web analytics

National’s vision: employment without dignity

Written By: - Date published: 3:23 pm, March 3rd, 2010 - 52 comments
Categories: national, workers' rights - Tags:

The National Government’s latest proposals to strip away workers’ protections against unfair dismissal, including extending the 90 day fire at will law, must surely put to bed any idea that this is a moderate, centrist government.

Over the last few months the Government has started to step up its attacks on workers’ rights, eschewing any sweeping overhauls of the Employment Relations Act and going instead for a strategy of death by a thousand cuts.

In an area that marks the core of the Left-Right divide this growing boldness is a telling sign of who National is governing for and raises questions about how long the myth of the centrist John Key can continue.

As the Greens point out, the latest proposals go beyond anything in National’s pre-election industrial relations policy, and I’d add that they go well beyond even the Employment Contracts Act 1991.

National’s proposals include:

  • Expanding the 90 day fire at will period, possibly up to six months.
  • Expanding the 90 day fire at will law to cover even more workers, with a suggestion of taking away rights to fairness and due process from all workers in businesses where there are fewer than 50 employees.
  • Giving employers many more grounds to dismiss workers.
  • Removing natural justice requirements in the dismissal process, including the right to be told what the charges are against you, the right to explain yourself, the right to have that explanation considered, and the right to a fair process.
  • Further limiting the time limit in which an employee can take a personal grievance.
  • Removing reinstatement as a primary remedy.
  • Removing all rights to fairness and due process in dismissal for people over a certain income threshold.

This really is pretty extreme stuff, and there’s no need to go into a detailed rebuttal of each point here. The most telling thing is the weakness of the arguments from National and the business lobby. There appears to be no real reason for this other than the fact that many employers simply don’t understand employment law and don’t like it when that law holds them to account for their mistakes and for their failures of management.

National’s line today on Morning Report was that the law is too focused on process rather than substance, and that employers should not have follow fair process when sacking someone. There’s no evidence for this, all they have is a few anecdotes from the employer lobby, while the minister’s own discussion document shows most people are happy with the current system. Indeed, you’ve got to wonder what use a right to fair process would be if there were no sanction on employers who breached it.

Meanwhile Business NZ’s Phil O’Reilly is claiming that taking away the right to appeal against unfair dismissal and denying natural justice will boost economic growth and reduce unemployment. He doesn’t have a shred of evidence either, and I doubt he believes this nonsense himself.

When you cut through the spin and the bullshit, there’s nothing here but pure self-interest from the employer lobby and their representatives in the National Party.

So, what’s at stake here for working New Zealanders if these proposals go ahead? Quite a bit, actually. As Andrew Little put it yesterday, ‘the ability to take away someone’s economic livelihood is a huge amount of power, and it’s a basic democratic right that all workers have access to natural justice.’

That cuts to the core of what this debate is really about. Employers have a huge amount of power over our lives. When you take away someone’s job you’re taking away their economic livelihood. You’re taking away the means to keep a roof over their heads, to put food on their dinner table and to support their family. An employer holds in their hands the threat of their employee’s financial ruin.

There’s a huge social element here too. A person’s job is a large part of their social life and of their identity. Often a job is the very reason a person moves to a place and becomes part of a community. Taking that away from someone in an arbitrary and unfair fashion is frequently humiliating and emotionally devastating.

In civilised societies we ensure that power as great as this is checked against abuse. In the political arena we have civil rights to protect us against potential abuses of power by the state. We don’t leave it up to citizens to ‘fend for themselves’ against the state or tell them to ‘leave this country and find another one if you don’t like it’. We limit the state’s power to ensure against abuse.

The same principle should apply for corporate power, particularly in the employment relationship. That’s why work rights are important to a democratic society – they’re not just some economic imposition on employers, they’re the civil rights of the workplace.

In rolling back these rights, National and the business lobby are trying to restore the economic relations of the 19th century. Some have mistakenly tried to compare the principle of at-will employment to medieval serfdom. I don’t think that’s quite right. For all the crimes of serfdom, at least there was a sense of noblesse oblige on the part of the landed aristocracy.

The principle of fire at will employment removes even that it is the ultimate commodification and dehumanisation of labour. You are not a human being with a right to dignity and respect and fairness in the workplace. You are a unit of labour, no different from a cargo of steel or a truck full of timber. If your employer doesn’t need you for whatever reason then you’re down the road you, your family, your social standing, the lot of it. It is a charter for employment without dignity.

When John Howard tried this in Australia with WorkChoices a few years back it was widely recognised as a step too far to the right and he was comprehensively turfed out at the next election. Here in New Zealand, John Key gets puff pieces about his visit to a bunch of gushing private school girls in Wellington.

The challenge for the New Zealand labour movement is to take these proposals and all the rest of National’s attacks on our work rights and form it into a coherent narrative about a Government that stands for the rich few at the top and against the interests of the many. And the media commentariat needs to get over the idea that just because John Key goes to the Big Gay Out one day then cuts taxes for the rich the next that makes him a centrist.

52 comments on “National’s vision: employment without dignity”

  1. Armchair Critic 1

    “You are a unit of labour, no different from a cargo of steel or a truck full of timber.”
    When will National realise that people are more than “resources”? Without even addressing the ethical side of the argument, the plan is a fail because cargoes of steel and truck loads of timber do not participate in the economy by spending whatever income they receive over their lifetime. Important difference, that.

  2. Onomatopoeia 2

    But you guys told me the world was going to end with the 90 days “fire at will” bill. People would be starving in the streets. Women would be raped with impunity by their employers. That didn’t happen. So why would I believe you now?

    • Where? Sources please.

      • lprent 2.1.1

        I bet you never get an answer… Idiots like this ‘Onomatopoeia’ are good at making crap up through ‘common-sense’ and totally useless at proving anything that they say is ‘true’.

        In fact it is almost the distinguishing feature of a wingnut… In this case he is starting to look to me like he is a troll…

        • Onomatopoeia 2.1.1.1

          I’ll take that bet. lprent. What are you putting up?

          • mickysavage 2.1.1.1.1

            How about you come up with the sources.

          • lprent 2.1.1.1.2

            It was a bet between the savage and myself – not you.

            I notice that you still haven’t put anything up to prove your assertion…. Did I ever mention what I do to people that just come here to bullshit without anything more between their ears than empty space?

            • Onomatopoeia 2.1.1.1.2.1

              On 9 December 2008 at 2:06 on the thread entitled “Ramming it through” Irishbill predicted widespread sexual harrassment of employees by employers. For some reason, it will not let me copy the link but you can look it up yourself.

              Now I have to admit to being a bit confused about who wins what. r0b wins me not being banned? I’m uncertain of the degree to which he is likely to value that.

              My catchpa is “staying”. It’s in the stars, lprent.

              [lprent: Not exactly. The stars don’t have control of this site. I do. You have to conform to the rough policies of this site. One of the things that I hand out bans for is making assertions without evidence when challenged. To not do so is viewed as evidence of trolling. ]

              • You mean here?

                If you read the comments properly a troll accused Irish of saying something like this. He said nothing of the sort apart from this:

                “I have a friend that has recently dealt with a case in which a small employer decided to reduce a new worker’s hour to a point where they were effectively zero because she rebuffed his advances during a staff night on the piss. That cost that employer a considerable sum. Not for the sexual harassment but for the breach of process.

                Besides you said “you guys” implying more than one. Yet you come up with only one source and it does not say what you claimed it would say.

                Onomataopoeis you are looking more and more like a troll.

                Slept under any bridges lately?

              • omomatopoeia

                One of the things that I hand out bans for…

                That’s the problem around here, and with the left in general. Time was, there was fun to be had here. Ribbing was tolerated accross the divide. Now, Irishbill wades in at a moment’s notice proclaiming (like it is something to be proud of) that not all left wingers are liberal and lprent will accuse anyone who disagrees with him of being a troll. Meanwhile the infantile smugenss of a BLip is encouraged as if he were clever and the mindless facism of a Millsy gets tacit approval. This place used to be reasonably unique in the NZ cyberspace discourse. Now it is a sad little echo chamber.

                [lprent: That is your opinion. Generally it is a hell of lot easier to read without the daft comments derived from reading the debris extracted from your navel. The number of comments keeps increasing and is generally of a higher quality that is actually interesting. If you can’t evolve, then that is mainly your problem. In the end I really don’t care that much about what your opinion is – it is seldom backed with any evidence. ]

              • yeahright

                Watch it buddy or you will be banned

              • felix

                Waaah! It’s no fun here! They make me back up my bullshit and I just caaaaan’t!

                Poor stupid fuck. Go cry somewhere else.

              • Onomatopoeia

                Hey, lprent, I actually like you. You are obviously very well meaning and talented in surprisingly wide-ranging number of fields. But have you noticed that none of your posts seem to attract much traffic. That’s because, despite being well-meaning, intelligent and hard-working, you are not actually that interesting. You are a basically nice human being who has gone a bit mad on a little bit of power in an odd little world. And the way in which you have exercised that power has made this site worse. You will not see that because, being a basically nice person, you value loyalty. So you will slap the backs of the bullies like Irishbill and the one dimensional children who are trying to be the Whaleoil of the left (BLiP, Millsy et al) and pretend to yourself that you are raising the tone of discourse. There are some who remember the early days of this site. When it was possible to make a joke at the expense of a person from any side of the spectrum. If the person was a dullard and the joke was funny, we all laughed and moved on. Not any more. I know you feel you must take yourselves so seriously because the very future of civilization rests with you. But maybe you are wrong.

                And as for putting yourself above the stars, that’s so not Grey Lynn of you.

                Oh, and Felix, I did back up my “bullshit”. Are you seriously saying that the left has not been arguing that lots of really, really bad things would happen once the “fire at will law” (as you insist on calling it) came in? Because they just did. And if you do not think bad things were going to happen, why did you not support it? Oh, I know why: because you thought lots of bad things were going to happen. Only they didn’t.

                [lprent: Answered in OpenMike. It is cluttering this post. ]

              • BLiP

                Moi – and BlubberBoy?

                Classic.

              • felix

                “Oh, and Felix, I did back up my “bullshit’.”

                No you didn’t. You claimed this:
                “But you guys told me the world was going to end with the 90 days “fire at will’ bill. People would be starving in the streets. Women would be raped with impunity by their employers.”

                And mickey called you on it. And then you had a little cry about how it’s no fun around here because you can’t make shit up and have it stand unchallenged.

                “Are you seriously saying that the left has not been arguing that lots of really, really bad things would happen once the “fire at will law’ (as you insist on calling it) came in?”

                Ah, so “you guys” means “the left” which means “something I thought I saw on the standard”. How about you figure out who the fuck you’re talking to and address a comment to them directly. I don’t speak for “the left” or anyone else.

                For the record though, look around you, moron. The govt is now trying to remove everyone else’s workplace rights too, as predicted. That’s a “really, really bad thing” in my book.

                Now back to your claim that “you guys told me … People would be starving in the streets. Women would be raped with impunity by their employers.”

                Come up with anything yet?

                Didn’t think so.

              • felix

                BLiP, I suspect he means to say that you’re the diametric opposite of Cam Slug. He just doesn’t have the facility to express the idea very well.

              • BLiP

                Ahh – that makes more sense. As unarmed as he is, I thought he might have been trying to be witty. Of course, I should have realised when his said his first comment concerning rape was a joke. Funny guy.

    • Bright Red 2.2

      there have been abuses of the 90 Day Bill. Some of them have been mentioned on this site. But with no legal recourse and without DoL monitoring the impact of the law, it’s hardly surprising that many abuses don’t come to public light.

    • Daveo 2.3

      Another aspect people don’t realise is that most employers don’t understand the law. They actually think the fire at will provisions come in automatically, when the employer has to actually put it in themselves. As a result most people aren’t actually on them.

      As you see the rot extend to large businesses more people will go on them. The difference is large organisations with HR departments actually know what they’re doing.

      There have been a few cases – that girl at Overland who was forced to buy shoes worth more than her pay or she’d get the sack under the fire at will law, and there was one Unite had a protest about recently. I understand the CTU has fielded quite a few cases, but understandably people are unwilling to speak out in case it hinders their chances of getting another job.

      Doesn’t help either that the Department of Labour hasn’t been keeping any stats.

      The other thing worth noting is that this package is far wider in scope than the original fire at will bill. It really is quite extreme.

    • Roger 2.4

      John Key said it would reduce unemployment and give people a better chance at finding employment. That didn’t happen. So why should I believe him now?

      • Sam 2.4.1

        Yeah good point. I for one would love to see some stats on how well the fire at will act has helped keep unemployment down.

    • kaplan 2.5

      So Onomatopoeia. You support the right for employers to be able to breed workers in captivity, feed them nothing but bread and water and instead of wages simply provide the most minimal level of heat and shelter required? That’s truly awfull.

      What’s that you say? You didn’t say that?

      Oh.. hard luck. it’s on teh interwebs now.

  3. If they passed this the next class of workers they would go for are the union delegates. The right and ability of workers to organise collectively would obviously be on the line.

    Yet they have promised to catch our wages up with those in Australia. It is obvious they do not have a freakin idea how to do this. They do not even understand that undermining workers protection can only drive wages down, not up.

    • Bright Red 3.1

      “they have promised to catch our wages up with those in Australia. It is obvious they do not have a freakin idea how to do this.”

      It’s the will that’s lacking

      “They do not even understand that undermining workers protection can only drive wages down, not up.”

      Oh, I think they understand perfectly.

    • Ari 3.2

      You assume their goal was actually to drive everyone’s wages up in the first place, and not simply to engage in class warfare. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the government’s actual goals have little or no relation to their electioneering.

    • Draco T Bastard 3.3

      Yet they have promised to catch our wages up with those in Australia.

      That’s what they promised and yet it’s obvious that it’s not something they ever wanted or that they would do anything about.

  4. vto 4

    I’m confused.. Surely bosses would not want to have a discontented workforce because that only makes things more difficult for the bosses.

    While generally more sympathetic to the ‘right’ view of things I do not understand this approach.

    Maybe they are simply simpletons now in Wgtn. Maybe it is not the bosses but the absentee owners who dont really care for the community who are driving this type of approach. Maybe something else.

    Sheesh, I don’t know much but I do know that you get more in the world with honey than you do with vinegar…

    • Roger 4.1

      In my workplace, I know that some bosses will be salivating over this because for every person in a job there, there are 50 applications sitting in an office tray from people willing to do anything for work.

      • vto 4.1.1

        But that is exactly what I mean Roger. No employer wants to be employing people all the time – they just want happy staff who stay and do a good job. One employee who stays is better than ten employees revolving through the same door each year.

        • Daveo 4.1.1.1

          Abuse doesn’t have to be limited to a policy of revolving sackings and rehirings every 89 days. There are any number of reasons why an employer might sack someone unfairly – happens all the time already, only at the moment there’s protections against that sort of thing.

        • Roger 4.1.1.2

          Yes, but here is what I’m highlighting. I know of managers that are quite adept at attacking some workers while others remain oblivious or happy. They then choose to drive them out the door so the problem of the unhappy worker goes away and they can get someone else they know or like.

  5. no, Mr Key, no 5

    ! Breaking News !
    The Government today announced the introduction of the 3,784 day ‘right to fire’ trial period for all employees. When questioned as to why they thought such a lengthy trial period was required, or even fair, the spokesperson replied “f#*k off and do what you are told’

  6. Who is the “person” GuestPost?

    Why should we listen to them?

    What is their agenda?

    Do they work for a union?

    Are they a Labour party member?

    [lprent: Who cares – comment on their writing – not whatever insane theory you’d like to believe. Of course if you want to get a real paranoid theory going, then I suggest that you avoid reading the site policy which tells you the types of things that moderators over-react to. ]

    • Quite possibly they are either a Labour Party member or a Union employee or (gasp) maybe both.

      Address the issues raised rather than attempting to denigrate them.

    • yeahright 6.2

      Could have sworn its wa mickeysavage making comment on my comment earlier today?

      What the blooming heck is going on here????

  7. no, Mr Key, no 7

    i am neither and that is irrelevant

    it was satire people, an abstract of the situation exagerrated to create effect of reason

  8. no, Mr Key, no 8

    my view is simple, remove the legislation entirely and go back to treating people with a little dignity
    but no government is capable of doing that as their agenda has other motives

  9. The “issues” are postulations and scaremongering for the most part.

    An example of this scaremongering is the text

    “National and the business lobby are trying to restore the economic relations of the 19th century. Some have mistakenly tried to compare the principle of at-will employment to medieval serfdom. I don’t think that’s quite right. For all the crimes of serfdom, at least there was a sense of noblesse oblige on the part of the landed aristocracy.

    The principle of fire at will employment removes even that it is the ultimate commodification and dehumanisation of labour

    Asking questions is not denigration (but you know that) rather it is putting the postulations and scaremongering into context as to their motivation.

    Thanks for letting me respond (and I hope my markup skills are not too rusty).

  10. @no, Mr Key, no – are you the author? I didn’t read the post as satire & I normally recognise satire when I see it.

    [lprent: I’d suggest that speculating on the identity of the author of any post could lead you to a ban. Read the policy. ]

    • no, Mr Key, no 10.1

      no i am not the author ‘guestpost’ , i was saying my post, ‘no Mr Key, no’,was satire of the article
      i think a wire got crossed somewhere. have a nice day

      [lprent: 😈 There are always fools who will believe anything. It was quite amusing watching two of them get twisted]

  11. no, Mr Key, no 11

    i thought the 3,784 days was obvious enough that everyone could see it was humour, or is the
    government really so bad you actually think it was a real announcement.

    That is a very very frightening concept and my sides are hurting from laughter,

    • I thought it was very funny although for a split second I wondered if it was a real announcement …

      • yeahright 11.1.1

        No it wasn’t satirical or funny or life like and the chronological order was out of whack but the inline commenting functionality fooled the fools so to speak

  12. Bill 12

    Hate to say this, but…maybe if the unions hadn’t gone along with the ‘partnership’ model ( even only in word if not completely in deed) and maybe if the unions hadn’t fought shy of taking back the right to strike and maybe if the unions had engaged their members more in improving working conditions (holiday pay etc) rather than relying on lobbying of a broadly sympathetic government that was also trying to mollify business, then maybe I’d think the present government would have a fight on its hands.

    But too many NZ unions held their breath and pussyfooted waiting for better deals to be passed into law following negotiations with the Labour party…thereby effectively chopping off their own balls…the balls being the ‘movement’ suffix that should naturally follow from the word ‘union’.

    Of all the comments here, of those that are not hand wringing, not one seems to step beyond the ‘write to the editor’ type response. And I think there is much more to that than the make up of ‘the standard’ readership. Sadly.

  13. Red Rosa 13

    All this reminds me of the quote from Chief Red Cloud of the Oglala Teton Sioux, in ‘Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee’.

    ‘The white man made us many promises, more than I can remember, but they never kept but one; they promised to take our land, and they took it.’

    We NZ’ers could almost say – ‘John Key made us many promises, but he only kept one. He promised to reduce wages, and he did.’

    Maybe someone from the Maori Party will read this.

  14. Ah, “No, Mr Key No” I was wondering what the heck you were talking about.

    Looks like there are three fools in this particular tangle eh Lynn.

    • Dave O 14.1

      Just one and that’s Iprent looking like the dick he is going in balls deep and failing on the coverup

      Classic comedy gold

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • New Zealand expresses condolences on passing of Vanuatu High Commissioner
    Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters today extended New Zealand’s condolences following the death of Vanuatu’s High Commissioner to New Zealand, Johnson Naviti, who passed away yesterday afternoon in Wellington. “Our thoughts are with the High Commissioner’s family and colleagues during this difficult time. This is a terrible loss both to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    15 hours ago
  • Government announces allocation of three waters funds for councils
    The Government has today set out the regional allocations of the $761 million Three Waters stimulus and reform funding for councils announced by Prime Minister Hon Jacinda Ardern this month.  "I want to thank Councils around the country for engaging with the Central Local Government Steering Group who have been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Funding boost for students with highest learning support needs
    Students with high and complex learning needs, as well as their teachers and parents, will benefit from a substantial increase to Ongoing Resourcing Scheme (ORS) funding, Associate Education Minister Martin announced today. “Nearly $160 million will go towards helping these students by lifting their base support over the next four ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Govt connecting kiwis to affordable, healthy food
    Funding for innovative projects to connect Kiwis with affordable, safe and wholesome food, reduce food waste, and help our food producers recover from COVID-19 has been announced today by Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor. “COVID-19 has seen an increasing number of families facing unprecedented financial pressure. Foodbanks and community food service ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    19 hours ago
  • Getting infrastructure for housing underway
    Eight shovel-ready projects within Kāinga Ora large-scale developments, and the Unitec residential development in Auckland have been given the go-ahead, Minister for Housing Dr Megan Woods announced today. Megan Woods says these significant infrastructure upgrades will ensure that the provision of homes in Auckland can continue apace. “The funding announced ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Napier walk and cycleway to improve safety
    The Government is funding a new separated walking and cycleway path along Napier’s Chambers and Ellison streets to provide safer access for local students and residents across Marine Parade and State Highway 51, Transport Minister Phil Twyford and Police Minister Stuart Nash announced today. Funding of $2.7 million has been ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    23 hours ago
  • PGF creates more than 10k jobs, success stories across NZ
    More than 13,000 people have been employed so far thanks to the Coalition Government’s Provincial Growth Fund, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has today announced. The number of jobs created by Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) investments has outstripped the 10,000 jobs target that the Government and Provincial Development Unit ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Inaugural seafood awards honour sustainability
    Scientists and innovative fishing operators from Stewart Island and Fiordland to Nelson, Marlborough and Wellington have been honoured in the first ever Seafood Sustainability Awards. Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash has congratulated the winners of the inaugural Seafood Sustainability Awards held at Parliament. “The awards night honours six winners, from a wide ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 day ago
  • Climate resilience packages for regions
    The Government is providing an investment totalling more than $100 million for regions to protect against and mitigate the effects of climate change, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones have announced. Six regions will receive funding from the $3 billion allocated to infrastructure projects from the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Southern Waikato shovel ready projects get the green light
    Three major local projects at Te Kuiti and Otorohanga have been given the money to get moving after the impact of Covid 19, says the Minister of Māori Development Hon Nanaia Mahuta.  The projects range from a Sports Centre for Te Kuiti, a redevelopment of the Otorohanga  Kiwi House and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • New Zealand extends Middle East and Africa peace support deployments
    The Coalition Government has extended three New Zealand Defence Force deployments to the Middle East and Africa by two years, Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters and Defence Minister Ron Mark announced today.  “These deployments promote peace in the Middle East and Africa by protecting civilians and countering the spread of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Govt progress on climate change essential, risk assessment shows
    The release of the National Climate Change Risk Assessment shows that the progress this Government has made to solve the climate crisis is essential to creating cleaner and safer communities across New Zealand. “Because of this report, we can see clearer than ever that the action our Government is taking ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • $10m sport recovery fund open for applications
    The second round of the Community Resilience Fund is now open for applications for sport and recreation organisations experiencing financial hardship between 1 July and 30 September 2020. “The fund opens today for five weeks – closing on September 6. The amount awarded will be decided on a case-by-case basis ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Rakitū Island declared latest predator free island
    Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage today declared Rakitū Island, off the coast of Aotea/Great Barrier Island, predator free. “I’m delighted to announce that with rats now gone, Rakitū is officially predator free. This is a major milestone because Rakitū is the last DOC administered island in the Hauraki Gulf Marine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Funding to restore significant Māori sites in the Far North
    The Provincial Growth Fund is investing $8.75 million to restore significant historic sites at Ōhaeawai in the Far North, upgrade marae and fund fencing and riparian planting. Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones made the announcements following a service at the historic St Michael’s Anglican Church at Ōhaeawai today.  Just ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Big boost for Chatham Islands’ economy
    The Chatham Islands will receive close to $40 million for projects that will improve its infrastructure, add to its attraction as a visitor destination, and create jobs through a planned aquaculture venture, Infrastructure Minister Shane Jones has announced. “The COVID-19 pandemic has had a devastating impact on the islands, first ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • More initiatives to reduce energy hardship
    The Government is delivering more initiatives to reduce energy hardship and to give small electricity consumers a voice, Energy and Resources Minister Megan Woods said today. “In addition to the initiatives we have already delivered to support New Zealand families, we are responding to the Electricity Price Review with further ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Turning the tide for hoiho/yellow-eyed penguin
    Government, iwi, NGOs and rehabilitation groups are working together to turn around the fortunes of the nationally endangered hoiho/yellow-eyed penguin following a series of terrible breeding seasons.  The Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage helped launch the Five Year Action Plan at the annual Yellow-Eyed Penguin symposium in Dunedin today. “I ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Taskforce ready to tackle tourism challenges
    The membership of the Tourism Futures Taskforce has now been confirmed, Tourism Minister Kelvin Davis announced at an event at Whakarewarewa in Rotorua today. “The main purpose of the independent Tourism Futures Taskforce is to lead the thinking on the future of tourism in New Zealand,” Kelvin Davis said. Joining ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Investing in the tourism sector’s recovery
    More than $300 million in funding has been approved to protect strategic tourism businesses, drive domestic tourism through regional events and lift digital capability in the tourism industry, Tourism Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. A $400 million Tourism Recovery Package was announced at Budget 2020, and with today’s announcements is ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    4 days ago
  • Permits to be required for exporting hard-to-recycle plastic waste
    From 2021 permits will be required for New Zealanders wanting to export hard-to-recycle plastic waste. The Associate Minister for the Environment, Eugenie Sage, today announced the requirements as part of New Zealand’s commitments to the Basel Convention, an international agreement of more than 180 countries which was amended in May ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Growth in new building consents shows demand is still high
    The building and construction sector is still showing strong growth, with the number of new dwellings consented up more than 8 per cent compared to last year, reflecting a welcome confidence in the Government’s COVID-19 response package, Minister for Building and Construction Jenny Salesa says. “While it is still too ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $23 million for Bay of Plenty flood protection
    Government investment of $23 million for Bay of Plenty flood protection will allow local communities to address long-standing flood risks and provide jobs, Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced in Rotorua today. These projects are being funded by the Infrastructure Reference Group’s (IRG) shovel ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Rotorua benefits from over $62 million boost
    Investment for projects that will create hundreds of jobs in Rotorua were announced today by Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau. These projects will provide opportunities for economic development in a region that has been hard hit by COVID-19,” Winston Peters said. Fletcher ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Increased counselling support for all students
    For the first time, primary schools will have access to funding for counsellors for their students, Associate Education Minister Tracey Martin announced today. “A major investment of $75.8 million will provide greater access to guidance counsellors to help primary and secondary school students deal with mental health and wellbeing issues,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Report of the Government Inquiry into Operation Burnham released
    Defence Minister Ron Mark today welcomed the release of the Report of the Government Inquiry into Operation Burnham and related matters, and the Government response.  “I thank the Inquiry for their thorough and detailed report, on a highly complex issue. I accept the recommendations of the report, and fully support ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • 1BT funds create jobs and lasting benefits
    Forestry Minister Shane Jones has announced $6 million of One Billion Trees funding for seven regional initiatives to create jobs and provide long-lasting environmental and economic benefits. The projects range from improving one of the poorest-quality water catchments in Otago to restoring 52km of waterways around Hokianga Harbour. Six of the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Kawerau projects to receive $5.5 million from Provincial Growth Fund
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters today announced $5.5 million in funding from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) for two Kawerau projects and says this is a significant boost for the people of Kawerau. “These projects will bring much-needed investment and will create up to 60 jobs for locals,” Mr Peters ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $5 million for Kaingaroa Village Redevelopment
    Kaingaroa Village in the Bay of Plenty is to get $5 million to help fund a comprehensive upgrade of its infrastructure, facilities and housing, Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. Mr Tabuteau travelled to the remote village to make the announcement, telling Kaingaroa residents how the funding ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • $18 Million Funding Boost for Bay of Plenty Business Park
    The Rangiuru Business Park project near Te Puke is getting $18 million from the Provincial Growth Fund (PGF), Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau announced today. “This is all about unlocking the potential of this region. When it’s finished, the Rangiuru Business Park will be the Bay of Plenty’s ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Town revitalisation and aquaculture investments create jobs in Ōpōtiki
    Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters has today announced that a $26 million investment in Ōpōtiki will see important public amenities upgraded and further progress made on new aquaculture opportunities. “The people of Ōpōtiki have been waiting decades for real investment in key infrastructure, and support for the incredible aquaculture opportunities ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Minister congratulates the Cook Islands community for its 9th year of Language Weeks
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio wishes to congratulate the Cook Islands community throughout Aotearoa for the 9th year of Te ‘Epetoma o Te Reo Māori Kūki ‘Āirani, the Cook Islands Language Week.  “This is a proud milestone that reflects on the huge effort made by the Cook ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Construction underway on longest section of Glen Innes to Tāmaki Drive Shared Path
    Aucklanders in the Eastern Suburbs will soon have more ways to get around, with Transport Minister Phil Twyford and Associate Transport Minister Julie Anne Genter kicking off construction on Section 2 of Te Ara Ki Uta Ki Tai, the Glen Innes to Tāmaki Drive Shared Path today. The Glen Innes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • 350,000 More Measles Vaccines for Massive Immunisation Campaign
    The Government is stepping up the fight against measles and protecting hundreds of thousands more young adults by investing up to $40 million for a year-long measles-catch-up campaign and $23 million to fully fund and develop the National Immunisation Solution, Associate Minister of Health Julie Anne Genter announced at Mangere ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Operation Burnham report released
    Attorney-General David Parker has today released the findings of the Government inquiry held into Operation Burnham and related events. The operation took place on 21-22 August 2010 in Tirgiran Valley, Afghanistan, and was carried out by NZSAS troops and other nations’ forces operating as part of the International Security Assistance ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Locally-led solutions at centre of new community resilience fund
    From tomorrow, community groups around New Zealand can apply to a $36 million fund established to encourage locally-led solutions as communities rebuild and recover from COVID-19, announced Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni and Minister for Community and Voluntary Sector Poto Williams. “The Community Capability and Resilience Fund (CCRF) builds ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Securing healthy futures for all Māori
    The Government has committed to improving Māori health and wellbeing over the next five years. The Associate Minister of Health (Māori Health) today released Whakamaua: Māori Health Action Plan 2020-2025 which sets the pathway towards achieving healthy futures for all Māori. “As kaitiaki of the system, the Ministry of Health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Porirua Development delivers more new public housing
    The first of nearly 70 new state homes have been opened in Cannons Creek, Porirua by the Associate Minister of Housing, Kris Faafoi, as part of an increase in public housing being delivered through the Porirua Development.  “Completion of the first 10 of 53 new two and five bedroom homes ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New standards for existing marine farms provide consistency
    New environmental standards will make the re-consenting of existing marine farms more consistent across the country.  The new regulations for the National Environmental Standards for Marine Aquaculture (NES-MA) will come into effect on 1 December, Environment Minister David Parker and Fisheries Minister Stuart Nash said.   “The NES-MA removes complexities and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government signs Accord reinvigorating commitment to Far North iwi
    Today marks a milestone as the Minister for Social Development Carmel Sepuloni and Minister for Māori Development Nanaia Mahuta co-sign an Addendum – with the Iwi Chairs of Te Rarawa, Ngāi Takoto and Te Aupōuri – to the Te Hiku o Te Ika Iwi-Crown Social Development and Wellbeing Accord (the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago