pm

higherstandard

The EB also acted entirely within the law as it stood at the time – the same cannot be said for the muppets that drafted this ridiculous EFA.
Sceptic 69

21 May 2008 at 8:10 pm

The Electoral Commission next meets on June 12 so that will probably be when the EPMU matter is considered again.

Illuminated tiger – In principle there is no reason why the Free Speech Coalition Trust couldn’t be struck off. You’d have to show that the Trust meets the test of “being involved in the administration of the affairs of the Party”. Farrar’s case relies on the fact that the EPMU as an affiliate is constitutionally recognised by the Labour Party Rules and that they have delegate rights on a number of committees because of that affiliate status. As far as I’m aware there isn’t anything in the National Party Constitution which recognises the Free Speech Coalition Trust nor provides them with any rights on National Party committees.

Under your suggestion you’d also have to prove that kiwiblog is National’s blog – which may be quite difficult as all this is based on is repeated rhetoric on this blog and other such blogs.

You’d also be suggesting that by acting as someone’s pollster (ie providing a service) you become involved in the administration of the affairs of a party. That would be a dangerous precedent as it would suggest that other service providers to political parties (their accountants, lawyers for example) would also be prevented from being a third party because they entered a contract to provide services to a political party.
AncientGeek 70

21 May 2008 at 8:10 pm

SD: The EB’s campaign was bad news alright. They did not do the correct attribution, yes.

But worse was that they had no requirement to account for the money they spent campaigning during the campaign period, whereas all political parties did.

Worse again, there was no requirement for them to show their sources of finance.

Both of the latter showed up some terrible holes in the 1993 Act.

Similarly, the National party ran most of their spending outside the campaign period in their billboard campaign starting in April 2005. None of that was required under the 1993 Act to be publicly transparent. Yet it was clearly campaigning and cost a bomb, and violated the intent of the 1993 Act – read the intents at the start of the act.

Similarly most parties ran blind trusts, especially the Nat’s, so the sources of finance for the election campaign were deliberately hidden. Again this violates the intent of the 1993 act.

As I said – if you don’t understand the issues with the 1993 act, then you hardly understand the 2007 act either.
burt 71

21 May 2008 at 8:14 pm

AncientGeek

Apparently all you need is a little common sense to understand the 2007 ACT – but tell that to Labour, Trevor Mallard and the EPMU and see what sort of reaction you get.

Labour have squarely shot themselves in the foot trying to tilt the playing field in their favour, sadly that’s the state of it in a nutshell.
higherstandard 72

21 May 2008 at 8:15 pm

Regarding acting within the law true Burt very true
Sceptic 73

21 May 2008 at 8:15 pm

Also Ancient Geek – one of the main things in the Electoral Finance Act is the definition of election advertising in section 5. What constitutes election advertising is crucial because it decides whether or not your advertising is subject to the EFA. If your ads fall outside that definition then you’re generally not subject to it.

Do you believe that this definition is a clear or good definition or do you agree with the Electoral Commission Chief Executive that “the definition of an election advertisement was still “a large grey area”” http://www.nzherald.co.nz/topic/story.cfm?c_id=286&objectid=10511422&pnum=2

Having a definition crucial to EFA issues still very unclear 6 months into election year seems like a fairly crucial error on Labour’s behalf.
Billy 74

21 May 2008 at 8:17 pm

Similarly most parties ran blind trusts, especially the Nat’s, so the sources of finance for the election campaign were deliberately hidden. Again this violates the intent of the 1993 act.

This does not violate the intent of the 1993 Act. The point was that anonymity was OK so long as it was anonymity from the party receiving the donation. It was an offence against that Act to disclose the identity of the anonymous donor. In fact, anonymity was a goal of the old legislation. Quite the reverse of how you represent it, AG.
burt 75

21 May 2008 at 8:20 pm

Sceptic

You won’t get much traction on this blog using phrases like “crucial error on Labour’s behalf” – this is all DPF’s and National’s fault – If they had just hung up their campaign intentions and sat quietly waiting for Labour to spend millions of tax payers dollars then none of this would have happened. It’s not fair when Labour need to follow the laws they made for others – it’s got to be somebody else’s fault, the victim mentality of their supporters can’t exists in an environment of being responsible for their own predicament.
illuminatedtiger 76

21 May 2008 at 8:25 pm

Their pollster and party member.
burt 77

21 May 2008 at 8:33 pm

rOb

If you are around, this is an interesting turn of events. I must say you did seem to have it nailed first time around but it appears that greater legal minds than your’s have had the final say.

What now? Do you think the EPMU will continue with it’s planned campaign and Labour will simply count the EPMU spending in it’s own returns? – isn’t this what Labour said the EB & National should have done?
George Darroch 78

21 May 2008 at 8:43 pm

Well, can’t say I have sympathy here for either the EPMU or the Labour Party. If they want to work with each other, well and dandy, but they can’t then claim they’re independent parties under the law.
AncientGeek 79

21 May 2008 at 9:01 pm

hs:

Think we’ll have to agree to disagree on this while I an sure each of your points was raised during the select committee briefings

They were as far as I’m aware. That is why there was sufficient support to pass the legislation.

Sceptic:

Do you believe that this definition is a clear or good definition or do you agree with the Electoral Commission Chief Executive that “the definition of an election advertisement was still “a large grey area’

Good question – I don’t know. It wasn’t an area that I looked at because it didn’t really impact at ground level (where I campaign) last time. It is impacting this time, but it is mainly a matter of getting things labelled. The biggest hassle has been getting a definitive answer about exactly what has to be done. But that process is getting close to finishing now that the EC has made some rulings. It is a minor issue.

The Electoral Commission next meets on June 12 so that will probably be when the EPMU matter is considered again.

Ok. Assuming a month or two before the court hears it again (I’m assuming that it will be appealed again), then there should be time for the EPMU to get a decision and decide what they will do well before the election. There are several strategies I can think of off-hand.

it: Skeptic is correct. The affiliated unions were always going to have the hardest time under this law. Thats why there will be a lot of interest in whatever judgment comes out of it. However that was an inevitable consequence of the law mets historic ties. That was always going to be an area that would have to be determined by the courts. Otherwise it left the door open for all sorts of interesting organizational schemes.

Billy:

In fact, anonymity was a goal of the old legislation. Quite the reverse of how you represent it, AG.

Quite correct – I stand corrected.

I think, and by the sound of it most people on this thread think, that was a bloody stupid idea. It was the thinnest of chinese walls because there was absolutely no way of enforcing the intent. All it took was a quiet word to tell someone that $x would be turning up, and the entire intent of the old act in that area was violated. Bloody hard to prove anything either. I dislike unenforceable laws.
Billy 80

21 May 2008 at 9:03 pm

And ‘sod and others, it is patent nonsense (or, as Joyce used to like saying, ballocks) to suggest that the fault lies with those challenging the law, rather than the law itself. To say that any law can be “cracked” if enough money is thrown at it is just stupid. Rich people have just as much or, in individual circumstances more, reason to break the Securities Act or the Crimes Act or the Property (Relationships) Act, but I do not notice those pieces of legislation “failing” (if that’s what you think it is) in the same way.
Billy 81

21 May 2008 at 9:11 pm

“It was the thinnest of chinese walls because there was absolutely no way of enforcing the intent.”

I do not necessarily disagree, but the point is: anonymity was not only encouraged under the old law, it was a legal requirement.
Harry 82

21 May 2008 at 9:18 pm

Tane sez

No, I’m pointing out that the National Party’s motives in this case are not pure – in an election year they are trying to silence some of their opponents on a issue where they are weak. They have chosen deliberately to take this course of action when there were others available. Now we have the Orwellian prospect of a party claiming it’s saving free speech by crushing it.

Perhaps I should point out that the Labour Party’s motives in this case are not pure – in an election year they have passed legislation to try to silence some of their opponents on a issue where they are weak. They have chosen deliberately to take this course of action when there were others available. Now we have the Orwellian prospect of supports of this act claiming it’s saving free speech by crushing it.
AncientGeek 83

21 May 2008 at 9:34 pm

Harry: another one of those interesting myths. Figure out the timeline and figure when they could have done it.

The act was designed to correct the problems that had shown up so strongly in the 2005 election.

The AG’s final report was released in October 2006, and that required before the detail of the bill could be worked out. It had been openly foreshadowed during and after the election campaign of 2005. Hell – I was pushing for changes in mid-2005 because of the things that were happening. We started preparing to campaign at the start of 2005.

October 2006 was also when Helen announced that it would be put forward in 2007 to be available for the 2008 election. One of the stated intents was to increase the electoral campaign period because 90 days wasn’t working under MMP.

It was put to parliament in July after several drafts and work by the crown law office and had to be completed by December if it was to go into force for the changed campaign period.

Given a 3 year election cycle and the limits – that was really all of the time that was available. Would you have preferred to have not had anything fixed in that bloody stupid 1993 kluge, bearing in mind what happened in 2005?

If the nat’s want to change it, they’re going to have exactly the same constraints. The only reason that the 1993 Act didn’t was it had a full 2 years after the 1990 referendum, and 3 years before the next election. There was a lot of complaining that was too rushed as well (and it showed).

Personally I’d like to see the electoral term raised to 4 and preferably 5 years. It seems reasonable bearing in mind what happens in coalition politics.
Inventory2 84

21 May 2008 at 9:43 pm

Harry – I think that you’ve successfully pointed to the absurdity and irony of the law of unintended consequence. This law MUST have been poorly drafted when to date, the only people to have fallen foul of it were the ;party who proposed it, one of that party’s most experienced politicians, and the party’s most significant affiliate.

Mind you, when the Minister responsible for the legislation says something like this:

“Hon ANNETTE KING: No, the Minister of Finance has not sought my advice, any more than that member has sought my advice on some of the things that his members are doing in their electorates now. I think the best thing to do, for every member, whether a Minister or a member of Parliament, is go to where he or she can get proper advice, and it is certainly not from me.”

… nothing would surprise!
r0b 85

21 May 2008 at 9:55 pm

Well, I seem to have missed all the excitement this evening! A bit to catch up on.

Burt: I must say you did seem to have it nailed first time around but it appears that greater legal minds than your’s have had the final say.

I am happy to be wrong in the good company of the Electoral Commission Burt. I have read the ruling in full, and learned a lot from it, the legal definition of “a person” turns out to be very complex. I was aware that this was the case in law in America (if you haven’t seen the film “The Corporation” then I highly recommend it), but it was interesting to see the relevant legislation in NZ explained.

The ruling as it stands is just that the EPMU must be considered as “a person” in the context of the EFA 13 (2) (f). That’s it, no more. It says nothing about whether the EPMU can register as a third party, that is again a matter for the EC. To me it seems likely that the EC will conclude that the EPMU cannot register as it is involved in the administration of the Labour Party.

Then we will be in a very interesting situation. Everyone (even Hooton!) seems to agree that the EPMU should be allowed to register and spend on political advertising (as it has in the past), but a complex legal opinion will mean that it cannot. So it seems to me that there will be considerable consensus to amend the bill to reflect its proper intent. It will be very interesting if the National Party oppose this – their anti-free speech agenda will then be very nakedly revealed.

And a final comment on one of the myths going round this thread — many people have said a version of it but this one is Burt: “Labour have squarely shot themselves in the foot trying to tilt the playing field in their favour, sadly that’s the state of it in a nutshell.” This is claiming that Labour tried to write a biased law and failed. This is silly, if Labour were trying to write a biased law it would have been easy – “unions can advertise and no one else can”. Done. What actually happened was that Labour tried to write a fair law in a very complex and contentious domain. In trying to write a fair law they have been caught out on a technicality. But anyone taking cheap shots about how the drafters of the law were incompetent or stupid should actually read the judges ruling and consider the complexities of the issues involved. This stuff isn’t easy to get right, but it’s important that we do.
Dean 86

21 May 2008 at 10:21 pm

“What actually happened was that Labour tried to write a fair law in a very complex and contentious domain.”

And failed.

After 9 years of being in power.

But it was probably a full moon, right? Or it was the previous National government’s fault?

Take your choice r0b, because either would be something we’d expect from the Labour party.
Razorlight 87

21 May 2008 at 10:29 pm

This whole thing is hilarious.

One of Labours clear objectives was to silence cashed up opponents of their government. How much abuse has that religous group recieved from the Left over the past 3 years.

So they construct a shoddy piece of legislation to silence this critic. They are told the legislation is shoddy. They ram it through anyway.

Then they are found to breach this legislation and their political opponents use this shoddy legislation to silence Labour supporters.

This is comical and shows how completley incompetent this goverment has become. They have shot themselves in the foot and are wondering why their support is disintergrating.

What National has done may or may not be right. What is clear though is Labour has no one else to blame but themselves.
r0b 88

21 May 2008 at 10:37 pm

We can always trust Dean to raise the level of the debate eh.

And failed.

They didn’t fail to write a fair law Dean, they failed to write a technically perfect law. Anyone who thinks this stuff is easy needs to explain how the Electoral Commission also got it “wrong” in their interpretation.

After 9 years of being in power.

What does that have to do with anything?

But it was probably a full moon, right? Or it was the previous National government’s fault?

It’s the “fault” of the people who drafted the law Dean, but the “fault” is small. This stuff is complicated – again, the Electoral Commission also got it “wrong” in their interpretation. Go and read the ruling for yourself, you might learn something.
burt 89

21 May 2008 at 10:37 pm

rOb

It will be very interesting if the National Party oppose this – their anti-free speech agenda will then be very nakedly revealed.

You yourself probably called National’s opposition to the EFA as it was first proposed, amended, committee’d, amended and passed under urgency an attack on free speech. Please explain to all people, not just National party supporters, how the hell any of us can have any confidence in the intentions of Labour after all of this. Politically I’d say they are in self destruct mode, look at the shambles – draft a contentious law, get caught, have an MP caught, completely f##kup the status quo on their pretty little parallel campaign strategy with the EPMU.

The EFA was touted as being about transparency, I cannot see how you could possibly allow the EPMU to register as long as Little sits in both camps. He has a simple choice if he wants to act in good faith and enforce the intent of the law rather than introduce another round of BS trying to polish the EFA turd.

The ruling may be technical, but how would you feel about John Key sitting on the board of 20 ‘associations’ all with $120K to spend. Without Little resigning (somewhere) and with amendments made for the ‘unions’ there would be no moral or ethical objection to John Key doing exactly that.

But hey amend away, I’d never tell Labour to stop digging on this one, I gave that several amendment cycles ago.
r0b 90

21 May 2008 at 10:46 pm

One of Labours clear objectives was to silence cashed up opponents of their government.

Ahh no, One of Labours clear objectives was to have balance and openness in the funding of electoral advertising.

How much abuse has that religous group recieved from the Left over the past 3 years.

Almost none? Far less than they dished out to the Greens, that’s for sure.

What National has done may or may not be right. What is clear though is Labour has no one else to blame but themselves.

Well you got the first bit right. I even agree that Labour has no one to blame but themselves, but what they are “to blame” for is aiming to write fair legislation and failing to write perfect legislation. It is a much lesser sin than National’s trying to use the imperfect legislation to stifle free speech in a democracy. Shame on National, and those that support them in this action.
Dean 91

21 May 2008 at 10:49 pm

“We can always trust Dean to raise the level of the debate eh.”

We can always trust r0b to get defensive whenever Labour is called into question eh.

“They didn’t fail to write a fair law Dean, they failed to write a technically perfect law. Anyone who thinks this stuff is easy needs to explain how the Electoral Commission also got it “wrong’ in their interpretation.”

They failed to write a law after having 9 years practice at it.

I’d call that imcompetent, but maybe it was just rushed. I mean, come on r0b. Even Mallard doesn’t seem to have figured it out yet.

And if you don’t think 9 years of experience in passing laws is a good reason not to stuff things up so badly then really there’s no sense in talking to you about it.

If the same mistake had been made by a National government, you’d be baying for their blood. And you know it.

“It’s the “fault’ of the people who drafted the law Dean, but the “fault’ is small. This stuff is complicated – again, the Electoral Commission also got it “wrong’ in their interpretation. Go and read the ruling for yourself, you might learn something.”

I thought Annette King said “common sense” would prevail?

Is that not the case? Was she wrong?

Or was there a full moon?

Remember, r0b. She was the minister in charge of this farce, those were her words, and you’re a member of the same political party. I’m sorry if the shoe is uncomfortable, but you have chosen to wear it.
KenS 92

21 May 2008 at 10:50 pm

You Tories will never understand, you have your big money by unfair means, so we need our unions and workers. This case is so unfair and that’s why Labour needs to change the law to exempt unions from it, thats what they wanted when the law was being considered and they should have got it. The Tories smashed the unions and the public service in the 1990’s and now they are doing it all over again with court cases.
Dean 93

21 May 2008 at 10:52 pm

“Almost none? Far less than they dished out to the Greens, that’s for sure.”

You sure are reading different newspapers and websites than I am. They’ve even been called “chinless scarf wearers” by the political party you’re a member of.

Let’s see you defend that one. Full moon notwithstanding, naturally.
Razorlight 94

21 May 2008 at 10:52 pm

‘Almost none? Far less than they dished out to the Greens, that’s for sure.’

You aren’t serious are you. The EB has been subjected to ridicule because they dared to oppose the Left. They made some administrative mistakes, that was their only fault. And as a result they have been abused in a way that if they were Jews or Muslims, Annette King and Trevor Mallard would have been hauled before the Human Rights Commission.
John Boscawen 95

21 May 2008 at 10:53 pm

This issue and others like it could have been prevented if the parties supporting the bill had listended to and followed the recommendations of our Human Rights Commission. The HRC said in their September 9 submisison that the bill was ” inherently flawed” and should be withdrawn. Parliament ignored them.

They repeated that at the Select Committee hearing on October 18th. I was present when Rosslyn Noonan said: ” The Commision’s preference is, and remains, that the proposed legislation, the bill, is withdrawn and redrafted to take into account the very substanial and indepth submissions of the over 600 submitters to the Select Committee. If it is not withdrawn, and rewritten the Commision’s view is that it is essential that any chnages be subject to the widest possible scrutiny to ensure the credibility and legitimacy of whatever electoral law reform emerges”.

So the HRC wanted the bill withdrawn and for parliament to start again. Failing that, they wanted the bill to be subject to a second round of public consultation. Parliament ignored the Human Rights Commission on this too.
A trade union should need to go to court in a democracy to fight for its right to be involved in the electoral preocess, but that sadly is what the EFA has given us.

The government should repeal the EFA before they are furthur embarassed. The law is uncertain and complex and will likely lead to a number of election results being contested in court after the election.
John Wilkins 96

21 May 2008 at 10:57 pm

George Darroch: fuck off. As a $14.50 an hour minimum wage worker you are dead to me. You make huge accusations about Labour and the unions but as a union member I can tell you you don’t have a clue how either organisation works. You are the reason I don’t vote green.
Dean 97

21 May 2008 at 10:57 pm

John,

“This issue and others like it could have been prevented if the parties supporting the bill had listended to and followed the recommendations of our Human Rights Commission. The HRC said in their September 9 submisison that the bill was ‘ inherently flawed’ and should be withdrawn. Parliament ignored them.”

The HRC only matters to Labour when it suits them to matter. As you’ll see from r0b and company and their continuted protests that there is nothing to see here, and could we all move along quietly please.

You can’t talk sense to them. Only that issued by the Labour party matters. Except when it suits them otherwise.
r0b 98

21 May 2008 at 11:00 pm

You yourself probably called National’s opposition to the EFA as it was first proposed, amended, committee’d, amended and passed under urgency an attack on free speech.

No Burt, I called that a desperate defense of their ability and intention to buy the 2008 election with the same kind of dishonest tactics and big money backers that cost them the 2005 election and their previous leader, the late and unlamented Don Brash.

Please explain to all people, not just National party supporters, how the hell any of us can have any confidence in the intentions of Labour after all of this.

Because they clearly didn’t write a law that was biased towards them or they wouldn’t have been caught out on this technicality, they clearly set out to write a fair law, and that is something that we should all approve of.

Politically I’d say they are in self destruct mode

Good oh Burt, I shall afford your opinion on this matter all the weight that it deserves.

The ruling may be technical, but how would you feel about John Key sitting on the board of 20 â€˜associations’ all with $120K to spend.

I would feel that was a pretty transparently foolish thing to do.

But hey amend away, I’d never tell Labour to stop digging on this one, I gave that several amendment cycles ago.

Make up your mind Burt – was the law rammed through without consultation, or were there several amendment cycles? When you run your “Labour Bad National Good” nonsense over here it’s best to pick just one line and stick with it…
John Boscawen 99

21 May 2008 at 11:05 pm

My last sentence should have read : ” A trade union should not need to go to court in a democracy to fight for its right to be involved in the electoral process”. I ommitted the word “not” in error.
infused 100

21 May 2008 at 11:06 pm

“The HRC only matters to Labour when it suits them to matter. As you’ll see from r0b and company and their continuted protests that there is nothing to see here, and could we all move along quietly please.

You can’t talk sense to them. Only that issued by the Labour party matters. Except when it suits them otherwise.”

Exactly. This is the funnest stuff I’ve ever read on this blog. Seriously. You’re still defending this daft law? My god. Like others said though, you only have yourself to blame.

Should have slowed down. Listened to the ammendments that other parties wanted. You allowed some, only those that didn’t impact on you in anyway.

Sorry, but you do have only yourself to blame. Wonder how Helen is sleeping these days?
AncientGeek 101

21 May 2008 at 11:08 pm

JB: So you’d have preferred to have run the election in 2008 with those incredulous holes in the 1993 act that showed up in 2005?

A trade union should need to go to court in a democracy to fight for its right to be involved in the electoral preocess, but that sadly is what the EFA has given us.

That is what happens with new laws. They tend go in front of a court to iron out the rough edges. That is how the system works. Parliament writes the legislation, and the courts interpret it and balance against other law.

With all of the kurffle from the opponents of the act, that the law was only written to unbalance the playing field, both last year and this. The only major public problems have been on the left. Proportably who the act was written to bias towards.

Makes a bit of a mockery of the opponents claims doesn’t it really. Seems like it really doesn’t seem to have been so unfair after all.

Perhaps you’d care to enlighten us of the problems of the other sides with the EFA. Or more likely we’ll just get more of the Chicken Little universe – “the sky is falling” from the acts opponents. But then they do seem to be a trifle hysterical most of the time.
AncientGeek 102

21 May 2008 at 11:11 pm

In the end, if there is an adverse decision, the EPMU can decide to allocate their money against the NZLP budget. Or they can remove themselves from any administrative positions in the NZLP and campaign on their own.

It is a bit of a pain – but new laws do a certain amount of that. Just getting a campaign period that is more based in reality is worth it on its own.
infused 103

21 May 2008 at 11:14 pm

AG, do you actually believe the stuff you write?

“That is what happens with new laws. They tend go in front of a court to iron out the rough edges. That is how the system works. Parliament writes the legislation, and the courts interpret it and balance against other law.”

No, Labour tried to silence everyone else apart from unions. But… It going interpreted in a way Labour didn’t expect. Bugger eh.
r0b 104

21 May 2008 at 11:14 pm

So John, you’ve made something of a boutique lifestyle campaigning under the flag of “free speech”. I think that you are sailing under false colours. Convince me that I’m wrong – what do you make of National’s attack on free speech?

This issue and others like it could have been prevented if the parties supporting the bill had listended to and followed the recommendations of our Human Rights Commission. The HRC said in their September 9 submisison that the bill was ‘ inherently flawed’ and should be withdrawn. Parliament ignored them.

Parliament followed a full process of public consultation, public submissions to the select committee, modifications to the original draft, and so on. Could they have done more? In theory perhaps, in practice the timing constraints were extreme, see AG’s post above:
http://www.thestandard.org.nz/?p=1982#comment-45676

The government should repeal the EFA before they are furthur embarassed.

Heh – you wish. The EFA is doing it’s job, a level playing field. I can understand how that must upset you!
Delma 105

21 May 2008 at 11:18 pm

John Boscawen: what do you make of National arguing in the EPMU case that its attempts to silence the union do not impinge on the Bill of Rights while meanwhile you are taking a case to the High Court arguing that the EFA impinges on the Bill of Rights?

How can you trumpet the National case but go against it entirely in your own?
Dean 106

21 May 2008 at 11:18 pm

r0b:

“Parliament followed a full process of public consultation, public submissions to the select committee, modifications to the original draft, and so on. Could they have done more?”

They could have listened to the HRC. Wouldn’t that have been nice? Happily the next time the HRC passes on a recommendation you’ll be happy to ignore it too, right?
lprent 107

21 May 2008 at 11:22 pm

Interesting debate. I’m really surprised that I only had to intervene once, and that was just the eternal ‘sod & whale.

Keep it up. I prefer it when I only have to scan and read. I get more work done.

Lynn
burt 108

21 May 2008 at 11:24 pm

rOb

Make up your mind Burt – was the law rammed through without consultation, or were there several amendment cycles?

I think you know the answer to that, as Dean said, against the HRC advice the bill never got a second airing and was passed under urgency.

Yes it had many amendments, all bills do – but it was passed under urgency against HRC advice to scrap it and go back to the drawing board. So why don’t we do just that, lets go back to the old bill for the election, set the date 90 or more days from now and no drama.

Now about that policy advertising…. that stuff that was illegal, done in 2005 (and probably 1999 & 2002) and retrospectively made legal, then made legal in the EFA was illegal under the previous act… OK, what now? Let me guess – Allow the unions in and “move on”.
r0b 109

21 May 2008 at 11:41 pm

Dean: They could have listened to the HRC. Wouldn’t that have been nice?

It’s hard to tell whether this line is based on ignorance or deliberate distortion. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that it’s ignorance.

THe HRC always supported the principles of the bill. They opposed many aspects of the first draft and made a submission. In response many changes were made to the second draft, which the HRC approved of. They had some remaining comments on specific clauses which they expressed. You can see their comments
here here , and here.

In short, in no way was the HRC ignored.
r0b 110

21 May 2008 at 11:54 pm

I think you know the answer to that

No Burt I don’t – what’s your opinion here – was the law rammed through without consultation, or were there several amendment cycles?

Yes it had many amendments, all bills do – but it was passed under urgency against HRC advice to scrap it and go back to the drawing board.

Lots of bills get passed under urgency at the end of a year. And the HRC advice applied to the first draft, not to the second amended version, please see the HRC comments linked above. I know this is a convenient lie to push for your “National Good Labour Bad” agenda, but it is a lie Burt.

Sadly Burt the rest of your post made very little sense, so I can’t comment.
burt 111

21 May 2008 at 11:55 pm

rOb

Rather than trying to polish the EFA turn some more we could force all parties to comply with the old legislation for one more round. The AG did a pretty good job of pointing out the rules of the game last time. Reckon Labour are up for it? Would be fun to see what a legal election looks like in NZ.

Yes you are correct, the HRC was certainly not ignored, just well informed advice was not taken. Refusal to accept wise counsel is usually a precursor to major f##kup’s.
r0b 112

21 May 2008 at 11:58 pm

And so good night. The morning shift can take over when they recover from their “Drinking Liberally” hangovers. Lucky sods sure got the better deal tonight!
burt 113

22 May 2008 at 12:02 am

rOb

I never said there was no consultation, however if you think canning the second airing after the massive response to the first one, then passing it under urgency was OK because that’s what was easiest for parliament and it’s the way it’s done, then you won’t see eye to eye on much when we discuss ethics, morals or principals. What sort of car have you got mate, Ford or Holden?
burt 114

22 May 2008 at 12:17 am

rOb

From the decision.

The interpretation contended for by the Union, would place greater limits on the freedom of expression of natural persons than of artificial persons.

Now back to amendments, confidence in intentions and *cough cough* National wanting to shut down free speech? Man you guys are hard to understand. All I can draw on is my dear old granny saying “the guilty always accuse the innocent of the things that they themselves are plotting to do.”

Good night.
AncientGeek 115

22 May 2008 at 12:27 am

infused:

AG, do you actually believe the stuff you write?

Well you know how it goes – like armchair generals, there are armchair politicians, and armchair activists. Ie people who are good at doing nothing while shooting their mouths off. People who don’t think about the logical consequences of what they say on other peoples lives.

I’m not one of those. I tend to actually do the things I talk about. So I form opinions from experience rather than idle chatter. That is reinforced by a rather wide range of reading and academia. It still means I get things wrong, and I get pulled up on them here by people, as Billy did earlier. That is how you learn and this place is sometimes pretty good at reinforcing learning.

But it gets pretty apparent around here who is worth while listening to and who isn’t. Now tell me again why I should be all that enthralled by your comments?
Seano 116

22 May 2008 at 12:52 am

[Tane: Interestingly though, they’re only targeting their critics, and one of their most effective ones at that. Where’s National’s test case against the Free Speech Coalition or Sensible Sentencing?]

Get real Tane, this is politics. The EFA was passed for a political purpose. If it was for some altruistic reason then the comments of the Human Rights Commission, the Law Society et. al. would have been taken into consideration.

Why on earth would the Opposition (which comes from the word “opposition”) want to test legislation on groups more likely to be its supporters?

As Ancient points out, all the EPMU has to do is, well, comply with the law. Much like the Opposition. And its supporters.
Robinsod 117

22 May 2008 at 8:05 am

Does anyone know when the Sensible Sentencing Trust are planning to register as a third party?
higherstandard 118

22 May 2008 at 9:40 am

hmmmmmmm

Now who was it that said on this site the EFB was a non issue and that no one really cared about it anymore ?
ak 119

22 May 2008 at 9:54 am

Non-issue HS? Heck no.

TORY FREE-SPEECH FIGHTERS DESPERATE TO MUZZLE UNION has a great resonance. Ta muchly all.

[lprent: Please don’t SHOUT. It hurts my sensibilities]
higherstandard 120

22 May 2008 at 10:01 am

Good deflection AK but I’m afraid the parties that passed this bill into Law are the real villains
John Boscawen 121

22 May 2008 at 10:15 am

Responses to last night’s comments:

Ancient Greek,

What I would have preferred was that parliament had listended to our Human Rights Commission. I found it incredible that Labour,Green,and NZ First MPs would ignore the advice and recommendations of our Human Rights Commision, particularly on the issue of free speech. I would have preferred the bill had been withdrawn and redrafted as they said it should. Failing that, if they were intent on pushing ahead with changes I would have preferred that those changes were open to a furthur round of public consultation. ( as recommended by the HRC)

When Rosslyn Noonan appeared before the select committee on 18 October she tabled a document listing four “essential ” changes to the bill. This document is still on the HRC website. One of these “essential” changes was that restrictions should not be placed on our ability to speak out for any more than three months prior to the election. In answer to Rob’s question there was more than ample time to either redraft the bill, or have a second round of public consultation and still have plenty of time for a three month restriction.

Ancient Greek, yes courts do interpret the law, but it should not be so uncertain and complex this becomes necessary on a regular basis. The Electoral Commision are quoted in the Herald yesterday as saying they do not know for sure what an “electoral adveretisement” is. How does this help to run our election with certainty?.

Take for example the case of Trevor Mallard’s car. It is easy to put an authorisation sign on this. However the real issue will be how much “cost” does TM report on his expense return. Is it just the cost of the paint job?, depreciation on the car? petrol? parking at th eairport?. The way is open for the second placed candidate in Lower Hutt to commence legal proceedings after the election unless TM takes a vey conservative view with his election expenses.

Ancient Greek referred to all the public problems coming from the left and so this some how made the Act right. We are talking about the most fundamental right of free speech and the right to participate in the electoral process. You can not asseess an Act and say because only “left ‘groups ae affectted, it is ok. It should not matter who is affectted.

With regard to “right ” groups being affected, the few ones I know have chosen not to register because of the uncertainty and have decided to change what they say in election year to ensure they do not make any “election advertisements” . So censorship is working. For example it was initally my intention to register the Freedom of Speech Trust, however after taking advice, I decided it would be simply much safer to not to make “election advertisement”. I am simply running a campaign for the repeal of the Electoral Finance Act, in the same way that Greenpeace campaigns against whaling in the southern oceans.

Robinsod asked the morning when the Sensible Sentencing Trust would register. They may not. They just make sure they do not make election advertisements.

Rob asked if I supportted National’s “attack on free speech”. I do not think National are attacking free speech. They strongly opposed the EFA which restricts the rights of people and organisations involved with a political party to be involved in the electoral process. I think the EPMU should be able to be involved,in the same way that I think the SST should be able to place “election advertisements”

Finally with regard to my case against the Attorney General the AG acts as a watchguard of our rights under the BOR. The orginal EFB provided that every New Zealander who wished to make any form of political comment in election year would first have to sign a statutory declartion. The Crown Law office thought this was acceptable. The AG thought this was acceptable. However the HRC said it ‘was a dramtic assault on two freedoms New Zealanders cherrish, the right to free speech and the right to participate as informed citizens in elections. I beleive the crown law office advice is wrong and that the AG, deputy PM Michael Cullen failed in his job. I am bringing these proceedings to challenge the precedent the Crown Law Office and the AG have created. If I win, parliament may change the law and so allow the EPMU too participate without restriction.
IrishBill 122

22 May 2008 at 10:26 am

That’s all very interesting John but you failed to answer one key question. Do you support the National Party’s action against the EPMU’s registration as a third party even though the National party strongly argued the EFA does not breach the Bill of Rights Act as part of its case?
John Boscawen 123

22 May 2008 at 10:37 am

Irish Bill, I do not have a view I am sorry.

I have not read the decision.

It surprises me that you said ” the National Party strongly argued the EFA does not breach the Bill of Rights Act as part of its case”.

I believe the EFA does breach the BORA and that was part of our argument to the court, so I would need to understand more about their case before commenting furthur.
IrishBill 124

22 May 2008 at 10:44 am

Oh. I would have thought that a man who has dedicated so much time and money to overturning the EFA would have been very interested in what is perhaps the most important decision made on it yet. I guess not.
Tim 125

22 May 2008 at 10:47 am

This annoys me intensely. Because of this law the EPMU may be hindered from running an effective workers’ rights campaign in election year. This is a big deal. EPMU workers and activists did such a great job of rallying to defeat the 90 day bill in 2006. When was the last time we saw a union mass meeting like that? When was the last time we saw workers mobilised around political issues on such a scale?

What annoys me even more intensely is the ham-fisted way in which Labour rushed through significant changes to electoral law just before election year, when such wide-spread changes weren’t even necessary. It’s a ridiculous, incomprehensible law. The fact is that the EB’s campaign last election probably got Labour into Parliament. Voters don’t like secret big-money campaigns and turned off National because of this.
randal 126

22 May 2008 at 10:51 am

give the EPMU a GO. its their turn. If it is time to give the nats a GO then its time to give the EPMU a GO. After all they do something for their members so they should havea bigger GO than the nats who only do somethings for their own little claque while all the blusterers who line up to yell give the nats a GO get nothing but a silly grin.
John Boscawen 127

22 May 2008 at 11:15 am

Irish Bill, its a question of priorities. I am busy organsing the next provincial protest calling for the Act’s repeal. You have only just told me National do not beleive the EFA is not inconsistent with BORA.

Tim. You said this is a ridiculous and incomprehensible law. In its submission the HRC emphasised the fact that the bill was complex and was likely to lead to less, rather than more political involvement. The Human Rights Commision beleives it is important that as many people as possible should be involved in the electoral process. This was a key reason why they thought the bill should be withdrawn and redrafted. I admire the HRC and its Commissioners Rosslyn Noonan and Judy Mc Gregor standing up for our rights to be involved in the political process.
r0b 128

22 May 2008 at 11:20 am

JB: Rob asked if I supportted National’s “attack on free speech’. I do not think National are attacking free speech.

How utterly and cynically predictable of you John. The EPMU are in do doubt that their rights are being attacked:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/4555891a11.html

EPMU National Secretary Andrew Little was disappointed with the decision and said the National Party was trying to gag its right to free speech.

So who knows best – you or the EPMU themselves?

If you are an advocate of free speech I call on you to publicly and vigourously attack National’s attempt to deprive the EPMU of their right to advertise in this election.

If you are a cynical political hack trying to discredit the EFA for the big money types who like to try to buy elections then just ignore this comment, or carry on trying to argue that black is white.

Go on, surprise me.
erikter 129

22 May 2008 at 11:29 am

“How utterly and cynically predictable of you John. The EPMU are in do doubt that their rights are being attacked.”

Rob, the EPMU and its members are free to believe what they want. Howver, the reality is that the High Cort has ruled against them and they will have to abide by the law.

Yes, the law, the same one that the Labour Party and its acolytes passed in urgency, the EFA.

Yours is another vain attempt to shoot the messenger, when in fact you should be directing your rage towards the Labour government (your political masters?).
Tim 130

22 May 2008 at 11:35 am

John – I have to say I disagree with you on everything politically except perhaps the EFA (it’s only good to the extent it ended secret donations). Free speech is important so we can see precisely what abject morons Family First, the exclusive brethern and so on are.

I do find it a bit rich that the National Party is now supporting the HRC, when it spends most of its time degrading it, and even had an “anti-PC” spokesperson Wayne Mapp, who heaped fulsome criticism on the HRC. Guess when it’s minority rights under attack it’s a different kettle of fish for the National Party.
MikeE 131

22 May 2008 at 12:45 pm

Heh,

Pwned.
James Kearney 132

22 May 2008 at 12:51 pm

Heh,

Pwned.

You mean John Boscawen? Yup.
dave 133

22 May 2008 at 1:08 pm

Andrew Little is wrong, the EPMU are not being gagged. They have their right to free speech. They are actually moaning that they have their right to paid speech gagged.

Let ’em moan. Why isnt the EPMU criticising the Crown Law for the crap advice they gave?
John Boscawen 134

22 May 2008 at 1:45 pm

Rob, Yes I do believe the EPMU should be allowed to participate in the electoral process, just as I believe every other individual and organisation should be allowed to participate. Sadly however it would appear the Electoral Finance Act restricts their ability to do so, and to an extent greater than applies to many other organisations. This is the reason why I ran a campaign against the Electoral Finance Bill and why I am currently running a campaign for the repeal of the Electoral Finance Act.

Free Speech and the right to participate in the electoral process affects all New Zealanders, no matter what their political persuasion. It is no coincidence that one of the most vehement critics was Rosslyn Noonan a former trade unionist.

Tim has stated that he agrees with me on this particular issue (but he feels apparently not on most other points). I think this highlights that thinking people from both the left and right realise that the EFA is an attack on free speech. Another example is Bryce Edwards. Bryce is also a critic of the Act and is a political science lecturer at Otago University. When I rang him recently to ask if he would speak at my Tauranga Protest March he insisted on telling me first about his support of left wing politics. As it happened he was not available that weekend but would have spoken had he been free. It concerns me not that Bryce is from the “left wing”. He simply knows the Act is wrong and is prepared to say so. He can see the Act can just as easily gag left wing groups such as the EPMU as right wing groups. Either way it is wrong.

Finally Tim comments the one good thing the EFA does is to prohibit anonymous donations. This is what the supporter of the bill have trumpeted but it is also not true. There is no limit whatsoever to the number of donations of $999 I could make to any political party. If for example I wanted to donate $100,000 to the Labour Party all I need to do is to get 101 bank cheques for $999 and drop them off one at a time. Bryce Edwards makes this point in his article published recently in The New Zealand Law Journal. Similarly if I was a major corporate and had a number of subsidiary companies there is nothing to stop each subsidiary making donations of $9999. While the financial agent of the political party concerned would know of my donation there would be no need for it to be disclosed to the wider New Zealand public.

Prior to the Act being passed I had a private meeting with an MP who supported and subsequently voted for the Act. He openly acknowledged that loopholes like the above were still available and individuals who wanted to continue to make substantial anonymous donations were free to do so. So sadly Tim, you are mistaken on this issue, although i can understand why you think that is the case.
George Darroch 135

22 May 2008 at 1:56 pm

“George Darroch: fuck off. As a $14.50 an hour minimum wage worker you are dead to me. You make huge accusations about Labour and the unions but as a union member I can tell you you don’t have a clue how either organisation works. You are the reason I don’t vote green.”

All I did was state the bleedingly obvious – that the EPMU have choosen to be affiliated with Labour, and spend a lot of money supporting the party every election.

That’s their right, and they obviously feel that Labour best suits their members interests – to the extent that they deliberately stood Lynne Pillay against Laila Harre – a successful attempt to replace a staunch and consistent champion of workers rights with a useless bench-warmer. What’s Lynne Pillay done? Oh, that’s right, the Waitakere Ranges Protection Bill. Still, getting rid of the Alliance made it easy to go with those noted workers advocates, United Future.

I know all too well what poverty feels like, what low minimum wages, jobs without health and safety protection, piecework, casual work, being ripped off and screwed around by bosses, and let off for no good reason (and an unemployment benefit that barely covers rent and food). I know the value of a good union and count a number of union organisers among my friends. I also know the pain of a bad one – one that won’t back you up, doesn’t think your workplace worth organising, thinks it works for workers rather than with them, and flies it’s executive in business class (I’m not making this accusation of the EPMU but an Australian union I refuse to join), and supports a neoliberal party that doesn’t give a whit about workers in other countries.

Hmmm, I didn’t mean to be so spiteful.
George Darroch 136

22 May 2008 at 2:01 pm

I like Bryce’s take on the EPMU and Labour.
Tim 137

22 May 2008 at 3:13 pm

John – I didn’t know that about the EFA. I could try reading it to see whether I agree with you or not but I’m not sure I’d understand it (or anyone else would)!

George – pretty lame bagging the EPMU. You’re really just bagging 50,000 workers and the many dedicated and hard working organisers there. It’s capitalism that divides workers according to industry and so on, don’t join in the division.

Bryce’s and Chris Trotter’s takes on the EPMU come from people far removed from the front line. Maybe Bryce should spend a day as a delegate or organiser. He couldn’t handle it. It’s far easier being a malcontent political lecturer criticising from the sidelines. When was the last time he stood on a picket line or got involved in grass roots action? Where was Bryce during the EPMU coal miners’ strikes/lockout? The AA strikes? The 90 day bill rallies? Much easier to fan political divisions than support workers though isn’t it?
r0b 138

22 May 2008 at 3:15 pm

JB: Rob, Yes I do believe the EPMU should be allowed to participate in the electoral process, just as I believe every other individual and organisation should be allowed to participate.

Excellent – me too. I look forward to you putting your money where your mouth is, and conducting a vigourous campaign against National’s attempts to exclude the EPMU. I’d come on that march for you John.

Sadly however it would appear the Electoral Finance Act restricts their ability to do so, and to an extent greater than applies to many other organisations.

Ahh well, I guess not then. What self serving nonsense. In the opinion of the Electoral Commission (the group charged with interpreting and implementing the act) no such restriction existed. National has run an expensive and aggressive legal campaign to challenge the EC because the EC’s decision didn’t suit them. The EFA didn’t restrict the EPMU in the opinion of the EC, but National kept pushing until they got a legal result that reopened the issue.

The fact that for National this is purely an issue of suppressing free speech is made completely obvious by their use of an injunction to muzzle the EPMU. If the intent was to “clarify the law” then no injunction was needed. Injunctions don’t clarify the law, their sole purpose is to shut people up.

So here you stand John, with your “free speech” flag of convenience in tatters. If this was about free speech you would be protesting National’s actions, not giving them a free pass on the grounds that “the EFA can be read as not expressly forbiding National from suppressing the free speech of the EPMU so it must be OK for them to do so”.

Links to post

The Standard 2.01: EPMU cleared to campaign: posted on 30 July 2008 at 10:21 am

Comments are now closed

Articles RSS

Comments
Opinions

The Bank of our Tamariki and Mokopuna.
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
1 hour ago

The worth of it all
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
4 hours ago

What is the Hardest Sport in the World?
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

What is the Most Expensive Sport?
The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

Pickleball On the Cusp of Olympic Glory
Introduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

The Origin and Evolution of Soccer Unveiling the Genius Behind the World’s Most Popular Sport
Abstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

How Much to Tint Car Windows A Comprehensive Guide
Tinting car windows offers numerous benefits, including enhanced privacy, reduced glare, UV protection, and a more stylish look for your vehicle. However, the cost of window tinting can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article provides a comprehensive guide to help you understand how much you can expect to ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

Why Does My Car Smell Like Gas? A Comprehensive Guide to Diagnosing and Fixing the Issue
The pungent smell of gasoline in your car can be an alarming and potentially dangerous problem. Not only is the odor unpleasant, but it can also indicate a serious issue with your vehicle’s fuel system. In this article, we will explore the various reasons why your car may smell like ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

How to Remove Tree Sap from Car A Comprehensive Guide
Tree sap can be a sticky, unsightly mess on your car’s exterior. It can be difficult to remove, but with the right techniques and products, you can restore your car to its former glory. Understanding Tree Sap Tree sap is a thick, viscous liquid produced by trees to seal wounds ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

How Much Paint Do You Need to Paint a Car?
The amount of paint needed to paint a car depends on a number of factors, including the size of the car, the number of coats you plan to apply, and the type of paint you are using. In general, you will need between 1 and 2 gallons of paint for ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

Can You Jump a Car in the Rain? Safety Precautions and Essential Steps
Jump-starting a car is a common task that can be performed even in adverse weather conditions like rain. However, safety precautions and proper techniques are crucial to avoid potential hazards. This comprehensive guide will provide detailed instructions on how to safely jump a car in the rain, ensuring both your ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
7 hours ago

Can taxpayers be confident PIJF cash was spent wisely?
Graham Adams writes about the $55m media fund — When Patrick Gower was asked by Mike Hosking last week what he would say to the many Newstalk ZB callers who allege the Labour government bribed media with $55 million of taxpayers’ money via the Public Interest Journalism Fund — and ...
Point of OrderBy gadams1000
13 hours ago

EGU2024 – An intense week of joining sessions virtually
Note: this blog post has been put together over the course of the week I followed the happenings at the conference virtually. Should recordings of the Great Debates and possibly Union Symposia mentioned below, be released sometime after the conference ends, I'll include links to the ones I participated in. ...
Skeptical Science
15 hours ago

Submission on “Fast Track Approvals Bill”
The following was my submission made on the “Fast Track Approvals Bill”. This potential law will give three Ministers unchecked powers, un-paralled since the days of Robert Muldoon’s “Think Big” projects.The submission is written a bit tongue-in-cheek. But it’s irreverent because the FTAB is in itself not worthy of respect. ...
Frankly SpeakingBy Frank Macskasy
16 hours ago

The Case for a Universal Family Benefit
One Could Reduce Child Poverty At No Fiscal CostFollowing the Richardson/Shipley 1990 ‘redesign of the welfare state’ – which eliminated the universal Family Benefit and doubled the rate of child poverty – various income supplements for families have been added, the best known being ‘Working for Families’, introduced in 2005. ...
PunditBy Brian Easton
17 hours ago

A who’s who of New Zealand’s dodgiest companies
Submissions on National's corrupt Muldoonist fast-track law are due today (have you submitted?), and just hours before they close, Infrastructure Minister Chris Bishop has been forced to release the list of companies he invited to apply. I've spent the last hour going through it in an epic thread of bleats, ...
No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
19 hours ago

On Lee’s watch, Economic Development seems to be stuck on scoring points from promoting sporting e...
Buzz from the Beehive A few days ago, Point of Order suggested the media must be musing “on why Melissa is mute”. Our article reported that people working in the beleaguered media industry have cause to yearn for a minister as busy as Melissa Lee’s ministerial colleagues and we drew ...
Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
20 hours ago

New Zealand has never been closed for business
1. What was The Curse of Jim Bolger?a. Winston Peters b. Soon after shaking his hand, world leaders would mysteriously lose office or shuffle off this mortal coilc. Could never shake off the Mother of All Budgetsd. Dandruff2. True or false? The Chairman of a Kiwi export business has asked the ...
More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
20 hours ago

Stop the panic – we’ve been here before
Jack Vowles writes – New Zealand is said to be suffering from ‘serious populist discontent’. An IPSOS MORI survey has reported that we have an increasing preference for strong leaders, think that the economy is rigged toward the rich and powerful, and political elites are ignoring ‘hard-working people’. ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
23 hours ago

Melissa Lee and the media: ending the quest
Chris Trotter writes – MELISSA LEE should be deprived of her ministerial warrant. Her handling – or non-handling – of the crisis engulfing the New Zealand news media has been woeful. The fate of New Zealand’s two linear television networks, a question which the Minister of Broadcasting, Communications ...
Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
1 day ago

The Hoon around the week to April 19
TL;DR: The podcast above features co-hosts and , along with regular guests Robert Patman on Gaza and AUKUS II, and on climate change.The six things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
1 day ago

The ‘Humpty Dumpty’ end result of dismantling our environmental protections
Policymakers rarely wish to make plain or visible their desire to dismantle environmental policy, least of all to the young. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: Here’s the top five news items of note in climate news for Aotearoa-NZ this week, and a discussion above between Bernard Hickey and The Kākā’s climate correspondent ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
1 day ago

Nicola's Salad Days.
I like to keep an eye on what’s happening in places like the UK, the US, and over the ditch with our good mates the Aussies. Let’s call them AUKUS, for want of a better collective term. More on that in a bit.It used to be, not long ago, that ...
Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
1 day ago

Study sees climate change baking in 19% lower global income by 2050
TL;DR: The global economy will be one fifth smaller than it would have otherwise been in 2050 as a result of climate damage, according to a new study by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) and published in the journal Nature. (See more detail and analysis below, and ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
1 day ago

Weekly Roundup 19-April-2024
It’s Friday again. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week on Greater Auckland On Tuesday Matt covered at the government looking into a long tunnel for Wellington. On Wednesday we ran a post from Oscar Simms on some lessons from Texas. AT’s ...
Greater AucklandBy Matt L
1 day ago

Jack Vowles: Stop the panic – we’ve been here before
New Zealand is said to be suffering from ‘serious populist discontent’. An IPSOS MORI survey has reported that we have an increasing preference for strong leaders, think that the economy is rigged toward the rich and powerful, and political elites are ignoring ‘hard-working people’. The data is from February this ...
Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
1 day ago

Clearing up confusion (or trying to)
Foreign Minister Winston Peters is understood to be planning a major speech within the next fortnight to clear up the confusion over whether or not New Zealand might join the AUKUS submarine project. So far, there have been conflicting signals from the Government. RNZ reported the Prime Minister yesterday in ...
PolitikBy Richard Harman
1 day ago

How to Retrieve Deleted Call Log iPhone Without Computer
How to Retrieve Deleted Call Log on iPhone Without a Computer: A Step–by–Step Guide Losing your iPhone call history can be frustrating, especially when you need to find a specific number or recall an important conversation. But before you panic, know that there are ways to retrieve deleted call logs on your iPhone, even without a computer. This guide will explore various methods, ranging from simple checks to utilizing iCloud backups and third–party applications. So, let‘s dive in and recover those lost calls! 1. Check Recently Deleted Folder: Apple understands that accidental deletions happen. That‘s why they introduced the “Recently Deleted“ folder for various apps, including the Phone app. This folder acts as a safety net, storing deleted call logs for up to 30 days before permanently erasing them. Here‘s how to check it: Open the Phone app on your iPhone. Tap on the “Recents“ tab at the bottom. Scroll to the top and tap on “Edit“. Select “Show Recently Deleted“. Browse the list to find the call logs you want to recover. Tap on the desired call log and choose “Recover“ to restore it to your call history. 2. Restore from iCloud Backup: If you regularly back up your iPhone to iCloud, you might be able to retrieve your deleted call log from a previous backup. However, keep in mind that this process will restore your entire phone to the state it was in at the time of the backup, potentially erasing any data added since then. Here‘s how to restore from an iCloud backup: Go to Settings > General > Reset. Choose “Erase All Content and Settings“. Follow the on–screen instructions. Your iPhone will restart and show the initial setup screen. Choose “Restore from iCloud Backup“ during the setup process. Select the relevant backup that contains your deleted call log. Wait for the restoration process to complete. 3. Explore Third–Party Apps (with Caution): ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
1 day ago

How to Factory Reset iPhone without Computer: A Comprehensive Guide to Restoring your Device
Life throws curveballs, and sometimes, those curveballs necessitate wiping your iPhone clean and starting anew. Whether you’re facing persistent software glitches, preparing to sell your device, or simply wanting a fresh start, knowing how to factory reset iPhone without a computer is a valuable skill. While using a computer with ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

How to Call Someone on a Computer: A Guide to Voice and Video Communication in the Digital Age
Gone are the days when communication was limited to landline phones and physical proximity. Today, computers have become powerful tools for connecting with people across the globe through voice and video calls. But with a plethora of applications and methods available, how to call someone on a computer might seem ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Skeptical Science New Research for Week #16 2024
Open access notables Glacial isostatic adjustment reduces past and future Arctic subsea permafrost, Creel et al., Nature Communications: Sea-level rise submerges terrestrial permafrost in the Arctic, turning it into subsea permafrost. Subsea permafrost underlies ~ 1.8 million km2 of Arctic continental shelf, with thicknesses in places exceeding 700 m. Sea-level variations over glacial-interglacial cycles control ...
Skeptical Science
2 days ago

Where on a Computer is the Operating System Generally Stored? Delving into the Digital Home of your ...
The operating system (OS) is the heart and soul of a computer, orchestrating every action and interaction between hardware and software. But have you ever wondered where on a computer is the operating system generally stored? The answer lies in the intricate dance between hardware and software components, particularly within ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

How Many Watts Does a Laptop Use? Understanding Power Consumption and Efficiency
Laptops have become essential tools for work, entertainment, and communication, offering portability and functionality. However, with rising energy costs and growing environmental concerns, understanding a laptop’s power consumption is more important than ever. So, how many watts does a laptop use? The answer, unfortunately, isn’t straightforward. It depends on several ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

How to Screen Record on a Dell Laptop A Guide to Capturing Your Screen with Ease
Screen recording has become an essential tool for various purposes, such as creating tutorials, capturing gameplay footage, recording online meetings, or sharing information with others. Fortunately, Dell laptops offer several built-in and external options for screen recording, catering to different needs and preferences. This guide will explore various methods on ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

How Much Does it Cost to Fix a Laptop Screen? Navigating Repair Options and Costs
A cracked or damaged laptop screen can be a frustrating experience, impacting productivity and enjoyment. Fortunately, laptop screen repair is a common service offered by various repair shops and technicians. However, the cost of fixing a laptop screen can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article delves into the ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

How Long Do Gaming Laptops Last? Demystifying Lifespan and Maximizing Longevity
Gaming laptops represent a significant investment for passionate gamers, offering portability and powerful performance for immersive gaming experiences. However, a common concern among potential buyers is their lifespan. Unlike desktop PCs, which allow for easier component upgrades, gaming laptops have inherent limitations due to their compact and integrated design. This ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Climate Change: Turning the tide
The annual inventory report of New Zealand's greenhouse gas emissions has been released, showing that gross emissions have dropped for the third year in a row, to 78.4 million tons: All-told gross emissions have decreased by over 6 million tons since the Zero Carbon Act was passed in 2019. ...
No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
2 days ago

How to Unlock Your Computer A Comprehensive Guide to Regaining Access
Experiencing a locked computer can be frustrating, especially when you need access to your files and applications urgently. The methods to unlock your computer will vary depending on the specific situation and the type of lock you encounter. This guide will explore various scenarios and provide step-by-step instructions on how ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Faxing from Your Computer A Modern Guide to Sending Documents Digitally
While the world has largely transitioned to digital communication, faxing still holds relevance in certain industries and situations. Fortunately, gone are the days of bulky fax machines and dedicated phone lines. Today, you can easily send and receive faxes directly from your computer, offering a convenient and efficient way to ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Protecting Your Home Computer A Guide to Cyber Awareness
In our increasingly digital world, home computers have become essential tools for work, communication, entertainment, and more. However, this increased reliance on technology also exposes us to various cyber threats. Understanding these threats and taking proactive steps to protect your home computer is crucial for safeguarding your personal information, finances, ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Server-Based Computing Powering the Modern Digital Landscape
In the ever-evolving world of technology, server-based computing has emerged as a cornerstone of modern digital infrastructure. This article delves into the concept of server-based computing, exploring its various forms, benefits, challenges, and its impact on the way we work and interact with technology. Understanding Server-Based Computing: At its core, ...
Gareth’s WorldBy admin
2 days ago

Vroom vroom go the big red trucks
The absolute brass neck of this guy.We want more medical doctors, not more spin doctors, Luxon was saying a couple of weeks ago, and now we’re told the guy has seven salaried adults on TikTok duty. Sorry, doing social media. The absolute brass neck of it. The irony that the ...
More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
2 days ago

Jones finds $410,000 to help the government muscle in on a spat project
Buzz from the Beehive Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones relishes spatting and eagerly takes issue with environmentalists who criticise his enthusiasm for resource development. He relishes helping the fishing industry too. And so today, while the media are making much of the latest culling in the public service to ...
Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
2 days ago

Again, hate crimes are not necessarily terrorism.
Having written, taught and worked for the US government on issues involving unconventional warfare and terrorism for 30-odd years, two things irritate me the most when the subject is discussed in public. The first is the Johnny-come-lately academics-turned-media commentators who … Continue reading → ...
KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
2 days ago

Despair – construction consenting edition
Eric Crampton writes – Kainga Ora is the government’s house building agency. It’s been building a lot of social housing. Kainga Ora has its own (but independent) consenting authority, Consentium. It’s a neat idea. Rather than have to deal with building consents across each different territorial authority, Kainga Ora ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
2 days ago

Coalition promises – will the Govt keep the commitment to keep Kiwis equal before the law?
Muriel Newman writes – The Coalition Government says it is moving with speed to deliver campaign promises and reverse the damage done by Labour. One of their key commitments is to “defend the principle that New Zealanders are equal before the law.” To achieve this, they have pledged they “will not advance ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
2 days ago

An impermanent public service is a guarantee of very little else but failure
Chris Trotter writes – The absence of anything resembling a fightback from the public servants currently losing their jobs is interesting. State-sector workers’ collective fatalism in the face of Coalition cutbacks indicates a surprisingly broad acceptance of impermanence in the workplace. Fifty years ago, lay-offs in the thousands ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
2 days ago

What happens after the war – Mariupol
Mariupol, on the Azov Sea coast, was one of the first cities to suffer almost complete destruction after the start of the Ukraine War started in late February 2022. We remember the scenes of absolute destruction of the houses and city structures. The deaths of innocent civilians – many of ...
Open ParachuteBy Ken
2 days ago

Babies and benefits – no good news
Lindsay Mitchell writes – Ten years ago, I wrote the following in a Listener column: Every year around one in five new-born babies will be reliant on their caregivers benefit by Christmas. This pattern has persisted from at least 1993. For Maori the number jumps to over one in three. ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
2 days ago

Should the RBNZ be looking through climate inflation?
Climate change is expected to generate more and more extreme events, delivering a sort of structural shock to inflation that central banks will have to react to as if they were short-term cyclical issues. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
2 days ago

Bernard's pick 'n' mix of the news links
The top six news links I’ve seen elsewhere in the last 24 hours, as of 9:16 am on Thursday, April 18 are:Housing: Tauranga residents living in boats, vans RNZ Checkpoint Louise TernouthHousing: Waikato councillor says wastewater plant issues could hold up Sleepyhead building a massive company town Waikato Times Stephen ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
2 days ago

Gordon Campbell on the public sector carnage, and misogyny as terrorism
It’s a simple deal. We pay taxes in order to finance the social services we want and need. The carnage now occurring across the public sector though, is breaking that contract. Over 3,000 jobs have been lost so far. Many are in crucial areas like Education where the impact of ...
Gordon CampbellBy lyndon
2 days ago

Meeting the Master Baiters
Hi,A friend had their 40th over the weekend and decided to theme it after Curb Your Enthusiasm fashion icon Susie Greene. Captured in my tiny kitchen before I left the house, I ending up evoking a mix of old lesbian and Hillary Clinton — both unintentional.Me vs Hillary ClintonIf you’re ...
David FarrierBy David Farrier
2 days ago

How extreme was the Earth's temperature in 2023
This is a re-post from Andrew Dessler at the Climate Brink blog In 2023, the Earth reached temperature levels unprecedented in modern times. Given that, it’s reasonable to ask: What’s going on? There’s been lots of discussions by scientists about whether this is just the normal progression of global warming or if something ...
Skeptical Science
2 days ago

Backbone, revisited
The schools are on holiday and the sun is shining in the seaside village and all day long I have been seeing bunches of bikes; Mums, Dads, teens and toddlers chattering, laughing, happy, having a bloody great time together. Cheers, AT, for the bits of lane you’ve added lately around the ...
More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
3 days ago

Ministers are not above the law
Today in our National-led authoritarian nightmare: Shane Jones thinks Ministers should be above the law: New Zealand First MP Shane Jones is accusing the Waitangi Tribunal of over-stepping its mandate by subpoenaing a minister for its urgent hearing on the Oranga Tamariki claim. The tribunal is looking into the ...
No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
3 days ago

What’s the outfit you can hear going down the gurgler? Probably it’s David Parker’s Oceans Sec...
Buzz from the Beehive Point of Order first heard of the Oceans Secretariat in June 2021, when David Parker (remember him?) announced a multi-agency approach to protecting New Zealand’s marine ecosystems and fisheries. Parker (holding the Environment, and Oceans and Fisheries portfolios) broke the news at the annual Forest & ...
Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
3 days ago

Will politicians let democracy die in the darkness?
Bryce Edwards writes – Politicians across the political spectrum are implicated in the New Zealand media’s failing health. Either through neglect or incompetent interventions, successive governments have failed to regulate, foster, and allow a healthy Fourth Estate that can adequately hold politicians and the powerful to account. ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
3 days ago

Matt Doocey doubles down on trans “healthcare”
Citizen Science writes – Last week saw two significant developments in the debate over the treatment of trans-identifying children and young people – the release in Britain of the final report of Dr Hilary Cass’s review into gender healthcare, and here in New Zealand, the news that the ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
3 days ago

A TikTok Prime Minister.
One night while sleeping in my bed I had a beautiful dreamThat all the people of the world got together on the same wavelengthAnd began helping one anotherNow in this dream, universal love was the theme of the dayPeace and understanding and it happened this wayAfter such an eventful day ...
Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
3 days ago

Texas Lessons
This is a guest post by Oscar Simms who is a housing activist, volunteer for the Coalition for More Homes, and was the Labour Party candidate for Auckland Central at the last election. ...
Greater AucklandBy Guest Post
3 days ago

Bernard's pick 'n' mix of the news links at 6:06 am
The top six news links I’ve seen elsewhere in the last 24 hours as of 6:06 am on Wednesday, April 17 are:Must read: Secrecy shrouds which projects might be fast-tracked RNZ Farah HancockScoop: Revealed: Luxon has seven staffers working on social media content - partly paid for by taxpayer Newshub ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
3 days ago

Fighting poverty on the holiday highway
Turning what Labour called the “holiday highway” into a four-lane expressway from Auckland to Whangarei could bring at least an economic benefit of nearly two billion a year for Northland each year. And it could help bring an end to poverty in one of New Zealand’s most deprived regions. The ...
PolitikBy Richard Harman
3 days ago

Bernard's six-stack of substacks at 6:26 pm
Tonight’s six-stack includes: launching his substack with a bunch of his previous documentaries, including this 1992 interview with Dame Whina Cooper. and here crew give climate activists plenty to do, including this call to submit against the Fast Track Approvals bill. writes brilliantly here on his substack ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
4 days ago

At a glance – Is the science settled?
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
Skeptical Science
4 days ago

Apposite Quotations.
How Long Is Long Enough? Gaza under Israeli bombardment, July 2014. This posting is exclusive to Bowalley Road. ...
Bowalley Road
4 days ago

What’s a life worth now?
You're in the mall when you hear it: some kind of popping sound in the distance, kids with fireworks, maybe. But then a moment of eerie stillness is followed by more of the fireworks sound and there’s also screaming and shrieking and now here come people running for their lives.Does ...
More Than A FeildingBy David Slack
4 days ago

Howling at the Moon
Karl du Fresne writes – There’s a crisis in the news media and the media are blaming it on everyone except themselves. Culpability is being deflected elsewhere – mainly to the hapless Minister of Communications, Melissa Lee, and the big social media platforms that are accused of hoovering ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
4 days ago

Newshub is Dead.
I don’t normally send out two newsletters in a day but I figured I’d say something about… the news. If two newsletters is a bit much then maybe just skip one, I don’t want to overload people. Alternatively if you’d be interested in sometimes receiving multiple, smaller updates from me, ...
Nick’s KōreroBy Nick Rockel
4 days ago

Seymour is chuffed about cutting early-learning red tape – but we hear, too, that Jones has loose...
Buzz from the Beehive David Seymour and Winston Peters today signalled that at least two ministers of the Crown might be in Wellington today. Seymour (as Associate Minister of Education) announced the removal of more red tape, this time to make it easier for new early learning services to be ...
Point of OrderBy Bob Edlin
4 days ago

Bryce Edwards: Will politicians let democracy die in the darkness?
Politicians across the political spectrum are implicated in the New Zealand media’s failing health. Either through neglect or incompetent interventions, successive governments have failed to regulate, foster, and allow a healthy Fourth Estate that can adequately hold politicians and the powerful to account. Our political system is suffering from the ...
Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
4 days ago

Was Hawkesby entirely wrong?
David Farrar writes – The Broadcasting Standards Authority ruled: Comments by radio host Kate Hawkesby suggesting Māori and Pacific patients were being prioritised for surgery due to their ethnicity were misleading and discriminatory, the Broadcasting Standards Authority has found. It is a fact such patients are prioritised. ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
4 days ago

PRC shadow looms as the Solomons head for election
PRC and its proxies in Solomons have been preparing for these elections for a long time. A lot of money, effort and intelligence have gone into ensuring an outcome that won’t compromise Beijing’s plans. Cleo Paskall writes – On April 17th the Solomon Islands, a country of ...
Point of OrderBy poonzteam5443
4 days ago

Climate Change: Criminal ecocide
We are in the middle of a climate crisis. Last year was (again) the hottest year on record. NOAA has just announced another global coral bleaching event. Floods are threatening UK food security. So naturally, Shane Jones wants to make it easier to mine coal: Resources Minister Shane Jones ...
No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
4 days ago

Is saving one minute of a politician's time worth nearly $1 billion?
Is speeding up the trip to and from Wellington airport by 12 minutes worth spending up more than $10 billion? Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The six news items that stood out to me in the last day to 8:26 am today are:The Lead: Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced ...
The KakaBy Bernard Hickey
4 days ago

Fast-track submissions period must be extended
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
Greens
19 hours ago

Release: Progress on climate will be undone by Govt
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
Labour Blog
19 hours ago

Release: Dark day for Kiwi kids as a third of Govt cuts affect them
News that 1000 jobs at the Ministry of Education and Oranga Tamariki could go is devastating for future generations of New Zealanders. ...
Labour Blog
3 days ago

Release: Alarm as Government signals further blow to school lunches
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
Labour Blog
3 days ago

Release: Quick, submit – stop Govt’s dodgy approvals bill
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Labour Blog
4 days ago

Government throws coal on the climate crisis fire
The Government’s policy announced today to ease consenting for coal mining will have a lasting impact across generations. ...
Greens
4 days ago

Release: Public transport costs to double as National looks at unaffordable roading project instead
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
Labour Blog
5 days ago

Release: Cost of living in Auckland still not a priority
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
Labour Blog
5 days ago

Greens look to fast-track submissions on harmful law
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
Greens
1 week ago

Release: Govt should stop making people’s lives harder and build more homes
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Labour Blog
1 week ago

Release: Melissa Lee missing in action on media
The action Melissa Lee promised to protect democracy and the media sector is missing, Media and Communications spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...
Labour Blog
1 week ago

Landlord Government leaves little hope for renters
The Government’s announcement on tenancy rules prove that it does not care about renters. ...
Greens
1 week ago

Opportunity to build a more sustainable economy
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
Greens
1 week ago

Significant step forward in fixing cruel and unjust past
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
Greens
1 week ago

Missed opportunity but NZ will surely one day recognise the right to a sustainable environment
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Greens
1 week ago

Release: Don’t cut our lunches – clear message sent to Government
Tens of thousands of people are demanding the Government commits to fully funding free and healthy school lunches. ...
Labour Blog
1 week ago

Release: Govt makes U-turn on Suicide Prevention Office
Labour welcomes the Government’s U-turn on the closure of the Suicide Prevention Office, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

CCC issues warning over further climate delay
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Greens
2 weeks ago

Luxon targets lame and lousy example of leadership
If talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...
Greens
2 weeks ago

Luxon targets are lousy example of leadership
If talk is cheap, Chris Luxon’s “targets” are bankrupt. ...
Greens
2 weeks ago

Release: Commitment to disability communities missing from Govt priorities
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

Methane target review is dangerous duplication
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
Greens
2 weeks ago

Release: Government must commit to school building project for disabled students
The Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

Release: National must take mental health seriously
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey and his Government colleagues have made a meal of their mental health commitments, showing how flimsy their efforts to champion the issue truly are, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

Referendums for Māori wards a racist step backwards
The Government's imposed referendum on Māori wards is a racist step backwards for Māori representation, and disregards Te Tiriti o Waitangi. ...
Greens
2 weeks ago

Release: Job losses at Health not worth it for tax cuts
New Zealand will feel the harm of the National Government’s reckless cuts to jobs at the health ministry for generations, says Ayesha Verrall. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

Press release: No Māori initiatives in Government’s nothing plan
Māori are yet to see anything from this Government except cuts, reversals and taking our people backwards, Māori Development spokesperson Willie Jackson said. ...
Labour Blog
2 weeks ago

Thirty six point PR spin
The Government’s ‘36 point’ plan for the next three months is as pointless as it is hollow. ...
Greens
3 weeks ago

Thirty six point PR spin
The Government’s ‘36 point’ plan for the next three months is as pointless as it is hollow. ...
Greens
3 weeks ago

Thirty six point PR spin
The Government’s ‘36 point’ plan for the next three months is as pointless as it is hollow. ...
Greens
3 weeks ago

Release: Social housing off Government’s to-do list
The Coalition Government’s refusal to commit to ongoing funding for social housing is seeing the sector pull back on developments and families watch their dreams of securing a home fade away, says Labour Housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty. ...
Labour Blog
3 weeks ago

Release: Less money in most people’s pockets this April
Changes to minimum wage and benefit indexation means many New Zealanders will get less this year, as the Government gives a big tax break to landlords instead. ...
Labour Blog
3 weeks ago

PM’s South East Asia mission does the business
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 hours ago

$41m to support clean energy in South East Asia
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
19 hours ago

Minister releases Fast-track stakeholder list
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
21 hours ago

Judicial appointments announced
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
22 hours ago

Education Minister heads to major teaching summit in Singapore
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
23 hours ago

Value of stopbank project proven during cyclone
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
23 hours ago

Anzac commemorations, Türkiye relationship focus of visit
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
23 hours ago

Minister to Europe for OECD meeting, Anzac Day
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 day ago

Comprehensive Partnership the goal for NZ and the Philippines
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Government commits $20m to Westport flood protection
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Taupō takes pole position
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Cost of living support for low-income homeowners
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Government backing mussel spat project
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Government focused on getting people into work
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Clean energy key driver to reducing emissions
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Earthquake-prone buildings review brought forward
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
2 days ago

Thailand and NZ to agree to Strategic Partnership
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 days ago

Government consults on extending coastal permits for ports
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 days ago

Inflation coming down, but more work to do
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 days ago

School attendance restored as a priority in health advice
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 days ago

Unnecessary bureaucracy cut in oceans sector
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
3 days ago

Patterson promoting NZ’s wool sector at International Congress
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
4 days ago

Removing red tape to help early learners thrive
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
4 days ago

RMA changes to cut coal mining consent red tape
Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
4 days ago

McClay reaffirms strong NZ-China trade relationship
Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
4 days ago

Prime Minister Luxon acknowledges legacy of Singapore Prime Minister Lee
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

PMs Luxon and Lee deepen Singapore-NZ ties
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. While in Singapore as part of his visit to South East Asia this week, Prime Minister Luxon also met with Singapore President Tharman Shanmugaratnam and will meet with Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

Antarctica New Zealand Board appointments
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has made further appointments to the Board of Antarctica New Zealand as part of a continued effort to ensure the Scott Base Redevelopment project is delivered in a cost-effective and efficient manner. The Minister has appointed Neville Harris as a new member of the Board. Mr ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

Finance Minister travels to Washington DC
Finance Minister Nicola Willis will travel to the United States on Tuesday to attend a meeting of the Five Finance Ministers group, with counterparts from Australia, the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. “I am looking forward to meeting with our Five Finance partners on how we can work ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

Pet bonds a win/win for renters and landlords
The coalition Government has today announced purrfect and pawsitive changes to the Residential Tenancies Act to give tenants with pets greater choice when looking for a rental property, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Pets are important members of many Kiwi families. It’s estimated that around 64 per cent of New ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

Long Tunnel for SH1 Wellington being considered
State Highway 1 (SH1) through Wellington City is heavily congested at peak times and while planning continues on the duplicate Mt Victoria Tunnel and Basin Reserve project, the Government has also asked NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) to consider and provide advice on a Long Tunnel option, Transport Minister Simeon Brown ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
5 days ago

New Zealand condemns Iranian strikes
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Foreign Minister Winston Peters have condemned Iran’s shocking and illegal strikes against Israel. “These attacks are a major challenge to peace and stability in a region already under enormous pressure," Mr Luxon says. "We are deeply concerned that miscalculation on any side could ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
6 days ago

Huge interest in Government’s infrastructure plans
Hundreds of people in little over a week have turned out in Northland to hear Regional Development Minister Shane Jones speak about plans for boosting the regional economy through infrastructure. About 200 people from the infrastructure and associated sectors attended an event headlined by Mr Jones in Whangarei today. Last ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Health Minister thanks outgoing Health New Zealand Chair
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti has today thanked outgoing Health New Zealand – Te Whatu Ora Chair Dame Karen Poutasi for her service on the Board. “Dame Karen tendered her resignation as Chair and as a member of the Board today,” says Dr Reti. “I have asked her to ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Roads of National Significance planning underway
The NZ Transport Agency (NZTA) has signalled their proposed delivery approach for the Government’s 15 Roads of National Significance (RoNS), with the release of the State Highway Investment Proposal (SHIP) today, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “Boosting economic growth and productivity is a key part of the Government’s plan to ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Navigating an unstable global environment
New Zealand is renewing its connections with a world facing urgent challenges by pursuing an active, energetic foreign policy, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “Our country faces the most unstable global environment in decades,” Mr Peters says at the conclusion of two weeks of engagements in Egypt, Europe and the United States. “We cannot afford to sit back in splendid ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

NZ welcomes Australian Governor-General
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has announced the Australian Governor-General, His Excellency General The Honourable David Hurley and his wife Her Excellency Mrs Linda Hurley, will make a State visit to New Zealand from Tuesday 16 April to Thursday 18 April. The visit reciprocates the State visit of former Governor-General Dame Patsy Reddy ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Pseudoephedrine back on shelves for Winter
Associate Health Minister David Seymour has announced that Medsafe has approved 11 cold and flu medicines containing pseudoephedrine. Pharmaceutical suppliers have indicated they may be able to supply the first products in June. “This is much earlier than the original expectation of medicines being available by 2025. The Government recognised ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

NZ and the US: an ever closer partnership
New Zealand and the United States have recommitted to their strategic partnership in Washington DC today, pledging to work ever more closely together in support of shared values and interests, Foreign Minister Winston Peters says. “The strategic environment that New Zealand and the United States face is considerably more ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Joint US and NZ declaration
April 11, 2024 Joint Declaration by United States Secretary of State the Honorable Antony J. Blinken and New Zealand Minister of Foreign Affairs the Right Honourable Winston Peters We met today in Washington, D.C. to recommit to the historic partnership between our two countries and the principles that underpin it—rule ...
BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
1 week ago

Why the pathology bulk-billing campaign is more about driving industry profits than saving you money
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne iamharin/Shutterstock For many people, the term “bulk billed” refers to a GP visit they don’t have to pay ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
40 mins ago

All about Emma: Three writers talk about the name they share in common
Emmas Hislop, Sidnam and Wehipeihana discuss what’s in a name. Emma Sidnam: Hello Emmas! Thank you so much for agreeing to do this with me. My first question for you is related to what’s been on my mind for a while. It’s very important. You see we’ve recently had some ...
The SpinoffBy The Spinoff Review of Books
58 mins ago

Restoring coastal habitat boosts wildlife numbers by 61% – but puzzling failures mean we can still...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michael Sievers, Research Fellow, Global Wetlands Project, Australia Rivers Institute, Griffith University Chris Brown Humans love the coast. But we love it to death, so much so we’ve destroyed valuable coastal habitat – in the case of some types of habitat, ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 hour ago

Public sector job cuts: Affected staff criticise leaders' handling of announcements
Staff are shell shocked and frustrated, and say leaders handled the announcements poorly. ...
Radio NZ – political
1 hour ago

‘The room went dead quiet’: Josh Thomson on his worst 7 Days moment
Josh Thomson on the 80s milk ad jingle he can’t stop singing, the beauty of The Simpsons, why Jersey Shore is as good as Shakespeare and more. For someone who spends a lot of time on our screens, popping up in everything from 7 Days to Taskmaster, Educators to Good ...
The SpinoffBy My Life in TV
2 hours ago

Shadow-boxing turns real for Israel and Iran
In apparent defiance of the Biden administration, the Netanyahu government has now initiated missile strikes against Iran. Last Saturday night (Sunday morning in New Zealand) Iran launched more than 300 drones, cruise missiles and ballistic missiles against Israeli military targets. With the assistance of US, UK and possibly French forces, ...
NewsroomBy Newsroom Contributor
4 hours ago

Prime Minister Christopher Luxon meets KPIs on Southeast Asia mission
Power Play - Asked for his own assessment of the visit, the prime minister said he was returning home "excited and energised". ...
Radio NZ – political
5 hours ago

Embracing Māori Representation Enriches Democracy, Not Divides It
Māori representation brings a perspective that encompasses not only the interests of Māori communities but also a broader, holistic approach to environmental stewardship and community well-being, principles deeply embedded in Te Ao Māori (the Māori ...
Scoop politics
5 hours ago

Anne Salmond: My open submission on this radical, flawed fast-track bill
This week in Auckland, a group of young people took over the microphone at a ministerial press conference, to explain why they oppose the Fast-Track Approvals Bill. One young woman said, ‘We’re here because we love Aotearoa New Zealand. We want to raise our children in an environment that’s thriving, ...
NewsroomBy Dame Anne Salmond
5 hours ago

Short story: Finally, by Caoimhe McKeogh
The summer was wonderful. Evie was wonderful, too; finally a teenager, finally worthy of long, hot days. She shaved her legs for the first time and bought cut-off shorts from the op-shop that made them look long. She got a Warehouse singlet so tight on her new shape that her ...
NewsroomBy Caoimhe McKeogh
5 hours ago

Thomas James is a master of invention
When Thomas James was on his solo camp as part of Outward Bound, the keen outdoorsman didn’t find it too challenging, as others often do. In what might just be the perfect illustration of his character, he saw it as a great opportunity to solve a few problems. “I thought, ...
NewsroomBy Ben Fahy
5 hours ago

All 28 road tunnels in New Zealand ranked from worst to best
From the unstable and drippy to the hi-tech and pretty, here’s our ranking of all the tunnels you can drive through in this country. The first tunnel seems to have been built in 2200BC in Babylonia, kicking off a global phenomenon for digging holes in order to get places more ...
The SpinoffBy Group Think
6 hours ago

How to make the most of your market haul
Lucinda Bennett on the art of being greedy but resourceful. This is an excerpt from our weekly food newsletter, The Boil Up. When I picture the market, it is always this time of year. Crisp air, dripping nose, counting coins with cold fingers. Sunlight pale, filtered through specks of dew still ...
The SpinoffBy Lucinda Bennett
6 hours ago

From a library basement comes a fashion history
Zoë Colling’s favourite piece in the ‘That’s So Last Century’ collection is a lubrication chart for a sewing machine from the ’60s. It’s about the size of a postcard, and carefully maintained. “I like it that this piece of ephemera highlights that manual and technical side of the skill involved ...
NewsroomBy Sharon Brettkelly
6 hours ago

Rousing farewell for Kiwi doctors flying out to Gaza aid flotilla
Kia Ora Gaza A passionate haka reverberated through Auckland International Airport as a medical team of three New Zealand doctors received an emotional farewell from a big crowd of supporters before flying to Turkey to join the international Freedom Flotilla to Gaza. The doctors, who left Auckland yesterday, hope to ...
Evening ReportBy Asia Pacific Report
13 hours ago

Communities Against The Fast-track Heartened By ‘Overwhelming’ Public Response; Disgusted By ‘...
With submissions closing today, Macassey-Pickard says groups around the country have been supporting a huge range of people to make their submissions. ...
Scoop politics
15 hours ago

Renters Rights To Drastically Reduce Under Landlord Government
The Government’s announced changes around tenancy rules set renters’ rights back by nearly a decade. ...
Scoop politics
15 hours ago

NZPI Submission on Fast Track Approvals Bill
Our response to the new legislation is informed by targeted conversations with practitioners working in the system and through an implementation lens. ...
Scoop politics
15 hours ago

Fast Track Invite List Includes Most Destructive Industries In New Zealand
The new ‘Fast-track Approvals Bill’ would give just three Ministers the power to approve or deny development projects. They would avoid the usual checks and balances that are in place to protect rivers, land, the ocean, and communities. ...
Scoop politics
15 hours ago

Eugene Doyle: Helen Clark on why AUKUS isn’t in New Zealand’s national interest
COMMENTARY: By Eugene Doyle Helen Clark, how I miss you. The former New Zealand Prime Minister — the safest pair of hands this country has had in living memory — gave a masterclass on the importance of maintaining an independent foreign policy when she spoke at an AUKUS symposium held ...
Evening ReportBy Asia Pacific Report
15 hours ago

Government releases list of organisations shoulder-tapped for fast-track consents
The government's released the list of organisations provided with information on how to apply - just hours before public submissions on the bill close. ...
Radio NZ – political
16 hours ago

The Week in Politics: Job cuts surge and Waitangi Tribunal trouble
Analysis - It's been a grim week for public servants, while trouble is also brewing between the government and Waitangi Tribunal. ...
Radio NZ – political
17 hours ago

It never rains but it pours: intense rain and flash floods have increased inland in eastern Australi...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Milton Speer, Visiting Fellow, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Technology Sydney Before climate change really got going, eastern Australia’s flash floods tended to concentrate on our coastal regions, east of the Great Dividing Range. But that’s changing. Now ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
18 hours ago

Watch: Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Manila
The PM has defended how he's talked up NZ trade on his trip to Southeast Asia, after criticism from his own delegation. ...
Radio NZ – political
18 hours ago

‘It could be the death of the museum’: why research cuts at a South Australian institution have ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elizabeth Finkel, Vice-Chancellor’s Fellow, La Trobe University Sia Duff / South Australian Museum In February, the South Australian Museum “re-imagined” itself. In the face of rising costs and inadequate government funds, CEO David Gaimster, who took the reins last June, declared ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
18 hours ago

Government signs off $41m clean energy deal with Asian Development Bank
The government has committed $41 million to clean energy transition at the Asian Development Bank's Energy Transition Mechanism. ...
Radio NZ – political
18 hours ago

Are 2 mid-career AFL retirements a sign Australian athletes are taking brain health more seriously?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alan Pearce, Professor, School of Allied Heath, Human Services & Sport, La Trobe University, La Trobe University This week, Collingwood AFL player Nathan Murphy announced his retirement, brought on by his concussion history and ongoing issues. The 24-year-old’s seemingly sudden retirement, ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
20 hours ago

Luxon: Waitangi Tribunal comments from coalition parties 'ill considered'
Comments from ACT and NZ First ministers about the Tribunal were "ill considered" and "that message will be underscored" to them, the PM says. ...
Radio NZ – political
20 hours ago

Mental Health Foundation Facing Staff Cuts From Govt Funding Squeeze
The Mental Health Foundation provides support and resources for those facing the loss of their job, so it’s wrong in the very week the Government adds another 1000 jobs to its tally of cuts, that this is happening. ...
Scoop politics
21 hours ago

I wholeheartedly recommend The President: a brilliant revival of a play of decay, terror and revulsi...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexander Howard, Senior Lecturer, Discipline of English and Writing, University of Sydney Daniel Boud/Sydney Theatre Company Decay, terror, revulsion. These are three of the central themes of Thomas Bernhard’s rarely performed play The President. The Austrian is one of the greatest ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
21 hours ago

How the coolest little capital is shrinking
It's not the first time a government has targeted public servants for job cuts, but this time Wellington is really feeling it. ...
Radio NZ – political
21 hours ago

Many prisoners go years without touching a smartphone. It means they struggle to navigate life on th...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ye In (Jane) Hwang, Postdoctoral Research Associate at School of Population Health, UNSW Sydney Shutterstock You’d be hard pressed to find any aspect of daily life that doesn’t require some form of digital literacy. We need only to look back ten ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
21 hours ago

Ministers accused of Cabinet Manual breach with threats to Waitangi Tribunal
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says threats by ministers Shane Jones and David Seymour to reform or close down the Waitangi Tribunal were “ill-considered”, as legal experts say the ministers may have breached Cabinet Manual conventions. “I think those comments are ill-considered and we expect all ministers to actually exercise good ...
NewsroomBy Marc Daalder
21 hours ago

Good news: midlife health is about more than a waist measurement. Here’s why
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rob Newton, Professor of Exercise Medicine, Edith Cowan University Pexels/RDNE stock project You’re not in your 20s or 30s anymore and you know regular health checks are important. So you go to your GP. During the appointment they measure your waist. ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
21 hours ago

The Friday Poem: ‘Mitochondrial Problem’ by Evangeline Riddiford Graham
A new poem by Evangeline Riddiford Graham. Mitochondrial Problem I. It was long drive to Kansas for the man and his dog but you have to understand he said She doesn’t fly. Which calls to mind not carsick shitting barking or whining but a dog who chooses not to as ...
The SpinoffBy Evangeline Riddiford Graham
21 hours ago

The Unity Books bestseller chart for the week ending April 18
The only published and available best-selling indie book chart in New Zealand is the top 10 sales list recorded every week at Unity Books’ stores in High St, Auckland, and Willis St, Wellington. AUCKLAND 1 Hemingway’s Goblet by Dermot Ross (Mary Egan Publishing, $38) Hot off the press, this debut ...
The SpinoffBy The Spinoff Review of Books
21 hours ago

Department of Conservation closing Dunedin centre, but no jobs lost
Visitor habits are changing and DOC needs to adapt in a financially sustainable way, its operations director says. ...
Radio NZ – political
22 hours ago

Unions Collaborate With Thousands Of Job Cuts
With New Zealand officially in recession, a swathe of mass sackings is currently sending shockwaves through the entire working class. ...
Scoop politics
22 hours ago

Watch live: Christopher Luxon speaks to media in Manila
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is speaking to reporters in Manila after pledging greater defence cooperation with the Philippines. Watch live. ...
Radio NZ – political
22 hours ago

Government sent please explain letter to Wellington City Council over transport disagreement
The contents were revealed in correspondence from Simeon Brown and Chris Bishop to Wellington's Mayor. ...
Radio NZ – political
22 hours ago

Some families push back against journalists who mine social media for photos – they have every rig...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Laura Wajnryb McDonald, PhD candidate in Criminology, University of Sydney Less than 24 hours after Ashlee Good was murdered in Bondi Junction, her family released a statement requesting the media take down photographs they had reproduced of Ashlee and her family without ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
22 hours ago

Mental Health Foundation staff cuts loom, with funding falling behind rising costs
Chief executive Shaun Robinson said it has not had any government funding cut, but government-funded contracts have not kept pace with rising costs. ...
Radio NZ – political
22 hours ago

The ‘devil comet’ 12P/Pons-Brooks has finally become visible from Australia. What can we expect?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jonti Horner, Professor (Astrophysics), University of Southern Queensland Pons–Brooks visible from Utah, March 9 2024. James Peirce/Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND If you’re a fan of all things space, you’ve doubtless heard about the “devil comet”, which has been captivating keen-eyed observers in the ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
23 hours ago

Rugby stadiums are sold as an economic asset – but NZ needs to ask if they’re really worth it
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Robert Hamlin, Senior Lecturer in Marketing , University of Otago A multi-billion dollar stadium precinct has been proposed for Auckland, one of three proposals in front of Auckland Council for a new stadium in the city. The council is also considering revamping ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
23 hours ago

Auckland dog attacks: Callouts for attacks on other animals going up
Roaming dogs are responsible for more than a thousand attacks on animals each year, and the number is growing. ...
Radio NZ – political
23 hours ago

What access to puberty blockers means for trans young people and their whānau
The Ministry of Health has delayed the release of its evidence brief on the safety, reversibility and mental health and wellbeing outcomes for puberty blockers. While we wait, Julia de Bres speaks to those with firsthand experience. Best practice gender-affirming healthcare is based on trans people’s self-determination and agency. The ...
The SpinoffBy Julia de Bres
23 hours ago

NZ and Philippines pledge defence cooperation amid rising tensions
The commitment came after a sit-down meeting between Christopher Luxon and President Ferdinand "Bongbong" Romualdez Marcos Jr overnight. ...
Radio NZ – political
1 day ago

How superblocks can help reimagine city life
Barcelona’s city streets have gone from traffic-clogged to pedestrian-friendly. How? Superblocks. Ellen Rykers explains. This is an excerpt from our weekly environmental newsletter Future Proof. Sign up here. Last week I read a great interview with renowned urbanist Janette Sadik-Khan by The Spinoff’s Wellington editor Joel MacManus: “You can reimagine streets, ...
The SpinoffBy Ellen Rykers
1 day ago

Fire engineering expertise may take a big hit with job cuts at MBIE
The public sector cuts are poised to take out a big chunk of expertise at the country's building regulator. ...
Radio NZ – political
1 day ago

“Fast-track Law To Kill Kiwi”: Students Say Fight Against Anti-democracy Legislation Is Only Jus...
Student groups ‘Climate Action VUW’, Schools Strike 4 Climate and VUWSA will be on the street in Wellington today, the last day for submissions on the Fast-track Approvals Bill, with a message that the fight against the Government’s ‘War on ...
Scoop politics
1 day ago

‘We have thousands of Modis’: the secret behind the BJP’s enduring success in India
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sofia Ammassari, Research Fellow, Griffith University Since 2014, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s popularity has grown exponentially – and so has the formidable organisational machine of his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). These two factors will be key to delivering the BJP a ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

Online schooling is not just for lockdowns. Could it work for your child?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Brendon Hyndman, Associate Professor of Education (Adjunct) & Senior Manager (BCE), Charles Sturt University During COVID almost all Australian students and their families experienced online learning. But while schools have long since gone back to in-person teaching, online learning has not gone ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

Hear me out: You can shove your reusable period products
Yes, they’re better for the environment. No, that’s not a good enough reason for me to use them. Once every 26 days or so, my period arrives, and if struck by an act of God, I am caught red-crotched without products. How, after 17 years of this, do I still ...
The SpinoffBy Kristin Kelly
1 day ago

Rip It Up And Start Over – Fast-Track Approvals Bill Needs To Be Scrapped
“It will cause significant harm to our environment and communities. It is completely at odds with New Zealanders’ relationship with nature and our need for a low-carbon, sustainable economic future." ...
Scoop politics
1 day ago

Maori Authority Warns Government On Fast Track Legislation
The Chair of the National Maori Authority, Matthew Tukaki, has warned a Parliamentary Select Committee that fast-tracking legislation is a perilous practice that undermines the core tenets of democracy, transparency, and accountability. ...
Scoop politics
1 day ago

Why the government’s haste in changing the health system could come back to haunt it
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Tim Tenbensel, Associate Professor, Health Policy, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Getty Images Since coming into power, the coalition government has adopted a simple but shrewd see-how-fast-we-can-move political strategy. However, in the health sector this need for speed entails ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

Many suicides are related to gambling. How can we tackle this problem?
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Anastasia Hronis, Clinical Psychologist, University of Technology Sydney Darya Sannikova/Pexels Whether you’re watching TV, attending a footy game, or eating a meal at your local pub, gambling is hard to escape. Although the rise of gambling is not unique to Australia, ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

Things that go buzz in the night – our global study found there really are more insects out after ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Wong, Forrest Fellow, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Western Australia Have you ever wondered if there are more insects out at night than during the day? We set out to answer this question by combing through the scientific ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

Why don’t Australians talk about their salaries? Pay transparency and fairness go hand-in-hand
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Carol T Kulik, Research Professor, University of South Australia IR Stone/Shutterstock In Australia, it’s not the done thing to know – let alone ask – what our colleagues are paid. Yet, it’s easy to see how pay transparency can make pay ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
1 day ago

‘Character’ And Its Impact On Immigration Status
The Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment (MBIE) is sounding a warning to migrants, that running foul of the law may see them leaving the country prematurely. ...
Scoop politics
1 day ago

20,000 more on jobseeker benefits than this time last year
The government’s plan to get 50,000 people off jobseeker support by 2030 has had a rocky start, writes Catherine McGregor in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. Beneficiary numbers are up – and so are ...
The SpinoffBy Catherine McGregor
1 day ago

All of the Raglan Roast cafes in Wellington, ranked from worst to best
Raglan Roast is a staple of Wellington coffee culture. But with five branches across the capital, which one is the best? I am a die-hard Raglan Roast fan. It’s consistently the most affordable cafe in Wellington, and one of the only places you can get a coffee after 3pm. So, ...
The SpinoffBy Zoë Mills
1 day ago

Auckland uni students threaten rent strike over rising accommodation fees
Residents of University of Auckland halls are being urged to withhold their accommodation fees from May 1, in a bid to force the university to take student concerns over rent hikes seriously. The University of Auckland is facing a strike from students over the cost of on-campus accommodation. The Students ...
The SpinoffBy Stewart Sowman-Lund
1 day ago

Emissions fall again – now NZ needs to up the pace
Official figures confirm New Zealand produced less climate pollution in 2022 than in any other year in the 21st century The post Emissions fall again – now NZ needs to up the pace appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Marc Daalder
1 day ago

Warning of death from a million cuts as Oceans Secretariat dissolved
Shane Jones says people voted for change, but opponents say small cuts such as ending a special oceans secretariat are starting to add up The post Warning of death from a million cuts as Oceans Secretariat dissolved appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Andrew Bevin
1 day ago

Defence deal to counter Beijing’s aggression in South China Sea
New Zealand and the Philippines have signed a new maritime security agreement and stated their concerns over activity in the South China Sea, as Chinese vessels continue to flout international law. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Philippines President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos committed to signing a Mutual Logistics Supporting Arrangement by ...
NewsroomBy Laura Walters
1 day ago

Wellington’s ebb and flow of public servants
The thousands of government “back-office” job cuts are causing widespread pain in the capital city. In today’s episode of The Detail, we speak to three journalists and a think tank researcher, looking at the larger picture around the cuts and what effect it will have on Wellington, a city that’s ...
NewsroomBy Tom Kitchin
1 day ago

New Zealand transport planning has gone off the rails
Opinion: The famed American architect and urban designer Daniel Burnham once said, “Make no little plans. They have no magic to stir men’s blood!” Burnham wouldn’t have been referring to the transport plans in Aotearoa New Zealand over the past five years; projects so big they hadn’t the credibility to ...
NewsroomBy Dr Timothy F Welch
1 day ago

Daily crossword, Friday 19 April
The post Daily crossword, Friday 19 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Newsroom Puzzles
1 day ago

Brakes on transport and logistics sector as demand for freight slows
The transport sector is currently in the slow lane The post Brakes on transport and logistics sector as demand for freight slows appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Emma Hatton
1 day ago

Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 19 April
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question? Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Friday 19 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Newsroom Puzzles
1 day ago

Financial literacy should be on all of us
Opinion: With maths understanding at 42 percent for Year 8 students, there’s no doubt something has to be done. But how? The post Financial literacy should be on all of us appeared first on Newsroom. ...
NewsroomBy Bryce Marsden
1 day ago

Missy rustles to stardom in Canada
Hineaupounamu ‘Missy’ Nuku has been scaling mountains in Canada for her college basketball team, the Lakeland Rustlers. Alberta is currently home for the 20-year-old point guard, who is in her first year of a scholarship at Lakeland College, where she is studying for a business degree. She has certainly made ...
NewsroomBy Aiden McLaughlin
1 day ago

Grattan on Friday: Ethnic tensions will complicate the Albanese government’s multicultural policy ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Michelle Grattan, Professorial Fellow, University of Canberra When ASIO boss Mike Burgess delivered his annual threat assessment earlier this year, he stressed the rising danger posed by espionage and foreign interference. “In 2024, threats to our way of life have surpassed ...
Evening ReportBy The Conversation
2 days ago

Group plans work to improve safety of female MPs
New research shows harassment of elected officials - especially women - is on the rise. ...
Radio NZ – political
2 days ago

National’s campaign to muzzle union continues

Related Posts

139 comments on “National’s campaign to muzzle union continues ”

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Related Posts

Related Posts

Related Posts

Related Posts

National’s campaign to muzzle union continues

Share this:

Related Posts

139 comments on “National’s campaign to muzzle union continues ”

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Share this:

Related Posts

Share this:

Related Posts

Share this:

Related Posts

Share this:

Related Posts