web analytics

NRT: If you can’t cap it, don’t drill it

Written By: - Date published: 9:49 am, June 7th, 2013 - 21 comments
Categories: disaster, energy - Tags: , ,

I/S at No Right Turn on deep water drilling off our coast line.

If you can’t cap it, don’t drill it

Next year Anadarko – one of the companies responsible for the Deepwater Horizon spill – will begin drilling in deep water off our coast next year. So how long will it take them to plug the well if they cause a similar “accident” here? Two weeks:

An international petroleum company manager says it would take up to 14 days to cap a deep water well in the event of a blowout.

Anadarko is planning to drill two deep water exploration wells off the coast of Taranaki and Canterbury next year.


Mr Boggan says if there was a blowout in a deep water well, four jumbo jets would need to fly a capping stack from the UK and the cap would then need to be shipped to the site.

And in the meantime while they’re pissing around, their well will be spewing oil, poisoning our oceans, our ecosystems, and our beaches. Anadarko clearly thinks that’s acceptable. But they don’t live here, and its not their backyard they’ll be poisoning.

If you can’t cap it, don’t drill it. Companies who want to drill in New Zealand should be forced to keep this equipment here, on-site, in case of any accident. Otherwise, they should not be allowed to drill. Its that simple.

21 comments on “NRT: If you can’t cap it, don’t drill it ”

  1. Mark Fletcher 1

    I call BS on this, but what would I know having only worked in the offshore oil industry for 6 years.

    All wells drilled offshore have three pieces of equipment “attached” to the seafloor.
    1: The Template, a base cemented to the sea floor and uppercasings.
    2: The BOP (Blow Out Preventer – catch the name) and
    3: The Lower Marine Riser. This allows the fixed part the template, BOT to interact with the moving bit the floating rig or drill ship.

    This is scare mongering after the Deepwater Horizon spill, an “accident” that should never have happened. The problem there was that there were some seals on the BOP that needed replacing and the Companies involved (not just BP) decided that as in the thirty + years they had been using BOPs they had never had to fire one of “In Anger” that they wouldn’t raise the BOP (A costly procedure but nowhere near as costly as the subsequent price to clean up). They took a risk they never should have. Inspectors and regulators turned a blind eye, that will NEVER happen again.
    There was a blow out on the rig and that is what you use a Blow Out Preventer for, but alas when they went to use it it didn’t work (see above for reason).
    Then unfortunately they had a major problem and we all know the results of that!
    This brings about two points;
    1: No drilling company will ever take that shortcut again as the financial risks are far too great and
    2: I bet you “dollars to donuts” there won’t be one inspector/regulator that will turn a blind eye again.

    • Zorr 1.1

      How about we do up the seatbelt before pulling out of the driveway rather than after the SUV has collided with us?

      Seriously… safety concerns are for those 1 in X amount of times where the consequences of a bad thing far outweigh any potential reimbursement for it. For myself, no amount of money would ever make up for anything remotely approaching Deepwater Horizon and that is only, potentially, made worse by knowing that any solution is (at best) several days away if it happens.

      If your “industry expertise” is to cut corners because the companies have weighed the risks and decided, financially, that the risk is worth it, then I have one thing to say to you. Fuck you and your industry. Come back when you have a conscience.

    • Lanthanide 1.2

      Still don’t see why this means the ‘worst-case scenario’ back up should be located in the UK, and not NZ.

      Failing that, it should be located in Oz, not the UK.

      • insider 1.2.1

        Fyi most of our current oil spill response gear and expertise is actually in singapore

    • Colonial Viper 1.3

      Oh that’s very reassuring.

      Given that layers of BP management ignored engineering warnings AND ignored their very own staff and their own operating procedures.

      Why? Expediency, cost, time. Greed in other words. The usual.

      It takes years to fix bad operating cultures in an industry. Would you walk off a job if yoru advice was being ignored? Guess what, a lot of platform staff kept working and kept accepting pay checks when their advice was ignored.

      btw we don’t care how much “financial risk” these operators take on, it’s our nation’s physical resources and reputation which will be ruined by an incident, this is really about the risk WE as a country are taking on.

    • weka 1.4

      This brings about two points;
      1: No drilling company will ever take that shortcut again as the financial risks are far too great and
      2: I bet you “dollars to donuts” there won’t be one inspector/regulator that will turn a blind eye again.

      I don’t believe that. Others have addressed other aspects of that, but I’ll just point out that as the easy to access oil gets used up, the pressure to get oil from wherever, however will get intense. I simply don’t believe that the capitalist drive of companies, nor the self-interest of governments and people clammering for oil will be put aside for the sake of the environment (we’re already not playing fair with the environment and we’re not under peak oil stress yet). Sure some companies will get smarter, and I bet BP doesn’t make the same mistake twice, but we already know that NACT are giving mining permits to companies without good reputations, so what makes you think an accident is impossible?

      Sorry dude, but your reassurances just don’t hold up.

    • Draco T Bastard 1.5

      1: The Template, a base cemented to the sea floor and uppercasings.
      2: The BOP (Blow Out Preventer – catch the name) and
      3: The Lower Marine Riser. This allows the fixed part the template, BOT to interact with the moving bit the floating rig or drill ship.

      All of which failed on the Deepwater horizon. That’s not scaremongering, that’s fact. The fact that there was an accident has no bearing on it or, to be more precise, the fact that an accident “that shouldn’t have happened” is why we need better systems in place.

      1: No drilling company will ever take that shortcut again as the financial risks are far too great and

      Show us the legislation that we have that will bankrupt them.

      2: I bet you “dollars to donuts” there won’t be one inspector/regulator that will turn a blind eye again.

      So, how are those regulators in the Electricity Authority doing? Looks to me like special pleading on behalf of the privateers.

  2. Mark Fletcher 2

    Because there should be no need if the BOP was working as it should (and I have explained the reasons above) then the Deepwater Horizon would have been a “relative” non event. BOPs should be tested before they are placed on the seabed (we used to do it) we also did tests on the backup to the backup where we used the ROV (unmanned submarine) to attach an hydraulic line to the BOP to operate it if the Primary and Secondary systems malfunctioned. But as said above this “accident” should never have happened and it comes down to people not the equipment. The “penalties” now are so high that responsible drillers (and believe it not most of the people working in this field that I know are responsible) wouldn’t ever risk it again.

    I know not what this “worst case scenario” back up is nor can I imagine what it is so I can’t comment.

    Zorr no need to attack me personally as I am only trying to shed some sunlight on this topic.

    • freedom 2.1

      We know the workers are responsible, it is the owners that no-one trusts.

      If the owners of petro-chemical companies could be trusted to do the right thing and operate their multi-trillion dollar business in an environmentally responsible manner, we would not have these very real concerns. Sadly, a century of avoidable disasters show the reality to be what it is, grave.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 2.2

      Your faith in safety procedures is interesting given your admission that only “most” of the people in the industry take their responsibilities seriously.

      There are players in the industry with very questionable ethics, so I think your attempt to dismiss criticism as “scaremongering” is unlikely to get much traction.

      Plus what Lanthanide said.

    • Colonial Viper 2.3

      But as said above this “accident” should never have happened and it comes down to people not the equipment.

      I’d like to know if you would guarantee the assurances you are making with your life: a kind of Hammurabi’s Rule for oil drillers.

    • weka 2.4

      Mark there are so many ‘shoulds’ in your comment. And saying that most drillers are responsible just proves our point. It’s not fail safe, and we shouldn’t be doing it.

      “it comes down to people not the equipment.”

      Yes, that’s right. That’s why it’s not to be trusted.

  3. Mark Fletcher 3

    CV all your comments on BP et al have validity. Walking off a floating drill rig (and I don’t mean it literally) is difficult, the Company provides the transport. As to how many of the employees working on the rig at the time knew of this we will never know as this probably was not a topic of conversation until after the event. It was probably only known to a few (Toolpusher [the boss] and maybe some engineering boffin) they consequently made a very poor decision.

    But what about the Inspectors et al that should have also been saying no, they were also conspicuous by their absence. So not just company expediency involved here.

    • One Anonymous Knucklehead 3.1

      They were using the same “high trust” regulatory model this government favours.

      • Colonial Viper 3.1.1

        Watch this clip from the TV show “The Newsroom”

        The material on the BP spill is factual

        At 3 minutes in they interview a government inspector from the Minerals Management Service – and it becomes clear that each MMS inspector is responsible for inspecting over 600 drilling wells a month.

        In other words – the self-regulatory and external regulatory regime was a systematic farce from top to bottom. Exactly the way the industry that Mark Fletcher works in wanted it.


      • Murray Olsen 3.1.2

        The high trust model is hardly favoured for beneficiaries, OAK, only for people and companies whose negligence and incompetence can cause real problems. For beneficiaries, it’s no trust at all.

        Nothing I have seen inspires any trust whatsoever in oil companies or Tory governments. I do not want these deep sea wells anywhere on the planet.

    • freedom 3.2

      “But what about the Inspectors et al that should have also been saying no, they were also conspicuous by their absence. So not just company expediency involved here.”

      This 2010 article from a New Orleans newspaper plainly spells out that situation. The investigation’s results, like all aspects of the Deepwater Horizon case, went largely unreported and numerous court proceedings from BP muddied almost all public visibility of what really happened. Some of the families of those that died are still awaiting answers on why safety procedures were manipulated. http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/05/federal_inspections_on_oil_rig.html

      Deepwater Horizon was held up by the Industry as the very model of a safe rig. It was reported at the time of the disaster that BP, the lease holder of the rig, (and other operators) regularly use the various operational exemptions (as mentioned in the article) to avoid scheduled Inspections. After the horrific failure of the rig, the destruction of the ecosystem and the not insignificant loss of human life, BP made various public statements. One that sticks in my craw was that due to the incredibly large number of active wells in the Gulf mistakes in scheduling were bound to occur. This is not a credible response.

      The Corporate manipulation of safety procedures and the flawed reporting of the reduced number of inspections that did happen, does not instil confidence when considering the risks of deep sea drilling in our own waters. Especially delivered under the well signalled allegiances of our current Government.

      • Colonial Viper 3.2.1

        Also MMS government inspection agency was found to have been run by corrupt practices, flows of money and gifts, their staff having sex with people from the industry etc. Sounds like industry standard practice to me.

  4. Viv K 4

    For gods sake! EVEN IF THERE ARE NEVER ANY LEAKS OIL IS A FOSSIL FUEL THAT CAUSES GLOBAL WARMING AND OCEAN ACIDIFICATION. You can argue till the cows come home about the risks of oil spills and how long it might take to cap one, but the fact is even if all off shore drilling goes completely to plan, there WILL be environmental damage! Please can we accept that this is the 21st century and we know that we have to use energy that does not come from fossil fuels.

  5. Jenny 5

    Deep Sea Oil is one of the Extreme Hydrocarbons. Which includes Fracking, Oil Sands, Shale Gas, Coal Gasification, (similar to the wacky coal to diesel technology initiated under the last Labour administration.)

    The science is clear. If these extreme hydrocarbon technologies are allowed to be realised, our world is headed for a 6 degree rise in average temperature.

    As well as this looming existential danger. Every one of the extreme hydrocarbons, including deep sea oil pose an immediate dangerous and/or destructive threat to the natural environment where they operate, as well as the global climate.

    We all moan about how terrible this is.

    But nothing ever seems to get done and business continues as usual.

    So how are we going to stop it?

    As in past crises that have afflicted humanity, leadership has proven to be the key necessary ingredient in starting an effective fight back.

    In New Zealand, where is that leadership?

    National are in support of Deep Sea Oil Drilling.

    So is Labour. (maybe with a bit tighter regulation).

    What is needed, in my opinion to stop Deep Sea oil, or indeed any other the extreme Hydrocarbons, is a high profile political campaign led by a political party, similar to the campaign against Asset Sales, or the Campaign for Feed the Kids or for MMP, or for Nuclear Free New Zealand.

    Every one of these campaigns were led by minority opposition parties.

    The one party that could provide the leadership to front such a successful campaign against Deep Sea Oil. The Green Party, are seriously contemplating going into a coalition government, where to get cabinet positions they have declared they are prepared to negotiate “without a bottom line”. If “no bottom line” means the Greens are prepared to go into government with no commitment from Labour to stop Deep Sea Oil Drilling. Then the Green party will be bound by collective cabinet responsibility not to oppose government policy including Deep Sea Oil Drilling.

    Why do the Green Party not see a problem with this?

    Labour, have shown no willingness to compromise at all on Deep Sea Oil Drilling, or indeed any of the other risky and dangerous and environmentally damaging plans to increase hydro carbon extraction. This can only mean that the Greens will be the ones to compromise, depending on how much they want those front seats in parliament.

    Excusing the Silence of the Greens, weka argues
    here that NGOs can take up the slack. But IMHO, with the retreat from leadership by the Greens, the NGOs will struggle to get traction.

  6. Kiwiiano 6

    Given that it is well established that the known (or at least claimed) reserves of fossil fuel are FIVE TIMES the amount needed to tip us into climate chaos, we can only question the sanity of those who would be exploring for more. The money would be better spent developing alternatives.

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

  • Prime Ministers’ meeting reaffirms close trans-Tasman relationship
    Prime Minister Chris Hipkins and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese today held their first bilateral meeting in Canberra. It was Chris Hipkins’ first overseas visit since he took office, reflecting the close relationship between New Zealand and Australia. “New Zealand has no closer partner than Australia. I was pleased to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    12 hours ago
  • Immediate humanitarian support to Türkiye and Syria following earthquakes
    New Zealand will immediately provide humanitarian support to those affected by the earthquakes in Türkiye and Syria, Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta announced today. “Aotearoa New Zealand is deeply saddened by the loss of life and devastation caused by these earthquakes. Our thoughts are with the families and loved ones affected,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    16 hours ago
  • Pākinga Pā site to be gifted back to local hapū
    An historic Northland pā site with links to Ngāpuhi chief Hongi Hika is to be handed back to iwi, after collaboration by government, private landowners and local hapū. “It is fitting that the ceremony for the return of the Pākinga Pā site is during Waitangi weekend,” said Regional Development Minister ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    18 hours ago
  • New initiatives to unlock Māori science and research resources
    The Government is investing in a suite of initiatives to unlock Māori and Pacific resources, talent and knowledge across the science and research sector, Research, Science and Innovation Minister Dr Ayesha Verrall announced today. Two new funds – He tipu ka hua and He aka ka toro – set to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    20 hours ago
  • Advancing our relationship in India
    Foreign Minister Nanaia Mahuta departs for India tomorrow as she continues to reconnect Aotearoa New Zealand to the world.  The visit will begin in New Delhi where the Foreign Minister will meet with the Vice President Hon Jagdeep Dhankar and her Indian Government counterparts, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 days ago
  • Government Northland housing investment to spark transformational change
    Over $10 million infrastructure funding to unlock housing in Whangārei The purchase of a 3.279 hectare site in Kerikeri to enable 56 new homes Northland becomes eligible for $100 million scheme for affordable rentals Multiple Northland communities will benefit from multiple Government housing investments, delivering thousands of new homes for ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Government investment safeguards Waitangi Treaty Grounds
    The Government is supporting one of Aotearoa New Zealand’s most significant historic sites, the Waitangi Treaty Grounds, as it continues to recover from the impacts of COVID-19. “The Waitangi Treaty Grounds are a taonga that we should protect and look after. This additional support will mean people can continue to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    5 days ago
  • Battle of Ohaeawai remembered
    A memorial event at a key battle site in the New Zealand land wars is an important event to mark the progress in relations between Māori and the Crown as we head towards Waitangi Day, Minister for Te Arawhiti Kelvin Davis said. The Battle of Ohaeawai in June 1845 saw ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • More Police deployed to the frontline
    More Police officers are being deployed to the frontline with the graduation of 54 new constables from the Royal New Zealand Police College today. The graduation ceremony for Recruit Wing 362 at Te Rauparaha Arena in Porirua was the first official event for Stuart Nash since his reappointment as Police ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Further support for upper North Island regions hit by significant weather
    The Government is unlocking an additional $700,000 in support for regions that have been badly hit by the recent flooding and storm damage in the upper North Island. “We’re supporting the response and recovery of Auckland, Waikato, Coromandel, Northland, and Bay of Plenty regions, through activating Enhanced Taskforce Green to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • The Princess Royal to visit New Zealand
    Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has welcomed the announcement that Her Royal Highness The Princess Royal, Princess Anne, will visit New Zealand this month. “Princess Anne is travelling to Aotearoa at the request of the NZ Army’s Royal New Zealand Corps of Signals, of which she is Colonel in Chief, to ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    6 days ago
  • Government and horticulture sector target $12b in exports by 2035
    A new Government and industry strategy launched today has its sights on growing the value of New Zealand’s horticultural production to $12 billion by 2035, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor said. “Our food and fibre exports are vital to New Zealand’s economic security. We’re focussed on long-term strategies that build on ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Cost of living support extended for families and businesses
    25 cents per litre petrol excise duty cut extended to 30 June 2023 – reducing an average 60 litre tank of petrol by $17.25 Road User Charge discount will be re-introduced and continue through until 30 June Half price public transport fares extended to the end of June 2023 saving ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • More Kiwis in work as rising wages match inflation
    The strong economy has attracted more people into the workforce, with a record number of New Zealanders in paid work and wages rising to help with cost of living pressures. “The Government’s economic plan is delivering on more better-paid jobs, growing wages and creating more opportunities for more New Zealanders,” ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    7 days ago
  • Government boosts fund for Auckland flooding
    The Government is providing a further $1 million to the Mayoral Relief Fund to help communities in Auckland following flooding, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced today. “Cabinet today agreed that, given the severity of the event, a further $1 million contribution be made. Cabinet wishes to be proactive ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • New Cabinet focused on bread and butter issues
    The new Cabinet will be focused on core bread and butter issues like the cost of living, education, health, housing and keeping communities and businesses safe, Prime Minister Chris Hipkins has announced. “We need a greater focus on what’s in front of New Zealanders right now. The new Cabinet line ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Prime Minister to meet with PM Albanese
    Prime Minister Chris Hipkins will travel to Canberra next week for an in person meeting with Australian Prime Minister, Anthony Albanese. “The trans-Tasman relationship is New Zealand’s closest and most important, and it was crucial to me that my first overseas trip as Prime Minister was to Australia,” Chris Hipkins ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    1 week ago
  • Government makes first payment to Auckland Flooding fund
    The Government is providing establishment funding of $100,000 to the Mayoral Relief Fund to help communities in Auckland following flooding, Minister for Emergency Management Kieran McAnulty announced. “We moved quickly to make available this funding to support Aucklanders while the full extent of the damage is being assessed,” Kieran McAnulty ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Government steps up to assist Auckland during flooding
    As the Mayor of Auckland has announced a state of emergency, the Government, through NEMA, is able to step up support for those affected by flooding in Auckland. “I’d urge people to follow the advice of authorities and check Auckland Emergency Management for the latest information. As always, the Government ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Poroporoaki: Titewhai Te Huia Hinewhare Harawira
    Ka papā te whatitiri, Hikohiko ana te uira, wāhi rua mai ana rā runga mai o Huruiki maunga Kua hinga te māreikura o te Nota, a Titewhai Harawira Nā reira, e te kahurangi, takoto, e moe Ka mōwai koa a Whakapara, kua uhia te Tai Tokerau e te kapua pōuri ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • Enhanced Task Force Green Approved following Cyclone Hale
    Carmel Sepuloni, Minister for Social Development and Employment, has activated Enhanced Taskforce Green (ETFG) in response to flooding and damaged caused by Cyclone Hale in the Tairāwhiti region. Up to $500,000 will be made available to employ job seekers to support the clean-up. We are still investigating whether other parts ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    2 weeks ago
  • General Election to be held on 14 October 2023
    The 2023 General Election will be held on Saturday 14 October 2023, Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announced today. “Announcing the election date early in the year provides New Zealanders with certainty and has become the practice of this Government and the previous one, and I believe is best practice,” Jacinda ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago
  • Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern announces resignation
    Jacinda Ardern has announced she will step down as Prime Minister and Leader of the Labour Party. Her resignation will take effect on the appointment of a new Prime Minister. A caucus vote to elect a new Party Leader will occur in 3 days’ time on Sunday the 22nd of ...
    BeehiveBy beehive.govt.nz
    3 weeks ago