Thinking about the defamation case I can see how the jury reached their verdict as it were.
If you you are pretty much disengaged with politics (As many in NZ are with the possible exception of voting every three years) it’s highly likely you had never heard of Jordan Williams and only been vaguely aware of Colin Craig.
It would be very easy to decide that the massive mail out was the over response of a rich man effectively trying to destroy someone who had drawn attention to his less than ideal conduct. I suspect the jury felt it was an unfair over reaction from Craig and defamatory in that it brought Jordan Williams to the direct attention of 1.6million households calling him a liar when they vast majority would know nothing of him.
Obviously if you follow politics closely you would say that Craig had not defamed Williams based on his past behaviour the jury I imagine didn’t see it this way and decided based upon the info in the pamphlet been false.
Outside of an enjoyable sideshow Will it make a difference? I’d imagine Conservative votes will split to Winston and the Nats…
I’d also be pretty sure the Nats will be happy to have Colin Craig out of the picture I suspect he was and irritation they will be happy to be free of.
…actually “Hard right” takes out a conservative Colin Craig who at the time ( before the Election, which his party lost by a whisker) was wavering in his support for jonkey Nact
if I remember correctly he was questioning some of their ethics ‘Dirty Politics’ and policies and questioning whether his Party would form a coalition with Nact (but can’t find the link)
he was turning his Party from a potential coalition partner into an adversary
( all these things would make Colin Craig and his Party an enemy of the interests of jonkey Nact…or at very least unreliable, hence the attacks by Slater…but Craig had other reservations also …the links which I can not find)
“So Key/ Joyce let Williams loose (claiming he was defamed) on Craig perhaps, to intentionally tarnish his reputation and credibility?”
Yes of course mary_a that was the master plan all along…
You also forgot to include Racheal in this evil master plan. After all she would of had to of been in on it…to receive her orders to resign days before the election.
Rachael would probably appreciate having her name spelt correctly. How come you are on first name terms with her? Everyone else a surname, but because Rachael is a woman, you feel you have the right to use (and butcher) her first name. You dirty sexist creep. Typical redneck.
You thought I was going to criticise your deliberately using ‘of’ instead of ‘have’, didn’t you? (Assuming you are literate enough to do such a thing deliberately.)
School holidays must be torture for you mate! Don’t worry another week and you can take out all your issues on the poor students again.
“You dirty sexist creep. Typical redneck”
LOL I reckon you’re a closet banjo player In Vino!
BTW I do like Lynyard Skynyrd…does that count?
Anyhow back to the topic of conversation: do you agree with your fellow activists that the Colin Craig thing was planned by John Key (I know I used his surname, but hey John is such a common name). A master plan if you like to take Colin out???
It remains to be seen what the damage to Williams’ reputation will be. Was he always known as “taking one for the team” to get information in a pretence of intimacy?
I guess that avenue of employment might have a few more speed bumps in it now…perhaps even an enraged father or two 😈
This is a big win for the Dirty Politics nest of vipers. It’s a rubber stamp by this particular court for Slater, Farrar, Williams, that mad bitch in Singapore, Eade-types, and the rest to continue their proxy attacks on behalf of the John Key government.
This is a big win for the Dirty Politics nest of vipers. It’s a rubber stamp by this particular court for Slater, Farrar, Williams, that mad bitch in Singapore, Eade-types, and the rest to continue their proxy attacks on behalf of the John Key government.
Some of these options sound like a 1.2L carb engine trying to pull a truck
No foreign ownership of NZ land, and a 10 year phase out period which allows existing foreign owners to sell their land to either another Kiwi citizen or the NZ government, and to get it back if desired on a 25 year lease.
+1 CV – and don’t forget with rising sea levels and weather disruption there is going to be less and less options. So selling our land, assets, farms and property off cheap now – what’s going to happen when there’s major disruption… We need to be like much of Asia and ban foreign ownership of all of the above.
BTW any mention of climate change disruption in our unitary plan???
It’s not mentioned in TPP.
So essentially politicians are just blocking their ears and shaking their heads on forward planning.
Basically your analysis is spot on. On Climate Change politicians are still playing their bullshit games of we have two, three, four decades to slash emissions.
In reality we ran out of time in the 1990s but morally we have to make the biggest effort possible right here right now.
Which means putting the knife to capitalism and to consumerism.
That article is from April….6 months later house prices have continued to rocket yet Key still sits on his hands. Meanwhile the whole nation except John Key knows that it is overseas buyers pushing up prices. What a dumb position National is taking.
Back in the land of reality to correct your statement, everyone knows oversea’s buyers are only PART of the problem. Quite frankly actual foreign investment would be minor compared to the influx of migrants needing to buy new homes on arrival, they are not foreign they are new residents.
the difference with resident migrants however is the fact their income (and consequently their ability to service) is likely to be local….there is much less likely to be such a disconnect from the real economy.
With Key’s B plan, shows that foreign ownership is an election issue that National are losing and so they are trying to hedge.
Hope Labour stick with their no foreign sales which is pretty easy to communicate rather than some sort of complicated policy that involves more taxes that might hit Kiwis.
Why do you support Labour limiting offshore investors to only buying new builds over a tax that could potentially (depending on how high it was set) deter them altogether?
Labour’s position (limiting offshore investors to only buying new builds) still puts international demand pressure on local land supply, thus driving up the cost of land, hence adding to the overall cost of housing. Which defeats the objective.
@ Chairman – sorry too late to edit. I don’t support Labour’s current policy of new builds only to foreign speculators. I support a total ban. New builds will not work to deter, as foreign investors love new builds, – see Guardian article.
The other issue is that the existing stock of Auckland has already been plundered by foreign speculation so it’s too late for that one. In Auckland a few years ago you could get a freehold bungalow in West Auckland for $350,000 or Helensville for $250,000 – now you are looking $700,000 plus.
Now politicians are rushing around saying that a small $500,000 apartment with Body corp and unsuitable for a family, is affordable and developers are our best friend and relax regulation. We already have a problem with shoddy developments from the 90’s.
I noticed Labour (or is it the media?) often tout Labour’s new build only policy as a ban on foreign investment, which I believe is misleading and could be seen as an appeal to the ignorant.
Keys plan B (or idle musing) ….It may, but as always the devil would be in the detail.
I wonder about the statement a stamp duty would breach the NZ Korea FTA given Australia have applied an additional non resident duty and they negotiated their FTA with Korea approx 12 months earlier. I also note the requirement is equal treatment.
One thing is certain it is a situation that cannot long continue for both economic and political reasons, and the capital flight when it ends will be a tad problematic.
If it does breach the FTA give the affected parties 90 days notice before implementing, invite a new round of trade discussions to be scheduled, then proceed to breach the FTA.
“If it does breach the FTA give the affected parties 90 days notice before implementing, invite a new round of trade discussions to be scheduled, then proceed to breach the FTA.”
There is no need too. A land tax can be just as effective.
except that Key has no intention in implementing his plan B, whereas the Labour package (and it must be viewed in total) would have an impact, how quickly and how much is open to debate.
Am unconvinced of the flexibility of a land tax to control any capital flight…..by its nature it is uncontrolled.
Adopting Key’s B plan would improve Labour’s package.
Moreover, one should never underestimate Key. If their internal polling suggests to them that the B plan is required, he could quickly put it in place.
It should be clear to you that the higher a land tax, the more unfeasible it becomes to invest, hence the more it will deter investors, thus encourage capital flight. Reducing the tax will help reduce the capital flight. Thus, the flexibility results in giving some control.
Not if said land tax was only aimed at foreign investors.
It wouldn’t be difficult to exempt NZ citizens/homeowners. And as they will be exempt, they would have little to fear.
Moreover, Key has already planted the seed, laying down good reasoning for it. Therefore, it would be difficult for him to now argue against that reasoning.
At best, all Key could do is argue it isn’t required, which is what he’ll most likely do when it comes to Labour’s new build only policy.
Another aspect that is beneficial to a land tax over Labour’s new build only policy is a land tax will help cover the infrastructure cost burden that comes with building new homes.
‘It should be clear to you that the higher a land tax, the more unfeasible it becomes to invest, hence the more it will deter investors, thus encourage capital flight. Reducing the tax will help reduce the capital flight. Thus, the flexibility results in giving some control.”
lol…the theory is simplistic enough,however i think you will discover that the effect will not be so in practice
Of course other variables may come into play. Nevertheless, that doesn’t discount the fact that the flexibility of a tax gives us some level of control.
It should be clear to you that the higher a land tax, the more unfeasible it becomes to invest, hence the more it will deter investors, thus encourage capital flight.
Ah, but the real question is: Should we be concerned with foreign money leaving our shores?
And the answer to that is No! In fact, as far as I can make out, we’d be far better off with it all gone. After all, we don’t actually foreign money to utilise our own resources. Our own government created money would work fine.
as always it is a question of degree….foreign investment may or may not be required/desirable depending of what level of trade and growth you desire…..thats when the arguments start
Growth isn’t dependent upon trade no matter how much the idiotic economist, RWNJs and politicians think it is. Growth is dependent upon increasing population.
Development is actually dependent upon the country being willing to spend the resources in supporting R&D.
The only thing that trade really supplies is the ability to get products before we can produce them ourselves fro our own resources.
“Growth isn’t dependent upon trade no matter how much the idiotic economist, RWNJs and politicians think it is. Growth is dependent upon increasing population.”
Almost, growth is dependent on demand…that demand can be as a result of population increase or other means, i.e. exports.
As to trade , this is a debate we’ve had before and I suspect we are unlikely to agree.
In any case Im still of the opinion that we need a model that operates with negative growth and am still looking.
The reason why growth is currently dependent upon trade is largely due to our debt based money supply.
While the principal is borrowed into the economy, the principal has to be repaid with interest incurred, which leaves the economy with a fiscal shortfall. Hence, the need to source and grow export revenue.
Foreign investment largely robs our economy of the benefits from trade and growth.
The more profitable a foreign owned investment is, the more money it tends to send offshore.
It’s often touted that jobs will be created, money will be spent locally and taxes will be paid. However, those benefits would eventuate regardless if assets were offshore owned or not.
It’s also often touted that we require the offshore funding to make it all happen, however there are alternatives to that.
Albeit, I concur, the level of degree plays a role in the scale of the negative impact.
Almost, growth is dependent on demand…that demand can be as a result of population increase or other means, i.e. exports.
The exports simulate increased local population.
In any case Im still of the opinion that we need a model that operates with negative growth and am still looking.
If we only supplied our local community then increasing productivity results in decreasing work/jobs in current industries. This frees up people to work in other industries especially in the R&D of those other industries.
All this means that we could have a developing economy without an increasing population.
Full recycling would mean that resource extraction could be minimised. This combined with a stable population level means that we could actually live sustainably.
There is no/very little trade between nations in this model.
@The Chairman
The reason why growth is currently dependent upon trade is largely due to our debt based money supply.
“if we only supplied our local community then increasing productivity results in decreasing work/jobs in current industries. This frees up people to work in other industries especially in the R&D of those other industries.”
It may, Keynes predicted it, however society appears unwilling to allow reduced labour and instead pursues increased consumption, usually of useless or throw away items and the misuse of resources.
however the economy needs to be considered in total and trade will remain instrumental to that, the problem that remains is the function of interest….and if I was being really negative (as I have been described) then it doesn’t matter as we will have no functioning economy in the not too distant future.
But it is a lie. There are other funding alternatives.
Moreover, over the long-term investors generally seek to receive far more than they initially invest. Which may be good for them but it’s not for our economy overall.
under the current system we do indeed need foreign investment, the question is whether we wish to be part of the current system…and if we don’t are we willing to accept what that means?
under the current system we do indeed need foreign investment
Why?
Even under the current system we don’t need foreign investment. Even a lot of the basic research necessary to develop our economy is freely available because the US Fed funded research is publicly available even when it’s been done by a private company as that happens to be part of the conditions for getting the money.
“Take the sharemarket for example. One could argue there is a shortage of listings rather a shortage of funding.”
please do…..but seriously, assume you are referring to the propensity to bubble…a direct result of current monetary policy, an inflationary surplus of CB created funds looking for a home (return)…..the number of listings is irrelevant.
like any economy if you increase money supply without increasing resource you have inflation, it was ever so and ever will be
When it comes to the NZ sharemarket, the domestic funding is there, it’s the lack of listings that is problematic.
New listings are far and few between, indicating businesses aren’t exactly queuing up for the money. And large local funds such as KiwiSaver funds, ACC and NZ Super find it difficult identifying suitable domestic investments.
Therefore, funding isn’t the problem, it’s more about NZ’s lack of suitable domestic investments.
As you know, NZ businesses are largely made up of SMEs. Moreover, only a small percentage of them export.
And there are numerous reasons for this, but funding isn’t the main concern.
As shown in the current account link, NZ offshore returns are failing to offset the returns offshore investors take out of our economy.
Therefore, encouraging more offshore investment will only make it more difficult for us to get back into surplus. And you are arguing we need more of this? We need to own our own future.
Despite all the neo-liberal reforms we’ve endured over the years, we haven’t had a current account surplus since the 70’s.
“Why would we need foreign cash when we could just create the money that we need?”
and there you have it…under the current system if you finance your debt (we currently have around260 billion in external debt) through gov issue you debase the currency to the point of toilet paper…..you can create credit for actions that increase value/return, those actions are relatively limited…or don’t you recognise hyperinflation?there have been numerous examples
I am well aware you advocate a government money tree economy and you are equally aware of my opinion of that, especially if you wish to continue cross boarder trade.
and there you have it…under the current system if you finance your debt (we currently have around260 billion in external debt) through gov issue you debase the currency to the point of toilet paper
No you won’t. That’s just another lie by the rich because they need the world to believe that we need them when we actually don’t.
If simply creating money debased it then it wouldn’t have any value as it’s created all the time. Billions per year just in NZ. The US and other large economies create proportionately larger amounts.
you can create credit for actions that increase value/return, those actions are relatively limited…or don’t you recognise hyperinflation?
Of course I do. The difference between me and you is that I recognise that it was the private banks creating money that caused the hyper-inflation.
there have been numerous examples
And there are even more examples of government created money causing prosperity while private control of the money system causes poverty.
Personally, I’m in favour of prosperity for everyone and not just the banksters.
sorry DTB…it is simple maths….resource in ratio to money supply.
Show me a constituency (and subsequently a politician) that will not demand and receive increased funding WITHOUT the required increased resource…..and that is in a closed economy, the impact is multiplied when you factor in cross boarder trade.
It has been shown to be true time and time again, what makes you think it will be different in your case?
“NZ M3 aggregate money supply has roughly doubled between 2006 and 2016.
Can you demonstrate to me where/how we have doubled our access to resources?
And if you can’t, can you explain to me why NZ is not currently in a period of hyperinflation?”
Ill take you at your word M3 has doubled in that time ….whats the average house price in Auckland at the moment?
“I have no idea why you keep hewing to the orthodox neoliberal view of monetary policy, but it’s a whole lot of stupid.’
except its not neoliberal economics….its simply the foundation of all economic theory of all orders, you don’t appear to grasp that simple fact
there is no advantage knowing all the terms CV if you don’t understand how the pieces fit together
I mean, fuck it, there is a clear scarcity of money in the bottom 50% of society, and here you are going on about how having too large a money supply is a real problem.
Meanwhile, I notice that we have just had another ‘European Prestige’ type new car showroom open up in Dunedin.
So some parts of our society seem to be having much easier and voluminous access to the money supply than others.
Yet no one is talking about restricting the access of the wealthy and the privileged to money due to fears of hyperinflation.
except its not neoliberal economics….its simply the foundation of all economic theory of all orders, you don’t appear to grasp that simple fact
Bullshit.
Keynes did not subscribe to this model of monetary theory, nor did Irving Fisher, who understood that private debt created private money independent of the actions of government.
And I’ll be very surprised if you can demonstrate that Marxian economics subscribes to this model of monetary theory.
In other words, your statement that this is the “foundation of all economic theory of all orders” is full of shit to overflowing and I wonder why you are lying your head off.
“This analysis shows that Keynes’s theory does explain the majority of the inflation spikes witnessed in the UK since the 1940s. Some are demand-pull factors e.g. war shortages and increases in the money supply. However cost-push factors have been particularly important i.e. increases in the price of oil, sterling devaluations (which have increased the prices of our imports) and tax rises.”
“The number of pieces of paper is thus determined by the quantity of gold currency which they represent in circulation, and as they are tokens of value only in so far as they take the place of gold currency, their value is simply determined by their quantity, Whereas, therefore, the quantity of gold in circulation depends on the prices of commodities, the value of the paper in circulation, on the other hand, depends solely on its own quantity” (Critique of Political Economy, p.119. Marx’s emphasis).
the point of difference amongst all economic schools is not the impact of increased money supply rather the when who and how of its implementation.
German hyper-inflation was caused by the private banks and speculators using the system that we have now – the private banks creating money.
Zimbabwe is the case of a bunch of psychopathic, greedy loons being in charge.
All the other times, and there’ve been several, were a case of stable government doing it right and there not being any hyper-inflation. An estimate that I read several years ago was that between 50% and 80% of inflation was due to the private banks creating money. It’s most definitely the cause of housing prices going up at massive rates.
except its not neoliberal economics….its simply the foundation of all economic theory of all orders, you don’t appear to grasp that simple fact
But that’s not a fact. In fact, it’s pure delusion. There are other monetary systems, ones that actually work, and our present system isn’t economic. If it was we wouldn’t have private cars for starters.
Yes, excessive amounts of money creation without a corresponding money destruction causes hyper-inflation. It’s what drives inflation today – the private banks creating too much money.
both Zimbabwe and Germany had first suffered massive destruction of industries and productive capabilities which were key factors setting up the hyperinflation.
you’re labouring under a misapprehension again I’m afraid DTB….the German Gov printed the dosh….
“The government’s strategy backfired when Germany lost the war. The new Weimar Republic was now saddled with a massive war debt that it could not afford, made even worse by the fact that it was printing money without the economic resources to back it up.[3] The Treaty of Versailles further accelerated the decline in the value of the mark, such that 48 paper marks were required to buy one US dollar by late 1919.[5]” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
and its extraordinary the number of psychopathic loons that end running (ruining) countries….in any case whoever or whenever the results are the same and wishing won’t change how humans interact with money.
those theories do not describe the hyperinflationary incidents of Germany nor Zimbabwe where the destruction and confiscation of productive and industrial capacity was central.
Anyway, fuck this, I’m uninterested in the TINA crowd who are simply looking for excuses to keep directing massive flows of new money to the top 0.1%, then pretending that has to be the way it needs to be, because “hyperinflation.”
Light is thrown on this mystery by the later writings of Hjalmar Schacht, the currency commissioner for the Weimar Republic. The facts are explored at length in The Lost Science of Money by Stephen Zarlenga, who writes that in Schacht’s 1967 book The Magic of Money, he “let the cat out of the bag, writing in German, with some truly remarkable admissions that shatter the ‘accepted wisdom’ the financial community has promulgated on the German hyperinflation.” What actually drove the wartime inflation into hyperinflation, said Schacht, was speculation by foreign investors, who would bet on the mark’s decreasing value by selling it short.
Short selling is a technique used by investors to try to profit from an asset’s falling price. It involves borrowing the asset and selling it, with the understanding that the asset must later be bought back and returned to the original owner. The speculator is gambling that the price will have dropped in the meantime and he can pocket the difference. Short selling of the German mark was made possible because private banks made massive amounts of currency available for borrowing, marks that were created on demand and lent to investors, returning a profitable interest to the banks.
At first, the speculation was fed by the Reichsbank (the German central bank), which had recently been privatized. But when the Reichsbank could no longer keep up with the voracious demand for marks, other private banks were allowed to create them out of nothing and lend them at interest as well.
Discussions of the dangers of inflation inevitably end up at the worst-ever case known – the German hyperinflation of 1923. Accompanied by economists’ moralizing warnings of the dire results of governments’ printing paper money, the German hyperinflation is used as a horror story by those who advocate a plutocratic control over money. However (as in other cases), when the monetary facts are actually examined, the argument falls apart as it becomes clear that the bankers themselves and speculators were the primary cause of the German hyperinflation, which was not stopped until the government took decisive action against them.
In other words, the banking system as we know it today with the same solution now as then – to take that power to create money away from them and place it solely in the hands of the government under strict rules.
And, of course, doing something about the speculators.
The reasons for the hyperinflation and the high inflation of today is to curtail the ability of the private banks to create money and tax speculators out of existence. The exact opposite if what you’ve been told your entire life. Having you and others hold onto the wrong belief is what’s getting in the way of being able to fix it.
EDIT:
The fix
More interesting is a little-known sequel to this tale. What allowed Germany to get back on its feet in the 1930s was the very thing today’s commentators are blaming for bringing it down in the 1920s – money issued by seigniorage by the government. Economist Henry C. K. Liu calls this form of financing “sovereign credit.” He writes of Germany’s remarkable transformation:
“The Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933, at a time when its economy was in total collapse, with ruinous war-reparation obligations and zero prospects for foreign investment or credit. Yet through an independent monetary policy of sovereign credit and a full-employment public-works program, the Third Reich was able to turn a bankrupt Germany, stripped of overseas colonies it could exploit, into the strongest economy in Europe within four years, even before armament spending began.”
US protects al-Nusra jihadists in Syria in order to keep “Plan B” regime change option open
Russian foreign minister Lavrov talks to BBC.
The US is keeping jihadist group al-Nusra for a “Plan B”, potentially to overthrow Syrian President Assad, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said in an interview with the BBC.
Speaking to the British outlet about increased violence in Syria, including in Aleppo, Lavrov said that Washington has still not delivered on its promise to persuade US-backed rebels to separate from Jabhat al-Nusra jihadists.
The Russian Foreign Minister also said that the reason for this could be Washington’s desire to “change the regime” in the country.
“They still, in spite of many repeated promises and commitments … are not able or not willing to do this and we have more and more reasons to believe that from the very beginning the plan was to spare al-Nusra and to keep it just in case for Plan B or stage two when it would be time to change the regime,” Lavrov said.
Lavrov talks as though the Syrian rebels were US clients in the way that the Assad regime is a Russian client. Lavrov can give Assad orders, but Kerry can’t give Syrian rebel groups orders, so there’s no basis for Lavrov to demand that they do. This is just spin to cover the Russian refusal to consider a cease-fire – if it comes down to peace talks, Assad has no future in Syria, unless it’s broken up, so defeating the rebels militarily and teaching the locals the usual lesson is Russia’s only way forward. I’m surprised they agreed to the earlier cease-fire.
I agree that the level of positive control that the US has over these Jihadists is poor.
However it is also not zero.
The airstrike that the US conducted against the Syrian Government military base in eastern Syria appeared to well co-ordinated with Islamist forces on the ground who launched their offensive within 10 minutes of the bombing ending.
The funding of the ‘White Helmets’ doesn’t indicate a poor level of control/influence. Oh – and then we get the ‘White Helmets’ being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize – couldn’t make it up if you tried.
Yep agree, and I only became aware of the “White Helmets” recently.
And that they operate only in Jihadist held territory, and in at least some cases seem to be the very same Jihadists who don fluoro vests and white safety helmets pretending to be civil defence volunteers.
They seem to have very slick well funded corporate PR, too.
The White Helmets get direct government funding from the UK and US among others as well as from the George Soros foundation. Some estimates put the funding as high as $200 million.
A petition on ‘change.org’ seeking support against them receiving a nobel peace prize was, according to those who set the page up, shut down by the site admin.
Meanwhile, nothing but glowing reports for them in the western ‘liberal’ media. (Google ‘white helmets’ and puke)
The funding of the ‘White Helmets’ doesn’t indicate a poor level of control/influence.
Exactly what level of control/influence do you imagine helping fund the White Helmets gives the US over them, let alone over rebel paramilitary forces?
Given that the White Helmets are allegedly ’embedded’ with, and may actually be an integral part of, the mercenary groupings – I’d punt at ‘quite a lot’.
Why? Further down, you linked to an interview on YouTube in which an Al Nusra commander declares that most of their money comes from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, that they’ve made good use of US TOW missiles but otherwise had little support from the US, and that they don’t take orders from the US. That sound to me like the US has fuck-all influence over these guys.
I have a book called “Feuersturm ueber Hamburg,” written by the head of the fire service in Hamburg during WW2. It covers the fire services’ attempts to deal with air raids, including the firestorm raids in 1943 that killed 43,000 civilians in a couple of days. It’s riveting stuff, detailing awesome bravery and heroic efforts to save civilian life, by a guy who was working for the Nazis and who probably assisted with no end of Nazi propaganda stories inbetween trying to deal with the carnage.
The fact is, in wartime you can be working under very bad people and still be heroically providing emergency services under impossible circumstances and at great risk to your own life. I expect this applies as much to the emergency workers in regime-held areas as it does to the White Helmets.
Lavrov talks as though the Syrian rebels were US clients in the way that the Assad regime is a Russian client
Well the state department use of veiled threats against russian cities suggest maybe they are.
The consequences are that the civil war will continue in Syria, that extremists and extremists groups will continue to exploit the vacuums that are there in Syria to expand their operations, which will include, no question, attacks against Russian interests, perhaps even Russian cities, and Russia will continue to send troops home in body bags, and they will continue to lose resources – even, perhaps, more aircraft. The stability that they claim they seek in Syria will be ever more elusive, and it’s hard to imagine how a continued war – not just a civil war now, but increasingly more violent extremist activity in Syria – can be in the interest of a nation that says, that claims, and has claimed publicly time and time again that what they want to see is a whole, unified, pluralistic Syria and a stable Syria, a secure Syria, a Syria where they want to continue to have a defense relationship and a presence. So that’s what’s in it for them.
It’s an indication of the level of delusion leftist authoritarians are bringing to this subject that you see “veiled threats against Russian ciities” in that.
That extremists and extremists groups will continue to exploit the vacuums that are there in Syria to expand their operations, which will include, no question, attacks against US interests, perhaps even US cities, and the US will continue to send troops home in body bags, and they will continue to lose resources – even, perhaps, more aircraft.
Would you read the above as being explicitly threatening to the USA, or do you think it is a completely neutral statement.
Well, you’re the guy who’s spent years saying every terrorist attack against westerners is a direct consequence of “the West” bombing Muslim countries. Were you making “veiled threats against western cities” by pointing that out?
Like I said, I thought the paragraph sounded like the kind of thing you write on this blog all the time. Certainly not neutral, but certainly not threatening anyone either.
In contrast to Syria or Assad, the President of the Philippines casually compares himself to Hitler, sanctions the indiscriminate murder of drug users and drug dealers and there’s nothing much of anything in reaction. Which has nothing to do with the Philippines being strategically positioned in a ‘necklace’ that runs through the South China Sea of course.
In contrast to Syria or Assad, the President of the Philippines casually compares himself to Hitler, sanctions the indiscriminate murder of drug users and drug dealers and there’s nothing much of anything in reaction.
I expect not. Even if Assad weren’t currently engaged in a huge, Russian-assisted campaign of mass murder against his own people, you only need to read a bit of Robert Fisk’s work to realise why comparisons between Assad and Duterte are ludicrous – Duterte’s a minor annoyance to his citizenry compared to Assad.
Putting aside the fact you’re merely echoing the dominant western narrative about Syria (eg – no mention of the sanctions that are on a par with those imposed on Iraq; no explanation offered as to why Assad, elected in monitored elections to a parliament that has an active opposition, would be at war with his own people etc)…going by your take on Duterte, I guess you’d have said that Indonesia’s Suharto was also ‘a minor annoyance to his citizenry’?
Saddam Hussein used to get re-elected every time, too. It’s not a “western narrative,” it’s “being able to recognise a murderous dictator when you’re reading about one.”
Maybe Duterte will make it up to Suharto or Assad’s level on the “murderous dictator” scale if he’s left to it for long enough. If he does, and the people of the Philippines rise up against him, can we assume based on current form that you’ll staunchly support the ruthless murder and torture needed to put him back in charge again?
Saddam Hussein used to get re-elected every time, too. It’s not a “western narrative,” it’s “being able to recognise a murderous dictator when you’re reading about one.”
Oh dear how did you get this gullible?
Where did you get your experience in “recognising murderous dictators”?
From MSM stories where they pretty much brand the West’s persona non grata of the month with “Murderous Dictator” on his forehead?
BTW what gives the Imperial Colonial West the right to start illegally funding head chopping regime changing insurgents and carrying out act of war airstrikes on foreign nations?
Gullible in what way? The most you can say for Bashir al Assad is that he’s less cruel than his predecessor, his father Hafez al Assad (democracy in action!). The basis of their power has been common knowledge and written about extensively for decades by all kinds of journalists (and if you consider Robert Fisk a promoter of the “Imperial Colonial West” you’re even more deluded than I thought).
As to what gives the “Imperial Colonial West” the right to fund insurgency in Syria: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar aren’t part of “the West” by any stretch of the imagination. Also: what gives Russia and Iran any more right to interfere in a Syrian civil war than Turkey and the Gulf states? It would be nice if foreigners had kept out of this conflict, but if they had Assad would have been dangling by his heels from a lamppost years ago. Foreign involvement’s what’s keeping your boy in power, so you should be happy with it, right?
Also: what gives Russia and Iran any more right to interfere in a Syrian civil war than Turkey and the Gulf states?
Well, not that it would make a difference to an Imperial Colonialist Westerner like yourself, but Russia and Iran were invited by the democratically elected government of Syria to help defend the country against Islamic extremists illegally armed and funded by the west.
Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar aren’t part of “the West” by any stretch of the imagination.
And please include Turkey. Everyone knows that these are Islamic client states of the US, all of which host US military personnel on a permanent basis, all of which get access to billions of dollars of US armaments, and all of which are assisting the US in its regime change efforts in Syria for their own reasons.
Unlike you, I know something of the Gulf states. Assad is a “client” of Russia because, without them, he’d be filled with holes by citizens of his country, so he has to do what they want. The leaders of Turkey, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, for all their unpleasant characteristics, aren’t in that situation. Those countries are interfering in the Syrian civil war in support of the rebels because it’s in their interests to do so – Russia and Iran are interfering in support of the regime because likewise. If you want to see good guys vs bad guys in there, no-one can stop you, but do try and keep it to yourself.
I guess the fact that all these US client states i.e. vassal states are armed to the teeth by the US itself, the same US which also turns a blind eye to their daily human rights abuses (imagine the US agreeing to sell another US$1.1B worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia as the Saudis continue to pound the towns and cities of their tiny, poor neighbour Yemen into dust).
” Those countries are interfering in the Syrian civil war in support of the rebels because it’s in their interests to do so – Russia and Iran are interfering in support of the regime because likewise.”
I’m glad you have now recognised the illegal and arrogant acts of aggression that these US client states have been carrying out against the people of the sovereign nation of Syria for five years now, all with the diplomatic and military cover of the US.
One small difference: Russia and Iran are operating in Syria legally, at the request of the democratically elected and popular secular government of Syria.
The US, and the vassal states of the US, are all operating in Syria illegally.
Russia and Iran are protecting a client who now couldn’t last a year in power without their protection, because his own subjects would string him up if given the chance. And they’re doing it to further their own interests, not because there’s some inherent good to be derived from it. Spin it how you like, it’s the same game Turkey and the Gulf states are playing, just with pompous bullshit about “legal,” “popular”and “secular,”all of which should come with a /sarc tag when applied to the Assad regime.
Assad remains highly popular in Syria. Especially compared to the head chopper Islamic extremists.
And that’s why ISIS/al-Nusra and the 100 flavours of Jihadists that the USA and her allies support, need to keep importing foreign fighters to fulfill their illegal regime change dreams.
Because Syrians as a whole are against regime change.
It’s also why the US has always resisted the call for a political settlement with popular elections where Assad can be a candidate.
Because Assad would be returned to office in a landslide.
That’s pretty funny. He’d have finished all that breathing he’s been doing back in 2012 if the Russians and Iranians hadn’t stepped in to protect their investment. I hope I never have that level of “popularity” myself.
Uh, the Russians and the Iranians didn’t directly intervene in the conflict until 2015
Also, between 100,000 to 200,000 Syrian Government soldiers have lost their lives fighting against the foreign funded jihadists, and stayed loyal to the legitimate authority in Damascus.
I’ve no problem with disagreement Psycho Milt. But you only seem to be capable of jumping on a soapbox to shout “White!” if you think “Black” might be being proposed or, alternatively, to exclaim “Over there!” instead of engaging.
The original comment offered a first hand interview and a report from the US Peace Council. It then juxtaposed the western approach to Assad with their approach to Duterte.
As for “disputing your claims”, the claims I made in the original comment were.
1. It seems most people are comfortable to accept the official narrative with regards Syria.
2. Less than a dozen journalists turned up to the US Peace Council’s presser.
3. Jürgen Todenhöfer’s interview and its contents has received next to no coverage.
4. The reaction to Duterte has been muted in spite of him self demonizing.
You disputed precisely zero of those claims in the four or five responses you made below that comment.
Not so. First, I disputed your implied argument that the relative lack of interest in Duterte vs Assad represents hypocrisy.
Next, I disputed your response that I’m peddling a “western narrative”and that I must presumably also regard Suharto’s dictatorship as being of relative unimportance.
My other comments point out Colonial Viper’s chronic Putin/Assad sycophancy – that’s in the nature of a blog comments thread. I didn’t have anything to say about the US Peace Council interview because they’re as entitled to their opinions as anyone else. Although, having said that, they were in Syria as guests of the regime and gave their interview at an event organised by the regime, so their opinion shouldn’t be taken as impartial.
00:21: Ta gueule!!! -> Shut up!!!
00:23: Ils violent mes droits -> They violate my rights
00:32: C’est bon? -> Are you finished?
00:34: Mesdames et messieus, Apple est une société qui viole les droits du consommateur -> Ladies and gentlemen, Apple is a firm that violates the rights of the consumer.
00:38: D’accord? -> Understand? / Right? / You acknowledge?
00:39: Merci m’sieur! -> Thank you Sir!
00:40: Donc effectivement ils violent mes droits, ils refusent de me rembourser conformément à la loi Européenne du consommateur -> Indeed they violate my rights, they refuse to reimburse me in accordance with the European consumer law
00:45: Je les ai prévenus, je leur ai dit: remboursez-moi mon oseille et ils ont dit non. -> I notified them, I told them: give me back my dough and they said no.
00:49: Qu’est-ce qui se passe? *PAF* Voilà ce qui se passe. -> What happens then? *WHAM* Here’s what happens.
00:56: (spectateur) Ca va, c’est fini maintenant… (monsieur pétanque) Ta gueule! -> (onlooker) OK, you’re done now… (mister petanque) Shut up!
00:59: (spectateur) Tu m’parles pas comme ça?!? (monsieur pétanque) Ta gueule. Non mais tu crois (inaudible: qu’t’es qui pour faire) ta loi mec? -> (onlooker) You don’t say?!? (mister petanque) Shut up. Who do you think (inaudible: you are to to lay down) the law man?
The rest is less audible but of the same tone.
On the back of the security guy: “Toison d’Or” -> “the Golden Fleece”
P.S. Glad to help you biftecks (I bet you can find a translation for this one)
“No foreign ownership of NZ land, and a 10 year phase out period which allows existing foreign owners to sell their land to either another Kiwi citizen or the NZ government, and to get it back if desired on a 25 year lease”
Can you imagine the outrage when Australia for example matches that stupid policy
and tells all Kiwi’s living there they have to sell there homes because they can no longer own property, ridiculous.
What’s the issue you are bitching about? Australia has a problem with Chinese buying up all their prime property too.
If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them.
“If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them”
You have answered your own question. That it would make Kiwi’s think that the Australian government dont give a shit about them.
Anyone with enough brains to own their home wont be happy about selling it and leasing it back.
Smart people dont want to give up tax free capital gains and retire poor.
What’s the issue you are bitching about? Australia has a big problem with Chinese buying up all their prime property too and making housing unaffordable for their own first home buyers.
If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
And if you were a really foolish Kiwi it means that you would have a full 35 years to get Australian citizenship.
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them.
Kiwis living there would have 35 years to get out of their property. What’s your issue with that.
This policy would be very popular with Australia which also has a big problem with Chinese buyers pushing up house prices unaffordably.
Maybe Kiwis there would finally understand that the Australian government only uses them, and doesn’t really care about their standing in Australian society.
They could even apply for their Australian citizenship in that time. If they really wanted.
The Australians are already telling NZers to go home and they’re not being particularly nice about it.
Time to return the favour and stop kowtowing to what others think about us and if they’d be nice to us or not. Time to start doing what’s right for NZ and not the rich.
“Going from bad to even worse: The very strident and harsh rhetoric coming out of Washington and directed towards Russia is unprecedented. Bilateral relations have reached a dangerous low. What happens now?
CrossTalking with Gilbert Doctorow, Brian Becker, and Daniel McAdams.”
“Turning reality on its head. Candidate Hillary Clinton claims the woes of the world are due to a vast alt-right conspiracy – and it is run out of Moscow. The fact is Western elites are in a panic. Publics and audiences around the world are no longer convinced by the messages propagated by the corporate mainstream media.
CrossTalking with Matthew Gordon-Banks, Gilbert Doctorow, and Earl Rasmussen.”
I see a trend emerging where the MSM is now attacking NZF and Peters at every opportunity. Key knows that Peters hates him and knows NZF will go with Labour so he has ordered his troops to attack in order to lower the NZF vote from say 10% to 6%-this will go on for the next 12 months.
Witness here Audrey Young’s linkage of NZF with the Hobson’s Pledge nutters.
I would love it is they formed a formal alliance. But they wont because NZF know their vote would die away should they tie themselves to Labour at this point.
IMO, the exact opposite would happen. Both Labour and NZFirsts’ vote would go up and we’d be looking at a government with an actual mandate where better than 50% of the voters actually voted for it.
Where will the votes come from Draco? I assume you are thinking from voters whom would of voted National?
Don’t you think there is a very good reason why Winston plays his game of not telling the public his preference in which side to support?
“In reality it’s about alignment and NZFirst is far more aligned with Labour and the Greens than they are with National.”
Does not matter…what matters is the negotiations after the election and the “policy wins” that either National or a Labour/Greens combo will give to Winston.
Where will the votes come from Draco? I assume you are thinking from voters whom would of voted National?
Yes.
Don’t you think there is a very good reason why Winston plays his game of not telling the public his preference in which side to support?
No. I remember the 1996 election and how both Winston’s and Labour’s support increased when everyone thought that he was going to go with Labour. And how Winston’s then crashed after he went with National and has never recovered from that crash.
Does not matter…what matters is the negotiations after the election and the “policy wins” that either National or a Labour/Greens combo will give to Winston.
Wrong. The negotiations can only work if the two parties are in alignment to begin with. National and NZFirst simply aren’t.
You obviously don’t understand MMP and still believe the lie that National’s been spreading around that the biggest party should always win government.
In reality it’s about alignment and NZFirst is far more aligned with Labour and the Greens than they are with National.
You haven’t been watching the body language. Do you really think Peters will ever forgive Key for forcing him out of parliament in 2008 with lies and rumours and the full force of the right-wing media?
Andrew Little: “Let the voters decide, but we are the party of change, the Greens are a party of change, that’s what we are committed to, lets see what the voters turn up at the parliament and if we are in a position to do so, we will talk to those interested in fundamentally changing what the story is now.. We know who those parties of change are, right now.”
“They’ve [Maori Party] shackled themselves to the National government for the last 8 years, they are as responsible as any National mp for the failure of people to get affordable houses, a decent education and all those other issues.. They’re not, right now if I think about the radar, about the parties of change, they are not on it”
Winston Peters: “We want dramatic economic and social change to regain what this country used to have to number one number 2 first world status as a world economic and social performer, we’ve lost that, and we haven’t given up hope of getting it back again”
Waatea 5th Estate – Labour vs NZ First – the fight for Maori votes
Judging by what Winston Peter’s said, quite frankly, anyone who still thinks Winston Peters will support this National government just isn’t listening.
I see a trend emerging where the MSM is now attacking NZF and Peters at every opportunity. Key knows that Peters hates him and knows NZF will go with Labour so he has ordered his troops to attack in order to lower the NZF vote from say 10% to 6%-this will go on for the next 12 months.
How would that work given that most NZF voters want Labour to lead the government? If they didn’t vote for NZF what makes you think they will vote for National?
“Witness here Audrey Young’s linkage of NZF with the Hobson’s Pledge nutters.”
What? Here’s what she said,
The one party that could get some benefit from it is Winston Peters’ New Zealand First – Brash even talked this week about passing on donations to the party.
To the undoubted delight of Hobson’s Pledge, Peters’ party delayed the third readings of a couple of three treaty settlement bills recently over a provision which gives iwi representation on two standing committee of the Taranaki District Council – not the council itself which retains ultimate control.
Both of those seem reasonable points to make about NZF.
I won’t call him a dinosaur because they ruled the world for 200M years and wee humans have been around for 200,000 years or so – dinosaurs were successful. I will instead say that if he went away I’d be quite happy.
The National government is presiding over the worst road tolls on record. This after AD and company have attributed roading and transport infrastructure as one of the things which makes John Key such great prime minister.
And what was with Phil Goff stealing the ring announcer’s microphone to introduce Parker, then the ring announcer did the real job straight after… I wonder how much Goff paid for that?? You could hear the audience’s collective sighs as Phil started talking. Also Ms Collins was there and had front row seats for the fight. Money not an issue there either.
unless Labour nationwide adds at least 100,000 votes to its 2014 total of 605,000 votes, it has zero chance of being a participant in the next government.
The required number may be as high as 200,000 votes, depending on turnout.
“A new paper just published in Annalen der Physik — which published Albert Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity — Dmitry Podolsky, a theoretical physicist now working on aging at Harvard University, and I explain how the arrow of time ‒ indeed time itself ‒ is directly related to the nature of the observer (that is, us).
Our paper shows that time doesn’t just exist “out there” ticking away from past to future, but rather is an emergent property that depends on the observer’s ability to preserve information about experienced events.”
Anyone noticed the Australian PMs diatribe against renewable power as being the cause of the recent state-wide South Australian power blackout?
The fact that there were 80,000 lightning strikes in South Australia that day and that at least 20 major power pylons were blown down doesn’t seem to have entered the plonker’s brain. Since about 50% of South Australia’s electrical generation now comes from wind turbines and there obviously was a bit of wind that day, I would suspect there was no problem with generation, merely a problem of no network to carry the electricity around.
Instead of blaming renewables for the problem he should be looking at hardening the South Australian grid – retrofitting power pylons to stand up to wind and fitting earth wires about electricity distribution lines to act as lightning conductors. To assure the lights stay on on with the present grid – both in Australia and in New Zealand – every house needs a solar panel and battery back-up. Now that would be really effective renewables.
This articles investigates an academic study into rugby coaching in NZ saying that coaches here focus on technical aspects and neglect character development.
Much to do with our binge-drinking, and violent youth?
On February 14, 2023 we announced our Rebuttal Update Project. This included an ask for feedback about the added "At a glance" section in the updated basic rebuttal versions. This weekly blog post series highlights this new section of one of the updated basic rebuttal versions and serves as a ...
What is it with the mining industry? Its not enough for them to pillage the earth - they apparently can't even be bothered getting resource consent to do so: The proponent behind a major mine near the Clutha River had already been undertaking activity in the area without a ...
Photo # 1 I am a huge fan of Singapore’s approach to housing, as described here two years ago by copying and pasting from The ConversationWhat Singapore has that Australia does not is a public housing developer, the Housing Development Board, which puts new dwellings on public and reclaimed land, ...
Buzz from the Beehive Reactions to news of the government’s readiness to make urgent changes to “the resource management system” through a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) suggest a balanced approach is being taken. The Taxpayers’ Union says the proposed changes don’t go far enough. Greenpeace says ...
I’m starting to wonder if Anna Burns-Francis might be the best political interviewer we’ve got. That might sound unlikely to you, it came as a bit of a surprise to me.Jack Tame can be excellent, but has some pretty average days. I like Rebecca Wright on Newshub, she asks good ...
Chris Trotter writes – Willie Jackson is said to be planning a “media summit” to discuss “the state of the media and how to protect Fourth Estate Journalism”. Not only does the Editor of The Daily Blog, Martyn Bradbury, think this is a good idea, but he has also ...
Graeme Edgeler writes – This morning [April 21], the Wellington High Court is hearing a judicial review brought by Hon. Karen Chhour, the Minister for Children, against a decision of the Waitangi Tribunal. This is unusual, judicial reviews are much more likely to brought against ministers, rather than ...
Both of Parliament’s watchdogs have now ripped into the Government’s Fast-track Approvals Bill. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāMy pick of the six newsey things to know from Aotearoa’s political economy and beyond on the morning of Tuesday, April 23 are:The Lead: The Auditor General,John Ryan, has joined the ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Sarah SpengemanPeople wait to board an electric bus in Pune, India. (Image credit: courtesy of ITDP) Public transportation riders in Pune, India, love the city’s new electric buses so much they will actually skip an older diesel bus that ...
The infrastructure industry yesterday issued a “hurry up” message to the Government, telling it to get cracking on developing a pipeline of infrastructure projects.The hiatus around the change of Government has seen some major projects cancelled and others delayed, and there is uncertainty about what will happen with the new ...
Hi,Over the weekend I revisited a podcast I really adore, Dead Eyes. It’s about a guy who got fired from Band of Brothers over two decades ago because Tom Hanks said he had “dead eyes”.If you don’t recall — 2001’s Band of Brothers was part of the emerging trend of ...
Buzz from the Beehive The 180 or so recipients of letters from the Government telling them how to submit infrastructure projects for “fast track” consideration includes some whose project applications previously have been rejected by the courts. News media were quick to feature these in their reports after RMA Reform Minister Chris ...
It would not be a desirable way to start your holiday by breaking your back, your head, or your wrist, but on our first hour in Singapore I gave it a try.We were chatting, last week, before we started a meeting of Hazel’s Enviro Trust, about the things that can ...
Calling all journalists, academics, planners, lawyers, political activists, environmentalists, and other members of the public who believe that the relationships between vested interests and politicians need to be scrutinised. We need to work together to make sure that the new Fast-Track Approvals Bill – currently being pushed through by the ...
Feel worried. Shane Jones and a couple of his Cabinet colleagues are about to be granted the power to override any and all objections to projects like dams, mines, roads etc even if: said projects will harm biodiversity, increase global warming and cause other environmental harms, and even if ...
Bryce Edwards writes- The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. ...
Michael Bassett writes – If you think there is a move afoot by the radical Maori fringe of New Zealand society to create a parallel system of government to the one that we elect at our triennial elections, you aren’t wrong. Over the last few days we have ...
Without a corresponding drop in interest rates, it’s doubtful any changes to the CCCFA will unleash a massive rush of home buyers. Photo: Lynn GrievesonTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate on Monday, April 22 included:The Government making a ...
Sunday was a lazy day. I started watching Jack Tame on Q&A, the interviews are usually good for something to write about. Saying the things that the politicians won’t, but are quite possibly thinking. Things that are true and need to be extracted from between the lines.As you might know ...
In our Weekly Roundup last week we covered news from Auckland Transport that the WX1 Western Express is going to get an upgrade next year with double decker electric buses. As part of the announcement, AT also said “Since we introduced the WX1 Western Express last November we have seen ...
TL;DR: The six key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to April 29 include:PM Christopher Luxon is scheduled to hold a post-Cabinet news conference at 4 pm today. Stats NZ releases its statutory report on Census 2023 tomorrow.Finance Minister Nicola Willis delivers a pre-Budget speech at ...
A listing of 29 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, April 14, 2024 thru Sat, April 20, 2024. Story of the week Our story of the week hinges on these words from the abstract of a fresh academic ...
The ability of the private sector to quickly establish major new projects making use of the urban and natural environment is to be supercharged by the new National-led Government. Yesterday it introduced to Parliament one of its most significant reforms, the Fast Track Approvals Bill. The Government says this will ...
This is a column to say thank you. So many of have been in touch since Mum died to say so many kind and thoughtful things. You’re wonderful, all of you. You’ve asked how we’re doing, how Dad’s doing. A little more realisation each day, of the irretrievable finality of ...
Identifying the engine type in your car is crucial for various reasons, including maintenance, repairs, and performance upgrades. Knowing the specific engine model allows you to access detailed technical information, locate compatible parts, and make informed decisions about modifications. This comprehensive guide will provide you with a step-by-step approach to ...
Introduction: The allure of racing is undeniable. The thrill of speed, the roar of engines, and the exhilaration of competition all contribute to the allure of this adrenaline-driven sport. For those who yearn to experience the pinnacle of racing, becoming a race car driver is the ultimate dream. However, the ...
Introduction Automobiles have become ubiquitous in modern society, serving as a primary mode of transportation and a symbol of economic growth and personal mobility. With countless vehicles traversing roads and highways worldwide, it begs the question: how many cars are there in the world? Determining the precise number is a ...
Maintaining a safe and reliable vehicle requires regular inspections. Whether it’s a routine maintenance checkup or a safety inspection, knowing how long the process will take can help you plan your day accordingly. This article delves into the factors that influence the duration of a car inspection and provides an ...
Mazda Motor Corporation, commonly known as Mazda, is a Japanese multinational automaker headquartered in Fuchu, Aki District, Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan. The company was founded in 1920 as the Toyo Cork Kogyo Co., Ltd., and began producing vehicles in 1931. Mazda is primarily known for its production of passenger cars, but ...
Your car battery is an essential component that provides power to start your engine, operate your electrical systems, and store energy. Over time, batteries can weaken and lose their ability to hold a charge, which can lead to starting problems, power failures, and other issues. Replacing your battery before it ...
In most states, you cannot register a car without a valid driver’s license. However, there are a few exceptions to this rule. Exceptions to the RuleIf you are under 18 years old: In some states, you can register a car in your name even if you do not ...
Mazda, a Japanese automotive manufacturer with a rich history of innovation and engineering excellence, has emerged as a formidable player in the global car market. Known for its reputation of producing high-quality, fuel-efficient, and driver-oriented vehicles, Mazda has consistently garnered praise from industry experts and consumers alike. In this article, ...
Struts are an essential part of a car’s suspension system. They are responsible for supporting the weight of the car and damping the oscillations of the springs. Struts are typically made of steel or aluminum and are filled with hydraulic fluid. How Do Struts Work? Struts work by transferring the ...
Car registration is a mandatory process that all vehicle owners must complete annually. This process involves registering your car with the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) and paying an associated fee. The registration process ensures that your vehicle is properly licensed and insured, and helps law enforcement and other authorities ...
Zoom is a video conferencing service that allows you to share your screen, webcam, and audio with other participants. In addition to sharing your own audio, you can also share the audio from your computer with other participants. This can be useful for playing music, sharing presentations with audio, or ...
Building your own computer can be a rewarding and cost-effective way to get a high-performance machine tailored to your specific needs. However, it also requires careful planning and execution, and one of the most important factors to consider is the time it will take. The exact time it takes to ...
Sleep mode is a power-saving state that allows your computer to quickly resume operation without having to boot up from scratch. This can be useful if you need to step away from your computer for a short period of time but don’t want to shut it down completely. There are ...
Introduction Computer-Assisted Translation (CAT) has revolutionized the field of translation by harnessing the power of technology to assist human translators in their work. This innovative approach combines specialized software with human expertise to improve the efficiency, accuracy, and consistency of translations. In this comprehensive article, we will delve into the ...
In today’s digital age, mobile devices have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Among the vast array of portable computing options available, iPads and tablet computers stand out as two prominent contenders. While both offer similar functionalities, there are subtle yet significant differences between these two devices. This ...
A computer is an electronic device that can be programmed to carry out a set of instructions. The basic components of a computer are the processor, memory, storage, input devices, and output devices. The Processor The processor, also known as the central processing unit (CPU), is the brain of the ...
Voice Memos is a convenient app on your iPhone that allows you to quickly record and store audio snippets. These recordings can be useful for a variety of purposes, such as taking notes, capturing ideas, or recording interviews. While you can listen to your voice memos on your iPhone, you ...
Laptop screens are essential for interacting with our devices and accessing information. However, when lines appear on the screen, it can be frustrating and disrupt productivity. Understanding the underlying causes of these lines is crucial for finding effective solutions. Types of Screen Lines Horizontal lines: Also known as scan ...
Right-clicking is a common and essential computer operation that allows users to access additional options and settings. While most desktop computers have dedicated right-click buttons on their mice, laptops often do not have these buttons due to space limitations. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on how to right-click ...
Powering up and shutting down your ASUS laptop is an essential task for any laptop user. Locating the power button can sometimes be a hassle, especially if you’re new to ASUS laptops. This article will provide a comprehensive guide on where to find the power button on different ASUS laptop ...
Dell laptops are renowned for their reliability, performance, and versatility. Whether you’re a student, a professional, or just someone who needs a reliable computing device, a Dell laptop can meet your needs. However, if you’re new to Dell laptops, you may be wondering how to get started. In this comprehensive ...
Two-thirds of the country think that “New Zealand’s economy is rigged to advantage the rich and powerful”. They also believe that “New Zealand needs a strong leader to take the country back from the rich and powerful”. These are just two of a handful of stunning new survey results released ...
In today’s digital world, screenshots have become an indispensable tool for communication and documentation. Whether you need to capture an important email, preserve a website page, or share an error message, screenshots allow you to quickly and easily preserve digital information. If you’re an Asus laptop user, there are several ...
A factory reset restores your Gateway laptop to its original factory settings, erasing all data, apps, and personalizations. This can be necessary to resolve software issues, remove viruses, or prepare your laptop for sale or transfer. Here’s a step-by-step guide on how to factory reset your Gateway laptop: Method 1: ...
“You talking about me?”The neoliberal denigration of the past was nowhere more unrelenting than in its depiction of the public service. The Post Office and the Railways were held up as being both irremediably inefficient and scandalously over-manned. Playwright Roger Hall’s “Glide Time” caricatures were presented as accurate depictions of ...
Roger Partridge writes – When the Coalition Government took office last October, it inherited a country on a precipice. With persistent inflation, decades of insipid productivity growth and crises in healthcare, education, housing and law and order, it is no exaggeration to suggest New Zealand’s first-world status was ...
Rob MacCulloch writes – In 2022, the Curriculum Centre at the Ministry of Education employed 308 staff, according to an Official Information Request. Earlier this week it was announced 202 of those staff were being cut. When you look up “The New Zealand Curriculum” on the Ministry of ...
Chris Bishop’s bill has stirred up a hornets nest of opposition. Photo: Lynn Grieveson for The KākāTL;DR: The six things that stood out to me in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, poverty and climate from the last day included:A crescendo of opposition to the Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill is ...
Monday left me brokenTuesday, I was through with hopingWednesday, my empty arms were openThursday, waiting for love, waiting for loveThe end of another week that left many of us asking WTF? What on earth has NZ gotten itself into and how on earth could people have voluntarily signed up for ...
Hello! Here comes the Saturday edition of More Than A Feilding, catching you up on the past week’s editions.State of humanity, 20242024, it feels, keeps presenting us with ever more challenges, ever more dismay.Do you give up yet? It seems to ask.No? How about this? Or this?How about this?Full story Share ...
Determining the hardest sport in the world is a subjective matter, as the difficulty level can vary depending on individual abilities, physical attributes, and experience. However, based on various factors including physical demands, technical skills, mental fortitude, and overall accomplishment, here is an exploration of some of the most challenging ...
The allure of sport transcends age, culture, and geographical boundaries. It captivates hearts, ignites passions, and provides unparalleled entertainment. Behind the spectacle, however, lies a fascinating world of financial investment and expenditure. Among the vast array of competitive pursuits, one question looms large: which sport carries the hefty title of ...
Introduction Pickleball, a rapidly growing paddle sport, has captured the hearts and imaginations of millions around the world. Its blend of tennis, badminton, and table tennis elements has made it a favorite among players of all ages and skill levels. As the sport’s popularity continues to surge, the question on ...
Abstract: Soccer, the global phenomenon captivating millions worldwide, has a rich history that spans centuries. Its origins trace back to ancient civilizations, but the modern version we know and love emerged through a complex interplay of cultural influences and innovations. This article delves into the fascinating journey of soccer’s evolution, ...
Tinting car windows offers numerous benefits, including enhanced privacy, reduced glare, UV protection, and a more stylish look for your vehicle. However, the cost of window tinting can vary significantly depending on several factors. This article provides a comprehensive guide to help you understand how much you can expect to ...
The pungent smell of gasoline in your car can be an alarming and potentially dangerous problem. Not only is the odor unpleasant, but it can also indicate a serious issue with your vehicle’s fuel system. In this article, we will explore the various reasons why your car may smell like ...
Tree sap can be a sticky, unsightly mess on your car’s exterior. It can be difficult to remove, but with the right techniques and products, you can restore your car to its former glory. Understanding Tree Sap Tree sap is a thick, viscous liquid produced by trees to seal wounds ...
The amount of paint needed to paint a car depends on a number of factors, including the size of the car, the number of coats you plan to apply, and the type of paint you are using. In general, you will need between 1 and 2 gallons of paint for ...
Jump-starting a car is a common task that can be performed even in adverse weather conditions like rain. However, safety precautions and proper techniques are crucial to avoid potential hazards. This comprehensive guide will provide detailed instructions on how to safely jump a car in the rain, ensuring both your ...
Graham Adams writes about the $55m media fund — When Patrick Gower was asked by Mike Hosking last week what he would say to the many Newstalk ZB callers who allege the Labour government bribed media with $55 million of taxpayers’ money via the Public Interest Journalism Fund — and ...
Note: this blog post has been put together over the course of the week I followed the happenings at the conference virtually. Should recordings of the Great Debates and possibly Union Symposia mentioned below, be released sometime after the conference ends, I'll include links to the ones I participated in. ...
The following was my submission made on the “Fast Track Approvals Bill”. This potential law will give three Ministers unchecked powers, un-paralled since the days of Robert Muldoon’s “Think Big” projects.The submission is written a bit tongue-in-cheek. But it’s irreverent because the FTAB is in itself not worthy of respect. ...
One Could Reduce Child Poverty At No Fiscal CostFollowing the Richardson/Shipley 1990 ‘redesign of the welfare state’ – which eliminated the universal Family Benefit and doubled the rate of child poverty – various income supplements for families have been added, the best known being ‘Working for Families’, introduced in 2005. ...
Buzz from the Beehive A few days ago, Point of Order suggested the media must be musing “on why Melissa is mute”. Our article reported that people working in the beleaguered media industry have cause to yearn for a minister as busy as Melissa Lee’s ministerial colleagues and we drew ...
1. What was The Curse of Jim Bolger?a. Winston Peters b. Soon after shaking his hand, world leaders would mysteriously lose office or shuffle off this mortal coilc. Could never shake off the Mother of All Budgetsd. Dandruff2. True or false? The Chairman of a Kiwi export business has asked the ...
It appears Nicola Willis is about to pull the rug out from under the feet of local communities still dealing with the aftermath of last year’s severe weather, and local councils relying on funding to build back from these disasters. ...
The Government is making short-sighted changes to the Resource Management Act (RMA) that will take away environmental protection in favour of short-term profits, Labour’s environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said today. ...
Labour welcomes the release of the report into the North Island weather events and looks forward to working with the Government to ensure that New Zealand is as prepared as it can be for the next natural disaster. ...
The Labour Party has called for the New Zealand Government to recognise Palestine, as a material step towards progressing the two-State solution needed to achieve a lasting peace in the region. ...
Some of our country’s most important work, stopping the sexual exploitation of children and violent extremism could go along with staff on the frontline at ports and airports. ...
The Government’s Fast Track Approvals Bill will give projects such as new coal mines a ‘get out of jail free’ card to wreak havoc on the environment, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
Cuts to frontline hospital staff are not only a broken election promise, it shows the reckless tax cuts have well and truly hit the frontline of the health system, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
The Green Party has joined the call for public submissions on the fast-track legislation to be extended after the Ombudsman forced the Government to release the list of organisations invited to apply just hours before submissions close. ...
New Zealand’s good work at reducing climate emissions for three years in a row will be undone by the National government’s lack of ambition and scrapping programmes that were making a difference, Labour Party climate spokesperson Megan Woods said today. ...
More essential jobs could be on the chopping block, this time Ministry of Education staff on the school lunches team are set to find out whether they're in line to lose their jobs. ...
The Government is trying to bring in a law that will allow Ministers to cut corners and kill off native species, Labour environment spokesperson Rachel Brooking said. ...
Cancelling urgently needed new Cook Strait ferries and hiking the cost of public transport for many Kiwis so that National can announce the prospect of another tunnel for Wellington is not making good choices, Labour Transport Spokesperson Tangi Utikere said. ...
A laundry list of additional costs for Tāmaki Makarau Auckland shows the Minister for the city is not delivering for the people who live there, says Labour Auckland Issues spokesperson Shanan Halbert. ...
The Green Party has today launched a step-by-step guide to help New Zealanders make their voice heard on the Government’s democracy dodging and anti-environment fast track legislation. ...
The National Government’s proposed changes to the Residential Tenancies Act will mean tenants can be turfed from their homes by landlords with little notice, Labour housing spokesperson Kieran McAnulty said. ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson is calling on all parties to support a common-sense change that’s great for the planet and great for consumers after her member’s bill was drawn from the ballot today. ...
A significant milestone has been reached in the fight to strike an anti-Pasifika and unfair law from the country’s books after Teanau Tuiono’s members’ bill passed its first reading. ...
New Zealand has today missed the opportunity to uphold the right to a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment, says James Shaw after his member’s bill was voted down in its first reading. ...
Today’s advice from the Climate Change Commission paints a sobering reality of the challenge we face in combating climate change, especially in light of recent Government policy announcements. ...
Minister for Disability Issues Penny Simmonds appears to have delayed a report back to Cabinet on the progress New Zealand is making against international obligations for disabled New Zealanders. ...
The Government’s newly announced review of methane emissions reduction targets hints at its desire to delay Aotearoa New Zealand’s urgent transition to a climate safe future, the Green Party said. ...
The Government must commit to the Maitai School building project for students with high and complex needs, to ensure disabled students from the top of the South Island have somewhere to learn. ...
Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey and his Government colleagues have made a meal of their mental health commitments, showing how flimsy their efforts to champion the issue truly are, says Labour Mental Health spokesperson Ingrid Leary. ...
Recreational catch limits will be reduced in areas of Fiordland and the Chatham Islands to help keep those fisheries healthy and sustainable, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones says. The lower recreational daily catch limits for a range of finfish and shellfish species caught in the Fiordland Marine Area and ...
Energy Minister Simeon Brown has welcomed an important milestone in New Zealand’s hydrogen future, with the opening of the country’s first network of hydrogen refuelling stations in Wiri. “I want to congratulate the team at Hiringa Energy and its partners K one W one (K1W1), Mitsui & Co New Zealand ...
The coalition Government is delivering on its commitment to improve resource management laws and give greater certainty to consent applicants, with a Bill to amend the Resource Management Act (RMA) expected to be introduced to Parliament next month. RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop has today outlined the first RMA Amendment ...
Overseas models for regulating the oil and gas sector, including their decommissioning regimes, are being carefully scrutinised as a potential template for New Zealand’s own sector, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. The Coalition Government is focused on rebuilding investor confidence in New Zealand’s energy sector as it looks to strengthen ...
Emergency Management and Recovery Minister Mark Mitchell has today released the Report of the Government Inquiry into the response to the North Island Severe Weather Events. “The report shows that New Zealand’s emergency management system is not fit-for-purpose and there are some significant gaps we need to address,” Mr Mitchell ...
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is today travelling to Europe where he’ll update the United Nations Human Rights Council on the Government’s work to restore law and order. “Attending the Universal Periodic Review in Geneva provides us with an opportunity to present New Zealand’s human rights progress, priorities, and challenges, while ...
Associate Agriculture Minister, Mark Patterson, formally reopened the world’s largest wool processing facility today in Awatoto, Napier, following a $50 million rebuild and refurbishment project. “The reopening of this facility will significantly lift the economic opportunities available to New Zealand’s wool sector, which already accounts for 20 per cent of ...
Hon Andrew Bayly, Minister for Small Business and Manufacturing At the Southland Otago Regional Engineering Collective (SOREC) Summit, 18 April, Dunedin Ngā mihi nui, Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Ko Whanganui aho Good Afternoon and thank you for inviting me to open your summit today. I am delighted ...
The Government is delivering on its commitment to bring back the Three Strikes legislation, Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee announced today. “Our Government is committed to restoring law and order and enforcing appropriate consequences on criminals. We are making it clear that repeat serious violent or sexual offending is not ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has today announced four new diplomatic appointments for New Zealand’s overseas missions. “Our diplomats have a vital role in maintaining and protecting New Zealand’s interests around the world,” Mr Peters says. “I am pleased to announce the appointment of these senior diplomats from the ...
New Zealand is contributing NZ$7 million to support communities affected by severe food insecurity and other urgent humanitarian needs in Ethiopia and Somalia, Foreign Minister Rt Hon Winston Peters announced today. “Over 21 million people are in need of humanitarian assistance across Ethiopia, with a further 6.9 million people ...
Minister for Arts, Culture and Heritage Paul Goldsmith is congratulating Mataaho Collective for winning the Golden Lion for best participant in the main exhibition at the Venice Biennale. "Congratulations to the Mataaho Collective for winning one of the world's most prestigious art prizes at the Venice Biennale. “It is good ...
The Government is reforming financial services to improve access to home loans and other lending, and strengthen customer protections, Commerce and Consumer Affairs Minister Andrew Bayly and Housing Minister Chris Bishop announced today. “Our coalition Government is committed to rebuilding the economy and making life simpler by cutting red tape. We are ...
“China remains a strong commercial opportunity for Kiwi exporters as Chinese businesses and consumers continue to value our high-quality safe produce,” Trade and Agriculture Minister Todd McClay says. Mr McClay has returned to New Zealand following visits to Beijing, Harbin and Shanghai where he met ministers, governors and mayors and engaged in trade and agricultural events with the New ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon has completed a successful trip to Singapore, Thailand and the Philippines, deepening relationships and capitalising on opportunities. Mr Luxon was accompanied by a business delegation and says the choice of countries represents the priority the New Zealand Government places on South East Asia, and our relationships in ...
New Zealand is demonstrating its commitment to reducing global greenhouse emissions, and supporting clean energy transition in South East Asia, through a contribution of NZ$41 million (US$25 million) in climate finance to the Asian Development Bank (ADB)-led Energy Transition Mechanism (ETM). Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Climate Change Minister Simon Watts announced ...
The Government is today releasing a list of organisations who received letters about the Fast-track applications process, says RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop. “Recently Ministers and agencies have received a series of OIA requests for a list of organisations to whom I wrote with information on applying to have a ...
Attorney-General Judith Collins today announced the appointment of Wellington Barrister David Jonathan Boldt as a Judge of the High Court, and the Honourable Justice Matthew Palmer as a Judge of the Court of Appeal. Justice Boldt graduated with an LLB from Victoria University of Wellington in 1990, and also holds ...
Education Minister Erica Stanford will lead the New Zealand delegation at the 2024 International Summit on the Teaching Profession (ISTP) held in Singapore. The delegation includes representatives from the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) Te Wehengarua and the New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) Te Riu Roa. The summit is co-hosted ...
A stopbank upgrade project in Tairawhiti partly funded by the Government has increased flood resilience for around 7000ha of residential and horticultural land so far, Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says. Mr Jones today attended a dawn service in Gisborne to mark the end of the first stage of the ...
Foreign Affairs Minister Winston Peters will represent the Government at Anzac Day commemorations on the Gallipoli Peninsula next week and engage with senior representatives of the Turkish government in Istanbul. “The Gallipoli campaign is a defining event in our history. It will be a privilege to share the occasion ...
Science, Innovation and Technology and Defence Minister Judith Collins will next week attend the OECD Science and Technology Ministerial conference in Paris and Anzac Day commemorations in Belgium. “Science, innovation and technology have a major role to play in rebuilding our economy and achieving better health, environmental and social outcomes ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon held a bilateral meeting today with the President of the Philippines, Ferdinand Marcos Jr. The Prime Minister was accompanied by MP Paulo Garcia, the first Filipino to be elected to a legislature outside the Philippines. During today’s meeting, Prime Minister Luxon and President Marcos Jr discussed opportunities to ...
The Government has announced that $20 million in funding will be made available to Westport to fund much needed flood protection around the town. This measure will significantly improve the resilience of the community, says Local Government Minister Simeon Brown. “The Westport community has already been allocated almost $3 million ...
The Government is proud to support the first ever Repco Supercars Championship event in Taupō as up to 70,000 motorsport fans attend the Taupō International Motorsport Park this weekend, says Economic Development Minister Melissa Lee. “Anticipation for the ITM Taupō Super400 is huge, with tickets and accommodation selling out weeks ...
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown has announced an increase to the Rates Rebate Scheme, putting money back into the pockets of low-income homeowners. “The coalition Government is committed to bringing down the cost of living for New Zealanders. That includes targeted support for those Kiwis who are doing things tough, such ...
The Coalition Government is investing in a project to boost survival rates of New Zealand mussels and grow the industry, Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones has announced. “This project seeks to increase the resilience of our mussels and significantly boost the sector’s productivity,” Mr Jones says. “The project - ...
Benefit figures released today underscore the importance of the Government’s plan to rebuild the economy and have 50,000 fewer people on Jobseeker Support, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “Benefit numbers are still significantly higher than when National was last in government, when there was about 70,000 fewer ...
The Government’s commitment to doubling New Zealand’s renewable energy capacity is backed by new data showing that clean energy has helped the country reach its lowest annual gross emissions since 1999, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand’s latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory (1990-2022) published today, shows gross emissions fell ...
The Government is bringing the earthquake-prone building review forward, with work to start immediately, and extending the deadline for remediations by four years, Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk says. “Our Government is focused on rebuilding the economy. A key part of our plan is to cut red tape that ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and his Thai counterpart, Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin, have today agreed that New Zealand and the Kingdom of Thailand will upgrade the bilateral relationship to a Strategic Partnership by 2026. “New Zealand and Thailand have a lot to offer each other. We have a strong mutual desire to build ...
RMA Reform Minister Chris Bishop and Transport Minister Simeon Brown have today announced the Coalition Government’s intention to extend port coastal permits for a further 20 years, providing port operators with certainty to continue their operations. “The introduction of the Resource Management Act in 1991 required ports to obtain coastal ...
Today’s announcement that inflation is down to 4 per cent is encouraging news for Kiwis, but there is more work to be done - underlining the importance of the Government’s plan to get the economy back on track, acting Finance Minister Chris Bishop says. “Inflation is now at 4 per ...
Refreshed health guidance released today will help parents and schools make informed decisions about whether their child needs to be in school, addressing one of the key issues affecting school attendance, says Associate Education Minister David Seymour. In recent years, consistently across all school terms, short-term illness or medical reasons ...
Oceans and Fisheries Minister Shane Jones is streamlining high-level oceans management while maintaining a focus on supporting the sector’s role in the export-led recovery of the economy. “I am working to realise the untapped potential of our fishing and aquaculture sector. To achieve that we need to be smarter with ...
Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson is speaking at the International Wool Textile Organisation Congress in Adelaide, promoting New Zealand wool, and outlining the coalition Government’s support for the revitalisation the sector. "New Zealand’s wool exports reached $400 million in the year to 30 June 2023, and the coalition Government ...
The Government is making legislative changes to make it easier for new early learning services to be established, and for existing services to operate, Associate Education Minister David Seymour says. The changes involve repealing the network approval provisions that apply when someone wants to establish a new early learning service, ...
Changes to the Resource Management Act will align consenting for coal mining to other forms of mining to reduce barriers that are holding back economic development, Resources Minister Shane Jones says. “The inconsistent treatment of coal mining compared with other extractive activities is burdensome red tape that fails to acknowledge ...
Trade, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay has concluded productive discussions with ministerial counterparts in Beijing today, in support of the New Zealand-China trade and economic relationship. “My meeting with Commerce Minister Wang Wentao reaffirmed the complementary nature of the bilateral trade relationship, with our Free Trade Agreement at its ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon today paid tribute to Singapore’s outgoing Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong. Meeting in Singapore today immediately before Prime Minister Lee announced he was stepping down, Prime Minister Luxon warmly acknowledged his counterpart’s almost twenty years as leader, and the enduring legacy he has left for Singapore and South East ...
How will the recent wave of job cuts impact ethnic diversity in the media? In November last year, I was working a very busy day in the newsroom of a large online news site, interviewing whānau about their concerns over the imminent closure of one of the few puna reo ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Ruth Knight, Researcher, Queensland University of Technology Have you ever felt sick at work? Perhaps you had food poisoning or the flu. Your belly hurt, or you felt tired, making it hard to concentrate and be productive. How likely would you be ...
Despite heavy criticism and an ongoing select committee process, the Police Minister says the Government will forge ahead with a ban on gang patches. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sam Whiting, Lecturer – Creative Industries, University of South Australia Shutterstock Everyone has a favourite band, or a favourite composer, or a favourite song. There is some music which speaks to you, deeply; and other music which might be the current ...
A new survey says ‘outlook not great’ for those charged with building infrastructure, while RMA changes delight farmers and depress environmentalists, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. First RMA changes announced ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Olli Hellmann, Associate Professor of Political Science, University of Waikato Getty Images When New Zealanders commemorate Anzac Day on April 25, it’s not only to honour the soldiers who lost their lives in World War I and subsequent conflicts, but also ...
A leaked document shows the Canterbury/Waitaha arm of health agency Te Whatu Ora is scurrying to save $13.3 million by July. The “financial sustainability target”, which was “allocated” to Waitaha, is consistent with what’s happening in other districts, says Sarah Dalton, executive director of the Association of Salaried Medical Specialists. ...
A look at the state of the previous government’s affordable housing scheme, and what could come next.Remind me: What’s KiwiBuild again?First announced in 2012, KiwiBuild was a flagship policy of the Labour Party heading into both its 2014 and 2017 election campaigns. With Jacinda Ardern as prime minister, ...
Labour in opposition will be shocked to learn which party had six years in power but squandered any chance to make real change. Grant Robertson’s valedictory speech was a predictably entertaining trip down memory lane. The acid-tongued incoming Otago University chancellor administered a sick burn to the coalition government. He ...
Taiwan’s semiconductor industry is seen some as its ‘silicon shield’ against invasion – but how will overseas expansion affect that protection? The post The state of Taiwan’s silicon shield appeared first on Newsroom. ...
There’s relief for building owners bending under the weight of earthquake strengthening rules – and costs – that came into force seven years ago. Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk has announced a scheduled 2027 review of the earthquake-prone building regulations will now start this year. Owners will also get ...
Opinion: It has been announced that nine percent of roles at Oranga Tamariki will be disestablished, presumably to help fund the tax cuts promised by the coalition Government. I am reminded of the graphics used to illustrate pandemic events, where five thousand people are standing in a field and then ...
After more than two sleepless days, running through savage terrain, Greig Hamilton didn’t know if he was going to finish one of the most gruelling psychological assaults in sport. He was metres away from the finish line, a yellow gate made famous in a Netflix documentary; a race he’d dreamed ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Wednesday 24 April appeared first on Newsroom. ...
The following interview with former Green Party MP Sue Kedgley came about because she features in the new memoir Hine Toa by activist Ngāhuia te Awekōtuku; the two knew each other at the University of Auckland in the early 70s, when they were both took on leadership roles in the ...
COMMENTARY:By Murray Horton New Zealand needs to get tough with Israel. It’s not as if we haven’t done so before. When NZ authorities busted a Mossad operation in Auckland 20 years ago, the government didn’t say: “Oh well, Israel has the right to defend itself.” No, it arrested, prosecuted, ...
NEWSMAKERS:By Vijay Narayan, news director of FijiVillage Blessed to be part of the University of Fiji (UniFiji) faculty to continue to teach and mentor those who want to join our noble profession, and to stand for truth and justice for the people of the country. I was privileged to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Martin, Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Three weeks from now, some of us will be presented with a mountain of budget papers, and just about all of us will get to hear about them on radio, ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dan Lowry, Ice Sheet & Climate Modeller, GNS Science Hugh Chittock/Antarctica New Zealand, CC BY-SA As the climate warms and Antarctica’s glaciers and ice sheets melt, the resulting rise in sea level has the potential to displace hundreds of millions of ...
The government's plan to reintroduce a three strikes regime is being strongly opposed by lawyers, who argue there is no evidence it reduces crime or helps people rehabilitate. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dan Jerker B. Svantesson, Professor specialising in Internet law, Bond University Do Australian courts have the right to decide what foreign citizens, located overseas, view online on a foreign-owned platform? Anyone inclined to answer “yes” to this question should perhaps also ask ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Giovanni E Ferreira, NHMRC Emerging Leader Research Fellow, Institute of Musculoskeletal Health, University of Sydney Last week in a post on X, owner of the platform Elon Musk recommended people look into disc replacement if they’re experiencing severe neck or back pain. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By David Hayward, Emeritus Professor of Public Policy, RMIT University anek.soowannaphoom/Shutterstock NSW Treasurer Daniel Mookhey caught the headlines yesterday, courtesy of a blistering speech condemning the latest GST carve-up. New South Wales, he claimed, would be A$11.9 billion worse off over the ...
While police are "broadly in favour", the government's proposed anti-gang laws are facing pushback from lawyers, rights groups and former gang members. ...
While police are "broadly in favour", the government's proposed anti-gang laws are facing pushback from lawyers, rights groups and former gang members. ...
By Miriam Zarriga in Port Moresby Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has arrived at Kokoda Station, Northern province, at the start of his state visit to Papua New Guinea. Both Albanese and Prime Minister James Marape will meet with the locals and the Northern Provincial government before they begin their ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Chris Wallace, Professor, School of Politics Economics & Society, Faculty of Business Government & Law, University of Canberra Shutterstock An important principle was invoked by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week in defence of the government’s Future Made in Australia industry ...
By Patrick Decloitre, RNZ Pacific correspondent French Pacific desk Security forces reinforcements were sent from France ahead of two rival marches in the capital Nouméa today, at the same time and only two streets away one from the other. One march, called by Union Calédonienne party (a component of the ...
A poll last August found that just 16% of New Zealanders oppose bringing back the ‘Three Strikes’ law. The nationwide poll of 1,000 New Zealanders was commissioned by Family First NZ and carried out by Curia Market Research. ...
The solo show from Ana Scotney is both sprawling and intimate, and a must-see, writes Mad Chapman. In the opening moments of Scattergun: After the Death of Rūaumoko, writer and performer Ana Scotney lays out the groundwork, literally. Silently moving around the square stage, Scotney is not so much dancing ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Burridge, Professor of Linguistics, Monash University Who makes the words? Why are trees called trees and why are shoes called shoes and who makes the names? – Elliot, age 5, Eltham, Victoria Good question Elliot! Let’s start with ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne at amRawpixel.com/Shutterstock Roles of health professionals are still unfortunately often stuck in the past. That is, before the ...
COMMENTARY:By Malcolm Evans Last week’s leaked New York Times staff directive, as to what words can and cannot be used to describe the carnage Israel is raining on Palestinians, is proof positive, since those reports are published verbatim here in New Zealand, that our understanding of the conflict is ...
In the case of New Zealand, the results confirm that there is no popular support for the vicious austerity program being imposed by the National Party-led government, which is backed in all fundamental respects by the opposition Labour Party. ...
The ‘Vampire’ singer has never visited our part of the world, but that might all be about to change. We assess the evidence.Olivia Rodrigo’s Guts World Tour is pulling in massive crowds as it whips around the US and Europe, even helping to catapult regular supporting act Chappell Roan ...
Testing of drinking water in rural Canterbury over the weekend by Greenpeace revealed that several public town supplies were reaching levels of nitrate above 5 mg/L - the threshold which a growing body of scientific evidence has linked to increased ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rohan Fisher, Information Technology for Development Researcher, Charles Darwin University It may come as a surprise to hear 2023 was Australia’s biggest bushfire season in more than a decade. Fires burned across an area eight times as big as the 2019–20 Black ...
Responding to the Government’s announcement of changes to resource management laws, Taxpayers’ Union Executive Director, Jordan Williams, said: “These changes are a step in the right direction in terms of removing ideological and unworkable ...
More than two years after the Human Rights Council called for the establishment of a national human rights commission, such a body has yet to be formed. ...
Comment:An emergency management system with wide variations in performance, significant capability gaps, funding shortfalls and above all a setup that is not meeting the needs of New Zealanders at times of crisis. The Government’s inquiry into the response to Cyclone Gabrielle and other severe weather events in the North ...
Welcome to the whirring wonders of one brain trying to align its actions with its beliefs within a system it thinks is evil. My brain has been spiralling in a woke conundrum ever since I found out a bookshop I’ve never been to was shutting down. Good Books, a bookshop ...
We repeat our call for criminal justice policy to be based on evidence, something the three strikes regime neglects to recognise – with no evidence that it either reduces crime or assists with rehabilitation. ...
By Koroi Hawkins, RNZ Pacific editor in Honiara With only four more seats in the 50-member Parliament yet to be officially declared, there is no outright winner in the Solomon Islands elections. As of Monday, the two largest blocs in the winner’s circle, independents and the incumbent Prime Minister Manasseh ...
Two/fiftyseven is a multi-purpose space hidden in the heart of Wellington that is paving a way for sustainable building and responsible landlording in Aotearoa and beyond.By 2060 the world is predicted to double its entire building stock, which equates to building an entire New York City every 34 days, ...
Popstars wasn’t just a reality television revolution, it was also a huge moment for Y2K fashion.It’s 25 years since girl group TrueBliss was formed on New Zealand national television, breaking new ground for both the reality television industry and the shiny clothing industry. With the first episode on NZ ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Christopher Pepping, Associate Professor in Clinical Psychology, Griffith University Marvin / Shutterstock Are all single people insecure? When we think about people who have been single for a long time, we may assume it’s because single people have insecurities that make ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By William Geary, Lecturer in Quantitative Ecology & Biodiversity Conservation, The University of Melbourne Trismegist san, Shutterstock Landscapes that have escaped fire for decades or centuries tend to harbour vital structures for wildlife, such as tree hollows and large logs. But these ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Rebecca Gladstone-Gallagher, Lecturer in Marine Science, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Shutterstock/S Curtis Why are we crossing ecological boundaries that affect Earth’s fundamental life-supporting capacity? Is it because we don’t have enough information about how ecosystems respond to change? Or ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Matthew Crocker, PhD Student in Economics, Deakin University Here’s something for the board of the Reserve Bank of Australia to ponder as it meets next month to set interest rates. It has pushed up rates on 13 occasions since it began its ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a charity director outlines how she’s saving for retirement and buying secondhand. Want to be part of The Cost of Being? Fill out the questionnaire here.Gender: Female Age: 45 Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: Charity director, mum of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sophie Yates, Research Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University Many Australians with disability feel on the edge of a precipice right now. Recommendations from the disability royal commission and the NDIS review were released late last year. Now a ...
It’s been called a failed experiment and a judicial straightjacket but the government says the revised three strikes law will be a more workable regime, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s morning news round-up. To receive The Bulletin in full each weekday, sign up here. Three ...
New Zealand’s Palestinian community and Palestinian Youth Aotearoa are voicing alarm and disappointment with the lack of factual rigour present during the Israeli Ambassador’s appearance as a guest on TVNZ’s Q+A With Jack Tame Sunday (21/04). ...
Both ACT leader David Seymour, who played a key role in drawing up the assisted dying law, and hospice leaders say it's time the legislation was changed. ...
Public submissions on proposed gang control laws are being heard today. Rising gang membership has been cited as rationale for a crackdown – but what do we actually know about how many people belong to gangs in New Zealand?What’s all this then?A rise in the number of gang ...
Climate activists are setting their sights on an unpopular target, and hoping to bring lots of the public with them. It’s hard to miss the Majestic Princess: the enormous cruise ship, docked at Auckland’s Prince’s Wharf, looms over the nearby buildings. The ship, which can fit nearly 6,000 people, ...
Opinion: We’ve kicked the tyres on the perception NZ’s economy is in a parlous state compared to Australia. We take a quick tour of relative trends in GDP, housing markets, labour markets, trade, the fiscal situation, and the outlooks for inflation and interest rates. We find the cyclical positions of ...
Opinion: Making sure developers, local and central government, and landowners are all on the same page makes sense The post A new kind of city deal appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Thinking about the defamation case I can see how the jury reached their verdict as it were.
If you you are pretty much disengaged with politics (As many in NZ are with the possible exception of voting every three years) it’s highly likely you had never heard of Jordan Williams and only been vaguely aware of Colin Craig.
It would be very easy to decide that the massive mail out was the over response of a rich man effectively trying to destroy someone who had drawn attention to his less than ideal conduct. I suspect the jury felt it was an unfair over reaction from Craig and defamatory in that it brought Jordan Williams to the direct attention of 1.6million households calling him a liar when they vast majority would know nothing of him.
Obviously if you follow politics closely you would say that Craig had not defamed Williams based on his past behaviour the jury I imagine didn’t see it this way and decided based upon the info in the pamphlet been false.
Hard right takes out hard right.
Top result.
Outside of an enjoyable sideshow Will it make a difference? I’d imagine Conservative votes will split to Winston and the Nats…
I’d also be pretty sure the Nats will be happy to have Colin Craig out of the picture I suspect he was and irritation they will be happy to be free of.
Keeps them fighting each other. Wasting money. Not organising. Humiliating each other. All good.
Opens an opportunity for the hard right to completely relaunch and restaff their political projects in time for election year.
Hard to see any money changing hands for a good while, if any.
Yep takes out 4-5% or so of the party vote that want to vote Christian. All good.
+ 1 ad.
…actually “Hard right” takes out a conservative Colin Craig who at the time ( before the Election, which his party lost by a whisker) was wavering in his support for jonkey Nact
if I remember correctly he was questioning some of their ethics ‘Dirty Politics’ and policies and questioning whether his Party would form a coalition with Nact (but can’t find the link)
he was turning his Party from a potential coalition partner into an adversary
http://www.nbr.co.nz/article/nz-politics-daily-national%E2%80%99s-future-coalition-colin-craig%E2%80%99s-conservatives-ts-148573
Conservatives opposed to Nact selling of State Assets
http://www.newshub.co.nz/nznews/conservatives-want-mandate-for-asset-sales-2013111611
“During the campaign the party portrayed itself as able to work with either of the two main parties, National and Labour.[25]”
“opposition to sales of rural land to foreign interests[9]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Party_of_New_Zealand
( all these things would make Colin Craig and his Party an enemy of the interests of jonkey Nact…or at very least unreliable, hence the attacks by Slater…but Craig had other reservations also …the links which I can not find)
Good comments there Chooky.
…” he (Craig) was turning his Party from a potential coalition partner into an adversary (National) …”
You could have a point in that regard.
So Key/ Joyce let Williams loose (claiming he was defamed) on Craig perhaps, to intentionally tarnish his reputation and credibility?
“So Key/ Joyce let Williams loose (claiming he was defamed) on Craig perhaps, to intentionally tarnish his reputation and credibility?”
Yes of course mary_a that was the master plan all along…
You also forgot to include Racheal in this evil master plan. After all she would of had to of been in on it…to receive her orders to resign days before the election.
Rachael would probably appreciate having her name spelt correctly. How come you are on first name terms with her? Everyone else a surname, but because Rachael is a woman, you feel you have the right to use (and butcher) her first name. You dirty sexist creep. Typical redneck.
You thought I was going to criticise your deliberately using ‘of’ instead of ‘have’, didn’t you? (Assuming you are literate enough to do such a thing deliberately.)
School holidays must be torture for you mate! Don’t worry another week and you can take out all your issues on the poor students again.
“You dirty sexist creep. Typical redneck”
LOL I reckon you’re a closet banjo player In Vino!
BTW I do like Lynyard Skynyrd…does that count?
Anyhow back to the topic of conversation: do you agree with your fellow activists that the Colin Craig thing was planned by John Key (I know I used his surname, but hey John is such a common name). A master plan if you like to take Colin out???
Wrong on every count. No x 4. Should I expect better from you?
I think it’s more that they listened to all the evidence and made a decision based on that alone and were neutral politically.
A lot of people on here are rabid bias and it blinkers their judgement so much they are incapable of seeing another view.
It remains to be seen what the damage to Williams’ reputation will be. Was he always known as “taking one for the team” to get information in a pretence of intimacy?
I guess that avenue of employment might have a few more speed bumps in it now…perhaps even an enraged father or two 😈
Yeea, I can hardly see my keyboard at this point, an the costs it wont stand.
This is a big win for the Dirty Politics nest of vipers. It’s a rubber stamp by this particular court for Slater, Farrar, Williams, that mad bitch in Singapore, Eade-types, and the rest to continue their proxy attacks on behalf of the John Key government.
Be afraid
This is a big win for the Dirty Politics nest of vipers. It’s a rubber stamp by this particular court for Slater, Farrar, Williams, that mad bitch in Singapore, Eade-types, and the rest to continue their proxy attacks on behalf of the John Key government.
Be afraid.
Yes Williams is judged to have a reputation that could be harmed! Astounding really.
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/sep/30/vancouver-canada-house-prices-solution-super-heated-housing-market
first domino?
Instead of limiting foreign buyers to new builds, do you think Labour should look at adopting Key’s suggestion?
Limiting foreign buyers to new builds will still put demand pressure on land.
Apparently applying a stamp duty in NZ infringes upon our Korean FTA.
But there is always Key’s B plan.
http://m.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11628459
Some of these options sound like a 1.2L carb engine trying to pull a truck
No foreign ownership of NZ land, and a 10 year phase out period which allows existing foreign owners to sell their land to either another Kiwi citizen or the NZ government, and to get it back if desired on a 25 year lease.
“Some of these options sound like a 1.2L carb engine trying to pull a truck “
An excessively punitive land tax on foreign owners would achieve your goal.
Leasing land still puts demand on land supply.
You want to ban foreign leasing and renting of NZ property as well as banning of ownership?
No. But we can’t be complacent. A form of oversight is required to ensure it doesn’t become problematic.
Yes.
Foreign people having control of our land does nothing for us.
+100 DTB
@draco
Agree
+1 CV – and don’t forget with rising sea levels and weather disruption there is going to be less and less options. So selling our land, assets, farms and property off cheap now – what’s going to happen when there’s major disruption… We need to be like much of Asia and ban foreign ownership of all of the above.
BTW any mention of climate change disruption in our unitary plan???
It’s not mentioned in TPP.
So essentially politicians are just blocking their ears and shaking their heads on forward planning.
Basically your analysis is spot on. On Climate Change politicians are still playing their bullshit games of we have two, three, four decades to slash emissions.
In reality we ran out of time in the 1990s but morally we have to make the biggest effort possible right here right now.
Which means putting the knife to capitalism and to consumerism.
That article is from April….6 months later house prices have continued to rocket yet Key still sits on his hands. Meanwhile the whole nation except John Key knows that it is overseas buyers pushing up prices. What a dumb position National is taking.
Some say the high cost of housing will be National’s downfall.
Back in the land of reality to correct your statement, everyone knows oversea’s buyers are only PART of the problem. Quite frankly actual foreign investment would be minor compared to the influx of migrants needing to buy new homes on arrival, they are not foreign they are new residents.
the difference with resident migrants however is the fact their income (and consequently their ability to service) is likely to be local….there is much less likely to be such a disconnect from the real economy.
With Key’s B plan, shows that foreign ownership is an election issue that National are losing and so they are trying to hedge.
Hope Labour stick with their no foreign sales which is pretty easy to communicate rather than some sort of complicated policy that involves more taxes that might hit Kiwis.
Why do you support Labour limiting offshore investors to only buying new builds over a tax that could potentially (depending on how high it was set) deter them altogether?
Labour’s position (limiting offshore investors to only buying new builds) still puts international demand pressure on local land supply, thus driving up the cost of land, hence adding to the overall cost of housing. Which defeats the objective.
@ Chairman – sorry too late to edit. I don’t support Labour’s current policy of new builds only to foreign speculators. I support a total ban. New builds will not work to deter, as foreign investors love new builds, – see Guardian article.
The other issue is that the existing stock of Auckland has already been plundered by foreign speculation so it’s too late for that one. In Auckland a few years ago you could get a freehold bungalow in West Auckland for $350,000 or Helensville for $250,000 – now you are looking $700,000 plus.
Now politicians are rushing around saying that a small $500,000 apartment with Body corp and unsuitable for a family, is affordable and developers are our best friend and relax regulation. We already have a problem with shoddy developments from the 90’s.
I noticed Labour (or is it the media?) often tout Labour’s new build only policy as a ban on foreign investment, which I believe is misleading and could be seen as an appeal to the ignorant.
Keys plan B (or idle musing) ….It may, but as always the devil would be in the detail.
I wonder about the statement a stamp duty would breach the NZ Korea FTA given Australia have applied an additional non resident duty and they negotiated their FTA with Korea approx 12 months earlier. I also note the requirement is equal treatment.
One thing is certain it is a situation that cannot long continue for both economic and political reasons, and the capital flight when it ends will be a tad problematic.
If it does breach the FTA give the affected parties 90 days notice before implementing, invite a new round of trade discussions to be scheduled, then proceed to breach the FTA.
believe it is 6 months but there is provision to legislate in the interest of public welfare in any event
Thanks Pat, go with 6 months then. NZ is a country which values proper diplomatic processes.
I agree that proceeding to breach a FTA could be a sensible plan, depending on the terms that are being breached etc.
It would put us at significant disadvantage for negotiating future deals, though.
“If it does breach the FTA give the affected parties 90 days notice before implementing, invite a new round of trade discussions to be scheduled, then proceed to breach the FTA.”
There is no need too. A land tax can be just as effective.
I don’t understand how a land tax is going to be effective against foreign buyers with endless hard currency funds on tap.
Really?
It’s rather simple. It can be used to price them out of the market.
How do you price out people who buy $1.5M Auckland properties in cash?
By making their investment unfeasible, hence they’ll leave to seek better returns elsewhere.
Indeed re the devil would be in the details.
Nonetheless, on the face of it, Key’s B plan would be more effective. Labour’s suggestion in this regard has a massive flaw.
As the tax rate can be adjusted to suit, it allows for more scope to control the correction, thus the capital flight.
except that Key has no intention in implementing his plan B, whereas the Labour package (and it must be viewed in total) would have an impact, how quickly and how much is open to debate.
Am unconvinced of the flexibility of a land tax to control any capital flight…..by its nature it is uncontrolled.
Adopting Key’s B plan would improve Labour’s package.
Moreover, one should never underestimate Key. If their internal polling suggests to them that the B plan is required, he could quickly put it in place.
It should be clear to you that the higher a land tax, the more unfeasible it becomes to invest, hence the more it will deter investors, thus encourage capital flight. Reducing the tax will help reduce the capital flight. Thus, the flexibility results in giving some control.
@ The Chairman
A proposed land tax could lose labour the election if it backfires and starts to scare off homeowners. Lose lose.
Key is probably hoping Labour does it too, and then back track once Labour starts publicising their policy.
Not if said land tax was only aimed at foreign investors.
It wouldn’t be difficult to exempt NZ citizens/homeowners. And as they will be exempt, they would have little to fear.
Moreover, Key has already planted the seed, laying down good reasoning for it. Therefore, it would be difficult for him to now argue against that reasoning.
At best, all Key could do is argue it isn’t required, which is what he’ll most likely do when it comes to Labour’s new build only policy.
Another aspect that is beneficial to a land tax over Labour’s new build only policy is a land tax will help cover the infrastructure cost burden that comes with building new homes.
‘It should be clear to you that the higher a land tax, the more unfeasible it becomes to invest, hence the more it will deter investors, thus encourage capital flight. Reducing the tax will help reduce the capital flight. Thus, the flexibility results in giving some control.”
lol…the theory is simplistic enough,however i think you will discover that the effect will not be so in practice
Of course other variables may come into play. Nevertheless, that doesn’t discount the fact that the flexibility of a tax gives us some level of control.
Ah, but the real question is: Should we be concerned with foreign money leaving our shores?
And the answer to that is No! In fact, as far as I can make out, we’d be far better off with it all gone. After all, we don’t actually foreign money to utilise our own resources. Our own government created money would work fine.
“But the real question is: Should we be concerned with foreign money leaving our shores?”
No we shouldn’t. However, with the lie (NZ needs foreign investment) being perpetuated all these years, some will disagree.
Then we need to counter that lie and not continue supporting it.
as always it is a question of degree….foreign investment may or may not be required/desirable depending of what level of trade and growth you desire…..thats when the arguments start
Growth isn’t dependent upon trade no matter how much the idiotic economist, RWNJs and politicians think it is. Growth is dependent upon increasing population.
Development is actually dependent upon the country being willing to spend the resources in supporting R&D.
The only thing that trade really supplies is the ability to get products before we can produce them ourselves fro our own resources.
“Growth isn’t dependent upon trade no matter how much the idiotic economist, RWNJs and politicians think it is. Growth is dependent upon increasing population.”
Almost, growth is dependent on demand…that demand can be as a result of population increase or other means, i.e. exports.
As to trade , this is a debate we’ve had before and I suspect we are unlikely to agree.
In any case Im still of the opinion that we need a model that operates with negative growth and am still looking.
The reason why growth is currently dependent upon trade is largely due to our debt based money supply.
While the principal is borrowed into the economy, the principal has to be repaid with interest incurred, which leaves the economy with a fiscal shortfall. Hence, the need to source and grow export revenue.
Foreign investment largely robs our economy of the benefits from trade and growth.
The more profitable a foreign owned investment is, the more money it tends to send offshore.
It’s often touted that jobs will be created, money will be spent locally and taxes will be paid. However, those benefits would eventuate regardless if assets were offshore owned or not.
It’s also often touted that we require the offshore funding to make it all happen, however there are alternatives to that.
Albeit, I concur, the level of degree plays a role in the scale of the negative impact.
@pat
The exports simulate increased local population.
If we only supplied our local community then increasing productivity results in decreasing work/jobs in current industries. This frees up people to work in other industries especially in the R&D of those other industries.
All this means that we could have a developing economy without an increasing population.
Full recycling would mean that resource extraction could be minimised. This combined with a stable population level means that we could actually live sustainably.
There is no/very little trade between nations in this model.
@The Chairman
Yes which is why I’ve been advocation a full sovereign monetary system:
Real Monetary Reform
Cashless
“if we only supplied our local community then increasing productivity results in decreasing work/jobs in current industries. This frees up people to work in other industries especially in the R&D of those other industries.”
It may, Keynes predicted it, however society appears unwilling to allow reduced labour and instead pursues increased consumption, usually of useless or throw away items and the misuse of resources.
however the economy needs to be considered in total and trade will remain instrumental to that, the problem that remains is the function of interest….and if I was being really negative (as I have been described) then it doesn’t matter as we will have no functioning economy in the not too distant future.
Is that due to society or due to the oligarch’s that actually rule? The ones that don’t want us to have time or resources to rule ourselves.
IT’s not a lie that NZ needs foreign investment, it’s the type and target of that finance, it’s certainly not housing speculation.
But it is a lie. There are other funding alternatives.
Moreover, over the long-term investors generally seek to receive far more than they initially invest. Which may be good for them but it’s not for our economy overall.
It’s not something we need more of.
under the current system we do indeed need foreign investment, the question is whether we wish to be part of the current system…and if we don’t are we willing to accept what that means?
Even with limiting our perspective to the current system there are still alternatives.
And some would even question if funding is the problem.
Take the sharemarket for example. One could argue there is a shortage of listings rather a shortage of funding.
NZ has been encouraging offshore investment for decades and this (link below) is the result thus far.
http://www.rbnz.govt.nz/statistics/key-graphs/key-graph-current-account
Why?
Even under the current system we don’t need foreign investment. Even a lot of the basic research necessary to develop our economy is freely available because the US Fed funded research is publicly available even when it’s been done by a private company as that happens to be part of the conditions for getting the money.
So, why do we need foreign investment?
“Take the sharemarket for example. One could argue there is a shortage of listings rather a shortage of funding.”
please do…..but seriously, assume you are referring to the propensity to bubble…a direct result of current monetary policy, an inflationary surplus of CB created funds looking for a home (return)…..the number of listings is irrelevant.
like any economy if you increase money supply without increasing resource you have inflation, it was ever so and ever will be
When it comes to the NZ sharemarket, the domestic funding is there, it’s the lack of listings that is problematic.
New listings are far and few between, indicating businesses aren’t exactly queuing up for the money. And large local funds such as KiwiSaver funds, ACC and NZ Super find it difficult identifying suitable domestic investments.
Therefore, funding isn’t the problem, it’s more about NZ’s lack of suitable domestic investments.
As you know, NZ businesses are largely made up of SMEs. Moreover, only a small percentage of them export.
And there are numerous reasons for this, but funding isn’t the main concern.
As shown in the current account link, NZ offshore returns are failing to offset the returns offshore investors take out of our economy.
Therefore, encouraging more offshore investment will only make it more difficult for us to get back into surplus. And you are arguing we need more of this? We need to own our own future.
Despite all the neo-liberal reforms we’ve endured over the years, we haven’t had a current account surplus since the 70’s.
Ok, can you explain to everyone why we need foreign money, which is created ex nihilo just like ours, to utilise our own resources?
Why would we need foreign cash when we could just create the money that we need?
“Why would we need foreign cash when we could just create the money that we need?”
and there you have it…under the current system if you finance your debt (we currently have around260 billion in external debt) through gov issue you debase the currency to the point of toilet paper…..you can create credit for actions that increase value/return, those actions are relatively limited…or don’t you recognise hyperinflation?there have been numerous examples
I am well aware you advocate a government money tree economy and you are equally aware of my opinion of that, especially if you wish to continue cross boarder trade.
No you won’t. That’s just another lie by the rich because they need the world to believe that we need them when we actually don’t.
If simply creating money debased it then it wouldn’t have any value as it’s created all the time. Billions per year just in NZ. The US and other large economies create proportionately larger amounts.
Of course I do. The difference between me and you is that I recognise that it was the private banks creating money that caused the hyper-inflation.
And there are even more examples of government created money causing prosperity while private control of the money system causes poverty.
Personally, I’m in favour of prosperity for everyone and not just the banksters.
sorry DTB…it is simple maths….resource in ratio to money supply.
Show me a constituency (and subsequently a politician) that will not demand and receive increased funding WITHOUT the required increased resource…..and that is in a closed economy, the impact is multiplied when you factor in cross boarder trade.
It has been shown to be true time and time again, what makes you think it will be different in your case?
That’s not simple maths. That’s making up excuses to keep the same failed system we have now.
Actually, it hasn’t. The exact opposite has. The exact opposite is the system we have now.
http://www.businessinsider.com.au/worst-hyperinflation-episodes-in-history-2013-9?r=US&IR=T#china-october-1947-may-1949-6
I guess Germany, Zimbabwe et al imagined it then
You’re being utterly ridiculous Pat.
I have no idea why you keep hewing to the orthodox neoliberal view of monetary policy, but it’s a whole lot of stupid.
NZ M3 aggregate money supply has roughly doubled between 2006 and 2016.
Can you demonstrate to me where/how we have doubled our access to resources?
And if you can’t, can you explain to me why NZ is not currently in a period of hyperinflation?
“NZ M3 aggregate money supply has roughly doubled between 2006 and 2016.
Can you demonstrate to me where/how we have doubled our access to resources?
And if you can’t, can you explain to me why NZ is not currently in a period of hyperinflation?”
Ill take you at your word M3 has doubled in that time ….whats the average house price in Auckland at the moment?
“I have no idea why you keep hewing to the orthodox neoliberal view of monetary policy, but it’s a whole lot of stupid.’
except its not neoliberal economics….its simply the foundation of all economic theory of all orders, you don’t appear to grasp that simple fact
there is no advantage knowing all the terms CV if you don’t understand how the pieces fit together
I mean, fuck it, there is a clear scarcity of money in the bottom 50% of society, and here you are going on about how having too large a money supply is a real problem.
Meanwhile, I notice that we have just had another ‘European Prestige’ type new car showroom open up in Dunedin.
So some parts of our society seem to be having much easier and voluminous access to the money supply than others.
Yet no one is talking about restricting the access of the wealthy and the privileged to money due to fears of hyperinflation.
Bullshit.
Keynes did not subscribe to this model of monetary theory, nor did Irving Fisher, who understood that private debt created private money independent of the actions of government.
And I’ll be very surprised if you can demonstrate that Marxian economics subscribes to this model of monetary theory.
In other words, your statement that this is the “foundation of all economic theory of all orders” is full of shit to overflowing and I wonder why you are lying your head off.
http://inflationmatters.com/keynesian-inflation-theory/
“This analysis shows that Keynes’s theory does explain the majority of the inflation spikes witnessed in the UK since the 1940s. Some are demand-pull factors e.g. war shortages and increases in the money supply. However cost-push factors have been particularly important i.e. increases in the price of oil, sterling devaluations (which have increased the prices of our imports) and tax rises.”
http://www.worldsocialism.org/spgb/education/study-guides/marxian-theory-inflation
“The number of pieces of paper is thus determined by the quantity of gold currency which they represent in circulation, and as they are tokens of value only in so far as they take the place of gold currency, their value is simply determined by their quantity, Whereas, therefore, the quantity of gold in circulation depends on the prices of commodities, the value of the paper in circulation, on the other hand, depends solely on its own quantity” (Critique of Political Economy, p.119. Marx’s emphasis).
the point of difference amongst all economic schools is not the impact of increased money supply rather the when who and how of its implementation.
German hyper-inflation was caused by the private banks and speculators using the system that we have now – the private banks creating money.
Zimbabwe is the case of a bunch of psychopathic, greedy loons being in charge.
All the other times, and there’ve been several, were a case of stable government doing it right and there not being any hyper-inflation. An estimate that I read several years ago was that between 50% and 80% of inflation was due to the private banks creating money. It’s most definitely the cause of housing prices going up at massive rates.
But that’s not a fact. In fact, it’s pure delusion. There are other monetary systems, ones that actually work, and our present system isn’t economic. If it was we wouldn’t have private cars for starters.
Yes, excessive amounts of money creation without a corresponding money destruction causes hyper-inflation. It’s what drives inflation today – the private banks creating too much money.
both Zimbabwe and Germany had first suffered massive destruction of industries and productive capabilities which were key factors setting up the hyperinflation.
you’re labouring under a misapprehension again I’m afraid DTB….the German Gov printed the dosh….
“The government’s strategy backfired when Germany lost the war. The new Weimar Republic was now saddled with a massive war debt that it could not afford, made even worse by the fact that it was printing money without the economic resources to back it up.[3] The Treaty of Versailles further accelerated the decline in the value of the mark, such that 48 paper marks were required to buy one US dollar by late 1919.[5]”
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperinflation_in_the_Weimar_Republic
and its extraordinary the number of psychopathic loons that end running (ruining) countries….in any case whoever or whenever the results are the same and wishing won’t change how humans interact with money.
@CV
was that the wrong Marx?…..perhaps you meant Chico?
those theories do not describe the hyperinflationary incidents of Germany nor Zimbabwe where the destruction and confiscation of productive and industrial capacity was central.
Anyway, fuck this, I’m uninterested in the TINA crowd who are simply looking for excuses to keep directing massive flows of new money to the top 0.1%, then pretending that has to be the way it needs to be, because “hyperinflation.”
The Weimar Hyperinflation? Could it Happen Again?
Germany’s 1923 Hyperinflation:
A “Private” Affair
In other words, the banking system as we know it today with the same solution now as then – to take that power to create money away from them and place it solely in the hands of the government under strict rules.
And, of course, doing something about the speculators.
The reasons for the hyperinflation and the high inflation of today is to curtail the ability of the private banks to create money and tax speculators out of existence. The exact opposite if what you’ve been told your entire life. Having you and others hold onto the wrong belief is what’s getting in the way of being able to fix it.
EDIT:
The fix
@ DTB
Thanks for the link, I shall do some reading
@ CV
Toys…meet cot
US protects al-Nusra jihadists in Syria in order to keep “Plan B” regime change option open
Russian foreign minister Lavrov talks to BBC.
https://www.rt.com/news/361242-interview-lavrov-bbc-syria/
Lavrov talks as though the Syrian rebels were US clients in the way that the Assad regime is a Russian client. Lavrov can give Assad orders, but Kerry can’t give Syrian rebel groups orders, so there’s no basis for Lavrov to demand that they do. This is just spin to cover the Russian refusal to consider a cease-fire – if it comes down to peace talks, Assad has no future in Syria, unless it’s broken up, so defeating the rebels militarily and teaching the locals the usual lesson is Russia’s only way forward. I’m surprised they agreed to the earlier cease-fire.
I agree that the level of positive control that the US has over these Jihadists is poor.
However it is also not zero.
The airstrike that the US conducted against the Syrian Government military base in eastern Syria appeared to well co-ordinated with Islamist forces on the ground who launched their offensive within 10 minutes of the bombing ending.
The funding of the ‘White Helmets’ doesn’t indicate a poor level of control/influence. Oh – and then we get the ‘White Helmets’ being nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize – couldn’t make it up if you tried.
Yep agree, and I only became aware of the “White Helmets” recently.
And that they operate only in Jihadist held territory, and in at least some cases seem to be the very same Jihadists who don fluoro vests and white safety helmets pretending to be civil defence volunteers.
They seem to have very slick well funded corporate PR, too.
The White Helmets get direct government funding from the UK and US among others as well as from the George Soros foundation. Some estimates put the funding as high as $200 million.
http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/09/30/we-saved-60000-bogus-claim-by-syrias-white-helmets-raises-even-more-questions/
A petition on ‘change.org’ seeking support against them receiving a nobel peace prize was, according to those who set the page up, shut down by the site admin.
Meanwhile, nothing but glowing reports for them in the western ‘liberal’ media. (Google ‘white helmets’ and puke)
The funding of the ‘White Helmets’ doesn’t indicate a poor level of control/influence.
Exactly what level of control/influence do you imagine helping fund the White Helmets gives the US over them, let alone over rebel paramilitary forces?
Given that the White Helmets are allegedly ’embedded’ with, and may actually be an integral part of, the mercenary groupings – I’d punt at ‘quite a lot’.
Why? Further down, you linked to an interview on YouTube in which an Al Nusra commander declares that most of their money comes from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, that they’ve made good use of US TOW missiles but otherwise had little support from the US, and that they don’t take orders from the US. That sound to me like the US has fuck-all influence over these guys.
So, nothing from you on the White Helmets. And a dodgy interpretation of a linked interview. Good-oh.
Something from me on the White Helmets:
I have a book called “Feuersturm ueber Hamburg,” written by the head of the fire service in Hamburg during WW2. It covers the fire services’ attempts to deal with air raids, including the firestorm raids in 1943 that killed 43,000 civilians in a couple of days. It’s riveting stuff, detailing awesome bravery and heroic efforts to save civilian life, by a guy who was working for the Nazis and who probably assisted with no end of Nazi propaganda stories inbetween trying to deal with the carnage.
The fact is, in wartime you can be working under very bad people and still be heroically providing emergency services under impossible circumstances and at great risk to your own life. I expect this applies as much to the emergency workers in regime-held areas as it does to the White Helmets.
Lavrov talks as though the Syrian rebels were US clients in the way that the Assad regime is a Russian client
Well the state department use of veiled threats against russian cities suggest maybe they are.
The consequences are that the civil war will continue in Syria, that extremists and extremists groups will continue to exploit the vacuums that are there in Syria to expand their operations, which will include, no question, attacks against Russian interests, perhaps even Russian cities, and Russia will continue to send troops home in body bags, and they will continue to lose resources – even, perhaps, more aircraft. The stability that they claim they seek in Syria will be ever more elusive, and it’s hard to imagine how a continued war – not just a civil war now, but increasingly more violent extremist activity in Syria – can be in the interest of a nation that says, that claims, and has claimed publicly time and time again that what they want to see is a whole, unified, pluralistic Syria and a stable Syria, a secure Syria, a Syria where they want to continue to have a defense relationship and a presence. So that’s what’s in it for them.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2016/09/262560.htm
Or the temerity of Assad and the syrian government for wanting to conquer syrian Territory as accused by samantha power at the SC.
It’s an indication of the level of delusion leftist authoritarians are bringing to this subject that you see “veiled threats against Russian ciities” in that.
Would you read the above as being explicitly threatening to the USA, or do you think it is a completely neutral statement.
Well, you’re the guy who’s spent years saying every terrorist attack against westerners is a direct consequence of “the West” bombing Muslim countries. Were you making “veiled threats against western cities” by pointing that out?
So you thought the paragraph above was neutral in character and not in any way threatening to the USA?
Like I said, I thought the paragraph sounded like the kind of thing you write on this blog all the time. Certainly not neutral, but certainly not threatening anyone either.
Well I’m just some troll on the internet; the US State Dept.has more weight than what I say
Sadly CV, not many are interested in anything that questions the official narrative.
This comprehensive report from the US Peace Council that was given at UN HQ in New York was attended by less than a dozen journalists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yc-RmAVK8Pg
And this interview by Jürgen Todenhöfer has dropped quietly under almost every radar
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8K6zqSTSp6g
In contrast to Syria or Assad, the President of the Philippines casually compares himself to Hitler, sanctions the indiscriminate murder of drug users and drug dealers and there’s nothing much of anything in reaction. Which has nothing to do with the Philippines being strategically positioned in a ‘necklace’ that runs through the South China Sea of course.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/sep/30/rodrigo-duterte-vows-to-kill-3-million-drug-addicts-and-likens-himself-to-hitler
Thanks for the US Peace Council link, Bill. Watching it now.
In contrast to Syria or Assad, the President of the Philippines casually compares himself to Hitler, sanctions the indiscriminate murder of drug users and drug dealers and there’s nothing much of anything in reaction.
I expect not. Even if Assad weren’t currently engaged in a huge, Russian-assisted campaign of mass murder against his own people, you only need to read a bit of Robert Fisk’s work to realise why comparisons between Assad and Duterte are ludicrous – Duterte’s a minor annoyance to his citizenry compared to Assad.
Putting aside the fact you’re merely echoing the dominant western narrative about Syria (eg – no mention of the sanctions that are on a par with those imposed on Iraq; no explanation offered as to why Assad, elected in monitored elections to a parliament that has an active opposition, would be at war with his own people etc)…going by your take on Duterte, I guess you’d have said that Indonesia’s Suharto was also ‘a minor annoyance to his citizenry’?
Saddam Hussein used to get re-elected every time, too. It’s not a “western narrative,” it’s “being able to recognise a murderous dictator when you’re reading about one.”
Maybe Duterte will make it up to Suharto or Assad’s level on the “murderous dictator” scale if he’s left to it for long enough. If he does, and the people of the Philippines rise up against him, can we assume based on current form that you’ll staunchly support the ruthless murder and torture needed to put him back in charge again?
Oh dear how did you get this gullible?
Where did you get your experience in “recognising murderous dictators”?
From MSM stories where they pretty much brand the West’s persona non grata of the month with “Murderous Dictator” on his forehead?
BTW what gives the Imperial Colonial West the right to start illegally funding head chopping regime changing insurgents and carrying out act of war airstrikes on foreign nations?
Gullible in what way? The most you can say for Bashir al Assad is that he’s less cruel than his predecessor, his father Hafez al Assad (democracy in action!). The basis of their power has been common knowledge and written about extensively for decades by all kinds of journalists (and if you consider Robert Fisk a promoter of the “Imperial Colonial West” you’re even more deluded than I thought).
As to what gives the “Imperial Colonial West” the right to fund insurgency in Syria: Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Qatar aren’t part of “the West” by any stretch of the imagination. Also: what gives Russia and Iran any more right to interfere in a Syrian civil war than Turkey and the Gulf states? It would be nice if foreigners had kept out of this conflict, but if they had Assad would have been dangling by his heels from a lamppost years ago. Foreign involvement’s what’s keeping your boy in power, so you should be happy with it, right?
Well, not that it would make a difference to an Imperial Colonialist Westerner like yourself, but Russia and Iran were invited by the democratically elected government of Syria to help defend the country against Islamic extremists illegally armed and funded by the west.
And please include Turkey. Everyone knows that these are Islamic client states of the US, all of which host US military personnel on a permanent basis, all of which get access to billions of dollars of US armaments, and all of which are assisting the US in its regime change efforts in Syria for their own reasons.
Unlike you, I know something of the Gulf states. Assad is a “client” of Russia because, without them, he’d be filled with holes by citizens of his country, so he has to do what they want. The leaders of Turkey, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, for all their unpleasant characteristics, aren’t in that situation. Those countries are interfering in the Syrian civil war in support of the rebels because it’s in their interests to do so – Russia and Iran are interfering in support of the regime because likewise. If you want to see good guys vs bad guys in there, no-one can stop you, but do try and keep it to yourself.
I guess the fact that all these US client states i.e. vassal states are armed to the teeth by the US itself, the same US which also turns a blind eye to their daily human rights abuses (imagine the US agreeing to sell another US$1.1B worth of weapons to Saudi Arabia as the Saudis continue to pound the towns and cities of their tiny, poor neighbour Yemen into dust).
” Those countries are interfering in the Syrian civil war in support of the rebels because it’s in their interests to do so – Russia and Iran are interfering in support of the regime because likewise.”
I’m glad you have now recognised the illegal and arrogant acts of aggression that these US client states have been carrying out against the people of the sovereign nation of Syria for five years now, all with the diplomatic and military cover of the US.
One small difference: Russia and Iran are operating in Syria legally, at the request of the democratically elected and popular secular government of Syria.
The US, and the vassal states of the US, are all operating in Syria illegally.
Russia and Iran are protecting a client who now couldn’t last a year in power without their protection, because his own subjects would string him up if given the chance. And they’re doing it to further their own interests, not because there’s some inherent good to be derived from it. Spin it how you like, it’s the same game Turkey and the Gulf states are playing, just with pompous bullshit about “legal,” “popular”and “secular,”all of which should come with a /sarc tag when applied to the Assad regime.
Assad remains highly popular in Syria. Especially compared to the head chopper Islamic extremists.
And that’s why ISIS/al-Nusra and the 100 flavours of Jihadists that the USA and her allies support, need to keep importing foreign fighters to fulfill their illegal regime change dreams.
Because Syrians as a whole are against regime change.
It’s also why the US has always resisted the call for a political settlement with popular elections where Assad can be a candidate.
Because Assad would be returned to office in a landslide.
That’s pretty funny. He’d have finished all that breathing he’s been doing back in 2012 if the Russians and Iranians hadn’t stepped in to protect their investment. I hope I never have that level of “popularity” myself.
Uh, the Russians and the Iranians didn’t directly intervene in the conflict until 2015
Also, between 100,000 to 200,000 Syrian Government soldiers have lost their lives fighting against the foreign funded jihadists, and stayed loyal to the legitimate authority in Damascus.
“Directly” being the operative word. The US has hardly had any “direct” involvement in the conflict at all, if you want to make that the yardstick.
Bottom line: if the population’s risen up against you and there’s a vicious civil war going on, your government isn’t “popular.”
If and when you ever arrive at a state that would allow for you to entertain honest, reasoned debate that might actually go somewhere, get back to me.
I can’t be bothered with the mal-engagement that results from the skittery, disjointed hop-scotching that you indulge in.
If, by “skittery, disjointed hop-skotching” you mean “disputing your claims,” guilty as charged. No obligation to respond is implied.
That you believe the words you post constitute ‘disputing claims’, paints an unneeded picture of the bottom feeder you sell yourself as
Have a word with yourself
I’ve no problem with disagreement Psycho Milt. But you only seem to be capable of jumping on a soapbox to shout “White!” if you think “Black” might be being proposed or, alternatively, to exclaim “Over there!” instead of engaging.
The original comment offered a first hand interview and a report from the US Peace Council. It then juxtaposed the western approach to Assad with their approach to Duterte.
As for “disputing your claims”, the claims I made in the original comment were.
1. It seems most people are comfortable to accept the official narrative with regards Syria.
2. Less than a dozen journalists turned up to the US Peace Council’s presser.
3. Jürgen Todenhöfer’s interview and its contents has received next to no coverage.
4. The reaction to Duterte has been muted in spite of him self demonizing.
You disputed precisely zero of those claims in the four or five responses you made below that comment.
Not so. First, I disputed your implied argument that the relative lack of interest in Duterte vs Assad represents hypocrisy.
Next, I disputed your response that I’m peddling a “western narrative”and that I must presumably also regard Suharto’s dictatorship as being of relative unimportance.
My other comments point out Colonial Viper’s chronic Putin/Assad sycophancy – that’s in the nature of a blog comments thread. I didn’t have anything to say about the US Peace Council interview because they’re as entitled to their opinions as anyone else. Although, having said that, they were in Syria as guests of the regime and gave their interview at an event organised by the regime, so their opinion shouldn’t be taken as impartial.
Fuck off mate as if you can even spell “impartial” without choking
Man walks into Apple Store and destroys every iPhone in sight.
There is a kind of anti-religious symbolism to this event.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-30/project-mayhem-man-calmly-enters-apple-store-and-crushes-every-iphone-sight-ball-bea
Interesting vid in need of a translator.
Article reporting, wtf?
Apparently…
00:21: Ta gueule!!! -> Shut up!!!
00:23: Ils violent mes droits -> They violate my rights
00:32: C’est bon? -> Are you finished?
00:34: Mesdames et messieus, Apple est une société qui viole les droits du consommateur -> Ladies and gentlemen, Apple is a firm that violates the rights of the consumer.
00:38: D’accord? -> Understand? / Right? / You acknowledge?
00:39: Merci m’sieur! -> Thank you Sir!
00:40: Donc effectivement ils violent mes droits, ils refusent de me rembourser conformément à la loi Européenne du consommateur -> Indeed they violate my rights, they refuse to reimburse me in accordance with the European consumer law
00:45: Je les ai prévenus, je leur ai dit: remboursez-moi mon oseille et ils ont dit non. -> I notified them, I told them: give me back my dough and they said no.
00:49: Qu’est-ce qui se passe? *PAF* Voilà ce qui se passe. -> What happens then? *WHAM* Here’s what happens.
00:56: (spectateur) Ca va, c’est fini maintenant… (monsieur pétanque) Ta gueule! -> (onlooker) OK, you’re done now… (mister petanque) Shut up!
00:59: (spectateur) Tu m’parles pas comme ça?!? (monsieur pétanque) Ta gueule. Non mais tu crois (inaudible: qu’t’es qui pour faire) ta loi mec? -> (onlooker) You don’t say?!? (mister petanque) Shut up. Who do you think (inaudible: you are to to lay down) the law man?
The rest is less audible but of the same tone.
On the back of the security guy: “Toison d’Or” -> “the Golden Fleece”
P.S. Glad to help you biftecks (I bet you can find a translation for this one)
ta. Ok, so nothing to see here really. The media coverage will most likely be fucked up.
“No foreign ownership of NZ land, and a 10 year phase out period which allows existing foreign owners to sell their land to either another Kiwi citizen or the NZ government, and to get it back if desired on a 25 year lease”
Can you imagine the outrage when Australia for example matches that stupid policy
and tells all Kiwi’s living there they have to sell there homes because they can no longer own property, ridiculous.
What’s the issue you are bitching about? Australia has a problem with Chinese buying up all their prime property too.
If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them.
London mayor launches unprecedented inquiry into foreign property ownership
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2016/sep/29/london-mayor-sadiq-khan-inquiry-foreign-property-ownership?utm_source=esp&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=GU+Today+main+NEW+H+categories&utm_term=192674&subid=13842748&CMP=EMCNEWEML6619I2
Nor does the New Zealand government….
“If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them”
You have answered your own question. That it would make Kiwi’s think that the Australian government dont give a shit about them.
Anyone with enough brains to own their home wont be happy about selling it and leasing it back.
Smart people dont want to give up tax free capital gains and retire poor.
get your Australian citizenship if you want so much to be an Ocker
+1
What’s the issue you are bitching about? Australia has a big problem with Chinese buying up all their prime property too and making housing unaffordable for their own first home buyers.
If you are a Kiwi who owns a house in Australia, you get 10 years to sell up the land, and then you get a guaranteed 25 year lease. What’s the problem again?
And if you were a really foolish Kiwi it means that you would have a full 35 years to get Australian citizenship.
This policy would be very popular with many Australians and Kiwis will finally understand that the Australian government doesn’t give a shit about them.
Kiwis living there would have 35 years to get out of their property. What’s your issue with that.
This policy would be very popular with Australia which also has a big problem with Chinese buyers pushing up house prices unaffordably.
Maybe Kiwis there would finally understand that the Australian government only uses them, and doesn’t really care about their standing in Australian society.
They could even apply for their Australian citizenship in that time. If they really wanted.
The Australians are already telling NZers to go home and they’re not being particularly nice about it.
Time to return the favour and stop kowtowing to what others think about us and if they’d be nice to us or not. Time to start doing what’s right for NZ and not the rich.
I’m in Australia on business at the moment and my Aus colleagues here aren’t being particularly welcoming to my presence.
Use your rational knowledge of science and technology on them and prove them wrong
Na, I prefer to use them on you because you are almost always categorically and provably wrong on almost everything you say.
“Time to return the favour”
Can we send Russel Norman back?
Please. Pretty please.
From the Other side ( to the msm):
‘Increased tensions’
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/361157-russia-us-tensions-syria/
“Going from bad to even worse: The very strident and harsh rhetoric coming out of Washington and directed towards Russia is unprecedented. Bilateral relations have reached a dangerous low. What happens now?
CrossTalking with Gilbert Doctorow, Brian Becker, and Daniel McAdams.”
…and
‘Universal bogeyman’
https://www.rt.com/shows/crosstalk/357995-hillary-moscow-mainstream-media/
“Turning reality on its head. Candidate Hillary Clinton claims the woes of the world are due to a vast alt-right conspiracy – and it is run out of Moscow. The fact is Western elites are in a panic. Publics and audiences around the world are no longer convinced by the messages propagated by the corporate mainstream media.
CrossTalking with Matthew Gordon-Banks, Gilbert Doctorow, and Earl Rasmussen.”
I see a trend emerging where the MSM is now attacking NZF and Peters at every opportunity. Key knows that Peters hates him and knows NZF will go with Labour so he has ordered his troops to attack in order to lower the NZF vote from say 10% to 6%-this will go on for the next 12 months.
Witness here Audrey Young’s linkage of NZF with the Hobson’s Pledge nutters.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11720125
+100…yes Peters hates jonkey Nact…if Labour/Greens don’t get a majority then Peters will be Kingmaker
( doom for jonkey Nactional…and they know it!)
Yep, the will try and destroy Peters like they try to destroy all their opposition.
So now is the time for an informal alliance between NZ First and Labour/Greens to work out how to get the most votes.
I would love it is they formed a formal alliance. But they wont because NZF know their vote would die away should they tie themselves to Labour at this point.
IMO, the exact opposite would happen. Both Labour and NZFirsts’ vote would go up and we’d be looking at a government with an actual mandate where better than 50% of the voters actually voted for it.
“Both Labour and NZFirsts’ vote would go up”
Where will the votes come from Draco? I assume you are thinking from voters whom would of voted National?
Don’t you think there is a very good reason why Winston plays his game of not telling the public his preference in which side to support?
“In reality it’s about alignment and NZFirst is far more aligned with Labour and the Greens than they are with National.”
Does not matter…what matters is the negotiations after the election and the “policy wins” that either National or a Labour/Greens combo will give to Winston.
Yes.
No. I remember the 1996 election and how both Winston’s and Labour’s support increased when everyone thought that he was going to go with Labour. And how Winston’s then crashed after he went with National and has never recovered from that crash.
Wrong. The negotiations can only work if the two parties are in alignment to begin with. National and NZFirst simply aren’t.
I love it how you believe NZF will go with Labour and the greens when the “main” party of that alliance is only on iro 30% and National are on 45 ish.
Mate …. you’re dreaming.
You obviously don’t understand MMP and still believe the lie that National’s been spreading around that the biggest party should always win government.
In reality it’s about alignment and NZFirst is far more aligned with Labour and the Greens than they are with National.
@James 30+12+10=52%=Key playing golf in Hawaii
It’s about policies and personalities James.
I love how you just keep assuming that 10% is going with labour.
I don’t think it will.
Come 2017 one of us is going to be disappointed.
You haven’t been watching the body language. Do you really think Peters will ever forgive Key for forcing him out of parliament in 2008 with lies and rumours and the full force of the right-wing media?
No, not at all. Winston Peters hates what John key and his National government are doing, he wants them out.
@James.
Andrew Little: “Let the voters decide, but we are the party of change, the Greens are a party of change, that’s what we are committed to, lets see what the voters turn up at the parliament and if we are in a position to do so, we will talk to those interested in fundamentally changing what the story is now.. We know who those parties of change are, right now.”
“They’ve [Maori Party] shackled themselves to the National government for the last 8 years, they are as responsible as any National mp for the failure of people to get affordable houses, a decent education and all those other issues.. They’re not, right now if I think about the radar, about the parties of change, they are not on it”
Winston Peters: “We want dramatic economic and social change to regain what this country used to have to number one number 2 first world status as a world economic and social performer, we’ve lost that, and we haven’t given up hope of getting it back again”
Waatea 5th Estate – Labour vs NZ First – the fight for Maori votes
<a href="http://thedailyblog.co.nz/2016/08/30/waatea-5th-estate-labour-vs-nz-first-the-fight-for-maori-votes/
Judging by what Winston Peter’s said, quite frankly, anyone who still thinks Winston Peters will support this National government just isn’t listening.
Draco T Bastard is right.
I see a trend emerging where the MSM is now attacking NZF and Peters at every opportunity. Key knows that Peters hates him and knows NZF will go with Labour so he has ordered his troops to attack in order to lower the NZF vote from say 10% to 6%-this will go on for the next 12 months.
How would that work given that most NZF voters want Labour to lead the government? If they didn’t vote for NZF what makes you think they will vote for National?
“Witness here Audrey Young’s linkage of NZF with the Hobson’s Pledge nutters.”
What? Here’s what she said,
The one party that could get some benefit from it is Winston Peters’ New Zealand First – Brash even talked this week about passing on donations to the party.
To the undoubted delight of Hobson’s Pledge, Peters’ party delayed the third readings of a couple of three treaty settlement bills recently over a provision which gives iwi representation on two standing committee of the Taranaki District Council – not the council itself which retains ultimate control.
Both of those seem reasonable points to make about NZF.
As we might have suspected, Donald Trump
is a member of New Zealand’s wacky ACT cult. Here’s the proof….
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xkvG3g7hEJE
What ACT cult?
What ACT cult?
The loons that voted for this fellow….
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11210373
Anyone anywhere anytime.
National security analyst Ahmad Ghappour has called it “possibly the broadest expansion of extraterritorial surveillance power since the FBI’s expansion.” It’s an obscure change approved earlier this year which would essentially allow the government to hack an unlimited number of computers, anywhere in the world, with a single warrant. An edit to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, it’s more commonly referred to just as “Rule 41.”
https://medium.com/govtrack-insider/the-doj-will-hack-an-unlimited-number-of-computers-with-a-single-warrant-unless-this-bill-is-6d967d45eddf#.m8ahztgrt
back to the use of general warrants then. History (the 1700s) repeating itself.
Whatever far right weirdo the right can wheel out pre election to laugh at , we the left can do better, behold the Mallard..
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/news/article.cfm?c_id=4&objectid=11720743
fair points but I just find it timely the quack appears near the rashes appearance.
Not the two most, um, intellectually empowered of the political species.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/84836787/treasury-warned-online-schools-could-be-a-parking-space-for-kids-atrisk-of-failing
national are a mess even english can see the cools are a shit idea.
So enjoyable watching brash gets schooled by Labour MP Louisa Wall.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/tvshows/thenation/interview-don-brash-and-louisa-wall-2016100112#.V-9TVK7vot5.facebook
I won’t call him a dinosaur because they ruled the world for 200M years and wee humans have been around for 200,000 years or so – dinosaurs were successful. I will instead say that if he went away I’d be quite happy.
The National government is presiding over the worst road tolls on record. This after AD and company have attributed roading and transport infrastructure as one of the things which makes John Key such great prime minister.
Is this part of the brighter future?
Or is the increased road toll Labour’s fault?
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/314670/september-road-toll-highest-in-seven-years
Good to see Naz deal to the screeching, big-nosed, Henry spawn.*
http://www.stuff.co.nz/entertainment/celebrities/84865139/naz-khanjani-shows-she-has-a-nasty-side-in-the-boxing-ring-with-impressive-win-on-debut
* this is how Henry himself would be happy describing anyone else he sought to demean for the purposes of entertainment.
It says that both fighters were in great shape but I see fat upper arms on Bella Henry in the image in this article…
http://www.newshub.co.nz/sport/naz-khanjani-wins-fight-against-bella-henry-2016100120
/Paul Henry mode
And what was with Phil Goff stealing the ring announcer’s microphone to introduce Parker, then the ring announcer did the real job straight after… I wonder how much Goff paid for that?? You could hear the audience’s collective sighs as Phil started talking. Also Ms Collins was there and had front row seats for the fight. Money not an issue there either.
Apropos the tuff about the housing situation, Auckland and Key’s “plan B”:
How many electorates in Auckland are likely to change from National to someone else?
How many party votes are going to have to change in Auckland from National to other parties for Key to not be Prime Minister?
unless Labour nationwide adds at least 100,000 votes to its 2014 total of 605,000 votes, it has zero chance of being a participant in the next government.
The required number may be as high as 200,000 votes, depending on turnout.
Some light reading before bed 🙂
“A new paper just published in Annalen der Physik — which published Albert Einstein’s theories of special and general relativity — Dmitry Podolsky, a theoretical physicist now working on aging at Harvard University, and I explain how the arrow of time ‒ indeed time itself ‒ is directly related to the nature of the observer (that is, us).
Our paper shows that time doesn’t just exist “out there” ticking away from past to future, but rather is an emergent property that depends on the observer’s ability to preserve information about experienced events.”
http://www.astronomy.com/news/2016/09/the-arrow-of-time-its-all-in-our-heads
Nice find; ancient cultures and traditions understood and used this some time ago.
Indeed many indigenous cultures today have a wider view of time, ancestors, past events and so on.
Just to change the subject entirely.
Anyone noticed the Australian PMs diatribe against renewable power as being the cause of the recent state-wide South Australian power blackout?
The fact that there were 80,000 lightning strikes in South Australia that day and that at least 20 major power pylons were blown down doesn’t seem to have entered the plonker’s brain. Since about 50% of South Australia’s electrical generation now comes from wind turbines and there obviously was a bit of wind that day, I would suspect there was no problem with generation, merely a problem of no network to carry the electricity around.
Instead of blaming renewables for the problem he should be looking at hardening the South Australian grid – retrofitting power pylons to stand up to wind and fitting earth wires about electricity distribution lines to act as lightning conductors. To assure the lights stay on on with the present grid – both in Australia and in New Zealand – every house needs a solar panel and battery back-up. Now that would be really effective renewables.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/rugby/news/article.cfm?c_id=80&objectid=11720015
This articles investigates an academic study into rugby coaching in NZ saying that coaches here focus on technical aspects and neglect character development.
Much to do with our binge-drinking, and violent youth?