Thanks TRP. Yesterday’s open Mike was very popular – now up to over 270 comments, so anything new there would have got lost.
I wanted to post this slightly lighthearted article by David Slack, as a good read for a Sunday morning for those of us who cannot turn off politics despite being summer.
Too bland. He’d probably defend that by saying `yeah, but the dude is actually bland, so my take has to reflect that’. Fair enough!
“I was put next to him at a lunch last month and greeted him with a warm handshake and the exact same words I use in the column: “Gidday, poor old Simon.” We chatted amiably for a good long while about our prospects in the respective cruel worlds of politics and media. He’s a good sport, poor old Simon.”
Hang on, the dude is not poor and he’s not old. Professional journalism is meant to be based on accuracy. Not misrepresentation. And he got it wrong twice in a row. If I was rich young Simon, I’d take the bugger to the press council on a formal complaint. Headlines are always good. I would demand accuracy in the media. Winston would fume.
You did, true, and I’m actually a fan of the guy & appreciate his stuff most of the time. Just felt the need to bitch at him a little for being shallow. I take the point he may well have done it to suit the SST average reader.. 🙂
…you don’t expect depth from the Sunday Star Times do you?
We did get it once many moons ago – a lot of good in-depth articles. The trouble was, nobody was buying it because people don’t want to be educated and informed. They prefer to be entertained by substance-less mish-mash. Its still better that the HoS rag.
I agree with you vv, David Slack socks it to them – usually in a wry, sly way – but he chooses to carefully select his topics and when he does it.
Inaccurate – due to buying low & selling high I actually became affluent old Dennis. Kinda strange for someone so averse to gambling that I never buy lottery tickets!
Congratulations to the cricket team.
To play poorly, (average bowling, dropped catches etc..) and still win is a sign of a good team.
Cheers too to the Sri Lanka’s for making it a thrilling competition.
dv
Alcohol our favourite drug, enjoyable but sneaky and encouraged by the government. Under a low regulation, high punitive approach, you are encouraged to drink till the small hours of the morning, even all day, then they will fine you high if you piddle in the streets. If you lie down on the road and someone inadvertently runs over you government will fine the driver.
It is all part of the money economy, find a way to make money out of everybody and everything, and laissez faire; but it isn’t fair to have no regulations, it isn’t fair to encourage people to take drugs, it isn’t fair to play on known human traits and enable people to get hooked and waste their lives and often become irresponsible and violent.
The RW government theme is, Be born, grow up, earn some money and be taxed, die early before you get to old age (or go in and out of prison till you collapse). There is still public expectation that old citizens will be cared for and it is more convenient for government if people die early from accident, or alcohol effects, though they haven’t enough honesty and care about citizens to bring laws in that govern euthanasia, so citizens have choice about when and how they die.
What we really need is to develop a different attitude to alcohol. Our ancestors have been drinking the stuff for a very long time, in fact it used to be drunk at breakfast time with no apparent ill effect – safer than the water!
However, at some stage it got turned into the ‘demon alcohol’ where the whole point seemed to be getting shit-faced and creating havoc of one sort or another. A thoughtful analysis of how we got to this pathetic state would be in order before I and my friends find ourselves being perceived as anti-social for our evening glass of wine and we redevelop prohibition mentality.
We have had periods in history when we rose above that.
The Georgians, like the Bourbons and the Neoliberals, needed a drugged out, dumbed down populace to passively accept the levels of austerity imposed on them.
Alcohol is a drug …. a legal recreation drug … and its either a straw-man or paranoia ….. to state that anyone is going to label you as “anti-social”, for consuming a glass of 14% alcohol wine…. unless that glass gets you shitfaced and you create havoc 😉
The drug Alcohol actually gets a soft ride …. “It is the cause of more damage than all the other drugs in the world combined and it is legal. Police
officers estimate it is a contributing factor in 70% of the incidents they attend. ” ….. yet its the other safer recreational drugs which are “demonized” …. this has accurately been called ‘drug policy abuse ‘.
Have an evening puff on a joint … or a night dancing on mdma … or take Lsd at an outdoor festival … and the state labels you a criminal …. with our ‘justice system’ administering this politically driven witch trial nonsense as law.
Apart from demonizing and persecuting those who use a different recreational drug than booze …… there is no denying NZ has a problem with the abuse of Alcohol & other drugs …
“ALCOHOL A MAJOR FACTOR
Detective Sergeant Kylie Schaare has dealt with some of the most horrific cases the unit has seen in the past 12 months.” …
“,,,,, an 8-month-old baby was beaten black and blue by his mother and suffered extensive bruising to his eyes, ears and face.
Alcohol was a major factor in the bashing, which was apparent in a lot of physical and sexual abuse cases the unit dealt with, Mrs Schaare said.”
“Police statistics show ample evidence that young people between the ages of 17
and 19 comprise the highest proportion of offenders who have consumed alcohol prior to committing an offence” https://www.policeassn.org.nz/system/files/file/2011-02_0.pdf
At the risk of starting another lengthy thread on a subject many readers aren’t interested in, I’d like to continue yesterday’s discussion with Robert in a place where there’s more room to reply. Robert wrote (quoting me in the fist sentence):
“This is a common problem with the arguments of GE opponents, ie the arguments often do not support the conclusions claimed.”
Yes, I think that’s true.
I also think the arguments of the GE proponents lack the “buffers” that come from outside of pure logic, buffers which come from somewhere other than the brain. The same issue is found in medicine, where the precise extract of a plant, synthesised even, becomes the medicine, rather than the plant itself, which contained the buffers that moderate the effects on the body. The two schools rarely mix, though I met a GP yesterday who practices both.
I do focus on the logic of people’s arguments and the practicalities of technology, and you’re right that there’s more to it than that. Because it’s such a huge leap up from selective breeding, genetic engineering of plants comes with risks, particularly the risk of it being used to double down on the intensification and industrialisation of agriculture. On that basis, it’s not surprising the Green Party is so suspicious of it. Added to that, the party has to consider its supporters in the organic food industry, which would face difficulties if GE plants were in general use in NZ. (NB: I’m a Green voter and financial donor, so any criticism I make of the party comes from a supporter, not an opponent.)
However, the GE jinn is out of the bottle and there won’t be any tricking it into getting back in again. The question now isn’t whether GE is good or bad, right or wrong, the question is what regulations do we need to apply to GE to make sure we don’t make things worse?
That’s where I’m in disagreement with the Greens. If we pretend we can make NZ a bastion of GE-free food, for one thing we’d fail (because we’re not isolated from the rest of the world) and for another we’d be putting our non-organic agricultural sector at a big disadvantage for the benefit of the organic sector. It would not be a rational approach and many voters (not to mention some Green voters) would recognise that. The Greens’ focus should continue to be on reducing the intensification and industrialisation of farming in general, and we have a lot of very capable scientists who can help figure out how GE could contribute to that. It doesn’t have to be a “GE = good” vs “GE = bad” debate.
“I’m a Green voter and financial donor, so any criticism I make of the party comes from a supporter, not an opponent.” Likewise. ” It doesn’t have to be a “GE = good” vs “GE = bad” debate.” True.
Nuance is real hard for a lot of people. Politics, on a numbers basis, always gets driven by those who prefer simplicity. In a complex world, most punters therefore get it wrong, and produce public policy accordingly. Occam’s razor is a useful guide in a lot of situations, but a blunt tool that is likely to make things worse in others.
I’ve not even tried to engage other Greens on GE policy. Am not even motivated to see it there’s a policy on the GP website. A can of worms best to side-step until it becomes necessary to clean it out, I reckon.
I’d say, first up, organic growers would lose the advantage of being able to market their produce as coming from a GE-free country, that is GE-Free NZ.
A very good question and one I can’t answer personally.
However I have been invited to a couple of organic farms, Gee I shuddered a little.
As far as I am concerned I wouldn’t want too eat or buy what was on that land animal or plant.
It seems the term “organic” means no fertiliser application and no animal health remedies, or any that work anyway.
Others may have different experiences?
I struggle to believe your claims, Jim. Organic farms are generally intensely aware of their soil and animal health and apply organic fertilisers and organic-approved animal remedies for the health of their stock – perhaps your ignorance of how organic farmers operate meant you were blind to what was really happening.
Of course not. But we should follow those opportunities unless there are compelling arguments not to follow them, which puts us back to where we were yesterday : are there compelling arguments not to follow this particular opportunity?
Why would our non-organic (yet GE free) agricultural sector want to turn to GMOs when they know it will cost them sales?
Consumers largely oppose GMOs with many opting for NZ products due to our clean image. Therefore, the loss of sales would vastly nullify any potential gain from investing in GMOs.
Potentially lowering production costs or increasing yields means little if the process then leads to a vast reduction in sales.
Why would our non-organic (yet GE free) agricultural sector want to turn to GMOs when they know it will cost them sales?
It probably would cost them sales among the world’s more irrational consumers, but most consumers are not irrational and increased production enables more sales to those consumers.
Consumers largely oppose GMOs with many opting for NZ products due to our clean image.
Our “clean image” is exactly that, an image. It’s fake. I suppose consumers who are irrational enough to demand GE-free food are likely to be foolish enough to be sucked in by our “clean image,” but the ability to fool some of the people all of the time certainly isn’t something I’d be willing to die in a ditch for.
Potentially lowering production costs means little if the process then leads to a vast reduction in sales.
A “vast” reduction in sales? Hardly. Organic food consumers are a small number of relatively-wealthy people with no problems beyond the first-world variety. And the fact that the well-off-but-irrational will currently pay a premium for woo would be a very dodgy thing to base an entire country’s economy on.
“It probably would cost them sales among the world’s more irrational consumers, but most consumers are not irrational…”
Calling them irrational doesn’t change the fact (from the number of polls I’ve seen) that most consumers oppose GMO products. And increasing production of GMOs is no guarantee of more sales.
“Our “clean image” is exactly that, an image.”
Indeed. Nevertheless, it is a widely held perception offshore consumers have. Thus, what our goods are marketed upon. Moreover, compared to a good number of our competitors, we are clean due to our isolation and small population.
“Organic food consumers are a small number of relatively-wealthy people…”
Maybe, but we’re not just talking organic food consumers, we’re also talking about the large number of buyers of our non-organic (yet GE free) products.
It would be a very dodgy thing to destroy the marketing capital we’ve built and risk our entire agricultural sector on something consumers largely don’t want a bar of.
No. An exaggeration perhaps, but it’s not a total lie. We do produce things that are clean and green, albeit we are not as clean and green as we’ve marketed.
And regardless if GE-free thinking is woo, the majority of consumers don’t want it, which is clearly not a solid base to push forward with GMOs.
“reducing the intensification and industrialisation of farming in general, and we have a lot of very capable scientists who can help figure out how GE could contribute to that. ”
a. How might GE reduce the industrialisation of farming?
&
b. Do you believe it would?
A. I’m not one of those scientists, but from my layman’s perspective: one political hurdle to overcome in reducing intensity and industrialisation of farming is that it results in lower yields. Andre posted yesterday one way GE could help offset that. There’ll be many others.
B. It depends. If we have a government committed to reducing intensity and industrialisation of farming, and public sector research organisations that carry out research in support of government policy, of course it would. However, if we have a government committed to increasing the intensity and industrialisation of farming, ie a National-led one, then no it wouldn’t – but in that case we’d have a much bigger problem than any that might result from introducing GE.
1. Considering that many GE seeds have been designed to kill themselves off what happens if that gene ‘escapes’ into the wild. Do we end up with a dead world?
2. Patenting life and that if all farmers are dependent upon patented products then so are the people. What happens when corporations start picking and choosing who can and can’t be a farmer? Where that food can be sold? Or even if it can be sold at all?
Is golden rice a terminator variety? Has it badly affected the old seed saved
rice that was tried and true from the past?
And b waghorn
What if?
You remind me of a sad and sorry old saying that reflects regularly-encountered reality.
“If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.”
On the 25th March of 2015, the Enlarged Board of Appeal of the EPO made the following unacceptable decision: ‘while processes for conventional breeding cannot be patented, plants and animals stemming from these processes are patentable.’ This decision made it possible to patent plants or seeds produced through conventional breeding, more than 180 have been granted already. On top of this, around 1.000 such patent applications are pending. The number is much higher when including genetically modified plants: more than 7.500 patents are pending at the moment. But the latter are not the issue of current discussions; their patentability will go on, in every case.
There is a serious question of if life should be patentable. We’re not really talking about an invention here but a discovery. The same that applies in mathematics formulas that makes them un-patentable and why the NZ government also stopped allowing patenting of software.
Patents are tools to protect commercial interests and investments, but as the Golden Rice example shows, they are not an impediment to the use and dissemination of a technology. Apart from being national in scope and limited in time, their owners can decide to whom to license and under what conditions. Notwithstanding the fact that a number of patented technologies were involved in the production of Golden Rice (Kryder et al. 2000), Syngenta Seeds AG was able to negotiate access to all pieces of the puzzle actively necessary for the intended humanitarian purposes, providing the Golden Rice Humanitarian Board with the right to sublicense breeding institutions in developing countries free of charge.
The patents still apply but the companies have agreed not to charge for humanitarian purposes.
I read an article years ago (i.e, can’t find it) about a patent that had been going on for more than 60 years. The corporate owner of the original patent kept changing a word here and there to argue that it was a new patent and, amazingly, winning it.
Soverain isn’t in the e-commerce business; it’s in the higher-margin business of filing patent lawsuits against e-commerce companies. And it has been quite successful until now. The company’s plan to extract a patent tax of about one percent of revenue from a huge swath of online retailers was snuffed out last week by Newegg and its lawyers, who won an appeal ruling [PDF] that invalidates the three patents Soverain used to spark a vast patent war.
We were lucky – that one got won but how many others have gone through?
Every single one of these fictitious patents costs us even if the ruling finally goes against the Patent Troll.
And patents give you the right to sue infringers, but not the means.
Well, that’s something that I’ve been thinking about lately and I’ve come to the conclusion that if the government id going to give you the right then it should also you the means. A law isn’t effective unless its enforced after all.
But the flipside is no non-governmental research, because there’s no money in R&D.
1. I don;t think that is true. Many people would still do research if they had access to the resources necessary.
2. Without government research then there’d be very little research. Government tends to do the basic research while companies do the applied research. In other words, government does the essential research that products are then based upon.
Your problem is that you think only capitalism can bring the research about but that is proven wrong by what’s actually happening in the world.
Fuck, people do like to build massive edifices on foundations that are mere assumptions.
I fucking love government research. But having it as the only provider of research is a route to less innovation. I’m not even talking about competition, but diversity of approach and prioritisation. Both the private sector and the public sector are needed.
As for “many people would still do research”, you’d provide anyone who wants it with the resources to built a multi-million dollar lab and push new compounds through three phases of drug trials? Good luck with that.
I fucking love government research. But having it as the only provider of research is a route to less innovation. I’m not even talking about competition, but diversity of approach and prioritisation. Both the private sector and the public sector are needed.
Fuck, people do like to build massive edifices on foundations that are mere assumptions.
Actually, it’s backed up by research. I’d link but its from many readings read across decades.
I fucking love government research. But having it as the only provider of research is a route to less innovation.
Who said it would be the only provider?
Read The Entrepreneurial State and you may get some understanding of what I’m getting at. In it the author shows how the US became so innovative using a lot of government funding and direction of research employing both private sector and state sector researchers.
That government funded research then being freely available to everyone to utilise.
As for “many people would still do research”, you’d provide anyone who wants it with the resources to built a multi-million dollar lab and push new compounds through three phases of drug trials?
No.
I’d build several multi-million dollar government labs where people with the qualifications would be employed to work and where anybody with an idea can present it for development. If the idea is accepted for development then the person who’s idea it was would be encouraged to partake in that development up to and including the higher education needed to do it.
I think we waste so much potential by slotting people into unfulfilling jobs. It’s why I’m firmly in favour of ever more automation.
The assumption you made was “you think only capitalism can bring the research about”.
If you’re getting at something, try to express it in your own words. All I said was that patents actually provide an incentive for non-governmental research. This might be applied research, or blue skies research. It is often expensive research.
I’d build several multi-million dollar government labs where people with the qualifications would be employed to work and where anybody with an idea can present it for development.
Presenting an idea for development is not the same as doing the research yourself, and you miss the specialisation and prioritisation of private research. There will be some wins, but if the provider misses the potential of the idea then there’s nobody else to go to. Yes, the flipside of a patent is that nobody else is allowed to copy it for 16 years without the permission of the original developers. But the benefit is that you’re presenting your idea to people directly involved in the field, and if they don’t see the opportunity then their competitor might.
Central planning via government departments has its limitations. Difficulty engaging with human creativity is one of those limitations.
Your only looking at the possible negatives.
What if we can produce spray free food (in monoculture s for feeding the masses not the wealthy few who can afford organic)
What if we can produce bulk crops that require half the amount of water and or fertilizer.
Continuous monoculture, or monocropping, where the same species is grown year after year,[2] can lead to the quicker buildup of pests and diseases, and then rapid spread where a uniform crop is susceptible to a pathogen. The practice has been criticized for its environmental effects and for putting the food supply chain at risk.
Suggesting doing more of what’s causing the majority of the problems is not a solution.
What if we can produce bulk crops that require half the amount of water and or fertilizer.
Then there’s the question of if we should even be using artificial fertilisers at all. Most artificial fertilisers are made from fossil fuels and they’re limited. Eventually we will run out. Doesn’t seem like a good idea to base future food production upon something that will run out.
I think we should be looking at the natural cycles and returning that which we take from the land back to the land so that it can continuously provide for us. It’s more complicated and requires knowing how fast our forest can turn our sewage into fertiliser that naturally runs onto our farms.
Working out these cycles is what will give us our maximum carrying capacity of the entire country. There will be a balance point of X number of forests supplying Y number of farms to feed Z number of people which fertilises X number of forests.
You’ll note that there is no exports in there. We can’t afford exports if we want to be sustainable. And that applies to all countries.
Good summation, Draco, but whaadabout…Brazil nuts?
“We can’t afford exports if we want to be sustainable. And that applies to all countries.”
Brazil nuts contain selenium and we haven’t enough of that in our soils, hence our food so we need to import…Brazil nuts, which are naturally rich in selenium. There will be alternatives, probably but there are also other plant-based products we need from outside of our growing zones/country.
Some exporting/importing is needed and can be a great reason for countries to treat each other well.
Brazil nuts contain selenium and we haven’t enough of that in our soils, hence our food so we need to import…Brazil nuts, which are naturally rich in selenium.
Do the Brazil Nuts produce selenium or do they absorb it out of the soil?
Selenium is a chemical element with symbol Se and atomic number 34.
Which answers that question.
Which means that we need a source of selenium to be deposited on our soils. This should then be collected and returned to the land along with the rest of the sewage.
Some exporting/importing is needed and can be a great reason for countries to treat each other well.
I wasn’t clear enough. I was specifically talking about exporting food. Sustainable cycles specifically prevent it.
Minerals are a different question to a degree as they’re not so closely associated with the natural cycles.
Hmm, okay. Coconut oil is really good. Losing palm oil imports would be a blessing though. Coffee, now there’s a flash point. Tea drinkers too, will have to rely on homegrown (I’m setting up for a small plantation of Camelia sinensis right now). Cacao, chocolate lovers? Maca? There’s a bit of a list of good foodstuffs we can’t grow here; I suppose we could go without, but coffee !!!
I do keep wondering if we can grow coffee in NZ. I do think we can but it would be an interesting engineering project to get the hot dry days and cold wet nights.
Animals will only have selenium in them if they’ve eaten plants containing it, or licked a salt-block that includes selenium in the mix, but, sure, they do and you can.
In this country, we scratch around for every last bit of selenium we can get. And yes, it’s correct – from a global perspective, our chicken is not a “rich” source of selenium. But relatively speaking, compared with other popular protein sources such as beef mince, it offers 10 times as much of the element.
The big difference in the selenium content of chicken versus red meat here probably comes down to the animals’ diet. Whereas our cattle are largely grazed and given some supplemental feed, poultry are fed a specially formulated diet, says Kerry Mulqueen of the Poultry Industry Association.
Their feed has been developed to deliver appropriate amounts of essential minerals such as selenium and copper, he says. “Their diets are totally controlled, and selenium is added to ensure they have enough.”
So, yes, chicken and eggs are a useful source of selenium, although they pale in comparison with fish and other seafood.
Which makes a problem for me as seafood makes me sick. No point eating something if you’re just to throw it up.
Patenting life and that if all farmers are dependent upon patented products then so are the people.
Patenting life isn’t inherent in genetic engineering, any more than Google and Facebook commercialising your personal data is inherent in computer networks. Whether or not we allow the patenting of life is its own issue, just like whether or not we allow slavery is its own issue.
Considering that many GE seeds have been designed to kill themselves off what happens if that gene ‘escapes’ into the wild.
What indeed? Given that we have no conceivable way of preventing people from designing such things, we might just as well worry that aliens will invade and enslave us. Regulation of such activities within NZ is the best we can manage, so let’s manage it. Prohibition of GE will be as effective as any other kind of prohibition in the long term.
We’ve prohibited many recreational drugs, too. If people don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited, many of them reject the prohibition. That’s why prohibiting recreational drugs is an entirely different category from prohibiting murder – nobody rejects a prohibition on murder, even if they’re a murderer, but many reject a prohibition on recreational drugs.
When it comes to prohibition, GE will fall very much into the “recreational drugs” category, rather than the “murder” category – for the “what compelling reasons against?” reason we’ve already discussed.
The recreational drugs were already in circulation by the time the prohibition was placed upon them. That prohibition was bound to lack effectiveness, given that and the nature of human desire for such substances. GMO crops are not here yet and a prohibition would keep them out (It’s hard to hide a paddock of GE corn). Humans don’t crave for GMO corn and so the prohibition won’t be circumvented in the same way recreational drug prohibition invariably is. The two, GMO and recreational drugs, are not in the same category, imo.
They’re both in the category I described: “If people don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited, many of them reject the prohibition.” In this case, the prohibition doesn’t really affect consumers, but it does affect researchers and farmers, and over the long term those people aren’t going to put a lot of effort into observing that prohibition.
You are suggesting that researchers would act unlawfully, “reject the prohibition” because they don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited. Wouldn’t that be illegal, contrary to their contracts and unethical?
Are you good with that? Seems irrational.
I’m saying that over the long term, such people will exist, likewise in the farming sector and the environmental protection bureacracy. Given a non-zero probability of X occurring, and a long enough time interval, X will occur. What I personally feel about X is irrelevant. Prohibition isn’t a viable long-term option.
” Prohibition isn’t a viable long-term option.”
I agree, with there rider “alone” – “prohibition alone” Your proposal (I think) is to regulate the industry and allow it to develop, much in the way it’s proposed with cannabis, perhaps. My hope is the public of NZ will choose not to have GM crops, such as pasture grasses, grown here and that the representative Government will act according to the peoples’ will and legislate accordingly. Rogue researchers and farmers, as described by you, will be pilloried by the public and punished by the Government and any incursions of GMO’s dealt with as Velvet Leaf has been in recent times.
Faint hope, mind you, but that’s my (rational) position.
Good luck trying to persuade the agricultural sector to adopt Bhutan and Khazakstan as role models. There’s money in woo, for sure, but woo isn’t reliable in the long term, except for religions.
Why is there more than one type of car? Surely any other than the simplest model are “woo”? There’s money in woo alright and it seems “reliable in the long term”. Are you suggesting we encourage all car manufacturers other than Lada that they should abandon their wooing?
That depends on why they’re willing to pay more for a particular car. There are rational reasons and irrational reasons. While we’re pursuing this metaphor, are you saying the production of Lada cars should be prohibited?
Too late – it’s already legal. There are rational and irrational reasons for wanting to eat food that’s non-GMO. Why do you characterise those people who want that as irrational? Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car irrational?
What are the rational reasons for refusing to eat food from plants that have been manipulated using this particular technique rather than a different one?
If you are told a plant is poisonous and you believe it to be true and you don’t want to be poisoned, it would be irrational to eat it.
If you are told a genetically modified plant will negatively affect your health and you believe it to be true and you don’t want your health negatively affected, it would be irrational to eat it.
If you believed allowing the production of GE crops in NZ would affect the country’s export market negatively, it would be irrational to support the proposal to grow such crops here.
It’s irrational, isn’t it, to act or decide against your beliefs you believe are rationally held.
Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car, irrational?
The last one is a separate issue (and a rational reason). By the logic of the first two, exorcism is a rational approach to mental ill-health (ie, if you are told your relative is possessed by a demon and you believe it to be true and don’t want them to be possessed by a demon, it would be irrational to refuse an exorcism).
“By the logic of the first two, exorcism is a rational approach to mental ill-health”
No, Psycho Milt. That’s not the logical conclusion of what I wrote.
Excorcism is a rational approach for the person who believes it to be effective but can’t be broadly called a rational approach where many people would not find it so.
The issue is localised.
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car” irrational”?
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
I haven’t said that at all, in fact I seem to recall agreeing that your reason for opposing it (to protect the organic food industry) was a rational one, just not one I personally agreed with.
I have said that consumer preference for GE-free food is irrational, on the basis that I haven’t seen any rational reasons given for that preference.
7 January 2019 at 9:18 am
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
“I haven’t said that at all”
You are quite right right, Psycho Milt and I’m wrong; Andre made the claim a couple of days ago and I assigned it to you in my flurry. I apologise. I made the mistake after seeing these statement-fragments from you:
“And the fact that the well-off-but-irrational will currently pay a premium”
“So, the argument is that we must ban GM crops in order to satisfy an irrational requirement of an unreasonable sector group.”
“(it would make it difficult for us to market GE-free food to irrational consumers)
I’ll retire from the discussion now, chastised (self) thanks for your time.
This fucktard dragged me into a lengthy debate on GE that he wasn’t interested in learning from at all… just one day before he started this abortion of a thread.
my advice – do not engage in any manner. Poisonous trash aka sad troll.
It is the stock approach which milt takes when discussing…anything…
Psycho is still claiming to not have seen a ‘rational’ reason why consumers would have a preference for gm free food…he is blinded…best to leave him to it…
His approach is not rational…such is the irony which he is seemingly not aware enough to realize…
Your comments have deteriorated to using terms like ‘woo’…
The ‘science’ (if you can call it that) of GMO is nothing but woo..
It can’t be controlled, I explained that to you yesterday, as well as dispelling the opportunity cost comment as above…
GMO can’t be an opportunity cost without using woo science, woo economics, woo marketing, woo lobbying et al…there is no legitimate case that could be made because the risk is immeasurable…
“Woo” is a useful generic term for belief in beneficial properties that can’t be defined in a rational way. Your personal belief that science is woo doesn’t alter that definition in the slightest.
Handy tip from my many years on blog comments threads: if you boast to everyone of your alleged glorious victory in the debate, you’ll only be embarrassing yourself.
You self immoliated, psycho…in a sub thread which you started up…my pointing it out is nothing more than…pointing it out…
Embarrassment…is a 3rd party emotion based on the perception of how another person believes someone else should feel in a given situation…because they think others are as callow as they are…
Tip for you…figure out what embarrassment actually is…
Climate crises and catastrophe is the most serious issue facing the world right now.
It would be good if we used this meeting place to put pressure on the New Zealand government and all politicians to act as if it is the most serious issue.
Daily recommendations.
Idea 3. Incentivise a plant based diet. Tax meat heavily and make vegetables and fruit tax free.
Yes it is @ The Chairman.
So here’s a poor man’s option for going some way towards the resurrection of PSB TV.
Whilst we’re buggerising around contemplating various options (some of which are tantamount to more corporate welfare) – put together the content available on NZPTV (not the live streams) and require TVNZ’s playout facilities to put it free-to-air on terrestrial and freeview satellite facilities.
They might even require TVNZ to intersperse it with hourly news updates
“By 2016, the self-employed had their lowest share of income since 1939. The largest beneficiary was corporate profits which rose to a 19% share in 2016, a level reached before only in 1940 under wartime conditions. It appears that labour productivity and real wages over the period were closely tied only during the period 1947 to 1974 when New Zealand’s industrial conciliation and arbitration system of collective bargaining extended by awards was working relatively well. From about 1990, real wage growth fell behind productivity growth. If wage and salary earners received the same share of the [national] income generated in 2017 as they did in 1981 they would on average have been $11,500 better off” – Bill Rosenberg.
Key point of diversion being the 1991Employment Contract Act and the desired destruction of the union movement by National, and with it the inability of labour to force good wages out of capitalists.
Well it doesn’t necessarily have to be nationwide. He could stand for local body elections as a start @ Ad.
I mean to say, Laidlaw is doomed and probably hasn’t even got the guts to stand another term, and it’s quite likely rubbed off on Daran Ponter as well. And for many people, I doubt they’ll be able to bring themselves to vote for a Lester unless it’s in the absence of anything else – and even then they’d have to be burned-on Labour, too embarrassed or too yea/nah to do anything else.
So there’s an ‘in for ‘Draco’. I doubt he’d be intimidated by the systems that have been setup for elected representatives to have become subservient to the corporate machine that is our local body Councils.
Hopefully he’ll have balls this
HIGH ^ as well as having a good bullshit detector (gaydar, radar, age-ar and race-ar no longer necessary, but an ability to laugh your arse off at management is essential)
Indeed @ Ad! SO let’s not allow some of the shit that’s been brought to the public’s attention this past year to be forgotten by the last remaining of our journalists:
– The so-called ‘Independent Contractors who are in effect ‘DEPENDENT Contractors’
e.g. Courier Drivers
Chorus Contractors
DeliveryEasy
Uber
etc., etc., etc
You can see how the language is manipulated in order to advance the neo-liberal agenda.
All the above seek to externalise their costs whilst preserving their own margin, AS WELL AS providing for the margins of a number of ticket-clippers along the way.
Is the coalition up to fixing it? The signs are sort of ‘OK’, but the pace of reform is pretty bloody pathetic – but then I suppose there’s 30+ years of agencies responsible for enforcement activity to battle, let alone some members within that have their right leg shorter than is needed in order to effect that ‘kinder society’.
Also practically, they want to get their promises up and running so they can point to them as the next election looms. It’s a KISS situation. Keep It Simple Stupid, and they need to keep this in mind all the time.
And they will get kissed for it with another term if they keep telling people what they have done.
“Three things you need to do, John,” I recall him saying. “Tell them what you are going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you told them.”
Cool, I got it from some capitalist source in the eighties. Didn’t credit Aristotle, nor that the Jesuits had recycled it. I don’t use it due to not being an evangelist or salesman, but my career making tv ads taught me how well it works. I wonder if teachers apply it to slow learners…
I apply it to all learners because it’s really effective.
I show a list of what I’m to present and a few reasons why, then the presentation, then a summary and two way question time (questions and pop quiz disguised as conversation) – result: Favorite teacher of many thriving students.
That’s also how I write academic papers which are: “beautifully written” and “succinct”. Succinct?!! Repetition lulls the mind.
Damn right being funny helps! I’m interested in where you do teaching and where you do academic writing. Just because context is important, eh? But if privacy concerns apply, fair enough…
Funny peculiar. I tutor in various capacities and most enjoy teaching uni level science.
I’ve written in several capacities under several names. I prefer anonymity except with comedy as it is live (and an act), even then… Poke your head up and jealous assholes notice.
I don’t disagree @ Ad.
They have and they did, but they do have a choice as to whether they want to spend their term and political capital (just to be trendy) battling against what are ‘the basics’ that will allow the less well-off to have a decent living and begin contributing, or whether they want to be all staunch and maintain the line “we’re doing the best we can under the circumstances we’ve been left by the previous junta”.
One year on – that’s already beginning to wear thin – as well as the fact that all the research they’ve undertaken in order to formulate policy is now due and people will be looking for results OR AT LEAST signs of a trend.
For me, I completely understand that H1 and H2 needed what was probably a generation to reverse what resulted from Roger, Ruth et al – but it really didn;t help that she chose to have a bit of a lay down and a cuppa cha in the 3rd term and concentrate on her future career aspirations. (I do concede she was probably one of the best PMs we ever had tho’).
If his policies were put alongside the Labour Party’s now, he is clearly left. The Overton Window was shifted radically to the right in the 1980s in the UK and New Zealand.
Unfortunately, once again the hype fails to meet reality.
Industrial action will not be permitted in negotiations for Fair Pay Agreements. Thus, reducing unions bargaining power.
Furthermore, Jacinda has sought to ease business concerns over the new type of collective bargaining, saying there will be “no more than one or two” fair pay agreements in the current electoral term.
From TC link at 8.
Dr Ganesh Nana, chief economist and executive director of Business and Economic Research, said New Zealand was a low-wage economy.
Factors such as a much smaller population size and a lower minimum wage rate was part of the reason New Zealanders earned significantly less than Australians.
“We’ve got a business model based on low wages. We’ve had settings in place over the last two to three decades that have minimised wages, and focused on wages as a cost rather than an investment in labour,” Nana said.
“We’ve been trying to put a lid on wage costs which supposedly translate into improved profitability and productivity but that model hasn’t worked.”
Minimum wage in Australia is A$18.93 ($19.83) per hour, which totals $719.20
each week or about $750 in New Zealand dollar terms.
Furthermore, low wages are helping to maintain struggling businesses with poor long-term prospect (those that state they can’t afford paying wage increases) that should really pack it in and look to invest elsewhere more viable.
The Government should consider doing more to help facilitate this transition to the more viable.
And those that can afford to pay a decent wage but don’t, should be named and shamed. Consumers blacklisting them would add further pressure.
While the New Zealand corporate news puppets parrot stories about UFOs and meteors, the planet burns.
No wonder we have such woefully ill informed public.
Let us decide how we relate to those figures Ed. You don’t have to put little help lines in. Four comments where only one was necessary. Why don’t you become anally retentive and squeeze them out over a long period. Four in 8 minutes!
George Galloway has started to reconsider meat eating after seeing and hearing about the conditions under which animals are treated, tortured and murdered.
His MOATs show features several discussions on the subject.
Great job by George to be open minded enough to consider change when faced by evidence.
I’ll post his contribution when it comes along.
In the meantime here’s a link to his show.
Just saw a report on One News from Delhi. Pollution levels there are currently twelve times the globally-accepted safe level. The fourteen most polluted cities on Earth are in India. One in every eight deaths in India is now caused by pollution.
I checked Wikipedia. “A 2013 study on non-smokers has found that Indians have 30% lower lung function compared to Europeans.” “Fuelwood and biomass burning is the primary reason for near-permanent haze and smoke observed above rural and urban India, and in satellite pictures of the country. Fuelwood and biomass cakes are used for cooking and general heating needs. These are burnt in cook stoves known as chullah or chulha piece in some parts of India. These cook stoves are present in over 100 million Indian households, and are used two to three times a day, daily. As of 2009, majority of Indians still use traditional fuels such as dried cow dung, agricultural waste, and firewood as cooking fuel.”
“This form of fuel is inefficient source of energy, its burning releases high levels of smoke, PM10 particulate matter, NOx, SOx, PAHs, polyaromatics, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and other air pollutants.[9][10][11][12] Some reports, including one by the World Health Organization, claim 300,000 to 400,000 people die of indoor air pollution and carbon monoxide poisoning in India because of biomass burning and use of chullahs.[13] The air pollution is also the main cause of the Asian brown cloud which is delaying the start of the monsoon.”
So the recent citation of corporations being the primary culprits in global warming is just part of the picture. Traditional lifestyles and Indians are extremely competitive as well.
at a mere 2.28 per capita tonnes per annum emissions I dont think theres a lot of scope for the average Indian to cut…and if the entire world emitted at that rate we likely wouldnt be discussing CC at all
Yes, theres no denying there are a myriad of problems to be addressed but in terms of GHG the statement….”So the recent citation of corporations being the primary culprits in global warming is just part of the picture. Traditional lifestyles and Indians are extremely competitive as well.”….serves little purpose other than to attempt to minimise the role of western consumption in driving CC
That point applies to policy formulation, whereas my point was that corporation-blaming, which is something I’ve done plenty of, is somewhat unrealistic. If we look at the creators of the problem, holism requires us to implement true-cost accounting (a key Green Party economic policy tenet) to lay blame accurately.
particulate pollution could be relatively easily addressed, especially if the west actually fronted the oft promised funding and expertise to the developing world…..or perhaps the bulk of the subcontinent should adopt a diet of raw foods ?
So India needs rocket stoves aka double burners aka a decent engineer or two to make better stoves drawing out gases for additional fuel and making char to offset pollution.
Absolutely primed for a revolution in stove type. Industry get on it.
It’s chronic but the power of Mother Nature is clearly evident. Even on a day where there is no wind, you can clearly see the effects of the jungle literally sucking in the crap – such that whilst you might go to bed with the choking fumes of the city, rural brick factories and daily life (heavily dependent on diesel and other fuel), by morning you can awake to the purest, crispest and freshest of air only a few hundred kilometres north at the base of the Himalayas.
Fuck me, this illustrates how low things have sunk.
You know that wall the waddling spray tan warning label always rambles incoherently about? And has shut down the US government in a tanty because Democrats and Repugs alike think it’s a stupid idea and won’t give it to him?
Allegedly it was just something dreamed up by Dolt45’s campaign advisers as a shorthand reminder to bash immigrants at his rallies. That’s it. But now the (possibly) sentient caps lock button can’t let it go. So here we are.
WASHINGTON — As the government shutdown drags on, lawyers from the White House, the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon are meeting to discuss whether President Donald Trump can declare a national emergency to deploy troops and Defense Department resources to build his border wall, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions.
[…]
The official said the talks are ongoing and will continue over the weekend as details are worked out.
ABC News first reported that the White House was considering declaring a national emergency to build the wall.
Trump said at a press briefing Friday he was considering declaring a national emergency in order to bypass Congress.
The official did not rule out that the Federal Emergency Management Administration, a part of DHS, may also be used as part of a national emergency response.
Yes, yes, I know. People who believe in democracy are a serious problem nowadays. He’s even too stupid to patiently explain to the news media & public that he campaigned on the wall, was elected on that basis, and therefore democracy provides him with a mandate to erect it.
Y’know, the only possible explanation for such weird behaviour is that he thinks Pelosi & the Democrats, the media & public, all know that. As if they not only understand how their democracy works, but expect their politicians to act accordingly! Really, seriously dumb. Since when did the Democrats actually practice democracy? Surely everyone knows by now they merely preach it.
More accurate to say capitalism failed them, Ed. Ironic that they’d elect a capitalist billionaire to solve that problem, but I guess they’re too busy dodging bullets to worry about details.
In the US government system, control of the purse lies with Congress (ie the House and the Senate together). The only direct control of spending that is granted to the president is the ability to veto spending bills, and even vetos can be overridden by Congress.
So in the case of spending huge amounts of money on something like a border wall, the mandate to do it (or not) is given by voters to the collective members of Congress, not the president.
That divided responsibility is one of the checks and balances that keeps the US from being a serial elected dictatorship. But it’s clearly something the Combover Con doesn’t understand, along with many others.
Yep, you got it. What people think is democracy and what it is in application are two different things. Much confusion results. Wouldn’t matter so much if politics wasn’t driven by that confusion. Nuances wash off simple-minded folk like water off a duck’s back.
And since they have the numbers, they control the outputs of the system as much as the powerful folk behind the scenes. The marxists called it the dictatorship of the proletariat, figuring their system would do that better, but the one we have is close enough. Their perception creates our reality via majority vote. They selected Trump to represent them, a simple guy easy for them to identify with. Identity politics works like that.
Looking forward to Pelosi and Schumer holding the line right through to State of the Union address January 21st.
The newly emboldened Democrats have the political will to hold the line. They’d be fools not to; this is a massive, singular issue on which Trump bet 100 percent of his credibility. He put his head on the chopping block and handed Pelosi the ax.
I’m looking for a series of massive defeats for Trump and the Republican Senators this year, and this looks like a doozy.
McConnell will block anything embarrassing ever making it to the floor of the senate. That’s why the senate won’t vote again on the spending bill to reopen the government passed by the House, which is damn near identical to what the senate passed late last year.
He’ll be happy though, if all he does for the next two years is confirm troglodyte judges and stop anything going onto the senate floor except the occasional bills that the House will never agree to. Just to pretend they’re doing something, and to generate talking points blaming House Democrats for something or other.
Gosh, it’s almost as if you believe American politicians are now incapable of enacting compromise legislation in the spirit of collaboration for the benefit of the public. Yet we had a classic example proving the contrary just before xmas.
“If you asked anyone in early November with insider knowledge whether the First Step Act, the now recently passed federal criminal justice reform bill, would get across the finish line, they would tell you “not without the endorsement of the president.” The prospects of a bill with the biggest changes to the federal criminal justice system in our generation were slim to none without an active role by the president himself.”
“Trump continued to push for reform in the public eye and behind the scenes, working with Senate Majority Mitch McConnell to allow this to the floor for a vote. Before Christmas, the active support shown by Trump for a much fairer, much smarter, more conservative, and more compassionate criminal justice system came to fruition as the First Step Act passed the House and Senate with stunning majorities.”
“Trump and the Republicans have been unfairly painted as “heartless” by the mainstream media. Alice Johnson, a great grandmother who served more than 20 years in prison for a first time nonviolent drug offense, had her sentenced commuted by the president earlier this year. She was able to spend Christmas with her family outside of a prison after two decades because of Trump. Over the next few years, thousands more families will get to do the same. This is what making America great again looks like.” https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/423666-first-step-act-is-victory-marking-compassion-of-president-trump
“The Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act or FIRST STEP Act reforms the federal prison system of the United States of America, and seeks to reduce recidivism. An initial version of the bill passed the House of Representatives (360-59) on May 22, 2018, a revised bill passed the U.S. Senate (on a bipartisan 87-12 vote) on December 18, 2018. The House approved the bill with Senate revisions on December 20, 2018 (358-36). The act was signed by President Donald Trump on December 21, 2018, before the end of the 115th Congress.”
So Trump, most Republicans, & the Democrats, enacted this progressive law! They proved they can collaborate! God was willing, apparently. Still moves in mysterious ways though…
But did you read their analysis? Her radical scheme has to be balanced by the likely result of implementing it.
“But even in the first couple of years, assuming the government gets its hands on 70% of all income earned over $10 million, how many households would get taxed at that level? The 99th percentile of individual income in 2017 started at just over $300,000 in a University of Minnesota analysis, which would include roughly two million individuals. There simply wouldn’t be enough people and enough money earned over the $10 million mark to fund even the first year, let alone the two-decade run of Ocasio-Cortez’ Green New Deal. It would, however, drag the economy and stunt the creation of new jobs.”
“One could describe that as radical, but ill-advised and self-destructive work better. That’s not an Emancipation Proclamation, but a recipe for full subservience to the elite who run this system.” Sounds like the law of unintended consequences may apply. However, if it threatens to cause de-growth I’ll support it!
It’s a conservative analysis and sure, with the current houses there’s little chance of implementing it.
But there’s no real shortage of analyses from the left to counter the conservative one and with a series of deepening crises on the horizon, anything’s possible.
Reminds me of what Russel Norman was advocating: using quantitative easing to advance a Green socialist agenda. These authors are framing it as a required public conversation. Upside & downside consequences both flow from that.
On the up, crowd-sourced wisdom causes opinion to coalesce around design principles of a policy solution, which like-minded politicians can then adopt.
On the down, various views are floated in the media, then everyone moves on. Instead of a developing narrative becoming a political movement, the thing evaporates.
Like Noam Chomsky state’s trump and brexit are a distraction thrown at the Papatunuku to slow down there losses of control and power carbon that the oil BARONs have now .
These 2 phenomenon are a BIG DISTRACTION for the people of the world. They are not the TRUE risk to HUMANANITY. trump will flop out of office and Britain will stay in the EU. While this bullshit is going down we are still not taking enough action to stop OUR PLANET from over heating and in the prosess destorying the good life that we are USE TO get ready for the SHIT TO HIT THE FAN if we let the OIL BARON play with our intelligent minds and make us beleve that trump and brexit is the main threat NOT.
Why do these 2 distractions have a BIG CLOAKING EFFECT on OUR reality .
Its a fact that money controls the the World at the minute its a fact that the west controls the money at the minute so if the westen people of the world are distracted by trump and brexit well the BIG PROBLEM is not being FOCUSED on even when it’s effecting our lives negtively NOW . Wake up people and don’t RELY on the POLLIES of the world to beable to see through the oil barons bullshit cloak to make the changes to stop burning coal & oil carbon so we leave a better world for the Mokopunas.
I
Katharine Hayhoe: ‘A thermometer is not liberal or conservative’
Jonathan Watts
The award-winning atmospheric scientist on the urgency of the climate crisis and why people are her biggest hope
Katharine Hayhoe is an atmospheric scientist and director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University. She has contributed to more than 125 scientific papers and won numerous prizes for her science communication work. In 2018 she was a contributor to the US National Climate Assessment and was awarded the Stephen H Schneider award for outstanding climate science communication.
In 2018, we have seen forest fires in the Arctic circle; record high temperatures in parts of Australia, Africa and the US; floods in India; and devastating droughts in South Africa and Argentina. Is this a turning point?
This year has hit home how climate change loads the dice against us by taking naturally occurring weather events and amplifying them. We now have attribution studies that show how much more likely or stronger extreme weather events have become as a result of human emissions. For example, wildfires in the western US now burn nearly twice the area they would without climate change, and almost 40% more rain fell during Hurricane Harvey than would have otherwise. So we are really feeling the impacts and know how much humanity is responsible.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its 1.5C report in October. A month later, the US federal government’s climate assessment – to which you contributed – came out. How did these two massive studies move our understanding along?
These assessments are important because there is a Schrödinger’s Cat element to studying climate impacts. The act of observing affects the outcome. If people aren’t aware of what is happening, why would anyone change? Assessments like these provide us with a vision of the future if we continue on our current pathway, and by doing so they address the most widespread and dangerous myth that the largest number of us have bought into: not that the science isn’t real, but rather that climate change doesn’t matter to me personally. Compared to past studies, how much media attention did these reports receive?
There was significant coverage but a lot of media survive by generating controversy so they bring on opposing voices rather than explaining the scientific facts. Climate change shouldn’t be fodder for commentators who represent the interests of the fossil fuel industry by muddying the science. As a human and a scientist, this focus on controversy is frustrating. A thermometer is not liberal or conservative.What’s the role of global finance? Can money managers, shareholders and multinationals exert pressure and take positive action in ways that short-termist, vote-hungry politicians seem unable to do?
Yes! In the world we live in, money speaks loudly. Thanks to the growing divestment movement, we have seen cities, universities and entire countries, in the case of Ireland, withdrawing investments from fossil fuel assets. This isn’t only happening for ethical reasons but for practical ones as well. As clean energy continues to expand, those assets could become stranded. When money talks the world listens.International talks are important but we should be looking at subnational actors because there is a lot going on at the city and corporate level. Across the US a hundred cities have committed to going 100% clean energy. Companies like Apple have already achieved that goal. In the US there’s a new climate bill with bipartisan sponsors, which is essential for legislation to succeed long-term.
Are we likely to get any respite from climate change?
(Sighs.) Climate change is a long-term trend superimposed over natural variability. There’ll be good and bad years, just like there are for a patient with a long-term illness, but it isn’t going away. To stabilise climate change, we have to eliminate our carbon emissions. And we’re still a long way away from that. Ka kite ano links below
Eco Maori Its well established that MONEY rules the Papatuanuku so I want to PLANT a IDEAR for our Worlds Music Star and Sports Star Movie Stars to and Media Stars to start fundrasing events like LIVE AID & WORLD VISION to raise billions to provide bridgeing finance to countrys that have viable climate change mitigating realitys that just don’t get financed because the people who control most of the money in the world carbon baron’s won’t invest in the prodject or they use there money to discredit the project. It would work better with the 21 century communication device the INTERNET as I heard some negative words about live aid & world vision like alot of funds being chewed up by management of those events. The funds raised & the projects invested in would need to be put up on a website for accountability and viability of the projects being invested in PEER REVIEWING to keep it HOUNEST .As actor can be planted in organizations to bring it down & the capitalist system can have one prouduct priced at up to a 1000% difference from different sources .
The financing required for an orderly transition to a low carbon, resilient global economy must be counted in the trillions, not billions.
Significant investment in infrastructure is needed over the next 15 years – around US$90 trillion by 2030 – but it does not need to cost much more to ensure that this new infrastructure is compatible with climate goals.
Climate action offers a major opportunity to ensure sustainable global development and boost economic growth. It is already delivering real results in terms of new jobs, economic savings, competitiveness and market opportunities, and improved wellbeing for people worldwide with even greater investment, innovation, and growth potential ahead. Links below P.S PEOPLE POWER RULES THE WORLD
Kia ora Newshub Dvd videos are a thing of the past . I remember when video first came out use to watch Terence Hill Bud spencer Clint Eastwood many good movies to chose from it was cool when one came from a place with no power .
Those fruit growers need to pay more money and they will get the worker isn’t that the capitalist way.
Flip Flop.
Is that Global warming that is affecting Maluab I think so.
I quite like the thermometer in Vags as when I go to Auckland or Gisborne at this time of the year instant discomfort . One of our children had problems with the heat in Hawke’s Bay when he was about 8 months old you just have to keep a eye on the temperature gage and keep young babys cool bath or cold cloth ect.
Tangaroa is a cool research ship doing a good job that was a photo of a Antarctica tooth fish we now know that we must be care full with new fisheries.
That Antarctica marathon between Kiwis and Americans was a good sports match the Kiwi won ka pai its good to see everyone having fun .
Ka kite ano
Buzz from the Beehive Housing Minister Chris Bishop delivered news – packed with the ingredients to enflame political passions – worthy of supplanting Winston Peters in headline writers’ priorities. He popped up at the post-Cabinet press conference to promise a crackdown on unruly and antisocial state housing tenants. His ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The Reserve Bank is advertising for a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion advisor. The Bank has one mandate – to keep inflation between one and three percent. It has failed in that and is only slowly getting inflation back down to the upper limit. Will it ...
Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency Waka KotahiThe fact that a ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Last week former National Party leader Simon Bridges was appointed by the Government as the new chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency Waka Kotahi (NZTA). You can read about the appointment in Thomas Coughlan’s article, Simon Bridges to become chair of NZ Transport Agency ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read: Gavin Jacobson talks to Thomas Piketty 10 years on from Capital in the 21st CenturyThe SalvoLocal scoop: Green MP’s business being investigated over migrant exploitation claims StuffSteve KilgallonLocal deep-dive: The commercial contractors making money from School ...
It’s a home - but Kāinga Ora tenants accused of “abusing the privilege” may lose it. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Government announced a crackdown on Kāinga Ora tenants who were unruly and/or behind on their rent, with Housing Minister Chris Bishop saying a place in a state ...
This is a guest post by Connor Sharp of Surface Light Rail Light rail in Auckland: A way forward sooner than you think With the coup de grâce of Auckland Light Rail (ALR) earlier this year, and the shift of the government’s priorities to roads, roads, and more roads, it ...
Note: As a paid-up Webworm member, I’ve recorded this Webworm as a mini-podcast for you as well. Some of you said you liked this option - so I aim to provide it when I get a chance to record! Read more ...
TL;DR: In my ‘six-stack’ of substacks at 6.06pm on Monday, March 18:IKEA is accused of planting big forests in New Zealand to green-wash; REDD-MonitorA City for People takes a well-deserved victory lap over Wellington’s pro-YIMBY District Plan votes; A City for PeopleSteven Anastasiou takes a close look at the sticky ...
Buzz from the Beehive Here’s hoping for a lively post-cabinet press conference when the PM and – perhaps – some of his ministers tell us what was discussed at their meeting today. Until then, Point of Order has precious little Beehive news to report after its latest monitoring of the ...
David Farrar writes – We now have almost all 2023 data in, which has allowed me to update my annual table of how labour went against its promises. This is basically their final report card. The promiseThe result Build 100,000 affordable homes over 10 ...
I’m a bit worried that I’ve started a previous newsletter with the words “just when you think they couldn’t get any worse…” Seems lately that I could begin pretty much every issue with that opening. Such is the nature of our coalition government that they seem to be outdoing each ...
Geoffrey Miller writes – Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. ...
Depictions of Islam in Western popular culture have rarely been positive, even before 9/11. Five years on from the mosque shootings, this is one of the cultural headwinds that the Muslim community has to battle against. Whatever messages of tolerance and inclusion are offered in daylight, much of our culture ...
Last week Transport Minster Simeon Brown and Mayor Wayne Brown opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre. The new train control centre will see teams from KiwiRail, Auckland Transport and Auckland One Rail working more closely together to improve train services across the city. The Auckland Rail Operations Centre in ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson said in an exit interview with Q+A yesterday the Government can and should sustain more debt to invest in infrastructure for future generations. Elsewhere in the news in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy at 6:36am: Read more ...
Timing is everything. And from China’s perspective, this week’s visit by its foreign minister to New Zealand could be coming at just the right moment. The visit by Wang Yi to Wellington will be his first since 2017. Anniversaries are important to Beijing. It is more than just a happy ...
TL;DR: The key events to watch in Aotearoa-NZ’s political economy in the week to March 18 include:China’s Foreign Minister visiting Wellington today;A post-cabinet news conference this afternoon; the resumption of Parliament on Tuesday for two weeks before Easter;retiring former Labour Finance Minister Grant Robertson gives his valedictory speech in Parliament; ...
New Zealand First Leader Winston Peters’s state-of-the-nation speech on Sunday was really a state-of-Winston-First speech. He barely mentioned any of the Government’s key policies and could not even wholly endorse its signature income tax cuts. Instead, he rehearsed all of his complaints about the Ardern Government, including an extraordinary claim ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
A listing of 35 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, March 10, 2024 thru Sat, March 16, 2024. Story of the week This week we'll give you a little glimpse into how we collect links to share and ...
“I’ve been internalising a really complicated situation in my head.”When they kept telling us we should wait until we get to know him, were they taking the piss? Was it a case of, if you think this is bad, wait till you get to know the real Christopher, after the ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
Happy fourth anniversary, Pandemic That Upended Bloody Everything. I have been observing it by enjoying my second bout of COVID. It’s 5.30 on Sunday morning and only now are lights turning back on for me.Allow me to copy and paste what I told reader Sara yesterday:Depleted, fogged and crappy. Resting, ...
.“$10 and a target that bleeds” - Bleeding Targets for Under $10!.Thanks for reading Frankly Speaking ! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.This government appears hell-bent on either scrapping life-saving legislation or reintroducing things that - frustrated critics insist - will be dangerous and likely ...
“It hardly strikes me as fair to criticise a government for doing exactly what it said it was going to do. For actually keeping its promises.”THUNDER WAS PLAYING TAG with lightning flashes amongst the distant peaks. Its rolling cadences interrupted by the here-I-come-here-I-go Doppler effect of the occasional passing car. ...
Subversive & Disruptive Technologies: Just as happened with that other great regulator of the masses, the Medieval Church, the advent of a new and hard-to-control technology – the Internet – is weakening the ties that bind. Then, and now, those who enjoy a monopoly on the dissemination of lies, cannot and will ...
Been Here Before: To find the precedents for what this Coalition Government is proposing, it is necessary to return to the “glory days” of Muldoonism.THE COALITION GOVERNMENT has celebrated its first 100 days in office by checking-off the last of its listed commitments. It remains, however, an angry government. It ...
Bob Edlin writes – And what is the world watching today…? The email newsletter from Associated Press which landed in our mailbox early this morning advised: In the news today: The father of a school shooter has been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter; prosecutors in Trump’s hush-money case ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is another Green MP on their way out? And are the Greens severely tarnished by another integrity scandal? For the second time in three months, the Green Party has secretly suspended an MP over integrity issues. Mystery is surrounding the party’s decision to ...
For the last few years, the Green Party has been the party that has managed to avoid the plague of multiple scandals that have beleaguered other political parties. It appears that their luck has run out with a second scandal which, unfortunately for them, coincided with Golraz Ghahraman, the focus ...
TL;DR: The six newsey things that stood out to me as of 6:46am on Saturday, March 16.Andy Foster has accidentally allowed a Labour/Green amendment to cut road user chargers for plug-in hybrid vehicles, which the Government might accept; NZ HeraldThomas CoughlanSimeon Brown has rejected a plea from Westport ...
What seemed a booming success a couple of years ago has collapsed into fraud convictions.I looked at the crash of FTX (short for ‘Futures Exchange’) in November 2022 to see whether it would impact on the financial system as a whole. Fortunately there was barely a ripple, probably because it ...
Anybody following the situation in Ukraine and Russia would probably have been amused by a recent Tweet on X NATO seems to be putting in an awful lot of effort to influence what is, at least according to them, a sham election in an autocracy.When do the Ukrainians go to ...
TL;DR:Shaun Baker on Wynyard Quarter's transformation. Magdalene Taylor on the problem with smart phones. How private equity are now all over reinsurance. Dylan Cleaver on rugby and CTE. Emily Atkin on ‘Big Meat’ looking like ‘Big Oil’.Bernard’s six-stack of substacks at 6pm on March 15Photo by Jeppe Hove Jensen ...
Buzz from the Beehive Finance Minister Nicola Willis had plenty to say when addressing the Auckland Business Chamber on the economic growth that (she tells us) is flagging more than we thought. But the government intends to put new life into it: We want our country to be a ...
The Transport and Infrastructure Committee has reported back on the Road User Charges (Light Electric RUC Vehicles) Amendment Bill, basicly rubberstamping it. While there was widespread support among submitters for the principle that EV and PHEV drivers should pay their fair share for the roads, they also overwhelmingly disagreed with ...
Peter Dunne writes – This week’s government bailout – the fifth in the last eighteen months – of the financially troubled Ruapehu Alpine Lifts company would have pleased many in the central North Island ski industry. The government’s stated rationale for the $7 million funding was that it ...
See if you can spot the difference. An Iranian born female MP from a progressive party is accused of serial shoplifting. Her name is leaked to the media, which goes into a pack frenzy even before the Police launch an … Continue reading → ...
Ele Ludemann writes – The government is omitting general Treaty references from legislation : The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last Government in a bid to get greater coherence in the public service on Treaty ...
What was that judge thinking?Peter Williams writes – That Golriz Ghahraman and District Court Judge Maria Pecotic were once lawyer colleagues is incontrovertible. There is published evidence that they took at least one case to the Court of Appeal together. There was a report on ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Climate Scorpion – the sting is in the tail. Introducing planetary solvency. A paper via the University of Exeter’s Institute and Faculty of Actuaries.Local scoop:Kāinga Ora starts pulling out of its Auckland projects and selling land RNZ ...
Wellington’s massively upzoned District Plan adds the opportunity for tens of thousands of new homes not just in the central city (such as these Webb St new builds) but also close to the CBD and public transport links. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: Wellington gave itself the chance of ...
It’s Friday and we’re halfway through March Madness. Here’s some of the things that caught our attention this week. This Week in Greater Auckland On Monday Matt asked how we can get better event trains and an option for grade separating Morningside Dr. On Tuesday Matt looked into ...
Something you might not know about me is that I’m quite a stubborn person. No, really. I don’t much care for criticism I think’s unfair or that I disagree with. Few of us do I suppose.Back when I was a drinker I’d sometimes respond defensively, even angrily. There are things ...
Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The five things that mattered in Aotearoa’s political economy that we wrote and spoke about via The Kākā and elsewhere for paying subscribers in the last week included:PM Christopher Luxon said the reversal of interest deductibility for landlords was done to help renters, who ...
It was not so much the Labour Party but really the Chris Hipkins party yesterday at Labour’s caucus retreat in Martinborough. The former Prime Minister was more or less consistent on wealth tax, which he was at best equivocal about, and social insurance, which he was not willing to revisit. ...
Buzz from the BeehiveThe text reproduced above appears on a page which records all the media statements and speeches posted on the government’s official website by Melissa Lee as Minister of Media and Communications and/or by Jenny Marcroft, her Parliamentary Under-secretary. It can be quickly analysed ...
For forty years, Robert Muldoon has been a dirty word in our politics. His style of government was so repulsive and authoritarian that the backlash to it helped set and entrench our constitutional norms. His pig-headedness over forcing through Think Big eventually gave us the RMA, with its participation and ...
Bryce Edwards writes – Is the new government reducing tax on rental properties to benefit landlords or to cut the cost of rents? That’s the big question this week, after Associate Finance Minister David Seymour announced on Sunday that the Government would be reversing the Labour Government’s removal ...
Saudi Arabia is rarely far from the international spotlight. The war in Gaza has brought new scrutiny to Saudi plans to normalise relations with Israel, while the fifth anniversary of the controversial killing of Jamal Khashoggi was marked shortly before the war began on October 7. And as the home ...
Questions need to be asked on both sides of the worldPeter Williams writes – The NRL Judiciary hands down an eight week suspension to Sydney Roosters forward Spencer Leniu , an Auckland-born Samoan, after he calls Ezra Mam, Sydney-orn but of Aboriginal and Torres Strait ...
Ele Ludemann writes – Contrary to what many headlines and news stories are saying, residential landlords are not getting a tax break. The government is simply restoring to them the tax deductibility of interest they had until the previous government removed it. There is no logical reason ...
I can't remember when it was goodMoments of happiness in bloomMaybe I just misunderstoodAll of the love we left behindWatching our flashbacks intertwineMemories I will never findIn spite of whatever you becomeForget that reckless thing turned onI think our lives have just begunI think our lives have just begunDoes anyone ...
Michael Bassett writes – At first reading, a front-page story in the New Zealand Herald on 13 March was bizarre. A group of severely intellectually limited teenagers, with little understanding of the law, have been pleading to the Justice Select Committee not to pass a bill dealing with ram ...
How much political capital is Christopher Luxon willing to burn through in order to deliver his $2.9 billion gift to landlords? Evidently, Luxon is: (a) unable to cost the policy accurately. As Anna Burns-Francis pointed out to him on Breakfast TV, the original ”rock solid” $2.1 billion cost he was ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Jonathon Porritt calling bullshit in his own blog post on mainstream climate science as ‘The New Denialism’.Local scoop:The Wellington City Council’s list of proposed changes to the IHP recommendations to be debated later today was leaked this ...
TL;DR:Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said yesterday tenants should be grateful for the reinstatement of interest deductibility because landlords would pass on their lower tax costs in the form of lower rents. That would be true if landlords were regulated monopolies such as Transpower or Auckland Airport1, but they’re not, ...
This is a re-post from Yale Climate Connections by Tom Toro Tom Toro is a cartoonist and author. He has published over 200 cartoons in The New Yorker since 2010. His cartoons appear in Playboy, the Paris Review, the New York Times, American Bystander, and elsewhere. Related: What 10 EV lovers ...
The business section of the NZ Herald is full of opinion. Among the more opinionated of all is the ex-Minister of Transport, ex-Minister of Railways, ex MP for Auckland Central (1975-93, Labour), Wellington Central (1996-99, ACT, then list-2005), ex-leader of the ACT Party, uncle to actor Antonia, the veritable granddaddy ...
Hi,Just quickly — I’m blown away by the stories you’ve shared with me over the last week since I put out the ‘Gary’ podcast, where I told you about the time my friend’s flatmate killed the neighbour.And you keep telling me stories — in the comments section, and in my ...
The first season of Rings of Power was not awful. It was thoroughly underwhelming, yes, and left a lingering sense of disappointment, but it was more expensive mediocrity than catastrophe. I wrote at length about the series as it came out (see the Review section of the blog, and go ...
Buzz from the Beehive Workplace Relations and Safety Minister Brooke van Velden told Auckland Business Chamber members they were the first audience to hear her priorities as a minister in a government committed to cutting red tape and regulations. She brandished her liberalising credentials, saying Flexible labour markets are the ...
Chris Trotter writes – TO UNDERSTAND WHY NEWSHUB FAILED, it is necessary to understand how TVNZ changed. Up until 1989, the state broadcaster had been funded by a broadcasting licence fee, collected from every citizen in possession of a television set, supplemented by a relatively modest (compared ...
Bob Edlin writes – The Māori Party has been busy issuing a mix of warnings and threats as its expresses its opposition to interest deductibility for landlords and the plans of seabed miners. It remains to be seen whether they follow the example of indigenous litigants in Australia, ...
Every year, in the Budget, Parliament forks out money to government agencies to do certain things. And every year, as part of the annual review cycle, those agencies are meant to report on whether they have done the things Parliament gave them that money for. Agencies which consistently fail to ...
Mike Grimshaw writes – Recent events in American universities point to an underlying crisis of coherent thinking, an issue that increasingly affects the progressive left across the Western world. This of course is nothing new as anyone who can either remember or has read of the late ...
The thing about life’s little victories is that they can be followed by a defeat.Reader Darryl told me on Monday night:Test again Dave. My “head cold” last week became COVID within 24 hours, and is still with me. I hear the new variants take a bit longer to show up ...
TL;DR: My top 10 news and analysis links this morning include:Today’s must-read:Angus Deaton on rethinking his economics IMFLocal scoop: The people behind Tamarind, the firm that left a $500m cleanup bill for taxpayers at Taranaki’s Tui oil well, are back operating in Taranaki under a different company name. Jonathan ...
Normally when we talk about accessing public transport it’s about improving how easy it is to get to, such as how easy is it to cross roads in a station/stop’s walking catchment, is it possible to cycle to safely, do bus connections work, or even if are there new routes/connections ...
Politicians are not renowned for telling the truth. Some tell us things that are verifiably not true. They offer statements that omit critical pieces of information. Gloss over risks, preferring to offer the best case scenario.Some not truths are quite small, others amusing in their transparency. There are those repeated ...
The pressure is mounting on the Government as it finalises its Budget Policy Statement, but yet more predicted revenue ‘goes missing’. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāTL;DR: The Climate Commission has delivered another funding blow to the National-ACT-NZ First coalition Government’s tax-cutting plans, potentially carving $1.4 billion off the ‘climate ...
The Government now faces the prospect of having to watch another tax raise the price of petrol when, only six days ago, it abolished the Auckland Regional Fuel tax. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon argued that the regional fuel tax imposed costs on lower-income people with less fuel-efficient vehicles and that ...
Kicking the most vulnerable people out of state housing and pushing them towards homelessness will result in a proliferation of poverty and trauma across our most vulnerable communities. ...
Te Pāti Māori co-leader and MP for Waiariki, Rawiri Waititi has penned a letter asking MPs to support his members bill to remove GST from all food. The bill is expected to go through its first reading in parliament this Wednesday. “I’m calling on all political parties to support my ...
This year is about getting real with Kiwis and discussing the tough issues, as the National Government exacerbates inequality and divides New Zealand, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said ...
The Government adding Significant Natural Areas (SNAs) to its already roaring environmental policy bonfire is an assault on the future of wildlife that makes Aotearoa unique. ...
After 12 years of fighting to protect our moana we are finding ourselves back at square one and back at court. Today, the Environmental Protection Agency is sitting in Hawera to reconsider an application from Trans-Tasman Resources to dig up 50 million tonnes of the seabed in South Taranaki. This ...
Minister Shane Jones’ decision to step away from a seabed mining project is evidence of the murky waters surrounding the Government’s fast-track legislation. ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The growth of Treaty of Waitangi clauses in legislation caused so much worry that a special oversight group was set up by the last government in a bid to get greater coherence in the publicservice on Treaty matters. When ministers first considered the need for tighter oversight in 2021, there ...
The Coalition Government’s miscalculation saga continues as it has forgotten an eyewatering $90 million gap in its interest deductibility cost figures, say Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds and Revenue Spokesperson Deborah Russell. ...
He Pou a Rangi Climate Change Commission has today released advice that says if the Government doesn’t act now New Zealand is at risk of not meeting its climate goals. ...
The Coalition Government has today confirmed it is abandoning first home buyers who are struggling to get ahead, says Labour Finance spokesperson Barbara Edmonds. ...
The New Zealand public voted for a change in direction at the 2023 general election and that is exactly what this coalition government has been delivering in its first 100 days. There was an immediate focus on the economy, easing the cost of living, cracking down on law and order ...
The Government has left the health system as an afterthought, announcing half-baked targets at the last minute of their 100-day plan, says Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall. ...
Kiwis are still waiting for their promised cost of living support after 100 days of a National Government that is taking us backwards, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins said today. ...
The National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
100 days of National taking NZ backwardsThe National Government has spent its first 100 days stopping, cutting and reversing. They have scrapped stuff for stuff for the sake of it, without putting up any solutions of their own – and it’s hardworking New Zealanders who will pay for it. ...
The Government must commit to funding free and healthy school lunches, as thousands of people sign the petition to keep them, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti says. ...
If the Government was serious about moving families into public housing, they would build more houses so there is actually somewhere for people to go. ...
The free and healthy school lunches programme feeds our kids, helps them to learn, and saves families money – but it is at risk under this Government, education spokesperson Jan Tinetti said. ...
The Government’s proposed changes to Firearms Prohibition Orders (FPO) add almost nothing new and are merely an attempt to distract from its plans to loosen gun laws, police spokesperson Ginny Andersen and justice spokesperson Dr Duncan Webb said. ...
The great Victorian era English politician Lord Macauley stood in the British House of Parliament and said, "The gallery in which the reporters sit has become a fourth estate of the realm".He understood and outlined even way back then, the significant role and influence media have in a democracy. ...
The government’s attack on Māori health this week is committing tangata-whenua to a premature death, says Te Pāti Māori. “The government have begun their onslaught on Māori health with the abolishment of the Māori Health Authority and smokefree laws in the same day” said health spokesperson and co-leader, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer. ...
Today marks a tragic milestone for New Zealanders as the Coalition Government side with big tobacco to repeal the Smokefree Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act 2022, Labour Leader Chris Hipkins and Labour Health spokesperson Ayesha Verrall said. ...
New Zealand’s social workers are qualified, experienced, and more representative of the communities they serve, Social Development and Employment Minister Louise Upston says. “I want to acknowledge and applaud New Zealand’s social workers for the hard work they do, providing invaluable support for our most vulnerable. “To coincide with World ...
Cabinet has agreed to a reduced road user charge (RUC) rate for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs), Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. Owners of PHEVs will be eligible for a reduced rate of $38 per 1,000km once all light electric vehicles (EVs) move into the RUC system from 1 April. ...
Minister of Agriculture and Trade, Todd McClay, says that today’s opening of Riverland Foods manufacturing plant in Christchurch is a great example of how trade access to overseas markets creates jobs in New Zealand. Speaking at the official opening of this state-of-the-art pet food factory the Minister noted that exports ...
Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters met with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi in Wellington today. “It was a pleasure to host Foreign Minister Wang Yi during his first official visit to New Zealand since 2017. Our discussions were wide-ranging and enabled engagement on many facets of New Zealand’s relationship with China, including trade, ...
Kāinga Ora – Homes & Communities has been instructed to end the Sustaining Tenancies Framework and take stronger measures against persistent antisocial behaviour by tenants, says Housing Minister Chris Bishop. “Earlier today Finance Minister Nicola Willis and I sent an interim Letter of Expectations to the Board of Kāinga Ora. ...
Tēna koutou katoa. Greetings everyone. Thank you to the Auckland Chamber of Commerce and the Honourable Simon Bridges for hosting this address today. I acknowledge the business leaders in this room, the leaders and governors, the employers, the entrepreneurs, the investors, and the wealth creators. The coalition Government shares your ...
Minister Winston Peters completed the final leg of his visit to South and South East Asia in Singapore today, where he focused on enhancing one of New Zealand’s indispensable strategic partnerships. “Singapore is our most important defence partner in South East Asia, our fourth-largest trading partner and a ...
Minister of Internal Affairs and Workplace Relations and Safety, Hon. Brooke van Velden, will travel to the Republic of Korea to represent New Zealand at the Third Summit for Democracy on 18 March. The summit, hosted by the Republic of Korea, was first convened by the United States in 2021, ...
ICNZ Speech 7 March 2024, Auckland Acknowledgements and opening Mōrena, ngā mihi nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Good morning, it’s a privilege to be here to open the ICNZ annual conference, thank you to Mark for the Mihi Whakatau My thanks to Tim Grafton for inviting me ...
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon and Lead Coordination Minister Judith Collins have expressed their deepest sympathy on the five-year anniversary of the Christchurch terror attacks. “March 15, 2019, was a day when families, communities and the country came together both in sorrow and solidarity,” Mr Luxon says. “Today we pay our respects to the 51 shuhada ...
Speech for Financial Advice NZ Conference 5 March 2024 Acknowledgements and opening Morena, Nga Mihi Nui. Ko Andrew Bayly aho, Nor Whanganui aho. Thanks Nate for your Mihi Whakatau Good morning. It’s a pleasure to formally open your conference this morning. What a lovely day in Wellington, What a great ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters held discussions in Jakarta today about the future of relations between New Zealand and South East Asia’s most populous country. “We are in Jakarta so early in our new government’s term to reflect the huge importance we place on our relationship with Indonesia and South ...
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Foreign Affairs Winston Peters has announced that the Foreign Minister of China, Wang Yi, will visit New Zealand next week. “We look forward to re-engaging with Foreign Minister Wang Yi and discussing the full breadth of the bilateral relationship, which is one of New Zealand’s ...
Transport Minister Simeon Brown has today opened the new Auckland Rail Operations Centre, which will bring together KiwiRail, Auckland Transport, and Auckland One Rail to improve service reliability for Aucklanders. “The recent train disruptions in Auckland have highlighted how important it is KiwiRail and Auckland’s rail agencies work together to ...
The Government is proud to support the 10th edition of Crankworx Rotorua as the Crankworx World Tour returns to Rotorua from 16-24 March 2024, says Minister for Economic Development Melissa Lee. “Over the past 10 years as Crankworx Rotorua has grown, so too have the economic and social benefits that ...
Legislation implementing coalition Government tax commitments and addressing long-standing tax anomalies will be progressed in Parliament next week, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The legislation is contained in an Amendment Paper to the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill issued today. “The Amendment Paper represents ...
Associate Environment Minister Andrew Hoggard has today announced that the Government has agreed to suspend the requirement for councils to comply with the Significant Natural Areas (SNA) provisions of the National Policy Statement for Indigenous Biodiversity for three years, while it replaces the Resource Management Act (RMA).“As it stands, SNAs ...
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay has classified the drought conditions in the Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts as a medium-scale adverse event, acknowledging the challenging conditions facing farmers and growers in the district. “Parts of Marlborough, Tasman, and Nelson districts are in the grip of an intense dry spell. I know ...
The Government is helping farmers eradicate the significant impact of facial eczema (FE) in pastoral animals, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “A $20 million partnership jointly funded by Beef + Lamb NZ, the Government, and the primary sector will save farmers an estimated NZD$332 million per year, and aims to ...
Foreign Minister Winston Peters has completed a successful visit to India, saying it was an important step in taking the relationship between the two countries to the next level. “We have laid a strong foundation for the Coalition Government’s priority of enhancing New Zealand-India relations to generate significant future benefit for both countries,” says Mr Peters, ...
Cabinet has agreed to provide $7 million to ensure the 2024 ski season can go ahead on the Whakapapa ski field in the central North Island but has told the operator Ruapehu Alpine Lifts it is the last financial support it will receive from taxpayers. Cabinet also agreed to provide ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Health Minister Dr Shane Reti says the launch of a new mobile breast screening unit in Counties Manukau reinforces the coalition Government’s commitment to drive better cancer services for all New Zealanders. Speaking at the launch of the new mobile clinic, Dr Reti says it’s a great example of taking ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Unlocking economic growth and land for housing are critical elements of the Government’s plan for our transport network, and planned upgrades to State Highway 29 (SH29) near Tauriko will deliver strongly on those priorities, Transport Minister Simeon Brown says. “The SH29 upgrades near Tauriko will improve safety at the intersections ...
Lower fruit and vegetable prices are welcome news for New Zealanders who have been doing it tough at the supermarket, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. Stats NZ reported today the price of fruit and vegetables has dropped 9.3 percent in the 12 months to February 2024. “Lower fruit and vege ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the sixty-eighth session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
Tēnā koutou katoa and greetings to you all. Chair, I am honoured to address the 68th session of the Commission on the Status of Women. I acknowledge the many crises impacting the rights of women and girls. Heightened global tensions, war, climate related and humanitarian disasters, and price inflation all ...
The coalition Government is supporting farmers to enhance land management practices by investing $3.3 million in locally led catchment groups, Agriculture Minister Todd McClay announced. “Farmers and growers deliver significant prosperity for New Zealand and it’s vital their ongoing efforts to improve land management practices and water quality are supported,” ...
Good evening everyone and thank you for that lovely introduction. Thank you also to the Honourable Simon Bridges for the invitation to address your members. Since being sworn in, this coalition Government has hit the ground running with our 100-day plan, delivering the changes that New Zealanders expect of us. ...
Recommendations from the Climate Change Commission for New Zealand on the Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) auction and unit limit settings for the next five years have been tabled in Parliament, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. “The Commission provides advice on the ETS annually. This is the third time the ...
The coalition Government is beginning its fight to lower building costs and reduce red tape by exempting minor building work from paying the building levy, says Building and Construction Minister Chris Penk. “Currently, any building project worth $20,444 including GST or more is subject to the building levy which is ...
Proposed changes to tax legislation to prevent the over-taxation of low-earning trusts are welcome, Finance Minister Nicola Willis says. The changes have been recommended by Parliament’s Finance and Expenditure Committee following consideration of submissions on the Taxation (Annual Rates for 2023–24, Multinational Tax, and Remedial Matters) Bill. “One of the ...
Assalaamu alaikum. السَّلَام عليكم In light of the holy month of Ramadan, I want to extend my warmest wishes to our Muslim community in New Zealand. Ramadan is a time for spiritual reflection, renewed devotion, perseverance, generosity, and forgiveness. It’s a time to strengthen our bonds and appreciate the diversity ...
Former Transport Minister and CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber Hon Simon Bridges has been appointed as the new Board Chair of the New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) for a three-year term, Transport Minister Simeon Brown announced today. “Simon brings extensive experience and knowledge in transport policy and governance to the role. He will ...
Good morning all, it is a pleasure to be here as Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology. It is fantastic to see how connected and collaborative the life science and biotechnology industry is here in New Zealand. I would like to thank BioTechNZ and NZTech for the invitation to address ...
Regional Development Minister Shane Jones says he is looking forward to the day when three key water projects in Northland are up and running, unlocking the full potential of land in the region. Mr Jones attended a community event at the site of the Otawere reservoir near Kerikeri on Friday. ...
Associate Finance Minister David Seymour has today announced that the Government has agreed to restore deductibility for mortgage interest on residential investment properties. “Help is on the way for landlords and renters alike. The Government’s restoration of interest deductibility will ease pressure on rents and simplify the tax code,” says ...
Sport and Recreation Minister Chris Bishop will travel to Switzerland today to attend an Executive Committee meeting and Symposium of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Mr Bishop will then travel on to London where he will attend a series of meetings in his capacity as Infrastructure Minister. “New Zealanders believe ...
This year’s Pacific Language Weeks celebrate regional unity and the contribution of Pacific communities to New Zealand culture, says Minister for Pacific Peoples Dr Shane Reti. Dr Reti announced dates for the 2024 Pacific Language Weeks during a visit to the Pasifika festival in Auckland today and says there’s so ...
By Lydia Lewis, RNZ Pacific journalist Food rationing is underway in remote areas in Papua New Guinea’s Highlands following torrential rain and flash flooding. More than 20 people have been reported dead in Chimbu Province. In nearby Enga Province, the centre of last month’s massacre, a 15-year-old boy has been ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andrew Hughes, Lecturer, Research School of Management, Australian National University After months of debate and intrigue, the AFL’s 19th and newest team, the Tasmania Devils, finally launched its jumper, logo and colours in Devonport this week. The Devils will wear green, ...
Brannavan Gnanalingam reviews the debut novel by Saraid de Silva.One of the most baffling things for children who move to a new country is what their parents’ (or grandparents’) lives were like prior to moving – for kids in particular, they’re too busy trying to fit in in their ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Gaunson, Associate Professor in Cinema Studies, RMIT University Narelle Portanier/Binge “If you don’t know who your mob are, you don’t know who you are,” Detective Andrea “Andie” Whitford (played by Leah Purcell) is told early into the new crime ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Elise Klein, Associate professor, Australian National University It’s commonly accepted that women do the vast majority of caregiving in Australian society. But less appreciated is that Indigenous women do larger amounts of unpaid care than any other group. Working with the Aboriginal ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne Joe Biden and Donald Trump have both secured their parties’ nominations for the November 5 United States general election by winning a ...
Comment: There has been a striking contrast in trans-Tasman interest about Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi’s visit to New Zealand and Australia. While the Australian press has been full of articles about the visit – including his curious decision to meet with former prime minister and China booster Paul Keating ...
After years of pressuring banks and other institutions to stop investing in fossil fuels, climate campaigners are making some progress. So how does divestment work?For years, climate activists have been pushing banks and other big institutions to divest from fossil fuels. New research from climate advocacy group 350 Aotearoa ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. The three young Polynesians are part of a K-pop fan community in Tāmaki Makaurau. It’s one of many that have sprung up worldwide as K-pop has gone ...
For Boba, Ethan and Ashley, K-pop is a place to belong, a way to express themselves, and a bridge to connect with others. This one-off documentary presents three intimate portraits of young Polynesians who are pulled into a Korean cultural phenomenon. K-POLYS is directed by Litia Tuiburelevu, Produced by Hex ...
There’s ample evidence demonstrating free school lunch programmes provide wide benefits across schools, households and communities according to public health researchers. ACT Minister David Seymour wants to reduce the spending on Aotearoa New Zealand’s ...
By Wata Shaw in Suva Fiji is facing an exodus of Fijians as many are leaving for overseas seeking employment and education and others are migrating, says Opposition MP Viliame Naupoto. Speaking in Parliament, he said: “His Excellency’s speech (Ratu Wiliame Katonivere) comes after a little over one year of ...
The Taxpayers’ Union is welcoming comments from Christopher Luxon this morning recommitting to ‘no new taxes’ as part of Budget 2024. “Mr Luxon’s refusal at the Post-Cabinet press conference yesterday to repeat the ‘no new taxes’ promise ...
SAFE is urgently calling on the Environment Committee to reject the Government’s Fast-Track Approvals Bill, and is urging New Zealanders to rally behind the call. The proposed Bill, currently under consideration with the Environment select committee, ...
Teammates who spend all their time picking fights with spectators are only helpful for the other team, writes Madeleine Chapman. Anyone who has ever played a team sport competitively, particularly as a child and particularly, for some reason, basketball, will know that there’s a lot of politics involved. While there ...
The long-running Wellington music festival is too focused on the Jim Beam-ness and not enough on the Homegrown-ness.There is something about Homegrown that’s difficult to place. A barely perceptible-ness. Like feeling a ghost is watching you from the corner of the room but when you look, there’s nothing there. ...
The latest Ipsos New Zealand Issues Monitor reveals that fewer New Zealanders believe crime / law and order is one of the top issues facing our country. In 2018, Ipsos New Zealand started tracking the key issues facing New Zealand. In this wave ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Kate Griffiths, Deputy Program Director, Budgets and Government, Grattan Institute Australia’s political donations rules are woefully inadequate, but donations reform is finally on the agenda. The federal government has signalled its interest in reform and will soon begin briefing MPs on its ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Mark Patrick Taylor, Chief Environmental Scientist, EPA Victoria; Honorary Professor, School of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University Naiyana Somchitkaeo/Shutterstock A recent study published in the prestigious New England Journal of Medicine has linked microplastics with risk to human health. The study ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Albert Van Dijk, Professor, Water and Landscape Dynamics, Fenner School of Environment & Society, Australian National University Global climate records were shattered in 2023, from air and sea temperatures to sea-level rise and sea-ice extent. Scores of countries recorded their hottest year ...
As part of our series exploring how New Zealanders live and our relationship with money, a teacher explains why he and his partner are in frugal mode – and how they’re making it work. Gender: Male Age: 35Ethnicity: Pākehā Role: I am an intermediate school teacher and my partner is ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Sarah Bendall, Senior Lecturer, Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences, Australian Catholic University Binge Mary & George, the new British television drama series, depicts the real-life story of Mary Villiers and her son George, and their social climbing at the ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Jason Nassios, Associate Professor, Centre of Policy Studies, Victoria University This article is part of The Conversation’s series examining the housing crisis. Read the other articles in the series here. Australian state and federal governments spend money in many ways to ...
The finance minister is denying that there’s a $5.6b shortfall in paying for the government’s campaign promises, including tax cuts. At his post-cabinet press conference yesterday, the PM refused to rule out new taxes to pay for the cuts, writes Anna Rawhiti-Connell in this excerpt from The Bulletin, The Spinoff’s ...
Kāinga Ora tenants abused by their neighbours are doubting the government's crackdown on disruptive tenants will make a difference on their behaviour. ...
Kāinga Ora is New Zealand’s biggest residential landlord, housing more than 180,000 vulnerable people in more than 67,000 properties. Yesterday the government announced a crackdown on its tenants who fall behind on rent. One longtime Kāinga Ora tenant shares her experience.For 18 years I lived in a 1960s standalone ...
Why does this myth persist, and what’s the real reason our skin is suffering?It’s one of the biggest international grievances New Zealanders hold, up there with the sinking of the Rainbow Warrior and 1981’s underarm incident. We’re quick to tell international travellers that the world’s pollution led to the ...
Auckland Council is opposing a fast-track development backed by Sir John Kirwan and Spark NZ, because it doesn’t meet stringent new climate adaptation requirements The post Surf-data centre faces new 3.8C climate warming rules appeared first on Newsroom. ...
When the Criminal Proceeds (Recovery) Act was introduced in 2009 it was firmly targeted at gangs and drugs. The legislation means police no longer need a conviction to seize assets that criminals can’t prove were paid for legitimately, as long as their alleged offences are punishable by more than a ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[quiz],DIV[quiz],A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp'); Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions. The post Newsroom daily quiz, Tuesday 19 March appeared first on Newsroom. ...
Bob’s relationship with certain members of Lincoln’s academic staff continued to deteriorate in the 1990s. Others supported him publicly, though articles such as Roland Clark’s 1993 piece in Growing Today cannot have pleased the university management. Clark wrote that Bob was selling onions from the Biological Husbandry Unit to a ...
SailGP’s races feature in-your-face action, with agile, hydro-foiling catamarans tacking and jibing for the title over several days. However, public comments ahead of the global series’ return to New Zealand have left this past year’s controversy in the shadows, as a key appointment attracts criticism from dolphin advocates. A year ...
Opinion: We are fast approaching a fundamental change in prisons. As the number of people on custodial remand looks set to overtake the number of sentenced prisoners, the main function of prisons in New Zealand may become incarcerating un-sentenced people who may not be guilty of offending. We have already ...
A huge seven months lies in store for the White Ferns, beginning this week with the visit of England and culminating with the T20 World Cup in Bangladesh in September and October. Starting on Tuesday in Dunedin, the world ranked No. 2 visitors will play five T20s and three ODIs, ...
Opinion: In a move that has shocked road safety advocates across the country, the new Minister of Transport, Simeon Brown, is poised to abandon the previous government’s speed limit reduction policy, particularly around schools. Even more alarmingly, he wants school speed limits to be variable rather than full-time, arguing ...
The letters, which were published last week, were addressed to Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDI-P) Chairperson Megawati Sukarnoputri, National Democrat Party (NasDem) Chairperson Surya Paloh, National Awakening Party (PKB) Chairperson Muhaimin Iskandar, Justice and Prosperity Party (PKS) President Ahmad Syaikhu and United Development Party (PPP) Chairperson Muhammad Mardiono. In ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Evicting more people from state housing is ignorant to the consequences of poverty, the Greens say, but the Housing Minister says it's a privilege that can be taken away if abused. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Emerald L King, Lecturer in Humanities, University of Tasmania IMDB Between Netflix’s 2023 live-action version of One Piece, and its latest take on Avatar: The Last Airbender, fans are once again asking: why are live-action anime adaptations so tricky to ...
The government says it still intends to deliver tax cuts by July, but will not lock them in until they have got them past their coalition partners. ...
Kiingi Tuheitia Pootatau Te Wherowhero VII has hosted members of the Green Party Caucus at Tuurangawaewae Marae in Ngaaruawahia. The audience follows the King’s Hui-aa-Motu on 20 January, where more than 10,000 people gathered to discuss national ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Dr Rachael Potter, Research Associate and Lecturer in Work and Organisational Psychology, University of South Australia Ground Picture/Shutterstock Pregnant women and workers with children are often unfairly treated by their bosses and colleagues, despite laws to protect against workplace discrimination ...
Reacting to Prime Minister Christopher Luxon’s refusal to rule out introducing new taxes at the budget, Taxpayers’ Union Campaigns Manager, Connor Molloy, said: “Today’s refusal to rule out new taxes suggests the Government is nothing more ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Stephen Duckett, Honorary Enterprise Professor, School of Population and Global Health, and Department of General Practice and Primary Care, The University of Melbourne Aila Images/Shutterstock Aged-care workers will receive a significant pay increase after the Fair Work Commission ruled they ...
He’s bringing ‘Sophie’ back, yeah. Goodshirt’s ‘Sophie’ music video is one of the most instantly recognisable New Zealand music videos of all time. Featuring a woman listening to the song on headphones while her entire house is burgled behind her, the video won the New Zealand music award for Best ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By John Blaxland, Professor, Strategic and Defence Studies Centre, Australian National University A year ago, the AUKUS agreement was formally announced between Australian and UK Prime Ministers Anthony Albanese and Rishi Sunak and US President Joe Biden. The agreement mapped out the “optimal ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Andreas Helwig, Associate Professor, Electro-Mechanical Engineering, University of Southern Queensland SmartS/Shutterstock Steam locomotives clattering along railway tracks. Paddle steamers churning down the Murray. Dreadnought battleships powered by steam engines. Many of us think the age of steam has ended. ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Carrie Leonetti, Associate Professor of Law, University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Victims who experience family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand are treated differently, depending on which part of the justice system they turn to for help. But a new member’s bill ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Peter Tesch, Visiting Fellow at the ANU Centre for European Studies, Australian National University In perhaps the least surprising news of the year, Vladimir Putin has triumphed at the Russian ballot box and been enthroned for the fifth time as president. He ...
The Papua New Guinea Supreme Court has stopped a byelection for the Madang Open seat being held until an appeal filed by former MP Bryan Kramer is concluded. Kramer had appealed to the Supreme Court over a National Court decision not to review his application of the Leadership Tribunal decision ...
By Miriam Zarriga in Port Moresby Despite a “historic” ceasefire agreement in Papua New Guinea between Enga authorities and tribal leaders after months of bitter warfare, a young woman has been found brutally killed near Kaekin village, Wapenamanda. Despite the peace agreement and signing concluded in Port Moresby last Thursday ...
The second season of Ryan Murphy’s Feud is a sadder and slower entry into his canon of true story-telling, leaning heavily on a verdict about the cost of a single work of art. Hollywood heavyweight Ryan Murphy has had a bit of “ick” about him in the last few years. ...
Are you deeply passionate about sharing Māori stories? We’re on the hunt for an experienced writer/editor to lead coverage in our Ātea section.Ātea is a deeply valued section of The Spinoff site, offering Māori perspectives and insights across politics, current affairs and culture. We are thrilled to be looking ...
By Aisha Azeemah in Suva With the lights on one of his sneakers blinking as he ran through the gallery, a little boy looked up at several works of art. One of them was a sculpture of his grandfather: the man who changed how we see the Pacific — Epeli ...
WHAT: Uber drivers are holding a rally outside the Court of Appeal in Wellington tomorrow, as the company begins its appeal against 2022’s Employment Court verdict (in a case taken jointly by FIRST Union and E tū) that four drivers were permanent ...
RNZ Pacific The Fiji Meteorological Service has a heavy rain warning still in place for the whole of the country after a weekend of flooding, although some floodwaters have receded. Flood and flash flood warnings and alerts are also in place, including a warning for all flash flood-prone areas, small ...
Responding to Grant Robertson’s recent admission on a Q+A with Jack Tame that his only regret from his time in office was that he didn’t take on more debt, Taxpayers’ Union spokesperson, Alex Murphy, said: “Grant Robertson has now admitted that he ...
Thanks TRP. Yesterday’s open Mike was very popular – now up to over 270 comments, so anything new there would have got lost.
I wanted to post this slightly lighthearted article by David Slack, as a good read for a Sunday morning for those of us who cannot turn off politics despite being summer.
https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/109708624/david-slack-simon-bridges-how-you-can-be-a-better-you-in-2019
Enjoy.
Too bland. He’d probably defend that by saying `yeah, but the dude is actually bland, so my take has to reflect that’. Fair enough!
“I was put next to him at a lunch last month and greeted him with a warm handshake and the exact same words I use in the column: “Gidday, poor old Simon.” We chatted amiably for a good long while about our prospects in the respective cruel worlds of politics and media. He’s a good sport, poor old Simon.”
Hang on, the dude is not poor and he’s not old. Professional journalism is meant to be based on accuracy. Not misrepresentation. And he got it wrong twice in a row. If I was rich young Simon, I’d take the bugger to the press council on a formal complaint. Headlines are always good. I would demand accuracy in the media. Winston would fume.
I did say “slightly lighthearted” and “a good read for a Sunday morning” !
David Slack is often tongue in cheek but is also able to slog it to them. Variety is the spice of life, Dennis.
And come on, you don’t expect depth from the Sunday Star Times do you? LOL
You did, true, and I’m actually a fan of the guy & appreciate his stuff most of the time. Just felt the need to bitch at him a little for being shallow. I take the point he may well have done it to suit the SST average reader.. 🙂
…you don’t expect depth from the Sunday Star Times do you?
We did get it once many moons ago – a lot of good in-depth articles. The trouble was, nobody was buying it because people don’t want to be educated and informed. They prefer to be entertained by substance-less mish-mash. Its still better that the HoS rag.
I agree with you vv, David Slack socks it to them – usually in a wry, sly way – but he chooses to carefully select his topics and when he does it.
So you don’t understand the expression ‘poor old x’ franky.
Poor old Dennis.
Inaccurate – due to buying low & selling high I actually became affluent old Dennis. Kinda strange for someone so averse to gambling that I never buy lottery tickets!
Jacinda Derangement Syndrome continues to afflict the Right Wing
First two dozen posts on Kiwiblog yesterday were all deranged attacks on the P.M. We’ve got at least another seven years of this to look forward to…
http://morrisseybreen.blogspot.com/2019/01/yet-more-jacinda-derangement-syndrome.html
Hold on, one comment thread that happens to flow from the first comment on open mike is now evidence of derangement.
What’s more deranged is counting comments, calling them posts and then announcing it as evidence of derangement.
Congratulations to the cricket team.
To play poorly, (average bowling, dropped catches etc..) and still win is a sign of a good team.
Cheers too to the Sri Lanka’s for making it a thrilling competition.
Bring on India!
Hospitals are wanting more alcohol restriction.
Maybe also increase the ACC levy for the alcohol industry, to help pay for the costs to hospitals etc.
dv
Alcohol our favourite drug, enjoyable but sneaky and encouraged by the government. Under a low regulation, high punitive approach, you are encouraged to drink till the small hours of the morning, even all day, then they will fine you high if you piddle in the streets. If you lie down on the road and someone inadvertently runs over you government will fine the driver.
It is all part of the money economy, find a way to make money out of everybody and everything, and laissez faire; but it isn’t fair to have no regulations, it isn’t fair to encourage people to take drugs, it isn’t fair to play on known human traits and enable people to get hooked and waste their lives and often become irresponsible and violent.
The RW government theme is, Be born, grow up, earn some money and be taxed, die early before you get to old age (or go in and out of prison till you collapse). There is still public expectation that old citizens will be cared for and it is more convenient for government if people die early from accident, or alcohol effects, though they haven’t enough honesty and care about citizens to bring laws in that govern euthanasia, so citizens have choice about when and how they die.
What we really need is to develop a different attitude to alcohol. Our ancestors have been drinking the stuff for a very long time, in fact it used to be drunk at breakfast time with no apparent ill effect – safer than the water!
However, at some stage it got turned into the ‘demon alcohol’ where the whole point seemed to be getting shit-faced and creating havoc of one sort or another. A thoughtful analysis of how we got to this pathetic state would be in order before I and my friends find ourselves being perceived as anti-social for our evening glass of wine and we redevelop prohibition mentality.
Our ancestors are us.
http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5502/31240865885_38f3fbe2ea_h.jpg
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Street_and_Gin_Lane
We have had periods in history when we rose above that.
The Georgians, like the Bourbons and the Neoliberals, needed a drugged out, dumbed down populace to passively accept the levels of austerity imposed on them.
Alcohol is a drug …. a legal recreation drug … and its either a straw-man or paranoia ….. to state that anyone is going to label you as “anti-social”, for consuming a glass of 14% alcohol wine…. unless that glass gets you shitfaced and you create havoc 😉
The drug Alcohol actually gets a soft ride …. “It is the cause of more damage than all the other drugs in the world combined and it is legal. Police
officers estimate it is a contributing factor in 70% of the incidents they attend. ” ….. yet its the other safer recreational drugs which are “demonized” …. this has accurately been called ‘drug policy abuse ‘.
Have an evening puff on a joint … or a night dancing on mdma … or take Lsd at an outdoor festival … and the state labels you a criminal …. with our ‘justice system’ administering this politically driven witch trial nonsense as law.
Apart from demonizing and persecuting those who use a different recreational drug than booze …… there is no denying NZ has a problem with the abuse of Alcohol & other drugs …
“ALCOHOL A MAJOR FACTOR
Detective Sergeant Kylie Schaare has dealt with some of the most horrific cases the unit has seen in the past 12 months.” …
“,,,,, an 8-month-old baby was beaten black and blue by his mother and suffered extensive bruising to his eyes, ears and face.
Alcohol was a major factor in the bashing, which was apparent in a lot of physical and sexual abuse cases the unit dealt with, Mrs Schaare said.”
“Police statistics show ample evidence that young people between the ages of 17
and 19 comprise the highest proportion of offenders who have consumed alcohol prior to committing an offence” https://www.policeassn.org.nz/system/files/file/2011-02_0.pdf
Our governments have been subservient to the global liquor industry for 30 years.
At the risk of starting another lengthy thread on a subject many readers aren’t interested in, I’d like to continue yesterday’s discussion with Robert in a place where there’s more room to reply. Robert wrote (quoting me in the fist sentence):
“This is a common problem with the arguments of GE opponents, ie the arguments often do not support the conclusions claimed.”
Yes, I think that’s true.
I also think the arguments of the GE proponents lack the “buffers” that come from outside of pure logic, buffers which come from somewhere other than the brain. The same issue is found in medicine, where the precise extract of a plant, synthesised even, becomes the medicine, rather than the plant itself, which contained the buffers that moderate the effects on the body. The two schools rarely mix, though I met a GP yesterday who practices both.
I do focus on the logic of people’s arguments and the practicalities of technology, and you’re right that there’s more to it than that. Because it’s such a huge leap up from selective breeding, genetic engineering of plants comes with risks, particularly the risk of it being used to double down on the intensification and industrialisation of agriculture. On that basis, it’s not surprising the Green Party is so suspicious of it. Added to that, the party has to consider its supporters in the organic food industry, which would face difficulties if GE plants were in general use in NZ. (NB: I’m a Green voter and financial donor, so any criticism I make of the party comes from a supporter, not an opponent.)
However, the GE jinn is out of the bottle and there won’t be any tricking it into getting back in again. The question now isn’t whether GE is good or bad, right or wrong, the question is what regulations do we need to apply to GE to make sure we don’t make things worse?
That’s where I’m in disagreement with the Greens. If we pretend we can make NZ a bastion of GE-free food, for one thing we’d fail (because we’re not isolated from the rest of the world) and for another we’d be putting our non-organic agricultural sector at a big disadvantage for the benefit of the organic sector. It would not be a rational approach and many voters (not to mention some Green voters) would recognise that. The Greens’ focus should continue to be on reducing the intensification and industrialisation of farming in general, and we have a lot of very capable scientists who can help figure out how GE could contribute to that. It doesn’t have to be a “GE = good” vs “GE = bad” debate.
“I’m a Green voter and financial donor, so any criticism I make of the party comes from a supporter, not an opponent.” Likewise. ” It doesn’t have to be a “GE = good” vs “GE = bad” debate.” True.
Nuance is real hard for a lot of people. Politics, on a numbers basis, always gets driven by those who prefer simplicity. In a complex world, most punters therefore get it wrong, and produce public policy accordingly. Occam’s razor is a useful guide in a lot of situations, but a blunt tool that is likely to make things worse in others.
I’ve not even tried to engage other Greens on GE policy. Am not even motivated to see it there’s a policy on the GP website. A can of worms best to side-step until it becomes necessary to clean it out, I reckon.
You say, we’d be putting our non-organic agricultural sector at a big disadvantage.
Can you give some detail on why you believe so?
I’d say, first up, organic growers would lose the advantage of being able to market their produce as coming from a GE-free country, that is GE-Free NZ.
The non-organic (yet GE free) agricultural sector would also suffer that marketing disadvantage, Robert.
Exactly. A good reason not to go down that path, Mr Chair.
Indeed.
How big is NZ organic market.?
A very good question and one I can’t answer personally.
However I have been invited to a couple of organic farms, Gee I shuddered a little.
As far as I am concerned I wouldn’t want too eat or buy what was on that land animal or plant.
It seems the term “organic” means no fertiliser application and no animal health remedies, or any that work anyway.
Others may have different experiences?
I struggle to believe your claims, Jim. Organic farms are generally intensely aware of their soil and animal health and apply organic fertilisers and organic-approved animal remedies for the health of their stock – perhaps your ignorance of how organic farmers operate meant you were blind to what was really happening.
Evidently about 10% of vineyards are organic, and it seems to be the ones who are doing fairly flash wine.
https://www.nzwine.com/en/sustainability/organic-winegrowing/
There’s also a substantial premium for organic honey, but all NZ honey attracts a premium because we don’t use antibiotics.
Can you give some detail on why you believe so?
The disadvantage would lie in the opportunity cost of not being able to use GE while overseas competition was able to use it.
Should we follow every opportunity available to avoid losing out to overseas competition?
Of course not. But we should follow those opportunities unless there are compelling arguments not to follow them, which puts us back to where we were yesterday : are there compelling arguments not to follow this particular opportunity?
Yes 🙂
There we part company!
True.
Suggesting about opportunity cost is flawed…
GM CAN’T be tested adequately (unlimited variables) which creates a risk profile such as to render opp cost, immeasurable…
Why would our non-organic (yet GE free) agricultural sector want to turn to GMOs when they know it will cost them sales?
Consumers largely oppose GMOs with many opting for NZ products due to our clean image. Therefore, the loss of sales would vastly nullify any potential gain from investing in GMOs.
Potentially lowering production costs or increasing yields means little if the process then leads to a vast reduction in sales.
Why would our non-organic (yet GE free) agricultural sector want to turn to GMOs when they know it will cost them sales?
It probably would cost them sales among the world’s more irrational consumers, but most consumers are not irrational and increased production enables more sales to those consumers.
Consumers largely oppose GMOs with many opting for NZ products due to our clean image.
Our “clean image” is exactly that, an image. It’s fake. I suppose consumers who are irrational enough to demand GE-free food are likely to be foolish enough to be sucked in by our “clean image,” but the ability to fool some of the people all of the time certainly isn’t something I’d be willing to die in a ditch for.
Potentially lowering production costs means little if the process then leads to a vast reduction in sales.
A “vast” reduction in sales? Hardly. Organic food consumers are a small number of relatively-wealthy people with no problems beyond the first-world variety. And the fact that the well-off-but-irrational will currently pay a premium for woo would be a very dodgy thing to base an entire country’s economy on.
“It probably would cost them sales among the world’s more irrational consumers, but most consumers are not irrational…”
Calling them irrational doesn’t change the fact (from the number of polls I’ve seen) that most consumers oppose GMO products. And increasing production of GMOs is no guarantee of more sales.
“Our “clean image” is exactly that, an image.”
Indeed. Nevertheless, it is a widely held perception offshore consumers have. Thus, what our goods are marketed upon. Moreover, compared to a good number of our competitors, we are clean due to our isolation and small population.
“Organic food consumers are a small number of relatively-wealthy people…”
Maybe, but we’re not just talking organic food consumers, we’re also talking about the large number of buyers of our non-organic (yet GE free) products.
It would be a very dodgy thing to destroy the marketing capital we’ve built and risk our entire agricultural sector on something consumers largely don’t want a bar of.
That “marketing capital” we’ve built is based on a lie, and GE-free is woo. Those are not solid bases for economic development.
No. An exaggeration perhaps, but it’s not a total lie. We do produce things that are clean and green, albeit we are not as clean and green as we’ve marketed.
And regardless if GE-free thinking is woo, the majority of consumers don’t want it, which is clearly not a solid base to push forward with GMOs.
I don’t know why you phrased it as a question: the answer was in your use of “if”.
“reducing the intensification and industrialisation of farming in general, and we have a lot of very capable scientists who can help figure out how GE could contribute to that. ”
a. How might GE reduce the industrialisation of farming?
&
b. Do you believe it would?
A. I’m not one of those scientists, but from my layman’s perspective: one political hurdle to overcome in reducing intensity and industrialisation of farming is that it results in lower yields. Andre posted yesterday one way GE could help offset that. There’ll be many others.
B. It depends. If we have a government committed to reducing intensity and industrialisation of farming, and public sector research organisations that carry out research in support of government policy, of course it would. However, if we have a government committed to increasing the intensity and industrialisation of farming, ie a National-led one, then no it wouldn’t – but in that case we’d have a much bigger problem than any that might result from introducing GE.
I have two concerns about GE:
1. Considering that many GE seeds have been designed to kill themselves off what happens if that gene ‘escapes’ into the wild. Do we end up with a dead world?
2. Patenting life and that if all farmers are dependent upon patented products then so are the people. What happens when corporations start picking and choosing who can and can’t be a farmer? Where that food can be sold? Or even if it can be sold at all?
The latter is, IMO, a bigger concern than the former and we already see it happening.
Your concern no.2 is shared by farmers across the globe, especially in the 3rd world, and if anyone would know the reality of it, they will.
Not all seeds are patented (golden rice for example is given away patent free) also not all are the ‘terminator’ variety.
Is golden rice a terminator variety? Has it badly affected the old seed saved
rice that was tried and true from the past?
And b waghorn
What if?
You remind me of a sad and sorry old saying that reflects regularly-encountered reality.
“If wishes were horses, beggars would ride.”
Not all of them – yet:
There is a serious question of if life should be patentable. We’re not really talking about an invention here but a discovery. The same that applies in mathematics formulas that makes them un-patentable and why the NZ government also stopped allowing patenting of software.
Golden rice is not given away patent free:
The patents still apply but the companies have agreed not to charge for humanitarian purposes.
I don’t have a problem with patents. A sixteen year monopoly provides a development incentive.
Copyright, on the other hand, is going insane simply because the US keeps extending it for whatever mickey-mouse reasons they might have…
lol
It was never fun watching Sonny Bono Act
I read an article years ago (i.e, can’t find it) about a patent that had been going on for more than 60 years. The corporate owner of the original patent kept changing a word here and there to argue that it was a new patent and, amazingly, winning it.
And then there’s the Patent Trolls:
We were lucky – that one got won but how many others have gone through?
Every single one of these fictitious patents costs us even if the ruling finally goes against the Patent Troll.
And patents give you the right to sue infringers, but not the means.
But the flipside is no non-governmental research, because there’s no money in R&D.
Well, that’s something that I’ve been thinking about lately and I’ve come to the conclusion that if the government id going to give you the right then it should also you the means. A law isn’t effective unless its enforced after all.
1. I don;t think that is true. Many people would still do research if they had access to the resources necessary.
2. Without government research then there’d be very little research. Government tends to do the basic research while companies do the applied research. In other words, government does the essential research that products are then based upon.
Your problem is that you think only capitalism can bring the research about but that is proven wrong by what’s actually happening in the world.
Fuck, people do like to build massive edifices on foundations that are mere assumptions.
I fucking love government research. But having it as the only provider of research is a route to less innovation. I’m not even talking about competition, but diversity of approach and prioritisation. Both the private sector and the public sector are needed.
As for “many people would still do research”, you’d provide anyone who wants it with the resources to built a multi-million dollar lab and push new compounds through three phases of drug trials? Good luck with that.
I fucking love government research. But having it as the only provider of research is a route to less innovation. I’m not even talking about competition, but diversity of approach and prioritisation. Both the private sector and the public sector are needed.
What he said.
Actually, it’s backed up by research. I’d link but its from many readings read across decades.
Who said it would be the only provider?
Read The Entrepreneurial State and you may get some understanding of what I’m getting at. In it the author shows how the US became so innovative using a lot of government funding and direction of research employing both private sector and state sector researchers.
That government funded research then being freely available to everyone to utilise.
No.
I’d build several multi-million dollar government labs where people with the qualifications would be employed to work and where anybody with an idea can present it for development. If the idea is accepted for development then the person who’s idea it was would be encouraged to partake in that development up to and including the higher education needed to do it.
I think we waste so much potential by slotting people into unfulfilling jobs. It’s why I’m firmly in favour of ever more automation.
The assumption you made was “you think only capitalism can bring the research about”.
If you’re getting at something, try to express it in your own words. All I said was that patents actually provide an incentive for non-governmental research. This might be applied research, or blue skies research. It is often expensive research.
Presenting an idea for development is not the same as doing the research yourself, and you miss the specialisation and prioritisation of private research. There will be some wins, but if the provider misses the potential of the idea then there’s nobody else to go to. Yes, the flipside of a patent is that nobody else is allowed to copy it for 16 years without the permission of the original developers. But the benefit is that you’re presenting your idea to people directly involved in the field, and if they don’t see the opportunity then their competitor might.
Central planning via government departments has its limitations. Difficulty engaging with human creativity is one of those limitations.
Your only looking at the possible negatives.
What if we can produce spray free food (in monoculture s for feeding the masses not the wealthy few who can afford organic)
What if we can produce bulk crops that require half the amount of water and or fertilizer.
And you’re ignoring them.
We can’t. After all, we do want the crops to be fertilised. Or are you suggesting that all seeds be produced in a lab?
Bulk crops are part of the problem:
Suggesting doing more of what’s causing the majority of the problems is not a solution.
We also can’t.
It’s probably possible to make them somewhat more efficient but a 50% reduction would, IMO, be stretching it.
Then there’s the question of if we should even be using artificial fertilisers at all. Most artificial fertilisers are made from fossil fuels and they’re limited. Eventually we will run out. Doesn’t seem like a good idea to base future food production upon something that will run out.
I think we should be looking at the natural cycles and returning that which we take from the land back to the land so that it can continuously provide for us. It’s more complicated and requires knowing how fast our forest can turn our sewage into fertiliser that naturally runs onto our farms.
Working out these cycles is what will give us our maximum carrying capacity of the entire country. There will be a balance point of X number of forests supplying Y number of farms to feed Z number of people which fertilises X number of forests.
You’ll note that there is no exports in there. We can’t afford exports if we want to be sustainable. And that applies to all countries.
Good summation, Draco, but whaadabout…Brazil nuts?
“We can’t afford exports if we want to be sustainable. And that applies to all countries.”
Brazil nuts contain selenium and we haven’t enough of that in our soils, hence our food so we need to import…Brazil nuts, which are naturally rich in selenium. There will be alternatives, probably but there are also other plant-based products we need from outside of our growing zones/country.
Some exporting/importing is needed and can be a great reason for countries to treat each other well.
Do the Brazil Nuts produce selenium or do they absorb it out of the soil?
Which answers that question.
Which means that we need a source of selenium to be deposited on our soils. This should then be collected and returned to the land along with the rest of the sewage.
I wasn’t clear enough. I was specifically talking about exporting food. Sustainable cycles specifically prevent it.
Minerals are a different question to a degree as they’re not so closely associated with the natural cycles.
Hmm, okay. Coconut oil is really good. Losing palm oil imports would be a blessing though. Coffee, now there’s a flash point. Tea drinkers too, will have to rely on homegrown (I’m setting up for a small plantation of Camelia sinensis right now). Cacao, chocolate lovers? Maca? There’s a bit of a list of good foodstuffs we can’t grow here; I suppose we could go without, but coffee !!!
I do keep wondering if we can grow coffee in NZ. I do think we can but it would be an interesting engineering project to get the hot dry days and cold wet nights.
I’m growing a coffee bush but no berries yet. Some chap in Chch was growing it well years back – got in the news.
If you’re worried about your selenium intake, eat animals, not Brazil nuts. Most questions about trace elements in the diet disappear if you do that.
Animals will only have selenium in them if they’ve eaten plants containing it, or licked a salt-block that includes selenium in the mix, but, sure, they do and you can.
Actually, for NZ it’s <a href="https://www.noted.co.nz/health/nutrition/new-zealand-selenium-soil-lack-make-up-for-it-sea/"eat seafood:
Which makes a problem for me as seafood makes me sick. No point eating something if you’re just to throw it up.
Patenting life and that if all farmers are dependent upon patented products then so are the people.
Patenting life isn’t inherent in genetic engineering, any more than Google and Facebook commercialising your personal data is inherent in computer networks. Whether or not we allow the patenting of life is its own issue, just like whether or not we allow slavery is its own issue.
Considering that many GE seeds have been designed to kill themselves off what happens if that gene ‘escapes’ into the wild.
What indeed? Given that we have no conceivable way of preventing people from designing such things, we might just as well worry that aliens will invade and enslave us. Regulation of such activities within NZ is the best we can manage, so let’s manage it. Prohibition of GE will be as effective as any other kind of prohibition in the long term.
We’ve prohibited murder and while there still are murders, I don’t think anyone’s campaigning to legalise it 🙂
We’ve prohibited many recreational drugs, too. If people don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited, many of them reject the prohibition. That’s why prohibiting recreational drugs is an entirely different category from prohibiting murder – nobody rejects a prohibition on murder, even if they’re a murderer, but many reject a prohibition on recreational drugs.
When it comes to prohibition, GE will fall very much into the “recreational drugs” category, rather than the “murder” category – for the “what compelling reasons against?” reason we’ve already discussed.
The recreational drugs were already in circulation by the time the prohibition was placed upon them. That prohibition was bound to lack effectiveness, given that and the nature of human desire for such substances. GMO crops are not here yet and a prohibition would keep them out (It’s hard to hide a paddock of GE corn). Humans don’t crave for GMO corn and so the prohibition won’t be circumvented in the same way recreational drug prohibition invariably is. The two, GMO and recreational drugs, are not in the same category, imo.
They’re both in the category I described: “If people don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited, many of them reject the prohibition.” In this case, the prohibition doesn’t really affect consumers, but it does affect researchers and farmers, and over the long term those people aren’t going to put a lot of effort into observing that prohibition.
You are suggesting that researchers would act unlawfully, “reject the prohibition” because they don’t see anything wrong with the thing that’s prohibited. Wouldn’t that be illegal, contrary to their contracts and unethical?
Are you good with that? Seems irrational.
I’m saying that over the long term, such people will exist, likewise in the farming sector and the environmental protection bureacracy. Given a non-zero probability of X occurring, and a long enough time interval, X will occur. What I personally feel about X is irrelevant. Prohibition isn’t a viable long-term option.
” Prohibition isn’t a viable long-term option.”
I agree, with there rider “alone” – “prohibition alone” Your proposal (I think) is to regulate the industry and allow it to develop, much in the way it’s proposed with cannabis, perhaps. My hope is the public of NZ will choose not to have GM crops, such as pasture grasses, grown here and that the representative Government will act according to the peoples’ will and legislate accordingly. Rogue researchers and farmers, as described by you, will be pilloried by the public and punished by the Government and any incursions of GMO’s dealt with as Velvet Leaf has been in recent times.
Faint hope, mind you, but that’s my (rational) position.
the best we can manage…
That is your defeated predjudice showing through, milt…hard to hide it, eh…
Bhutan is already organic…and now so is Kazakhstan heading in the same direction…
Don’t be a defeatist, psycho…
https://www.bloomberg.com/amp/news/articles/2018-07-18/kazakhstan-goes-organic-in-bid-to-build-niche-in-grains-market
Good luck trying to persuade the agricultural sector to adopt Bhutan and Khazakstan as role models. There’s money in woo, for sure, but woo isn’t reliable in the long term, except for religions.
Why is there more than one type of car? Surely any other than the simplest model are “woo”? There’s money in woo alright and it seems “reliable in the long term”. Are you suggesting we encourage all car manufacturers other than Lada that they should abandon their wooing?
Are you suggesting consumer preference for GE-free is nothing more than brand preference?
No. It includes it, for sure, but there’s more to it. Are you saying the buyers of non-Lada cars are irrational?
That depends on why they’re willing to pay more for a particular car. There are rational reasons and irrational reasons. While we’re pursuing this metaphor, are you saying the production of Lada cars should be prohibited?
Too late – it’s already legal. There are rational and irrational reasons for wanting to eat food that’s non-GMO. Why do you characterise those people who want that as irrational? Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car irrational?
What are the rational reasons for refusing to eat food from plants that have been manipulated using this particular technique rather than a different one?
If you are told a plant is poisonous and you believe it to be true and you don’t want to be poisoned, it would be irrational to eat it.
If you are told a genetically modified plant will negatively affect your health and you believe it to be true and you don’t want your health negatively affected, it would be irrational to eat it.
If you believed allowing the production of GE crops in NZ would affect the country’s export market negatively, it would be irrational to support the proposal to grow such crops here.
It’s irrational, isn’t it, to act or decide against your beliefs you believe are rationally held.
Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car, irrational?
The last one is a separate issue (and a rational reason). By the logic of the first two, exorcism is a rational approach to mental ill-health (ie, if you are told your relative is possessed by a demon and you believe it to be true and don’t want them to be possessed by a demon, it would be irrational to refuse an exorcism).
“By the logic of the first two, exorcism is a rational approach to mental ill-health”
No, Psycho Milt. That’s not the logical conclusion of what I wrote.
Excorcism is a rational approach for the person who believes it to be effective but can’t be broadly called a rational approach where many people would not find it so.
The issue is localised.
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
Do you classify everybody who wants to buy a car” irrational”?
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
I haven’t said that at all, in fact I seem to recall agreeing that your reason for opposing it (to protect the organic food industry) was a rational one, just not one I personally agreed with.
I have said that consumer preference for GE-free food is irrational, on the basis that I haven’t seen any rational reasons given for that preference.
7 January 2019 at 9:18 am
You say people who oppose the growing of GM crops in NZ are “irrational”
“I haven’t said that at all”
You are quite right right, Psycho Milt and I’m wrong; Andre made the claim a couple of days ago and I assigned it to you in my flurry. I apologise. I made the mistake after seeing these statement-fragments from you:
“And the fact that the well-off-but-irrational will currently pay a premium”
“So, the argument is that we must ban GM crops in order to satisfy an irrational requirement of an unreasonable sector group.”
“(it would make it difficult for us to market GE-free food to irrational consumers)
I’ll retire from the discussion now, chastised (self) thanks for your time.
Lol yes Andre definitely takes a harder line than me. Always a pleasure discussing things with you, Robert, thanks for your time too.
This fucktard dragged me into a lengthy debate on GE that he wasn’t interested in learning from at all… just one day before he started this abortion of a thread.
my advice – do not engage in any manner. Poisonous trash aka sad troll.
It is the stock approach which milt takes when discussing…anything…
Psycho is still claiming to not have seen a ‘rational’ reason why consumers would have a preference for gm free food…he is blinded…best to leave him to it…
His approach is not rational…such is the irony which he is seemingly not aware enough to realize…
So defeatist, milt..
Your comments have deteriorated to using terms like ‘woo’…
The ‘science’ (if you can call it that) of GMO is nothing but woo..
It can’t be controlled, I explained that to you yesterday, as well as dispelling the opportunity cost comment as above…
GMO can’t be an opportunity cost without using woo science, woo economics, woo marketing, woo lobbying et al…there is no legitimate case that could be made because the risk is immeasurable…
So that is pure projection…
Woo Woo
“Woo” is a useful generic term for belief in beneficial properties that can’t be defined in a rational way. Your personal belief that science is woo doesn’t alter that definition in the slightest.
You’ve got nothing for this subject, milt…you demand others do the leg work which you don’t have the chops for…
The white flag was raised by you many comments ago…
I’m not one of those scientists…
Is when you hoisted the white flag…
Exactly the same as you do with this subject each time it’s come up…
Boo Woo Hoo
Handy tip from my many years on blog comments threads: if you boast to everyone of your alleged glorious victory in the debate, you’ll only be embarrassing yourself.
You self immoliated, psycho…in a sub thread which you started up…my pointing it out is nothing more than…pointing it out…
Embarrassment…is a 3rd party emotion based on the perception of how another person believes someone else should feel in a given situation…because they think others are as callow as they are…
Tip for you…figure out what embarrassment actually is…
Climate crises and catastrophe is the most serious issue facing the world right now.
It would be good if we used this meeting place to put pressure on the New Zealand government and all politicians to act as if it is the most serious issue.
Daily recommendations.
Idea 3. Incentivise a plant based diet. Tax meat heavily and make vegetables and fruit tax free.
Worth a look
New Zealand Public Television
http://www.nzptv.org.nz
Thank you.
Yes it is @ The Chairman.
So here’s a poor man’s option for going some way towards the resurrection of PSB TV.
Whilst we’re buggerising around contemplating various options (some of which are tantamount to more corporate welfare) – put together the content available on NZPTV (not the live streams) and require TVNZ’s playout facilities to put it free-to-air on terrestrial and freeview satellite facilities.
They might even require TVNZ to intersperse it with hourly news updates
Something to ponder
40% of our full-time workers are on the minimum wage, earning $34,320 annually or $660 per week.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=12172282
A little more to ponder
“By 2016, the self-employed had their lowest share of income since 1939. The largest beneficiary was corporate profits which rose to a 19% share in 2016, a level reached before only in 1940 under wartime conditions. It appears that labour productivity and real wages over the period were closely tied only during the period 1947 to 1974 when New Zealand’s industrial conciliation and arbitration system of collective bargaining extended by awards was working relatively well. From about 1990, real wage growth fell behind productivity growth. If wage and salary earners received the same share of the [national] income generated in 2017 as they did in 1981 they would on average have been $11,500 better off” – Bill Rosenberg.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317868928_A_brief_history_of_labour's_share_of_income_in_New_Zealand_1939-2016
Key point of diversion being the 1991Employment Contract Act and the desired destruction of the union movement by National, and with it the inability of labour to force good wages out of capitalists.
If we got rid of the capitalists we wouldn’t have to force good wages out of them.
You really should stand for election.
I would vote for him or any decent socialist.
A nationwide sigh of relief occurs.
Well it doesn’t necessarily have to be nationwide. He could stand for local body elections as a start @ Ad.
I mean to say, Laidlaw is doomed and probably hasn’t even got the guts to stand another term, and it’s quite likely rubbed off on Daran Ponter as well. And for many people, I doubt they’ll be able to bring themselves to vote for a Lester unless it’s in the absence of anything else – and even then they’d have to be burned-on Labour, too embarrassed or too yea/nah to do anything else.
So there’s an ‘in for ‘Draco’. I doubt he’d be intimidated by the systems that have been setup for elected representatives to have become subservient to the corporate machine that is our local body Councils.
Hopefully he’ll have balls this
HIGH ^ as well as having a good bullshit detector (gaydar, radar, age-ar and race-ar no longer necessary, but an ability to laugh your arse off at management is essential)
a wasted vote that would be for sure.
Indeed @ Ad! SO let’s not allow some of the shit that’s been brought to the public’s attention this past year to be forgotten by the last remaining of our journalists:
– The so-called ‘Independent Contractors who are in effect ‘DEPENDENT Contractors’
e.g. Courier Drivers
Chorus Contractors
DeliveryEasy
Uber
etc., etc., etc
You can see how the language is manipulated in order to advance the neo-liberal agenda.
All the above seek to externalise their costs whilst preserving their own margin, AS WELL AS providing for the margins of a number of ticket-clippers along the way.
Is the coalition up to fixing it? The signs are sort of ‘OK’, but the pace of reform is pretty bloody pathetic – but then I suppose there’s 30+ years of agencies responsible for enforcement activity to battle, let alone some members within that have their right leg shorter than is needed in order to effect that ‘kinder society’.
No, this government has reformed employment law as much as it is going to.
The Employment Relations Amendment Act was passed on December 5th.
The Act restores many of the conditions that existed during the previous Labour-led government. They are pretty basic and include:
– reinstating meal breaks
– strengthening collective bargaining
– limiting 90-day trials to businesses with fewer than 20 employees.
Comes in to force on Monday May 6th this year.
Otherwise there are minor increases to the minimum wage, probably a bit of a further increase to WFF in the 2019 budget, and other minor tinkering.
Remember this is their first term where they have all their ideological vim and enthusiasm on full display.
Entropy only takes further hold in the second and third terms.
Also practically, they want to get their promises up and running so they can point to them as the next election looms. It’s a KISS situation. Keep It Simple Stupid, and they need to keep this in mind all the time.
And they will get kissed for it with another term if they keep telling people what they have done.
Cool, I got it from some capitalist source in the eighties. Didn’t credit Aristotle, nor that the Jesuits had recycled it. I don’t use it due to not being an evangelist or salesman, but my career making tv ads taught me how well it works. I wonder if teachers apply it to slow learners…
I apply it to all learners because it’s really effective.
I show a list of what I’m to present and a few reasons why, then the presentation, then a summary and two way question time (questions and pop quiz disguised as conversation) – result: Favorite teacher of many thriving students.
That’s also how I write academic papers which are: “beautifully written” and “succinct”. Succinct?!! Repetition lulls the mind.
Being funny helps too.
Damn right being funny helps! I’m interested in where you do teaching and where you do academic writing. Just because context is important, eh? But if privacy concerns apply, fair enough…
Is that funny-ha-ha or funny-odd?
Funny peculiar. I tutor in various capacities and most enjoy teaching uni level science.
I’ve written in several capacities under several names. I prefer anonymity except with comedy as it is live (and an act), even then… Poke your head up and jealous assholes notice.
Very gun-shy of any public profile whatsoever.
I don’t disagree @ Ad.
They have and they did, but they do have a choice as to whether they want to spend their term and political capital (just to be trendy) battling against what are ‘the basics’ that will allow the less well-off to have a decent living and begin contributing, or whether they want to be all staunch and maintain the line “we’re doing the best we can under the circumstances we’ve been left by the previous junta”.
One year on – that’s already beginning to wear thin – as well as the fact that all the research they’ve undertaken in order to formulate policy is now due and people will be looking for results OR AT LEAST signs of a trend.
For me, I completely understand that H1 and H2 needed what was probably a generation to reverse what resulted from Roger, Ruth et al – but it really didn;t help that she chose to have a bit of a lay down and a cuppa cha in the 3rd term and concentrate on her future career aspirations. (I do concede she was probably one of the best PMs we ever had tho’).
Controversial opinion: The last socialist PM New Zealand had, was Rob Muldoon.
Totally agree. Not all controversial, either.
If his policies were put alongside the Labour Party’s now, he is clearly left. The Overton Window was shifted radically to the right in the 1980s in the UK and New Zealand.
Fair Pay Agreements are still to come – that’s a significant piece of employment legislation.
Unfortunately, once again the hype fails to meet reality.
Industrial action will not be permitted in negotiations for Fair Pay Agreements. Thus, reducing unions bargaining power.
Furthermore, Jacinda has sought to ease business concerns over the new type of collective bargaining, saying there will be “no more than one or two” fair pay agreements in the current electoral term.
Indeed, Ad. The Employment Contract Act played a pivotal role in reducing labours share of income.
From TC link at 8.
Dr Ganesh Nana, chief economist and executive director of Business and Economic Research, said New Zealand was a low-wage economy.
Factors such as a much smaller population size and a lower minimum wage rate was part of the reason New Zealanders earned significantly less than Australians.
“We’ve got a business model based on low wages. We’ve had settings in place over the last two to three decades that have minimised wages, and focused on wages as a cost rather than an investment in labour,” Nana said.
“We’ve been trying to put a lid on wage costs which supposedly translate into improved profitability and productivity but that model hasn’t worked.”
Minimum wage in Australia is A$18.93 ($19.83) per hour, which totals $719.20
each week or about $750 in New Zealand dollar terms.
“We’ve got a business model based on low wages.”
Indeed, greywarshark. Nana is correct.
Furthermore, low wages are helping to maintain struggling businesses with poor long-term prospect (those that state they can’t afford paying wage increases) that should really pack it in and look to invest elsewhere more viable.
The Government should consider doing more to help facilitate this transition to the more viable.
And those that can afford to pay a decent wage but don’t, should be named and shamed. Consumers blacklisting them would add further pressure.
Disgraceful.
We need to change the system.
something else related to ponder
Inflation rates for q1 2008 to q1 2018 (past 10 years)…the previous 10 carry the same theme
CPI 18.7%
Food 20.7%
Clothing -0.5%
Transport 7.6%
Housing 64.5%
Wages 31.0%
Time for some yellow vests.
And they have to do this facing some of the highest housing costs in the world.
And expensive food.
While the New Zealand corporate news puppets parrot stories about UFOs and meteors, the planet burns.
No wonder we have such woefully ill informed public.
https://t.co/VBFumoLT0s?amp=1
Let us decide how we relate to those figures Ed. You don’t have to put little help lines in. Four comments where only one was necessary. Why don’t you become anally retentive and squeeze them out over a long period. Four in 8 minutes!
George Galloway has started to reconsider meat eating after seeing and hearing about the conditions under which animals are treated, tortured and murdered.
His MOATs show features several discussions on the subject.
Great job by George to be open minded enough to consider change when faced by evidence.
I’ll post his contribution when it comes along.
In the meantime here’s a link to his show.
http://talkradio.co.uk/radio/listen-again/1546628400#
Just saw a report on One News from Delhi. Pollution levels there are currently twelve times the globally-accepted safe level. The fourteen most polluted cities on Earth are in India. One in every eight deaths in India is now caused by pollution.
I checked Wikipedia. “A 2013 study on non-smokers has found that Indians have 30% lower lung function compared to Europeans.” “Fuelwood and biomass burning is the primary reason for near-permanent haze and smoke observed above rural and urban India, and in satellite pictures of the country. Fuelwood and biomass cakes are used for cooking and general heating needs. These are burnt in cook stoves known as chullah or chulha piece in some parts of India. These cook stoves are present in over 100 million Indian households, and are used two to three times a day, daily. As of 2009, majority of Indians still use traditional fuels such as dried cow dung, agricultural waste, and firewood as cooking fuel.”
“This form of fuel is inefficient source of energy, its burning releases high levels of smoke, PM10 particulate matter, NOx, SOx, PAHs, polyaromatics, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and other air pollutants.[9][10][11][12] Some reports, including one by the World Health Organization, claim 300,000 to 400,000 people die of indoor air pollution and carbon monoxide poisoning in India because of biomass burning and use of chullahs.[13] The air pollution is also the main cause of the Asian brown cloud which is delaying the start of the monsoon.”
So the recent citation of corporations being the primary culprits in global warming is just part of the picture. Traditional lifestyles and Indians are extremely competitive as well.
at a mere 2.28 per capita tonnes per annum emissions I dont think theres a lot of scope for the average Indian to cut…and if the entire world emitted at that rate we likely wouldnt be discussing CC at all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_greenhouse_gas_emissions_per_capita
Black carbon is the dominant absorber of visible sr.regionally across the tropics,(hence the per capita metric is not a useful metric)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/32034622_Global_and_Regional_Climate_Changes_Due_to_Black_Carbon
It also reduces photosynthetic available radiation at the surface and subsequent crop yields in India (with other SLCP.
https://www.pnas.org/content/111/46/16319
Yes, theres no denying there are a myriad of problems to be addressed but in terms of GHG the statement….”So the recent citation of corporations being the primary culprits in global warming is just part of the picture. Traditional lifestyles and Indians are extremely competitive as well.”….serves little purpose other than to attempt to minimise the role of western consumption in driving CC
That point applies to policy formulation, whereas my point was that corporation-blaming, which is something I’ve done plenty of, is somewhat unrealistic. If we look at the creators of the problem, holism requires us to implement true-cost accounting (a key Green Party economic policy tenet) to lay blame accurately.
particulate pollution could be relatively easily addressed, especially if the west actually fronted the oft promised funding and expertise to the developing world…..or perhaps the bulk of the subcontinent should adopt a diet of raw foods ?
So India needs rocket stoves aka double burners aka a decent engineer or two to make better stoves drawing out gases for additional fuel and making char to offset pollution.
Absolutely primed for a revolution in stove type. Industry get on it.
It’s chronic but the power of Mother Nature is clearly evident. Even on a day where there is no wind, you can clearly see the effects of the jungle literally sucking in the crap – such that whilst you might go to bed with the choking fumes of the city, rural brick factories and daily life (heavily dependent on diesel and other fuel), by morning you can awake to the purest, crispest and freshest of air only a few hundred kilometres north at the base of the Himalayas.
Fuck me, this illustrates how low things have sunk.
You know that wall the waddling spray tan warning label always rambles incoherently about? And has shut down the US government in a tanty because Democrats and Repugs alike think it’s a stupid idea and won’t give it to him?
Allegedly it was just something dreamed up by Dolt45’s campaign advisers as a shorthand reminder to bash immigrants at his rallies. That’s it. But now the (possibly) sentient caps lock button can’t let it go. So here we are.
https://www.msn.com/en-nz/news/world/trump-campaign-advisers-invented-border-wall-idea/ar-BBRQFrC?li=BBqdg4K&ocid=mailsignout
…partying like it’s 1933….
WASHINGTON — As the government shutdown drags on, lawyers from the White House, the Department of Homeland Security and the Pentagon are meeting to discuss whether President Donald Trump can declare a national emergency to deploy troops and Defense Department resources to build his border wall, according to two sources with knowledge of the discussions.
[…]
The official said the talks are ongoing and will continue over the weekend as details are worked out.
ABC News first reported that the White House was considering declaring a national emergency to build the wall.
Trump said at a press briefing Friday he was considering declaring a national emergency in order to bypass Congress.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/trump-admin-lawyers-eye-national-emergency-pentagon-resources-build-wall-n954926
Snark fails me.
Yes, yes, I know. People who believe in democracy are a serious problem nowadays. He’s even too stupid to patiently explain to the news media & public that he campaigned on the wall, was elected on that basis, and therefore democracy provides him with a mandate to erect it.
Y’know, the only possible explanation for such weird behaviour is that he thinks Pelosi & the Democrats, the media & public, all know that. As if they not only understand how their democracy works, but expect their politicians to act accordingly! Really, seriously dumb. Since when did the Democrats actually practice democracy? Surely everyone knows by now they merely preach it.
Trump only happened because the Democrats has failed working class Americans since 1992.
People forget that.
Actually failed is too mild a word.
Betrayed is better.
More accurate to say capitalism failed them, Ed. Ironic that they’d elect a capitalist billionaire to solve that problem, but I guess they’re too busy dodging bullets to worry about details.
In the US government system, control of the purse lies with Congress (ie the House and the Senate together). The only direct control of spending that is granted to the president is the ability to veto spending bills, and even vetos can be overridden by Congress.
So in the case of spending huge amounts of money on something like a border wall, the mandate to do it (or not) is given by voters to the collective members of Congress, not the president.
That divided responsibility is one of the checks and balances that keeps the US from being a serial elected dictatorship. But it’s clearly something the Combover Con doesn’t understand, along with many others.
Yep, you got it. What people think is democracy and what it is in application are two different things. Much confusion results. Wouldn’t matter so much if politics wasn’t driven by that confusion. Nuances wash off simple-minded folk like water off a duck’s back.
And since they have the numbers, they control the outputs of the system as much as the powerful folk behind the scenes. The marxists called it the dictatorship of the proletariat, figuring their system would do that better, but the one we have is close enough. Their perception creates our reality via majority vote. They selected Trump to represent them, a simple guy easy for them to identify with. Identity politics works like that.
Looking forward to Pelosi and Schumer holding the line right through to State of the Union address January 21st.
The newly emboldened Democrats have the political will to hold the line. They’d be fools not to; this is a massive, singular issue on which Trump bet 100 percent of his credibility. He put his head on the chopping block and handed Pelosi the ax.
I’m looking for a series of massive defeats for Trump and the Republican Senators this year, and this looks like a doozy.
McConnell will block anything embarrassing ever making it to the floor of the senate. That’s why the senate won’t vote again on the spending bill to reopen the government passed by the House, which is damn near identical to what the senate passed late last year.
He’ll be happy though, if all he does for the next two years is confirm troglodyte judges and stop anything going onto the senate floor except the occasional bills that the House will never agree to. Just to pretend they’re doing something, and to generate talking points blaming House Democrats for something or other.
Gosh, it’s almost as if you believe American politicians are now incapable of enacting compromise legislation in the spirit of collaboration for the benefit of the public. Yet we had a classic example proving the contrary just before xmas.
“If you asked anyone in early November with insider knowledge whether the First Step Act, the now recently passed federal criminal justice reform bill, would get across the finish line, they would tell you “not without the endorsement of the president.” The prospects of a bill with the biggest changes to the federal criminal justice system in our generation were slim to none without an active role by the president himself.”
“Trump continued to push for reform in the public eye and behind the scenes, working with Senate Majority Mitch McConnell to allow this to the floor for a vote. Before Christmas, the active support shown by Trump for a much fairer, much smarter, more conservative, and more compassionate criminal justice system came to fruition as the First Step Act passed the House and Senate with stunning majorities.”
“Trump and the Republicans have been unfairly painted as “heartless” by the mainstream media. Alice Johnson, a great grandmother who served more than 20 years in prison for a first time nonviolent drug offense, had her sentenced commuted by the president earlier this year. She was able to spend Christmas with her family outside of a prison after two decades because of Trump. Over the next few years, thousands more families will get to do the same. This is what making America great again looks like.”
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/423666-first-step-act-is-victory-marking-compassion-of-president-trump
“The Formerly Incarcerated Reenter Society Transformed Safely Transitioning Every Person Act or FIRST STEP Act reforms the federal prison system of the United States of America, and seeks to reduce recidivism. An initial version of the bill passed the House of Representatives (360-59) on May 22, 2018, a revised bill passed the U.S. Senate (on a bipartisan 87-12 vote) on December 18, 2018. The House approved the bill with Senate revisions on December 20, 2018 (358-36). The act was signed by President Donald Trump on December 21, 2018, before the end of the 115th Congress.”
So Trump, most Republicans, & the Democrats, enacted this progressive law! They proved they can collaborate! God was willing, apparently. Still moves in mysterious ways though…
Yup, Mongolian hip-hop is a thing. And it’s glorious.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eCKAE2SOPi4
A blend of ancient and modern. Beautifully done.
Speaking of a beautiful blend, I’ve been rocking these guys a bit of late
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFJ717atqaw
She takes no prisoners.
https://twitter.com/60Minutes/status/1081162243327356928
https://hotair.com/archives/2019/01/04/aoc-tax-rate-70-fund-green-new-deal/
But did you read their analysis? Her radical scheme has to be balanced by the likely result of implementing it.
“But even in the first couple of years, assuming the government gets its hands on 70% of all income earned over $10 million, how many households would get taxed at that level? The 99th percentile of individual income in 2017 started at just over $300,000 in a University of Minnesota analysis, which would include roughly two million individuals. There simply wouldn’t be enough people and enough money earned over the $10 million mark to fund even the first year, let alone the two-decade run of Ocasio-Cortez’ Green New Deal. It would, however, drag the economy and stunt the creation of new jobs.”
“One could describe that as radical, but ill-advised and self-destructive work better. That’s not an Emancipation Proclamation, but a recipe for full subservience to the elite who run this system.” Sounds like the law of unintended consequences may apply. However, if it threatens to cause de-growth I’ll support it!
It’s a conservative analysis and sure, with the current houses there’s little chance of implementing it.
But there’s no real shortage of analyses from the left to counter the conservative one and with a series of deepening crises on the horizon, anything’s possible.
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/opinion-green-new-deal-cost_us_5c0042b2e4b027f1097bda5b
Reminds me of what Russel Norman was advocating: using quantitative easing to advance a Green socialist agenda. These authors are framing it as a required public conversation. Upside & downside consequences both flow from that.
On the up, crowd-sourced wisdom causes opinion to coalesce around design principles of a policy solution, which like-minded politicians can then adopt.
On the down, various views are floated in the media, then everyone moves on. Instead of a developing narrative becoming a political movement, the thing evaporates.
Like Noam Chomsky state’s trump and brexit are a distraction thrown at the Papatunuku to slow down there losses of control and power carbon that the oil BARONs have now .
These 2 phenomenon are a BIG DISTRACTION for the people of the world. They are not the TRUE risk to HUMANANITY. trump will flop out of office and Britain will stay in the EU. While this bullshit is going down we are still not taking enough action to stop OUR PLANET from over heating and in the prosess destorying the good life that we are USE TO get ready for the SHIT TO HIT THE FAN if we let the OIL BARON play with our intelligent minds and make us beleve that trump and brexit is the main threat NOT.
Why do these 2 distractions have a BIG CLOAKING EFFECT on OUR reality .
Its a fact that money controls the the World at the minute its a fact that the west controls the money at the minute so if the westen people of the world are distracted by trump and brexit well the BIG PROBLEM is not being FOCUSED on even when it’s effecting our lives negtively NOW . Wake up people and don’t RELY on the POLLIES of the world to beable to see through the oil barons bullshit cloak to make the changes to stop burning coal & oil carbon so we leave a better world for the Mokopunas.
I
Katharine Hayhoe: ‘A thermometer is not liberal or conservative’
Jonathan Watts
The award-winning atmospheric scientist on the urgency of the climate crisis and why people are her biggest hope
Katharine Hayhoe is an atmospheric scientist and director of the Climate Science Center at Texas Tech University. She has contributed to more than 125 scientific papers and won numerous prizes for her science communication work. In 2018 she was a contributor to the US National Climate Assessment and was awarded the Stephen H Schneider award for outstanding climate science communication.
In 2018, we have seen forest fires in the Arctic circle; record high temperatures in parts of Australia, Africa and the US; floods in India; and devastating droughts in South Africa and Argentina. Is this a turning point?
This year has hit home how climate change loads the dice against us by taking naturally occurring weather events and amplifying them. We now have attribution studies that show how much more likely or stronger extreme weather events have become as a result of human emissions. For example, wildfires in the western US now burn nearly twice the area they would without climate change, and almost 40% more rain fell during Hurricane Harvey than would have otherwise. So we are really feeling the impacts and know how much humanity is responsible.The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its 1.5C report in October. A month later, the US federal government’s climate assessment – to which you contributed – came out. How did these two massive studies move our understanding along?
These assessments are important because there is a Schrödinger’s Cat element to studying climate impacts. The act of observing affects the outcome. If people aren’t aware of what is happening, why would anyone change? Assessments like these provide us with a vision of the future if we continue on our current pathway, and by doing so they address the most widespread and dangerous myth that the largest number of us have bought into: not that the science isn’t real, but rather that climate change doesn’t matter to me personally. Compared to past studies, how much media attention did these reports receive?
There was significant coverage but a lot of media survive by generating controversy so they bring on opposing voices rather than explaining the scientific facts. Climate change shouldn’t be fodder for commentators who represent the interests of the fossil fuel industry by muddying the science. As a human and a scientist, this focus on controversy is frustrating. A thermometer is not liberal or conservative.What’s the role of global finance? Can money managers, shareholders and multinationals exert pressure and take positive action in ways that short-termist, vote-hungry politicians seem unable to do?
Yes! In the world we live in, money speaks loudly. Thanks to the growing divestment movement, we have seen cities, universities and entire countries, in the case of Ireland, withdrawing investments from fossil fuel assets. This isn’t only happening for ethical reasons but for practical ones as well. As clean energy continues to expand, those assets could become stranded. When money talks the world listens.International talks are important but we should be looking at subnational actors because there is a lot going on at the city and corporate level. Across the US a hundred cities have committed to going 100% clean energy. Companies like Apple have already achieved that goal. In the US there’s a new climate bill with bipartisan sponsors, which is essential for legislation to succeed long-term.
Are we likely to get any respite from climate change?
(Sighs.) Climate change is a long-term trend superimposed over natural variability. There’ll be good and bad years, just like there are for a patient with a long-term illness, but it isn’t going away. To stabilise climate change, we have to eliminate our carbon emissions. And we’re still a long way away from that. Ka kite ano links below
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2019/jan/06/katharine-hayhoe-interview-climate-change-scientist-crisis-hope
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGc3OFtmEa0
This is OUR REALITY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTBWfkE7BXU
Here is some more of our reality from the great man
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2lsEVlqts0
Eco Maori Its well established that MONEY rules the Papatuanuku so I want to PLANT a IDEAR for our Worlds Music Star and Sports Star Movie Stars to and Media Stars to start fundrasing events like LIVE AID & WORLD VISION to raise billions to provide bridgeing finance to countrys that have viable climate change mitigating realitys that just don’t get financed because the people who control most of the money in the world carbon baron’s won’t invest in the prodject or they use there money to discredit the project. It would work better with the 21 century communication device the INTERNET as I heard some negative words about live aid & world vision like alot of funds being chewed up by management of those events. The funds raised & the projects invested in would need to be put up on a website for accountability and viability of the projects being invested in PEER REVIEWING to keep it HOUNEST .As actor can be planted in organizations to bring it down & the capitalist system can have one prouduct priced at up to a 1000% difference from different sources .
The financing required for an orderly transition to a low carbon, resilient global economy must be counted in the trillions, not billions.
Significant investment in infrastructure is needed over the next 15 years – around US$90 trillion by 2030 – but it does not need to cost much more to ensure that this new infrastructure is compatible with climate goals.
Climate action offers a major opportunity to ensure sustainable global development and boost economic growth. It is already delivering real results in terms of new jobs, economic savings, competitiveness and market opportunities, and improved wellbeing for people worldwide with even greater investment, innovation, and growth potential ahead. Links below P.S PEOPLE POWER RULES THE WORLD
https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/climatefinance
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jlfYk91lRXc
Some Eco Maori Music for the minute.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cEXhZ8PwM-Y
Kia ora Newshub Dvd videos are a thing of the past . I remember when video first came out use to watch Terence Hill Bud spencer Clint Eastwood many good movies to chose from it was cool when one came from a place with no power .
Those fruit growers need to pay more money and they will get the worker isn’t that the capitalist way.
Flip Flop.
Is that Global warming that is affecting Maluab I think so.
I quite like the thermometer in Vags as when I go to Auckland or Gisborne at this time of the year instant discomfort . One of our children had problems with the heat in Hawke’s Bay when he was about 8 months old you just have to keep a eye on the temperature gage and keep young babys cool bath or cold cloth ect.
Tangaroa is a cool research ship doing a good job that was a photo of a Antarctica tooth fish we now know that we must be care full with new fisheries.
That Antarctica marathon between Kiwis and Americans was a good sports match the Kiwi won ka pai its good to see everyone having fun .
Ka kite ano