web analytics

Nats don’t understand a party of principle

Written By: - Date published: 6:44 am, September 28th, 2017 - 163 comments
Categories: election 2017, greens - Tags: , ,

Nats and their proxies continue to try and drag the Greens into negotiations with National. The Greens of course say no.

I guess Nat types just can’t conceive of a party based on principal. A party that exists for something other than the pursuit of power for power’s sake. It doesn’t compute. They have no frame of reference.

Bravo to the Greens. But I fear that they might have a stern test coming up. If Winston makes the price of supporting Labour the exclusion of the Greens from Cabinet or government (giving confidence and supply) – what would the Greens do? Would they support a Labour led government that they were excluded from, or would they see Peters go with National instead?

The Greens have much to bring to a change coalition government. Let’s hope Peters is not so petty as to try and exclude them.

163 comments on “Nats don’t understand a party of principle ”

  1. Carolyn_nth 1

    I guess Nat types just can’t conceive of a party based on principal. A party that exists for something other than the pursuit of power for power’s sake.

    Agreed.

    what would the Greens do? Would they support a Labour led government that they were excluded from, or would they see Peters go with National instead?

    But, also, what would Labour do? Would they accept NZF’s bid to exclude Greens from cabinet or government?

    Or would it be best to let NZF go with the Nats? and wait see how that uncomfortable relationship plays out?

    • Bob 1.1

      Or would it be best to let NZF go with the Nats? and wait see how that uncomfortable relationship plays out?

      I totally agree, let Winnie go with the Nats & watch them implode !

  2. chris73 2

    Its really quite simple, if the price of power for Labour is to exclude the Greens then they’ll exclude the Greens

    NZFirsts biggest areas of support are rural/smaller centers:

    http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2017/09/how_does_nz_first_survive.html

    where National holds sway so NZFirst can easily go with National (I think they’ll end up going with National anyway) especially given that National is the largest single party

    Also when it comes to negotiations Winston would have more power if he only had to deal with National or Labour, dealing with Labour and the Greens would cause more negotiations so by cutting the Greens out as much as possible would only be of benefit for Winston

    So really theres not much upside for the Greens to be in power (from Winstons pov) so why would he want them there if they don’t need to be

    • One Anonymous Bloke 2.1

      You wouldn’t want the resources Julie-Anne Genter can bring to transport, or Shaw to climate change response. What does that say about Winston Peters?

      Not much. I think he’ll go with Labour. Or National.

      • chris73 2.1.1

        I agree it’ll be Labour or National (ok thats not much of a prediction) but the Greens will be squeezed out as much as possible

        • One Anonymous Bloke 2.1.1.1

          That’s more projection than prediction.

          • tracey 2.1.1.1.1

            Touche

            This is where Labour also have to step up…

            IF reducing poverty, climate change, clean rivers is truly their core as they campaigned upon they will not compromise these 3 but barter lesser points. I imagine Greens would be over the moon to be outside govt with those 3 pillars at the core of a Labour/NZF govt?

        • Robert Guyton 2.1.1.2

          chris73 doesn’t like The Greens, doesn’t want The Greens in Government, won’t say a good thing about them; we get it, Chris73 and could you give it a rest? Your opinion is as useful as anyone else’s, only that’s all it is and … we get it.

          • xanthe 2.1.1.2.1

            No you don’t get it Robert. Your attitude of intolerance and absolute certainty is endemic in the Greens and that is why they should not, and very likely will not make cabinet. The purge of bullies is not yet complete in the Greens and it would be fatal for them to now have power. You may assume I am anti green but you will be wrong (again!). I want nothing more than a Green party in parliament but just not this one, now!

            • One Anonymous Bloke 2.1.1.2.1.1

              Kennedy Graham is a bully?

              • xanthe

                Kennedy Graham and Dave Clendon are not bullies IMHO, They left because of the bullying.

                Which just shows that the Greens still have a long way to go in sorting this out!

                • Who bullied them? That doesn’t fit with the ethos of the greens imo

                  • xanthe

                    “That doesn’t fit with the ethos of the greens imo”
                    Indeed!
                    That suggests that the “ethos” is a sham and has been for some time!

                    • tracey

                      Can you give an example of how they were bullied and which rules the Green party broke in its responses to them?

                    • xanthe

                      are you suggesting that bullying is OK if its within the “rules”?

                    • @xanthe 9.38 – Or xanthe, the other conclusion is that you are incorrect in your stated belief – that’s my conclusion but I hope I’m wrong. Who did this bullying, who was it that BULLIED so much that those men left the greens?

                    • tracey

                      No, I am asking you to prove your allegation against the Green Party.

                      How was he/they bullied? Can it be construed to be bullying/ransom to tell others you will resign if they do not do what you want?

                      It is not always bullying to apply the rules of an organisation.

                  • alwyn

                    You do remember what was said about them by leading figures in the Green Party in early August, don’t you?

                    “Green Party general manager Sarah Helm said the pair had done very little in the way of campaigning, and suggested they had been disgruntled for some time.

                    “Neither of these candidates have been campaigning for us all year. David’s made one phone call, and Kennedy’s put in about three or four hours worth of calls.
                    “My understanding is that both of them were not happy with their list placings either,” Helm said.
                    The party is understood to be furious at how the two MPs have handled it – going outside normal parliamentary channels to tell media of their plans.”
                    From
                    https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/95542553/two-green-mps-threaten-to-quit-over-metiria-turei

                    That sounds rather like bullying to me.

                    Or, from James Shaw himself
                    “Green Party co-leader James Shaw says the party has been “betrayed” by Kennedy Graham and David Clendon who stepped down on Monday evening.
                    The two MPs withdrew from the party list in protest after Metiria Turei’s admission of benefit fraud.
                    Mr Shaw wants them both out as soon as possible, and says the rest of the caucus MPs are backing Ms Turei.
                    “I feel betrayed by the way they have gone about this and so do the rest of the caucus,” he says”

                    and

                    “Tomorrow morning at the caucus meeting I’ll be moving a motion to suspend both of them from the Green party caucus.
                    The way that they have chosen to go about it is strongly in violation of every Green Party norm, culture and process that we have.”

                    That is from Newshub
                    http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/election/2017/08/green-party-betrayed-by-david-clendon-and-kennedy-graham.html

                    • solkta

                      They shat on the Party from a great height. The only bullying I saw was those two making a public ultimatum to try and overturn a consensus decision. James and the other MPs were right to suspend them from Caucus and the Party was very gracious to have not expelled them from the party.

                    • @ alwyn – can you put a link up where THEY say that they were BULLIED thanks otherwise it is just your opinion, valuable tho that is…

                    • alwyn

                      @marty mars.
                      Don’t be so totally stupid.
                      There are a lot of kids who are bullied at schools and they don’t tell anyone about it. Some commit suicide though.
                      That doesn’t mean they weren’t bullied does it?

                      And no, it doesn’t mean that I think Graham and Clendon are children. The only juveniles in this affair are the people like you who don’t see anything wrong with the behaviour of Shaw and Helm.

                    • The only juveniles in this affair are the people like you who don’t see anything wrong with the behaviour of Shaw and Helm.

                      Their responses were pretty restrained, when you think about how most parties would react to two MPs deliberately putting a stick in the election campaign’s spokes. “Bullying” is a ridiculous word for their response.

                    • @ alwyn
                      So you think Shaw and Helm did the bullying?

                    • alwyn

                      @marty.
                      “Shaw and Helm did the bullying”.
                      I think that what is reported about them indicates that they were involved in bullying.
                      They were of course those whose statements were reported. I would suspect that a lot of the then members of the party hierarchy were involved in the same thing. Those who believed that the Party had a mainly environmental focus, rather than a crazy approach to ripping of the taxpayer were probably appalled by the attacks, on Graham in particular. I know a couple of people who said they had resigned over it.

                      It is your method of argument that is particularly risible. Because “they made no public complaint so it never happened” seems to be the gist of it.
                      People will no doubt be pleased that, using Marty Mars’ methods, that there are no murders committed in New Zealand. After all, given that there are no cases where a murder victim has made a complaint to the Police, there haven’t been any murders committed.

                      @Psycho.
                      Your argument appears to be “It wasn’t very serious bullying”.
                      Perhaps so. but It would certainly be enough to make me decline to make public, in a way that meant I was identifiable, opinions on flaws in any Green Party policies that they propose. I don’t wish to have to face abuse from their more imbecilic members who can do it with the benefit of Parliamentary Privilege and which I cannot, in practise, answer.
                      That is the threat from their behaviour.

                    • xanthe

                      The culture of bullying goes much deeper than Shaw and Helm IMHO

                      If i actually knew how to deal with it I would still be a member working for them, I honestly cant see any other way but for them to be out of power and for those who are there for power to move on. Only then can the party rebuild.

                      I know David from when he was Co-Convenor of the greens, he has a depth of institutional knowledge and history with the party that goes way beyond the ken of most commentators here. (so please respect that!)

                      I can assure you that the only reason David would “go public” would be if he was put into a position of no other option (ie bullied!) .

                      Please dont spout crap about breaking consensus, The Greens have not operated by consensus (except in name) for a long time.

                      I am not going to name names here. but i will say that David and Kennedy’s sacrifice has not been totally in vain IMHO

                    • tracey

                      “That sounds rather like bullying to me.”

                      So does

                      “We will resign if we don’t get what we want” and going to the media to try to get pressure for your way.

                      neither may be bullying, both may be, and only one.

                      But alwyn, excuse me while I chuckle at a National party voter getting into a conversation about what is and is not bullying when they just voted for

                      Paula Bennett (breach Privacy Act) deliberately silencing a challenger
                      Collins (breach privacy Act leading to death threats) deliberately seeking revenge on a civil servantSmith (using his position of power to get a favourable outcome for a firend)

                    • tracey

                      marty mars

                      In fairness has xanthe got links for her/his claims?

                      It is clear, from the post below, that xanthe is much closer to whatever went on than me and on that basis I will defer and step out of this.

                • cathy

                  anyone who says “i will resign” if you do this… or don’t do that… is a bully, and their resignation should be accepted on the spot

                  • xanthe

                    To put a person in a position where their only option is to resign is called constructive dismissal….. its illegal in employment!…. oh and its also bullying

                    • tracey

                      Why was it their only option?

                      It is also perfectly reasonable that if an organisation you belong to has rules that you do not like, you leave. You say” we disagree on this, I am in a mojority in this issue, and as this organisation operates by a vote if consensus is not reached, I will levae.

                      I see from your other post that you are much closer to what happened than me, and I defer to that.

            • reason 2.1.1.2.1.2

              “The purge of bullies” ??? ….

              Night of the long Lentils …..

              Where the fascist storm Green wing cleanse the party of Bully cells and petty tyrants

              Jeanette Fitzsimons …. Jihad Jean
              Russell Norman ….Aussie I is Isis …. oi oi oi

              Dangerous extremists with more faces than john Key …

              Although my main complaint regarding them ….. Is they are far to polite when being lied about and maliciously attacked by grubby neanderthal fuckwits.

              *********************8***********

              They are also the only Party who treat our Parliaments debating chamber with respect,…. which is treating us,… the voters, with respect.

              Others like Wayne Mapp and co act like braying playground idiots … and John Key was like a really bad, half pissed Groucho Marx impersonator ….

              With his lunchtime drinking sidekick tag teaming …. mocking the king slayer ….

              ” David Seymour: In what century did the wine-box inquiry take place?

              Rt Hon JOHN KEY: One so far back I can hardly remember it.”

      • Bearded Git 2.1.2

        LOL

    • Incognito 2.2

      Essentially, you’re saying that Labour can be ‘bought’ but the Greens can’t? I love the thinking behind this: I want it, I buy it, I have it, and it’s mine. Indeed, we live in a society where everything and everybody has a price and you just have to name it to get ahead, at the cost of others, may I add. Nobody is forcing to behave like this but we do it anyway; go figure …

      • chris73 2.2.1

        Wouldn’t be the first time Labour have left the Greens out of power when it came down to it but once again if it happens its the Greens own fault

        • One Anonymous Bloke 2.2.1.1

          So that’s how ‘personal responsibility’ works: the consequences of my behaviour are your fault.

        • tracey 2.2.1.2

          Reading is a skill. The Author has addressed this. You are simply proving his point.

    • Incognito 2.3

      Hi chris73,

      The relationships you’re describing are based on power and ownership. When power is unevenly distributed it’s called an asymmetric relationship. Examples are master-slave/servant, boss-subordinate, employer-employee. The more asymmetric, the more ‘ownership’ is involved. Of course, not all relationships are based on equal symmetric power distribution.

      You also perceive these relationships as dual; there are two independent parties involved that agree to a transaction that is supposedly mutually beneficial. But there is no dissolving of boundaries involved and the two parties remain largely or completely independent after the transaction (unless one swallows the other).

      This is where it gets really interesting! We humans are social creatures and hardwired to form symmetric relationships that are vital for survival. These relationships were based on interaction rather than transaction and not dualistic; each member of a group was fully integrated in the group and the group was the only party, the only unit.

      Nowadays, we don’t have to fight for survival and this is reflected in our relationships (as above). However, it is still entirely possible to form those relationships in which the partners do form a new integrated unit and synergise; it becomes more than the sum of the two (or higher number). I can think of plenty of examples but marriage is just one of them; nobody is losing their individuality or identity but they add something to it and become something different, something bigger & better, if you like. (NB it is just an example, right)

      I believe this is where the Greens are coming from. They don’t stick (as much) to the dualism that is a hallmark of all other political parties (with the possible exception of Mana). If I am correct then it makes no sense to engage in coalition talks that are more like the ones that I described earlier (i.e. power & ownership), which is apparently being strongly advocated by quite a few from all sides of the political spectrum.

      Does this make any sense to you?

  3. lprent 3

    It would be unwise for Labour to try to exclude the Greens. Once was enough, and I am pretty sure that would be the feeling of most leftish activists. I certainly won’t be interested in supporting such a government because it would be another government concentrating on the short term like the current one. Who could be bothered exerting effort for that?

    Besides right now Labour needs the Greens to provide a principled way forward for Labour. That might be uncomfortable for some in the Labour caucus. They just have to learn to live with compromises. Peters when he gets out of bargaining mode is aware of this as well. There are a lot of areas where the Greens and NZF policy is in resonance and out of step with anything that would normally get past the Labour caucus. To get the Labour caucus to act on those would require both parties to hang up on that caucus. Unlikely to happen if the NZF tries to exclude the Greens again.

    And the reason for that is that Greens get much of their solid support in provincial NZ from people who aren’t ever going to vote NZF and who also view Labours track record as being suspicious. If there is a viable long term coalition government covering the centre left, it needs to be as broad as possible. Trying to cut out Greens just makes it a one term wonder. Who in the hell would want to support that? NZF would have to be as aware of that as everyone else – they are deeply embedded in those same areas.

    To have a narrow coalition would be like like trying to get themselves into the same awful political position National is now in. It sucked up the vote of its coalition partners, is a large party and can’t govern without its harshest critic who would be determined to change how it operates. That ain’t going to work.

    I have been amused by the throughly venal and outright stupid lines by shallow political commentators (Hosking and Hooton come to mind) about the Greens being foolish enough to let National embrace them. Nice for the wordcount I guess. Isn’t going to happen. National simply aren’t trustworthy in any of the areas that the Greens are want to improve.

    • tracey 3.1

      two things are driving some of our fellow kiwis mad;

      1. how can there be no winner, there must be a winner, I need to know I voted for the winning team!

      2. The Green’s attitude to politics is, in part, different to other parties. They hold a different world view and do not play by the prevailing “rules” (do anything for power).

      Imposing the “do anything for power” mantra – madness that way lies.

      • ianmac 3.1.1

        Hoskings said plaintively, “Why do we have to put up with waiting for a decision? Look at Germany Election over. Angela Merkel won. Decision made. End of story.”
        Hoskings ignorance shows. Surprised? Germany wont have a new Government till at least Christmas.

    • Wainwright 3.2

      ‘Once was enough, and I am pretty sure that would be the feeling of most leftish activists. ‘

      True, problem is the leftish activists aren’t calling the shots in Lbaour.

    • red-blooded 3.3

      “It would be unwise for Labour to try to exclude the Greens…Besides right now Labour needs the Greens to provide a principled way forward for Labour.”
      You make it sound as if Labour would be choosing to exclude the Greens (and as if Labour doesn’t have principals of their own). These are your own projections.

      Labour will be bargaining with NZF. If they can form a 3-way government, great. If they can’t, but are able to negotiate a deal with NZF and with the Greens that gives confidence and supply, are you saying that they should walk away from this and allow 3 more years of decline and drift under the Nats? Because that would basically be denying the urgency of the very issues that both Labour and the Greens campaigned on. “Homelessness can wait another 3 years. Let’s clean up those rivers – maybe sometime in the future. Climate change is our nuclear free issue – but hey, another 3 years won’t make much difference. Our DHBs are foundering and people are suffering, but we’re pretty sure the thousands who will suffer over the next 3 years won’t mind, so long as the Greens get the chance to be in government then…”

      What guarantee do you see that we’ll get a more decisive result in the 2020 election that will allow a Lab-Green government? Because basically you’re saying we should step away from the opportunity to implement most of Labour’s policies, plus some of NZF’s and some (yes, probably fewer) of the Greens’, in the hope that there can be your (and my) preferred option in 3 years.

      “To have a narrow coalition would be like like trying to get themselves into the same awful political position National is now in. It sucked up the vote of its coalition partners, is a large party and can’t govern without its harshest critic who would be determined to change how it operates. That ain’t going to work.”

      Your comparison with the Nats’ current position only holds true if:
      1) We think that Labour would “suck up the votes” of NZF in coalition. What’s your evidence for that? True, last time NZF had a term out of government after being in coalition with Labour, but that was more down to the fuss about funding (and Peters’ holding up that stupid “NO” sign) than Labour taking their votes. Those votes went to the Nats.
      2) We think the Greens would be the harshest critics of a Labour-NZF coalition government. In your scenario, where’s National? I would definitely see them as the harsher critics of any left-leaning government (and yes, it would lean to the left, even if not as far as a Lab-Green government would have).

      Look, I hope that if Labour get a chance to form the government, they get to include the Greens in a meaningful way. I think the Greens could add positively to any such government and should be included in cabinet positions. But I’m not conducting the negotiations. Those who are will have huge challenges and I’m not willing to condemn them if they make decisions that some on this site would find unpalatable.

  4. Peter 4

    In the end every party needs to look after its own interests. If the Greens are going to talk to Peters, directly or indirectly, surely they should also be taking to National? Right now they appear to be running the risk of standing on the sidelines.

    • One Anonymous Bloke 4.1

      I’m sure they’ll listen to National talking.

      *Yap yap yap lip service, yap yap yap lies, yap yap yap bad faith, yap yap yap personal attacks, yap yap yap slams the phone down in a rage, accompanied by the sound of quiet laughter.*

      • Carolyn_nth 4.1.1

        One thing’s for certain, the Nats and their supporters will not give up power easily. they have been trwoing everything at it as they see their influence with voters is waning, and change is coming, one way or another.

        They blatantly lied and smeared during the election. now they are trying to skew the negotiations towards a minority hold on a status quo neoliberal, power at all costs, cling to power.

        • SpaceMonkey 4.1.1.1

          Given that National want power over everything else and their principles, if they have any, are malleable… then it really shouldn’t be that hard for them to adopt Green policies and principles.

          • tracey 4.1.1.1.1

            Can you explain the basis for which Green party negotiators can trust National?

            • SpaceMonkey 4.1.1.1.1.1

              I can’t… because there is none. National can’t be trusted. They will do and say anything for power. My comment was tongue-in-cheek and a poor attempt at highlighting the gap between National and Greens on principles and policies.

            • One Anonymous Bloke 4.1.1.1.1.2

              When they agree to open integrative bargaining.

        • Adrian Thornton 4.1.1.2

          @Carolyn_nth+1 Yes I think that is the part of the equation that has not been unpacked enough, National have dragged NZ politics down into the sewers, I cannot remember any politician, let alone the leader of a political party in NZ lying out in the open so blatantly, and then actually double downing on those lies once exposed, as we have just witnessed.
          John Key planted the seeds of hateful politics that have now blossomed under the careful watch and encouragment of English.

          Unfortunately the NZ media has not adapted fast enough to this new politics of brutalism that the National deploy,

          They have to actually call out the lies and misinformation in the same blatant fashion that it is presented to them, nip it in the bud so to speak,

        • Baba Yaga 4.1.1.3

          I’d hardly say 46% of the popular vote as seeing their influence ‘waning’. The reality is that is very close to what National achieved in 2008. It’s also naïve to expect any politician to give up power easily. In 2005 Labour clung to power largely as a result of improper election spending (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_New_Zealand_election_funding_controversy), and the last minute bribe to students. Let’s criticise our politicians and try to hold them to account, but let’s not fool ourselves that any one party is better or worse than the other.

          • Drowsy M. Kram 4.1.1.3.1

            National party strategy over the last 9 years ‘has been’ the quintessence of the lying. Thankfully, much of it is on record, and it’s really unsustainable (not that National politicians have demonstrated any understanding of the word.)

            What’s truly extraordinary is that Joyce, English, Bennett, Collins, Smith, Coleman, Brownlee, Tolley, Ngaro (not to mention Key, Parata and so many more) have no shame; they don’t do contrition. It’s not that the lying attribute is in short supply in politics, rather that National have a super-abundance of liarministers, the role-models for National back benchers.

            • Baba Yaga 4.1.1.3.1.1

              I don’t view this current crop as any worse than any other party. Politicians all lie, we know when they’re doing it too. Their lips are moving.

          • Adrian Thornton 4.1.1.3.2

            @Baba Yaga, I am no fan boy of the current Labour Party, but they are sure as hell better than National, of that there is no question, well at least to any citizen with even the slightest social conscience.

            • Baba Yaga 4.1.1.3.2.1

              No, they aren’t better. Labour politicians ran a campaign for months lying about health spending not increasing, a claim that has been debunked. That’s just one example. They are all as bad as each other. We shouldn’t encourage them.

              • Macro

                The Joycian claim that Health Spending has increased under National has been debunked that many times that only an idiot would suggest otherwise. You clearly fall into that category.

                Health spending was falling in proportion to overall gross domestic product (GDP), the research showed.

                Between 2009-10 and 2014-15, Vote Health’s operational expenditure increased by $2 billion, while core government spending increased by $8.8b. In the same period, GDP increased by $45.2b.

                Vote Health’s operational expenditure decreased from 6.32 per cent to 5.95 per cent as a proportion of GDP in the same five years.

                Government expenditure was set to continue falling overall, with New Zealand ranked 26th out of OECD countries for spending as a proportion of GDP in 2013.

                This meant further cuts for health spending, which was estimated to drop by about 4 per cent a year.

                “The continued under-resourcing of our health services . . . is not owing to unaffordability; it is a policy decision to reduce government expenditure overall and introduce tax cuts,” the editorial said.

                http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/80318036/researchers-claim-nz-health-budget-declining-publiclyfunded-surgery-on-way-out
                Just because the number of dollars sent on Health has increased does not mean that the total provision of Health services is maintained. But obviously you are incapable of understanding that – as are most National voters. And it is on that fact, that Joyce et. al. rely when they spin their lies.

                • Baba Yaga

                  That data is well out of date. And false. A better analysis is here https://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/Health-Funding.png. That clearly shows vote health has increased in real terms. And don’t assume to know my voting preferences, just because I am prepared to assert Labour politicians lie as well as National ones.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    A better analysis from Princess Party Farrar?

                    Are you trying to look stupid or something?

                    • Baba Yaga

                      Shoot the messenger anyone?

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      The messenger has proved himself unreliable too many times to count. He still runs with and enables the crew he was so contrite about associating with in 2014.

                      Whose messenger is this wholly owned subsidiary of the National Party?

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “The messenger has proved himself unreliable too many times to count. ”

                      If you can discredit the numbers I posted, I’d be genuinely interested. Farrar published the figures under his own name, and they have yet to be refuted.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      You didn’t post any numbers. I’m not going to boost that piece of shit’s web statistics by visiting his sewer.

                      If he’s using publicly available info, verify it yourself before expecting me to lift a finger. If he isn’t, then he’s party to a criminal offence. Again.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “You didn’t post any numbers”.

                      I posted a link to the numbers. I have verified them, or I wouldn’t have posted them. It surprises me you are still defending this particular Labour line. There is very little disagreement in the real world.

                    • McFlock

                      Farrar uses CPI.
                      Stats NZ has a sweet inflation visualisation tool that shows that while CPI increased 15.6% between Q2 ’08 and Q2 ’17, the healthcare component of CPI increased 29.4%.

                      Using Farrar’s pop and expenditure numbers, that suggests that if healthcare inflation is used instead of the full CPI package of goods and services, a per capita decrease in real expenditure is on the cards, no?

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “…the healthcare component of CPI increased 29.4%.”

                      That’s irrelevant, because it isn’t what Labour have been arguing.

                    • McFlock

                      A decrease in real terms per capita is a decrease. Therefore, health funding decreased under national in the terms that matter: real health dollars to treat the patients we have.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    Just in case you missed the point.

                    …while CPI increased 15.6% between Q2 ’08 and Q2 ’17, the healthcare component of CPI increased 29.4%.

                    That’s some mighty fine verification you got going on there.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      Irrelevant. Labour have not been arguing that. They’ve been arguing based on inflation and population. On both counts, they have been lying.

                      Excuse my jaundiced view, but as I have previously said, they all do it. It’s called ‘politics’.

                    • McFlock

                      They’ve been arguing based on inflation and population. On both counts, they have been lying.

                      Except healthcare costs increased by just under 30% for the same items (aka “inflation”), the population also increased, and the nominal funding “increase” doesn’t make up the real terms shortfall.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “A decrease in real terms per capita is a decrease.”

                      It would be, if that had happened. It hasn’t. Real health spend per capita has gone up over 8%.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “Except healthcare costs increased by just under 30% for the same items (aka “inflation”), the population also increased, and the nominal funding “increase” doesn’t make up the real terms shortfall.”

                      You’re simply wrong. Health spend has risen on a real basis (whether measured against inflation or per capita). Labour have been lying.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      Keep telling yourself that.

                      Together, the data indicate the New Zealand Government can afford to spend more on healthcare. We identify compelling reasons why it should do so, including forecast growing health need, signs of increasing unmet need, and the fact that if health needs are not met the costs still have to be borne by the economy.

                      From the abstract – full paper at the link – my bold.

                      When the only person who supports the deeply held belief you’re clutching at is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the National Party, your argument has no foundation.

                      What’s missing from the National Party’s spin is any acknowledgement of demographic pressure.

                    • McFlock

                      You’re simply wrong. Health spend has risen on a real basis (whether measured against inflation or per capita). Labour have been lying.

                      Some purchase areas that you and Farrar use to hide the healthcare cost inflation when you insist on using the entire CPI to calculate real healthcare funding changes:

                      package holidays
                      wine
                      housing rentals
                      international air transport
                      credit services

                      When calculating the real cost of healthcare, why do you insist on measuring it against the changing price of a bottle of wine?

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                Labour politicians ran a campaign for months lying about health spending not increasing

                So you’ll be able to provide a link to one of them saying that then. Put up or shut up.

                The NBR also dragged Farrar’s the National Party’s claims into the sunlight.

                • Baba Yaga

                  The article your refer to by Bryce Edwards does not even attempt to refute Farrar’s numbers. Rather it concentrates on an entirely different measure, GDP growth. I would ask that you demonstrate you have actually read the article, or I will conclude I’m wasting my time. And I’m busy.

                  The article also provides the answer to your own question about Labour politicians claims.

                  Well done, on both counts.

                  • One Anonymous Bloke

                    There is not a single quote from anyone from Labour in the article. It summarises their criticism as “National has effectively cut health expenditure”.

                    I can only conclude that you are a: lying or b: have a problem understanding the qualification in the claim.

                    Unless you can actually link to anyone from Labour supporting your Farrar’s the National Party’s story, that is.

                    Stop twisting and avoiding and admit you can’t and we can all move on

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “It summarises their criticism as “National has effectively cut health expenditure”.”

                      Which is a lie. Thank you.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      It’s true. As the article says, the National Party and the trash who lie for them have one story: everyone else contradicts it.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      The article doesn’t say anything of the sort. You asserted it contradicted Farrar’s calculations. You were wrong.

                      But back to the main point. Politicians lie. To assert that National are any worse than Labour is the height of naivety.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      That’s right: the article doesn’t take a view.

                      It’s Vic. U. and the NZIER and Andy Fyers and the CTU and the ASMS and Jane McGeorge and the Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition and Medicines NZ and Shane Cowlishaw that contradict the National Party.

                      As for your the National Party’s story that “Labour does it too”, try and articulate an opinion of your own for a change, because at the moment you could be replaced by a sign saying “I agree with Steven”.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “It’s Vic. U. and the NZIER and Andy Fyers and the CTU and the ASMS and Jane McGeorge and the Breast Cancer Aotearoa Coalition and Medicines NZ and Shane Cowlishaw that contradict the National Party.”
                      You’re on the wrong tangent. I’m saying Labour lied about government funding of health, by saying health spending has effectively declined in real terms. If any of the people or organisations you name have run numbers that refute the Farrar calculations, then reference them.

                      “As for your the National Party’s story that “Labour does it too”, try and articulate an opinion of your own for a change…”
                      If you are saying the ‘Labour does it too’ comment is commonplace, then, yes, I’m guilty. Many other people have the same view. We’re realists. Politicians lie. Sorry to have shattered any illusions you may have had.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      health spending has effectively declined in real terms

                      That’s what Vic U and the NZIER say in the article. And Fyers too.

                      When you can cite an occasion when a Labour Minister (let alone Prime Minister) ran a rat-fucking unit out of their tax-payer funded office, you’ll be able to point to some sort of equivalence of the “Labour did it too” variety.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “That’s what Vic U and the NZIER say in the article. And Fyers too.”

                      Yes, I asked you for their figures. Not their opinions. The only calculations I’ve seen demonstrate they are wrong.

                      “When you can cite an occasion…”

                      Keep to the subject. We’re not talking about how politics is dirty (and, newsflash, it is), we’re talking about how politicians lie.

                      But I’m getting the idea you feel you’re argument is best served by changing the line of discussion. It won’t work with me.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      …and yet you keep on stepping back from your initial statements:

                      Labour politicians ran a campaign for months lying about health spending not increasing

                      has now become:

                      Labour lied about government funding of health, by saying health spending has effectively declined in real terms

                      …and the only person who you cite in agreement with “your” opinion is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the National Party.

                      These retreating claims are intended to support “your” assertion that “Labour did it too.” Therefore ratfucking by the Prime Minister is relevant because it speaks to the depths of dishonesty to which gutter scum like the National Party and its wholly owned subsidiaries will sink.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      I haven’t stepped back on any claims. Labour have been lying about the health spend for months.

                      You have tried a full range of obfuscation, from linking to an article that did not support your position, to introducing totally irrelevant issues that simply reinforce the weakness of your position.

                      Finally, the numbers prepared by David Farrar have yet to be refuted, and, as such, they stand. I’ve invited you to offer a refutation, and you have failed. Your apparent contempt for Farrar and the National Party is noted, but it can’t take the place of a reasoned argument.

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      Your retreat from your original position is right there in black and white. Words have meaning: even yours.

                      the numbers prepared by David Farrar have yet to be refuted

                      David Farrar has yet to earn some credibility. All you’ve established is that you believe National Party propaganda, and that you are unable to support your their assertions about Labour’s criticisms*.

                      If you could link to someone from Labour making the claims you’ve alleged, you would have done so by now. Plus what McFlock said.

                      *criticisms based on work by Infometrics using Treasury’s own modelling.

                    • Baba Yaga

                      “Your retreat from your original position is right there in black and white.”
                      No, Labour politicians lie. All politicians lie. I told you before, trying to argue your way out of a spot by changing the subject won’t work with me, I’ve been around too long.

                      “David Farrar has yet to earn some credibility.”
                      Really? Farrar is the foremost political analyst and pollster in the country. You clearly cannot refute them, so you shoot the messenger. You’ve been doing it since the beginning of our discussion. It’s weak.

                      “If you could link to someone from Labour making the claims…”
                      That’s funny, considering your own reference, which again did not support your own contention, mentioned Labour’s claims.
                      But just to keep you up with how dishonest they have been, I’ll start feeding you:

                      “Repeating one of his party’s election-year refrains, that health spending had in real terms endured a $1.7 billion cut during the past seven years…”
                      http://www.stuff.co.nz/southland-times/news/91000475/housing-mayhem-reaching-south–little

                    • One Anonymous Bloke

                      …and as McFlock et al have demonstrated, the healthcare budget has declined in real terms, which is why it cannot meet demand. Infometrics did the study for Labour: take it up with them.

                      As for Farrar, have you read Dirty Politics? Your regard for him is misplaced, to put it mildly.

          • One Anonymous Bloke 4.1.1.3.3

            46% of the popular vote

            We can update this info once the official count is known; what we know now is that on preliminary results:

            3,569,830ish is the size of the electorate, 92.39ish% of whom are actually enrolled to vote.

            That’s 3,298,166 people (rounded up to the nearest whole person)

            1,131,501 of them voted for the incompetent and sadistic human rights abuse party (aka National).

            That’s ~34%. Not 46%, and unlike 2014, they now have no mates at all.

            All figures from the Electoral Commission.

            • Baba Yaga 4.1.1.3.3.1

              46% of those who voted, voted National. That’s despite all the hype about early voting and a supposed ‘youth quake’. I’m not celebrating it, just placing the facts on record.

              • One Anonymous Bloke

                Now you’re qualifying your statement, retreating from your original position. I like that. Now step back a bit more. Your breath smells of National Party.

    • Carolyn_nth 4.2

      Are you a Green Party member or voter? If not, you are contradicting yourself. It’s up to the GP to decide who they talk with and how.

      Please note this from the GP website:

      Between now and September 23, you can vote in the general election.
      If you vote Green and want a Labour-led government then voting Green will not split your vote. Every Green vote adds to every Labour vote.

      So now you want the GP to betray all those voters who took them at their word, and voted for them with the above in mind?

    • tracey 4.3

      Read the openong post again. Read the Green charter. Learn about the Greens. What you are doing is applying your “principles” and world view on the Green Party.

    • JanM 4.4

      “I guess Nat types just can’t conceive of a party based on principal”. And I guess this is why you would say things like that. Can it, Peter – it’s getting very tiresome

  5. Ad 5

    Either the Greens or New Zealand First will probably end up as Confidence and Supply partners. And it’s safer for both of them.

  6. Wayne 6

    I appreciate that the Greens in their current composition are wedded to the left. Their older party membership mostly is ex-Alliance. So National is not seen as possible.

    However, I wonder if the Green voters are a bit more diverse than the membership?

    Anyway, by their choice the Greens have lost any real negotiating power. It is easy for Winston to demand they be largely cut out, in the event he goes left.

    I would note that National would do a better green deal than many commenters on this site imagine. Mostly around fresh water (a billion dollar package over 5 years or so would be easy to do). Renewable power, a big boost for electric cars, a substantial green innovation fund would all fit. I am sure that other things are also possible. Bill English will do a lot more on poverty than his predecessor.

    But the Greens apparently don’t want to talk about any of these options.

    • Bearded Git 6.1

      @Wayne…What interests me is why you and your National Party mates are so desperate to shack up with the Greens, who in reality you hate.

      I think this is a signal that you know Winston will not be going with the tired, devious and corrupt Nats.

      • tracey 6.1.1

        Not all Nat voters hate the Greens but their leadership plays to the hating Green base and then wonder why the Greens do not want to negotiate with them. Possibly because the Green’s take them at their campaigning and other rhetoric? And why shouldn’t they judge them by those words?

        “Rent a mob” to describe those concerned with TTP, poverty, housing problems…

        It is not for the Green’s to second guess national’s meaning behind its rhetoric (which is largely derogatory toward Greens and Green policy), it is for National to show some maturity in the words they use, and not just when they cannot form a government.

    • tracey 6.2

      But Wayne not ending poverty was Key’s biggest regret…

    • One Anonymous Bloke 6.3

      Their older party membership mostly is ex-Alliance. So National is not seen as possible.

      No, that isn’t the reason. Try again.

    • tracey 6.4

      Labour campaigned on the same three pillars as the Green party

      Reduce Poverty, address Climate Change, Clean the rivers

      National campaigned on…

      Labour has a big hole (which cynically ignores the 2 zero budgets English and Key ran in 2014 and 2015)
      Labour will raise every tax on the book and invent a few more

      While I appreciate your view that Green’s should assume that National were lying during their campaign about what they stand for, it is based on such a flawed premise from a Green perspective.

      • Wayne 6.4.1

        The Greens made it clear prior to the election they didn’t want to deal with National, so it is hardly surprising National vigourously campaigned against them.

        In the event NZF goes with National, then the Greens should look afresh at their positioning of whether they should be permanently and solely wedded to Labour. I appreciate that will be moot if NZF goes with Labour and the Greens are part of it. But even in that situation it would not surprise me if the Greens are marginalised in such a government. They can be because they have already said they only want to be in a left bloc.

        The Greens would have more negotiating strength if they were prepared to look afresh at their options. I appreciate that is unlikely to happen right at the moment, rather it is something for the future.

        In my view they would get more from National than many of commenters on this site appreciate. Which is why looking afresh at the options has merit.

        • solkta 6.4.1.1

          But wouldn’t Labour be able to get much more policy through if they went with National, given that Labour and National are much closer policy wise than the Greens and National? Why don’t you suggest that Labour take a fresh look at their options?

        • tracey 6.4.1.2

          During the election? It’s like you have erased your hero, John Key’s entire reign from your memory. he regularly called Green party loonies, rent a mob etc.

          The Greens operate in a different paradigm to your and the Nats Wayne. They work on building relationships which takes trust. You work on the basis that you tear everyone else apart and then say “Game’s over now boys, let’s talk”.

          It is actually possible to campaign on what you will do for NZ rather than “vigorously campaign against” your opponents. Again, this is a foreign concept to you.

    • solkta 6.5

      So how many young Greens do you know? Nothing changing that I can see. People aren’t separate from the environment.

      Wouldn’t Labour do much better in negotiations with National given that they have more policy in common?

    • Wainwright 6.6

      ‘Bill English will do a lot more on poverty than his predecessor.’ Admittedly it is easier to do more than nothing.

    • Once was Tim 6.7

      I hate to state what to me seems the bleeding obvious @Wayne, but if as you suggest Green voters are a bit more diverse, why have they not started another party wedded to green principles? Perhaps Green Nation or something.
      Or is it that they aren’t really that committed, or they’re only committed just as long as they can also remain committed to the outcomes of the last nine years. Or that they don’t really like MMP and pissy little parties that aren’t bold and tough, or that they fear they might be a bit like TOP

      • Once was Tim 6.7.1

        Come to think of it – they could get Nick Smith to lead it. He’s always eagre to tell us how ‘green he is’, or rather WAS

      • tracey 6.7.2

        They call it the Blue- Greens….

        Wayne has offered no proof that National voters are Green inclined, most notably that they vote National. It seems to know the Nats are Greenish you have to dismiss all of their rhetoric to woo business and self-interested people and read between extremely narrow (almost invisible lines).

    • Andrea 6.8

      “the Greens have lost any real negotiating power.”

      It depends what they bring to the table, doesn’t it? And their political skills.

      They’ve been coasting along for years now – the little party of principles. So cute. But can they fight their corner (nicely) instead of trailing off to the cross benches to let the big kids play?

      It’s not ‘make or break’ – yet. However, it is time for the Greens to walk the talk – preferably not at heel and on a leash.

      If they can deal well with the present players – all relatively friendly compared with the like of the folk across the Ditch, or Boris Johnson, or the smooth-talking folk from Beijing – then they can demonstrate to all of us that nice can win even better than mean, tough and crushing.

      Otherwise – the familiar comforts of the cross-benches.

      PS Why aren’t we aspiring to having a triple-party government, ranging from conservative-progressive NZF, to moderating Labour, and progressive Green? It’s definitely possible.

  7. Cinny 7

    What a crack up… now a national party supporter has a petition going calling for the Greens to go into coalition with national.

    The desperation by some to cling onto power is becoming more amusing by the hour.

    http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11927166

    • solkta 7.1

      Fuck that’s funny:

      “I genuinely think there is common ground between the National Party and the Green Party, which could result in practical policy wins for New Zealand. Environmental issues such as carbon neutrality and social issues like child poverty come to mind.”

    • ianmac 7.2

      Bill English would love Green to be there at the table so that National can play NZF against Greens and theoretically get a better deal with NZF. But if NZF don’t accept a Labour Green why would they accept a National Green?
      National sees the writing on the wall and so over 3,000 Nat members voted in the petition @ Cinny. Ha!

    • Bearded Git 7.3

      It is slowly dawning on the Gnats and their supporters that they have lost.

    • Anne 7.4

      So a bunch of naive, self important, upwardly mobile and politically moronic Nats think that’s a viable arrangement given the chasm which exits between the two parties is almost beyond credulity.

      “I genuinely think there is common ground between the National Party and the Green Party, which could result in practical policy wins for New Zealand. Environmental issues such as carbon neutrality and social issues like child poverty come to mind.”

      … a govt. that has only now become ‘consciously aware’ of what they’ve done to so many people (eg. having spent the last few years denying there was a child poverty problem of their own making) and now they expect the Greens – begging bowls at the ready – to prostrate themselves before them “please can we be part of your coalition and we promise we’ll be good”. Holy cow!!

  8. Stuart Munro 8

    More Gnat grasping at straws. This too shall pass, and the world will be better for its passing.

    • I feel it passing already. The shrill panic in the gnats, as their ANTI environmental and ANTI climate change and ANTI reducing homelessness and poverty and inequality policies and beliefs are shown for what they are, is sad and funny.

      • tracey 8.1.1

        +100

        I suspect they want Greens in the mix as Ianmac suggests, to drive NZF demands down and then go with NZF

        • marty mars 8.1.1.1

          Yep or greenwash to increase mining and add more shit to the rivers.

          • tracey 8.1.1.1.1

            It beggars belief at how Hollow Wayne is depicting the nats.

            • Once was Tim 8.1.1.1.1.1

              I find it utterly unsurprising. It just shows what a hollowed out, unprincipled, shoddy lot the GNats have become – not that I’ve ever voted for them. It’s probably also why Winnie the Poo jumped ship.

  9. roy cartland 9

    The Greens could always go with NAT if they make their three-pillar policies bottom lines. Things like (but not limited to):
    Pollution Tax
    Higher Income Tax
    CGT
    Abolish Charter Schools
    Billion trees
    Increased funding for health and edu
    No Property Speculation or foreign buyers
    Maori in schools
    Scrap TPP
    Legislated Climate Change measures and action

    And when the NATs baulk, they could then say, rightly, that the NATs were being unflexible and unreasonable.

    • patricia bremner 9.1

      National have deals in the pipeline, they have to save face in front of their blue dragons. They need friends to reach 61.

      They will swallow small rats to achieve their goals. but they are only involved in short term planning, so true cooperation can not happen with long term thinkers like the Greens.

      They push aside any group who doesn’t fit anymore. Hollow men, they spin and lie and call on their media friends to stir the pot.

      They show their disdain for MMP and lament the loss of first past the post.

      They tried to blame Winston through the media, Winston called their bluff.

      Now they are playing on the Green’s fear of being sidelined.

      Next it will be Labour’s fiscal hole (visible to Joyce and Bill alone), or Jacinda’s lack of ministerial experience, or the three headed monster of Coalition…. So it goes!!

      What has changed?? Even their supporters can’t really buy it now.

      Had enough??? Let’s do this!! Let’s love NZ and her people.!!

      And we are relentlessly positive, even you Nats are included, because “We can all be better.”

    • Wayne 9.2

      Roy,

      In negotiations parties don’t get everything they want. But even knowing that, any party has to know what it is reasonable to put on the table.

      As a general point, in any negotiations it is more sensible to look for the common ground and the possible points of agreement, rather than putting up a series of things you know that other party will automatically reject. Taking that approach does not even constitute a negotiation. Certainly not a good faith negotiation.

      So it would be ludicrous in a hypothetical negotiation with National for the Greens to demand a CGT or higher income tax. They won’t even be able to get those things in a Labour/NZF/Green govt, and it would be silly for the Greens to ask for such things even of Labour and NZF.

      • solkta 9.2.1

        Perhaps you could list for us what you see as the “common ground and the possible points of agreement” that the Greens and National could start negotiations on? You are sounding sillier with every post.

        • solkta 9.2.1.1

          Perhaps you could also do the same for Labour and National.

        • tracey 9.2.1.2

          Look forward to the list…

        • Wayne 9.2.1.3

          solkta

          I have already set out the things that I reckon National would readily agree to in my first comment on this post, but basically:
          1. Clean rivers/water, a billion dollar fund over 5 years
          2. Electric vehicles
          3. Renewable energy
          4. Green innovation fund (substantial size)
          5. Bigger focus on poverty alleviation, more social housing, WOF for rentals

          It is mostly an environmental list. I am sure other things could be added.

          But based on your post you couldn’t care less what the points of agreement could be. You would be against it anyway.

          • tracey 9.2.1.3.1

            “Clean rivers/water, a billion dollar fund over 5 years”, who pays Wayne?

            “Council ratepayers and iwi have footed the bill to clean up New Zealand’s waterways to the tune of $94 million under the Government’s Freshwater Improvement Fund in 2017, dwarfing the agricultural industry’s direct contribution of just over $1 million…

            Mr Smith said he was “absolutely” comfortable that farmers were paying the correct proportion of funds towards Freshwater Infrastructure Fund grants relative to the extent they pollute the waterways.

            However, Ms Sage said the financial contribution of farmers is an obligation of doing business using water which is a community asset. And she pointed out that agriculture is not part of the Emissions Trading Scheme and doesn’t pay a resource rental on water.”

            Electric cars… The Nats chose to have only 1 in 3 parliamentary vehicles as electric.

            Bigger focus on poverty alleviation, more social housing,

            Th epoverty that for 9 years they deny even exists Wayne? The Social housing they are selling and replacing with Motel Units?

            Most importantly Wayne you have offered no evidence for why the Greens should trust anything national says in a negotiation?

          • solkta 9.2.1.3.2

            Well that looks like fuck all, even if National were to agree to it. How would the billion clean the rivers? Would you use the notes to filter the water?

            Farm practices need to change to sort the rivers but I am sure that National will never tell farmers that or force them to face their responsibilities.

            EVs, renewable energy, innovation fund – yawn. All a long way from a carbon tax or bringing agriculture into the ETS, or having a comprehensive program to be carbon neutral by 2050.

            I think you mean in number 5 “a” focus on poverty alleviation. Like, we want things to get better not keep getting worse.

            Labour have already made a commitment to 1 and 5 by borrowing Green policy. The rest is just small change.

            • tracey 9.2.1.3.2.1

              I note Wayne stridently avoids comment on the importance of trust in negotiations and after the agreement is concluded.

              In writing of his confusion at the demonising of National he seems unable to reflect on Key call the Greens loonies. On the use of socialist and communist as demonising descriptors of Labour and Green. Helengrad and its clear demonising her as Communist.

              Yey if anyone were to suggest National were facists…

            • tracey 9.2.1.3.2.2

              And he doesnt say what they would do or if industry would pay for it. Or taxpayers. Surely they wouldnt raise a tax or provide a new one?

          • roy cartland 9.2.1.3.3

            No. Selfishness at the expense of all around you, people, economy and the enviro is the Right’s ideology. That is undeniable. It is also completely incompatible with the Greens’ idea of everyone working together and benefitting together, which NECESSARILY must happen to achieve any environmental goals.

            The Right needs externalities (the enviro, the poor, Maori, refugees, the “other”) to operate; it is built into their system. The only way we could all benefit under them is if we externalised something else – the sea, other countries, for eg.

            (Think NAT “likes” farmers? Of course not. They parasitically use each other to further their own gains at the “other”‘s expense.)

      • tracey 9.2.2

        Joke of the Day

        The party which bald-faced lied to the electorate to get into power will engage in “good faith negotiation”.

        Hilarious Wayne.

        Next, Wayne, you will explain why trusting the other party to a negotiation is irrelevant.

  10. tracey 10

    Can anyone envisage a government consisting of the Green Party where the TPP or any version of it containing the Investor protections/shields , is on the table?

  11. mac1 11

    “The unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable”. Oscar Wilde on National hunting the Greens for coalition?

    • garibaldi 11.1

      It must be obvious to all that the Right have no principles, therefore they can’t conceive there will be no kowtowing to the Natz by the Greens.

      • greywarshark 11.1.1

        But the Nats have the power, potentially, and if they can be screwed and squeezed to do something then it would be a gamble worth taking. We haven’t got time to wait for principled people to step up to the plate and take the throng with them. The game is rigged, and Braveheart may have to fight the nasties face to face instead of placarding them from the environs.

        Ttrying to change their minds with facts, reason, likely scenarios, present day scenarios, demonstrating how our brand is being spoiled, more tourists ‘to be educated’ not to poo in the woods! RW minds have a very small rabbit hole entrance opening into an amazing maze stretching into the far distance. Hansel and Gretel used crumbs or string has been used in other folk fables for finding where you have come from. As we don’t know where we are going and how things will be when we get there, we really need to try new passages through the rocky reefs of the moneyed built out of fool’s gold.

        Imaginative talk, a bit fabled, but FGS we need to get off the path most used.

        • tracey 11.1.1.1

          The electorate has already rewarded National for lying to their faces, let’s not reward them further by folding to their grasping “do anything, to hold power for the donors.

          • greywarshark 11.1.1.1.1

            The electorate has had its go at trying to elect a government and large numbers, not the majority are unable to grasp the idea that it’s not the same as cheering on the horse carrying your bet or the team having a run for a try.

            We can’t let them punish the people who really care about NZ. These others in Nat and generally the RW con’t seem to have any love for their country and fellow citizens apart from those within their front gate and bach by the sea.

            I didn’t want Nats and Greens to come together. But the Greens lost the voting strength we had because we didn’t keep our powder dry, there was an excess of anger and righteousness that led to speaking out in a bold move that ended up an own goal. Now we need to change strategies again as the past is not the way to go. Don’t stand on your dignity, there isn’t time. If something can be extracted from National then mine it.

            • tracey 11.1.1.1.1.1

              We will have to agree to disagree both on why Green vote dropped and whether principles are worth standing on. The Greens are NOT the ones holding the nation back from being more caring or ending suffering.

  12. Sparky 12

    Yeah its not a one way street. The Greens need to be willing to compromise too. That said my concern is Labour’s ability to work with NZF.

    • tracey 12.1

      Of course, the Green’s will compromise. They have a history of just that. In this instance, they are compromising a slice of power for turning away from the Party that just lied to the electorate, subsidises farmers at taxpayer expense to opt out of ETS, and has caused suffering to our vulnerable.

  13. Tony Veitch (not etc) 13

    Three points:

    First – the Nats are yesterday’s party. We will face so many major problems in the future, not the least of which is climate breakdown, that a non-interventionist, little government party is just not feasible. They are dying – but don’t expect them to be aware of that yet, or to acknowledge it.

    Second – I hope Labour sticks to its principles (such as it has) and insists on the inclusion of the Greens in government. After all, what can Winnie do? Go off to the Nats in a huff? Binglish would make the most of that. And Winnie is an astute politician – he can see what getting into bed with the Nats has cost other parties.

    Third – I’m warming to the idea of making the Hologram, Speaker! Oh, he’d be a disaster, but so, so entertaining. And it would kill off Act for seven generations! How does ‘Sir David Seymour” sound, after his three years in office?

  14. Whispering Kate 14

    The Greens or NZ First should seriously consider how contaminated National are – they would need to enter a bleach bath and wear a hazard protection suit to sit with National and negotiate – totally filthy and a serious hazard to one’s health. I wouldn’t want to shake any one of their hands and certainly wouldn’t go near them with a forty foot barge pole.

    I think the above image would be a great cartoon.

  15. Ed 15

    The Panel repeating right wing bs about National Green alliance.
    Please RNZ ……. stop repeating National Party lies and spin.
    Do your job.

  16. infused 16

    Keep your principles and continue being out of govt. Changing… nothing.

Links to post

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • The Fog Of Economic Policy Is Starting To Clear…
    Bryan Bruce, https://www.facebook.com/www.redsky.tv, 19 September 2020 National’s economic policy of temporary tax cuts yesterday proved, if proof be needed, that they are unapologetic neoliberals. While their claim that with more money in their pockets people will spend more might sound attractive, the reality is that tax cuts always benefit the ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    7 hours ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #38, 2020
    Highlighted article: Carbon pricing and planetary boundaries  Engström et al take what might be called a systems approach to evaluating carbon pricing, taking into a account various economic sectors affected by and affecting paying for emissions. The conclusions are overall a rare pleasant surprise— a feature predicated on cooperation.  Abstract: ...
    11 hours ago
  • Humans ignite almost every wildfire that threatens homes
    Nathan Mietkiewicz, National Ecological Observatory Network and Jennifer Balch, University of Colorado Boulder CC BY-ND Summer and fall are wildfire season across the western U.S. In recent years, wildfires have destroyed thousands of homes, forced hundreds of thousands of people to evacuate and exposed tens of millions to harmful ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    13 hours ago
  • Climate Change: China steps up
    China has increased its climate change ambition, and set a target to be carbon-neutral by 2060: China will reach carbon neutrality before 2060 and ensure its greenhouse gas emissions peak in the next decade, Xi Jinping has told the UN general assembly. “China will scale up its intended nationally ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    15 hours ago
  • Humans have dealt with plenty of climate variability
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz How much climate variability have humans dealt with since we ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    16 hours ago
  • Indigenous perspectives on unrestricted access to genomic data
    By Genomics Aotearoa researcher Maui Hudson, University of Waikato It is vital that genomics research respects genomic data and genetic heritage from indigenous communities. Genomics research is a rapidly growing field of study, and there is a strong push to make the huge amount of data being produced open ...
    SciBlogsBy Genomics Aotearoa
    18 hours ago
  • Terrible luck: lockdowns on learning and youth job prospects
    What is bad luck? Bad luck is spilling spaghetti sauce down your shirt right before an important meeting. When the person in front of you gets the last seat on the bus, that’s bad luck. Bad luck is when it’s sunny outside, so you leave the house without a coat, ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    18 hours ago
  • Ian Powell: Does private healthcare threaten public healthcare in New Zealand?
    Is the private health system impacting negatively on the public health system? Health commentator Ian Powell evaluates a recent NZ Herald article by Natalie Akoorie (“Public v private healthcare: Moonlighting, skimming, duplication – should NZ do better”), and looks at how the dual system works, and concludes that the answer ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    22 hours ago
  • A rabbit-hole election debate: So do you want more avocado orchards?
    We live in strange and unusual times. It’s been a century since we’ve endured a global pandemic like this, more than half a century since we’ve had economic woes like this. So maybe we got an opening election debate for the times - because that was a strange and unusual ...
    PunditBy Tim Watkin
    1 day ago
  • LIVE: Jacinda Ardern vs. Judith Collins, First Debate
    Tonight, The Civilian will be live-blogging the first of too many debates between Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern and National Party leader Judith Collins, and also the last fifteen minutes of the news. Be sure to tune in from 6:45pm for regular updates, which can be accessed by refreshing this page ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 day ago
  • Hundreds of Aucklanders arrested after illegal mass gathering on Harbour Bridge
    An enormous drive-in party, shown here, was held this morning on Auckland’s Harbour Bridge, where police were forced to intervene. Hundreds of Aucklanders were arrested this morning on public health grounds, after an apparent illegal mass gathering on the city’s Harbour Bridge. Police say hundreds of Aucklanders gathered in their ...
    The CivilianBy admin
    1 day ago
  • The Looming Fight.
    Social Distancing Be Damned - It's Jacinda! Shortly after ascending to Labour’s leadership, Jacinda described herself as a “pragmatic idealist”. It was an inspired oxymoron – packing into just two words the essence of the social-democrat’s dilemma. It was good to know that she knew what lay ahead of her. ...
    2 days ago
  • Climate Change: Moving faster
    Back in 2017, the UK announced that it would ban the sale of new fossil fuel vehicles by 2040. Its a basic climate change measure, aimed at reducing emissions by shifting the vehicle fleet to cleaner technologies. Now, in the wake of the pandemic, they're planning to bring it forward ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • The Australian courts have had enough of refugee detention
    For the past decade, Australia has had a racist, anti-refugee policy. Those claiming refugee status are imprisoned without trial and left to rot in the hope they would "voluntarily" return to be tortured and murdered. When the courts have granted them visas, the government has immediately revoked them on racial ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Friction and the Anti-lock Braking System
    Yesterday afternoon I had to call on my car’s anti-lock braking system (ABS). For reasons best known to its driver, a car pulled out of a side road right in front of me while I was driving home after work, and I needed to stop in a hurry. I rather ...
    SciBlogsBy Marcus Wilson
    2 days ago
  • The Inside Word: New Zealand Quarantine
    There are a fair few misconceptions about conditions within New Zealand’s Quarantine Hotels. Madeline Grant’s misplaced accusations being one prominent example, though she is not alone. Today, I thought I’d share the inside word, so to speak. A friend of mine has recently returned to New Zealand from overseas, and ...
    2 days ago
  • Hard News: ASA: Let’s not talk about this
    Last week, major newspapers carried a full-page ad as part of the campaign for a "No" vote to the referendum question about supporting the Cannabis Legalisation and Control Bill. The ad was authorised by the SAM NZ Coalition, which takes its name from a controversial American anti-cannabis group and includes ...
    2 days ago
  • This is not kind
    New Zealand has a serious homelessness problem, due to skyrocketing rents and a lack of state houses. One of the ways we stick a band-aid on it is to put people up in motels. Previously, they were charged full commercial rates, saddled with odious debt due to the government's failure ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    2 days ago
  • Wokies are the establishment
    by Ani O’Brien In the absence of a better word with which to refer to the rabid activists who claim progressivism while demanding adherence to an increasingly prescriptive set of political beliefs, I call them “woke”. With its roots in Black American slang, the term originally denoted a person or ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    2 days ago
  • How to strengthen the post-isolation Covid rules
    Over the weekend, the Ministry of Health reported a case of Covid-19 in Auckland that is not related to the current Auckland cluster. Before we start to panic, here’s how I think the case happened and how we can strengthen our current border controls. The new Covid-19 case is someone ...
    SciBlogsBy Siouxsie Wiles
    3 days ago
  • Neuralink and You: A Human-AI Symbiosis
    Becky Casale Elon Musk reckons his Neuralink brain implant is much more than a medical device–that one day it will drive a symbiosis between humans and artificial intelligence. “Good morning! I’m Dr Benedict Egg and I’ll be supervising your Neuralink insertion today. Do you have any questions?” “Yes, Doc. ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    3 days ago
  • Liam Hehir: Our obsession with American politics
    Many New Zealanders take a strong interest in US politics, with the death of Supreme Court Judge Ruth Bader Ginsberg being the latest example. Liam Hehir wonders if it very wise for New Zealanders to get so worked about it.   Many politically engaged New Zealanders are now furiously ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    3 days ago
  • COVID: Back to Level 1
    After stamping the Coronavirus out via strict lockdown between March and May, New Zealand went through a good three months without any community cases. Then a local outbreak in Auckland rather buggered things up last month. Auckland’s been in level 3 and level 2.5 for the past six weeks. ...
    3 days ago
  • Climate Change: Climate injustice
    Who's causing our skyrocketing emissions? As with most of our other problems, It's the rich: The wealthiest 1% of the world’s population were responsible for the emission of more than twice as much carbon dioxide as the poorer half of the world from 1990 to 2015, according to new ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • Good riddance
    The border closure and resulting lack of foreign slave-workers is driving the fishing industry out of business: One fishing company is effectively out of business while others are bracing for large financial hits as the deepwater New Zealand industry, unable to get skilled foreign workers into the country, have ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    3 days ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #38
    Story of the Week... Toon of the Week... Coming Soon on SkS... Climate Feedback Claim Review... SkS Week in Review... Poster of the Week... Story of the Week... The tipping points at the heart of the climate crisis Many parts of the Earth’s climate system have been destabilised by ...
    3 days ago
  • Anyone for Collins?
    In the absence of national public opinion polls, we have had to make do in recent weeks with other guides to voter intentions. Those guides, such as the Auckland Central poll, the incidence of google enquiries and the responses to Vote Compass questions, have suggested, not unexpectedly, that Labour is ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    3 days ago
  • Crusher’s fiscal malfunction
    Crusher Collins - National Party leaderWe all know that the National Party is desperate to gain some traction during this election campaign and have been throwing pretty much everything at the Labour Party in order to try and undermine Jacinda Ardern and what the Coalition Government has achieved. But unfortunately ...
    3 days ago
  • Much of the commentariat’s reporting of the most recent GDP figure was misleading and unhelpful. The prize for the stupidest remark about the GDP figure for second quarter 2020 (2020Q2) released on Thursday (17 Sept) goes to Judith Collins, whose response to Grant Robertson’s comments indicated she did not ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    3 days ago
  • Love and Hate as Complementary Revolutionary Acts
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh goloing@gmail.com (19/09/2020) Che Guevara said that a true revolutionary is motivated by love i.e. love of the oppressed, the poor, the children dying from preventable illnesses. This phrase of his is true but has been used by reformists and their more hippy wing have taken advantage ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    4 days ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #38
    A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Sep 13, 2020 through Sat, Sep 19, 2020 Editor's Choice Get to Net-Zero by Mid-Century? Even Some Global Oil and Gas Giants Think it Can Be Done A report by a ...
    4 days ago
  • Tax cuts for all!!! (except you, you, and you)
    With the National Party this week announcing a new policy of tax cuts to spice up the election campagin. MyThinks went along to the launch and afterwards we spoke to the party’s finance spokesperson Paul “Golden Touch” Goldsmith. MT: Thanks for speaking to us Mr Goldsmith. PG: No. Thank you. ...
    My ThinksBy boonman
    5 days ago
  • Great Waves Washing Over New Zealand
    Always to islanders danger Is what comes over the seas ‘Landfall in Unknown Seas’ (Allen Curnow)Six economic issues external to New Zealand, which will greatly impact upon us. 1.         The Diminishing Global Dominance of the US. Since 1941 America has dominated the world economically and politically. Probably it could ...
    PunditBy Brian Easton
    5 days ago
  • New Zealand has role to play in resolving crisis on ‘geopolitical fault line’, Helen Clark says
    By Geoffrey Miller New Zealand should continue to champion human rights in Belarus amidst an ongoing crackdown on protests by the country’s regime, former Prime Minister Helen Clark says. Protests in the country often referred to as ‘Europe’s last dictatorship’ erupted after the country’s disputed presidential elections on August 9 ...
    Democracy ProjectBy Geoffrey Miller
    6 days ago
  • Euthanasia referendum: How to cut through the emotions
    Jacqui Maguire, registered clinical psychologist This podcast episode highlights how difficult it is to have effective conversations about euthanasia due to how polarised people’s views are. I’m a clinical psychologist, with a passion for science communication. In early 2020 I founded the podcast Mind Brew, with an aim to make psychological ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    6 days ago
  • Why we need cameras on boats
    In case anyone needed further convincing, there's another example today of why we need cameras on fishing boats: reported seabird bycatch doubled during a camera trial: Commercial fishers operating off Auckland's coast around vulnerable seabirds are twice as likely to report accidentally capturing them when cameras are on ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Graham Adams: The religious right’s campaign to spike the euthanasia referendum
    In the leadup to the euthanasia referendum, an array of conservative Christian political organisations is running an expensive campaign to sow doubt about the safety of assisted dying. Graham Adams argues that these religious forces know that Christian arguments aren’t convincing the public, but that it is in the public ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 days ago
  • Opportunistic looting
    The National Party has spent the last six months acting horrified at the cost of supporting people through the pandemic and banging on about how the debt must be repaid. So what was their economic policy released today? Massive tax-cuts for the rich, of course! National has walked back ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    6 days ago
  • Uncomfortable Choices.
    Dangerous Times: This will be the choice confronting those coming of age in the 2020s. Embrace Neoliberalism’s belief in racial and sexual equality; adopt its secular and scientific world view; and cultivate the technocratic, multicultural, global outlook required of those who keep the machinery of hyper-capitalism humming. Or, throw your ...
    6 days ago
  • Tony Burton: Covid and benefit payments
    It would be a great time to reform the benefit system, according to former Deputy Chief Economic Advisor at the Treasury, Tony Burton. He argues the complexity of benefit system means that it’s failing to achieve its difficult three core objectives, which form an “iron triangle”.   New Zealand’s benefit ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    6 days ago
  • Talking tax: How to win support for taxing wealth
    Tax Justice UK, September 2020 Serious tax reform is on the political agenda for the first time in decades due to the coronavirus crisis. As this debate hots up it is important to understand what people think about public spending, wealth and tax. Tax Justice UK, along with Survation and ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    6 days ago
  • Getting Tough.
    Not Mucking Around: With upwards of 800 dead from the virus’s resurgence in the Australian state of Victoria, leniency is not on Premier Daniel Andrews’ agenda. The Victorian Police are cracking down hard on the protesters the Australian press has labelled "Covidiots".IMAGES OF POLICE, some in riot gear, others on ...
    6 days ago
  • Media Link: Nuclear strategy, then and now.
    Although I had the fortune of being a graduate student of some of the foremost US nuclear strategists of the day (1970s) and later rubbed shoulders with Air Force and Naval officers who were entrusted with parts of the US nuclear arsenal, I seldom get to write or speak about ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    7 days ago
  • The Chinese List.
    News that Zhenhua Data, an arm of China Zhenhua Electronics Group, a subsidiary of the military-connected China Electronic Information Industry Group (CETC), maintains a list of 800 New Zealanders on a “Overseas Key Information Database” that contains personal information on more than 2.4 million foreign individuals, has caused some consternation ...
    KiwipoliticoBy Pablo
    7 days ago
  • Things that grow fast, and things that surprise us
    Marie Becdelievre January 2020. The number of news article mentioning coronavirus exploded and anxious voices whispered about a global pandemic. Whisper? To me, it was only a whisper. I tend to learn about the world through non-fiction books, conferences, and academic research rather than news and social media, so ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    7 days ago
  • Skeptical Science New Research for Week #37, 2020
    2,082,476,000,000,000 Viability of greenhouse gas removal via the artificial addition of volcanic ash to the ocean  (not open access, unfortunately) walks us through the numbers on a particular means of CO2 removal, addition of volcanic tephra to the ocean. The mechanism is straight chemistry and the cost is fully an order of ...
    1 week ago
  • Barbados to become a republic
    Barbados is planning to remove the queen as head of state and become a republic in time for the 55th anniversary of its independence in 2021: Barbados has announced its intention to remove the Queen as its head of state and become a republic by November 2021. [...] Reading ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Party Like It’s 1989: Bait and Switch is a Bad Look, Mr Hipkins
    At the 2017 election, the New Zealand Labour Party promised a Fees Free Policy for tertiary students. Basically, it would make the first year of university education free in 2018, with a second year in 2021, and a third in 2024. It also promised to restore Post-Graduate access to the ...
    1 week ago
  • Will the tropics eventually become uninhabitable?
    Climate Explained is a collaboration between The Conversation, Stuff and the New Zealand Science Media Centre to answer your questions about climate change. If you have a question you’d like an expert to answer, please send it to climate.change@stuff.co.nz What is the impact of temperature increases in the tropics? ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • A first-hand look: What it’s like to live in a 2020 California wildfire evacuation zone
    This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Daisy Simmons It felt like 100 degrees in my in-laws’ Grass Valley, California, kitchen, but at least the lights were on and for the moment we were safely “distanced” from the Jones Fire. We’d just finished dessert, after pizza and a movie ...
    1 week ago
  • COVID-19 is not the only infectious disease New Zealand wants to eliminate, and genome sequencing is...
    Nigel French, Massey University Genome sequencing — the mapping of the genetic sequences of an organism — has helped track the spread of COVID-19 cases in Auckland, but it also plays an important role in the control of other infectious diseases in New Zealand. One example is Mycoplasma bovis, a ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • A flaw in our electoral transparency regime
    A key part of our electoral funding regime is a requirement for some transparency around donations, on the basis that if we can find out who has bought our politicians (typically after we have voted for them) then everything is alright. There are a lot of problems with that regime ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Don’t Steal This Book
    On “In Defense of Looting” Matt Taibibi takes an entertaining look at this generation of woke activists and how they compare with Abbie Hoffman the iconic anti-Vietnam war counter-culture figure of the 1960s On Thursday, August 27th, the same day Donald Trump formally accepted the Republican nomination, National Public Radio ...
    RedlineBy Daphna
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Carbon prices must rise
    When Parliament introduced the Emissions Trading Scheme, it was worried that carbon prices might get too high. So it introduced a "fixed price option", allowing polluters to pay the government $25 in the place of surrendering credits. The result was predictable: after we were thrown out of international carbon markets ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: Disclosure
    The government will finally be requiring large New Zealand companies to disclose their climate change risks: New Zealand finance companies will be made to report on climate change risk, Climate Change Minister James Shaw has announced. The policy will force around 200 large financial organisations in New Zealand to ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Tackling the hard issues – trust and relationships
    By Claire Grant, Genomics Aotearoa Communications Manager Community consultation is becoming an increasingly important aspect of research programmes in New Zealand, and with that comes the art of relationship building. Engagement between scientists and user-groups is certainly nothing new. But as stakeholder involvement becomes more of a requirement for science, ...
    SciBlogsBy Genomics Aotearoa
    1 week ago
  • Equality Network – September Newsletter
    Read the Equality Network newsletter here ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    1 week ago
  • The Left’s Lost Allies.
    Rebels In A Wrong Cause: The truly frightening thing about Jami-Lee Ross’s and Billy Te Kahika’s success in persuading thousands of New Zealanders that Covid-19 is just another trick, just another way of stealing away their power, is realising just how many of them once marched at the Left’s side. ...
    1 week ago
  • Legal Beagle: Low-Hanging Fruit
    In a couple of months, the 53rd Parliament will meet in Wellington, and approximately 120 MPs will be sworn in, many of them for the first time.They will all have political goals, some aligning with their party platforms, some not, some complex, and some simple, but they will gain one ...
    1 week ago
  • Closing the Gap thinks that Labour’s proposal to raise the top tax rate is great but………
    Media Statement For Immediate Release 10th September 2020 The income and wealth inequality lobby group, “Closing the Gap” thinks the Labour proposal a great start says Peter Malcolm, a spokesperson for the group. But they need to be aware of what many of the rich do and of what do ...
    Closing the GapBy Tracey Sharp
    1 week ago
  • Climate Change: No nonsense
    ACT is pushing a "no-nonsense climate change plan". What does it involve? Repealing the Zero Carbon Act and Emissions Trading Scheme, reversing the fossil-fuel exploration ban, and allowing mining on conservation land. In other words, repealing any policy which might actually reduce emissions. Which is the very definition of nonsensical. ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • My Climate Story: Coming full Circle
    This blog post is a follow up to my recap of Al Gore's Climate Reality Leadership Training I recently participated in. One of the exercises we were asked to complete was to write about our respective "Climate Story". This is a slightly updated version to the one I had submitted during ...
    1 week ago
  • A bill to criminalise wage theft
    Wage theft is a problem in New Zealand, with a widespread practice of forcing employees to work without pay, and regular cases of underpayment and exploitation. One reason why its such a widespread problem is impunity: rather than a crime, wage theft is merely a tort, dealt with by the ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • Liam Hehir: What the voting age debate tells us about our disconnected political media
    New Zealand’s media and online politics often reflect the values of liberal and progressive agendas. According to Liam Hehir, the current proposals to lower the voting age to 16 years – which the media overwhelming supports – is indicative of a wider mismatch with society, which is not good for ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    1 week ago
  • Why Pay Taxes?
    My wife and I, through a combination of good luck and good management, have managed to retire in comfortable circumstances. We celebrate our good fortune by making relatively small but regular donations to a range of good causes – to rescue services like the rescue helicopters, St John’s Ambulance and ...
    Bryan GouldBy Bryan Gould
    1 week ago
  • Now everyone’s a statistician. Here’s what armchair COVID experts are getting wrong
    Jacques Raubenheimer, University of Sydney If we don’t analyse statistics for a living, it’s easy to be taken in by misinformation about COVID-19 statistics on social media, especially if we don’t have the right context. For instance, we may cherry pick statistics supporting our viewpoint and ignore statistics showing we ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • More timid bullshit from Labour
    Over the weekend, Labour released its welfare policy: an increase in benefit abatement thresholds. And that's it. Faced with clear evidence of ongoing hardship among beneficiaries and a call from its on Welfare Expert Advisory Group to raise core benefits by between 12 percent and 47 percent, Labour's response is ...
    No Right TurnBy Idiot/Savant
    1 week ago
  • The Police Kill as Part of their Social Function
    by Gearóid Ó Loingsigh (Bogota; 09/11/2020) The murder of Javier Ordoñez in the neighbourhood of Villa Luz in Bogotá, Colombia at the hands of two policemen brings to the fore the issue of police violence and its function in society. First of all we should be clear that we are ...
    RedlineBy Admin
    1 week ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming Digest #37
    Story of the Week... La Niña Update... Toon of the Week... Quote of the Week... Coming Soon on SkS...  Poster of the Week... SkS Week in Review... Story of the Week... Humans exploiting and destroying nature on unprecedented scale – report Animal populations have plunged an average of 68% ...
    1 week ago
  • The 2019 measles epidemic in Samoa
    Gabrielle Po-Ching In November 1918, the cargo and passenger ship Talune travelled to Apia, Samoa from Auckland, carrying a number of passengers who had pneumonic influenza. From these passengers stemmed the biggest pandemic Samoa had ever seen. With around 8,500 deaths, over 20% of the country’s population at the ...
    SciBlogsBy Guest Author
    1 week ago
  • Shifting all Isolation/Quarantine Facilities to a Single Air Force Base: The Need for a Critical Ana...
    Prof Nick Wilson*, Prof Michael Baker In this blog the arguments for and against shifting all COVID-19 related isolation/quarantine facilities to a single air force base at Ōhakea are considered. The main advantage would be a reduction in the risk of border control failures, which can potentially involve outbreaks ...
    SciBlogsBy Public Health Expert
    1 week ago
  • The difference between Green and Labour: a tale of two Finance Ministers
    So the Greens co-leader James Shaw recently made a mistake. In his role as Associate Finance Minister approving funding for “shovel-ready” projects, he fought hard for a private “Green school” to get funding to expand their buildings and, therefore, their student capacity. There are many problems with what he did: ...
    Cut your hairBy calebmorgan
    1 week ago
  • Bryce Edwards: Political Roundup – The missing election policy on free dental visits
    Over the last three years there have been growing calls for the government to provide dental services under the health system – universal free dental care. This is because at the moment there’s an anomaly in which teeth are regarded as different from the rest of the body which means ...
    Democracy ProjectBy bryce.edwards
    2 weeks ago
  • 2020 SkS Weekly Climate Change & Global Warming News Roundup #37
    A chronological listing of news articles linked to on the Skeptical Science Facebook Page during the past week: Sun, Sep 6, 2020 through Sat, Sep 12, 2020 Editor's Choice With California ablaze, Newsom blasts Trump administration for failing to fight climate change Trinity River Conservation Camp crew members drown ...
    2 weeks ago
  • Letter to the Editor
    Dear Sir, As we head into the run up to the upcoming election I feel it is my duty to draw your attention to the lack of fun we are currently forced to ensure by the Adern regime. In their efforts to keep the nation’s essential workers, health compromised people, ...
    My ThinksBy boonman
    2 weeks ago

  • Support for innovative Pacific education responses to COVID-19 needs
    Supporting new and creative Pacific education practices as part of our COVID-19 response and recovery is the focus of a new $28.5 million Pacific Education Innovation Fund announced today by Associate Minister of Education Jenny Salesa.  “There is already an incredible amount of innovative and creative work going on in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    17 hours ago
  • Eligibility expanded for COVID-19 leave support
    The expanded scheme will cover: People who have COVID-19 like symptoms and meet the Ministry of Health’s criteria, and need to self-isolate while awaiting the results of a COVID-19 test. People who are directed to self-isolate by a Medical Officer of Health or their delegate or on advice of their ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Seasonal work visa available to more people
    The Government is putting in place a range of immigration policy changes to help fill labour shortages in key industries while ensuring New Zealanders, who have lost jobs due to COVID-19, have the chance to find new employment. “Two key sectors we are moving to help are horticulture and wine ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • More border exceptions for critical roles
    The Government has established class exceptions for border entry for a limited number of veterinarians, deep sea fishing crew, as well as agricultural and horticultural machinery operators. “Tight border restrictions remain the backbone of the Government’s border strategy to protect New Zealand against COVID-19 and ensure New Zealand citizens and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Crown will not appeal Dodds v Southern Response decision
    The Crown will not appeal the Court of Appeal decision in the Dodds v Southern Response case, Grant Robertson announced today. “Southern Response will be paying the damages awarded by the Court to Mr and Mrs Dodds shortly. The Crown was already meeting their legal costs for this appeal. “The ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • Crucial PGF investments for Northland
    The Provincial Growth Fund is investing nearly $30 million in a diverse range of projects that will create immediate and long-term jobs and lift economic and social outcomes for Northland and its people. Deputy Prime Minister Winston Peters and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones made the announcement today in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 days ago
  • $27million investment in global vaccine facility
    The Coalition Government has committed to invest $27 million in COVID-19 vaccine development through the global COVAX Facility, Foreign Minister Winston Peters announced today. “The COVAX Facility is a key part of our COVID-19 Vaccine Strategy to obtain safe and effective vaccines. It allows us to invest in a high-quality, ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government backing Māori landowners
    The Government will provide up to $1.69 million through the One Billion Trees programme to Māori landowners to make their whenua more productive through the planting of forests, both native and exotic, and improve economic and environmental outcomes, Forestry Minister Shane Jones has announced. “Around 1.5 million ha of land ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • New tools to make nature more accessible
    People planning to head outdoors now have a resource that lets them know how accessible an area is for people with varying levels of mobility, Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced today. The Halberg Foundation, Sensibel, and the Department of Conservation (DOC) have launched Accessibel, a new tool which helps ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • PGF makes Māori history more accessible
    One of the most significant battle sites of the 1860s Land Wars will receive $2.96 million from the Provincial Growth Fund to improve the site and help tell the New Zealand story to visitors, Māori Development Minister Nanaia Mahuta and Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones have announced. Nanaia Mahuta ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Making it official: The journey of te reo Māori | Kia whakapūmautia: Ngā piki me ngā heke o te r...
    The journey towards recognising Māori as an official language and taonga has been captured as a web series and launched today during Te Wiki o te Reo Māori, announced Associate Arts, Culture and Heritage Minister Carmel Sepuloni. “Te reo Māori is a living language, and understanding its significance, and pathways to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Better-than-forecast GDP reflects decision to protect New Zealand
    Today’s better-than-forecast GDP figures show the expected impact of the decision to act quickly to protect New Zealanders from the global COVID-19 pandemic. GDP fell 12.2% in the June quarter from March, reflecting decisions to close New Zealand’s borders and enter Alert Level 4. “This result was better than the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Boost for COVID-19 related Pacific education needs
    The Government is investing $39.7 Million over four years to support the educational needs of Pacific learners and families in the regions hardest hit by COVID-19, with Auckland getting an immediate boost, Associate Minister of Education Jenny Salesa says.   “Like all New Zealanders Pacific families want learners to do well ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • More resources for kiwi conservation
    New Zealand’s goal of 100,000 kiwi by 2030 is being helped by an extra $19.7 million in funding to accelerate iwi and community efforts to protect kiwi, Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage announced. “$19.7 million of Jobs for Nature funding is being invested in kiwi conservation activities including increased predator ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Improving access to affordable electricity
    Ensuring New Zealanders can get the best deal on their electricity takes a step in the right direction today with the South Island launch of the EnergyMate pilot run by the Electricity Retailers’ Association, says Minister of Energy and Resources, Dr Megan Woods. EnergyMate is an industry-led programme providing coaching ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government achieves 50 percent women on state boards
    Minister for Women Julie Anne Genter announced today that the Government has reached its target of 50 percent on women on state sector board and committees – setting a new record level of women on state sector boards. “This Government is committed to having more women in leadership roles - ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Record transport investment to help economic recovery and save lives
    Transport Minister Phil Twyford released today the final Government Policy Statement on land transport (GPS) 2021 which outlines the planned $48 billion investment in services and infrastructure over the next decade. “The final GPS supports our Government’s five-point plan for economic recovery by confirming our record investments in transport infrastructure ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Advancing clean energy technology
    Three ambitious and cutting-edge research programmes that will lift New Zealand’s advanced energy technology research capability over seven years, have been supported by Government today, says Research, Science and Innovation Minister Megan Woods. The projects will each receive a share of $40.7 million investment from the Strategic Science Investment Fund. ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Major milestone reached in Pike River Re-entry
    The critical area for forensic examination known as Pit Bottom in Stone has been reached in what is a major milestone for the Pike River re-entry project, Minister Responsible for Pike River Re-entry Andrew Little announced. “The infrastructure located in Pit Bottom in Stone is of very significant interest in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Economic recovery guides Govt response to retirement income policy review
    The Government is working on how New Zealand’s retirement income policies and settings can best support Kiwis in light of the COVID-19 economic recovery, with the help of the Retirement Commissioner’s latest review, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Kris Faafoi said. “The Retirement Commissioner’s three-yearly review into New Zealand’s retirement ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Iwi community hub opens in Murupara
    A new digital hub and development centre in Murupara will be instrumental in growing the region’s productivity, said Under-Secretary for Regional Economic Development Fletcher Tabuteau at the official opening of two community initiatives today. “I’m pleased to be here celebrating a significant milestone for two projects set to make a ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • PREFU shows economy doing better than forecast
    PREFU shows economy doing better than forecast Unemployment to peak at 7.8%, down from 9.8% forecast in the Budget Year-to-June accounts show tax revenue, debt and OBEGAL better than forecast Global forecast downgraded as COVID-19 second waves and uncertainty grows Balanced plan to support critical public services, manage debt and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Spruce-up for Ōtaki community facilities
    The Kāpiti Coast town of Ōtaki will receive $1.4 million in Government funding for two projects providing scores of jobs for locals while improving community facilities, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. The Māoriland Charitable Trust will receive a $900,000 Provincial Growth Fund (PGF) grant to upgrade the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • PGF funding for Jobs for Nature programme
    The Provincial Growth Fund will provide $11.88 million to fund fencing and waterway projects nationwide that will improve the environment and create jobs in their communities, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. “These projects will create more than 100 jobs nationwide with work starting within the next couple ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Procurement to promote jobs, Māori and Pasifika businesses and sustainability
    As part of the COVID-19 recovery, the Government has strengthened its procurement rules to ensure its annual $42 billion spend creates more jobs, uses more sustainable construction practices and results in better outcomes for Māori and Pasifika, Government Ministers announced today.   Economic Development Minister Phil Twyford says the $42 ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Timaru’s Theatre Royal to be upgraded and new heritage facility built
    The Government is supporting a major upgrade of Timaru’s iconic Theatre Royal and the construction of a new connected Heritage Facility museum and exhibition space with $11.6 million from the Government’s Infrastructure Fund, Jacinda Ardern announced today. “We heard the call from the community and the council. The Theatre Royal ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • District Court judge appointed
    Chrissy Montague (formerly Armstrong), barrister of Auckland has been appointed as a District Court Judge with Family Court jurisdiction to be based in Wellington, Attorney-General David Parker announced today. Ms Montague commenced practice in Auckland in 1987 and went into general practice dealing with Wills, Estates, Trusts, Conveyancing, Relationship Property ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Approval given to Commercial Film and Video Production Proposal
      A Proposal to provide for the development and operation of commercial film and video production facilities in areas of Christchurch has been given the go ahead. Hon Poto Williams, Associate Minister for Greater Christchurch Regeneration, has approved the Proposal, which was prepared and submitted by Regenerate Christchurch. Minister Williams ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Supporting a thriving wānanga sector to benefit Māori learners
    As part of the Government’s focus on building closer partnerships with Māori and enhancing the quality of, and access to, Māori medium education, a payment of $8 million will be made to Te Wānanga o Raukawa in partial recognition of its Waitangi Tribunal claim (WAI 2698), Associate Education Minister Kelvin ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Jobs for Nature boosts efforts to restore Kaimai-Mamaku
    The Minister of Conservation Eugenie Sage has announced a $19 million investment over four years in an important forest restoration project involving a partnership between the Department of Conservation, iwi/hapū, the Bay of Plenty and Waikato Regional Councils, community conservation groups and organisations such as Forest and Bird across the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Zealand first in the world to require climate risk reporting
    New Zealand will be the first country in the world to require the financial sector to report on climate risks, the Minister for Climate Change James Shaw announced today. The changes build on the huge progress this Government has made to tackle the climate crisis. “Today is another step on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Economic data highlights impact of Auckland moving out of Level 3
    Economic activity across the Auckland region and the country bounced back to levels experienced under Alert Level 1 following Auckland’s move out of Alert Level 3, analysis in the Treasury’s latest Weekly Economic Update shows. The analysis of economic data since Auckland’s move out of Level 3 shows: Auckland card ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • PM statement on Cabinet COVID-19 Alert Level review
    Takiri mai te ata, ka ao, ka ao, ka awatea, tihei mauriora! Tātou katoa ngā iwi o Aotearoa, tēnā koutou! Tēnā tātou e whakanuia ana i te wiki nei, te wiki o te reo Māori Greeting to you all from Otepoti, Dunedin.  This week is the Māori Language week and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • More mental wellbeing services for young people in regions
    More mental health and addiction services are available for young New Zealanders in Rotorua and Taupō, Wairarapa, South Canterbury, Dunedin and Southland from next month, Health Minister Chris Hipkins and Associate Health Minister Julie Anne Genter say. “The Government is serious about making sure New Zealanders struggling with mental health ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government joins forces with Central Otago communities to clean up waterways
    The Manuherekia catchment in Central Otago is the third exemplar catchment to be targeted as part of the Government’s plan to clean up waterways by supporting community-led programmes.   Environment Minister David Parker said the Manuherekia catchment is vitally important to the people of Central Otago.  “The Manuherekia rises in the ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government confirms new Dunedin Hospital design
    The Government has agreed on a preferred design for the new Dunedin Hospital featuring two separate buildings, and has provided funding for the next stages of work.   Minister of Health Chris Hipkins says Cabinet has approved in principle the detailed business case for the new hospital, giving people in ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Join the one in a million reo Māori moment
    New Zealanders across the country are set to mark history as part of the Māori Language Week commemorations led by Te Taura Whiri i te reo Māori this year.  Māori Development Minister, Nanaia Mahuta says the initiative will mark history for all the right reasons including making te reo Māori ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Education initiatives add to momentum of Te Wiki o te Reo Māori 2020
    More than 1000 teachers, support staff and school leaders have graduated from a programme designed to grow their capability to use te reo Māori in their teaching practice, as part of the Government’s plan to integrate te reo Māori into education, Associate Education Minister Kelvin Davis announced today. Being trialled ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • The Toloa Tertiary Scholarships for 2021 aims to increase Pacific participation in STEM
    The Minister for Pacific Peoples, Aupito William Sio, says the Toloa Tertiary Scholarships which aims to encourage more Pacific student numbers participating and pursuing STEM-related studies in 2021, are now open. “These tertiary scholarships are administrated by the Ministry for Pacific Peoples (MPP), and are part of MPP’s overall Toloa ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Financial support for timber industry
    Four Bay of Plenty timber businesses will receive investments totalling nearly $22 million through the Provincial Growth Fund to boost the local economy and create jobs, Regional Economic Development Minister Shane Jones has announced. Rotorua-based sawmill Red Stag Wood Solutions will receive a $15 million loan to develop an engineered ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago