However, the report notes that welfare numbers have declined faster than unemployment in recent years, suggesting that not all those pushed off benefits have found jobs.
“Just what has happened to these people, and whether they are better or worse off, is a mystery.”
Maybe they are living in cars, garages, or on the street?
According to our journalists crime is rising because of criminals having a change of circumstances or to feed a drug/alcohol habit. Fairly lacklustre analysis I have to say and supports what theyve told their middle class readers for decades.
Wage and salary earners saw an on average $10 per week increase between Decembers 2015 and 2016.
This tells us nothing about the situation for those on the lowest incomes, especially the bottom 10-20%. An average increase could all be accounted for rises in incomes of the highest paid.
Average house prices in the City of Sails topped $1 million in 2016, while rent increases outpaced income growth.
Yes poverty is a huge problem in NZ for many people.
Personally I’ve not much time for the Sallies, they are well known in Motueka for throwing away thousands of good quality items in their skip.
We have a couple of charity shops here, Red Cross has a free rack outside their store, free clothes and other bits and pieces, rather than dumping it in a skip.
Meanwhile the Motueka Salvation Army store offers free coat hangers and magazines, that’s it, the clothes that they don’t want, shoes, toys etc they would rather throw them in the skip than offer items free to the poor. This has been happening for years, and is disgusting. Items that they place in their store but don’t sell, they throw into their skip.
Many locals boycott the Sallies here for the reasons above.
To any whom run charity stores, if you really want to do something to help people in poverty who are often too embarrassed to ask for help, put up a ‘free’ rack of clothes outside, not clothes hangers and magazines, that won’t keep people warm.
There has been a huge shift in NZ involving what were formerly ‘Op Shops’ becoming ‘alternative retailers’. I’ve a friend did her dissertation on the phenomenon – not good.
And yes, it means that stuff gets skipped (much of it fine) and it also means that prices rise.
As a book dealer my advice is…do not bother donating old books to the op shops, unless you regularly see collectible old books on their shelves, as for the most part you might as well dump them in the skip yourself.
Certain large op shop organisations are throwing away absolute treasures, that do not even make it to the shelves, as they have strange ideas about things being ‘old’. Danielle Steele books…excellent…150 year old ‘Origin of the Species’…rubbish.
We have had repeated ‘discussions’ with head office, and have offered to buy certain old books that are being thrown straight into the bin, but no, they would rather throw money away. In fact, they INSIST on throwing these books away. They do not even want us to tell them which books are valuable!!
And then, even odder, complain about the cost of disposing of ‘rubbish’.
Its inexplicable and a tragedy when you think of the heirlooms being handed over in good faith. Let alone the money lost.
Why they do not hire some old ‘dealers’, and there must be enough of them out there, to sort this situation out is inexplicable.
As an organisation they do good work in highlighting poverty…but they have some very odd ideas, and not just about old books.
Over several years I bought knives at a re-use store at 50 cents each, – amongst them quality blades (Santoku, Sheffield, Victorinox, Atlantic Chef, Solingen) in great condition and collectively worth hundreds of dollars.
Yep, I just built a sunroom over the top of our deck, at some point we’re going to cover the decking with cementBoard and tile but in the meantime, I just wanted to paint the decking to tidy it up a bit.
Went down to the dump, 4 litre tin of timbacryl in dark grey $10, normally $100 at Bunnings.
Property empty most of the time is owned by ‘charity’ exempt from tax organizations. As church going decline the properties wont be sold as they are part of large portfolios that keep other properties rented out for more. Given how low dense Nz is, foot traffic being so important to business, is kept higher retail rents but lower foot traffic. And then dont get me started about new builds, putting up one floor homes on corner sites, its just crazy econmics, higher fott traffic would suggest highe buildings with shops. But retail like property is stuffed in NZ, lots of rent seeking behavior holding NZ back.
At least eight million tonnes of plastics find their way into the ocean every year—equal to one garbage truckful every minute, said the report by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, which included analysis by the McKinsey Centre for Business and Environment.
“If no action is taken, this is expected to increase to two per minute by 2030 and four per minute by 2050,” it said, with packaging estimated to represent the largest share of the pollution.
Hands up, all those who think that individual action could have saved this poor creature’s life?
“Dead whale’s stomach clogged with plastic”
“The haul of plastic, which also included sweet wrappers and plastic bread bags, had blocked the Cuvier’s beaked whale’s digestive system, according to experts from the University of Bergen who found no traces of food.”
Would it be too much to ask for a 50 cents recycling fee for each plastic container and each piece of plastic packaging, to properly kick start a recycling industry with hundreds of jobs?
I am old enough to remember when Muldoon under lobbying from the packaging industry got rid of the refunds for used glass bottles. After which the the country (and the world) was flooded with a huge increase in plastic packaging.
Why can’t we bring back this useful idea?
I know that in the modern neo-liberal regime that we are not allowed to put any constraints on the free market.
I questioned some LP members on what the LP is doing for west and south Aucklanders and urban Māori. Some said Willie Jackson understood west and South Aucklanders and urban Māori.
Today onne blogger and social media commentator has questioned whether Jackson really does understand, or will do anything much for urban Maori.
Also think ppl need to be careful (me included) about saying X represents Y. e.g. “WJ represents urban Māori” or “urban Māori left behind”
WJ represents an “authority” that provides services to urban Māori. He does not politically represent our diverse views.
Urban Māori are also not “all left behind”, ie suffering hardship. Many of our kaupapa whānau are but not all. So not a good metric since…
The largest Māori pop is Auckland, which is home to many in professionals sector. Also read @teataotu journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00…
ie she’s saying Māori are a diverse group, and we should beware of assuming they are all the same. And has since tweeted she is thinking of putting her thoughts on this into a post.
Trump exaggerates, yeah lies, yet gets votes. So you have to ask yourself why. Some form of cut through obviously. Now contrast how a labour MP deals with Jackson on morning tv1. Boring, uncontroversial, weak defensive. Key called the whole opposition a bunch of rapist supporters while welcoming rapist thrownout of Oz.
Now the fact that Labour still play like wet squid while nasty nats slag them is sure principled, its also stupid, since a politician should know how both not to sledge while suggesting it and also enlightening us about their position. Labour refuses to ditch neo-lib edicts, unlike Trump who expresses himself woefully yet still kicks neolibs.
This is why the left fails, and yes needs less saints like Jackson in its ranks. We want you to fight our corner, less so the oh your high principles that keep us from gaining a gist of your thinking, heart, soul, etc.
When the banker Key trades and becime successful, the idea the Labour would not hold him accoutable for shitty rivers, poor roads, faulting drugs, by actually question his credentials as a master of the economy, says something deep about the Labour out of touchness.
Clinton smiliarly married to the President who famous slogan, its the economy stupid, could not consider the impact that fuelled Sanders supporters.
The left have for too long conceeded, become weakened, by their inane strategy of not attacking the econmics of stupid that is Thacherism. Or as we know here in NZ rogernomics.
Labour have to soul search, Clark won when neolibs were untested, now hey are found unwanted and flawed, so where is Labour. You can be principled, anti neolib, and strong on the economy. We are all free traders, we all want fewer ticket clippers, so wht does Labour accept that being anti tppa means being anti free trade!
Some of my Whanau are urban Maori and they have benefited the most from working for families.
Politics are completely outside their lives. I doubt they have even heard of Willy Jackson or be on the Maori roll and he will not influence them in any way to vote.
They are on one income, 2 kids, work a 6 day week and get only $650 (in Auckland that is nothing) but working for families top them up approx $200.
Working for families has been the biggest policy to help them.
Personally think Labour or Mana will do the most for them with policies that target them. Or someone like Sue Bradford that understands they need help, just to navigate to get the help. WINZ are a waste of time for them and their attitude just puts them off going to them.
State housing would also help them. But they work in an expensive area of Auckland. I don’t think there are any state houses there not sold off. That is also one of the disasters for the poor that State houses used to be everywhere and so there was a cross section of the community in each area. Not rich ghettos like we are getting.
On minimum wages a mortgage of $300,000 is max, so essentially the so called affordable houses of $500,000 or $600,000 being built to replace the state houses are out of their reach.
In my parents day, the state actually built houses on mass to sell to families. But with immigration at the levels they are not only are there not enough rentals or houses but how could you afford to build enough for the amount of people needing them and coming in?
The Maori party has let urban Maori down by collaborating with National and making their lives worse by their appalling policies against the poor.
I’m not a fan of Willy Jackson, and think he’s going to put off more voters than he attracts. In particular putting off women and anyone against Charter schools.
Labour already have Nash, with pretty extreme views.
Oh do pull your head out of your ass. Sorry for the language, but I’m over it.
So a M.P. spoke up about her portfolio, then the bloke brigade got all upset. Left wing men had a tizzy, and we have to listen to them moan for weeks on end now. Left wing men in this country need there heads in the game, that was not disunity or messy. That was politics, so grow up.
It’s not that an MP spoke up about her portfolio, it’s about making it PUBLIC, politicians are supposed to exercise diplomacy, if this is an example of diplomacy in the political arena , then getting a change of Govt isn’t going to happen any time soon………
I read the Soper bit and translated it into what it really said; to whit, “Bill English is a liar.”
I then translated that into what it really meant; to whit, “We have another lying bastard Prime Minister and it is simply accepted without saying it like it is.”
“English says notes were taken, which assumes someone was listening into the call. At one point, recalling the call as Parliament resumed, he initially said it wasn’t being eavesdropped on because it was a personal call. But then, in the next breath, he agreed someone was listening in, which would make sense if notes were being taken.”
Most likely you are simply expressing your own pre-existing belief.
Brian Rudman has a column showing that Trump is not as bad as some previous administrations. Our “friends” in USA have a lot to face up to.
“His now saintly predecessor, Barack Obama, did not just contemplate such tactics. For eight years he employed remote controlled drone gunships to hunt down suspected terrorists, blasting away at homes, villages, wedding and funeral processions and anyone unlucky enough to be in their way, across a huge swathe of the Islamic crescent, from Pakistan to Somalia. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported last month of 546 confirmed drone strikes against suspected terrorists in Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan under Obama.
Rudman doesn’t seem to grasp the difference between the fact that committing to military action means committing to the possibility or likelihood of civilian casualties, and the fact that deliberately targeting civilians for murder is a war crime. Obama was doing the first one; Trump’s proposal to kill relatives of terrorists is the second.
Readers who share Rudman’s difficulty with this concept should consider that the British killed a large number of French civilians while getting the Germans out of Caen in 1944, mostly by carpet-bombing the place, while Einsatzgruppe A killed a large number of Lithuanian civilians while getting the Jews out of Lithuania in 1941, mostly by lining them up on the edge of a pre-dug mass grave and shooting them into it. International law treats those two actions differently, for reasons that hopefully are obvious.
In between the mad fanatics of Isis and the many and varied foreign powers dropping bombs from above, their dictator for life continues to slaughter those who speak against him.
Labour’s Poto Williams hired a private public relations firm to craft her statement on Willie Jackson joining the party.
Christchurch-based Inform PR sent out a statement from Ms Williams condemning her leader Andrew Little’s decision to welcome Mr Jackson into the Labour fold.
Crikey. This moves from an impassioned critique to something more planned and deliberate. There’s a process to follow in selecting list candidates. Williams should have addressed her concerns to the committee that determines list selection.
I just thought Labour had got past disunity and airing dirty laundry.
Real life? I dunno man, in real life if working stiffs like the rest of us disagree with our boss, hiring a PR company to help us undermine them with social media postings instead of dealing with the outcome of their decision invariably gets us fired. I know some will say that a political party is not a regular company, but the point quite clearly stands when you’re talking about someone who is out to represent us cog-in-the-wheel 99%ers on a political level.
It looks really out of touch with what we get to do or how we get to deal with what life hands us. If we get consulted on change, but the boss’ final decision doesn’t deliver 100% of what we wanted, we either deal or leave. I don’t think it’s unrealistic to ask the same of those who purport to represent our interest as ‘Labour’. What’s the point of having a leader if you get to choose when it is or isn’t important to back their decisions – decisions which we now know were arrived at *after* consultation? I’ve been a cleaner. I’ve been a chef. I’ve been a storeman. I’ve worked in a number of roles in commercial research. If at any time I’m asked to do work which goes against what I feel is a principle I hold, I weigh that against what it would mean to leave – my principles vs my rent (or these days, my mortgage); my principles vs how my family will be affected, or how my bills will be paid. I don’t get to have it both ways, and neither do most of us working stiffs. I resent the idea that politicians should get to have it different to the rest of us.
But the thing is that Little is the caucus leader. He doesn’t sign mp pay cheques. He can’t overrule party democratic processes by pre-empting list selection. He was elected leader by the same organisation that organises list selection.
Williams represents Christchurch East. Her role in the caucus follows from her experiences in social services.
Little is not her “boss”. He’s the caucus leader, not a dictator. Consultation does not mean that you have to consent to the outcome. Yes, this causus difficulty, mainly because he failed to lead before this was all publicly announced.
Worst case scenario, Little sends her to the back bench. That’s the worst he can do as leader. The best he can do is to somehow build this incident into a learning experience and a point of strength.
Yes yes, I see what you are saying about how the Labour party works – but my post was about looking beyond that to how it compares to those of us out here in that ‘real world’ cited by LP above. And how it looks to us when people purporting to represent us act like you can spit the dummy if you don’t get 100% of the outcomes you want. We can condescendingly call it ‘wage slavery’, but for us 99%ers, that’s what we live with – a ‘real world’ where principles and consequences can often not balance, and where our choices in those instances are deal or quit. We know she was consulted by her leader, and we know that his final decision was not what she wanted. So she hired a PR company to sabotage his decision. I don’t care what Labour’s rules are, Labour are representing people who don’t get to do that in these circumstances. And when you have politicians who get to do things we don’t, they aren’t going to be in the right mentality to represent us. Again, what’s the point of having a leader if nobody in caucus thinks you get to choose when you abide by their decisions or trust their strategy?
Well, firstly I don’t think it’s fair to portray the issue as not getting 100% of what you want. WJ’s comments were pretty objectionable. Regardless of Little’s decision, he should have known that someone prominent was going to be pissed – and if he were a better leader, he would have recognised the strength of feeling from some in his own caucus.
She allegedly hired a pr company. We don’t know whether this was a regular relationship that a public figure might have to maintain a consistent image, or whether it was specifically for this job. We don’t know whether the job was to harm Labour or Little, or act as advisor on how to moderate the conflict between minimising the damage to the party and to Little, while at the same time expressing the sentiments that she felt obliged to express.
What if Little decided that Labour was no longer for a nuclear free NZ? Or arbitrarily announced that Shane Jones was back as as an MP, or even David Garrett?
Labour are representing employees, who don’t have the same freedom as MPs. MPs can talk about anyone they want in the House without fear of being sued, for example.
But let me put it this way: which would be the biggest flaw in the Labour party: the argument we’re having now, or the argument we don’t have because the Labour spokesperson on domestic violence refuses to speak out when the party leader announces he’s parachuting to the upper reaches of the list someone who recently called rape “mischief”? The first is when the leader screws up but someone else does their job. The second is when they both fail to do their job.
That final point might be relevant if Jackson had refused to acknowledge that he was out of line or had refused to confront how bone-headed it was, but we know that Jackson apologised, and we’ve heard that he also put in extra time with the community. I’ve heard some claim it’s a Clayton’s apology, but ultimately the tone of these comments suggest that they aren’t interested in his apology. Do you assert that he cannot be redeemed? Is that the position you’d like the Labour spokesperson on domestic violence to take? He’s not exactly Tony fucking Veitch.
You still bring it back to this idea: Williams was “expressing the sentiments that she felt obliged to express.” On social media. In the middle of Waitangi weekend media coverage. Again, us 99%ers don’t get to do this kind of thing when we disagree with leaders’ strategy – we are obliged to make other decisions. But our would-be representatives in politics feel obliged to enjoy other luxuries which we don’t get.
“What if Little decided that Labour was no longer for a nuclear free NZ? Or arbitrarily announced that Shane Jones was back as as an MP, or even David Garrett?”
We’re not talking about that though, are we. Also, you say “arbitrarily announced”; we know that he didn’t arbitrarily announce it. He consulted her – presumably in his capacity as *leader*. But his decision wasn’t the one she wanted, so she got her PR firm to craft her a social media campaign to undermine his decision, which the press is now gleefully holding up as evidence that Labour’s recovery is a sham. Bravo.
Hey look, I can understand why you find it justified – I’m not saying you don’t make valid points in the context of politics and what Labour MPs are entitled to do. You probably know far more than me about this stuff. But can you understand how terrible it looks to working people who don’t get to make choices like that without dire consequences for their personal working lives, their mortgage or rent, their CC, their family life? And how undesirable it might be to us to see them carrying on like that and doing so much damage? It just doesn’t come across as the work of a smart operator in the political arena, let alone one with an eye for what ordinary people go through, what our ‘real world’ works like.
Firstly, I’m a working person, and I know how it looks to me.
Secondly, no I’m not overly interested in a Clayton’s apology. If you follow “sorry” with “out of context”, “devil’s advocate”, or just saying you took it too casually, it’s not an apology, is it? Apology followed by minimisation or excuse is not an apology.
No, he’s not Tony Veitch. However, he still hasn’t indicated that he knows why saying girls shouldn’t drink should never be part of a discussion about rape, nor does the age at which someone first consents to sex have anything to do with the topic of rape. If he doesn’t get why it’s a problem, how will he avoid doing it again?
If Little “consulted” caucus and then ignored serious and significant concerns from caucus members, it wasn’t really “consultation”, was it.
“If Little “consulted” caucus and then ignored serious and significant concerns from caucus members, it wasn’t really “consultation”, was it.”
Taking someone’s concerns into account during your decision making process, but nonetheless deciding that your final decision won’t go the way they wanted it doesn’t automatically amount to ‘ignoring’ them. Not consulting them in the first place is ignoring them. It’s perfectly reasonable to weigh up both sides of the argument and stick with one over the other without the other being ‘ignored’. And this is the concern I have about the response.
As a working person yourself, you’ll be aware that when this happens in our lives, we don’t get to respond to such situations by laying into our bosses on social media and have it go well for us. MPs doing so in their capacity as the representatives of ‘Labour’ is a bloody terrible look.
I stayed away from all this shit and was going to stay ‘staying away’. But…
Any org. running on human interactions and ‘common cause’ has to have bars set. Sometimes the idea will be to default to the highest common denominator (principle) and other times the lowest (ie – most accommodating)
This was clearly a time when the highest denominator should have been defaulted to.
Also…
1. What the fuck are Labour playing at still parachuting people into positions? It’s bullshit.
2. Why are there suggestions that Labour should have been secretive about their disagreements? Whatever happened to the idea of transparency?
Anyway, if a political party can’t even set up what I’d have thought to be a pretty fucking basic component of internal organisational culture, then…ah fuck it Labour died to me a while back and the smell just sometimes gets higher on the wind is all.
If Little had truly consulted everybody, then the strength of Williams’ concerns wouldn’t have been a surprise to him. Or Jackson.
And yet it seems to have taken both of them on the back foot.”
He’s the party leader. If that doesn’t count for anything, why have one? And what does ‘truly consulted everybody’ really mean? As covered previously, being consulted =/= getting everything you want. I would suggest Little was on the back foot because he foolishly expected a spokesperson who owes their appointment to his leadership to abide by their leader’s decision, only to find that they instead hired a PR company to ratfuck him on Waitangi Day.
Yeah, well I don’t know who was consulted. But I could have told them that this was exactly what would have happened. A lot of Labour activists have said pretty much the same thing.
Just think about how many ways that this was going to annoy people inside Labour.
1. Parachuting candidates in without going through the selection process is just outright daft. It was a problem with both the selection of Shearer and with Shearer’s attempts to repeat the same for others. To date I can’t actually think of many times when it has worked successfully on the left. And I can count only a few cases where I think it worked at all in NZ.
2. Willie comes in with a lot of baggage. The Roastbusters debacle was just the most recent. Which is what the union FB yesterday demonstrated.
3. It appears to have been done to get two audiences. Auckland Moari and whoever listened to his show at Radio Live. The latter is probably pretty small and there seem to be quite a lot of Maori who don’t seem to like him.
4. There are some quite large constituencies that a list position could serve.
5. Offhand, I don’t know of any skills that he would have brought to the job of being an MP. Sure being able to speak is an important skill. Being able to speak with a clear and reasoned judgement is an even more important skill.
For me the Roastbusters interview only a few years ago makes me wonder if Willie is up for the job. That in my opinion showed a clear level of misogynist bigotry that would be hard to sell to one of the larger constituencies around – and it was going to be raised. And it was done when he was a grown man, had already been a MP, and presumably as part of his duties in that role would have seen the social and personal problems that the types of things that he and John T were sprouting off about brings.
In my view, he isn’t a candidate that was worth putting up.
Oh and BTW: Andrew Little isn’t the “party leader”. That is Nigel Haworth, the president. Andrew Little is the leader of Labour’s parliamentary caucus. It is a role with some pretty specific responsibilities. He is also a member of the Labour Council. You really do need to learn some of this
And what does ‘truly consulted everybody’ really mean? As covered previously, being consulted =/= getting everything you want.
Very true.
“Truly consulted everybody” means that you end up with an understanding of the depth of feeling people have about an issue.
We’re not talking about a petulant child not getting dessert, we’re talking about a caucus member concerned that a parachuted politician has character flaws that completely invalidate his capabilities of acting as an MP for the Labour party. At the very least, Little should have expected his grand plan to be a massive headache.
I would suggest Little was on the back foot because he foolishly expected a spokesperson who owes their appointment to his leadership to abide by their leader’s decision, only to find that they instead hired a PR company to ratfuck him on Waitangi Day.
If that is the case, he failed to consult thoroughly.
Especially as it’s not even his decision to make.
Williams hiring a pr company, if true, only says that she chose to save the Labour party pr crew a massive conflict of interest: oppose an MP fulfilling their remit, or oppose a caucus leader exceeding his authority.
The complaint Williams made is clear, specific, and reasonable.
The only thing that “ratfucks” Little as leader would be digging in and declaring Williams persona non grata for saying something it was her job to say and reflects the opinions of many members.
Alternatively, he could clarify that it’s all up to the selection process and let shit cool down as the process takes its course. And if Jackson still is minimising and treating the issue as a farce and still gets selected, Little can cross that bridge when he comes to it.
Probably I don’t live in the type of world that you do. I work in one that doesn’t involve me being any kind of a slave.
Sure my bosses can fire me if they want to lose my skills. It has only ever happened a couple of times when month-by-month contracts weren’t renewed. That is the nature of contract work. Something that I have done for less than 2 years of my working life, each time to raise my skill levels.
I have walked away from several jobs when either I thought that the project I was working on was finished, or where my employers wanted me to move on to things that I didn’t want to do. I’m always keenly aware of my responsibilities in a job, and what I was employed to do.
By the sound of it, so is Poto Williams. Both as a representative of her electorate, and in the role she does as a spokesperson for Labour. She appears to have acted well within what she was employed to do and appears to have done it admirably. As McFlock points out further up, she isn’t employed by Andrew Little
I’d suggest that you should look to yourself about why you feel so trapped in your ‘real life’. What you are describing is something that I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy, and I’d suggest that you join a union to do something about fixing the situation.
BTW: Just as background. The Standard isn’t paid work. It is something that I do in my unpaid time. Just as I have helped various community organisations over the years including the NZLP. I do those because I think that they are worth supporting. In the same way that I support members of my extended family.
I don’t feel trapped, I feel aware of there being rules I have to abide by, one of which remains that in most normal jobs, it’s not ‘feeling trapped’ to know that if you disagree with your superiors, attacking them on social media doesn’t go well for you. Only a couple of times in all those years have I faced that choice. Once, I dealt with it by leaving despite the stress it caused – I put my money where my mouth was. The other time, I sucked it up and got on with it, letting time itself prove me right. Thing is, I think you’re more than smart enough to understand that perfectly well – are you just sledging me here? It seems a rather passive aggressive way to debate with someone.
“Probably I don’t live in the type of world that you do. I work in one that doesn’t involve me being any kind of a slave.
Sure my bosses can fire me if they want to lose my skills. It has only ever happened a couple of times when month-by-month contracts weren’t renewed. That is the nature of contract work. Something that I have done for less than 2 years of my working life, each time to raise my skill levels.”
Ah, the slave argument again. I’m sorry man, but this sounds to me like something that libertarians would say to people campaigning for a living wage. If you think that most ordinary people who live in a real world where undermining your superiors on social media ends with getting fired is being a ‘slave’, I think you need to reconnect with working people. Most of us consider it quite logical that you’d get fired for doing that. It’s not a question of arguing that it’s unfair we don’t get to do it; it’s a question of arguing that it’s unfair that MPs think that’s an acceptable thing to do when purporting to represent us.
I might be ignorant of how the Labour party works, but I get no joy from insulting people for not being an expert at the things I’ve chosen to be an expert at. I’m not a drone, but I believe that if you can’t follow your leader when the going gets tough then you’ll lose every time – I found this just playing football as a kid. Seems to me it’s true anywhere else. I might not be right about how authority works in the Labour party, but that was never my point. It’s how it looks to those of us outside of it who have that impression that ‘leader’ means that you’re in charge.
Ah the ritual whining…. I was wondering when we would get to that typical trollish run-away. After decades around the nets it becomes so so predicable.
I have no particular interest in explaining the basics of how every political party in parliament in this country operates. With the exception of the micro parties they all have very similar structures.
I am also not that much into blindly following leaders either. In fact I have strong track record over decades of telling them when I think that they are treading on dangerous ground. That applies just as much in business as it does in politics or the military. I don’t expect them to take my advice. I do expect them to listen and take note.
My criteria of someone that is a competent leader is that they can do exactly that. Because there are few people who are particularly competent across wide ranges of expertise.
On the nets I am wont to dispurse advice and education about things that I know. When a gentle hint doesn’t get through… well when I meet someone acting like dumb ox trying to batter down a gate and closing their ears whilst doing it, I find that lacing these with some sarcastic reflections of how they appear to me usually makes the lesson penetrate their obsessional stupidity.
This helps me in any subsequent interaction. Because I then don’t have to explain that is what I am likely to do again. The lesson is usually as memorable as your whining indicates it was today.
That’s cool, I’m not asking you to educate me on the internal workings of all the parliamentary parties. I just believe that MPs claiming to represent working people should be a little more in tune with them and not go around doing things that to us would be career ending.
“when I meet someone acting like dumb ox trying to batter down a gate and closing their ears whilst doing it, I find that lacing these with some sarcastic reflections of how they appear to me usually makes the lesson penetrate their obsessional stupidity.”
I don’t think there’s anything dumb about expecting Labour MPs to think a little about how it looks when you hire a PR firm to attack the party leader.
“This helps me in any subsequent interaction. Because I then don’t have to explain that is what I am likely to do again. The lesson is usually as memorable as your whining indicates it was today.”
Whining? I’ve got to be honest, that paragraph and the previous one sounds a bit pompous man. You’re saying that you taught me a lesson? I guess I learned that you can know an awful lot about the Labour party while not really getting what their voters expect from the people who presume to represent them, but I dunno if that’s something to be stoked about. It just seems a bit nihilistic.
I understand your argument and agree with it, my biggest concern is the public spat created from the issue, one made public deliberately through a PR company, a show of unity is paramount at this stage of the election year. If members have concerns about any issue, they should be dealing with it behind closed doors, there is no excuse for unsolicited disagreements find there way into the public domain. Let history show time and time again, that if you want to air your dirty laundry in the public domain as a political party hoping to be elected in the near future, your chances are going to be severely curbed, many a good political party has failed to reach the finish line because of the lack of discipline and unity, not because they didn’t have the right policies or candidates.
FFS The point is that you don’t understand the rules that Poto has to abide by. Clearly she does. One of the most specific things that everyone should do is to understand exactly under what conditions they work in.
And if you want to comment on someone else’s working situation like you are waffling on about, then you should get off your arse and learn about it BEFORE acting like a ignorant dork.
I dunno man, in real life if working stiffs like the rest of us disagree with our boss…
Andrew Little isn’t Poto Williams boss. He is a colleague acting in a different role – that of caucus leader. He doesn’t pay her, he doesn’t hold her employment contract, and he has very limited authority over her. Sure there is a political party involved who nominated her for the position. But she isn’t employed by them either.
She is employed by parliamentary services acting on behalf of the people who elected her. Directly in her case from her electorate. In the case of a list MP that would be the voters who voted for the party.
Now she can be removed from the position of being spokesperson by Andrew Little. She can be dropped from the party by the Labour party council. Those are actions that either of them could do. I am pretty sure that Poto would have calculated that
However neither are who she is employed by and who she is responsible to. She is a representative of the electorate who voted her in.
So why are you trying to say that Andrew Little is her boss?
You’re relying on technicalities to avoid addressing my point. And you need to use insults to make your point? I didn’t need to insult you, or to insult McFlock, even though I find your reasoning way off the mark.
Public perception matters big league. To us out there who are not versed in the minutae of party rules, the party leader is seen as being the boss. It might not be technically true, but I simply cannot believe that someone as knowledgeable as yourself would be unaware that this is how the public perceive the role to work, and that when MPs buck the party leader, that’s how it tends to be read.
We’re looking to Andrew Little as a potential prime minister. If he can’t just once in a while make a call and have it followed by his team, what kind of PM is he going to make? A bad one in most people’s book. We’re not asking him to be some kind of tinpot dictator, or for that to be the way he handles day-to-day decisionmaking. But if his team won’t abide when he makes a call which he has consulted them on, negotiated with them, and delivered a judgment that while he understands their concerns, this time he’s not for turning. That’s actually a sign of leadership to most of us. And as for Williams, yeah you know what? Most ordinary people are happy when consulted by our managers (can I say managers instead of bosses to avoid being insulted?), even if they don’t go with what we wanted. And be they managers, or be they bosses, or be they whatever a ‘caucus leader’ would be in a normal job, there’s just nowhere out there in voter land where you’re gonna find them being cool with you slagging off their decisions on social media.
Now, I feel like this is something I spoke with McFlock about but I understand these are two conversations, but to reiterate what I discussed with him, I don’t doubt that what you say is correct in the strictest terms of what goes in the Labour party, but surely you can see how we’d like to see Labour MPs having a bit of regard for what the rest of us go through in our daily lives and what would be appropriate for us? Let’s say Little is just a colleague for Williams. Most contracts these days have a clause about bringing your employer into disrepute, and I’m pretty sure that slagging off a coworker about things they’ve done in the workplace on social media would get you in trouble even if they weren’t your manager. That’s real life to us.
We’re looking to Andrew Little as a potential prime minister. If he can’t just once in a while make a call and have it followed by his team, what kind of PM is he going to make?
Appropriate Decision-making:
For the implementation of ecological wisdom and social responsibility, decisions will be made directly at the appropriate level by those affected.
and
Non-Violence:
Non-violent conflict resolution is the process by which ecological wisdom, social responsibility and appropriate decision making will be implemented. This principle applies at all levels.
So I’m sorry – If Little is not going to split the Government within his first week of Premiership, then he will have to learn a bit more about negotiation, and collaboration, and give a bit more respect to the opinions of his colleagues.
I have explained up above about what I use insults. It helps make the point and reduces the amount of effort I have to expend in future interactions.
Can I also point out that you don’t make the rules about behaviour on this site. That is generally considered to be one of my roles. I wrote the manual on it.
Technicalities are the lifeblood of any argument for anyone who is actually interested in what they are waffling about. However I will accept that you don’t seem to want to know them. I envisage that in your political life you may be as unsuccessful as Donald Trump is at his getting his immigrant ban working. He also seemed to have skipped a few technicalities and got reamed by the courts for doing so.
Most contracts these days have a clause about bringing your employer into disrepute, and I’m pretty sure that slagging off a coworker about things they’ve done in the workplace on social media would get you in trouble even if they weren’t your manager. That’s real life to us.
Indeed. However as was pointed out many times repetitively over and over again. Andrew Little was not her employer, does not hold a contract with Poto Williams, and if there was such a clause ina code of conduct or the like then it would stand directly in the way of Poto Williams obligations to her real employers – the people who voted for her. That is a completely fatuous argument.
This is the case for EVERY MP in parliament. So your weak pleas to ignorance tend to indicate that you really should learn something about basic politics before waving your two inch troll dick around pretending that it is at least 10 inches.
We’re looking to Andrew Little as a potential prime minister. If he can’t just once in a while make a call and have it followed by his team…
I believe that you are managing to miss a vital point here. There are processes that any manager has to follow. If someone goes off and tries to coop or bypass me in my role without my permission and outside the bounds of the process, then they will have to show an immediate and justifiable cause or they will get a severe bollocking.
It sounds to me like you have a simple minded approach to working with and for other people. Which leads us back to McFlocks point about you acting like a simple wage slave. Or an adolescent in a sports team. Not very mature either way.
Well, it seems to me that you’re aggressively defending the notion that MPs shouldn’t have to be sensitive to how their activities look to voters. Good luck to them (and to you in defending them, I might add; if the Labour caucus is going to start acting like this again, then anyone who takes that job on is going to have a very busy 2017).
It’s interesting that you are so offended by me being ‘immature’ in demanding this, but you are not offended by politicians being demonstrably immature with their ill-disciplined, poorly timed, and counter productive social media behaviour. It’s like some of these folks have PhDs in losing.
Also, when I wrote what I thought was a reasonable observation about our different approaches to the topic:
“And you need to use insults to make your point? I didn’t need to insult you, or to insult McFlock, even though I find your reasoning way off the mark.”
You wrote back:
“Can I also point out that you don’t make the rules about behaviour on this site. That is generally considered to be one of my roles. I wrote the manual on it.”
For someone who accuses other people of being immature, I dunno where to start on that one. Tried a couple times but, just, no.
I think that the very fact we’re having these discussions demonstrates that ‘how it looks to voters’ is not exactly clear-cut.
Maybe Little should have made the same consideration, alongside asking “do I have the constitutional authority to make and announce this deal?” and “should I listen just a little bit harder to what people are saying to me as I consult caucus about this proposal?”
Dude, Lynn knows he’s being annoying and he’s not going to change. This is not an argument you are going to win. Nor would it be particularly helpful even if you did, Lynn doesn’t work for the Labour Party and doesn’t have any particular influence over them as far as I’m aware.
Nope. I was briefly a branch chair for Sandringham back in the early 90s.
Being annoying, memorable, and being accurate about facts and downstream consequences far more often than not is my lever. It also takes a lot less time than spending loads of times in meetings or extended discussions.
And I get to hear the best of what others are capable of when they rise to the occasion. CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening!!
Nope. I was briefly a branch chair for Sandringham back in the early 90s.
Being annoying, memorable, and being accurate about facts and downstream consequences far more often than not is my lever. It also takes a lot less time than spending loads of times in meetings or extended discussions.
And I get to hear the best of what others are capable of when they rise to the occasion. CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening or thinking!!
Nope. What I am mostly pointing is that almost everything you are saying is incorrect. It is based largely on how you think that the world should operate with the type of leadership style that really should have beckme obsolete in the trenches a 100 years ago.
What I am referrong to is how the rules actually operate or who management, political or otherwise, actually works in modern times. This particular case is pretty interesting because Poto Williams did exactly what the party and the caucus requires her to do in her roles for them.
I don’t mind needling to ensure that I am getting through. In fact I find it to be kind of amusing seeing if certain types of commenters can in fact get beyond their inflexible thinking habits of a lifetime.
Take it as a compliment. I usually don’t bother because of my lack of time. Speaking of which. I had better head off to work.
Thanks Antoine, I’m definitely not conflating LP with the Labour Party – but it’s a debate where I’ve questioned their actions, and he has defended them, as is his right and mine.
LP, I won’t say any more than the items below – it’s your site etc.
“CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening or thinking!!”
For a guy who claims to think so little of the points I made, it’s interesting how little you engaged with them in this debate, except for where you could selectively use details of inner party processes to argue that you don’t have to. This despite the fact that I was talking about how it looks to the public rather than how it works in private. You’ve studiously avoided engaging with the issue of how things look to the public and focused pretty much exclusively on what’s ok within the party – as if much of the public knows or cares when the news just covers an MP defying the leader in a party which is known for that but seeking to say it’s changed.
So yeah, disappointing on that score. I’ve overlooked the insulting tone which I felt was designed to troll me and not taken the bait by returning serve – but I won’t attempt to rewrite your site rules! I guess the ‘lesson’ I’ll be taking away isn’t the one you intended to impart. I’ll remember contrasts really; the pompous tone of the comments, the condescension immense not just in and of itself, but in equally immense contrast with the studious avoidance of discussing what I argued was the matter at hand – how bad this looks to much of the public. I can only hope that the Labour party themselves don’t make the same mistake, or we’re destined for 3 more years of National.
Thanks for providing the platform, in any case. I can see I reached a couple people who feel the same as me.
I guess the ‘lesson’ I’ll be taking away isn’t the one you intended to impart. I’ll remember contrasts really; the pompous tone of the comments, the condescension immense not just in and of itself, but in equally immense contrast with the studious avoidance of discussing …
That conceitedness and abusiveness are lprent’s trademark behaviour. He patronisingly thinks he’s teaching people a lesson by abusing them, but as you say, the lesson people learn is not the one he thinks he’s imparting. The lesson I take from it is that it’s not worth trying to discuss things with him because he’s too arrogant to consider other points of view, and his hyper-aggression is a form of trolling to shut down discussion.
It’s possible to avoid him, but still, it must be harmful to the culture of the Standard to have a sysop with anger management issues and an inflated sense of the superiority of his own opinions. Is this kind of macho bullying style a factor in the well-known gender imbalance of the site?
Did I care? You appear to miss the point. As far as I am concerned this is an alternate way of moderating.
What I am concerned with is that I don’t have my attention attracted by people acting like fools. The best way of making sure that happens is for the foolish to not want to attract my attention. If I have time, I prefer to treat a fool like a fool. It is more effective than the other techniques I could use.
For the record, Williams would be bound by the Labour Caucus Rules – no idea what those comprise of, but if they apply it would be an avenue of discipline.
Yes. That is probably why she made a point of pointing out that what she did actually falls under her portfolio and therefore under her responsibilities to caucus. This was hardly reputable, and curiously, seems to have been largely unexamined by the commenters.
Think through what a probable caucus rule set would say about that.
I read the article, and disagree with you, and he was still talking of a “winnable list placing” which is what he spoke of before. But remember, Willie Jackson still has a process to go through first.
President Trump has inherited a vast domestic intelligence agency with extraordinary secret powers. A cache of documents offers a rare window into the FBI’s quiet expansion since 9/11.” https://theintercept.com/series/the-fbis-secret-rules/
So, is he implying that high-income people will not get cuts?
And if so, what is a plausible mechanism for this to happen? (I.e. lower- and middle-income earners have their tax burden eased, and higher-income earners do not.)
Can’t change rates down or brackets up, since everyone gets less tax from those.
Or is he just not telling the whole story, and of course everyone will get cuts?
Just heard the outgoing deputy PM address the nation for the start of the year.
Paula spent 10 minutes gossiping about Labour. You know the type, a gossip, stirrer, bully. What a disgusting display it was, mutton as.
Obviously she is not too bright, a better use of time would be to talk up her own party.
But she didn’t, the outgoing deputy PM seems to have no ideas, no solutions, nothing nada.
And I don’t want to sound shallow, but by crikey she’s a big lass.
Is that all she does, gossip when given time to speak to the NZ public in Parliament? What a waste of tax payer money she is.
It reminds me of the story of a guy who was jailed for stealing to support himself, years after he had served his time, the stigma still hung around, even though he had paid his debt to society in full, and learnt the lesson attached to it.
[lprent: I don’t like losing moderators. Having a fool attacking my moderators tends to piss me off.
But you aren’t banned because you didn’t quite quite drop over the bounds. Since the last comments I looked at last night from you were praising TDB. I thought of an appropriate warning that would serve a dual purpose.
All your comments are now subject to automatic moderation and release when a moderator feels like it. That is because you appear to have been ignoring gentle warnings from moderators about thinking before pressing submit.
And just think about how privileged you now are. You are now the only person on this site who can operate as if you are on TDB. Doesn’t that make you feel excited 😈 ]
Olivia and Noah and Hana are going to the library!It is fun to go to the library. It has books and songs and mat time and people who smile at you and say, Hello Olivia, what have you been doing this morning?The library is more fun than the mall. At ...
New World Orders: The challenge facing Christopher Luxon and Chris Hipkins is how to keep their small and vulnerable nation safe and stable in a world whose economic and political climate the forty-seventh American president is changing so profoundly.IT IS, SURELY, the ultimate Millennial revenge fantasy. Calling senior Baby-Boomer and Gen-X ...
“This might surprise you, Laurie, but I reckon Trump’s putting on a bloody impressive performance.”“GOODNESS ME, HANNAH, just look at all those Valentine’s Day cards!”“Occupational hazard, Laurie, the more beer I serve, the more my customers declare their undying love!”“Crikey! I had no idea business was so good.” Laurie squinted ...
In 2005, Labour repealed the long-standing principle of birthright citizenship in Aotearoa. Why? As with everything else Labour does, it all came down to austerity: "foreign mothers" were supposedly "coming to this country to give birth", and this was "put[ting] pressure on hospitals". Then-Immigration Minister George Hawkins explicitly gave this ...
And I just hope that you can forgive usBut everything must goAnd if you need an explanation, nationThen everything must goSongwriters: James Dean Bradfield / Sean Anthony Moore / Nicholas Allen Jones.Today, I’d like to talk about a couple of things that happened over the weekend:Brian Tamaki’s Library Invasion and ...
New reporting highlights how Brooke van Velden refuses to meet with the CTU but is happy to meet with fringe Australian-based unions. Van Velden is pursuing reckless changes to undermine the personal grievance system against the advice of her own officials. Engineering New Zealand are saying that hundreds of engineers ...
The NZCTU strongly supports the Employment Relations (Employee Remuneration Disclosure) Amendment Bill. This Bill represents a positive step towards addressing serious issues around unlawful disparities in pay by protecting workers’ rights to discuss their pay and conditions. This Bill also provides welcome support for helping tackle the prevalent gender and ...
Years of hard work finally paid off last week as the country’s biggest and most important transport project, the City Rail Link reached a major milestone with the first test train making its way slowly though the tunnels for the first time. This is a fantastic achievement and it is ...
Engineers are pleading for the Government to free up funds to restart stalled projects. File Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Monday, February 17 are:Engineering New Zealand CEO Richard Templer said yesterday hundreds of ...
It’s one of New Zealand’s great sustaining myths: the spirit of ANZAC, our mates across the ditch, the spirit of Earl’s Court, Antipodeans united against the world. It is also a myth; it is not reality. That much was clear from a series of speakers, including a former Australian Prime ...
Many people have been unsatisfied for years that things have not improved for them, some as individuals, many more however because their families are clearly putting in more work, for less money – and certainly far less purchase on society. This general discontent has grown exponentially since the GFC. ...
A listing of 34 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 9, 2025 thru Sat, February 15, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report shows worsening food poverty and housing shortages mean more than 400,000 people now need welfare support, the highest level since the 1990s. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in our political economy around housing, climate and ...
You're just too too obscure for meOh you don't really get through to meAnd there's no need for you to talk that wayIs there any less pessimistic things to say?Songwriters: Graeme DownesToday, I thought we’d take a look at some of the most cringe-inducing moments from last week, but don’t ...
Please note: I’ve delayed my “What can we do?” article for this video.The video above shows Destiny Church members assaulting staff and librarians as they pushed through to a room of terrified parents and young children.It was posted to social media last night.But if you read Sinead Boucher’s Stuff, you ...
Skeptical Science is partnering with Gigafact to produce fact briefs — bite-sized fact checks of trending claims. You can submit claims you think need checking via the tipline. Is sea level rise exaggerated? Sea levels are rising at an accelerating rate, not stagnating or decreasing. Warming global temperatures cause land ice ...
Here is a scenario, but first a historical parallel. Hitler and the Nazis could well have accomplished everything that they wanted to do within German borders, including exterminating Jews, so long as they confined their ambitious to Germany itself. After all, the world pretty much sat and watched as the ...
I’ve spent the last couple of days in Hamilton covering Waikato University’s annual NZ Economics Forum, where (arguably) three of the most influential people in our political economy right now laid out their thinking in major speeches about the size and role of Government, their views on for spending, tax ...
Simeon Brown’s Ideology BentSimeon Brown once told Kiwis he tries to represent his deep sense of faith by interacting “with integrity”.“It’s important that there’s Christians in Parliament…and from my perspective, it’s great to be a Christian in Parliament and to bring that perspective to [laws, conversations and policies].”And with ...
Severe geological and financial earthquakes are inevitable. We just don’t know how soon and how they will play out. Are we putting the right effort into preparing for them?Every decade or so the international economy has a major financial crisis. We cannot predict exactly when or exactly how it will ...
Questions1. How did Old Mate Grabaseat describe his soon-to-be-Deputy-PM’s letter to police advocating for Philip Polkinghorne?a.Ill-advisedb.A perfect letterc.A letter that will live in infamyd.He had me at hello2. What did Seymour say in response?a.What’s ill-advised is commenting when you don’t know all the facts and ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff has called on OJI Fibre Solutions to work with the government, unions, and the community before closing the Kinleith Paper Mill. “OJI has today announced 230 job losses in what will be a devastating blow for the community. OJI needs to work with ...
NZCTU Te Kauae Kaimahi President Richard Wagstaff is sounding the alarm about the latest attack on workers from Minister of Workplace Relations and Safety Brooke van Velden, who is ignoring her own officials to pursue reckless changes that would completely undermine the personal grievance system. “Brooke van Velden’s changes will ...
Hi,When I started writing Webworm in 2020, I wrote a lot about the conspiracy theories that were suddenly invading our Twitter timelines and Facebook feeds. Four years ago a reader, John, left this feedback under one of my essays:It’s a never ending labyrinth of lunacy which, as you have pointed ...
And if you said this life ain't good enoughI would give my world to lift you upI could change my life to better suit your moodBecause you're so smoothAnd it's just like the ocean under the moonOh, it's the same as the emotion that I get from youYou got the ...
Aotearoa remains the minority’s birthright, New Zealand the majority’s possession. WAITANGI DAY commentary see-saws manically between the warmly positive and the coldly negative. Many New Zealanders consider this a good thing. They point to the unexamined patriotism of July Fourth and Bastille Day celebrations, and applaud the fact that the ...
The podcast above of the weekly ‘Hoon’ webinar for paying subscribers on Thursday night features co-hosts & talking about the week’s news with regular and special guests, including: and on the week in geopolitics, including the latest from Donald Trump’s administration over Gaza and Ukraine; on the ...
Up until now, the prevailing coalition view of public servants was that there were simply too many of them. But yesterday the new Public Service Commissioner, handpicked by the Luxon Government, said it was not so much numbers but what they did and the value they produced that mattered. Sir ...
In a moment we explore the question: What is Andrew Bayly wanting to tell ACC, and will it involve enjoying a small wine tasting and then telling someone to fuck off? But first, for context, a broader one: What do we look for in a government?Imagine for a moment, you ...
As expected, Donald Trump just threw Ukraine under the bus, demanding that it accept Russia's illegal theft of land, while ruling out any future membership of NATO. Its a colossal betrayal, which effectively legitimises Russia's invasion, while laying the groundwork for the next one. But Trump is apparently fine with ...
A ballot for a single member's bill was held today, and the following bill was drawn: Employment Relations (Collective Agreements in Triangular Relationships) Amendment Bill (Adrian Rurawhe) The bill would extend union rights to employees in triangular relationships, where they are (nominally) employed by one party, but ...
This is a guest post by George Weeks, reviewing a book called ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin AshtonBook review: ‘How to Fly a Horse’ by Kevin Ashton (2015) – and what it means for Auckland. The title of this article might unnerve any Greater Auckland ...
This story was originally published by Capital & Main and is part of Covering Climate Now, a global journalism collaboration strengthening coverage of the climate story. Within just a week, the sheer devastation of the Los Angeles wildfires has pushed to the fore fundamental questions about the impact of the climate crisis that have been ...
In this world, it's just usYou know it's not the same as it wasSongwriters: Harry Edward Styles / Thomas Edward Percy Hull / Tyler Sam JohnsonYesterday, I received a lovely message from Caty, a reader of Nick’s Kōrero, that got me thinking. So I thought I’d share it with you, ...
In past times a person was considered “unserious” or “not a serious” person if they failed to grasp, behave and speak according to the solemnity of the context in which they were located. For example a serious person does not audibly pass gas at Church, or yell “gun” at a ...
Long stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Thursday, February 13 are:The coalition Government’s early 2024 ‘fiscal emergency’ freeze on funding, planning and building houses, schools, local roads and hospitals helped extend and deepen the economic and jobs recession through calendar ...
For obvious reasons, people feel uneasy when the right to be a citizen is sold off to wealthy foreigners. Even selling the right to residency seems a bit dubious, when so many migrants who are not millionaires get turned away or are made to jump through innumerable hoops – simply ...
A new season of White Lotus is nearly upon us: more murder mystery, more sumptuous surroundings, more rich people behaving badly.Once more we get to identify with the experience of the pampered tourist or perhaps the poorly paid help; there's something in White Lotus for all New Zealanders.And unlike the ...
In 2016, Aotearoa shockingly plunged to fourth place in the Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index. Nine years later, and we're back there again: New Zealand has seen a further slip in its global ranking in the latest Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI). [...] In the latest CPI New Zealand's score ...
1. You’ve started ranking your politicians on how much they respect the rule of law2. You’ve stopped paying attention to those news publications3. You’ve developed a sudden interest in a particular period of history4. More and more people are sounding like your racist, conspiracist uncle.5. Someone just pulled a Nazi ...
Transforming New Zealand: Brian EastonBrian Easton will discuss the above topic at 2/57 Willis Street, Wellington at 5:30pm on Tuesday 26 February at 2/57 Willis Street, WellingtonThe sub-title to the above is "Why is the Left failing?" Brian Easton's analysis is based on his view that while the ...
Salvation Army’s State of the Nation 2025 report highlights falling living standards, the highest unemployment rates since the 1990s and half of all Pacific children going without food. There are reports of hundreds if not thousands of people are applying for the same jobs in the wake of last year’s ...
Mountain Tui is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.Correction: On the article The Condundrum of David Seymour, Luke Malpass conducted joint reviews with Bryce Wilkinson, the architect of the Regulatory Standards Bill - not Bryce Edwards. The article ...
Tomorrow the council’s Transport, Resilience and Infrastructure Committee meet and agenda has a few interesting papers. Council’s Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport Every year the council provide a Letter of Expectation to Auckland Transport which is part of the process for informing AT of the council’s priorities and ...
All around in my home townThey're trying to track me down, yeahThey say they want to bring me in guiltyFor the killing of a deputyFor the life of a deputySongwriter: Robert Nesta Marley.Support Nick’s Kōrero today with a 20% discount on a paid subscription to receive all my newsletters directly ...
Hi,I think all of us have probably experienced the power of music — that strange, transformative thing that gets under our skin and helps us experience this whole life thing with some kind of sanity.Listening and experiencing music has always been such a huge part of my life, and has ...
Business frustration over the stalled economy is growing, and only 34% of voters are confidentNicola Willis can deliver. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty on Wednesday, February 12 are:Business frustration is growing about a ...
I have now lived long enough to see a cabinet minister go both barrels on their Prime Minister and not get sacked.It used to be that the PM would have a drawer full of resignations signed by ministers on the day of their appointment, ready for such an occasion. But ...
This session will feature Simon McCallum, Senior Lecturer in Engineering and Computer Science (VUW) and recent Labour Party candidate in the Southland Electorate talking about some of the issues around AI and how this should inform Labour Party policy. Simon is an excellent speaker with a comprehensive command of AI ...
The proposed Waimate garbage incinerator is dead: The company behind a highly-controversial proposal to build a waste-to-energy plant in the Waimate District no longer has the land. [...] However, SIRRL director Paul Taylor said the sales and purchase agreement to purchase land from Murphy Farms, near Glenavy, lapsed at ...
The US Foreign Corrupt Practices Act has been a vital tool in combatting international corruption. It forbids US companies and citizens from bribing foreign public officials anywhere in the world. And its actually enforced: some of the world's biggest companies - Siemens, Hewlett Packard, and Bristol Myers Squibb - have ...
December 2024 photo - with UK Tory Boris Johnson (Source: Facebook)Those PollsFor hours, political poll results have resounded across political hallways and commentary.According to the 1News Verizon poll, 50% of the country believe we are heading in the “wrong direction”, while 39% believe we are “on the right track”.The left ...
A Tai Rāwhiti mill that ran for 30 years before it was shut down in late 2023 is set to re-open in the coming months, which will eventually see nearly 300 new jobs in the region. A new report from Massey University shows that pensioners are struggling with rising costs. ...
As support continues to fall, Luxon also now faces his biggest internal ructions within the coalition since the election, with David Seymour reacting badly to being criticised by the PM. File photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Not since 1988 when Richard Prebble openly criticised David Lange have we seen such a challenge to a Prime Minister as that of David Seymour to Christopher Luxon last night. Prebble suggested Lange had mental health issues during a TV interview and was almost immediately fired. Seymour hasn’t gone quite ...
Three weeks in, and the 24/7 news cycle is not helping anyone feel calm and informed about the second Trump presidency. One day, the US is threatening 25% trade tariffs on its friends and neighbours. The reasons offered by the White House are absurd, such as stopping fentanyl coming in ...
This video includes personal musings and conclusions of the creator climate scientist Dr. Adam Levy. It is presented to our readers as an informed perspective. Please see video description for references (if any). Wherever you look, you'll hear headlines claiming we've passed 1.5 degrees of global warming. And while 2024 saw ...
Photo by Heather M. Edwards on UnsplashHere’s the key news, commentary, reports and debate around Aotearoa’s politics and economy in the week to Feb 10 below. That’s ahead of live chats on the Substack App and The Kākā’s front page on Substack at 5pm with: on his column in The ...
Is there anyone in the world the National Party loves more than a campaign donor? Why yes, there is! They will always have the warmest hello and would you like to slip into something more comfortable for that great god of our age, the High Net Worth Individual.The words the ...
Waste and fraud certainly exist in foreign aid programs, but rightwing celebration of USAID’s dismantling shows profound ignorance of the value of soft power (as opposed to hard power) in projecting US influence and interests abroad by non-military/coercive means (think of “hearts and minds,” “hugs, not bullets,” “honey versus vinegar,” ...
Health New Zealand is proposing to cut almost half of its data and digital positions – more than 1000 of them. The PSA has called on the Privacy Commissioner to urgently investigate the cuts due to the potential for serious consequences for patients. NZNO is calling for an urgent increase ...
We may see a few more luxury cars on Queen Street, but a loosening of rules to entice rich foreigners to invest more here is unlikely to “turbocharge our economic growth”. Photo: Lynn Grieveson / The KākāLong stories short, the top six things in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate ...
Let us not dance daintily around the elephant in the room. Our politicians who serve us in the present are not honest, certainly not as honest as they should be, and while the right are taking out most of the trophies for warping narratives and literally redefining “facts”, the kiwi ...
A few weeks ago I took a look at public transport ridership in 2024. In today’s post I’m going to be looking a bit deeper at bus ridership. Buses make up the vast majority of ridership in Auckland with 70 million boardings last year out of a total of 89.4 ...
Oh, you know I did itIt's over and I feel fineNothing you could say is gonna change my mindWaited and I waited the longest nightNothing like the taste of sweet declineSongwriters: Chris Shiflett / David Eric Grohl / Nate Mendel / Taylor Hawkins.Hindsight is good, eh?The clarity when the pieces ...
Photo by Towfiqu barbhuiya on UnsplashHere’s what we’re watching in the week to February 16 and beyond in Aotearoa’s political economy around housing, climate and poverty:Monday, February 10The Kākā’s weekly wrap-up of news about politics and the economy is due at midday, followed by webinar for paying subscribers in Substack’s ...
A listing of 23 news and opinion articles we found interesting and shared on social media during the past week: Sun, February 2, 2025 thru Sat, February 8, 2025. This week's roundup is again published soleley by category. We are still interested in feedback to hone the categorization, so if ...
Today, I stumbled across a Twitter Meme: the ending of The Lord of the Rings as a Chess scenario: https://x.com/mellon_heads/status/1887983845917564991 It gets across the basic gist. Aragorn and Gandalf offering up ‘material’ at the Morannon allows Frodo and Samwise to catch Sauron unawares – fair enough. But there are a ...
Last week, Kieran McAnulty called out Chris Bishop and Nicola Willis for their claims that Kāinga Ora’s costs were too high.They had claimed Kāinga Ora’s cost were 12% higher than market i.e. private devlopersBut Kāinga Ora’s Chair had already explained why last year:"We're not building to sell, so we'll be ...
The Government's sudden cancellation of the tertiary education funding increase is a reckless move that risks widespread job losses and service reductions across New Zealand's universities. ...
National’s cuts to disability support funding and freezing of new residential placements has resulted in significant mental health decline for intellectually disabled people. ...
The hundreds of jobs lost needlessly as a result of the Kinleith Mill paper production closure will have a devastating impact on the Tokoroa community - something that could have easily been avoided. ...
Today Te Pāti Māori MP for Te Tai Tokerau, Mariameno Kapa-Kingi, released her members bill that will see the return of tamariki and mokopuna Māori from state care back to te iwi Māori. This bill will establish an independent authority that asserts and protects the rights promised in He Whakaputanga ...
The Whangarei District Council being forced to fluoridate their local water supply is facing a despotic Soviet-era disgrace. This is not a matter of being pro-fluoride or anti-fluoride. It is a matter of what New Zealanders see and value as democracy in our country. Individual democratically elected Councillors are not ...
Nicola Willis’ latest supermarket announcement is painfully weak with no new ideas, no real plan, and no relief for Kiwis struggling with rising grocery costs. ...
Half of Pacific children sometimes going without food is just one of many heartbreaking lowlights in the Salvation Army’s annual State of the Nation report. ...
The Salvation Army’s State of the Nation report is a bleak indictment on the failure of Government to take steps to end poverty, with those on benefits, including their children, hit hardest. ...
New Zealand First has today introduced a Member’s Bill which would restore decision-making power to local communities regarding the fluoridation of drinking water. The ‘Fluoridation (Referendum) Legislation Bill’ seeks to repeal the Health (Fluoridation of Drinking Water) Amendment Act 2021 that granted centralised authority to the Direct General of Health ...
New Zealand First has introduced a Member’s Bill aimed at preventing banks from refusing their services to businesses because of the current “Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Framework”. “This Bill ensures fairness and prevents ESG standards from perpetuating woke ideology in the banking sector being driven by unelected, globalist, climate ...
Erica Stanford has reached peak shortsightedness if today’s announcement is anything to go by, picking apart immigration settings piece by piece to the detriment of the New Zealand economy. ...
Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. The intention was to establish a colony with the cession of sovereignty to the Crown, ...
Te Whatu Ora Chief Executive Margie Apa leaving her job four months early is another symptom of this government’s failure to deliver healthcare for New Zealanders. ...
The Green Party is calling for the Prime Minister to show leadership and be unequivocal about Aotearoa New Zealand’s opposition to a proposal by the US President to remove Palestinians from Gaza. ...
The latest unemployment figures reveal that job losses are hitting Māori and Pacific people especially hard, with Māori unemployment reaching a staggering 9.7% for the December 2024 quarter and Pasifika unemployment reaching 10.5%. ...
Waitangi 2025: Waitangi Day must be community and not politically driven - Shane Jones Our originating document, theTreaty of Waitangi, was signed on February 6, 1840. An agreement between Māori and the British Crown. Initially inked by Ngā Puhi in Waitangi, further signatures were added as it travelled south. ...
Despite being confronted every day with people in genuine need being stopped from accessing emergency housing – National still won’t commit to building more public houses. ...
The Green Party says the Government is giving up on growing the country’s public housing stock, despite overwhelming evidence that we need more affordable houses to solve the housing crisis. ...
Before any thoughts of the New Year and what lies ahead could even be contemplated, New Zealand reeled with the tragedy of Senior Sergeant Lyn Fleming losing her life. For over 38 years she had faithfully served as a front-line Police officer. Working alongside her was Senior Sergeant Adam Ramsay ...
Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson will return to politics at Waitangi on Monday the 3rd of February where she will hold a stand up with fellow co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick. ...
Te Pāti Māori is appalled by the government's blatant mishandling of the school lunch programme. David Seymour’s ‘cost-saving’ measures have left tamariki across Aotearoa with unidentifiable meals, causing distress and outrage among parents and communities alike. “What’s the difference between providing inedible food, and providing no food at all?” Said ...
The Government is doubling down on outdated and volatile fossil fuels, showing how shortsighted and destructive their policies are for working New Zealanders. ...
Green Party MP Steve Abel this morning joined Coromandel locals in Waihi to condemn new mining plans announced by Shane Jones in the pit of the town’s Australian-owned Gold mine. ...
The Green Party is calling on the Government to strengthen its just-announced 2030-2035 Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement and address its woeful lack of commitment to climate security. ...
Today marks a historic moment for Taranaki iwi with the passing of the Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill in Parliament. "Today, we stand together as descendants of Taranaki, and our tūpuna, Taranaki Maunga, is now formally acknowledged by the law as a living tūpuna. ...
Labour is relieved to see Children’s Minister Karen Chhour has woken up to reality and reversed her government’s terrible decisions to cut funding from frontline service providers – temporarily. ...
The Government’s commitment to get New Zealand’s roads back on track is delivering strong results, with around 98 per cent of potholes on state highways repaired within 24 hours of identification every month since targets were introduced, Transport Minister Chris Bishop says. “Increasing productivity to help rebuild our economy is ...
The former Cadbury factory will be the site of the Inpatient Building for the new Dunedin Hospital and Health Minister Simeon Brown says actions have been taken to get the cost overruns under control. “Today I am giving the people of Dunedin certainty that we will build the new Dunedin ...
From today, Plunket in Whāngarei will be offering childhood immunisations – the first of up to 27 sites nationwide, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. The investment of $1 million into the pilot, announced in October 2024, was made possible due to the Government’s record $16.68 billion investment in health. It ...
New Zealand’s strong commitment to the rights of disabled people has continued with the response to an important United Nations report, Disability Issues Minister Louise Upston has announced. Of the 63 concluding observations of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), 47 will be progressed ...
Resources Minister Shane Jones has launched New Zealand’s national Minerals Strategy and Critical Minerals List, documents that lay a strategic and enduring path for the mineral sector, with the aim of doubling exports to $3 billion by 2035. Mr Jones released the documents, which present the Coalition Government’s transformative vision ...
Firstly I want to thank OceanaGold for hosting our event today. Your operation at Waihi is impressive. I want to acknowledge local MP Scott Simpson, local government dignitaries, community stakeholders and all of you who have gathered here today. It’s a privilege to welcome you to the launch of the ...
Racing Minister, Winston Peters has announced the Government is preparing public consultation on GST policy proposals which would make the New Zealand racing industry more competitive. “The racing industry makes an important economic contribution. New Zealand thoroughbreds are in demand overseas as racehorses and for breeding. The domestic thoroughbred industry ...
Business confidence remains very high and shows the economy is on track to improve, Economic Growth Minister Nicola Willis says. “The latest ANZ Business Outlook survey, released yesterday, shows business confidence and expected own activity are ‘still both very high’.” The survey reports business confidence fell eight points to +54 ...
Enabling works have begun this week on an expanded radiology unit at Hawke’s Bay Fallen Soldiers’ Memorial Hospital which will double CT scanning capacity in Hawke’s Bay to ensure more locals can benefit from access to timely, quality healthcare, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. This investment of $29.3m in the ...
The Government has today announced New Zealand’s second international climate target under the Paris Agreement, Climate Change Minister Simon Watts says. New Zealand will reduce emissions by 51 to 55 per cent compared to 2005 levels, by 2035. “We have worked hard to set a target that is both ambitious ...
Nine years of negotiations between the Crown and iwi of Taranaki have concluded following Te Pire Whakatupua mō Te Kāhui Tupua/the Taranaki Maunga Collective Redress Bill passing its third reading in Parliament today, Treaty Negotiations Minister Paul Goldsmith says. “This Bill addresses the historical grievances endured by the eight iwi ...
As schools start back for 2025, there will be a relentless focus on teaching the basics brilliantly so all Kiwi kids grow up with the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to grow the New Zealand of the future, Education Minister Erica Stanford says. “A world-leading education system is a key ...
Housing Minister Chris Bishop and Associate Agriculture Minister Mark Patterson have welcomed Kāinga Ora’s decision to re-open its tender for carpets to allow wool carpet suppliers to bid. “In 2024 Kāinga Ora issued requests for tender (RFTs) seeking bids from suppliers to carpet their properties,” Mr Bishop says. “As part ...
Associate Education Minister David Seymour has today visited Otahuhu College where the new school lunch programme has served up healthy lunches to students in the first days of the school year. “As schools open in 2025, the programme will deliver nutritious meals to around 242,000 students, every school day. On ...
Minister for Children Karen Chhour has intervened in Oranga Tamariki’s review of social service provider contracts to ensure Barnardos can continue to deliver its 0800 What’s Up hotline. “When I found out about the potential impact to this service, I asked Oranga Tamariki for an explanation. Based on the information ...
A bill to make revenue collection on imported and exported goods fairer and more effective had its first reading in Parliament, Customs Minister Casey Costello said today. “The Customs (Levies and Other Matters) Amendment Bill modernises the way in which Customs can recover the costs of services that are needed ...
Minister of Internal Affairs Brooke van Velden says the Department of Internal Affairs [the Department] has achieved significant progress in completing applications for New Zealand citizenship. “December 2024 saw the Department complete 5,661 citizenship applications, the most for any month in 2024. This is a 54 per cent increase compared ...
Reversals to Labour’s blanket speed limit reductions begin tonight and will be in place by 1 July, says Minister of Transport Chris Bishop. “The previous government was obsessed with slowing New Zealanders down by imposing illogical and untargeted speed limit reductions on state highways and local roads. “National campaigned on ...
Finance Minister Nicola Willis has announced Budget 2025 – the Growth Budget - will be delivered on Thursday 22 May. “This year’s Budget will drive forward the Government’s plan to grow our economy to improve the incomes of New Zealanders now and in the years ahead. “Budget 2025 will build ...
Alex Casey unearths Simon Court’s full sales pitch for how menstrual cups could end poverty. On Friday last week, Act MP Simon Court was accused of “mansplaining” during a parliamentary committee hearing about benefit sanctions. After submitter Rachel Dibble shared her concerns about period poverty and the impact that sanctions ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Alexander Gillespie, Professor of Law, University of Waikato It’s an unfortunate fact that bad people sometimes want guns. And while laws are designed to prevent guns falling into the wrong hands, the determined criminal can be highly resourceful. There are three main ...
Asia Pacific Report Two independent Jewish Voices groups in Aotearoa New Zealand have written an open letter to the government condemning the Zionist “colonisation” project leading to genocide and criticising the role of the NZ Jewish Council for its “unelected” and “uncritical support” for Israel. The groups, Alternative Jewish Voices ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Adrian Beaumont, Election Analyst (Psephologist) at The Conversation; and Honorary Associate, School of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Melbourne A national Newspoll, conducted February 10–14 from a sample of 1,244, gave the Coalition a 51–49 lead, unchanged from the previous Newspoll, ...
We round up everything coming to streaming services this week, including Netflix, Amazon Prime, Disney+, Apple TV+, ThreeNow, Neon and TVNZ+. If you enjoy whip-smart satire: The White Lotus (Neon, February 17) HBO’s award-winning The White Lotus is back for what critics are calling “an absolutely exquisite third ...
NZPF called for a slowdown of the curriculum change, asking for one subject at a time, so that teachers and principals could be fully trained and feel confident and competent to implement the changes, New Zealand Principals’ Federation (NZPF) President ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By T.J. Thomson, Senior Lecturer in Visual Communication & Digital Media, RMIT University Indonesia’s TVOne launched an AI news presenter in 2023.T.J. Thomson Generative artificial intelligence (AI) has taken off at lightning speed in the past couple of years, creating disruption in ...
Many of the young vapers interviewed by a team of public health researchers said they felt unable to resist the pro-vaping environment that surrounded them. New Zealand’s smokefree law was hailed around the world for creating a smokefree generation that would have lifelong protection from smoking’s harms. The smokefree ...
Analysis: While most Wellingtonians enjoyed a rare but unbeatable sunny day on Saturday, some New Zealand diplomats will have been briefly shocked by a screenshot making the rounds on social media showing US President Donald Trump calling us a “third world country”.The image, it appears, was a fake – certainly a ...
ActionStation Director, Kassie Hartendorp says that the Treaty Principles Bill has galvanised the biggest movement in support of Te Tiriti in modern history. ...
While it is in the interests of Wellington ratepayers to sell off this subsidy for the rich, it is unfortunate that it has come to this point. The council should have never spent a penny on this programme, and the $3.4 million spent is a flagrant abuse ...
A search for the person behind a social media account ridiculing Māori.Last week, while scrolling Facebook, I came across a post shared to the New Zealand Centre for Political Research group. The post began, “From Matua Kahurangi on X”, before pasting his critique of iwi leadership – particularly Ngāpuhi ...
On the heels of The White Lotus season three, Tara Ward travels to Koh Samui, Thailand, to live her best life as a five-star wannabe. I’ve never been one for luxury travel. Despite religiously watching TV shows like Luxury Escapes: World’s Best Holidays and harbouring grand dreams of one day ...
The Treaty Principles Bill submission hearings continue at Parliament today with a range of submitters expected including councils, iwi, community organisations and individuals. ...
It’s become of one of Christchurch’s most famous landmarks online, but why? Alex Casey steps through the portal of the brutalist Timezone. Ask anyone what Christchurch’s most iconic building is and you might expect to hear some of the dusty old classics like the Cathedral, or the Town Hall, or ...
New Zealand’s alignment with the White House is further underscored by its refusal to oppose Trump’s sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC). ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Amin Saikal, Emeritus Professor of Middle Eastern and Central Asian Studies, Australian National University The dismantling of the US Agency for International Development (USAID) is a serious blow to the soft power of the United States and disastrous for many poor countries ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By Janet Hoek, Professor in Public Health, University of Otago Shutterstock/Aliaksandr Barouski New Zealand’s smokefree law was hailed around the world for creating a smokefree generation that would have lifelong protection from smoking’s harms. The smokefree generation would have ended sales of ...
Source: The Conversation (Au and NZ) – By George Disney, Research Fellow, Social Epidemiology, The University of Melbourne Edwin Tan/Getty Images When the National Disability Insurance Scheme (NDIS) was established in 2013, one of its driving aims was to make disability services and support systems fairer. However, our new ...
The resignation of the director general of health is the latest departure in what Labour is calling a ‘purge’ of health leadership. Another day, another health resignation It’s a dangerous time to be a top health executive. On Friday, Dr Diana Sarfati announced her resignation as director general of health ...
Labour and the Greens say the government should focus spending on tourism infrastructure like tracks, toilets and protection of nature instead of more advertising. ...
Hundreds of people called the former prime minister vile and dehumanising things online. Internet safety agencies did nothing - then called in the lawyers. ...
Hundreds of people called the former prime minister vile and dehumanising things online. Internet safety agencies did nothing - then called in the lawyers. ...
After a morning spent calf marking, Flock Hill Station manager Richard Hill headed up Bridge Hill – about 100km from Christchurch on the way to the West Coast – to check on a fire near the station’s boundary.It was December 5 last year, and the Craigieburn area had experienced three ...
It can’t be much of a surprise that a relatively inexperienced Act MP, handed the workplace relations portfolio, doesn’t want to entertain the country’s biggest union in her office.But it still astonishes the head of that union, the CTU’s president, Richard Wagstaff.After all, he’s met regularly with ministers of all ...
Late 21st century Christchurch will be unrecognisable when compared with Christchurch today.Flooding will prompt retreat from all eastern and many northern suburbs. These areas, together with land near the Heathcote and Avon Rivers, are in a fifty-year flood zone. Fifty-year floods can happen more than once every fifty years; there ...
Is humanising a mountain the path to real transformation, or does it signal the need for a cultural paradigm shift in the operating system? Recently, a family member shared their delight at the news of Taranaki Maunga becoming a legal person.Of course, I was pleased for the eight Taranaki ...
Why New Zealanders donate money and who they give it to – and how tools like Givealittle are changing the giving landscape.Is New Zealand really a generous country? It’s difficult to quantify. Giving to registered charities can be counted through tax returns, but giving to overseas causes, giving money ...
Loading…(function(i,s,o,g,r,a,m){var ql=document.querySelectorAll('A[data-quiz],DIV[data-quiz]'); if(ql){if(ql.length){for(var k=0;k<ql.length;k++){ql[k].id='quiz-embed-'+k;ql[k].href="javascript:var i=document.getElementById('quiz-embed-"+k+"');try{qz.startQuiz(i)}catch(e){i.start=1;i.style.cursor='wait';i.style.opacity='0.5'};void(0);"}}};i['QP']=r;i[r]=i[r]||function(){(i[r].q=i[r].q||[]).push(arguments)},i[r].l=1*new Date();a=s.createElement(o),m=s.getElementsByTagName(o)[0];a.async=1;a.src=g;m.parentNode.insertBefore(a,m)})(window,document,'script','https://take.quiz-maker.com/3012/CDN/quiz-embed-v1.js','qp');Got a good quiz question?Send Newsroom your questions.The post Newsroom daily quiz, Monday 17 February appeared first on Newsroom. ...
As the four Findlay siblings run out on the hockey turf, dressed in black with the silver fern, they take the drive and determination of their late mum with them.Emma Findlay is a Black Stick defender, on her way to Chile on Monday to play for the New Zealand women ...
Poverty entrenched – Sallies
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/89172618/rampant-house-prices-and-entrenched-child-poverty-salvation-army-state-of-the-nation
Herald version here:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11796071
Maybe they are living in cars, garages, or on the street?
Maybe that’s why burglaries are rising. Perhaps I should ask Pula.
http://i.stuff.co.nz/national/crime/88971054/a-burglary-reported-every-7-minutes-as-recorded-crime-rate-jumps
According to our journalists crime is rising because of criminals having a change of circumstances or to feed a drug/alcohol habit. Fairly lacklustre analysis I have to say and supports what theyve told their middle class readers for decades.
Or wander from bin to bin, looking in, then resting on the pavement with a cap in hand. All too common sight.
This tells us nothing about the situation for those on the lowest incomes, especially the bottom 10-20%. An average increase could all be accounted for rises in incomes of the highest paid.
My bold indicates the most worrying data.
Yes poverty is a huge problem in NZ for many people.
Personally I’ve not much time for the Sallies, they are well known in Motueka for throwing away thousands of good quality items in their skip.
We have a couple of charity shops here, Red Cross has a free rack outside their store, free clothes and other bits and pieces, rather than dumping it in a skip.
Meanwhile the Motueka Salvation Army store offers free coat hangers and magazines, that’s it, the clothes that they don’t want, shoes, toys etc they would rather throw them in the skip than offer items free to the poor. This has been happening for years, and is disgusting. Items that they place in their store but don’t sell, they throw into their skip.
Many locals boycott the Sallies here for the reasons above.
To any whom run charity stores, if you really want to do something to help people in poverty who are often too embarrassed to ask for help, put up a ‘free’ rack of clothes outside, not clothes hangers and magazines, that won’t keep people warm.
There has been a huge shift in NZ involving what were formerly ‘Op Shops’ becoming ‘alternative retailers’. I’ve a friend did her dissertation on the phenomenon – not good.
And yes, it means that stuff gets skipped (much of it fine) and it also means that prices rise.
As a book dealer my advice is…do not bother donating old books to the op shops, unless you regularly see collectible old books on their shelves, as for the most part you might as well dump them in the skip yourself.
Certain large op shop organisations are throwing away absolute treasures, that do not even make it to the shelves, as they have strange ideas about things being ‘old’. Danielle Steele books…excellent…150 year old ‘Origin of the Species’…rubbish.
We have had repeated ‘discussions’ with head office, and have offered to buy certain old books that are being thrown straight into the bin, but no, they would rather throw money away. In fact, they INSIST on throwing these books away. They do not even want us to tell them which books are valuable!!
And then, even odder, complain about the cost of disposing of ‘rubbish’.
Its inexplicable and a tragedy when you think of the heirlooms being handed over in good faith. Let alone the money lost.
Why they do not hire some old ‘dealers’, and there must be enough of them out there, to sort this situation out is inexplicable.
As an organisation they do good work in highlighting poverty…but they have some very odd ideas, and not just about old books.
Shocking! (the dumping of books).
I think Charities dump art too a lot of the time.
Saying that publishers pulp something like 30% of the books they publish.
Then they wonder why Amazon is so popular.
Sounds like an opportunity for someone to provide a service to take away people’s old books and re sell them to people who will appreciate them!
The clothing bins are also a scam apparently – most of the proceeds go to private enterprise with a small amount going to charity I have heard.
Lots of people shop at the dump these days.
Amazing what people throw out, lots of bargains to be had for the budget conscious shopper.
Too true.
Over several years I bought knives at a re-use store at 50 cents each, – amongst them quality blades (Santoku, Sheffield, Victorinox, Atlantic Chef, Solingen) in great condition and collectively worth hundreds of dollars.
Yep, I just built a sunroom over the top of our deck, at some point we’re going to cover the decking with cementBoard and tile but in the meantime, I just wanted to paint the decking to tidy it up a bit.
Went down to the dump, 4 litre tin of timbacryl in dark grey $10, normally $100 at Bunnings.
Property empty most of the time is owned by ‘charity’ exempt from tax organizations. As church going decline the properties wont be sold as they are part of large portfolios that keep other properties rented out for more. Given how low dense Nz is, foot traffic being so important to business, is kept higher retail rents but lower foot traffic. And then dont get me started about new builds, putting up one floor homes on corner sites, its just crazy econmics, higher fott traffic would suggest highe buildings with shops. But retail like property is stuffed in NZ, lots of rent seeking behavior holding NZ back.
It will require legislation, it will require regulation
It will require leadership
“Plastic to outweigh fish in oceans by 2050, study warns”
January 19, 2016 by David Williams:
Hands up, all those who think that individual action could have saved this poor creature’s life?
“Dead whale’s stomach clogged with plastic”
Would it be too much to ask for a 50 cents recycling fee for each plastic container and each piece of plastic packaging, to properly kick start a recycling industry with hundreds of jobs?
I am old enough to remember when Muldoon under lobbying from the packaging industry got rid of the refunds for used glass bottles. After which the the country (and the world) was flooded with a huge increase in plastic packaging.
Why can’t we bring back this useful idea?
I know that in the modern neo-liberal regime that we are not allowed to put any constraints on the free market.
But just once, couldn’t we make an exception?
Saw that article. Very sad. Good idea, I’d like to bring back glass milk bottles if we could.
Also force biodegradable plastic or packaging by making those without it, pay for the recycling.
Continuing a topic from Daily review last night.
I questioned some LP members on what the LP is doing for west and south Aucklanders and urban Māori. Some said Willie Jackson understood west and South Aucklanders and urban Māori.
Today onne blogger and social media commentator has questioned whether Jackson really does understand, or will do anything much for urban Maori.
Ellipster tweeted:
ie she’s saying Māori are a diverse group, and we should beware of assuming they are all the same. And has since tweeted she is thinking of putting her thoughts on this into a post.
Carrie is also a strong Maori Party supporter, it should be noted.
Yes. But it’s also useful to read diverse Māori views on the Jackson issue; which partly about political party positioning.
Trump exaggerates, yeah lies, yet gets votes. So you have to ask yourself why. Some form of cut through obviously. Now contrast how a labour MP deals with Jackson on morning tv1. Boring, uncontroversial, weak defensive. Key called the whole opposition a bunch of rapist supporters while welcoming rapist thrownout of Oz.
Now the fact that Labour still play like wet squid while nasty nats slag them is sure principled, its also stupid, since a politician should know how both not to sledge while suggesting it and also enlightening us about their position. Labour refuses to ditch neo-lib edicts, unlike Trump who expresses himself woefully yet still kicks neolibs.
This is why the left fails, and yes needs less saints like Jackson in its ranks. We want you to fight our corner, less so the oh your high principles that keep us from gaining a gist of your thinking, heart, soul, etc.
When the banker Key trades and becime successful, the idea the Labour would not hold him accoutable for shitty rivers, poor roads, faulting drugs, by actually question his credentials as a master of the economy, says something deep about the Labour out of touchness.
Clinton smiliarly married to the President who famous slogan, its the economy stupid, could not consider the impact that fuelled Sanders supporters.
The left have for too long conceeded, become weakened, by their inane strategy of not attacking the econmics of stupid that is Thacherism. Or as we know here in NZ rogernomics.
Labour have to soul search, Clark won when neolibs were untested, now hey are found unwanted and flawed, so where is Labour. You can be principled, anti neolib, and strong on the economy. We are all free traders, we all want fewer ticket clippers, so wht does Labour accept that being anti tppa means being anti free trade!
Some of my Whanau are urban Maori and they have benefited the most from working for families.
Politics are completely outside their lives. I doubt they have even heard of Willy Jackson or be on the Maori roll and he will not influence them in any way to vote.
They are on one income, 2 kids, work a 6 day week and get only $650 (in Auckland that is nothing) but working for families top them up approx $200.
Working for families has been the biggest policy to help them.
Personally think Labour or Mana will do the most for them with policies that target them. Or someone like Sue Bradford that understands they need help, just to navigate to get the help. WINZ are a waste of time for them and their attitude just puts them off going to them.
State housing would also help them. But they work in an expensive area of Auckland. I don’t think there are any state houses there not sold off. That is also one of the disasters for the poor that State houses used to be everywhere and so there was a cross section of the community in each area. Not rich ghettos like we are getting.
On minimum wages a mortgage of $300,000 is max, so essentially the so called affordable houses of $500,000 or $600,000 being built to replace the state houses are out of their reach.
In my parents day, the state actually built houses on mass to sell to families. But with immigration at the levels they are not only are there not enough rentals or houses but how could you afford to build enough for the amount of people needing them and coming in?
The Maori party has let urban Maori down by collaborating with National and making their lives worse by their appalling policies against the poor.
I’m not a fan of Willy Jackson, and think he’s going to put off more voters than he attracts. In particular putting off women and anyone against Charter schools.
Labour already have Nash, with pretty extreme views.
“The Green and Labour Parties’ State of the Nation event showed that New Zealand has an energised, well-organised and ready government-in-waiting.”
True, until Labour reverted to messy factional form this week. Oh well.
[TheStandard: A moderator moved this comment to Open Mike as being off topic or irrelevant in the post it was made in. Be more careful in future.]
Oh do pull your head out of your ass. Sorry for the language, but I’m over it.
So a M.P. spoke up about her portfolio, then the bloke brigade got all upset. Left wing men had a tizzy, and we have to listen to them moan for weeks on end now. Left wing men in this country need there heads in the game, that was not disunity or messy. That was politics, so grow up.
adam
It’s not that an MP spoke up about her portfolio, it’s about making it PUBLIC, politicians are supposed to exercise diplomacy, if this is an example of diplomacy in the political arena , then getting a change of Govt isn’t going to happen any time soon………
I read the Soper bit and translated it into what it really said; to whit, “Bill English is a liar.”
I then translated that into what it really meant; to whit, “We have another lying bastard Prime Minister and it is simply accepted without saying it like it is.”
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/politics/news/article.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=11796352I
–Bit harsh on bill. Give him some credit as It seems he has ‘broken the ice with trump’ Herald reports a US icebreaker is on its way to nz.
repateet
How could you possibly draw that from the Soper item? More likely you are simply expressing your own pre-existing belief.
Bill English is a liar!
That is documented
Then, now,forever
It’s a big club, Wayne
How? Start with,
“English says notes were taken, which assumes someone was listening into the call. At one point, recalling the call as Parliament resumed, he initially said it wasn’t being eavesdropped on because it was a personal call. But then, in the next breath, he agreed someone was listening in, which would make sense if notes were being taken.”
Most likely you are simply expressing your own pre-existing belief.
http://www.radionz.co.nz/national/programmes/morningreport/audio/201832369/andrew-little-we-have-to-broaden-our-reach
This is worth listening to – Andrew Little on Morning Report today – and the need for Labour to “broaden its reach” .
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/02/06/these-smart-tvs-were-apparently-spying-on-their-owners/?utm_term=.daa414147029
Interesting story about what data your smart TV might be collecting for its manufacurers about everything you view
Brian Rudman has a column showing that Trump is not as bad as some previous administrations. Our “friends” in USA have a lot to face up to.
“His now saintly predecessor, Barack Obama, did not just contemplate such tactics. For eight years he employed remote controlled drone gunships to hunt down suspected terrorists, blasting away at homes, villages, wedding and funeral processions and anyone unlucky enough to be in their way, across a huge swathe of the Islamic crescent, from Pakistan to Somalia. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported last month of 546 confirmed drone strikes against suspected terrorists in Yemen, Somalia and Pakistan under Obama.
It calculated that between 384 and 807 civilians died in these attacks.
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/opinion/news/article.cfm?c_id=466&objectid=11796087
Rudman doesn’t seem to grasp the difference between the fact that committing to military action means committing to the possibility or likelihood of civilian casualties, and the fact that deliberately targeting civilians for murder is a war crime. Obama was doing the first one; Trump’s proposal to kill relatives of terrorists is the second.
Readers who share Rudman’s difficulty with this concept should consider that the British killed a large number of French civilians while getting the Germans out of Caen in 1944, mostly by carpet-bombing the place, while Einsatzgruppe A killed a large number of Lithuanian civilians while getting the Jews out of Lithuania in 1941, mostly by lining them up on the edge of a pre-dug mass grave and shooting them into it. International law treats those two actions differently, for reasons that hopefully are obvious.
The poor Syrian people.
In between the mad fanatics of Isis and the many and varied foreign powers dropping bombs from above, their dictator for life continues to slaughter those who speak against him.
https://www.amnesty.org/en/countries/middle-east-and-north-africa/syria/
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/feb/07/up-to-13000-secretly-hanged-in-syrian-jail-says-amnesty
Late and misguided of you, mullett
That article was pulled apart, yesterday
Hello Moz how’s the weather over in Northcote.
Sorry to disillusion you, my friend, but I am not “One Two” and he/she is not me.
And the weather’s always wonderful in Northcote Point, thanks.
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/89167955/little-changes-tack-saying-davis-and-senior-mps-should-rank-ahead-of-jackson
So Little backs down and now looks weak, not sure who wins (apart from National) out of this
He certainly deserves an F for this effort, all he seems to have done is piss everyone off.
Definitely not one of hs better plays.
This election is brought to you (and will be contested about) by the letter I
1 Immigration
2 Interest rates
3 IYI’S
Just saw this on the daily blog
Labour’s Poto Williams hired a private public relations firm to craft her statement on Willie Jackson joining the party.
Christchurch-based Inform PR sent out a statement from Ms Williams condemning her leader Andrew Little’s decision to welcome Mr Jackson into the Labour fold.
http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/02/poto-williams-hired-pr-firm-for-willie-jackson-ploy.html
Wow, bit of an understatement here, but that’s not good.
Could be worse. Could have hired Lusk lol
Crikey. This moves from an impassioned critique to something more planned and deliberate. There’s a process to follow in selecting list candidates. Williams should have addressed her concerns to the committee that determines list selection.
I just thought Labour had got past disunity and airing dirty laundry.
If that’s true, it’s a sackable offence.
Huh? They always do. Cabinet level MPs do in every party list I have ever looked at.
You appear to have gotten your head in some kind of theoretical stupidity. Perhaps you should try real life some time.
Real life? I dunno man, in real life if working stiffs like the rest of us disagree with our boss, hiring a PR company to help us undermine them with social media postings instead of dealing with the outcome of their decision invariably gets us fired. I know some will say that a political party is not a regular company, but the point quite clearly stands when you’re talking about someone who is out to represent us cog-in-the-wheel 99%ers on a political level.
It looks really out of touch with what we get to do or how we get to deal with what life hands us. If we get consulted on change, but the boss’ final decision doesn’t deliver 100% of what we wanted, we either deal or leave. I don’t think it’s unrealistic to ask the same of those who purport to represent our interest as ‘Labour’. What’s the point of having a leader if you get to choose when it is or isn’t important to back their decisions – decisions which we now know were arrived at *after* consultation? I’ve been a cleaner. I’ve been a chef. I’ve been a storeman. I’ve worked in a number of roles in commercial research. If at any time I’m asked to do work which goes against what I feel is a principle I hold, I weigh that against what it would mean to leave – my principles vs my rent (or these days, my mortgage); my principles vs how my family will be affected, or how my bills will be paid. I don’t get to have it both ways, and neither do most of us working stiffs. I resent the idea that politicians should get to have it different to the rest of us.
That’s called “wage slavery”, fwiw.
But the thing is that Little is the caucus leader. He doesn’t sign mp pay cheques. He can’t overrule party democratic processes by pre-empting list selection. He was elected leader by the same organisation that organises list selection.
Williams represents Christchurch East. Her role in the caucus follows from her experiences in social services.
Little is not her “boss”. He’s the caucus leader, not a dictator. Consultation does not mean that you have to consent to the outcome. Yes, this causus difficulty, mainly because he failed to lead before this was all publicly announced.
Worst case scenario, Little sends her to the back bench. That’s the worst he can do as leader. The best he can do is to somehow build this incident into a learning experience and a point of strength.
Yes yes, I see what you are saying about how the Labour party works – but my post was about looking beyond that to how it compares to those of us out here in that ‘real world’ cited by LP above. And how it looks to us when people purporting to represent us act like you can spit the dummy if you don’t get 100% of the outcomes you want. We can condescendingly call it ‘wage slavery’, but for us 99%ers, that’s what we live with – a ‘real world’ where principles and consequences can often not balance, and where our choices in those instances are deal or quit. We know she was consulted by her leader, and we know that his final decision was not what she wanted. So she hired a PR company to sabotage his decision. I don’t care what Labour’s rules are, Labour are representing people who don’t get to do that in these circumstances. And when you have politicians who get to do things we don’t, they aren’t going to be in the right mentality to represent us. Again, what’s the point of having a leader if nobody in caucus thinks you get to choose when you abide by their decisions or trust their strategy?
Well, firstly I don’t think it’s fair to portray the issue as not getting 100% of what you want. WJ’s comments were pretty objectionable. Regardless of Little’s decision, he should have known that someone prominent was going to be pissed – and if he were a better leader, he would have recognised the strength of feeling from some in his own caucus.
She allegedly hired a pr company. We don’t know whether this was a regular relationship that a public figure might have to maintain a consistent image, or whether it was specifically for this job. We don’t know whether the job was to harm Labour or Little, or act as advisor on how to moderate the conflict between minimising the damage to the party and to Little, while at the same time expressing the sentiments that she felt obliged to express.
What if Little decided that Labour was no longer for a nuclear free NZ? Or arbitrarily announced that Shane Jones was back as as an MP, or even David Garrett?
Labour are representing employees, who don’t have the same freedom as MPs. MPs can talk about anyone they want in the House without fear of being sued, for example.
But let me put it this way: which would be the biggest flaw in the Labour party: the argument we’re having now, or the argument we don’t have because the Labour spokesperson on domestic violence refuses to speak out when the party leader announces he’s parachuting to the upper reaches of the list someone who recently called rape “mischief”? The first is when the leader screws up but someone else does their job. The second is when they both fail to do their job.
That final point might be relevant if Jackson had refused to acknowledge that he was out of line or had refused to confront how bone-headed it was, but we know that Jackson apologised, and we’ve heard that he also put in extra time with the community. I’ve heard some claim it’s a Clayton’s apology, but ultimately the tone of these comments suggest that they aren’t interested in his apology. Do you assert that he cannot be redeemed? Is that the position you’d like the Labour spokesperson on domestic violence to take? He’s not exactly Tony fucking Veitch.
You still bring it back to this idea: Williams was “expressing the sentiments that she felt obliged to express.” On social media. In the middle of Waitangi weekend media coverage. Again, us 99%ers don’t get to do this kind of thing when we disagree with leaders’ strategy – we are obliged to make other decisions. But our would-be representatives in politics feel obliged to enjoy other luxuries which we don’t get.
“What if Little decided that Labour was no longer for a nuclear free NZ? Or arbitrarily announced that Shane Jones was back as as an MP, or even David Garrett?”
We’re not talking about that though, are we. Also, you say “arbitrarily announced”; we know that he didn’t arbitrarily announce it. He consulted her – presumably in his capacity as *leader*. But his decision wasn’t the one she wanted, so she got her PR firm to craft her a social media campaign to undermine his decision, which the press is now gleefully holding up as evidence that Labour’s recovery is a sham. Bravo.
Hey look, I can understand why you find it justified – I’m not saying you don’t make valid points in the context of politics and what Labour MPs are entitled to do. You probably know far more than me about this stuff. But can you understand how terrible it looks to working people who don’t get to make choices like that without dire consequences for their personal working lives, their mortgage or rent, their CC, their family life? And how undesirable it might be to us to see them carrying on like that and doing so much damage? It just doesn’t come across as the work of a smart operator in the political arena, let alone one with an eye for what ordinary people go through, what our ‘real world’ works like.
Firstly, I’m a working person, and I know how it looks to me.
Secondly, no I’m not overly interested in a Clayton’s apology. If you follow “sorry” with “out of context”, “devil’s advocate”, or just saying you took it too casually, it’s not an apology, is it? Apology followed by minimisation or excuse is not an apology.
No, he’s not Tony Veitch. However, he still hasn’t indicated that he knows why saying girls shouldn’t drink should never be part of a discussion about rape, nor does the age at which someone first consents to sex have anything to do with the topic of rape. If he doesn’t get why it’s a problem, how will he avoid doing it again?
If Little “consulted” caucus and then ignored serious and significant concerns from caucus members, it wasn’t really “consultation”, was it.
“If Little “consulted” caucus and then ignored serious and significant concerns from caucus members, it wasn’t really “consultation”, was it.”
Taking someone’s concerns into account during your decision making process, but nonetheless deciding that your final decision won’t go the way they wanted it doesn’t automatically amount to ‘ignoring’ them. Not consulting them in the first place is ignoring them. It’s perfectly reasonable to weigh up both sides of the argument and stick with one over the other without the other being ‘ignored’. And this is the concern I have about the response.
As a working person yourself, you’ll be aware that when this happens in our lives, we don’t get to respond to such situations by laying into our bosses on social media and have it go well for us. MPs doing so in their capacity as the representatives of ‘Labour’ is a bloody terrible look.
Again, Little isn’t Williams’ boss.
If Little had truly consulted everybody, then the strength of Williams’ concerns wouldn’t have been a surprise to him. Or Jackson.
And yet it seems to have taken both of them on the back foot.
I stayed away from all this shit and was going to stay ‘staying away’. But…
Any org. running on human interactions and ‘common cause’ has to have bars set. Sometimes the idea will be to default to the highest common denominator (principle) and other times the lowest (ie – most accommodating)
This was clearly a time when the highest denominator should have been defaulted to.
Also…
1. What the fuck are Labour playing at still parachuting people into positions? It’s bullshit.
2. Why are there suggestions that Labour should have been secretive about their disagreements? Whatever happened to the idea of transparency?
Anyway, if a political party can’t even set up what I’d have thought to be a pretty fucking basic component of internal organisational culture, then…ah fuck it Labour died to me a while back and the smell just sometimes gets higher on the wind is all.
McFlock:
“Again, Little isn’t Williams’ boss.
If Little had truly consulted everybody, then the strength of Williams’ concerns wouldn’t have been a surprise to him. Or Jackson.
And yet it seems to have taken both of them on the back foot.”
He’s the party leader. If that doesn’t count for anything, why have one? And what does ‘truly consulted everybody’ really mean? As covered previously, being consulted =/= getting everything you want. I would suggest Little was on the back foot because he foolishly expected a spokesperson who owes their appointment to his leadership to abide by their leader’s decision, only to find that they instead hired a PR company to ratfuck him on Waitangi Day.
Yeah, well I don’t know who was consulted. But I could have told them that this was exactly what would have happened. A lot of Labour activists have said pretty much the same thing.
Just think about how many ways that this was going to annoy people inside Labour.
1. Parachuting candidates in without going through the selection process is just outright daft. It was a problem with both the selection of Shearer and with Shearer’s attempts to repeat the same for others. To date I can’t actually think of many times when it has worked successfully on the left. And I can count only a few cases where I think it worked at all in NZ.
2. Willie comes in with a lot of baggage. The Roastbusters debacle was just the most recent. Which is what the union FB yesterday demonstrated.
3. It appears to have been done to get two audiences. Auckland Moari and whoever listened to his show at Radio Live. The latter is probably pretty small and there seem to be quite a lot of Maori who don’t seem to like him.
4. There are some quite large constituencies that a list position could serve.
5. Offhand, I don’t know of any skills that he would have brought to the job of being an MP. Sure being able to speak is an important skill. Being able to speak with a clear and reasoned judgement is an even more important skill.
For me the Roastbusters interview only a few years ago makes me wonder if Willie is up for the job. That in my opinion showed a clear level of misogynist bigotry that would be hard to sell to one of the larger constituencies around – and it was going to be raised. And it was done when he was a grown man, had already been a MP, and presumably as part of his duties in that role would have seen the social and personal problems that the types of things that he and John T were sprouting off about brings.
In my view, he isn’t a candidate that was worth putting up.
Oh and BTW: Andrew Little isn’t the “party leader”. That is Nigel Haworth, the president. Andrew Little is the leader of Labour’s parliamentary caucus. It is a role with some pretty specific responsibilities. He is also a member of the Labour Council. You really do need to learn some of this
Very true.
“Truly consulted everybody” means that you end up with an understanding of the depth of feeling people have about an issue.
We’re not talking about a petulant child not getting dessert, we’re talking about a caucus member concerned that a parachuted politician has character flaws that completely invalidate his capabilities of acting as an MP for the Labour party. At the very least, Little should have expected his grand plan to be a massive headache.
If that is the case, he failed to consult thoroughly.
Especially as it’s not even his decision to make.
Williams hiring a pr company, if true, only says that she chose to save the Labour party pr crew a massive conflict of interest: oppose an MP fulfilling their remit, or oppose a caucus leader exceeding his authority.
The complaint Williams made is clear, specific, and reasonable.
The only thing that “ratfucks” Little as leader would be digging in and declaring Williams persona non grata for saying something it was her job to say and reflects the opinions of many members.
Alternatively, he could clarify that it’s all up to the selection process and let shit cool down as the process takes its course. And if Jackson still is minimising and treating the issue as a farce and still gets selected, Little can cross that bridge when he comes to it.
Probably I don’t live in the type of world that you do. I work in one that doesn’t involve me being any kind of a slave.
Sure my bosses can fire me if they want to lose my skills. It has only ever happened a couple of times when month-by-month contracts weren’t renewed. That is the nature of contract work. Something that I have done for less than 2 years of my working life, each time to raise my skill levels.
I have walked away from several jobs when either I thought that the project I was working on was finished, or where my employers wanted me to move on to things that I didn’t want to do. I’m always keenly aware of my responsibilities in a job, and what I was employed to do.
By the sound of it, so is Poto Williams. Both as a representative of her electorate, and in the role she does as a spokesperson for Labour. She appears to have acted well within what she was employed to do and appears to have done it admirably. As McFlock points out further up, she isn’t employed by Andrew Little
I’d suggest that you should look to yourself about why you feel so trapped in your ‘real life’. What you are describing is something that I wouldn’t wish on my worst enemy, and I’d suggest that you join a union to do something about fixing the situation.
BTW: Just as background. The Standard isn’t paid work. It is something that I do in my unpaid time. Just as I have helped various community organisations over the years including the NZLP. I do those because I think that they are worth supporting. In the same way that I support members of my extended family.
I don’t feel trapped, I feel aware of there being rules I have to abide by, one of which remains that in most normal jobs, it’s not ‘feeling trapped’ to know that if you disagree with your superiors, attacking them on social media doesn’t go well for you. Only a couple of times in all those years have I faced that choice. Once, I dealt with it by leaving despite the stress it caused – I put my money where my mouth was. The other time, I sucked it up and got on with it, letting time itself prove me right. Thing is, I think you’re more than smart enough to understand that perfectly well – are you just sledging me here? It seems a rather passive aggressive way to debate with someone.
“Probably I don’t live in the type of world that you do. I work in one that doesn’t involve me being any kind of a slave.
Sure my bosses can fire me if they want to lose my skills. It has only ever happened a couple of times when month-by-month contracts weren’t renewed. That is the nature of contract work. Something that I have done for less than 2 years of my working life, each time to raise my skill levels.”
Ah, the slave argument again. I’m sorry man, but this sounds to me like something that libertarians would say to people campaigning for a living wage. If you think that most ordinary people who live in a real world where undermining your superiors on social media ends with getting fired is being a ‘slave’, I think you need to reconnect with working people. Most of us consider it quite logical that you’d get fired for doing that. It’s not a question of arguing that it’s unfair we don’t get to do it; it’s a question of arguing that it’s unfair that MPs think that’s an acceptable thing to do when purporting to represent us.
(edited for muddled final sentence)
Well said Cemetery Jones!!! Hundreds and thousands of +1’s on every comment you made in that discussion.
You are as ignorant as Cemetery Jones…
https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-08022017/#comment-1297327
I might be ignorant of how the Labour party works, but I get no joy from insulting people for not being an expert at the things I’ve chosen to be an expert at. I’m not a drone, but I believe that if you can’t follow your leader when the going gets tough then you’ll lose every time – I found this just playing football as a kid. Seems to me it’s true anywhere else. I might not be right about how authority works in the Labour party, but that was never my point. It’s how it looks to those of us outside of it who have that impression that ‘leader’ means that you’re in charge.
Ah the ritual whining…. I was wondering when we would get to that typical trollish run-away. After decades around the nets it becomes so so predicable.
I have no particular interest in explaining the basics of how every political party in parliament in this country operates. With the exception of the micro parties they all have very similar structures.
I am also not that much into blindly following leaders either. In fact I have strong track record over decades of telling them when I think that they are treading on dangerous ground. That applies just as much in business as it does in politics or the military. I don’t expect them to take my advice. I do expect them to listen and take note.
My criteria of someone that is a competent leader is that they can do exactly that. Because there are few people who are particularly competent across wide ranges of expertise.
On the nets I am wont to dispurse advice and education about things that I know. When a gentle hint doesn’t get through… well when I meet someone acting like dumb ox trying to batter down a gate and closing their ears whilst doing it, I find that lacing these with some sarcastic reflections of how they appear to me usually makes the lesson penetrate their obsessional stupidity.
This helps me in any subsequent interaction. Because I then don’t have to explain that is what I am likely to do again. The lesson is usually as memorable as your whining indicates it was today.
You can think what you like, I still agree with Cemetery Jones and Newsflash.
That’s cool, I’m not asking you to educate me on the internal workings of all the parliamentary parties. I just believe that MPs claiming to represent working people should be a little more in tune with them and not go around doing things that to us would be career ending.
“when I meet someone acting like dumb ox trying to batter down a gate and closing their ears whilst doing it, I find that lacing these with some sarcastic reflections of how they appear to me usually makes the lesson penetrate their obsessional stupidity.”
I don’t think there’s anything dumb about expecting Labour MPs to think a little about how it looks when you hire a PR firm to attack the party leader.
“This helps me in any subsequent interaction. Because I then don’t have to explain that is what I am likely to do again. The lesson is usually as memorable as your whining indicates it was today.”
Whining? I’ve got to be honest, that paragraph and the previous one sounds a bit pompous man. You’re saying that you taught me a lesson? I guess I learned that you can know an awful lot about the Labour party while not really getting what their voters expect from the people who presume to represent them, but I dunno if that’s something to be stoked about. It just seems a bit nihilistic.
Cemetery Jones
I understand your argument and agree with it, my biggest concern is the public spat created from the issue, one made public deliberately through a PR company, a show of unity is paramount at this stage of the election year. If members have concerns about any issue, they should be dealing with it behind closed doors, there is no excuse for unsolicited disagreements find there way into the public domain. Let history show time and time again, that if you want to air your dirty laundry in the public domain as a political party hoping to be elected in the near future, your chances are going to be severely curbed, many a good political party has failed to reach the finish line because of the lack of discipline and unity, not because they didn’t have the right policies or candidates.
Completely agree with you Newsflash.
You are as ignorant as Cemetery Jones…
https://thestandard.org.nz/open-mike-08022017/#comment-1297327
FFS The point is that you don’t understand the rules that Poto has to abide by. Clearly she does. One of the most specific things that everyone should do is to understand exactly under what conditions they work in.
And if you want to comment on someone else’s working situation like you are waffling on about, then you should get off your arse and learn about it BEFORE acting like a ignorant dork.
Andrew Little isn’t Poto Williams boss. He is a colleague acting in a different role – that of caucus leader. He doesn’t pay her, he doesn’t hold her employment contract, and he has very limited authority over her. Sure there is a political party involved who nominated her for the position. But she isn’t employed by them either.
She is employed by parliamentary services acting on behalf of the people who elected her. Directly in her case from her electorate. In the case of a list MP that would be the voters who voted for the party.
Now she can be removed from the position of being spokesperson by Andrew Little. She can be dropped from the party by the Labour party council. Those are actions that either of them could do. I am pretty sure that Poto would have calculated that
However neither are who she is employed by and who she is responsible to. She is a representative of the electorate who voted her in.
So why are you trying to say that Andrew Little is her boss?
You’re relying on technicalities to avoid addressing my point. And you need to use insults to make your point? I didn’t need to insult you, or to insult McFlock, even though I find your reasoning way off the mark.
Public perception matters big league. To us out there who are not versed in the minutae of party rules, the party leader is seen as being the boss. It might not be technically true, but I simply cannot believe that someone as knowledgeable as yourself would be unaware that this is how the public perceive the role to work, and that when MPs buck the party leader, that’s how it tends to be read.
We’re looking to Andrew Little as a potential prime minister. If he can’t just once in a while make a call and have it followed by his team, what kind of PM is he going to make? A bad one in most people’s book. We’re not asking him to be some kind of tinpot dictator, or for that to be the way he handles day-to-day decisionmaking. But if his team won’t abide when he makes a call which he has consulted them on, negotiated with them, and delivered a judgment that while he understands their concerns, this time he’s not for turning. That’s actually a sign of leadership to most of us. And as for Williams, yeah you know what? Most ordinary people are happy when consulted by our managers (can I say managers instead of bosses to avoid being insulted?), even if they don’t go with what we wanted. And be they managers, or be they bosses, or be they whatever a ‘caucus leader’ would be in a normal job, there’s just nowhere out there in voter land where you’re gonna find them being cool with you slagging off their decisions on social media.
Now, I feel like this is something I spoke with McFlock about but I understand these are two conversations, but to reiterate what I discussed with him, I don’t doubt that what you say is correct in the strictest terms of what goes in the Labour party, but surely you can see how we’d like to see Labour MPs having a bit of regard for what the rest of us go through in our daily lives and what would be appropriate for us? Let’s say Little is just a colleague for Williams. Most contracts these days have a clause about bringing your employer into disrepute, and I’m pretty sure that slagging off a coworker about things they’ve done in the workplace on social media would get you in trouble even if they weren’t your manager. That’s real life to us.
Let’s just examine that statement a little.
I think you will agree that if the Government is to change.. then it won’t just be Labour that form the Government. It is likely at the very least to include the Greens and dare I say it – NZF.
Little – if he is to be PM is going to have to collaborate not only with his Labour MPs, but also with two other parties.
The Greens, I can assure you, take the issue with regards to sexual abuse and the denigration of women very seriously:
https://www.greens.org.nz/sites/default/files/Green%20Party%20Sexual%20Orientation%20and%20Identity%20Policy.pdf
https://www.greens.org.nz/sites/default/files/Green%20Party%20Womens%20Policy.pdf
Two of the core principles of the Green Party are:
So I’m sorry – If Little is not going to split the Government within his first week of Premiership, then he will have to learn a bit more about negotiation, and collaboration, and give a bit more respect to the opinions of his colleagues.
I have explained up above about what I use insults. It helps make the point and reduces the amount of effort I have to expend in future interactions.
Can I also point out that you don’t make the rules about behaviour on this site. That is generally considered to be one of my roles. I wrote the manual on it.
Technicalities are the lifeblood of any argument for anyone who is actually interested in what they are waffling about. However I will accept that you don’t seem to want to know them. I envisage that in your political life you may be as unsuccessful as Donald Trump is at his getting his immigrant ban working. He also seemed to have skipped a few technicalities and got reamed by the courts for doing so.
Indeed. However as was pointed out many times repetitively over and over again. Andrew Little was not her employer, does not hold a contract with Poto Williams, and if there was such a clause ina code of conduct or the like then it would stand directly in the way of Poto Williams obligations to her real employers – the people who voted for her. That is a completely fatuous argument.
This is the case for EVERY MP in parliament. So your weak pleas to ignorance tend to indicate that you really should learn something about basic politics before waving your two inch troll dick around pretending that it is at least 10 inches.
I believe that you are managing to miss a vital point here. There are processes that any manager has to follow. If someone goes off and tries to coop or bypass me in my role without my permission and outside the bounds of the process, then they will have to show an immediate and justifiable cause or they will get a severe bollocking.
It sounds to me like you have a simple minded approach to working with and for other people. Which leads us back to McFlocks point about you acting like a simple wage slave. Or an adolescent in a sports team. Not very mature either way.
Well, it seems to me that you’re aggressively defending the notion that MPs shouldn’t have to be sensitive to how their activities look to voters. Good luck to them (and to you in defending them, I might add; if the Labour caucus is going to start acting like this again, then anyone who takes that job on is going to have a very busy 2017).
It’s interesting that you are so offended by me being ‘immature’ in demanding this, but you are not offended by politicians being demonstrably immature with their ill-disciplined, poorly timed, and counter productive social media behaviour. It’s like some of these folks have PhDs in losing.
Also, when I wrote what I thought was a reasonable observation about our different approaches to the topic:
“And you need to use insults to make your point? I didn’t need to insult you, or to insult McFlock, even though I find your reasoning way off the mark.”
You wrote back:
“Can I also point out that you don’t make the rules about behaviour on this site. That is generally considered to be one of my roles. I wrote the manual on it.”
For someone who accuses other people of being immature, I dunno where to start on that one. Tried a couple times but, just, no.
I think that the very fact we’re having these discussions demonstrates that ‘how it looks to voters’ is not exactly clear-cut.
Maybe Little should have made the same consideration, alongside asking “do I have the constitutional authority to make and announce this deal?” and “should I listen just a little bit harder to what people are saying to me as I consult caucus about this proposal?”
Dude, Lynn knows he’s being annoying and he’s not going to change. This is not an argument you are going to win. Nor would it be particularly helpful even if you did, Lynn doesn’t work for the Labour Party and doesn’t have any particular influence over them as far as I’m aware.
A.
Nope. I was briefly a branch chair for Sandringham back in the early 90s.
Being annoying, memorable, and being accurate about facts and downstream consequences far more often than not is my lever. It also takes a lot less time than spending loads of times in meetings or extended discussions.
And I get to hear the best of what others are capable of when they rise to the occasion. CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening!!
Nope. I was briefly a branch chair for Sandringham back in the early 90s.
Being annoying, memorable, and being accurate about facts and downstream consequences far more often than not is my lever. It also takes a lot less time than spending loads of times in meetings or extended discussions.
And I get to hear the best of what others are capable of when they rise to the occasion. CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening or thinking!!
Nope. What I am mostly pointing is that almost everything you are saying is incorrect. It is based largely on how you think that the world should operate with the type of leadership style that really should have beckme obsolete in the trenches a 100 years ago.
What I am referrong to is how the rules actually operate or who management, political or otherwise, actually works in modern times. This particular case is pretty interesting because Poto Williams did exactly what the party and the caucus requires her to do in her roles for them.
I don’t mind needling to ensure that I am getting through. In fact I find it to be kind of amusing seeing if certain types of commenters can in fact get beyond their inflexible thinking habits of a lifetime.
Take it as a compliment. I usually don’t bother because of my lack of time. Speaking of which. I had better head off to work.
Thanks Antoine, I’m definitely not conflating LP with the Labour Party – but it’s a debate where I’ve questioned their actions, and he has defended them, as is his right and mine.
LP, I won’t say any more than the items below – it’s your site etc.
“CJ however tends to remind me of the CJ from the Reginald Perrin books. Paraphrasing… I didn’the get where I am today by listening or thinking!!”
For a guy who claims to think so little of the points I made, it’s interesting how little you engaged with them in this debate, except for where you could selectively use details of inner party processes to argue that you don’t have to. This despite the fact that I was talking about how it looks to the public rather than how it works in private. You’ve studiously avoided engaging with the issue of how things look to the public and focused pretty much exclusively on what’s ok within the party – as if much of the public knows or cares when the news just covers an MP defying the leader in a party which is known for that but seeking to say it’s changed.
So yeah, disappointing on that score. I’ve overlooked the insulting tone which I felt was designed to troll me and not taken the bait by returning serve – but I won’t attempt to rewrite your site rules! I guess the ‘lesson’ I’ll be taking away isn’t the one you intended to impart. I’ll remember contrasts really; the pompous tone of the comments, the condescension immense not just in and of itself, but in equally immense contrast with the studious avoidance of discussing what I argued was the matter at hand – how bad this looks to much of the public. I can only hope that the Labour party themselves don’t make the same mistake, or we’re destined for 3 more years of National.
Thanks for providing the platform, in any case. I can see I reached a couple people who feel the same as me.
That conceitedness and abusiveness are lprent’s trademark behaviour. He patronisingly thinks he’s teaching people a lesson by abusing them, but as you say, the lesson people learn is not the one he thinks he’s imparting. The lesson I take from it is that it’s not worth trying to discuss things with him because he’s too arrogant to consider other points of view, and his hyper-aggression is a form of trolling to shut down discussion.
It’s possible to avoid him, but still, it must be harmful to the culture of the Standard to have a sysop with anger management issues and an inflated sense of the superiority of his own opinions. Is this kind of macho bullying style a factor in the well-known gender imbalance of the site?
Did I care? You appear to miss the point. As far as I am concerned this is an alternate way of moderating.
What I am concerned with is that I don’t have my attention attracted by people acting like fools. The best way of making sure that happens is for the foolish to not want to attract my attention. If I have time, I prefer to treat a fool like a fool. It is more effective than the other techniques I could use.
For the record, Williams would be bound by the Labour Caucus Rules – no idea what those comprise of, but if they apply it would be an avenue of discipline.
Yes. That is probably why she made a point of pointing out that what she did actually falls under her portfolio and therefore under her responsibilities to caucus. This was hardly reputable, and curiously, seems to have been largely unexamined by the commenters.
Think through what a probable caucus rule set would say about that.
I read the article, and disagree with you, and he was still talking of a “winnable list placing” which is what he spoke of before. But remember, Willie Jackson still has a process to go through first.
“The FBI’s Secret Rules
President Trump has inherited a vast domestic intelligence agency with extraordinary secret powers. A cache of documents offers a rare window into the FBI’s quiet expansion since 9/11.”
https://theintercept.com/series/the-fbis-secret-rules/
Well we know we were lied to about 9/11.
Joyce says
“We remain committed to reducing the tax burden on lower and middle-income earners when we have the room to do so”
http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/political/324065/budget-date-set,-tax-cuts-likely
So, is he implying that high-income people will not get cuts?
And if so, what is a plausible mechanism for this to happen? (I.e. lower- and middle-income earners have their tax burden eased, and higher-income earners do not.)
Can’t change rates down or brackets up, since everyone gets less tax from those.
Or is he just not telling the whole story, and of course everyone will get cuts?
I see basic fact checking still on holiday with stuff reporting on the Waikato river death stating that mercury energy opened its dam gates.
It’s mighty river power, the generator, who own mercury, a retailer, who opened the gates.
Tuned into Parliament.
Just heard the outgoing deputy PM address the nation for the start of the year.
Paula spent 10 minutes gossiping about Labour. You know the type, a gossip, stirrer, bully. What a disgusting display it was, mutton as.
Obviously she is not too bright, a better use of time would be to talk up her own party.
But she didn’t, the outgoing deputy PM seems to have no ideas, no solutions, nothing nada.
And I don’t want to sound shallow, but by crikey she’s a big lass.
Is that all she does, gossip when given time to speak to the NZ public in Parliament? What a waste of tax payer money she is.
And it begins.
Labour’s vibe takes a dive
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2017/02/labour-s-vibe-takes-a-dive.html
It’s just another opinion.
And here’s another one.
It reminds me of the story of a guy who was jailed for stealing to support himself, years after he had served his time, the stigma still hung around, even though he had paid his debt to society in full, and learnt the lesson attached to it.
+1000 NewsFlash
Still can’t see why I was banned.
[lprent: I don’t like losing moderators. Having a fool attacking my moderators tends to piss me off.
But you aren’t banned because you didn’t quite quite drop over the bounds. Since the last comments I looked at last night from you were praising TDB. I thought of an appropriate warning that would serve a dual purpose.
All your comments are now subject to automatic moderation and release when a moderator feels like it. That is because you appear to have been ignoring gentle warnings from moderators about thinking before pressing submit.
And just think about how privileged you now are. You are now the only person on this site who can operate as if you are on TDB. Doesn’t that make you feel excited 😈 ]